1
|
Lachance AD, Giro ME, Edelstein A, Lee W. Suture button fixation yields high levels of patient reported outcomes, return to sport, and stable fixation in isolated Lisfranc injuries: A systematic review. J ISAKOS 2023; 8:474-483. [PMID: 37611870 DOI: 10.1016/j.jisako.2023.08.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2023] [Revised: 07/23/2023] [Accepted: 08/17/2023] [Indexed: 08/25/2023]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Lisfranc injuries remain a significant, but often misdiagnosed, orthopaedic injury. Alongside the traditional methods of surgical fixation, including arthrodesis and open reduction and internal fixation with screws, suture button fixation is an emerging technique. OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study is to investigate the efficacy of suture button fixation for treatment of Lisfranc injuries through a systematic review. EVIDENCE REVIEW A comprehensive literature review was conducted according to the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews using PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases for original, English-language studies observing outcomes of Lisfranc injury until August 19, 2022. The clinical studies with evidence level I-IV and at least a 12 month follow-up after the index surgery were included if they examined quantifiable outcomes of Lisfranc injury treated with suture button. Articles were excluded if they included case reports, systematic reviews, comments, editorials, surveys, animal studies, or biomechanical/cadaveric studies. Variables extracted from text and figures include demographic information, return to sport measures, patient reported outcomes, and complications. FINDINGS Of the 10 studies included, there were 186 total patients with an age range of 13-72. In every study, all patients were able to return to sport or activity with a return time averaging from 10.8 to 25.9 weeks. Postoperative American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society scores ranged from 83.5 to 97.0 while pain Visual Analogue Scale ranged from 0.6 to 2.5. Complications were reported in four studies at a rate of 7.7% including two cases of diastasis, two cases of paraesthesia, one case of button irritation, and one of postoperative degenerative joint disease, with no reported revisions. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In our systematic review, suture button fixation shows high levels of patient reported outcomes, return to sport, and stable fixation in isolated Lisfranc injuries. This surgical technique provides a physiologic reduction across the Lisfranc joint and reduces the need for reoperation including removal of hardware. However, further evidence such as large sample size high-quality randomized controlled trials is needed to draw a definitive conclusion regarding the best treatment for Lisfranc injuries. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level IV, Systematic Review of Level III and IV studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew D Lachance
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Guthrie Clinic, 1 Guthrie Sq, Sayre, PA, 18840, United States.
| | - Margaret Elizabeth Giro
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Guthrie Clinic, 1 Guthrie Sq, Sayre, PA, 18840, United States.
| | - Alexander Edelstein
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Guthrie Clinic, 1 Guthrie Sq, Sayre, PA, 18840, United States.
| | - Wonyong Lee
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Guthrie Clinic, 1 Guthrie Sq, Sayre, PA, 18840, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Chona DV, Park CN, Kim BI, Lau BC. Clinical and Biomechanical Outcomes of Suture Button Fixation for Ligamentous Lisfranc Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Orthop J Sports Med 2023; 11:23259671231186387. [PMID: 37538534 PMCID: PMC10395171 DOI: 10.1177/23259671231186387] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2023] [Accepted: 04/14/2023] [Indexed: 08/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Flexible ligamentous fixation has increased in popularity for the treatment of ligamentous Lisfranc injury, but the optimal fixation strategy is unclear. Purpose To review the biomechanical, clinical, and radiographic results of ligamentous Lisfranc injuries treated with flexible fixation. Study Design Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4. Methods A systematic literature review was conducted according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. The PubMed/Medline and Google Scholar literature databases were queried for clinical and biomechanical (cadaveric) studies relating to flexible fixation of ligamentous Lisfranc injury. Outcomes of interest included patient-reported outcome scores, clinical/biomechanical results, radiographic alignment, and return to activity. Where appropriate, meta-analysis of the postoperative outcomes was performed. Results Of the 34 initial studies, 14 articles (243 feet) were included in the analysis. In the 11 clinical studies (216 patients), the mean postoperative American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society score was 90.1 (n = 150; 6 studies) and the mean visual analog scale score was 1.5 (n = 137; 5 studies). The rate of return to activity was 100% (n = 35; 5 studies), and 100% of patients maintained radiographic alignment postoperatively (n = 62; 6 studies). No complications or subsequent hardware removals were reported. Of the 3 biomechanical studies (27 feet), 1 study found significantly greater change in diastasis under axial load between intact and postfixation ligaments with suture button versus screw fixation (+1.1 vs -0.1 mm; P < .05), another found no difference in the decrease in diastasis under axial load between the injured state and screw or suture button fixation (1.2 vs 1.0 mm; P = .5), and the third found no difference in displacement between intact and either screw or suture button fixation under either axial (intact vs screw: 1.0 vs 2.0 mm, P = .1; intact vs suture button: 0.6 vs 1.8 mm, P = .1) or abduction (intact vs screw: 1.5 vs 1.1 mm, P = .5; intact vs suture button: 1.3 vs 2.1 mm, P = .1) load. Conclusion Flexible fixation use in the treatment of ligamentous Lisfranc injury was found to have significant potential as a fixation option, as demonstrated by excellent clinical results. Biomechanical evidence was inconclusive but suggested a trend toward decreased diastasis in specimens fixed with screws compared with suture buttons.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deepak V. Chona
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Caroline N. Park
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University Hospital, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Billy I. Kim
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA
| | - Brian C. Lau
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Yi Y, Chaudhari S. Various Flexible Fixation Techniques Using Suture Button for Ligamentous Lisfranc Injuries: A Review of Surgical Options. MEDICINA (KAUNAS, LITHUANIA) 2023; 59:1134. [PMID: 37374337 DOI: 10.3390/medicina59061134] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2023] [Revised: 05/21/2023] [Accepted: 06/06/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023]
Abstract
Contrary to Lisfranc joint fracture-dislocation, ligamentous Lisfranc injury can lead to additional instability and arthritis and is difficult to diagnose. Appropriate procedure selection is necessary for a better prognosis. Several surgical methods have recently been introduced. Here, we present three distinct surgical techniques for treating ligamentous Lisfranc employing flexible fixation. First is the "Single Tightrope procedure", which involves reduction and fixation between the second metatarsal base and the medial cuneiform via making a bone tunnel and inserting Tightrope. Second is the "Dual Tightrope Technique", which is similar to the "Single Tightrope technique", with additional fixation of an intercuneiform joint using one MiniLok Quick Anchor Plus. Last but not least, the "internal brace approach" uses the SwiveLock anchor, particularly when intercueniform instability is seen. Each approach has its own advantages and disadvantages in terms of surgical complexity and stability. These flexible fixation methods, on the other hand, are more physiologic and have the potential to lessen the difficulties that have been linked to the use of conventional screws in the past.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Young Yi
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Seoul Foot and Ankle Center, Inje University Seoul Paik Hospital, 85, 2-ga, Jeo-dong, Jung-gu, Seoul 04551, Republic of Korea
| | - Sagar Chaudhari
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, K. B. Bhabha Hospital, Bandra, Mumbai 400050, Maharashtra, India
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Carter TH, Heinz N, Duckworth AD, White TO, Amin AK. Management of Lisfranc Injuries: A Critical Analysis Review. JBJS Rev 2023; 11:01874474-202304000-00001. [PMID: 37014938 DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.rvw.22.00239] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/06/2023]
Abstract
» There is a spectrum of midtarsal injuries, ranging from mild midfoot sprains to complex Lisfranc fracture-dislocations. » Use of appropriate imaging can reduce patient morbidity, by reducing the number of missed diagnoses and, conversely, avoiding overtreatment. Weight-bearing radiographs are of great value when investigating the so-called subtle Lisfranc injury. » Regardless of the operative strategy, anatomical reduction and stable fixation is a prerequisite for a satisfactory outcome in the management of displaced injuries. » Fixation device removal is less frequently reported after primary arthrodesis compared with open reduction and internal fixation based on 6 published meta-analyses. However, the indications for further surgery are often unclear, and the evidence of the included studies is of typically low quality. Further high-quality prospective randomized trials with robust cost-effectiveness analyses are required in this area. » We have proposed an investigation and treatment algorithm based on the current literature and clinical experience of our trauma center.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas H Carter
- Edinburgh Orthopaedics, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - Nicholas Heinz
- Edinburgh Orthopaedics, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - Andrew D Duckworth
- Edinburgh Orthopaedics, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
- Centre for Population Health Sciences, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - Timothy O White
- Edinburgh Orthopaedics, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - Anish K Amin
- Edinburgh Orthopaedics, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ahluwalia R, Yip G, Richter M, Maffulli N. Surgical controversies and current concepts in Lisfranc injuries. Br Med Bull 2022; 144:57-75. [PMID: 36151742 DOI: 10.1093/bmb/ldac020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2021] [Revised: 08/06/2022] [Accepted: 08/09/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Lisfranc injuries, not as rare as previously reported, range from ligamentous to complex fracture-dislocations. Anatomical studies have identified a complex of discrete structures, and defined the anatomical characteristics of the Lisfranc joint. SOURCES OF DATA A narrative evidence-based review encompassed and analyzed published systematic reviews. Outcomes included clinical and surgical decision-making, including clinical-presentation, diagnosis, pathological-assessment, surgical-management techniques and indications, post-surgical care and comparative outcomes. AREAS OF AGREEMENT Better understanding of the Lisfranc complex anatomy aids surgical treatment and tactics. Prognosis is related to injury severity, estimated by the number of foot columns affected. Surgical outcome is determined by anatomical reduction for most fixation and fusion techniques. Appropriate treatment allows return to sport, improving outcome scores. AREAS OF CONTROVERSY Identification of Lisfranc injuries may be improved by imaging modalities such as weight-bearing computer tomography. Recent evidence supports dorsal plate fixation as a result of better quality of reduction. In complex injuries, the use of combined techniques such as trans-articular screw and plate fixation has been associated with poorer outcomes, and fusion may instead offer greater benefits. GROWING POINTS Open reduction is mandatory if closed reduction fails, highlighting the importance of understanding surgical anatomy. If anatomical reduction is achieved, acute arthrodesis is a safe alternative to open reduction internal fixation in selected patients, as demonstrated by comparable outcomes in subgroup analysis. AREAS FOR DEVELOPING RESEARCH The current controversies in surgical treatment remain around techniques and outcomes, as randomized controlled trials are infrequent.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raju Ahluwalia
- Department of Orthopaedics, King's College Hospital, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Bessemer Road, London, SE5 9RS, UK
| | - Grace Yip
- Department of Orthopaedics, King's College Hospital, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Bessemer Road, London, SE5 9RS, UK
| | - Martinus Richter
- Department for Foot and Ankle Surgery Nuremberg and Rummelsberg, Hospital Rummelsberg, Rummelsberg 71, Schwarzenbruck 90592, Germany
| | - Nicola Maffulli
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry, University of Salerno, Via S. Allende, 84081 Baronissi, Salerno, Italy.,Centre for Sports and Exercise Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Centre for Sports and Exercise Medicine, Mile End Hospital, 275 Bancroft Road, London E1 4DG, UK.,School of Pharmacy and Bioengineering, Keele University School of Medicine, Thornburrow Drive, Stoke on Trent ST4 7QB, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kitsukawa K, Hirano T, Niki H, Tachizawa N, Mimura H. The Diagnostic Accuracy of MRI to Evaluate Acute Lisfranc Joint Injuries: Comparison With Direct Operative Observations. FOOT & ANKLE ORTHOPAEDICS 2022; 7:24730114211069080. [PMID: 35097492 PMCID: PMC8792696 DOI: 10.1177/24730114211069080] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Early diagnosis is important in patients with Lisfranc joint injury to avoid
subsequent complications. As the ligaments in the Lisfranc joint are
relatively small and course obliquely, isotropic 3-dimensional (3D) magnetic
resonance imaging (MRI) can be beneficial to evaluate ligament injury. The
purpose of this study was to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of MRI,
including isotropic 3D MRI for acute injury of the Lisfranc joint,
especially of the interosseous C1-M2 ligament (Lisfranc ligament), the
dorsal C1-M2 ligament (dorsal ligament), and the interosseous C1-C2
ligament, compared with direct operative observations. Methods: This retrospective review identified 27 patients who had undergone MR
examination for acute Lisfranc joint injury followed by surgery. We reviewed
the operative reports that described the Lisfranc, dorsal, and interosseous
C1-C2 ligaments. All patients underwent an MRI, including a 2D oblique plane
image parallel to the Lisfranc ligament and an isotropic 3D MRI. An image
analysis of the integrity of the 3 ligaments and other associated injuries
was performed. The diagnostic accuracy of MRI was analyzed using operative
findings as a reference standard. Results: Lisfranc and dorsal ligament injuries were identified on MRI in all patients.
MRI depicted disruption of the interosseous C1-C2 ligament in 12 patients.
MRI diagnostic accuracy for detection of Lisfranc, dorsal, and interosseous
C1-C2 ligaments was 100% (95% CI 0.82-1.0), 74% (95% CI 0.54-0.89), and 70%
(95% CI 0.50-0.86), respectively. Conclusion: MRI with oblique planes parallel to the Lisfranc ligament and isotropic 3D
MRI was reliable for detecting Lisfranc ligament injury, whereas MRI
findings of the dorsal and interosseous C1-C2 ligaments were less consistent
with operative observations. Level of Evidence: Level IV, case series.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kaoru Kitsukawa
- Department of Radiology, St. Marianna
University School of Medicine, Kawasaki City, Kanagawa, Japan
- Kaoru Kitsukawa, MD, Chiba University
Hospital, Comprehensive Radiology Center, 1-8-1 Inohana, Chuo-Ku, Chiba-shi,
Chiba 260-8677, Japan.
| | - Takaaki Hirano
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, St.
Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki City, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Hisateru Niki
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, St.
Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki City, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Natsuki Tachizawa
- Department of Radiology, St. Marianna
University School of Medicine, Kawasaki City, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Hidefumi Mimura
- Department of Radiology, St. Marianna
University School of Medicine, Kawasaki City, Kanagawa, Japan
| |
Collapse
|