Development and evaluation of a test program for Y-site compatibility testing of total parenteral nutrition and intravenous drugs

Physical compatibility of ceftazidime-avibactam with selected intravenous antimicrobials in simulated Y-site administration

OBJECTIVE

The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the physical compatibility of ceftazidime-avibactam with selected intravenous antimicrobials during simulated Y-site administration.

METHODS

Ceftazidime-avibactam (25 mg/mL) was mixed with select intravenous antimicrobials (tigecycline, metronidazole, meropenem, imipenem and cilastatin, fosfomycin, aztreonam and vancomycin) at an equal volume and evaluated using simulated Y-sites. Each admixture was evaluated immediately (0 hour) and after 1, 2, and 4 hours at room temperature (approximately 22°C) for visual characteristics, Tyndall beam, turbidity, pH, spectroscopic absorption of 550 nm and particle counts. If an admixture failed any one of these six assessments, it was considered incompatible.

RESULTS

No evidence of incompatibility was observed between the combinations of ceftazidime-avibactam and the seven intravenous antimicrobials in simulated Y-site experiments.

CONCLUSION

Ceftazidime-avibactam was physically compatible with the selected intravenous antimicrobials (tigecycline, metronidazole, meropenem, imipenem and cilastatin, fosfomycin, aztreonam and vancomycin) in simulated Y-site administration.

Physical compatibility of lipid emulsions and intravenous medications used in neonatal intensive care settings

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to investigate the physical compatibility of intravenous lipid emulsions with parenteral medications used in neonatal intensive care.

METHODS

Lipid emulsion and drug solutions were combined 1:1 in glass vials, inspected for physical incompatibility at 0, 1 and 2 hours, and assessed on the basis of lipid droplet size at 0 and 2 hours after mixing. Intravenous fluid controls (Water for Injection, sodium chloride 0.9% w/v, glucose 5% w/v), positive controls (gentamicin, albumin), negative controls (metronidazole, paracetamol, vancomycin) and 21 previously untested drug combinations were evaluated.

RESULTS

No phase separation, change in colour, gas production or other visible anomaly was observed. The between-run mean droplet diameter (MDD) for SMOFlipid20% alone (0.301±0.008 µm) was comparable to the lipid emulsion/intravenous fluid and lipid emulsion/drug solution combinations. In addition to gentamicin and albumin, caffeine citrate (20 mg/mL) was shown to be incompatible with the lipid emulsion. All other lipid:drug combinations were compatible, based on the MDD data.

CONCLUSION

Intravenous lipid emulsions were found to be compatible with 20 parenteral medications, including antimicrobial agents, inotropes, anti-inflammatory drugs and caffeine base, in simulated Y-site conditions. The lipid emulsion was incompatible with caffeine citrate injection.

Intravenous tigecycline with selected multichamber bag parenteral nutrition: A compatibility study

BACKGROUND

Tigecycline is widely used to treat infections in intensive care units. Drugs often need to be delivered to critically ill patients feeding by parenteral nutrition (PN). Before two preparations are administered in the same infusion line, the safety of this combination should be established. The objective of this study was to determine the compatibility of tigecycline with selected multichamber bag PN (MCB-PN).

METHODS

Tigecycline was diluted in 0.9% sodium chloride solution and 5% glucose solution to obtain two 0.5 mg/ml solutions. Then the solutions were combined with selected MCB-PN in appropriate proportions. The samples were visually assessed, and pH, osmolality, turbidity, particle size, and zeta potential were measured. These measurements were made immediately after combining the solutions and after 4 h of storage at 23°C ± 1°C.

RESULTS

It was determined that the pH values of the mixtures after combining with tigecycline changed by ≤0.1 unit. An increase in zeta potential was recorded, excluding one combination of tigecycline with the mixture. For all samples tested, the particle size distribution was within the acceptable range immediately after combination and after 4 h of storage. The difference in osmolality did not exceed ±3%, whereas the zeta potential decreased for only one combination. The turbidity of none of the samples exceeded a critical value.

CONCLUSION

The physical compatibility of the tigecycline with five MCB-PN was proved. They can therefore be administered to patients in one infusion line using the Y-site.

Physical Compatibility Between Intravenous Magnesium Sulfate and Potassium or Sodium Phosphate in a Pediatric Intensive Care Unit

Objective:To evaluate the physical compatibility between intravenous magnesium sulfate and potassium and sodium phosphate, a common electrolyte intravenous supplementation in pediatric intensive care units. Study design: Magnesium sulfate was mixed separately with potassium phosphate and sodium phosphate at ratios of 1:1, 1:4, and 4:1. Binary mixtures were prepared, in triplicate and under sterile conditions, by permuting the order of addition. The undiluted pure drugs were used as controls for possible sequence effects. Visual changes, turbidity, and pH were assessed immediately after mixing (baseline) and at 4 and 24 hours. Two observers performed visual changes by naked-eye visual inspection in order to search visible haze, particulate matter, gas formation, or color change. Turbidity was measured by nephelometry and incompatibility was defined as an increase of ≥0.5 nephelometric turbidity units (NTU) from baseline. pH was measured using a portable pH meter and incompatibility was defined as a variation of >1 pH unit during the observation period. Results: None of the admixtures exhibited visual changes or significant variations in turbidity (increases of ≥0.5 in nephelometric turbidity units) or pH (changes of >1 unit) during the observation period and neither compared with baseline. Conclusion: In this study, no visual changes were observed, and turbidity and pH evaluated by instrumental methods remained within acceptable limits and showed no significant variations from baseline, therefore no physical incompatibility between magnesium sulfate and potassium or sodium phosphate was found.

A new approach to drug intravenous compatibility research: the case of obstetric parenteral drugs

OBJECTIVES

The product information and literature does not provide confirmation of compatibility for co-administration of all commonly used drug pairs in obstetrics. However, there is a need for co-administration of these drugs over one lumen for this group of patients. Therefore, this study focuses on Y-site compatibility. Since different conditions between clinical and laboratory settings can lead to discrepancies in results, a novel approach for drug intravenous compatibility testing was designed to reflect clinical conditions. The aim was to study the compatibility of nine commonly used drug pairs in obstetrics and to evaluate the clinical value of the designed method.

METHODS

The clinical situation was reflected by using different temperature ranges (20°C and 37°C), actual Y-site flow ratios, clinically relevant drug pairs and an observation time of 120 min. The clinically relevant drugs pairs include atosiban, nicardipine, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, oxytocin, remifentanil, labetalol and magnesium sulpfate. Drug pairs were visually assessed according to the European Pharmacopoeia (Ph. Eur.) and pH was measured. When incompatibility of a drug pair seemed likely based on literature review or observed abnormalities during visual assessment, subvisual analysis was performed using a particle counter. Y-site compatibility applied for drug pairs when no visual changes occurred or when no additional particles were formed during the observation time.

RESULTS

Eight of the nine combinations showed no visual changes or noticeable changes in pH during the observation time. The amoxicillin/clavulanic-acid-oxytocin combination showed a colour change at 37°C at the actual Y-site flow ratio. However, subvisual particle counting showed no formation of additional particles.

CONCLUSIONS

Y-site compatibility was established for all tested drug pairs. The new clinical approach for analysing Y-site compatibility provides a high certainty of outcomes for clinical practice. In this way, clinical complications and use of several additional intravenous catheters can be avoided.

Potential Use of Common Administration of Emulsion for Parenteral Nutrition and Vinpocetine: Compatibility Study and Prospect

Vinpocetine (VP) is distributed after oral and intravenous administration, and its uptake in the thalamus, basal ganglia, and visual cortex. Due to poor bioavailability (~7%) and marked first-pass effect (~75%), including a short half-life (2-3 h), oral administration of VP is limited. It requires frequent administration of the drug to obtain a therapeutic effect. Attempts to overcome these difficulties include the use of new drug delivery systems and/or alternative routes of drug administration. One possibility is the common administration of lipid emulsion and drug using the same catheter. However, this procedure is not recommended due to potential interaction and lack of safety data. For this purpose, we checked the compatibility of VP solutions with eight commercially available parenteral nutrition admixtures, i.e., Lipoflex special, Omegaflex special, Lipoflex peri, Omegaflex peri, Kabiven, SmofKabiven, Kabiven Peripheral, and Olimel Peri N4E. Coadministration is only possible if the stability of the drug and the lipid emulsion is confirmed. The available data are scarce and only concern the incompatibility of VP with ibuprofen. Compatibility tests were carried out in simulated administration through a Y-site connector using clinical flow rates. The stability of the drug and lipid emulsion was assessed by visual inspection and measurement of pH, osmolality, particle size as mean droplet diameter (MDD) and percentage of lipids residing in globules larger than 5 µm (PFAT5), zeta potential, polydispersity index, and lipid-free parenteral nutrition admixture(PNA) turbidity. The results of the compatibility of VP with eight commercial PN admixtures showed that all lipid emulsions show different signs of destabilization. In the studied samples, particles larger than 1000 nm, a significant increase in MDD, zeta potential, and loss of homogeneity visible as an increase in the polydispersity index were observed. Most of the samples had PFAT5 above the USP limit (0.05%). Taking into account the obtained data, VP should not be administered with the studied lipid emulsions for parenteral nutrition.

Compatibility studies of selected multichamber bag parenteral nutrition with fluconazole

OBJECTIVE

Fluconazole (FLZ) is a drug widely used in the treatment of fungal infections including the treatment of immunocompromised patients, HIV-infected patients, and cancer patients. Critically ill patients often require the administration of drugs with parenteral nutrition (PN). The safety of this combination should be defined before the drug and PN are administered in one infusion line. This study aimed to determine the compatibility of FLZ with six selected multichamber bag parenteral nutrition.

METHODS

FLZ solution for infusion was combined with PNs in appropriate proportions, considering most clinical situations resulting from different possible administration rates of the preparations. Samples were visually assessed, and pH, osmolality, turbidity, particle size (dynamic light scattering and light obscuration methods), and zeta potential were measured. These measurements were made immediately after combining the solutions and after 4 h of storage at 23 ± 1°C.

RESULTS

FLZ combined with PNs did not cause changes observed visually. The turbidity of the samples was <0.4 NTU. The average particle size of the lipid emulsion was below 300 nm, and the PFAT5 parameter was ≤0.02%. The absolute value of the zeta potential of the PN + FLZ samples was higher for 5 out of 6 PN than the corresponding value for PN immediately after activation. Changes in pH and osmolality during 4 h of sample observations were within acceptable limits.

CONCLUSION

Compatibility of the FLZ with six multichamber bag PN was confirmed. Hence, those preparations can be administered to patients in one infusion line using the Y-site.

Harmonising IV Oxycodone with Paediatric Perioperative Medications: A Compatibility Study Through Y-Type Connectors

Purpose

Co-administering multiple intravenous (IV) agents via Y-connectors is a common practice in hospitalised and fasting surgical patients. However, there is a lack of reliable data confirming the physical compatibility of some combinations including IV oxycodone, a drug that is gaining increasing popularity in the perioperative period. Concern regarding physical drug incompatibilities precludes concurrent coadministration with other common drugs through a single lumen. This can result in the cessation of infusions to allow the administration of other medications, resulting in exacerbation of acute pain. This study aims to evaluate the physical compatibility of IV oxycodone with some commonly co-administered drugs and IV fluids.

Methods

Mixtures of oxycodone (1mg.mL-1) and the tested drugs and IV fluids were prepared in a ratio of 1:1. The mixtures were examined at 0 and 60 minutes from mixing and assessed using the European Conference Consensus Standards. This involved visual inspection (precipitation, turbidity, colour change, gas formation), spectrophotometry, and pH change. The tested drugs included ketamine, tramadol, clonidine, vancomycin, piperacillin/tazobactam, dexmedetomidine, cefotaxime, gentamicin, and paracetamol. In addition, the commonly used IV fluids tested included glucose 5% + sodium chloride 0.9% + 60 mmol potassium chloride, plasmalyte + dextrose 5%;plasmalyte + dextrose 5% + 55 mmol potassium chloride, plasmalyte + dextrose 5% + 55mmol potassium acetate, plasmalyte + dextrose 5% + 55mmol potassium dihydrogen phosphate, Hartmann's solution, Standard pediatric Total Parenteral Nutrition (TPN) 20/100 and TPN 25/150.

Results

IV oxycodone (1 mg.mL-1) showed no visual changes; no spectrophotometric absorption variability at 350, 410, or 550nm; and no pH changes of >0.5 at 0 or 60 minutes with any of the tested drugs or fluids in the concentrations tested.

Conclusion

According to European Consensus Conference Standards, IV Oxycodone at 1 mg.mL-1 is physically compatible in a ratio of 1:1 v/v with all investigated drugs and fluids tested for at least 60 minutes.

Y-Site Compatibility Studies of Parenteral Nutrition and Other Intravenous Medications in Neonatal and Pediatric Patients: A Review of the Literature Evidence

BACKGROUND

Polytherapy in neonatal and pediatric patients requiring parenteral nutrition (PN) administration is a challenging task. Due to limited intravenous access, the Y-site administration of medication with PN admixtures is sometimes inevitable.

AIM

This review aims to summarize the evidence on the compatibility of the Y-site of intravenous medications and PN admixtures in neonatal and pediatric settings.

METHODS

A literature review of the PubMed database was conducted. Articles published between January 1995 and November 2023 concerning the compatibility of intravenous medications in pediatric-dose PN admixtures or with intravenous lipid emulsions only were included. Studies concerning the compatibility/stability of the ingredients of PN admixtures and those concerning unapproved medications were excluded. Based on the methodology used, the quality of the research was assessed.

RESULTS

A total of fifteen studies were explored. Among fifty-five different drug substances assessed in the research reviewed, 56% (31/55) were found to be compatible, 13% (7/55) were assigned as incompatible, and for 31% (17/55), the data were ambiguous. None of the studies demonstrated an "A" grade (very high quality), and the grades "B", "C", and "D" were assigned to four, six, and five studies, respectively. The compatibility data are presented in two tables, the first concerning the simultaneous administration of medications with 2-in-1 PN formulations (without lipids) and the second, with 3-in-1 formulations (with lipids) and lipid emulsions.

CONCLUSIONS

This review presents data on compatibilities between intravenously administered medications and PN mixtures intended for neonates and pediatric patients found in the PubMed database. It should be highlighted, however, that this work has some limitations. The clinical decisions on the simultaneous administration of intravenous medication with PN admixtures should be based not only on this review (including assessment of the quality of evidence) but also on manufacturer data, available electronic databases, and incompatibility data for PN admixtures dedicated to adult patients.

Use of Total Parenteral Nutrition (TPN) as a Vehicle for Drug Delivery

Total Parenteral Nutrition (TPN) is a method of providing nutrients directly into the bloodstream for individuals who are unable to meet their nutritional needs through the normal digestive process or gastrointestinal system. It provides macronutrients and micronutrients in a single container, reducing handling and contamination risks and making it more cost-effective. TPN has the potential to be used as a drug delivery system, with applications in combination therapies, personalized medicine, and integrating advanced technologies. It can enhance drug dosage precision and provide nutritional assistance, potentially reducing hospitalization and improving patient outcomes. However, implementing new applications requires thorough testing and regulatory approval. TPN could be particularly useful in pediatric and geriatric care and could also contribute to global health by combating malnutrition in areas with limited medical resources. Healthcare professionals prepare a sterile solution tailored to each patient's nutritional needs, and administration involves a central venous catheter. However, the simultaneous administration of medications with PN admixtures can result in pharmacological incompatibility, which can impact the stability of the oil-in-water system. The European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism and the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition recommendations advise against including non-nutrient drugs in PN admixtures due to safety concerns. This review focuses on the utilization of Total Parenteral Nutrition (TPN) as a method for delivering drugs. It discusses the benefits and difficulties associated with its commercial application and offers suggestions for future research endeavors.

Improving the Safety of Clinical Management of COVID-19 Patients Receiving Aminoglycosides and Parenteral Nutrition: Y-site Compatibility Studies

PURPOSE

Aminoglycosides (AMGs) are broad-spectrum bactericidal antibiotics that can resolve bacterial infections co-existing with COVID-19 or exploit their potential antiviral activities. Patients presenting the most severe forms of COVID-19 due to escalating catabolism and significant lean body mass loss often require the concomitant administration of parenteral nutrition (PN) and antibiotics. The Y-site administration is one of the approaches allowing the co-administration of two intravenous medications in patients with limited vascular access. Our study aimed to investigate the compatibility of AMGs and selected commercial PN admixtures enriched in omega-3 fatty acids.

METHODS

Gentamycin (GM), amikacin (AM), and tobramycin (TM) solutions for infusion were combined with Nutriflex Omega Special (NOS) and Smofkabiven (SFK). Three different volume ratios were investigated: 1:2, 1:1, and 2:1, simulating Y-site administration. Samples underwent visual examination and determination of the lipid emulsion particle size, zeta potential, and pH immediately after preparation and after four hours of storage at room temperature (22 ± 2 °C) with sunlight exposure.

RESULTS

GM and AM combined with NOS in all studied ratios met the set-up acceptance criteria. The addition of TM to NOS in a 2:1 volume ratio and all tested AMGs to SFK in all studied combinations significantly influenced the stability of the oil-water system leading to the appearance of globules larger than 5 µm exceeding the pharmacopeial limit of 0.05% immediately after preparation or after four hours of storage.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, our study showed that NOS was less prone to destabilization of oil-in-water systems by AMGs than SFK. In justified clinical cases, due to the lack of appearance of precipitate or enlarged lipid droplets, the combined administration of GM and AM with the NOS could be considered, provided tested volume ratios of the drug and MCB in the infusion line are maintained. However, it should be noted that such an infusion may be associated with the risk of changes in the pharmacokinetics of the drug.

Antiemetic Drugs Compatibility Evaluation with Paediatric Parenteral Nutrition Admixtures

Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting are defined as the most common of side effects of treatment and, at the same time, are very difficult to accept for patients', frequently causing changes in the therapy regimen, significantly reducing its effectiveness. Thus, an antiemetic prophylactic is essential to the provision of such a therapy for the patient. Pharmacotherapy often includes various drugs, including antiemetics, with the administration of such drugs by injection through two separate catheters being the preferred method. However, the co-administration of drugs and parenteral nutrition admixtures (PNAs) requires the consideration of compatibility, stability and potential negative interactions. To meet the purposes of clinical pharmacy, a compatibility test of ondansetron, dexamethasone and hydrocortisone with paediatric PNAs was conducted. PNAs differ in the composition of amino acid source (Primene® or Aminoplasmal Paed® 10%) and the type of injectable lipid emulsion (Lipidem® 200 mg/mL, Clinoleic® 20%, SMOFlipid® 200 mg/mL, Intralipid® 20%). An in vitro evaluation was performed in a static way as a simulated co-administration through a Y-site. The drug PNA ratios were determined based on the extreme infusion rates contained in the characteristics of medicinal products. All calculations were performed for a hypothetical patient aged 7 years weighing 24 kg. As a result of this study, it can be concluded that all tested PNAs showed the required stability in the range of parameters such as pH, osmolality, turbidity, zeta potential, MDD and homogeneity. The co-administration of antiemetic drugs does not adversely affect lipid emulsion stability. This combination was consistently compatible during the evaluation period.

The Physical Compatibility of Glycopyrrolate and Rocuronium

OBJECTIVE

Scientific evidence has rarely, if at all, been reported in the literature demonstrating analytical confirmation of the physical compatibility and stability of glycopyrrolate and rocuronium combined. The purpose of this experiment was to determine if glycopyrrolate and rocuronium are physically compatible.

METHODS

Glycopyrrolate and rocuronium were combined in various containers, observed over a 60-minute period, and compared against positive and negative controls. Measured metrics included color change, precipitate formation, Tyndall beam test, turbidity, and pH. Statistical analyses were used to assess significance of data trends.

RESULTS

The combination of glycopyrrolate and rocuronium did not result in any color change, precipitate formation, a positive Tyndall beam test, or a significantly positive turbidity and did not result in any significant change in pH, regardless of container.

CONCLUSION

Per the protocol used in this study, glycopyrrolate and rocuronium were determined to be physically compatible.

Co-administration of Intravenous Drugs: Rapidly Troubleshooting the Solid Form Composition of a Precipitate in a Multi-drug Mixture Using On-Site Raman Spectroscopy

Intravenous drugs are often co-administrated in the same intravenous catheter line due to which compatibility issues, such as complex precipitation processes in the catheter line, may occur. A well-known example that led to several neonatal deaths is the precipitation due to co-administration of ceftriaxone- and calcium-containing solutions. The current study is exploring the applicability of Raman spectroscopy for testing intravenous drug compatibility in hospital settings. The precipitation of ceftriaxone calcium was used as a model system and explored in several multi-drug mixtures containing both structurally similar and clinically relevant drugs for co-infusion. Equal molar concentrations of solutions containing ceftriaxone and calcium chloride dihydrate were mixed with solutions of cefotaxime, ampicillin, paracetamol, and metoclopramide. The precipitate formed was collected as an "unknown" material, dried, and analyzed. Several solid-state analytical methods, including X-ray powder diffraction, Raman spectroscopy, and thermogravimetric analysis, were used to characterize the precipitate. Raman microscopy was used to investigate the identity of single sub-visual particles precipitated from a mixture of ceftriaxone, cefotaxime, and calcium chloride. X-ray powder diffraction suggested that the precipitate was partially crystalline; however, the identity of the solid form of the precipitate could not be confirmed with this standard method. Raman spectroscopy combined with multi-variate analyses (principal component analysis and soft independent modelling class analogy) enabled the correct detection and identification of the precipitate as ceftriaxone calcium. Raman microscopy enabled the identification of ceftriaxone calcium single particles of sub-visual size (around 25 μm), which is in the size range that may occlude capillaries. This study indicates that Raman spectroscopy is a promising approach for supporting clinical decisions and especially for compatibility assessments of drug infusions in hospital settings.

Effective loading of incompatible drugs into nanosized vesicles: a strategy to allow concurrent administration of furosemide and midazolam in simulated clinical settings

The current study aims to assess the use of nanocarriers to limit drug incompatibilities in clinical settings, and thus eliminating serious clinical consequences (e.g., catheter obstruction and embolism), and enhancing in vivo bioavailability and efficacy. As a proof-of-concept, the impact of loading well-documented physically incompatible drugs (i.e., furosemide and midazolam) into nanosized vesicles on in vitro stability and in vivo bioavailability of the two drugs was investigated. Furosemide and midazolam were loaded into nanosized spherical vesicles at high entrapment efficiency (ca. 62-69%). The drug-loaded vesicles demonstrated a sustained drug release patterns, high physical stability and negligible hemolytic activity. Physical incompatibility was assessed by exploiting microscopic technique coupled with image processing and analysis, dynamic light scattering and laser Doppler anemometry. Incorporation of drugs separately inside the nanosized vesicles dramatically decreased size and number of the precipitated particles. In vivo, the niosomal drug mixture demonstrated a significant improvement in pharmacokinetic profiles of furosemide and midazolam compared to the mixed free drug solutions, as evidenced by their longer circulation half-lives and higher area under the plasma-concentration time curves of both drugs. Nanocarriers could provide an auspicious strategy for circumventing drug incompatibilities, thus reducing adverse reactions, hospitalization period and improving therapeutic outcomes.

Physical compatibility of medications with concentrated neonatal and pediatric parenteral nutrition: A simulated Y-site drug compatibility study

BACKGROUND

The physical intravenous Y-site compatibility of 15 different medications with highly concentrated neonatal and pediatric parenteral nutrition (PN) compounds is described, using existing and novel methods.

METHODS

PN formulations were developed based on common prescribing practices in a 400+-bed freestanding children's hospital. Medications at commonly used pediatric concentrations were mixed in a 1:1 ratio with both pediatric and neonatal PN formulations and incubated at room temperature for 4 h to simulate Y-site administration. Samples were then analyzed using the light obscuration (LO) technique, as recommended by United States Pharmacopeia (USP) chapter <788>, in addition to novel flow imaging (FI) microscopy and backgrounded membrane imaging (BMI). Physical compatibility was determined using USP <788> particle count limits for all techniques.

RESULTS

Most combinations were found to be compatible per USP <788> thresholds. Pediatric PN was incompatible by at least two methods with cisatracurium 2 mg/ml, sildenafil 0.8 mg/ml, furosemide 10 mg/ml, and ketamine 10 mg/ml. Neonatal PN was incompatible by at least two methods with cisatracurium 2 mg/ml and furosemide 10 mg/ml. Overall, results for 20 of the 30 combinations (66%) agreed across all three methods. FI and BMI results agreed for 22 of 30 combinations. LO agreed with FI in 25 of 30 combinations, and BMI and LO results agreed in 23 of 30 combinations.

CONCLUSION

Most combinations tested were found to be compatible across all methods. Novel methods of FI and BMI seem useful to further evaluate LO findings and improve accuracy of particle counts when assessing PN-medication combinations.

Exploring a case of incompatibility in a complex regimen containing Plasma-Lyte 148 in the pediatric intensive care

BACKGROUND

In the local pediatric intensive care unit, precipitation was observed in the intravenous catheter upon co-administration of four drugs together with the buffered electrolyte solution (Plasma-Lyte 148, Baxter). Co-infusion of incompatible combinations represents a safety concern.

AIMS

To reproduce the clinical case of precipitation. To further explore and understand the risk of precipitation, different combinations of the components as well as the corresponding electrolyte solution with 5% glucose (Plasma-Lyte 148 with 5% glucose) should be investigated.

METHODS

Physical compatibility of fentanyl, ketamine, midazolam, and potassium chloride was tested in combination with the buffered electrolyte solutions. The concentrations and infusion rates representative of children 10-40 kg were used to estimate mixing ratios. Analyses detecting visual particles (Tyndall beam) and sub-visual particles (light obscuration technology) were undertaken. Measured turbidity and pH in mixed samples were compared with unmixed controls.

RESULTS

Both midazolam and ketamine showed formation of visual and sub-visual particles upon mixing with Plasma-Lyte 148, respectively. Particle formation was confirmed by increased turbidity and a distinct Tyndall effect. pH in mixed samples mirrored the pH of the buffered electrolyte, suggesting that the solubility limits of midazolam, and in some ratios also ketamine, were exceeded. Midazolam also precipitated in combination with the glucose-containing product that held a lower pH, more favorable for keeping midazolam dissolved.

CONCLUSIONS

Replication of the case revealed that both midazolam and ketamine contributed to the precipitation. Midazolam and ketamine were both evaluated as incompatible with the buffered electrolyte solution and midazolam also with the buffered electrolyte-glucose solution and should not be co-administered in the same i.v.-catheter line. Fentanyl and potassium chloride were interpreted as compatible with both buffered electrolytes.

Assessment of compatibility of rhIGF-1/rhIGFBP-3 with neonatal intravenous medications

BACKGROUND

Recombinant human (rh)IGF-1/IGFBP-3 protein complex, administered as a continuous intravenous infusion in preterm infants, is being studied for the prevention of complications of prematurity.

METHODS

We conducted in vitro studies to evaluate the physical and chemical compatibility of rhIGF-1/IGFBP-3 with medications routinely administered to preterm neonates. In vitro mixing of rhIGF-1/IGFBP-3 drug product with small-molecule test medications plus corresponding controls was performed. Physical compatibility was defined as no color change, precipitation, turbidity, gas evolution, no clinically relevant change in pH/osmolality or loss in medication content. Chemical compatibility of small molecules was assessed using liquid chromatography (e.g., reverse-phase HPLC and ion chromatography), with incompatibility defined as loss of concentration of ≥ 10%. A risk evaluation was conducted for each medication based on in vitro compatibility data and potential for chemical modification.

RESULTS

In vitro physical compatibility was established for 11/19 medications: caffeine citrate, fentanyl, fluconazole, gentamicin, insulin, intravenous fat emulsion, midazolam, morphine sulfate, custom-mixed parenteral nutrition solution (with/without electrolytes), parenteral nutrition solution + intravenous fat emulsion, and vancomycin (dosed from a 5 mg/mL solution), but not for 8/19 medications: amikacin, ampicillin, dopamine, dobutamine, furosemide, meropenem, norepinephrine, and penicillin G, largely owing to changes in pH after mixing. Small-molecule compatibility was unaffected post-mixing, with no loss of small-molecule content. For physically compatible medications, risk analyses confirmed low probability and severity of a risk event.

CONCLUSION

Co-administration of rhIGF-1/rhIGFBP-3 drug product with various medications was assessed by in vitro studies using case-by-case risk analyses to determine the suitability of the products for co-administration.

Frequently acquired drugs in neonatal intensive care and their physical compatibility

AIM

Incompatibility of intravenous drugs is dangerous and therefore undesirable. The aim of this study was to identify the most commonly acquired intravenous drugs in five neonatal intensive care units and test these for compatibility.

METHODS

The most frequently acquired drugs in five key hospitals in the South-Eastern district of Norway for 2019 and 2020 served as a proxy for the prevalence of use. Representatives were selected from the three most prevalent groups based on the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical classification system. Co-administration of drug pairs was simulated using clinically relevant concentrations and infusion rates representing mixing ratios in the catheter. Particle formation was assessed by particle counting and size measurement, by visual examination using Tyndall beam, by turbidity and by measuring pH of mixed samples.

RESULTS

The most frequently acquired drug groups were anti-infectives, neurological agents and cardiovascular drugs. Compatibility testing revealed that both ampicillin and benzylpenicillin were incompatible with morphine. Flecainide and fluconazole showed no signs of incompatibility with morphine. No information on these combinations in a neonatal-relevant setting is available.

CONCLUSION

We recommend to abstain from co-administering ampicillin and benzylpenicillin with morphine in neonatal intensive settings. Morphine co-administered with flecainide and fluconazole in neonatal patients were evaluated as safe.

Co-administration of drugs with parenteral nutrition in the neonatal intensive care unit-physical compatibility between three components

There is a lack of compatibility data for intravenous therapy to neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) patients, and the purpose of this study was to contribute with documented physical compatibility data to ensure safe co-administration. We selected Numeta G13E, the 3-in-1 parenteral nutrition (PN) used at our NICU, together with the frequently used drugs morphine, dopamine and cefotaxime in two- but also three-component combinations. Incompatibility may lead to particle formation (precipitation) and oil-droplet growth (emulsion destabilisation), both which are undesirable and pose a safety risk to already unstable patients. We assessed potential particle formation of three mixing ratios for each combination (always including 1 + 1 ratio) using light obscuration, turbidity and pH measurements combined with visual inspection by focused Tyndall beam. Potential droplet-growth and emulsion destabilisation was assessed by estimating PFAT5 from droplet size measurements and counts, mean droplet diameter and polydispersity index from dynamic light scattering, and pH measurements. Mixed samples were always compared to unmixed controls to capture changes as a result of mixing and samples were analysed directly after mixing and after 4 h to simulate long contact time. None of the samples showed any sign of precipitation, neither in the drug-drug nor in the two- or three-component mixture with PN. Neither did we detect any form of emulsion destabilisation.

CONCLUSION

Dopamine, morphine and cefotaxime were found to be compatible with NumetaG13E, and it is safe to co-administer these drugs together with this PN in NICU patients.

WHAT IS KNOWN

• The need for co-administration of drugs and complex PN admixtures occurs frequently in NICU due to limited venous access. • Available compatibility data are scarce and for combinations of more than two components non-existent.

WHAT IS NEW

• Here we report physical compatibility data of two- as well as three-component combinations of frequently used NICU drugs and a 3-in-1 PN admixture. • Co-administration of Numeta G13E with dopamine and morphine, but also with morphine and cefotaxime is safe in NICU.

Sodium Valproate Incompatibility with Parenteral Nutrition Admixtures—A Risk to Patient Safety: An In Vitro Evaluation Study

Epilepsy is defined as a group of concerning problems related to the nervous system; its defining feature is a predisposition to epileptic seizures. The frequency of seizures in intensive care units (ICU) ranges from 3.3% to 34%, and ICU antiepileptic treatment is routine practice. The administration of drugs through the same infusion line is not recommended but is common clinical practice, especially in ICU. Incompatibilities between parenteral drugs and between drugs and parenteral nutrition admixtures (PNAs) are common medical errors and pose risks to patient safety. The co-administration of drugs must always be confirmed and clearly defined. The simultaneous infusion of sodium valproate (VPA, drug used to treat seizures and epilepsy) with parenteral PNAs has not yet been studied. During the experiment reported in this study, a visual control, pH, osmolality, zeta potential, particle size, polydispersity index, and turbidity were measured. The conducted research shows that the lipid emulsion composition has a significant influence on drug–PN (drug–parenteral nutrition) compatibility. The acceptance criteria were met only for PNs containing omega-3-acid-triglycerides (Omegaflex special and peri). The second fraction of particles above 1000 nm was observed for most of the tested PNAs (Lipoflex special, Lipoflex peri, Kabiven, SmofKabiven, Kabiven Peripheral, and Olimel Peri N4E), which disqualifies their simultaneous administration with VPA.

Parenteral nutrition compatibility and stability: A comprehensive review

Several guidance documents support best practices across the stages of the parenteral nutrition (PN)-use process to optimize patient safety. The critical step of PN order verification and review by the pharmacist requires a contextual assessment of the compatibility and stability implications of the ordered PN prescription. This article will provide working definitions, describe PN component characteristics, and present a wide-ranging representation of compatibility and stability concerns that need to be considered prior to preparing a PN admixture. This paper has been approved by the ASPEN Board of Directors. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Physical compatibility of Normosol-R with critical care medications used in patients with COVID-19 during simulated Y-site administration

DISCLAIMER

In an effort to expedite the publication of articles , AJHP is posting manuscripts online as soon as possible after acceptance. Accepted manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and copyedited, but are posted online before technical formatting and author proofing. These manuscripts are not the final version of record and will be replaced with the final article (formatted per AJHP style and proofed by the authors) at a later time.

PURPOSE

Guidelines from the National Institutes of Health support the use of balanced crystalloid solutions such as Normosol-R (Hospira, Lake Forest, IL) for patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). However, their clinical utility is hindered by a lack of Y-site compatibility data that is essential for use in patients with limited intravenous access. The objective of this study was to determine the physical compatibility of selected intensive care unit medications with Normosol-R.

METHODS

The study involved laboratory simulation of Y-site compatibility. Medications tested included amiodarone, caspofungin, dexmedetomidine, dobutamine, dopamine, epinephrine, levofloxacin, norepinephrine, pantoprazole, phenylephrine, piperacillin/tazobactam, vancomycin, and vasopressin. Tests performed were visual assessment with Tyndall light, turbidity measurement, and pH assessment. Tests were performed immediately after mixing (with the exception of turbidity testing) and after 1 hour and 4 hours.

RESULTS

Incompatibility was defined as observation of haze, gas, particulate, or color change or admixture turbidity above 0.3 or above 0.5 nephelometric turbidity unit (NTU), depending on whether the baseline turbidity was less than or greater than 0.5 NTU, respectively. Analysis of solubility and compatibility based on change from baseline to admixture pH in relation to reported acid dissociation constant (pKa) was performed. There was no evidence of visual incompatibility for any of the admixtures when mixed with Normosol-R. Turbidity exceeded the defined threshold with pantoprazole, phenylephrine, and highly concentrated norepinephrine. Pantoprazole was the only test medication with a significant pH change when compared to its pKa.

CONCLUSION

Normosol-R is compatible for Y-site administration with all tested medications except for pantoprazole, phenylephrine, and highly concentrated norepinephrine, allowing for potential increased use in patients with COVID-19.

All-in-One Pediatric Parenteral Nutrition Admixtures with an Extended Shelf Life-Insight in Correlations between Composition and Physicochemical Parameters

The administration of three-in-one parenteral nutrition (PN) admixtures to pediatric patients requires special consideration, specifically concerning quality and physicochemical stability. The introduction of a new parenteral amino acid solution into the market prompted us to evaluate Aminoplasmal Paed-based PN admixtures’ stability. The study aimed to determine the physicochemical parameters of the chosen variations of PN admixtures and search for a correlation between its composition and those parameters. One hundred and sixty-eight variations of PN admixtures intended for patients weighing from 10 to 25 kg and aged from 1 to 12 years and differing in the quantitative composition of electrolytes were selected for the study. The samples were prepared using each of the four intravenous lipid emulsions dedicated to pediatric patients: Intralipid 20%, Clinoleic 20%, Lipidem 20%, and Smoflipid 20%. The stability of the PN admixtures was assessed by visual inspection and determination of pH, osmolality, zeta potential, and hydrodynamic mean droplet diameter (MDD) immediately upon preparation and after seven days of storage at the temperature of 5 ± 1 °C with light protection. Pearson’s correlation was used to quantify the relationships between selected ingredients of the PN admixtures and the physicochemical parameters. The PN admixtures were characterized by pH ranging from 5.91 to 7.04, osmolality ranging from 1238 to 1678 mOsm/kg, and zeta potential ranging from −41.3 to −2.16 mV. The changes in pH and osmolality after seven days of storage did not exceed 0.2 and 4.4%, respectively. The homogeneity of the PN admixtures was confirmed by determining the polydispersity index, which ranged from 0.06 to 0.2. The MDD of the studied formulas ranged from 235 to 395 nm and from 233 to 365 nm immediately upon preparation and after the storage period, respectively. Correlations between selected components of the PN admixtures and some physicochemical parameters were found. All Aminoplasmal Paed 10%-based PN admixtures were characterized by appropriate physicochemical quality to be administered via the central veins, both immediately upon preparation and after seven days of storage at the temperature of 5 ± 1 °C with light protection. The applied electrolyte concentrations ranges and types of lipid emulsions in the selected macronutrient quantitative compositions allowed the PN admixtures to remain stable for seven days within the specified limits.

Stability and Compatibility Aspects of Drugs: The Case of Selected Cephalosporins

Intravenous drug incompatibilities are a common cause of medical errors, contributing to ineffective therapy and even life-threatening events. The co-administration of drugs must always be supported by studies confirming compatibility and thus guarantee the therapy's safety. Particular attention should be paid to the possible incompatibilities or degradation of intravenous cephalosporins in different infusion regimens since the administration of drugs with inadequate quality may cause treatment failure. Therefore, an appropriate stability test should be performed. The study aimed to present various aspects of the stability and compatibility of five cephalosporins: cefepime (CFE), cefuroxime (CFU), ceftriaxone (CFX), ceftazidime (CFZ), and cefazoline (CFL). The degradation studies in parenteral infusion fluids and PN admixtures were conducted for CFE and CFU. The interactions between CFX or CFZ and PN admixtures, as well as the compatibility of CFL with five commercial parenteral nutrition (PN) admixtures, were investigated. The content of CFX and CFZ in PN admixture after 24 h was >90%. CFL administered simultaneously with PN admixture by the same infusion set using Y-site was compatible only with Nutriflex Lipid Special. CFE and CFU were stable in all tested infusion fluids for a minimum of 48 h and decomposed in PN admixtures during storage.

Physical compatibility of alprostadil with selected drugs commonly used in the neonatal intensive care units

This study aimed to determine the physical compatibility of alprostadil with 17 continuous infusion drugs commonly administered in neonatal intensive care units. Test samples were prepared in a laminar airflow hood. Alprostadil 20 mcg/ml was mixed with each drug in a 1:1 ratio, in two orders of mixing. Physical stability of the admixtures was assessed by visual examination and by measuring turbidity. Visual examination was conducted by two observers by two methods: visual examination against a black and white background under normal fluorescent light and using a high-intensity monodirectional light. pH was measured as chemical stability predictor. Evaluations were performed immediately and 4 h after mixing. An additional visual control was performed at 24 h. Visual examination was positive or doubtful for the four drug combinations not considered compatible. Turbidity values were under 0.5 NTU throughout the study in all samples. No modifications of one pH unit or more was detected in any drug pair over time.Conclusion: Alprostadil was considered physical compatible with 13 drugs (adrenalin, amiodarone, calcium gluconate, dobutamine, dopamine, fentanyl, flecainide, furosemide, heparin, ketamine, midazolam, milrinone and morphine). Incompatibility could not be ruled out for 3 drugs (cisatracurium, dexmedetomidine and noradrenalin), and insulin was considered incompatible with alprostadil. What is Known: • Y-site administration is common in neonatal intensive care units, and volume of diluents and rate of infusions in newborns were lower than in adults which might result in high concentrations and prolonged contact time at Y-site administration. • Available data about compatibility of alprostadil with other drugs was scarce. What is New: • Alprostadil was compatible with 13 drugs commonly used in neonatal intensive care units. • Insulin was considered incompatible with alprostadil, and incompatibility cannot be ruled out for cisatracurium, dexmedetomidine and noradrenalin with alprostadil.

Toward Safe Pharmacotherapy: The Interplay between Meropenem and Parenteral Nutrition Admixtures

Simultaneous administration of parenteral nutrition (PN) admixtures with intravenous antibiotics is a common clinical problem. Coadministration of drugs incompatible with PN admixture may affect its stability, especially in the context of lipid droplet size, which is a crucial parameter for patient safety. In the present study, we investigate the in vitro compatibility of meropenem (Meropenem 1000, MPM) with five commercial PN admixtures used worldwide: Kabiven, Olimel N9E, Nutriflex Lipid Special, Nutriflex Omega Special, and SmofKabiven. The appropriate volumetric ratios, reflecting their clinical practice ratios, were used to prepare the MPM–PN admixture samples. Physicochemical properties of MPM–PN admixtures samples were determined upon preparation and after four hours of storage. The pH changes for all MPM–PN admixtures samples did not exceed the assumed level of acceptability and ranged from 6.41 to 7.42. After four hours of storage, the osmolarity changes were ±3%, except MPM–Olimel N9E samples, for which differences from 7% to 11% were observed. The adopted level of acceptability of changes in zeta potential after four hours of storage (±3 mV) was met for MPM–Kabiven, MPM–Nutriflex Lipid Special, and MPM–Nutriflex Omega Special. The mean droplet diameter for all samples was below 500 nm. However, only in the case of Nutriflex Lipid Special and Nutriflex Omega Special, the addition of MPM did not cause the formation of the second fraction of lipid droplets. The coadministration of MPM via Y-site with Kabiven, Olimel N9E, and Smofkabiven should be avoided due to osmolarity fluctuations (MPM–Olimel), significant differences in zeta potential (MPM–Olimel, MPM–Smofkabiven), and the presence of the second fraction of lipid droplets >1000 nm (MPM–Kabiven, MPM–Olimel, and MPM–Smofkabiven). The assumed acceptance criteria for MPM compatibility of MPM with PN admixtures were met only for Nutriflex Lipid Special and Nutriflex Omega Special in 1:1, 2:1, and 4:1 volume ratios.

Review of evolution and current status of protein requirements and provision in acute illness and critical care

Nutrition therapy, by enteral, parenteral, or both routes combined, is a key component of the management of critically ill, surgical, burns, and oncology patients. Established evidence indicates overfeeding (provision of excessive calories) results in increased risk of infection, morbidity, and mortality. This has led to the practice of "permissive underfeeding" of calories; however, this can often lead to inadequate provision of guideline-recommended protein intakes. Acutely ill patients requiring nutritional therapy have high protein requirements, and studies demonstrate that provision of adequate protein can result in reduced mortality and improvement in quality of life. However, a significant challenge to adequate protein delivery is the current lack of concentrated protein solutions. Patients often have fluid administration restrictions and existing protein solutions are frequently not sufficiently concentrated to deliver a patient's protein requirements. This has led to the development of new enteral and parenteral nutrition solutions incorporating higher levels of protein in smaller volumes. This review article summarizes current evidence supporting the role of higher protein intakes, especially during the early phases of nutrition therapy in acute illness, methods for assessing protein requirements, as well as, the currently available high-protein enteral and parenteral nutrition solutions. There is sufficient evidence (albeit limited from true randomized, controlled studies) to indicate that earlier provision of guideline-recommended protein intakes may be key to improving patient outcomes and that nutritional therapy that tailors caloric and protein intake to the patients' needs should be considered a desired standard of care.

Co-Administration of Drugs and Parenteral Nutrition: In Vitro Compatibility Studies of Loop Diuretics for Safer Clinical Practice

Parenteral nutrition (PN) admixtures are prone to interacting with drugs administered intravenously via a common catheter. This may cause a threat to a patient’s health and life. The literature that has been reported on the compatibility of loop diuretics with PN presents conflicting results. This work aimed to study the compatibility of furosemide and torsemide with PN used in clinical practice. Undiluted solutions of drugs were mixed with PN at various ratios determined by flow rates. In order to assess compatibility, visual control was followed by pH measurement, osmolality, mean emulsion droplet diameter (MDD), and zeta potential upon mixing and at 4 h of storage. No macroscopic changes that indicated lipid emulsion degradation were observed. After the addition of the drugs, the value of pH ranged from 6.37 ± 0.01 to 7.38 ± 0.01. The zeta potential was in reverse proportion to the drug concentration. The addition of the drugs did not affect the MDD. It may be suggested that the co-administration of furosemide or torsemide and PN caused no interaction. The absence of such signs of unwanted interactions allowed for the co-administration of the mentioned loop diuretics and PN at each of the studied ratios.

Compatibility of intravenous metronidazole with some all-in-one parenteral nutrition regimens

OBJECTIVES

Supplementation of parenteral nutrition (PN) admixtures with other parenteral drugs may be desired especially in the case of polypharmacy and limited vascular access. Metronidazole (MTZ) is administered in surgical and critically ill patients often requiring concomitant nutritional therapy in the form of parenteral nutrition. The aim of the study was to evaluate the possibility of the concomitant administration of MTZ with PN admixtures from one container.

METHODS

MTZ (1500 mg) was combined with six different PN admixtures and stored for 7 days before the simulation of administration. The mean droplet size (MDS) of the lipid emulsion, zeta potential, color, and pH of the tested samples were determined every 24 h. The content of MTZ was determined by the high-performance liquid chromatography method within the same time frames.

RESULTS

PN admixtures supplemented with MTZ were characterized by a pH range from 6.19 to 6.38 and zeta potential range from -21.6 mV to -8.8 mV. For all samples the pharmacopeial criteria for intravenously administered emulsions were met: The visual inspection showed no sign of emulsion destabilization or precipitation, and the MDS was <500 nm. The MTZ content remained >90% of the initial value throughout the whole study period.

CONCLUSIONS

Results showed the physicochemical compatibility and stability of PN admixtures supplemented with MTZ at the dose of 1500 mg. Such formulations can be stored at a temperature of 5°C for up to 7 d before administration to the patient.

Y-Site Physical Compatibility of Numeta G13E with Drugs Frequently Used at Neonatal Intensive Care

Preterm neonates require parenteral nutrition (PN) in addition to intravenous drug therapy. Due to limited venous access, drugs are often co-administered with PN via the same lumen. If incompatible, precipitation and emulsion destabilization may occur with the consequent risk of embolism and hyper-immune reactions. Information on intravenous compatibility is scarce. Our aim was to analyse the compatibility of Numeta G13E with paracetamol, vancomycin and fentanyl because of the frequency of their use. A panel of methods was chosen to assess precipitation (sub-visual particle counting, turbidity measurement, Tyndall beam effect and pH measurement) and emulsion destabilization (mean droplet diameter measurement and sub-visual counting of oil droplets, followed by estimation of PFAT5 (percentage of fat residing in globules larger than 5 µm) and pH measurement). Samples in clinically relevant mixing ratios were tested immediately and after 4 h. All samples of drugs mixed with Numeta G13E were compared to unmixed controls. None of the tested drugs precipitated in contact with Numeta G13E, and we did not see any sign of emulsion destabilization when clinically relevant mixing ratios were applied. These results are reassuring. However, when contact time exceeds the established norm, caution in the form of filter utilisation and close inspection is advised.

Stability Study and Clinical Evaluation of Lipid Injectable Emulsion in Parenteral Nutrition Admixtures Used for Preterm Neonates

BACKGROUND

Intravenous administration of parenteral nutrition (PN) admixtures containing 4-oil lipid injectable emulsion (ILE) in preterm neonates is usually prohibited because of limited clinical data. The authors evaluated the stability, safety, and efficacy of PN admixtures containing 4-oil ILE, for the first time, in preterm neonates.

METHODS

A series of PN admixtures were prepared for consecutive administration in preterm neonates over a period of 15 days. Admixture stability was assessed after 24 hours of storage at 25 and 37 °C via visual inspection and measurement of mean droplet size (MDS). Safety and efficacy of the admixtures in preterm neonates were assessed via serum triglyceride levels and body weight increase measurements, respectively.

RESULTS

PN admixtures were stable at 25 °C and had MDS ˂500 nm. After 15 days, there was a significant increase in body weight (P ≤ .0001) and level of serum triglycerides (P ≤ .0001), compared with the level before PN administration.

CONCLUSIONS

PN admixtures containing 4-oil ILE were stable at 25 °C and showed instability at 37 °C. Therefore, it is recommended to keep the temperature during administration of PN admixtures at 25 °C. PN admixtures were well tolerated and safe over a period of 8 days while providing a balanced fatty acid supply. Tight monitoring of serum triglyceride level is essential, particularly in neonates of low birth weight and/or young gestational age, to avoid hypertriglyceridemia. Hence, the use of these PN admixtures is expected to be beneficial in terms of being cost-effective and reducing the contamination risks.

Safe Practice of Y-Site Drug Administration: The Case of Colistin and Parenteral Nutrition

A serious problem in everyday clinical practice is the co-administration of drugs using the same infusion line. Potential complications of co-administration of incompatible drugs include precipitation in the infusion line or central venous catheter leading to its occlusion. Administration of precipitate and large lipid droplets into the venous system may lead to the embolization of capillaries and local or systemic inflammatory reactions, with the consequences of venous thrombosis, chronic venous insufficiency, and even pulmonary embolism. The co-administration of drugs must always be confirmed and clearly defined. The study aimed to determine the interaction between colistin (COL) in the dose used during intermittent hemodialysis and five different ready-to-use PN admixtures (PN) (Kabiven, Smofkabiven, Olimel N9E, Nutriflex Lipid Special, and Nutriflex Omega Special). COL-PN compatibilities were tested by comparing physicochemical properties (pH, zeta potential, lipid emulsion particle size) of COL and PN at three time points: immediately after sample preparation, after ten minutes, and after four hours. No changes in the visual inspection were observed. Both PN without COL and COL-PN samples remained white, homogeneous oil-in-water emulsions with no signs of phase separation, precipitation, or color change. There were no significant changes in pH, and the mean droplet diameter remained below the acceptance limit of 500 nm. The zeta potential and osmolality of COL-PN samples ranged from -21.4 to -7.22 mV and from 567 to 1304 mOsm/kg, respectively. The COL does not influence the physical stability of studied PN admixtures. The co-infusion of COL with Kabiven, Nutriflex Lipid Special, Olimel N9E, Nutriflex Omega Special, and Smofkabiven is possible in the dose used during intermittent hemodialysis.

Physicochemical stability of an admixture of lidocaine and ketamine in polypropylene syringe used in opioid-free anaesthesia

Objectives

Opioid-free anaesthesia is a treatment strategy of pain management based on the use of drugs such as lidocaine, ketamine and dexmedetomidine that do not interact significantly with opioid receptors. In particular, these drugs are used by anaesthesiologists to ensure adequate levels of analgesia during surgical procedures for burn patients such as daily wound dressings and graft surgeries. Furthermore, for hypothermia prevention and wound-healing purposes, ambient temperature must be kept high for these patients, usually between 27°C and 30°C. To facilitate the use of this technique, clinicians want to mix lidocaine and ketamine in the same syringe. No stability data is available to determine the feasibility of this admixture and at this temperature. The objective was to study the physicochemical stability of lidocaine 20 mg/mL with ketamine 2.5 mg/mL diluted with 0.9% sodium chloride (0.9% NaCl) stored at 28°C in polypropylene syringe for 48 hours.

Methods

Physical stability was evaluated by visual examination and by measuring turbidity with a spectrophotometer. Chemical stability was determined after preparation and after 6, 24 and 48 hours of conservation with a high performance liquid chromatography and pH measurements. The method was validated according to International Conference on Harmonisation Q2(R1) guidelines.

Results

Both lidocaine (99.98%±1.44%) and ketamine (100.70%±0.95%) retained more than 95% of their initial concentration after 48 hours storage. pH measurements remained stable over the course of the study (less than 0.21 point of variation). No signs of physical instability were observed after visual and subvisual inspections.

Conclusions

The physicochemical stability of lidocaine 20 mg/mL and ketamine 2.5 mg/mL diluted with 0.9% NaCl in a polypropylene syringe stored at 28°C protected from light was demonstrated for 48 hours. This infusion technique is therefore feasible from a pharmaceutical point of view in burn-unit settings.

Physical stability of an all-in-one parenteral nutrition admixture for preterm infants upon mixing with micronutrients and drugs

Objectives

The main objective was to investigate Y-site compatibility of intravenous drugs with one standard total parenteral nutrition (TPN) admixture for preterm infants. Since micro-precipitation was observed in the water phase after addition of trace elements, the concentration effect on micro-precipitation formation developed as a sub-goal.

Methods

Seven drugs (ampicillin, ceftazidime, fluconazole, fosphenytoin, furosemide, metronidazole and paracetamol) were mixed in three mixing ratios with one preterm TPN admixture. Samples were investigated within 1 hour and again after 4 hours. Precipitation was studied in a lipid-free version called TPNaq by light obscuration, turbidimetry and visual examination. Emulsion stability data were assessed by light obscuration and laser diffraction. pH was measured to assess the theoretical risk of precipitation and emulsion destabilisation. The influence of different concentrations of trace elements on precipitation was investigated by visual examination, turbidimetry and light obscuration.

Results

Ampicillin, ceftazidime, fosphenytoin and furosemide led to precipitation after mixing with TPNaq. In some samples of TPN and fluconazole, metronidazole and paracetamol, the emulsion droplet size was above the acceptance limit, although this might also be inherent to the TPN admixture. An unexpected formation of micro-precipitate correlating with increasing amounts of added trace elements might be caused by an interaction of cysteine and copper, and complicated the compatibility assessment with drugs.

Conclusions

The micro-precipitate resulting from the addition of trace elements should be investigated further. This study did not provide sufficient evidence to recommend Y-site infusion of the tested drugs and the preterm admixture; however, it might offer some additional support to other compatibility data.

Development, Validation, and Stability Assessment Application of RP-HPLC-DAD Method for Quantification of Ampicillin in Total Parenteral Nutrition Admixtures

BACKGROUND

The administration of total parenteral nutrition (TPN) is a common procedure in intensive care units, where the concomitant use of other intravenous medication is frequently needed. One of the particularly dangerous complications for neurosurgical patients is meningitis, for which high doses of ampicillin (AMP) are used. In such cases, the addition of AMP to TPN admixtures would be a desirable procedure. Thus, the AMP determination method in TPN admixture was developed and validated.

METHODS

An isocratic HPLC analysis was performed on a LiChrospher C18 end-capped column (250 mm, 4.6 mm, 5 µm) with a C18 pre-column (LiChrospher 100, 4 mm, 5 µm). The flow rate was 1.0 mL min^-1 and the detection wavelength was 230 nm. System suitability parameters, such as capacity factor, numbers of the theoretical plate, asymmetry factor, as well as validation parameters, including method precision, accuracy, linearity, selectivity, and robustness, were set up.

RESULTS

The method was shown to be linear, precise, accurate, specific, and robust, and it can be used for the quantitative analysis of AMP in TPN admixtures.

CONCLUSIONS

The degradation of AMP in the TPN admixtures occurred according to first order kinetics. The degradation rate was high and dependent on the composition of the mixture and the storage conditions (t_0.5 varied from 142.44 h to 300.45 h).

Y-Site Compatibility of Intravenous Levetiracetam With Commonly Used Critical Care Medications

Purpose: Levetiracetam is an antiepileptic medication commonly used in critical care areas for seizure treatment or prophylaxis. Compatibility data of levetiracetam with other critical care medications are limited, which can make administration challenging. This study aims to assess the physical Y-site compatibility of intravenous levetiracetam with some other commonly used critical care medications. Methods: Y-site administration was simulated by independently mixing levetiracetam with each of 11 selected medications in a 4-dram, colorless, screw-cap, glass vial, at a 1:1 ratio. Clinically used concentrations of each medication were compounded in 0.9% sodium chloride following United States Pharmacopeia chapter 797 standards. Physical compatibility was observed and assessed at 0, 15, and 30 minutes after mixing. Medication mixtures were considered physically incompatible if there was visual evidence of color change, gas evolution, haze, or particulate formation, pH change >10%, or if they had an absorbance value >0.010 A. Results: No evidence of physical incompatibility was observed during simulated Y-site testing with cisatracurium 1 mg/mL, dexmedetomidine 4 µg/mL, fosphenytoin 15 mg PE/mL, norepinephrine 16 mg/mL, norepinephrine 32 mg/mL, norepinephrine 64 mg/mL, piperacillin-tazobactam 33.75 mg/mL, propofol 10 mg/mL, vancomycin 5 mg/mL, or vasopressin 1 unit/mL when tested in 0.9% sodium chloride. Levetiracetam was incompatible with piperacillin-tazobactam 45 mg/mL. Conclusion: Levetiracetam 5 mg/mL in 0.9% sodium chloride was found to be physically compatible for 30 minutes with 10 of the 11 medications tested during simulated Y-site administration.

In vitro compatibility studies of vancomycin with ready-to-use parenteral nutrition admixtures for safer clinical practice

BACKGROUND & AIMS

A co-infusion of parenteral nutrition (PN) and other drugs is often necessary in patients with a limited number of vascular access sites. This practice increases the risk of interaction between drugs and PN admixtures that may be manifested as drug precipitation or lipid emulsion destabilization. The present study aimed to determine the compatibility between vancomycin (VMC) and five ready-to-use PN admixtures utilized worldwide (Kabiven, Nutriflex Lipid Special, Olimel N9E, Nutriflex Omega Special, and Smofkabiven) in order to assess the possibility of their co-administration via Y-sites.

METHODS

VMC and PN admixtures were mixed at three volume ratios (1:1, 1.5:1, and 3:1) and potential interactions were examined using visual inspection, pH and osmolality measurements, as well as particle size and zeta potential determination. The analyses were conducted immediately after sample preparation and after 4 h of storage.

RESULTS

The PN admixtures were characterized by the pH in the range from 5.44 to 6.23, the osmolality in the range from 1169 ± 3 mOsm/kg H₂O to 1929 ± 6 mOsm/kg H₂O. The zeta potential of the PN admixtures was between -12.97 ± 0.86 mV and -4.55 ± 0.45 mV. The particle size, expressed as mean droplet diameter (MDD) ranged from 226.8 ± 4.2 nm to 281.6 ± 6.3 nm. The addition of VMC to PN admixtures caused a decrease in the pH, osmolality, and zeta potential. The MDD values for all samples were below 500 nm, except VMC-Olimel N9E at the volume ratio 1:1 (v/v), for which MDD = 805 nm. The presence of lipid particles exceeded the size of 4000 nm was observed for VMC-Olimel N9E and VMC-Smofkabiven.

CONCLUSIONS

We suggest that a simultaneous administration of VMC with PN admixtures containing olive oil should be avoided. As we established, this type of emulsion is less stable and tends to form agglomerates when combined with VMC. However, as demonstrated in our study, when it is necessary to co-administer VMC with PN admixtures, this is possible with Kabiven, Nutriflex Lipid Special, and Nutriflex Omega Special at volume ratios of 1:1, 1.5:1, and 3:1.

Emulsion Stability of Different Intravenous Propofol Formulations in Simulated Co-Administration with Remifentanil Hydrochloride

Background

Propofol and remifentanil often need to be co-administered via the same intravenous catheter line, which predisposes to potential compatibility issues. Our aim was to determine and compare the emulsion stability of three propofol formulations, two with medium chain triglycerides and one with long chain triglycerides, when administered together with remifentanil hydrochloride.

Methods

Remifentanil hydrochloride (Ultiva ® ) 50 µg/mL was mixed with two concentrations (10 and 20 mg/mL) of each propofol formulation in mixing ratios 10+1, 20+1, 1+1 and 1+20. Emulsion stability was assessed immediately after mixing and 4 hours later by measurements of pH, mean droplet diameter, polydispersity index, and calculating percentage of fat residing in globules>5 µm (PFAT5).

Results

High PFAT5 values were observed in certain mixing ratios. The correlation between elevated PFAT5 and high propofol concentration (20 mg/mL), when remifentanil was in abundance and for long contact time indicated that these factors influenced the stability of the propofol emulsions.

Conclusions

Stability differences between the propofol formulations were identified under extreme test conditions. Co-administration of remifentanil and propofol in the same i.v. line is safe when propofol is in abundance. Caution is advised when remifentanil is present in equal parts or in abundance when co-administered with propofol 20 mg/mL.

Physical compatibility of MCT/LCT propofol emulsions with crystalloids during simulated Y-site administration

Objective

In intensive care units numerous drugs have to be infused simultaneously, resulting inline incompatibility. Propofol is formulated as a lipid emulsion and it is well known that electrolytes can affect the stability of an emulsion system. Our goal was to evaluate and to compare the physical compatibility of three commercial propofol lipid emulsions of different manufacturers, mixing them with the most commonly used crystalloids in intensive care units.

Methods

Simulated Y-site administration was accomplished by mixing the 2% MCT/LCT propofol emulsions with the commonly used crystalloids in the intensive care unit in a 1:1 ratio in a polypropylene syringe. The aliquot samples were evaluated immediately and at 15, 30, 60 and 120 min after preparation by visual observation, pH and droplet size measurement.

Results

There was no emulsion breakdown or any visible change during the study period. Mixing the propofols with crystalloids, 10% magnesium sulphate or 10% potassium chloride there was no significant change in the droplet size compared with the original propofol emulsions. A slight alteration in droplet size was noticed in a few of the propofol samples, when magnesium, potassium or both were the secondary additives to the crystalloids, but this is not considered clinically relevant.

Conclusion

The physical properties of emulsions are determined by component, therefore the compatibility data in literature has to be evaluated prudently. All three commercially available MCT/LCT propofol emulsions are considered physically compatible with the tested crystalloids.

Making Medicines Baby Size: The Challenges in Bridging the Formulation Gap in Neonatal Medicine

The development of age-appropriate formulations should focus on dosage forms that can deliver variable yet accurate doses that are safe and acceptable to the child, are matched to his/her development and ability, and avoid medication errors. However, in the past decade, the medication needs of neonates have largely been neglected. The aim of this review is to expand on what differentiates the needs of preterm and term neonates from those of the older paediatric subsets, in terms of environment of care, ability to measure and administer the dose (from the perspective of the patient and carer, the routes of administration, the device and the product), neonatal biopharmaceutics and regulatory challenges. This review offers insight into those challenges posed by the formulation of medicinal products for neonatal patients in order to support the development of clinically relevant products.

Investigations of Physical Compatibilities of Commonly Used Intravenous Medications with and without Parenteral Nutrition in Pediatric Cardiovascular Intensive Care Unit Patients

Many pediatric intensive care patients require numerous specialized intravenous (IV) medications at various dosages in multiple fluids often with nutritional support. This requires several venous access points due to lack of Y-site compatibility data for combinations of two or more drugs. This project investigated physical compatibilities of intravenous medications: alprostadil, calcium gluconate, dexmedetomidine, epinephrine, norepinephrine, esmolol, furosemide, vasopressin, and milrinone with and without lipid-free total parenteral nutrition (TPN) commonly used in a pediatric cardiovascular intensive care unit (CVICU) patient. Actual drug combinations were evaluated using a simulated Y-site study design. Compatibility was determined based on observational data: odor (change/appearance), evolution of gas, and visual appearance combined with physical or chemical endpoints with predefined acceptance criteria: change in pH (± 1 unit), and turbidity (>0.5 NTU) at eight time points between 0 and 240 min. All binary drug combinations along with the four drug plus TPN combination were found to be physically compatible up to 240 min. The three drug combinations were determined to be incompatible and were not evaluated with TPN. This study demonstrates the utility of simulated Y-site study design to multi-drug combinations and increases the scientific body of knowledge related to medications used in a pediatric CVICU.

Evaluation of Y-site compatibility of home total parenteral nutrition and intravenous loop diuretics

In chronic kidney disease (CKD), the design of the parenteral nutrition (PN) regimen becomes more challenging where only individualized PN is appropriate, coupled with the increased risk of unintended interactions with diuretic therapy. In an effort to ensure safe therapy in the home, we assessed the physical stability of bespoke PN formulations intended for use in CKD in the simultaneous presence of Y-site compatibility of furosemide and torasemide. The patient's daily needs were determined based on both metabolic demands as well as the demand for fluids.Complete admixtures were subjected to physical stability analysis consisting of visual inspection, a validated light microscope method, pH measurement, zeta potential measurement, and characterization of oily globule size distribution. Y-site compatibility of furosemide and torasemide with the formulated admixtures was also performed.The total parenteral admixture was stable over 7 days at +4°C and 24 h at +25°C and compatible via the Y-line together with furosemide and torasemide over 12 h at +25°C.The stability assessment guarantees the safety and efficiency of home PN with loop diuretics therapy in CKD patients. This means that these patients do not need long hospitalization and they can be safely treated at home. Furthermore, this study proved that torasemide is the same safety diuretic as furosemide, which has a great impact on clinical practice.

A new alternative for intravenous lipid emulsion 20% w/w from superolein oil and its effect on lipid and liver profiles in an animal model

PURPOSE

Intravenous lipid emulsion (IVLE) was first used to prevent essential fatty acids deficiency. IVLE with α-tocopherol was reported to provide protection against parenteral nutrition-associated liver disease. This study aims to determine the optimal parameters and conditions in developing a physically stable IVLE from superolein palm oil (SoLE 20%) and its effect on lipid and liver profiles in an animal model.

METHODS

SoLE 20% was prepared using superolein oil and MCT oil (1:1), stabilized with egg lecithin and homogenized using a high pressure homogenizer. Mean droplet size was used as the response variable and was measured using laser diffraction and dynamic light scattering method. Physical stability at 4 °C, 25 °C and 40 °C storage temperatures were determined based on particle size and distribution, polydispersity index, zeta potential, viscosity, vitamin E contents and pH. Sterility and pyrogenicity were also investigated. Rabbits were administered with 1.0 g/kg SoLE 20% for 5 h and repeated daily for 3 days to investigate its effect on blood lipid and liver enzymes profile.

RESULTS

SoLE 20% was succesfully prepared using the optimized parameters of 800 psi, 7 cycles and 1.2 g lecithin. The IVLE prepared had a particle size of 252.60 ± 4.88 nm and was physically stable for 4 weeks at different storage temperatures. SoLE 20% had a high content of natural vitamin E, remained sterile and pyrogen free. It was also safe for intravenous administration and did not alter the blood lipid (p > 0.05) and liver enzymes profiles (p > 0.05) of the rabbits.

CONCLUSION

The optimal parameters to develop a stable superolein based IVLE are 800 psi homogenization pressure, 7 homogenization cycles and using 1.2 g lecithin as the emulsifier. SoLE 20% is safe for intravenous administration and does not significantly alter lipid and liver enzymes profiles of the rabbits.

Effect of Lipid Emulsion on Stability of Ampicillin in Total Parenteral Nutrition

Background: Ampicillin (AMP) is frequently administered parenterally in critically ill patients with meningitis or endocarditis. Many of them require parallel infusion of total parenteral nutrition (TPN) admixtures. The aim of the study was to determine the physicochemical stability of AMP in TPN admixtures. Methods: AMP was added to two formulations of TPN admixtures differing in the lipid emulsion (Lipofundin^® MCT/LCT 20% or LIPIDem^®). Samples were stored at 4 ± 1 °C with light protection, and at 25 ± 1 °C with and without light protection to assess the impact of temperature and light on formulation stability. Every 24 h the pH, zeta potential, mean droplet diameter (MDD) of a lipid emulsion, and AMP concentration using HPLC method were determined. The assessment of stability and compatibility of TPN admixtures with vitamins and trace elements was carried out immediately after preparation and after 24 h of storage. Results: The addition of AMP as well as vitamins and trace elements to the TPN admixtures did not affect their physical stability. An increase in the pH value of approx. 0.6 and reduction of zeta potential were observed. The MDD of the lipid emulsions was below the limit of 500 nm (dynamic light scattering (DLS) method) and no fat droplets greater than 525 nm were observed (light diffraction (LD) method). The content of AMP after the first 24 h was within the acceptable limit of 90% for TPN admixtures stored at 4 ± 1 °C and 25 ± 1 °C with light protection. Conclusions: The results showed that co-administration of AMP in the same bag with TPN admixture at the tested dose is possible when used ex tempore and with light protection.

Biological and Clinical Aspects of an Olive Oil-Based Lipid Emulsion-A Review

Intravenous lipid emulsions (ILEs) have been an integral component of parenteral nutrition for more than 50 years. Numerous formulations are available and are based on vegetable (soybean, olive, coconut) and animal (fish) oils. Therefore, each of these formulations has a unique fatty acid composition that offers both benefits and limitations. As clinical experience and our understanding of the effects of fatty acids on various physiological processes has grown, there is evidence to suggest that some ILEs may have benefits compared with others. Current evidence suggests that olive oil-based ILE may preserve immune, hepatobiliary, and endothelial cell function, and may reduce lipid peroxidation and plasma lipid levels. There is good evidence from a large randomized controlled study to support a benefit of olive oil-based ILE over soybean oil-based ILE on reducing infections in critically ill patients. At present there is limited evidence to demonstrate a benefit of olive oil-based ILE over other ILEs on glucose metabolism, and few data exist to demonstrate a benefit on clinical outcomes such as hospital or intensive care unit stay, duration of mechanical ventilation, or mortality. We review the current research and clinical evidence supporting the potential positive biological and clinical aspects of olive oil-based ILE and conclude that olive oil-based ILE is well tolerated and provides effective nutritional support to various PN-requiring patient populations. Olive oil-based ILE appears to support the innate immune system, is associated with fewer infections, induces less lipid peroxidation, and is not associated with increased hepatobiliary or lipid disturbances. These data would suggest that olive oil-based ILE is a valuable option in various PN-requiring patient populations.

Compatibility of intravenous ibuprofen with lipids and parenteral nutrition, for use as a continuous infusion

There is increasing interest to administer ibuprofen as a continuous infusion instead of a traditional bolus for treating Patent Ductus Arteriosus (PDA). However, its compatibility data with commonly used drugs in the neonatal period, including parenteral nutrition (PN) and lipids is unavailable. The aim is to determine the compatibility of intravenous ibuprofen lysine with various ANZNN parenteral nutrition consensus group standard neonatal PN formulations and lipids. The PN and lipid solutions used in a tertiary neonatal unit were obtained. These included a Starter, Standard Preterm and low carbohydrate PN, and IV SMOF lipid admixture (SMOFLipid 20% 15 mL; Vitalipid N infant 4 mL, Soluvit N 1 mL) plus vitamin mixtures. 10% glucose was used as a control. 1:1 mixtures of different concentrations (1.25 to 5mg/mL) of ibuprofen lysine and each of the PN/glucose/lipid formulations were made. Samples were taken at hourly intervals for a total of 4 hours and tested for both physical (visual assessment, pH and microscopy) and chemical compatibility (High Performance Liquid Chromatography analysis). Zeta potential and particle diameter were measured for SMOF lipid admixture and ibuprofen combination to assess emulsion stability. 24 hour stability of ibuprofen dilution in 5 mL BD Luer-lok polypropylene syringes at 25°C was also assessed. Most PN formed opaque solutions when mixed with ibuprofen 2.5 and 5mg/mL solutions. However, ibuprofen dilution of 1.25mg/mL produced clear, colourless solutions with no microscopic particles when mixed with all PN/glucose/lipid formulations tested. Ibuprofen was chemically stable with all PN and SMOF lipid admixture, for a period of 4 hours. The zeta potential and particle diameter were within acceptable limits. Ibuprofen lysine was stable over 24 hours in Luer-lok polypropylene syringes. Ibuprofen 1.25mg/mL is physically and chemically compatible with 10% glucose, starter PN, standard preterm and low carbohydrate PN, and SMOF lipid admixture plus vitamins for a period of four hours, which is the maximum time they could be in an admixture during a continuous infusion.

Physical compatibility of total parenteral nutrition and drugs in Y-site administration to children from neonates to adolescents

OBJECTIVES

Infusion of precipitate or destabilized emulsion can be harmful. The purpose of this study was to obtain Y-site compatibility data on intravenous drugs and total parenteral nutrition (TPN) relevant for children.

METHODS

Two three-in-one TPN admixtures (Olimel N5E and Numeta G16E) used for children of different age groups were tested with ten drugs (ampicillin, ceftazidime, clindamycin, dexamethasone, fluconazole, fosphenytoin, furosemide, metronidazole, ondansetron and paracetamol). Drug : TPN ratios were estimated from a wide range of age and weight classes, and the most extreme mixing ratios (drug > TPN, TPN > drug) in addition to 1 + 1 were chosen. Assessment of potential precipitation was performed by subvisual particle counting, visual examinations and measurements of turbidity and pH. Emulsion stability was investigated by estimation of percentage of droplets above 5 μm (PFAT5), mean droplet diameter and pH measurements. Complimentary theoretical evaluations were performed.

KEY FINDINGS

Ampicillin, fosphenytoin and furosemide precipitated when mixed with TPN. The results for ceftazidime, clindamycin, dexamethasone, fluconazole, metronidazole, ondansetron and paracetamol suggest that they were compatible with either TPN in the tested concentrations. None of the drugs were found to destabilize the emulsions.

CONCLUSION

Three drugs showed clear signs of precipitation when mixed with TPN and these products should not be co-administered in the same infusion line.