A scoping review of applications of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) to telehealth service implementation initiatives

"Four I" Framework for Telehealth Optimization in Congregate Care Communities

Background: Telehealth can provide innovative models of care for people living in congregate care communities (CCC), but lack of consistent workflow is a barrier for administrators and staff. We propose a framework for CCC to implement workflows for age-inclusive telehealth. Methods: As part of an infection control initiative with a focus on telehealth optimization, Virginia Infection Mitigation, Prevention and Control Through Technology developed relationships with administrators and staff of CCC across the Commonwealth of Virginia. Partners in this community of practice completed a statewide survey that we conducted on anticipated and experienced barriers to telehealth implementation. Through survey responses, virtual meetings with organizational leadership, and on-site facility visits, our team assessed the strengths, needs, and goals for telehealth capability. Working with administrative and clinical teams, we developed a consultation report to define short- and long-term implementation steps. Results: We collaborated with a nonprofit organization supporting a community of people with neurodevelopmental disabilities and a rural Program of All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly. We developed a framework for telehealth optimization with four tiers: Initiate, Integrate, Incentivize, and Inspire. Each stage included an overall goal with corresponding interventions to guide program implementation. Discussion: The "Four I" Framework can be used to outline telehealth readiness and implement workflows for CCC. We aim to further develop an iterative process and to collaborate with additional organizations to optimize telehealth programs.

Identifying and Optimizing Factors Influencing the Implementation of a Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources Accelerator: Qualitative Study Using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research-Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change Approach

BACKGROUND

Fragmented sharing of health information is known to negatively impact patient care and outcomes. To support the sharing of health information between systems, Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR) has emerged as the global interoperability standard for health information exchange. To speed up the process of adoption, various FHIR accelerator groups have been formed. FHIR accelerators such as the Sparked program in Australia enable communities and collaborative groups to develop high-quality FHIR standards for health care information exchange and encourage widespread uptake. However, limited research exists on the development, delivery, and implementation of FHIR accelerator programs.

OBJECTIVE

This study used qualitative methods to identify the key components of the Sparked FHIR accelerator, what factors influence implementation, and which strategies may help enhance its delivery.

METHODS

Semistructured interviews were conducted with Sparked stakeholders in the early stage of the program. The Sparked FHIR accelerator intervention components were described using a standardized reporting checklist (Template for Intervention Description and Replication). The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) 2.0 was used to analyze factors influencing implementation. On the basis of a cumulative majority analysis, the most mentioned factors influencing implementation were identified. These factors were then mapped to the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) tool to identify strategies for enhancing the implementation of the Sparked program.

RESULTS

A total of 17 participants were interviewed, including program leads, cochairs, representatives of software industry implementers, clinicians, and consumers. In total, 8 key CFIR influencing factors were identified: engaging, innovation design, assessing needs, local conditions, access to knowledge and information, partnerships and connections, capability, and work infrastructure. After mapping the top CFIR influencing factors to the ERIC tool, 5 strategy clusters were identified: adapt and tailor to context, develop stakeholder interrelations, support participants, train and educate stakeholders, and use evaluative and iterative strategies.

CONCLUSIONS

This study enabled the core components of the Sparked FHIR accelerator to be defined and identified the factors that have the strongest influence on program implementation. Using the CFIR-ERIC approach facilitated the generation of expert-informed recommendations for improving the implementation of Sparked, but researcher recommendations were needed to supplement the tool. This research offers valuable insights for decision makers and implementers.

Using constructs from the Diffusion of Innovation theory and Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research to evaluate and implement rehabilitation technology in neurologic rehabilitation: A commentary

There are no existing guidelines for healthcare teams to evaluate rehabilitation technology and maximize its use in neurologic rehabilitation. By incorporating rehabilitation technologies into neurorehabilitation, therapists can bridge the gap between research and feasible client-centered interventions. Technology use can facilitate evidence-based practice that reflects recent trends in neurorehabilitation. Integration of rehabilitation technology is heavily dependent on the consideration of the barriers to technological adoption at both the organizational level and clinical level. The purpose of this commentary is to describe a theory-driven, systematic process with consideration of facilitators and barriers to technological uptake in neurorehabilitation. This process considers the views of multiple stakeholders to evaluate technology in rehabilitation and make cost-effective decisions, maximize available interventions, prevent technological abandonment, and integrate evidenced-based interventions for neurorehabilitation best practice.

Perceived Risks, Mitigation Strategies, and Modifiability of Telehealth in Rural and Remote Emergency Departments: Qualitative Exploration Study

BACKGROUND

Telehealth is a recognized and rapidly evolving domain in the delivery of emergency medicine. Research suggests a positive impact of telehealth in patients presenting for emergency care; however, the regional challenges of acute telemedicine delivery have not been studied. The WA Country Health Service (WACHS) established the Emergency Telehealth Service (ETS) in 2012 to provide telehealth and other technology-enabled services to regional Western Australian hospitals and clinics. The WACHS ETS supports 87 rural and remote WACHS-operated hospitals as well as 10 non-WACHS health clinics via high-definition audio-visual equipment installed in the resuscitation bay of the emergency department (ED) at each site. This 12-year practical application of emergency telemedicine offers a unique opportunity to explore the experiences and perceptions of clinicians delivering virtual care to rural and remote communities.

OBJECTIVE

 This study explores the perceptions of ETS clinicians regarding acceptability, appropriateness, and clinical decision-making when delivering emergency telemedicine in rural and remote settings.

METHODS

This qualitative study used semistructured interviews to explore the perspectives of ETS clinicians regarding the factors influencing their clinical decision-making. It explored how ETS clinicians determine and modify clinical risks associated with using audio-visual equipment to deliver care. Emerging themes were compared with the concepts arising from the interim guidance of the Medical Board of Australia, and both the Australian and New Zealand, and American Colleges of Emergency Medicine.

RESULTS

Overall, 16 doctors, 4 clinical nurse coordinators, and a nurse educator from WACHS ETS provided their experiences and perspectives. Accurate clinical decisions, especially regarding patient disposition, were crucial to virtual care. Timeliness and accuracy were enhanced through a mutual learning model grounded in the local context. Mitigation strategies such as improvisation and flexible technology use compensated for technological barriers. Nonmodifiable risk factors included patients' presenting complaints, clinical urgency of presentation, ED capability, clinician scope of practice, and, if a transfer was required, the distance between the ED of original presentation and the hospital of definitive care.

CONCLUSIONS

Telehealth can enhance clinical decision-making in rural and remote EDs, and ETS clinicians can prioritize patient safety through a lens incorporating both local hospital capabilities and community contexts. Even for the most experienced clinicians, telehealth was not comparable to face-to-face communication in all circumstances. The impact of the ETS on the scope of the regional emergency medicine practice and on the building of clinical skills warrants further study in relation to its overall effectiveness and cost-effectiveness in rural and remote EDs. These findings identify areas for further qualitative research while providing a rich contextual background for rigorous quantitative analysis of the effectiveness of the ETS.

Assessing the costs and savings of telemedicine: Insights from the consolidated framework for implementation research

Cost reduction is an often-cited reason to use telemedicine. In assessing telemedicine's cost and value, providers often turn to published cost analyses in the scientific literature for guidance. In this commentary on existing telemedicine cost analysis literature, we discuss the generalizability of these analyses and identify the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research framework to help assess the applicability of a given cost analysis using inner- and outer-setting constructs. Outer-setting factors-location, practice type, and specialty-can substantially affect telemedicine cost and value, as can the implementation setting. While the body of evidence shows telemedicine may often reduce costs, there is still a need for robust cost analyses to guide implementation decisions as telemedicine becomes a mainstay of healthcare provision. Along with a call for more cost research, we ultimately argue that providers should consider a more holistic, value-based approach to determining when and how telemedicine implementation could benefit healthcare delivery.

Virtual Primary Care for People With Opioid Use Disorder: Scoping Review of Current Strategies, Benefits, and Challenges

BACKGROUND

There is a pressing need to understand the implications of the rapid adoption of virtual primary care for people with opioid use disorder. Potential impacts, including disruptions to opiate agonist therapies, and the prospect of improved service accessibility remain underexplored.

OBJECTIVE

This scoping review synthesized current literature on virtual primary care for people with opioid use disorder with a specific focus on benefits, challenges, and strategies.

METHODS

We followed the Joanna Briggs Institute methodological approach for scoping reviews and the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) checklist for reporting our findings. We conducted searches in MEDLINE, Web of Science, CINAHL Complete, and Embase using our developed search strategy with no date restrictions. We incorporated all study types that included the 3 concepts (ie, virtual care, primary care, and people with opioid use disorder). We excluded research on minors, asynchronous virtual modalities, and care not provided in a primary care setting. We used Covidence to screen and extract data, pulling information on study characteristics, health system features, patient outcomes, and challenges and benefits of virtual primary care. We conducted inductive content analysis and calculated descriptive statistics. We appraised the quality of the studies using the Quality Assessment With Diverse Studies tool and categorized the findings using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.

RESULTS

Our search identified 1474 studies. We removed 36.36% (536/1474) of these as duplicates, leaving 938 studies for title and abstract screening. After a double review process, we retained 3% (28/938) of the studies for extraction. Only 14% (4/28) of the studies were conducted before the COVID-19 pandemic, and most (15/28, 54%) used quantitative methodologies. We summarized objectives and results, finding that most studies (18/28, 64%) described virtual primary care delivered via phone rather than video and that many studies (16/28, 57%) reported changes in appointment modality. Through content analysis, we identified that policies and regulations could either facilitate (11/28, 39%) or impede (7/28, 25%) the provision of care virtually. In addition, clinicians' perceptions of patient stability (5/28, 18%) and the heightened risks associated with virtual care (10/28, 36%) can serve as a barrier to offering virtual services. For people with opioid use disorder, increased health care accessibility was a noteworthy benefit (13/28, 46%) to the adoption of virtual visits, whereas issues regarding access to technology and digital literacy stood out as the most prominent challenge (12/28, 43%).

CONCLUSIONS

The available studies highlight the potential for enhancing accessibility and continuous access to care for people with opioid use disorder using virtual modalities. Future research and policies must focus on bridging gaps to ensure that virtual primary care does not exacerbate or entrench health inequities.

Integrating the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) and Tensions into a Novel Conceptual Model for Telehealth Advancement in Healthcare Organizations

Telehealth services have potential to enhance access to quality healthcare, reduce costs, and increase satisfaction for both patients and providers. As a disruptive healthcare innovation, telehealth disorders old systems and creates a new hybrid model of care that delivers significant value to stakeholders. However, the failure rate of innovation implementation in healthcare ranges from 30% to 90%, depending on the complexity involved. While researchers have conducted extensive studies on the barriers and facilitators to widespread innovation implementation, the root causes of innovation implementation failure in health services (eg, telehealth implementation failure) are not fully understood. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) introduced in 2009 has become increasingly popular as a framework for informing successful innovation implementation in health services. The CFIR identifies barriers and facilitators to innovation implementation across five domains of implementation-the innovation, individual, inner, outer, and process domains. However, it lacks a mechanism to capture the complex social challenges (tensions) underlying the barriers and facilitators that affect implementation success or failure. The Tensions framework supplies a foundation beyond barriers and facilitators to provide a dynamic understanding of the role of social conflicts impacting the implementation process. This paper presents a novel conceptual model, Tensions in Innovation Implementation Processes (TIIPs), which integrates tensions and management strategies within the CFIR framework. A key contribution of TIIPS is its ability to visualize the social conflicts within and across implementation domains, offering a clearer understanding of the challenges and opportunities involved in innovation implementation. We apply TIIPs to telehealth implementation, drawing implications for practice, policy, and research to enable successful telehealth implementation in healthcare organizations. This approach advances existing frameworks, aligning with the systems thinking essential for today's healthcare leadership.

Operationalizing implementation science frameworks to plan a hybrid effectiveness-implementation study of a digital health intervention

Background

Evaluating implementation of digital health interventions (DHIs) in practice settings is complex, involving diverse users and multistep processes. Proactive planning can ensure desired implementation determinants and outcomes are captured for hybrid studies, but operational guidance for DHI studies is limited.

Methods

We planned a cluster randomized, type II hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial testing PositiveLinks, a smartphone application for HIV care, compared to usual care (n = 6 sites per arm), among HIV outpatient sites in the DC Cohort Longitudinal HIV Study in Washington, DC. Our process included: 1) Defining components of the DHI and associated implementation strategy, 2) Selecting implementation science frameworks to accomplish evaluation aims, 3) Mapping framework dimensions, domains, and constructs to implementation strategy steps, 4) Modifying/creating instruments to collect data for implementation outcome measures and determinants and 5) Developing a compatible implementation science data collection and management plan.

Results

Specification of components of the DHI and implementation strategy identified relevant platform usage data and necessary implementer actions, toward planning measurement of program reach and adoption. A priori mapping of implementation strategy steps to the Reach Effectiveness Adoption Implementation Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework identified how data would be collected for each step/corresponding outcome measure. The multi-site cohort study provided infrastructure for prospective, scaled implementation research, including site research assistants (RAs) coordinating implementation. Existing cohort tools (periodic site assessments, patient consent logs) were adapted for the evaluation to further capture representativeness and reach/adoption 'denominators.' New survey instruments allowed for framework-guided evaluation of provider adaptations/dose/fidelity to planned implementation across a large number of participants and multiple timepoints. Some aspects of real-world implementation were challenging to mirror within the planned hybrid trial (e.g. RAs selected as de facto site implementation leads) or were modified to preserve internal validity of effectiveness measurement (e.g. PositiveLinks 'community of practice').

Conclusions

Challenges and opportunities arose in planning the implementation evaluation for PositiveLinks within a hybrid trial in a cohort population. Prospective hybrid trial planning must balance generalizability of implementation processes to 'real world' conditions, with rigorous trial procedures to measure intervention effectiveness. Rapid, scalable tools require further study to enable evaluations within large, multi-site hybrid studies.

Barriers to Recruitment and Retention Among Underrepresented Populations in Cancer Clinical Trials: A Qualitative Study of the Perspectives of Clinical Trial Research Coordinating Staff at a Cancer Center

Background

Although US research agencies have instituted peer review processes to require participant diversity in clinical trials before funding decisions are made, the underrepresentation of certain populations (eg, racial and ethnic minorities) in clinical trials remains a persistent challenge in biomedical research. This issue has the potential to affect the generalizability of findings and impede efforts to ensure the provision of high-quality healthcare across all populations. In this study, we examined barriers to the recruitment and retention of underrepresented populations in cancer clinical trials from the perspective of research coordinating staff.

Methods

Semi-structured interviews were conducted at a US-based academic cancer center and included 6 patient-facing staff (clinical research coordinators) and 6 non-patient-facing staff (regulatory and financial specialists). Interview data were subjected to thematic analysis. To provide additional organizational context, descriptive data were obtained on the characteristics of clinical trials undertaken at the cancer center.

Results

The following themes emerged from the staff interviews: 1) absence of a consistent structure for decision-making and problem-solving related to recruitment and retention, 2) staff shortages, 3) administrative burden, and 4) lack of resources. In addition, descriptive data revealed that nearly half the trials, 64/134 (48%), offered informed consent only in English, and only 3/134 (2%) offered participant incentives or reimbursement (eg, for transportation). These interrelated organizational issues were indicative of inadequate systems for ensuring diverse and equitable representation in cancer clinical trials.

Conclusion

Results indicate that overcoming barriers to underrepresentation may require dedicated support from sponsoring agencies in the form of evidence-based guidelines, learning collaboratives to facilitate implementation, technical support, resources, and oversight. For progress to be made therefore, both sponsors and cancer centers may need to assume joint responsibility for the implementation of effective systems for ensuring diverse and equitable representation in cancer clinical trials.

Factors that influence the uptake of virtual care solutions in Australian primary care practice: a systematic scoping review

INTRODUCTION

Uptake of virtual care solutions in primary care settings has increased exponentially, and current evidence suggests high patient satisfaction but mixed clinician views.

AIMS

This paper aimed to identify factors influencing its' implementation to support delivery to the right patient, in the right clinical context, at the right time. Further, this paper evaluates how the updated Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) can be used to assess these factors that contribute to the uptake of virtual care innovations.

METHODS

This systematic scoping review identified empirical research on factors influencing the uptake of virtual care solutions in the Australian primary care setting. Searches were undertaken in Embase, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. The CFIR was used to code factors influencing the implementation of virtual care solutions. Inductive coding was used to generate new constructs where no appropriate CFIR construct could be identified.

RESULTS

Fourteen eligible studies were identified as eligible for inclusion. Five common influencing factors were identified. Three are from the existing CFIR framework, and two are newly developed constructs. CFIR constructs included innovation relative advantage, capability, and IT infrastructure. New constructs included accessibility and suitability. A further six new constructs were identified (trust, privacy, governance, unintended consequences, preference, and choice) but these were not prominently mentioned.

CONCLUSIONS

Common factors influence virtual care uptake in Australian primary care. The CFIR assisted in conceptualizing these but was not sufficient for capturing factors unique to virtual care. Newly developed constructs are noted to be of importance in the literature, but further research is needed to understand whether they are applicable in multiple contexts.

SPANISH ABSTRACT

http://links.lww.com/IJEBH/A286.

The regional development and implementation of home-based stroke rehabilitation using participatory action research

PURPOSE

This study aims to overcome the challenges experienced in the regional development and implementation of home-based stroke rehabilitation (HBSR) and to understand the change process needed.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Using participatory action research (PAR), participants and researchers collaboratively produced knowledge and took action to improve the offered HBSR. Different methods for data generation and analysis were used, depending on the aim of the PAR phase and the participants' stages of change. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) was used to select implementation strategies and to evaluate the implementation process.

RESULTS

Developing and implementing HBSR resulted in multiple products that promoted the implementation of a regional stroke network and affiliated work arrangements. Work arrangements were embodied in a stroke care pathway, follow-up tool, and expertise requirements. Evaluating the PAR process identified participants being able to take the lead, being facilitated by others, and making progress visible, as implementation facilitators. Collaborating within a primary care project can be challenging but is considered essential and has a positive impact on multiple levels. Also, the implementation of HBSR calls for multiple implementation strategies reflecting multiple CFIR constructs.

CONCLUSION

This study highlights the complexity and achievements of developing and implementing HBSR using PAR.

Factors influencing implementation of digital cardiac rehabilitation: A qualitative analysis of health workers perspectives

Background

Despite growing evidence for the effectiveness of digital cardiac rehabilitation (CR) uptake of this technology remains low. Understanding the factors that influence implementation of digital CR in clinical practice is a growing area of research. The aim of this nested qualitative study was to explore health worker perspectives on factors influencing implementation of a digital CR programme.

Methods

Using convenience sampling, semi-structured interviews were conducted with health workers, including health care professionals (nurses, dietitians, physiotherapists) and those in administrative and managerial roles who were involved in delivering and referring patients to Croí MySláinte, a 12-week digital CR intervention delivered during the Coronavirus 2019 pandemic. The updated Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) guided data collection and framework analysis.

Results

Interviews were conducted with 14 health workers. Factors influencing implementation of Croí MySláinte were multiple, with some operating independently and others in combination. They related to: (i) characteristics of individuals (e.g., senior leadership support, commitment and motivation of Health workers to meet patient needs, technical capability, workload and perceived fit with role); (ii) features of the programme (e.g., accessibility and convenience for patients, the digital platform, patient self- monitoring tools, the multidisciplinary team and core components); (iii) the external environment (e.g., partnership and connections between organisations, broadband and COVID-19); (iv) the internal environment (e.g., organisational culture, teamwork, resources including funding, digital infrastructure and staffing); and (v) the implementation process (e.g., engaging patients through provision of technical support).

Conclusion

The study findings suggest that factors influencing implementation of digital CR operate at multiple levels. Therefore, multi-level implementation strategies are required if the true potential of digital health in improving equitable cardiac rehabilitation access, participation and patient outcomes is to be realised.

Long-Term Adoption of Televisits in Nursing Homes During the COVID-19 Crisis and Following Up Into the Postpandemic Setting: Mixed Methods Study

BACKGROUND

There is growing evidence that telemedicine can improve the access to and quality of health care for nursing home residents. However, it is still unclear how to best manage and guide the implementation process to ensure long-term adoption, especially in the context of a decline in telemedicine use after the COVID-19 crisis.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to identify and address major challenges for the implementation of televisits among residents in a nursing home, their caring nurses, and their treating general practitioners (GPs). It also evaluated the impact of televisits on the nurses' workload and their nursing practice.

METHODS

A telemedical system with integrated medical devices was introduced in 2 nursing homes and their cooperating GP offices in rural Germany. The implementation process was closely monitored from the initial decision to introduce telemedicine in November 2019 to its long-term routine use until March 2023. Regular evaluation was based on a mixed methods approach combining rigorous qualitative approaches with quantitative measurements.

RESULTS

In the first phase during the COVID-19 pandemic, both nursing homes achieved short-term adoption. In the postpandemic phase, an action-oriented approach made it possible to identify barriers and take control actions for long-term adoption. The implementation of asynchronous visits, strong leadership, and sustained training of the nurses were critical elements in achieving long-term implementation in 1 nursing home. The implementation led to enhanced clinical skills, higher professional recognition, and less psychological distress among the nursing staff. Televisits resulted in a modest increase in time demands for the nursing staff compared to organizing in-person home visits with the GPs.

CONCLUSIONS

Focusing on health care workflow and change management aspects depending on the individual setting is of utmost importance to achieve successful long-term implementation of telemedicine.

Implementing digital sexual and reproductive health care services in youth clinics: a qualitative study on perceived barriers and facilitators among midwives in Stockholm, Sweden

BACKGROUND

Digital health care services have the potential to improve access to sexual and reproductive health care for youth but require substantial implementation efforts to translate into individual and public health gains. Health care providers are influential both regarding implementation and utilization of the services, and hence, their perceptions of digital health care services and the implementation process are essential to identify and address. The aim of this study was to explore midwives' perception of digital sexual and reproductive health care services for youth, and to identify perceived barriers and facilitators of the implementation of digital health care provision in youth clinics.

METHODS

We performed semi-structured interviews with midwives (n = 16) working at youth clinics providing both on-site and digital sexual and reproductive health care services to youth in Stockholm, Sweden. Interview data were analyzed using a content analysis approach guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR).

RESULTS

Midwives acknowledged that the implementation of digital health care improved the overall access and timeliness of the services at youth clinics. The ability to accommodate the needs of youth regarding their preferred meeting environment (digital or on-site) and easy access to follow-up consultations were identified as benefits of digital health care. Challenges to provide digital health care included communication barriers, privacy and confidentiality concerns, time constraints, inability to offer digital appointments for social counselling, and midwives' preference for in person consultations. Experiencing organizational support during the implementation was appreciated but varied between the respondents.

CONCLUSION

Digital sexual and reproductive health care services could increase access and are valuable complements to on-site services in youth clinics. Sufficient training for midwives and organizational support are crucial to ensure high quality health care. Privacy and safety concerns for the youth might aggravate implementation of digital health care. Future research could focus on equitable access and youth' perceptions of digital health care services for sexual and reproductive health.

Mapping Theories, Models, and Frameworks to Evaluate Digital Health Interventions: Scoping Review

BACKGROUND

Digital health interventions (DHIs) are a central focus of health care transformation efforts, yet their uptake in practice continues to fall short of their potential. In order to achieve their desired outcomes and impact, DHIs need to reach their target population and need to be used. Many factors can rapidly intersect between this dynamic of users and interventions. The application of theories, models, and frameworks (TMFs) can facilitate the systematic understanding and explanation of the complex interactions between users, practices, technology, and health system factors that underpin research questions. There remains a gap in our understanding of how TMFs have been applied to guide the evaluation of DHIs with real-world health system operations.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to map TMFs used in studies to guide the evaluation of DHIs. The objectives are to (1) describe the TMFs and the constructs they target, (2) identify how TMFs have been prospectively used (ie, their roles) in primary studies to evaluate DHIs, and (3) to reflect on the relevance and utility of our findings for knowledge users.

METHODS

This scoping review was conducted in partnership with knowledge users using an integrated knowledge translation approach. We included papers (eg, reports; empirical quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods studies; conference proceedings; and dissertations) if primary insights resulting from the application of TMFs were presented. Any type of DHI was eligible. Papers published from 2000 and onward were mainly identified from the following databases: MEDLINE (Ovid), CINAHL Complete (EBSCOhost), PsycINFO (Ovid), EBM Reviews (Ovid), and Embase (Ovid).

RESULTS

A total of 156 studies published between 2000 and 2022 were included. A total of 68 distinct TMFs were identified across 85 individual studies. In more than half (85/156, 55%) of the included studies, 1 of following 6 prevailing TMFs were reported: Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (n=39); the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance Framework (n=17); the Technology of Acceptance Model (n=16); the Unified Theory on Acceptance and Use of Technology (n=12); the Diffusion of Innovation Theory (n=10); and Normalization Process Theory (n=9). The most common intended roles of the 6 TMFs were to inform data collection (n=86), to inform data analysis (n=69), and to identify key constructs that may serve as barriers and facilitators (n=52).

CONCLUSIONS

As TMFs are most often reported to be applied to support data collection and analysis, researchers should consider more clearly synthesizing key insights as practical use cases to both increase the relevance and digestibility of their findings. There is also a need to adapt or develop guidelines for better reporting DHIs and the use of TMFs to guide evaluation. Hence, it would contribute to ensuring ongoing technology transformation efforts are evidence and theory informed rather than anecdotally driven.

Perceived barriers and facilitators of implementing a sustained smartphone-based telemonitoring program for pregnant women at high-risk for pre-eclampsia in the public and private sectors in Pakistan

Background

In Pakistan, a smartphone-based telemonitoring (TM) program (Raabta) has been designed to support pregnant women with high risk for preeclampsia (HRPE) in Pakistan. However, implementing TM interventions is often challenging, particularly in low-resource settings, given the complexity of healthcare environments and variations in public and private health sectors. This study explores the potential barriers and facilitators for a sustained implementation of the Raabta program in public and private sector hospitals in Pakistan.

Methods

Using a qualitative description design, 57 semi-structured interviews with a diverse group of participants including patients from the public (n = 15) and private sector hospitals (n = 17), obstetricians from the public (n = 5) and private sector hospitals (n = 7), decision-makers (n = 7) and telehealth experts (n = 6). Participants were recruited using purposive and snowball sampling techniques. Interview transcripts were deductively analyzed using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) domains.

Results

Based on the CFIR domains, the findings included: (1) Raabta being perceived as user-friendly even for patients with low digital and language literacy; (2) Outer settings: Limited health and digital literacy, poor language proficiency, and cultural norms can influence the willingness and ability of public sector patients to use the Raabta; (3) Inner settings: The private health sector is well-equipped for the Raabta implementation, while the public health sector faces challenges related to physical space, limited human and financial resources, and physician resistance; (4) Individual characteristics: Majority participants demonstrated positive attitudes toward the Raabta program and expressed confidence in using it (5) Process: Recommendations included adopting a nurse-led model for the private sector, leveraging paramedics for monitoring the Raabta dashboard, integrating Raabta with existing digital platforms, and establishing an advisory committee for program sustainability.

Conclusion

Raabta implementation may be more feasible in the private sector due to patient demographics, health and digital literacy, cultural norms, financial resources, physician readiness, and hospital infrastructure.

Free and Charitable Clinic Telehealth Adoption and Utilization During the COVID-19 Era: The North Carolina Experience

Purpose

The emergence of the COVID-19 pandemic led health care systems and providers worldwide to rapidly adopt telehealth solutions to minimize risk and comply with isolation mandates. This article explores telehealth utilization trends in North Carolina (NC) free and charitable clinics-an ambulatory health care delivery setting where traditional third-party reimbursement policies are not a primary consideration.

Methods

We surveyed NC free and charitable clinic administrators regarding clinic decisions to adopt an externally sponsored telehealth system, what services are provided by telehealth, clinic implementation processes, which populations used telehealth, how telehealth was incorporated into current clinic workflows, and perceptions of telehealth outcomes.

Findings

Telehealth was rapidly adopted among free and charitable clinics after the COVID-19 outbreak. Reasons for implementing telehealth included the ability to continue providing services during a public health emergency and to increase access to patients. However, clinics report that telehealth utilization has dropped significantly since the initial pandemic surge. Patient and provider preferences for in-person services are a common reason cited for this drop. Free and charitable clinics report a strong interest in continuing to deliver services through telehealth. The majority reported continuing to offer telehealth services, but primarily as a supplement to in-person visits rather than as a replacement. They perceive that implementing telehealth has increased access to care but are less certain about the impact on cost of care and patient satisfaction. However, clinic administrators believe improvements in interoperability with other data systems, workflows, scheduling, and care delivery approaches are needed to achieve telehealth's fullest utilization.

Conclusion

Telehealth can play a significant role in expanding access to services in the free and charitable clinic setting. However, continued refinements in the technology to facilitate integration with other systems and workflow processes are needed to reach its full potential.

Barriers and facilitators to implementing Advanced HIV Disease screening at secondary referral hospital -Malawi: Asequential exploratory mixed method-study

Background Malawi continues to register increased HIV/AIDs mortality despite increased expansion of ART services. One of the strategies for reducing AIDS related deaths outlined in the Malawi National HIV Strategic Plan (NSP) is scaling up screening for AHD in all antiretroviral therapy (ART) screening sites. This study investigated factors influencing the implementation of the advanced HIV disease (AHD) screening package at Rumphi District Hospital, Malawi. Methods We conducted a mixed method, sequential exploratory study from March, 2022 to July, 2022. The study was guided by a consolidated framework of implementation research (CFIR). Interviews were administered to key healthcare providers, purposively selected from various hospital departments. Transcripts were organized and coded using NVivo 12 software with thematically predefined CFIR constructs. Newly HIV-positive client records extracted from ART cards (July -Dec, 2021) were analyzed using STATA 14 which generated table of proportions, means and standard deviations. Results Out of 101 data records of the new ART clients reviewed, 60% {(n = 61) had no documented results for CD4 Cell count as a baseline screening test for AHD. Four major themes emerged as barriers: complexity of the intervention, poor work coordination, limited resources to support the expansion of point of care services for AHD, knowledge and information gap among providers. Technical support from MoH implementing partners and the availability of committed focal leaders coordinating HIV programs emerged as major facilitators of AHD screening package. Conclusion The study has identified major contextual barriers to AHD screening affecting work coordination and client linkage to care. Improving coverage of AHD screening services would therefore require overcoming the existing barriers such communication and information gaps.