Evaluation of the efficacy of cisplatin-etoposide and the role of thoracic radiotherapy and prophylactic cranial irradiation in LCNEC

Clinical characteristics and treatment management of combined large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma, a subtype of large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma

Combined large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (CLCNEC) is a rare neuroendocrine carcinoma, accounting for approximately 10% of large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC). Mainly composed of coexisting adenocarcinoma components, with strong invasiveness and poor prognosis. The treatment regimen for CLCNEC mainly refers to complete surgical resection as the first choice in the early stage, while patients with stage II or higher require adjuvant treatment. At present, research on CLCNEC is mostly small sample and retrospective, and there is no consensus on whether molecular typing and treatment should be carried out. There is considerable controversy over whether it should be managed as small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) or non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Therefore, in order to solve the problem of confusion in the selection of treatment regimens for CLCNEC, while also considering the therapeutic effects, this article summarizes and analyzes previous studies, fully seeks evidence, and boldly proposes new therapeutic insights: the etoposide-platinum (EP) regimen serves as the basis for adjuvant therapy; In addition, SCLC/NSCLC-CLCNEC can be distinguished based on presence of RB1 and TP53 co-mutation, and targeted therapy or NSCLC type chemotherapy including platinum + gemcitabine or taxanes (NSCLC-GEM/TAX) can be used in combination or sequentially for NSCLC-CLCNEC.

Combined large‑cell neuroendocrine carcinoma and small‑cell lung cancer: A case report

Combined large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) and small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is extremely rare, with only a few reports available in the literature. An accurate diagnosis is difficult to make due to the overlapping clinical features between LCNEC and SCLC, and a standardized treatment option is lacking. A 53-year-old female patient was admitted to Xiaoshan Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University (Hangzhou, China) due to symptoms of dyspnea and phlegm, with blood in the sputum. Computed tomography revealed a 52×32×26-mm irregular soft-tissue mass in the left upper lung. Pathological examination of the biopsy specimen showed a poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma with compression injury, consistent with a mixed type of large and small cell carcinoma. The patient was administered chemotherapy, radiotherapy and targeted therapy, and as of October 2023, the patient had a survival period of 29 months. LCNEC combined with SCLC is a sporadic tumor with a high potential for malignancy. Multidisciplinary treatment and close follow-up are recommended. The multidisciplinary treatment strategy used in the present study is expected to help inform future therapeutic decisions.

Efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors in lung large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma

Background

Lung large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (L-LCNEC) is a rare and highly aggressive neuroendocrine tumor. There is currently no standard therapeutic regimen, and systemic chemotherapy results in poor prognosis. Due to the rarity of L-LCNEC, the efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) remain unclear.

Methods

This study included 34 L-LCNEC patients administered ICIs at Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, from February 6, 2018 to February 6, 2023. The treatment responses were evaluated. Fisher's exact test was used to compare categorical variables, and the Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival analyses. Cox regression was used for multivariate analysis.

Results

The objective response rate (ORR) of 34 patients was 29.4%, the disease control rate (DCR) was 82.4%, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 6.30 months, and the median overall survival (OS) was 14.77 months. The ORRs of combined LCNEC (n=7) and pure LCNEC (n=27) were 14.3% and 33.3%; the DCRs were 100% and 77.8%; the median PFSs were 12.48 and 5.6 months (P=0.032); and the median OSs were 21.27 and 14.73 months, respectively (P=0.233). The observed incidence of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) was 61.8%, primarily occurring in grades 1/2 (58.8%) and grade 3 (5.9%). Elevated aminotransferases (14.7%), pneumonia (8.8%), and fatigue (8.8%) were the most common irAEs.

Conclusions

ICIs treatment showed efficacy and safety in advanced L-LCNEC, with the potential for greater benefits in the combined LCNEC subtype.

Lung Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma: A Population-Based Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUNDS

Pulmonary large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) is a rarely high-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma of the lung with features of both small cell and non-small cell lung cancer. In this study, we aim to construct a prognostic nomogram that integrates the clinical features and treatment options to predict disease-specific survival (DSS).

METHODS

A total of 713 patients diagnosed with LCNEC were from the US National Cancer Institute's Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) registry between 2010-2016. Cox proportional hazards analysis was conducted to choose the significant predictors of DSS. External validation was performed using 77 patients with LCNEC in the West China Hospital Sichuan University between 2010-2018. The predictive accuracy and discriminative capability were estimated by the concordance index (C-index), calibration curve, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. The clinical applicability of the nomogram was verified through the decision curve analysis (DCA). Additionally, we conducted a subgroup analysis of data available in the external cohort that may impact prognosis but was not recorded in the SEER database.

RESULTS

Six independent risk factors for DSS were identified and integrated into the nomogram. The nomogram achieved good C- indexes of 0.803 and 0.767 in the training and validation group, respectively. Moreover, the calibration curves for the probability of survival showed good agreement between prediction by nomogram and actual observation in 1-, 3- and 5-year DSS. The ROC curves demonstrated the prediction accuracy of the established nomogram (all Area Under Curve (AUC) > 0.8). DCA exhibited the favorable clinical applicability of the nomogram in the prediction of LCNEC survival. A risk classification system was built which could perfectly classify LCNEC patients into high-, medium- and low-risk groups (p < 0.001). The survival analysis conducted on the West China Hospital cohort indicated that whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT), prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI), surgical procedures, tumor grade, Ki-67, and PD-L1 expression were not significantly associated with DSS.

CONCLUSION

This study has effectively developed a prognostic nomogram and a corresponding risk stratification system, which demonstrate promising potential for predicting the DSS of patients with LCNEC.

The prognosis analysis of organ metastatic patterns in lung large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma: A population-based study

Lung large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) is a rare and highly aggressive malignancy with a dismal prognosis. This study was designed to depict patterns of distant organ metastatic and to analyze prognosis of LCNEC patients. We gathered data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database between 2010 and 2015. We conducted the Kaplan-Meier method to calculate overall survival (OS) and compare different variables. Cox proportional hazards regression models in univariate and multivariate analyses were employed to further explore prognostic factors. A total of 1335 LCNEC patients were eventually selected from the SEER database, of which 348 patients (26.0%) had single organ metastasis and 197 patients (14.8%) had multiple metastases. Our study indicates that patients with single organ metastasis generally have a poor prognosis, with a median OS of 8 months for both lung and brain metastasis with 1-year survival rates of 33% and 29% respectively. Patients with multiple metastases exhibited the worst prognosis, with a median OS of only 4 months and a 1-year OS of 8%. Multivariate analysis revealed that age, T stage, N stage, chemotherapy and radiation in metastatic patients were independently associated with OS. In conclusion, LCNEC exhibits a high metastatic rate when diagnosed. The most common metastatic organ is the brain in single-site metastatic patients. Patients with single or multiple metastases exhibit a significantly worse prognosis than those with non-organ metastases. In the group of single organ metastases, patients with brain and lung metastases had a better prognosis than those with bone and liver metastases.

Pulmonary Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma

Pulmonary large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) is a rare subtype of malignant pulmonary tumor. The incidence rate of LCNEC was reported to be 0.3%–3% in lung cancers. Although LCNEC is classified as non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), it is more aggressive and malignant than other NSCLC, and its biological behavior is similar to that of small cell lung cancer (SCLC). Most of the LCNEC patients are elderly smoking male and the clinical manifestations are not specific. The imaging manifestations of the tumors are often located in the periphery and the upper lobes, and the enlargement of mediastinal or hilar lymph nodes is common. The diagnosis is mainly based on pathology by the histological features and immunohistochemistry (IHC). Specific neuroendocrine markers such as chromogranin A (CgA), synaptophysin (Syn) and CD56 are usually diffusely positive in LCNEC, and found that insulinoma-associated protein (INSM1) and high rate of Ki-67 are helpful for diagnosis. More differential diagnoses also increase the difficulty of correctly diagnosing LCNEC. The rise of LCNEC molecular typing in recent years may be helpful for diagnosis and subsequent treatment. This review focuses on the epidemiological features, imaging studies, pathology, diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of LCNEC.

Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of the Lung: Current Understanding and Challenges

Large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the lung (LCNEC) is a rare and highly aggressive type of lung cancer, with a complex biology that shares similarities with both small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) and non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The prognosis of LCNEC is poor, with a median overall survival of 8-12 months. The diagnosis of LCNEC requires the identification of neuroendocrine morphology and the expression of at least one of the neuroendocrine markers (chromogranin A, synaptophysin or CD56). In the last few years, the introduction of next-generation sequencing allowed the identification of molecular subtypes of LCNEC, with prognostic and potential therapeutic implications: one subtype is similar to SCLC (SCLC-like), while the other is similar to NSCLC (NSCLC-like). Because of LCNEC rarity, most evidence comes from small retrospective studies and treatment strategies that are extrapolated from those adopted in patients with SCLC and NSCLC. Nevertheless, limited but promising data about targeted therapies and immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with LCNEC are emerging. LCNEC clinical management is still controversial and standardized treatment strategies are currently lacking. The aim of this manuscript is to review clinical and molecular data about LCNEC to better understand the optimal management and the potential prognostic and therapeutic implications of molecular subtypes.

The Role of Conventionally Fractionated Radiotherapy and Stereotactic Radiotherapy in the Treatment of Carcinoid Tumors and Large-Cell Neuroendocrine Cancer of the Lung

The occurrence of neuroendocrine tumors among the diagnosed neoplasms is extremely rare and is associated with difficulties in undertaking effective therapy due to the histopathological differentiation of individual subtypes and the scarce clinical data and recommendations found in the literature. The choice of treatment largely depends not only on its type, but also on the location and production of excess hormones by the tumor itself. Common therapeutic approaches include surgical removal of the tumor, the use of chemotherapy, targeted drug therapy, peptide receptor radionuclide therapy, and the use of radiation therapy. This article reviews the current knowledge on the classification and application of radiotherapy in the treatment of lung NETs. Case reports were presented in which treatment with conventional radiotherapy, radical and palliative radiochemotherapy, as well as stereotactic fractionated radiotherapy in the treatment of typical (TC) and atypical (AT) lung carcinoids and large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNC) were used. We hope that the solutions presented in the literature will allow many radiation oncologists to make the best, often personalized decisions about the therapeutic qualifications of patients.

Management of Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) is a rare, aggressive cancer with a dismal prognosis. The majority of cases occur in the lung and the gastrointestinal tract; however, it can occur throughout the body. Recently advances in the understanding of the molecular underpinnings of this disease have paved the way for additional novel promising therapies. This review will discuss the current best evidence for management of LCNEC and new directions in the classification and treatment of this rare disease.

METHODS

We performed a PubMed search for "Large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma" and "High grade neuroendocrine carcinoma." All titles were screened for relevance to the management of LCNEC. Papers were included based on relevance to the management of LCNEC.

RESULTS

Papers were included reviewing both pulmonary and extra pulmonary LCNEC. We summarized the data driven best practices for the management of both early and advanced stage LCNEC. We describe emerging therapies with promising potential.

DISCUSSION

LCNEC are rare and aggressive neoplasms. In advanced disease, the historical regimen of platinum based therapy in combination with etoposide or irinotecan remains among the commonly used first line therapies, however for extra thoracic LCNEC regimens like FOLFOX, FOLFOIRI and CAPTEM can also be used. Further effective and safe treatment options are desperately needed. Recently, new advances including a new understanding of the genetic subcategories of LCNEC and immunotherapy agents may guide further treatments.

Survival and prognosis of lung large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma

INTRODUCTION

Only a few large-scale studies have focused on large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma, a rare type of pulmonary malignancy, and uniform diagnostic criteria and standardized treatments are lacking. This study aimed to assess the treatment outcomes and factors influencing patients' prognosis with large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma.

METHODS

The data of 55 patients with pathologically confirmed large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma, treated at our hospital from January 2013 to January 2018, were collected. Relationships between clinical characteristics, diagnoses, treatment outcomes, and prognoses were retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

Patients were followed for a median of 18.5 (0.5-41.0) months. Thirty-four patients died before the final follow-up, resulting in a median overall survival of 17.9 (0.5-36.0) months, with 1-, 2-, and 3-year survival rates of 69.1%, 23.6%, and 1.8%, respectively. Single-factor analysis identified gender (P=0.036), smoking history (P=0.008), obstructive atelectasis (P=0.032), regional lymph node metastasis (P=0.020), and treatment selection (P=0.000) as factors influencing overall survival. Multifactor analysis identified treatment selection as an independent survival prognostic factor. Particularly, significant differences were observed between the combination therapies (surgery+chemotherapy, surgery+radiotherapy, surgery+radiotherapy+chemotherapy, and concurrent chemoradiotherapy) and single-therapy approaches (chemotherapy or radiotherapy alone; P<0.001), but not among the combination therapies (P=0.216).

DISCUSSION

Male patients with large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma with a history of smoking, obstructive atelectasis, and regional lymph node metastasis have a particularly poor prognosis. Our observation of the treatment approach as an independent survival prognostic factor suggests that combination therapies may yield survival benefits to patients.

Activity and Immune Correlates of Programmed Death-1 Blockade Therapy in Patients With Advanced Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of anti-programmed death receptor 1 (PD-1) therapy in patients with large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) remains unclear. We investigated the outcome of anti-PD-1 therapy and its predictive markers by evaluating the immune-related tumor microenvironment.

PATIENTS

We retrospectively reviewed patients with advanced LCNEC treated with systemic chemotherapy. We also evaluated PD ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression (clone: 22C3), CD8-positive tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), and the mutational profiles.

RESULTS

Seventy patients were enrolled, and 13 of 70 patients received anti-PD-1 therapy. The progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR) of the anti-PD-1 therapy were 4.2 months and 39%, respectively. The overall survival of patients treated with anti-PD-1 therapy (n = 13) was significantly better than those treated without anti-PD-1 therapy (n = 57) (25.2 months vs 10.9 months; P = .02). Among the 13 patients treated with anti-PD-1 therapy, 10 patients (90%) had PD-L1-negative tumors. Patients with a high density of tumoral CD8-positive TILs (≥38/mm²) had a significantly better ORR and PFS than those with a low density of tumoral CD8-positive TILs (ORR: P = .02; PFS: P = .003). Additionally, all 3 patients with TP53 mutation co-occurring with PIK3CA mutation (2 of 8 patients) or RB1 mutation (1 of 8 patients) responded to anti-PD-1 therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Anti-PD-1 therapy was effective regardless of PD-L1 positivity in patients with advanced LCNEC. Our investigation might suggest that the density of tumoral CD8-positive TILs and the presence of co-occurring mutations are predictors of the efficacy of anti-PD-1 therapy in patients with advanced LCNEC.

Outcomes for localized treatment of large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the lung in the United States

Background

Treatment paradigms for large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) of the lung are based largely upon small retrospective studies and smaller prospective trials. It is unclear if these tumors behave like non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) or small cell lung cancer (SCLC). Data are lacking with regard to the role of radiotherapy (RT). U. S. guidelines recommend that LCNEC be treated as a NSCLC. We sought to perform a cross-sectional study of LCNEC cases to understand treatment paradigms and outcomes in this disease.

Methods

The Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database was queried for cases of stage I-III pulmonary LCNEC diagnosed 2004-2013. Treatment groups were defined as no surgery, RT alone, surgery alone, and surgery + RT. The Cox-proportional hazards regression model was used to compare overall survival and cause-specific survival (OS/CSS), stratified by AJCC 6th Staging. Factors that were significant on univariable analysis were included in multivariable analysis.

Results

We identified 1,523 cases of LCNEC, with 748, 177, and 598 cases of stage I, II, and III disease, respectively. In stage I and II disease, RT was associated with improved survival for non-surgical patients, but not for those who underwent surgery. In stage I disease, the adjusted hazard ratios for OS for RT alone, surgery, and surgery + RT were 0.39, 0.21, and 0.22, respectively (P<0.001). In stage II disease, the adjusted hazard ratios for RT alone, surgery, and surgery + RT were 0.51 (P=0.15), 0.39 (P=0.004), and 0.38 (P=0.01), respectively. For patients with stage III disease, RT was associated with improved survival in surgical and non-surgical patients. The adjusted hazard ratios for RT alone, surgery, and surgery + RT were 0.49, 0.43, and 0.36, respectively (P<0.001).

Conclusions

Our findings indicate that non-metastatic LCNEC may be treated as a NSCLC with respect to RT. Prospective studies are necessary to increase our understanding of optimal treatment regimens.

Anterior mediastinal large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma with elevated AFP: A case report and review

Large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) is a rare and aggressive cancer that typically presents in the lung. The current case report describes a 56 year old male who presented to Strong Memorial Hospital with progressive dyspnea and was revealed to have a large anterior mediastinal tumor with metastases to axillary, hilar and mediastinal lymph nodes. Tumor marker results revealed an elevated plasma level of α-fetoprotein (AFP), which initially pointed towards a diagnosis of teratoma, but the tumor stained positive for neuroendocrine markers CD56, chromogranin, and synaptophysin on biopsy, consistent with LCNEC. AFP-positive tumor cells were identified, and no alternate cause for the elevated AFP was identified. The patient underwent genetic testing revealing the tumor to be ALK, ROS1, KRAS, BRAF and EGFR wild type. The patient received 6 cycles of chemotherapy with cisplatin (80 mg/m²) and etoposide (100 mg/m²) and then radiation with an initial minor response. The patients course was complicated by the development of superior vena cava syndrome requiring emergency stenting. The results of the current case suggest that AFP may be worthy of further exploration as a potential tumor marker in LCNEC.

Prognostic impact of peripheral blood neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio in advanced-stage pulmonary large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma and its association with the immune-related tumour microenvironment

Background

The prognostic value of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) with large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) patients remains unclear. Thus, we performed a retrospective study to examine the relationship between the pretreatment NLR and clinical outcome in advanced LCNEC patients and the impact of the immune-related tumour microenvironment (TME).

Methods

This retrospective study included 63 advanced LCNEC patients who had received chemotherapy. We collected clinical data and investigated the TME status (CD4, CD8, CD20 and FOXP3).

Results

The overall survival of the patients with a low NLR (<5) was significantly longer than those with a high NLR (≥5) (14.9 vs. 5.2 months; p < 0.001). A multivariate analysis identified a high NLR as a predictor of a poor prognosis (HR, 3.43; 95% CI, 1.73–6.79; p < 0.001). The NLR was inversely correlated with tumoural and stromal CD8-positive tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes (tumoural: r = −0.648, p = 0.005, stromal: r = −0.490, p = 0.046).

Conclusions

A high NLR was associated with a poor prognosis in advanced LCNEC patients. Our study revealed that the NLR can reflect the TME, at least in part, suggesting that the NLR plays an important role not only as a clinical outcome predictor but also as a tumour immune status indicator.

Pulmonary Large-Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma: Therapeutic Challenges and Opportunities

Pulmonary large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (P-LCNEC) is a rare, poorly differentiated, non-small cell malignancy within the spectrum of neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) of the lung. Despite sharing several similarities with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) in their clinical, immunohistopathological, genomic, and prognostic features, it is a distinct and biologically heterogeneous entity with challenging diagnostic and therapeutic requirements. Given the lack of prospective, randomized data to guide management, it is common practice to pursue thoracic surgery for resectable tumors according to the guidelines for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and implement systemic chemotherapy as early as at stage I, similar to the treatment of SCLC. However, important issues, such as the optimal timing and combination of therapeutic modalities, the most effective type of chemotherapy for advanced-stage disease, and the benefit from prophylactic cranial irradiation, remain debated. Accumulating evidence from retrospective, molecular profiling studies supports the existence of at least two P-LCNEC subtypes, most notably a SCLC-like and a NSCLC-like phenotype, which presumably underlie the observed differential sensitivity to platinum-based regimens and warrant further validation as predictive biomarkers of efficacy. Furthermore, several potentially actionable, driver molecular alterations have been identified, offering implications for personalized treatment approaches, including targeted therapies and immunotherapy. The current review discusses open questions on the diagnosis and management of P-LCNEC, as well as recent advances in its genomic and transcriptomic characterization that create promising therapeutic opportunities.

Temozolomide Combined With Capecitabine In The Treatment Of Mixed Neuroendocrine Carcinoma Of The Lung With Poor Tolerance After Repeated Radiochemotherapy: A Case Report And Literature Review

The incidence of lung neuroendocrine carcinomas, which originate from lung neuroendocrine cells, is 1.35/100,000, among which mixed neuroendocrine carcinomas are very rare. Because of the heterogeneity and significant differences in sensitivity to treatments, there is no effective treatment, and the prognosis is poor. In this article, we report the diagnosis and treatment of a case of mixed neuroendocrine carcinoma of the lung in our hospital. During the treatment, the patients had significant myelosuppression after initial chemotherapy, but benefited from oral chemotherapy consisting of a combination of capecitabine and temozolomide (CAPTEM). The report was approved by the affiliated Cancer Hospital of Shandong University.

Double-edged role of radiotherapy in patients with pulmonary large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma

Purpose: Pulmonary large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) is classified as non-small-cell lung cancer, but has characteristics similar to small-cell lung cancer. This study was performed to evaluate the effect of surgery and radiotherapy on patients with LCNEC. Materials and Methods: We analyzed 1,619 patients with stage I-III LCNEC, identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database, diagnosed from 2000 to 2013. The Kaplan-Meier analysis and the Cox proportional hazard model were used to study patient prognosis. Results: Overall, 869 (53.7%) stage I LCNEC patients, 203 (12.5%) stage II patients, and 547 (33.8%) stage III patients were included in the analysis. Various surgery types were all associated with higher overall survival (OS) and lung cancer-specific survival (LCSS) than no surgery, with the following HRs: 0.334 (OS) and 0.279 (LCSS) for lobectomy, 0.468 (OS) and 0.416 (LCSS) for partial/wedge/segmental resection, and 0.593 (OS) and 0.522 (LCSS) for pneumonectomy (all p < 0.05). OS and LCSS of stage I and II LCNEC patients were not improved by radiotherapy (stage I: OS p = 0.719, LCSS p = 0.557; stage II: OS p = 0.136, LCSS p = 0.697). However, in stage III patients, radiotherapy significantly improved both OS and LCSS (p < 0.001). Following multivariate analysis, increased age, male patients, radiotherapy and diagnosed at stage II or III were all independent risk factors for LCNEC (all p < 0.05). Conclusion: Lobectomy had the best outcome for OS and LCSS in stage I-II LCNEC. For stage III LCNEC patients, radiotherapy can significantly improve survival time. However, in LCNEC patients undergoing surgery, radiotherapy may reduce survival time.

Large-Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of the Lung: A Population-Based Study

INTRODUCTION

Large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) accounts for approximately 3% of lung malignancies. There are limited data on the epidemiology and best treatment practices for this malignancy. This study aimed to be the largest cohort with the most up-to-date analysis of the epidemiology of LCNEC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database was queried to identify cases of LCNEC diagnosed from 2010 through 2015, reflecting years the American Joint Committee on Cancer 7th edition staging system was in use. Using these data, we compared the epidemiology, demographics, clinical characteristics, and survival times of LCNEC with small-cell lung carcinoma (SCLC) and non-SCLC (NSCLC). Trends in incidence and mortality were recorded from 2004 to 2015.

RESULTS

A total of 195,148 cases of lung cancer, including 1681 (0.9%) cases of LCNEC, were analyzed. LCNEC was more common among male subjects, and disease usually presented at stage IV (55%). Brain metastasis occurred more frequently in LCNEC (19.2%) than SCLC (16.7%, P < .001) or NSCLC (13%, P < .001). Incidence increased by 0.011 people per 100,000 per year, primarily of stage IV disease. Annual mortality from LCNEC doubled over the time period studied. Survival in patients with stage I-III LCNEC mirrored survival trends of patients with NSCLC, whereas stage IV LCNEC behaved similarly to SCLC.

CONCLUSION

LCNEC generally presents at more advanced stages than NSCLC but earlier than SCLC. Stage I-III LCNEC behaves similarly to NSCLC, whereas stage IV is more akin to SCLC. LCNEC incidence is increasing. Despite this, it remains poorly studied and did not demonstrate an improved prognosis in our cohort.

Lung Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma: An Analysis of Patients from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End-Results (SEER) Database

Background

The aim of this study was to assess the incidence, clinicopathologic characteristics, prognostic factors, and treatment outcomes in lung large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC).

Material/Methods

Patients diagnosed with lung LCNEC between 2000 and 2013 were identified using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End-Results database. Kaplan–Meier methods and univariate and multivariate analyses were used for statistical analysis.

Results

A total of 2097 patients were identified. The total age-adjusted incidence rate of lung LCNEC was 0.3/100 000, with a rise in incidence over the study period. The 5-year lung cancer-specific survival (LCSS) and overall survival (OS) were 20.7% and 16.7%, respectively. Multivariate analysis indicated that age ≥65 years, male sex, advanced tumor stage, advanced nodal stage, not undergoing surgery. and not undergoing chemotherapy were independent adverse indicators for survival outcomes. After stratification by tumor stage, undergoing surgery was associated with more favorable LCSS and OS compared with those without surgery, regardless of tumor stage.

Conclusions

LCNEC is a rare lung cancer subtype with a dismal prognosis. Primary surgical treatment has significant survival benefits, even for stage IV patients. The optimal treatment strategies for lung LCNEC require further investigation.

Management of brain metastases from large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the lung: improved outcomes with radiosurgery

OBJECTIVES

Large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) of the lung is a rare pulmonary tumor, having similar natural history and management strategy as small cell lung cancer. Therefore, the management of brain metastases in these patients has mirrored that of SCLC through the use of whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT). We used the National Cancer Database (NCDB) to look at predictors of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and any potential differences in outcomes for patients with brain metastases from LCNEC.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We queried the NCDB from 2004 to 2015 for patients with LCNEC of the lung with brain metastases that received brain radiation. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed to identify factors predictive of SRS use and overall survival (OS). Propensity-adjusted Cox proportional hazard ratios for survival were used to account for indication bias.

RESULTS

Out of 9970 patients with LCNEC of the lung we identified 348 with brain metastases. Sixty-eight patients were treated with upfront SRS and 280 were treated with WBRT. Patients that were treated at an academic facility or received chemotherapy as part of upfront treatment were more likely to receive SRS. Univariable analysis revealed improved outcomes with SRS compared to WBRT, with a median OS of 11 months compared to 6 months, respectively (p = .007). Multivariable Cox regression with propensity score confirmed SRS to have improved survival (HR: 0.68, 95%CI: 0.51-0.91, p = .0093). Multivariable Cox regression with propensity score also identified younger age, receipt of chemotherapy, absence of extracranial disease and non-rural locations as additional predictors of improved OS.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment of brain metastases from LCNEC of the lung with SRS was associated with improved survival. For the appropriate patients, upfront treatment of limited brain metastases with SRS may be appropriate.

Clinicopathological characteristics and prognostic factors of pulmonary large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma: A large population-based analysis

BACKGROUND

The study was conducted to compare the clinicopathological characteristics, survival outcomes, and metastatic patterns between pulmonary large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) and other non-small cell lung cancer (ONSCLC), and to identify the prognostic factors of LCNEC.

METHODS

Data of patients diagnosed with LCNEC and ONSCLC from 2004 to 2014 were obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results dataset. Pearson's chi-square tests were used to compare differences in clinicopathological characteristics. The Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival analysis. A propensity score was used for matching and a Cox proportional hazards model was used for multivariate and subgroup analyses.

RESULTS

A total of 2368 LCNEC cases and 231 672 ONSCLC cases were identified. LCNEC incidence increased slightly over time. Except for marital status, LCNEC patients had obviously different biological features to ONSCLC patients. Survival analysis showed that LCNEC had poorer outcomes than ONSCLC. Multivariate analysis revealed that female gender, black race, surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy were protective factors for LCNEC. Matched subgroup analysis further demonstrated that most subgroup factors favored ONSCLC, especially in early stage. Early-stage LCNEC patients had a higher risk of lung cancer-specific death than early-stage ONSCLC patients. Moreover, metastatic patterns were different between LCNEC and ONSCLC. LCNEC patients with isolated liver metastasis or combined invasion to other organs had poorer survival rates.

CONCLUSIONS

LCNEC has totally different clinicopathological characteristics and metastatic patterns to ONSCLC. LCNEC also has poorer survival outcomes, primarily because of isolated liver metastasis or combined invasion to other organs. Most subgroup factors are adverse factors for LCNEC.

Treatment outcomes and incidence of brain metastases in pulmonary large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma

INTRODUCTION

Large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) is a rare type of high-grade pulmonary neuroendocrine tumor. The study objective is to investigate its survival outcomes, incidence of brain metastases, and patterns of recurrence.

METHODS

This is a single center study of patients with pathologic diagnosis of pulmonary LCNEC. Patient data were collected retrospectively and analyzed, including survival, incidence of brain metastases, and patterns of recurrence.

RESULTS

Of 87 patients (stages I: 24, II: 14, III: 23, IV: 26), 52 were managed curatively and 35 palliatively. The median follow-up time was 17.3 months (range 0.6-89.5) for those treated with curative intent and 7.0 months (range 0.1-28.6) for those treated palliatively. The 2- and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates are 48.4% and 25.5% for the curative group, with a median OS of 13.5 months. In the palliative group, the OS are 30.8% at 1 year and 6.8% at 2 years, with a median OS of 7.0 months. Thirty-eight of 52 (73%) patients treated with curative intent had disease relapse, with the common sites being regional lymph nodes (20), brain (18), bones (11), and liver (9). The incidence of brain recurrence among those managed curatively are 21.4% and 41.3%, respectively at 1 and 2 years. Of 18 patients experiencing brain metastases, 14 developed them as part of a first relapse.

CONCLUSIONS

LCNEC's survival outcomes are poor. The incidence of brain metastases is higher than what is observed for other types of nonsmall cell lung cancers. Prophylactic cranial irradiation should be investigated as a means of improving outcomes.