Effects of variations in access to care for children with atopic dermatitis

Emergency vs. Outpatient Care for Pediatric Atopic Dermatitis: A Population-Based Study of Sociodemographic Factors and Healthcare Utilization

OBJECTIVE

To examine sociodemographic differences in pediatric atopic dermatitis (AD) visits between emergency and outpatient settings.

STUDY DESIGN

We used the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey and National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey to identify emergency and outpatient visits for pediatric AD patients from 2009-2016 and 2018-2019.

RESULTS

We identified 16,712,960 visits for pediatric AD (weighted). We identified differences in race/ethnicity and payment source between emergency and outpatient pediatric AD visits. In emergency settings, more pediatric AD visits were for Hispanic patients and patients with public insurance. In outpatient settings, more pediatric AD visits were for non-Hispanic White patients and patients with private insurance. After adjusting for sociodemographic factors, multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that pediatric AD patients seen in emergency settings were over five times more likely to be Hispanic than non-Hispanic White (aOR 5.34, p<0.01) and over five times more likely to have public insurance than private insurance (aOR 5.21, p<0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Pediatric AD patients seen in emergency settings were more likely to be Hispanic and have public insurance. Future research may explore how to improve healthcare access and utilization for all pediatric AD patients.

Risk factors and temporal associations of progression of the atopic march in children with early-onset atopic dermatitis

BACKGROUND

Risk factors and the temporal relationship between atopic dermatitis (AD) and atopic march remain understudied.

OBJECTIVE

Determine risk factors for atopic march in early-onset AD patients and the temporality between AD and atopic march.

METHODS

We used the MarketScan Research Database for our retrospective cohort analysis from 2010 to 2018, comparing infants diagnosed with AD before age 1 with controls without early-onset AD. Primary outcomes were hazard ratios (HRs) for the development of asthma, allergic rhinitis, and food allergy.

RESULTS

Compared to 55,174 controls, higher proportions of the 27,228 AD patients developed asthma (19.21% vs 8.65%, P < .001), allergic rhinitis (28.27% vs 12.62%, P < .001), food allergy (16.00% vs 2.27%, P < .001), and all atopic triad conditions (10.69% vs 0.71%, P < .001). Among AD patients, higher proportions developed the atopic triad if they were male (HR 1.66, 95% confidence interval [1.45-1.90]), had severe disease (HR 3.16, [2.77-3.60]), or had family atopy history (HR > 3.40, P < .001 for all comparisons). Among AD patients, 20.1% developed allergic rhinitis.

LIMITATIONS

Our study was based on health care claims data.

CONCLUSION

Early-onset AD is associated with higher rates of developing atopic march conditions compared to controls. Particular attention should be paid toward risk factors and atopic march screening in early-onset AD patients.

Moving beyond biology: the critical role of social and structural determinants in atopic dermatitis

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a prevalent chronic inflammatory skin disease with a substantial global burden and negative impact on quality of life. While genetics and pathophysiology are key to understanding AD, emerging evidence indicates that social and structural determinants of health (SDOH and StDOH) strongly influence the condition's onset, severity, and outcomes. SDOH, such as economic stability, education quality and access, healthcare quality and access, neighborhood environment, and social/community context, shape individual risk and disease experience. StDOH, including government processes, economic policies, social/public policies, and cultural/societal values, further act as upstream forces that directly and indirectly influence AD outcomes. In this review, we synthesize current knowledge on the impacts of SDOH and StDOH on AD incidence, severity, and disparities. Embracing a biopsychosocial model is crucial to elucidate the etiology, epidemiology, and optimal management of AD. Future research should adopt a holistic approach, moving beyond a purely biological perspective to consider the intricate interplay of social and structural determinants in understanding and managing AD.

Managing Childhood and Adolescent Atopic Dermatitis in Primary Care: A US Expert Group Consensus

Objective

This expert-led consensus aims to provide primary care providers (PCPs) with recommendations for the care of atopic dermatitis (AD) in patients aged <18 years. The first point of contact for diagnosis and management of AD is often a PCP, and appropriate, coordinated care between PCPs and AD specialists is essential to optimizing care.

Study design

A systematic literature review was conducted followed by expert-led development of 25 consensus management recommendations relevant to 4 key themes in AD management: defining control, current and emerging treatments, referral care pathways, and patient-caregiver experience. Consensus was achieved using a modified Delphi process. For each statement, consensus for inclusion was considered achieved if ≥75% of the experts voted within the 7-9 range on a 9-point scale.

Results

Consensus was reached on 24 of 25 statements. Nine statements reached the score of 7-9 by 100% of the experts. Of these, 4 were pertinent to topical therapy for the management of childhood and adolescent AD in primary care: the need for anti-inflammatory medication to achieve clear or almost clear skin; the need to tailor decisions about therapy to the individual patient or family; the importance of coordinated management between PCPs and specialists as part of effective treatment approaches; and the importance of patient and/or caregiver engagement in shared decision-making.

Conclusions

It is hoped that these recommendations will guide the management of pediatric AD in primary care settings, facilitate coordinated care between PCPs and AD specialists, and improve outcomes for patients and their families.

Systemic Therapy for Atopic Dermatitis in Children and Adolescents: A US Expert Consensus

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic, type-2 mediated, inflammatory skin disease characterized by intense pruritus, disruption of skin barrier function, and immune dysregulation. Management strategies for AD are routinely determined based on disease severity. First-line treatment begins with basic skin care and topical anti-inflammatory medication, which is typically sufficient for the management of mild-to-moderate disease. For those patients with moderate-to-severe disease, systemic therapy is often required. This can involve off-label treatment with conventional immunosuppressant medications. However, this approach is limited by a lack of robust clinical trial data and safety concerns that necessitate close monitoring. The emergence of novel targeted biologics and small molecules to treat AD presents an opportunity to optimize AD management and patient outcomes by offering greater efficacy than traditional immunosuppressants and a favorable safety profile. As the treatment landscape shifts, clinicians can benefit from a standardized process of patient assessment and treatment, along with resources to help maintain contemporary knowledge of available therapeutic options. This US-based, expert-led consensus used a modified Delphi process to develop core recommendations for the use of systemic medications for the management of pediatric patients <18 years of age with moderate-to-severe AD.

The reporting of social determinants of health in pediatric dermatology clinical trials: a systematic review

Background

Despite the acknowledgment of the importance of social determinants of health (SDOH) on clinical outcomes, few clinical trials provide information about SDOH. Including these markers in pediatric dermatologic clinical trials may lead to improved care and novel observations about the disease.

Objective

Using a systematic review, assess the use of SDOH in pediatric dermatology clinical trials.

Methods

CINAHL Plus, Cochrane: CENTRAL, Embase, PubMed, and Scopus were searched. English language randomized controlled trials about pediatric dermatology diseases published from January 2011 to May 2022 were included. Two authors independently screened all records using Covidence at 2 levels. Two authors independently collected data using Covidence and Microsoft Excel and assessed study quality. A protocol was registered at Open Science Framework: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/B93VY.

Results

A total of 6463 records were retrieved and 4298 were screened at title/abstract. Next, 1738 records were screened at full text and 1085 were included. Of these, 119 reported an SDOH factor for a pediatric dermatology disease. Income or socioeconomic status was the factor most reported followed by social support, location, and health insurance. Most of the studies were conducted outside of the United States.

Limitations

There are a limited number of dermatology clinical trials that include a pediatric population.

Conclusion

Despite including over 1000 pediatric dermatology clinical trials, only 119 used SDOH. Pediatric dermatology researchers must prioritize including and reporting additional SDOH in clinical trials if the goal is to impact and improve clinical care and innovate for diverse populations of patients.

The relationship between childhood atopic dermatitis and asthma in an under resourced community

Background: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is an inflammatory skin disease caused by allergen exposures and estimated to affect ∼20% of children. Children in urban areas have a higher prevalence of AD compared with those living outside of urban areas. AD is believed to lead to asthma development as part of the "atopic march." Objective: Our objective was to determine the sequential and chronological relationships between AD and asthma for children in an under-resourced community. Methods: The progression from AD to asthma in the under-resourced, urban community of Sun Valley, Colorado, was examined by assessing Medicaid data for the years 2016 to 2019 for a diagnosis of AD or asthma in children 6 and 7 years old. Results: Pearson correlations between AD and asthma diagnoses were significant only with respect to AD at age 6 years compared with asthma 1 year later, at age 7 years. Conclusion: By studying a susceptible community with a consistent but mixed genetic background, we found sequential and chronological links between AD and asthma.

Pharmacoequity in Allergy-Immunology: Disparities in Access to Medications for Allergic Diseases and Proposed Solutions in the United States and Globally

Pharmacoequity is the principle that individuals should have access to high-quality medications regardless of race and ethnicity, socioeconomic status, or availability of resources. In this review, we summarize access to therapeutics for allergic diseases in the United States and other selected countries. We focus on domains of health care access (health insurance coverage, medication availability, and specialist access) as well as system-level factors and clinician- and patient-level factors such as interpersonal racism and cultural beliefs, and how they can affect timely access to appropriate therapy for allergic diseases. Finally, we propose how pharmacoequity in allergy-immunology can be achieved by highlighting solutions to factors limiting access to medications for allergic diseases, and identify potential future research directions.

Atopic Dermatitis Across Shades of Skin

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic, heterogeneous inflammatory skin disease that is associated with immense patient burden globally. There is increasing appreciation of disparities among patients identified as having skin of color (SOC), which often refers to patients of non-White race or non-European ancestry, but can broadly include individuals from a number of different racial, ethnic, ancestral, and skin pigmentation groups based on definition. In this narrative review, we discuss key terminology as it relates to AD across shades of skin, including modern definitions of 'race', 'ethnicity', and 'SOC'. We then synthesize the current literature describing disparities in AD prevalence, disease recognition, and burden alongside current data regarding genetic and immunologic findings across SOC populations. In the context of these findings, we highlight key concomitant social determinants of health, including environmental factors, socioeconomic status, and access to care, for which race often serves as a proxy for true biological and genetic differences. Finally, we discuss future efforts to shift to a more inclusive understanding of AD to encompass all shades of skin, to ensure equitable representation of diverse populations in high impact research, and intensify efforts to address the critical upstream factors driving observed disparities.

Capturing the Diversity of Dermatology-What's in a Name?

As research related to skin of color (SOC) in dermatology continues to grow, it is increasingly important to precisely define terminology. The terms 'SOC', 'race', and 'ethnicity' are frequently used to analyze differences in dermatologic disease onset, severity, and outcomes. These terms are used interchangeably, are ill-defined across research studies, and frequently conflate biologic and socially constructed categories. SOC has been thought to represent differing degrees of pigment or melanin in the skin, however skin pigment is quite variable among races and ethnicities. Furthermore, certain individuals with less skin pigment may socially consider themselves to be SOC, while the inverse is also true. Fitzpatrick skin phototype classifications in SOC dermatology, while commonly used as an objective measure of diversity, also present with numerous limitations and inaccuracies. We seek to highlight strengths and weaknesses of the current terminology used in SOC dermatology and recommend a more holistic understanding of reported differences, including a framework reflective of upstream socioeconomic, environmental, and historical factors that may be most relevant to reported associations.

Update on Atopic Dermatitis

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory skin disorder with a lifetime prevalence of up to 20% which can occur at any age but is most common among children. There is a significant burden of pediatric AD in the primary care setting; thus, the ability to recognize and manage AD is of utmost importance to pediatricians. Treatment of AD requires a multifaceted approach based on a patient's severity including behavioral modifications, topical and systemic pharmacologic therapies, and phototherapy.

Managing Atopic Dermatitis in Patients With Skin of Color

Managing atopic dermatitis (AD) in patients with skin of color presents unique challenges for the clinician. There is increasing evidence that AD has higher prevalence, persistence, and severity among skin of color populations. This is likely to be partly related to differences in living conditions and exposure to irritants and allergens, among other factors. Assessment of AD severity in patients with darker skin can be challenging, in particular the assessment of erythema, leading to the potential for underscoring AD severity. Variations in disease have also been described, with the potential for a greater risk of inflammation-induced nodularity and hyper- or hypopigmentation. Management challenges include variable adherence to treatment, potential disparities in access to health care, and differences in the metabolism of cyclosporine. Optimal management of AD in patients with skin of color requires a tailored approach. Here, we review approaches to diagnosing AD, evaluating extent and severity with subjective and objective measures, considering treatment options for patients with skin of color, and highlighting areas for improvement in AD care for skin of color populations.

Access to pediatric dermatology

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To identify factors that impact accessibility to pediatric dermatology and review healthcare delivery models that improve access and address these barriers.

RECENT FINDINGS

Up to one-third of pediatric primary care visits include a skin-related problem, yet pediatric dermatology subspecialist services are highly inaccessible. Workforce shortages and geographic, sociocultural, and economic barriers perpetuate inaccessibility. Teledermatology expands care, particularly to underserved or geographically remote communities, and reduces healthcare-related costs. Federal legislation to support telehealth services with adequate reimbursement for providers with parity between live, video, and phone visits will dictate the continued feasibility of virtual visits. Innovative care delivery models, such as language-based clinics, multidisciplinary teleconferencing, or embedded dermatology services within primary care are other promising alternatives.

SUMMARY

Despite efforts to expand access, dermatology still ranks among the most underserved pediatric subspecialties. Improving access requires a multipronged approach. Efforts to expand exposure and mentorship within pediatric dermatology, diversify the workforce and clinical curriculum, recruit and retain clinicians in geographically underserved areas, and collaborate with policymakers to ensure adequate reimbursement for teledermatology services are necessary.

Dermatology Workforce in the United States - Part 1: Overview, Transformations, and Implications

The dermatology workforce continues to evolve to meet the growing and diversified demands of the United States population. Part 1 of this continuing medical education (CME) series is designed to provide an overview of the dermatology workforce as well as delineate the motivators and socio-economic implications of significant workforce transformations which are impacting dermatologic health care. Part 2 of the series will consider the impact of workforce challenges on patient outcomes and discuss potential actions that may help to optimize workforce organization and care delivery.

A systematic scoping review of racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic health disparities in pediatric dermatology

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

Health disparities encompass a wide range of personal, societal, environmental, and system-based factors that contribute to inequitable health and health outcomes in vulnerable patient populations. The goal of this work was to scientifically summarize the existing published North American research on disparity as it pertains to pediatric dermatology.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed according to PRISMA guidelines. A medical librarian performed electronic searches from multiple electronic databases from their dates of inception to March 2021. Title and abstracts were reviewed by authors, identifying articles for full review. Data on article characteristics and identified disparities were then extracted and collected in a spreadsheet.

RESULTS

Fifty-one articles met final inclusion criteria, of which 25 highlighted disparities due to race/ethnicity, 13 highlighted disparities due to socioeconomic (SES), and 13 highlighted disparities due to both race/ethnicity and SES. The most frequent study designs were cross-sectional or survey, followed by retrospective cohort. Only two were prospective cohort studies. Disparities reported included reduced access to care and medications, increased school absenteeism, reduced knowledge about skin care including sun protection, increased hospitalizations and emergency department visits, and severe and persistent disease in the setting of minority race and poverty, among other indicators.

CONCLUSIONS

There are few, scattered research studies addressing disparity in pediatric dermatology. Greater focus will be needed in the future to improve knowledge of sources of disparity and its detrimental effects on the health of children, to rectify the notable disparity under-reporting of disparity research.

Barriers to healthcare access in pediatric dermatology: A systematic review

Barriers to healthcare access are healthcare inequities that have been widely studied across different medical specialties. No studies have previously evaluated the state of barriers to healthcare access research in pediatric dermatology. A systematic review was conducted to examine the types of barriers identified within pediatric dermatology literature. Relevant information was extracted and categorized into the themes of systemic, sociocultural, or individual barriers. The systemic barriers we found include finances, wait times, and geography. The sociocultural barriers included culture beliefs and communication. Patient beliefs and health knowledge were found as individual barriers. The small number and limited scope of studies we identified suggest that barriers to healthcare access in pediatric dermatology remain an understudied topic. Additional research is needed to further characterize these barriers to dermatologic care, as well as the impact of any interventions designed to overcome them.

Reframing racial and ethnic disparities in atopic dermatitis in Black and Latinx populations

Black people in the United States experience greater atopic dermatitis (AD) prevalence, severity, and persistence when compared with White people. Although very little published literature describes AD in the Latinx population, additional differences in severity, persistence, and age of onset exist in contrast to White people. Thus far, genetic polymorphisms associated with increased risk and/or severity of AD are less common among Black people, so should confer reduced, rather than the observed increased, AD risk among Black people. Little is known regarding genetic risk factors in Latinx people. In contrast, there is consistent evidence that socioeconomic, environmental, and health care factors influence AD prevalence, severity, and/or persistence, and these same risk factors are more common among racial and ethnic minority populations as a result of racism. Researchers too often pursue genetic explanations for racial and ethnic AD disparities when the evidence points to the importance of contextual, rather than genetic, causes of these disparities. Reframing the prevailing view that innate differences among racial and ethnic groups are responsible for these disparities by emphasizing the role of racism and its downstream effects on contextual factors will be a critical first step toward shrinking these disparities.

Real-world comorbidities of atopic dermatitis in the pediatric ambulatory population in the United States

BACKGROUND

Increasing evidence has suggested the systemic nature of atopic dermatitis (AD), a common inflammatory skin condition in children. However, comprehensive analyses of real-world comorbidities in pediatric AD are limited.

OBJECTIVE

To characterize comorbidity burden in patients with AD aged <18 years old.

METHODS

The MarketScan commercial claims database was queried from January 1, 2017, to December 31, 2017. Age- and sex-matched analyses were used to compare patients with AD with general population controls.

RESULTS

A total of 86,969 pediatric patients with AD and 116,564 matched controls were identified. Increased anxiety (odds ratio [OR], 1.20) and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (OR, 1.11) were noted in patients with AD. In addition to dermatologic/allergic diseases, AD was also associated with infections, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (OR, 3.76), and autoimmune conditions, including vitiligo (OR, 2.98) and alopecia areata (OR, 4.32). Pediatric patients with AD had higher likelihoods of lymphoid/hematologic malignancies (OR, 1.94), ocular disorders (OR, 1.37-2.02), metabolic syndrome (OR, 1.61), and obesity (OR, 1.81). For all the ORs mentioned above, P was <.001.

LIMITATIONS

Retrospective analysis of health care claims data.

CONCLUSIONS

AD in pediatric patients was associated with a wide range of psychologic and systemic comorbidities. Increased awareness can help minimize its negative effects on the quality of life and prevent long-term health consequences in young patients with AD.