Management of severe asthma: a European Respiratory Society/American Thoracic Society guideline

Fractional exhaled nitric oxide in a respiratory healthy general population through the lifespan

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

The fractional exhaled fraction of nitric oxide (FeNO) is used in clinical practice for asthma diagnosis, phenotyping, and therapeutic management. Therefore, accurate thresholds are crucial. The normal FeNO values over lifespan in a respiratory healthy population and the factors related to them remain unclear.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We determined FeNO levels in 2,251 respiratory healthy, non-atopic, and non-smoking participants from the Lung, hEart, sociAl, boDy (LEAD) cohort, a general population, observational cohort study of participants aged 6-82 years in Austria.

RESULTS

The median FeNO value in the total study population was 13.0 [interquartile range: 9.0, 20.0] ppb, increases with age, and, except in young participants (<18 years: 9.0 [7.0, 12.0], ≥18 years: 15.0 [11.0, 22.0]), it was significantly lower in females versus males. Multiple regression analyses showed that body height and blood eosinophil counts were associated with higher FeNO levels, both in children/adolescents and adults. In children/adolescents, FeNO values were positively associated with total IgE levels, FEV1/FVC ratio, and urban living. In adults, FeNO was positively associated with age and negatively associated with the presence of cardiovascular and ischaemic vascular disease.

CONCLUSIONS

We identified the normal FeNO ranges within a respiratory healthy population at different age ranges and associated factors. Collectively, they serve as a reference to frame FeNO values in clinical practice.

Drug survival of omalizumab in atopic asthma: Impact of clinical and genetic variables

It is estimated that 40-50% of severe asthma has an atopic basis, representing a clinical challenge and a significant economic burden for healthcare systems. The most effective treatment has emerged with the use of biologic therapies such as omalizumab; however, the rate of therapy switching due to loss of efficacy is high, which has a negative impact on the healthcare system. The aim was to evaluate the influence of genetic polymorphisms as predictors of omalizumab survival. We conducted a retrospective observational cohort study of 110 patients with uncontrolled severe allergic asthma treated with omalizumab in a tertiary hospital. We analyzed FCER1A (rs2251746, rs2427837), FCER1B (rs1441586, rs573790, rs1054485, rs569108), C3 (rs2230199), FCGR2A (rs1801274), FCGR2B (rs3219018, rs1050501), FCGR3A (rs10127939, rs396991), IL1RL1 (rs1420101, rs17026974, rs1921622) and GATA2 (rs4857855) by real-time PCR using Taqman probes. Drug survival was defined as the time from initiation to discontinuation of omalizumab. Cox regression analysis adjusted for the presence of respiratory disease, GERD, SAHS and years with asthma showed that the SNPs FCER1B rs573790 - CT (p < .001; HR = 3.38; CI95% = 1.66-6.87), FCGR3A rs10127939-AC (p = .018; HR = 3.85; CI95% = 1.25-11.81) and FCGR3A rs396991-CC (p = .020; HR = 2.23; CI95% = 1.14-4.38) were the independent variables associated with worse survival in patients diagnosed with asthma. A trend toward statistical significance was also found between and FCGR3A rs10127939-CC (p = .080; HR = 0.13; CI95% = 0.01-1.28) and longer drug survival. The results of this study demonstrate the potential influence of the polymorphisms studied on omalizumab survival and the clinical benefit that could be achieved by defining predictive biomarkers of drug survival.

Addressing Gaps in Asthma Management During Childbearing age and Pregnancy: Insights from a Survey of Italian Physicians and Patients

BACKGROUND

Asthma is a common condition among women of childbearing age, requiring careful management, particularly during pregnancy. Despite existing guidelines, significant gaps remain in asthma management during pregnancy, notably for women with moderate-to-severe asthma.

AIM

This study aimed to explore the awareness, limitations, and challenges of asthma management during childbearing age and pregnancy from both asthmatic women (AW) and physician perspectives in Italy. Additionally, it sought to identify unmet needs and collect real-life experiences from Italian centers specialized in severe asthma care.

METHODS

An anonymous online survey was disseminated through scientific networks and patient associations. Separate questionnaires were developed for doctors and AW by a task force of specialists.

RESULTS

76 doctors and 54 AW completed the survey, with 70% of AW reporting moderate-to-severe asthma. While most physicians had experience managing asthma in pregnancy, 40% lacked systematic collaboration with gynecologists recognizing the need for integrated care. Despite guidelines supporting asthma medication continuity, 60% of doctors reported discontinuing treatments due to perceived risks. However, surveyed AW generally expressed greater confidence in medication safety. Physicians and AW highlighted the lack of pre-pregnancy counseling, with 55% of AW reporting they had never discussed pregnancy plans when starting asthma treatment. Both groups emphasized the need for improved interdisciplinary collaboration and structured asthma care pathways during pregnancy.

CONCLUSIONS

This study reveals significant gaps in asthma management for women of childbearing age and during pregnancy, especially those with moderate-to-severe asthma. Improving outcomes requires better education for patients and healthcare providers, along with a structured multidisciplinary network.

Shared decision-making in severe asthma therapy: qualitative study of physician-patient communication

RATIONALE

Biologics are indicated for severe asthma, but little is known about the factors driving patient and physician decisions surrounding their use.

OBJECTIVES

To understand decision drivers for biologic use and conversational dynamics between patients with severe asthma and physicians.

METHODS

This retrospective database study used anonymized physician-patient conversations (recorded September 2018-August 2020) from routine clinical visits, captured in Verilogue's physician-patient syndicated database. Eligible conversations included those of patients with severe asthma, who were considering biologic therapy (Topic 1), had initiated biologic within 7 months of clinical visit (Topic 2), or were discontinuing/considering switching biologic treatment (Topic 3). Conversations were analyzed quantitatively and descriptively by topic.

RESULTS

Overall, 50 conversations between 14 physicians and 50 patients were included (considering biologic, n = 10; recent biologic initiation, n = 20; switched/discontinued biologic, n = 20). Physicians had 68-73% share of the conversation. When considering biologic treatment, the presence of symptoms (including coughing, wheezing, shortness of breath and chest tightness) drove the decision, with 3/10 patients providing additional symptom impact/severity details, and 2/10 describing adjustments to accommodate symptoms. Physicians set unspecified treatment goals and modest expectations for biologic efficacy, framing any symptom control as success (13/20 conversations). Patient symptom assessment drove the decision to continue, discontinue, or switch biologic treatment: in 5/20 cases, physicians asked patients if they were "better" or the medication is "helping".

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that patients relied on physicians to shape patient-physician interactions and treatment expectations. This suggests that shared decision-making may improve physicians' understanding of the impact severe asthma has on patients and facilitate the setting of treatment expectations.

The concept of difficult-to-treat disease in rheumatology: where next?

New pathogenesis-based therapeutics and evidence-based consensus treatment recommendations, often with predefined treatment goals, have remarkably improved outcomes across many chronic diseases. However, a clinically significant subgroup of patients responds poorly to interventions and show a progressive decline in the disease trajectory, which poses an increasing health-care challenge. Difficult-to-treat approaches exist in several areas of medicine and the need for similar definitions has recently also emerged in rheumatology. The term difficult-to-treat refers not only to patients with pathology-driven, treatment-refractory disease, but also implicates multiple other factors that can contribute to patients being in this state, including having few treatment options, misdiagnosis, and coincident psychosocial factors. Therefore, the difficult-to-treat state requires a comprehensive, holistic, multidisciplinary approach that considers the specific characteristics of each disease and the personalised needs of the patient. In this Personal View, we provide an overview of the different aspects of the concept of difficult-to-treat disease, highlight its advantages, and propose the importance of incorporating this concept more widely in the design of rheumatological treatment strategies.

The Role of Bronchial Biopsy in the Prediction of Response to Biologic Therapy in Severe Uncontrolled Asthma: A Prospective Study

BACKGROUND

Up to two-thirds of patients with severe uncontrolled asthma (SUA) who received biologic therapy do not have a complete response.

RESEARCH QUESTION

Can bronchial biopsy (BB) play a role in the identification of patients with SUA who have a better response to biologic therapy?

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

This prospective multicenter study included consecutive patients with SUA who were candidates for biologic therapy. They underwent bronchoscopy and BB prior to biologic therapy, and clinical response was evaluated 6 months later. BB was evaluated according to a previously validated pathological score (PS) and was compared with a score of type 2 (T2) inflammation (T2 score) that includes blood eosinophil count and fractional exhaled nitric oxide in predicting response to biologic therapy. Response was graded as super-response, good response, and partial/no response according to a composite score that includes exacerbations, oral corticosteroid steroid (OCS) use, asthma control test, and improvement in FEV1.

RESULTS

A total of 92 patients were recruited. Of the 92 patients recruited, 78 completed the study. Among them, 63 received an anti-IL-5 or IL-5 receptor (anti-IL5/5R) (mepolizumab, reslizumab, and benralizumab) while 15 received dupilumab. The proportion of super-responders was 36.5% in the anti-IL5/5R group and 26.6% in the dupilumab group (P = .126). The PS was the only variable independently associated with response; the T2 score was not. Super-responders had a statistically significantly higher PS. Response was better predicted by the PS compared with the T2 score in those receiving OCSs and especially in those taking anti-IL5/5Rs. Reduced eosinophil levels (< 10 eosinophils/field) were associated with poor response to biologic therapy.

INTERPRETATION

Our findings indicate that BB is more precise in the prediction of response to biologic therapy than the T2 score, especially in those requiring OCSs or receiving anti-IL5/5Rs. Tissue eosinophilia is the main driver of this predictive capacity. However, other items in the PS related to bronchial remodeling might contribute to the identification of response to biologic therapy.

Severe asthma exacerbations associated with unconventional natural gas development activity in area of concentrated development

INTRODUCTION

Residential proximity to unconventional natural gas development (UNGD) has been shown to be associated with asthma exacerbations, but there is limited evidence regarding whether exacerbations are associated with a particular distance or phase of well activity.

OBJECTIVE

To study the impact of proximity to UNGD activity by well phase and buffer distance.

METHODS

We included asthma patients 5-90 years old with a primary diagnosis of asthma and at least one order for medications prescribed for asthma residing in one of eight Southwestern Pennsylvania counties between 2011 and 2020. We matched events (severe exacerbation, emergency department visit, hospitalization) by age group, sex, and year to cohort members without an event of the same or greater severity. The primary exposure measure was an inverse distance-weighted index of UNGD activity up to 10 miles of a patient's residence. We fit a series of adjusted multilevel logistic regression models using tertiles of exposure activity by well phase and buffer distance.

RESULTS

Our cohort consisted of 46,676 asthma patients. We found strong evidence for an increased risk specifically during the production phase for all buffer distances examined for all three event types, as based on consistent, statistically significantly elevated odds ratios. Elevations ranged from 2 to 8 times the baseline of no wells within 10 miles of the patient's residence.

CONCLUSION

This study provides evidence of increased risk of asthma events with the production phase. This should be considered in determining risk communication and assessment for these vulnerable populations, particularly during the production phase.

Real-World Evidence of Administration of Biologic Agents in Patients with Severe Asthma: An Analysis of the Respiratory Department of University Hospital of Patras Asthma Registry

Background: Real-world data on currently used biologic agents in patients with severe asthma are lacking. Methods: In this retrospective study, we recorded between 16 May 2020 and 31 December 2024 consecutive patients who presented to our asthma outpatient clinic received a diagnosis of uncontrolled severe asthma and were treated with biologic agents. Outcomes included a comparison of disease phenotypic characteristics, as well as asthma control, lung function, longitudinal use of corticosteroids, and hospitalizations due to exacerbations at baseline and post-biologic treatment at 6-month follow-up. Results: We identified 80 patients with uncontrolled severe asthma treated with biologic agents. The median age (95% CI) at the time of diagnosis was 67.0 (61.0 to 70.0) years. Most patients were female (65.0%, n = 52) and never smokers (51.3%, n = 41). The median value of ACT (95% CI) was 15 (15 to 16) at the time of diagnosis. The mean FEV1% predicted ±SD at the baseline was 68.9 ± 22.0. The median value of blood eosinophils (95% CI) was 365 (252 to 448) K/μL in the overall population. One-third (36.3%) of patients were hospitalized due to severe asthma exacerbation in the previous year. Longitudinal use of oral corticosteroids was recorded in 11.3% of included patients. Three patients (3.8%) were treated with omalizumab, 23 patients (28.8%) with mepolizumab, 33 patients (41.2%) with benralizumab and 21 patients (26.2%) with tezepelumab. The median value of ACT (95% CI) post-biologic treatment at 6-month follow-up was 20 (20 to 21), p < 0.0001. The mean FEV1% predicted ±SD at 6-month follow-up was 77.6 ± 25.2, p = 0.12. The median value of blood eosinophils (95% CI) 6 months after initiation of biologic treatment was 100 (40 to 121) K/μL, p < 0.0001. Elimination of hospitalizations due to asthma flares was recorded in 97.5% of patients (p < 0.0001). With regard to the longitudinal use of oral corticosteroids, we noticed that 96.2% of patients achieved discontinuation. No treatment-related adverse events were noticed. Conclusions: The administration of current biologic agents in patients with severe asthma seems to be both effective and safe, sparing the toxicity of oral corticosteroids.

Severe Asthma and Active SARS-CoV-2 Infection: Insights into Biologics

Since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, managing asthma has become significantly more challenging. Both national and international guidelines emphasize the importance of continuing prescribed medications to maintain asthma control and prevent exacerbations. However, the emergence of SARS-CoV-2 infection has raised concerns about the safety of biologic therapies during acute COVID-19 episodes, necessitating a careful and individualized approach to their use. Biologic therapies, including omalizumab, dupilumab, mepolizumab, reslizumab, benralizumab, and tezepelumab, which target specific pathways in severe asthma, have revolutionized asthma management by improving symptom control and reducing exacerbation rates. Despite their proven benefits, the intersection of biologic therapy and active SARS-CoV-2 infection has prompted questions regarding potential immunomodulatory effects and risks. This review aimed to synthesize the current literature on the antiviral effects and safety of biologic drugs in severe asthmatic patients with active SARS-CoV-2 infection, encompassing both pediatric and adult populations.

Comparison of usability and user-friendliness of three FeNO analyzers in a general population cohort of the LEAD study

Exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) is a marker for airway inflammation measured by hand-held or stationary analyzers, but their usability was not previously assessed. NIOX VERO (CN), NObreath (BN), Vivatmo pro (BV), and CLD88 analyzer (reference, EC) were compared in a prospective study of the general population LEAD (Lung, hEart, sociAl, boDy) cohort, including the System Usability Scale and tests for equivalence at a clinically relevant range of ≤ 70 ppb with linear models and Bland-Altman plots. In 486 participants (62.4 ± 14.2 years old, 48.1% female), all hand-held analyzers had a good usability score, with BN scoring best. BV required the fewest attempts and time to measurement success, followed by BN. The FeNO results were clinically equivalent between devices (difference to EC 0.7-7.5 ppb) with increasing variability at higher FeNO values. The analyzers had an agreement of ≥ 95% at the threshold of ≥ 40 ppb. CN showed the lowest difference to EC, followed by BV. All portable analyzers showed good usability with an above-average usability score. The best usability score was observed with the BN device, while the BV device had the shortest measuring time and the fewest additional attempts. The lowest difference to the stationary EC analyzers was observed with the CN device.

Effect of dupilumab on exhaled nitric oxide, mucus plugs, and functional respiratory imaging in patients with type 2 asthma (VESTIGE): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 4 trial

BACKGROUND

Asthma is a respiratory disease characterised by chronic airway inflammation and mucus hypersecretion. VESTIGE used functional respiratory imaging to assess changes in airway structure and function, including mucus plugging, in response to dupilumab.

METHODS

VESTIGE was a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 4 trial done at 72 research sites or academic centres in 14 countries. We recruited adult patients (aged 18-70 years) with physician-diagnosed, uncontrolled, moderate-to-severe type 2 asthma (blood eosinophil count ≥300 cells/μL and fractional exhaled nitric oxide [FeNO] ≥25 parts per billion [ppb]) being treated with medium-dose to high-dose inhaled corticosteroids combined with other controller medications. Patients were randomly assigned (2:1; block size of 6) via interactive voice-web response technology to receive add-on dupilumab 300 mg subcutaneously once every 2 weeks or volume-matched placebo up to week 24. Randomisation was stratified by inhaled corticosteroids dose level and region (eastern Europe vs the rest of the world). Participants and investigators, including those assessing outcomes, were masked to group assignment. The primary endpoints were the proportion of patients with a FeNO concentration below 25 ppb at week 24, and percentage change from baseline to week 24 in airway volumes (specific regional airway volumes corrected for lung volume, [s]iVaw) at total lung capacity (TLC), both assessed in the intention-to-treat population. Safety was assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of study drug or placebo. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04400318, and is completed.

FINDINGS

Patient recruitment occurred from July 18, 2020, to Jan 6, 2023. Patients (mean age 50·4 years [SD 12·6]; 68 [62%] female and 41 [38%] male) were randomly assigned to receive dupilumab 300 mg (n=72) or placebo (n=37). At week 24, patients in the dupilumab group were significantly more likely than those in the placebo group to have a FeNO concentration below 25 ppb (41 [57%] of 72 patients vs four [11%] of 37; odds ratio: 9·8 [95% CI 3·1 to 30·8]; p<0·001). Treatment with dupilumab versus placebo led to a numerical increase in (s)iVaw at TLC from baseline to week 24, although the difference was not significant (least squares [LS] mean percentage change from baseline to week 24: 19·7% [SE 8·1] for dupilumab and -2·0% [11·5] for placebo; LS mean difference vs placebo: 21·8% [95% CI -7·7 to 51·3]; p=0·14). Safety was consistent with the reported safety profile for dupilumab. Treatment-emergent adverse events related to study intervention were reported in 11 (15%) of 72 patients who received dupilumab and four (11%) of 37 who received placebo; no deaths occurred during the intervention period.

INTERPRETATION

The full results of this study indicate that dupilumab reduced airway inflammation and mucus plugging, and improved airway volume and flow, corresponding to improved lung function and asthma control. This study highlights the potential of imaging technology to assess disease burden, monitor progression, and evaluate therapeutic responses, which can provide valuable insights to guide clinical decision making for patients with uncontrolled, moderate-to-severe type 2 asthma.

FUNDING

Sanofi and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals.

Computed tomography-based measurements associated with rapid lung function decline in severe asthma

BACKGROUND

Patients with severe asthma are susceptible to lung function decline (LFD), but biomarkers that reliably predict an accelerated LFD have not been fully recognized.

OBJECTIVE

To identify variables associated with previous LFD occurrences in patients with severe asthma by exploring the computed tomography (CT) imaging features within predefined LFD groups.

METHODS

We obtained inspiratory and expiratory CT images of 102 patients with severe asthma and derived 2 airway structural parameters (wall thickness [WT] and hydraulic diameter) and 2 parenchymal variables (functional small airway disease and emphysema). We retrospectively calculated the annual changes in forced expiratory volume in 1 second and grouped participants by their values determined. The 4-imaging metrics, along with levels of several biomarkers, were compared among the LFD groups.

RESULTS

Patients with severe asthma with enhanced LFD exhibited significantly lower WT and smaller hydraulic diameter compared with those with minimal change or slight decline in lung function, after an adjustment of smoking status. Conversely, CT-based percentages of emphysema and functional small airway disease did not significantly differ according to LFD. Furthermore, fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) level and the blood matrix metalloproteinase-9/TIMP metallopeptidase inhibitor 1 ratio were significantly higher in patients with severe asthma with enhanced LFD compared with those in the others.

CONCLUSION

Lower WT on CT scans with increased FeNO that may represent increased airway inflammation significantly correlated with enhanced LFD in patients with severe asthma. Consequently, active management plans may help to attenuate LFD for patients with severe asthma with lower WT and high FeNO.

Challenges in treating patients with comorbid asthma and bronchiectasis

The management of patients with overlapping asthma and bronchiectasis requires a tailored approach, starting with a comprehensive assessment of the patient's clinical profile, including the severity of asthma and the extent of bronchiectasis. Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) are often recommended, but their use should be carefully monitored because of the risk of increased infection. If asthma is well controlled and bronchiectasis remains stable, a gradual reduction in the dose of ICS may be considered. Adjunctive therapies such as macrolides, which have anti-inflammatory and antimicrobial effects, or leukotriene receptor antagonists (LTRAs) may be beneficial. However, LTRAs should be used with caution in patients with bronchiectasis. Long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMA), especially in combination with ICS and long-acting beta-agonists (LABA), can improve bronchodilation and reduce inflammation. Although triple therapy (ICS/LABA/LAMA) is promising, its efficacy in bronchiectasis has not yet been confirmed by randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Ongoing monitoring is essential to adjust treatment as the patient's condition evolves. Preventive measures, including vaccination and regular sputum cultures, are important to minimize the risk of infection. Further research and RCTs are needed to better understand the role of dual bronchodilators and triple therapy in the management of overlapping asthma-bronchiectasis.

Cluster Analysis Identifies Patients With Severe Eosinophilic Asthma Who Achieve Super-Response and Remission With Mepolizumab

This study identifies two distinct subgroups of patients with severe eosinophilic asthma who respond differently to mepolizumab. Cluster analysis reveals that patients with a family history of asthma, positive skin prick tests and higher baseline lung function have better treatment outcomes, highlighting the value of personalised treatment strategies.

The Bronchodilator and Anti-Inflammatory Effect of Long-Acting Muscarinic Antagonists in Asthma: An EAACI Position Paper

As cholinergic innervation is a major contributor to increased vagal tone and mucus secretion, inhaled long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMA) are a pillar for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and asthma. By blocking the muscarinic receptors expressed in the lung, LAMA improve lung function and reduce exacerbations in asthma patients who remained poorly controlled despite treatment with inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting β2 agonists. Asthma guidelines recommend LAMA as a third controller to be added on before the initiation of biologicals. In addition to bronchodilation, LAMA also exert anti-inflammatory and anti-fibrotic effects by inhibiting muscarinic receptors present in neutrophils, macrophages, fibroblasts and airway smooth muscle cells. Thus, besides bronchodilation, LAMA might provide additional therapeutic effects, thereby supporting an endotype-driven approach to asthma management. The Position Paper, developed by the Asthma Section of the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, discusses the main cholinergic pathways in the lung, reviews the findings of significant clinical trials and real-life studies on LAMA use in asthma, examines the placement of these drugs in asthma clinical guidelines, and considers the potential for personalised medicine with LAMA in both adult and paediatric asthma patients.

Precision medicine and choosing a biologic in asthma: understanding the current state of knowledge for predictors of response and clinical remission

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

We review updated key literature on comparative meta-analyses and real-world effectiveness of asthma biologics, with a focus on predictors of response and clinical remission while highlighting ongoing knowledge gaps. We aim to provide insight into the many factors to consider when choosing a biologic to treat uncontrolled moderate to severe asthma.

RECENT FINDINGS

Predictors of response included higher type 2 (T2) biomarkers, shorter duration of asthma, and presence of key T2-related comorbidities. There were outcome-related variations in predictors. Predictors of clinical remission included better controlled asthma, better lung function, and higher T2 biomarkers. Few real-world studies included those treated with tezepelumab, a clear knowledge gap.

SUMMARY

Asthma biologics demonstrate clear real-world effectiveness. There have been significant strides in better understanding predictors of response or clinical remission to guide management, yet ongoing knowledge gaps and the heterogeneity of asthma preclude a simple algorithmic approach. Our tools for precision medicine include consideration of clinical phenotypes and shared decision making while striving to achieve clinical remission in all our patients with asthma.

Costs of Oral Corticosteroid Use in Patients with Severe Asthma With/Without Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps: Data from the Italian SANI Registry

INTRODUCTION

The burden of severe asthma on patients, especially on those with concomitant chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP), is substantial. Treatment intensification with oral corticosteroids is a common strategy for managing severe asthma exacerbations; however, prolonged exposure to systemic corticosteroids is associated with multisystem toxicity. This study aimed to quantify the association between oral corticosteroid use and annual asthma-related costs in patients with severe asthma with or without CRSwNP.

METHODS

This pharmacoeconomic analysis was based on data from the Severe Asthma Network in Italy (SANI) registry. Asthma-related costs were estimated in the context of the Italian healthcare system and included exacerbations requiring treatment intensification, unplanned visits, admissions to hospital and emergency/intensive care units, and lost workdays. For each item, the mean annual cost per patient was estimated based on national tariffs and the frequency of the event. To quantify the association between oral corticosteroid treatment and costs, the study cohort was stratified according to oral corticosteroid use in the 1-year preceding inclusion in the SANI registry.

RESULTS

A total of 669 patients from the SANI registry were included in the present analysis, 255 of whom had concomitant CRSwNP. Corticosteroid use was associated with significantly higher annual disease-related costs per patient compared with no corticosteroid use. Compared with the overall study cohort and patients without CRSwNP, patients with CRSwNP had higher disease-related costs (higher by €1307 and €1869, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Use of corticosteroids, in particular systemic corticosteroids, is associated with an increase in asthma-related costs. The concomitant presence of CRSwNP impacts negatively on costs. This study suggests that a thorough analysis of costs, expected benefits, and occurrence of adverse events is required when selecting treatment intensification strategies for managing uncontrolled severe asthma.

Background therapy in severe asthma on monoclonal antibody treatment in real life

BACKGROUND

Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) recently recommends clinicians to reduce inhaled corticosteroid doses in patients with severe asthma who respond positively to monoclonal antibodies (MAbs).

OBJECTIVE

As we operated this reduction even before the document, we analysed our cohort of subjects on treatment with a MAbs for at least 24 months.

METHODS

Data stored in our electronic archive and at the 6-month follow-up (FU) were registered and patients' adherence to asthma therapy was derived by electronic pharmacy claim database.

RESULTS

Sixty-three subjects were enrolled. A complete asthma remission and reduction to GINA Step 3 was obtained in 41 % and 61 % of them, respectively. Non-adherent subjects to inhaled and oral asthma therapy were 45 % of them, with a higher percentage among those in complete remission (59 % vs 33 %).

CONCLUSION

In our cohort, stepping down asthma therapy from 5 to 3 level in severe asthmatic patients on Mabs is without any negative consequences on asthma control, even in the case of non-adherence.

Poor Agreement Among Asthma Specialists on the Choice and Timing of Initiation of a Biologic Treatment for Severe Asthma Patients

BACKGROUND

Because the number of monoclonal antibodies available for severe asthma is growing, specialists currently choose without clear guidelines. Despite increasing knowledge on treatment response to these monoclonal antibodies, making the optimal choice for each individual patient remains a challenge. However, evidence of this daily challenge is lacking.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate interobserver agreement on the choice of biologic therapy in severe asthma patients among severe asthma specialists, based on clinical cases.

METHODS

This 2-phase study included a pilot local study and an international validation study. Asthma specialists were presented 7 real-life asthma cases managed with a monoclonal antibody. Based on the clinical information provided in the cases, they were asked whether they would have initiated a monoclonal antibody and, if so, their treatment of choice between (1) omalizumab, (2) mepolizumab, (3) reslizumab, (4) benralizumab, and (5) dupilumab. Interobserver agreement for each question was assessed using Gwet agreement coefficient (AC1).

RESULTS

Sixteen physicians from the Province of Quebec (Canada) completed the pilot survey, and 70 physicians from 26 countries completed the international survey. The Gwet AC1 for the decision to initiate a biological therapy was 0.48 in the pilot survey and 0.33 in the international survey. For the choice of therapy, agreement was 0.33 and 0.26, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The interobserver agreement among asthma specialists in both the decision to initiate a biological treatment in patients with severe asthma and the selection of treatment is weak. These results highlight the need for studies seeking reliable predictors for optimal response to biological therapies.

Impact of Smoking on Biological Treatment Response in Patients From the German Severe Asthma (GAN) Registry

BACKGROUND

Clinical studies of biologics in severe asthma exclude smokers or ex-smokers (ExS) with over 10 pack-years (py). Thus, the effectiveness of this therapy in ExS with severe asthma is not well understood.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the impact of smoking on clinical efficiency of biologics in patients with severe asthma from the German Asthma Net, a comprehensive international registry.

METHODS

This analysis included 1129 patients (55.8% female, mean age: 53.82 ± 14.67 years), of whom 56% were never-smokers (NS), whereas 44% were ExS (<10 py: 22.9%, 10-20 py: 10.3%, and >20 py: 10.6%). They received benralizumab (38.3%), dupilumab (28.9%), mepolizumab (18.3%), omalizumab (14%), or reslizumab (0.5%).

RESULTS

Biologic therapy significantly improved asthma control, measured by change in Asthma Control Test, Asthma Control Questionnaire-5, and Mini-Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire, lung function, reduced exacerbations, and daily oral prednisolone dose in all patients at week 52. Of note, no significant differences in asthma control between NS and ExS at week 52 (P = .48, .09, and .15, respectively) were observed. Also, lung function improvement (forced expiratory volume in 1 second, forced vital capacity, total lung capacity, peak expiratory flow, mean expiratory flow at 50%, P > .05), and reduction in acute exacerbation (P = .8) and oral corticosteroid doses (P = .15) were comparable in NS and ExS. Markers of type 2 inflammation, such as fraction of exhaled nitric oxide and blood eosinophils, decreased in ExS similar to NS (P = .29 and P = .48, respectively).

CONCLUSION

ExS with severe asthma experienced similar improvements in asthma control, exacerbations, lung function, and biomarkers as NS after 1 year of biologics, suggesting that severe asthmatics even with a substantial smoking history can benefit from biologic therapy.

Updated review of omalizumab to treat uncontrolled pediatric allergic asthma

Asthma has been increasingly recognized as a heterogeneous disease; however, many patients with asthma have allergic asthma (AA). Inhaled corticosteroids and other inhalers have been integral in treating many symptoms of asthma, but these medications do not completely address the disease's underlying mechanism. Pediatric asthma imposes a substantial burden on patients and the health care system. Omalizumab is consistently recognized as an important consideration for add-on therapy in pediatric patients with AA in published guidelines from multiple international societies such as the Global Initiative for Asthma. Since our last report in 2017, the amount of information available regarding the safety and effectiveness of omalizumab in pediatric patients with AA has continued to accumulate and is supported by several observational and real-world data studies. A number of studies including real-world effectiveness studies, post hoc analyses of clinical trial data, and systematic literature reviews and meta-analyses have since expanded the published data on the efficacy and safety of omalizumab in pediatric patients. In this article, we present an updated review of this literature focused on omalizumab therapy in children with AA.

Predicting dupilumab effectiveness with Type-2 biomarkers: A real-world study of severe asthma

BACKGROUND

The therapeutic effectiveness of dupilumab for severe asthma in real-world settings is yet to be prospectively investigated across multiple institutions, and uncertainties persist regarding predictive factors for its effectiveness. We aimed to assess the effectiveness of dupilumab and identify predictors of its effectiveness in real-world settings using two type-2 biomarkers: FeNO concentration and blood eosinophil count.

METHODS

This prospective multicenter study included 103 patients with severe asthma. Exacerbations and respiratory functions were monitored for 24 weeks. Asthma control was evaluated using the Asthma Control Questionnaire-5. Clinical symptoms and their impact on cough and sputum were assessed using the Cough and Sputum Assessment Questionnaire (CASA-Q). Subgroup analyses of type-2 biomarkers were conducted based on FeNO levels and blood eosinophil counts at baseline.

RESULTS

Treatment with dupilumab led to a reduction in exacerbations and enhancement in asthma control, FEV1, and CASA-Q scores. FEV1 improvement was correlated with enhancement in the sputum domain of the CASA-Q. Patients exhibiting elevated FeNO levels and blood eosinophil counts demonstrated more significant enhancements in FEV1. CASA-Q sputum domain scores were significantly higher in the group with elevated eosinophil counts. Regression analysis revealed that FeNO levels and blood eosinophil counts are significant predictors of FEV1 improvement, with blood eosinophil counts also predicting sputum improvement in patients treated with dupilumab.

CONCLUSIONS

Type-2 biomarkers may act as indicators of improvement in FEV1 and sputum outcomes among patients with severe asthma undergoing dupilumab treatment in real-world settings.

Factors associated with uncontrolled severe asthma in the biologic era

BACKGROUND

Despite the development of biologics for severe asthma, individuals with uncontrolled status persist, posing a significant social problem. This multicenter prospective study aimed to identify factors associated with the uncontrolled status of patients with severe asthma in the biologic era assessed using the Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ).

METHODS

Subjects with severe asthma diagnosed by respiratory specialists were enrolled from 11 hospitals. Clinical data and questionnaires were collected. We compared controlled (ACQ-5 <1.5) with uncontrolled severe asthma (ACQ-5 ≥1.5) and assessed factors linked to uncontrolled severe asthma using logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

One hundred fifty-four patients were analyzed (median age, 66 years; 62.3 % female; 52.6 % administered biologics). Among them, 56 patients (36.4 %) had uncontrolled severe asthma (ACQ-5 ≥1.5). The uncontrolled group had more frequent exacerbations (≥2 times in the previous year) and elevated blood neutrophil counts compared with the controlled group. Factors associated with uncontrolled status were analyzed in the overall population, with patients stratified into two groups: those receiving biologics and those not receiving biologics. Multivariate analysis revealed that frequent exacerbations and elevated blood neutrophil counts were associated with uncontrolled status in the overall population and in patients without biologics, whereas elevated blood neutrophil counts were significantly associated with uncontrolled status in patients receiving biologics.

CONCLUSION

Elevated blood neutrophil counts and frequent exacerbations were independently associated with uncontrolled severe asthma. Specifically, elevated blood neutrophil counts were a significant factor related to uncontrolled status irrespective of biologics, suggesting their potential utility as a biomarker in the biologic era.

Integrating hot topics and implementation of treatable traits in asthma

People with asthma experience many different problems related to their illness. The number and type of problems differ between patients. This results in asthma being a complex and heterogeneous disorder which mandates a personalised approach to management. These features pose very significant challenges for the effective implementation of evidence-based management. "Treatable traits" is a model of care that has been specifically designed to address these issues. Traits are identified in the pulmonary, extrapulmonary (comorbidity) and behavioural/risk factor domains. Traits are clinically relevant, recognisable with validated trait identification markers and treatable using evidence-based therapies. The clinician and patient agree on a personalised management plan that addresses the relevant traits, and trials show superiority of this approach with significant improvements in asthma control and quality of life. A number of tools have now been developed to assist the clinician in the implementation of this approach. The success of the treatable traits model of care is now being realised in other disease areas.

Triple inhaled therapy in asthma: Beliefs, behaviours and doubts

Long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMA) in association with inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) plus long-acting beta-2 agonists (LABA) are recommended by the GINA report as further option in step 4 and first choice in step 5 treatment. Despite consistent evidence of its efficacy and safety, inhaled triple therapy (ITT) is still not largely used in patients with asthma. With the aim to explore belief and behaviours of asthma specialists, an ad hoc survey has been developed by a panel of Interasma Scientific Network (INESnet) experts and subsequently defined by two Delphi rounds among an international group of physicians. The questionnaire has been distributed through Interasma social media between June and September 2023. Besides a descriptive analysis, to assess the responses gathered from the questionnaire, Spearman's non-parametric statistical method was employed. Totally, three hundred fourteen questionnaires were completed. Clinicians' attitudes and behaviours toward timing and methodologies adopted in prescribing ITT, were analysed. 35.7 % specialists consider ITT as a relevant therapeutic option, 61.8 % that is second option after reaching high dose of ICS-LABA and 89.2 % agreed that optimization of inhaled therapy should be attempted before the use of biological drugs. Persistent flow limitation and high reversibility are considered predictive factors of response. Specialists consider ITT a resource in asthma management. Although its efficacy in decreasing exacerbation rate and improving lung function were well known, the survey revealed persistent uncertainties among clinicians in positioning it highlighting the need for further measures to effectively integrate research findings into day-to-day clinical practice.

Current Biologic Therapies for Severe Asthma and Real-World Data: Are Expectations Being Met?

Advances in knowledge about clinical features, physiology, and underlying immunology are leading to targeted therapies and a new era of therapies. Biological treatments for severe asthma have changed the way this disease is managed, especially in patients who do not respond adequately to conventional treatments with corticosteroids and bronchodilators. These treatments block the action of different molecules involved in the immune response and in the inflammation of the airways, bronchoconstriction, bronchial hyperresponsiveness, and excessive mucus production. Currently, there are sufficient real-life data to corroborate the good results obtained in clinical trials by these type of drugs for severe asthma patients. Observational studies reveal their efficacy and safety, reducing exacerbations, leading to fewer emergency room visits and hospitalizations, and improving quality of life with better asthma control and better functional status.

Severe Uncontrolled Asthma: A Longitudinal Retrospective Study Illustrating the Experience of the Pulmonology Clinic of Târgu-Mureș, Romania

Introduction: Severe uncontrolled asthma (SUA) affects approximately 5% of asthma patients, leading to frequent exacerbations, reduced lung function, and lower quality of life. Recent biologic therapies target specific inflammatory pathways, offering new options for SUA. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate clinical characteristics, treatment outcomes, and biomarkers in patients with SUA treated with biologics (Omalizumab, Benralizumab, and Dupilumab) at our clinic. Material and Methods: A six-month retrospective longitudinal study was conducted on 28 patients aged 36-83 years with SUA. Patients were divided into three groups: Omalizumab (n = 4), Benralizumab (n = 18), and Dupilumab (n = 6). Lung function tests and biomarkers such as eosinophil and IgE levels were measured over 3-month periods (T0, T1, and T2). Asthma control was assessed using asthma control tests (ACT), and non-parametric statistical methods were applied. Results: The median patient age was 64 years, with 75% showing elevated eosinophil counts (>300 cells/µL). Benralizumab significantly improved lung function (p < 0.05) and ACT scores (p < 0.001), reducing eosinophil counts to zero (p < 0.001). Patients on Dupilumab and Omalizumab showed improved asthma control (p < 0.05) and reduced exacerbations, albeit to a lesser extent (p > 0.05). Conclusions: Biologics, particularly Benralizumab and Dupilumab, improved asthma control, lung function, and quality of life in SUA patients, with improved ACT scores and spirometry values. Some patients remained poorly controlled, emphasizing the need for personalized treatment and regular biomarker monitoring. Multidisciplinary management and lifestyle changes are critical for better outcomes in SUA.

An interpretable cluster-based logistic regression model, with application to the characterization of response to therapy in severe eosinophilic asthma

Asthma is a disease characterized by chronic airway hyperresponsiveness and inflammation, with signs of variable airflow limitation and impaired lung function leading to respiratory symptoms such as shortness of breath, chest tightness and cough. Eosinophilic asthma is a distinct phenotype that affects more than half of patients diagnosed with severe asthma. It can be effectively treated with monoclonal antibodies targeting specific immunological signaling pathways that fuel the inflammation underlying the disease, particularly Interleukin-5 (IL-5), a cytokine that plays a crucial role in asthma. In this study, we propose a data analysis pipeline aimed at identifying subphenotypes of severe eosinophilic asthma in relation to response to therapy at follow-up, which could have great potential for use in routine clinical practice. Once an optimal partition of patients into subphenotypes has been determined, the labels indicating the group to which each patient has been assigned are used in a novel way. For each input variable in a specialized logistic regression model, a clusterwise effect on response to therapy is determined by an appropriate interaction term between the input variable under consideration and the cluster label. We show that the clusterwise odds ratios can be meaningfully interpreted conditional on the cluster label. In this way, we can define an effect measure for the response variable for each input variable in each of the groups identified by the clustering algorithm, which is not possible in standard logistic regression because the effect of the reference class is aliased with the overall intercept. The interpretability of the model is enforced by promoting sparsity, a goal achieved by learning interactions in a hierarchical manner using a special group-Lasso technique. In addition, valid expressions are provided for computing odds ratios in the unusual parameterization used by the sparsity-promoting algorithm. We show how to apply the proposed data analysis pipeline to the problem of sub-phenotyping asthma patients also in terms of quality of response to therapy with monoclonal antibodies.

Choosing the right biologic treatment for individual patients with severe asthma - Lessons learnt from Picasso

Severe asthma represents a true challenge for clinicians from two basic perspectives, i.e.: a rational assessment of the underlying endo/phenotype and the subsequent selection of the best fitted (personalized) and effective treatment. Even though asthma is a heterogeneous disease, in the majority of therapy-compliant patients, it is possible to achieve (almost) complete disease control or even remission through conventional and quite uniform step-based pharmacotherapy, even without phenotyping. However, the absence of deeper assessment of individual patients revealed its handicap to its fullest extent during the first years of the new millennium upon the launch of biological therapeutics for patients with the most severe forms of asthma. The introduction of differentially targeted biologics into clinical practice became a challenge in terms of understanding and recognizing the etiopathogenetic heterogeneity of the asthmatic inflammation, pheno/endotyping, and, consequently, to choose the right biologic for the right patient. The answers to the following three questions should lead to correct identification of the dominant pheno/endotype: Is it really (severe) asthma? Is it eosinophilic asthma? If eosinophilic, is it (predominantly) allergen-driven? The identification of the best achievable and relevant alliance between endotypes and phenotypes ("euphenotypes") should be based not only on the assessment of the actual clinical characteristics and laboratory biomarkers, but more importantly, on the evaluation of their development and changes over time. In the current paper, we present a pragmatic three-step approach to severe asthma diagnosis and management.

Integrating asthma care guidelines into primary care electronic medical records: a review focused on Canadian knowledge translation tools

INTRODUCTION

Asthma is one of the most common chronic respiratory diseases globally. Despite national and international asthma care guidelines, gaps persist in primary care. Knowledge translation (KT) electronic tools (eTools) exist aiming to address these gaps, but their impact on practice patterns and patient outcomes is variable. We aimed to conduct a nonsystematic review of the literature for key asthma care gaps and identify limitations and future directions of KT eTools optimised for use in electronic medical records (EMRs).

METHODS

The database OVID Medline was searched (1999-2024) using keywords such as asthma, KT, primary healthcare and EMRs. Primary research articles, systematic reviews and published international/national guidelines were included. Findings were interpreted within the knowledge-to-action framework.

RESULTS

Key asthma care gaps in primary care include under-recognition of suboptimal control, underutilisation of pulmonary function tests, barriers to care delivery, provider attitudes/beliefs, limited access to asthma education and referral to asthma specialists. Various KT eTools have been validated, many with optimisation for use in EMRs. KT eTools within EMRs have been a recent focus, including asthma management systems, decision support algorithms, data standards initiatives and asthma case definition validation for EMRs.

CONCLUSIONS

The knowledge-to-action cycle is a valuable framework for developing and implementing novel KT tools. Future research should integrate end-users into the process of KT tool development to improve the perceived utility of these tools. Additionally, the priorities of primary care physicians should be considered in future KT tool research to improve end-user uptake and overall asthma management practices.

Expert opinion on diagnosis and management of Severe Asthma in low and middle income countries (LMIC) with focus on India

OBJECTIVE

In this document, 9 Indian experts have evaluated the factors specific to LMICs when it came to Severe Asthma (SA) diagnosis, evaluation, biologic selection, non-biologic treatment options, and follow-up.

DATA SOURCES

A search was performed using 50 keywords, focusing on the Indian/LMICs perspective, in PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar. The key areas of the search were focused on diagnosis, phenoendotyping, non-biological therapies, selecting a biologic, assessment of treatment response, and management of exacerbation.

STUDY SELECTIONS

The initial search revealed 1826 articles, from these case reports, observational studies, cohort studies, non-English language papers, etc., were excluded and we short-listed 20 articles for each area. Five relevant articles were selected by the experts for review.

RESULTS

In LMICs, SA patients may be referred to the specialist for evaluation a little late for Phenoendotyping of SA. While biologic therapy is now a standard of care, pulmonologists in LMICs may not have access to all the investigations to phenoendotype SA patients like fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO), skin prick test (SPT), etc., but phenotyping of SA patients can also be done with simple blood investigations, eosinophil count and serum immunoglobulin E (IgE). Choosing a biologic in the overlapping phenotype of SA and ACO patients is also a challenge in the LMICs.

CONCLUSIONS

Given the limitations of LMIC, it is important to select the right patient and explain the potential benefits of biological therapy. Non-biologic add-on therapies can be attempted in a resource-limited setting where biological therapy is not available/feasible for patients.

Real-world biologics response and super-response in the International Severe Asthma Registry cohort

BACKGROUND

Biologic asthma therapies reduce exacerbations and long-term oral corticosteroids (LTOCS) use in randomized controlled trials (RCTs); however, there are limited data on outcomes among patients ineligible for RCTs. Hence, we investigated responsiveness to biologics in a real-world population of adults with severe asthma.

METHODS

Adults in the International Severe Asthma Registry (ISAR) with ≥24 weeks of follow-up were grouped into those who did, or did not, initiate biologics (anti-IgE, anti-IL5/IL5R, anti-IL4/13). Treatment responses were examined across four domains: forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) increase by ≥100 mL, improved asthma control, annualized exacerbation rate (AER) reduction ≥50%, and any LTOCS dose reduction. Super-response criteria were: FEV1 increase by ≥500 mL, new well-controlled asthma, no exacerbations, and LTOCS cessation or tapering to ≤5 mg/day.

RESULTS

5.3% of ISAR patients met basic RCT inclusion criteria; 2116/8451 started biologics. Biologic initiators had worse baseline impairment than non-initiators, despite having similar biomarker levels. Half or more of initiators had treatment responses: 59% AER reduction, 54% FEV1 increase, 49% improved control, 49% reduced LTOCS, of which 32%, 19%, 30%, and 39%, respectively, were super-responses. Responses/super-responses were more frequent in biologic initiators than in non-initiators; nevertheless, ~40-50% of initiators did not meet response criteria.

CONCLUSIONS

Most patients with severe asthma are ineligible for RCTs of biologic therapies. Biologics are initiated in patients who have worse baseline impairments than non-initiators despite similar biomarker levels. Although biologic initiators exhibited clinical responses and super-responses in all outcome domains, 40-50% did not meet the response criteria.

Characteristics, Management, and Outcomes of Acute Life-Threatening Asthma in Adult Intensive Care

BACKGROUND

There is limited evidence regarding the management of acute life-threatening asthma in intensive care units (ICUs), and few guidelines have details on this. We aimed to describe the characteristics, management, and outcomes of adults with life-threatening asthma requiring ICU admission.

METHODS

In this single-centre retrospective observational study, we included consecutive adults with acute asthma requiring ICU admission between 1 January 2016 and 31 December 2023. Our primary outcome was requirement for invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV).

RESULTS

We included 100 patients (median age 42.5 years, 67% female). The median pH, PaCO2, and white cell count (WCC) on ICU admission were 7.37, 39 mmHg, and 13.6 × 109/L. There were 30 patients (30%) who required IMV, and the best predictors of IMV requirement were pH (AUC 0.772) and PaCO2 (AUC 0.809). In univariate analysis, IMV requirement was associated with both increasing WCC (OR 1.14) and proven bacterial infection (OR 8.50). A variety of respiratory support strategies were utilised, with 38 patients (38%) receiving only non-invasive respiratory support.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data highlight key characteristics which may be risk factors for acute asthma requiring ICU admission and suggest that pH, PaCO2, and WCC are prognostic markers for disease severity. Our overall outcomes were good, with an IMV requirement of 30% and a 28-day mortality of 1%.

Update on Inflammatory Biomarkers for Defining Asthma Phenotype

Asthma is a chronic heterogeneous disease characterized by various symptoms and persistent airway inflammation, resulting in progressive lung function decline. Classifying asthma phenotypes/endotypes is crucial because the underlying mechanisms and long-term outcomes vary from patient to patient. Recent trials have identified several biomarkers for classifying asthma phenotypes/endotypes, and current treatments have been developed on the basis of these biomarkers. Conventional biomarkers, including immunoglobulin E, blood/sputum eosinophil counts, airway obstruction or reversibility, and fractional exhaled nitric oxide, are widely used to diagnose asthma. However, these markers have some limitations, necessitating the discovery of additional biomarkers. Therefore, this review summarizes recently suggested biomarkers for representing type 2-high (eosinophilic) vs. type 2-low (neutrophilic) asthma, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug-exacerbated respiratory disease, and severe asthma. Additionally, we discuss the potential benefits of these biomarkers in classifying specific phenotypes/endotypes and managing asthmatic patients.

New Therapies in Outpatient Pulmonary Medicine

Newer medications and devices, as well as greater understanding of the benefits and limitations of existing treatments, have led to expanded treatment options for patients with lung disease. Treatment advances have led to improved outcomes for patients with asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, interstitial lung disease, pulmonary hypertension, and cystic fibrosis. The risks and benefits of available treatments are substantially variable within these heterogeneous disease groups. Defining the role of newer therapies mandates both an understanding of these disorders and overall treatment approaches. This section will review general treatment approaches in addition to focusing on newer therapies for these conditions..

Type 2 Inflammation and Asthma in Children: A Narrative Review

Increased understanding of the underlying pathophysiology has highlighted the heterogeneity of asthma and identified that most children with asthma have type 2 inflammation with elevated biomarkers, such as blood eosinophils and/or fractional exhaled nitric oxide. Although in the past most of these children may have been categorized as having allergic asthma, identifying the type 2 inflammatory phenotype provides a mechanism to explain both allergic and non-allergic triggers in pediatric patients with asthma. Most children achieve control with low to medium doses of inhaled corticosteroids. However, in a small but significant proportion of children, asthma remains uncontrolled despite maximum conventional treatment, with an increased risk of severe exacerbations. In this review, we focus on the role of type 2 inflammation and allergic processes in children with asthma, together with evidence of the efficacy of available treatment options for those who experience severe symptoms.

Effect of Azithromycin on Asthma Remission in Adults With Persistent Uncontrolled Asthma: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized, Double-Anonymized, Placebo-Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Asthma remission is a potential treatment goal.

RESEARCH QUESTION

Does adding azithromycin to standard therapy in patients with persistent uncontrolled asthma induce remission compared with placebo?

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

This secondary analysis used data from the Asthma and Macrolides: the Azithromycin Efficacy and Safety (AMAZES) clinical trial-a double-anonymized placebo-controlled trial that evaluated the safety and efficacy of azithromycin on asthma exacerbations. The primary remission definition (referred to as clinical remission) was zero exacerbations and zero oral corticosteroids during the previous 6 months evaluated at 12 months and a 5-item Asthma Control Questionnaire score ≤ 1 at 12 months. Secondary remission definitions included clinical remission plus lung function criteria (postbronchodilator FEV1 ≥ 80% or postbronchodilator FEV1 ≤ 5% decline from baseline) and complete remission (sputum eosinophil count < 3% plus the aforementioned criteria). Sensitivity analyses explored the robustness of primary and secondary remission definitions. The predictors of clinical remission were identified.

RESULTS

A total of 335 participants (41.5% male; median age, 61.01 years; quartile 1-3, 51.03-68.73) who completed the 12-month treatment period were included in the analysis. Twelve months of treatment with azithromycin induced asthma remission in a subgroup of patients, and a significantly higher proportion in the azithromycin arm achieved both clinical remission (50.6% vs 38.9%; P = .032) and clinical remission plus lung function criteria (50.8% vs 37.1%; P = .029) compared with placebo, respectively. In addition, a higher proportion of the azithromycin group achieved complete remission (23% vs 13.7%; P = .058). Sensitivity analyses supported these findings. Baseline factors (eg, better asthma-related quality of life, absence of oral corticosteroid burst in the previous year) predicted the odds of achieving clinical remission. Azithromycin induced remission in both eosinophilic and noneosinophilic asthma.

INTERPRETATION

In this study, adults with persistent symptomatic asthma achieved a higher remission rate when treated with azithromycin. Remission on treatment may be an achievable treatment target in moderate/severe asthma, and future studies should consider remission as an outcome measure.

Imagining the severe asthma decision trees of the future

INTRODUCTION

There are no validated decision-making algorithms concerning severe asthma (SA) management. Future risks are crucial factors and can be derived from SA trajectories.

AREAS COVERED

The future severe asthma-decision trees should revisit current knowledge and gaps. A focused literature search has been conducted.

EXPERT OPINION

Asthma severity is currently defined a priori, thereby precluding a role for early interventions aiming to prevent outcomes such as exacerbations (systemic corticosteroids exposure) and lung function decline. Asthma 'at-risk' might represent the ultimate paradigm but merits longitudinal studies considering modern interventions. Real exacerbations, severe airway hyperresponsiveness, excessive T2-related biomarkers, noxious environments and patient behaviors, harms of OCS and high-doses inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), and low adherence-to-effectiveness ratios of ICS-containing inhalers are predictors of future risks. New tools such as imaging, genetic, and epigenetic signatures should be used. Logical and numerical artificial intelligence may be used to generate a consistent risk score. A pragmatic definition of response to treatments will allow development of a validated and applicable algorithm. Biologics have the best potential to minimize the risks, but cost remains an issue. We propose a simplified six-step algorithm for decision-making that is ultimately aiming to achieve asthma remission.

A Review of the Latest Guidelines for Diagnosing and Managing Asthma in Children in the United States and Canada

Globally, asthma remains the most widespread chronic respiratory condition in children, with a larger proportion of children being affected by the condition. Regardless of the higher prevalence rates, the outcomes of pediatric asthma have remained inadequate, even as there are numerous preventable deaths (approximately 300 children in the United States and 250 children in Canada, annually). The characteristic symptoms of pediatric asthma include wheezing, cough, and shortness of breath that are characteristically triggered by several potential stimuli. However, several diagnostic challenges exist and have resulted in either overdiagnosis or underdiagnosis, making pediatric asthma diagnosis and management problematic. Effective management of asthma in children entails a holistic approach that encompasses non-pharmacological and pharmacological management, alongside self-management and educational aspects. Working with pediatric asthma patients and their families/caregivers is vital to promoting and realizing better asthma diagnosis and management outcomes. Educational guidelines regarding the best ways for effective treatment, avoidance of triggers, modifiable risk factors, and the actions that should be taken during chronic asthma attacks through individualized action plans are vital. Thus, the objective of this systematic review is to provide an overview of the latest guidelines on pediatric asthma diagnosis and management. In this regard, this review presents several similarities in existing pediatric asthma diagnosis and management guidelines in the United States and Canada. For instance, most guidelines and studies reviewed have proposed the use of objective tests for confirmation of asthma diagnosis, particularly in symptomatic individuals. The peak flow variability measurement, bronchodilator reversibility testing, and spirometry have also been proposed by the guidelines and studies, even as the recommendations regarding the timing and hierarchy of the objective test substantially vary between the guidelines and studies. We hope that the present review will be helpful to physicians and healthcare service providers working within pediatric health contexts.

Endotyping Chronic Respiratory Diseases: T2 Inflammation in the United Airways Model

Over the past 15 years, the paradigm of viewing the upper and lower airways as a unified system has progressively shifted the approach to chronic respiratory diseases (CRDs). As the global prevalence of CRDs continues to increase, it becomes evident that acknowledging the presence of airway pathology as an integrated entity could profoundly impact healthcare resource allocation and guide the implementation of pharmacological and rehabilitation strategies. In the era of precision medicine, endotyping has emerged as another novel approach to CRDs, whereby pathologies are categorized into distinct subtypes based on specific molecular mechanisms. This has contributed to the growing acknowledgment of a group of conditions that, in both the upper and lower airways, share a common type 2 (T2) inflammatory signature. These diverse pathologies, ranging from allergic rhinitis to severe asthma, frequently coexist and share diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers, as well as therapeutic strategies targeting common molecular pathways. Thus, T2 inflammation may serve as a unifying endotypic trait for the upper and lower airways, reinforcing the practical significance of the united airways model. This review aims to summarize the literature on the role of T2 inflammation in major CRDs, emphasizing the value of common biomarkers and integrated treatment strategies targeting shared molecular mechanisms.

The long-term outcomes of mepolizumab treatment at 100 mg dose on idiopathic chronic eosinophilic pneumonia: A real-life experience

Background: The standard therapeutic regimen for idiopathic chronic eosinophilic pneumonia (ICEP) involves the administration of oral corticosteroids (OCS). However, a notable proportion of individuals experience recurrent episodes after the tapering or cessation of OCS during the course of ICEP. There has been a growing interest in exploring alternative treatment modalities for patients with ICEP at heightened risk of relapse. Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of mepolizumab at a dose of 100 mg administered every 4 weeks in preventing relapses of ICEP and its impact on the clinical outcomes. Methods: This retrospective clinical observational study used real-world data to assess the impact of mepolizumab on patients diagnosed with ICEP accompanied by severe asthma. Demographic information and clinical characteristics were extracted from medical records. The study examined the effect of mepolizumab on the annual relapse rate, OCS dose, eosinophil count, and respiratory function parameters. Results: All patients included in the study, with a median (range) follow-up period of 19 months (4-40 months), the annual relapse rate decreased from 0.33 to 0 after the initiation mepolizumab. In addition, the maintenance OCS dose, expressed in methylprednisolone equivalents, declined from 4 mg/day to 0 mg/day. A reduction in the blood eosinophil count was observed, alongside a partial improvement in respiratory function test results among the patients. Conclusıon: A dose regimen of 100 mg of mepolizumab administered every 4 weeks emerges as a promising and well-tolerated therapeutic approach for averting relapses of ICEP.

Association Between Cytokeratin 19-Specific IgG and Neutrophil Activation in Asthma

PURPOSE

Patients with non-eosinophilic asthma (NEA) are less responsive to anti-inflammatory drugs and suffer from frequent asthma exacerbations. The pathogenic mechanism of NEA is not fully understood; however, the roles of monocytes and autoimmune mechanisms targeting airway epithelial cell (AEC) antigens have been proposed.

METHODS

The effects of monocyte extracellular traps (MoETs) on cytokeratin 19 (CK19) production in AECs, as well as the impact of CK19-specific immunoglobulin (Ig) G on neutrophil and monocyte activation, were investigated both in vivo and in vitro. Sixty asthmatic patients and 15 healthy controls (HCs) were enrolled, and the levels of serum immune complexes containing CK19-specific IgG and neutrophil extracellular trap (NET)-specific IgG were measured using enzyme-linked immunoassay.

RESULTS

MoETs induced CK19 and CK19-specific IgG production. Furthermore, the levels of serum CK19-specific IgG were significantly higher in the NEA group than in the eosinophilic asthma group. Among patients with NEA, asthmatics with high levels of CK19-specific IgG had higher levels of myeloperoxidase and NET-specific IgG than those with low levels of CK19-specific IgG (P = 0.020 and P = 0.017; respectively). Moreover, the immune complexes from asthmatics with high CK19-specific IgG enhanced NET formation and reactive oxygen species production (neutrophil activation), which were suppressed by N-acetylcysteine and anti-CD16 antibody treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that circulating CK19 and CK19-specific IgG may contribute to NET formation, leading to airway inflammation and steroid resistance in NEA.

Direct vagus nerve stimulation: A new tool to control allergic airway inflammation through α7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Asthma is characterized by airway inflammation, mucus hypersecretion, and airway hyperresponsiveness. The use of nicotinic agents to mimic the cholinergic anti-inflammatory pathway (CAP) controls experimental asthma. Yet, the effects of vagus nerve stimulation (VNS)-induced CAP on allergic inflammation remain unknown.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

BALB/c mice were sensitized and challenged with house dust mite (HDM) extract and treated with active VNS (5 Hz, 0.5 ms, 0.05-1 mA). Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid was assessed for total and differential cell counts and cytokine levels. Lungs were examined by histopathology and electron microscopy.

KEY RESULTS

In the HDM mouse asthma model, VNS at intensities equal to or above 0.1 mA (VNS 0.1) but not sham VNS reduced BAL fluid differential cell counts and alveolar macrophages expressing α7 nicotinic receptors (α7nAChR), goblet cell hyperplasia, and collagen deposition. Besides, VNS 0.1 also abated HDM-induced elevation of type 2 cytokines IL-4 and IL-5 and was found to block the phosphorylation of transcription factor STAT6 and expression level of IRF4 in total lung lysates. Finally, VNS 0.1 abrogated methacholine-induced hyperresponsiveness in asthma mice. Prior administration of α-bungarotoxin, a specific inhibitor of α7nAChR, but not propranolol, a specific inhibitor of β2-adrenoceptors, abolished the therapeutic effects of VNS 0.1.

CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS

Our data revealed the protective effects of VNS on various clinical features in allergic airway inflammation model. VNS, a clinically approved therapy for depression and epilepsy, appears to be a promising new strategy for controlling allergic asthma.

The clinical effectiveness of mepolizumab treatment in severe eosinophilic asthma; outcomes from four years cohort evaluation

BACKGROUND

Clinical trials and real world studies demonstrated benefit of mepolizumab treatment in severe asthma but data on its effectiveness beyond 2 years remain limited. Herein, we provide mepolizumab treatment evaluation up to 4 years.

METHODS

we studied all patients initiated on mepolizumab in our center from June 2017 to August 2018. Clinical outcomes data were retrieved from the local dendrite systems registry. Comparison analyses and logistic regression were conducted to explore longevity and predictors of response to mepolizumab treatment.

RESULTS

a total of 66 patients initiated on mepolizumab with a median follow-up of 45.8 (42.4,48.1) months were included in the study [mean age 50.3 years (range 18-79), females 50 (73%) ]. At 20.7 months of treatment, 42 patients (63.6%) had positive response, 13 (19.7%) negative response, and 11 (16.7%) discontinued due to other factors. At 45.8 months, 35 (53%) patients were still on mepolizumab, 21 (31.8%) switched to a different biologic, and 10 (15.2%) discontinued biologics. Two deaths were recorded during the study period.The median blood eosinophil was reduced from 0.43x109/L (0.27, 0.75) to 0.04 (0.0, 0.1) (p < 0.00001)]. The median annual exacerbations were reduced from 6.0 (4,8) to 1.0 (0.0,3.0) (p < 0.00001), and mOCS use was reduced from59% to 29%, p = 0.001. The mean asthma control questionnaire-6 (ACQ6) improved from 3.1 ± 1.7 to 2.1 ± 1.3 (p < 0.00001).

CONCLUSIONS

mepolizumab clinical benefit was sustained over 4 years. However, approximately half of the cohort discontinued the treatment prompting the need for further research into the treatment response longevity.

Bronchiectasis and asthma: Data from the European Bronchiectasis Registry (EMBARC)

BACKGROUND

Asthma is commonly reported in patients with a diagnosis of bronchiectasis.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate whether patients with bronchiectasis and asthma (BE+A) had a different clinical phenotype and different outcomes compared with patients with bronchiectasis without concomitant asthma.

METHODS

A prospective observational pan-European registry (European Multicentre Bronchiectasis Audit and Research Collaboration) enrolled patients across 28 countries. Adult patients with computed tomography-confirmed bronchiectasis were reviewed at baseline and annual follow-up visits using an electronic case report form. Asthma was diagnosed by the local investigator. Follow-up data were used to explore differences in exacerbation frequency between groups using a negative binomial regression model. Survival analysis used Cox proportional hazards regression.

RESULTS

Of 16,963 patients with bronchiectasis included for analysis, 5,267 (31.0%) had investigator-reported asthma. Patients with BE+A were younger, were more likely to be female and never smokers, and had a higher body mass index than patients with bronchiectasis without asthma. BE+A was associated with a higher prevalence of rhinosinusitis and nasal polyps as well as eosinophilia and Aspergillus sensitization. BE+A had similar microbiology but significantly lower severity of disease using the bronchiectasis severity index. Patients with BE+A were at increased risk of exacerbation after adjustment for disease severity and multiple confounders. Inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) use was associated with reduced mortality in patients with BE+A (adjusted hazard ratio 0.78, 95% CI 0.63-0.95) and reduced risk of hospitalization (rate ratio 0.67, 95% CI 0.67-0.86) compared with control subjects without asthma and not receiving ICSs.

CONCLUSIONS

BE+A was common and was associated with an increased risk of exacerbations and improved outcomes with ICS use. Unexpectedly we identified significantly lower mortality in patients with BE+A.