Biomechanical study of strength and stiffness of the knee anterolateral ligament

The anterolateral ligament complex has limited impact on anterior tibial translation or internal rotational stability in ACL-deficient and ACL-reconstructed knees. A systematic review of biomechanical cadaver studies

PURPOSE

To perform an updated systematic review of the biomechanical characteristics investigating the contributions of the anterolateral ligament complex to rotational and anterior knee stability in ACL-intact, ACL-deficient, and ACL-reconstructed knees.

METHODS

Medline, Embase, Scopus, and Google Scholar were screened for studies from 2012 to 2024. Biomechanical laboratory cadaver studies were included if they described biomechanical characteristics in ACL-intact (ACLI), ACL-deficient (ACLD), ACL-reconstructed with (ALLR) or without ALL-reconstruction (ALLD). Studies examining other anatomical structures, such as the iliotibial band and Kaplan fibers, and alternative reconstruction techniques, such as lateral extra-articular tenodesis, were excluded. CASP (Critical Appraisal Skills Programme) checklist for qualitative research and the BOBQAT (Biomechanics Objective, Basic Science Quality Assessment Tool) scale, were used for study quality assessment. Heterogeneity within and between studies was evaluated using the I2 statistic. Publication bias was examined using funnel plots and Egger's test.

RESULTS

Twenty-two studies were included in the analysis. CASP assessment deemed 21 of these studies to be valuable. BOBQAT evaluated, 9 studies were as moderate quality, 8 as fair quality, and 5 as poor quality. The mean load to failure varied between 49 N and 319.8 N, with a pooled mean of 171.9 N. Stiffness values ranged from 2.6 to 41.9 N/mm, yielding a pooled mean of 21.46 N/mm. Comparisons of load displacement did not reveal significant differences across the following groups for both anterior tibial translation (ATT) and internal rotation (IR) for all comparisons.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review did not find conclusive evidence that the ALL plays a significant role in limiting anterior tibial translation or internal rotation stability in either ACLI or ACLR knees at point zero during biomechanical testing of cadaver specimens.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Biomechanical laboratory studies conducted at time zero suggest that the added benefit of combining ALLR with ACLR reconstruction remains uncertain. When ACLR sufficiently restores knee stability, additional procedures may not always be necessary.

Development and validation of a biomechanically fidelic surgical training knee model

Knee arthroplasty technique is constantly evolving and the opportunity for surgeons to practice new techniques is currently highly dependent on the availability of cadaveric specimens requiring certified facilities. The high cost, limited supply, and heterogeneity of cadaveric specimens has increased the demand for synthetic training models, which are currently limited by a lack of biomechanical fidelity. Here, we aimed to design, manufacture, and experimentally validate a synthetic knee surgical training model which reproduces the flexion dependent varus-valgus (VV) and anterior-posterior (AP) mechanics of cadaveric knees, while maintaining anatomic accuracy. A probabilistic finite element modeling approach was employed to design physical models to exhibit passive cadaveric VV and AP mechanics. Seven synthetic models were manufactured and tested in a six-degree-of-freedom hexapod robot. Overall, the synthetic models exhibited cadaver-like VV and AP mechanics across a wide range of flexion angles with little variation between models. In the extended position, two models showed increased valgus rotation (<0.5°), and three models showed increased posterior tibial translation (<1.7 mm) when compared to the 95% confidence interval (CI) of cadaveric measurements. At full flexion, all models showed VV and AP mechanics within the 95% CI of cadaveric measurements. Given the repeatable mechanics exhibited, the knee models developed in this study can be used to reduce the current reliance on cadaveric specimens in surgical training.

Shear wave elastography demonstrates different material properties between the medial collateral ligament and anterolateral ligament

BACKGROUND

Anterolateral ligament and medial collateral ligament injuries could happen concomitantly with anterior cruciate ligament ruptures. The anterolateral ligament is injured more often than the medial collateral ligament during concomitant anterior cruciate ligament ruptures although it offers less restraint to knee movement. Comparing the material properties of the medial collateral ligament and anterolateral ligament helps improve our understanding of their structure-function relationship and injury risk before the onset of injury.

METHODS

Eight cadaveric lower extremity specimens were prepared and mechanically tested to failure in a laboratory setting using a hydraulic platform. Measurements of surface strains of superficial surface of each medial collateral ligament and anterolateral ligament specimen were found using three-dimensional digital image correlation. Ligament stiffness was found using ultrasound shear-wave elastography. t-tests were used to assess for significant differences in strain, stress, Young's modulus, and stiffness in the two ligaments.

FINDINGS

The medial collateral ligament exhibited greater ultimate failure strain along its longitudinal axis (p = 0.03) and Young's modulus (p < 0.0018) than the anterolateral ligament. Conversely, the anterolateral ligament exhibited greater ultimate failure stress than the medial collateral ligament (p < 0.0001). Medial collateral ligament failure occurred mostly in the proximal aspect of the ligament, while most anterolateral ligament failure occurred in the distal or midsubstance aspect (P = 0.04).

INTERPRETATION

Despite both being ligamentous structures, the medial collateral ligament and anterolateral ligament exhibited separate material properties during ultimate failure testing. The weaker material properties of the anterolateral ligament likely contribute to higher rates of concomitant injury with anterior cruciate ligament ruptures.

Progress in research on and classification of surgical methods of arthroscopic reconstruction of the ACL and ALL using a shared tendon graft through the femoral tunnel

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tear is a common clinical injury, and ACL reconstruction has reached a very mature stage. However, with the accumulation of cases, scholars have found that isolated ACL reconstruction may not completely solve the problem of knee rotational stability. With the increase in our understanding of knee joint structure, ACL combined with anterolateral ligament (ALL) reconstruction has become accepted by most scholars, and this operation has also achieved good clinical results. At present, there is no unified surgical method for ACL combined with ALL reconstruction. There are differences in bone tunnel location, reconstruction methods, and graft selection. Compared with the independent reconstruction of the ACL and ALL during the operation, shared tendon graft reconstruction of the ACL and ALL has the advantages of preserving tendon and avoiding tunnel convergence. So far, there is no relevant literature summarizing the reconstruction of the ACL and ALL with a shared tendon graft. This paper reviews the anatomic study of the ALL, the study of isometric points, surgical indications, and surgical methods and their classification for shared tendon graft reconstruction of the ACL and ALL.

Characterizing the viscoelastic properties of the anterolateral ligament and grafts commonly used in its reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Current anatomic anterolateral ligament reconstruction is typically performed using either a gracilis tendon or an iliotibial band graft based on their quasi-static behavior. However, there is limited knowledge about their viscoelastic behaviors. This study aimed to characterize the viscoelastic properties of the anterolateral ligament, distal iliotibial band, distal gracilis tendon and proximal gracilis tendon for graft material choice in anterolateral ligament reconstruction.

METHODS

All the tissues were harvested from thirteen fresh-frozen cadaveric knees and subjected to preconditioning (3-6 MPa), sinusoidal cycle (1.2-12 MPa), dwell at constant load (12 MPa), and load to failure (3%/s). The quasi-static and viscoelastic properties of the soft tissues were computed and compared using a linear mixed model (p < 0.05).

FINDINGS

The hysteresis of anterolateral ligament (mean:0.4 Nm) was comparable with gracilis halves (p > 0.85) but iliotibial band (6 Nm) was significantly higher (p < 0.001,ES = 6.5). In contrast, the dynamic creep of anterolateral ligament (0.5 mm) was similar to iliotibial band (0.7 mm, p > 0.82) whereas both gracilis halves were significantly lower (p < 0.007,ES > 1.4). The elastic modulus of anterolateral ligament (181.4 MPa, p < 0.001,ES > 2.1) was the lowest compared to the grafts materials (distal gracilis tendon:835 MPa, distal gracilis tendon:726 MPa, iliotibial band:910 MPa). Additionally, the failure load of the anterolateral ligament (124.5 N, p < 0.001,ES > 2.9) was also the lowest.

INTERPRETATION

The mechanical properties of the gracilis halves and iliotibial band were significantly different from anterolateral ligament, except for hysteresis and dynamic creep, respectively. Our findings showed that the gracilis halves may be a more appropriate graft choice for anterolateral ligament reconstruction due to its low energy dissipation and permanent deformation under dynamic loads.

Anatomical and Biomechanical Characteristics of the Anterolateral Ligament: A Descriptive Korean Cadaveric Study Using a Triaxial Accelerometer

Background and Objectives: The anterolateral ligament (ALL) could be the potential anatomical structure responsible for rotational instability after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. The purpose of this study was to investigate the anatomical and biomechanical characteristics of the ALL in Korean cadaveric knee joints. Materials and Methods: Twenty fresh-frozen cadaveric knees were dissected and tested. Femoral and tibial footprints of the ALL were recorded. Pivot shift and Lachman tests were measured with KiRA. Results: The prevalence of ALL was 100%. The average distance of the tibial footprint to the tip of the fibular head was 19.85 ± 3.41 mm; from the tibial footprint to Gerdy's tubercle (GT) was 18.3 ± 4.19 mm; from the femoral footprint to the lateral femoral epicondyle was 10.25 ± 2.97 mm. ALL's footprint distance was the longest at 30° of flexion (47.83 ± 8.05 mm, p < 0.01) in a knee with intact ALL-ACL and neutral rotation. During internal rotation, the footprint distance was the longest at 30° of flexion (50.05 ± 8.88 mm, p < 0.01). Internal rotation produced a significant increase at all three angles after ACL-ALL were transected (p = 0.022), where the footprint distance was the longest at 30° of flexion (52.05 ± 7.60 mm). No significant difference was observed in KiRA measurements between intact ALL-ACL and ALL-transected knees for pivot shift and Lachman tests. However, ACL-ALL-transected knees showed significant differences compared to the intact ALL-ACL and ALL-transected knees (p < 0.01). Conclusions: The ALL was identified as a distinct ligament structure with a 100% prevalence in this cadaveric study. The ALL plays a protective role in internal rotational stability. An isolated ALL transection did not significantly affect the ALL footprint distances or functional stability tests. Therefore, the ALL is thought to act as a secondary supportive stabilizer for rotational stability of the knee joint in conjunction with the ACL.

Rational Design of Soft-Hard Interfaces through Bioinspired Engineering

Soft-hard tissue interfaces in nature present a diversity of hierarchical transitions in composition and structure to address the challenge of stress concentrations that would otherwise arise at their interface. The translation of these into engineered materials holds promise for improved function of biomedical interfaces. Here, soft-hard tissue interfaces found in the body in health and disease, and the application of the diverse, functionally graded, and hierarchical structures that they present to bioinspired engineering materials are reviewed. A range of such bioinspired engineering materials and associated manufacturing technologies that are on the horizon in interfacial tissue engineering, hydrogel bioadhesion at the interfaces, and healthcare and medical devices are described.

Biomechanical Evaluation of Anterolateral Ligament Repair Augmented with Internal Brace

Injuries to the anterolateral ligament (ALL) of the knee are commonly associated with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) ruptures. Biomechanical studies have demonstrated conflicting results with regard to the role of the ALL in limiting tibial internal rotation. Clinically, residual pivot shift following ACL reconstruction has been reported to occur up to 25% and has been correlated with poor outcomes. As such, surgical techniques have been developed to enhance rotational stability. Recent biomechanical studies have demonstrated restoration of internal rotational control following ALL reconstruction. The purpose of our study was to understand the biomechanical effects of ACL reconstruction with an ALL internal brace augmentation. We hypothesized that (1) sectioning of the ALL while preserving other lateral extra-articular structures would lead to significant internal rotation laxity and gap formation and (2) ALL repair with internal brace augmentation would lead to reduction in internal rotation instability and gap formation. In total, 10 fresh-frozen cadaveric knees were thawed and biomechanically tested in internal rotation for 10 cycles of normal physiologic torque in the intact, ACL-deficient, ACL/ALL-deficient, ACL-reconstructed, and ALL-repaired conditions. Each condition was tested at 30, 60, and 90 degrees of flexion. Following the final ALL-repaired condition, specimens were additionally subjected to a final internal rotation to failure at 1 degree at the last-tested degree of flexion. Kinematic measurements of angle and linear gap between the femur and tibia were calculated in addition to torsional stiffness and failure torque. As hypothesized, ALL repair with internal brace augmentation significantly reduced internal rotation angular motion and gap formation at flexion angles greater than 30 degrees. Additionally, ALL sectioning produced nonsignificant increases in internal rotation laxity and gap formation compared with ACL-deficient and ACL-reconstructed states, which did not support our other hypothesis.

A validated lower extremity model to investigate the effect of stabilizing knee components in pedestrian collisions

Lower extremity injuries account for over 50% of pedestrian orthopedic injuries in car-to-pedestrian collisions. Pedestrian finite element models are useful tools for studying pedestrian safety, but current models use simplified knee models that exclude potentially important stabilizing knee components. The effect of these stabilizing components in pedestrian impacts is currently unknown. The goal of this study was to develop a detailed lower-extremity model to investigate the effect of these stabilizing components on pedestrian biomechanics. In this study the Global Human Body Model Consortium male 50th percentile pedestrian model lower body was updated to include various stabilizing knee components, enhance geometric anatomical accuracy of previously modeled soft tissue structures, and update hard and soft tissue material models. The original and updated models were compared across 13 validation tests and the updated model reported significantly ( p = 0.01) larger CORA scores (0.73 ± 0.15) than the original model (0.56 ± 0.20). To investigate the effect of the new stabilizing knee components the updated model had its stabilizing components severed. The severed and intact models were impacted by the EuroNCAP SUV and family car models at 30 and 40 km/h. The intact and severed models reported nearly identical head impact times, wrap around distances, and lower-extremity injury outcomes in all four impacts, but the stabilizing components reduced the varus knee angle of the secondarily impacted leg by up to 4.9°. The stabilizing components may prevent secondary impacted leg injuries in lower intensity impacts but overall had little effect on pedestrian biomechanical outcomes.

Overview of the anterolateral complex of the knee

In the last few years, much more information on the anterolateral complex of the knee has become available. It has now been demonstrated how it works in conjunction with the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) controlling anterolateral rotatory laxity. Biomechanical studies have shown that the anterolateral complex (ALC) has a role as a secondary stabilizer to the ACL in opposing anterior tibial translation and internal tibial rotation. It is of utmost importance that surgeons comprehend the intricate anatomy of the entire anterolateral aspect of the knee. Although most studies have only focused on the anterolateral ligament (ALL), the ALC of the knee consists of a functional unit formed by the layers of the iliotibial band combined with the anterolateral joint capsule. Considerable interest has also been given to imaging evaluation using magnetic resonance and several studies have targeted the evaluation of the ALC in the setting of ACL injury. Results are inconsistent with a lack of association between magnetic resonance imaging evidence of injury and clinical findings. Isolated ACL reconstruction may not always reestablish knee rotatory stability in patients with associated ALC injury. In such cases, additional procedures, such as anterolateral reconstruction or lateral tenodesis, may be indicated. There are several techniques available for ALL reconstruction. Graft options include the iliotibial band, gracilis or semitendinosus tendon autograft, or allograft.

Association between a Concomitant Anterolateral Ligament Tear and Pivot Shift Before and After Single-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND: Regardless of the type of intra-articular anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction performed, a certain degree of rotatory instability is often seen after surgery. Recent studies suggest that the anterolateral ligament (ALL) plays a significant role in maintaining stability during internal rotation of the tibia at high knee flexion angles. Unrecognized damage to the ALL may potentially be associated with a positive pivot shift despite a surgically reconstructed ACL being done. AIM: The primary objective of this study was to determine whether a concomitant ALL tear is associated with a high-grade pivot shift before and after ACL reconstruction. METHODS: This study was a retrospective cohort study of patients that underwent single-bundle ACL reconstruction surgery in our institution from October 2014 to March 2017. One hundred and forty-four patients were included in this study. All data were extracted from the department of ACL registry. All knee MRIs were reviewed by the author and coauthor to determine the integrity of the ALL. Subjects were divided into two groups based on the grade of pivot shift before surgery. The prevalence of ALL tear based on MRI was further compared between high-grade and low-grade pivot-shift groups. RESULTS: Overall, the prevalence of a concomitant ALL tear was 70.83%. Comparing the prevalence of concomitant ALL tear between the high-grade pivot-shift group (73.11%) and low-grade pivot-shift group (60%), we had insufficient evidence to demonstrate an association between pre-surgery high-grade pivot shift and concomitant ALL tear. After surgery, none of the patients had a high-grade pivot shift or was positive for Lachman’s test. CONCLUSION: There is a high prevalence of concomitant ALL tear in patients with torn ACL. We have insufficient evidence to demonstrate an association between the presence of a torn ALL and high-grade pivot shift before and after single-bundle ACL reconstruction.

Current trends in the anterior cruciate ligament part II: evaluation, surgical technique, prevention, and rehabilitation

Clinical evaluation and management of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury is one of the most widely researched topics in orthopedic sports medicine, giving providers ample data on which to base their practices. The ACL is also the most commonly treated knee ligament. This study reports on current topics and research in clinical management of ACL injury, starting with evaluation, operative versus nonoperative management, and considerations in unique populations. Discussion of graft selection and associated procedures follows. Areas of uncertainty, rehabilitation, and prevention are the final topics before a reflection on the current state of ACL research and clinical management of ACL injury. Level of evidence V.

The Segond's fracture and the anterolateral ligament

The study of Mullins et al. reasonably explains how the Segond's fracture is probably the most frequent avulsion fracture of the tibia plateau, but it does not challenge the hypothesis of the existence of a discrete ligament (the ALL) strong enough to sometimes pull out its bony insertion as a result of a forced internal rotation and of an ACL failure.

The Anterolateral Ligament of the Knee: An Updated Systematic Review of Anatomy, Biomechanics, and Clinical Outcomes

PURPOSE

To perform an updated systematic review of the anatomy, biomechanics, function of the anterolateral ligament (ALL), and the clinical outcomes of anterolateral ligament reconstruction (ALLR) when performed in conjunction with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR).

METHODS

A systematic search of the literature was performed by searching PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Embase with the search phrase anterolateral ligament for articles published from February 2017 to May 2020. Inclusion criteria included studies that evaluated the anatomy, function, or biomechanics of the ALL; surgical technique articles on ALLR; clinical articles reporting outcomes of ALLR; studies published in English; and full-text articles. Exclusion criteria included studies published before February 2017. A subjective synthesis was performed, in which ranges were reported, and individual study data were presented in forest plots.

RESULTS

Overall, 40 articles were included in this systematic review, with 11 articles describing ALL anatomy, 14 articles analyzing ALL function and biomechanics, 7 articles discussing the surgical technique of combined ACLR and ALLR (ACLR/ALLR), and 8 articles describing the clinical outcomes of ACLR/ALLR. The addition of ALLR in combination with ACLR (ACLR+) results in lower graft failure rates for ACLR/ALLR (0.0%-15.7%) when compared with isolated ACLR (I-ACLR) patients (7.4%-21.7%). Three of 5 studies using the Subjective International Knee Documentation Committee score, 2 of 5 studies using the Lysholm score, and 1 of 2 studies using the Tegner score reported significantly better scores at latest follow-up among ACLR+ patients compared with I-ACLR (P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

The ALL acts as a secondary stabilizer to the anterior cruciate ligament and helps resist internal knee rotation and anterior tibial translation. Based on the current literature, combined ACLR with ALLR may result in lower graft failure rates and improved patient-reported outcomes when compared with I-ACLR in patients with specific indications, although several studies have shown equivalent outcomes between these 2 cohorts.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The contents of this review provide great insight for orthopaedic surgeons who are performing ACLR and considering additional procedures to increase overall knee stability and decrease likeliness for re-rupture. The postoperative functional and clinical outcomes shown in patients undergoing ACLR+ compared with I-ACLR should be given proper consideration when evaluating available treatment courses.

Mechanical Properties and Characteristics of the Anterolateral and Collateral Ligaments of the Knee

Biomechanical studies assessing the major knee ligaments, such as the anterior cruciate ligament, posterior cruciate ligament, medial collateral ligament (MCL), and lateral collateral ligament (LCL), have been conducted using various methodologies. However, despite the anterolateral ligament (ALL) being regarded as the important ligament for the stability of the knee, a lack of biomechanical research focusing on the ALL exists to date. Moreover, studies assessing the relative mechanical properties of each ligament of the knee are insufficient. Therefore, this study examined the mechanical properties of the ALL, MCL, and LCL and considered the relative differences between these ligaments. Twenty-one fresh cadaver knees were chosen to investigate the mechanical properties. The width, thickness, and length were measured. The stiffness, ultimate load, and elastic modulus were also tested. The MCL showed the greatest ultimate load (498.5 N) and the highest stiffness (71.97 N/mm), and the ALL presented the smallest ultimate load (146.64 N) and lowest stiffness (42.62 N/mm). Meanwhile, the LCL was second concerning the ultimate load (263.22 N) and stiffness (69.70 N/mm). The elastic modulus of the LCL (493.86 MPa) was greater than those of both the MCL and ALL (326.75 MPa and 345.27 MPa, respectively). There was no difference between the sides according to the different properties of all the ligaments. A sex difference was apparent only concerning the ultimate load for all the ligaments. Each ligament showed similar stiffness irrespective of its size; for this reason, stiffness should be considered initially and while conducting biomechanical simulations of these ligaments.

Plantaris tendon: a novel graft for anterolateral ligament reconstruction and additional reinforcement for anterior cruciate ligament autografts in combined reconstructive procedures

The anterolateral ligament is recently recognized as an important structure in restoring rotational stability of the anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knee. Biomechanical and clinical studies confirmed the benefits of concurrent anterior cruciate ligament and anterolateral ligament reconstruction. However, present techniques mostly use hamstring tendons autografts and therefore additionally disrupt the knee biomechanics. The plantaris tendon is a well known and accessible graft and has excellent biomechanical properties for anterolateral ligament reconstruction. The present paper describes a new combined anterior cruciate ligament and anterolateral ligament reconstruction technique using plantaris tendon and semitendinosus tendon.Level of evidence V (Case report).

The role of the anterolateral ligament in knee's biomechanics: a case-control retrospective study

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to assess the functional and clinical results of patients who underwent ACL reconstruction surgery and were divided into subpopulations related to ACL-associated lesions and focused on ALL-associated lesion.

METHODS

Our retrospective analysis included 62 patients who underwent standard ACL reconstruction surgery in our hospital from 2014 to 2016. The mean follow-up period was 21 months (range 11-35). We divided the sample into two subpopulations due to the presence or absence of ALL tear at the preoperative MRI. In 42 patients out of 62 (68%), ALL lesion was evident. We evaluated in both subpopulations the ACL failure rate, the functional outcomes rated with IKDC, KOOS, Lysholm scores and the clinical assessment of anteroposterior and rotatory instability with the Lachman test and pivot-shift test.

RESULTS

The overall re-injury rate in our cohort of patients was 4.8% with a smaller but not a significant difference between the two groups. A statistically significant difference was observed for the three functional scores, favoring the isolated ACL-lesion group (p < 0.05). Similarly, a better Lachman score was observed in the isolated ACL-lesion group, without statistical significance (p = 0.77); overall, the rate of positive test was lower in the isolated ACL-lesion group. We observed a significant difference of residual rotatory instability (positive pivot-shift test) in the two subpopulations (p = 0.036), and 9% of patients in the ACL + ALL lesion group showed residual jerk or subluxation.

CONCLUSION

The additional ALL reconstruction/repair surgery should always be considered in patients with evident ALL tear at the preoperative MRI.

Biomechanical function of the anterolateral ligament of the knee: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

It has been suggested that the anterolateral ligament (ALL) is an important anterolateral stabilizer of the knee joint which functions to prevent anterolateral subluxation and anterior subluxation at certain flexion angles in the knee.

PURPOSE

To analyze and systematically interpret the biomechanical function of the ALL.

METHODS

An online search was conducted for human cadaveric biomechanical studies that tested function of the ALL in resisting anterolateral subluxation and anterior subluxation of the knee. Two reviewers independently searched Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews for studies up to 25 September 2018. Biomechanical studies not reporting the magnitude of anterior tibial translation or tibial internal rotation in relation to the function of the ALL were excluded.

RESULTS

Twelve biomechanical studies using human cadavers evaluating parameters including anterior tibial translation and/or internal tibial rotation in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)-sectioned and ALL-sectioned knees were included in the review. Five studies reported a minor increase or no significant increase in anterior tibial translation and internal tibial rotation with further sectioning of the ALL in ACL-deficient knees. Five studies reported a significant increase in knee laxity in tibial internal rotation or pivot shift with addition of sectioning the ALL in ACL-deficient knees. Two studies reported a significant increase in both anterior tibial translation and internal tibial rotation during application of the anterior-drawer and pivot-shift tests after ALL sectioning.

CONCLUSION

There was inconsistency in the biomechanical characteristics of the ALL of the knee in resisting anterolateral and anterior subluxation of the tibia.

The anterolateral ligament of the knee joint: a review of the anatomy, biomechanics, and anterolateral ligament surgery

Residual knee instability and low rates of return to previous sport are major concerns after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. To improve outcomes, surgical methods, such as the anatomical single-bundle technique or the double-bundle technique, were developed. However, these reconstruction techniques failed to adequately overcome these problems, and, therefore, new potential answers continue to be of great interest. Based on recent anatomical and biomechanical studies emphasizing the role of the anterolateral ligament (ALL) in rotational stability, novel surgical methods including ALL reconstruction and anterolateral tenodesis have been introduced with the possibility of resolving residual instability after ACL reconstruction. However, there is still little consensus on many aspects of the ALL, including: several anatomical issues, appropriate indications for ALL surgery, and the optimal surgical method and graft choice for reconstruction surgery. Therefore, further studies are necessary to advance our knowledge of the ALL and its contribution to knee stability.

Biomechanical Evaluation of Different Tibial Fixation Methods in the Reconstruction of the Anterolateral Ligament in Swine Bones

Objective  The present study aims to evaluate different methods of tibial fixation in the reconstruction of the anterolateral ligament (ALL). In addition, the present paper aims to compare the effectiveness of these methods and their mechanisms of failure in swine knees. Methods  A total of 40 freshly frozen swine limbs were divided into 4 groups of 10 specimens, according to the tibial fixation technique used. In group A, the tibial fixation of the tendon graft was made through an anchor passing the graft. In group B, the tibial fixation was performed through a metal interference screw in a single bone tunnel. In group C, the tibial fixation included an anchor associated with a tendinous suture (but not with a wire crossing the tendon). In group D, two confluent bony tunnels were drilled and combined with an interference screw in one of them. Results  The lowest mean force (70.56 N) was observed in group A, and the highest mean force (244.85 N) was observed in group B; the mean values in the other 2 groups ranged from 171.68 N (group C) to 149.43 N (group D). Considering the margin of error (5%), there was a significant difference between the groups ( p  < 0.001). Conclusion  Fixation with an interference screw in a single tunnel bone showed the highest tensile strength among the evaluated techniques.

Lateral Augmentation Procedures in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Anatomic, Biomechanical, Imaging, and Clinical Evidence

BACKGROUND

There has been an increasing interest in lateral-based soft tissue reconstructive techniques as augments to anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). The objective of these procedures is to minimize anterolateral rotational instability of the knee after surgery. Despite the relatively rapid increase in surgical application of these techniques, many clinical questions remain.

PURPOSE

To provide a comprehensive update on the current state of these lateral-based augmentation procedures by reviewing the origins of the surgical techniques, the biomechanical data to support their use, and the clinical results to date.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review.

METHODS

A systematic search of the literature was conducted via the Medline, EMBASE, Scopus, SportDiscus, and CINAHL databases. The search was designed to encompass the literature on lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) procedures and the anterolateral ligament (ALL) reconstruction. Titles and abstracts were reviewed for relevance and sorted into the following categories: anatomy, biomechanics, imaging/diagnostics, surgical techniques, and clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

The search identified 4016 articles. After review for relevance, 31, 53, 27, 35, 45, and 78 articles described the anatomy, biomechanics, imaging/diagnostics, surgical techniques, and clinical outcomes of either LET procedures or the ALL reconstruction, respectively. A multitude of investigations were available, revealing controversy in addition to consensus in several categories. The level of evidence obtained from this search was not adequate for systematic review or meta-analysis; thus, a current concepts review of the anatomy, biomechanics, imaging, surgical techniques, and clinical outcomes was performed.

CONCLUSION

Histologically, the ALL appears to be a distinct structure that can be identified with advanced imaging techniques. Biomechanical evidence suggests that the anterolateral structures of the knee, including the ALL, contribute to minimizing anterolateral rotational instability. Cadaveric studies of combined ACLR-LET procedures demonstrated overconstraint of the knee; however, these findings have yet to be reproduced in the clinical literature. The current indications for LET augmentation in the setting of ACLR and the effect on knee kinematic and joint preservation should be the subject of future research.

Is anterolateral ligament rupture a reason for persistent rotational instability after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction?

BACKGROUND

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the clinical role of anterolateral ligament (ALL) rupture and its impact on rotational stability by comparing the clinical results and rotational stability between reconstructed anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) with intact ALL knees and reconstructed ACL with ALL injured knees.

METHODS

A total of 69 patients who had undergone surgery for ACL reconstruction and had received a minimum of two years of follow-up were included. Patients were divided into two groups with respect to the presence of ALL rupture on knee magnetic resonance imaging. Patients were assessed preoperatively and at final follow-up with physical examination findings and functional outcomes. Rotational stability was measured by a non-invasive rotameter-like device at the final follow-up at different torque values of 5 Nm (newton metres), 10 Nm and 15 Nm, and compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

The ALL was considered to be ruptured in 45 cases, named Group I (65.2%). The ALL was considered to be intact in 24 cases, named Group II (34.8%). No significant difference was found between the groups regarding the improvement of the clinical scores and physical examination findings (P > 0.05). Group I showed significantly higher internal rotation difference compared with Group II in all torque values (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The difference found on rotational measurement is possibly under the value of minimal clinical important difference and does not have a clinical effect, therefore ALL reconstruction is not recommended as a standard treatment in all patients.

Anatomic and Histological Study of the Anterolateral Aspect of the Knee: A SANTI Group Investigation

Background:

The structure and function of the anterolateral aspect of the knee have been significantly debated, with renewed interest in this topic since the description of the anterolateral ligament (ALL).

Purpose:

To define and describe the distinct structures of the lateral knee and to correlate the macroscopic and histologic anatomic features.

Study Design:

Descriptive laboratory study.

Methods:

Twelve fresh-frozen human cadavers were used for anatomic analysis. In the left knee, a layer-by-layer dissection and macroscopic analysis were performed. In the right knee, an en bloc specimen was obtained encompassing an area from the Gerdy tubercle to the posterior fibular head and extending proximally from the anterior aspect to the posterior aspect of the lateral femoral epicondyle. The en bloc resection was then frozen, sliced at the level of the joint line, and reviewed by a musculoskeletal pathologist.

Results:

Macroscopically, the lateral knee has 4 main layers overlying the capsule of the knee: the aponeurotic layer, the superficial layer including the iliotibial band (ITB), the deep fascial layer, and the ALL. Histologically, 8 of 12 specimens demonstrated 4 consistent, distinct structures: the ITB, the ALL, the lateral collateral ligament, and the meniscus.

Conclusion:

The lateral knee has a complex orientation of layers and fibers. The ALL is a distinct structure from the ITB and is synonymous to the previously described capsulo-osseous layer of the ITB.

Clinical Relevance:

Increasingly, lateral extra-articular procedures are performed at the time of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Understanding the anatomic features of the anterolateral aspect of the knee is necessary to understand the biomechanics and function of the structures present and allows surgeons to attempt to replicate those anatomic characteristics when performing extra-articular reconstruction.

The anterolateral ligament is a distinct ligamentous structure: A histological explanation

BACKGROUND

The aim was to determine whether the anterolateral ligament (ALL) had a histological structure that defined it as a real ligament.

METHODS

Histological examination of 30 ALL samples taken from fresh-frozen knees were performed. The ALL femoral insertion and its relationship with the lateral collateral ligament (LCL) were studied and the tibial insertion and its relationship with articular cartilage of the tibial joint surface were analyzed. For the ligamentous part, its histological structure and its differences with the articular capsule were studied.

RESULTS

This connective tissue is composed of a dense fibrous core constituted by a network of oriented collagenous fibers. The periphery of this dense connective center is made up of loose fibrocollagenous tissue with vascular structures and focal deposits of adipose tissue. This part was in contact but different to the joint capsule. With a perpendicular orientation of the collagen fibers relative to the bone, a fibrocartilaginous zone with an unmineralized hyalinized aspect, a mineralization front, its bone insertions presented a typical ligamentous insertion. With a cleavage plane between ALL and LCL femoral insertion, the ALL appeared to have a femoral insertion distinct from the LCL. ALL tibial insertion was less characteristic with less organized connective tissue and was at a distance from the articular cartilage.

CONCLUSION

From its bony insertion to its tissue composition and organization, the ALL has all the histological characteristics of a ligamentous structure. Our study confirms that ALL can be considered a real and distinct ligament.

Current Concepts of the Anterolateral Ligament of the Knee: Anatomy, Biomechanics, and Reconstruction

In 1879, Paul Segond described an avulsion fracture (now known as a Segond fracture) at the anterolateral proximal tibia with the presence of a fibrous band at the location of this fracture. Although references to this ligament were occasionally made in the anatomy literature after Segond's discovery, it was not until 2012 that Vincent et al named this ligament what we know it as today, the anterolateral ligament (ALL) of the knee. The ALL originates near the lateral epicondyle of the distal femur and inserts on the proximal tibia near Gerdy's tubercle. The ALL exists as a ligamentous structure that comes under tension during internal rotation at 30°. In the majority of specimens, the ALL can be visualized as a ligamentous structure, whereas in some cases it may only be palpated as bundles of more tense capsular tissue when internal rotation is applied. Biomechanical studies have shown that the ALL functions as a secondary stabilizer to the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) in resisting anterior tibial translation and internal tibial rotation. These biomechanical studies indicate that concurrent reconstruction of the ACL and ALL results in significantly reduced internal rotation and axial plane tibial translation compared with isolated ACL reconstruction (ACLR) in the presence of ALL deficiency. Clinically, a variety of techniques are available for ALL reconstruction (ALLR). Current graft options include the iliotibial (IT) band, gracilis tendon autograft or allograft, and semitendinosus tendon autograft or allograft. Fixation angle also varies between studies from full knee extension to 60° to 90° of flexion. To date, only 1 modern study has described the clinical outcomes of concomitant ALLR and ACLR: a case series of 92 patients with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Further studies are necessary to define the ideal graft type, location of fixation, and fixation angle for ALLR. Future studies also must be designed in a prospective comparative manner to compare the clinical outcomes of patients undergoing ACLR with ALL reconstruction versus without ALL reconstruction. By discovering the true effect of the ALL, investigators can elucidate the importance of ALLR in the setting of an ACL tear.

Combined ACL reconstruction and Segond fracture fixation fails to abolish anterolateral rotatory instability

The Segond fracture (SF) is considered pathognomonic of an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tear. However, the anatomy of the soft-tissue attachments responsible for the avulsion of SFs has been a cause of controversy. A 31-year-old male patient presented with an injury to his right knee that resulted in ACL tear and a SF. Open SF fixation and arthroscopic ACL reconstruction were performed. The anatomical dissection demonstrated that the avulsion of SFs had occurred because of the tibial attachment of the anterolateral ligament (ALL) with an intact Iliotibial band. At 1-year postoperative follow-up, the ACL graft had restored anterior tibial translation to within normal limits. However, residual rotational knee laxity was observed. This finding highlights that patients with SF may be at increased risk of persistent instability after ACL reconstruction. Consideration should be given to recession of the fixation or augmentation of the ALL when dealing with this injury pattern.

Anterolateral Ligament of the Knee: Anatomy, Function, Imaging, and Treatment

The anterolateral ligament (ALL) of the knee has gained attention recently for its potential role in rotational stability of the knee, especially in association with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries. Anatomic studies have characterized the ALL as it runs in an anteroinferior and oblique direction from the lateral distal femur to the anterolateral proximal tibia, although the prevalence and variance of this ligament are not well understood. Magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound have identified the ligament and linked it with the classically described Segond fracture. While the ALL likely plays a role in rotational stability of the knee, further studies investigating the significance of ALL injuries and the role of ALL reconstruction in combination with ACL reconstruction are warranted.

Ultrasonographic Evaluation of Anterolateral Ligament Injuries: Correlation With Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Pivot-Shift Testing

PURPOSE

(1) To compare the diagnostic ability of ultrasonography (US) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to detect anterolateral ligament (ALL) injuries in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)-deficient patients, and (2) to evaluate the correlation between ALL injury status (as determined by US and MRI) and the knee's rotational stability.

METHODS

Thirty patients with an isolated ACL injury were included prospectively over a 3-month period. The condition of the ALL was evaluated by 2 experienced radiologists using both US and MRI. Rotational stability was evaluated by 2 surgeons with the pivot-shift test with patients under general anesthesia. It was classified as either negative (grades 0 and I) or positive (grades II and III). The radiologists were blinded to the knee's rotational stability, and the surgeons were blinded to the ALL's status based on the US images. The correlation between the ALL's injury status (US and MRI) and the pivot shift was determined with the Pearson χ² test. To evaluate the reproducibility of the results, the agreement between observers was determined with the Cohen κ coefficient.

RESULTS

On US, the ALL was identified and visible over its entire length in 100% of patients (30 of 30, κ = 1). The ALL was injured in 63% of patients (19 of 30, κ = 0.93). On MRI, the ALL was identified in 96% of patients (29 of 30, κ = 0.91). The ALL appeared injured in 53% of cases (16 of 30, κ = 0.93). An ALL that appeared injured on US was more often associated with a positive pivot shift than was an uninjured ALL (75% vs 39%, χ² = 13.7, P < .05). The interobserver agreement was high for both US (κ = 0.91-1) and MRI (κ = 0.76-1).

CONCLUSIONS

US is a reproducible examination for the diagnosis of ALL injury. An ALL injury is most often associated with a high pivot-shift grade.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II, prospective comparative study.

Anterolateral ligament reconstruction with autologous grafting: A biomechanical study

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the reliability of the Iliotibial band compared to gracilis tendon as a graft to be used in anterolateral ligament reconstruction.

METHODS

Gracilis tendon and a strip of Iliotibial band compared were harvested from 8 fresh human cadaveric knees. The gracilis tendon was prepared to obtain a graft of 10cm in length (Group 1). Iliotibial band compared was prepared to obtain a graft of 10cm in length and 0.5cm in width from the middle portion (Group 2). All the specimens were fixed on a servo hydraulic tensile machine with dedicated cryo-clamp. The loading protocol, used to compare the previously published results of ultimate failure load and Stiffness of the anterolateral ligament (Group 3), included a cyclic preconditioning between 10 and 25N at 0.1Hz for 10cycles and then a load to failure test at 20mm/min.

FINDINGS

Gracilis tendon showed higher Ultimante Failure Load and stiffness when compared to a strip of Iliotibial band. Gracilis tendon and a strip of Iliotibial band compared showed higher Ultimante Failure Load and stiffness when compared with native anterolateral ligament as reported by Kennedy.

INTERPRETATION

Both grafts tested in the present studies are suitable for an anatomical anterolateral ligament reconstruction.

Minimally invasive anatomic reconstruction of the anterolateral ligament with ipsilateral gracilis tendon

BACKGROUND

There has been much interest in understanding the anatomy and biomechanics of the anterolateral ligament (ALL). Several recon struction procedures have been proposed to correct rotatory instability after Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) and anterolateral soft tissues injuries.

METHODS

We propose a new anatomic minimally invasive ALL reconstruction using the ipsilateral gracilis tendon. Through small skin incisions, the femoral attachment and the tibial insertion of the ALL can be identified, and half tunnels drilled. Then, the neo-ligament can be passed under the fascia lata into the tunnels. Fixation to the tibia is accomplished with a biotenodesis screw, and to the femur with a TightRope RT (Arthrex).

CONCLUSION

This procedure allows to reconstruct in a minimally invasive fashion the ALL in selected patients with chronic anterolateral instability in ACL deficient knees.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

V.

Anterolateral ligament abnormalities are associated with peripheral ligament and osseous injuries in acute ruptures of the anterior cruciate ligament

PURPOSE

Few studies have used MRI to identify the ALL. As it was shown that it is not possible to precisely characterize this ligament in all examination, it is important to identify concomitant lesions that can help in diagnosing ALL abnormalities. It is important to characterise this injury due to its association with anterolateral knee instability. Thus, the present study was performed to determine the frequency of ALL injuries in patients with acute ACL rupture and to analyse its associated knee lesions.

METHODS

Patients with acute ACL injuries were evaluated by MRI. Among this population, the ALL was classified as non-visualised, injured or normal. The possible abnormalities of the meniscus, collateral ligaments, popliteus tendon, posterior cruciate ligament, Iliotibial band (ITB), anterolateral capsule and osseus injuries were evaluated. The association of an ALL injury with these other knee structures as well as sex and age was calculated.

RESULTS

Among the 228 knees evaluated, the ALL could not be entirely identified in 61 (26.7%). Of the remaining 167, 66 (39.5%) presented an ALL abnormality and only four (6.1%) were Segond fractures. ALL abnormalities were associated with lesions of the lateral collateral ligament, medial collateral ligament, popliteus tendon, ITB, anterolateral capsule and osseous contusions of the femoral condyle and tibial plateau. No correlation was found with medial meniscus, lateral meniscus and posterior cruciate ligament injuries. There was no association between ALL injuries and gender, and older patients were more likely to present an ALL injury.

CONCLUSION

ALL injuries are present in approximately 40% of ACL injuries, and a minority of these are Segond fractures. These injuries are associated with peripheral ligament injuries, anterolateral structures lesions and bone contusions, but there is no association with meniscal injuries. Surgeons must be aware of these associations to consider an ALL lesion even if it is not completely clear in imaging evaluation, especially if a high degree of anterolateral instability is present on physical examination.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Historical perspective on the "discovery" of the anterolateral ligament of the knee

There is a lively debate about the existence, origins and discoverer of the anterolateral ligament of the knee. The complex anatomy of the lateral aspect of the knee has made it difficult to differentiate between various structures such as the iliotibial band, capsulo-osseous layer, Kaplan's fibres and the anterolateral capsule. The "discovery" of a new anterolateral structure in 2013 was the culmination of many historical studies. In 1879, Paul Ferdinand Segond described a tibial plateau fracture in which he noted a pearly band reinforcing the joint capsule. Other anatomists had their suspicions about this ligament; it was described by Vallois in 1914 in his thesis and extensively studied by Jost in 1921. References to it can be found in comparative anatomy studies. This historical review serves as a reminder that understanding and treating knee sprains is not something new.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

V.

The Anterolateral Ligament: An Anatomic Study on Sex-Based Differences

BACKGROUND

The anterolateral ligament (ALL) has been shown to have an important role in rotatory stability of the knee. While there is abundant research on sex-based differences related to anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture, there is a paucity of literature related to such differences in the ALL.

PURPOSE

To define any sex-based differences in the ALL with regard to length, width, and thickness.

STUDY DESIGN

Descriptive laboratory study.

METHODS

The ALL was initially evaluated in 165 unpaired knees (92 males and 65 females after exclusion criteria applied). The length, width, and thickness of the ALL were measured using a digital caliper. Width and thickness were measured at the joint line just superior to the lateral meniscus. The Mann-Whitney test and Student t tests were used to compare measurements between males and females. The Pearson product-moment correlation was subsequently used to determine the correlation between height and weight and the statistically different morphometric variables.

RESULTS

The mean (±SD) thickness of the ALL in males was 2.09 ± 0.56 mm, almost twice as thick as females (1.05 ± 0.49 mm; P = 8.8 × 10-20). There was also a statistically significant difference in ALL length (P = 3.8 × 10-7), but no significant difference was found for width. A moderate association was found between donor height and ALL thickness and length.

CONCLUSION

The anatomic measurements of the ALL demonstrate a difference between sexes, and the ALL is significantly thicker in males than females.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

As the role of the ALL in rotatory stability of the knee becomes better understood, the difference in the thickness of the ALL we have found between the sexes may be another factor why female athletes have an increased incidence of ACL rupture compared with males. This may also help explain why females have issues with knee laxity and rotatory instability.

Kinematic outcomes following ACL reconstruction

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction aims to restore the translational and rotational motion to the knee joint that is lost after injury. However, despite technical advancements, clinical outcomes are less than ideal, particularly in return to previous activity level. A major issue is the inability to standardize treatment protocols due to variations in materials and approaches used to accomplish ACL reconstruction. These include surgical techniques such as the transtibial and anteromedial portal methods that are currently under use and the wide availability of graft types that will be used to reconstruct the ACL. In addition, concomitant soft tissue injuries to the menisci and capsule are frequently present after ACL injury and, if left unaddressed, can lead to persistent instability even after the ACL has been reconstructed. Advances in the field of biomechanics that help to objectively measure motion of the knee joint may provide more precise data than current subjective clinical measurements. These technologies include extra-articular motion capture systems that measure the movement of the tibia in relation to the femur. With data gathered from these devices, a threshold for satisfactory knee stability may be established in order to correctly identify a successful reconstruction following ACL injury.