Inter- and intra-rater reliability for measurement of range of motion in joints included in three hypermobility assessment methods

Protocol and validity testing of femoroacetabular posterior translation with dynamic hip ultrasonography

OBJECTIVE

To describe femoroacetabular posterior translation (FAPT) using dynamic hip ultrasonography (DHUS), and to determine the inter- and intra-rater reliability of hip ultrasound measurements of FAPT.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study design was a feasibility study of 13 healthy young adults (26 hips) using test-retest analysis. The data was collected prospectively over a 2-week time period. Three DHUS measurements (posterior neutral (PN), flexion, adduction, and internal rotation (PFADIR), and stand and load (PStand) were measured by four independent raters (2 senior who divided the cohort, 1 intermediate, 1 junior) at two time points for bilateral hips of each participant. Reliability was assessed by calculating the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) along with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for each rater and across all raters.

RESULTS

A total of 468 US scans were completed. The mean age of the cohort was 25.7 years (SD 5.1 years) and 54% were female. The inter-rater reliability was excellent for PFADIR (ICC 0.85 95% CI 0.76-0.91), good for PN (ICC 0.69 95% CI 0.5-0.81), and good for PStand (ICC 0.72 95% CI 0.55-0.83). The intra-rater reliability for all raters was good for PFADIR (ICC 0.60 95% CI 0.44-0.73), fair for PN (ICC 0.42 95% CI 0.21-0.59), and fair for PStand (ICC 0.42 95% CI 0.22-0.59).

CONCLUSION

This is the first study to present a protocol using dynamic ultrasonography to measure FAPT. DHUS measure for FAPT was shown to be reliable across raters with varying levels of ultrasound experience.

Variability of joint hypermobility in children: a meta-analytic approach to set cut-off scores

Current international consensus of the appropriate Beighton score cut-off to define if a child has generalised joint hypermobile or not is based upon expert opinion. Our aim was to determine the prevalence of Beighton scores of children worldwide to provide a recommendation for establishing the Beighton score cut-off to identify generalised joint hypermobility in children. We used AMED, OVID Medline, Embase and CINAHL to find published articles from inception to April 2024 describing Beighton scores of children up to and including 18 years from the general population. We extracted study demographics including country of publication, total number of participants, summary data about the age and sex of participant, Beighton scores and any cut-off used where authors deemed children hypermobile and how many children were rated at the corresponding Beighton scores. There were 37 articles reporting on the prevalence or incidence of hypermobility at cut-off scores from 28,868 participants. Using the cut-off of ≥ 6 resulted in a prevalence of 6% for studies reporting male data and 13% for studies reporting female data. Limited data reporting availability precluded further sub-analysis at a Beighton score of ≥ 7, age, pubertal status and ethnicity.    Conclusion: The working threshold for identifying generalised joint hypermobility in children should be a Beighton score of 6 or more. Our analysis also suggests a Beighton score of 7 or greater may be appropriate in childhood, particularly for females. What is Known: • The working threshold for identifying generalised joint hypermobility in children previously was set based on expert opinion. What is New: • The threshold to identify hypermobility in children should be at a minimum of ≥ 6 on the Beighton score.

"Could a subset of joint mobility tests define generalized joint hypermobility?": A descriptive observational inception study

BACKGROUND

Generalized joint hypermobility is an inherited collagen phenotype based on clinical assessments of joint mobility. However, there is no international consensus to define generalized joint hypermobility, both considering which joint mobility tests should be included and limits for joint hypermobility.

OBJECTIVES

The primary aim of the study was to identify a subset of joint mobility tests to define generalized joint hypermobility. A further aim was to evaluate standardized limits for the classification of hypermobility in different joint types throughout the body.

METHODS

A total of 255 early pregnant women were included in the study. Joint mobility was measured according to a structured protocol. Correlation and principal component analysis were used to find a subset of joint mobility tests. To classify hypermobility in each joint mobility test, five different standard deviation levels plus 0.84, plus 1.04, plus 1.28, plus 1.64 and plus 2 were used, corresponding to 20%, 15%, 10%, 5% and 2.5% of the normal distribution.

RESULTS

No subset of joint mobility test could define generalized joint hypermobility. The higher the standard deviation levels, the higher the limit to classify joint hypermobility and the lower the prevalence. As a result of no subset of joint mobility tests were found to define generalized joint hypermobility, different combinations of major and minor joints in upper and lower limbs and the axial skeleton, were systematically developed. These combinations were evaluated for each standard deviation level, resulting in a prevalence of generalized joint hypermobility between 0% and 12.9% and a clear variation in how the hypermobile joint mobility tests were distributed.

CONCLUSION

It is probably not possible to choose a subset of joint mobility tests to define GJH. In order not to overlook generalized joint hypermobility, a broader assessment of different joint types and sizes of joints appears to be needed. The prevalence of generalized joint hypermobility is dependent on joint hypermobility limit and the chosen combination of joint mobility tests.

Classification of the Pathological Range of Motion in Low Back Pain Using Wearable Sensors and Machine Learning

Low back pain (LBP) is a highly common musculoskeletal condition and the leading cause of work absenteeism. This project aims to develop a medical test to help healthcare professionals decide on and assign physical treatment for patients with nonspecific LBP. The design uses machine learning (ML) models based on the classification of motion capture (MoCap) data obtained from the range of motion (ROM) exercises among healthy and clinically diagnosed patients with LBP from Imbabura-Ecuador. The following seven ML algorithms were tested for evaluation and comparison: logistic regression, decision tree, random forest, support vector machine (SVM), k-nearest neighbor (KNN), multilayer perceptron (MLP), and gradient boosting algorithms. All ML techniques obtained an accuracy above 80%, and three models (SVM, random forest, and MLP) obtained an accuracy of >90%. SVM was found to be the best-performing algorithm. This article aims to improve the applicability of inertial MoCap in healthcare by making use of precise spatiotemporal measurements with a data-driven treatment approach to improve the quality of life of people with chronic LBP.

Application of non-parametric correlations to compare the compliance of Beighton and Sachse tests in the assessment of hypermobility based on research of the fitness instructors group

BACKGROUND

Joint hypermobility is a spectrum of symptoms associated with connective tissue disorders. The main feature is the increased range of joint mobility. Hypermobility is rarely recognised in clinical practice. The diagnosis is based on the evaluation of diagnostic tests, mainly the Beighton score. The divergence of research methods means that patients do not receive a proper diagnosis and treatment.

METHODS

The study used the Beighton score and the Sachse scale. Both tests are "all-or-none-tests". Non-parametric correlations were used to assess the concordance effect. To this end, two methods were adopted, i.e., the Spearman Rank Correlation and Kendall tau Rank Correlation. The values of correlation coefficients were calculated, respectively, rho and Kendall tau. The study involved 30 women working as fitness instructors.

RESULTS

Consent results of hypermobility assessment for both methods were obtained in 3 cases, while the discrepancy in the hypermobility statement concerns measurements made in 10 participants. This cursory assessment already indicates a significant differentiation of results obtained for both methods.

DISCUSSION

To the best of our knowledge, there are not many studies comparing different HSD diagnostic methods. The Beighton score is the most commonly used, but the selection of only 5 joints for the examination does not show the systemic nature of hypermobility. A reliable methodology should be based not only on goniometric measurements of selected joints.

CONCLUSION

The expanded correlation analysis of Beighton and Sachse hypermobility tests indicates their poor compliance. Therefore, there is a need to standardise hypermobility spectrum disorder diagnostics, which may affect the objectification and credibility of these diagnostics.

Relation of lumbar intervertebral disc height and severity of disc degeneration based on Pfirrmann scores

Background

Disc height (DH) change is considered one of the most critical factors in assessing intervertebral disc degeneration (IVD). Pfirrmann et al. developed a scoring system for disc degeneration evaluation based on changes in DH in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). While the relationship between DH measurements and Pfirrmann scores for disc degeneration has been explored, the validity of different DH measuring techniques or their connection with disc degeneration is yet uncertain. The present study investigates intra-rater and inter-rater agreement and reliability of different DH measurement methods on MRI and evaluates the relationship between different DH measurement methods and Pfirrmann scores of IVD degeneration, as well as between different Pfirrmann scores and clinical outcomes.

Methods

Adult patients with MRI scans of the lumbar spine were recruited. Eight DH measuring techniques were tested for intra-rater and inter-rater agreement and reliability. Bland and Altman's Limits of Agreement (LOA) was used to evaluate intra-rater and inter-rater agreements. Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability were evaluated using intra-class correlations (ICC) with 95 % confidence intervals (95 % CI). The association between DH and Pfirrmann scores was examined using one-way ANOVA.

Results

Excellent intra-rater reliability was reported for 332 participants on DH (ranging from 0.912 (0.901, 0.923) to 0.973 (0.964, 0.981) and from 0.902 (0.892, 0.915) to 0.975 (0.962, 0.985) by two independent raters). All measuring methods had high intra-rater agreement, except for methods 4 and 5. All methods had good-to-excellent of inter-rater reliability on DH (ICCs ranging from 0.812 (0.795, 0.828) to 0.995 (0.994, 0.995)) except for the posterior disc material length of method 5 (ICC 0.740 (0.718, 0.761)). Methods 1 to 6 for evaluating DH in patients with spondylolisthesis had poor inter-rater reliability. The IVD levels with grades IV and V in Pfirrmann scores had significantly lower DH than the IVD levels with grades I to III in Pfirrmann scores. IVD levels with grades IV and V in Pfirrmann scores had significantly higher VAS and ODI than IVD levels with grades I in Pfirrmann scores.

Conclusion

A good-to-excellent intra-rater and inter-rater reliability was achieved on most DH measuring methods on MRI following a standardized and structured protocol. However, small anatomical structures and different tissue borders could influence measurements. Additionally, DH can differentiate between grade IV and V Pfirrmann scores, and severe IVD degeneration (IV and V Pfirrmann) is linked to clinical outcomes.

Generalized joint hypermobility and the risk of pregnancy-related pelvic girdle pain: Is body mass index of importance?-A prospective cohort study

INTRODUCTION

Pelvic girdle pain (PGP) affects approximately 50% of pregnant women. The mechanisms are multifactorial but not fully understood. Women with generalized joint hypermobility (GJH) may be vulnerable to load in the pelvic joints during pregnancy. Our aim was to investigate if women with GJH had an increased risk of PGP and higher pain intensity during and after pregnancy, compared with women with normal joint mobility. We also studied if body mass index (BMI) in early pregnancy influenced that risk.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A prospective cohort study of 356 women, whose data were collected by self-reports and clinical examinations in early and in late pregnancy and 9 months after childbirth. GJH was present with ≥5/9 points on the Beighton score. PGP was defined by a pain drawing and ≥1 positive test. Pain intensity was measured with a visual analogue scale (0-100 mm). We adjusted for age and origin in logistic regression and ordinal logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

In early pregnancy, 47.1% of the women with GJH had PGP vs 32.6% of women with normal joint mobility (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.76; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.86-3.62) and had higher odds of reporting higher pain intensity (aOR 2.04; 95% CI 1.02-4.07). The odds of PGP were highest for women with GJH and BMI ≥25 kg/m2 (aOR 6.88; 95% CI 1.34-35.27) compared with women with normal joint mobility and BMI <25 kg/m2 . The estimated associations were weaker and not statistically significant in late pregnancy or after childbirth.

CONCLUSIONS

Women with GJH did not have an increased risk of PGP during or after pregnancy but reported higher pain intensity in early pregnancy compared with women with normal joint mobility. Since women with combined GJH and BMI ≥25 kg/m2 had the highest odds of PGP in early pregnancy, our results may suggest that health care needs to pay attention to and develop methods to reduce the risk of PGP and delay the onset of pain during pregnancy in women with this combination.

Injury Risk in Collegiate Football Players With Generalized Joint Hypermobility: A Prospective Cohort Study Over 2 Years

Background

Generalized joint hypermobility (GJH) has been identified as a risk factor for injury in various athletic patient populations.

Purpose

To evaluate GJH as a predisposing risk factor for injury in a population of National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) Division I football players.

Study Design

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2.

Methods

The Beighton score was collected for 73 athletes during their preseason physical examinations in 2019. GJH was defined as a Beighton score ≥4. Athlete descriptive characteristics, including age, height, weight, and playing position, were recorded. The cohort was evaluated prospectively for 2 years, and the number of musculoskeletal issues, injuries, treatment episodes, days unavailable, and surgical procedures for each athlete during this period were recorded. These measures were compared between the GJH and no-GJH groups.

Results

The mean Beighton score was 1.4 ± 1.5 for the 73 players; 7 players (9.6%) had a Beighton score indicating GJH. During the 2-year evaluation, there were 438 musculoskeletal issues, including 289 injuries. The mean number of treatment episodes per athlete was 77 ± 71 (range, 0-340), and the mean number of days unavailable was 67 ± 92 days (range, 0-432 days). There were 23 athletes who required 25 operations, the most common procedure being arthroscopic shoulder stabilization (n = 6). The number of injuries per athlete was not significantly different between the GJH and no-GJH groups (3.0 ± 2.1 vs 4.1 ± 3.0; P = .13), nor were there any between-group differences in the number of treatments received (74.6 ± 81.9 vs 77.2 ± 71.5; P = .47), days unavailable (79.6 ± 124.5 vs 65.3 ± 89.3; P = .61), or rates of surgery (43% vs 30%; P = .67).

Conclusion

A preseason diagnosis of GJH did not place NCAA football players at a greater risk for injury during the 2-year study period. Based on the findings of this study, no specific preparticipation risk counseling or intervention is warranted for football players who are diagnosed with GJH as defined by the Beighton score.

Prevalence and Demographic Distribution of Hypermobility in a Random Group of School-Aged Children in Nigeria

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of hypermobility in randomly selected healthy children, without previous trauma or disease process affecting the joints and whether other demographic variables (age, sex, BMI) had an impact on Beighton scores and range of motion (RoM) in children between 6 and 10 years of age.

RESULTS

286 children were included; 27.3% of them had a Beighton score ≥7/9 and 72% would be classified hypermobile if we had used a Beighton cut-off score ≥4/9. Prevalence declined with increasing age. Girls were more often hypermobile (34%) than boys (20%) and this was mainly caused by increased RoM in the knees. Positive scores of finger items of the Beighton were more common than on the other items, leading to a high prevalence of peripheral hypermobility. Localized hypermobility was only found in the fifth MCP joint. A total of 15% of the children with normal mobility reached 20 excess degrees RoM of the left and right fifth MCP. Pain was present in 12 of the 239 children but was not linked to the level of mobility.

CONCLUSION

Hypermobility is the rule in this pain-free population of children with GJH.

A novel simulator-based checklist for evaluating residents' competence in cerebral angiography in China

Background

Nowadays, with the fast-increasing demand for neuro-endovascular therapy, surgeons in this field are in urgent need. Unfortunately, there is still no formal skill assessment in neuro-endovascular therapy in China.

Methods

We used a Delphi method to design a newly objective checklist for standards of cerebrovascular angiography in China and evaluated its validity and reliability. A total of 19 neuro-residents with no interventional experience and 19 neuro-endovascular surgeons from two centers (Guangzhou and Tianjin) were recruited; they were divided into two groups: residents and surgeons. Residents completed a simulation-based cerebrovascular angiography operation training before assessment. Assessments were under live and video record forms with two tools: the existing global rating scale (GRS) of endovascular performance and the new checklist.

Results

The average scores of residents were significantly increased after training in two centers (p < 0.05). There is good consistency between GRS and the checklist (p = 0.856). Intra-rater reliability (Spearman's rho) of the checklist was >0.9, and the same result was also observed in raters between different centers and different assessment forms (p < 0.001, rho > 0.9). The reliability of the checklist was higher than that of the GRS (Kendall's harmonious coefficient is 0.849, while GRS is 0.684).

Conclusion

The newly developed checklist appears reliable and valid for evaluating the technical performance of cerebral angiography and differentiating between trained and untrained trainees' performance well. For its efficiency, our method has been proven to be a feasible tool for resident angiography examination in certification nationwide.

Research and application advances in rehabilitation assessment of stroke

Stroke has a high incidence and disability rate, and rehabilitation is an effective means to reduce the disability rate of patients. To systematize rehabilitation assessment, which is the foundation for rehabilitation therapy, we summarize the assessment methods commonly used in research and clinical applications, including the various types of stroke rehabilitation scales and their applicability, and related biomedical detection technologies, including surface electromyography (sEMG), motion analysis systems, transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and combinations of different techniques. We also introduce some assessment techniques that are still in the experimental phase, such as the prospective application of artificial intelligence (AI) with optical correlation tomography (OCT) in stroke rehabilitation. This review provides a useful bibliography for the assessment of not only the severity of stroke injury, but also the therapeutic effects of stroke rehabilitation, and establishes a solid base for the future development of stroke rehabilitation skills.

Radiographic evaluation of lumbar intervertebral disc height index: An intra and inter-rater agreement and reliability study

PURPOSE

To evaluate intra- and inter-rater agreement and reliability of seven reported disc height index (DHI) measurement methods on standing lateral X-ray of lumbar spine.

METHODS

The adult patients who had standing lateral X-ray of lumbar spine were recruited. Seven methods were used to measure DHI of each lumbar intervertebral disc level, including a ratio of sum of anterior and posterior disc height (DH) to disc diameter (Method 1), a ratio of middle DH to mid-vertebral body height (Method 2), a ratio of middle DH to disc diameter (Method 3), a ratio of the mean of anterior, middle, and posterior DH to the sagittal diameter of the proximal vertebral body (Method 4), a ratio of DH to vertebral height which cross the centre of adjacent vertebral bodies (Method 5), a ratio of the mean of anterior, middle, and posterior DH to the mean of proximal and distal vertebral body height (Method 6), and a ratio of the sum of anterior and posterior DH to the sum of superior and inferior disc depth (Method 7). Two raters conducted the measurements (one medical student (SS) and the other an experienced spine surgeon (XC)). Bland and Altmańs Limits of Agreement (LOA) with standard difference were calculated to examine intra- and inter-rater agreements between two out of seven methods for DHI. Intra-class correlations (ICC) with 95% confidence intervals were calculated to assess intra- and inter-rater reliability.

RESULTS

The intra-rater reliability in DHI measurements for 288 participants were ICCs from 0.807 (0.794, 0.812) to 0.922 (0.913, 0.946) by rater 1 (SS) and from 0.827 (0.802, 0.841) to 0.918 (0.806, 0.823) by rater 2 (XC). Method 2, 3, and 5 on all segmental levels had bias (95 % CI does not include zero) or/and out of the acceptable cut-off proportion (>50 %). A total of 609 outliers in 9174 segmental levels' LOA range. Inter-rater reliability was good-to-excellent in all but method 2 (0.736 (0.712, 0.759)) and method 5 (0.634 (0.598, 0.667)). ICCs of related lines to good-to-excellent reliability methods was excellent in all but only indirect lines in method 1 and 4 (ICCs lie in the range from 0.8 to 0.9).

CONCLUSION

Following a structured protocol, intra- and inter-rater reliability was good-to-excellent for most DHI measurement methods on X-ray. However, the complicated methods (more indirect lines) and IVD degeneration (nucleus pulposus degeneration and disc herniation) potentially affected the agreement on inter-rater measurements. Method 7 is the best reproducible method to measure disc height index for all intervertebral disc segmental levels with a good-to-excellent intra- and inter-rater reliability and agreement.

Assessment of systemic joint laxity in the clinical context: Relevance and replicability of the Beighton score in chronic fatigue

BACKGROUND

Persistent symptoms in patients with systemic joint laxity (SJL) are often equivalent with complications. Screening for SJL is an important part of the assessment of musculoskeletal phenotype. The common measuring tool, the Beighton score (BS), still has unclear evidence.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the Beighton score in a clinical context for (1) ability to classify SJL as absent or present (criterion validity), and (2) interrater reliability (physician-physiotherapist), for a dichotomous cut-off (yes/no), as well as for interpretation in categories (no, some, clear SJL).

METHODS

This real-world observational study included 149 consecutive patients seeking secondary care for investigation of possible myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome. Assessment was done during a routine examination. Data were evaluated with Cohen's kappa and Spearman's rho.

RESULTS

BS criterion validity showed poor agreement with the assessment of SJL: percentage agreement was 74 % and kappa 0.39 (3-cut level), 73 % and kappa 0.39/0.45 (4-/5-cut level). The best interrater reliability was moderate (rho 0.66) for interpretation in categories.

CONCLUSIONS

The BS alone was not a reliable proxy for SJL and should be supplemented with a targeted history. Nevertheless, its interrater reliability was acceptable, and the categorised score appears to have greater clinical relevance than the dichotomous score.

Is Cam Morphology Found in Ancient and Medieval Populations in Addition to Modern Populations?

BACKGROUND

Cam morphology is thought to originate near puberty and reflects a response of the peripheral aspect of the proximal femoral physis to increased local load. Participation in particular sports activities has been associated with cam morphology in contemporary patient populations; however, it is unclear whether cam is a recent phenomenon. There are limited data regarding the frequency of its occurrence and the general deviations in femoral anatomy in different historical populations. Such information may help to understand the possible influence of lifestyle and diet on cam morphology.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

The purpose of this study was to evaluate femoral morphology in three historical populations. We asked: (1) Was cam morphology present in the three study populations, did those populations differ, and were there differences between sexes? (2) Were there differences in neck-shaft angle, version, or inclination between and among the examined populations?

METHODS

We examined 204 adult femurs from the Neolithic population from Iran (n = 37, 3000 BC to 1631 BC), medieval population from Poland (n = 135, 10th to 13th centuries), and contemporary Australian aborigines (n = 32, early 20th century), provided by the Open Research Scan Archive, Museum of the First Piasts at Lednica and the University of Wrocław, respectively. All three human populations represent different chronologic periods and lifestyles. All bones were scanned using CT and then measured on their three-dimensional (3-D) reconstructions in selected planes. Cam impingement was defined as an alpha angle > 55° measured on the inclination view. To evaluate the differences in anatomy between populations, we measured the true neck-shaft angle on the true AP view, apparent neck-shaft angle on the apparent AP view, the version angle on the version view, and the inclination angle on the inclination view. The prevalence of cam morphology and other anatomic parameters were compared among groups using chi-square test, one-way ANOVA with post hoc Tukey test, and paired t-test.

RESULTS

Cam morphology was present in 5% of the Neolithic population from Iran, in 7% of the medieval population from Poland, and 3% of the contemporary Australian aborigine femurs (OR Neolithic population from Iran/the medieval population from Poland 0.7 [95% CI 0.2 to 3.4]; p = 0.67; OR Neolithic population from Iran/contemporary Australian aborigines 1.8 [95% CI 0.2 to 20.5]; p = 0.65; OR the medieval population from Poland/contemporary Australian aborigines 2.5 [95% CI 0.3 to 20.1]; p = 0.40). There were differences in the presence of cam morphology between the sexes in the medieval population from Poland with both femurs (females: 1% [1 of 76]; males: 15% [9 of 59]; p = 0.002). There was a difference in true neck-shaft angle between the Neolithic population from Iran (121° ± 6°) and contemporary Australian aborigines (131° ± 5°; mean difference 10° [95% CI 7° to 13°]; p < 0.001) and between the medieval population from Poland (124° ± 5°) and the contemporary Australian aborigines (mean difference 7° [95% CI 5° to 9°]; p < 0.001). Apparent neck-shaft angle differed between the Neolithic population from Iran (126° ± 6°) and the contemporary Australian aborigines (134° ± 5°; mean difference 8° [95% CI 6° to 11°]; p < 0.001), and between the medieval population from Poland (126° ± 6°) and the contemporary Australian aborigines (mean difference 9° [95% CI 7° to 11°]; p < 0.001). Moreover, we observed a difference in the version angle between the Neolithic population from Iran (19° ± 7°) and the medieval population from Poland (12° ± 9°; mean difference 7° [95% CI 4° to 10°]; p < 0.001] and in the inclination angle between aforementioned groups (18° ± 7° versus 11° ± 8°; mean difference 7° [95% CI 5° to 10°]; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

This study found that cam morphology existed in historical populations at rates comparable with a contemporary population.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The presence of cam morphology in historical populations suggests that cam morphology can develop outside of the intense sports activity seen in modern adolescents. Further study will help elucidate the etiology of cam morphology, which may be useful in the development of preventive strategies.

The Dutch Main Concept Analysis: Translation and Establishment of Normative Data

Purpose The main concept analysis (MCA; Kong, 2009) quantifies the effectiveness and efficiency of information transfer during verbal discourse by means of four sets of sequential pictorial stimuli. This test was originally developed for a Cantonese-speaking population. The main goals of this study were (a) to translate and adapt the MCA to Dutch; (b) to establish normative data for healthy native Dutch-speaking adults; (c) to assess the effect of age, education level, and gender on MCA outcome; and (d) to establish inter- and intrarater reliability of the Dutch MCA. Method Language samples were collected from 60 healthy native Dutch speakers, equally recruited in different age (20-39 years, 40-59 years, 60-79 years) and education (middle and highly educated) categories through administration of the MCA. Utterances produced by at least 75% of the participants were included as a main concept in the Dutch MCA. Subsequently, age-specific normative data were established for each of the MCA parameters. Finally, an ICC was calculated in order to verify inter- and intrarater reliability of the Dutch MCA. Results The translated MCA consisted of 19 main concepts. Age-specific normative data were obtained. Both age and education level had a significant effect on MCA outcome. Information transfer in elderly was both less effectively and efficiently compared to young- and middle-aged adults. In addition, highly educated participants transferred information less efficiently compared to middle educated participants. Based on inter- and intrarater reliability measures, the Dutch MCA proved to be a reliable measuring instrument. Conclusions The MCA was translated to Dutch, and age-specific normative data were established for a healthy, Dutch-speaking population. The Dutch MCA is a reliable tool for eliciting and quantifying discourse production. Validation of the test for people with aphasia is necessary in order for the test to be useful in a clinical practice.

Objective structured assessment of technical skill in temporal bone dissection: validation of a novel tool

OBJECTIVE

This study developed an assessment tool that was based on the objective structured assessment for technical skills principles, to be used for evaluation of surgical skills in cortical mastoidectomy. The objective structured assessment of technical skill is a well-established tool for evaluation of surgical ability. This study also aimed to identify the best material and printing method to make a three-dimensional printed temporal bone model.

METHODS

Twenty-four otolaryngologists in training were asked to perform a cortical mastoidectomy on a three-dimensional printed temporal bone (selective laser sintering resin). They were scored according to the objective structured assessment of technical skill in temporal bone dissection tool developed in this study and an already validated global rating scale.

RESULTS

Two external assessors scored the candidates, and it was concluded that the objective structured assessment of technical skill in temporal bone dissection tool demonstrated some main aspects of validity and reliability that can be used in training and performance evaluation of technical skills in mastoid surgery.

CONCLUSION

Apart from validating the new tool for temporal bone dissection training, the study showed that evolving three-dimensional printing technologies is of high value in simulation training with several advantages over traditional teaching methods.

Generalized joint hypermobility and risk of pelvic girdle pain in pregnancy: does body mass index matter?

Background: Women with generalized joint hypermobility may be at increased risk of pregnancy-related pelvic girdle pain, but evidence is inconclusive. Objectives: In this prospective cohort study of 283 pregnant women in Norway, we aimed to study the association of generalized joint mobility with pelvic girdle pain, and to evaluate if pre-pregnancy body mass index was a modifier of the association. Methods: Generalized joint hypermobility was defined as a score of ≥5/9 positive tests on the Beighton score measured in early pregnancy. Primary outcome was evening pain intensity in gestation week 30, measured by a 100 mm visual analogue scale. We applied linear regression analyses to estimate age-adjusted unstandardized beta coefficients. Results: Evening pain intensity was similar among women with Beighton score ≥ 5/9 and women with Beighton score < 5/9 (age-adjusted mean difference 2.8 mm; 95% CI: -9.2 to 14.9 mm). Women with Beighton score ≥ 5/9 and pre-pregnancy body mass index ≥ 25 kg/m², reported higher evening pain than women with Beighton score < 5/9 and pre-pregnancy body mass index <25 kg/m² (age-adjusted mean difference 28.7 mm; 95% CI: 14.3-43.1 mm). Conclusions: Overall, evening pain intensity was similar among pregnant women with and without generalized joint hypermobility. However, women with a combination of generalized joint hypermobility and body mass index ≥25 kg/m² reported higher evening pain compared to women with normal joint mobility and body mass index <25 kg/m², suggesting that body mass index may modify the association. The estimates could be imprecise due to the small study sample, and our findings should be interpreted with caution.

Foot Posture Index Reference Values among Young Adults in Saudi Arabia and Their Association with Anthropometric Determinants, Balance, Functional Mobility, and Hypermobility

Background

The foot posture index (FPI) is a valid, reliable, and multidimensional method for determining foot posture in a wide range of clinical settings. To date, no normative data of healthy young adults in Saudi Arabia have been available for comparison and reference. Hence, this study is aimed at establishing the FPI reference values, gender, and side differences of FPI and their association with anthropometric determinants, balance, functional mobility, and hypermobility.

Methods

FPI was assessed in 581 (291 men and 290 women) healthy young adults aged 18–25 years. The FPI range was obtained for both feet as the sum of the scores (–2, –1, 0, 1, and 2) given to each criterion: (–1 to –12) supinated foot, (0 to +5) neutral foot, and (+6 to +12) pronated foot. The study furthermore assessed the balance using a near tandem balance test, functional mobility by stair ascent and descent test, and joint hypermobility via the Beighton scale.

Results

The average FPI score was 2.76 ± 5.23 for all subjects, 2.98 ± 5.02 for men and 2.55 ± 5.43 for women. Neutral foot posture was most frequent in this study (52.9%). A higher proportion of women had pronated (21.0%) and supinated (11.7%) feet than men which were 16.8% and 10.3%, respectively. This study also confirmed that side differences were found to be significant (p value < 0.001), whereas gender differences were significant only in the normal, pronated, and supinated foot groups.

Conclusion

The most common foot posture in both genders was ranged from neutral to slight pronation. We also found a correlation between balance with FPI in the supinated and hypersupinated foot groups, functional mobility with FPI of pronated and supinated foot groups, and joint hypermobility with FPI of the hyperpronated foot group.

The Beighton Score as a measure of generalised joint hypermobility

The Beighton Score (BS) is a set of manoeuvres in a nine-point scoring system, used as the standard method of assessment for Generalised Joint Hypermobility (GJH). It was originally developed as an epidemiological tool used in screening large populations for GJH, but later adopted as a clinical tool for diagnostic purposes. Its ability to truly reflect GJH remains controversial, as joints within the scoring system are predominantly of the upper limb and disregard many of the major joints, preventing a direct identification of GJH. Furthermore, a consistent finding in the literature whereby the BS failed to identify hypermobility in joints outside the scoring system suggests its use as an indirect indicator of GJH is also not viable. As such, the collective findings of this review demonstrate a need for a change in clinical thinking. The BS should not be used as the principle tool to differentiate between localised and generalised hypermobility, nor used alone to exclude the presence of GJH. Greater emphasis should be placed on a clinician’s judgement to identify or exclude GJH, according to its full definition.

Women with diastasis recti abdominis might have weaker abdominal muscles and more abdominal pain, but no higher prevalence of pelvic floor disorders, low back and pelvic girdle pain than women without diastasis recti abdominis

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether women with diastasis recti abdominis (DRA) have weaker abdominal muscles and higher prevalence of pelvic floor disorders (PFD), low back, pelvic girdle and abdominal pain than women without DRA.

DESIGN

Cross sectional study of women with and without DRA.

SETTING

University study.

PARTICIPANTS

Seventy-two parity and age matched women with and without DRA.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Maximal abdominal muscle strength and endurance were assessed with a dynamometer and with a curl-up test. Women reported whether they experienced PFD, low back pain, pelvic girdle pain or abdominal pain. Those experiencing PFD or pain completed the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-short form 20 (PFDI-20), the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), the Pelvic Girdle Questionnaire (PGQ) or questions about abdominal pain, respectively.

RESULTS

Maximal abdominal strength standing with 30° hip flexion was significantly lower in women with DRA (mean difference -12.9Nm, 95%CI: -24.4 to -1.5; P=0.028), but adjusted analyses showed no significant difference (mean difference -11.9Nm, 95%CI: -26.5 to 2.6; P=0.106). Adjusted analyses showed significant higher prevalence of abdominal pain in women with DRA (OR: 0.02, 95%CI: 0.00 to 0.61, P=0.026). There was no difference between the groups in PFD, low back and pelvic girdle pain.

CONCLUSION

Women with DRA tend to have weaker abdominal muscles and higher prevalence of abdominal pain, but no higher prevalence of PFD, low back or pelvic girdle pain than women without DRA.

Reliability of the beighton score and impact of generalized joint mobility and resting scapular position on Median Neurodynamic Test 1

INTRODUCTION

There is a lack of understanding of the impact of generalized joint mobility, joint hypermobility, and resting scapular position on neurodynamic testing of the median nerve. The objectives of the study were to determine: 1) the reliability of the Beighton score (BS) with and without the cutoff score for general joint hypermobility (GJH); 2) if there are differences in the Median Neurodynamic Test 1 (MNT 1) based on the Beighton cutoff score for GJH; 3) if there are differences in the MNT 1 based on an assessment of resting scapular position; 4) if there are relationships between the BS with and without the cutoff score for GJH, resting scapular position, and MNT 1.

METHODS

Testing was performed by two testers at two-time intervals at least 1 week apart. The population of interest was healthy asymptomatic adults. The outcome measures included the BS, resting scapular position, and MNT 1.

RESULTS

Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC_2,1) were 0.52 for intertester reliability at visit 1 and 0.86 at visit 2, with intratester reliability of 0.88 for Tester 1 and 0.71 for Tester 2 for the BS. Intertester prevalence-adjusted bias-adjusted kappa (PABAK) values for the Beighton GJH cutoff scores were 0.80-0.84 and 0.80 to 0.92 for intratester reliability. There were no statistically significant differences or relationships for any of the other variables of interest.

CONCLUSION

Joint mobility and resting scapular position are not confounding variables when performing MNT 1 in an asymptomatic population.

Validity of the self-reported five-part questionnaire as an assessment of generalized joint hypermobility in early pregnancy

Background

The assessment of generalized joint hypermobility is difficult due to differences in classification methods and in the performance of joint mobility assessment. The primary aim was to evaluate the validity of the self-reported five-part questionnaire, 5PQ, for identifying generalized joint hypermobility using the Beighton score as reference test. The secondary aim was to describe how joint angles measured in degrees included in the Beighton score varied in different cut-off levels in the self-reported 5PQ and the Beighton score.

Methods

A cross-sectional validity study with a total of 301 women in early pregnancy, mean age of 31 years, were included in the study. The participants answered the self-reported 5PQ before the joint angles were measured. To standardize the joint mobility measurement, a structural protocol was used. The sensitivity, specificity, receiver operating characteristic curve, area under curve, positive- and negative predictive value, positive likelihood ratio and Spearman’s rank correlation between the self-reported 5PQ ≥ 2 and the Beighton score ≥ 5 were used as main outcome measures in the validity analyses. Joint angles, measured in degrees, were calculated with means in relation to different cut-off levels.

Results

There was moderate correlation between the self-reported 5PQ and the Beighton score. The highest combined sensitivity, 84.1%, as well as specificity, 61.9%, was on 5PQ cut-off level ≥ 2, with a 38% false-positive rate, a moderate area under curve, a low positive predictive value and likelihood ratio, and a high negative predictive value. The odds of a self-reported 5PQ, cut-off level ≥ 2, among women with generalized joint hypermobility, Beighton ≥5, was low indicating a low post-test probability. The mean for all joint angles measured in degrees increased with increased cut-off levels, both in the Beighton score and in the self-reported 5PQ. However, there was a significant variation for each cut-off level.

Conclusions

There is uncertainty in identifying generalized joint hypermobility in young women using the self-reported 5PQ with a cut-off level of ≥2 when the Beighton score ≥ 5 is used as the reference test. The strength of the self-reported 5PQ is to rule-out women without generalized joint hypermobility.

High level rhythmic gymnasts and urinary incontinence: Prevalence, risk factors, and influence on performance

Urinary incontinence (UI) is common among exercising women, but no studies have been found in rhythmic gymnasts. The aims of the present study were to investigate the prevalence and risk factors for UI in rhythmic gymnasts and the impact of UI on performance. This was a cross‐sectional study including all rhythmic gymnasts competing at the highest national and international level in Norway. One hundred and thirty‐three gymnasts from 22 sports clubs were invited to participate. Background data and possible risk factors were collected via electronic questionnaires. UI was assessed by Urinary Incontinence short form (ICIQ‐UI SF). The "Triad‐specific self‐report questionnaire" was applied to assess the female athlete triad. Joint mobility was assessed by Beighton score. Logistic regression analysis was used to assess possible risk factors. One hundred and seven nulliparous rhythmic gymnasts (80.5% response rate) from 21 sports clubs, with mean age of 14.5 (SD 1.6) years, participated in the study. Thirty‐four (31.8%) reported UI with 21 (61.8%), 3 (8.8%), 6 (17.6%), and 4 (11.8%) reporting stress, urgency, mixed urinary incontinence, and leakage for no obvious reason, respectively. BMI, hypermobility, menarche, disordered eating, and hours of training were not found to be risk factors for stress urinary incontinence. Twenty‐four gymnasts with UI (70.6%) reported incontinence to influence sports performance; 10 (29.4%) reported to be afraid of visible leakage and 5 (14.7%) that the leakage would happen again. Seventy‐four (69.1%) had never heard about the pelvic floor. In conclusion, UI is common in rhythmic gymnasts and may influence sports performance.