Challenging the paradigm: moving from umbrella labels to treatable traits in airway disease

Asthma-Genomic Advances Toward Risk Prediction

Asthma is a common complex airway disease whose prediction of disease risk and most severe outcomes is crucial in clinical practice for adequate clinical management. This review discusses the latest findings in asthma genomics and current obstacles faced in moving forward to translational medicine. While genome-wide association studies have provided valuable insights into the genetic basis of asthma, there are challenges that must be addressed to improve disease prediction, such as the need for diverse representation, the functional characterization of genetic variants identified, variant selection for genetic testing, and refining prediction models using polygenic risk scores.

Bronchial reactivity and asthma at school age after early-life metapneumovirus infection

Background

The association between early-life lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI) and asthma is well established. Knowledge about bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) and asthma after metapneumovirus (MPV) LRTI is scarce. The aim of this study was to assess BHR and current asthma in school-aged children after hospital admission for early-life LRTI with MPV, and to compare with more well-known viruses, rhinovirus (RV) and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), and with controls.

Methods

A cohort consisting of children admitted for LRTI and controls was followed-up at school age with a clinical research assessment and lung function tests, including a methacholine provocation test. Current asthma was defined based on objective variable airway obstruction and clinical symptoms. BHR and asthma were compared according to viral groups.

Results

135 children (median age 9.3 years) were included (16 MPV, 34 RV, 51 RSV, 13 mixed infections and 21 controls). Compared with controls there was increased BHR after MPV and RV LRTI (provocative dose causing a 20% fall in forced expiratory volume in 1 s and dose-response slope; p<0.05). Using Kaplan-Meier statistics, BHR was increased for MPV compared with both controls and RSV (p=0.02 and p=0.01). The proportion of children with current asthma at follow-up was higher in the LRTI children compared with the controls (46% versus 24%; p=0.06). Among children who had undergone MPV and RV infection, 50% fulfilled the asthma criteria compared with 43% in the RSV group (p=0.37).

Conclusion

We found increased BHR and a high prevalence of asthma in school-aged children after early-life MPV infection, and findings were similar to RV, and less to RSV, compared with controls.

The 5T approach in asthma: Triple Therapy Targeting Treatable Traits

Using a therapeutic strategy that is free from traditional diagnostic labels and based on the identification of "treatable traits" (TTs), which are influential in clinical presentations in each patient, might overcome the difficulties in identifying and validating asthma phenotypes and endotypes. Growing evidence is documenting the importance of using the triple therapy with ICS, LABA, and LAMAs in a single inhaler (SITT) in cases of asthma not controlled by ICS/LABA and in the prevention of exacerbations. The identification of TTs may overcome the possibility of using SITT without considering the specific needs of the patient. In effect, it allows a treatment strategy that is closer to the precision strategy now widely advocated for the management of patients with asthma. There are different TTs in asthma that may benefit from treatment with SITT, regardless of guideline recommendations. The airflow limitation and small airway dysfunction are key TTs that are present in different phenotypes/endotypes, do not depend on the degree of T2 inflammation, and respond better than other treatments to SITT. We suggest that the 5T (Triple Therapy Targeting Treatable Traits) approach should be applied to the full spectrum of asthma, not just severe asthma, and, consequently, SITT should begin earlier than currently recommended.

Reply to: Challenging the paradigm

We thank M.L. Everard for his interest in our article [1] and thank the Editors for giving us the opportunity to respond. Space constraints precluded us describing the detailed management of extrapulmonary treatable traits, hence the educational aim was to begin to appreciate, but we are happy to refer interested readers to other review articles on the subject [2–4].

Inhaled corticosteroids should be targeted to those with documented airway eosinophilia, not prescribed indiscriminately to all who wheeze. Blind steroid treatment without regard to underlying pathophysiology is not 21st century standard of care.https://bit.ly/34lyaJG

Challenging the paradigm

I read with interest the review by Bush and Pavord [1] regarding the suggestion that we should abandon “umbrella” diagnoses and rather we should address “treatable traits” when looking after patients with airways disease. Unfortunately, aspects of their proposal are only likely to add to, rather than reduce, the current confusion regarding management of these conditions. More importantly, it seems to include some potentially very dangerous recommendations.

While advocating for addressing “treatable traits” is admirable in that it reminds clinicians to consider the patient and not the disease, the use of this idea to promote dangerous changes in practice should be challenged.https://bit.ly/30VkP8Q

Precision Medicine and Childhood Asthma: A Guide for the Unwary

Many thousands of articles relating to asthma appear in medical and scientific journals each year, yet there is still no consensus as to how the condition should be defined. Some argue that the condition does not exist as an entity and that the term should be discarded. The key feature that distinguishes it from other respiratory diseases is that airway smooth muscles, which normally vary little in length, have lost their stable configuration and shorten excessively in response to a wide range of stimuli. The lungs' and airways' limited repertoire of responses results in patients with very different pathologies experiencing very similar symptoms and signs. In the absence of objective verification of airway smooth muscle (ASM) lability, over and underdiagnosis are all too common. Allergic inflammation can exacerbate symptoms but given that worldwide most asthmatics are not atopic, these are two discrete conditions. Comorbidities are common and are often responsible for symptoms attributed to asthma. Common amongst these are a chronic bacterial dysbiosis and dysfunctional breathing. For progress to be made in areas of therapy, diagnosis, monitoring and prevention, it is essential that a diagnosis of asthma is confirmed by objective tests and that all co-morbidities are accurately detailed.

How to Choose the Correct Drug in Severe Pediatric Asthma

When a child with severe asthma (asthma defined clinically for the purposes of this review as wheeze, breathlessness, and chest tightness sometimes with cough) does not respond to treatment, it is important to be sure that an alternative or additional diagnosis is not being missed. In school age children, the next step is a detailed protocolized assessment to determine the nature of the problem, whether within the airway or related to co-morbidities or social/environmental factors, in order to personalize the treatment. For example, those with refractory difficult asthma due to persistent non-adherence may benefit from using budesonide and formoterol combined in a single inhaler [single maintenance and reliever treatment (SMART)] as both a reliever and preventer. For those with steroid-resistant Type 2 airway inflammation, the use of biologicals such as omalizumab and mepolizumab should be considered, but for mepolizumab at least, there is a paucity of pediatric data. Protocols are less well developed in preschool asthma, where steroid insensitive disease is much more common, but the use of two simple measurements, aeroallergen sensitization, and peripheral blood eosinophil count, allows the targeted use of inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs). There is also increasing evidence that chronic airway infection may be important in preschool wheeze, increasing the possibility that targeted antibiotics may be beneficial. Asthma in the first year of life is not driven by Type 2 inflammation, so beyond avoiding prescribing ICSs, no evidence based recommendations can be made. In the future, we urgently need to develop objective biomarkers, especially of risk, so that treatment can be targeted effectively; we need to address the scandal of the lack of data in children compared with adults, precluding making evidence-based therapeutic decisions and move from guiding treatment by phenotypes, which will change as the environment changes, to endotype based therapy.

Update on Long-Acting Anticholinergics in Children and Adolescents With Difficult and Severe Asthma

Tiotropium bromide is the only long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) approved for treatment of patients aged ≥6 years old who have symptoms of uncontrolled asthma. Results from several clinical trials have found that once-daily inhaled tiotropium bromide is safe and efficacious in 6- to 17-year-olds with symptomatic asthma despite treatment with inhaled corticosteroids, with or without other medications. There are still few available studies investigating the impact of tiotropium bromide treatment in preschool children with suboptimal control. In this narrative review, we summarize the pharmacological effects of the LAMA tiotropium bromide, provide an overview about current asthma studies at different pediatric ages, and describe future research needs.

Disease definitions in respiratory and sleep medicine: changes in diagnostic criteria and categories over time and clinical implications

The latest issue of Breathe focuses on disease definitions in respiratory and sleep medicine: read the introductory editorial by Chief Editor @ClaudiaCDobler https://bit.ly/3A7CeYj.