1
|
Bußenius L, Harendza S, van den Bussche H, Selch S. Final-year medical students' self-assessment of facets of competence for beginning residents. BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION 2022; 22:82. [PMID: 35130891 PMCID: PMC8822672 DOI: 10.1186/s12909-021-03039-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2021] [Accepted: 11/25/2021] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Final-year undergraduate medical students often do not feel well prepared for their start of residency training. Self-assessment of competences is important so that medical trainees can take responsibility for their learning. In this study, we investigated how final-year medical students self-assessed their competences as they neared their transition to postgraduate training. The aim was to identify areas for improvement in undergraduate training. METHODS In the academic year 2019/2020, a national online survey was sent to final-year undergraduate medical students via their respective medical schools. The survey included ten facets of competence (FOC) most relevant for beginning residents. The participants were asked to self-assess their competence for each FOC on a 5-point Likert scale (1: strongly disagree to 5: strongly agree). We established an order of self-assessed FOC performance by means and calculated paired t-tests. Gender differences were assessed with independent t-tests. RESULTS A total of 1083 students from 35 medical schools completed the questionnaire. Mean age was 27.2 ± 3.1 years and 65.8% were female. Students rated their performance highest in the FOCs 'Teamwork and collegiality' and 'Empathy and openness' (97.1 and 95.0% 'strongly agree' or 'agree', respectively) and lowest in 'Verbal communication with colleagues and supervisors' and 'Scientifically and empirically grounded method of working' (22.8 and 40.2% 'strongly disagree', 'disagree', or 'neither agree nor disagree', respectively). Women rated their performance of 'Teamwork and collegiality', 'Empathy and openness', and 'Knowing and maintaining own personal bounds and possibilities' significantly higher than men did (Cohen's d > .2), while men showed higher self-assessed performance in 'Scientifically and empirically grounded method of working' than women (Cohen's d = .38). The FOCs 'Responsibility', 'Knowing and maintaining own personal bounds and possibilities', 'Structure, work planning, and priorities', 'Coping with mistakes', and 'Scientifically and empirically grounded method of working' revealed lower self-assessed performance than the order of FOC relevance established by physicians for beginning residents. CONCLUSIONS The differences between the level of students' self-assessed FOC performance and physicians' ranking of FOC relevance revealed areas for improvement in undergraduate medical education related to health system sciences. Final-year students might benefit from additional or better training in management skills, professionalism, and evidence-based medicine. Surveys of self-assessed competences may be useful to monitor competence development during undergraduate training.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa Bußenius
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Cell Biology, Center for Experimental Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Sigrid Harendza
- III. Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Hendrik van den Bussche
- Department of General Practice and Primary Care, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Susan Selch
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Cell Biology, Center for Experimental Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
- Department of General Practice and Primary Care, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Stress responses in high-fidelity simulation among anesthesiology students. Sci Rep 2021; 11:17073. [PMID: 34426598 PMCID: PMC8382759 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-96279-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2021] [Accepted: 08/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
Simulation sessions can produce high-fidelity emergency situations that facilitate the learning process. These sessions may also generate a complex stress response in the learners. This prospective observational study assessed psychological, physiological, immunological, and humoral levels of stress during high-fidelity simulation training. Fifty-six undergraduate medicine students who took part in a medical simulation session were assigned team roles (physician, nurse or assistant). Subsequently, each participant was assessed before the scenario (T0), after the procedure (T1), and two hours later (T2). Psychological stress and anxiety were measured at T0 and T1, using the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) and Dundee Stress State Questionnaire (DSSQ). Cortisol, testosterone, secretory immunoglobulin class A (sIgA), alpha-amylase, and oxygen saturation level were measured at T0, T1, and T2, as was the physiological response indicated by heart rate (HR) and blood pressure (BP). It was found that the onset of task performance was related to increased anticipatory worry and higher oxygen saturation. The participants reported decreased worry, followed by increased emotional distress after the simulation training (T1). Participants trait anxiety predicted the intensity of worry, distress and task engagement. In contrast, no clear relationships were found between trait anxiety and biological stress markers. Testosterone levels were growing significantly in each phase of measurement, while physiological responses (BP, HR) increased at T1 and declined at T2. The levels of stress markers varied depending on the assigned roles; however, the trajectories of responses were similar among all team members. No evidence for prolonged cortisol response (T1, T2) was found based on psychological stress at the onset of simulation (T0). Regression analysis followed by receiver operating characteristics analyses showed uncertain evidence that initial state anxiety and worry predicted the levels of sIgA. Medical students are relatively resilient in terms of stress responses to medical simulation. The observed stress patterns and interrelationships between its psychological, physiological, hormonal, and immunological markers are discussed in accordance with theoretical concepts, previous research work, and further recommendations.
Collapse
|
3
|
Harendza S. When strategy must follow structure…. GMS JOURNAL FOR MEDICAL EDUCATION 2019; 36:Doc47. [PMID: 31544147 PMCID: PMC6737255 DOI: 10.3205/zma001255] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2019] [Revised: 07/03/2019] [Accepted: 07/05/2019] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Sigrid Harendza
- Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, III. Medizinische Klinik, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Prediger S, Fürstenberg S, Berberat PO, Kadmon M, Harendza S. Interprofessional assessment of medical students' competences with an instrument suitable for physicians and nurses. BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION 2019; 19:46. [PMID: 30728006 PMCID: PMC6364398 DOI: 10.1186/s12909-019-1473-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2018] [Accepted: 01/24/2019] [Indexed: 05/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Physicians need a set of specific competences to perform well in interprofessional teams in their first year of residency. These competences should be achieved with graduation from medical school. Assessments during undergraduate medical studies are mostly rated by supervisors only. The aim of our study was to compare the rating of core facets of competence of medical students late in their undergraduate training as well as the rating confidence between three different groups of assessors (supervisors, residents, and nurses) in an assessment simulating the first day of residency. METHODS Sixty-seven advanced medical students from three different medical schools (Hamburg, Oldenburg and Munich) participated in a 360-degree assessment simulating the first working day of a resident. Each participant was rated by three assessors - a supervisor, a resident and a nurse - in seven facets of competence relevant for the first year of residency: (1) responsibility, (2) teamwork and collegiality, (3) knowing and maintaining own personal bounds and possibilities, (4) structure, work planning and priorities, (5) coping with mistakes, (6) scientifically and empirically grounded method of working, and (7) verbal communication with colleagues and supervisors. Means of all assessed competences and confidences of judgement of the three rating groups were compared. Additionally, correlations between assessed competences and confidence of judgement within each group of raters were computed. RESULTS All rating groups showed consistent assessment decisions (Cronbach's α: supervisors = .90, residents = .80, nurses = .78). Nurses assessed the participants significantly higher in all competences compared to supervisors and residents (all p ≤ .05) with moderate and high effect sizes (d = .667-1.068). While supervisors' and residents' ratings were highest for "teamwork and collegiality", participants received the highest rating by nurses for "responsibility". Competences assessed by nurses were strongly positively correlated with their confidence of judgment while supervisors' assessments correlated only moderately with their confidence of judgment in two competences. CONCLUSIONS Different professional perspectives provide differentiated competence ratings for medical students in the role of a beginning resident. Rating confidence should be enhanced by empirically derived behavior checklists with anchors, which need to be included in rater training to decrease raters' subjectivity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Prediger
- Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, D-20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Sophie Fürstenberg
- Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, D-20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Pascal O. Berberat
- TUM Medical Education Center, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, München, Germany
| | - Martina Kadmon
- Faculty of Medicine, III. Medizinische Klinik, University of Augsburg, Deanery, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Sigrid Harendza
- Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, D-20246 Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Harendza S, Soll H, Prediger S, Kadmon M, Berberat PO, Oubaid V. Assessing core competences of medical students with a test for flight school applicants. BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION 2019; 19:9. [PMID: 30616684 PMCID: PMC6322305 DOI: 10.1186/s12909-018-1438-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2018] [Accepted: 12/26/2018] [Indexed: 05/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Important competences of physicians regarding patient safety include communication, leadership, stress resistance, adherence to procedures, awareness, and teamwork. Similarly, while selected, prospective flight school applicants are tested for the same set of skills. The aim of our study was to assess these core competences in advanced undergraduate medical students from different medical schools. METHODS In 2017, 67 medical students (year 5 and 6) from the universities of Hamburg, Oldenburg, and TU Munich, Germany, participated in the verified Group Assessment Performance (GAP)-Test at the German Aerospace Center (DLR) in Hamburg. All participants were rated by DLR assessment observers with a set of empirically derived behavioural checklists. This lists consisted of 6-point rating scales (1: very low occurrence to 6: very high occurrence) and included the competences leadership, teamwork, stress resistance, communication, awareness, and adherence to procedures. Medical students' scores were compared with the results of 117 admitted flight school applicants. RESULTS Medical students showed significantly higher scores than admitted flight school applicants for adherence to procedures (p < .001, d = .63) and communication (p < .01, d = .62). They reached significantly lower ratings for teamwork (p < .001, d = .77), stress resistance (p < 0.001, d = .70), and awareness (p < .001, d = 1.31). Students in semester 10 showed significantly (p < .02, d = .58) higher scores in domain awareness compared to the final year students. On average, flight school entrance level was not reached by either group for this domain. CONCLUSIONS Advanced medical students' low results for awareness are alarming as awareness is essential and integrative for clinical reasoning and patient safety. Further studies should elucidate and discuss whether awareness needs to be included in medical student selection or integrated into the curriculum in training units.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sigrid Harendza
- III. Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
- III. Medizinische Klinik, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, D-20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | | | - Sarah Prediger
- III. Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Martina Kadmon
- Medical Faculty, Deanery, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Pascal O. Berberat
- TUM Medical Education Center, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Fürstenberg S, Oubaid V, Berberat PO, Kadmon M, Harendza S. Medical knowledge and teamwork predict the quality of case summary statements as an indicator of clinical reasoning in undergraduate medical students. GMS JOURNAL FOR MEDICAL EDUCATION 2019; 36:Doc83. [PMID: 31844655 PMCID: PMC6905359 DOI: 10.3205/zma001291] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2018] [Revised: 09/08/2019] [Accepted: 09/26/2019] [Indexed: 05/21/2023]
Abstract
Background: Clinical reasoning refers to a thinking process including medical problem solving and medical decision making skills. Several studies have shown that the clinical reasoning process can be influenced by a number of factors, e.g. context or personality traits, and the results of this thinking process are expressed in case presentation. The aim of this study was to identify factors, which predict the quality of case summary statements as an indicator of clinical reasoning of undergraduate medical students in an assessment simulating the first day of residency. Methods: To investigate factors predicting aspects of clinical reasoning 67 advanced undergraduate medical students participated in the role of a beginning resident in our competence-based assessment, which included a consultation hour, a patient management phase, and a handover. Participants filled out a Post Encounter Form (PEF) to document their case summary statements and other aspects of clinical reasoning. After each phase, they filled out the Strain Perception Questionnaire (STRAIPER) to measure their situation dependent mental strain. To assess medical knowledge the participants completed a 100 questions multiple choice test. To measure stress resistance, adherence to procedures, and teamwork students took part in the Group Assessment of Performance (GAP) test for flight school applicants. These factors were included in a multiple linear regression analysis. Results: Medical knowledge and teamwork predicted the quality of case summary statements as an indicator of clinical reasoning of undergraduate medical students and explained approximately 20.3% of the variance. Neither age, gender, undergraduate curriculum, academic advancement nor high school grade point average of the medical students of our sample had an effect on their clinical reasoning skills. Conclusion: The quality of case summary statements as an indicator of clinical reasoning can be predicted in undergraduate medical students by their medical knowledge and teamwork. Students should be supported in developing abilities to work in a team and to acquire long term knowledge for good case summary statements as an important aspect of clinical reasoning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophie Fürstenberg
- University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, III. Department of Internal Medicine, Hamburg Germany
| | | | - Pascal O. Berberat
- Technical University of Munich, TUM Medical Education Center, School of Medicine, Munich, Germany
| | - Martina Kadmon
- University of Augsburg, Faculty of Medicine, Deanery, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Sigrid Harendza
- University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, III. Department of Internal Medicine, Hamburg Germany
- *To whom correspondence should be addressed: Sigrid Harendza, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, III. Department of Internal Medicine, Martinistr. 52, D-20246 Hamburg, Germany, Phone: +49 (0)40/7410-53908, Fax: +49 (0)40/7410-40218, E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|