1
|
García GA, Galick DS, Smith JM, Iyanga MM, Rivas MR, Mba Eyono JN, Phiri WP, Donfack OT, Smith DL, Guerra CA. The challenge of improving long-lasting insecticidal nets coverage on Bioko Island: using data to adapt distribution strategies. RESEARCH SQUARE 2024:rs.3.rs-4188387. [PMID: 38645156 PMCID: PMC11030524 DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-4188387/v1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/23/2024]
Abstract
Background Since 2015, malaria vector control on Bioko Island has relied heavily upon long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLIN) to complement other interventions. Despite significant resources utilised, however, achieving and maintaining high coverage has been elusive. Here, core LLIN indicators were used to assess and redefine distribution strategies. Methods LLIN indicators were estimated for Bioko Island between 2015 and 2022 using a 1×1 km grid of areas. The way these indicators interacted was used to critically assess coverage targets. Particular attention was paid to spatial heterogeneity and to differences between urban Malabo, the capital, and the rural periphery. Results LLIN coverage according to all indicators varied substantially across areas, decreased significantly soon after mass distribution campaigns (MDC) and, with few exceptions, remained consistently below the recommended target. Use was strongly correlated with population access, particularly in Malabo. After a change in strategy in Malabo from MDC to fixed distribution points, use-to-access showed significant improvement, indicating those who obtained their nets from these sources were more likely to keep them and use them. Moreover, their use rates were significantly higher than those of whom sourced their nets elsewhere. Conclusions Striking a better balance between LLIN distribution efficiency and coverage represents a major challenge as LLIN retention and use rates remain low despite high access resulting from MDC. The cost benefit of fixed distribution points in Malabo was deemed significant, providing a viable alternative for guaranteeing access to LLINs to those who use them.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guillermo A. García
- MCD Global Health, 8403 Colesville Road, Suite 425, 20910 Silver Spring, USA
| | - David S. Galick
- MCD Global Health, Av. Parques de Africa, Malabo, Equatorial Guinea
| | - Jordan M. Smith
- MCD Global Health, 8403 Colesville Road, Suite 425, 20910 Silver Spring, USA
| | | | - Matilde Riloha Rivas
- National Malaria Control Program, Ministry of Health and Social Welfare of Equatorial Guinea, Malabo, Equatorial Guinea
| | | | - Wonder P. Phiri
- MCD Global Health, Av. Parques de Africa, Malabo, Equatorial Guinea
| | | | - David L. Smith
- Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, 2301 Fifth Avenue, 98121 Seattle, USA
| | - Carlos A. Guerra
- MCD Global Health, 8403 Colesville Road, Suite 425, 20910 Silver Spring, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Aguma HB, Rukaari M, Nakamatte R, Achii P, Miti JT, Muhumuza S, Nabukenya M, Opigo J, Lukwago M. Mass distribution campaign of long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) during the COVID-19 pandemic in Uganda: lessons learned. Malar J 2023; 22:310. [PMID: 37845711 PMCID: PMC10577996 DOI: 10.1186/s12936-023-04753-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2022] [Accepted: 10/11/2023] [Indexed: 10/18/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Uganda implemented its third mass campaign to distribute long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) in 2020 during the COVID-19 pandemic. This context necessitated modification of implementation guidelines. The mass campaign's objective was to ensure that at least 85% of the targeted population had access to LLINs. METHODS Revised implementation guidelines were followed while conducting the LLIN distribution campaign. Lessons learned were captured from documented activities and reports. RESULTS A total of 27,789,044 mosquito nets were distributed in 11,287,392 households, with an average of 5.1 persons per household. Household coverage of the LLIN distribution was 94.1%. The 2020/2021 campaign design was modified to follow COVID-19 Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs). These included using Personal Protective Equipment (PPE), e-platforms for training and briefing meetings, electronic data management systems and door-to-door household registration and distribution of LLINs. CONCLUSIONS Campaign modifications due to the COVID-19 pandemic were effective in implementing mass distribution of LLINs despite the disruptions and restrictions. The campaign's net coverage far exceeded its objective. Electronic data management was critical in monitoring and reporting distribution activities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Herbert Bush Aguma
- National Malaria Control Division, Ministry of Health, Kampala, Uganda.
- Department of Pharmacy, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
| | - Medard Rukaari
- National Malaria Control Division, Ministry of Health, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Rukia Nakamatte
- National Malaria Control Division, Ministry of Health, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Pamela Achii
- National Malaria Control Division, Ministry of Health, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Joel Tutu Miti
- National Malaria Control Division, Ministry of Health, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Solomon Muhumuza
- National Malaria Control Division, Ministry of Health, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Mariam Nabukenya
- National Malaria Control Division, Ministry of Health, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Jimmy Opigo
- National Malaria Control Division, Ministry of Health, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Martin Lukwago
- Department of Planning, Finance & Policy, Ministry of Health, Kampala, Uganda
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Huang W, Rodrigues J, Bilgo E, Tormo JR, Challenger JD, De Cozar-Gallardo C, Pérez-Victoria I, Reyes F, Castañeda-Casado P, Gnambani EJ, Hien DFDS, Konkobo M, Urones B, Coppens I, Mendoza-Losana A, Ballell L, Diabate A, Churcher TS, Jacobs-Lorena M. Delftia tsuruhatensis TC1 symbiont suppresses malaria transmission by anopheline mosquitoes. Science 2023; 381:533-540. [PMID: 37535741 DOI: 10.1126/science.adf8141] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2022] [Accepted: 06/22/2023] [Indexed: 08/05/2023]
Abstract
Malaria control demands the development of a wide range of complementary strategies. We describe the properties of a naturally occurring, non-genetically modified symbiotic bacterium, Delftia tsuruhatensis TC1, which was isolated from mosquitoes incapable of sustaining the development of Plasmodium falciparum parasites. D. tsuruhatensis TC1 inhibits early stages of Plasmodium development and subsequent transmission by the Anopheles mosquito through secretion of a small-molecule inhibitor. We have identified this inhibitor to be the hydrophobic molecule harmane. We also found that, on mosquito contact, harmane penetrates the cuticle, inhibiting Plasmodium development. D. tsuruhatensis TC1 stably populates the mosquito gut, does not impose a fitness cost on the mosquito, and inhibits Plasmodium development for the mosquito's life. Contained field studies in Burkina Faso and modeling showed that D. tsuruhatensis TC1 has the potential to complement mosquito-targeted malaria transmission control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei Huang
- Department of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, Malaria Research Institute, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
| | | | - Etienne Bilgo
- Institut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé (IRSS), Bobo-Dioulasso BP: 545, Burkina Faso
| | | | - Joseph D Challenger
- MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, London W2 1PG, UK
| | | | | | | | - Pablo Castañeda-Casado
- Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics (DMPK) Discovery, In Vitro/In Vivo Translation (IVIVT), GSK, 28760 Tres Cantos, Madrid, Spain
| | | | | | - Maurice Konkobo
- Institut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé (IRSS), Bobo-Dioulasso BP: 545, Burkina Faso
| | - Beatriz Urones
- Global Health Medicines R&D, GSK, Tres Cantos, 28760 Madrid, Spain
| | - Isabelle Coppens
- Department of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, Malaria Research Institute, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
| | | | - Lluís Ballell
- Global Health Medicines R&D, GSK, Tres Cantos, 28760 Madrid, Spain
| | - Abdoulaye Diabate
- Institut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé (IRSS), Bobo-Dioulasso BP: 545, Burkina Faso
| | - Thomas S Churcher
- MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, London W2 1PG, UK
| | - Marcelo Jacobs-Lorena
- Department of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, Malaria Research Institute, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kuetche MTC, Tabue RN, Fokoua-Maxime CD, Evouna AM, Billong S, Kakesa O. Prevalence and risk factors determinants of the non-use of insecticide-treated nets in an endemic area for malaria: analysis of data from Cameroon. Malar J 2023; 22:205. [PMID: 37407962 DOI: 10.1186/s12936-023-04510-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2022] [Accepted: 02/21/2023] [Indexed: 07/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Malaria is the main cause of morbidity and mortality in Cameroon. Insecticide-treated nets (ITNs) significantly reduce malaria transmission, but their use is not common in the population. This study aimed to estimate the nationwide prevalence of the non-use of ITNs and identify its major determinants. METHODS A cross-sectional study was conducted on interview data collected in households selected across all the regions of Cameroon through a non-probabilistic, random, 2-stage stratified sampling process. Descriptive statistics were used to describe the distribution of baseline characteristics across the households, and statistical tests assessed if the distribution of these characteristics differed significantly based on the non-use of ITNs, with 0.05 serving as a threshold of the p-value for statistical significance. The prevalence of the non-use of ITNs was estimated, and logistic regression models were used to tally the odds ratios of the associations between various factors and the non-use of ITNs, along with their 95% confidence intervals. The sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) were determined, and the Hosmer Lemeshow test was used to measure the goodness of fit of each statistical model. RESULTS Of the 7593 households interviewed, 77% had at least one ITN and 59% of the population used ITNs. Only 72% of the population with at least one ITN used it. The logistic model of the multivariate analysis was significant at a 5% threshold. The AUC was 0.7087 and the error rate was 18.01%. The sensitivity and specificity of the model were 97.56% and 13.70%, respectively. The factors that were associated with ITN use were the presence of sufficient nets in the household (p < 0.0001), the region of residence (p < 0.0001), the level of education of the respondent (p < 0.0001), and the standard of living (p = 0.0286). Sex, age, colour preferences, as well as the shape and size of the nets were not associated with ITN use. CONCLUSIONS The use of ITNs in Cameroon was low and varied according to specific factors. These identified factors could be used as the foundations of effective sensitization campaigns on the importance of ITNs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - C D Fokoua-Maxime
- School of Public Health, New York State University at Albany, Albany, NY, USA
| | - Armel M Evouna
- Cameroon Field Epidemiology Training Program, Yaoundé, Cameroon
| | - Serge Billong
- National Committee Against HIV-AIDS, Yaoundé, Cameroon
| | - Olivier Kakesa
- President's Malaria Initiative (PMI)-Measure Malaria Project, Yaoundé, Cameroon
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kabeya TK, Kasongo JCM, Matumba NB, Tshibangu DI, Garcia-Morzon LA, Burgueño E. Impact of mass distribution of long-lasting insecticide nets on the incidence of malaria in Lomami, Democratic Republic of Congo: a study based on electronic health record data (2018 - 2019). Pan Afr Med J 2023; 45:89. [PMID: 37663637 PMCID: PMC10474805 DOI: 10.11604/pamj.2023.45.89.33099] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2022] [Accepted: 05/16/2023] [Indexed: 09/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction holoendemic, malaria remains one of the major public health problems in Lomami Province in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC). To fight against it, a free mass distribution of long-lasting insecticide nets (LLINs) was organized in July 2019 throughout the province. The present study aimed to assess the incidence of malaria and its impact on anaemia of children from 0 to 59 months in this region before and after this intervention. Methods we had conducted a retrospective observational study from June to December 2018 and June to December 2019. The data were collected on District Health Information System version two (DHIS2) and analyzed with T-tests to compare the incidence rates before (second semester 2018) and after the distribution of LLINs (second semester 2019). Results the evolution of malaria cases immediately dropped after the distribution campaign. The incidence rates per 1,000 inhabitants in 2018 and 2019 were 106 and 107 respectively in the general population; 302 versus 305 in children aged 0 to 59 months and 219 versus 209 in pregnant women. The differences in incidence were not statistically significant with p values 0.497, 0.4602, and 0.3097 respectively. However, it was observed that the decrease in malaria cases led to a decrease in anaemia cases in general. Conclusion the LLIN distribution campaign did not decrease the incidence of malaria. The synergy of preventive interventions to reduce the incidence of malaria remains key.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Theddy Kazadi Kabeya
- School of Public Health, University of Mwene Ditu, Lomami, Democratic Republic of Congo
- Health Regional Division, Kabinda, Lomami, Democratic Republic of Congo
| | - Jean Claude Musasa Kasongo
- School of Public Health, University of Mwene Ditu, Lomami, Democratic Republic of Congo
- Mwene-Ditu Health Zone, Lomami, Democratic Republic of Congo
| | | | | | | | - Eduardo Burgueño
- Centre Médical Vésale, Ngaliema, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo
- School of Medicine, Official University of Mbujimayi, Kasai-Oriental, Democratic Republic of Congo
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Bollinger LA, Bellows N, Linder R. Examining the characteristics of social and behavior change communication intervention costs in low- and middle-income countries: A hedonic method approach. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0287236. [PMID: 37319243 PMCID: PMC10270606 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287236] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2023] [Accepted: 06/01/2023] [Indexed: 06/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Understanding the costs of health interventions is critical for generating budgets, planning and managing programs, and conducting economic evaluations to use when allocating scarce resources. Here, we utilize techniques from the hedonic pricing literature to estimate the characteristics of the costs of social and behavior change communication (SBCC) interventions, which aim to improve health-seeking behaviors and important intermediate determinants to behavior change. SBCC encompasses a wide range of interventions including mass media (e.g., radio, television), mid media (e.g., community announcements, live dramas), digital media (e.g., short message service/phone reminders, social media), interpersonal communication (e.g., individual or group counseling), and provider-based SBCC interventions focused on improving provider attitudes and provider-client communication. While studies have reported on the costs of specific SBCC interventions in low- and middle-income countries, little has been done to examine SBCC costs across multiple studies and interventions. We use compiled data across multiple SBCC intervention types, health areas, and low- and middle-income countries to explore the characteristics of the costs of SBCC interventions. Despite the wide variation seen in the unit cost data, we can explain between 63 and 97 percent of total variance and identify a statistically significant set of characteristics (e.g., health area) for media and interpersonal communication interventions. Intervention intensity is an important determinant for both media and interpersonal communication, with costs increasing as intervention intensity increases; other important characteristics for media interventions include intervention subtype, target population group, and country income as measured by per capita Gross National Income. Important characteristics for interpersonal communication interventions include health area, intervention subtype, target population group and geographic scope.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Nicole Bellows
- Avenir Health, Glastonbury, Connecticut, United States of America
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Fernández Montoya L, Alafo C, Martí-Soler H, Máquina M, Malheia A, Sacoor C, Abílio AP, Marrenjo D, Cuamba N, Galatas B, Aide P, Saúte F, Paaijmans KP. An evaluation of LLIN ownership, access, and use during the Magude project in southern Mozambique. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0282209. [PMID: 36972236 PMCID: PMC10042371 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282209] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2022] [Accepted: 02/07/2023] [Indexed: 03/29/2023] Open
Abstract
The Magude Project assessed the feasibly of eliminating malaria in a low transmission setting in southern Mozambique using a package of interventions. This study measured the ownership, access and use of long-lasting insecticide treated nets (LLINs) and inequalities in these indicators across household wealth, size and population subgroups, to understand the protection that LLINs provided during the project. Data were obtained from various household surveys. At least 31% of the nets distributed during the 2014 and 2017 campaigns were lost during the first year post-distribution. Most nets (77.1%) present in the district were Olyset Nets. LLIN access never exceeded 76.3% and use varied seasonally between 40% and 76.4%. LLIN access limited LLIN use during the project, especially during the high transmission season. LLIN ownership, access and use were lower in harder-to-reach localities, in poorer and larger households. Children and women below 30 had poorer access to LLINs than the overall population. Net use was lowest among school-aged children and young adults, especially among young males, and highest in children under 5, pregnant women, in older adults and in households that received indoor residual spraying (IRS). This study revealed that LLIN mass-distribution campaigns alone are not sufficient to achieve the high level of net protection needed during elimination programs and that reviewing the LLIN allocation scheme, top-up distributions and/or community engagement campaigns is needed, also to reduce inequalities in populations' access to LLINs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucia Fernández Montoya
- Centro de Investigação em Saúde de Manhiça (CISM), Fundação Manhiça, Manhiça Maputo, Mozambique
- ISGlobal, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Celso Alafo
- Centro de Investigação em Saúde de Manhiça (CISM), Fundação Manhiça, Manhiça Maputo, Mozambique
| | | | - Mara Máquina
- Centro de Investigação em Saúde de Manhiça (CISM), Fundação Manhiça, Manhiça Maputo, Mozambique
| | - Arlindo Malheia
- Centro de Investigação em Saúde de Manhiça (CISM), Fundação Manhiça, Manhiça Maputo, Mozambique
| | - Charfudin Sacoor
- Centro de Investigação em Saúde de Manhiça (CISM), Fundação Manhiça, Manhiça Maputo, Mozambique
| | - Ana Paula Abílio
- Instituto Nacional da Saúde, Ministério da Saúde, Maputo, Mozambique
| | - Dulcisaria Marrenjo
- Programa Nacional de Controlo da Malária, Ministério da Saúde, Maputo, Mozambique
| | - Nelson Cuamba
- Programa Nacional de Controlo da Malária, Ministério da Saúde, Maputo, Mozambique
- PMI VectorLink Project, Abt Associates Inc., Maputo, Mozambique
| | - Beatriz Galatas
- Centro de Investigação em Saúde de Manhiça (CISM), Fundação Manhiça, Manhiça Maputo, Mozambique
- ISGlobal, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Pedro Aide
- Centro de Investigação em Saúde de Manhiça (CISM), Fundação Manhiça, Manhiça Maputo, Mozambique
- Instituto Nacional da Saúde, Ministério da Saúde, Maputo, Mozambique
| | - Francisco Saúte
- Centro de Investigação em Saúde de Manhiça (CISM), Fundação Manhiça, Manhiça Maputo, Mozambique
| | - Krijn P Paaijmans
- Centro de Investigação em Saúde de Manhiça (CISM), Fundação Manhiça, Manhiça Maputo, Mozambique
- ISGlobal, Barcelona, Spain
- Center for Evolution and Medicine, School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, United States of America
- The Biodesign Center for Immunotherapy, Vaccines and Virotherapy, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, United States of America
- Simon A. Levin Mathematical, Computational and Modeling Sciences Center, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Kwiringira A, Nanziri C, Nsubuga EJ, Migamba SM, Ntono V, Atuhaire I, Ahirirwe SR, Asio A, Senyange S, Nakamya P, Masanja V, Elayeete S, Komakech A, Nansikombi HT, Mwine P, Nampeera R, Ndyabakira A, Okello P, Migisha R, Bulage L, Kwesiga B, Kadobera D, Rutazaana D, Harris JR, Ario AR. Ownership and use of long-lasting insecticidal nets three months after a mass distribution campaign in Uganda, 2021. Malar J 2022; 21:367. [PMID: 36463150 PMCID: PMC9719168 DOI: 10.1186/s12936-022-04401-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2022] [Accepted: 11/25/2022] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Uganda conducted its third mass long-lasting insecticidal net (LLIN) distribution campaign in 2021. The target of the campaign was to ensure that 100% of households own at least one LLIN per two persons and to achieve 85% use of distributed LLINs. LLIN ownership, use and associated factors were assessed 3 months after the campaign. METHODS A cross-sectional household survey was conducted in 14 districts from 13 to 30 April, 2021. Households were selected using multistage sampling. Each was asked about LLIN ownership, use, duration since received to the time of interview, and the presence of LLINs was visually verified. Outcomes were having at least one LLIN per two household members, and individual LLIN use. Modified Poisson regression was used to assess associations between exposures and outcomes. RESULTS In total, 5529 households with 27,585 residents and 15,426 LLINs were included in the analysis. Overall, 95% of households owned ≥ 1 LLIN, 92% of the households owned ≥ 1 LLIN < 3 months old, 64% of households owned ≥ 1 LLIN per two persons in the household. Eighty-seven per cent could sleep under an LLIN if every LLIN in the household were used by two people, but only 69% slept under an LLIN the night before the survey. Factors associated with LLIN ownership included believing that LLINs are protective against malaria (aPR = 1.13; 95% CI 1.04-1.24). Reported use of mosquito repellents was negatively associated with ownership of LLINs (aPR = 0.96; 95% CI 0.95-0.98). The prevalence of LLIN use was 9% higher among persons who had LLINs 3-12 months old (aPR = 1.09; 95% CI 1.06-1.11) and 10% higher among those who had LLINs 13-24 months old (aPR = 1.10; 95% CI 1.06-1.14) than those who had LLINs < 3 months old. Of 3,859 LLINs identified in the households but not used for sleeping the previous night, 3250 (84%) were < 3 months old. Among these 3250, 41% were not used because owners were using old LLINs; 16% were not used because of lack of space for hanging them; 11% were not used because of fear of chemicals in the net; 5% were not used because of dislike of the smell of the nets; and, 27% were not used for other reasons. CONCLUSION The substantial difference between the population that had access to LLINs and the population that slept under LLINs indicates that the National Malaria Control Programme (NMCP) may need to focus on addressing the main drivers or barriers to LLIN use. NMCP and/or other stakeholders could consider designing and conducting targeted behaviour change communication during subsequent mass distribution of LLINs after the mass distribution campaign to counter misconceptions about new LLINs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew Kwiringira
- Uganda Public Health Fellowship Program, Kampala, Uganda ,Uganda National Institute of Public Health, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Carol Nanziri
- Uganda National Institute of Public Health, Kampala, Uganda
| | | | | | - Vivian Ntono
- Uganda National Institute of Public Health, Kampala, Uganda
| | | | | | - Alice Asio
- Uganda Public Health Fellowship Program, Kampala, Uganda
| | | | | | | | - Sarah Elayeete
- Uganda Public Health Fellowship Program, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Allan Komakech
- Uganda Public Health Fellowship Program, Kampala, Uganda
| | | | - Patience Mwine
- Uganda Public Health Fellowship Program, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Rose Nampeera
- Uganda Public Health Fellowship Program, Kampala, Uganda
| | | | - Paul Okello
- Uganda National Institute of Public Health, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Richard Migisha
- Uganda Public Health Fellowship Program, Kampala, Uganda ,Uganda National Institute of Public Health, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Lilian Bulage
- Uganda Public Health Fellowship Program, Kampala, Uganda ,Uganda National Institute of Public Health, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Benon Kwesiga
- Uganda Public Health Fellowship Program, Kampala, Uganda ,Uganda National Institute of Public Health, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Daniel Kadobera
- Uganda Public Health Fellowship Program, Kampala, Uganda ,Uganda National Institute of Public Health, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Damian Rutazaana
- grid.415705.2Uganda National Malaria Control Program, Ministry of Health, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Julie R. Harris
- grid.512457.0US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Alex R. Ario
- Uganda Public Health Fellowship Program, Kampala, Uganda ,Uganda National Institute of Public Health, Kampala, Uganda
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Okiring J, Gonahasa S, Nassali M, Namuganga JF, Bagala I, Maiteki-Sebuguzi C, Opigo J, Nabende I, Nangendo J, Kabami J, Ssewanyana I, Kiwuwa SM, Nankabirwa JI, Dorsey G, Briggs J, Kamya MR, Staedke SG. LLIN Evaluation in Uganda Project (LLINEUP2)-Factors associated with coverage and use of long‑lasting insecticidal nets following the 2020-21 national mass distribution campaign: a cross-sectional survey of 12 districts. Malar J 2022; 21:293. [PMID: 36261818 PMCID: PMC9580445 DOI: 10.1186/s12936-022-04302-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2022] [Accepted: 09/26/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In 2020-2021, long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) were distributed nationwide in Uganda during the COVID-19 pandemic. A cross-sectional survey was conducted in 12 districts to evaluate the impact of the campaign 1-5 months after LLIN distribution. METHODS During April-May 2021, households were randomly selected from target areas (1-7 villages) surrounding 12 government-run health facilities established as Malaria Reference Centres; at least 50 households were enrolled per cluster. Outcomes included household ownership of LLINs distributed through the universal coverage campaign (UCC) (at least one UCC LLIN), adequate coverage of UCC LLINs (at least one UCC LLIN per 2 residents), and use of LLINs (resident slept under a LLIN the previous night). Multivariate logistic regression models were used to identify household- and individual-level factors associated with outcomes, controlling for clustering around health facilities. RESULTS In total, 634 households, with 3342 residents and 1631 bed-nets, were included. Most households (93.4%) owned at least 1 UCC LLIN, but only 56.8% were adequately covered by UCC LLINs. In an adjusted analysis, the factor most strongly associated with adequate coverage by UCC LLINs was fewer household residents (1-4 vs 7-14; adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 12.96, 95% CI 4.76-35.26, p < 0.001; 5-6 vs 7-14 residents; aOR 2.99, 95% CI 1.21-7.42, p = 0.018). Of the 3166 residents of households that owned at least one UCC LLIN, only 1684 (53.2%) lived in adequately covered households; 89.9% of these used an LLIN the previous night, compared to 1034 (69.8%) of 1482 residents living in inadequately covered households. In an adjusted analysis, restricted to residents of inadequately covered households, LLIN use was higher in children under-five than those aged 5-15 years (aOR 3.04, 95% CI 2.08-4.46, p < 0.001), and higher in household heads than distantly-related residents (aOR 3.94, 95% CI 2.38-6.51, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Uganda's 2021-21 campaign was successful, despite the COVID-19 pandemic. In future campaigns, strategies should be adopted to ensure high LLIN coverage, particularly for larger households. A better understanding of the drivers of LLIN use within households is needed to guide future interventions, educational messages, and behaviour change communication strategies; school-aged children and distantly-related residents appear vulnerable and could be targeted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jaffer Okiring
- Clinical Epidemiology Unit, School of Medicine, Makerere University College of Health Sciences, Kampala, Uganda.
- Infectious Diseases Research Collaboration, PO Box 7475, Kampala, Uganda.
| | - Samuel Gonahasa
- Infectious Diseases Research Collaboration, PO Box 7475, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Martha Nassali
- Infectious Diseases Research Collaboration, PO Box 7475, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Jane F Namuganga
- Infectious Diseases Research Collaboration, PO Box 7475, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Irene Bagala
- Infectious Diseases Research Collaboration, PO Box 7475, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Catherine Maiteki-Sebuguzi
- Infectious Diseases Research Collaboration, PO Box 7475, Kampala, Uganda
- National Malaria Control Division, Ministry of Health, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Jimmy Opigo
- National Malaria Control Division, Ministry of Health, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Isaiah Nabende
- Infectious Diseases Research Collaboration, PO Box 7475, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Joanita Nangendo
- Clinical Epidemiology Unit, School of Medicine, Makerere University College of Health Sciences, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Jane Kabami
- Clinical Epidemiology Unit, School of Medicine, Makerere University College of Health Sciences, Kampala, Uganda
- Infectious Diseases Research Collaboration, PO Box 7475, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Isaac Ssewanyana
- Infectious Diseases Research Collaboration, PO Box 7475, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Steven M Kiwuwa
- Department of Child Health and Development Centre, School of Medicine, Makerere University College of Health Sciences, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Joaniter I Nankabirwa
- Clinical Epidemiology Unit, School of Medicine, Makerere University College of Health Sciences, Kampala, Uganda
- Infectious Diseases Research Collaboration, PO Box 7475, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Grant Dorsey
- Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, USA
| | - Jessica Briggs
- Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, USA
| | - Moses R Kamya
- Infectious Diseases Research Collaboration, PO Box 7475, Kampala, Uganda
- Department of Medicine, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Sarah G Staedke
- Infectious Diseases Research Collaboration, PO Box 7475, Kampala, Uganda
- Department of Clinical Research, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Millat-Martínez P, Gabong R, Balanza N, Luana S, Sanz S, Raulo S, Elizah A, Wali C, Paivu B, Dalmas J, Tabie S, Karl S, Laman M, Pomat W, Mitjà O, Baro B, Bassat Q. Coverage, determinants of use and repurposing of long-lasting insecticidal nets two years after a mass distribution in Lihir Islands, Papua New Guinea: a cross-sectional study. Malar J 2021; 20:336. [PMID: 34348727 PMCID: PMC8336363 DOI: 10.1186/s12936-021-03867-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2021] [Accepted: 07/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Universal coverage with long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) is an essential component of malaria control programmes. Three-yearly mass distribution of LLINs in Papua New Guinea (PNG) has been successful in reducing infection transmission since 2009, but malaria prevalence ramped up from 2015 onwards. Although LLIN universal coverage is mostly achieved during these campaigns, it may not be related with net use over time. Uses given to LLINs and non-compliance of this strategy were evaluated. METHODS A knowledge, attitude and practice (KAP) cross-sectional study was conducted in Lihir Islands, PNG, 2-2.5 years after the last LLIN mass distribution campaign. Data on bed net ownership, use and maintenance behaviour was collected using a household questionnaire administered by trained community volunteers. Logistic regression models were used to identify factors associated with owning at least one LLIN and sleeping under a LLIN the previous night. RESULTS Among 2694 households surveyed, 27.4 % (95 % CI: 25.8-29.2) owned at least one LLIN and 8.7 % (95 % CI: 7.6-9.8) had an adequate LLIN coverage (at least one LLIN for every two people). Out of 13,595 individuals in the surveyed households, 13.6 % (95 % CI: 13.0--4.2) reported having slept under a LLIN the preceding night. Determinants for sleeping under LLIN included living in a household with adequate LLIN coverage [adjusted OR (aOR) = 5.82 (95 % CI: 3.23-10.49)], household heads knowledge about LLINs [aOR = 16.44 (95 % CI: 8.29-32.58)], and female gender [aOR = 1.92 (95 % CI: 1.53-2.40)] (all p-values < 0.001). LLIN use decreased with older age [aOR = 0.29 (95 % CI: 0.21-0.40) for ≥ 15 year-olds, aOR = 0.38 (95 % CI: 0.27-0.55) for 5-14 year-olds] compared to < 5 year-olds (p-value < 0.001). Knowledge on the use of LLIN was good in 37.0 % of the household heads. Repurposed nets were reported serving as fishing nets (30.4 %), fruits and seedlings protection (26.6 %), covering up food (19.0 %) and bed linen (11.5 %). CONCLUSIONS Two years after mass distribution, LLIN coverage and use in Lihir Islands is extremely low. Three yearly distribution campaigns may not suffice to maintain an acceptable LLIN coverage unless knowledge on maintenance and use is promoted trough educational campaigns.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pere Millat-Martínez
- ISGlobal, Hospital Clínic-Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain. .,Lihir Malaria Elimination Programme (LMEP), Lihir Island, Papua New Guinea.
| | - Rebecca Gabong
- Lihir Malaria Elimination Programme (LMEP), Lihir Island, Papua New Guinea
| | - Núria Balanza
- ISGlobal, Hospital Clínic-Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Sakaia Luana
- Lihir Malaria Elimination Programme (LMEP), Lihir Island, Papua New Guinea
| | - Sergi Sanz
- ISGlobal, Hospital Clínic-Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.,Consorcio de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain.,Department of Basic Clinical Practice, Faculty of Medicine, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Silvia Raulo
- Lihir Malaria Elimination Programme (LMEP), Lihir Island, Papua New Guinea
| | - Arthur Elizah
- Lihir Malaria Elimination Programme (LMEP), Lihir Island, Papua New Guinea
| | - Chilaka Wali
- Lihir Malaria Elimination Programme (LMEP), Lihir Island, Papua New Guinea
| | - Benjamin Paivu
- Lihir Malaria Elimination Programme (LMEP), Lihir Island, Papua New Guinea
| | - Julian Dalmas
- Lihir Malaria Elimination Programme (LMEP), Lihir Island, Papua New Guinea
| | - Samson Tabie
- Lihir Malaria Elimination Programme (LMEP), Lihir Island, Papua New Guinea
| | - Stephan Karl
- Australian Institute of Tropical Health and Medicine, James Cook University, Smithfield, Australia.,Papua New Guinea Institute of Medical Research, Goroka/Madang, Papua New Guinea
| | - Moses Laman
- Papua New Guinea Institute of Medical Research, Goroka/Madang, Papua New Guinea
| | - William Pomat
- Papua New Guinea Institute of Medical Research, Goroka/Madang, Papua New Guinea
| | - Oriol Mitjà
- Fight AIDS and Infectious Diseases Foundation, Badalona, Spain.,Infectious Disease Department, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain.,Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.,Lihir Medical Centre, International SOS, Lihir Island, Papua New Guinea
| | - Bàrbara Baro
- ISGlobal, Hospital Clínic-Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Quique Bassat
- ISGlobal, Hospital Clínic-Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.,Consorcio de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain.,ICREA, Pg. Lluís Companys 23, 08010, Barcelona, Spain.,Pediatrics Department, Hospital Sant Joan de Déu, Universitat de Barcelona, Esplugues, Barcelona, Spain.,Centro de Investigação em Saúde de Manhiça (CISM), Maputo, Mozambique
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Conteh L, Shuford K, Agboraw E, Kont M, Kolaczinski J, Patouillard E. Costs and Cost-Effectiveness of Malaria Control Interventions: A Systematic Literature Review. VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2021; 24:1213-1222. [PMID: 34372987 PMCID: PMC8324482 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2021.01.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2020] [Revised: 12/18/2020] [Accepted: 01/04/2021] [Indexed: 05/05/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To systematically review the literature on the unit cost and cost-effectiveness of malaria control. METHODS Ten databases and gray literature sources were searched to identify evidence relevant to the period 2005 to 2018. Studies with primary financial or economic cost data from malaria endemic countries that took a provider, provider and household, or societal perspective were included. RESULTS We identified 103 costing studies. The majority of studies focused on individual rather than combined interventions, notably insecticide-treated bed nets and treatment, and commonly took a provider perspective. A third of all studies took place in 3 countries. The median provider economic cost of protecting 1 person per year ranged from $1.18 to $5.70 with vector control and from $0.53 to $5.97 with chemoprevention. The median provider economic cost per case diagnosed with rapid diagnostic tests was $6.06 and per case treated $9.31 or $89.93 depending on clinical severity. Other interventions did not share enough similarities to be summarized. Cost drivers were rarely reported. Cost-effectiveness of malaria control was reiterated, but care in methodological and reporting standards is required to enhance data transferability. CONCLUSIONS Important information that can support resource allocation was reviewed. Given the variability in methods and reporting, global efforts to follow existing standards are required for the evidence to be most useful outside their study context, supplemented by guidance on options for transferring existing data across settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lesong Conteh
- Department of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, England, UK; School of Public Health, Imperial College London, St Mary's Campus, Paddington, England, UK
| | - Kathryn Shuford
- Department of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, England, UK
| | - Efundem Agboraw
- Vector Biology, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, England, UK
| | - Mara Kont
- Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Imperial College London, England, UK
| | - Jan Kolaczinski
- Department of the Global Malaria Programme, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Edith Patouillard
- Department of Health Systems Governance and Financing, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Tilaye T, Tessema B, Alemu K. Malaria Infection is High at Transit and Destination Phases Among Seasonal Migrant Workers in Development Corridors of Northwest Ethiopia: A Repeated Cross-Sectional Study. Res Rep Trop Med 2021; 12:107-121. [PMID: 34079425 PMCID: PMC8165298 DOI: 10.2147/rrtm.s306001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2021] [Accepted: 04/24/2021] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Malaria is a leading public health problem in Ethiopia. Every year, thousands of seasonal farm workers travel to farm corridors in Northwest Ethiopia and fall at risk of malaria infection. However, the magnitude of malaria infection and risk factors during harvest time were not well identified. This study aimed at estimating the prevalence and risk factors of malaria infection among seasonal migrant workers in Northwest Ethiopia. Methods A repeated cross-sectional study was conducted at transit and destination phases in Metema district from September 15, 2018 to October 30, 2019. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire. A capillary blood sample was collected to examine infection with malaria parasite using a microscope. A multivariate logistic regression technique was used to determine risk factors. Results The malaria prevalence at transit and destination phases among migrant workers was 13.5% (95% CI: 12.07–14.93%) and 18.7% (95% CI: 16.40–21.02%), respectively. The combined prevalence was 16.1% (95% CI: 14.67–17.63%). The odds of malaria infection among migrant workers at the destination phase was 1.5 (OR=1.5, 95% CI 1.167–1.846) times higher compared to the transit phase. Education (AOR=8.198; 95% CI: 4.318–15.564), knowledge of antimalarial drugs (AOR=2.4; 95% CI: 1.43–3.95), and use of long-lasting insecticidal nets (AOR=5.0; 95% CI: 3.34–4.43) were significantly associated with malaria infection at migration phases. Conclusion This study showed that the burden of malaria among seasonal migrant workers was high at transit and destination phases. Malaria prevalence was higher at the destination phase compared to the transit phase. A tailored malaria prevention intervention is needed including awareness creation, screening, treatment, repellent, and prophylaxis at both phases to reduce malaria infections.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tesfaye Tilaye
- Institute of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia
| | - Belay Tessema
- Department of Medical Microbiology, School of Biomedical and Medical Laboratory, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia
| | - Kassahun Alemu
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Institute of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Worrall E, Were V, Matope A, Gama E, Olewe J, Mwambi D, Desai M, Kariuki S, Buff AM, Niessen LW. Coverage outcomes (effects), costs, cost-effectiveness, and equity of two combinations of long-lasting insecticidal net (LLIN) distribution channels in Kenya: a two-arm study under operational conditions. BMC Public Health 2020; 20:1870. [PMID: 33287766 PMCID: PMC7720381 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-020-09846-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2020] [Accepted: 11/05/2020] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Malaria-endemic countries distribute long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) through combined channels with ambitious, universal coverage (UC) targets. Kenya has used eight channels with variable results. To inform national decision-makers, this two-arm study compares coverage (effects), costs, cost-effectiveness, and equity of two combinations of LLIN distribution channels in Kenya. METHODS Two combinations of five delivery channels were compared as 'intervention' and 'control' arms. The intervention arm comprised four channels: community health volunteer (CHV), antenatal and child health clinics (ANCC), social marketing (SM) and commercial outlets (CO). The control arm consisted of the intervention arm channels except mass campaign (MC) replaced CHV. Primary analysis used random sample household survey data, service-provider costs, and voucher or LLIN distribution data to compare between-arm effects, costs, cost-effectiveness, and equity. Secondary analyses compared costs and equity by channel. RESULTS The multiple distribution channels used in both arms of the study achieved high LLIN ownership and use. The intervention arm had significantly lower reported LLIN use the night before the survey (84·8% [95% CI 83·0-86·4%] versus 89·2% [95% CI 87·8-90·5%], p < 0·0001), higher unit costs ($10·56 versus $7·17), was less cost-effective ($86·44, 95% range $75·77-$102·77 versus $69·20, 95% range $63·66-$77·23) and more inequitable (Concentration index [C.Ind] = 0·076 [95% CI 0·057 to 0·095 versus C.Ind = 0.049 [95% CI 0·030 to 0·067]) than the control arm. Unit cost per LLIN distributed was lowest for MC ($3·10) followed by CHV ($10·81) with both channels being moderately inequitable in favour of least-poor households. CONCLUSION In line with best practices, the multiple distribution channel model achieved high LLIN ownership and use in this Kenyan study setting. The control-arm combination, which included MC, was the most cost-effective way to increase UC at household level. Mass campaigns, combined with continuous distribution channels, are an effective and cost-effective way to achieve UC in Kenya. The findings are relevant to other countries and donors seeking to optimise LLIN distribution. TRIAL REGISTRATION The assignment of the intervention was not at the discretion of the investigators; therefore, this study did not require registration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eve Worrall
- Department of Vector Biology, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Pembroke Place, Liverpool, UK
| | - Vincent Were
- Centre for Applied Health Research and Delivery (CAHRD), Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK
- Kenya Medical Research Institute and Centre for Global Health Research, Kisumu, Kenya
| | - Agnes Matope
- Department of Vector Biology, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Pembroke Place, Liverpool, UK
| | - Elvis Gama
- Directorate of Quality Management and Digital Health, Ministry of Health and Population, Lilongwe, Malawi
| | - Joseph Olewe
- Kenya Medical Research Institute and Centre for Global Health Research, Kisumu, Kenya
| | - Dennis Mwambi
- Population Services Kenya (PS Kenya), Nairobi, Kenya
- Population Reference Bureau, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Meghna Desai
- Malaria Branch, Division of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Center for Global Health, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA USA
| | - Simon Kariuki
- Kenya Medical Research Institute and Centre for Global Health Research, Kisumu, Kenya
| | - Ann M. Buff
- Malaria Branch, Division of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Center for Global Health, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA USA
- U.S. President’s Malaria Initiative, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Louis W. Niessen
- Centre for Applied Health Research and Delivery (CAHRD), Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Sonibare OO, Bello IS, Olowookere SA, Shabi O, Makinde NO. Effect of malaria preventive education on the use of long-lasting insecticidal nets among pregnant females in a Teaching Hospital in Osun state, south-west Nigeria. Parasite Epidemiol Control 2020; 11:e00182. [PMID: 33005773 PMCID: PMC7519353 DOI: 10.1016/j.parepi.2020.e00182] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2019] [Revised: 09/01/2020] [Accepted: 09/13/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Malaria in pregnancy is a major public health problem in Nigeria. Long-Lasting Insecticidal Nets (LLINs) have been advocated as an effective tool against malaria transmission. However, success of this intervention largely depends on the knowledge and practices regarding malaria and its prevention. Unfortunately, few studies have been done on effect of malaria preventive education on use of LLIN in pregnancy. OBJECTIVE To assess the knowledge of malaria and determine the effect of malaria preventive education on the use of LLINs among pregnant females in a Teaching Hospital in Osun state. METHOD It was a one group pre-test post-test quasi - experimental hospital based study involving pregnant females attending Ante-Natal Clinic (ANC) of the Obafemi Awolowo University Teaching Hospitals Complex (OAUTHC). A total of 200 respondents were recruited for this study by 2-stage sampling technique. Data was collected using a pretested questionnaire to elicit information on socio-demographic characteristics, use of LLIN in pregnancy, knowledge of malaria and its preventive measures. The data collected was analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics. The descriptive statistics comprised frequency, percentage, means and standard deviations. Bivariate analysis comprised Chi-square test on knowledge of malaria before and after intervention while correlation test assessed strength of relationship between knowledge of malaria preventive education and use of LLINs before and after intervention. Multivariate analysis determined the predictors of LLINs use. Analytical statistics of cross tabulation was conducted considering a p < 0.05 to be statistically significant. RESULTS There was an increase in the scores of knowledge on malaria transmission after the intervention and this was statistically significant (χ2 = 8.862, p < 0.01). Similarly, the scores of knowledge on malaria prevention increased after the intervention and this was statistically significant (χ2 = 10.023, p < 0.01). Respondents' age, marital status and gravidity were predictors of LLINs use. Biserial correlation showed a statistically positive relationship between knowledge of malaria preventive education and use of LLINs after intervention (r = 0.036, p < 0.01). CONCLUSION The use of malaria preventive education was found to be effective in increasing the use of LLIN in this study. These findings highlight a need for educational intervention in implementation of LLINs. There is therefore a need to strengthen the policy of malaria prevention education as an integral component with distribution of free LLIN in health care setting to enhance its utilization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Omowonuola O Sonibare
- Department of Family Medicine, Obafemi Awolowo University Teaching Hospitals Complex, Ile-Ife, Nigeria
| | - Ibrahim S Bello
- Department of Family Medicine, Obafemi Awolowo University Teaching Hospitals Complex, Ile-Ife, Nigeria
| | - Samuel A Olowookere
- Department of Community Health, College of Health Sciences, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Nigeria
| | | | - Niyi O Makinde
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, College of Health Sciences, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Nigeria
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Bannor R, Asare AK, Sackey SO, Osei-Yeboah R, Nortey PA, Bawole JN, Ansah V. Sleeping space matters: LLINs usage in Ghana. Pathog Glob Health 2020; 114:271-278. [PMID: 32530747 PMCID: PMC7480583 DOI: 10.1080/20477724.2020.1776920] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Long Lasting Insecticidal Net (LLIN) is an effective malaria prevention mechanism. However, ownership of LLIN does not imply its use among households. The availability of enough sleeping space is a natural prerequisite to install and use LLINs. The objective of this study was to explore the effect of sleeping space and other socio-demographic factors of households' heads on LLINs usage among households. A cross-sectional household-based study was conducted using a quantitative approach. Data was collected exclusively from households that received LLINs at no direct financial cost to them in a mass malaria campaign conducted in the study area using a structured questionnaire. A total of 383 households sampled for the study received 1,181 LLINs with a range of 1 to 15 LLINs per household. Less than 16% of households that received more than 2 LLINs installed all the LLINs they received during the distribution. Among households that received LLINs, 45% of them did not use them at all and 36% of them used them every night including the night before data collection. The number of bedrooms, children and members per household, and the number of occupants per bedroom were also found statistically associated with the use of LLINs among households. The study used a quantitative approach to investigate sleeping space in relation to LLINs usage and malaria control, an area and topic that has not been adequately covered in the literature.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard Bannor
- Department of Allied Health Sciences, UConn Center for
mHealth and Social Media, Institute for Collaboration on Health, Intervention and Policy, University
of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA
| | | | - Samuel Oko Sackey
- Department of Epidemiology and Disease Control, School of
Public Health, University of Ghana, Legon, Accra, Ghana
| | - Richard Osei-Yeboah
- Computational Biology Division, Institute of Infectious Disease and Molecular Medicine, University of Cape
Town, South Africa
| | - Priscillia Awo Nortey
- Department of Epidemiology and Disease Control, School of
Public Health, University of Ghana, Legon, Accra, Ghana
| | - Justice Nyigmah Bawole
- Department of Public Administration and Health Services
Management, University of Ghana Business School, Legon, Accra, Ghana
| | - Victoria Ansah
- Allied Health and Social Sciences, Institute of Health and Society, University of Worcester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Mansiangi P, Umesumbu S, Etewa I, Zandibeni J, Bafwa N, Blaufuss S, Olapeju B, Ntoya F, Sadou A, Irish S, Mukomena E, Kalindula L, Watsenga F, Akogbeto M, Babalola S, Koenker H, Kilian A. Comparing the durability of the long-lasting insecticidal nets DawaPlus ® 2.0 and DuraNet© in northwest Democratic Republic of Congo. Malar J 2020; 19:189. [PMID: 32448213 PMCID: PMC7247235 DOI: 10.1186/s12936-020-03262-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2019] [Accepted: 05/15/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Anecdotal reports from DRC suggest that long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLIN) distributed through mass campaigns in DRC may not last the expected average three years. To provide the National Malaria Control Programme with evidence on physical and insecticidal durability of nets distributed during the 2016 mass campaign, two brands of LLIN, DawaPlus® 2.0 and DuraNet©, were monitored in neighbouring and similar health zones in Sud Ubangi and Mongala Provinces. Methods This was a prospective cohort study of representative samples of households from two health zones recruited at baseline, 2 months after the mass campaign. All campaign nets in these households were labelled, and followed up over a period of 31 months. Primary outcome was the “proportion of nets surviving in serviceable condition” based on attrition and integrity measures and the median survival in years. The outcome for insecticidal durability was determined by bio-assay from subsamples of campaign nets. Results A total of 754 campaign nets (109% of target) from 240 households were included in the study. Definite outcomes could be determined for 67% of the cohort nets in Sud Ubangi and 74% in Mongala. After 31 months all-cause attrition was 57% in Sud Ubangi and 76% in Mongala (p = 0.005) and attrition due to wear and tear was 26% in Sud Ubangi and 48% in Mongala (p = 0.0009). Survival in serviceable condition at the last survey was 37% in Sud Ubangi and 17% in Mongala (p = 0.003). Estimated median survival was 1.6 years for the DawaPlus® 2.0 in Mongala (95% CI 1.3–1.9) and 2.2 years for the DuraNet in Sud Ubangi (95% CI 2.0–2.4). Multivariable Cox proportionate hazard models suggest that the difference between sites was mainly attributable to the LLIN brand. Insecticidal effectiveness was optimal for DuraNet©, but significantly dropped after 24 months for DawaPlus® 2.0. Conclusions In the environment of northwest DRC the polyethylene LLIN DuraNet© performed significantly better than the polyester LLIN DawaPlus® 2.0, but both were below a three-year median survival. Improvement of net care behaviours should be able to improve physical durability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul Mansiangi
- Ecole de Santé Publique, Université de Kinshasa, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo
| | - Solange Umesumbu
- National Malaria Control Programme, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo
| | - Irène Etewa
- Ecole de Santé Publique, Université de Kinshasa, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo
| | - Jacques Zandibeni
- Ecole de Santé Publique, Université de Kinshasa, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo
| | - Nissi Bafwa
- Ecole de Santé Publique, Université de Kinshasa, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo
| | - Sean Blaufuss
- PMI VectorWorks Project, JHU Center for Communication Programs, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Bolanle Olapeju
- PMI VectorWorks Project, JHU Center for Communication Programs, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Ferdinand Ntoya
- U.S. President's Malaria Initiative, U.S. Agency for International Development, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo
| | - Aboubacar Sadou
- U.S. President's Malaria Initiative, U.S. Agency for International Development, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo
| | - Seth Irish
- U.S. President's Malaria Initiative, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Eric Mukomena
- National Malaria Control Programme, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo
| | - Lydie Kalindula
- National Malaria Control Programme, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo
| | - Francis Watsenga
- Institut Nationale de Recherche Bio-Medicale, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo
| | - Martin Akogbeto
- Centre de Recherche Entomologique de Cotonou, Cotonou, Benin
| | - Stella Babalola
- PMI VectorWorks Project, JHU Center for Communication Programs, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Hannah Koenker
- PMI VectorWorks Project, JHU Center for Communication Programs, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Albert Kilian
- PMI VectorWorks Project, Tropical Health LLP, Montagut, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Systematic review and meta-analysis of the cost and cost-effectiveness of distributing insecticide-treated nets for the prevention of malaria. Acta Trop 2020; 202:105229. [PMID: 31669182 DOI: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2019.105229] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2019] [Revised: 10/21/2019] [Accepted: 10/21/2019] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
Insecticide-treated nets are one of two core vector control interventions recommended by the World Health Organization for deployment in malaria-endemic regions around the world, especially sub-Saharan Africa. Although there are many factors that influence the type of distribution strategy chosen, among the most important considerations for the type of distribution strategy chosen is cost, both in terms of total expenditure required and in terms of relative cost-effectiveness. This research attempted to inform these decisions by conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature on the cost and cost-effectiveness of ITN distribution. The analysis compared the relative cost and cost-effectiveness of distribution strategies. Findings suggest that mass campaigns have lower average distribution costs per net compared with continuous/health facility distribution or sale/vouchers, although the relationship between distribution channel and cost were not statistically significant in the multivariate regression models. Continuous/health facility distribution channels were found to be more cost-effective than mass campaigns for averting DALYs, death, and cases of malaria. Those who design and budget for malaria programs should base decisions about distribution channels more on operational and epidemiological considerations than on cost per net, as the costs per net between distribution channels are not statistically different.
Collapse
|
18
|
Arroz JAH, Candrinho B, Mendis C, Lopez M, Martins MDRO. Cost-effectiveness of two long-lasting insecticidal nets delivery models in mass campaign in rural Mozambique. BMC Res Notes 2019; 12:578. [PMID: 31521189 PMCID: PMC6744705 DOI: 10.1186/s13104-019-4620-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2019] [Accepted: 09/07/2019] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim is to compare the cost-effectiveness of two long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) delivery models (standard vs. new) in universal coverage (UC) campaigns in rural Mozambique. RESULTS The total financial cost of delivering LLINs was US$ 231,237.30 and US$ 174,790.14 in the intervention (302,648 LLINs were delivered) and control districts (219,613 LLINs were delivered), respectively. The average cost-effectiveness ratio (ACER) per LLIN delivered and ACER per household (HH) achieving UC was lower in the intervention districts. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) per LLIN and ICER per HH reaching UC were US$ 0.68 and US$ 2.24, respectively. Both incremental net benefit (for delivered LLIN and for HHs reaching UC) were positive (intervention deemed cost-effective). Overall, the newer delivery model was the more cost-effective intervention. However, the long-term sustainability of either delivery models is far from guaranteed in Mozambique's current economic context.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Maria do Rosário O. Martins
- Global Health and Tropical Medicine, GHTM, Instituto de Higiene e Medicina Tropical, IHMT, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, UNL, Rua da Junqueira 100, 1349-008 Lisbon, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Asingizwe D, Poortvliet PM, Koenraadt CJM, van Vliet AJH, Ingabire CM, Mutesa L, Leeuwis C. Role of individual perceptions in the consistent use of malaria preventive measures: mixed methods evidence from rural Rwanda. Malar J 2019; 18:270. [PMID: 31395048 PMCID: PMC6686450 DOI: 10.1186/s12936-019-2904-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2019] [Accepted: 08/05/2019] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Malaria preventive measures, including long-lasting insecticide-treated bet nets (LLINs), indoor residual spraying (IRS), and controlling mosquito breeding sites, are key measures to achieve malaria elimination. Still, compliance with these recommended measures remains a major challenge. By applying a novel and comprehensive model for determinants of malaria prevention behaviour, this study tests how individual perceptions influence the intentions to use malaria preventive measures and explores strategies that stimulate their consistent use. Methods The study was carried out in the sectors of Ruhuha and Busoro, Rwanda during October and November 2017, and these were conducted into two phases. Phase one involved a questionnaire survey (N = 742), whereas Phase two employed a qualitative approach that included nine focus group discussions, seven key informant interviews, and three in-depth interviews. Results The findings of the quantitative study showed that participants very often use LLINs (66.6%), accept IRS (73.9%), and drain stagnant water in case of presence (62%). The intentions to use malaria preventive measures were consistently driven by perceived severity, perceived self-efficacy, perceived response efficacy, and subjective norms, and hindered by perceived barriers. The intentions were also positively associated with the actual use of LLINs, acceptance of IRS, and drainage of stagnant water. There is no evidence that either not having enough LLINs (ownership of at least one bed net in the household, here referred to as availability) or having sufficient LLINs (having one LLIN per two people in the household, here referred to as accessibility) moderated the relationship between behavioural intentions and actual use of LLINs. The qualitative study indicated that participants believed malaria risk to be high and perceived a high mosquito density. They also believed that repetitive malaria episodes are caused by the perceived low effectiveness of anti-malaria medications. Lack of LLINs increased the perceived added value of LLINs, and together with the increased malaria burden increased the perceived response efficacy. Participants highlighted the need to continuously mobilize and engage community members especially those who do not use LLINs when having one, and those who do not accept the spraying activities. Conclusion Malaria prevention interventions should target individual perceptions to enhance consistent use of malaria preventive measures. Three strategies to improve consistent use and acceptance of these measures are highlighted: (1) ensure access to LLINs and regular spraying activities, (2) community mobilization and (3) citizen engagement in malaria prevention activities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Domina Asingizwe
- College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Rwanda, Kigali, Rwanda. .,Strategic Communication Group, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
| | - P Marijn Poortvliet
- Strategic Communication Group, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Arnold J H van Vliet
- Environmental Systems Analysis Group, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Leon Mutesa
- College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Rwanda, Kigali, Rwanda
| | - Cees Leeuwis
- Knowledge, Technology and Innovation Group, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Lechthaler F, Matthys B, Lechthaler-Felber G, Likwela JL, Mavoko HM, Rika JM, Mutombo MM, Ruckstuhl L, Barczyk J, Shargie E, Prytherch H, Lengeler C. Trends in reported malaria cases and the effects of malaria control in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. PLoS One 2019; 14:e0219853. [PMID: 31344062 PMCID: PMC6658057 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219853] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2019] [Accepted: 07/02/2019] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Considerable upscaling of malaria control efforts have taken place over the last 15 years in the Democratic Republic of Congo, the country with the second highest malaria case load after Nigeria. Malaria control interventions have been strengthened in line with the Millenium Development Goals. We analysed the effects of these interventions on malaria cases at health facility level, using a retrospective trend analysis of malaria cases between 2005 and 2014. Data were collected from outpatient and laboratory registers based on a sample of 175 health facilities that represents all eco-epidemiological malaria settings across the country. Methods We applied a time series analysis to assess trends of suspected and confirmed malaria cases, by health province and for different age groups. A linear panel regression model controlled for non-malaria outpatient cases, rain fall, nightlight intensity, health province and time fixed effects, was used to examine the relationship between the interventions and malaria case occurrences, as well as test positivity rates. Results Overall, recorded suspected and confirmed malaria cases in the DRC have increased. The sharp increase in confirmed cases from 2010 coincides with the introduction of the new treatment policy and the resulting scale-up of diagnostic testing. Controlling for confounding factors, the introduction of rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) was significantly associated with the number of tested and confirmed cases. The test positivity rate fluctuated around 40% without showing any trend. Conclusion The sharp increase in confirmed malaria cases from 2010 is unlikely to be due to a resurgence of malaria, but is clearly associated with improved diagnostic availability, mainly the introduction of RDTs. Before that, a great part of malaria cases were treated based on clinical suspicion. This finding points to a better detection of cases that potentially contributed to improved case management. Furthermore, the expansion of diagnostic testing along with the increase in confirmed cases implies that before 2010, cases were underreported, and that the accuracy of routine data to describe malaria incidence has improved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Filippo Lechthaler
- Swiss Centre for International Health, Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Canton of Basel Stadt, Switzerland
- University of Basel, Basel, Canton of Basel Stadt, Switzerland
- School of Agricultural, Forest and Food Sciences, Bern University of Applied Sciences, Zollikofen, Canton of Bern, Switzerland
| | - Barbara Matthys
- Swiss Centre for International Health, Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Canton of Basel Stadt, Switzerland
- University of Basel, Basel, Canton of Basel Stadt, Switzerland
- * E-mail:
| | - Giulia Lechthaler-Felber
- Faculty of Business and Economics, University of Basel, Basel, Canton of Basel Stadt, Switzerland
| | - Joris Losimba Likwela
- Soins de Santé en Milieu Rural (non-profit organization SANRU), Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo
| | - Hypolite Muhindo Mavoko
- Tropical Medicine Department, University of Kinshasa, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo
| | - Junior Matangila Rika
- Tropical Medicine Department, University of Kinshasa, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo
| | - Meschac Mutombo Mutombo
- National Malaria Control Program, Ministry of Health, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo
| | - Laura Ruckstuhl
- University of Basel, Basel, Canton of Basel Stadt, Switzerland
- Epidemiology and Public Health Department, Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Canton of Basel Stadt, Switzerland
| | - Joanna Barczyk
- The Global Fund to fight AIDS, Tuberculosis, and Malaria, Geneva, Canton of Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Estifanos Shargie
- The Global Fund to fight AIDS, Tuberculosis, and Malaria, Geneva, Canton of Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Helen Prytherch
- Swiss Centre for International Health, Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Canton of Basel Stadt, Switzerland
- University of Basel, Basel, Canton of Basel Stadt, Switzerland
| | - Christian Lengeler
- University of Basel, Basel, Canton of Basel Stadt, Switzerland
- Epidemiology and Public Health Department, Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Canton of Basel Stadt, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Andrada A, Herrera S, Inyang U, Mohammed AB, Uhomoibhi P, Yé Y. A subnational profiling analysis reveals regional differences as the main predictor of ITN ownership and use in Nigeria. Malar J 2019; 18:185. [PMID: 31138216 PMCID: PMC6540480 DOI: 10.1186/s12936-019-2816-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2018] [Accepted: 05/18/2019] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To reduce the malaria burden in Nigeria, the country is scaling up prevention and treatment interventions, especially household ownership and use of insecticide-treated nets (ITNs). Nevertheless, large gaps remain to achieve the goals of the National Malaria Strategic Plan 2014-2020 of universal access to ITNs and their increased use. To inform the targeting of intervention strategies and to maximize impact, the authors conducted a sub-national profiling of household ITN ownership and use in the general population to identify key predictors of ITN ownership and use, and the sub-groups that are at higher risk of low ITN coverage and use. METHODS The authors conducted a secondary analysis of data from the 2015 Nigeria Malaria Indicator Survey. Using the Chi square automatic interaction detector (CHAID) and multiple logistic regression analysis, the authors examined the key predictors of ITN ownership and use in the general population throughout Nigeria. RESULTS The CHAID models identified region of the country as the best predictor of household ownership of at least one ITN and its use in the general population, with higher ownership and use observed in the northern regions. The odds of a household owning an ITN were five times greater in the North West region compared with the North Central region (odds ratio [OR] = 5.47, 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.46-6.72, p < 0.001). The odds of ITN use were two times greater for those living in the North West region compared with the North Central region (OR = 2.04, 95% CI 1.73-2.41, p < 0.001). Other significant predictors were household size, head of household education level, household wealth quintile, and place of residence. The CHAID gain index results identified households in the South West, North Central and South Central regions with low ITN ownership, and the general population in the South South, South East and North Central regions with low ITN use. CONCLUSIONS This study reveals regional differences in ITN ownership and use in Nigeria. Therefore, the findings from this analysis provide evidence that could inform the NMEP to better target future campaign and routine distribution of ITNs, to achieve universal access and increased use by 2020 in Nigeria.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew Andrada
- MEASURE Evaluation, ICF, 530 Gaither Road, Suite 500, Rockville, MD, 20850, USA.
| | - Samantha Herrera
- MEASURE Evaluation, ICF, 530 Gaither Road, Suite 500, Rockville, MD, 20850, USA.,Save the Children, 899 North Capitol Street, NE, #900, Washington, DC, 20002, USA
| | - Uwem Inyang
- President's Malaria Initiative/United States Agency for International Development, Plot 1075 Diplomatic Drive, Central District Area, Abuja, Nigeria
| | - Audu Bala Mohammed
- National Malaria Elimination Programme, Federal Ministry of Health, 1st Floor, Abia Plaza, 1 Avenue, Cadastral Zone A0, Central Business District, Abuja, Nigeria
| | - Perpetua Uhomoibhi
- National Malaria Elimination Programme, Federal Ministry of Health, 1st Floor, Abia Plaza, 1 Avenue, Cadastral Zone A0, Central Business District, Abuja, Nigeria
| | - Yazoumé Yé
- MEASURE Evaluation, ICF, 530 Gaither Road, Suite 500, Rockville, MD, 20850, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Sousa JDO, de Albuquerque BC, Coura JR, Suárez-Mutis MC. Use and retention of long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) in a malaria risk area in the Brazilian Amazon: a 5-year follow-up intervention. Malar J 2019; 18:100. [PMID: 30909924 PMCID: PMC6434793 DOI: 10.1186/s12936-019-2735-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2018] [Accepted: 03/18/2019] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) are one of the main vector control strategies recommended by the World Health Organization for the control and elimination of malaria. This study aimed to evaluate the use and retention of LLINs during the 5 years of implementing an integrated control strategy in a malaria-endemic area in the Brazilian Amazon. Methods This intervention study was conducted in localities of the municipality of Barcelos, Amazonas, from 2008 to 2014. Four rural localities situated along the Padauiri River were the object of this study. Two localities (Bacabal-rio Aracá and the São Sebastião district) were used as controls. LLINs were distributed to all residents of the Padauiri River; assessments were made regarding their use and retention via a semistructured questionnaire, a household register, and direct observation during 5 years. Results Overall, 208 individuals participated in the study. In the baseline pilot study (2008), 9.9% of the subjects in the intervention group had slept with mosquito nets the previous night compared with 37.8% of the subjects in the control group. In 2010, this percentage was 43.2% in the intervention group and 50.9% in the control group. Therefore, 1 year after the implementation of the strategy, although there was an increase in the use of mosquito nets in both groups, this increase was significantly higher in the intervention group. This increase in LLINs use did not persist after 5 years of intervention. The households’ evaluation in 2014 showed that 80% of the houses in the intervention group owned at least one LLIN compared with 66% in the control group (p = 0.11); 76% of households in the intervention group owned sufficient LLINs for all family members compared with 50% in the control group (p = 0.007). Conclusions High ownership and retention of the LLINs was observed in the intervention group. At 1 year after the distribution of these LLINs, there was a significant increase in their use that was not maintained over the long term. Control strategies must be permanent; however, exploring new strategies is necessary to ensure that the knowledge acquired further modifies the attitudes and behaviours.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica de Oliveira Sousa
- Laboratory of Parasitic Diseases, Institute Oswaldo Cruz/Fiocruz, Av Brasil 4365. Pavilhão Artur Neiva, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, CEP: 21040-900, Brazil.
| | - Bernardino Claudio de Albuquerque
- Foundation of Health Surveillance of Amazonas, Av. Torquato Tapajós, 4.010, Colônia Santo Antônio, Manaus, AM, CEP 69.093-018, Brazil
| | - José Rodrigues Coura
- Laboratory of Parasitic Diseases, Institute Oswaldo Cruz/Fiocruz, Av Brasil 4365. Pavilhão Artur Neiva, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, CEP: 21040-900, Brazil
| | - Martha Cecilia Suárez-Mutis
- Laboratory of Parasitic Diseases, Institute Oswaldo Cruz/Fiocruz, Av Brasil 4365. Pavilhão Artur Neiva, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, CEP: 21040-900, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Optimal mode for delivery of seasonal malaria chemoprevention in Ouelessebougou, Mali: A cluster randomized trial. PLoS One 2018; 13:e0193296. [PMID: 29505578 PMCID: PMC5837084 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0193296] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2017] [Accepted: 02/05/2018] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Seasonal malaria chemoprevention (SMC), the administration of complete therapeutic courses of antimalarials to children aged 3–59 months during the malaria transmission season, is a new strategy recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO) for malaria control in Sahelian countries such as Mali with seasonal transmission. The strategy is a highly cost-effective approach to reduce malaria burden in these areas. Despite the substantial benefits of SMC on malaria infection and disease, the optimal approach to deliver SMC remains to be determined. While fixed-point delivery (FPD) and non-directly observed treatment (NDOT) by community health workers are logistically attractive, these need to be evaluated and compared to other modes of delivery for maximal coverage. Methods To determine the optimal mode fixed-point (FPD) vs door-to-door delivery (DDD); directly observed treatment (DOT) vs. non- directly observed treatment (NDOT)), 31 villages in four health sub-districts were randomized to receive three rounds of SMC with Sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine plus Amodiaquine (SP+AQ) at monthly intervals using one of the following methods: FPD+DOT; FPD+NDOT; DDD+DOT; DDD+NDOT. The primary endpoint was SMC coverage assessed by cross-sectional survey of 2,035 children at the end of intervention period. Results Coverage defined as the proportion of children who received all three days of SMC treatment during the three monthly rounds based information collected by interview (primary endpoint) was significantly higher in children who received SMC using DDD 74% (95% CI 69% - 80%) compared to FPD 60% (95% CI 50% - 70%); p = 0.009. It was similar in children who received SMC using DOT or NDOT 65%, (95% CI 55% - 76%) versus 68% (95% CI 57% - 79%); p = 0.72. Conclusions In summary, door-to-door delivery of SMC provides better coverage than FPD. Directly observed therapy, which requires more time and resources, did not improve coverage with SMC. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02646410
Collapse
|
24
|
Raghavendra K, Chourasia MK, Swain DK, Bhatt RM, Uragayala S, Dutta GDP, Kleinschmidt I. Monitoring of long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) coverage versus utilization: a community-based survey in malaria endemic villages of Central India. Malar J 2017; 16:467. [PMID: 29149892 PMCID: PMC5693530 DOI: 10.1186/s12936-017-2117-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2017] [Accepted: 11/11/2017] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Despite the known effectiveness of long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) in providing protection against malaria, high level of ownership and use are very difficult to achieve and maintain. Nearly 40,000 LLINs were distributed in 2014 as an intervention tool against malaria transmission in 80 villages of Keshkal sub-district in Chhattisgarh, India. This study assessed LLIN coverage, access, utilization pattern, and key determinants for the net use 1 year after mass distribution. Methods In 2015, a cross-sectional household survey was carried out in 80 study clusters (whole village or part of village). From each cluster, 40 households were randomly selected and interviewed using a structured questionnaire adapted from the malaria indicator survey of Roll Back Malaria guidelines. Information on demographic characteristics, LLIN ownership, and its use on the night before the survey, and physical condition of LLINs were recorded. Results 2970 households were interviewed with a total of 15,003 individuals present in the households during the night before the survey. Nearly 98% of households had at least one LLIN and 59.4% of the surveyed population reportedly used an LLIN the previous night. LLIN use varied from 41 to 94% between the study clusters. Nearly 89% of the LLINs were found in good physical condition (without holes). However, proportion of household with at least one LLIN per two persons was only 39%. Conclusion Universal coverage of LLINs was inadequate in the study clusters making it difficult for all household members to use an LLIN. LLIN use varied between clusters and was highest in children under 5 years of age. Health education campaigns and creating awareness about the benefit of sleeping under the LLINs in providing protection against malaria is required not only to high risk groups of pregnant women and children below 5 years of age but all the members of the family to have an epidemiological impact of this intervention at the community level. Relatively high net use despite poor access to LLINs indicates an overall desire to use nets when they are available. The main barrier to increased use of nets is the low coverage at household level.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kamaraju Raghavendra
- National Institute of Malaria Research (ICMR), Sector-8, Dwarka, New Delhi, 110077, India.
| | - Mehul Kumar Chourasia
- National Institute of Malaria Research (ICMR) IIR-WHO Project, Field Unit, Kondagaon, Chhattisgarh, India
| | - Dipak Kumar Swain
- National Institute of Malaria Research (ICMR) IIR-WHO Project, Field Unit, Kondagaon, Chhattisgarh, India
| | - Rajendra M Bhatt
- National Institute of Malaria Research (ICMR), Field Unit, Lalpur, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, India
| | - Sreehari Uragayala
- National Institute of Malaria Research (ICMR), Field Unit, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
| | - G D P Dutta
- National Institute of Malaria Research (ICMR), Field Unit, Lalpur, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, India
| | - Immo Kleinschmidt
- Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Nkamedjie PP, Dongho GB, Mabvouna RB, Russo G, Sobze MS. Long lasting impregnated mosquito net (LLIN) utilisation, incidence of fever and therapeutic itineraries: the case of Mifi health district in western Cameroon. MALARIAWORLD JOURNAL 2017; 8:19. [PMID: 34532242 PMCID: PMC8415069] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Long Lasting Impregnated mosquito Net (LLIN) use is effective against malaria in endemic tropical areas. However, its utilisation remains limited. Among the most common clinical signs of malaria is fever and many studies have reported the existence of different local ways of handling fever; amongst which uncontrolled used of antimalarial drugs. We investigated LLINs use and its impact on fever outcomes and the various therapeutic measures used to deal with fever episodes. MATERIALS AND METHODS Data was extracted from a cross sectional descriptive and analytic study performed between January and April 2014 in Mifi health district. Data was collected in households through a face to face interview with standard household questionnaires, treated and analysed using Epi Info statistical software version 3.5.3. RESULTS A total of 317 participants were interviewed with average age 33.2 years (SD = 10.8). Female respondents were predominant (85.2%; n=270). Most participants attended secondary education (53.6%; n= 170). Married marital status was most represented (58.1%; n= 185). 75.4% (n=239) of households owned at least 1 LLIN against an estimated average district coverage of 1 LLIN for 3.3 persons. Average bednet usage for households owning at least 1 LLIN was 57.9%. Utilisation of LLINs in households reduced fever episodes by 5.3%, (p=0.36). To handle fever episodes, road side medicines represented priority therapeutic itinerary for most of our respondents (95.0%; n=301). CONCLUSIONS Although LLINs are effective in reducing fever episodes, their utilisation remains low. Self-medication to treat fever seems to be prominent. There is a need to optimise communication for behavioural change strategies to promote consistent LLIN use and anti-malarial therapy, assisted by qualified health personnel.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick P. Nkamedjie
- Institute for Research, Socio-economic Development and Communication (IRESCO), Yaoundé, Cameroon,*
| | - Ghyslaine B. Dongho
- Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, “Sapienza” University of Rome, Italy
| | - Rodrigue B. Mabvouna
- Department of Biology, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, Rome, Italy
| | - Gianluca Russo
- Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, “Sapienza” University of Rome, Italy
| | - Martin S. Sobze
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Dschang, Cameroon
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Seyoum D, Speybroeck N, Duchateau L, Brandt P, Rosas-Aguirre A. Long-Lasting Insecticide Net Ownership, Access and Use in Southwest Ethiopia: A Community-Based Cross-Sectional Study. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2017; 14:ijerph14111312. [PMID: 29077052 PMCID: PMC5707951 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph14111312] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2017] [Revised: 10/23/2017] [Accepted: 10/24/2017] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
Introduction: A large proportion of the Ethiopian population (approximately 68%) lives in malaria risk areas. Millions of long-lasting insecticide treated nets (LLINs) have been distributed as part of the malaria prevention and control strategy in the country. This study assessed the ownership, access and use of LLNs in the malaria endemic southwest Ethiopia. Methods: A community-based cross-sectional study was conducted in southwest Ethiopia during October–November 2015, including 836 households from sixteen villages around Gilgel-Gibe dam area. Indicators of ownership, access and use of LLINs were derived following the Roll Back Malaria (RBM) guidelines. Factors associated with failure for both LLIN access and use were analysed at household level using a multivariate logistic regression model. Results: The proportion of households with at least one LLIN was 82.7% (95% CI: 80.0, 85.1). However, only 68.9% (95% CI: 65.6, 71.9) had enough LLINs to cover all family members (with ≥one LLIN for every two persons). While 75.3% (95% CI: 68.4, 83.0) of the population was estimated to have accessed to LLINs, only 63.8% (95% CI: 62.3, 65.2) reported to have used a LLIN the previous night. The intra-household gap (i.e., households owning at least one LLIN, but unable to cover all family members) and the behavioral gap (i.e., household members who did not sleep under a LLIN despite having access to one) were 16.8% and 10.5%, respectively. Age, marital status and education of household heads, as well as household size and cooking using firewood were associated with the access to enough LLINs within households. Decreased access to LLINs at households was the main determinant for not achieving ≥80% household members sleeping under a LLIN the previous night. Other associated factors were household size and education level of household head. Conclusions: LLIN coverage levels in study villages remain below national targets of 100% for ownership and 80% for use. The access to enough LLINs within the households is the main restriction of LLIN use in the study area.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dinberu Seyoum
- Institute of Health and Society (IRSS), Université Catholique de Louvain, 1200 Brussels, Belgium.
- Department of Statistics, Natural Science College, Jimma University, Jimma 378, Ethiopia.
| | - Niko Speybroeck
- Institute of Health and Society (IRSS), Université Catholique de Louvain, 1200 Brussels, Belgium.
| | - Luc Duchateau
- Biometrics Research Group, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.
| | - Patrick Brandt
- School of Economic, Political and Policy Sciences, The University of Texas, Dallas, TX 75080, USA.
| | - Angel Rosas-Aguirre
- Institute of Health and Society (IRSS), Université Catholique de Louvain, 1200 Brussels, Belgium.
- Institute of Tropical Medicine "Alexander von Humboldt", Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima 31, Peru.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Galactionova K, Smith TA, de Savigny D, Penny MA. State of inequality in malaria intervention coverage in sub-Saharan African countries. BMC Med 2017; 15:185. [PMID: 29041940 PMCID: PMC5646111 DOI: 10.1186/s12916-017-0948-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2017] [Accepted: 09/27/2017] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Scale-up of malaria interventions over the last decade have yielded a significant reduction in malaria transmission and disease burden in sub-Saharan Africa. We estimated economic gradients in the distribution of these efforts and of their impacts within and across endemic countries. METHODS Using Demographic and Health Surveys we computed equity metrics to characterize the distribution of malaria interventions in 30 endemic countries proxying economic position with an asset-wealth index. Gradients were summarized in a concentration index, tabulated against level of coverage, and compared among interventions, across countries, and against respective trends over the period 2005-2015. RESULTS There remain broad differences in coverage of malaria interventions and their distribution by wealth within and across countries. In most, economic gradients are lacking or favor the poorest for vector control; malaria services delivered through the formal healthcare sector are much less equitable. Scale-up of interventions in many countries improved access across the wealth continuum; in some, these efforts consistently prioritized the poorest. Expansions in control programs generally narrowed coverage gaps between economic strata; gradients persist in countries where growth was slower in the poorest quintile or where baseline inequality was large. Despite progress, malaria is consistently concentrated in the poorest, with the degree of inequality in burden far surpassing that expected given gradients in the distribution of interventions. CONCLUSIONS Economic gradients in the distribution of interventions persist over time, limiting progress toward equity in malaria control. We found that, in countries with large baseline inequality in the distribution of interventions, even a small bias in expansion favoring the least poor yielded large gradients in intervention coverage while pro-poor growth failed to close the gap between the poorest and least poor. We demonstrated that dimensions of disadvantage compound for the poor; a lack of economic gradients in the distribution of malaria services does not translate to equity in coverage nor can it be interpreted to imply equity in distribution of risk or disease burden. Our analysis testifies to the progress made by countries in narrowing economic gradients in malaria interventions and highlights the scope for continued monitoring of programs with respect to equity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katya Galactionova
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Socinstrasse 57, 4051, Basel, Switzerland. .,University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
| | - Thomas A Smith
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Socinstrasse 57, 4051, Basel, Switzerland.,University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Don de Savigny
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Socinstrasse 57, 4051, Basel, Switzerland.,University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Melissa A Penny
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Socinstrasse 57, 4051, Basel, Switzerland.,University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Access to and use of long-lasting insecticidal nets and factors associated with non-use among communities in malaria-endemic areas of Al Hudaydah governorate in the Tihama region, west of Yemen. Malar J 2017; 16:244. [PMID: 28599666 PMCID: PMC5466721 DOI: 10.1186/s12936-017-1894-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2017] [Accepted: 06/06/2017] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Universal coverage of the targeted malaria-endemic areas with long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) is implemented as one of the key interventions for malaria control and elimination in Yemen. In 2013, through a mass campaign, LLINs were distributed to the targeted communities in Al Hudaydah governorate. This study aimed to assess the ownership of, access to, and use of LLINs. It also aimed to identify factors associated with not using LLINs in malaria-endemic areas of Al Hudaydah in the Tihama region, west of Yemen. Methods A cross-sectional survey was conducted in four districts (Ad Durayhimi, Al Marawi’ah, Al Mansuriyah and Bayt Al Faqiah) in Al Hudaydah during February 2016. A total of 701 households were included in this study. Data on socio-demographic characteristics and availability of LLINs were collected by interview and observation. Four indicators for malaria prevention using LLINs; proportion of households with at least one LLIN, proportion of households with at least one LLIN for every two people, proportion of population with access to LLINs in the surveyed households and proportion of population who slept under LLINs the previous night of the survey were calculated as indicated by Roll Back Malaria Monitoring and Evaluation Reference Group. Use to access ratio was assessed. Factors associated with not using LLINs among people with access were also investigated. Results Of 701 households with 4900 de facto population, ownership of at least one LLIN was 90.6%, while 24.1% owned at least one for every two people during the survey in 2016. The overall proportion of people with access to LLINs was 51.5% (95% CI 50.1–52.9). Only 19.0% (95% CI 17.9–20.1) slept under LLINs the night before the survey and the overall use to access ratio was 0.37. The proportions of children under 5 years of age with access to and use of LLINs were 13.7 and 42.5%, respectively. On the other hand, the proportions of pregnant women with access to and use of LLINs were 16.4 and 20.0%, respectively. Multivariable analysis identified that people living in Al Mansuriyah district [adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 3.29, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.35–8.01; P = 0.009)], having three or more damaged LLINs in the house (AOR = 2.76, 95% CI 1.79–4.25; P < 0.001), aged between 16 and 45 years old (AOR = 2.17, 95% CI 1.26–3.75; P = 0.005) or older (AOR = 2.17, 95% CI 1.09–4.29; P = 0.026) and living in huts (AOR = 1.59, 95% CI 1.09–2.32; P = 0.015) were significantly less likely to use LLINs. Conclusions This study shows a low LLIN access rate among local communities targeted for universal LLIN coverage in Al Hudaydah, a malaria-endemic area of high transmission. This finding necessitates additional distribution channels following mass campaigns to maintain the universal coverage. Reduced use of LLINs among people with access in these communities together with the identified risks of non-use highlight the importance of conducting behaviour change communication campaigns to enhance using LLINs in areas with universal coverage.
Collapse
|