Increased cancer risk in patients undergoing dialysis: a population-based cohort study in North-Eastern Italy

Dialysis and the risk of early urological cancer: A nationwide population-based cohort study in Taiwan

Patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) are predisposed to a higher risk of developing malignancies. This study aimed to explore the association between chronic dialysis with ESRD treated and the subsequent development of urothelial cell carcinoma or renal cell carcinoma (UC/RCC). Data spanning 13 years were retrieved from Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database. A total of 11,820 patients with ESRD undergoing maintenance dialysis between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2013, and 35,460 controls matched for sex, age, and index year, were identified. After adjusting for confounding factors, Cox proportional hazards analysis was performed to compare the risk of UC/RCC during the 13-year follow-up period, and Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to evaluate the cumulative UC/RCC incidence between the ESRD and non-ESRD cohorts. The average time before developing UC/RCC was 4.18 years after dialysis initiation in the ESRD group compared to 5.39 years in the control group. After adjusting for sex, age, monthly income, urbanization level, geographic region, and comorbidities, the hazard ratio for UC/RCC was 1.186 (95% confidence interval, 1.071-1.448; P = .005). Stratified by age, the odds ratios (ORs) for developing UC/RCC were 2.105, 1.498, 1.371, and 0.925 among patients with ESRD aged 40 to 49, 50 to 59, 60 to 69, and ≥ 70 years, respectively. Stratification by comorbidities revealed ORs of 1.204, 1.179, 1.186,1.172, 1.211, and 1.210 for patients without diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia, obesity, coronary artery disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and hematuria, respectively. The mean time to UC/RCC occurrence was 4.18 years after dialysis. Furthermore, younger male patients undergoing dialysis with fewer comorbidities were at higher risk of developing UC/RCC. Early or more intensive surveillance for urological cancers post-dialysis initiation is recommended for patients undergoing dialysis with longer life expectancies or a higher likelihood of undergoing renal transplantation.

Incidence of major urological cancers in patients on dialysis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Studies have demonstrated an elevated risk of urological malignancies in individuals undergoing dialysis, which consequently leads to unfavorable prognoses and diminished quality of life for patients with end-stage kidney disease. Nevertheless, the absence of standardized recommendations for cancer screening and limited utilization of conventional screening methods within the dialysis population remain prevalent issues.

METHODS

A meta-analysis was conducted on cohort studies published prior to June 2024, aiming to quantify the cancer risk among individuals undergoing dialysis. Random-effects meta-analyses were employed to combine standardized incidence rates (SIRs) along with their corresponding 95% confidence intervals, considering a p-value of less than 0.05 or an I² value exceeding 50%. Subgroup analyses, heterogeneity tests, and sensitivity analyses were performed as well.

RESULTS

A total of 10 studies, consisting of 12 cohort studies, were ultimately identified, encompassing a collective patient population of 1,362,196 individuals. Compared to the general population, the pooled SIRs for all cancers except non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC), major urological cancers (MUCs), cancers of the kidney/renal pelvis, bladder cancers and prostate cancers were 1.40 (95% CI: 1.28-1.54), 1.76 (95% CI: 1.45-2.14), 4.73 (95% CI: 3.96-5.64), 1.89 (95% CI: 1.61-2.21) and 0.94 (95% CI: 0.79-1.11), respectively. The cancer risk was notably elevated in specific subgroups of women, younger patients (age at first dialysis, 0-34 years), during the initial year of dialysis, and among Asian patients. SIRs differed when considering different primary renal diseases. However, high heterogeneity was observed among the studies investigating cancers during dialysis, while this heterogeneity did not have a substantial impact on the pooled SIRs for overall cancer, as determined through sensitivity analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with the general population, the dialysis population had a significantly increased risk of developing urological malignancies, particularly cancers of the kidney/renal pelvis. Our findings indicate a substantial increase in risks among female, young, Asian patients, during the first year of dialysis and highlight variations in SIRs based on primary renal disease. These results suggest the potential for adopting a more personalized approach to cancer screening in chronic dialysis patients. Given the considerable heterogeneity observed, further rigorous investigations are warranted to enhance our understanding in this area.

Is End-Stage Renal Disease Tumor Suppressive? Dispelling the Myths

The prevalence of end-stage renal disease is increasing worldwide. Malignancies accompanying end-stage renal disease are detected in approximately 120 individuals per 10,000 person-years. Most studies have suggested that end-stage renal disease causes carcinogenesis and promotes tumor development; however, this theory remains questionable. Contrary to the theory that end-stage renal disease is predominantly carcinogenic, recent findings have suggested that after controlling for biases and sampling errors, the overall cancer risk in patients with end-stage renal disease might be lower than that in the general population, except for renal and urothelial cancer risks. Additionally, mortality rates associated with most cancers are lower in patients with end-stage renal disease than in the general population. Several biological mechanisms have been proposed to explain the anticancer effects of end-stage renal disease, including premature aging and senescence, enhanced cancer immunity, uremic tumoricidal effects, hormonal and metabolic changes, and dialysis therapy-related factors. Despite common beliefs that end-stage renal disease exacerbates cancer risk, emerging evidence suggests potential tumor-suppressive effects. This review highlights the potential anticancer effects of end-stage renal disease, proposing reconsideration of the hypothesis that end-stage renal disease promotes cancer development and progression.

Management of cancer treatments in hemodialysis patients

INTRODUCTION

The number of cancer patients receiving long-term hemodialysis (HD) is increasing, and HD could jeopardize treatments' safety and efficacy. Therefore, managing anticancer drugs is critical in this frail population. In addition, evidence of HD safety or risk is regularly released both for cytotoxic chemotherapy (CT) or hormone therapy (HT) as well as new therapies with molecularly targeted therapies (MTT), immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), and a summary of current knowledge is needed.

METHODS

We aimed to synthesize available data on cancer treatments in HD patients using PubMed database, FDA labels, summary of product characteristics (SmPC), FDA and EMA approval documents, guidelines and finally case reports for which relevant pharmacokinetic (PK) data is available.

RESULTS

For CT, recently proposed guidelines were balanced by the publication of particular toxic reports following them. SmPC was helpful in some cases, but no data was found for most CTs. MTT, both oral and monoclonal antibodies, were rarely modified by HD. However, HD patients have particular frailty that could require dose adaptation despite no substantial PK modification. Similarly, exposure to ICIs is unlikely to be modified by HD since immunoglobulins are not dialyzable. For HT, PK characteristics and HD impact were more heterogeneous and were reviewed molecule by molecule.

CONCLUSIONS

We summarized current knowledge on HD and cancer treatments. Data remains scarce, and the latest guidelines rely on few clinical data. There is a need to collect both retrospective and prospective data to better characterize the safety and relevant dose and schedule adaptations whenever needed in this situation to reinforce future guidelines.

Systemic oncological therapy in breast cancer patients on dialysis

The advancement of renal replacement therapy has significantly enhanced the survival rates of patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) over time. However, this prolonged survival has also been associated with a higher likelihood of cancer diagnoses among these patients including breast cancer. Breast cancer treatment typically involves surgery, radiation, and systemic therapies, with approaches tailored to cancer type, stage, and patient preferences. However, renal replacement therapy complicates systemic therapy due to altered drug clearance and the necessity for dialysis sessions. This review emphasizes the need for optimized dosing and administration strategies for systemic breast cancer treatments in dialysis patients, aiming to ensure both efficacy and safety. Additionally, challenges in breast cancer screening and diagnosis in this population, including soft-tissue calcifications, are highlighted.

[Pathology of the kidneys in malignant tumors of various localizations and antitumor therapy]

Non-tumorlesions of the kidneys in malignant neoplasms are very diverse. They can alter the results of chemotherapy and lead to death in the long term. In this regard, the related discipline of onconephrology has increasingly begun to be identified, which emphasizes the importance of diagnosing non-tumor kidney lesions in this category of patients. This review is devoted to the classification, diagnosis, course, prevention and treatment of non-tumor kidney lesions in patients with malignant neoplasms. There are four groups of lesions: mechanical damage; nephropathy due to anticancer therapy; paraneoplastic nephropathy; lesions associated with metabolic disorders. Kidney lesions in patients with malignant neoplasms are characterized by a variable course. In some cases, acute renal failure develops. Others are characterized by an asymptomatic course with an outcome in nephrosclerosis. Timely diagnosis and treatment of kidney lesions in malignant neoplasms can improve the quality of life and prognosis of patients with malignant neoplasms.

How to manage renal masses in kidney transplant recipients? A collaborative review by the EAU-YAU kidney transplantation and renal cancer working groups

INTRODUCTION

Kidney transplant (KT) recipients have a four-times higher risk of renal malignancies compared to general population. As these patients frequently harbor bilateral or multifocal tumors, the management of renal masses is still under debate.

OBJECTIVE

To explore the current management of the native kidney masses in KT patients.

ACQUISITION OF EVIDENCE

We performed a literature search on MEDLINE/PubMed database. A number of 34 studies were included in the present review.

SYNTHESIS OF EVIDENCE

In frail patients with renal masses below 3 cm, active surveillance is a feasible alternative. Nephron-sparing surgery is not justified for masses in the native kidney. Radical nephrectomy is the standard treatment for post-transplant renal tumors of the native kidneys in KT recipients, with laparoscopic techniques leading to significantly less perioperative complication rates as compared to the open approach. Concurrent bilateral native nephrectomy at the time of transplantation can be considered in patients with renal mass and polycystic kidney disease, especially if no residual urinary output is present. Patients with localized disease and successful radical nephrectomy do not require immunosuppression adjustment. In metastatic cases, mTOR agents can ensure efficient antitumoral response, while maintaining proper immunosuppression in order to protect the graft.

CONCLUSIONS

Post-transplant renal cancer of the native kidneys is a frequent occurrence. Radical nephrectomy is most frequently performed for localized renal masses. A standardized and widely-approved screening strategy for malignancies of native renal units is yet to be implemented.

Dietary Intake of Anthocyanidins and Renal Cancer Risk: A Prospective Study

Evidence on the association between anthocyanidin intake and renal cancer risk is limited. The aim of this study was to assess the association of anthocyanidin intake with renal cancer risk in the large prospective Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial. The cohort for this analysis consisted of 101,156 participants. A Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to estimate the hazard ratios (HRs) and the 95% confidence intervals (CIs). A restricted cubic spline model with three knots (i.e., 10th, 50th, and 90th percentiles) was used to model a smooth curve. A total of 409 renal cancer cases were identified over a median follow-up of 12.2 years. In the categorical analysis with a fully adjusted model, a higher dietary anthocyanidin consumption was associated with a lower risk of renal cancer (HR_Q4vsQ1: 0.68; 95% CI: 0.51-0.92; p for trend < 0.010). A similar pattern was obtained when anthocyanidin intake was analyzed as a continuous variable. The HR of one-SD increment in the anthocyanidin intake for renal cancer risk was 0.88 (95% CI: 0.77-1.00, p = 0.043). The restricted cubic spline model revealed a reduced risk of renal cancer with a higher intake of anthocyanidins and there was no statistical evidence for nonlinearity (p for nonlinearity = 0.207). In conclusion, in this large American population, a higher dietary anthocyanidin consumption was associated with a lower risk of renal cancer. Future cohort studies are warranted to verify our preliminary findings and to explore the underlying mechanisms in this regard.

Meta-analysis of cancer risk among end stage renal disease undergoing maintenance dialysis

Currently, there is no consensus on whether maintenance dialysis increases cancer risk in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Therefore, this study was to systematically evaluate the risk of cancer among ESRD patients undergoing maintenance dialysis. Related studies on the impact of maintenance dialysis on cancer risk were retrieved from PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and other databases from their respective inceptions to 19 February 2021. ESRD patients receiving maintenance dialysis were classified into cancer including non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) and cancer excluding NMSC. Standardized incidence ratio (SIR) with its 95% confidence interval (95% CI) was calculated to assess cancer risk. Fourteen studies were included in the meta-analysis. The risk of cancer in patients undergoing maintenance dialysis (with or without NMSC) was significantly higher than controls both in cancer including NMSC (SIR = 1.38, 95% CI: 1.27-1.49, P < 0.001) and cancer excluding NMSC (SIR = 1.34, 95% CI: 1.23-1.47, P < 0.001). Subgroup results identified the higher risk of cancer incidence in both men and women receiving maintenance dialysis. Meanwhile, elevated excess risks were observed among patients with younger age and shorter follow-up time (P < 0.001). Meanwhile, the combined SIR of bladder, cervix, colorectum, kidney, liver, thyroid, tongue, and other cancers were all increased (P < 0.05). ESRD patients undergoing dialysis has higher risk of cancer.

Malignancies in adult kidney transplant candidates and recipients: current status

Posttransplant malignancies, particularly recurrent and de novo, in solid organs including kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) are a significant complication associated with substantial mortality, largely attributed to long-term immunosuppression necessary to maintain allograft tolerance. Older age at transplantation and oncogenic virus infection along with pretransplant malignancies are among the main factors contributing to the risk of cancer in this population. As the mean age of transplant candidates rises, the rate of transplant recipients with pretransplant malignancies also increases. The eligibility criteria for transplantation in patients with prior cancer have recently changed. The overall risk of posttransplant malignancies is at least double after transplantation including KTRs relative to the general population, most pronounced for skin cancers associated with UV radiation and virally-mediated tumors. The risk of renal cell carcinoma is specifically increased in the kidney transplant population. The therapy of cancer in transplant patients is associated with risk of higher toxicity, and graft rejection and/or impairment, which poses a unique challenge in the management. Reduction of immunosuppression and the use of mTOR inhibitors are common after cancer diagnosis, although optimal immunosuppression for transplant recipients with cancer remains undefined. Suboptimal cancer treatment contributing to a worse prognosis has been reported for malignancies in this population. In this article, we focus on the prevalence and outcomes of posttransplant malignancies, cancer therapy including a short overview of immunotherapy, cancer screening and prevention strategies, and immunosuppression as a cancer risk factor. The 2020/2021 recommendations of the Kidney Diseases Improving Global Outcome (KDIGO) and American Society of Transplantation (AST) for transplant candidates with a history of cancer are presented.

Postoperative outcomes of cancer surgery in patients with and without kidney failure with dialysis therapy: A matched-pair cohort study

Background

The difference in outcomes of cancer surgery between patients with and without kidney failure with dialysis therapy (KFDT) remains uncertain.

Methods

Using 2010–18 data in a national inpatient database in Japan, we identified patients who had undergone resection of colorectal, lung, gastric or breast cancer. We matched selected patient characteristics, type of cancer, surgical procedure and hospital of up to four patients without KFDT to each patient with KFDT. We assessed 30-day mortality and postoperative complications.

Results

Through matching, we identified 2248 patients with KFDT (807 with colorectal, 579 with lung, 500 with gastric and 362 with breast cancer) and 8210 patients without KFDT (2851 with colorectal, 2216 with lung, 1756 with gastric and 1387 with breast cancer). Postoperative complications occurred in a higher proportion of patients with KFDT than of those without KFDT after colorectal {20.3% versus 14.6%; risk difference (RD): 5.7% [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 2.6%–8.8%]}, lung [18.0% versus 12.9%; RD: 5.1% (95% CI 1.6%–8.4%)], gastric [25.0% versus 13.2%; RD: 11.8% (95% CI 7.6%–16.2%)] and breast cancer surgery [7.5% versus 3.5%; RD: 3.9% (95% CI 1.1%–6.9%)]. Patients with KFDT had a higher 30-day mortality than those without KFDT after gastric cancer surgery [1.6% versus 0.3%; RD: 1.3% (95% CI 0.1%–2.3%)]. Heart failure and ischemic heart disease occurred more frequently in patients with KFDT.

Conclusions

Patients with KFDT had higher rates of postoperative complications and 30-day mortality; however, RDs varied between cancer types. The higher rates of postoperative complications in patients with KFDT were mainly attributable to cardiovascular complications.

The Effect of Statins in Cancer Risk Reduction in Patients on Dialysis: A Population-Based Case-Control Study

Simple Summary

The lifetime risk of several cancers is elevated in patients receiving dialysis following kidney failure compared with the general population. Using a large dataset available in Taiwan, we conducted a nationwide population-based cohort study to delineate the relationship between statin use and cancer risk in patients on dialysis. Our study provides an association that statins reduce the risk of malignancy in patients on dialysis, especially with a longer treatment duration, and irrespective of the type of statin prescription. The use of statins in patients on dialysis was associated with significantly lower incidences in developing respiratory, soft tissue and connective tissue, breast, gynecological, prostate, central nervous system, and lymphatic and hematopoietic cancer.

Abstract

Background: To realize whether statins reduce the risk of cancer in susceptible dialysis populations, this study analyzed the relationship between statin use and cancer risk in patients on dialysis. Methods: Patients having a history of chronic kidney disease with hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis and receiving statin prescriptions or not were enrolled. The main outcome was cancer diagnosis. This study used univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses. Results: In total, 4236 individuals in the statin group and 8472 individuals in the statin nonuser group were included in the study. Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that statin users are significantly less likely to develop cancer than statin nonusers (adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 0.81, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.78–0.90). Subgroup analyses revealed that statin cumulative defined daily doses >365 were associated with a significantly decreased risk of cancer incidence (adjusted HR 0.59, 95% CI 0.45–0.87), and statin users have a reduced risk of respiratory, soft tissue and connective tissue, breast, gynecological, prostate, central nervous system, and lymphatic and hematopoietic cancer than nonusers. Conclusions: Our population-based cohort study provides an association that statins reduce the risk of malignancy in patients on dialysis, especially with a longer treatment duration, and certain types of cancer.

"Together We Stand": A Pilot Study Exploring the Feasibility, Acceptability, and Preliminary Effects of a Family-Based Psychoeducational Intervention for Patients on Hemodialysis and Their Family Caregivers

This pilot study aimed to assess the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary effects of a family-based psychoeducational intervention for patients undergoing hemodialysis (HD) and their family members. This was a single-group (six dyads), six-week, pre–post pilot study, delivered in a multifamily group format. Feasibility was based on screening, eligibility, content, retention, completion, and intervention adherence rates. Acceptability was assessed at post-intervention through a focus group interview. Self-reported anxiety and depression and patients’ inter-dialytic weight gain (IDWG) were also measured. The screening (93.5%), retention (85.7%), and completion (100%) rates were satisfactory, whereas eligibility (22.8%), consent (18.4%), and intervention adherence (range: 16.7–50%) rates were the most critical. Findings showed that participants appreciated the intervention and perceived several educational and emotional benefits. The results from the Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Test showed that a significant decrease in anxiety symptoms (p = 0.025, r = 0.646) was found, which was followed by medium to large within-group effect sizes for changes in depression symptoms (p = 0.261, r = 0.325) and patients’ IDWG (p = 0.248, r = 0.472), respectively. Overall, the results indicated that this family-based psychoeducational intervention is likely to be feasible, acceptable, and effective for patients undergoing HD and their family caregivers; nonetheless, further considerations are needed on how to make the intervention more practical and easily implemented in routine dialysis care before proceeding to large-scale trials.

Hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with renal dysfunction: Pathophysiology, prognosis, and treatment challenges

The population of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) overlaps to a high degree with those for chronic kidney disease (CKD) and end-stage renal disease (ESRD). The degrees of renal dysfunction vary, from the various stages of CKD to dialysis-dependent ESRD, which often affects the prognosis and treatment choice of patients with HCC. In addition, renal dysfunction makes treatment more difficult and may negatively affect treatment outcomes. This study summarized the possible causes of the high comorbidity of HCC and renal dysfunction. The possible mechanisms of CKD causing HCC involve uremia itself, long-term dialysis status, immunosuppressive agents for postrenal transplant status, and miscellaneous factors such as hormone alterations and dysbiosis. The possible mechanisms of HCC affecting renal function include direct tumor invasion and hepatorenal syndrome. Finally, we categorized the risk factors that could lead to both HCC and CKD into four categories: Environmental toxins, viral hepatitis, metabolic syndrome, and vasoactive factors. Both CKD and ESRD have been reported to negatively affect HCC prognosis, but more research is warranted to confirm this. Furthermore, ESRD status itself ought not to prevent patients receiving aggressive treatments. This study then adopted the well-known Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer guidelines as a framework to discuss the indicators for each stage of HCC treatment, treatment-related adverse renal effects, and concerns that are specific to patients with pre-existing renal dysfunction when undergoing aggressive treatments against CKD and ESRD. Such aggressive treatments include liver resection, simultaneous liver kidney transplantation, radiofrequency ablation, and transarterial chemoembolization. Finally, focusing on patients unable to receive active treatment, this study compiled information on the latest systemic pharmacological therapies, including targeted and immunotherapeutic drugs. Based on available clinical studies and Food and Drug Administration labels, this study details the drug indications, side effects, and dose adjustments for patients with renal dysfunction. It also provides a comprehensive review of information on HCC patients with renal dysfunction from disease onset to treatment.

Renal cell carcinoma in native nephrectomy specimens of autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) patients with end-stage renal disease: Findings from an Australian transplant center

Objectives:

The aim of this study was to present a contemporary review of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in native nephrectomy (NN) specimens of patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) and end-stage renal disease (ESRD).

Materials (patients) and methods:

A retrospective review of all ADPKD patients who underwent NN from 1 October 2010 to 31 July 2019 was performed. Data was collected on demographics, length of time on renal replacement therapy, indications for surgery, perioperative details, and histology.

Results:

In total, 32 NNs were performed in our study period with 12.5% ( n=4) histologically diagnosed with RCC, consisting of 75% ( n=3) Type 1 papillary RCC (p RCC) and 25% ( n=1) clear cell RCC. Average age of ADPKD patients with ESRD diagnosed with RCC was 67±5.9 years. Average time on dialysis for RCC and non-RCC patients was 35.75±46.28 and 22.04±24.33 months, respectively. We did not find a significant correlation between the diagnosis of RCC and time on dialysis.

Conclusion:

Our contemporary series shows a significant proportion of ADPKD patients with ESRD undergoing NN have RCC. Compared to previously published datasets, our patients are older, and selective to those with very large kidneys and lesions suspicious for RCC. While there may be a role in imaging native kidneys with ADPKD to rule out suspicious lesions, it must be balanced against the cost, radiation exposure, and potential harm from an increased rate of nephrectomy that may ensue for suspicious lesions found on screening.

Level of evidence:

Not applicable for this multicentre audit.

Immunoglobulin A Vasculitis in a Patient on Hemodialysis and With a Metastatic Liver Lesion

We present the case of a 79-year-old man on hemodialysis with immunoglobulin A (IgA) vasculitis. He developed palpable purpura three weeks after having pneumonia. A skin biopsy showed leukocytoclastic vasculitis with IgA and C3 deposition. He received a topical corticosteroid for his IgA vasculitis. He was also diagnosed with a metastatic liver lesion, which was thought to be of colorectal origin because of the elevations in carcinoembryonic antigen and cancer antigen 19-9 levels. The skin biopsy played an important role in the diagnosis of the patient on hemodialysis. Pneumonia and a metastatic liver lesion thought to be from colorectal cancer might be related to the pathogenesis of IgA vasculitis.

[Preparation of the dialysis patient with type 1 diabetes mellitus for kidney transplantation]

Kidney transplantation is unique method of renal replacement therapy, allowing to improve quality and duration of life for patients with diabetes mellitus type 1 (DM1) and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) on dialysis therapy. Recently using of innovation technologies for diabetes management and modern immunosuppression enable achieving better results of posttransplant rehabilitation for patients with DM1, especially if kidney transplantation is performed early after initiation of dialysis. Detailed examination of patient with DM1 before potential kidney transplantation is very important to reduce of early and late postoperative complications. Kidney transplantation preparation includes effective glycemic control, adequate dialysis therapy, treatment of diabetes and ESRD complications and concomitant conditions, especially cardiovascular diseases, accounting for kidney transplantation perspective. Furthermore, diagnostics and treatment of any infectious process, timely vaccination, cancer screening are basic approaches of kidney transplantation preparation program, providing the best survival rate of kidney graft and patient.

ZiMM: A deep learning model for long term and blurry relapses with non-clinical claims data

This paper considers the problems of modeling and predicting a long-term and "blurry" relapse that occurs after a medical act, such as a surgery. We do not consider a short-term complication related to the act itself, but a long-term relapse that clinicians cannot explain easily, since it depends on unknown sets or sequences of past events that occurred before the act. The relapse is observed only indirectly, in a "blurry" fashion, through longitudinal prescriptions of drugs over a long period of time after the medical act. We introduce a new model, called ZiMM (Zero-inflated Mixture of Multinomial distributions) in order to capture long-term and blurry relapses. On top of it, we build an end-to-end deep-learning architecture called ZiMM Encoder-Decoder (ZiMM ED) that can learn from the complex, irregular, highly heterogeneous and sparse patterns of health events that are observed through a claims-only database. ZiMM ED is applied on a "non-clinical" claims database, that contains only timestamped reimbursement codes for drug purchases, medical procedures and hospital diagnoses, the only available clinical feature being the age of the patient. This setting is more challenging than a setting where bedside clinical signals are available. Our motivation for using such a non-clinical claims database is its exhaustivity population-wise, compared to clinical electronic health records coming from a single or a small set of hospitals. Indeed, we consider a dataset containing the claims of almost all French citizens who had surgery for prostatic problems, with a history between 1.5 and 5 years. We consider a long-term (18 months) relapse (urination problems still occur despite surgery), which is blurry since it is observed only through the reimbursement of a specific set of drugs for urination problems. Our experiments show that ZiMM ED improves several baselines, including non-deep learning and deep-learning approaches, and that it allows working on such a dataset with minimal preprocessing work.

ABO blood group relationships to kidney transplant recipient and graft outcomes

Introduction

Certain ABO blood types have been linked to cardiovascular disease, infection and cancers. The effect of recipient ABO blood group on patient and graft survival has not been studied in ABO-matched kidney transplantation. This study aims to determine the association between kidney transplant recipient ABO blood groups with patient and graft survival in Australian and New Zealand.

Methods

All Australian and New Zealand transplant recipients who received ABO-compatible primary kidney transplants between 1995–2016 were analysed using a de-identified dataset from the Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant (ANZDATA) Registry. Primary analysis was undertaken of recipient ABO blood group O versus non-O blood groups. The primary outcome was patient survival post kidney transplantation and the secondary outcome was death censored graft survival. Recipient age at first transplant, gender, ethnicity, body mass index, smoking status, vascular disease, presence of diabetes mellitus, chronic lung disease, primary kidney disease, donor source, donor age and gender, and era of transplants were included in the multivariate model as confounders.

Results and conclusions

On analysis of 15,523 kidney transplant recipients, blood group O was not associated with patient survival (hazard ratio (HR) 0.96, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.89–1.04) nor death censored graft survival (HR 0.97, 95% CI 0.89–1.05) compared to non-blood group O recipients. Competing risks analyses showed an increased risk of cancer-related mortality in blood group O recipients on univariate analyses (HR 1.18, 95% CI 1.01–1.37) however, this became insignificant on multivariate analyses. On secondary analyses, recipient blood group AB (4.11% participants) was associated with inferior death censored graft survival compared to those with blood group O (HR 1.24, 95% CI 1.02–1.50). Although recipient ABO blood groups were not associated with patient nor graft survival, differences in cause-specific mortality between individual blood groups cannot be excluded based on current analyses.

Treatment options for localised renal cell carcinoma of the transplanted kidney

Currently, there is no consensus among the transplant community about the treatment of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) of the transplanted kidney. Until recently, graftectomy was universally considered the golden standard, regardless of the characteristics of the neoplasm. Due to the encouraging results observed in native kidneys, conservative options such as nephron-sparing surgery (NSS) (enucleation and partial nephrectomy) and ablative therapy (radiofrequency ablation, cryoablation, microwave ablation, high-intensity focused ultrasound, and irreversible electroporation) have been progressively used in carefully selected recipients with early-stage allograft RCC. Available reports show excellent patient survival, optimal oncological outcome, and preserved renal function with acceptable complication rates. Nevertheless, the rarity and the heterogeneity of the disease, the number of options available, and the lack of long-term follow-up data do not allow to adequately define treatment-specific advantages and limitations. The role of active surveillance and immunosuppression management remain also debated. In order to offer a better insight into this difficult topic and to help clinicians choose the best therapy for their patients, we performed and extensive review of the literature. We focused on epidemiology, clinical presentation, diagnostic work up, staging strategies, tumour characteristics, treatment modalities, and follow-up protocols. Our research confirms that both NSS and focal ablation represent a valuable alternative to graftectomy for kidney transplant recipients with American Joint Committee on Cancer stage T1aN0M0 RCC. Data on T1bN0M0 lesions are scarce but suggest extra caution. Properly designed multi-centre prospective clinical trials are warranted.

Risk of intestinal and extra-intestinal cancers in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases: A population-based cohort study in northeastern Italy

The cancer risk of patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) has not been well documented in southern Europe. This study aimed to evaluate the overall pattern of cancer risk among patients with IBD in Friuli Venezia Giulia, northeastern Italy. A population-based cohort study was performed through a record linkage between local healthcare databases and the cancer registry (1995–2013). We identified 3664 IBD patients aged 18–84 years, including 2358 with ulcerative colitis (UC) and 1306 with Crohn’s disease (CD). Sex- and age-standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to compare the cancer incidence of IBD patients with the general population. The cumulative cancer risk among IBD patients reached about 10% after 10 years of follow-up. A total of 246 cancers occurred among UC patients (SIR = 1.05, 95% CI: 0.92–1.19), and 141 among CD patients (SIR = 1.20, 95% CI: 1.01–1.41). As compared with the general population, no increased risk of colorectal cancers was observed for either UC or CD patients, whereas the risk of anal cancer was significantly elevated among UC patients (SIR = 6.03, 95% CI: 1.24–17.60). Increased risks were seen for specific extra-intestinal cancers, including corpus uteri (SIR = 2.67, 95% CI: 1.07–5.50) and kidney (SIR = 2.06, 95% CI: 1.03–3.69) among UC patients; thyroid (SIR = 5.58, 95% CI: 2.41–11.00) and skin non-melanoma (SIR = 1.86, 95% CI: 1.32–2.55) among CD patients. This population-based study showed that both UC and CD patients had a colorectal cancer risk similar to that of the general population. However, they were at a higher risk of developing certain extra-intestinal cancer types. Although detection biases cannot be excluded, the study findings pointed to a role of long-standing exposures to immunosuppressive therapies, underlying disease status, as well as the interactions with lifestyle factors. Our findings lent additional support to the need for monitoring the cancer burden in this at-risk population.

Incidence and risk factors for HPV-associated cancers in women with end-stage renal disease

Human papillomavirus (HPV) causes the majority of cervical, anal/rectal, and oropharyngeal cancers in women. End-stage renal disease (ESRD) is also associated with an increased risk of malignancy, but the incidence of and risk factors for HPV-associated cancers in US dialysis patients are not defined. We queried the US Renal Data System for women with HPV-associated cancers and assessed for incidence of cancer diagnosis and association of risk factors. From 2005 to 2011, a total of 1032 female patients with ESRD had 1040 HPV-associated cancer diagnoses. Patients had a mean age of 65 years, were mostly white (63%), and on hemodialysis (92%). Cervical cancer (54%) was the most common, followed by anal/rectal (34%), and oropharyngeal (12%). The incidence of HPV-associated cancers in patients with ESRD increased yearly, with up to a 16-fold increased incidence compared with the general population. Major risk factors associated with the development of any HPV-associated cancer included smoking (adjusted relative risk=1.89), alcohol use (1.87), HIV (2.21), and herpes infection (2.02). Smoking, HIV, and herpes infection were prominent risk factors for cervical cancer. The incidence of HPV-associated cancers in women with ESRD is rising annually and is overall higher than in women of the general population. Tobacco use is a universal risk factor. For cervical cancer, the presence of HIV and herpes are important comorbidities. Recognizing risk factors associated with these cancers may improve diagnosis and facilitate survival. The role of HPV vaccination in at-risk dialysis patients remains to be defined but warrants further study.

Otorhinolaryngological dysfunctions induced by chronic kidney disease in pre- and post-transplant stages

Purpose

Otorhinolaryngological abnormalities are common complications of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and its treatment. The main aim of this study was to provide a brief and precise review of the current knowledge regarding CKD and its treatment-related influence on head and neck organs.

Methods

The Medline and Web of Science databases were searched using the terms “chronic kidney disease”, “kidney transplantation”, “immunosuppression”, “dialysis” in conjunction with “otorhinolaryngological manifestation”. Articles that did not address the topics, low-quality studies, case reports, and studies based on nonsignificant cohorts were excluded, and the full text of remaining high-quality, novel articles were examined and elaborated on.

Results

Patients with CKD are prone to develop sensorineural hearing loss, tinnitus, recurrent epistaxis, opportunistic infections including oropharyngeal candidiasis or rhino-cerebral mucormycosis, taste and smell changes, phonatory and vestibular dysfunctions, deep neck infections, mucosal abnormalities, gingival hyperplasia, halitosis or xerostomia. Immunosuppressive therapy after kidney transplantation increases the risk of carcinogenesis, both related and not-related to latent viral infection. The most commonly viral-related neoplasms observed in these patients are oral and oropharyngeal cancers, whereas the majority of not-related to viral infection tumors constitute lip and thyroid cancers. CKD-related otorhinolaryngological dysfunctions are often permanent, difficult to control, have a significant negative influence on patient’s quality of life, and can be life threatening.

Conclusion

Patients with CKD suffer from a number of otorhinolaryngological CKD-induced complications. The relationship between several otorhinolaryngological complications and CKD was widely explained, whereas the correlation between the rest of them and CKD remains unclear. Further studies on this subject are necessary.

De Novo Cancer Incidence and Prognosis After Kidney Transplantation: A Single Center Analysis

BACKGROUND

Malignancy is an important cause of mortality in renal transplants recipients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence, prognosis, and survival of patients developing a de novo post-transplant cancer.

METHODS

Using a retrospective cohort design, we evaluated the incidence of de novo cancers among kidney transplants patients in our hospital from January 2000 to December 2012. We also evaluated the patient survival after tumor diagnosis.

RESULTS

We included 535 kidney transplants recipients with a mean follow-up of 7.8 years; among them, 39 (7.2%) developed malignancies. Median time from transplant to cancer diagnosis was 3 years, with a median age at diagnosis of 60 years. Male patients were significantly older at time of cancer diagnosis (68.5 years) compared with women (38 years, P < .05), and cancer diagnosis occurred significantly earlier in men (3.5 years since transplantation) than in women (8.5 years, P < .05). Among 39 patients affected by a de novo post-transplant cancer, 18 patients (46.2%) died, with an average age at death of 58.5 years. The average time from cancer diagnosis to death was 1.5 years. Among the group of patients who did not develop a post-transplant cancer, 83 patients (16.7%) died, with a median age at time of death of 54.5 years (P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Kidney transplant recipients are at higher risk of developing a post-transplant cancer. Prognosis after cancer diagnosis is poor, probably as a consequence of a more aggressive behavior of cancer in transplant recipients. Intensive screening protocols could allow for an earlier diagnosis thereby improving the long-term outcome of these patients.