Hepatic safety of repeated treatment with pyronaridine-artesunate versus artemether-lumefantrine in patients with uncomplicated malaria: a secondary analysis of the WANECAM 1 data from Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso

Pyronaridine: a review of its clinical pharmacology in the treatment of malaria

Pyronaridine-artesunate was recently strongly recommended in the 2022 update of the WHO Guidelines for the Treatment of Malaria, becoming the newest artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT) for both uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax malaria. Pyronaridine-artesunate, available as a tablet and paediatric granule formulations, is being adopted in regions where malaria treatment outcome is challenged by increasing chloroquine resistance. Pyronaridine is an old antimalarial agent that has been used for more than 50 years as a blood schizonticide, which exerts its antimalarial activity by interfering with the synthesis of the haemozoin pigment within the Plasmodium digestive vacuole. Pyronaridine exhibits a high blood-to-plasma distribution ratio due to its tendency to accumulate in blood cells. This feature is believed to play a crucial role in its pharmacokinetic (PK) properties and pharmacological activity. The PK characteristics of pyronaridine include rapid oral absorption, large volumes of distribution and low total body clearance, resulting in a long terminal apparent half-life. Moreover, differences in PK profiles have been observed between healthy volunteers and malaria-infected patients, indicating a potential disease-related impact on PK properties. Despite a long history, there is only limited knowledge of the clinical PK and pharmacodynamics of pyronaridine, particularly in special populations such as children and pregnant women. We here provide a comprehensive overview of the clinical pharmacology of pyronaridine in the treatment of malaria.

Prospective observational study to evaluate the clinical and biological safety profile of pyronaridine-artesunate in a rural health district in Burkina Faso

The assessment in real‐life conditions of the safety and efficacy of new antimalarial drugs is of greatest interest. This study aimed to monitor and evaluate both clinical and biological safety of pyronaridine‐artesunate (PA) in real‐life conditions in Burkina Faso's health system. This was a single‐arm, open‐label study, where patients attending Nanoro health facilities with uncomplicated malaria were consented to be part of a cohort event monitoring (CEM). At inclusion (day‐0), PA was administered orally once a day for 3 days. Patients spontaneous reported any clinical adverse events (AEs) occurring within 28 days following the treatment. Additionally, the study focused on AEs of special interest (AESI), namely clinical signs related to hepatotoxicity and increased alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST). A nested subset of patients with blood sample collection at day‐0 and day‐7 were monitored to investigate the effect of PA on biochemistry parameters. From September 2017 to October 2018, 2786 patients were treated with PA. About 97.8% (2720/2786) of patients did not report any AE. The most commonly reported events were respiratory, thoracic, and mediastinal disorders (8.3 per 1000), infections and infestations (7.9 per 1000), and gastrointestinal disorders (7.2 per 1000). No clinical or biological hepatotoxicity event related to PA was reported during the follow‐up. Changes in biochemistry parameters remained within laboratory reference ranges. The study showed that PA is a well‐tolerated drug and should be considered as a good option by malaria control programs in countries where existing first‐line antimalarial drugs are continuously threatened by the emergence of drug resistance.

Pyronaridine-artesunate for treating uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria

BACKGROUND

The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends artemisinin-based combination therapies (ACTs) to treat uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria. Concerns about artemisinin resistance have led to global initiatives to develop new partner drugs to protect artemisinin derivatives in ACT. Pyronaridine-artesunate is a novel ACT.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy of pyronaridine-artesunate compared to alternative ACTs for treating people with uncomplicated P falciparum malaria, and to evaluate the safety of pyronaridine-artesunate and other pyronaridine treatments compared to alternative treatments.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Infectious Diseases Group Specialized Register; Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), published in the Cochrane Library; MEDLINE; Embase; and LILACS. We also searched ClinicalTrials.gov, the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, and the ISRCTN registry for ongoing or recently completed trials. The date of the last search was 27 October 2021.

SELECTION CRITERIA

For the efficacy analysis, we included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of pyronaridine-artesunate for treating uncomplicated P falciparum malaria. For the safety analysis, we included RCTs that used pyronaridine alone or in combination with any other antimalarials. In addition to these analyses, we conducted a separate systematic review summarizing data on safety from non-randomized studies (NRS) of any patient receiving pyronaridine (NRS safety review).  DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently extracted all data and assessed the certainty of the evidence. We meta-analysed data to calculate risk ratios (RRs) for treatment failures between comparisons, and for safety outcomes between and across comparisons.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 10 relevant RCTs. Seven RCTs were co-funded by Shin Poong Pharmaceuticals, and three were funded by government agencies. Efficacy analysis (RCTs) For the efficacy analysis, we identified five RCTs comprising 5711 participants. This included 4465 participants from 13 sites in Africa, and 1246 participants from five sites in Asia. The analysis included 541 children aged less than five years. Overall, pyronaridine-artesunate had a polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-adjusted treatment failure rate of less than 5%. We evaluated pyronaridine-artesunate versus the following. • Artemether-lumefantrine. Pyronaridine artesunate may perform better for PCR-adjusted failures at day 28 (RR 0.59, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.26 to 1.31; 4 RCTs, 3068 participants, low-certainty evidence); for unadjusted failures at day 28 (RR 0.27, 95% CI 0.13 to 0.58; 4 RCTs, 3149 participants, low-certainty evidence); and for unadjusted failures at day 42 (RR 0.61, 95% CI 0.46 to 0.82; 4 RCTs, 3080 participants, low-certainty evidence). For PCR-adjusted failures at day 42, there may be little or no difference between groups (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.49 to 1.51; 4 RCTs, 2575 participants, low-certainty evidence). • Artesunate-amodiaquine. Pyronaridine artesunate may perform better for PCR-adjusted failures at day 28 (RR 0.55, 95% CI 0.11 to 2.77; 1 RCT, 1245 participants, low-certainty evidence); probably performs better for unadjusted failures at day 28 (RR 0.49, 95% CI 0.30 to 0.81; 1 RCT, 1257 participants, moderate-certainty evidence); may make little or no difference for PCR-adjusted failures at day 42 (RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.20 to 4.83; 1 RCT, 1091 participants, low-certainty evidence); and probably makes little or no difference for unadjusted failures at day 42 (RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.78 to 1.23; 1 RCT, 1235 participants, moderate-certainty evidence). • Mefloquine plus artesunate. Pyronaridine artesunate may perform better for PCR-adjusted failures at day 28 (RR 0.37, 95% CI 0.13 to 1.05; 1 RCT, 1117 participants, low-certainty evidence); probably performs better for unadjusted failures at day 28 (RR 0.36, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.78; 1 RCT, 1120 participants, moderate-certainty evidence); may make little or no difference for unadjusted failures at day 42 (RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.54 to 1.31; 1 RCT, 1059 participants, low-certainty evidence); but may lead to higher PCR-adjusted failures at day 42 (RR 1.80, 95% CI 0.90 to 3.57; 1 RCT, 1037 participants, low-certainty evidence). Safety analysis (RCTs) For the RCT safety analysis, we identified eight RCTs, one of which was delineated by study site, comparing pyronaridine-artesunate to other antimalarials. Pyronaridine-artesunate was associated with raised liver enzymes compared to other antimalarials: alanine aminotransferase (ALT) (RR 3.59, 95% CI 1.76 to 7.33; 8 RCTS, 6669 participants, high-certainty evidence) and aspartate transaminase (AST) (RR 2.22, 95% CI 1.12 to 4.41; 8 RCTs, 6669 participants, moderate-certainty evidence). No such effect was demonstrated with bilirubin (RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.49 to 2.18; 7 RCTs, 6384 participants, moderate-certainty evidence). There was one reported case in which raised ALT occurred with raised bilirubin. No study reported severe drug-induced liver injury. Electrocardiograph (ECG) abnormalities were less common with pyronaridine-artesunate compared to other antimalarials. We identified no other safety concerns. NRS safety review A review on safety in NRS allowed us to increase the population within which safety was assessed. We included seven studies with 9546 participants: five single-arm observational studies, one cohort event monitoring study, and one dose-escalation study. All studies provided data on adverse event frequency, with a small number of participants experiencing serious adverse events and adverse effects related to pyronaridine: serious adverse events average 0.37%; drug-related 9.0%. In two studies reporting elevations in liver enzymes, small percentages of participants (2.4% and 14.1% respectively) experienced increases in either ALT, AST, or bilirubin on day 7; however, these were small increases that returned to normal by day 42.  AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Pyronaridine-artesunate was efficacious against uncomplicated P falciparum malaria; achieved a PCR-adjusted treatment failure rate of less than 5% at days 28 and 42; and may be at least as good as, or better than, other marketed ACTs. Pyronaridine-artesunate increases the risk of episodes of abnormally raised ALT. The observational data did not signal an excess of clinically important adverse effects.

Pyronaridine-Artesunate (Pyramax) for Treatment of Artemisinin- and Piperaquine-Resistant Plasmodium falciparum in the Central Highlands of Vietnam

The rise in Plasmodium falciparum resistance to dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine in Vietnam justifies the need to evaluate alternative artemisinin-based combination therapies. Between July 2018 and October 2019, a single-arm trial of pyronaridine-artesunate (Pyramax, PA) was conducted in Dak Nong province, Vietnam. PA (3-day course) was administered to adults and children infected with P. falciparum. PA was well tolerated by the participants. The proportion of patients with Day 42 PCR-corrected adequate clinical and parasitological response was 95.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 82.3 to 98.8, n = 40/42) for treating falciparum malaria. The median parasite clearance half-life was 6.7 h (range, 2.6 to 11.9) and the median parasite clearance time was 72 h (range, 12 to 132) with 44.9% (22/49) of patients having positive blood films at 72 h. The two patients that recrudesced had comparable Day 7 blood pyronaridine concentrations (39.5 and 39.0 ng/ml) to the 40 patients who did not recrudesce (median 43.4 ng/ml, 95% CI, 35.1 to 54.9). Ring-stage and piperaquine survival assays revealed that of the 29 P. falciparum isolates collected from the patients before PA treatment, 22 (75.9%) had reduced susceptibility to artemisinins and 17 (58.6%) were resistant to piperaquine. Genotyping confirmed that 92.0% (46/50) of falciparum patients were infected with parasites bearing the Pfkelch13 C580Y mutation associated with artemisinin resistance. Of these, 56.0% (28/50) of the isolates also had multiple copies of the plasmepsin 2/3 genes responsible for piperaquine resistance. Overall, PA was effective in treating P. falciparum in the Central Highlands of Vietnam. (This study has been registered at AustralianClinicalTrials.gov.au under trial ID ACTRN12618001429246.).