1
|
Wang B, Peng M, Li Y, Gao J, Chang T. Developing a predictive model and uncovering immune influences on prognosis for brain metastasis from lung carcinomas. Front Oncol 2025; 15:1554242. [PMID: 40098698 PMCID: PMC11911169 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1554242] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/01/2025] [Accepted: 02/14/2025] [Indexed: 03/19/2025] Open
Abstract
Objective Primary lung carcinomas (LCs) often metastasize to the brain, resulting in a grim prognosis for affected individuals. This population-based study aimed to investigate their survival period and immune status, while also establishing a predictive model. Methods The records of 86,763 primary LCs from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database were extracted, including 15,180 cases with brain metastasis (BM) and 71,583 without BM. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression were employed to construct a prediction model. Multiple machine learning methods were applied to validate the model. Flow cytometry and ELISA were used to explore the immune status in a real-world cohort. Results The research findings revealed a 17.49% prevalence of BM from LCs, with a median survival of 8 months, compared with 16 months for their counterparts (p <0.001). A nomogram was developed to predict survival at 1, 3, and 5 years on the basis of these variables, with the time-dependent area under the curve (AUC) of 0.857, 0.814, and 0.786, respectively. Moreover, several machine learning approaches have further verified the reliability of this model's performance. Flow cytometry and ELISA analysis suggested the prediction model was related the immune status. Conclusions BM from LCs have an inferior prognosis. Considering the substantial impact of these factors, the nomogram model is a valuable tool for guiding clinical decision-making in managing patients with this condition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bowen Wang
- Department of Gastroenterology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
- Department of Emergency, General Hospital of Tibet Military Command, Lhasa, China
| | - Mengjia Peng
- Department of Emergency, General Hospital of Tibet Military Command, Lhasa, China
| | - Yan Li
- Physical Examination Center, General Hospital of Western Theater Command, Chengdu, China
| | - Jinhang Gao
- Department of Gastroenterology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Tao Chang
- Department of Neurosurgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kieliszek AM, Mobilio D, Bassey-Archibong BI, Johnson JW, Piotrowski ML, de Araujo ED, Sedighi A, Aghaei N, Escudero L, Ang P, Gwynne WD, Zhang C, Quaile A, McKenna D, Subapanditha M, Tokar T, Vaseem Shaikh M, Zhai K, Chafe SC, Gunning PT, Montenegro-Burke JR, Venugopal C, Magolan J, Singh SK. De novo GTP synthesis is a metabolic vulnerability for the interception of brain metastases. Cell Rep Med 2024; 5:101755. [PMID: 39366383 PMCID: PMC11513854 DOI: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2024.101755] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2023] [Revised: 05/21/2024] [Accepted: 09/06/2024] [Indexed: 10/06/2024]
Abstract
Patients with brain metastases (BM) face a 90% mortality rate within one year of diagnosis and the current standard of care is palliative. Targeting BM-initiating cells (BMICs) is a feasible strategy to treat BM, but druggable targets are limited. Here, we apply Connectivity Map analysis to lung-, breast-, and melanoma-pre-metastatic BMIC gene expression signatures and identify inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase (IMPDH), the rate-limiting enzyme in the de novo GTP synthesis pathway, as a target for BM. We show that pharmacological and genetic perturbation of IMPDH attenuates BMIC proliferation in vitro and the formation of BM in vivo. Metabolomic analyses and CRISPR knockout studies confirm that de novo GTP synthesis is a potent metabolic vulnerability in BM. Overall, our work employs a phenotype-guided therapeutic strategy to uncover IMPDH as a relevant target for attenuating BM outgrowth, which may provide an alternative treatment strategy for patients who are otherwise limited to palliation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Agata M Kieliszek
- Centre for Discovery in Cancer Research, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada; Department of Biochemistry and Biomedical Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Daniel Mobilio
- Centre for Discovery in Cancer Research, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada; Department of Biochemistry and Biomedical Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Blessing I Bassey-Archibong
- Centre for Discovery in Cancer Research, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada; Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Jarrod W Johnson
- Department of Biochemistry and Biomedical Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Mathew L Piotrowski
- Department of Biochemistry and Biomedical Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Elvin D de Araujo
- Centre for Medicinal Chemistry, University of Toronto Mississauga, Mississauga, ON, Canada
| | - Abootaleb Sedighi
- Centre for Medicinal Chemistry, University of Toronto Mississauga, Mississauga, ON, Canada
| | - Nikoo Aghaei
- Centre for Discovery in Cancer Research, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada; Department of Biochemistry and Biomedical Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Laura Escudero
- Centre for Discovery in Cancer Research, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada; Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Patrick Ang
- Centre for Discovery in Cancer Research, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - William D Gwynne
- Centre for Discovery in Cancer Research, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada; Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Cunjie Zhang
- Terrence Donnelly Centre for Cellular and Biomolecular Research, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Andrew Quaile
- Terrence Donnelly Centre for Cellular and Biomolecular Research, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Dillon McKenna
- Centre for Discovery in Cancer Research, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada; Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | | | - Tomas Tokar
- Krembil Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Muhammad Vaseem Shaikh
- Centre for Discovery in Cancer Research, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada; Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Kui Zhai
- Centre for Discovery in Cancer Research, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada; Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Shawn C Chafe
- Centre for Discovery in Cancer Research, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada; Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Patrick T Gunning
- Centre for Medicinal Chemistry, University of Toronto Mississauga, Mississauga, ON, Canada
| | - J Rafael Montenegro-Burke
- Terrence Donnelly Centre for Cellular and Biomolecular Research, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Chitra Venugopal
- Centre for Discovery in Cancer Research, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada; Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Jakob Magolan
- Department of Biochemistry and Biomedical Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Sheila K Singh
- Centre for Discovery in Cancer Research, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada; Department of Biochemistry and Biomedical Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada; Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Müller SJ, Khadhraoui E, Henkes H, Ernst M, Rohde V, Schatlo B, Malinova V. Differentiation between multifocal CNS lymphoma and glioblastoma based on MRI criteria. Discov Oncol 2024; 15:397. [PMID: 39217585 PMCID: PMC11366735 DOI: 10.1007/s12672-024-01266-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2023] [Accepted: 08/22/2024] [Indexed: 09/04/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Differentiating between glioblastoma (GB) with multiple foci (mGB) and multifocal central nervous system lymphoma (mCNSL) can be challenging because these cancers share several features at first appearance on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The aim of this study was to explore morphological differences in MRI findings for mGB versus mCNSL and to develop an interpretation algorithm with high diagnostic accuracy. METHODS In this retrospective study, MRI characteristics were compared between 50 patients with mGB and 50 patients with mCNSL treated between 2015 and 2020. The following parameters were evaluated: size, morphology, lesion location and distribution, connections between the lesions on the fluid-attenuated inversion recovery sequence, patterns of contrast enhancement, and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values within the tumor and the surrounding edema, as well as MR perfusion and susceptibility weighted imaging (SWI) whenever available. RESULTS A total of 187 mCNSL lesions and 181 mGB lesions were analyzed. The mCNSL lesions demonstrated frequently a solid morphology compared to mGB lesions, which showed more often a cystic, mixed cystic/solid morphology and a cortical infiltration. The mean measured diameter was significantly smaller for mCNSL than mGB lesions (p < 0.001). Tumor ADC ratios were significantly smaller in mCNSL than in mGB (0.89 ± 0.36 vs. 1.05 ± 0.35, p < 0.001). The ADC ratio of perilesional edema was significantly higher (p < 0.001) in mCNSL than in mGB. In SWI / T2*-weighted imaging, tumor-associated susceptibility artifacts were more often found in mCNSL than in mGB (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION The lesion size, ADC ratios of the lesions and the adjacent tissue as well as the vascularization of the lesions in the MR-perfusion were found to be significant distinctive patterns of mCNSL and mGB allowing a radiological differentiation of these two entities on initial MRI. A diagnostic algorithm based on these parameters merits a prospective validation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastian Johannes Müller
- Institute of Neuroradiology, University Medical Center, Göttingen, Germany
- Clinic for Neuroradiology, Katharinen-Hospital Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany
| | - Eya Khadhraoui
- Institute of Neuroradiology, University Medical Center, Göttingen, Germany
- Clinic for Neuroradiology, Katharinen-Hospital Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany
| | - Hans Henkes
- Clinic for Neuroradiology, Katharinen-Hospital Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany
| | - Marielle Ernst
- Institute of Neuroradiology, University Medical Center, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Veit Rohde
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center, Georg-August-University, Robert-Koch-Straße 40, 37075, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Bawarjan Schatlo
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center, Georg-August-University, Robert-Koch-Straße 40, 37075, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Vesna Malinova
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center, Georg-August-University, Robert-Koch-Straße 40, 37075, Göttingen, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Müller SJ, Khadhraoui E, Ernst M, Rohde V, Schatlo B, Malinova V. Differentiation of multiple brain metastases and glioblastoma with multiple foci using MRI criteria. BMC Med Imaging 2024; 24:3. [PMID: 38166651 PMCID: PMC10759655 DOI: 10.1186/s12880-023-01183-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2023] [Accepted: 12/13/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Glioblastoma with multiple foci (mGBM) and multiple brain metastases share several common features on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). A reliable preoperative diagnosis would be of clinical relevance. The aim of this study was to explore the differences and similarities between mGBM and multiple brain metastases on MRI. METHODS We performed a retrospective analysis of 50 patients with mGBM and compared them with a cohort of 50 patients with multiple brain metastases (2-10 lesions) histologically confirmed and treated at our department between 2015 and 2020. The following imaging characteristics were analyzed: lesion location, distribution, morphology, (T2-/FLAIR-weighted) connections between the lesions, patterns of contrast agent uptake, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC)-values within the lesion, the surrounding T2-hyperintensity, and edema distribution. RESULTS A total of 210 brain metastases and 181 mGBM lesions were analyzed. An infratentorial localization was found significantly more often in patients with multiple brain metastases compared to mGBM patients (28 vs. 1.5%, p < 0.001). A T2-connection between the lesions was detected in 63% of mGBM lesions compared to 1% of brain metastases. Cortical edema was only present in mGBM. Perifocal edema with larger areas of diffusion restriction was detected in 31% of mGBM patients, but not in patients with metastases. CONCLUSION We identified a set of imaging features which improve preoperative diagnosis. The presence of T2-weighted imaging hyperintensity connection between the lesions and cortical edema with varying ADC-values was typical for mGBM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastian Johannes Müller
- Department of Neuroradiology, University Medical Center, Göttingen, Germany
- Neuroradiologische Klinik, Klinikum Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany
| | - Eya Khadhraoui
- Department of Neuroradiology, University Medical Center, Göttingen, Germany
- Neuroradiologische Klinik, Klinikum Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany
| | - Marielle Ernst
- Department of Neuroradiology, University Medical Center, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Veit Rohde
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Bawarjan Schatlo
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Vesna Malinova
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center, Göttingen, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Zhu D, Shao Y, Yang Z, Cheng A, Xi Q, Liang X, Chu S. Magnetic resonance imaging characteristics of brain metastases in small cell lung cancer. Cancer Med 2023; 12:15199-15206. [PMID: 37288842 PMCID: PMC10417172 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.6206] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2023] [Revised: 05/13/2023] [Accepted: 05/23/2023] [Indexed: 06/09/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Lung is the most common primary site of brain metastases (BMs). For different pathological types of BMs have some similar characteristics, it is still a challenge to confirm the origin based on their characteristics directly. BMs of small cell lung cancer (SCLC) have favorable therapeutic expectations due to their high sensitivity to radiotherapy. This study sought to identify unique characteristics of BMs in SCLC, aiming to assist in clinical decision-making. METHODS Patients diagnosed with BMs of lung cancer who received radiotherapy from January 2017 to January 2022 were reviewed (N = 284). Definitive diagnosis of BMs of SCLC was reached for 36 patients. All patients underwent head examination using magnetic resonance imaging. The number, size, location, and signal characteristics of lesions were analyzed. RESULTS There were 7 and 29 patients with single focus and non-single focus, respectively. Ten patients had diffuse lesions, and the remaining 26 patients had a total of 90 lesions. These lesions were divided into three groups according to size: <1, 1-3, and >3 cm (43.33%, 53.34%, and 3.33%, respectively). Sixty-six lesions were located in the supratentorial area, primarily including cortical and subcortical lesions (55.56%) and deep brain lesions (20%). Moreover, 22 lesions were located in the infratentorial area. According to diffusion-weighted imaging and T1-weighted contrast enhancement, the imaging characteristics were classified into six patterns. Hyperintensity in diffusion-weighted imaging and homogeneous enhancement was the most common pattern of BMs in SCLC (46.67%), while partial lesions showed hyperintensity in diffusion-weighted imaging without enhancement (7.78%). CONCLUSIONS The manifestations of BMs in SCLC were multiple lesions (diameter: 1-3 cm), hyperintensity in diffusion-weighted imaging, and homogeneous enhancement. Interestingly, hyperintensity in diffusion-weighted imaging without enhancement was also one of the characteristics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dan Zhu
- Department of Radiology, Shanghai East HospitalTongji University School of MedicineShanghaiChina
| | - Yongjia Shao
- Department of Radiology, Shanghai East HospitalTongji University School of MedicineShanghaiChina
| | - Zhangwei Yang
- Department of Radiology, Shanghai East HospitalTongji University School of MedicineShanghaiChina
| | - Ailan Cheng
- Department of Radiology, Shanghai East HospitalTongji University School of MedicineShanghaiChina
| | - Qian Xi
- Department of Radiology, Shanghai East HospitalTongji University School of MedicineShanghaiChina
| | - Xiaohua Liang
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Huashan HospitalFudan University School of MedicineShanghaiChina
| | - Shuguang Chu
- Department of Radiology, Shanghai East HospitalTongji University School of MedicineShanghaiChina
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Chakrabarty N, Mahajan A, Patil V, Noronha V, Prabhash K. Imaging of brain metastasis in non-small-cell lung cancer: indications, protocols, diagnosis, post-therapy imaging, and implications regarding management. Clin Radiol 2023; 78:175-186. [PMID: 36503631 DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2022.09.134] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2022] [Revised: 09/09/2022] [Accepted: 09/29/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Increased survival (due to the use of targeted therapies based on genomic profiling) has resulted in the increased incidence of brain metastasis during the course of disease, and thus, made it essential to have proper imaging guidelines in place for brain metastasis from non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Brain parenchymal metastases can have varied imaging appearances, and it is pertinent to be aware of the various molecular risk factors for brain metastasis from NSCLC along with their suggestive imaging appearances, so as to identify them early. Leptomeningeal metastasis requires additional imaging of the spine and an early cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis. Differentiation of post-therapy change from recurrence on imaging has a bearing on the management, hence the need for its awareness. This article will provide in-depth literature review of the epidemiology, aetiopathogenesis, screening, detection, diagnosis, post-therapy imaging, and implications regarding the management of brain metastasis from NSCLC. In addition, we will also briefly highlight the role of artificial intelligence (AI) in brain metastasis screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Chakrabarty
- Department of Radiodiagnosis, Tata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, 400 012, Maharashtra, India
| | - A Mahajan
- Department of Radiodiagnosis, Tata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, 400 012, Maharashtra, India.
| | - V Patil
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, 400 012, Maharashtra, India
| | - V Noronha
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, 400 012, Maharashtra, India
| | - K Prabhash
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, 400 012, Maharashtra, India
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Wang S, Feng Y, Chen L, Yu J, Van Ongeval C, Bormans G, Li Y, Ni Y. Towards updated understanding of brain metastasis. Am J Cancer Res 2022; 12:4290-4311. [PMID: 36225632 PMCID: PMC9548021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2022] [Accepted: 08/06/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Brain metastasis (BM) is a common complication in cancer patients with advanced disease and attributes to treatment failure and final mortality. Currently there are several therapeutic options available; however these are only suitable for limited subpopulation: surgical resection or radiosurgery for cases with a limited number of lesions, targeted therapies for approximately 18% of patients, and immune checkpoint inhibitors with a response rate of 20-30%. Thus, there is a pressing need for development of novel diagnostic and therapeutic options. This overview article aims to provide research advances in disease model, targeted therapy, blood brain barrier (BBB) opening strategies, imaging and its incorporation with artificial intelligence, external radiotherapy, and internal targeted radionuclide theragnostics. Finally, a distinct type of BM, leptomeningeal metastasis is also covered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shuncong Wang
- KU Leuven, Biomedical Group, Campus GasthuisbergLeuven 3000, Belgium
| | - Yuanbo Feng
- KU Leuven, Biomedical Group, Campus GasthuisbergLeuven 3000, Belgium
| | - Lei Chen
- KU Leuven, Biomedical Group, Campus GasthuisbergLeuven 3000, Belgium
| | - Jie Yu
- KU Leuven, Biomedical Group, Campus GasthuisbergLeuven 3000, Belgium
| | - Chantal Van Ongeval
- Department of Radiology, University Hospitals Leuven, KU LeuvenHerestraat 49, Leuven 3000, Belgium
| | - Guy Bormans
- KU Leuven, Biomedical Group, Campus GasthuisbergLeuven 3000, Belgium
| | - Yue Li
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Shanghai University of Medicine and Health SciencesShanghai 201318, China
| | - Yicheng Ni
- KU Leuven, Biomedical Group, Campus GasthuisbergLeuven 3000, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|