Adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder, treatment with corticosteroid, corticosteroid with distension or treatment-as-usual; a randomised controlled trial in primary care

British Elbow and Shoulder Society patient care pathway: Frozen shoulder

Background

Current guidelines from the British Elbow and Shoulder Society (BESS) were published in 2015 for managing frozen shoulders in the primary and secondary care setting. Updated guidelines have been developed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) methodology.

Methods

A multi-disciplinary BESS Working Group defined key management questions based on agreed outcome measures and time points. A literature search, conducted up to March 2023 following PRISMA guidelines, identified randomised controlled trials, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses. Quality assessments were performed using the GRADE Decision Framework, considering bias, imprecision, indirectness, and inconsistency. Data were extracted for meta-analysis. In the absence of high-quality trials, narrative reviews were created.

Results

Consensus opinions produced statements based on the quality and volume of evidence and the magnitude of desirable and undesirable effects. These statements form a comprehensive framework for managing frozen shoulder.

Discussion

This updated guideline provides evidence-based guidance for managing frozen shoulder and identifies key areas for future research.

Joint Efforts: A Review of Large Joint and Bursa Steroid Injections and Aspirations by Primary Care Physicians

Large joint and bursa steroid injections and aspirations are useful for many musculoskeletal pathologies commonly seen in primary care. However, there is lack of clarity on whether primary care physicians should perform these procedures themselves or refer to specialists. This study reviews the existing literature to explore the impact of primary care physicians performing these procedures. We performed a PubMed search using two search protocols to identify relevant articles. Two investigators independently screened articles for relevance via specific inclusion and exclusion criteria. Two additional investigators resolved disagreements. We also hand-searched references in all articles. The search methods identified 257 articles, of which 132 met inclusion criteria. Agreement was almost perfect for results from Protocol 1 (kappa = 0.96, 95% CI 0.91-0.99) and substantial for Protocol 2 (kappa = 0.77, 95% CI 0.60-0.94). The results reveal data on primary care physicians performing large joint and bursa steroid injections and aspirations including current trends, management and procedural techniques, outcomes, safety and complication rates, patients' access to treatments, cost differences between primary care versus subspecialty performed procedures, feasibility concerns, training, and patients' perspectives. We conclude there is a benefit to primary care physicians performing these procedures with regards to cost, access, and patient satisfaction with no compromise to outcomes, safety, and complication rates.

Assessing injectate spread in ultrasound-guided capsular hydro dilatation for adhesive capsulitis: A comparative MRI study of anterior rotator interval vs. posterior glenohumeral joint approaches

Adhesive capsulitis is a self-limiting condition of the shoulder, characterized by pain and limited range of motion (ROM). Intra-articular steroid injection and hydrodistension of the joint capsule are effective strategies for pain relief and improvement of ROM. Several randomized studies indicate that anterior rotator cuff interval (RCI) injections yield better outcomes than posterior glenohumeral (GH) joint injections. No study has examined the differences in injectate spread patterns between anterior RCI and posterior GH joint approaches. This study involved three patients with adhesive capsulitis who received ultrasound-guided shoulder joint injections with capsular hydrodilatation, utilizing 10 cc, via either the anterior RCI approach or the posterior GH joint approach. The injectate comprised 1 mL (80 mg) methylprednisolone acetate, 4 mL of 2 % lidocaine, and 5 mL of saline mixed with gadolinium contrast. Immediately following the injection, an MRI of the shoulder was performed to evaluate the distribution of the injectate. Injections via the anterior RCI approach exhibited significant intra-capsular spread and vital pathological intra-capsular and pericapsular structures. In contrast, posterior GH joint injections revealed restricted spread, mainly enlarging the joint recess without involvement of the pericapsular ligaments. This study highlights the distribution of injectate following an ultrasound-guided anterior shoulder joint injection, demonstrating that the anterior RCI approach effectively disperses a 10 mL injectate to the intra-capsular synovial lining and key pericapsular structures. The findings suggest that technique selection significantly impacts injectate distribution in adhesive capsulitis, with a 10 mL volume achieving optimal capsular distension without rupture.

A Comparative Study Between Hydrodilatation and Intra-Articular Corticosteroid Injection in Patients with Shoulder Adhesive Capsulitis: A Single-Blinded Randomized Clinical Trial

This study compares the efficacy of hydrodilatation (HD) alone with intra-articular corticosteroid injection (ICI) in treating frozen shoulder (FS). A total of 48 patients with FS were randomly assigned to two groups: 24 patients received HD treatment, while the other 24 patients received ICI treatment. HD involved 20 mL 0.9% normal saline solution with 3 mL 2% lidocaine, and ICI included 1 mL of 40 mg/mL methylprednisolone acetate with 1 mL 2% lidocaine and 3 mL normal saline. Outcome measures included Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI), and passive range of motion (ROM) at baseline, two-, four-, and eight-week follow-ups. Both treatments demonstrated significant improvement in the VAS, SPADI, and passive ROM, when between-times comparison was conducted in each group at all follow-up points over the eight-week study period (p < 0.001). However, no significant differences were found in between groups comparison at study end (p > 0.05), with no significant interaction between groups and times (p > 0.05). Absolute changes from baseline to eight-week follow-up were not significantly different between HD and ICI (p > 0.05). In the short term, HD alone demonstrates strong efficacy in managing FS, matching the effectiveness of ICI.

A team approach to adhesive capsulitis with ultrasound guided hydrodilatation: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Adhesive capsulitis (AC) causes shoulder pain and limited range of motion. While ultrasound-guided suprascapular nerve block, glenohumeral joint hydrodilatation, and physical therapy are effective individually, their combined use is not well-studied.

OBJECTIVE

This study evaluates the effect and safety of combining ultrasound-guided suprascapular nerve block, glenohumeral joint hydrodilatation, and physical therapy on range of motion and pain, comparing diabetic and non-diabetic patients.

DESIGN

Retrospective Cohort; Level of Evidence 3.

METHODS

150 patients (30-75 years) with AC received ultrasound-guided suprascapular nerve block, glenohumeral joint hydrodilatation with corticosteroid injection, and subsequent physical therapy. Baseline Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain score, active forward flexion, and external rotation range of motion were measured using a goniometer. At 3 months post-procedure, range of motion and pain were reevaluated.

RESULTS

Significant improvements in active forward flexion (median improvement of 25 degrees) and external rotation (median improvement of 19 degrees) were observed at 3 months (p < 0.001). No complications were reported.

CONCLUSION

Combining ultrasound-guided suprascapular nerve block, glenohumeral joint hydrodilatation, and physical therapy is safe, effective, and improves pain, flexion, and external rotation range of motion in patients with adhesive capsulitis.

Research trends and emerging treatment in frozen shoulder research: A bibliometric analysis and meta-analysis

Frozen shoulder (FS), characterized by pain and restricted mobility, remains a challenging condition with unclear optimal treatment. This study aims to investigate the development of FS research, identify hotspot treatments, and verify their efficacy. Analyzing 3139 FS-related publications from the Web of Science Core Collection revealed a significant rise in publications (R2 = 0.9478), with the United States as a leader in this research area. Our keyword analysis pinpointed suprascapular nerve block (SSNB) as a notable research focus since 2021. To assess the effectiveness of SSNB, we conducted a meta-analysis of eight randomized controlled trials including 435 patients. The results at the 6-8 weeks follow-up showed SSNB significantly reduced pain and improved active shoulder function compared to intra-articular corticosteroid injections (IACI). Specifically, SSNB led to considerable enhancements in abduction (SMD: 12.88; 95 % CI: 4.13, 21.64; p = 0.004; I2 = 54 %), flexion (SMD: 9.16; 95 % CI: 6.50, 11.82; p < 0.00001; I2 = 0 %), and external rotation (SMD: 18.03; 95 % CI: 6.59, 29.48; p = 0.008; I2 = 59 %). Additionally, there was a significant reduction in Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) scores (SMD: 4.46; 95 % CIs: 7.75, -1.17; p = 0.008; I2 = 59 %). Despite these findings, no differences were observed in the improvement of passive activities between the SSNB and IACI groups at any follow-up. This study supports the short-term benefits of SSNB for FS, prompting further investigation into its long-term efficacy and comparison with other treatments.

Efficacy comparison of sodium hyaluronate, corticosteroids, and autologous platelet-rich plasma in the treatment of primary frozen shoulder

OBJECTIVES

Primary frozen shoulder is a shoulder joint disease that severely impacts the quality of life of patients, and intra-articular injection is a common treatment method. This study aims to evaluate and compare the therapeutic effects of sodium hyaluronate (SH), corticosteroids (CS), and autologous platelet-rich plasma (PRP) in the treatment primary frozen shoulder.

METHODS

A total of 117 patients diagnosed with primary frozen shoulder and treated with a single injection of SH, CS, or PRP into the glenohumeral joint under ultrasound guidance at the Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University from January 1, 2020, to December 31, 2022, were included in the study. The patients were divided into a SH group, a CS group, and a PRP group. Clinical data of patients, including Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) pain score, range of motion, Constant score, and Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score were collected before treatment and at 1, 3, and 6 months after treatment. The efficacy of these 3 intra-articular injection therapies for primary frozen shoulder was compared.

RESULTS

Compared with the baseline, the SH, CS, and PRP groups all showed significant improvements in shoulder VAS pain scores, range of motion, Constant scores, and DASH scores at 6 months after treatment (all P<0.05). Compared with the SH and PRP groups, the CS group showed better VAS pain score, range of motion, Constant score, and DASH score at 1 month after treatment (all P<0.05). However, the VAS pain score, range of motion, Constant score, and DASH score in the PRP group were better than those in the SH and CS groups at 6 months after treatment (all P<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

A single ultrasound-guided injection of SH, CS, or PRP into the glenohumeral joint can significantly improve pain degree, range of motion, and function in patients with primary frozen shoulder. Among these 3 injection therapies, CS may provide better short-term efficacy, while PRP may offer better long-term outcomes.

The comparative effectiveness of combined hydrodilatation/corticosteroid procedure with two different quantities for adhesive capsulitis

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy of injecting various amounts of fluid into the shoulder joints for capsule distension in patients with adhesive capsulitis.

DESIGN

A randomized controlled trial.

SETTING

Outpatient clinic of a tertiary care centre.

PARTICIPANTS

Eighty-four patients with adhesive capsulitis underwent a baseline (time0), 6 weeks (time1), and 12 weeks (time2) follow-up after hydrodilitation.

INTERVENTION

Group 1 (n  =  42) received 20 ml of lidocaine, steroid, and saline hydrodilatation via posterior glenohumeral recess, while Group 2 (n  =  42) received 10 ml of lidocaine, steroid, and saline hydrodilitation.

MAIN MEASURES

The primary outcome was the visual analogue scale for pain. The secondary outcomes were shoulder pain and disability index (SPADI) and ROM of the shoulder.

RESULTS

There was a significant reduce in VAS scores for pain, SPADI scores, and increased shoulder ROM in both groups over time; however, the group-by-time interactions for any of the outcomes between groups were not significant except VAS pain in motion. Post-hoc pairwise analysis of the marginal effect of time and group showed that the significant difference of VAS in motion is due to time effect: time1 vs time0 (95% CI -4.09 to -2.68), time2 vs time0 (-4.21 to -2.77), and time2 vs time1 (-0.83 to 0.63), without between-group difference: group 1 vs group 2 (-0.38 to 0.59).

CONCLUSION

Our study suggests hydrodilatation achieved an optimal effect at time1 for patients with adhesive capsulitis in both groups, and adding more saline offers additional benefits in flexion and external roatation until time2.

Corticosteroid Injection Methods for Frozen Shoulder: A Network Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the efficacy of corticosteroid (CS) injection methods for frozen shoulder.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched up to May 6, 2023.

STUDY SELECTION

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that investigated CS injection methods for frozen shoulder were included.

DATA EXTRACTION

Data were extracted independently by 2 authors. Risk of bias was assessed using the RoB 2 tool.

DATA SYNTHESIS

A random-effects network meta-analysis was performed within a frequentist framework. The certainty of evidence was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations approach. A total of 66 RCTs involving 4491 patients were included. For short-term outcomes, 4-site injection (vs placebo [PLA]: standardized mean difference [SMD]=-2.20, 95% confidence interval [CI], -2.81 to -1.59 in pain; SMD=2.02; 95% CI, 1.39-2.65 in global function) was the most effective (low certainty). Rotator interval injection was the optimal treatment with moderate to high certainty (vs PLA: SMD=-1.07, 95% CI, -1.51 to -0.64 in pain; SMD=0.94, 95% CI, 0.49-1.40 in global function). For midterm outcomes, 4-site injection was most effective (vs PLA: SMD=-1.71, 95% CI, -2.41 to -1.01 in pain; SMD=2.22, 95% CI, 1.34-3.09 in global function; low certainty). Distension via rotator interval (D-RI) was the optimal treatment with moderate to high certainty (vs PLA: SMD=-1.10, 95% CI, -1.69 to -0.51 in pain; SMD=1.46, 95% CI, 0.73-2.20 in global function). Distension and intra-articular injection via anterior or posterior approaches produced effects equivalent to those of rotator interval injection and D-RI.

CONCLUSIONS

Rotator interval injection, distension, and intra-articular injection had equivalent effects on symptom relief. More RCTs are required to validate the superiority of multisite injections.

Efficacy of hydrodilatation in frozen shoulder: a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

It is unclear whether hydrodilatation is beneficial in the management of frozen shoulder compared with other common conservative management modalities. This systematic review evaluates the efficacy of hydrodilatation for the management of frozen shoulder.

SOURCES OF DATA

A systematic review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. An extensive search of PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Central, Web of Science and CINAHL databases using multiple keyword combinations of 'shoulder', 'rotator', 'adhesive capsulitis', 'hydrodilatat*', 'distension' since inception of the databases to June 2023 was implemented.

AREAS OF AGREEMENT

Hydrodilatation leads to at least transient more marked improvements in shoulder disability and passive external rotation compared with intra-articular corticosteroid injections.

AREAS OF CONTROVERSY

Hydrodilatation improves passive external rotation in the longer term. Moreover, hydrodilatation may be a preferable option over manipulation under anaesthesia, given its lower cost and better patient convenience.

GROWING POINTS

Intensive mobilization after hydrodilatation is a promising adjuvant treatment option for patients suffering from a frozen shoulder.

AREAS TIMELY FOR DEVELOPING RESEARCH

Although current evidence suggests that hydrodilatation provides a transient improvement in disability in patients with frozen shoulder, its clinical relevance remains unclear. Further research is necessary to establish its role in the management of the condition.

Ultrasound-guided hydrodistension for adhesive capsulitis: a longitudinal study on the effect of diabetes on treatment outcomes

OBJECTIVE

The effect of diabetes on adhesive capsulitis (AC) and its impact on the outcomes of ultrasound (US)-guided hydrodistension of the glenohumeral joint are still unclear. We aimed to identify predictors of US-guided hydrodistension outcomes, while assessing the performance of the method in diabetic compared to non-diabetic patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 135 patients with AC who underwent US-guided hydrodistension were prospectively included. Demographics and factors linked to chronic inflammation and diabetes were recorded and patients were followed-up for 6 months. Functionality and pain were evaluated with the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) and the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score. Statistical analysis was performed with Mann-Whitney U test, linear, and binary logistic regression.

RESULTS

Diabetes was identified in 25/135 patients (18.5%). Diabetic patients had worse DASH and VAS score at presentation (P < 0.0001) and presented with a higher grade of AC (P < 0.0001) and lower range of motion (P < 0.01) compared to non-diabetics. Higher DASH (P = 0.025) and VAS scores (P = 0.039) at presentation were linked to worse functionality at 6 months. Presence and duration of diabetes, and the number of hydrodistension repeats, correlated with worse VAS and DASH scores at 6 months. The number of procedure repeats was the only independent predictor of complete pain resolution at 6 months (OR 0.418, P = 003).

CONCLUSION

Diabetes is linked to more severe AC at presentation and worse outcomes in patients undergoing US-guided hydrodistension. In resistant cases, repeating the intervention is independently linked to worse outcomes for at least 6 months post-intervention.

Adhesive Capsulitis

Adhesive capsulitis, colloquially known as "frozen shoulder," is a relatively common disorder, affecting approximately 2% to 5% of the general population. The incidence may be higher as the condition can be relatively mild and self-limited and thus many patients who experience it may never present for treatment. It involves a pathologic process of gradual fibrosis of the glenohumeral joint that leads to limited active and passive range of motion, contracture of the joint capsule, and shoulder pain.

Post-surgical physiotherapy in frozen shoulder: A review

Despite its prevalence, the optimal management of frozen shoulder is unclear. A range of conservative measures are often undertaken with varying degrees of success. In cases of severe and persistent symptoms, release procedures which could include any combination of manipulation under anaesthetic, arthroscopic capsular release or hydrodilatation are frequently offered, none of which has been shown to offer superior outcome over the others. When surgical release is performed a period of rehabilitation is normally recommended but no best practice guidelines exist resulting in considerable variations in practice which may or may not directly affect patient outcome. During this narrative review, we hypothesise that these differing responses to treatment (both conservative and surgical options) are potentially the result of different causal mechanisms for frozen shoulder and may also suggest that post-release rehabilitation may need to take this into account.

Depression and Anxiety Are Associated With Worse Subjective and Functional Baseline Scores in Patients With Frozen Shoulder Contracture Syndrome: A Systematic Review

Purpose

To investigate whether psychological factors, such as avoidance behavior, fear, pain catastrophization, kinesiophobia, anxiety, depression, optimism, and expectation are associated with different subjective and functional baseline scores in patients with frozen shoulder contracture syndrome (FSCS).

Methods

Searches were conducted in MEDLINE, Cochrane Library (CENTRAL Database), PEDro, Pubpsych, and PsychNET.APA without restrictions applied to language, date, or status of publication. Two authors reviewed study titles, abstract, and full text based on the following inclusion criteria: adult population (≥ 30 < 70 years old) with FSCS.

Results

Seven hundred and seventy-six records were included by the search strategies. After title final screening, 6 studies were included for the qualitative synthesis. Psychological features investigated were anxiety, depression, pain-related fear, pain catastrophizing, and pain self-efficacy; reported outcomes included pain, function, disability, quality of life, and range of motion. Data suggest that anxiety and depression impact self-assessed function, pain, and quality of life. There is no consensus on the correlation between psychological variables and range of motion. Associations were suggested between pain-related fear, pain-related beliefs, and pain-related behavior and perceived arm function; pain-related conditions showed no significant correlation with range of motion and with perceived stiffness at baseline.

Conclusion

Scores traditionally thought to assess physical dimensions like shoulder pain, disability, and function seem to be influenced by psychological variables. In FSCS patients, depression and anxiety were associated with increased pain perception and decreased function and quality of life at baseline. Moreover, pain-related fear and catastrophizing seem to be associated with perceived arm function.

Adhesive capsulitis: A review for clinicians

ABSTRACT

Adhesive capsulitis, a common primary care and orthopedic diagnosis often referred to as frozen shoulder, is a painful inflammatory process that leads to a mechanical block in active and passive range of shoulder motion. Risk factors include diabetes and thyroid dysfunction. Diagnosis is made based on physical examination, but can be augmented by diagnostic imaging. Nonsurgical management is the mainstay of treatment because the disease is self-limiting. However, some patients may need surgical intervention.

Efficacy of Arthroscopic Surgery in the Management of Adhesive Capsulitis: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

PURPOSE

To determine which interventions optimize clinical outcomes in adhesive capsulitis by performing a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted of all clinical trials on adhesive capsulitis published since 2008. Patient cohorts were grouped into treatment categories; data collected included range of motion (ROM) and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Interventions were compared across groups by means of arm-based Bayesian network meta-analysis in a random-effects model.

RESULTS

Sixty-six studies comprising 4042 shoulders (57.6% female patients, age 54.8 ± 3.2 years [mean ± standard deviation]) were included. The most commonly studied interventions were physical therapy (PT) or shoulder injections. Network meta-analysis demonstrated that arthroscopic surgical capsular release was the most effective treatment in increasing ROM. This effect was apparent in forward flexion (effect difference [ED] versus placebo, 44°, 95% confidence interval [CI] 31° to 58°), abduction (ED 58°, 45° to 71°), internal rotation (ED 34°, 24° to 44°), and external rotation (ED 59°, 37° to 80°). Interventions most effective for pain relief included PT supplemented with either medical therapy (ED -4.50, -9.80 to 2.80) or ultrasound therapy (ED -5.10, -5.10 to -1.40). Interventions most effective for improvement of functional status included PT, manipulation under anesthesia (MUA), intra-articular or subacromial steroid injection, surgical capsular release, and supplementation of PT with alternative therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

No one treatment emerged superior in regard to ROM, pain symptoms, and functional status. Surgery (after failure of conservative treatment) ranked highest across all ROM domains. Treatments that ranked highest for treatment of pain included PT supplemented with either medical therapy or ultrasound. Finally, treatments that ranked highest for improvements in functional status included MUA, PT with medical therapy, surgical intervention, PT with ultrasound, PT with injection, and injection alone.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II, systematic review and network meta-analysis of level I and II studies.

Outcome of manipulation under anesthesia with or without intra-articular steroid injection for treating frozen shoulder: A retrospective cohort study

Manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) combined with intra-articular steroid injection (ISI) is preferred in management of the refractory frozen shoulder (FS). This study aimed to evaluate the effect of MUA with ISI or not on pain severity and function of the shoulder.Data on 141 patients receiving MUA with primary FS refractory to conservative treatments for at least 1 month were retrospectively obtained from medical records. We performed propensity score matching analysis between patients receiving MUA only and those receiving MUA plus ISI, and then conducted logistic regression analysis to identify the risk factors for the need to other treatments during 6-month follow-up.More improvement in terms of the SPADI pain scores and passive ROM at 2 weeks after first intervention remained in patients receiving MUA plus ISI after matching. The need to other treatments during 6-month follow-up occurred in 10.6% patients (n = 141). Logistic regression analysis revealed that a repeat MUA 1 week after first intervention was a protective factor (OR 0.042; 95% CI 0.011-0.162; P = .000) and duration of disease was the only one risk factor (OR 1.080; 95% CI 1.020-1.144; P = .008) for the need to other treatments during follow-up.ISI immediately following MUA provided additional benefits in rapid relief of pain and disability for patients with refractory FS. Pain and disability of the shoulder may be rapidly alleviated by an earlier MUA from the onset of the symptoms and a repeat MUA 1 week after first intervention.

Comparison of Treatments for Frozen Shoulder: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

IMPORTANCE

There are a myriad of available treatment options for patients with frozen shoulder, which can be overwhelming to the treating health care professional.

OBJECTIVE

To assess and compare the effectiveness of available treatment options for frozen shoulder to guide musculoskeletal practitioners and inform guidelines.

DATA SOURCES

Medline, EMBASE, Scopus, and CINHAL were searched in February 2020.

STUDY SELECTION

Studies with a randomized design of any type that compared treatment modalities for frozen shoulder with other modalities, placebo, or no treatment were included.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Data were independently extracted by 2 individuals. This study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) reporting guideline. Random-effects models were used.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Pain and function were the primary outcomes, and external rotation range of movement (ER ROM) was the secondary outcome. Results of pairwise meta-analyses were presented as mean differences (MDs) for pain and ER ROM and standardized mean differences (SMDs) for function. Length of follow-up was divided into short-term (≤12 weeks), mid-term (>12 weeks to ≤12 months), and long-term (>12 months) follow-up.

RESULTS

From a total of 65 eligible studies with 4097 participants that were included in the systematic review, 34 studies with 2402 participants were included in pairwise meta-analyses and 39 studies with 2736 participants in network meta-analyses. Despite several statistically significant results in pairwise meta-analyses, only the administration of intra-articular (IA) corticosteroid was associated with statistical and clinical superiority compared with other interventions in the short-term for pain (vs no treatment or placebo: MD, -1.0 visual analog scale [VAS] point; 95% CI, -1.5 to -0.5 VAS points; P < .001; vs physiotherapy: MD, -1.1 VAS points; 95% CI, -1.7 to -0.5 VAS points; P < .001) and function (vs no treatment or placebo: SMD, 0.6; 95% CI, 0.3 to 0.9; P < .001; vs physiotherapy: SMD 0.5; 95% CI, 0.2 to 0.7; P < .001). Subgroup analyses and the network meta-analysis demonstrated that the addition of a home exercise program with simple exercises and stretches and physiotherapy (electrotherapy and/or mobilizations) to IA corticosteroid may be associated with added benefits in the mid-term (eg, pain for IA coritocosteriod with home exercise vs no treatment or placebo: MD, -1.4 VAS points; 95% CI, -1.8 to -1.1 VAS points; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

The findings of this study suggest that the early use of IA corticosteroid in patients with frozen shoulder of less than 1-year duration is associated with better outcomes. This treatment should be accompanied by a home exercise program to maximize the chance of recovery.

Intra-articular steroid for adhesive capsulitis: does hydrodilatation give any additional benefit? A randomized control trial

OBJECTIVES

To assess the benefit offered by capsular hydrodilatation in addition to intra-articular steroid injections in cases of adhesive capsulitis, assess outcomes in diabetic patients with capsular hydrodilatation as compared to non-diabetics and correlate duration of symptoms with outcome based on the type of intervention given.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This prospective double-blinded randomized control trial included patients presenting with clinical features of adhesive capsulitis with no evidence of rotator cuff pathology and randomized them into two groups-intra-articular steroid with hydrodilatation (distension group) and only intra-articular steroid (non-distension group) with intervention being performed as per the group allotted. Primary outcome measure was Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) scores which were taken pre-intervention, at 1.5, 3 and 6 months post-intervention, which were assessed by generalized linear model statistics and Pearson correlation.

RESULTS

Although there was statistically significant drop in SPADI in both groups over time [F(1.9, 137.6) = 112.2; p < 0.001], mean difference in SPADI between the 2 groups was not statistically significant (1.53; CI:-3.7 to 6.8; p = 0.56). There was no significant difference between both groups among diabetics [F(1,38) = 0.04; p = 0.95] and no significant difference between diabetic and non-diabetic patients who received hydrodilatation [F(1.8, 60) = 2.26; p = 0.12]. There was no significant correlation between the reduction in SPADI scores and duration of symptoms in any subset of the study population.

CONCLUSION

Shoulder joint hydrodilatation offered no additional benefit compared to intra-articular steroid injections for shoulder adhesive capsulitis. Outcome for diabetics and non-diabetics were similar and there was no correlation between duration of symptoms and outcome.

[Conservative treatment of frozen shoulder]

Idiopathic shoulder stiffness (i.e. frozen shoulder, FS) is a common pathology of the glenohumeral joint characterized by a sudden onset of pain syndrome and progressive restriction of the range of motion. While the histological changes of FS are accompanied by synovial inflammation and increasing capsular fibrosis, the underlying cause of FS is still unknown. The treatment options for FS are multifarious and include medication, local steroid injection, physiotherapy, hydrodistension, manipulation under anesthesia, arthroscopic and open capsular release. As the disease is usually self-limiting and the symptoms resolve after 2-3 years, especially conservative treatment measures are often clinically applied; however, in this context there is still no scientifically based consensus on which treatment measures are most likely to contribute to symptom relief in which phase of the disease. For this reason, this article focuses on the description of the scientifically investigated conservative treatment methods in FS and their temporal classification into the classical three-phase course of the disease.

Treatment of Adhesive Capsulitis of the Shoulder

Adhesive capsulitis presents clinically as limited, active and passive range of motion caused by the formation of adhesions of the glenohumeral joint capsule. Radiographically, it is thickening of the capsule and rotator interval. The pathology of the disease, and its classification, relates to inflammation and formation of extensive scar tissue. Risk factors include diabetes, hyperthyroidism, and previous cervical spine surgery. Nonsurgical management includes physical therapy, corticosteroid injections, extracorporeal shock wave therapy, calcitonin, ultrasonography-guided hydrodissection, and hyaluronic acid injections. Most patients will see complete resolution of symptoms with nonsurgical management, and there appears to be a role of early corticosteroid injection in shortening the overall duration of symptoms. Surgical intervention, including manipulation under anesthesia, arthroscopic capsular release both limited and circumferential, and the authors' technique are described in this article. Complications include fracture, glenoid and labral injuries, neurapraxia, and rotator cuff pathology. Postoperative care should always include early physical therapy.

Effectiveness of Hydrodilatation in Adhesive Capsulitis of Shoulder: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS:

Even though hydrodilatation has been used for 50 years, the evidence on its effectiveness is not clear. Only one earlier review has strictly focused on this treatment method. The aims of this study are to evaluate the evidence on the effectiveness of hydrodilatation in treatment of adhesive capsulitis and, if appropriate, to assess the correlation between the effects of this procedure and the amount of fluid injected.

MATERIALS AND METHODS:

A literature search on MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Central, Web of Science, and CINAHL databases was done; random-effects meta-analysis and meta-regression were employed; and cost-effectiveness and safeness analyses were left outside the scope of the review.

RESULTS:

Of the 270 records identified through search, 12 studies were included in qualitative and quantitative analysis and seven were included in a meta-analysis. The lower 95% confidence interval for the effect of hydrodilatation on pain severity was 0.12 indicating small effect size and mean number needed to treat 12. The pooled effect of hydrodilatation on disability level was insignificant 0.2 (95% confidence interval: -0.04 to 0.44). The lower 95% confidence interval for the effect of hydrodilatation on the range of shoulder motion was close to zero (0.07) indicating small effect size with mean number needed to treat 12. The amount of injected solution did not have a substantial effect on pain severity or range of shoulder motion. The heterogeneity level I² was acceptable from 0% to 60%.

CONCLUSION:

According to current evidence, hydrodilatation has only a small, clinically insignificant effect when treating adhesive capsulitis.

New episodes of musculoskeletal conditions among employed people in Norway, sickness certification and return to work: a multiregister-based cohort study from primary care

OBJECTIVES

To identify new cases of musculoskeletal (MSK) disorders among employed people presenting in Norwegian primary care in 2012, frequency of sickness certification and length of sick leave. To identify patient-, diagnosis- and GP-related predictors of sickness certification, prolonged sick leave and return to work (RTW).

METHODS

An observational multiregister-based cohort study covering all employed persons in Norway(1 176 681 women and 1 330 082 men) based on claims data from all regular GPs merged with individual sociodemographic data from public registers was performed. Participants were employed patients without any GP consultation during the previous 3 months who consulted a GP with a diagnosis of a MSK condition. Those not on sick leave and with a known GP affiliation were included in the analyses. Outcomes were incidence, proportion sickness certified and proportion on sick leave after 16 days, according to the diagnosis, ORs with 95% CIs for sickness certified and for sick leave exceeding 16 days and HRs with 95% CIs for RTW.

RESULTS

One-year incidence of MSK episodes was 159/1000 among employed women and 156/1000 among employed men. 27.1% of the women and 28.2% of the men were sickness certified in the initial consultation. After 16 days, 10.5% of women and 9.9% of men were still on sick leave. Upper limb problems were most frequent. After adjustments, medium/high education predicted a lower risk of absence from work due to sickness and rapid RTW after 16 days. Back pain, fractures and female gender carried a higher risk of sickness certification but faster RTW. Older age was associated with less initial certification, more sick leave exceeding 16 days and slower RTW. Male patients with male GPs had a lower risk of sickness absence, which was similar to patients with GPs born in Norway and GPs with many patients. After 16 days, GP variables had no effect on RTW.

CONCLUSION

Upper limb problems and GPs as stakeholders in 'the inclusive workplace' strategy need more attention.

Hydrodilatation With Corticosteroid for the Treatment of Adhesive Capsulitis: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Current evidence suggests that corticosteroid injection alone expedites the recovery of pain-free range of motion (ROM) in patients with adhesive capsulitis compared to physiotherapy or placebo. However, it remains unclear whether the addition of hydrodilatation with corticosteroid provides improvement in pain-free ROM as well as pain relief.

OBJECTIVE

A review of the literature was conducted to determine whether the combined intervention of hydrodilatation and corticosteroid injection expedites restoration of pain-free ROM compared to a control treatment of corticosteroid injection in patients with adhesive capsulitis.

METHODS

EMBASE, MEDLINE, and CINAHL were searched from database inception to January 2017. Relevant studies were determined as randomized controlled trials written in English, comparing the outcomes of hydrodilatation and corticosteroid injection to a control group treated with corticosteroid injection alone in patients with adhesive capsulitis. Two independent reviewers assessed manuscripts for study inclusion and extracted data.

RESULTS

A total of 2276 studies were identified through the search, of which 6 randomized controlled studies (involving 410 shoulders) met criteria for inclusion in this review. Mean age ranged from 51-61 years, with mean symptom duration of 4-9 months. Studies varied significantly regarding the volume of injectate, anatomical injection approach, symptom duration, and the method of glenohumeral capsule distension (capsular rupture versus preservation). Two studies demonstrated clinically and statistically significant improvement in the combination group at 3-month follow-up, and one study demonstrated clinically significant improvement only in ROM and/or pain/functional scales, compared to 3 studies demonstrating no benefit when compared to corticosteroid injection alone.

CONCLUSION

Combining hydrodilatation with corticosteroid injection potentially expedites recovery of pain-free ROM. The greatest benefit is experienced within the first 3 months of intervention. Differences in hydrodilatation techniques, inclusion of capsular preservation, anatomical approach, and length of symptoms may explain the variability in efficacy demonstrated. Further trials using larger sample sizes, better anatomical approaches, image guidance, and hydrodilatation techniques are required to determine the true nature of benefits of hydrodilatation with corticosteroid injection.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

Comparative Efficacy of Intra-Articular Steroid Injection and Distension in Patients With Frozen Shoulder: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy of intra-articular (IA) steroid injection and distension in patients with frozen shoulder.

DATA SOURCES

Databases, including MEDLINE (via PubMed), Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Library, were searched for studies published up to November 2016.

STUDY SELECTION

We included all published randomized controlled trials (RCTs), quasi-experimental studies, and observational studies investigating the effectiveness of IA steroid injection, distension, and physiotherapy in patients with frozen shoulder. Sixteen RCTs and 1 observational study were enrolled in meta-analysis.

DATA EXTRACTION

Full texts were independently reviewed, and quality of RCTs was assessed with The Cochrane Collaboration's tool. The primary outcome was functional improvement; the secondary outcomes included pain reduction and external rotation (ER) improvement.

DATA SYNTHESIS

In pairwise meta-analysis, pooled standardized mean difference (SMD) of functional improvement and pain reduction revealed equal efficacy at 3 follow-up time points. With respect to ER improvement, distension has a superior effect compared with IA steroid injection in the short term [(2-4wk; SMD, -.36; 95% confidence interval [CI], -.68 to -.04) and medium term (6-16wk; SMD, -0.80; 95% CI, -1.32 to -0.29). The network meta-analysis indicated a better efficacy for distension than for IA steroid injection in ER improvement only in the medium term (6-16wk; SMD, -0.70; 95% CI, -1.19 to -0.21).

CONCLUSIONS

IA steroid injection was as effective as distension in shoulder function improvement, pain reduction, and increasing ER of the shoulder. Distension yielded better ER improvement in the medium term but to a minor extent in the long term. For patients with predominant ER limitation, early distension could be considered the primary choice of treatment.

Effectiveness of Glenohumeral Joint Dilatation for Treatment of Frozen Shoulder: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

The objective was to explore the effectiveness of glenohumeral joint distension for the treatment of frozen shoulder. We searched electronic data sources including PubMed, Scopus, and Embase from the earliest records available to February 2017. Eleven randomized controlled trials including at least one pair of comparisons between capsular distension and a reference treatment were included, comprising 747 participants. Patients’ characteristics, details of reference treatments, aspects of capsular distension therapy, and outcome measurement were evaluated at three points in time: baseline, early following intervention, and at the trial’s end. The primary and secondary outcomes were the between-group standardized mean differences of changes in shoulder function and range of motion, respectively. Regarding the long-term primary outcome, the superiority of capsular distension to reference treatments was not identified. One secondary outcome (external rotation limitation) showed a probable early positive response to capsular distension when compared to intra-articular corticosteroid injection. Aspects of approaches, imaging guiding techniques and doses of distension were not found to modify treatment effectiveness. In conclusion, distension of the glenohumeral joint provides a similar long-term efficacy to all reference treatments. A single dose of a corticosteroid-contained regimen introduced through the ultrasound-guided posterior approach is a preferable practice of capsular distension for the management of frozen shoulder.

Predicting outcome in frozen shoulder (shoulder capsulitis) in presence of comorbidity as measured with subjective health complaints and neuroticism

BACKGROUND

There is a substantive lack of knowledge about comorbidity in patients with frozen shoulder. The aim of this study was to investigate whether subjective health complaints and Neuroticism would predict treatment outcome in patients diagnosed with frozen shoulder as measured by the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) and change in SPADI.

METHODS

A total of 105 patients with frozen shoulder were recruited for a randomised controlled trial, where 69 were in the intervention group and received intraarticular corticosteroid injections and 36 patients served as control group. The SPADI was used as the outcome measure after 8 weeks, and change in SPADI from baseline to 8 weeks as a measure of rate of recovery. To examine comorbidities, all participants completed the Subjective Health Complaints (SHC) questionnaire with its five subscales, and the Neuroticism (N) component of the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire Revised. Multiple regression analysis was performed with the baseline comorbidity variables that correlated significantly with SPADI after 8 weeks, and with change in SPADI from baseline to 8 weeks, controlling for the variables intervention, age, gender and duration of pain.

RESULTS

In this study, patients with frozen shoulder had little comorbidity as measured with SHC and scored normally with respect to Neuroticism. Only the Pseudoneurology subscale in SHC correlated significantly with SPADI and had significant predictive power (p < 0.001) for the outcome at 8 weeks. The intervention group exhibited significant statistical predictive power (p < 0.001) for the treatment outcome as measured by a change in SPADI from baseline to 8 weeks. Being female also had some predictive significance for change in SPADI (p < 0.005).

CONCLUSION

Psychometric parameters as measured by the Pseudoneurology subscale in SHC questionnaire did predict the treatment outcome in frozen shoulder as measured by SPADI at 8 weeks, but not by change in SPADI from baseline to 8 weeks. One may conclude that psychometric parameters may affect symptoms, but do not predict the rate of recovery in frozen shoulder.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT01570985 .