1
|
Meyer C, Scarinci N, Lind C, Tulloch K, Atkins J, Hickson L. Implementation science challenges: hearing care professionals identify barriers to clinical research. Int J Audiol 2024; 63:63-68. [PMID: 36384381 DOI: 10.1080/14992027.2022.2142162] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2022] [Accepted: 10/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Conducting research in clinical settings is challenging. The aim of this study was to increase our understanding of hearing care professionals' perceptions of barriers to participating in such research. DESIGN A modified group concept mapping approach was used to gain anonymous responses from 124 hearing care professionals to the statement: "One reason why it is hard to conduct intervention research studies in my centre/practice is….". Participants were asked for reasons other than 'time' as this is universally reported as a barrier to clinical research. RESULTS A total of 107 distinct reasons were provided by participants and these were sorted into 5 clusters: "Competing demands/pressures" (18 statements), "Not a priority for management/organisation" (14 statements), "Lack of opportunity/support" (19 statements), "Clinician's knowledge, confidence, and beliefs" (24 statements), and "Recruitment/adherence to protocols is challenging" (32 statements). Identified barriers were generally similar to those reported in other healthcare settings, with unique barriers being those associated with a fear of scrutiny and lack of trust in the "academic elite". CONCLUSION Findings highlight the importance of researchers, clinicians, and clinic managers working together at all stages of the research process in order for clinical research to be successful.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carly Meyer
- School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, QLD, Australia
| | - Nerina Scarinci
- School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, QLD, Australia
| | - Christopher Lind
- College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Kristen Tulloch
- School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, QLD, Australia
- School of Health and Behavioural Sciences, University of the Sunshine Coast, Moreton Bay, Petrie, Australia
| | - Jenny Atkins
- School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, QLD, Australia
| | - Louise Hickson
- School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, QLD, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bosma AR, Boot CR, Schaap R, Schaafsma FG, Anema JR. Participatory Approach to Create a Supportive Work Environment for Employees With Chronic Conditions: A Pilot Implementation Study. J Occup Environ Med 2022; 64:665-674. [PMID: 35673259 PMCID: PMC9377494 DOI: 10.1097/jom.0000000000002557] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate a pilot implementation of an organizational-level intervention. The participatory approach (PA) was used to create a supportive work environment for employees with chronic conditions, with a key role for occupational physicians (OPs). METHODS Twenty-eight semi-structured interviews were conducted with OPs and stakeholders within their organizations. Furthermore, observational data and research notes were gathered. Data analysis occurred through content analysis. RESULTS Recruitment of organizations was challenging, with a reach of 25%. Dose delivered, dose received, and fidelity differed across the three organizations. Organizations were positive about the PA as a method to improve support for employees with chronic conditions. CONCLUSIONS The PA could be of added value for creating a supportive work environment. However, research is needed on activating organizations to improve support for employees with chronic conditions.
Collapse
|
3
|
Peterson G, Carlfjord S, Nilsing Strid E, Ask S, Jönsson M, Peolsson A. Evaluation of implementation and effectiveness of neck-specific exercise for persistent disability and pain after whiplash injury: study protocol for a randomized controlled study using a hybrid 2 design. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2022; 23:516. [PMID: 35637458 PMCID: PMC9153087 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-022-05470-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2022] [Accepted: 05/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Persistent pain and disability in whiplash-associated disorders (WAD) grades II and III are common. In two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of neck-specific exercises (NSE), we have seen promising results in chronic WAD, with a sustained clinically important reduction in pain and disability. NSE can also be delivered through internet support (NSEIT) and a few visits to a physiotherapist, saving time and cost for both patients and providers. NSE have been shown to have positive effects in other neck pain disorders and we will evaluate the diffusion of the exercises to other patients. The aims of the proposed study are to evaluate an implementation strategy for NSEIT and NSE in primary health care and to evaluate the effectiveness of NSEIT and NSE in clinical practice. Methods The proposed study is a prospective cluster-randomized mixed-design study with hybrid 2 trial design. Reg. physiotherapists working in twenty physiotherapy clinics will be included. The primary implementation outcome is proportion of patients with neck pain receiving neck-specific exercise. Secondary outcomes are; physiotherapists attitudes to implementation of evidence-based practice, their self-efficacy and confidence in performing NSEIT/NSE, number of patients visits, and use of additional or other exercises or treatment. To further evaluate the implementation strategy, two qualitative studies will be performed with a sample of the physiotherapists. The primary outcome in the patient effectiveness evaluation is self-reported neck disability according to the Neck Disability Index (NDI). Secondary outcomes are pain intensity in the neck, arm, and head; dizziness; work- and health-related issues; and patient’s improvement or deterioration over time. All measurements will be conducted at baseline and at 3 and 12 months. Physiotherapists´ self-efficacy and confidence in diagnosing and treating patients with neck pain will also be evaluated directly after their instruction in NSEIT/NSE. Discussion This trial will evaluate the implementation strategy in terms of adoption of and adherence to NSEIT and NSE in clinical primary health care, and measure diffusion of the method to other patients. In parallel, the effectiveness of the method will be evaluated. The results may guide physiotherapists and health care providers to sustainable and effective implementation of effective exercise programs. Trial registration The randomized trial is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05198258, initial release date January 20, 2022.
Collapse
|
4
|
OUP accepted manuscript. Health Promot Int 2022:6576076. [DOI: 10.1093/heapro/daac048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
5
|
Hente L, Schlesinger T. Factors influencing the implementation of workplace health promotion in companies in rural areas. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF WORKPLACE HEALTH MANAGEMENT 2021. [DOI: 10.1108/ijwhm-04-2020-0058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
PurposeWorkplace health promotion (WHP) is becoming increasingly important due to the ageing workforce and a shortage of skilled workers. Nevertheless, too few companies have reacted to the demographic change and introduced health-promoting measures. This paper aims to identify which factors influence the implementation of WHP, especially in small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in rural areas.Design/methodology/approach253 companies in a rural area in the federal state of Saxony (Germany) were surveyed using a standardised questionnaire via a computer-assisted telephone interview. Bivariate analyses and logistic regression models were carried out. The focus was on the relationship between the status of WHP and the size of the company, pressure of demographic change, health-related attitude and organisational capacity factors.FindingsIt was shown that, in addition to the control variables company size and pressure of the shortage of skilled workers, a company's attitude regarding health promotion, financial capacity and planning and development capacity has a relevant influence on the status of WHP.Practical implicationsBased on the results, targeted measures can be developed and converted to implement WHP, particularly in SMEs in rural regions. The focus should be on sensitisation, knowledge transfer and capacity development.Originality/valueThe present paper reveals the relationship between company size, pressure of demographic change, health-related attitude and organisational capacities regarding the status of health-promoting measures in SMEs in a rural region.
Collapse
|
6
|
Schaap R, Schaafsma FG, Bosma AR, Huysmans MA, Boot CRL, Anema JR. Improving the health of workers with a low socioeconomic position: Intervention Mapping as a useful method for adaptation of the Participatory Approach. BMC Public Health 2020; 20:961. [PMID: 32560709 PMCID: PMC7304135 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-020-09028-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2020] [Accepted: 06/01/2020] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Workers with a low socioeconomic position (SEP) have a higher risk for health problems and premature dropout from the workforce. Unfavorable working conditions and unhealthy behaviors are more prevalent among this group of workers. The Participatory Approach (PA), is an evidence-based method to identify and solve problems at the workplace related to health issues of the worker. Health problems among workers with a low SEP are usually caused by an interplay of problems in and outside the workplace. To solve health problems on multiple life domains for workers with a low SEP we aim to adapt this approach to a broader perspective. Methods An Intervention Mapping (IM) protocol was used to adapt the PA. First, a needs assessment was conducted combining literature with data from interviews and focus groups with workers with a low SEP, employers and occupational health professionals (OHPs). Based on the needs assessment a program goal and performance and change objectives were defined, which resulted in methods and practical strategies to solve problems on multiple life domains. Based on the results of these steps, the PA was adapted and an implementation and evaluation plan were developed. Results The needs assessment confirmed that an interplay of problems on multiple life domains affect work functioning and health of workers with a low SEP. Moreover, they perceived difficulties with solving problems or used passive or avoidant coping styles towards these problems. The program goal is to identify and solve problems on multiple life domains that affect healthy functioning at work. To achieve this workers need support from OHPs to solve problems. The PA protocol and materials were adapted using theoretical concepts of the Self-Determination Theory (SDT), which resulted in the Grip on Health intervention. For OHPs a training was developed on how to implement this intervention in practice. The intervention will be evaluated in a pilot implementation study among workers with a low SEP and other relevant stakeholders. Conclusions IM was a valuable tool for the adaptation of the PA to better support workers with a low SEP to improve their work functioning and health from a broader perspective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Schaap
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - F G Schaafsma
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - A R Bosma
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M A Huysmans
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - C R L Boot
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J R Anema
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Cuny-Guerrier A, Savescu A, Tappin D. Strategies to commit senior subcontractor managers in participatory ergonomics interventions. APPLIED ERGONOMICS 2019; 81:102878. [PMID: 31422274 DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2019.102878] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2018] [Revised: 04/30/2019] [Accepted: 06/09/2019] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
The commitment of managers is one of the facilitators of participatory ergonomics (PE). However, to achieve this, practical practitioners' strategies vary depending on the organizational context and type of stakeholder and are poorly described in the literature. The purpose of this paper is to describe and to analyze the process and strategies that led to senior managers commitment during a decision-making intervention in a subcontracting context. A reflexive practice method was used to describe strategies implemented during a multi-site research project focusing on musculoskeletal disorders prevention in the meat processing sector. A 3 levels commitment method was developed which included: each subcontractor individually, subcontractors together, and subcontractors with their main contractor. Four strategies from the literature were firstly implemented: the creation of a steering committee, the identification of tendencies to act, the transfer of knowledge and moderation of collective discussion. An additional new strategy based on the sharing of a common interest - knife sharpening and maintenance was necessary to achieve the commitment. These results reinforce the importance of stakeholder strategies commitment in PE. A greater consideration for developing a valid framework is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Cuny-Guerrier
- INRS, Working Life Department, 1 rue du Morvan CS60027, 54519, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France.
| | - A Savescu
- INRS, Working Life Department, 1 rue du Morvan CS60027, 54519, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| | - D Tappin
- School of Management, Massey University, Albany, Auckland, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Zipfel N, van der Nat PB, Rensing BJWM, Daeter EJ, Westert GP, Groenewoud AS. The implementation of change model adds value to value-based healthcare: a qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res 2019; 19:643. [PMID: 31492184 PMCID: PMC6728951 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-019-4498-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2019] [Accepted: 08/30/2019] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Value-based healthcare (VBHC) is a concept that focuses on outcome measurement to contribute to quality improvement. However, VBHC does not offer a systematic approach for implementing improvement as implementation science does. The aim is to, firstly, investigate the implementation of improvement initiatives in the context of VBHC and secondly, to explore how implementation science could be of added value for VBHC and vice versa. Methods A case study with two cases in heart care was conducted; one without the explicit use of a systematic implementation method and the other one with the use of the Implementation of Change Model (ICM). Triangulation of data from document research, semi-structured interviews and a focus group was applied to evaluate the degree of method uptake. Interviews were held with experts involved in the implementation of Case 1 (N = 4) and Case 2 (N = 7). The focus group was held with experts also involved in the interviews (N = 4). A theory-driven qualitative analysis was conducted using the ICM as a framework. Results In both cases, outcome measures were seen as an important starting point for the implementation and for monitoring change. Several themes were identified as most important: support, personal importance, involvement, leadership, climate and continuous monitoring. Success factors included intrinsic motivation for the change, speed of implementation, complexity and continuous evaluation. Conclusion Application of the ICM facilitates successful implementation of quality- improvement initiatives within VBHC. However, the practical use of the ICM shows an emphasis on processes. We recommend that monitoring of outcomes be added as an essential part of the ICM. In the discussion, we propose an implementation model that integrates ICM within VBHC. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12913-019-4498-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nina Zipfel
- Department of Value-based Healthcare, St. Antonius Hospital, P.O. Box 2500, 3430, EM, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands. .,Radboud university medical center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Scientific Center for Quality of Healthcare (IQ healthcare), P.O. Box 9101, 6500, HB, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
| | - Paul B van der Nat
- Department of Value-based Healthcare, St. Antonius Hospital, P.O. Box 2500, 3430, EM, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
| | - Benno J W M Rensing
- Department of Cardiology, St. Antonius Hospital, P.O. Box 2500, 3430, EM, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
| | - Edgar J Daeter
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, P.O. Box 2500, 3430, EM, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
| | - Gert P Westert
- Radboud university medical center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Scientific Center for Quality of Healthcare (IQ healthcare), P.O. Box 9101, 6500, HB, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - A Stef Groenewoud
- Radboud university medical center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Scientific Center for Quality of Healthcare (IQ healthcare), P.O. Box 9101, 6500, HB, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Koma BS, Bergh AM, Costa-Black KM. Barriers to and facilitators for implementing an office ergonomics programme in a South African research organisation. APPLIED ERGONOMICS 2019; 75:83-90. [PMID: 30509541 DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2018.09.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2017] [Revised: 08/31/2018] [Accepted: 09/06/2018] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
The focus of this study was on the possibility of implementing an office ergonomics programme as part of a broader workplace health initiative at a South African research organisation. We explored the perspectives of actors in the workplace regarding organisational barriers and facilitators to implementing ergonomic interventions. This qualitative study presents the perspectives of three workplace actor groups: operational managers (n = 4); health and safety representatives (n = 9); and office employees (n = 4) who were involved in a previous ergonomic assessments that proposed several corrective and preventive actions. Eight factors emerged as either barriers or as simultaneous barriers and facilitators to the implementation of proposed ergonomic interventions. These are: organisational culture; information and specialist support; funding; support from operational managers; attitude towards changes; general organisational awareness; individual knowledge of ergonomics; and support from colleagues. This study is one of the first in South Africa to investigate the perspectives of workplace actors in an office setting with regard to factors that influence implementation of ergonomics initiatives to reduce work-related musculoskeletal disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bauba S Koma
- School of Health Systems and Public Health, University of Pretoria, Private Bag X323, Arcadia, 0007, Pretoria, South Africa.
| | - Anne-Marie Bergh
- School of Health Systems and Public Health, University of Pretoria, Private Bag X323, Arcadia, 0007, Pretoria, South Africa; SAMRC Unit for Maternal and Infant Health Care Strategies, University of Pretoria, Private Bag X323, Arcadia, 0007, Pretoria, South Africa.
| | - Katia M Costa-Black
- School of Health Systems and Public Health, University of Pretoria, Private Bag X323, Arcadia, 0007, Pretoria, South Africa; Program of Ergonomics and Biomechanics, New York University School of Medicine, 63 Downing Street, New York, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Visser S, van der Molen HF, Sluiter JK, Frings-Dresen MHW. Evaluation of the effects of two alternative participatory ergonomics intervention strategies for construction companies. ERGONOMICS 2019; 62:42-51. [PMID: 30350755 DOI: 10.1080/00140139.2018.1516806] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2017] [Accepted: 08/22/2018] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
To improve the use of ergonomics tools by construction workers, the effect of two guidance strategies - a face-to-face strategy (F2F) and an e-guidance strategy (EG) - of a participatory ergonomics intervention was studied. Twelve construction companies were randomly assigned to the F2F group or the EG group. The primary outcome measure, the percentage of workers using ergonomics tools, and secondary outcome measures - work ability, physical functioning and limitations due to physical problems - were assessed using surveys at baseline and after 6 months. Additionally, a cost-benefit analysis was performed on company level. No differences in primary and secondary outcomes were found with the exception of the use of ergonomics tools to adjust working height (F2F +1%; EG +10%; p = .001). Newly-implemented tools were used by 23% (F2F) and 42% (EG) of the workers (p = .271). Costs were mainly determined by guidance costs (F2F group) or purchase costs (EG group). Practitioner Summary: Participatory strategies aim to stimulate behavioural change of stakeholders to increase the use of ergonomics tools. Two guidance strategies - face-to-face or e-mail interventions - among construction companies were studied. Both guidance strategies led to an increase in the use of new ergonomics tools.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steven Visser
- a Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam , Coronel Institute of Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute , Amsterdam , the Netherlands
| | - Henk F van der Molen
- a Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam , Coronel Institute of Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute , Amsterdam , the Netherlands
| | - Judith K Sluiter
- a Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam , Coronel Institute of Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute , Amsterdam , the Netherlands
| | - Monique H W Frings-Dresen
- a Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam , Coronel Institute of Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute , Amsterdam , the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Schall MC, Fethke NB, Roemig V. Digital Human Modeling in the Occupational Safety and Health Process: An Application in Manufacturing. IISE Trans Occup Ergon Hum Factors 2018; 6:64-75. [PMID: 30984907 DOI: 10.1080/24725838.2018.1491430] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Abstract
Digital human modeling (DHM) and simulation software has been identified as an effective tool for evaluating work tasks and design alternatives without requiring the expense of physical mock-ups and production trials. Despite recent commercial advancements and a broader availability of DHM platforms, the peer-reviewed scientific literature lacks sufficient demonstration of the application of DHM software within an occupational safety and health process for mitigating exposures to physical risk factors in a real work environment. We describe the implementation of a commercially-available DHM platform as a component of an occupational safety and health process in a manufacturing environment over the course of one year. Success stories, challenges, and practical recommendations are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark C Schall
- Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering Auburn University,
| | - Nathan B Fethke
- Department of Occupational and Environmental Health University of Iowa,
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Visser S, van der Molen HF, Sluiter JK, Frings-Dresen MHW. The process evaluation of two alternative participatory ergonomics intervention strategies for construction companies. ERGONOMICS 2018; 61:1156-1172. [PMID: 29557290 DOI: 10.1080/00140139.2018.1454514] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2017] [Accepted: 03/12/2018] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
UNLABELLED To gain insight into the process of applying two guidance strategies - face-to-face (F2F) or e-guidance strategy (EC) - of a Participatory Ergonomics (PE) intervention and whether differences between these guidance strategies occur, 12 construction companies were randomly assigned to a strategy. The process evaluation contained reach, dose delivered, dose received, precision, competence, satisfaction and behavioural change of individual workers. Data were assessed by logbooks, and questionnaires and interviews at baseline and/or after six months. Reach was low (1%). Dose delivered (F2F: 63%; EC: 44%), received (F2F: 42%; EC: 16%) were not sufficient. The precision and competence were sufficient for both strategies and satisfaction was strongly affected by dose received. For behavioural change, knowledge (F2F) and culture (EC) changed positively within companies. Neither strategy was delivered as intended. Compliance to the intervention was low, especially for EC. Starting with a face-to-face meeting might lead to higher compliance, especially in the EC group. Practitioner Summary: This study showed that compliance to a face-to-face and an e-guidance strategy is low. To improve the compliance, it is advised to start with a face-to-face meeting to see which parts of the intervention are needed and which guidance strategy can be used for these parts. TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN73075751.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steven Visser
- a Coronel Institute of Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Academic Medical Center , University of Amsterdam , Amsterdam , The Netherlands
| | - Henk F van der Molen
- a Coronel Institute of Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Academic Medical Center , University of Amsterdam , Amsterdam , The Netherlands
| | - Judith K Sluiter
- a Coronel Institute of Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Academic Medical Center , University of Amsterdam , Amsterdam , The Netherlands
| | - Monique H W Frings-Dresen
- a Coronel Institute of Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Academic Medical Center , University of Amsterdam , Amsterdam , The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Munguía Vega NE, Flores Borboa VS, Zepeda Quintana DS, Velazquez Contreras LE. Assessing the effectiveness of integrating ergonomics and sustainability: a case study of a Mexican maquiladora. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND ERGONOMICS 2017; 25:587-596. [PMID: 29256817 DOI: 10.1080/10803548.2017.1419589] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
In 2015, the United Nations defined sustainable industrialization as one of 17 sustainable development goals. In this article, an analysis is performed to assess the opportunities for ergonomics to contribute toward sustainability in the manufacturing industry. To that effect, a case study was carried out in a maquiladora of electronic components in the northwestern region of Mexico. The investigation was developed in four stages: (a) diagnosis; (b) planning; (c) implementations; (d) verification of results. Barriers found during each stage are presented. Finally, a discussion of the obtained results is provided, and areas of opportunity for programs or actions to prevent health risks are identified.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Vania S Flores Borboa
- a Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Sonora , México.,b Sustainability Graduate Program Alumni, University of Sonora , México
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Sultan-Taïeb H, Parent-Lamarche A, Gaillard A, Stock S, Nicolakakis N, Hong QN, Vezina M, Coulibaly Y, Vézina N, Berthelette D. Economic evaluations of ergonomic interventions preventing work-related musculoskeletal disorders: a systematic review of organizational-level interventions. BMC Public Health 2017; 17:935. [PMID: 29216849 PMCID: PMC5721617 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-017-4935-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2017] [Accepted: 11/22/2017] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSD) represent a major public health problem and economic burden to employers, workers and health insurance systems. This systematic review had two objectives: (1) to analyze the cost-benefit results of organizational-level ergonomic workplace-based interventions aimed at preventing WMSD, (2) to explore factors related to the implementation process of these interventions (obstacles and facilitating factors) in order to identify whether economic results may be due to a successful or unsuccessful implementation. METHODS Systematic review. Studies were searched in eight electronic databases and in reference lists of included studies. Companion papers were identified through backward and forward citation tracking. A quality assessment tool was developed following guidelines available in the literature. An integration of quantitative economic results and qualitative implementation data was conducted following an explanatory sequential design. RESULTS Out of 189 records, nine studies met selection criteria and were included in our review. Out of nine included studies, grouped into four types of interventions, seven yielded positive economic results, one produced a negative result and one mixed results (negative cost-effectiveness and positive net benefit). However, the level of evidence was limited for the four types of interventions given the quality and the limited number of studies identified. Our review shows that among the nine included studies, negative and mixed economic results were observed when the dose delivered and received by participants was low, when the support from top and/or middle management was limited either due to limited participation of supervisors in training sessions or a lack of financial resources and when adequacy of intervention to workers' needs was low. In studies where economic results were positive, implementation data showed strong support from supervisors and a high rate of employee participation. CONCLUSION Studies investigating the determinants of financial outcomes of prevention related to implementation process are very seldom. We recommend that in future research economic evaluation should include information on the implementation process in order to permit the interpretation of economic results and enhance the generalizability of results. This is also necessary for knowledge transfer and utilization of research results for prevention-oriented decision-making in occupational health and safety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hélène Sultan-Taïeb
- École des Sciences de la Gestion, UQÀM - Université du Québec à Montréal, 315, rue Sainte-Catherine Est, Montréal, Québec H2X 1L7 Canada
| | - Annick Parent-Lamarche
- Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, 3351, boul. des Forges, C.P. 500, Trois-Rivières, Québec G9A 5H7 Canada
| | - Aurélie Gaillard
- LEDI, Pôle d’économie et de gestion, Université de Bourgogne, 2 boulevard Gabriel, BP 26611, 21066 Dijon cedex, France
| | - Susan Stock
- Institut National de Santé Publique du Québec and School of Public Health, Université de Montréal, 190 boulevard Crémazie est, Montréal, Québec H2P 1E2 Canada
| | - Nektaria Nicolakakis
- Institut National de Santé Publique du Québec and School of Public Health, Université de Montréal, 190 boulevard Crémazie est, Montréal, Québec H2P 1E2 Canada
| | - Quan Nha Hong
- McGill University, 5858, Chemin de la Côte-des-Neiges, Suite 300, Montreal, QC H3S 1Z1 Canada
| | - Michel Vezina
- Institut National de Santé Publique du Québec, 945 avenue Wolfe, Québec, G1V 5B3 Canada
| | - Youssouph Coulibaly
- École des Sciences de la Gestion, UQÀM - Université du Québec à Montréal, 315, rue Sainte-Catherine Est, Montréal, Québec H2X 1L7 Canada
| | - Nicole Vézina
- UQAM- Université du Québec à Montréal, 141 avenue du Président Kennedy, Montréal, Québec H2X 1Y4 Canada
| | - Diane Berthelette
- École des Sciences de la Gestion, UQÀM - Université du Québec à Montréal, 315, rue Sainte-Catherine Est, Montréal, Québec H2X 1L7 Canada
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Ketelaar SM, Schaafsma FG, Geldof MF, Kraaijeveld RA, Boot CRL, Shaw WS, Bültmann U, Anema JR. Implementation of the Participatory Approach for Supervisors to Increase Self-Efficacy in Addressing Risk of Sick Leave of Employees: Results of a Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial. JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL REHABILITATION 2017; 27:247-257. [PMID: 27402346 PMCID: PMC5405097 DOI: 10.1007/s10926-016-9652-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/30/2023]
Abstract
Purpose To study the effectiveness of a multifaceted strategy to implement the participatory approach (PA) for supervisors to increase their self-efficacy in addressing risk of sick leave of employees. Methods Supervisors from three organizations were invited to participate. Randomization was performed at department level. Supervisors (n = 61) in the intervention departments received the implementation strategy consisting of a working group meeting, supervisor training in PA application, and optional supervisor coaching. Supervisors in the control departments (n = 55) received written information on PA. The primary outcome was supervisors' self-efficacy to apply the PA, measured at baseline and 6 months' follow-up. The number of employees with whom supervisors discussed work functioning problems or (risk of) sick leave was also assessed. Effects were tested using multilevel analyses. Results The strategy did not increase self-efficacy to apply the PA. Subgroup analyses showed that self-efficacy increased for supervisors who at baseline reported to have discussed (risk of) sick leave with less than three employees during the last 6 months (B = 1.42, 95 % CI 0.34-2.50). Furthermore, the implementation strategy increased the number of employees with whom supervisors discussed work functioning problems or risk of sick leave (B = 1.26, 95 % CI 0.04-2.48). Conclusion Although the implementation strategy cannot be recommended for all supervisors, for supervisors who less frequently discuss (risk of) sick leave with employees the implementation strategy might be helpful. Trial registration NTR3733.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S M Ketelaar
- Department of Public and Occupational Health, EMGO+ Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - F G Schaafsma
- Department of Public and Occupational Health, EMGO+ Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- Research Center for Insurance Medicine, Collaboration Between AMC-UMCG-UWV-VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - M F Geldof
- Department of Public and Occupational Health, EMGO+ Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - R A Kraaijeveld
- Department of Public and Occupational Health, EMGO+ Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - C R L Boot
- Department of Public and Occupational Health, EMGO+ Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Body@Work, Research Center Physical Activity, Work and Health, TNO-VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - W S Shaw
- Liberty Mutual Research Institute for Safety, Hopkinton, MA, USA
- University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA
| | - U Bültmann
- Department of Health Sciences, Community and Occupational Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - J R Anema
- Department of Public and Occupational Health, EMGO+ Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Research Center for Insurance Medicine, Collaboration Between AMC-UMCG-UWV-VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Cervai S, Polo F. The impact of a participatory ergonomics intervention: the value of involvement. THEORETICAL ISSUES IN ERGONOMICS SCIENCE 2017. [DOI: 10.1080/1463922x.2016.1274454] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Cervai
- Department of Humanities, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy
| | - Federica Polo
- Department of Production, University of Vaasa, Vaasa, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Rasmussen CDN, Lindberg NK, Ravn MH, Jørgensen MB, Søgaard K, Holtermann A. Processes, barriers and facilitators to implementation of a participatory ergonomics program among eldercare workers. APPLIED ERGONOMICS 2017; 58:491-499. [PMID: 27633246 DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2016.08.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2016] [Revised: 08/02/2016] [Accepted: 08/08/2016] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
This study aimed to investigate the processes of a participatory ergonomics program among 594 eldercare workers with emphasis on identified risk factors for low back pain and solutions, and reveal barriers and facilitators for implementation. Sixty-nine per cent of the identified risk factors were physical ergonomic, 24% were organisational and 7% were psychosocial risk factors. Most solutions were organisational (55%), followed by physical (43%) and psychosocial solutions (2%). Internal factors (e.g. team or management) constituted 47% of the barriers and 75% of the facilitators. External factors (e.g. time, financial resources, collaboration with resident or relatives) constituted 53% of the barriers and 25% of the facilitators. This study revealed the processes and implementation of a participatory ergonomics program among eldercare workers. The findings can be transferred to workers, workplaces, health and safety professionals, and researchers to improve future participatory ergonomics programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlotte Diana Nørregaard Rasmussen
- National Research Centre for the Working Environment, Lersø Parkallé 105, 2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark; Institute of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, 5230 Odense M, Denmark.
| | - Naja Klærke Lindberg
- Institute of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, 5230 Odense M, Denmark
| | - Marie Højbjerg Ravn
- National Research Centre for the Working Environment, Lersø Parkallé 105, 2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark
| | - Marie Birk Jørgensen
- National Research Centre for the Working Environment, Lersø Parkallé 105, 2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark
| | - Karen Søgaard
- Institute of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, 5230 Odense M, Denmark
| | - Andreas Holtermann
- National Research Centre for the Working Environment, Lersø Parkallé 105, 2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark; Institute of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, 5230 Odense M, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Kraaijeveld RA, Schaafsma FG, Ketelaar SM, Boot CRL, Bültmann U, Anema JR. Implementation of the participatory approach for supervisors to prevent sick leave: a process evaluation. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 2016; 89:847-56. [PMID: 26970753 PMCID: PMC4871914 DOI: 10.1007/s00420-016-1118-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2015] [Accepted: 01/25/2016] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Purpose To perform a process evaluation of a multifaceted strategy to implement the participatory approach for supervisors to prevent sick leave in three organisations. Methods The implementation strategy incorporated a working group meeting with stakeholder representatives, supervisor training, and optional supervisor coaching. Context, recruitment, reach, dose delivered, dose received, fidelity, and satisfaction with the strategy were assessed at organisational and supervisor level using questionnaires and registration forms. Results At least 4 out of 6 stakeholders were represented in the working group meetings, and 11 % (n = 116) of supervisors could be reached. The working group meetings and supervisor training were delivered and received as planned and were well appreciated within all three organisations. Three supervisors made use of coaching. At 6-month follow-up, 11 out of 41 supervisors (27 %) indicated that they had applied the participatory approach at least one time. Conclusion The implementation strategy was largely carried out as intended. However, reach of both supervisors and department managers should be improved. Future studies should consider targeting employees with the strategy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R A Kraaijeveld
- Department of Public and Occupational Health, EMGO+ Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - F G Schaafsma
- Department of Public and Occupational Health, EMGO+ Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. .,Research Center for Insurance Medicine, Collaboration Between AMC-UMCG-UWV-VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - S M Ketelaar
- Department of Public and Occupational Health, EMGO+ Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - C R L Boot
- Department of Public and Occupational Health, EMGO+ Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Body@Work, Research Center Physical Activity, Work and Health, TNO-VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - U Bültmann
- Department of Health Sciences, Community and Occupational Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - J R Anema
- Department of Public and Occupational Health, EMGO+ Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Research Center for Insurance Medicine, Collaboration Between AMC-UMCG-UWV-VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Tappin DC, Vitalis A, Bentley TA. The application of an industry level participatory ergonomics approach in developing MSD interventions. APPLIED ERGONOMICS 2016; 52:151-159. [PMID: 26360206 DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2015.07.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2011] [Revised: 06/08/2015] [Accepted: 07/09/2015] [Indexed: 06/05/2023]
Abstract
Participatory ergonomics projects are traditionally applied within one organisation. In this study, a participative approach was applied across the New Zealand meat processing industry, involving multiple organisations and geographical regions. The purpose was to develop interventions to reduce musculoskeletal disorder (MSD) risk. This paper considers the value of an industry level participatory ergonomics approach in achieving this. The main rationale for a participative approach included the need for industry credibility, and to generate MSD interventions that address industry level MSD risk factors. An industry key stakeholder group became the primary vehicle for formal participation. The study resulted in an intervention plan that included the wider work system and industry practices. These interventions were championed across the industry by the key stakeholder group and have extended beyond the life of the study. While this approach helped to meet the study aim, the existence of an industry-supported key stakeholder group and a mandate for the initiative are important prerequisites for success.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D C Tappin
- School of Management, Massey University, Albany, Auckland, New Zealand.
| | - A Vitalis
- School of Management, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand
| | - T A Bentley
- New Zealand Work Research Institute, Faculty of Business and Law, AUT University, Auckland, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Organizing workplace health literacy to reduce musculoskeletal pain and consequences. BMC Nurs 2015; 14:46. [PMID: 26388697 PMCID: PMC4574516 DOI: 10.1186/s12912-015-0096-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2015] [Accepted: 09/04/2015] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Despite numerous initiatives to improve the working environment for nursing aides, musculoskeletal disorders (pain) is still a considerable problem because of the prevalence, and pervasive consequences on the individual, the workplace and the society. Discrepancies between effort and effect of workplace health initiatives might be due to the fact that pain and the consequences of pain are affected by various individual, interpersonal and organizational factors in a complex interaction. Recent health literacy models pursue an integrated approach to understanding health behavior and have been suggested as a suitable framework for addressing individual, organizational and interpersonal factors concomitantly. Therefore, the aim of the trial is to examine the effectiveness of an intervention to improve health literacy (building knowledge, competences and structures for communication and action) at both the organizational and individual level and reduce pain among nursing aides. Methods/design The intervention consists of 2 steps: 1) Courses at the workplace for employees and management in order to organize a joint fundament of knowledge and understanding, and a platform for communication and action about pain prevention in the organization. 2) Organizing a fixed 3-weekly structured dialogue between each employee and her/his supervisor, with particular focus on developing specific plans to prevent and reduce pain and its consequences. This enables the workplace to generate knowledge about employee resources and health challenges and to act and convey this knowledge into initiatives at the workplace. Discussion Previous studies to improve health literacy have primarily targeted patients or specific deprived groups in health care or community settings. Recently the idea of the workplace as an arena for improving health literacy has developed emphasizing the organizational responsibility in facilitating and supporting that employees obtain basic knowledge and information needed to understand and take action on individual and occupational health concerns. The literature about workplace health literacy is very limited but points at the importance of educating employees to be able to access, appraise and apply health information and of organizing the infrastructure and communication in the organization. This study suggests a concrete operationalization of health literacy in a workplace setting. Results are expected published in 2016.
Collapse
|
21
|
Bolis I, Brunoro CM, Sznelwar LI. Mapping the relationships between work and sustainability and the opportunities for ergonomic action. APPLIED ERGONOMICS 2014; 45:1225-1239. [PMID: 24680165 DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2014.02.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2013] [Revised: 02/17/2014] [Accepted: 02/23/2014] [Indexed: 06/03/2023]
Abstract
A map was drawn up of the relationships between work (in its multiple interpretations) and sustainability (sustainable development and corporate sustainability) based on a bibliographic analysis of articles that discuss these themes jointly in the current academic literature. The position of the discipline of ergonomics focused on work was identified from this map and, based on its specific academic literature, it was possible to identify where this discipline could contribute so that work and workers can be included in the discourse of sustainable development and considered in corporate sustainability policies. Ergonomics can be actively influential within the organization on issues relating to work improvements; it may boost integrated increases in the organization's performance and in workers' well-being; it can provide support for changes and new (environmental) sustainability-related work requirements to be considered; and it can contribute to the definition of the concept of work in a context of sustainable development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ivan Bolis
- Department of Production Engineering, University of São Paulo, Avenida Professor Luciano Gualberto, 530, São Paulo, SP 05508-010, Brazil.
| | - Claudio M Brunoro
- Department of Production Engineering, University of São Paulo, Avenida Professor Luciano Gualberto, 530, São Paulo, SP 05508-010, Brazil.
| | - Laerte I Sznelwar
- Department of Production Engineering, University of São Paulo, Avenida Professor Luciano Gualberto, 530, São Paulo, SP 05508-010, Brazil.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Visser S, van der Molen HF, Sluiter JK, Frings-Dresen MHW. Guidance strategies for a participatory ergonomic intervention to increase the use of ergonomic measures of workers in construction companies: a study design of a randomised trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2014; 15:132. [PMID: 24742300 PMCID: PMC3997435 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-15-132] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2013] [Accepted: 04/10/2014] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND More than seven out of 10 Dutch construction workers describe their work as physically demanding. Ergonomic measures can be used to reduce these physically demanding work tasks. To increase the use of ergonomic measures, employers and workers have to get used to other working methods and to maintaining them. To facilitate this behavioural change, participatory ergonomics (PE) interventions could be useful. For this study a protocol of a PE intervention is adapted in such a way that the intervention can be performed by an ergonomics consultant through face-to-face contacts or email contacts. The objective of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of the face-to-face guidance strategy and the e-guidance strategy on the primary outcome measure: use of ergonomic measures by individual construction workers, and on the secondary outcome measures: the work ability, physical functioning and limitations due to physical problems of individual workers. METHODS/DESIGN The present study is a randomised intervention trial of six months in 12 companies to establish the effects of a PE intervention guided by four face-to-face contacts (N = 6) or guided by 13 email contacts (N = 6) on the primary and secondary outcome measures at baseline and after six months. Construction companies are randomly assigned to one of the guidance strategies with the help of a computer generated randomisation table. In addition, a process evaluation for both strategies will be performed to determine reach, dose delivered, dose received, precision, competence, satisfaction and behavioural change to find possible barriers and facilitators for both strategies. A cost-benefit analysis will be performed to establish the financial consequences of both strategies. The present study is in accordance with the CONSORT statement. DISCUSSION The outcome of this study will help to 1) evaluate the effect of both guidance strategies, and 2) find barriers to and facilitators of both guidance strategies. When these strategies are effective, implementation within occupational health services can take place to guide construction companies (and others) with the implementation of ergonomic measures. TRIAL REGISTRATION [corrected] Trailnumber: ISRCTN73075751, Date of registration: 30 July 2013.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steven Visser
- Coronel Institute of Occupational Health, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, P.O. Box 22660, Amsterdam 1100 DD, The Netherlands
| | - Henk F van der Molen
- Coronel Institute of Occupational Health, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, P.O. Box 22660, Amsterdam 1100 DD, The Netherlands
- Arbouw, P.O. Box 213, Harderwijk 3840 AE, The Netherlands
| | - Judith K Sluiter
- Coronel Institute of Occupational Health, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, P.O. Box 22660, Amsterdam 1100 DD, The Netherlands
| | - Monique HW Frings-Dresen
- Coronel Institute of Occupational Health, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, P.O. Box 22660, Amsterdam 1100 DD, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Wierenga D, Engbers LH, Van Empelen P, Duijts S, Hildebrandt VH, Van Mechelen W. What is actually measured in process evaluations for worksite health promotion programs: a systematic review. BMC Public Health 2013; 13:1190. [PMID: 24341605 PMCID: PMC3890539 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-1190] [Citation(s) in RCA: 124] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2013] [Accepted: 12/03/2013] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Numerous worksite health promotion program (WHPPs) have been implemented the past years to improve employees’ health and lifestyle (i.e., physical activity, nutrition, smoking, alcohol use and relaxation). Research primarily focused on the effectiveness of these WHPPs. Whereas process evaluations provide essential information necessary to improve large scale implementation across other settings. Therefore, this review aims to: (1) further our understanding of the quality of process evaluations alongside effect evaluations for WHPPs, (2) identify barriers/facilitators affecting implementation, and (3) explore the relationship between effectiveness and the implementation process. Methods Pubmed, EMBASE, PsycINFO, and Cochrane (controlled trials) were searched from 2000 to July 2012 for peer-reviewed (randomized) controlled trials published in English reporting on both the effectiveness and the implementation process of a WHPP focusing on physical activity, smoking cessation, alcohol use, healthy diet and/or relaxation at work, targeting employees aged 18-65 years. Results Of the 307 effect evaluations identified, twenty-two (7.2%) published an additional process evaluation and were included in this review. The results showed that eight of those studies based their process evaluation on a theoretical framework. The methodological quality of nine process evaluations was good. The most frequently reported process components were dose delivered and dose received. Over 50 different implementation barriers/facilitators were identified. The most frequently reported facilitator was strong management support. Lack of resources was the most frequently reported barrier. Seven studies examined the link between implementation and effectiveness. In general a positive association was found between fidelity, dose and the primary outcome of the program. Conclusions Process evaluations are not systematically performed alongside effectiveness studies for WHPPs. The quality of the process evaluations is mostly poor to average, resulting in a lack of systematically measured barriers/facilitators. The narrow focus on implementation makes it difficult to explore the relationship between effectiveness and implementation. Furthermore, the operationalisation of process components varied between studies, indicating a need for consensus about defining and operationalising process components.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Debbie Wierenga
- Body@Work, Research Centre on Physical Activity, Work and Health, TNO-VUmc, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Tompa E, Dolinschi R, Natale J. Economic evaluation of a participatory ergonomics intervention in a textile plant. APPLIED ERGONOMICS 2013; 44:480-487. [PMID: 23237231 DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2012.10.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2011] [Revised: 10/06/2012] [Accepted: 10/25/2012] [Indexed: 06/01/2023]
Abstract
In this study we report on the economic evaluation of a participatory ergonomics process undertaken at a clothing manufacturer in Southwestern Ontario, Canada that employs approximately 300 workers. We undertake a cost-benefit analysis from the company perspective. Intervention costs amounted to $65,787 and intervention benefits $360,614 (2011 Canadian dollars). The net present value was $294,827, suggesting that the intervention was worth undertaking based on the costs and consequences over the measurement period spanning more than four years. Based on these costs and benefits, the benefit-to-cost ratio is 5.5. Overall, the findings from this study suggest that participatory ergonomics interventions can be cost beneficial from the company perspective. Even though the changes were typically low-cost and low-tech interventions implemented by the plant mechanics and maintenance personnel, benefits were realized on both the health and financial fronts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emile Tompa
- Institute for Work & Health, 481 University Avenue, Suite 800, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5G 2E9.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Benzer JK, Beehler S, Cramer IE, Mohr DC, Charns MP, Burgess JF. Between and within-site variation in qualitative implementation research. Implement Sci 2013; 8:4. [PMID: 23286552 PMCID: PMC3598511 DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-8-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2012] [Accepted: 12/11/2012] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Multisite qualitative studies are challenging in part because decisions regarding within-site and between-site sampling must be made to reduce the complexity of data collection, but these decisions may have serious implications for analyses. There is not yet consensus on how to account for within-site and between-site variations in qualitative perceptions of the organizational context of interventions. The purpose of this study was to analyze variation in perceptions among key informants in order to demonstrate the importance of broad sampling for identifying both within-site and between-site implementation themes. METHODS Case studies of four sites were compared to identify differences in how Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) medical centers implemented a Primary Care/Mental Health Integration (PC/MHI) intervention. Qualitative analyses focused on between-profession variation in reported referral and implementation processes within and between sites. RESULTS Key informants identified co-location, the consultation-liaison service, space, access, and referral processes as important topics. Within-site themes revealed the importance of coordination, communication, and collaboration for implementing PC/MHI. The between-site theme indicated that the preexisting structure of mental healthcare influenced how PC/MHI was implemented at each site and that collaboration among both leaders and providers was critical to overcoming structural barriers. CONCLUSIONS Within- and between-site variation in perceptions among key informants within different professions revealed barriers and facilitators to the implementation not available from a single source. Examples provide insight into implementation barriers for PC/MHI. Multisite implementation studies may benefit from intentionally eliciting and analyzing variation within and between sites. Suggestions for implementation research design are presented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justin K Benzer
- Department of Veterans Affairs, Center for Organization, Leadership, and Management Research, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Sarah Beehler
- Department of Veterans Affairs, Center for Organization, Leadership, and Management Research, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Irene E Cramer
- Department of Veterans Affairs, Center for Organization, Leadership, and Management Research, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA
| | - David C Mohr
- Department of Veterans Affairs, Center for Organization, Leadership, and Management Research, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Martin P Charns
- Department of Veterans Affairs, Center for Organization, Leadership, and Management Research, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA
| | - James F Burgess
- Department of Veterans Affairs, Center for Organization, Leadership, and Management Research, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Jørgensen MB, Faber A, Hansen JV, Holtermann A, Søgaard K. Effects on musculoskeletal pain, work ability and sickness absence in a 1-year randomised controlled trial among cleaners. BMC Public Health 2011; 11:840. [PMID: 22044549 PMCID: PMC3221640 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-840] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2011] [Accepted: 11/01/2011] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Only a few workplace initiatives among cleaners have been reported, even though they constitute a job group in great need of health promotion. The purpose of this trial was to evaluate the effect of either physical coordination training or cognitive behavioural training on musculoskeletal pain, work ability and sickness absence among cleaners. Methods A cluster-randomised controlled trial was conducted among 294 female cleaners allocated to either physical coordination training (PCT), cognitive behavioural training (CBTr) or a reference group (REF). Questionnaires about musculoskeletal pain and work ability were completed at baseline and after one year's intervention. Sickness absence data were obtained from the managers' records. Analyses were performed according to the intention-to-treat-principle (ITT). Results No overall reduction in musculoskeletal pain, work ability or sickness absence from either PCT or CBTr compared with REF was found in conservative ITT analyses. However, explorative analyses revealed a treatment effect for musculoskeletal pain of the PCT. People with chronic neck/shoulder pain at baseline were more frequently non-chronic at follow-up after PCT compared with REF (p = 0.05). Conclusions The PCT intervention appeared effective for reducing chronic neck/shoulder pain among the female cleaners. It is recommended that future interventions among similar high-risk job groups focus on the implementation aspects of the interventions to maximise outcomes more distal from the intervention such as work ability and sickness absence. Trial registration ISRCTN: ISRCTN96241850
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marie B Jørgensen
- National Research Centre for the Working Environment, Lersø Parkallé 105, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|