Comparative efficacy and safety of combination therapies for advanced melanoma: a network meta-analysis

Partial recovery of peripheral blood monocyte subsets in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients upon radio(chemo)therapy is associated with decreased plasma CXCL11

BACKGROUND

Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) represents a common and heterogeneous malignancy of the oral cavity, pharynx and larynx. Surgery and radio(chemo)therapy are the standard treatment options and also have great influence on the composition of the tumor microenvironment and immune cell functions. However, the impact of radio(chemo)therapy on the distribution and characteristics of circulating monocyte subsets in HNSCC are not fully understood.

METHODS

Expression patterns of adhesion molecules and chemokine receptors CD11a (integrin-α L; LFA-1), CD11b (integrin-α M; Mac-1), CD11c (integrin-α X), CX3CR1 (CX3CL1 receptor) and checkpoint molecule PD-L1 (programmed cell death ligand-1) were investigated upon radio(chemo)therapeutic treatment using flow cytometry. Furthermore, comprehensive analysis of plasma cytokines was performed before and after treatment using ELISA measurements.

RESULTS

Our data reveal a partial recovery of circulating monocytes in HNSCC patients upon radio(chemo)therapeutic treatment, with differential effects of the individual therapy regimen. PD-L1 expression on non-classical monocytes significantly correlates with the individual plasma levels of chemokine CXCL11 (C-X-C motif chemokine 11).

CONCLUSIONS

Further comprehensive investigations on larger patient cohorts are required to elucidate the meaningfulness of peripheral blood monocyte subsets and chemokine CXCL11 as potential bioliquid indicators in HNSCC with regard to therapy response and the individual immunological situation.

Real-world management practices and characteristics of patients with advanced melanoma initiated on immuno-oncology or targeted therapy in the first-line setting during the period 2015-2018 in Greece. The 'SUMMER' study: a retrospective multicenter chart review project

This study primarily aimed to generate real-world evidence (RWE) on the profile and first-line treatment (1LT) patterns of patients with advanced (unresectable Stage III/metastatic) cutaneous melanoma initiated on immuno-oncology (IO)- or targeted therapy (TT)-based 1LT between 1 January 2015 and 1 January 2018 (index period), in routine settings of Greece. This was a multicenter, retrospective chart review study. Eligible consented (unless deceased, for whom consent was waived by the hospital) patients were consecutively included by six oncology clinics. The look-back period extended from informed consent or death to initial melanoma diagnosis. Between 9 Junuary 2021 and 9 February 2022, 225 eligible patients (all Caucasians; 60.4% male; 35.6% diagnosed with de novo advanced melanoma) were included. At 1LT initiation, median age was 62.6 years; 2.7/6.7/90.7% of the patients had Stage IIIB/IIIC/IV disease and 9.3% were unresected. Most frequent metastatic sites were the lung (46.7%), non-regional nodes (33.8%), and liver (20.9%). Among patients, 98.2% had single primary melanoma, 45.6% had disease localized on the trunk, and 63.6% were BRAF-mutant. Of the patients, 45.3% initiated 1LT with an IO-based, 53.3% with a TT-based regimen, and three patients (1.3%) received TT-based followed by IO-based or vice versa. Most common 1LT patterns (frequency ≥10%) were BRAFi/MEKi combination (31.6%), anti-PD-1 monotherapy (25.3%), BRAFi monotherapy (21.8%), and anti-CTLA-4 monotherapy (17.8%). Most frequent regimens were Dabrafenib+Trametinib in 25.3%, and monotherapies with Pembrolizumab/Ipilimumab/Vemurafenib/Dabrafenib in 23.6/17.8/11.1/10.7% of patients, respectively. SUMMER provides RWE on 1LT strategies and profile of patients initiated 1L IO- or TT-based therapy in Greece during the 3-year index period.

Efficacy of immunotherapy (Prolgolimab) and targeted therapy (Trametinib and Dabrafenib, Cobimetinib and Vemurafenib) in adult patients with metastatic or unresectable skin melanoma: matching-adjusted indirect comparison

Aim. To assess the comparative clinical efficacy of Prolgolimab monotherapy versus combination therapy with BRAF/MEK inhibitors (Dabrafenib and Trametinib, Vemurafenib and Cobimetinb) in adult patients with metastatic or unresectable skin melanoma implementing a matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC). Materials and methods. We conducted a systematic search for randomized clinical trials of Prolgolimab, combinations of Dabrafenib and Trametinib, Cobimetinib and Vemurafenib. Unanchored MAIC was applied due to the absence of common comparator between trials. We determined effect modifiers based on an expert survey. The population from Prolgolimab studies was weighted using defined effect modifiers, followed by the approximation of survival curves. Results. Systematic literature search revealed 4 RCTs that met the inclusion criteria: MIRACULUM, coBRIM, combi-v and combi-d. To increase the power of prolgolimab comparison, data from the observational study FORA were included in evidence synthesis and combined with data from MIRACULUM. We selected M staging and the proportion of patients with elevated LDH levels as effect modifiers. No significant differences (all p0.05) were established between Prolgolimab and combination therapy with BRAF/MEK inhibitors for both OS after 1 year and PFS outcomes after 2 years from initiation. Discussion. Despite the inclusion of observational data and the limitations of adjusted indirect comparison method, the results of this analyses are consistent with both other comparisons of anti-PD1 inhibitors with BRAF/MEK inhibitors, and with real world data. It is necessary to recompare targeted therapy and immunotherapy after five-year follow-up period due to peculiarities of time of onset of their effect with the presence of a primary failure with a gradual exit to a long plateau on anti-PD1 inhibitors therapy. Conclusion. In these unanchored MAICs, Prolgolimab monotherapy showed comparable efficacy with combinations of BRAF/MEK inhibitors (Dabrafenib + Trametinib, Vemurafenib + Cobimetinib) in first line therapy of patients with metastatic or unresectable melanoma. This analysis may be relevant for clinical decision-making about the choice of the first line therapy for patients with BRAF mutation.

Comparative efficacy and safety of targeted therapies for BRAF-mutant unresectable or metastatic melanoma: Results from a systematic literature review and a network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to estimate the relative efficacy and safety of targeted therapies for the treatment of metastatic melanoma using a network meta-analysis (NMA).

METHODS

A systematic literature review (SLR) identified studies in Medline, Embase and Cochrane published until November 2020. Screening used prespecified eligibility criteria. Following a transitivity assessment across included studies, Bayesian NMA was conducted.

RESULTS

A total of 43 publications reporting 15 targeted therapy trials and 42 reporting 18 immunotherapy trials were retained from the SLR and considered for the NMA. Due to substantial between-study heterogeneity with immunotherapy trials, the analysis considered a network restricted to targeted therapies. Among combination therapies, encorafenib + binimetinib was superior to dabrafenib + trametinib for overall response rate (OR = 1.86; 95 % credible interval [CrI] 1.10, 3.17), superior to vemurafenib + cobimetinib with fewer serious adverse events (SAEs) (OR = 0.51; 95 % CrI 0.29, 0.91) and fewer discontinuations due to AEs (OR = 0.45; 95 % CrI 0.21, 0.96), and superior to atezolizumab + vemurafenib + cobimetinib with fewer SAEs (OR = 0.41; 95 % CrI 0.21, 0.82). Atezolizumab + vemurafenib + cobimetinib and encorafenib + binimetinib were generally comparable for efficacy endpoints. Among double combination therapies, encorafenib + binimetinib showed high probabilities of being better for all efficacy and safety endpoints.

CONCLUSIONS

This NMA confirms that combination therapies are more efficacious than monotherapies. Encorafenib + binimetinib has a favourable efficacy profile compared to other double combination therapies and a favourable safety profile compared to both double and triple combination therapies.

Deglycosylation of pathological specimens alters performance of diagnostic PDL1 antibodies

Immunohistochemical (IHC) predictive quantitation of PDL1 expression is obligatory in many cancer entities with improved response to immune checkpoint inhibition in PDL1-positive subgroups. With recent demonstration of increased positivity rates after enzymatic deglycosylation in breast cancer specimens, a comparative analysis with two different antibodies and extended controls was performed in a cohort of head and neck squamous cell cancer samples (HNSCC).Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue from HNSCC specimens was used for initial on-slide method optimization based on the PNGase F assay. SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting with the PDL1 antibody 28-8 was performed to evaluate deglycosylation efficiency. A tissue micro array of n = 527 tissue cores of 181 patients with HNSCC was used to determine the effects of deglycosylation on staining pattern and intensity with PDL1 antibodies 28-8 and E1L3N.Successful on-slide deglycosylation with PNGase F was confirmed by immunoblot but varied across replicates. Using E1L3N (intracellular binding domain, most probably not glycosylated), mean signal intensity as well as the fraction of PDL1 positive cells was increased by deglycosylation. Opposite effects were observed with 28-8 (extracellular binding domain, glycosylated).Deglycosylation reduces diagnostic performance of the PDL1 antibody 28-8. In contrast, effects for E1L3N are complex and probably involve reduction of off-target binding leading to specifically improved signal intensity. However, enzymatic deglycosylation adds further variance to IHC.

Managing Metastatic Melanoma in 2022: A Clinical Review

Cutaneous melanoma remains the most lethal of the primary cutaneous neoplasms, and although the incidence of primary melanoma continues to rise, the mortality from metastatic disease remains unchanged, in part through advances in treatment. Major developments in immunomodulatory and targeted therapies have provided robust improvements in response and survival trends that have transformed the clinical management of patients with metastatic melanoma. Additional advances in immunologic and cancer cell biology have contributed to further optimization in (1) risk stratification, (2) prognostication, (3) treatment, (4) toxicity management, and (5) surveillance approaches for patients with an advanced melanoma diagnosis. In this review, we provide a comprehensive overview of the historical and future advances regarding the translational and clinical implications of advanced melanoma and share multidisciplinary recommendations to aid clinicians in the navigation of current treatment approaches for a variety of patient cohorts.

Spatial Distribution of Immune Cells in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinomas

Background

Head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCCs) have a very moderate response rate to immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment compared to other cancer types. Lacking predictive markers for treatment response, we analyzed the immune status of HNSCC and assessed the spatial distribution of immune cells.

Materials and Methods

Via assessing hematoxylin–eosin (H&E) stains, we divided HNSCCs by the immune cell distribution in hot, cold, and excluded tumors. For each group, each with 10 tumors, we performed serial immunohistochemical (IHC) staining of the immune cell markers, checkpoint molecules, and immune regulators.

Results

The spatial distributions were different for each immune cell type, allocating regulatory T cells (Tregs) and CD11b cells predominantly in the stroma. CD4 and CD8 cells were present either in the tumor stroma or between cancer cells. Interestingly, the expressions of PD-1 (programmed cell death 1 receptor) and PD-L1 (programmed death-ligand 1) were higher in hot tumors in comparison to cold and excluded tumors. The expression of pSMAD [indicating active transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β)] was higher in excluded tumors.

Conclusion

Different immune cell distribution patterns within tumors might be crucial for ICI treatment response since hot tumors have the highest expressions of PD-1 and PD-L1. TGF-β might be a key regulator for immune cell distribution and a promising therapeutic target that determines the formation of hot or excluded immune patterns.

Sargramostim and immune checkpoint inhibitors: combinatorial therapeutic studies in metastatic melanoma

The use of immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with metastatic melanoma generates clinical benefit, including improved survival. Yet disease resistance and immune-related adverse events persist as unmet needs. Sargramostim, a yeast-derived recombinant human GM-CSF, has shown clinical activity against diverse solid tumors, including metastatic melanoma. Here we review the use of sargramostim for treatment of advanced melanoma. Potential sargramostim applications in melanoma draw on the unique ability of GM-CSF to link innate and adaptive immune responses. We review preclinical and translational data describing the mechanism of action of sargramostim and synergy with immune checkpoint inhibitors to enhance efficacy and reduce treatment-related toxicity.

Immunologic "Cold" Squamous Cell Carcinomas of the Head and Neck Are Associated With an Unfavorable Prognosis

Background: Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) represents a common cancer worldwide. Past therapeutic advances have not significantly improved HNSCC prognosis. Therefore, it is necessary to further stratify HNSCC, especially with recent advances in tumor immunology.

Methods: Tissue microarrays were assembled from tumor tissue samples and were complemented with comprehensive clinicopathological data of n = 419 patients. H&E whole slides from resection specimen (n = 289) were categorized according to their immune cell infiltrate as “hot,” “cold,” or “excluded.”

Results: Investigating tumor immune cell patterns, we found significant differences in survival rates. Immunologic “hot” and “excluded” HNSCCs are associated with better overall survival than “cold” HNSCC patients (p < 0.05). Interestingly, the percentage of all three patterns is nearly identical in p16 positive and negative HNSCCs.

Conclusions: Using a plain histological H&E approach to categorize HNSCC as being immunologic “hot,” “cold,” or “excluded” can offer a forecast of patients' prognosis and may thus aid as a potential prognostic tool in routine pathology reports. This “hot-cold-excluded” scheme needs to be applied to more HNSCC cohorts and possibly to other cancer types to determine prognostic meaning, e.g., regarding OS or DFS. Furthermore, our cohort reflects epidemiological data in the national, European, and international context. It may, therefore, be of use for future HNSCC characterization.

Comparative Risks of High-Grade Adverse Events Among FDA-Approved Systemic Therapies in Advanced Melanoma: Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

Background: Head-to-head evidence is lacking in comparative risks of high-grade adverse events (AEs) among different systemic treatment options for advanced melanoma. Methods: An up-to-date systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) was performed. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of patients with advanced melanoma were eligible if at least one intervention was the Food and Drug Administration-approved targeted or immune checkpoint inhibitors. Risks of high-grade AEs were estimated by random-effects Bayesian NMAs, based on relative risks. Surface under the cumulative ranking probabilities was used to assess relative ranking of treatments. The summary incidences were calculated. Results: Twenty-five RCTs (12,925 patients) comparing 10 different systemic treatment options were included. BRAF/MEK had the highest risk of overall high-grade AEs (pooled incidence: 32.11%). BRAF had the highest risk of high-grade arthralgia (0.39%), whereas MEK had the highest risk of high-grade hypertension (2.28%) and nausea (0.37%). Cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4)/chemo had the highest risk of high-grade diarrhea (1.31%), alanine aminotransferase (0.60%), and aspartate aminotransferase elevation (0.59%). Programmed cell death 1 (PD-1)/CTLA-4 had the highest risks of high-grade pyrexia (1.14%) and rash (0.94%). Using PD-1 inhibitor alone had the lowest risks of overall high-grade AEs. Conclusions: Different systemic treatment options have varying high-grade AEs in advanced melanoma treatment. Current evidences highlight the important risks of BRAF/MEK, CTLA-4/chemo, and PD-1/CTLA-4.

Maintaining Quality of Life: Electrochemotherapy for Palliative Periorbital Malignancy

Electrochemotherapy has been used successfully for treatment of recurrent head and neck skin cancers and skin metastasis. It combines both electroporation and chemotherapy. The authors report 4 patients, who all had metastatic periorbital malignancy. These patients were palliative with widespread metastatic malignancy. All patients had either already had multiple procedures or declined surgical resection and preferred less involved measures. The authors report technique and outcomes. Patient 1: 83-year-old man with recurrent malignant melanoma (MM) nodules (BRAF negative) in the left medial orbit and medial canthal area after rhinectomy and previous resections. Patient 2: 72-year-old man with metastatic MM who developed painful and unsightly metastatic nodules on the right and left forehead and the left medial canthus. Patient 3: 93-year-old man with background of widespread multiple myeloma, considered palliative. He developed a left forehead SCC, apparent as a fungating ulcer, which caused significant pain due to perineural invasion. Patient 4: 91-year-old woman with recurrent metastatic sebaceous cell carcinoma of the left lower eyelid obstructing her vision. All patients experienced an improvement in their pain and quality of life. None of the patients developed any significant periorbital inflammation or adverse complications. Electrochemotherapy may be a useful palliative treatment for periorbital tumors. It improves pain and reduces tumor volume. It can be considered for tumors where palliative radiotherapy may be contraindicated.Electrochemotherapy is a useful palliative treatment for metastases to the periorbital area, improving pain and size of the tumors.