1
|
Jebram L, Prediger S, Oubaid V, Harendza S. Matching of advanced undergraduate medical students' competence profiles with the required competence profiles of their specialty of choice for postgraduate training. BMC Med Educ 2023; 23:647. [PMID: 37679688 PMCID: PMC10485971 DOI: 10.1186/s12909-023-04632-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2023] [Accepted: 08/29/2023] [Indexed: 09/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Matching between undergraduate students and their chosen specialty has implications for their personal job satisfaction and performance as well as societies' needs regarding health care quality. Knowledge regarding student-specialty fit can help improve students' decisions and detect potential deficiencies in specific competences. In this study, we compare self-assessed competence profiles of medical students close to graduation with the competence profiles of their specialty of choice for postgraduate training. METHODS Self-assessed competence profiles were collected with the modified requirement-tracking (R-Track) questionnaire from 197 final-year medical students close to graduation in 2022. To determine student-specialty fit, difference scores between students' self-assessed competences and physicians' requirements for specific specialties were calculated across the R-Track's six competence areas "Motivation", "Personality traits", "Social interactive competences", "Mental abilities", "Psychomotor & multitasking abilities", and "Sensory abilities", which were assessed on a 5-point Likert scale (1: "very low" to 5: "very high"). Mean difference scores across competence areas were calculated and compared between specialties with multivariate analysis of variance. Student-specialty fit was also calculated independent of students' choices. RESULTS The competence area "Motivation" scored highest for both students and physicians across specialties. However, students' scores were lower than physicians' requirements for "Motivation" as well as "Personality traits" across all specialties. Difference scores for "Social interactive competences" were either close to zero or showed higher scores for students. A similar competence pattern for internal medicine, general medicine, paediatrics, and gynaecology was identified with higher than required student scores for "Mental abilities", "Psychomotor & multitasking abilities", and "Sensory abilities". All other specialties showed higher physicians' requirements for at least one of these competence areas. Independent of students' specialty choice, we found the highest difference score in favour of student scores for general medicine (0.31) and the lowest difference score for internal medicine (-0.02). CONCLUSIONS Students' competence profiles overall show better fit with person-oriented specialties. "Mental abilities", "Psychomotor & multitasking abilities", and "Sensory abilities" show higher requirement scores for more technique-oriented specialties. Students interested in such specialties could focus more on basic skill development in undergraduate training or will develop specific skills during residency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lea Jebram
- III. Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Sarah Prediger
- III. Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | | | - Sigrid Harendza
- III. Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Harendza S, Bußenius L, Gärtner J, Heuser M, Ahles J, Prediger S. "Fit for the finals" - project report on a telemedical training with simulated patients, peers, and assessors for the licensing exam. GMS J Med Educ 2023; 40:Doc17. [PMID: 37361248 PMCID: PMC10285374 DOI: 10.3205/zma001599] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2022] [Revised: 01/11/2023] [Accepted: 02/06/2023] [Indexed: 06/28/2023]
Abstract
Background Undergraduate medical students take the licensing exam (M3) as a two-day oral-practical examination. The main requirements are to demonstrate history taking skills and coherent case presentations. The aim of this project was to establish a training in which students can test their communication skills during history taking and their clinical reasoning skills in focused case presentations. Methods In the newly developed training, final-year students took four telemedical histories in the role of physicians from simulated patients (SP). They received further findings for two SPs and presented these in a handover, in which they also received a handover of two SPs which they had not seen themselves. Each student presented one of the two received SPs in a case discussion with a senior physician. Feedback was given to the participants on their communication and interpersonal skills by the SPs with the ComCare questionnaire and on the case presentation by the senior physician. Sixty-two students from the universities of Hamburg and Freiburg in their final year participated in September 2022 and evaluated the training. Results Participants felt that the training was very appropriate for exam preparation. The SPs' feedback on communication and the senior physician's feedback on clinical reasoning skills received the highest ratings in importance to the students. Participants highly valued the practice opportunity for structured history taking and case presentation and would like to have more such opportunities in the curriculum. Conclusion Essential elements of the medical licensing exam can be represented, including feedback, in this telemedical training and it can be offered independent of location.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sigrid Harendza
- Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, III. Medizinische Klinik, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Lisa Bußenius
- Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, III. Medizinische Klinik, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Julia Gärtner
- Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, III. Medizinische Klinik, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Miriam Heuser
- Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Medizinische Fakultät, Studiendekanat, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Jonathan Ahles
- Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Medizinische Fakultät, Studiendekanat, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Sarah Prediger
- Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, III. Medizinische Klinik, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Brätz J, Bußenius L, Brätz I, Grahn H, Prediger S, Harendza S. Assessment of final-year medical students' entrustable professional activities after education on an interprofessional training ward: A case-control study. Perspect Med Educ 2022; 11:266-272. [PMID: 35864296 PMCID: PMC9302559 DOI: 10.1007/s40037-022-00720-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2022] [Revised: 06/12/2022] [Accepted: 06/27/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Interprofessional training wards (ITWs) are implemented to provide medical students with a holistic and authentic health care experience to improve their clinical competencies. Controlled outcome studies assessing students' competencies after ITW-training are uncommon. In this case-control study, we assessed final-year medical students who received ITW-training regarding entrustable professional activities (EPAs) and communicative as well as social competencies. METHODS In March 2021, 32 final-year students, 16 with (ITW group) and 16 without (control group) a previous four-week placement on an ITW participated in a training simulating the first day of residency. The simulated patients assessed students' communication and interpersonal skills for history taking with the ComCare index after every consultation. Twelve prospective EPAs were assessed by three senior physicians after watching videos of the students' case presentations. RESULTS While baseline characteristics and ComCare index ratings were not significantly different between the two groups, the overall mean entrustment level for the 12 EPAs was significantly higher (p < 0.001) in the ITW group compared to the control group (median = 3.15 versus 2.22). The interrater reliability for all EPAs was high and entrustment in students from the ITW group was significantly higher in 10 out of 12 EPAs. DISCUSSION ITW training seems to prepare medical students well to practice competencies which are relevant for prospective entrustment decisions and can be deduced by senior physicians from case presentations. Further studies with larger student cohorts are needed to corroborate this finding and observable EPAs could also be defined to assess students' competencies after ITW training.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julian Brätz
- Heart Center, Cardiology Division, Albertinen Hospital, Hamburg, Germany.
| | - Lisa Bußenius
- III. Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Irina Brätz
- Heart Center, Cardiology Division, Albertinen Hospital, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Hanno Grahn
- Department for Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Sarah Prediger
- III. Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Sigrid Harendza
- III. Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Gärtner J, Bußenius L, Schick K, Prediger S, Kadmon M, Berberat PO, Harendza S. Validation of the ComCare index for rater-based assessment of medical communication and interpersonal skills. Patient Educ Couns 2022; 105:1004-1008. [PMID: 34389227 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2021.07.051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2021] [Revised: 07/12/2021] [Accepted: 07/29/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To develop and validate a short instrument to assess undergraduate medical students' communication and interpersonal skills in videographed history taking situations with simulated patients. METHODS Sixty-seven undergraduate medical students participating in an assessment including videographed physician-patient encounters for history taking with five simulated patients were included in this study. The last video of each participant's consultation hour was rated by two independent assessors with the eight-item ComCare index for assessment of communication and interpersonal skills newly designed for the external rater perspective (ComCareR). We compared the sum scores of the ComCareR with ratings of the same videos with the Kalamazoo Communication Skills Assessment Form from an observational perspective (KCSAFd-video) and the Global Rating scale (GR), which also measure communication and interpersonal skills. RESULTS The ComCareR showed an excellent interrater reliability (ICC = .85). We found a small but significant correlation with the KCSAFd-video Interpersonal Competence (ρ = .34, 95% CI [.10,.54]) and a high positive correlation with the GR (ρ = .59, 95% CI [.40,.73]). CONCLUSIONS The ComCareR is a valid and brief index for holistic assessment of communication and interpersonal skills in physician-patient encounters. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS The ComCareR can be used for quick rater-based assessment of physicians' communication and interpersonal skills.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Gärtner
- III. Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Lisa Bußenius
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Cell Biology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Kristina Schick
- TUM Medical Education Center, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Sarah Prediger
- III. Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Martina Kadmon
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Pascal O Berberat
- TUM Medical Education Center, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Sigrid Harendza
- III. Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Gärtner J, Prediger S, Berberat PO, Kadmon M, Harendza S. Frequency of medical students' language expressing implicit uncertainty in simulated handovers. Int J Med Educ 2022; 13:28-34. [PMID: 35220275 PMCID: PMC9017509 DOI: 10.5116/ijme.61e6.cde0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2021] [Accepted: 01/18/2022] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to investigate the number and type of implicit expressions of uncertainty by medical students during simulated patient handovers. METHODS Eighty-seven volunteer medical students, a convenience sample collected on a first-come, first-served basis, participated in simulated handovers. They each worked with three simulated patients who presented with different chief complaints and personal conditions. The handovers were video recorded and transcribed. A framework of implicit expressions of uncertainty was used to identify and count modifiers that attenuate or strengthen medical information using MAXQDA lexical search. We analysed the findings with respect to the patients' contexts. RESULTS Implicit uncertainty expressions which attenuate or strengthen information occurred in almost equal frequency, 1879 (55%) versus 1505 (45%). Attenuators were found most frequently in the category 'Questionable', 1041 (55.4%), strengtheners in the category 'Focused', 1031 (68.5%). Most attenuators and strengtheners were found in the handover of two patients with challenging personal conditions ('angry man', 434 (23.1%) versus 323 (21.5%); 'unfocused woman', 354 (19.4%) versus 322 (21.4%)) and one patient with abnormal laboratory findings ('elevated creatinine', 379 (20.2%) versus 285 (18.9%)). CONCLUSIONS Medical students use a variety of implicit expressions of uncertainty in simulated handovers. These findings provide an opportunity for medical educators to design communication courses that raise students' awareness for content-dependent implicit expressions of uncertainty and provide strategies to communicate uncertainty explicitly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Gärtner
- III. Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany
| | - Sarah Prediger
- III. Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany
| | - Pascal O. Berberat
- TUM Medical Education Centre, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Germany
| | - Martina Kadmon
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Augsburg, Deanery, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Sigrid Harendza
- III. Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Prediger S, Harendza S. Perspective matters: assessment of medical students' communication and interpersonal skills by simulated patients from the internal and external patient perspective. GMS J Med Educ 2021; 38:Doc82. [PMID: 34056071 PMCID: PMC8136342 DOI: 10.3205/zma001478] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2020] [Revised: 12/16/2020] [Accepted: 02/16/2021] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
Background: Communication and interpersonals skills are important qualities of professionalism in medicine. In medical curricula, they are usually acquired in communication trainings and assessed in OSCEs. Studies show correlations as well as differences between communication ratings of examiners and simulated patients. In our study, simulated patients assessed medical students' communication and interpersonal skills after a consultation hour from the internal and the external patient perspective. Methods: In December 2019, 52 final-year medical students participated in a consultation hour as part of a simulated first day of residency assessment. They were assessed twice with a questionnaire for communication and interpersonal skills (ComCare) by the simulated patients: directly after each consultation from the internal perspective of the patient's view (internal perspective) and four month later from the 208 consultation videos from an external perspective of the patient's view (external perspective). All eight ComCare items were assessed on a five-point Likert scale (1=full disagreement to 5=full agreement). Differences between the item means of internal and external perspective were examined by paired t-tests. Results: Overall, significantly higher ratings were found for all ComCare items from the external perspective except for the item "Interest". Ratings for the items "Language" and "Listening" were significantly higher from the external perspective for all simulated patients. Significantly higher ratings for all items from the external perspective were observed for two simulated patients. Conclusion: Simulated patients' ratings after a conversation seem to represent a more authentic view on students' communication and interpersonal skills because of the emotionally experienced situation. The evaluation of those skills from a simulated patient perspective could be a valuable complement to communication ratings by examiners.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Prediger
- Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, III. Medizinische Klinik, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Sigrid Harendza
- Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, III. Medizinische Klinik, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Gärtner J, Prediger S, Harendza S. Development and pilot test of ComCare - a questionnaire for quick assessment of communicative and social competences in medical students after interviews with simulated patients. GMS J Med Educ 2021; 38:Doc68. [PMID: 33824904 PMCID: PMC7994874 DOI: 10.3205/zma001464] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2020] [Revised: 10/17/2020] [Accepted: 11/20/2020] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
Background: Physicians' communicative and social competences are highly relevant for doctor-patient relationships. Simulation-based learning is frequently used to provide students with learning experiences resembling realistic medical situations. This study aims to assess communication and interpersonal skills in medical students after simulated consultations with a newly designed short questionnaire. Methods: In 2019, 103 final year students participated in a simulated consultation hour seeing four simulated patients. Communicative and social competences were assessed by a questionnaire including items for communication (Com) and interpersonal (Care) skills. The questionnaire was used by the simulated patients (ComCareP) after each consultation and as self-assessment by the students (ComCareD) after the fourth consultation. An explorative factor analysis was performed and the results of ComCareP and ComCareD were compared with respect to students' sex and advancement in their final year. Results: All ComCareP items loaded on one factor, which explained 50.7% of the variance. The participants self-assessed their communication and interpersonal skills significantly better than the simulated patients. No significant differences were found for students' sexes or advancement in their final year except for the item "responding to patients' needs satisfactorily" which was significantly lower in students at the end of their final year. Patients' general "satisfaction with the consultation" was higher while physicians' general "satisfaction with the consultation" was lower than their total ComCare mean score. The general satisfaction with the consultation showed a significant positive correlation with both ComCares' total mean scores. Conclusion: The ComCare measures communication and interpersonal skills as one factor. It can be used directly after consultations and shows significant positive correlation with the general satisfaction with a consultation. Since simulated patients' satisfaction with the consultation was higher than their ComCare score, other factors than communication and interpersonal skills could play a role for patient satisfaction with a conversation and need to be further investigated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Gärtner
- University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Department of Internal Medicine, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Sarah Prediger
- University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Department of Internal Medicine, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Sigrid Harendza
- University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Department of Internal Medicine, Hamburg, Germany
- University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, III. Medical Clinic, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Harendza S, Gärtner J, Zelesniack E, Prediger S. Evaluation of a telemedicine-based training for final-year medical students including simulated patient consultations, documentation, and case presentation. GMS J Med Educ 2020; 37:Doc94. [PMID: 33364373 PMCID: PMC7740024 DOI: 10.3205/zma001387] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2020] [Revised: 07/25/2020] [Accepted: 10/15/2020] [Indexed: 05/13/2023]
Abstract
Background: Focused history taking, knowledge-based clinical reasoning, and adequate case presentation during hand-offs represent important facets of competence of practicing physicians. Based on a validated 360-degree assessment simulating a first day of residency we developed a training for final-year medical students including patient consultation, patient management, and patient hand-off. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic the training was changed to a telemedicine format and evaluated. Methods: In 2019, 103 final-year students participated in a newly designed competence-based training including a consultation hour with simulated patients, a patient management phase with an electronic patient chart, and a case presentation in hand-off format. Due to social distancing regulations, the training was not allowed to take place in this way. Therefore, we changed the training to a telemedicine format. In May 2020, 32 students participated in the telemedicine training. A 5-point Likert scale (1: does not apply to 5: fully applies) was used for the evaluation items. The two formats were compared with t-tests. Results: The students were similarly satisfied with the content of the training independently of its format. Both groups found the patient cases interesting (presence: 4.68 ± 0.49, telemedicine: 4.66 ± 0.48). With respect to the telemedicine format, participants were glad that an option had been found that could be offered throughout the final year (4.94 ± 0.24) despite the COVID-19 pandemic and they regarded it as a very useful training for their final examination (4.94 ± 0.24). Conclusion: The telemedicine format of the competence-based training worked as well as the presence format. In its telemedicine format, the training can be offered to students independently of their location.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sigrid Harendza
- Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, III. Medizinische Klinik, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Julia Gärtner
- Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, III. Medizinische Klinik, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Elena Zelesniack
- Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, III. Medizinische Klinik, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Sarah Prediger
- Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, III. Medizinische Klinik, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Fürstenberg S, Helm T, Prediger S, Kadmon M, Berberat PO, Harendza S. Assessing clinical reasoning in undergraduate medical students during history taking with an empirically derived scale for clinical reasoning indicators. BMC Med Educ 2020; 20:368. [PMID: 33076879 PMCID: PMC7574202 DOI: 10.1186/s12909-020-02260-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2019] [Accepted: 09/28/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The clinical reasoning process, which requires biomedical knowledge, knowledge about problem-solving strategies, and knowledge about reasons for diagnostic procedures, is a key element of physicians' daily practice but difficult to assess. The aim of this study was to empirically develop a Clinical Reasoning Indicators-History Taking-Scale (CRI-HT-S) and to assess the clinical reasoning ability of advanced medical students during a simulation involving history taking. METHODS The Clinical Reasoning Indictors-History Taking-Scale (CRI-HT-S) including a 5-point Likert scale for assessment was designed from clinical reasoning indicators identified in a qualitative study in 2017. To assess indicators of clinical reasoning ability, 65 advanced medical students (semester 10, n = 25 versus final year, n = 40) from three medical schools participated in a 360-degree competence assessment in the role of beginning residents during a simulated first workday in hospital. This assessment included a consultation hour with five simulated patients which was videotaped. Videos of 325 patient consultations were assessed using the CRI-HT-S. A factor analysis was conducted and the students' results were compared according to their advancement in undergraduate medical training. RESULTS The clinical reasoning indicators of the CRI-HT-S loaded on three factors relevant for clinical reasoning: 1) focusing questions, 2) creating context, and 3) securing information. Students reached significantly different scores (p < .001) for the three factors (factor 1: 4.07 ± .47, factor 2: 3.72 ± .43, factor 3: 2.79 ± .83). Students in semester 10 reached significantly lower scores for factor 3 than students in their final year (p < .05). CONCLUSIONS The newly developed CRI-HT-S worked well for quantitative assessment of clinical reasoning indicators during history taking. Its three-factored structure helped to explore different aspects of clinical reasoning. Whether the CRI-HT-S has the potential to be used as a scale in objective structured clinical examinations (OCSEs) or in workplace-based assessments of clinical reasoning has to be investigated in further studies with larger student cohorts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophie Fürstenberg
- Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, III Medizinische Klinik, Martinistr. 52, D-20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Tillmann Helm
- Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, III Medizinische Klinik, Martinistr. 52, D-20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Sarah Prediger
- Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, III Medizinische Klinik, Martinistr. 52, D-20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Martina Kadmon
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Augsburg, Deanery, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Pascal O. Berberat
- TUM Medical Education Center, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Sigrid Harendza
- Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, III Medizinische Klinik, Martinistr. 52, D-20246 Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Fritze-Büttner F, Toth B, Bühren A, Schlosser K, Schierholz S, Rumpel B, Helm PC, Bauer UMM, Niethard M, Prediger S, Götzky K, Jähne J. Surgery during pregnancy - results of a German questionnaire. Innov Surg Sci 2020; 5:21-26. [PMID: 33506090 PMCID: PMC7798309 DOI: 10.1515/iss-2020-0025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2020] [Accepted: 09/09/2020] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives Worldwide, not only the number of female medical students, but also of female surgeons increases. Simultaneously, younger generations take a closer look to their work-life balance. With this in mind, it seems necessary to evaluate the expectations of female surgeons in particular with respect to pregnancy during their surgical career. Methods Therefore, a nationwide survey was conducted in Germany from July to December 2016 under the auspices of the German Society of Surgery as well as the Professional Board of German Surgeons. The questionnaire involved 2,294 female surgeons and 1,843 complete records were evaluated. Results Of the analyzed answers, 62% of the women (n=781) were operating during pregnancy. The joy of surgery (91.6%), followed by team spirit (57.1%), were the main motivations to perform operations while pregnant. Operative activity decreased from 30.8% in the first 3 months of pregnancy to 21.5% during the last three months. Regarding the possible complaints, e.g., leg edema, back pain, premature labor and vaginal bleeding, there were no significant differences between the women with or without activity in the operating room. Sick leave due to pregnancy (1–10 days) was stated by 40.4% of respondents. Conclusion Despite strong legal regulations for pregnant surgeons, the survey showed that most female surgeons are eager to operate despite their pregnancy. The results also demonstrate no significant differences regarding complications during pregnancy- or pregnant-dependent absence from work. Hospitals and surgical departments are asked to establish proper working conditions for pregnant surgeons and pregnancy should not be an obstacle for a career in surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frauke Fritze-Büttner
- Klinik für Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie, Sana Klinikum Lichtenberg, Berlin, Germany
| | - Bettina Toth
- Universitätsklinik für Gynäkologische Endokrinologie und Reproduktionsmedizin, Medizinische Universität Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Astrid Bühren
- Praxis für Psychosomatik und Psychotherapie, Honorary President of the German Association of Female Physicians, Murnau, Germany
| | - Katja Schlosser
- Klinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral, Endokrine und Gefäßchirurgie, Agaplesion, Evangelisches Krankenhaus Mittelhessen, Giessen, Germany
| | - Stefanie Schierholz
- Klinik für Chirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Beatrix Rumpel
- Klinik für Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie, Sana Klinikum Lichtenberg, Berlin, Germany
| | - Paul C Helm
- Kompetenznetz Angeborene Herzfehler e. V., Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Maya Niethard
- Klinik für Tumororthopädie, Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch GmbH, Berlin, Germany
| | - Sarah Prediger
- III. Med. Klinik, Sektion Ausbildungsforschung, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Kristina Götzky
- Klinik für Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie, DIAKOVERE Henriettenstift, Hannover, Germany
| | - Joachim Jähne
- Klinik für Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie, DIAKOVERE Henriettenstift, Hannover, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Fincke F, Prediger S, Schick K, Fürstenberg S, Spychala N, Berberat PO, Harendza S, Kadmon M. Entrustable professional activities and facets of competence in a simulated workplace-based assessment for advanced medical students. Med Teach 2020; 42:1019-1026. [PMID: 32579039 DOI: 10.1080/0142159x.2020.1779204] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
Background: Competence-based assessment formats in medical education usually focus on individual facets of competence (FOCs). The concept of 'Entrustable Professional Activities' (EPAs) encompasses supervisors' decisions on which level of supervision a trainee requires to perform a professional activity including several FOCs. How the different FOCs as perceived by clinician raters contribute to entrustment decisions is yet unclear.Objective: How do FOC perceptions relate to entrustment-decisions?Methods: Sixty-seven advanced medical students participated in an assessment simulating the first day of a resident physician. Participants were rated by supervisors for seven FOCs and twelve EPAs.Results: There was a positive correlation between FOC and EPA scores. Each EPA displayed a different correlation pattern with FOC ratings.Discussion: For most EPAs high levels of entrustment were associated with high ratings for selected FOCs. The results are in alignment with the assumption that each EPA encompasses a different set of FOCs.Conclusions: In our simulated workplace-based assessment, entrustment decisions for EPAs reflect the FOCs observed in a trainee. Thus, assessment of FOCs alongside with EPA ratings could add to the understanding of factors contributing to entrustment decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabian Fincke
- Department of Medical Education and Educational Research, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany
| | - Sarah Prediger
- Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Kristina Schick
- TUM Medical Education Center, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Sophie Fürstenberg
- Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Nadine Spychala
- Department of Medical Education and Educational Research, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany
| | - Pascal O Berberat
- TUM Medical Education Center, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Sigrid Harendza
- Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Martina Kadmon
- Department of Medical Education Augsburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Gärtner J, Bußenius L, Prediger S, Vogel D, Harendza S. Need for cognitive closure, tolerance for ambiguity, and perfectionism in medical school applicants. BMC Med Educ 2020; 20:132. [PMID: 32345278 PMCID: PMC7189591 DOI: 10.1186/s12909-020-02043-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2019] [Accepted: 04/13/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Physicians have to deal with uncertainty on a daily basis, which requires high tolerance for ambiguity. When medical decisions have to be made in ambiguous situations, low levels of need for cognitive closure and high levels of adaptive perfectionism are beneficial. It might be useful to measure such personality traits during medical school selection processes. In our study, we explored the expression of need for cognitive closure, tolerance for ambiguity, and perfectionism in medical school applicants who participated in a multiple mini-interview selection process with respect to the final decision of admission or rejection. METHODS After participating in the multiple mini-interview procedure (HAM-Int) at Hamburg Medical School in August 2019, 189 medical school applicants filled out a questionnaire including the Multidimensional Perfectionism Scale by Hewitt and Flett (MPS-H), the Multidimensional Perfectionism Scale by Frost (MPS-F), the Tolerance for Ambiguity Scale (TAS), the 16-Need for Cognitive Closure Scale (16-NCCS), and sociodemographic data. After the final admission decision, the scores of need for cognitive closure, tolerance for ambiguity, and perfectionism of admitted and rejected applicants were compared. We also assessed the predictive power of need for cognitive closure and age for the admission decision in a binary logistic regression model. RESULTS Compared to the admitted applicants, the rejected applicants showed a significantly higher need for cognitive closure (p = .009). A high need for cognitive closure correlated significantly positively with maladaptive perfectionism (p < .001) and significantly negatively with tolerance for ambiguity (p < .001). Low need for cognitive closure and older age were associated with a positive admission decision. CONCLUSIONS Regarding the personality traits need for cognitive closure, tolerance for ambiguity, and perfectionism we identified interesting differences and correlations of relevance for physicians' daily work in medical school applicants who were admitted or rejected after participating in a multiple mini-interview selection procedure. Further studies are needed to investigate these characteristics and their development longitudinally in medical students and to correlate them with students' medical performance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Gärtner
- III. Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Lisa Bußenius
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Cell Biology, Center for Experimental Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Sarah Prediger
- III. Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Daniela Vogel
- III. Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Sigrid Harendza
- III. Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Prediger S, Schick K, Fincke F, Fürstenberg S, Oubaid V, Kadmon M, Berberat PO, Harendza S. Validation of a competence-based assessment of medical students' performance in the physician's role. BMC Med Educ 2020; 20:6. [PMID: 31910843 PMCID: PMC6947905 DOI: 10.1186/s12909-019-1919-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2019] [Accepted: 12/22/2019] [Indexed: 05/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Assessing competence of advanced undergraduate medical students based on performance in the clinical context is the ultimate, yet challenging goal for medical educators to provide constructive alignment between undergraduate medical training and professional work of physicians. Therefore, we designed and validated a performance-based 360-degree assessment for competences of advanced undergraduate medical students. METHODS This study was conducted in three steps: 1) Ten facets of competence considered to be most important for beginning residents were determined by a ranking study with 102 internists and 100 surgeons. 2) Based on these facets of competence we developed a 360-degree assessment simulating a first day of residency. Advanced undergraduate medical students (year 5 and 6) participated in the physician's role. Additionally knowledge was assessed by a multiple-choice test. The assessment was performed twice (t1 and t2) and included three phases: a consultation hour, a patient management phase, and a patient handover. Sixty-seven (t1) and eighty-nine (t2) undergraduate medical students participated. 3) The participants completed the Group Assessment of Performance (GAP)-test for flight school applicants to assess medical students' facets of competence in a non-medical context for validation purposes. We aimed to provide a validity argument for our newly designed assessment based on Messick's six aspects of validation: (1) content validity, (2) substantive/cognitive validity, (3) structural validity, (4) generalizability, (5) external validity, and (6) consequential validity. RESULTS Our assessment proved to be well operationalised to enable undergraduate medical students to show their competences in performance on the higher levels of Bloom's taxonomy. Its generalisability was underscored by its authenticity in respect of workplace reality and its underlying facets of competence relevant for beginning residents. The moderate concordance with facets of competence of the validated GAP-test provides arguments of convergent validity for our assessment. Since five aspects of Messick's validation approach could be defended, our competence-based 360-degree assessment format shows good arguments for its validity. CONCLUSION According to these validation arguments, our assessment instrument seems to be a good option to assess competence in advanced undergraduate medical students in a summative or formative way. Developments towards assessment of postgraduate medical trainees should be explored.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Prediger
- III. Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Kristina Schick
- TUM Medical Education Center, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Fabian Fincke
- Department of Medical Education and Educational Research, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany
| | - Sophie Fürstenberg
- III. Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | | | - Martina Kadmon
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Augsburg, Deanery, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Pascal O. Berberat
- TUM Medical Education Center, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Sigrid Harendza
- III. Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Fritze-Büttner F, Schlosser K, Prediger S. Chirurgie und Familie – wie kann es gehen? Zentralbl Chir 2019; 144:329-332. [DOI: 10.1055/a-0758-1999] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- F. Fritze-Büttner
- Klinik für Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie, Sana Klinikum Lichtenberg
| | - K. Schlosser
- Klinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral, Endokrine und Gefäßchirurgie, Agaplesion Evangelisches Krankenhaus Mittelhessen
| | - S. Prediger
- III. Med. Klinik, Sektion Ausbildungsforschung, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Prediger S, Fürstenberg S, Berberat PO, Kadmon M, Harendza S. Interprofessional assessment of medical students' competences with an instrument suitable for physicians and nurses. BMC Med Educ 2019; 19:46. [PMID: 30728006 PMCID: PMC6364398 DOI: 10.1186/s12909-019-1473-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2018] [Accepted: 01/24/2019] [Indexed: 05/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Physicians need a set of specific competences to perform well in interprofessional teams in their first year of residency. These competences should be achieved with graduation from medical school. Assessments during undergraduate medical studies are mostly rated by supervisors only. The aim of our study was to compare the rating of core facets of competence of medical students late in their undergraduate training as well as the rating confidence between three different groups of assessors (supervisors, residents, and nurses) in an assessment simulating the first day of residency. METHODS Sixty-seven advanced medical students from three different medical schools (Hamburg, Oldenburg and Munich) participated in a 360-degree assessment simulating the first working day of a resident. Each participant was rated by three assessors - a supervisor, a resident and a nurse - in seven facets of competence relevant for the first year of residency: (1) responsibility, (2) teamwork and collegiality, (3) knowing and maintaining own personal bounds and possibilities, (4) structure, work planning and priorities, (5) coping with mistakes, (6) scientifically and empirically grounded method of working, and (7) verbal communication with colleagues and supervisors. Means of all assessed competences and confidences of judgement of the three rating groups were compared. Additionally, correlations between assessed competences and confidence of judgement within each group of raters were computed. RESULTS All rating groups showed consistent assessment decisions (Cronbach's α: supervisors = .90, residents = .80, nurses = .78). Nurses assessed the participants significantly higher in all competences compared to supervisors and residents (all p ≤ .05) with moderate and high effect sizes (d = .667-1.068). While supervisors' and residents' ratings were highest for "teamwork and collegiality", participants received the highest rating by nurses for "responsibility". Competences assessed by nurses were strongly positively correlated with their confidence of judgment while supervisors' assessments correlated only moderately with their confidence of judgment in two competences. CONCLUSIONS Different professional perspectives provide differentiated competence ratings for medical students in the role of a beginning resident. Rating confidence should be enhanced by empirically derived behavior checklists with anchors, which need to be included in rater training to decrease raters' subjectivity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Prediger
- Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, D-20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Sophie Fürstenberg
- Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, D-20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Pascal O. Berberat
- TUM Medical Education Center, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, München, Germany
| | - Martina Kadmon
- Faculty of Medicine, III. Medizinische Klinik, University of Augsburg, Deanery, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Sigrid Harendza
- Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, D-20246 Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Harendza S, Soll H, Prediger S, Kadmon M, Berberat PO, Oubaid V. Assessing core competences of medical students with a test for flight school applicants. BMC Med Educ 2019; 19:9. [PMID: 30616684 PMCID: PMC6322305 DOI: 10.1186/s12909-018-1438-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2018] [Accepted: 12/26/2018] [Indexed: 05/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Important competences of physicians regarding patient safety include communication, leadership, stress resistance, adherence to procedures, awareness, and teamwork. Similarly, while selected, prospective flight school applicants are tested for the same set of skills. The aim of our study was to assess these core competences in advanced undergraduate medical students from different medical schools. METHODS In 2017, 67 medical students (year 5 and 6) from the universities of Hamburg, Oldenburg, and TU Munich, Germany, participated in the verified Group Assessment Performance (GAP)-Test at the German Aerospace Center (DLR) in Hamburg. All participants were rated by DLR assessment observers with a set of empirically derived behavioural checklists. This lists consisted of 6-point rating scales (1: very low occurrence to 6: very high occurrence) and included the competences leadership, teamwork, stress resistance, communication, awareness, and adherence to procedures. Medical students' scores were compared with the results of 117 admitted flight school applicants. RESULTS Medical students showed significantly higher scores than admitted flight school applicants for adherence to procedures (p < .001, d = .63) and communication (p < .01, d = .62). They reached significantly lower ratings for teamwork (p < .001, d = .77), stress resistance (p < 0.001, d = .70), and awareness (p < .001, d = 1.31). Students in semester 10 showed significantly (p < .02, d = .58) higher scores in domain awareness compared to the final year students. On average, flight school entrance level was not reached by either group for this domain. CONCLUSIONS Advanced medical students' low results for awareness are alarming as awareness is essential and integrative for clinical reasoning and patient safety. Further studies should elucidate and discuss whether awareness needs to be included in medical student selection or integrated into the curriculum in training units.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sigrid Harendza
- III. Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
- III. Medizinische Klinik, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, D-20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | | | - Sarah Prediger
- III. Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Martina Kadmon
- Medical Faculty, Deanery, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Pascal O. Berberat
- TUM Medical Education Center, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Fürstenberg S, Prediger S, Kadmon M, Berberat PO, Harendza S. Perceived strain of undergraduate medical students during a simulated first day of residency. BMC Med Educ 2018; 18:322. [PMID: 30594177 PMCID: PMC6310964 DOI: 10.1186/s12909-018-1435-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2018] [Accepted: 12/17/2018] [Indexed: 05/24/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Residents face demanding situations on the job and have been found to perceive high levels of strain. Medical students also reported a high degree of strain and even depressive tendencies when entering their clinical rotations. The aim of this study was to explore the perceived strain of medical students from different undergraduate curricula and at different stages of academic advancement during different phases of an assessment simulating a resident's first day in hospital. METHODS Sixty-seven undergraduate medical students participated in the following three phases of the assessment in the role of a resident: a consultation hour with five simulated patients, a management phase with interprofessional contact, and a patient handover with a colleague. They completed the Strain Perception Questionnaire (STRAIPER) after each phase. Students from different undergraduate curricula (VI: vertically integrated, n = 35 versus non-VI: not vertically integrated, n = 26) and different academic advancement (semester 10, n = 26 versus final year, n = 41) were compared. RESULTS All students showed the highest strain level after the management phase compared to the consultation hour and the handover. Medical students from a non-VI curriculum felt significantly more strain in the dimension of agitation (p < .05) after the consultation hour compared to students from a VI curriculum and compared to the management phase and the handover. No significant difference in perceived strain was found between students from semester 10 compared to final year students. CONCLUSIONS During the consultation hour and the handover with a colleague medical students faced tasks which are familiar to them from undergraduate education. Their higher strain levels during the management phase might occur because they are confronted with unfamiliar tasks and decisions. Feeling responsible for the right actions in this phase of multitasking and professional interaction might have added to the strain students perceived during this phase. Patient management should be emphasized more in any type of undergraduate medical curriculum.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophie Fürstenberg
- Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Sarah Prediger
- Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Martina Kadmon
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Augsburg, Deanery, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Pascal O. Berberat
- TUM Medical Education Center, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Sigrid Harendza
- Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
- Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, III. Medizinische Klinik, Martinistr. 52, D-20246 Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Fürstenberg S, Schick K, Deppermann J, Prediger S, Berberat PO, Kadmon M, Harendza S. Competencies for first year residents - physicians' views from medical schools with different undergraduate curricula. BMC Med Educ 2017; 17:154. [PMID: 28882189 PMCID: PMC5590189 DOI: 10.1186/s12909-017-0998-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2017] [Accepted: 09/04/2017] [Indexed: 05/17/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Frameworks like the CanMEDS model depicting professional roles and specific professional activities provide guidelines for postgraduate education. When medical graduates start their residency, they should possess certain competencies related to communication, management and professionalism while other competencies will be refined during postgraduate training. Our study aimed to evaluate the relevance of different competencies for a first year resident required for entrustment decision from the perspective of physicians from medical faculties with different undergraduate medical curricula. METHODS Nine hundred fifty-two surgeons and internists from three medical schools with different undergraduate medical curricula were invited to rank 25 competencies according to their relevance for first year residents. The rankings were compared between universities, specialties, physicians' positions, and gender. RESULTS Two hundred two physicians participated, 76 from Hamburg University, 44 from Oldenburg University, and 82 from Technical University Munich. No significant differences were found regarding the top 10 competencies relevant for first year residents between the universities. 'Responsibility' was the competency with the highest rank overall. Internists ranked 'Structure, work planning and priorities' higher while surgeons ranked 'Verbal communication with colleagues and supervisors' higher. Consultants evaluated 'Active listening to patients' more important than department directors and residents. Female physicians ranked 'Verbal communication with colleagues and supervisors' and 'Structure, work planning and priorities' significantly higher while male physicians ranked 'Scientifically and empirically grounded method of working' significantly higher. CONCLUSIONS Physicians from universities with different undergraduate curricula principally agreed on the competencies relevant for first year residents. Some differences between physicians from different positions, specialties, and gender were found. These differences should be taken into account when planning competence-based postgraduate education training programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophie Fürstenberg
- Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Kristina Schick
- TUM Medical Education Center, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Jana Deppermann
- Department of Medical Education and Education Research, Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany
| | - Sarah Prediger
- Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Pascal O. Berberat
- TUM Medical Education Center, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Martina Kadmon
- Department of Medical Education and Education Research, Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany
| | - Sigrid Harendza
- Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
- Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, III. Medizinische Klinik, Martinistr, 52 D-20246 Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Prediger S, Harendza S. Analysis of educational research at a medical faculty in Germany and suggestions for strategic development - a case study. GMS J Med Educ 2016; 33:Doc71. [PMID: 27990467 PMCID: PMC5135420 DOI: 10.3205/zma001070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2015] [Revised: 07/07/2016] [Accepted: 07/29/2016] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
Background: Evidence-based medical education is playing an increasingly important role in the choice of didactic methods and the development of medical curricula and assessments. In Germany, a growing number of educational research projects has accompanied an ongoing change in the medical education process. The aim of this project was to assess medical education research activities at one medical faculty to develop procedural recommendations for the support and development of best evidence medical education. Methods: Using a newly developed online questionnaire, the 65 institutes and departments of the medical faculty of Hamburg University at Hamburg University Medical-Center (UKE) were asked to report their medical education research and service projects, medical education publications, medical education theses, financial support for educational projects, and supportive structures that they would consider helpful in the future. The data were grouped, and a SWOT analysis was performed. Results: In total, 60 scientists who were involved in 112 medical education research publications between 1998 and 2014 were identified at the UKE. Twenty-five of them had published at least one manuscript as first or last author. Thirty-three UKE institutions were involved in educational service or research projects at the time of the study, and 75.8% of them received internal or external funding. Regular educational research meetings and the acquisition of co-operation partners were mentioned most frequently as beneficial supportive structures for the future. Conclusion: An analysis to define the status quo of medical education research at a medical faculty seems to be a helpful first step for the development of a strategy and structure to further support researchers in medical education.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Prediger
- University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, III. Medical Clinic, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Sigrid Harendza
- University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, III. Medical Clinic, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|