1
|
Rony F, Cortellini M, Guasconi A, Mathews KS, Piccinno A, Poli G, Vanhoutte F, Klein J. Evaluating the pharmacokinetics of beclometasone dipropionate/formoterol fumarate/glycopyrronium bromide delivered via pressurised metered-dose inhaler using a low global warming potential propellant. Pulm Pharmacol Ther 2024; 85:102299. [PMID: 38663512 DOI: 10.1016/j.pupt.2024.102299] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2023] [Revised: 04/04/2024] [Accepted: 04/19/2024] [Indexed: 05/02/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Use of propellants with high global warming potential (such as HFA-134a) for pressurised metered-dose inhalers (pMDIs) is being phased down. Switching to dry-powder inhalers may not be clinically feasible for all patients; an alternative is reformulation using propellants with low global warming potential. The combination of beclometasone dipropionate/formoterol fumarate/glycopyrronium bromide (BDP/FF/GB) is available for asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease via pMDI using HFA-134a as propellant. This is being reformulated using the low global warming potential propellant HFA-152a. This manuscript reports three studies comparing BDP/FF/GB pharmacokinetics delivered via pMDI using HFA-152a vs HFA-134a. METHODS The studies were four-way crossover, single-dose, randomised, double-blind, in healthy volunteers. In Studies 1 and 2, subjects inhaled four puffs of BDP/FF/GB (Study 1: 100/6/12.5 μg [medium-strength BDP]; Study 2: 200/6/12.5 μg [high-strength]), ingesting activated charcoal in two of the periods (once per propellant). In Study 3, subjects inhaled medium- and high-strength BDP/FF/GB using a spacer. All three studies compared HFA-152a vs HFA-134a in terms of lung availability and total systemic exposure of beclometasone-17-monopropionate (B17MP; active metabolite of BDP), BDP, formoterol and GB. Bioequivalence was concluded if the 90 % confidence intervals (CIs) of the ratios between formulations of the geometric mean maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve between time zero and the last quantifiable timepoint (AUC0-t) for the analytes were between 80 and 125 %. RESULTS In Studies 1 and 2, systemic exposure bioequivalence (i.e., comparisons without charcoal block) was demonstrated, except for GB Cmax in Study 2 (upper 90 % CI 125.11 %). For lung availability (i.e., comparisons with charcoal block), B17MP and formoterol demonstrated bioequivalence in both studies, as did BDP in Study 2; in Study 1, BDP upper CIs were 126.96 % for Cmax and 127.34 % for AUC0-t). In Study 1, GB AUC0-t lower CI was 74.54 %; in Study 2 upper limits were 135.64 % for Cmax and 129.12 % for AUC0-t. In Study 3, the bioequivalence criteria were met for BDP, B17MP and formoterol with both BDP/FF/GB strengths, and were met for GB AUC0-t, although not for Cmax. Both formulations were similarly well tolerated in all three studies. CONCLUSIONS Overall, while formal bioequivalence cannot be concluded for all analytes, these data suggest therapeutic equivalence of the new formulation with the existing BDP/FF/GB pMDI formulation, therefore supporting reformulation using a propellant with low global warming potential.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- François Rony
- Global Clinical Development, Chiesi SAS, Bois Colombes, France.
| | - Mauro Cortellini
- Global Clinical Development, Chiesi Farmaceutici SpA, Parma, Italy
| | | | - Kusum S Mathews
- Global Clinical Development, Chiesi Farmaceutici SpA, Parma, Italy
| | | | - Gianluigi Poli
- Global Clinical Development, Chiesi Farmaceutici SpA, Parma, Italy
| | | | - Jelle Klein
- Clinical Pharmacology Unit, SGS Belgium NV, Edegem, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Koyuncu A, Ari A. Filling the gaps in the evaluation and selection of mobile health technologies in respiratory medicine. Expert Rev Respir Med 2024; 18:159-174. [PMID: 38795074 DOI: 10.1080/17476348.2024.2361048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2024] [Accepted: 05/24/2024] [Indexed: 05/27/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Mobile health (mHealth) technology in respiratory medicine is a fast-growing and promising digital technology that is popular among patients and healthcare providers (HCPs). They provide reminders and step-by-step instructions for the correct inhalation technique, monitor patients' adherence to treatment, and facilitate communication between patients and HCPs. AREAS COVERED While numerous mHealth apps have been developed over the years, most applications do not have supporting evidence. Selecting the best mHealth app in respiratory medicine is challenging due to limited studies carrying out mHealth app selection. Although mHealth technologies play an important part in the future of respiratory medicine, there is no single guide on the evaluation and selection of mHealth technologies for patients with pulmonary diseases. This paper aims to provide an overview of mHealth technologies, particularly emphasizing digital inhalers and standalone applications used in asthma. Additionally, it offers insights into the evaluation, selection, and pertinent considerations surrounding mHealth applications in respiratory medicine. EXPERT OPINION Evaluating mHealth apps will take time, resources, and collaboration between stakeholders such as governmental regulatory bodies, subject-matter experts, and industry representatives. Filling the gaps in the evaluation and selection of the mHealth app will improve clinical decision-making, personalized treatments, self-management and disease monitoring in respiratory medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ayfer Koyuncu
- Graduate School of Science and Engineering, Bioengineering Department, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Arzu Ari
- College of Health Professions Department of Respiratory Care, Regent's Professor and Associate Dean for Research, Texas State University, Round Rock, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Cheng DT, Wee LYJ, Teoh OH, Thomas B. Approach to difficult-to-treat asthma in childhood: a narrative review. Singapore Med J 2024:00077293-990000000-00095. [PMID: 38363652 DOI: 10.4103/singaporemedj.smj-2023-137] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2023] [Accepted: 09/02/2023] [Indexed: 02/18/2024]
Abstract
ABSTRACT Asthma is a major chronic disease affecting children, and children with difficult-to-treat asthma account for a disproportionate share of resource utilisation and healthcare costs. This review presents a comprehensive and up-to-date overview of the treatment strategies in difficult-to-treat paediatric asthma. Mimickers of asthma must first be ruled out, and the diagnosis confirmed with objective tests whenever possible. The effect of comorbid conditions such as obesity, smoking, other atopic conditions and psychosocial factors on asthma control and severity should be considered. Treatment can then be optimised by implementing personalised strategies, including the use of appropriate drug delivery devices and adherence monitoring. Biologics can be an alternative treatment option for selected patients but should not be a substitute for addressing poor adherence. Many patients with difficult-to-treat asthma may not have severe asthma, and the physician should work with patients and families to achieve good asthma control via an individualised approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Duo-Tong Cheng
- Department of Paediatrics, Respiratory Medicine Service, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Mahler DA, Halpin DMG. Consideration and Assessment of Patient Factors When Selecting an Inhaled Delivery System in COPD. Chest 2024; 165:323-332. [PMID: 37977266 DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2023.11.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2023] [Revised: 10/23/2023] [Accepted: 11/09/2023] [Indexed: 11/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Because guidelines and strategies for pharmacologic treatment of COPD focus on specific classes of inhaled medications, there is an unmet need for information to guide health care professionals for selecting an inhaled medication delivery system that matches the unique characteristics of individual patients. This article provides guidance for selecting an inhaled medication delivery system based on three "key" patient factors: cognitive function, manual dexterity/strength, and peak inspiratory flow. In addition, information is provided about specific tests to assess these patient factors. Cognitive impairment with an estimated prevalence of 25% among patients with COPD adversely affects patients' ability to correctly use a handheld device. To our knowledge, the prevalence of impaired manual dexterity/strength has not been reported in those with COPD. However, 79% of patients with COPD have reported one or more physical impediments that could influence their ability to manipulate an inhaler device. The measurement of peak inspiratory flow against the simulated resistance (PIFr) of a dry powder inhaler establishes whether the patient has the inhalation ability for creating optimal turbulent energy within the device. A suboptimal PIFr for low to medium-high resistance dry powder inhalers has been reported in 19% to 84% of stable outpatients with COPD. Health care professionals should consider cognitive function, manual dexterity/strength, and PIFr in their patients with COPD when prescribing inhaled pharmacotherapy. Impairments in these patient factors are common among those with COPD and can affect the individual's competency and effectiveness of using inhaled medications delivered by handheld devices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Donald A Mahler
- Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH; Respiratory Services, Valley Regional Hospital, Claremont, NH.
| | - David M G Halpin
- Respiratory Medicine, University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, England
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Al-Moamary MS, Alhaider SA, Allehebi R, Idrees MM, Zeitouni MO, Al Ghobain MO, Alanazi AF, Al-Harbi AS, Yousef AA, Alorainy HS, Al-Hajjaj MS. The Saudi initiative for asthma - 2024 update: Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of asthma in adults and children. Ann Thorac Med 2024; 19:1-55. [PMID: 38444991 PMCID: PMC10911239 DOI: 10.4103/atm.atm_248_23] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2023] [Accepted: 10/31/2023] [Indexed: 03/07/2024] Open
Abstract
The Saudi Initiative for Asthma 2024 (SINA-2024) is the sixth version of asthma guidelines for the diagnosis and management of asthma for adults and children that was developed by the SINA group, a subsidiary of the Saudi Thoracic Society. The main objective of the SINA is to have guidelines that are up-to-date, simple to understand, and easy to use by healthcare workers dealing with asthma patients. To facilitate achieving the goals of asthma management, the SINA Panel approach is mainly based on the assessment of symptom control and risk for both adults and children. The approach to asthma management is aligned for age groups: adults, adolescents, children aged 5-12 years, and children aged <5 years. SINA guidelines have focused more on personalized approaches reflecting a better understanding of disease heterogeneity with the integration of recommendations related to biologic agents, evidence-based updates on treatment, and the role of immunotherapy in management. The medication appendix has also been updated with the addition of recent evidence, new indications for existing medication, and new medications. The guidelines are constructed based on the available evidence, local literature, and the current situation at national and regional levels. There is also an emphasis on patient-doctor partnership in the management that also includes a self-management plan.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohamed Saad Al-Moamary
- Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Sami A. Alhaider
- Department of Pediatrics, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Riyad Allehebi
- Department of Medicine, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Majdy M. Idrees
- Department of Medicine, Respiratory Division, Prince Sultan Military Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Mohammed O. Zeitouni
- Department of Medicine, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Mohammed O. Al Ghobain
- Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Abdullah F. Alanazi
- Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Adel S. Al-Harbi
- Department of Pediatrics, Prince Sultan Military Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Abdullah A. Yousef
- Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
| | - Hassan S. Alorainy
- Department of Respiratory Care, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Mohamed S. Al-Hajjaj
- Department of Paediatrics, College of Medicine, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Jayasooriya S, Stolbrink M, Khoo EM, Sunte IT, Awuru JI, Cohen M, Lam DC, Spanevello A, Visca D, Centis R, Migliori GB, Ayuk AC, Buendia JA, Awokola BI, Del-Rio-Navarro BE, Muteti-Fana S, Lao-Araya M, Chiarella P, Badellino H, Somwe SW, Anand MP, Garcí-Corzo JR, Bekele A, Soto-Martinez ME, Ngahane BHM, Florin M, Voyi K, Tabbah K, Bakki B, Alexander A, Garba BL, Salvador EM, Fischer GB, Falade AG, ŽivkoviĆ Z, Romero-Tapia SJ, Erhabor GE, Zar H, Gemicioglu B, Brandão HV, Kurhasani X, El-Sharif N, Singh V, Ranasinghe JC, Kudagammana ST, Masjedi MR, Velásquez JN, Jain A, Cherrez-Ojeda I, Valdeavellano LFM, Gómez RM, Mesonjesi E, Morfin-Maciel BM, Ndikum AE, Mukiibi GB, Reddy BK, Yusuf O, Taright-Mahi S, Mérida-Palacio JV, Kabra SK, Nkhama E, Filho NR, Zhjegi VB, Mortimer K, Rylance S, Masekela RR. Clinical standards for the diagnosis and management of asthma in low- and middle-income countries. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2023; 27:658-667. [PMID: 37608484 PMCID: PMC10443788 DOI: 10.5588/ijtld.23.0203] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2023] [Accepted: 05/09/2023] [Indexed: 08/24/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The aim of these clinical standards is to aid the diagnosis and management of asthma in low-resource settings in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs).METHODS: A panel of 52 experts in the field of asthma in LMICs participated in a two-stage Delphi process to establish and reach a consensus on the clinical standards.RESULTS: Eighteen clinical standards were defined: Standard 1, Every individual with symptoms and signs compatible with asthma should undergo a clinical assessment; Standard 2, In individuals (>6 years) with a clinical assessment supportive of a diagnosis of asthma, a hand-held spirometry measurement should be used to confirm variable expiratory airflow limitation by demonstrating an acute response to a bronchodilator; Standard 3, Pre- and post-bronchodilator spirometry should be performed in individuals (>6 years) to support diagnosis before treatment is commenced if there is diagnostic uncertainty; Standard 4, Individuals with an acute exacerbation of asthma and clinical signs of hypoxaemia or increased work of breathing should be given supplementary oxygen to maintain saturation at 94-98%; Standard 5, Inhaled short-acting beta-2 agonists (SABAs) should be used as an emergency reliever in individuals with asthma via an appropriate spacer device for metered-dose inhalers; Standard 6, Short-course oral corticosteroids should be administered in appropriate doses to individuals having moderate to severe acute asthma exacerbations (minimum 3-5 days); Standard 7, Individuals having a severe asthma exacerbation should receive emergency care, including oxygen therapy, systemic corticosteroids, inhaled bronchodilators (e.g., salbutamol with or without ipratropium bromide) and a single dose of intravenous magnesium sulphate should be considered; Standard 8, All individuals with asthma should receive education about asthma and a personalised action plan; Standard 9, Inhaled medications (excluding dry-powder devices) should be administered via an appropriate spacer device in both adults and children. Children aged 0-3 years will require the spacer to be coupled to a face mask; Standard 10, Children aged <5 years with asthma should receive a SABA as-needed at step 1 and an inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) to cover periods of wheezing due to respiratory viral infections, and SABA as-needed and daily ICS from step 2 upwards; Standard 11, Children aged 6-11 years with asthma should receive an ICS taken whenever an inhaled SABA is used; Standard 12, All adolescents aged 12-18 years and adults with asthma should receive a combination inhaler (ICS and rapid onset of action long-acting beta-agonist [LABA] such as budesonide-formoterol), where available, to be used either as-needed (for mild asthma) or as both maintenance and reliever therapy, for moderate to severe asthma; Standard 13, Inhaled SABA alone for the management of patients aged >12 years is not recommended as it is associated with increased risk of morbidity and mortality. It should only be used where there is no access to ICS.The following standards (14-18) are for settings where there is no access to inhaled medicines. Standard 14, Patients without access to corticosteroids should be provided with a single short course of emergency oral prednisolone; Standard 15, Oral SABA for symptomatic relief should be used only if no inhaled SABA is available. Adjust to the individual's lowest beneficial dose to minimise adverse effects; Standard 16, Oral leukotriene receptor antagonists (LTRA) can be used as a preventive medication and is preferable to the use of long-term oral systemic corticosteroids; Standard 17, In exceptional circumstances, when there is a high risk of mortality from exacerbations, low-dose oral prednisolone daily or on alternate days may be considered on a case-by-case basis; Standard 18. Oral theophylline should be restricted for use in situations where it is the only bronchodilator treatment option available.CONCLUSION: These first consensus-based clinical standards for asthma management in LMICs are intended to help clinicians provide the most effective care for people in resource-limited settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Jayasooriya
- Academic Unit of Primary Care, University of Sheffield, Sheffield
| | - M Stolbrink
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Tygerberg, South Africa
| | - E M Khoo
- Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, International Primary Care Respiratory Group, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK
| | - I T Sunte
- Global Allergy and Airways Patient Platform, Vienna, Austria
| | - J I Awuru
- Global Allergy and Airways Patient Platform, Vienna, Austria
| | - M Cohen
- Hospital Centro Médico, Guatemala City, Guatemala, Mexico, Asociación Latinoamericana de Tórax, Montevideo, Uruguay
| | - D C Lam
- Department of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Asian Pacific Society of Respirology, Hong Kong, China
| | - A Spanevello
- Division of Pulmonary Rehabilitation, Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Tradate, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Respiratory Diseases, University of Insubria, Varese-Como
| | - D Visca
- Asociación Latinoamericana de Tórax, Montevideo, Uruguay, Department of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - R Centis
- Servizio di Epidemiologia Clinica delle Malattie Respiratorie, Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri, Tradate, Italy
| | - G B Migliori
- Servizio di Epidemiologia Clinica delle Malattie Respiratorie, Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri, Tradate, Italy
| | - A C Ayuk
- College of Medicine, University of Nigeria, Enugu, Nigeria
| | - J A Buendia
- Affiliation Departamento de Farmacologia y Tóxicologia, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia
| | - B I Awokola
- Medical Research Council, The Gambia at the London School of Tropical Medicine, The Gambia
| | | | - S Muteti-Fana
- Department of Primary Care Sciences, University of Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe
| | - M Lao-Araya
- Division of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Chian Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand
| | - P Chiarella
- Health Sciences School, Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas, Lima, Peru
| | - H Badellino
- Head Pediatric Respiratory Medicine Department, Clinica Regional del Este, San Francisco, Argentina
| | - S W Somwe
- Paediatrics and Child Health, University of Lusaka, Lusaka, Zambia
| | - M P Anand
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, JSS Medical College, Mysore, India
| | - J R Garcí-Corzo
- Department of Pediatrics, Universidad Industrial de Santander, Santander, Colombia
| | - A Bekele
- College of Health Sciences, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | - M E Soto-Martinez
- Department of Pediatrics, Universidad de Costa Rica, San Jose, Costa Rica
| | - B H M Ngahane
- Douala General Hospital, University of Douala, Douala, Cameroon
| | - M Florin
- Institute of Pneumology M. Nasta, Bucharest, Romania
| | - K Voyi
- School of Health Systems and Public Health, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa
| | - K Tabbah
- College of Medicine, Ajman University, Ajman, United Arab Emirates
| | - B Bakki
- University of Maiduguri Teaching Hospital, Maiduguri
| | - A Alexander
- Deparment of Medicine, University of Abuja, Abuja
| | - B L Garba
- Department of Paediatrics, Usmanu Danfodiyo, University Teaching Hospital, Sokoto, Nigeria
| | - E M Salvador
- Deparment of Biological Sciences, Eduardo Mondlane University, Maputo, Mozambique
| | - G B Fischer
- University of Medical Sciences, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
| | - A G Falade
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria
| | - Zorica ŽivkoviĆ
- Dragiša Mišovic, Childrens Hsopital for Lung Disease and TB, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - S J Romero-Tapia
- Health Sciences, Academic Division, Juarez Autononous, University of Tabasco, Villahermosa, Mexico
| | - G E Erhabor
- Department of Medicine, Obafemi Awolowo University Teaching Hospital Complex, Ile-Ife, Nigeria
| | - H Zar
- Department of Paediatrics & Child Health & SA MRC Unit on Children & Adolescent Health, Red Cross Childrens Hospital, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - B Gemicioglu
- Department of Pulmonary Diseases, Istanbul University, Cerrahpasa, Turkey
| | - H V Brandão
- State University of Feira de Santana, Feira de Santana, BA, Brazil
| | - X Kurhasani
- UBT Higher Education Institution, Prishtina, Kosovo
| | | | - V Singh
- MJ Rajasthan Hospital, Jaipur, India
| | | | - S T Kudagammana
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Peradeniya, Kandy, Sri Lanka
| | - M R Masjedi
- Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - J N Velásquez
- Medical School, Santander Industrial, Bucaramanga, Colombia
| | - A Jain
- Department of Community Medicine, Kasturba Medical College, Mangalore
| | | | - L F M Valdeavellano
- Asociación Latinoamericana de Tórax, Montevideo, Uruguay, Francisco Morroguín University, Guatemala City, Guatemala
| | - R M Gómez
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Catholic University of Salta, Salta, Argentina
| | - E Mesonjesi
- Department of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, University Hospital Centre "Mother Teresa", Tirana, Albania
| | | | - A E Ndikum
- The University of Yaounde 1, Yaounde, Cameroon
| | | | - B K Reddy
- Shishuka Children's Speciality Hospital, Bangalore, India
| | - O Yusuf
- The Allergy and Asthma Institute, Islamabad, Pakistan
| | - S Taright-Mahi
- Medecin Faculty, Mustapha Universitary Hospital Algiers, Algeria
| | - J V Mérida-Palacio
- Centrode Investigación de Enfermedades Alérgicas y Respiratorias SC, Mexico DF, Mexico
| | - S K Kabra
- Pediatrics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - E Nkhama
- Levy Mwanawasa Medical University, School of Public Health and Environmental Sciences, Lusaka, Zambia
| | - N R Filho
- Federal University of Parana, Curitiba, PA, Brazil
| | - V B Zhjegi
- Social Medicine, Medical Faculty, University of Prishtina, Prishtina, Kosovo
| | - K Mortimer
- University of Cambridge, Cambridge, Imperial College, London, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK, Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, School of Clinical Medicine, University of KwaZulu Natal, Durban, South Africa
| | - S Rylance
- Department of Non-communicable Diseases, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - R R Masekela
- Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, School of Clinical Medicine, University of KwaZulu Natal, Durban, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Moreau-Neidhardt M, Leclerc L, Grange J, Périnel S, Pourchez J. Assessing of low-tech solutions for aerosol delivery: Comparative performance study of manufactured versus homemade spacers. Int J Pharm 2023; 633:122652. [PMID: 36709833 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2023.122652] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2022] [Revised: 01/20/2023] [Accepted: 01/23/2023] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aims to evaluate the performance of low-cost homemade spacers compared with manufactured valved holding chambers (VHCs) for fluticasone propionate delivery via a pMDI (pressurized Metered Dose Inhaler). METHODS The Total Emitted Dose (TED) and particle size distribution were measured for pMDI alone or connected to the different spacers, according to CAN/CSA-Z264.1-02 standard. Two types of low-cost alternative and manufactured spacers were investigated: 500 mL plastic bottle and 553 mL aluminium can; non-antistatic plastic VHCs and aluminium antistatic VHCs. RESULTS The TED of homemade plastic bottle vs plastic VHC were similar in the 20-23% range. In contrast, the TED of homemade aluminium can was higher compared to aluminium VHC (83% vs 68%). The Fine Particle Fraction (FPF) was similar for the two plastic-based spacers (in the 12.68-17.60% range), although it was greater for the aluminium can compared to aluminium VHC (51% vs 42%). However, all spacers have limited large particles fraction, mainly deposited in the oropharyngeal tract, potentially decreasing side effects. CONCLUSION We demonstrated that low-tech solutions as homemade spacers have at least similar performances to VHC medical devices composed of same material (aluminium or plastic). Thus, low-cost homemade spacers represent alternatives in case of emergency and without VHCs nearby.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manon Moreau-Neidhardt
- Mines Saint-Etienne, Université Jean Monnet Saint-Etienne, INSERM, U1059 SAINBIOSE, Centre CIS, F-42023 Saint-Etienne, France
| | - Lara Leclerc
- Mines Saint-Etienne, Université Jean Monnet Saint-Etienne, INSERM, U1059 SAINBIOSE, Centre CIS, F-42023 Saint-Etienne, France
| | - Jeanne Grange
- Mines Saint-Etienne, Université Jean Monnet Saint-Etienne, INSERM, U1059 SAINBIOSE, Centre CIS, F-42023 Saint-Etienne, France
| | - Sophie Périnel
- University Hospital of Saint-Etienne, INSERM, U1059 SAINBIOSE, 42023 Saint-Étienne, France; Université Jean Monnet Saint-Etienne, Mines Saint-Etienne, INSERM U1059 SAINBIOSE, Saint-Etienne F-42023, France
| | - Jérémie Pourchez
- Mines Saint-Etienne, Université Jean Monnet Saint-Etienne, INSERM, U1059 SAINBIOSE, Centre CIS, F-42023 Saint-Etienne, France.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Electronic Monitoring Devices to Support Inhalation Technique in Patients with Asthma: a Narrative Review. CURRENT TREATMENT OPTIONS IN ALLERGY 2023. [DOI: 10.1007/s40521-023-00328-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/19/2023]
Abstract
Abstract
Purpose of Review
Improper inhaling technique is common and is associated with poor patient outcomes. However, digital e-health devices may offer novel opportunities for educational support. This narrative review provides an overview of electronic monitoring devices (EMDs) measuring patient inhalation technique. We summarise their technical features, capabilities and limitations and discuss the steps necessary for implementation in clinical practice.
Recent Findings
Six EMDs measuring inhalation were identified. The quality of published evidence varied widely. Devices differed in the inhalation technique steps measured, the feedback provided and the type of sensor employed. Sustainability and battery life differed according to whether devices were built into inhalers or add-ons. Nevertheless, all EMDs could reliably capture diverse inhaler technique errors, and some can guide educational interventions and follow-up treatment. In addition, some EMDs may serve as an early warning system for exacerbations.
Summary
New-generation EMDs can measure patient inhalation technique, yet there is limited data on patient preferences, acceptability of inhaler technique monitoring, cost-effectiveness and the influence of inhaler technique monitoring on clinical outcomes, all representing areas for further research.
Collapse
|
9
|
Bacterial Contamination of Inhalation Chambers Used for Cats and Dogs with Chronic Airway Diseases. Pathogens 2023; 12:pathogens12020275. [PMID: 36839547 PMCID: PMC9961833 DOI: 10.3390/pathogens12020275] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2022] [Revised: 02/05/2023] [Accepted: 02/06/2023] [Indexed: 02/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Inhalation chambers (ICs) are regularly used in veterinary medicine for the inhalative treatment of chronic respiratory diseases in dogs and cats. Since therapy is usually required lifelong and daily, devices are frequently in use. The aim of this study was to identify bacterial contamination of ICs used for cats and dogs in relation to the applied cleaning measures. Swabs from ICs of 66 cats and 19 dogs with chronic airway diseases were obtained using a standardized protocol and subsequently cultured. A questionnaire was completed by the pet owners regarding the history of their pet's illness and applied device cleaning measures. Overall, 64% (54/86) of the ICs were found to be contaminated; the mask was significantly (p < 0.001) more often contaminated than other device parts. Most cultured bacteria were environmental contaminants; however, some harbored pathogenic potential. Cleaning frequency and method did not significantly influence the presence of contamination. Bacterial contamination of ICs, used for cats and dogs, is common but is not significantly influenced by the type or frequency of cleaning. To avoid potential infection by opportunistic bacteria, the instruction of pet owners regarding the maintenance of the ICs is recommended.
Collapse
|
10
|
Doniec Z, Olszanecka-Glinianowicz M, Hantulik P, Almgren-Rachtan A, Chudek J. The Efficacy, Tolerance and Acceptance of a New Fixed-Dose Salmeterol and Fluticasone Propionate Dry-Powder Inhaler—Salflumix Easyhaler® in COPD Patients in the Daily Clinical Practice. APPLIED SCIENCES 2022; 12:12142. [DOI: 10.3390/app122312142] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/13/2023]
Abstract
The efficacy of the fix-dose salmeterol/fluticasone propionate combination in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) was only shown for the original product. This investigator-initiated study aimed to prove the efficacy and safety of Salflumix Easyhaler®, a second-entry product (dry-powder inhaler) in a real-life setting. The efficacy of the therapy was assessed in 440 COPD outpatients (36.1% classified as C&D groups according to GOLD) using the COPD assessment test (CAT) and the modified Medical Research Council (mMRC). During 86 ± 30 days, the frequency of COPD with a big and very big impact on life (CAT > 20 pts); and high scores of dyspnea (mMRC ≥ 2) decreased from 60.7% and 57.5% at I visit to 15.2% and 22.6% at III visits, respectively (p < 0.001). There was a greater improvement in newly diagnosed patients than those who switched from other devices due to insufficient disease control or patient dissatisfaction with the used inhaler. Patients’ satisfaction was scored 3.2–3.5 in a 4 pts scale. Physicians scored the burden related to the use of Salflumix Easyhaler® as very low. Adherence exceeded 90%. This study supports effectiveness, satisfaction, and convenience with the use of this new product in COPD, and shows that ICS-containing DPI therapy is still improperly prescribed for patients with a low risk of COPD exacerbation in real-life settings.
Collapse
|
11
|
Trillo-Calvo E, González-Bejar M, Hidalgo A, Richard L. Proyecto INCLIASMA fase II - Inercia clínica en asma en España. Semergen 2022; 48:101816. [DOI: 10.1016/j.semerg.2022.101816] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2022] [Revised: 06/20/2022] [Accepted: 06/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
|
12
|
Ammari WG, Sanders M. Relative Lung and Systemic Bioavailability Along with Oropharyngeal Deposition of Salbutamol Post-Inhalation: A Pharmacokinetic Evaluation of Novel Inhaler Technique Training Gadgets. J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv 2022; 35:278-285. [PMID: 35984934 DOI: 10.1089/jamp.2022.0006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Suboptimal use of pressurized metered dose inhaler (pMDI) remains a major barrier to inhaled therapy success. Verbal inhaler technique training (VT) fails to maintain patients' good pMDI use, thus training tools might help. Trainhaler® (THR device) and Flo-Tone® CR (FTCR device), two novel pMDI technique training tools, were evaluated and compared in terms of relative lung and systemic bioavailability and oropharyngeal deposition of salbutamol inhaled from Ventolin® Evohaler® (GlaxoSmithKline) either alone following THR or connected to FTCR. Methods: Sixteen healthy adults inhaled 2 × 100 μg salbutamol puffs (1 minute apart) from Ventolin using the THR device or FTCR device in a two-period, randomized crossover study. A 7-day washout separated THR and FTCR approaches. Immediately after each puff inhalation, each subject gargled with 20 mL water for oropharyngeal deposition determination. Urine samples were collected 0.5 hour (pre-inhalation) and 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 hours post-inhalation. Urine was then pooled till 24-hour post-inhalation. The relative lung bioavailability (0- to 0.5-hour urinary salbutamol excretion-USAL0.5) and relative systemic bioavailability (0- to 24-hour urinary excretion of salbutamol and its metabolite-USALMET24) were determined. Results: The mean (standard deviation [SD]) USAL0.5 of the THR and FTCR groups was 5.70 (6.43) and 11.39 (9.67) μg, respectively. The mean (SD) oropharyngeal deposition was 11.11 (4.37) and 6.09 (1.89) μg, respectively. The THR and FTCR devices were statistically significantly different in USAL0.5 and oropharyngeal deposition (p < 0.001), whereas there was no statistically significant difference in USALMET24. Conclusion: The THR device and the FTCR device showed positive impact on inhaled pMDI delivery. Indeed, the FTCR device doubled the relative lung bioavailability and minimized the unwanted oropharyngeal deposition of inhaled salbutamol. In practice, these pMDI trainers would complement and maintain VT. Study Registration: The study was registered on the ISRCTN registry (Reference: ISRCTN88332465-06/12/2017 [Prospectively Registered]).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wesam G Ammari
- Faculty of Pharmacy, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan.,Pharmacological and Diagnostic Research Centre (PDRC), Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan
| | - Mark Sanders
- Clement Clarke International Limited, Harlow, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Hefnawy A, Herpin MJ, Easton M, Joshi S, Jordan D, Smyth HDC, Tarpy J. Design Validation of a Smart Inhaler Device with an Integrated Spacer for Enhanced Aerosolization Performance. J Pharm Innov 2022. [DOI: 10.1007/s12247-022-09673-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
14
|
Klenk FK, Schulz B. [Inhalation therapy in dogs and cats with chronic lower airway disease - a literature review]. TIERARZTLICHE PRAXIS. AUSGABE K, KLEINTIERE/HEIMTIERE 2022; 50:279-292. [PMID: 36067770 DOI: 10.1055/a-1910-3327] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
Chronic respiratory diseases are prevalent medical conditions in dogs and cats requiring lifelong treatment. Mainstay of therapy for chronic inflammatory respiratory diseases are glucocorticoids. Concurrent treatment with bronchodilators may be necessary to control clinical signs sufficiently. Due to the successful use in people as well as subsequent reduction of adverse effects of long-term glucocorticoid therapy, inhalative therapy has become increasingly important in veterinary medicine as well. Primarily spacers or valved holding chambers, in combination with metered dose inhalers, are used in dogs and cats. The technical properties of these devices, as well as their use and maintenance will be described in the following article. Furthermore, the existing literature regarding efficacy of inhalative medications for therapy of chronic inflammatory airway diseases in dogs and cats will be summarized.
Collapse
|
15
|
Dierick BJ, Been-Buck S, Klemmeier T, Hagedoorn P, van de Hei SJ, Kerstjens HA, Kocks JW, Zijp TR, Wessels AMA, Touw DJ, van Boven JF. Digital spacer data driven COPD inhaler adherence education: The OUTERSPACE proof-of-concept study. Respir Med 2022; 201:106940. [DOI: 10.1016/j.rmed.2022.106940] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2022] [Revised: 07/12/2022] [Accepted: 07/21/2022] [Indexed: 10/16/2022]
|
16
|
Dierick BHJ, Achterbosch M, Been-Buck S, Klemmeier T, van de Hei SJ, Hagedoorn P, Kerstjens HAM, Kocks JWH, van Boven JFM. Can electronic monitoring with a digital smart spacer support personalised medication adherence and inhaler technique education in patients with asthma?: Protocol of the randomised controlled OUTERSPACE trial. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e059929. [PMID: 35697450 PMCID: PMC9196171 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059929] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Medication adherence and inhaler technique in patients with asthma remain suboptimal. A digital, smart spacer may support personalised adherence and inhaler technique education. The aim of this study is to assess the feasibility of undertaking a definitive randomised controlled trial of personalised, smart spacer data-driven education and explore clinical benefits. METHODS AND ANALYSIS We present the design of the multicentre, randomised controlled OUtcomes following Tailored Education and Retraining: Studying Performance and AdherenCE feasibility trial of 2 months. Patients will be recruited from four Dutch general practices. At t=-1, patients with asthma ≥18 years using inhaled corticosteroids±long-acting beta-agonists±short-acting beta-agonists administered with a pressurised-metered-dose-inhaler and spacer (n=40) will use a smart spacer for 1 month. The rechargeable CE-marked smart spacer (Aerochamber Plus with Flow Vu) includes a sensor that monitors adherence and inhalation technique to prescribed dosing regimen of both maintenance and reliever inhalers. After 1 month (t=0), patients are 1:1 randomised into two groups: control group (usual care) versus intervention group (personalised education). At t=-1, t=0 and t=1 month, the Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ), Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) questionnaire and Test of Adherence to Inhalers (TAI) are administered and fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) is assessed. At t=0 and t=1, spirometry is performed. At t=1, usability and satisfaction will be analysed using the System Usability Scale and interviews with patients and healthcare providers. Primary outcome is the overall feasibility of a definitive trial assessed by patient recruitment speed, participation and drop-out rate. Secondary outcomes are patient and healthcare provider satisfaction and exploratory clinical outcomes are adherence, inhaler technique, TAI score, FeNO, lung function, ACQ and WPAI. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Ethical approval was obtained from the RTPO in Leeuwarden, Netherlands (number: NL78361.099.21). Patients will provide written informed consent. Study findings will be disseminated through conferences and peer-reviewed scientific and professional journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NL9637.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Boudewijn H J Dierick
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy & Pharmacology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
- Department of General Practice & Elderly Care Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
- Groningen Research Institute for Asthma and COPD (GRIAC), Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Maria Achterbosch
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy & Pharmacology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Sandra Been-Buck
- Department of Pulmonology, Martini Hospital, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Titia Klemmeier
- Department of Pulmonology, Martini Hospital, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Susanne J van de Hei
- Groningen Research Institute for Asthma and COPD (GRIAC), Groningen, The Netherlands
- Department of Health Sciences, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Paul Hagedoorn
- Pharmaceutical Technology and Biopharmacy, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
- Medication Adherence Expertise Center of the northern Netherlands (MAECON), Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Huib A M Kerstjens
- Groningen Research Institute for Asthma and COPD (GRIAC), Groningen, The Netherlands
- Department of Pulmonary Diseases and Tuberculosis, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Janwillem W H Kocks
- Medication Adherence Expertise Center of the northern Netherlands (MAECON), Groningen, The Netherlands
- Observational and Pragmatic Research Institute, Singapore
- General Practitioners Research Institute, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Job F M van Boven
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy & Pharmacology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
- Groningen Research Institute for Asthma and COPD (GRIAC), Groningen, The Netherlands
- Medication Adherence Expertise Center of the northern Netherlands (MAECON), Groningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Alharbi AS, Yousef AA, Alharbi SA, Almaghamsi TM, Al Qwaiee MM, Al-Somali FM, Alahmadi TS, Alhaider SA, Alotaibi WH, Albalawi MA, Alotaibi FN, Alenizi AS, Alsaadi MM, Said YS. Severe asthma in children: An official statement from Saudi Pediatric Pulmonology Association. Saudi Med J 2022; 43:329-340. [PMID: 35414610 PMCID: PMC9998054 DOI: 10.15537/smj.2022.4.43.20210756] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2021] [Accepted: 03/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
In Saudi Arabia, the prevalence of pediatric asthma ranges between 8% and 25%. However, there are no sufficient data regarding severe asthma in childhood in Saudi Arabia. Therefore, a task force has been formed by the Saudi Pediatric Pulmonology Association which is a subsidiary group of the Saudi Thoracic Society and consists of Saudi experts with well-respected academic and clinical backgrounds in the fields of pediatric asthma as well as other respiratory diseases to write a consensus on definitions, phenotypes, and pathophysiology, evaluation, and management. To achieve this, the subject was divided into various sections, each of which was assigned to at least 2 experts. Without a central literature review, the authors searched the literature using their own strategies. To reach an agreement, the entire panel reviewed and voted on proposed findings and recommendations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adel S. Alharbi
- From the Department of Pediatrics (A. Alharbi, Alotaibi), Pediatric Pulmonology Division and Pediatric Sleep Center, from the Department of Pediatrics (Al-Somali), Pediatric Pulmonary Division, Prince Sultan Military City, from the Departments of Pediatric Pulmonology & Sleep Medicine (Albalawi), King Fahad Medical City, from the Pediatric Pulmonology And Sleep Medicine Department (Alenizi), Children’s Hospital, King Saud Medical City, from the Department of Pediatrics (Alenizi), College of Medicine and King Khalid University Hospital, King Saud University, From the Pediatric Department (Said), Security Forces Hospital, Riyadh; from the Department of Pediatrics (Yousef), Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, College of Medicine; from the Department of Pediatrics (Almaghamsi, Alhaider), King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam; King Fahd Hospital of the University (Yousef), from the Department of Pediatrics (Alahmadi), Dr. Sulaiman Al Habib Hospital, Al-Khobar; Department of Pediatrics (S. Alharbi), Faculty of Medicine, Umm Alqura University, Mecca; from the Department of Pediatrics (S. Alharbi), Dr. Soliman Fakeeh Hospital; from the Pediatric Department (Al Qwaiee), King Faisal specialist hospital & Research Center, from the Department of Pediatrics (Alotaibi), Faculty of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
| | - Abdullah A. Yousef
- From the Department of Pediatrics (A. Alharbi, Alotaibi), Pediatric Pulmonology Division and Pediatric Sleep Center, from the Department of Pediatrics (Al-Somali), Pediatric Pulmonary Division, Prince Sultan Military City, from the Departments of Pediatric Pulmonology & Sleep Medicine (Albalawi), King Fahad Medical City, from the Pediatric Pulmonology And Sleep Medicine Department (Alenizi), Children’s Hospital, King Saud Medical City, from the Department of Pediatrics (Alenizi), College of Medicine and King Khalid University Hospital, King Saud University, From the Pediatric Department (Said), Security Forces Hospital, Riyadh; from the Department of Pediatrics (Yousef), Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, College of Medicine; from the Department of Pediatrics (Almaghamsi, Alhaider), King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam; King Fahd Hospital of the University (Yousef), from the Department of Pediatrics (Alahmadi), Dr. Sulaiman Al Habib Hospital, Al-Khobar; Department of Pediatrics (S. Alharbi), Faculty of Medicine, Umm Alqura University, Mecca; from the Department of Pediatrics (S. Alharbi), Dr. Soliman Fakeeh Hospital; from the Pediatric Department (Al Qwaiee), King Faisal specialist hospital & Research Center, from the Department of Pediatrics (Alotaibi), Faculty of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
| | - Saleh A. Alharbi
- From the Department of Pediatrics (A. Alharbi, Alotaibi), Pediatric Pulmonology Division and Pediatric Sleep Center, from the Department of Pediatrics (Al-Somali), Pediatric Pulmonary Division, Prince Sultan Military City, from the Departments of Pediatric Pulmonology & Sleep Medicine (Albalawi), King Fahad Medical City, from the Pediatric Pulmonology And Sleep Medicine Department (Alenizi), Children’s Hospital, King Saud Medical City, from the Department of Pediatrics (Alenizi), College of Medicine and King Khalid University Hospital, King Saud University, From the Pediatric Department (Said), Security Forces Hospital, Riyadh; from the Department of Pediatrics (Yousef), Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, College of Medicine; from the Department of Pediatrics (Almaghamsi, Alhaider), King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam; King Fahd Hospital of the University (Yousef), from the Department of Pediatrics (Alahmadi), Dr. Sulaiman Al Habib Hospital, Al-Khobar; Department of Pediatrics (S. Alharbi), Faculty of Medicine, Umm Alqura University, Mecca; from the Department of Pediatrics (S. Alharbi), Dr. Soliman Fakeeh Hospital; from the Pediatric Department (Al Qwaiee), King Faisal specialist hospital & Research Center, from the Department of Pediatrics (Alotaibi), Faculty of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
| | - Talal M. Almaghamsi
- From the Department of Pediatrics (A. Alharbi, Alotaibi), Pediatric Pulmonology Division and Pediatric Sleep Center, from the Department of Pediatrics (Al-Somali), Pediatric Pulmonary Division, Prince Sultan Military City, from the Departments of Pediatric Pulmonology & Sleep Medicine (Albalawi), King Fahad Medical City, from the Pediatric Pulmonology And Sleep Medicine Department (Alenizi), Children’s Hospital, King Saud Medical City, from the Department of Pediatrics (Alenizi), College of Medicine and King Khalid University Hospital, King Saud University, From the Pediatric Department (Said), Security Forces Hospital, Riyadh; from the Department of Pediatrics (Yousef), Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, College of Medicine; from the Department of Pediatrics (Almaghamsi, Alhaider), King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam; King Fahd Hospital of the University (Yousef), from the Department of Pediatrics (Alahmadi), Dr. Sulaiman Al Habib Hospital, Al-Khobar; Department of Pediatrics (S. Alharbi), Faculty of Medicine, Umm Alqura University, Mecca; from the Department of Pediatrics (S. Alharbi), Dr. Soliman Fakeeh Hospital; from the Pediatric Department (Al Qwaiee), King Faisal specialist hospital & Research Center, from the Department of Pediatrics (Alotaibi), Faculty of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
| | - Mansour M. Al Qwaiee
- From the Department of Pediatrics (A. Alharbi, Alotaibi), Pediatric Pulmonology Division and Pediatric Sleep Center, from the Department of Pediatrics (Al-Somali), Pediatric Pulmonary Division, Prince Sultan Military City, from the Departments of Pediatric Pulmonology & Sleep Medicine (Albalawi), King Fahad Medical City, from the Pediatric Pulmonology And Sleep Medicine Department (Alenizi), Children’s Hospital, King Saud Medical City, from the Department of Pediatrics (Alenizi), College of Medicine and King Khalid University Hospital, King Saud University, From the Pediatric Department (Said), Security Forces Hospital, Riyadh; from the Department of Pediatrics (Yousef), Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, College of Medicine; from the Department of Pediatrics (Almaghamsi, Alhaider), King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam; King Fahd Hospital of the University (Yousef), from the Department of Pediatrics (Alahmadi), Dr. Sulaiman Al Habib Hospital, Al-Khobar; Department of Pediatrics (S. Alharbi), Faculty of Medicine, Umm Alqura University, Mecca; from the Department of Pediatrics (S. Alharbi), Dr. Soliman Fakeeh Hospital; from the Pediatric Department (Al Qwaiee), King Faisal specialist hospital & Research Center, from the Department of Pediatrics (Alotaibi), Faculty of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
| | - Faisal M. Al-Somali
- From the Department of Pediatrics (A. Alharbi, Alotaibi), Pediatric Pulmonology Division and Pediatric Sleep Center, from the Department of Pediatrics (Al-Somali), Pediatric Pulmonary Division, Prince Sultan Military City, from the Departments of Pediatric Pulmonology & Sleep Medicine (Albalawi), King Fahad Medical City, from the Pediatric Pulmonology And Sleep Medicine Department (Alenizi), Children’s Hospital, King Saud Medical City, from the Department of Pediatrics (Alenizi), College of Medicine and King Khalid University Hospital, King Saud University, From the Pediatric Department (Said), Security Forces Hospital, Riyadh; from the Department of Pediatrics (Yousef), Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, College of Medicine; from the Department of Pediatrics (Almaghamsi, Alhaider), King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam; King Fahd Hospital of the University (Yousef), from the Department of Pediatrics (Alahmadi), Dr. Sulaiman Al Habib Hospital, Al-Khobar; Department of Pediatrics (S. Alharbi), Faculty of Medicine, Umm Alqura University, Mecca; from the Department of Pediatrics (S. Alharbi), Dr. Soliman Fakeeh Hospital; from the Pediatric Department (Al Qwaiee), King Faisal specialist hospital & Research Center, from the Department of Pediatrics (Alotaibi), Faculty of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
| | - Turki S. Alahmadi
- From the Department of Pediatrics (A. Alharbi, Alotaibi), Pediatric Pulmonology Division and Pediatric Sleep Center, from the Department of Pediatrics (Al-Somali), Pediatric Pulmonary Division, Prince Sultan Military City, from the Departments of Pediatric Pulmonology & Sleep Medicine (Albalawi), King Fahad Medical City, from the Pediatric Pulmonology And Sleep Medicine Department (Alenizi), Children’s Hospital, King Saud Medical City, from the Department of Pediatrics (Alenizi), College of Medicine and King Khalid University Hospital, King Saud University, From the Pediatric Department (Said), Security Forces Hospital, Riyadh; from the Department of Pediatrics (Yousef), Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, College of Medicine; from the Department of Pediatrics (Almaghamsi, Alhaider), King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam; King Fahd Hospital of the University (Yousef), from the Department of Pediatrics (Alahmadi), Dr. Sulaiman Al Habib Hospital, Al-Khobar; Department of Pediatrics (S. Alharbi), Faculty of Medicine, Umm Alqura University, Mecca; from the Department of Pediatrics (S. Alharbi), Dr. Soliman Fakeeh Hospital; from the Pediatric Department (Al Qwaiee), King Faisal specialist hospital & Research Center, from the Department of Pediatrics (Alotaibi), Faculty of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
| | - Sami A. Alhaider
- From the Department of Pediatrics (A. Alharbi, Alotaibi), Pediatric Pulmonology Division and Pediatric Sleep Center, from the Department of Pediatrics (Al-Somali), Pediatric Pulmonary Division, Prince Sultan Military City, from the Departments of Pediatric Pulmonology & Sleep Medicine (Albalawi), King Fahad Medical City, from the Pediatric Pulmonology And Sleep Medicine Department (Alenizi), Children’s Hospital, King Saud Medical City, from the Department of Pediatrics (Alenizi), College of Medicine and King Khalid University Hospital, King Saud University, From the Pediatric Department (Said), Security Forces Hospital, Riyadh; from the Department of Pediatrics (Yousef), Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, College of Medicine; from the Department of Pediatrics (Almaghamsi, Alhaider), King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam; King Fahd Hospital of the University (Yousef), from the Department of Pediatrics (Alahmadi), Dr. Sulaiman Al Habib Hospital, Al-Khobar; Department of Pediatrics (S. Alharbi), Faculty of Medicine, Umm Alqura University, Mecca; from the Department of Pediatrics (S. Alharbi), Dr. Soliman Fakeeh Hospital; from the Pediatric Department (Al Qwaiee), King Faisal specialist hospital & Research Center, from the Department of Pediatrics (Alotaibi), Faculty of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
| | - Wadha H. Alotaibi
- From the Department of Pediatrics (A. Alharbi, Alotaibi), Pediatric Pulmonology Division and Pediatric Sleep Center, from the Department of Pediatrics (Al-Somali), Pediatric Pulmonary Division, Prince Sultan Military City, from the Departments of Pediatric Pulmonology & Sleep Medicine (Albalawi), King Fahad Medical City, from the Pediatric Pulmonology And Sleep Medicine Department (Alenizi), Children’s Hospital, King Saud Medical City, from the Department of Pediatrics (Alenizi), College of Medicine and King Khalid University Hospital, King Saud University, From the Pediatric Department (Said), Security Forces Hospital, Riyadh; from the Department of Pediatrics (Yousef), Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, College of Medicine; from the Department of Pediatrics (Almaghamsi, Alhaider), King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam; King Fahd Hospital of the University (Yousef), from the Department of Pediatrics (Alahmadi), Dr. Sulaiman Al Habib Hospital, Al-Khobar; Department of Pediatrics (S. Alharbi), Faculty of Medicine, Umm Alqura University, Mecca; from the Department of Pediatrics (S. Alharbi), Dr. Soliman Fakeeh Hospital; from the Pediatric Department (Al Qwaiee), King Faisal specialist hospital & Research Center, from the Department of Pediatrics (Alotaibi), Faculty of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
| | - Mona A. Albalawi
- From the Department of Pediatrics (A. Alharbi, Alotaibi), Pediatric Pulmonology Division and Pediatric Sleep Center, from the Department of Pediatrics (Al-Somali), Pediatric Pulmonary Division, Prince Sultan Military City, from the Departments of Pediatric Pulmonology & Sleep Medicine (Albalawi), King Fahad Medical City, from the Pediatric Pulmonology And Sleep Medicine Department (Alenizi), Children’s Hospital, King Saud Medical City, from the Department of Pediatrics (Alenizi), College of Medicine and King Khalid University Hospital, King Saud University, From the Pediatric Department (Said), Security Forces Hospital, Riyadh; from the Department of Pediatrics (Yousef), Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, College of Medicine; from the Department of Pediatrics (Almaghamsi, Alhaider), King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam; King Fahd Hospital of the University (Yousef), from the Department of Pediatrics (Alahmadi), Dr. Sulaiman Al Habib Hospital, Al-Khobar; Department of Pediatrics (S. Alharbi), Faculty of Medicine, Umm Alqura University, Mecca; from the Department of Pediatrics (S. Alharbi), Dr. Soliman Fakeeh Hospital; from the Pediatric Department (Al Qwaiee), King Faisal specialist hospital & Research Center, from the Department of Pediatrics (Alotaibi), Faculty of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
| | - Faisal N. Alotaibi
- From the Department of Pediatrics (A. Alharbi, Alotaibi), Pediatric Pulmonology Division and Pediatric Sleep Center, from the Department of Pediatrics (Al-Somali), Pediatric Pulmonary Division, Prince Sultan Military City, from the Departments of Pediatric Pulmonology & Sleep Medicine (Albalawi), King Fahad Medical City, from the Pediatric Pulmonology And Sleep Medicine Department (Alenizi), Children’s Hospital, King Saud Medical City, from the Department of Pediatrics (Alenizi), College of Medicine and King Khalid University Hospital, King Saud University, From the Pediatric Department (Said), Security Forces Hospital, Riyadh; from the Department of Pediatrics (Yousef), Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, College of Medicine; from the Department of Pediatrics (Almaghamsi, Alhaider), King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam; King Fahd Hospital of the University (Yousef), from the Department of Pediatrics (Alahmadi), Dr. Sulaiman Al Habib Hospital, Al-Khobar; Department of Pediatrics (S. Alharbi), Faculty of Medicine, Umm Alqura University, Mecca; from the Department of Pediatrics (S. Alharbi), Dr. Soliman Fakeeh Hospital; from the Pediatric Department (Al Qwaiee), King Faisal specialist hospital & Research Center, from the Department of Pediatrics (Alotaibi), Faculty of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
| | - Ahmed S. Alenizi
- From the Department of Pediatrics (A. Alharbi, Alotaibi), Pediatric Pulmonology Division and Pediatric Sleep Center, from the Department of Pediatrics (Al-Somali), Pediatric Pulmonary Division, Prince Sultan Military City, from the Departments of Pediatric Pulmonology & Sleep Medicine (Albalawi), King Fahad Medical City, from the Pediatric Pulmonology And Sleep Medicine Department (Alenizi), Children’s Hospital, King Saud Medical City, from the Department of Pediatrics (Alenizi), College of Medicine and King Khalid University Hospital, King Saud University, From the Pediatric Department (Said), Security Forces Hospital, Riyadh; from the Department of Pediatrics (Yousef), Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, College of Medicine; from the Department of Pediatrics (Almaghamsi, Alhaider), King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam; King Fahd Hospital of the University (Yousef), from the Department of Pediatrics (Alahmadi), Dr. Sulaiman Al Habib Hospital, Al-Khobar; Department of Pediatrics (S. Alharbi), Faculty of Medicine, Umm Alqura University, Mecca; from the Department of Pediatrics (S. Alharbi), Dr. Soliman Fakeeh Hospital; from the Pediatric Department (Al Qwaiee), King Faisal specialist hospital & Research Center, from the Department of Pediatrics (Alotaibi), Faculty of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
| | - Muslim M. Alsaadi
- From the Department of Pediatrics (A. Alharbi, Alotaibi), Pediatric Pulmonology Division and Pediatric Sleep Center, from the Department of Pediatrics (Al-Somali), Pediatric Pulmonary Division, Prince Sultan Military City, from the Departments of Pediatric Pulmonology & Sleep Medicine (Albalawi), King Fahad Medical City, from the Pediatric Pulmonology And Sleep Medicine Department (Alenizi), Children’s Hospital, King Saud Medical City, from the Department of Pediatrics (Alenizi), College of Medicine and King Khalid University Hospital, King Saud University, From the Pediatric Department (Said), Security Forces Hospital, Riyadh; from the Department of Pediatrics (Yousef), Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, College of Medicine; from the Department of Pediatrics (Almaghamsi, Alhaider), King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam; King Fahd Hospital of the University (Yousef), from the Department of Pediatrics (Alahmadi), Dr. Sulaiman Al Habib Hospital, Al-Khobar; Department of Pediatrics (S. Alharbi), Faculty of Medicine, Umm Alqura University, Mecca; from the Department of Pediatrics (S. Alharbi), Dr. Soliman Fakeeh Hospital; from the Pediatric Department (Al Qwaiee), King Faisal specialist hospital & Research Center, from the Department of Pediatrics (Alotaibi), Faculty of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
| | - Yazan S. Said
- From the Department of Pediatrics (A. Alharbi, Alotaibi), Pediatric Pulmonology Division and Pediatric Sleep Center, from the Department of Pediatrics (Al-Somali), Pediatric Pulmonary Division, Prince Sultan Military City, from the Departments of Pediatric Pulmonology & Sleep Medicine (Albalawi), King Fahad Medical City, from the Pediatric Pulmonology And Sleep Medicine Department (Alenizi), Children’s Hospital, King Saud Medical City, from the Department of Pediatrics (Alenizi), College of Medicine and King Khalid University Hospital, King Saud University, From the Pediatric Department (Said), Security Forces Hospital, Riyadh; from the Department of Pediatrics (Yousef), Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, College of Medicine; from the Department of Pediatrics (Almaghamsi, Alhaider), King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam; King Fahd Hospital of the University (Yousef), from the Department of Pediatrics (Alahmadi), Dr. Sulaiman Al Habib Hospital, Al-Khobar; Department of Pediatrics (S. Alharbi), Faculty of Medicine, Umm Alqura University, Mecca; from the Department of Pediatrics (S. Alharbi), Dr. Soliman Fakeeh Hospital; from the Pediatric Department (Al Qwaiee), King Faisal specialist hospital & Research Center, from the Department of Pediatrics (Alotaibi), Faculty of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
How to Choose the Right Inhaler Using a Patient-Centric Approach? Adv Ther 2022; 39:1149-1163. [PMID: 35080761 PMCID: PMC8790222 DOI: 10.1007/s12325-021-02034-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2021] [Accepted: 12/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
There are many different inhaler devices and medications on the market for the treatment of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, with over 230 drug-delivery system combinations available. However, despite the abundance of effective treatment options, the achieved disease control in clinical practice often remains unsatisfactory. In this context, a key determining factor is the match or mismatch of an inhalation device with the characteristics or needs of an individual patient. Indeed, to date, no ideal device exists that fits all patients, and a personalized approach needs to be considered. Several useful choice-guiding algorithms have been developed in the recent years to improve inhaler–patient matching, but a comprehensive tool that translates the multifactorial complexity of inhalation therapy into a user-friendly algorithm is still lacking. To address this, a multidisciplinary expert panel has developed an evidence-based practical treatment tool that allows a straightforward way of choosing the right inhaler for each patient.
Collapse
|
19
|
Huber B, Keller C, Jenkins M, Raza A, Aurivillius M. Effect of inhaled budesonide/formoterol fumarate dihydrate delivered via two different devices on lung function in patients with COPD and low peak inspiratory flow. Ther Adv Respir Dis 2022; 16:17534666221107312. [PMID: 35815354 PMCID: PMC9340410 DOI: 10.1177/17534666221107312] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and aims: Low peak inspiratory flow (PIF) is common following severe exacerbations of
chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Patients with COPD and low PIF
may be at risk of suboptimal delivery of inhaled therapies to the airways,
especially when using devices such as dry powder inhalers (DPIs), which
require greater inspiratory effort than metered dose inhalers (MDIs). We
report the results from a 2-week crossover study evaluating the effects of
inhaled dual therapy with budesonide/formoterol fumarate dihydrate with an
MDI with a spacer versus a DPI in patients with COPD and
low PIF. Methods: This randomized, open-label, two-period (each 1 week in duration) crossover
efficacy and safety study included patients with severe-to-very severe COPD
and PIF < 50 L/min (NCT04078126). Patients were randomized 1:1 to
twice-daily budesonide/formoterol fumarate dihydrate MDI (BFF MDI) 320/10 µg
with a spacer for 1 week followed by twice-daily budesonide/formoterol
fumarate dihydrate DPI (BUD/FORM DPI) 320/9 µg for 1 week, or the inverse.
The primary endpoint was peak change from baseline in forced expiratory
volume in 1 s (FEV1) within 4 h post-dose following 1 week of
treatment. Other assessments included pre-dose lung function,
pharmacokinetics, and safety, as assessed by adverse events. Results: The modified intention-to-treat analysis set comprised 30 patients (mean age:
66.9 years; mean baseline FEV1: 766 mL; mean COPD assessment test
score: 22.20). Following 1 week of treatment, both BFF MDI and BUD/FORM DPI
improved mean [95% confidence interval (CI)] peak FEV1 4 h
post-dose [256 (190, 322) mL and 274 (208, 340) mL, respectively]. No
clinically meaningful difference between treatments was observed for any
lung function endpoint. There were no unexpected safety findings. Conclusion: Dual therapy with BFF MDI and with BUD/FORM DPI led to improvements in lung
function in patients with severe-to-very severe COPD and low PIF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Claus Keller
- Lung and Bronchial Medicine, Praxis Dr. Claus Keller, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Martin Jenkins
- Late Respiratory and Immunology Biometrics, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK
| | | | - Magnus Aurivillius
- AstraZeneca Research and Development, Pepparedsleden 1, Gothenburg 43183, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Tony SM, Abdelrahman MA, Osama H, Abdelrahim MEA. Advanced counselling using training device and smartphone application on inhalation technique from metered-dose inhaler with spacer equipped with different interfaces in asthmatic children. Int J Clin Pract 2021; 75:e14413. [PMID: 34047001 DOI: 10.1111/ijcp.14413] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2021] [Accepted: 05/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Spacers are equipped with either facemask or mouthpiece as an interface through which patient inhale their dose. The present study aimed to evaluate the effect of advanced counselling using training devices and smartphone applications on inhalation techniques from the metered-dose inhaler (MDI) with a spacer equipped with different interfaces. METHODS 100 paediatric asthmatic children (8-18 years) were divided into two groups. Group one was a spacer with a mouthpiece (n = 50) and group two was a spacer with a facemask group (n = 50). Both groups had three visits one month apart. At each visit, patients were asked to show the investigator their inhalation technique using MDI with spacer, and mistakes were recorded and then patients were trained on the proper inhalation technique of using MDI with a spacer. In the spacer with mouthpiece group, Flo-Tone was attached to the mouthpiece to allow the Trainhaler smartphone application to detect the duration of inhalation. In the spacer with facemask group, there was no need to use the Flo-Tone training device since the facemask was equipped with a built-in whistle detected by the Trainhaler smartphone application. RESULTS The total number of mistakes in the inhalation technique decreased significantly (P < .05) in visits 2 and 3 for both groups. Duration of inhalation increased significantly (P < .05) in the mouthpiece group at visit 2 and in the facemask group at visit 3. Achieving 5 seconds of slow deep inhalation, breath-holding for 5 seconds after inhalation and the tight fit of facemask represented the major obstacles in most children especially the youngest subjects. Breath out as far as comfortable had the highest number of mistakes in the first visit in both groups. CONCLUSION The Flo-Tone with its positive reinforcement whistle and the Trainhaler smartphone application significantly improved the inhalation technique by decreasing the total number of mistakes especially in important steps eg, shaking MDI, maintaining slow inhalation rate, breath-holding after inhalation and appropriate facemask fitting. Also, they increased the duration of inhalation of asthmatic children from MDI with a spacer. Both spacer interfaces are easy to handle once taught well.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara M Tony
- Clinical pharmacy department, Beni-Suef Specialized Hospital, Beni-Suef, Egypt
- Technical Office of Deputy Minister of Health in Beni-Suif Directorate of Health Affairs, Beni-Suef, Egypt
| | - Mona A Abdelrahman
- Clinical Pharmacy Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, Beni-Suef University, Beni-Suef, Egypt
| | - Hasnaa Osama
- Clinical Pharmacy Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, Beni-Suef University, Beni-Suef, Egypt
| | - Mohamed E A Abdelrahim
- Clinical Pharmacy Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, Beni-Suef University, Beni-Suef, Egypt
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Salbutamol Transport and Deposition in the Upper and Lower Airway with Different Devices in Cats: A Computational Fluid Dynamics Approach. Animals (Basel) 2021; 11:ani11082431. [PMID: 34438888 PMCID: PMC8388725 DOI: 10.3390/ani11082431] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2021] [Revised: 08/04/2021] [Accepted: 08/10/2021] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Administration of inhaled salbutamol via metered-dose inhalers can effectively treat bronchoconstriction. Different devices are used for the delivery of this drug in cats, either in the hospital or at home, for long-term treatment. Effective drug administration may depend on the drug delivery device as well as patient cooperation. By using non-invasive computational fluid dynamics techniques, the impact of these devices on the deposition and transport of salbutamol particles in the cat airways was simulated and assessed. The results confirm a variable drug distribution depending on the device used. The percentage of particles reaching the lung was reduced when using spacers and increased when applied directly into an endotracheal tube. Abstract Pressurized metered-dose inhalers (pMDI) with or without spacers are commonly used for the treatment of feline inflammatory airway disease. During traditional airways treatments, a substantial amount of drugs are wasted upstream of their target. To study the efficiency of commonly used devices in the transport of inhaled salbutamol, different computational models based on two healthy adult client-owned cats were developed. Computed tomographic images from one cat were used to generate a three-dimensional geometry, and two masks (spherical and conical shapes) and two spacers (10 and 20 cm) completed the models. A second cat was used to generate a second model having an endotracheal tube (ETT) with and without the same spacers. Airflow, droplet spray transport, and deposition were simulated and studied using computational fluid dynamics techniques. Four regions were evaluated: device, upper airways, primary bronchi, and downstream lower airways/parenchyma (“lung”). Regardless of the model, most salbutamol is deposited in devices and/or upper airways. In general, particles reaching the lung varied between 5.8 and 25.8%. Compared with the first model, pMDI application through the ETT with or without a spacer had significantly higher percentages of particles reaching the lung (p = 0.006).
Collapse
|
22
|
Melani AS. Inhaler technique in asthma and COPD: challenges and unmet knowledge that can contribute to suboptimal use in real life. Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol 2021; 14:991-1003. [PMID: 33983092 DOI: 10.1080/17512433.2021.1929922] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Introduction: Inhalers are the most commonly used devices for lung drug delivery in asthma and COPD. Inhaler use offers several advantages but requires the user's proper mastery. The issue of inhaler technique is very important as inhaler misuse remains common in real life regardless of the inhaler used and is associated with poor disease control.Areas covered:This narrative review analyses the key-steps of inhaler mastery and the significance of the errors of use for the main devices. There are uncertainties on many tasks of inhaler use and on those variations from recommended steps that are considered as critical errors.Expert opinion: Despite technological advancements, an easy-to-use device is not yet available. Whatever the chosen inhaler, health care givers' proper practical education with the opportunity of feedback learning has a key-role for improving inhaler technique, but is time-consuming, and remains limited to few successful experiences. Newer digital technologies will be applied to the field of inhaler education, but the lack of knowledge on many practical aspects of inhaler technique might be a limit for its extensive implementation. Possibly digital innovation might substantially contribute to reduce inhaler misuse only if clinicians, manufacturers, and subjects will cooperate together on this issue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea S Melani
- Dipartimento Scienze Mediche, Policlinico Le Scotte, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Senese, Siena, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Mask Use with Spacers/Valved Holding Chambers and Metered Dose Inhalers among Children with Asthma. Ann Am Thorac Soc 2021; 18:17-22. [PMID: 33052700 DOI: 10.1513/annalsats.202005-522cme] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Inhaler misuse is highly prevalent and associated with high morbidity and costs. For metered dose inhalers, proper use can be supported with devices such as spacers/valved holding chambers (VHCs) and masks to effectively deliver inhaled medication to the lungs. However, guidelines are vague about which children with asthma should use spacers/VHCs with masks to deliver medication from metered dose inhalers as well as when they should transition to spacers/VHCs with mouthpieces. In this paper, we provide a focused review of the evidence for mask use, highlighting unclear and conflicting information in guidelines and studies. We synthesize the differences in recommendations and practice. Based on these findings, we call for future research to determine the appropriate age and necessary skills for transitioning children from using metered dose inhalers with spacers/VHCs and masks to using spacers/VHCs and mouthpieces. Guidelines about mask use should be standardized to help ensure optimal medical delivery for patients, provide consistent inhaler prescriptions and education across settings, and support team-based care to help lower pediatric asthma morbidity and costs.
Collapse
|
24
|
Spencer S, Hamer O, Berger E, Booth A, Irving GJ, Owen M, Relph N, Usmani O, Kelly C. Interventions to improve inhaler technique for adults with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Hippokratia 2021. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd014956] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Sally Spencer
- Health Research Institute, Faculty of Health, Social Care & Medicine; Edge Hill University; Ormskirk UK
| | - Oliver Hamer
- Respiratory Research Centre, Faculty of Health, Social Care & Medicine; Edge Hill University; Ormskirk UK
| | | | | | - Greg J Irving
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care; University of Cambridge; Cambridge UK
| | - Michael Owen
- Faculty of Health and Social Care; Edge Hill University; Ormskirk UK
| | - Nicola Relph
- Faculty of Health, Social Care & Medicine; Edge Hill University; Ormskirk UK
| | - Omar Usmani
- National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London and Royal Brompton Hospital; London UK
| | - Carol Kelly
- Respiratory Research Centre, Faculty of Health, Social Care & Medicine; Edge Hill University; Ormskirk UK
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Volerman A, Fierstein J, Boon K, Vojta D, Gupta R. Determinants of asthma knowledge and practices among caregivers of children with moderate-to-severe persistent asthma. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2021; 127:392-394. [PMID: 34098112 DOI: 10.1016/j.anai.2021.06.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2021] [Revised: 05/18/2021] [Accepted: 06/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Volerman
- Departments of Medicine and Pediatrics, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Jamie Fierstein
- Department of Pediatrics, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois
| | - Kathy Boon
- Department of Pediatrics, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois
| | | | - Ruchi Gupta
- Department of Pediatrics, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois; Division of Academic General Pediatrics, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Panigone S, Sandri F, Ferri R, Volpato A, Nudo E, Nicolini G. Environmental impact of inhalers for respiratory diseases: decreasing the carbon footprint while preserving patient-tailored treatment. BMJ Open Respir Res 2021; 7:7/1/e000571. [PMID: 32238349 PMCID: PMC7173981 DOI: 10.1136/bmjresp-2020-000571] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2020] [Revised: 03/18/2020] [Accepted: 03/18/2020] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Patients with asthma and Chronic Obstructive Respiratory Disease (COPD) rely on three main device classes for inhalation therapy: metered-dose inhalers (MDIs), dry powder inhalers (DPIs) and soft-mist inhalers (SMIs). The carbon footprint (CF) of these inhalers differs with MDIs having a higher impact than DPIs and SMIs due to the propellant in MDIs. However, the certified CF of specific MDI products may differ significantly. MDIs still represent an essential option for many patients. Consequently, novel approaches shall be considered to balance environmental goals with patient health and well-being while maintaining a diverse range of choices for patients and physicians.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Panigone
- Corporate Marketing, Chiesi Farmaceutici SpA, Parma, Italy
| | | | - Rossella Ferri
- Corporate Health Safety & Environment, Chiesi Farmaceutici SpA, Parma, Italy
| | - Andrea Volpato
- Corporate Health Safety & Environment, Chiesi Farmaceutici SpA, Parma, Italy
| | - Elena Nudo
- Global Medical Affairs, Chiesi Farmaceutici SpA, Parma, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Nicola M, Hussein RRS, Soliman YMA, Abdelrahim M. Effect of different accessory devices on the dose delivered from pressurised metred-dose inhalers. Int J Clin Pract 2021; 75:e14157. [PMID: 33763954 DOI: 10.1111/ijcp.14157] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2020] [Accepted: 03/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTIONS Improved aerosol delivery of bronchodilators to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) subjects is a cornerstone in the treatment approach. Drug delivery and response are improved with the use of accessory devices [spacers and valved holding chambers (VHCs)] with metred-dose inhalers (pMDIs). However, different accessory devices are available in the market with different properties that could affect aerosol delivery. Thus, this study aimed to assess the relative lung deposition and systemic bioavailability and compare bronchodilator response of salbutamol delivered using different accessory devices attached to pMDIs. METHODS Twelve healthy subjects and twelve COPD subjects inhaled 300 μg salbutamol (3 pMDI puffs) using five different accessory devices with either masks or mouthpieces (Able, Aerochamber plus flow Vu, Dolphin chamber, Tipshaler spacer, and modified Drink bottle spacer). Urine samples were collected thirty minutes post-dosing and cumulatively for the next twenty-four hours, to determine and compare the relative lung deposition [0-0.5 hour excretion of urinary salbutamol (USAL0.5)] and systemic bioavailability [0.5-24 hours excretion of urinary salbutamol (USAL24)] of salbutamol from the selected accessory devices. Also, the difference between pre and post-inhalation forced expiratory volume in one second (ΔFEV1 %) of predicted was determined for each accessory device. RESULTS Urinary excretion of salbutamol (both USAL0.5 and USAL24 samples) in COPD subjects was significantly (P < .05) lower than in healthy subjects for all accessory devices. USAL0.5 and USAL24 in non-antistatic spacers (modified Drink bottle spacer and Dolphin chamber spacers) were significantly lower (P < .05) than that for antistatic spacers (Aerochamber plus flow Vu, Able and Tips-haler). No significant difference in USAL0.5 and USAL24 was observed between facemasks and mouthpieces. There was a significant difference (P < .05) in ΔFEV1 % of predicted values between COPD subjects and healthy subjects. However, within the COPD group and the healthy group there was no significant difference in ΔFEV1 % of predicted values between all accessory devices or between with mouthpiece or with a mask. CONCLUSIONS COPD subjects had lower aerosol delivered compared with healthy subjects. Anti-static accessory devices delivered a higher amount of aerosol compared with non-antistatic accessory devices. Even though the presence of a significant difference in aerosol delivery between non-antistatic and antistatic accessory devices no significant difference was found in the ΔFEV1 % between all accessory devices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mina Nicola
- Clinical Pharmacy Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, Beni-Suef University, Beni-Suef, Egypt
| | - Raghda R S Hussein
- Clinical Pharmacy Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, Beni-Suef University, Beni-Suef, Egypt
| | - Youssef M A Soliman
- Department of Chest Diseases, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt
| | - Mohamed Abdelrahim
- Clinical Pharmacy Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, Beni-Suef University, Beni-Suef, Egypt
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Jõgi R, Mattila L, Vahteristo M, Takala A, Lähelmä S, Vartiainen VA, Lindqvist A. Inspiratory Flow Parameters Through Dry Powder Inhalers in Healthy Volunteers and Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD): Device Resistance Does Not Limit Use in COPD. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis 2021; 16:1193-1201. [PMID: 33958863 PMCID: PMC8096421 DOI: 10.2147/copd.s298514] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2021] [Accepted: 04/01/2021] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Achieving correct inhalation technique through an inhaler to ensure effective drug delivery is key to managing symptoms in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). However, many patients struggle to use their inhalers correctly, with the resultant reduction in therapeutic benefit. Consequently, appropriate inhaler choice is important to maximize clinical benefit. The primary objective of this study was to characterize inspiratory flow parameters across two Easyhaler® inhalers and the HandiHaler® inhaler in patients with COPD and healthy volunteers. Methods In this randomized, open-label, crossover study, subjects (100 patients with COPD; 100 healthy volunteers) were trained to perform inhalations of placebo powder via two variants of Easyhaler and placebo capsules via the HandiHaler inhalers. Subjects then performed three placebo inhalations through each inhaler in a random sequence. Inspiratory flow parameters were assessed, including peak inspiratory flow (PIF), for each inhaler. A parallel sub-study was conducted in patients with COPD from the main study to assess correct use of the inhalers, patient’s preference, ability to learn to use the inhalers, and the feasibility of the In-Check Dial device to measure PIF values. Results Mean PIF rates and inspiratory volumes through the three inhalers were similar between patients with COPD and healthy volunteers, and all subjects achieved the 30 L/min PIF required for effective use of Easyhaler. Almost 70% of the 88 patients enrolled in the sub-study used the Easyhaler and HandiHaler inhalers without errors. The Easyhaler was preferred by 51% of patients, while 25% favored the HandiHaler. Teaching the use of both inhalers to almost 70% of patients was very easy. The In-Check Dial PIF values and those obtained via spirometry were strongly correlated (p<0.0001) for all three inhalers. Conclusion The respiratory performance of patients with COPD does not appear to be a limiting factor in the use of Easyhaler.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rain Jõgi
- Tartu University Hospital, Lung Clinic, Tartu, Estonia
| | | | - Mikko Vahteristo
- Research Unit of Pulmonary Diseases, Helsinki University Hospital and Helsinki University, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Aino Takala
- Medical Affairs, Orion Corporation, Espoo, Finland
| | - Satu Lähelmä
- Inhalation Platform, Orion Corporation, Espoo, Finland
| | | | - Ari Lindqvist
- Biostatistics and Data Analytics, Orion Corporation, Espoo, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Abstract
Asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are amongst the most common chronic diseases worldwide, and are largely preventable by improving the quality of the air we breathe. The most commonly deployed treatment, the metered dose inhaler (MDI), uses hydrofluorocarbon propellants, which are powerful greenhouse gases that contribute disproportionately to the climate crisis. Alternative treatment strategies are required if we are to avoid contributing to the worst effects of climate change. These strategies include promoting non-pharmacological therapies like smoking cessation and pulmonary rehabilitation; empowering patients to gain better disease control through written management plans and encouraging preventer, rather than reliever therapies. Pharmacological strategies include: improving inhaler technique and spacer use; minimising propellant release by using smaller volume MDIs and simpler dosing regimes; dose counters to prevent waste; switching to low global warming potential inhalers; and inhaler recycling. There are also opportunities to improve disease control alongside reduced greenhouse gas emissions, including better matching of patients' devices to inhaler technique rather than defaulting to MDIs, stopping unnecessary inhaled steroids in COPD and maintenance and reliever therapy in asthma. New, lower global warming potential propellants are on the horizon, and their introduction could offer a golden opportunity to enhance MDIs usability and sustainability by making them refillable, integrating whistles to optimise inhalation technique, adding integrated caps, optimising materials for recycling and adding dose counters to all MDIs.
Collapse
|
30
|
Lim SH, Park S, Lee CC, Ho PCL, Kwok PCL, Kang L. A 3D printed human upper respiratory tract model for particulate deposition profiling. Int J Pharm 2021; 597:120307. [PMID: 33540019 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2021.120307] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2020] [Revised: 01/19/2021] [Accepted: 01/20/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Pulmonary route is the main route of drug delivery for patients with asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases, offering several advantages over the oral route. Determining the amount of drug deposited onto various parts of the respiratory tract allows for a good correlation to clinical efficacy of inhalation drug devices. However, current in vitro cascade impactors measure only the aerodynamic particle size distribution, which does not truly represent the in vivo deposition pattern in human respiratory tract. In this study, a human upper respiratory tract model was fabricated using a 3D printer and subsequently characterized for its dimensional accuracy, surface finishing and air leaking. The effects of using a spacer and/or various airflow rates were also investigated. To assess this in vitro model, the deposition pattern of a model drug, namely, salbutamol sulphate, was tested. The resultant deposition pattern of salbutamol sulphate from a metered dose inhaler at 15 L per minute with the spacer, showed no significant difference from that of a published radiological in vivo study performed in adult humans. In addition, it was also found that the deposition pattern of salbutamol at 35 L per minute was comparable to the results of another published study in human. This in vitro model, showing reasonable in vitro-in vivo correlation, may provide opportunities for personalized medicine in special populations or disease states.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seng Han Lim
- Department of Pharmacy, National University of Singapore, 18 Science Drive 4, Block S4A, Level 3, Singapore 117543, Republic of Singapore
| | - Sol Park
- School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Pharmacy and Bank Building A15, NSW 2006, Australia
| | - Chun Chuan Lee
- Department of Pharmacy, National University of Singapore, 18 Science Drive 4, Block S4A, Level 3, Singapore 117543, Republic of Singapore
| | - Paul Chi Lui Ho
- Department of Pharmacy, National University of Singapore, 18 Science Drive 4, Block S4A, Level 3, Singapore 117543, Republic of Singapore
| | - Philip Chi Lip Kwok
- School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Pharmacy and Bank Building A15, NSW 2006, Australia
| | - Lifeng Kang
- School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Pharmacy and Bank Building A15, NSW 2006, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Usmani OS, Roche N, Jenkins M, Stjepanovic N, Mack P, De Backer W. Consistent Pulmonary Drug Delivery with Whole Lung Deposition Using the Aerosphere Inhaler: A Review of the Evidence. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis 2021; 16:113-124. [PMID: 33500616 PMCID: PMC7822085 DOI: 10.2147/copd.s274846] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2020] [Accepted: 11/24/2020] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Metered dose inhalers (MDIs) are one of the most common device types for delivering inhaled therapies. However, there are several technical challenges in development and drug delivery of these medications. In particular, suspension-based MDIs are susceptible to suspension heterogeneity, in vitro drug–drug interactions, and patient handling errors, which may all affect drug delivery. To overcome these challenges, new formulation approaches are required. The AerosphereTM inhaler, formulated using co-suspension delivery technology, combines drug crystals with porous phospholipid particles to create stable, homogenous suspensions that dissolve once they reach the airways. Two combination therapies using this technology have been developed for the treatment of COPD: glycopyrrolate/formoterol fumarate (GFF MDI; dual combination) and budesonide/glycopyrrolate/formoterol fumarate (BGF MDI; triple combination). Here, we review the evidence with a focus on studies assessing dose delivery, lung deposition, and effects on airway geometry. In vitro assessments have demonstrated that the Aerosphere inhaler provides consistent dose delivery, even in the presence of simulated patient handling errors. Combination therapies delivered with this technology also show a consistent fine particle fraction (FPF) and an optimal particle size distribution for delivery to the central and peripheral airways even when multiple drugs are delivered via the same inhaler. Studies using gamma scintigraphy and functional respiratory imaging have demonstrated that GFF MDI is effectively deposited in the central and peripheral airways, and provides clinically meaningful benefits on airway volume and resistance throughout the lung. Overall, studies suggest that the Aerosphere inhaler, formulated using co-suspension delivery technology, may offer advantages over traditional formulations, including consistent delivery of multiple components across patient handling conditions, optimal particle size and FPF, and effective delivery to the central and peripheral airways. Future studies may provide additional evidence to further characterize the clinical benefits of these technical improvements in MDI drug delivery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Omar S Usmani
- National Heart and Lung Institute (NHLI), Imperial College London, and Royal Brompton Hospital, London, UK
| | - Nicolas Roche
- Respiratory Medicine, Cochin Hospital, University Paris Descartes, Paris, France
| | | | | | | | - Wilfried De Backer
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Biddiscombe M, Usmani O. Delivery and adherence with inhaled therapy in asthma. Minerva Med 2021; 112:564-572. [PMID: 33438386 DOI: 10.23736/s0026-4806.20.07276-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
The benefits of inhaled medication for the treatment of respiratory diseases are immense. Inhalers are unquestionably the most important medical devices for the treatment of asthma and in Europe today there are more than 230 different device and drug combinations of inhaled therapies many of which are available for the treatment of asthma. They are designed to alleviate the symptoms of asthma by controlling inflammation and minimising exacerbations and are intended to be simple enough to operate by all patients regardless of their age and education. However, it is still a huge challenge for patients to use their inhaler correctly and consistently and achieving asthma control continues to be an elusive goal for most patients worldwide. The reality is that despite advances in the diagnosis of asthma, the availability of comprehensive asthma management guidelines and potent asthma medications combined with efficient delivery systems, uncontrolled disease is still linked to substantial morbidity and mortality. Despite the enormous benefits of delivering topically acting medication directly to the site of disease in the lungs adherence to treatment still remains one of the biggest challenges in asthma control. This current review looks at why patients have difficulty in using their inhalers and why adherence is so poor and how this may be improved through the use of innovation in inhaler design.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martyn Biddiscombe
- National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London and Royal Brompton Hospital, London, UK -
| | - Omar Usmani
- National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London and Royal Brompton Hospital, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Al-Moamary MS, Alhaider SA, Alangari AA, Idrees MM, Zeitouni MO, Al Ghobain MO, Alanazi AF, Al-Harbi AS, Yousef AA, Alorainy HS, Al-Hajjaj MS. The Saudi Initiative for Asthma - 2021 Update: Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of asthma in adults and children. Ann Thorac Med 2021; 16:4-56. [PMID: 33680125 PMCID: PMC7908897 DOI: 10.4103/atm.atm_697_20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2020] [Accepted: 12/10/2020] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
The Saudi Initiative for Asthma 2021 (SINA-2021) is the fifth version of asthma guidelines for the diagnosis and management of asthma for adults and children, which is developed by the SINA group, a subsidiary of the Saudi Thoracic Society. The main objective of the SINA is to have guidelines that are up to date, simple to understand, and easy to use by healthcare workers dealing with asthma patients. To facilitate achieving the goals of asthma management, the SINA panel approach is mainly based on the assessment of symptom control and risk for both adults and children. The approach to asthma management is aligned for age groups: adults, adolescents, children aged 5-12 years, and children aged less than 5 years. SINA guidelines have focused more on personalized approaches reflecting better understanding of disease heterogeneity with the integration of recommendations related to biologic agents, evidence-based updates on treatment, and the role of immunotherapy in management. Medication appendix has also been updated with the addition of recent evidence, new indications for existing medication, and new medications. The guidelines are constructed based on the available evidence, local literature, and the current situation at national and regional levels. There is also an emphasis on patient-doctor partnership in the management that also includes a self-management plan.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohamed S. Al-Moamary
- Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Sami A. Alhaider
- Department of Pediatrics, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Abdullah A. Alangari
- Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Majdy M. Idrees
- Respiratory Division, Department of Medicine, Prince Sultan Military Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Mohammed O. Zeitouni
- Department of Medicine, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Mohammed O. Al Ghobain
- Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Abdullah F. Alanazi
- Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Adel S. Al-Harbi
- Department of Pediatrics, Prince Sultan Military Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Abdullah A. Yousef
- Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, Imam Abdulrahman bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
| | - Hassan S. Alorainy
- Department of Respiratory Care, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Mohamed S. Al-Hajjaj
- Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Medicine, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Chaicoming K, Preutthipan A, Adirekkittikun A, Nugboon M. Homemade valved holding chambers for children with airway hyperresponsiveness: A randomized crossover trial. Pediatr Pulmonol 2021; 56:49-56. [PMID: 33150727 DOI: 10.1002/ppul.25123] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2020] [Revised: 10/10/2020] [Accepted: 10/13/2020] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND During the COVID-19 pandemic, a metered-dose inhaler (MDI) with a valved holding chamber (VHC) is a preferred route of bronchodilator delivery. We have developed a new homemade VHC, made of a paper coffee cup, and a drinking water bottle. This study was conducted to compare the bronchodilator response in children with airway hyperresponsiveness after the use of our homemade VHC and that of a standard commercial one. METHODS In a randomized, two-period, two-sequence crossover trial, we recruited 20 children, aged 6-15 years, who had a greater than 12% increase in FEV1 after inhaled salbutamol. They were randomized into Group A and B. Group A used our VHC on the first day and Aerochamber® on the second day. Group B used the same VHCs but in alternate sequence. Spirometries were performed before and after 400 µg of salbutamol, MDI was administered via those VHCs. RESULTS Baseline demographic data and spirometric values did not have statistically significant differences between group A and B and between the first and second day (p > .05). After giving salbutamol MDI, both VHCs produced significant increases in FVC, FEV1 , and FEF25-75% (p < .005). The improvement in FEV1 did not significantly differ between our homemade VHC and Aerochamber® (p > .05). CONCLUSION Our homemade VHC is effective for an MDI bronchodilator delivery. Since it is very cheap and easy to make, it may be used as a disposable device to minimize airborne transmission especially when commercial VHC is not available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kesanee Chaicoming
- Nursing Affairs, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Aroonwan Preutthipan
- Division of Pediatric Pulmonology, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Anusorn Adirekkittikun
- Division of Pediatric Pulmonology, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Malinee Nugboon
- Nursing Affairs, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Csonka P, Tapiainen T, Mäkelä MJ, Lehtimäki L. Optimal administration of bronchodilators with valved holding chambers in preschool children: a review of literature. Eur J Pediatr 2021; 180:3101-3109. [PMID: 33877400 PMCID: PMC8055476 DOI: 10.1007/s00431-021-04074-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2021] [Revised: 03/06/2021] [Accepted: 04/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Our aim was to synthesize the published literature on factors that potentially affect the delivery of bronchodilators using valved holding chambers (VHC) in preschool children. We also aimed to identify those attributes that are not yet incorporated or clearly stated in the guidelines and those topics that are still lacking sufficient data. There is strong evidence supporting several recommendations in current guidelines. Based on present knowledge, bronchodilators should be delivered by VHC administering each puff separately. Face mask should be omitted as soon as the child can hold the mouthpiece of the VHC tightly between the lips and teeth. Based on the review, we suggest adding a specific note to current guidelines about the effect of chamber volume and the impact of co-operation during drug administration. Calming the child and securing a tight face-to-mask seal is critical for successful drug delivery. There is not enough evidence to make specific recommendations on the most reliable VHC and face mask for children. There is an urgent need for studies that evaluate and compare the effectiveness of VHCs in various clinical settings in wide age-groups and respiratory patterns. In addition, there is insufficient data on ideal chamber volume, material, and effective antistatic treatment. What is Known: • Valved holding chambers (VHC) should not be considered interchangeable when used with pressurized metered dose inhalers (pMDI). • Drug delivery is influenced by VHC volume, aerodynamic and electrostatic properties; mask fit; respiratory pattern and co-operation during inhalation; and the number of puffs actuated. What is New: • The impact of co-operation, VHC volume, and good mask-to-face fit during drug inhalation is not stressed enough in the guidelines. • Studies are urgently needed to evaluate the effectiveness of different VHCs in various clinical settings focusing on VHC electrostatic properties, respiratory patters, face masks, and ideal pMDI+VHC combinations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Péter Csonka
- Centre for Child Health Research, Tampere University and Tampere University Hospital, Kalevantie 4, 33014 Tampereen yliopisto, Tampere, Finland. .,Terveystalo Healthcare, Tampere, Finland.
| | - Terhi Tapiainen
- Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Oulu University Hospital and PEDEGO Research Unit, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
| | - Mika J. Mäkelä
- Skin and Allergy Hospital, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Lauri Lehtimäki
- Allergy Centre, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland ,Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Yoshida H, Abe Y, Usui A, Izutsu KI. Evaluation of Valved Holding Chambers Simulating Repurposing Use of Ciclesonide Metered-dose Inhaler by Patients with Pneumonia. YAKUGAKU ZASSHI 2020; 140:1495-1500. [DOI: 10.1248/yakushi.20-00169] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Yasuhiro Abe
- Division of Drugs, National Institute of Health Sciences
| | - Akiko Usui
- Division of Drugs, National Institute of Health Sciences
| | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Valero AL, Trigueros JA, Plaza V. Multidisciplinary consensus on inhaled therapy in asthma. Expert Rev Respir Med 2020; 15:425-434. [PMID: 33170733 DOI: 10.1080/17476348.2021.1841639] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Asthma is managed by health professionals from different specialties. We aim to reach a consensus on the optimal use of inhaled therapy and the initial steps of asthma treatment, taking into account the opinions of the involved specialists. METHODS A modified Delphi approach was used. A scientific committee provided 52 controversial statements, which were submitted to primary care physicians, allergists, and pulmonologists. Discrepancies among specialties were evaluated. RESULTS A total of 209 specialists completed the questionnaire (20.2 ± 9.3 years of asthma management experience). A consensus was reached on 37 statements (71.1%), discrepancies among specialties were found in 14. The most recommended maintenance treatment for mild persistent asthma in adults/adolescents was low-dose-inhaled corticosteroids daily. MART (Maintenance and Reliever Therapy) was recommended as salvage treatment for moderate persistent asthma. Panelists agreed on the most frequent critical errors with pressurized Metered-Dose Inhalers or Dry-Powder Inhalers, and considered that Breath-Actuated Inhalers are a suitable option for all patients with the ability to inhale voluntarily. CONCLUSIONS The experts endorse the main guidelines recommendations; however, do not fully agree on recent GINA recommendations about the treatment of the initial steps of the disease. The experts value positively the differential characteristics of BAI over other devices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio L Valero
- Allergy Unit, Pneumology Department, Hospital Clínic, IDIBAPS, CIBER de Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES), Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Vicente Plaza
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Institut d'Investigació Biomédica Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), Department of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Amini S, Ghasemi A, Solduzian M, Rahimi B, Heidari K, Hadjibabaie M, Kargar M. Is Inhaler Technique Associated with Quality of Life in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease? Curr Ther Res Clin Exp 2020; 93:100608. [PMID: 33296446 PMCID: PMC7691547 DOI: 10.1016/j.curtheres.2020.100608] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2020] [Accepted: 09/16/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
The study showed a high prevalence of incorrect technique among patients with COPD. There is an association between inhaler technique (>30% error) and lower quality of life in these patients.
Background Inhalers are the mainstay of treatment for patients suffering from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. However, incorrect inhaler technique is a considerable challenge. Objective We aimed to evaluate inhaler technique and its association with quality of life in a sample of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Methods This cross-sectional study included patients with confirmed chronic obstructive pulmonary disease who were prescribed at least 1 inhaler medication on a regular basis. Patients were recruited from the outpatient pulmonary clinic of a hospital in Tehran. Inhaler technique was assessed according to a validated checklist. Patients’ quality of life was evaluated using Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Assessment Test. Results One hundred seventy-five patients with mean (SD) age of 59.0 (10.1) years were included. Patients’ devices were 192 (62.3%) pressurized metered-dose inhalers (including pressurized metered-dose inhalers plus spacer) and 116 (37.7%) dry powder inhalers. Unfortunately, only 2.86% of patients used their inhalers completely correct. The highest rate of errors was committed by patients who used metered-dose inhalers plus spacer. Patients with a higher educational degree had significantly lower rate of errors on average (P = 0.001). The most frequent errors made by patients using pressurized metered-dose inhalers or Turbuhaler was priming the inhaler before the first administration in 90.6% and 78.3% of patients, respectively. Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Assessment Test scores in patients using different inhaler devices were not significantly different. However, in patients with lower quality of life, significantly more patients had poor inhaler technique (P = 0.0001). Conclusions There is still considerable need for interventions to optimize inhaler technique. We also noted that appropriate inhaler technique is associated with better quality of life. (Curr Ther Res Clin Exp. 2020; 81:XXX–XXX)
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shahideh Amini
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Arezou Ghasemi
- Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Mohammad Solduzian
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Besharat Rahimi
- Advanced Thoracic Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Kazem Heidari
- Research Center for Rational Use of Drugs, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Molouk Hadjibabaie
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Mona Kargar
- Research Center for Rational Use of Drugs, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Nicola M, Soliman YMA, Hussein R, Saeed H, Abdelrahim M. Comparison between traditional and nontraditional add-on devices used with pressurised metered-dose inhalers. ERJ Open Res 2020; 6:00073-2020. [PMID: 33083443 PMCID: PMC7553115 DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00073-2020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2020] [Accepted: 06/02/2020] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Add-on devices that are attached to metered-dose inhalers (MDIs) were introduced to improve aerosol delivery. The objective of this study was to determine the efficacy of drug delivery from an MDI when attached to different add-on devices at different inhalation volumes. The total emitted dose (TED) of salbutamol was estimated for the MDI alone and the MDI connected to five different add-on devices (Able valved holding chamber, Tips-haler valved holding chamber, Aerochamber plus flow Vu valved holding chamber, Dolphin chamber, and a handmade water bottle spacer), at inhalation flow of 28.3 L·min−1 with flow volume of 1, 2 and 4 L, assuming young child (aged <6 years), old child (>6 years) and adult inhalation volumes, respectively. The TED% ranged between 84.1% and 87.2% at all inhalation volumes from the MDI alone, which was significantly greater than all MDI add-on device combinations (p<0.05). The TED% delivered to MDI sampling apparatus by a homemade water bottle spacer and Dolphin chamber, as non-antistatic add-on devices, ranged between 30.5% and 35.3%. However, washing these non-antistatic add-on devices with a light detergent before use improved their TED to range between 47.6% and 51.2%. Non-antistatic add-on devices had significantly lower TED (p<0.05) than that delivered by most antistatic add-on devices, which ranged from 51.3% to 71.6%. This study suggests that antistatic add-on devices delivered much more aerosol than non-antistatic add-on devices. However, it may be advised to still use a non-antistatic add-on device, for the sake of solving the coordination problem, and wash it with light detergent before use to improve TED. Antistatic add-on devices deliver much more aerosol from MDIs than non-antistatic add-on deviceshttps://bit.ly/3gSE5aR
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mina Nicola
- Dept of Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Beni-Suef University, Beni-Suef, Egypt
| | | | - Raghda Hussein
- Dept of Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Beni-Suef University, Beni-Suef, Egypt
| | - Haitham Saeed
- Dept of Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Beni-Suef University, Beni-Suef, Egypt
| | - Mohamed Abdelrahim
- Dept of Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Beni-Suef University, Beni-Suef, Egypt
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Gomes JT, Gregorio PHP, Santos ES, Ribeiro BP, Gregório MG. Effectiveness of Spacer Devices on Preventing Undesirable Cardiovascular Effects of Inhaled Salbutamol. J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv 2020; 34:217-222. [PMID: 33030386 DOI: 10.1089/jamp.2019.1591] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Currently, there are no regulatory guidelines indicating spacer devices/valved holding chamber (VHC) should be used routinely during pulmonary function tests, and few studies evaluated if spacer devices reduce beta-agonist bronchodilators' side effects. Methods: A prospective study compared salbutamol's cardiovascular effects and bronchodilation response during spirometry tests with and without a spacer device/VHC. Heart rate (HR), the corrected QT interval (QTc), and systolic and diastolic blood pressure were measured 10 minutes after the first spirometry test, before the drug administration, and 20 minutes after inhalation in both groups. Spirometric parameters (forced expiratory volume in the first second [FEV1], forced vital capacity [FVC], and FEV1/FVC) were also measured for both groups. Results: HR and QTc increase were significantly higher in the pressurized meter dose inhalers alone group versus the VHC group [mean SD] [73.1 ± 10 bpm to 74.3 + 10 bpm, p = 0.021] and [median (25%-75% interquartile range)] [389 ms (381-404) to 398 ms (387-407), p = 0.045] vs. [mean SD] [75.4 ± 9 to 73.8 + 8 bpm, p = 0.4] and [median (25%-75% interquartile range)] [388 ms (347-408) to 385 ms (366-408), p = 0.35], respectively. FEV1 variation before and after salbutamol were similar between both groups. Discussion: Although VHC significantly reduces HR and QTc variation when using beta-agonist bronchodilators in healthy patients, no clinical repercussions of this variation were found in this study, since no event of tachycardia or pathological QTc was recorded. Conclusion: VHC has a diminished clinical impact for healthy patients when considering cardiovascular effects and spirometric parameters. Beta-agonist bronchodilators may be administrated despite the use of spacer devices in patients without known cardiovascular diseases. Its significance for other populations still needs to be determined.
Collapse
|
41
|
Azak M, Mutlu B, Tamay Z. The effect of training of metered-dose inhaler technique on asthma control and quality of life in children with asthma: a randomized trial. CHILDRENS HEALTH CARE 2020. [DOI: 10.1080/02739615.2020.1821376] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Merve Azak
- Faculty of Nursing, Department of Pediatric Nursing, Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa Florence Nightingale, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Birsen Mutlu
- Faculty of Nursing, Department of Pediatric Nursing, Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa Florence Nightingale, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Zeynep Tamay
- Istanbul Medical Faculty, Division of Allergy and Chest Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Popov TA, Passalacqua G, González-Díaz SN, Plavec D, Braido F, García-Abujeta JL, Dubuske L, Rouadi P, Morais-Almeida M, Bonini S, Cheng L, Ansotegui IJ. Medical devices in allergy practice. World Allergy Organ J 2020; 13:100466. [PMID: 33024482 PMCID: PMC7529824 DOI: 10.1016/j.waojou.2020.100466] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2020] [Revised: 08/22/2020] [Accepted: 09/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Medical devices provide people with some health benefits in terms of diagnosis, prevention, treatment, and monitoring of disease processes. Different medical specialties use varieties of medical devices more or less specific for them. Allergology is an interdisciplinary field of medical science and teaches that allergic reactions are of systemic nature but can express themselves at the level of different organs across the life cycle of an individual. Subsequently, medical devices used in allergology could be regarded as: 1) general, servicing the integral diagnostic and management principles and features of allergology, and 2) organ specific, which are shared by organ specific disciplines like pulmonology, otorhinolaryngology, dermatology, and others. The present position paper of the World Allergy Organization (WAO) is meant to be the first integral document providing structured information on medical devices in allergology used in daily routine but also needed for sophisticated diagnostic purposes and modern disease management. It is supposed to contribute to the transformation of the health care system into integrated care pathways for interrelated comorbidities.
Collapse
Key Words
- AAP, Asthma Action Plan
- ATS, American Thoracic Society
- Airway inflammation
- Allergic rhinitis
- Allergology
- Allergy
- Allergy diagnosis
- Asthma
- CE mark, Conformité Européenne mark
- CO, Carbon monoxide
- DPIs, Dry Powder Inhalers
- EAI/AAI, Epinephrine/Adrenaline Auto-Injector
- EBC, Exhaled Breath Condensate
- EBT, Exhaled Breath Temperature
- EDS, Exhalation Delivery Systems
- EMA, European Medicines Agency
- ERS, European Respiratory Society
- ERV, Expiratory Reserve Volume
- FDA, Food and Drug Administration
- FEF, Forced Expiratory Flows
- FEV1, Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second
- FOT, Forced Oscillation Technique
- FRC, Functional Residual Capacity
- FVC, Forced Vital Capacity
- FeNO, Fractional Exhaled Nitric Oxide
- GLI, Global Lung Function Initiative
- IOS, Impulse Oscillometry
- IRV, Inspiratory Reserve Volume
- Lung function tests
- MDPS, Metered-Dose Pump Sprays
- Medical devices
- NDDD, Nasal Drug Delivery Device
- NO, Nitric oxide
- PDMI, Pressurized Metered Dose Inhaler
- PEF, Peak Expiratory Flow
- PNIF, Peak Nasal Inspiratory Flow
- PT, Patch Tests
- PhPT, Photopatch tests
- Ppb, part per billion
- RV, Residual Volume
- SPT, Skin Prick Test
- Skin tests
- TLC, Total Lung Capacity
- UV, Ultra Violet
- VC, Vital Capacity
- VT, Tidal Volume
- WAO, World Allergy Organization
- WHO, World Health Organization
- m-health
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Lawrence Dubuske
- The George Washington University School of Medicine, Washington DC, USA
| | | | | | - Sergio Bonini
- Institute of Translational Pharmacology, Italian National Research Council, Rome, Italy
| | - Lei Cheng
- Nanjing Medical University, First Affiliated Hospital, Nanjing, China
| | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Ribó P, Molina J, Calle M, Maiz L, Campo C, Rytilä P, Plaza V, Valero A. Prevalence of modifiable factors limiting treatment efficacy of poorly controlled asthma patients: EFIMERA observational study. NPJ Prim Care Respir Med 2020; 30:33. [PMID: 32737324 PMCID: PMC7395116 DOI: 10.1038/s41533-020-00189-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2019] [Accepted: 07/07/2020] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Several modifiable factors leading to poor asthma control have been described. We aimed to determine the proportion of patients with inadequate treatment, adherence to it, or critical mistakes with inhaler technique, and their impact on asthma control. We conducted a cross-sectional multicenter observational study including asthma patients referred from primary to specialist care for the first time. Data collected were adequate prescription according to guidelines, treatment adherence, and disease control. Of the 1682 patients (age 45 ± 17 years, 64.6% men), 35.9% showed inadequate prescription, 76.8% low adherence, and 17% critical mistakes with inhaler technique, with significantly less critical mistakes among Easyhaler users versus other dry powder inhaler users (10.3 versus 18.4%; p < 0.05). Factors related to bad asthma control were inadequate prescription (OR: 3.65), non-adherence to treatment (OR: 1.8), and inhaler misuse (OR: 3.03). A higher number of risk factors were associated with a higher probability of having badly controlled asthma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paula Ribó
- Allergology Section, Pulmonology and Allergy Department, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain. .,Grup d'Inmunoal·lèrgia Respiratoria Clínica i Experimental (IRCE), Institut d'investigacions Biomèdiques Agustí Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain. .,Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
| | - Jesús Molina
- Family Medicine Department, Centro de Salud Francia, Fuenlabrada, Madrid, Spain
| | - Myriam Calle
- Pulmonology Departament, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain.,Medicine Department, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.,Instituto de Investigación Biomédica, Hospital Clínico San Carlos (IdISSC), Madrid, Spain
| | - Luis Maiz
- Pulmonology Department, Hospital Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain
| | | | | | - Vicente Plaza
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.,Respiratory Medicine Department, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain.,Institut d'Investigació Biomédica Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), Barcelona, Spain.,Medicine Department, Facultat de Medicina, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain
| | - Antonio Valero
- Allergology Section, Pulmonology and Allergy Department, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.,Grup d'Inmunoal·lèrgia Respiratoria Clínica i Experimental (IRCE), Institut d'investigacions Biomèdiques Agustí Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain.,Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Anzueto A, Miravitlles M. Tiotropium in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease - a review of clinical development. Respir Res 2020; 21:199. [PMID: 32727455 PMCID: PMC7389564 DOI: 10.1186/s12931-020-01407-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2020] [Accepted: 05/26/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Bronchodilators are the mainstay of pharmacological treatment in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) monotherapy is recommended as initial treatment for Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) groups B, C, and D. Main body Tiotropium bromide was the first LAMA available for COPD in clinical practice and, because of its long duration of action, is administered once daily. Tiotropium was initially available as an inhalation powder delivered via a dry-powder inhaler (DPI). Later, tiotropium also became available as an inhalation spray delivered via a soft mist inhaler (SMI). The SMI was designed to overcome or minimize some of the issues associated with other inhaler types (eg, the need for strong inspiratory airflow with DPIs). Results of short- and long-term randomized, controlled clinical trials of tiotropium in patients with COPD indicated tiotropium was safe and significantly improved lung function, health-related quality of life, and exercise endurance, and reduced dyspnea, lung hyperinflation, exacerbations, and use of rescue medication compared with placebo or active comparators. These positive efficacy findings triggered the evaluation of tiotropium in fixed-dose combination with olodaterol (a long-acting β2-agonist). In this review, we provide an overview of studies of tiotropium for the treatment of COPD, with a focus on pivotal studies. Conclusion Tiotropium is safe and efficacious as a long-term, once-daily LAMA for the maintenance treatment of COPD and for reducing COPD exacerbations. The SMI generates a low-velocity, long-duration aerosol spray with a high fine-particle fraction, which results in marked lung drug deposition. In addition, high inspiratory flow rates are not required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Anzueto
- Internal Medicine, Pulmonary Disease, University of Texas Health, and South Texas Veterans Health Care System, San Antonio, TX, USA.
| | - Marc Miravitlles
- Pneumology Department, Hospital Universitary Vall d'Hebron/Vall d'Hebron Research Institute (VHIR). CIBER de Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES), Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Moore D. Management of COPD exacerbations: pharmacotherapeutics of medications. BRITISH JOURNAL OF NURSING (MARK ALLEN PUBLISHING) 2020; 29:738-743. [PMID: 32649242 DOI: 10.12968/bjon.2020.29.13.738] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is widely established as a health challenge, with predictions that it will be the third leading cause of global mortality and reduced health status within the next 10 years. Exacerbations of COPD are now the second largest cause of emergency hospitalisation in the UK. The respiratory clinical nurse specialist has an active role in the acute management of COPD exacerbations in the hospital setting, and it is essential that prescribing decisions are made based on the best available evidence. This article critically evaluates the pharmacotherapeutics and evidence base for the use of two medications, salbutamol and amoxicillin, in treating unstable COPD, and discusses implications for clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Moore
- Respiratory Nurse Specialist and Independent Nurse Prescriber, Mater Hospital, Belfast
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
COVID-19: Time to embrace MDI+ valved-holding chambers! J Allergy Clin Immunol 2020; 146:331. [PMID: 32482527 PMCID: PMC7242949 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2020.04.046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2020] [Revised: 04/25/2020] [Accepted: 04/30/2020] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
|
47
|
Ramadan WH, Sarkis A, Aderian SS, Milane A. Asthma and COPD Patients' Perception of Appropriate Metered-Dose Inhaler Technique. Dose Response 2020; 18:1559325820917832. [PMID: 32284704 PMCID: PMC7139180 DOI: 10.1177/1559325820917832] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2019] [Revised: 03/09/2020] [Accepted: 03/11/2020] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives: Asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are chronic illnesses
of the airways affecting a good number of people in Lebanon and the Middle
East. Pressurized metered-dose inhalers (pMDIs) are important drug delivery
systems used to treat such pulmonary diseases. Drugs proven to be valuable
and effective may fail to act effectively if such inhalers are used
incorrectly. The purpose of this study was to assess the technical use of
pMDIs by patients with pulmonary diseases presenting to the community
pharmacies in Lebanon. Methods: A structured questionnaire was developed to collect data. A total of 601
patients using drugs delivered through pMDIs and presenting to 12 Lebanese
community pharmacies were recruited to participate in the research project.
The questionnaire items were divided into 3 subscales: subscale 1—assessing
the device preparation; subscale 2—investigating the device use; and
subscale 3—examining the knowledge and use of spacers. After confirming the
reliability and validity of the survey tool, patients’ responses were
analyzed and compared according to many variables. Results: Many patients answered inaccurately to questions assessing both the device
preparation and use. Around 40% of patients said they do not coordinate the
inhalation with pressing the canister down. The mean scores were 1.72 (±
0.73) over 6 and 5.67 (± 1.44) over 7 for subscales 1 and 2, respectively.
The mean total score on all questions was 7.39 over 13, with a standard
deviation of 1.75. While patients’ age did not impact the results,
asthmatic, well-educated, male patients had fewer wrong answers when it
comes to preparing and using the device (P < .01). Conclusions: Our study showed that many patients with asthma and COPD might not be
properly using their pMDIs. Appropriate inhaler use is crucial for
successful pulmonary disease management. As pMDIs are one of the most
difficult devices to use, proper and tailored instructions should be given
to patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wijdan H Ramadan
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, School of Pharmacy, Lebanese American University, Byblos, Lebanon
| | - Aline Sarkis
- School of Pharmacy, Lebanese American University, Byblos, Lebanon
| | | | - Aline Milane
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, Lebanese American University, Byblos, Lebanon
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Dorinsky P, DePetrillo P, DeAngelis K, Trivedi R, Darken P, Gillen M. Relative Bioavailability of Budesonide/Glycopyrrolate/Formoterol Fumarate Metered Dose Inhaler Administered With and Without a Spacer: Results of a Phase I, Randomized, Crossover Trial in Healthy Adults. Clin Ther 2020; 42:634-648. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2020.02.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2019] [Revised: 02/04/2020] [Accepted: 02/14/2020] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
|
49
|
Ju Y, Cortez‐Jugo C, Chen J, Wang T, Mitchell AJ, Tsantikos E, Bertleff‐Zieschang N, Lin Y, Song J, Cheng Y, Mettu S, Rahim MA, Pan S, Yun G, Hibbs ML, Yeo LY, Hagemeyer CE, Caruso F. Engineering of Nebulized Metal-Phenolic Capsules for Controlled Pulmonary Deposition. ADVANCED SCIENCE (WEINHEIM, BADEN-WURTTEMBERG, GERMANY) 2020; 7:1902650. [PMID: 32195089 PMCID: PMC7080547 DOI: 10.1002/advs.201902650] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2019] [Revised: 11/21/2019] [Indexed: 05/07/2023]
Abstract
Particle-based pulmonary delivery has great potential for delivering inhalable therapeutics for local or systemic applications. The design of particles with enhanced aerodynamic properties can improve lung distribution and deposition, and hence the efficacy of encapsulated inhaled drugs. This study describes the nanoengineering and nebulization of metal-phenolic capsules as pulmonary carriers of small molecule drugs and macromolecular drugs in lung cell lines, a human lung model, and mice. Tuning the aerodynamic diameter by increasing the capsule shell thickness (from ≈100 to 200 nm in increments of ≈50 nm) through repeated film deposition on a sacrificial template allows precise control of capsule deposition in a human lung model, corresponding to a shift from the alveolar region to the bronchi as aerodynamic diameter increases. The capsules are biocompatible and biodegradable, as assessed following intratracheal administration in mice, showing >85% of the capsules in the lung after 20 h, but <4% remaining after 30 days without causing lung inflammation or toxicity. Single-cell analysis from lung digests using mass cytometry shows association primarily with alveolar macrophages, with >90% of capsules remaining nonassociated with cells. The amenability to nebulization, capacity for loading, tunable aerodynamic properties, high biocompatibility, and biodegradability make these capsules attractive for controlled pulmonary delivery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yi Ju
- ARC Centre of Excellence in Convergent Bio‐Nano Science and Technology, and the Department of Chemical EngineeringThe University of MelbourneParkvilleVictoria3010Australia
| | - Christina Cortez‐Jugo
- ARC Centre of Excellence in Convergent Bio‐Nano Science and Technology, and the Department of Chemical EngineeringThe University of MelbourneParkvilleVictoria3010Australia
| | - Jingqu Chen
- ARC Centre of Excellence in Convergent Bio‐Nano Science and Technology, and the Department of Chemical EngineeringThe University of MelbourneParkvilleVictoria3010Australia
| | - Ting‐Yi Wang
- Nanobiotechnology LaboratoryAustralian Centre for Blood DiseasesCentral Clinical SchoolMonash UniversityMelbourneVictoria3004Australia
| | - Andrew J. Mitchell
- Department of Chemical EngineeringMaterials Characterisation and Fabrication PlatformThe University of MelbourneParkvilleVictoria3010Australia
| | - Evelyn Tsantikos
- Department of Immunology and PathologyCentral Clinical SchoolMonash UniversityMelbourneVictoria3004Australia
| | - Nadja Bertleff‐Zieschang
- ARC Centre of Excellence in Convergent Bio‐Nano Science and Technology, and the Department of Chemical EngineeringThe University of MelbourneParkvilleVictoria3010Australia
| | - Yu‐Wei Lin
- Monash Biomedicine InstituteDepartment of MicrobiologyMonash UniversityClaytonVictoria3800Australia
| | - Jiaying Song
- ARC Centre of Excellence in Convergent Bio‐Nano Science and Technology, and the Department of Chemical EngineeringThe University of MelbourneParkvilleVictoria3010Australia
| | - Yizhe Cheng
- ARC Centre of Excellence in Convergent Bio‐Nano Science and Technology, and the Department of Chemical EngineeringThe University of MelbourneParkvilleVictoria3010Australia
| | - Srinivas Mettu
- School of Chemistry and the Department of Chemical EngineeringThe University of MelbourneParkvilleVictoria3010Australia
| | - Md. Arifur Rahim
- ARC Centre of Excellence in Convergent Bio‐Nano Science and Technology, and the Department of Chemical EngineeringThe University of MelbourneParkvilleVictoria3010Australia
| | - Shuaijun Pan
- ARC Centre of Excellence in Convergent Bio‐Nano Science and Technology, and the Department of Chemical EngineeringThe University of MelbourneParkvilleVictoria3010Australia
| | - Gyeongwon Yun
- ARC Centre of Excellence in Convergent Bio‐Nano Science and Technology, and the Department of Chemical EngineeringThe University of MelbourneParkvilleVictoria3010Australia
| | - Margaret L. Hibbs
- Department of Immunology and PathologyCentral Clinical SchoolMonash UniversityMelbourneVictoria3004Australia
| | - Leslie Y. Yeo
- Micro/Nanophysics Research LaboratorySchool of EngineeringRMIT UniversityMelbourneVictoria3001Australia
| | - Christoph E. Hagemeyer
- Nanobiotechnology LaboratoryAustralian Centre for Blood DiseasesCentral Clinical SchoolMonash UniversityMelbourneVictoria3004Australia
| | - Frank Caruso
- ARC Centre of Excellence in Convergent Bio‐Nano Science and Technology, and the Department of Chemical EngineeringThe University of MelbourneParkvilleVictoria3010Australia
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
A comparative analysis of changes in pMDI drug dose delivery before and after detergent coating using five antistatic valved holding chambers. THE JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY-IN PRACTICE 2020; 8:1124-1125.e4. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2019.09.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2019] [Revised: 09/16/2019] [Accepted: 09/19/2019] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
|