Intra-articular platelet-rich plasma injections versus intra-articular corticosteroid injections for symptomatic management of knee osteoarthritis: systematic review and meta-analysis

Corticosteroids versus platelet-rich plasma injections for knee osteoarthritis: Where is there more evidence? A systematic review of 60 years of literature

BACKGROUND

Corticosteroid (CS) injections are often recommended by international societies for knee osteoarthritis (OA) treatment, but platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has shown higher safety and efficacy in comparative analyses. Despite this, PRP use is often not endorsed by scientific societies due to perceived insufficient body of evidence. This study aims to quantify clinical data documenting CS and PRP intra-articular injections for knee OA.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature was conducted on CS and PRP injections for knee OA. The search, performed in March 2024, used PubMed, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases, following PRISMA and Cochrane guidelines. Data collected included publication trends, number of articles, patients evaluated, and study designs documenting CS or PRP injections.

RESULTS

Of 16,979 records, 356 studies were analyzed, covering 24,435 knee OA patients. Both treatments showed an increasing publication trend, with PRP surpassing CS in 2020. The analysis included 9,322 CS patients and 15,113 PRP patients. Among CS studies, there were 103 RCTs with 5,478 patients, 18 comparative studies with 1,095 patients, and 31 case series with 2,749 patients. Among PRP studies, there were 119 RCTs with 6,028 patients, 33 comparative studies with 2,011 patients, and 72 case series with 7,074 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

PRP injections for knee OA have been documented in more studies and in larger patient numbers compared with CS injections. The higher number of high-level trials for PRP, combined with the lower safety and efficacy documented for CS by previous meta-analyses directly comparing the two products, strongly suggests reconsidering current guidelines that favor CS, highlighting PRP's body of evidence and the potential role in the effective and safe treatment of knee OA.

Molecular Mechanisms and Therapeutic Role of Intra-Articular Hyaluronic Acid in Osteoarthritis: A Precision Medicine Perspective

Background: Osteoarthritis (OA) is a degenerative joint disease characterized by progressive cartilage breakdown, synovial inflammation, and pain, which leads to significant disability. IAHA is widely used because of its viscoelastic properties, which restore synovial fluid homeostasis and reduce symptoms. However, emerging evidence suggests that IAHA exerts additional biological effects including chondroprotection, inflammatory modulation, oxidative stress reduction, and pain modulation, which may influence disease progression. Objective: This narrative review examines the biological mechanisms underlying IAHA's role in OA management. The review explored IAHA's effects on synovial fluid viscoelasticity, inflammatory cytokine modulation, cartilage preservation, oxidative stress regulation, and pain pathways, emphasizing the influence of molecular weight variations on therapeutic efficacy. Additionally, this review evaluates IAHA's integration into multimodal treatment strategies, its potential disease-modifying effects, and future directions for personalized treatment approaches. Methods: A comprehensive literature review was conducted using PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Scopus, and Web of Science for studies published between January 2000 and March 2024. The search focused on IAHA's molecular, cellular, and biochemical effects in OA and clinical findings assessing its impact on joint function, pain relief, and disease progression. Results: IAHA improves synovial fluid lubrication, reduces proinflammatory cytokines (IL-1β, TNF-α), inhibits matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), scavenges reactive oxygen species (ROS), and modulates nociceptive pathways. High-molecular-weight IAHA demonstrates superior efficacy in advanced OA, while low-molecular-weight formulations may be better suited for early-stage disease. Although IAHA's symptom relief is comparable to corticosteroids and NSAIDs, its favorable safety profile and emerging disease-modifying potential support its long-term use in OA management. Conclusions: IAHA represents a multifaceted therapeutic approach bridging symptomatic relief and regenerative strategies. While long-term efficacy, optimal administration protocols, and patient-specific responses remain subjects of ongoing research, refining treatment selection criteria, dosing regimens, and combination strategies may enhance clinical outcomes. Future studies should explore biomarker-driven approaches, standardize treatment protocols, and assess IAHA's synergy with regenerative medicine to optimize its role in OA management.

Clinical and Cellular Predictors of Outcomes in Autologous Conditioned Plasma Therapy for Knee Osteoarthritis: A Prospective Cohort Study

IntroductionAutologous conditioned plasma (ACP) is a single-spin, leukocyte-poor platelet-rich plasma (PRP) that provides a plasma with a platelet concentration 2 to 3 times the blood platelet concentration. The objective of this study was to investigate the clinical effectiveness of ACP intra-articular injection in patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA) and to identify any demographic, disease-associated, or biological predictors of outcome.MethodsA prospective cohort study was conducted between 2022 and 2023 in a single high-volume tertiary center, including 42 patients (54 knees) who consented to be enrolled. Patients underwent a series of 3 injections of ACP at weekly intervals, prepared using the Arthrex ACP Double-Syringe System. Lysholm scores were collected at baseline, 3-months, and 6-months post-injection.ResultsForty patients (49 knees) completed the follow-up and were included in the final analysis. The mean age was 53.8 ± 10.16 years (range 35-76 years), and the median body mass index (BMI) was 29 (interquartile range [IQR]: 27-34). There were 22 females and 18 males. Treatment failure occurred in 12 out of 49 cases (24.49%). The mean platelet concentration in the ACP was 588.5 ± 183.2 × 106/ml, with a mean platelet fold increase of 2.14 ± 0.71 compared to the baseline. Multi-linear regression modeling showed that older age and higher mean platelet concentration were predictors of higher post-injection Lysholm scores, with beta coefficients of 0.34 and 0.28, respectively, and p values of 0.013 and 0.036, respectively.ConclusionAutologous conditioned plasma provided clinical benefits in this cohort study of knee OA patients for at least 6 months post-injection. Older age and a higher mean platelet concentration in the ACP were identified as predictors of a higher Lysholm score.

Corticosteroids, hyaluronic acid, platelet-rich plasma, and cell-based therapies for knee osteoarthritis - literature trends are shifting in the injectable treatments' evidence: a systematic review and expert opinion

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this systematic review was to quantify the data available on corticosteroids (CS), hyaluronic acid, (HA), platelet-rich plasma (PRP), and cell-based therapies for knee osteoarthritis (OA) treatment.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted on PubMed, Cochrane, WebofScience according to the PRISMA guidelines. Inclusion criteria: clinical studies of any level of evidence, written in English, evaluating the intra-articular use of CS, HA, PRP, or cell-based therapies for knee OA treatment.

RESULTS

The initial search identified 17,415 records. A total of 766 studies from 1959 were included. Of these, 401 were randomized controlled trials, 110 comparative studies, and 255 case series, for a total of 75,834 patients. (11,245 treated with CS 40,862 with HA 16,174 with PRP, 7,553 with cell-based therapies).

CONCLUSIONS

The evidence on injective knee OA treatments is increasing at different speeds with a more rapidly growing literature focusing on orthobiologics. Currently, HA has the largest evidence, followed by PRP that recently surpassed the number of studies evaluating CS. Cell-based therapies are also growing rapidly, although the number of studies is still lower. The rapid literature shift toward orthobiologics urges an update in societies' guidelines to align with the new body of evidence on knee OA treatments.

PROTOCOL REGISTRATION

www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero identifier is CRD42024592972.

The Multiple Dosing Effects of Platelet-Rich Plasma on Cartilage Regeneration in Knee Osteoarthritis: Randomised, Placebo-Controlled Trial

Introduction

The purpose of this study was to evaluate clinical and biochemical efficacy of autologous intraarticular (IA) platelet rich plasma (PRP) compared to saline and to measure effectiveness of single and multiple doses given at monthly intervals for Kellgren-Lawrence (K-L) grade II, III knee osteoarthritis (KOA).

Material and Methods

A total of 130 patients were randomised into 4 groups; PRP-1 (n=36), PRP-2 (n=34), PRP-3 (n=32) and saline (NS) (n=28), after approval from institute ethics committee (reference number: TMU/IEC/20-21/091) and was conducted in accordance with Helsinki declaration. Groups PRP-1, PRP-2, PRP-3 received single, double and triple injections of PRP whereas NS group received single saline (0.9%) injection. Assessment of outcome scores (visual analogue scale [VAS] and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index [WOMAC]) was done at baseline and three, six, nine months post intervention. Serum collagen 2-1 (Coll2-1) estimation at baseline and nine months post-therapy was used for biochemical assessment.

Results

Improvement in VAS and WOMAC was statistically significant and clinically meaningful (Minimal clinically important change [MCIC]; >12% of baseline and ≥2cm difference in mean for WOMAC and VAS, respectively) for groups PRP-1, PRP-2 and PRP-3 in comparison to saline (P<0.05), at every follow-up. PRP groups also exhibited a significant decrease in serum Coll2-1 at 9 months (P<0.05). On comparison among the PRP groups, multiple doses (groups PRP-2 and PRP-3) produced significantly better clinical results than single dose (group PRP-1) (P<0.05), whereas the difference in Coll2-1 levels was significant for group PRP-1 vs PRP-3 only (P<0.05).

Conclusion

PRP results in clinically significant amelioration of functional and pain scores as well as significant reduction in serum levels of Coll2-1 in K-L grade II, III KOA over nine months. These benefits can be accentuated by multiple doses given one month apart.

Proteomic analysis reveals biomarkers associated with performance-based joint function and patient-reported outcomes in knee osteoarthritis

Objective

This study aimed to identify proteins associated with clinical manifestations of knee osteoarthritis (KOA), including performance-based joint function and patient-reported outcome measures (PROM).

Methods

This cross-sectional exploratory study included thirteen individuals with KOA and eleven age-matched controls. All participants performed the 30s Single Leg Mini Squat test and 30s Sit-to-Stand test with simultaneous recording of joint kinematics. Individuals with KOA completed the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score and Forgotten Joint Score-12. Proteins were determined by quantitative mass spectrometry (MS) in plasma. Principal component analysis (PCA), hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA), and Reactome enrichment analysis of the proteome were conducted to identify activated pathways and groups.

Results

Performance-based function was worse in individuals with KOA compared to controls, and they reported higher levels of pain. MS analysis identified 82 differentially expressed proteins (DEPs) in KOA (28 upregulated, 54 downregulated of 321 detected proteins). PCA displayed distinct features between KOA and controls, similar to HCA, which distinguished two major clusters. Enrichment analysis displayed platelet activation and degranulation, neutrophil, and extracellular matrix (ECM)-related pathways. From the proteome, 23 DEPs were associated with different aspects of joint function, and 25 DEPs with PROM.

Conclusions

Individuals with KOA differed from controls across all three assessment modalities; they presented worse joint function, higher levels of pain, and an altered plasma protein profile. Multiple associations were observed between up- and downregulated DEPs and clinical manifestations. The described study protocol shows promise for performing multivariate analyses for future subgrouping of individuals with KOA.

Intra-Articular Hyaluronic Acid for Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Umbrella Review

Objective: to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of intra-articular hyaluronic acid (IAHA) in treating osteoarthritis (OA), considering innovations in formulations, comparative outcomes, and variability in guidelines. This review aims to synthesize evidence supporting the role of IAHA in multimodal treatment strategies. Materials and Methods: A general, narrative, umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses was conducted. Clinical practice recommendations and guidelines for IAHA use were also reviewed and evaluated. A comprehensive search was conducted across the main medical data sources. Inclusion criteria focused on studies evaluating the efficacy, safety, and impact of IAHA. Key outcomes included pain reduction (e.g., WOMAC, VAS), functional improvement, safety, and cost-effectiveness. Results: IAHA showed moderate efficacy in pain relief and functional improvement, especially in early-to-moderate OA. The results indicate that hybrid formulations and combination therapies show better clinical outcomes, with expanded efficacy and potential chondroprotection. However, heterogeneity between studies was noted, reflecting variability in patient populations and intervention protocols. International guidelines varied significantly, with some opposing routine use (e.g., AAOS, NICE) and others endorsing IAHA more or less conditionally (e.g., ESCEO, OARSI). Conclusions: IAHA remains a treatment modality in the arsenal of selected populations of people with OA, especially for early and moderate disease. High-quality, standardized studies are still needed to refine IAHA's role and establish personalized guidelines for individual patients. A concerted effort to harmonize global recommendations and economic strategies, such as tiered pricing, can increase equitable access and optimize IAHA's integration of multimodal treatment for OA.

A meta-analysis and systematic review of the clinical efficacy and safety of platelet-rich plasma combined with hyaluronic acid (PRP + HA) versus PRP monotherapy for knee osteoarthritis (KOA)

INTRODUCTION

KOA, a chronic degenerative joint disease, is commonly treated with intra-articular HA and PRP, used alone or in combination. However, the efficacy and safety of combination therapy (PRP + HA) remain unclear.

AIM

The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to assess the clinical effectiveness and safety profile of PRP + HA versus PRP monotherapy for KOA.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A systematic search was conducted using four electronic databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, and Cochrane Library) to select publications published in peer-reviewed journals. The mean difference (MD) and risk ratio (RR) was calculated, along with their 95% confidence intervals. We assessed heterogeneity using Cochrane Q and I2statistics and the appropriate p-value. The analysis used RevMan 5.4. GRADE system was used for evidence assessment for each outcome parameter.

RESULTS

This meta-analysis of 11 RCTs (n = 1023 KOA patients) revealed that PRP + HA has substantial effectiveness than PRP alone in reducing OMAC total scores [MD -1.77 (95% CI -2.20 to - 1.34); I2 = 10%, and p < 0.001], VAS scores [MD -4.27 (95% CI -4.96 to - 3.58); I2 = 13%, and p < 0.001], and Lequesne index score [MD -5.48 (95% CI -6.56 to - 4.40); I2 = 16%, and p < 0.001], while increasing IKDC scores [MD -2.10 (95% CI -3.70 to - 0.50); I2 = 9%, and p = 0.01], with low risk of adverse events [RR 0.41 (95% CI 0.35 to 0.48); I2 = 12%, and p < 0.001].

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis reveals that, for patients with KOA, PRP + HA therapy is safe and yields better outcomes in pain relief and functional improvement compared to PRP monotherapy.

A Comprehensive Summary of the Meta-Analyses and Systematic Reviews on Platelet-Rich Plasma Therapies for Knee Osteoarthritis

INTRODUCTION

Osteoarthritis (OA), including that of the knee joint, represents a significant proportion of musculoskeletal injuries in the Canadian Armed Forces (CAF) due to the frequent, high-stress physical activity for which member participation is necessary. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is a conservative, autologous treatment that has the potential to relieve symptoms and improve functionality of military members to decrease the impact of the disease and ultimately strengthen the CAF.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A search of systematic reviews and meta-analyses was conducted to determine the efficacy of PRP injections in treating knee OA. The Scopus database, PubMed database, and Omni academic search tools were scoped for relevant publications. English literature, published up to and including March 2023, that investigated only clinically randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was eligible for inclusion. The results of network meta-analyses were investigated and summarized independent of reviews and non-network meta-analyses.

RESULTS

A total of 225 unique systematic reviews and meta-analyses were initially identified, of which 39 publications, including 7 network meta-analyses, adhered to the defined inclusion and exclusion criteria. PRP was found to significantly alleviate symptoms of pain based on the visual analog scale and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index pain scores within the 12-month follow-up. Function, activity, sport, quality of life, and stiffness were additionally determined to generally improve to a greater extent from PRP treatment compared to controls, while adverse effects were minor and temporary. PRP placed in the top 3 in 9 reported surface under the cumulative ranking curves, while individually reported rankings of leukocyte-poor and leukocyte-rich PRP both placed in the top 4. The clinical recommendations made were generally positive, with 17 publications acknowledging the benefits of PRP, 3 supporting possible efficacy, and an additional 8 recommending that it be an option for the conservative treatment of knee OA.

CONCLUSION

The results of this review support the efficacy of PRP for relieving symptoms of pain and improving function, stiffness, and quality of life for patients experiencing knee OA within 12 months. As a result, leukocyte-poor-PRP could be considered for members of the CAF with mild to moderate knee OA (Kellgren-Lawrence grades 1-3) to slow the progression of OA and extend the military careers of CAF members. There continues to be a need for future studies to investigate the longer-term effects of PRP to verify sustained benefits at follow-up points greater than 12 months, including findings of improvement in a delayed fashion at the 3- and 6-month timeframe compared to hyaluronic acid treatment.

Is there a role for autologous conditioned serum injections in osteoarthritis? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) improve after autologous conditioned serum (ACS) administration in patients with osteoarthritis.

METHODS

Databases and clinical trial registers were searched to March 2024 for randomised controlled trial (RCTs) comparing ACS vs comparators/controls. Primary outcomes were pain, function and stiffness measured with Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and visual analogue scale (VAS). Secondary outcome was complications. Risk of bias (RoB) and certainty of evidence were assessed using RoB 2 and the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation Working Group (GRADE) respectively. Meta-analysis was undertaken using RevMan v5.4. Results are presented as standardised mean differences (SMD) or mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Sensitivity analysis compared all comparators and saline control.

RESULTS

Five RCTs were identified (n = 741 participants); two (n = 529 participants) compared ACS against saline (placebo). Three studies were "some concern" and two studies "high risk" for bias. Analysis comparing ACS with all comparators significantly favoured ACS at 6 months for WOMAC: SMD -0.61 (95% CI -1.01 to -0.21; p = 0.003); and VAS: SMD -1.24 (95% CI -2.11 to -0.38; p = 0.005); with high heterogeneity. Comparing ACS with saline, there was no significant difference in WOMAC or VAS at 6 months: SMD -0.40 (95% CI -0.93 to 0.12; p = 0.13) and MD -9.87 (95% CI -27.73 to 7.98, p = 0.28). Complications were similar: ACS (24.8%) vs saline (24.4%), with serious complications rare.

CONCLUSION

There is currently insufficient data to support the use of ACS in osteoarthritis with conflicting results when compared to alternative therapies and saline control, with high heterogeneity. Before consideration as a potential treatment, a high-quality multicentre RCT is required to assess the efficacy of ACS.

Platelet-Rich Plasma Versus Alternative Injections for Osteoarthritis of the Knee: A Systematic Review and Statistical Fragility Index-Based Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

BACKGROUND

Based in part on the results of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that suggest a beneficial effect over alternative treatment options, the use of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) for the management of knee osteoarthritis (OA) is widespread and increasing. However, the extent to which these studies are vulnerable to slight variations in the outcomes of patients remains unknown.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the statistical fragility of conclusions from RCTs that reported outcomes of patients with knee OA who were treated with PRP versus alternative nonoperative management strategies.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 2.

METHODS

All RCTs comparing PRP with alternative nonoperative treatment options for knee OA were identified. The fragility index (FI) and reverse FI were applied to assess the robustness of conclusions regarding the efficacy of PRP for knee OA. Meta-analyses were performed to determine the minimum number of patients from ≥1 trials included in the meta-analysis for which a modification on the event status would change the statistical significance of the pooled treatment effect.

RESULTS

In total, this analysis included outcomes from 1993 patients with a mean ± SD age of 58.0 ± 3.8 years. The mean number of events required to reverse significance of individual RCTs (FI) was 4.57 ± 5.85. Based on random-effects meta-analyses, PRP demonstrated a significantly higher rate of successful outcomes when compared with hyaluronic acid (P = .002; odds ratio [OR], 2.19; 95% CI, 1.33-3.62), as well as higher rates of patient-reported symptom relief (P = .019; OR, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.07-2.24), not requiring a reintervention after the initial injection treatment (P = .002; OR, 2.17; 95% CI, 1.33-3.53), and achieving the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for pain improvement (P = .007; OR, 6.19; 95% CI, 1.63-23.42) when compared with all alternative nonoperative treatments. Overall, the mean number of events per meta-analysis required to change the statistical significance of the pooled treatment effect was 8.67 ± 4.50.

CONCLUSION

Conclusions drawn from individual RCTs evaluating PRP for knee OA demonstrated slight robustness. On meta-analysis, PRP demonstrated a significant advantage over hyaluronic acid as well as improved symptom relief, lower rates of reintervention, and more frequent achievement of the MCID for pain improvement when compared with alternative nonoperative treatment options. Statistically significant pooled treatment effects evaluating PRP for knee OA are more robust than approximately half of all comparable meta-analyses in medicine and health care. Future RCTs and meta-analyses should consider reporting FIs and fragility quotients to facilitate interpretation of results in their proper context.

Factors affecting the therapeutic effects of multiple intra-articular injections of platelet-rich-plasma for knee osteoarthritis

Background

Platelet-rich-plasma (PRP) is rapidly spreading as a conservative treatment option for knee osteoarthritis (KOA), however, its therapeutic efficacy is controversial. This study aimed to investigate the factors affecting the therapeutic effect of intra-articular PRP therapy for KOA in patients who received multiple PRP injections (PRP-I).

Methods

This is a historical cohort study included 1057 knees of 701 patients who received PRP-I during KOA treatment from 2018 to 2020. The difference in visual analog scale (VAS) scores before and after PRP-I was defined as the amount of change in VAS (ΔVAS). A linear mixed-effects model was employed with ΔVAS as a random effect and age, sex, BMI, KL classification, pre-treatment VAS, treatment duration, and the number of PRP injections as fixed effects. Evaluations using the Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) classification were added.

Results

Age, KL grade, and VAS score before treatment and after three, four, and five PRP-I were significantly associated with ΔVAS score. According to KL grade, age was significantly associated with ΔVAS score in the KL grade 4 group. VAS score before treatment was significantly associated with ΔVAS score, regardless of KL grade. Three-time PRP-I were significantly associated with ΔVAS in the KL-grade 1 and 2 groups. For KL grade 4, two or more PRP-I were significantly associated with the high efficacy.

Conclusions

Age, pain before treatment, KL grade and number of injections were associated with pain reduction after intra-articular PRP-I for KOA treatment. Pain reduction can be expected after PRP-I when patients are younger or experience severe pain before treatment. Three-time PRP-I are recommended to reduce pain in early-stage KOA and more than three times in advanced-stage KOA.

Trial registration

Retrospectively registration.

Corticosteroid injections for knee osteoarthritis offer clinical benefits similar to hyaluronic acid and lower than platelet-rich plasma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Purpose

Intra-articular corticosteroid (CS) injections for knee osteoarthritis (OA) management are endorsed by several scientific societies, while the use of hyaluronic acid (HA) and platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is more controversial. Aim of the study was to quantify and compare the clinical effectiveness of CS injections with respect to HA and PRP in patients with knee OA.

Methods

The search was conducted on PubMed, Cochrane, and Web of Science following the PRISMA guidelines. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the comparison of CS injections and HA or PRP injections for the treatment of knee OA were included. The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) was used to interpret the clinical relevance of the improvements at different follow-ups up to 12 months. The study quality was assessed using the Cochrane RoB-2 tool and the GRADE guidelines.

Results

Thirty-five RCTs were included (3348 patients). The meta-analysis comparing CS and HA revealed no difference in terms of WOMAC improvement, while HA showed superior VAS pain improvement at long-term follow-up (P = 0.011), without reaching the MCID. PRP offered a superior WOMAC improvement compared to CS at short- (P = 0.002), mid- (P < 0.001, exceeding the MCID), and long-term (P < 0.001, exceeding the MCID) follow-ups. PRP offered a superior VAS improvement at mid- (P < 0.001, exceeding the MCID) and long-term (P = 0.023) follow-ups.

Conclusion

CS injections for knee OA offer similar results to HA and PRP only at short term, while there is an overall superiority of PRP at longer follow-ups. This difference is not only statistically significant but also clinically relevant in favour of PRP.

The chimera of reaching a universal consensus on platelet-rich plasma treatment for knee osteoarthritis: a review of recent consensus statements and expert opinion

INTRODUCTION

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a prevalent cause of disability worldwide, affecting millions and posing significant socioeconomic burdens. Various conservative measures like hyaluronic acid (HA) and platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injections aim to manage OA symptoms and delay surgical interventions. Despite the increasing utilization of PRP, consensus on its efficacy remains elusive, reflecting the evolving landscape of OA management.

AREAS COVERED

This study reviews guidelines and recommendations on intra-articular PRP injections for OA globally, highlighting divergent perspectives among different medical societies. A comprehensive literature search identified 19 relevant guidelines, indicating a temporal and geographic evolution in attitudes toward PRP use. While some guidelines endorse PRP for mild-to-moderate OA, others express caution due to concerns about product standardization and clinical evidence heterogeneity.

EXPERT OPINION

The lack of universal consensus on PRP for OA underscores the complex interplay between clinical evidence, practice patterns, and evolving perspectives. Recent shifts toward endorsing PRP may reflect advancements in preparation techniques and personalized medicine approaches. However, challenges persist, including patient selection and product standardization. Efforts to develop consensus and refine PRP classification systems are essential for guiding clinical practice and advancing OA management.

Ultrasound-Guided PRP and SVF Therapy Shows Sustained Improvement in Severe Knee Osteoarthritis: A 12-Month Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a chronic disease caused by cartilage degeneration in the joint accompanied by joint deformities, pain, and stiffness. This study assessed the changes over time in the Western Ontario and McMasters Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) values of patients after the combined application of stromal vascular fraction (SVF) and platelet-rich plasma (PRP). MATERIAL AND METHODS A retrospective clinical study was designed. Thirty-four patients (8 males, 26 females, mean age 65.21±10.71, range 30-83 years) with pain due to knee osteoarthritis received SVF and PRP between 2019 and 2020. During and after the procedure, ultrasound-guided intra-articular spread was checked. RESULTS PRP+SVF injection provided significant improvement in the clinical symptoms of the patients measured according to their VAS and WOMAC scores, and this improvement continued until the twelfth month. The change in VAS scores of the patients was 1.76±1.18 (P=0.000) in the first month, 1.50±1.46 (P=0.000) in the sixth month, and 1.53±1.41 (P=0.000) in the twelfth month. VAS scores decreased 6.6 to 1.6 point at the end of the twelfth month. The WOMAC scores of the patients were 23.20±12.12 (P=0.000) in the first month, 19.48±12.0 (P=0.000) in the sixth month, and 20.01±10.48 (P=0.000) in the twelfth month. WOMAC scores decreased 51.99 to 20.48 point at the end of the twelfth month. CONCLUSIONS Applying ultrasound-guided PRP+SVF injection into the knee joint once in OA patients improved VAS and WOMAC scores.

Efficacy of Intraoperative Platelet-Rich Plasma After Meniscal Repair: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Background

Meniscal injuries frequently require surgical intervention to restore knee joint function and stability. Intraoperative platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injection has emerged as a potential adjunctive therapy to enhance tissue healing post-meniscal repair. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy of PRP in terms of pain relief, functional recovery, and overall success rates in patients undergoing meniscal repair procedures.

Methods

A comprehensive search strategy was employed to identify relevant studies across Scopus, PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases. The inclusion criteria encompassed human studies, including randomized controlled trials (RCTs), cohorts, and case-control studies, focusing on intraoperative platelet-rich plasma (PRP) use post-meniscal repair and reporting outcomes related to pain, functionality, and cure rates. Exclusion criteria comprised animal studies, non-English publications, studies lacking relevant outcome measures, and those with insufficient data. Two reviewers independently screened titles and abstracts, resolving disagreements through consensus or consultation with a third reviewer, followed by a full-text assessment for potentially eligible studies. Data extraction was conducted independently by two reviewers using a standardized form. The reliability of observational studies was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Subgroup analyses and pooled effect estimates for main outcomes were computed using RevMan 5.3, a meta-analysis tool.

Results

The demographic analysis revealed that the PRP group had an average age of 41.39 years, while the control group had an average age of 42.1 years. In terms of gender distribution, the PRP group consisted of 61 men and 29 women, while the control group had 62 men and 34 women. Pain ratings showed a preference for PRP with a mean difference of 4.83 (p = 0.13). However, there was no significant difference in Lysholm scores (mean difference: - 0.44, p = 0.91) or IKDC scores (mean difference: 2.80, p = 0.14) between the PRP and control groups. Similarly, ROM measures did not show a statistically significant difference, with a mean difference of 2.80 (p = 0.18). Additionally, there was no significant distinction in failure rates between the PRP and control groups, as indicated by a weighted mean difference of 0.71 (p = 0.52). These findings suggest that while PRP may offer some benefits in pain relief, its impact on functional recovery, range of motion, and failure rates following meniscal repair procedures is inconclusive.

Conclusion

The current evidence regarding the effect of intraoperative platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injection on patients undergoing meniscal repair remains inconclusive. While some studies suggest potential benefits in terms of pain relief and functional recovery, others show no significant differences compared to control groups. The impact of PRP therapy on overall success rates, including rates of re-tear and revision surgery, is also uncertain. Further well-designed randomized controlled trials with larger sample sizes are needed to provide more robust evidence and guide clinical practice in orthopedic surgery.

Comparison of the short-term effect of intra-articular hyaluronic acid and platelet-rich plasma injections in knee osteoarthritis: a randomized clinical trial

Introduction

Osteoarthritis (OA) is one of the most common degenerative joint diseases which involved all joints. It is very important to choose a treatment method with high efficiency to reduce the pain and disability of patients and also to improve their quality of life. The current study aimed to investigate the therapeutic effects of intra-articular injection of PRP and hyaluronic acid (HA) in the knee of people with knee osteoarthritis (KOA).

Methods

In this randomized clinical trial study, 90 patients with KOA were randomly divided into two groups of intra-articular HA and PRP. The patients of the two groups were followed up for five months and different outcomes were recorded. The McMaster index (WOMAC) evaluated all patients at rest and during movements. Measurements were taken at the beginning and after the third month of follow-up.

Results

Three month after the last injection (5th month) and after adjusting of baseline value using analysis of covariance, the mean of knee pain, stiffness, physical function and finally total score in the PRP group, was significantly lower than the HA group. Regarding the Osteoarthritis grade, the mean of knee pain, Stiffness, Physical function and finally total score in the PRP group was significantly lower than the HA group in all Osteoarthritis grades. Also, there were no complications in the studied groups.

Conclusions

The results of the current study showed that pain and stiffness reduction as well as physical function of the knee joint in the PRP group was better than in the HA group.

Demonstrating the effectiveness of intra-articular prolotherapy combined with peri-articular perineural injection in knee osteoarthritis: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to compare the efficacy of intra-articular prolotherapy (IG) combined with peri-articular perineural injection (PG) in the management of knee osteoarthritis (KOA).

METHODS

A total of 60 patients with the diagnosis of KOA were included in this double-blinded randomized controlled clinical trials. The inclusion criteria were as follow: (1) 48-80 years old; (2) the diagnose of KOA; (3) the grade 2 and 3 of the Kellgern-Lawrence grading scale; (4) the pain, crepitation, and knee joint stiffness continuing for 3 months at least. The main exclusion criteria were as follow: (1) any infection involving the knee skin; (2) history of any Influencing factors of disease. All patients were divided into three groups and received either IG, PG and I + PG under the ultrasound guidance and the 2, 4 and 8 weeks follow-up data of patients were available. (IG n = 20 or PG n = 20, I + PG n = 20). Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), The Western Ontario McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and the pressure pain threshold (PPT) were used as outcome measures at baseline, 2, 4 and 8 weeks.

RESULTS

There were no statistically significant differences in terms of age, sex, BMI, duration of current condition and baseline assessments of pain intensity, WOMAC scores and PPT. After treatment, the improvement of VAS activity, WOMAC and PPT values was showed compared with pre-treatment in all groups (p < 0.05). At 4 and 8 weeks after treatment, the VAS and WOMAC scores of the I + PG were significantly lower than those of the PG or IG, and the difference was statistically significant (p < 0.05). The PPT values of PG and I + PG were significantly improved compared to IG at 2, 4, and 8 weeks after treatment.

CONCLUSION

The ultrasound guided I + PG of 5% glucose seem to be more effective to alleviate pain and improve knee joint function than single therapy in short term. Clinical rehabilitators could clinically try this combination of I + PG to improve clinical symptoms in patients with KOA.

The Efficacy of Intra-articular Platelet-Rich Plasma Injection Versus Corticosteroid Injection in the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis: A Prospective Comparative Analysis

Background Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is the most typical cause of knee pain and impairment worldwide. It is typified by slow and progressive degeneration of the articular cartilage of the knee joint. Although KOA is being managed with a variety of therapies, the comparison of the effectiveness of different intra-articular injections in KOA treatment in Pakistan is still not thoroughly investigated. Therefore, the purpose of this current study is to compare the efficacy of intra-articular administration of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and corticosteroids (CSs) in the treatment of KOA. Methods This prospective comparative study was performed among one hundred patients diagnosed with KOA in Benazir Bhutto Hospital, Rawalpindi, for one year from April 2022 to March 2023. Specified inclusion and exclusion criteria were employed for patient enrollment. Patients were divided into two equal groups through simple random sampling. Group A patients received an intra-articular injection of PRP solution whereas group B patients received an intra-articular injection of CSs. Informed consent and ethical approval were also acquired prior to data collection. A self-designed proforma based on interviews was used to collect data. The data analysis in Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, IBM Corp., Version 25.0, Armonk, NY) was carried out via descriptive statistics and an independent t-test. Results Women (N=71, 71%) had a higher prevalence of KOA than men (N=29, 29%). The means of study variables like age, Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score, and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) score were 56.10 ± 8.70 years, 8.08 ± 1.6, and 70.08 ± 8.76 respectively. The frequency of KOA on the right side was 62% (N=62) while it was 38% (N=38) on the left side. In the study population, 69% (N=69) patients had grade II KOA, and 31% (N=31) patients had grade III KOA. At the first-month, second-month, and third-month follow-up visits, there were statistically significant differences in the mean scores of the WOMAC and VAS between the study groups. However, at the first-month follow-up visit, mean scores of VAS and WOMAC were lower in group B than in group A while these were lower in group A as compared to group B, at the second-month and third-month follow-up appointments. Conclusions Intra-articular infiltration of both PRP and CSs was efficacious in the treatment of KOA-related pain and functional limitations; however, overall improvement in the PRP group was higher than CS group.

Mesenchymal stem cells and platelet rich plasma therapy for knee osteoarthritis: an umbrella review of systematic reviews with meta-analysis

The effect of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and platelet-rich plasma (PRP) therapy on knee osteoarthritis (KOA) has been contradictory in previous meta-analyses. This umbrella review on published meta-analyses aimed to investigate the effect of MSCs and PRP on KOA. We systematically searched Scopus, PubMed, and Cochrane databases to include related meta-analyses. The outcome included studies reporting visual analog scale scores, the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, Whole-Organ Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scores, International Knee Documentation Committee scores, and the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score. A total of 28 meta-analyses with 32 763 participants. MSCs and PRP therapies were significantly associated with an improvement in KOA scores. This umbrella meta-analysis supports the beneficial health effects of MSCs and PRP in KOA.

Distal Clavicular Osteolysis Treated With Platelet-Rich Plasma: A Case Report

ABSTRACT

Atraumatic distal clavicular osteolysis (DCO) is a cause of shoulder pain in younger athletes, often resulting from weightlifting and activities with repetitive pressing and overhead lifting. Athletes will present with shoulder pain localized to the acromioclavicular (AC) joint, with tenderness to palpation over the joint exacerbated by provocative testing on examination. Conservative management often includes activity modification, oral analgesics, physical therapy, and corticosteroid injection. Distal clavicular osteolysis can be refractory to conservative management and these athletes are often referred for surgical consultation. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injections have been used to treat a wide variety of musculoskeletal injuries, but there have been no published studies assessing the efficacy of PRP injections specifically for distal clavicle osteolysis. We present a case of refractory DCO successfully treated with an ultrasound-guided PRP injection of the AC joint.

The use of injectable orthobiologics for knee osteoarthritis: A European ESSKA-ORBIT consensus. Part 1-Blood-derived products (platelet-rich plasma)

PURPOSE

The aim of this European Society of Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery and Arthroscopy (ESSKA) consensus is to provide recommendations based on evidence and expert opinion to improve indications, decision-making and administration-related aspects when using blood-derived orthobiologics (for simplicity indicated as PRP-platelet-rich plasma-with PRP being the most common product) for the management of knee osteoarthritis (OA).

METHODS

Leading European expert clinicians and scientists were divided into a steering group, a rating group and a peer review group. The steering group prepared 28 question-statement sets divided into three sections: PRP rationale and indications, PRP preparation and characterisation and PRP protocol. The quality of the statements received grades of recommendation ranging from A (high-level scientific support) to B (scientific presumption), C (low-level scientific support) or D (expert opinion). The question-statement sets were then evaluated by the rating group, and the statements scored from 1 to 9 based on their degree of agreement with the statements produced by the steering group. Once a general consensus was reached between the steering and rating groups, the document was submitted to the peer review group who evaluated the geographic adaptability and approved the document. A final combined meeting of all the members of the consensus was held to produce the official document.

RESULTS

The literature review on the use of blood-derived products for knee OA revealed that 9 of 28 questions/statements had the support of high-level scientific literature, while the other 19 were supported by a medium-low scientific quality. Three of the 28 recommendations were grade A recommendations: (1) There is enough preclinical and clinical evidence to support the use of PRP in knee OA. This recommendation was considered appropriate with a strong agreement (mean: 8). (2) Clinical evidence has shown the effectiveness of PRP in patients for mild to moderate degrees of knee OA (KL ≤ 3). This recommendation was considered appropriate with a strong agreement (mean: 8.1). (3) PRP injections have been shown to provide a longer effect in comparison to the short-term effect of CS injections. They also seem to provide a safer use profile with less potential related complications. This recommendation was considered appropriate with a very strong agreement (mean: 8.7). Six statements were grade B recommendations, 7 were grade C and 12 were grade D. The mean rating score was 8.2 ± 0.3.

CONCLUSIONS

The consensus group reached a high level of agreement on all the questions/statements despite the lack of clear evidence for some questions. According to the results from this consensus group, given the large body of existing literature and expert opinions, PRP was regarded as a valid treatment option for knee OA and as a possible first-line injectable treatment option for nonoperative management of knee OA, mainly for KL grades 1-3.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II.

Are patients with knee osteoarthritis aware that platelet-rich plasma is a treatment option?

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a prevalent joint disease, particularly affecting the knees. This condition is often managed through various treatments, including intra-articular injections such as corticosteroids (CS), hyaluronic acid (HA), and platelet-rich plasma (PRP). PRP has shown promising outcomes in recent studies although it does lack strong endorsement in some clinical guidelines due to inconsistent results and lack of standardized results. This study was conducted to assess patient awareness and the frequency of PRP offered for the treatment of knee OA, compared to CS and HA. In a cross-sectional study, 46 knee OA patients were surveyed regarding their knowledge and experiences of CS, HA, and PRP injections. The questionnaires were administered between September 2022 and February 2023. Additionally, the study evaluated the severity of patients knee OA, using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index, and gathered demographic information from the participants. CS injections were offered to 93.5%, and 100% of participants had previously heard of this type of injection. HA injections were offered to 37%, and 65.9% of participants had heard of them. PRP was offered to 2%, and 6.5% had ever heard of it. This study underscores the limited awareness and utilization of PRP among knee OA patients. Patients and physicians need to be more informed of all of the treatment options available for knee OA, especially orthobiologics such as PRP. Future research in larger, diverse populations is needed.

Comparative effectiveness of intra-articular therapies in knee osteoarthritis: a meta-analysis comparing platelet-rich plasma (PRP) with other treatment modalities

INTRODUCTION

Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is a progressive joint disease commonly treated with intra-articular injections, including platelet-rich plasma (PRP), hyaluronic acid (HA), or corticosteroids (CS). This updated meta-analysis aims to enhance the statistical power of the results and provide comprehensive clinical evidence that reflects the most current research. By doing so, the authors aim to suggest a reliable estimate for the development of guidelines, addressing the pressing need for effective and minimally invasive treatment options.

METHODS

PubMed, Scopus, clinicaltrials.gov, Cochrane Central were searched until March 2023, for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the effectiveness of intra-articular injectable therapies, including PRP, HA, CS, and placebo, in KOA. Data extraction involved baseline characteristics and outcome measures [Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) scores, Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain scores, KOOS, and IKDC scores] at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months. Statistical analysis, including subgroup analysis, assessment of heterogeneity, and publication bias, was conducted using Review Manager.

RESULTS

Our meta-analysis of 42 studies involving 3696 patients demonstrated that PRP treatment resulted in significant pain relief compared to HA injections, as evidenced by improved WOMAC pain (MD: -0.74; 95% CI: -1.02 to -0.46; P≤0.00001; I 2=94%) and VAS pain (MD: -0.65; 95% CI: -1.24 to -0.06; P=0.03; I2=97%) outcomes. Similarly, PRP showed greater efficacy in reducing WOMAC pain (MD: -8.06; 95% CI: -13.62 to -2.51: P=0.004; I 2=96%) and VAS pain (MD: -1.11; 95% CI: -1.64 to -0.59; P≤0.0001; I 2=68%) compared to CS injections, with the most significant improvement observed at 6 months.

CONCLUSIONS

PRP is an effective treatment for KOA. It provides symptomatic relief, has the potential to reduce disease progression, and has sustained effects up to 12 months. PRP offers superior pain relief and functional enhancement compared to CS and HA injections.

SAS-PRP Study: A Real-Life Satisfaction Assessment in Patients with Cartilage Lesions of the Knee Treated by Platelet-Rich Plasma

Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is a rising therapy treating locomotor system lesions such as knee osteoarthritis. The objective of this study was to evaluate patients' satisfaction 6 to 12 months after a PRP injection for cartilage lesions of their knee under real-life conditions. Patients' satisfaction was assessed by a specific questionnaire named SATMED-Q©, which explores six different dimensions of a given treatment. In addition, pain and function were assessed thanks to VAS pain, WOMAC, and IKDC scores. Responders were identified through the OMERACT-OARSI criteria. We observed excellent satisfaction after a PRP injection with a SATMED-Q© score of 80.81% 6 to 12 months after the procedure. Even when there was no significant improvement in pain and function scores, 52% of the evaluated population fulfilled the OMERACT-OARSI criteria and were considered responders. According to the sub-group analysis, patients with less osteoarthritis damage (i.e., Kellgren-Lawrence grades 1-2) and older study subjects (i.e., >40 years old) with focal chondropathy had benefited most from their PRP injection. Thus, platelet-rich plasma seems to be a well-tolerated and efficient therapy for cartilage lesions of the knee.

Current Status and Advancements in Platelet-Rich Plasma Therapy

Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) as a treatment modality has been around for the last four decades, but only truly gained popularity over the last 10 to 15 years in medicine, in a variety of fields ranging from regenerative medicine to infertility treatment. It has gained popularity, especially in treating musculoskeletal conditions where the bulk of research has been performed and published. There is level I evidence available supporting its efficacy in the treatment of osteoarthritis (OA), epicondylitis, bursitis, compressive neuropathy, plantar fasciitis, muscular injuries and osteochondral lesions. Most published research with regards to PRP has been focused on knee OA (limited research in shoulder, elbow, and foot and ankle OA), lateral epicondylitis and carpal tunnel syndrome, whereas spinal and hand conditions have limited research available. Tendinopathies and partial tendon tears have conflicting evidence available, with level I evidence supporting PRP's use in rotator cuff tendinopathies and tears, with contradictory level I evidence discouraging its use in patella and Achilles tendinopathies and tears. The available evidence regarding the use of PRP continues to produce conflicting results, but despite this, there is an ongoing increase in the popularity and use of PRP in patients with musculoskeletal conditions.

Age and synovitis affect the results of the treatment of knee osteoarthritis with Microfragmented Autologous Fat Tissue

PURPOSE

This study aims to assess the effectiveness of Microfragmented Autologous Fat Tissue (MFAT) treatment for knee osteoarthritis and to investigate whether patients' pre-treatment clinical condition, such as synovitis, correlates with clinical outcomes, to identify potential predicting factors for the success or failure of the treatment.

METHODS

In this prospective Cohort Study Level II multicentric trial, consecutive patients with a diagnosis of early/mild osteoarthritis and failure of previous conservative measures were enrolled to undergo diagnostic arthroscopy and a single MFAT injection. Patients were assessed with repeated scoring systems at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months after surgery. The demographic features, the arthroscopic findings, the immunophenotype of injected tissue and the histologic examination of synovia of failed patients were analyzed.

RESULTS

Data from 91 patients showed a significant improvement in Lysholm, WOMAC scores at 1-year follow-up (p < 0.001). A significant decrease in VAS score was observed, while a significant improvement of measured flexion angle was registered at 1 year (p < 0.001). No major complications were reported. Age and synovitis were identified as significant factors influencing the clinical outcome (p < 0.05). Body mass index, previous or concomitant procedures, and specific cartilage defects had no influence. The mean number of injected adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells seem not to correlate with the clinical outcome.

CONCLUSION

MFAT is effective in reducing pain when used with a single dose injection in early/mild OA of the knee, without major complications. Age over 60 and synovitis may be predictive for persistent pain at one year and should be considered before indications.

Local injection therapy in the complex treatment of musculoskeletal disorders: principles of application, evidence base, safety

Local injection therapy (LIT)  is an important component of the complex treatment of musculoskeletal disorders (MSD), which is widely used in real clinical practice. Glucocorticoids, hyaluronic acid drugs (HA), autologous cell drugs, botulinum toxin type A, radioactive isotopes, etc. are used for LIT.  LIT makes it possible to achieve a pronounced symptomatic effect, while in some cases, for example, repeated HA treatments in patients with osteoarthritis, the possibility of slowing the progression of the disease and reducing the need for surgical treatment is discussed.

The performance of LIT requires special skills and abilities of the physician, careful compliance with the rules of asepsis and antisepsis, and instrumental visualization. LIT can be associated with serious complications and therefore must be performed according to strict indications.

The Expert Council was devoted to defining the basic principles of LIT. The indications for the use of certain types of this therapies, the evidence base for its efficacy and safety, the order of application of different drugs, and the need to combine LIT with other drug and non-drug treatments of MSD were reviewed.

Inflammatory ultrasound features as prognostic factors of pain and functional outcomes following intra-articular platelet-rich plasma in knee osteoarthritis

AIM

To explore inflammatory ultrasound predictors of improvements in pain and function over 2, 6, and 12 months following administration of intra-articular platelet-rich plasma (PRP) in knee osteoarthritis (OA).

METHOD

Patients with painful mild-moderate radiographic knee OA from a subset of the RESTORE RCT underwent ultrasound assessment according to the standardized OMERACT scanning protocol to detect inflammatory features such as synovitis, synovial hypertrophy, and effusion with power Doppler. The study knee was treated with 3 once-weekly PRP injections obtained after centrifugation at 1500 g for 5 min. Numerical Rating Score (NRS), Intermittent and Constant Osteoarthritis Pain (ICOAP) questionnaire, and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) function sub-score were used to measure pain and functional severity. Separate linear regression models were performed to determine whether baseline ultrasound-detected features of inflammation predicted the improvement in pain and function following PRP injection in both unadjusted and adjusted models for confounders.

RESULTS

Forty-four participants were included, with 25 (56.8%) being female. In an unadjusted model, higher OMERACT scores for inflammatory features such as global synovitis and/or effusion were significantly associated with greater improvement in all outcomes measured at 2 months but not at 6 and 12 months for pain measures. Only global synovitis showed significant association with functional improvement at 2 and 12 months. Similar findings were observed in the adjusted model.

CONCLUSION

Ultrasound indices of knee inflammation predicted short-term improvements in pain severity and both short- and longer-term improvements in function following intra-articular PRP injection.

Do age, gender, BMI and disease duration influence the clinical outcomes in patients of knee osteoarthritis treated with serial injections of autologous platelet rich plasma?

Purpose

To study whether age, gender, body mass index(BMI) and disease duration influence the clinical outcomes in kellgren-Lawrence(K-L) grade II,III knee osteoarthritis(KOA) patients treated with serial injections of platelet rich plasma(PRP).

Patients and methods

65 patients were given three monthly intra-articular injections of PRP in this prospective interventional study. The patients were divided into subgroups depending on the factor studied: by age(in years) into young <45(n = 7), middle age 45-60(n = 35), and elderly >60(n = 23): by BMI(in kg/m2) into; normal <25(n = 25), overweight 25-30(n = 27) and obese >30(n = 13) and disease duration; less(n = 32) or more than 1 year(n = 33) symptom duration. Visual analogue scale (VAS) and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) were used as outcome measures and assessed before each injection and then at 6 and 9 months post injection. Groups were homogenous with respect to baseline characteristics.

Results

Mean VAS and WOMAC scores showed a statistically significant improvement (P < 0.0001) across all groups and subgroups (age,gender,BMI,disease duration) at follow up. On intra-subgroup comparison, we found no significant differences(P > 0.05) among age, BMI or gender subgroups, however the scores were significantly better in patients with disease duration of less than 1 year than those with more than 1 year duration at both 6 and 9 months[P < 0.001(RC = 9.630,95% CI = 4.037-15.222,P = 0.001)].

Conclusion

PRP injections if given serially can improve the short term subjective scores of VAS and WOMAC scores in patients with K-L grade II and III KOA irrespective of age, gender, BMI or disease duration, however, clinical benefits can be maximized if given early in the disease course.

Platelet-Rich Plasma for Knee Osteoarthritis: What Does the Evidence Say?

The utilization of platelet-rich-plasma as a therapeutic intervention for knee osteoarthritis has gained immense attention since 2008. The increase in the number of scientific publications dedicated to this area can be attributed to the majority of favorable results reported in clinical trials and basic science studies. However, despite the growing evidence, the use of platelet-rich plasma in clinical practice still poses controversial aspects. The potential mechanisms of action described for platelet-rich-plasma so far indicate that it could serve as a disease-modifying drug, acting to counteract important aspects of knee osteoarthritis pathophysiology (cartilage breakdown, inflammation, and bone remodeling). Nevertheless, its efficacy in slowing down the progression of knee osteoarthritis remains unproven. While inconsistencies have been noted, the majority of controlled clinical trials and meta-analyses advocate for the utilization of platelet-rich-plasma in treating knee osteoarthritis, as it has demonstrated greater efficacy than hyaluronic acid and placebo, with a follow-up of at least 1 year. Despite advancements made in certain areas, significant diversity persists regarding the formulations used, therapeutic regimen, extended follow-up periods, patient selection, and assessment of clinically relevant outcomes. Consequently, the leading clinical practice guidelines do not recommend its use. In light of the emerging evidence, this narrative review aims to provide an objective evaluation of the recent available scientific literature (last 5 years) focused on randomized clinical trials and meta-analyses to present a current overview of the topic.

Clinical and Biochemical Correlation of Intra-articular Platelet-Rich Plasma and Corticosteroid Using Serum Matrix Metalloproteinase 3 (MMP-3) Levels in Osteoarthritis of Knee

Introduction Osteoarthritis (OA) in humans is an inevitable consequence of ageing and can now be effectively managed with advancements in knowledge and understanding of the disease. The major concern in a patient suffering from this disease is the functional impairment caused by the pain. The goals in the management of OA knee include symptom relief with preservation of joint function. Despite there being a number of studies on the effectiveness of PRP and CS for knee OA, most of them have focused on patient-reported functional outcomes only. Hence, we conducted this study to assess the potential and effectiveness of a single intra-articular injection of PRP and CS in the functional improvement of knee OA patients using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and to establish the bio-modulatory effects of intra-articular PRP and CS in knee OA patients by estimating the serum matrix metalloproteinase-3 (MMP-3) levels. Methodology Patients attending the outpatient department with complaints of knee pain were screened. Standing anteroposterior and lateral radiographs of the knees were obtained. Patients with Kellgren and Lawrence (K-L) grades II and III were enrolled in our study. A total of 96 patients were included in the study after fulfilling the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Patients were divided into two groups (PRP and CS) by randomisation. There were 48 each in the PRP and CS groups, out of which nine were lost to follow-up, two from the PRP group and seven from the CS group. A total of 87 patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria were finally enrolled in the study and followed up for nine months after a single intra-articular injection. The biochemical assessment of serum levels of MMP-3 was done at baseline and in the ninth month. Accordingly, patients in the PRP group were injected with freshly prepared PRP (3 ml) within two hours of preparation, whereas those in the CS received 80 mg of methylprednisolone acetate. VAS and WOMAC were measured at baseline, and then in the first, third, sixth, and ninth month post-injection follow-ups. MMP-3 level was estimated before the injection and at the ninth-month post-injection follow-up. Data collected for both groups were analysed and compared with each other. Conclusion PRP is unquestionably a better option than CS in OA of the knee based on boosting functional activity, lowering stiffness, and reducing pain, all three of which are denoted by the WOMAC and VAS scores as the effect of PRP lasts longer than CS injections for the aforesaid issues. We could not find any significant change in levels of MMP3 post PRP and CS injections, which signifies that these two modalities do not have any effect in either preventing cartilage degeneration or promoting cartilage regeneration. Our findings have shown that PRP injections are safe, minimally invasive, and effective treatment modalities for OA knee.

The short-to-midterm outcomes of geniculate artery embolization for mild-to-moderate osteoarthritis of the knee: a systematic review

Background

Geniculate Artery Embolization (GAE) is a novel, minimally-invasive treatment for mild to moderate Osteoarthritis (OA) associated with musculoskeletal pain.

Purpose

To investigate the outcomes of GAE in patients with mild to moderate OA of the knee using a Quantitative-analysis of the available literature.

Methods

The PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane databases were searched for GAE-related studies. Qualitative and quantitative analyses were performed following PRISMA-guidelines. Quantitative-analysis was performed using windows based 'MedCalc-Statistical-Software version 19.6.1 (2020). Statistical analysis was performed in Stata-IC-13.1(Stata corp-USA). Quantitative-analysis was done using the random-effects model, and the Standardized-Mean-Differences (SMD) were calculated.

Results

After a full-text review, 13 studies with 399 knees (345-patients) were included in the qualitative synthesis, 10 were included in the quantitative synthesis. The total WOMAC score improved by a [SMD (95% CI)] of 3.46 points (1.27, 5.65), 3.50 (1.28, 5.71), 3.77 (0.58, 6.96), 5.46 (1.59, 9.33), 2.96 (-0.93, 6.85) compared to baseline at 1, 3, 6, 12, 24 months respectively. The VAS score improved by 2.06 (1.35, 2.76), 2.13 (1.39, 2.87), 2.36 (1.85, 2.90), 2.09 (0.91, 3.28) compared to baseline at 1, 3, 6, 12 months respectively. The Pain WOMAC score improved by SMD 2.97 (0.51, 5.43), 3.77 (0.58, 6.96), 2.27 (0.31, 4.22), 2.27 (0.31, 4.22) compared to baseline at 1, 3, 12, 24 months, respectively.

Conclusion

There was a statistically significant change from baseline in all outcome measures after GAE. GAE is a safe and effective method for pain control in mild to moderate OA-associated knee pain in the short and medium term.

Comparative Efficacy of Intra-Articular Injection, Physical Therapy, and Combined Treatments on Pain, Function, and Sarcopenia Indices in Knee Osteoarthritis: A Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is associated with a high risk of sarcopenia. Both intra-articular injections (IAIs) and physical therapy (PT) exert benefits in KOA. This network meta-analysis (NMA) study aimed to identify comparative efficacy among the combined treatments (IAI+PT) in patients with KOA. Seven electronic databases were systematically searched from inception until January 2023 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reporting the effects of IAI+PT vs. IAI or PT alone in patients with KOA. All RCTs which had treatment arms of IAI agents (autologous conditioned serum, botulinum neurotoxin type A, corticosteroids, dextrose prolotherapy (DxTP), hyaluronic acid, mesenchymal stem cells (MSC), ozone, platelet-rich plasma, plasma rich in growth factor, and stromal vascular fraction of adipose tissue) in combination with PT (exercise therapy, physical agent modalities (electrotherapy, shockwave therapy, thermal therapy), and physical activity training) were included in this NMA. A control arm receiving placebo IAI or usual care, without any other IAI or PT, was used as the reference group. The selected RCTs were analyzed through a frequentist method of NMA. The main outcomes included pain, global function (GF), and walking capability (WC). Meta-regression analyses were performed to explore potential moderators of the treatment efficacy. We included 80 RCTs (6934 patients) for analyses. Among the ten identified IAI+PT regimens, DxTP plus PT was the most optimal treatment for pain reduction (standard mean difference (SMD) = -2.54) and global function restoration (SMD = 2.28), whereas MSC plus PT was the most effective for enhancing WC recovery (SMD = 2.54). More severe KOA was associated with greater changes in pain (β = -2.52) and WC (β = 2.16) scores. Combined IAI+PT treatments afford more benefits than do their corresponding monotherapies in patients with KOA; however, treatment efficacy is moderated by disease severity.

Serial intraarticular injections of growth factor concentrate in knee osteoarthritis: A placebo controlled randomized study

Objective

To evaluate and compare clinical efficacy and effect on specific serum biomarker with serial injections of growth factor concentrate (GFC) for knee osteoarthritis (KOA) in a randomized triple blinded placebo controlled interventional study.

Methods

Final assessment was done on 58 patients. Patients with Kellgren-Lawrence grade II, III knee osteoarthritis were administered monthly intraarticular injections(3 injections) of GFC(n = 31) or saline(n = 27) and evaluated clinically with visual analogue scale(VAS) and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index(WOMAC) at 3,6 and 12 months post therapy. Biochemical analysis was done with serum biomarker of cartilage degeneration, Collagen 2-1 (Coll2-1), estimated at baseline and at final follow up.

Results

Both the groups exhibited statistically significant improvements (P < 0.05) in VAS at 3,6 and 12 months. WOMAC improvement reached statistical significance for GFC group at every evaluation (P < 0.001) but only at 12 months in NS group (P = 0.029). The improvements were clinically meaningful only in GFC group throughout follow up (Minimal clinically important differences >12% of baseline in WOMAC and >2 cm difference in mean for VAS). Intergroup comparison revealed GFC to be much better for both scores at every evaluation (95% CI of 0.2-1.5,[P = 0.008], 1.4-2.9,[P < 0.0001], and 2.7-4.2,[P < 0.0001] for VAS, 7.3-16.0 [P < 0.001], 11.6-21.9 [P < 0.001] and 18.1-31.1[P < 0.001] for WOMAC). Statistically significant decrease in serum Coll2-1 levels were observed for GFC group only. No serious complications were seen.

Conclusion

Serial(three) monthly GFC injections result in clinically meaningful improvement of subjective pain and function outcome scores, sustaining up to 12 months in KOA grade II and III. GFC also lead to significant reduction in serum levels of cartilage degradation biomarker coll2-1.

Intra-articular platelet-rich plasma vs. corticosteroid injections efficacy in knee osteoarthritis treatment: a systematic review

Osteoarthritis (OA) affects the entire joint structure. The most injured joints are the hands, knees, and hips. OA is a common disease all over the world, and a cause of disability in the elderly; hence, medicine is facing a steady challenge to find effective therapeutics to relieve the pain, improving symptoms for a better quality of life for patients.

Purpose

To compare the results, in the recent literature, of intra-articular injection of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and corticosteroids (CSs) in osteoarthritic knees at early and mid-term postinjection.

Methods

A PubMed and CENTRAL (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) database search was performed. Initial screening yielded 108 randomized controlled trials, 17 results, and 17 others were added after updates. The final review includes nine randomized control trials, with outcome evaluating of knee OA by Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Osteoarthritis Index, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scale Index, and Visual Analog Scale.

Results

PRP and CS intra-articular injections both are safe and effective treatments in knee OA for alleviating pain, and improving symptoms. It seems that PRP injections have prolonged and shown better improvement in some studies. However, the results do not prefer one method over the other.

Conclusion

Up till now, it is not easy to draw firm conclusions about prioritizing PRP or CS injections for knee OA treatment due to the limitation of this review.

Pay attention to the evidence: in the longer term, intraarticular corticosteroid injections offer only harm for knee osteoarthritis

With respect to the long-term effects of intra-articular corticosteroid injections (IACIs) in knee osteoarthritis (OA), we are at the stage where it seems like the jury has returned a verdict but the judge hasn't yet accepted it. Supporters of IACIs for knee OA, when reading about potential and actual harms and complete lack of any benefit in the medium- or long- term, are now clutching at straws that we shouldn't even expect to observe any benefit in the longer term. Sadly, the same arguments that orthopaedic surgeons use to justify continuing with knee arthroscopy when there are only documented long-term harms and no documented long-term benefits, are being used by rheumatologists to justify continuing with IACIs for knee OA. The only actual reason to keep recommending both IACIs and knee arthroscopy (which sadly society guidelines still do) is the "status quo", with the self-affirming argument that the quality of the RCTs published to date is not (yet) high enough to justify a change in expert opinion. There is a very strong argument against preserving the status quo for knee OA: outcomes everywhere keep getting worse. Knee replacements seem to be on a steady growth curve upwards in all countries and knee OA prevalence itself is also increasing. Something is badly wrong with the status quo for knee OA: if we were getting good results with medical treatment then fewer people would be needing knee replacements, not more. A very easy place to start questioning the status quo is to read a systematic review showing worse results than all comparators for IACIs followed by an editorial saying "let's not give up on IACIs for knee OA just yet". But as mentioned you could just as easily start with an orthopaedic journal editorial saying "let's not give up on knee arthroscopy just yet" after a systematic review showing no benefit for this procedure either.

Platelet-rich plasma versus corticosteroid injections in the management of patients with rotator cuff disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is an alternative to corticosteroid (CS) injections in managing rotator cuff disease. This meta-analysis investigated differences between PRP and CS for function and pain scores in significance and minimal clinical important difference (MCID). A literature search of Ovid Cochrane Library, Medline, Embase, Epub, and Scopus was conducted from inception to October 28, 2021. Eligible studies reported patients older than 18 years with a diagnosis of rotator cuff disease. This review was registered in PROSPERO (ID: CRD42021278740). Twelve studies met eligibility criteria (n = 639) of patients receiving either PRP or CS. At short-term follow-up, a difference favored CS compared to PRP in baseline change for disability of arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH) score (MD = -5.08, 95% CI: -8.00, -2.15; p = 0.0007; I2  = 0%) and simple shoulder test (SST) (MD = 1.25, 95% CI: 0.33, 2.18; p = 0.008; I2  = 0%). At intermediate follow-up, a difference favored PRP to CS baseline change of the DASH score (MD = 3.41, 95% CI: 0.67, 6.15; p = 0.01; I2  = 0%). At medium-term, a difference favored PRP to CS baseline change of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder (ASES) score (MD = -4.42, 95% CI: -8.16, -0.67; p = 0.02; I2  = 0%). Both treatments achieved individual MCID for each score. Despite favoring CS at short-term follow-up and PRP at intermediate- and medium-term follow-up, functional and pain scores did not demonstrate any clinical difference between the two treatment modalities in management of rotator cuff disease at all follow-up periods.

Tissue-Protective and Anti-Inflammatory Landmark of PRP-Treated Mesenchymal Stromal Cells Secretome for Osteoarthritis

Bone-marrow-mesenchymal-stromal-cells (BMSCs)- and platelet-rich-plasma (PRP)-based therapies have shown potential for treating osteoarthritis (OA). Recently, the combination of these two approaches was proposed, with results that overcame those observed with the separate treatments, indicating a possible role of PRP in ameliorating BMSCs' regenerative properties. Since a molecular fingerprint of BMSCs cultivated in the presence of PRP is missing, the aim of this study was to characterize the secretome in terms of soluble factors and extracellular-vesicle (EV)-embedded miRNAs from the perspective of tissues, pathways, and molecules which frame OA pathology. One hundred and five soluble factors and one hundred eighty-four EV-miRNAs were identified in the PRP-treated BMSCs' secretome, respectively. Several soluble factors were related to the migration of OA-related immune cells, suggesting the capacity of BMSCs to attract lympho-, mono-, and granulocytes and modulate their inflammatory status. Accordingly, several EV-miRNAs had an immunomodulating role at both the single-factor and cell level, together with the ability to target OA-characterizing extracellular-matrix-degrading enzymes and cartilage destruction pathways. Overall, anti-inflammatory and protective signals far exceeded inflammation and destruction cues for cartilage, macrophages, and T cells. This study demonstrates that BMSCs cultivated in the presence of PRP release therapeutic molecules and give molecular ground for the use of this combined and innovative therapy for OA treatment.

Interventional Therapies for Osteoarthritis: An Update

Osteoarthritis (OA) is one of the most common diseases worldwide and is expected to increase in incidence as the age of the general population rises. Both oral medications, such as NSAIDs, and surgical treatments used for OA management have limitations. Demand is rising for minimally invasive techniques such as intraarticular injections and percutaneous interventions for use in place of or in conjunction with oral medications and surgical therapies, and the past 2 decades have seen a rapid expanse in both pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic minimally invasive OA treatments. Image guidance with fluoroscopy, CT, or ultrasound is often used in conjunction with these procedures to achieve precise treatment localization to achieve maximal therapeutic effect. The choice of modality used for image guidance is often influenced by clinician experience, patient characteristics, and equipment availability. This article reviews the mechanisms of action, contraindications, complications, and efficacy of conventional and developing minimally invasive OA treatments. The minimally invasive treatment options described in this Review include therapeutic injections such as antiinflammatory agents, viscosupplements, and biologics, as well as nonpharmacologic treatments of subchondroplasty, nerve ablation, genicular artery embolization, intraarticular pulsed radiofrequency therapy, and MRI-guided focused ultrasound therapy.

The role of Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) intraarticular injections in restoring articular cartilage of osteoarthritic knees. A systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective

To assess the effect of PRP on knee articular cartilage content (thickness/volume) and examine the correlation between cartilage changes and clinical outcomes in patients with knee OA.

Method

A systematic literature search was performed using the Cochrane methodology in four online databases. Studies were included if they reported on cartilage content with cross-sectional imaging pre- and post-injection. A random-effects model meta-analysis was performed. Correlation with clinical outcomes was evaluated.

Results

14 studies (n ​= ​1099 patients) from 1452 records met the inclusion criteria: seven RCTs (n ​= ​688), one prospective (n ​= ​50), one retrospective (n ​= ​68), and four case-series (n ​= ​224). The PRP preparation process and treatment protocol varied widely (follow-up 6-12 months). In meta-analysis, PRP treatment was not associated with a significant increase in cartilage thickness (4 studies, n ​= ​187, standardized mean difference: Hedges g: 0.079; 95%CI: 0.358 - 0.516; p ​= ​0.723). Meta-analysis of 3 RCTs (n ​= ​112) showed no significant difference in the change of overall knee cartilage content with PRP injections compared with no PRP (Hedges' g: 0.217; 95%CI: 0.177 - 0.611; P ​= ​0.281).

Conclusion

The current literature does not support the PRP as chondrogenic in treatment of knee OA. However, there is substantial heterogeneity in the evaluated studies which limits the robustness of any conclusion. An adequately powered RCT, with a standardized PRP regime and standardized high-resolution MRI is needed to definitely define any effect of PRP on knee cartilage content and its relation to clinical outcomes. Until such high-quality evidence becomes available, we recommend that PRP is not administered with the intention of promoting chondrogenesis.

miR-219a-5p inhibits the pyroptosis in knee osteoarthritis by inactivating the NLRP3 signaling via targeting FBXO3

PURPOSE

This work was to identify the function and mechanism of miR-219a-5p in regulating knee osteoarthritis (KOA).

METHODS

Rat fibroblast-like synoviocytes (FLSs) were isolated to construct KOA cell model by lipopolysaccharide and adenosine triphosphate treatment. miR-219a-5p and FBXO3 expression in FLSs was modulated by transfection. Flow cytometry was executed to research FLSs apoptosis. Caspase-1 and IL-1β expression in FLSs was researched by immunofluorescence. The binding between miR-219a-5p and FBXO3 was identified by dual luciferase reporter gene assay. KOA rat model and miR-219a-5p up-modulation KOA rat model were constructed. Step size of rats was analyzed. Knee joints of rats were experienced Safranin O-fast green staining to evaluate the knee joint injury. FBXO3, pyroptosis-associated proteins, and IL-1β and IL-18 expression in FLSs and articular cartilage tissues of rats were assessed by Western blot, qRT-PCR and Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.

RESULTS

KOA cell model had higher apoptosis percentage, expression of pyroptosis-associated proteins, and IL-1β and IL-18 level. miR-219a-5p up-modulation decreased the above indicators, whereas miR-219a-5p down-modulation increased the above indicators. FBXO3 expression was directly repressed by miR-219a-5p. Loss of FBXO3 suppressed the above indicators. FBXO3 counteracted the suppression of miR-219a-5p on the above indicators. miR-219a-5p agomir attenuated knee joint injury, increased step size of KOA rats, and reduced FBXO3, pyroptosis-associated proteins and level of IL-1β and IL-18 in the articular cartilage tissues of KOA rats.

CONCLUSION

miR-219a-5p suppressed the pyroptosis in KOA by inactivating the NLRP3 signaling via targeting FBXO3, which might be a promising target for ameliorating KOA in the clinic.

A comprehensive review of intraarticular knee injection therapy, geniculate injections, and peripheral nerve stimulation for knee pain in clinical practice

The knee is the most common joint in adults associated with morbidity. Many pathologies are associated with knee damage, such as gout or rheumathoid arthritis, but the primary condition is osteoarthritis (OA). Not only can osteoarthritis cause significant pain, but it also can result in signficant disability as well. Treatment for this condition varies, starting off with oral analgesics and physical therapy to surgical total knee replacmenet. In the gamut of this various treatments, a conservative approach has included intra articular steroid injections. With time, researchers and clinicians determined that other components injected to the knee may additionally provide relief of this condition. In this investigation, we describe different types of knee injections such as platelet-rich plasma (PRP), hyaluronic acid, stem cells, and prolotherapy. Additionally, we describe the role of geniculate knee injections, radiofrequency, and periopheral nerve stimulation. These treatments should be considered for patients with knee pain refractory to conservative therapies.

Serial Platelet-Rich Plasma Intra-articular Injections in Kellgren and Lawrence Grade IV Knee Joint Osteoarthritis: A Prospective Blinded Placebo-Controlled Interventional Study

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether serial intra-articular (IA) Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) injections improve pain and function in patients of Kellgren-Lawrence (K-L) Grade IV primary knee osteoarthritis (KOA), not willing for arthroplasty or having relative contraindications to surgery.

Methods

90 patients (84 available at final follow-up) of Grade IV KOA were given 3 PRP or Normal Saline injections at 1-month interval. Pain and functional assessment was done with Visual analog scale (VAS) and Western Ontario and McMaster universities osteoarthritis index (WOMAC) respectively, at baseline and then at three and six months of follow-up. Both groups were homogenous with similar baseline characteristics.

Results

Both groups showed statistically significant improvements in the outcome scores but only PRP showed minimal clinically important difference (25% in WOMAC and > 2 cm difference of mean in VAS at follow-up). For inter-group comparison, PRP showed better results as there was statistically significant difference in WOMAC at 3 months (Difference =  - 9.220, 95% CI =  - 13.1945 to - 5.2455, P < 0.0001) and at 6 months (Difference =  - 10.360, 95% CI =  - 14.5358 to - 6.1842, P < 0.0001). Similar results were seen for VAS also (Difference =  - 0.580, 95% CI =  - 1.1412 to - 0.0188, P = 0.04 at 3 months, Difference =  - 0.870, 95% CI - 1.3993 to - 0.3407, P = 0.001 at 6 months). Outcome scores significantly correlated with age and sex but not with body mass index (BMI).

Conclusion

Serial Intra-articular Injections of autologous PRP mildly improve short-term subjective pain and knee function scores in patients of Grade IV KOA without any major complications.

Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Platelet-Rich Plasma With Intra-Articular Corticosteroid Injections in Patients With Bilateral Knee Osteoarthritis

Introduction

Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) intra-articular injections have gained popularity and are suggested to be more effective and longer lasting than corticosteroid or visco-supplementation therapy. There are few studies comparing PRP with corticosteroid injections and none comparing PRP in patients with bilateral knee osteoarthritis with the patient acting as their own control.

Methods

We performed a double-blind randomized controlled trial including 29 patients (58 knees) with radiologically confirmed mild-to-moderate bilateral knee osteoarthritis. They were randomized to receive an intra-articular PRP injection into one knee and a methylprednisolone injection with a local anesthetic into the contralateral knee. The primary outcome was measured using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) before the treatment and at six weeks, three months, and six months. Secondary outcome was measured pain with the visual numerical pain rating scale (VNS).

Results

Corticosteroids and PRP were both effective in improving pain, stiffness, and function at all time points, with maximal improvements at six weeks and three months. PRP scored slightly better than steroid injections at six months; nevertheless, there was no statistically significant difference between corticosteroids and PRP injections (F_2,139=0.173, p=0.84). The secondary outcome also delivered the same result with improvement at all time points but no statistically significant difference (F_2,139=0.168, p=0.85).

Conclusions

Both corticosteroids and PRP interventions are effective in improving pain, stiffness, and function in patients with bilateral knee osteoarthritis up to six months with no statistically significant difference between the two.

Biological Targets of Multimolecular Therapies in Middle-Age Osteoarthritis

Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a common condition, prevalent in middle-agedness, associated with chronic pain and impaired quality of life. Two interrelated biological processes fuel early OA progression: inflammation and structural tissues catabolism. Procatabolic and proinflammatory mediators are interconnected and form part of a self-perpetuating loop. They leverage OA research complexity because of the impossibility to discern certain spatiotemporal tissues' changes from others. Both are shared targets of versatile regenerative multimolecular therapies. In particular, platelet-rich plasma can interfere with inflammation and inflammatory pain. The therapeutic approach is to alter the vicious inflammatory loop by modifying the molecular composition of the synovial fluid, thereby paracrine cellular cross talk. Intra-articular injections of platelet-rich plasma can provide key factors balancing proinflammatory and anti-inflammatory factors, targeting macrophage dysfunction and modulating immune mechanisms within the knee.

The use of platelet-rich plasma in management of musculoskeletal pain: a narrative review

Musculoskeletal pain is the most common pain reported by patients. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is widely used to treat musculoskeletal pain. However, the efficacy of PRP to treat this pain remains controversial. This review highlights the application of PRP in the treatment of musculoskeletal pain. PRP treatment appears to reduce pain and improve function in patients with musculoskeletal pain. However, there are limitations to the currently published studies. These limitations include the PRP preparation methods, type of activators, types of pathology to be treated, methods and times of administration, and association of PRP with other treatments.