Association of statin use and clinical outcomes in heart failure patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Use of Statins in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: Current Evidence and Perspectives

Systemic inflammation and coronary microvascular endothelial dysfunction are essential pathophysiological factors in heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) that support the use of statins. The pleiotropic properties of statins, such as anti-inflammatory, antihypertrophic, antifibrotic, and antioxidant effects, are generally accepted and may be beneficial in HF, especially in HFpEF. Numerous observational clinical trials have consistently shown a beneficial prognostic effect of statins in patients with HFpEF, while the results of two larger trials in patients with HFrEF have been controversial. Such differences may be related to a more pronounced impact of the pleiotropic properties of statins on the pathophysiology of HFpEF and pro-inflammatory comorbidities (arterial hypertension, diabetes mellitus, obesity, chronic kidney disease) that are more common in HFpEF. This review discusses the potential mechanisms of statin action that may be beneficial for patients with HFpEF, as well as clinical trials that have evaluated the statin effects on left ventricular diastolic function and clinical outcomes in patients with HFpEF.

Lipotoxicity as a therapeutic target in obesity and diabetic cardiomyopathy

Unhealthy sources of fats, ultra-processed foods with added sugars, and a sedentary lifestyle make humans more susceptible to developing overweight and obesity. While lipids constitute an integral component of the organism, excessive and abnormal lipid accumulation that exceeds the storage capacity of lipid droplets disrupts the intracellular composition of fatty acids and results in the release of deleterious lipid species, thereby giving rise to a pathological state termed lipotoxicity. This condition induces endoplasmic reticulum stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, inflammatory responses, and cell death. Recent advances in omics technologies and analytical methodologies and clinical research have provided novel insights into the mechanisms of lipotoxicity, including gut dysbiosis, epigenetic and epitranscriptomic modifications, dysfunction of lipid droplets, post-translational modifications, and altered membrane lipid composition. In this review, we discuss the recent knowledge on the mechanisms underlying the development of lipotoxicity and lipotoxic cardiometabolic disease in obesity, with a particular focus on lipotoxic and diabetic cardiomyopathy.

Effects of Administration and Intensity of Statins on Mortality in Patients Undergoing Hemodialysis

(1) Background: Few studies have investigated the association between the intensity of statins and patient survival rates in patients undergoing hemodialysis (HD) as primary outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate patient survival rates according to the intensity of statins using a large sample of patients undergoing maintenance HD. (2) Methods: Data from a national HD quality assessment program were used in this study (n = 53,345). We divided the patients into four groups based on the administration and intensity of statins: Group 1, patients without a prescription of statins (n = 37,944); Group 2, patients with a prescription of a low intensity of statins (n = 700); Group 3, patients with a prescription of a moderate intensity of statins (n = 14,160); Group 4, patients with a prescription of a high intensity of statins (n = 541). (3) Results: Significant differences in baseline characteristics were observed among the four groups. Group 1 had the best patient survival among the four groups in the univariate Cox regression analyses. However, multivariable Cox regression analyses showed that the patient survival rate was higher for Group 3 than for Group 1. Cox regression analyses using data of a balanced cohort showed that, on univariate analyses, the HRs were 0.93 (95% CI, 0.91-0.95, p < 0.001) in Group 2 and 0.95 (95% CI, 0.93-0.96, p < 0.001) in Group 3 compared to that in Group 1. Group 4 had a higher mortality rate than Groups 2 or 3. The results from the cohort after balancing showed a similar trend to those from the multivariable Cox regression analyses. Young age and less comorbidities in Group 1 were mainly associated with favorable survival in Group 1 in the univariate analysis using cohort before balancing. Among the subgroup analyses based on sex, age, presence of diabetes mellitus, and heart disease, most multivariable analyses showed significantly higher patient survival rates in Group 3 than for Group 1. (4) Conclusions: Our study exhibited significant differences in baseline characteristics between the groups, leading to limitations in establishing a robust association between statin intensity and clinical outcomes. However, we conducted various statistical analyses to mitigate these differences. Some results, including multivariable analyses controlling for baseline characteristics and analyses of a balanced cohort using propensity score weighting, indicated improved patient survival in the moderate-intensity statin group compared to non-users. These findings suggest that moderate statin use may be associated with favorable patient survival.

Management of dyslipidemia in special groups

Dyslipidemia management in situations like pregnancy, in diseases like rheumatoid arthritis, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) disease, chronic liver disease, and in the elderly are challenging scenarios. Pregnancy is a contraindication for many drugs. The interaction of various drugs used in HIV infection and rheumatoid arthritis makes it even more difficult to treat with conventional and approved drugs for dyslipidemia. Elderly and chronic renal failure patients often do not tolerate the drugs very well and the data of dyslipidemia management is very different. Lastly, COVID-19 is a unique scenario where clear information is yet to be provided. In this manuscript, the current understanding and available data on the treatment of dyslipidemia in these special situations are discussed.

Heart Failure Treatment in 2023: Is There a Place for Lipid Lowering Therapy?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

An evidence for lipid lowering therapy in heart failure is briefly summarized in this review.

RECENT FINDINGS

Heart failure therapy is based on recent guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure. The question of the importance of hypolipidemic treatment in heart failure remains insufficiently answered. We still rely only on results of two randomized controlled trials that did not show significant benefit of statins on mortality in these patients. In contrast, some meta-analysis, prospective or retrospective cohorts, found some positive effects of this therapy. Recently, the role of inflammation and the possibility of its influence by hypolipidemics have been discussed. PCSK9 inhibitors, new lipid lowering drugs, are very effective in LDL-cholesterol lowering and atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases prevention. The role of PCSK9 inhibitors in heart failure treatment is investigated. Based on current knowledge, hypolipidemics are not generally recommended in heart failure therapy, unless there is another indication for their use.

Correlation between Statin Solubility and Mortality in Patients on Chronic Hemodialysis

This study aimed to evaluate the effect of statin solubility on the survival of patients undergoing hemodialysis (HD). This retrospective study used laboratory and clinical data from a national HD quality assessment program and claims data (n = 53,345). The use of statins was defined as prescription ≥30 days during 6 months of each HD quality assessment period. We divided the patients into three groups based on the use and solubility of statins: No group, patients without a prescription of statins (n = 37,944); Hydro group, patients with a prescription of hydrophilic statins (n = 2823); and Lipo group, patients with a prescription of lipophilic statins (n = 12,578). The 5-year survival rates in the No, Hydro, and Lipo groups were 69.6%, 67.9%, and 67.9%, respectively (p < 0.001 for the trend). Multivariable Cox regression analyses showed that the Lipo group had better patient survival than the No group. However, multivariable analyses did not show statistical significance between the Hydro and No or Lipo groups. In all subgroups based on sex, age, presence of diabetes mellitus, and heart disease, the Lipo group had better patient survival than the No group. We identified no significant association between hydrophilic and lipophilic statins and patient survival. However, patients taking lipophilic statins had a modest survival benefit compared with those who did not receive statins.

Lower low density lipoprotein cholesterol associates to higher mortality in non-diabetic heart failure patients

Background

In patients with established heart failure (HF) low total cholesterol levels associate with worse prognosis. Evidence concerning the impact of Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c) in HF is scarce. We aimed to evaluate the prognostic impact of LDL-c in patients with HF, both with and without diabetes mellitus (DM).

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed outpatients with chronic HF with systolic dysfunction followed in our HF clinic from January/2012 to May/2018. LDL-c was calculated using the Friedewald's formula. Patients without a complete lipid profile were excluded. The endpoint under analysis was all-cause mortality. Patients were followed until January/2021. A Cox-regression analysis was used to study the prognostic impact of LDL-c. The LDL-c cut-off used was 100 mg/dL (mean value). Analysis was stratified according to the coexistence of DM. Multivariate models were built adjusting for age, sex, coronary artery disease, atherosclerotic non-coronary artery disease, arterial hypertension, smoking status, statin use, severity of systolic dysfunction, creatinine clearance and evidence-based therapy.

Results

We studied 522 chronic HF patients, mean age was 70 years, 66.5% males. Severe systolic dysfunction was present in 42.7%, 30.5% had coronary heart disease, 60.5% had arterial hypertension, 41.6% had DM. A total of 92.0% were treated with beta blocker, 87.5% with an ACEi/ARB and 29.1% with a MRA. During a median follow-up of 53 (interquartile range 33-73) months, 235 (45%) patients died. Patients with LDL-c ≤100 mg/dL presented increased multivariate-adjusted risk of all-cause mortality: HR = 1.58 (95% CI: 1.08-2.30), p = 0.02. When patients were stratified according to DM, LDL-c ≤100 mg/dL was independently associated with increased death risk - HR = 1.55 (95% CI:1.05-2.30), p = 0.03 in patients without DM; in patients with DM no association was detected - multivariate-adjusted HR = 1.18 (95% CI: 0.77-1.80), p = 0.44.

Conclusion

Non-DM HF patients with LDL-c>100 mg/dL have a 35% reduction in the mortality risk when compared with those with lower values. The "cholesterol paradox" in HF also applies to LDL-c in non-DM patients.

Therapies for patients with coexisting heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease

Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) are two common comorbidities that share similar pathophysiological mechanisms. There is a growing interest in the potential of targeted therapies to improve outcomes in patients with coexisting HFrEF and NAFLD. This manuscript reviews current and potential therapies for patients with coexisting HFrEF and NAFLD. Pharmacological therapies, including angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers, mineralocorticoids receptor antagonist, and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors, have been shown to reduce fibrosis and fat deposits in the liver. However, there are currently no data showing the beneficial effects of sacubitril/valsartan, ivabradine, hydralazine, isosorbide nitrates, digoxin, or beta blockers on NAFLD in patients with HFrEF. This study highlights the importance of considering HFrEF and NAFLD when developing treatment plans for patients with these comorbidities. Further research is needed in patients with coexisting HFrEF and NAFLD, with an emphasis on novel therapies and the importance of a multidisciplinary approach for managing these complex comorbidities.

Oral and gut microbiome alterations in heart failure: Epidemiology, pathogenesis and response to advanced heart failure therapies

Despite significant advances in therapies, heart failure (HF) remains a progressive disease that, once advanced, is associated with significant death and disability. Cardiac replacement therapies with left ventricular assist device (LVAD) and heart transplantation (HT) are the only treatment options for advanced HF, while lifesaving they can also be lifespan limiting due to the associated complications. Systemic inflammation is mechanistically important in HF pathophysiology and progression. However, directly targeting inflammation in HF has not been beneficial thus far. These failed attempts at therapeutics might be related to our limited understanding of the factors that cause inflammation in HF, and, therefore, to our inability to investigate these triggers in interventional studies. Observational studies have consistently demonstrated associations between alterations in the digestive (gut and oral) microbiome, inflammation and HF risk and progression. Additionally, recent data indicate that these microbial perturbations persist following LVAD and HT, along with residual inflammation and oxidative stress. Furthermore, there is rising recognition of the critical contribution of the microbiome to the metabolism of immunosuppressive drugs after HT. Cumulatively, these findings might posit a mechanistic link between microbiome alterations, systemic inflammation, and adverse outcomes in HF patients before and after cardiac replacement therapies. This review (1) provides an update on available data linking changes in digestive tract microbiota, inflammation, and oxidative stress, to HF pathogenesis and progression; (2) describes evolution of these relationships following LVAD and HT; and (3) outlines present and future intervention strategies that can manipulate the microbiome and possibly modify HF disease trajectory.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of the association between all-cause mortality and statin therapy in patients with preserved ejection fraction heart failure (HFpEF)

BACKGROUND

Heart failure (HF) is a growing global health burden increasing in prevalence as the average age of the population rises. HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is defined as EF that is ≥50% and represents almost half of the population with HF.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis exploring an association between HFpEF and statin use on all-cause mortality and cardiovascular rehospitalisation. Searches were conducted in MEDLINE via Ovid, The Cochrane Library for clinical trials in CENTRAL and Embase via Ovid for articles published between 1 January 2000 and 2 July 2021. Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and evidence rated for quality using the GRADE approach.

RESULTS

A total of 19 studies were included in the review. The analysis suggests a risk reduction of 27% for the statin exposed participants compared to the statin non-exposed participants (HR 0.73, 95% CI: 0.68-0.79) with regard to all-cause mortality. There is a low level of heterogeneity (I² = 38%) associated with this result that has been accounted for by using a random effects model, however given the included studies are observational, the quality of the evidence is rated as low. Information on rehospitalisation was insufficient for determining the impact of statin use on rehospitalisations.

CONCLUSION

Our meta-analysis revealed a reduction in all-cause mortality in patients with HFpEF on statin therapy. Considering the outcomes from this meta-analysis there is a need for high level studies to provide quality evidence on the use of statins in patients with HFpEF.

Residual risk in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease

The residual risk in patients with atherosclerosis, despite the its controversial aspects, remains an urgent problem of modern cardiology. The article presents a review of publications on the prevalence and significance for determining the prognosis of residual risk, which is currently interpreted as the risk of macroand microvascular complications in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ACVD) taking standard therapy, with the achievement of optimal levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, blood pressure and glucose. Based on available publications, we highlighted current views on the factors associated with residual inflammatory and lipid risks in ACVD patients, including those associated with heart failure and diabetes, and the prognostic significance of residual risk in such patients. An attempt was made to rationale the significance of determining the residual risk for secondary prevention of cardiovascular events.

Long-Term Prognosis of Patients with Heart Failure: Follow-Up Results of Journey HF-TR Study Population

BACKGROUND

Despite advances in therapeutic management of patients with heart failure, there is still an increasing morbidity and mortality all over the world. In this study, we aimed to present the 3-year follow-up outcomes of patients included in the Journey HF-TR study in 2016 that has evaluated the clinical characteristics and management of patients with acute heart failure admitted to the hospital and present a national registry data.

METHODS

The study was designed retrospectively between November 2016 and December 2019. Patient data included in the previously published Journey HF-TR study were used. Among 1606 patients, 1484 patients were included due to dropout of 122 patients due to inhospital death and due to exclusion of 173 due to incomplete data. The study included 1311 patients. Age, gender, concomitant chronic conditions, precipitating factors, New York Heart Association, and left ventricular ejection fraction factors were adjusted in the Cox regression analysis.

RESULTS

During the 3-year follow-up period, the ratio of hospitalization and mortality was 70.5% and 52.1%, respectively. Common causes of mortality were acute decompensation of heart failure and acute coronary syndrome. Angiotensin receptor blockers, betablockers, statin, and sacubitril/valsartan were found to reduce mortality. Hospitalization due to acute decompensated heart failure, acute coronary syndrome, lung diseases, oncological diseases, and cerebrovascular diseases was associated with the increased risk of mortality. Implantation of cardiac devices also reduced the mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite advances in therapeutic management of patients with heart failure, our study demonstrated that the long-term mortality still is high. Much more efforts are needed to improve the inhospital and long-term survival of patients with chronic heart failure.

Statins in High Cardiovascular Risk Patients: Do Comorbidities and Characteristics Matter?

Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) morbidity and mortality are decreasing in high-income countries, but ASCVD remains the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in high-income countries. Over the past few decades, major risk factors for ASCVD, including LDL cholesterol (LDL-C), have been identified. Statins are the drug of choice for patients at increased risk of ASCVD and remain one of the most commonly used and effective drugs for reducing LDL cholesterol and the risk of mortality and coronary artery disease in high-risk groups. Unfortunately, doctors tend to under-prescribe or under-dose these drugs, mostly out of fear of side effects. The latest guidelines emphasize that treatment intensity should increase with increasing cardiovascular risk and that the decision to initiate intervention remains a matter of individual consideration and shared decision-making. The purpose of this review was to analyze the indications for initiation or continuation of statin therapy in different categories of patient with high cardiovascular risk, considering their complexity and comorbidities in order to personalize treatment.

Statins are associated with reduced likelihood of sarcopenia in a sample of heart failure outpatients: a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Sarcopenia is prevalent in heart failure (HF) patients, contributing to its poor prognosis. Statin use is postulated as a probable risk for developing sarcopenia, but little is known regarding this association in HF patients. This work aims at classifying and characterising sarcopenia and at describing the association of statin use with sarcopenia in a sample of Portuguese HF outpatients.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional study, a sample of 136 HF patients (median age: 59 years, 33.8% women) was recruited from an HF outpatients' clinic of a University Hospital in Portugal. Sarcopenia was defined according to the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People 2. Clinical, nutritional, and dietary data were collected.

RESULTS

A total of 25 (18.4%) individuals were categorised as sarcopenic, ranging from 12.2% in younger (< 65 years) participants vs. 30.4% in older ones and from 3.3% in men vs. 47.8% in women. Severe sarcopenia accounted for 7.4% of the sample and sarcopenic obesity was identified in 5.1% of the individuals. A total of 65.4% of the participants were statin users. In multivariable analysis (n = 132, 25 sarcopenic), the use of statins was inversely associated with sarcopenia (OR = 0.03; 95% CI = 0.01, 0.30). Each additional age year was associated with a 9% increase in the likelihood of being sarcopenic (OR = 1.09; 95% CI = 1.01, 1.17), and each Kg.m^-2 increment in body mass index was associated with a 21% decrease in the likelihood of sarcopenia (OR = 0.79; 95% CI = 0.65, 0.96). The daily use of five or more medicines was also directly associated with sarcopenia (OR = 26.87; 95% CI = 2.01, 359.26). On the other hand, being a man and being physically active were inversely associated with sarcopenia (OR = 0.01; 95% CI = 0.00, 0.07 and OR = 0.09; 95% CI = 0.01, 0.65, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Contrary to what was expected, patients medicated with statins were less likely to be sarcopenic. Although this finding deserves further research, we hypothesise that this might be related to the pleiotropic effects of statins on endothelial function, contributing to better neuromuscular fitness.

[Treatment of patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction: reliance on clinical phenotypes]

The article discusses the problem of improving the effectiveness of treatment of heart failure with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (HFpEF). The relative "failure" of early studies with renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors was largely due to the lack of understanding that patients with HFpEF represent a heterogeneous group with various etiological factors and pathogenetic mechanisms of the disease. Therefore, the so-called personalized approach should be used in the treatment of these patients. This approach is based on the identification of clearly defined disease phenotypes, each characterized by a set of demographic, pathogenetic, and clinical characteristics. Based on the literature and own experience, the authors consider four main phenotypes of HFpEF: 1) phenotype with brain natriuretic peptide "deficiency" syndrome associated with moderate/severe left ventricular hypertrophy; 2) cardiometabolic phenotype; 3) phenotype with mixed pulmonary hypertension and right ventricular failure; and 4) cardiac amyloidosis phenotype. In the treatment of patients with phenotype 1, it seems preferable to use the valsartan + sacubitril (possibly in combination with spironolactone) combination treatment; with phenotype 2, the empagliflozin treatment is the best; with phenotype 3, the phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor sildenafil; and with phenotype 4, transthyretin stabilizers. Certain features of different phenotypes overlap and may change as the disease progresses. Nevertheless, the isolation of these phenotypes is advisable to prioritize the choice of drug therapy. Thus, the diuretic treatment (preferably torasemide) should be considered in the presence of congestion, regardless of the HFpEF phenotype; the valsartan + sacubitril and spironolactone treatment is appropriate not only in the shortage of brain natriuretic peptide but also in the presence of concentric left ventricular hypertrophy (except for the amyloidosis phenotype); and the treatment with empagliflozin and statins may be considered in all situations where pro-inflammatory mechanisms are involved.

Perceived symptoms as the primary indicators for 30-day heart failure readmission

Background

To identify 30-day rehospitalizations in patients discharged with heart failure (HF) based on clinical indications, physiologic measures and symptoms.

Methods

Fifty-six patients with heart failure participated. After discharge to home, clinical indicators of dyspnea, fatigue, orthopnea, dyspnea with exertion, daily weight, edema, heart rate, blood pressure, mental condition, medication adherence, and overall well-being were reported by participants daily for up to 30 days.

Results

Joint modeling of longitudinal and time-to-event approach was applied to assess the association of readmission with longitudinal measurements. There was no association between demographic, physiological, or laboratory variables and re-hospitalization within 30 days post discharge. Perceptions of dyspnea (p = .012) and feeling unwell (p < .001) were associated with rehospitalization. Patients struggling to breath were 10.7 times more likely to be readmitted than those not struggling to breath.

Conclusion

Perceived measures, particularly dyspnea and feeling unwell were more important factors than demographic, physiological, or laboratory parameters in predicting 30-day rehospitalizations in this racially diverse cohort. The symptomatic experience of heart failure is an important indicator of rehospitalization.

Melatonin supplementation improves N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide levels and quality of life in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: Results from MeHR trial, a randomized clinical trial

Background

Melatonin, the major secretion of the pineal gland, has beneficial effects on the cardiovascular system and might advantage heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) by attenuating the effects of the renin–angiotensin–aldosterone and sympathetic system on the heart besides its antioxidant and anti‐inflammatory effects.

Hypothesis

We hypothesized that oral melatonin might improve echocardiographic parameters, serum biomarkers, and a composite clinical outcome (including quality of life, hospitalization, and mortality) in patients with HFrEF.

Methods

A placebo‐controlled double‐blinded randomized clinical trial was conducted on patients with stable HFrEF. The intervention was 10 mg melatonin or placebo tablets administered every night for 24 weeks. Echocardiography and measurements of N‐terminal pro‐B‐type natriuretic peptide (NT‐Pro BNP), high‐sensitivity C‐reactive protein, lipid profile, and psychological parameters were done at baseline and after 24 weeks.

Results

Overall, 92 patients were recruited, and 85 completed the study (melatonin: 42, placebo: 43). Serum NT‐Pro BNP decreased significantly in the melatonin compared with the placebo group (estimated marginal means for difference [95% confidence interval]: 111.0 [6.2–215.7], p = .044). Moreover, the melatonin group had a significantly better clinical outcome (0.93 [0.18–1.69], p = .017), quality of life (5.8 [0.9–12.5], p = .037), and New York Heart Association class (odds ratio: 12.9 [1.6–102.4]; p = .015) at the end of the trial. Other studied outcomes were not significantly different between groups.

Conclusions

Oral melatonin decreased NT‐Pro BNP and improved the quality of life in patients with HFrEF. Thus it might be a beneficial supplement in HFrEF.

Dysregulated Epicardial Adipose Tissue as a Risk Factor and Potential Therapeutic Target of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction in Diabetes

Cardiovascular (CV) disease and heart failure (HF) are the leading cause of mortality in type 2 diabetes (T2DM), a metabolic disease which represents a fast-growing health challenge worldwide. Specifically, T2DM induces a cluster of systemic metabolic and non-metabolic signaling which may promote myocardium derangements such as inflammation, fibrosis, and myocyte stiffness, which represent the hallmarks of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). On the other hand, several observational studies have reported that patients with T2DM have an abnormally enlarged and biologically transformed epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) compared with non-diabetic controls. This expanded EAT not only causes a mechanical constriction of the diastolic filling but is also a source of pro-inflammatory mediators capable of causing inflammation, microcirculatory dysfunction and fibrosis of the underlying myocardium, thus impairing the relaxability of the left ventricle and increasing its filling pressure. In addition to representing a potential CV risk factor, emerging evidence shows that EAT may guide the therapeutic decision in diabetic patients as drugs such as metformin, glucagon-like peptide‑1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2-Is), have been associated with attenuation of EAT enlargement.

PoLA/CFPiP/PCS/PSLD/PSD/PSH guidelines on diagnosis and therapy of lipid disorders in Poland 2021

In Poland there are still nearly 20 million individuals with hypercholesterolaemia, most of them are unaware of their condition; that is also why only ca. 5% of patients with familial hypercholesterolaemia have been diagnosed; that is why other rare cholesterol metabolism disorders are so rarely diagnosed in Poland. Let us hope that these guidelines, being an effect of work of experts representing 6 main scientific societies, as well as the network of PoLA lipid centers being a part of the EAS lipid centers, certification of lipidologists by PoLA, or the growing number of centers for rare diseases, with a network planned by the Ministry of Health, improvements in coordinated care for patients after myocardial infarction (KOS-Zawał), reimbursement of innovative agents, as well as introduction in Poland of an effective primary prevention program, will make improvement in relation to these unmet needs in diagnostics and treatment of lipid disorders possible.

Epicardial Fat Expansion in Diabetic and Obese Patients With Heart Failure and Preserved Ejection Fraction-A Specific HFpEF Phenotype

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a heterogeneous syndrome with diverse etiologies and pathophysiological factors. Obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), conditions that coexist frequently, induce a cluster of metabolic and non-metabolic signaling derangements which are in favor to induce inflammation, fibrosis, myocyte stiffness, all hallmarks of HFpEF. In contrast to other HFpEF risk factors, obesity and T2DM are often associated with the generation of enlarged epicardial adipose tissue (EAT). EAT acts as an endocrine tissue that may exacerbate myocardial inflammation and fibrosis via various paracrine and vasocrine signals. In addition, an abnormally large EAT poses mechanical stress on the heart via pericardial restrain. HFpEF patients with enlarged EAT may belong to a unique phenotype that can benefit from specific EAT-targeted interventions, including life-style modifications and pharmacologically via statins and fat modifying anti-diabetics drugs; like metformin, sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors, or glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists, respectively.

Risk-factors associated with extremely high cardiovascular risk of mid- and long-term mortality following myocardial infarction: Analysis of the Hyperlipidaemia Therapy in tERtiary Cardiological cEnTer (TERCET) registry

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Risk-factor identification and risk stratification are prerequisites to the effective primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Patients at the highest risk benefit the most from the intensive risk-factor reduction. However, the high-risk patients' group is heterogeneous, and it is increasingly recognised that there is an 'extreme-risk' category of patients who may require particularly close attention and intensive therapeutic approach. The aim of this study was to identify subgroups of patients at the highest risk of death following myocardial infarction (MI) that might be considered as those at extremely high CVD risk.

METHODS

We used data from 19,582 participants of the Hyperlipidaemia Therapy in tERtiary Cardiological cEnTer (TERCET) Registry (NCT03065543) of patients with ischaemic heart disease in Poland from 2006 to present. Characteristics of 13,052 patients with chronic coronary syndromes (CCS) were compared with those of 4295 patients with myocardial infarction (STEMI and NSTEMI). Multivariable logistic regression with stepwise backward elimination was used to identify risk factors associated with mortality in the 12-36 months following the index hospitalisation.

RESULTS

The mortality rates were significantly higher in patients after MI than in patients with CCS. In the multivariable analysis, the risk factors most strongly associated with 12-month mortality in patients after MI were left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) lower than 35% (hazard ratio [HR] 3.83, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.14-4.67), age >75 years (HR 1.91, 95%CI 1.55-2.35), multivessel coronary artery disease (HR 1.61, 95%CI 1.30-1.99), atrial fibrillation (HR 1.53, 95%CI 1.21-1.94) diabetes mellitus (HR 1.35, 95%CI 1.11-1.64) and increased LDL-C (HR per 1 mmol/l 1.09, 95%CI 1.01-1.19) or creatinine levels (HR per 10 μmol/L 1.04, 95% CI 1.04-1.05). The risk factors that influenced mortality after 24-36 months were consistent with those after 12 months, with additional low haemoglobin (20-25% risk increase per 1 mmol reduction) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (65% risk increase after 36 months).

CONCLUSIONS

In our large, single-center real-world analysis, we identified the patients with the highest risk of death who could probably benefit the most from the most intensive therapy, and hence should be considered to be an 'extreme risk' population.

Atorvastatin-Eluting Contact Lenses: Effects of Molecular Imprinting and Sterilization on Drug Loading and Release

Statins are receiving increasing attention in the ophthalmic field. Their activity as 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl–CoA (HMG–CoA) reductase inhibitors is clinically used to regulate cholesterol levels and leads to pleiotropic effects, which may help in the management of diabetes-related ocular pathologies. This work aims to design bioinspired contact lenses (CLs) with an affinity for atorvastatin by mimicking the active site of HMG–CoA reductase. Sets of imprinted and nonimprinted 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA) hydrogels were synthesized, varying the contents in functional monomers that bear chemical groups that resemble those present in HMG–CoA reductase, namely, ethylene glycol phenyl ether methacrylate (EGPEM), 2-aminoethyl methacrylate hydrochloride (AEMA), and N-(3-aminopropyl) methacrylamide hydrochloride (APMA). The hydrogels were characterized in terms of suitability as CLs (solvent uptake, light transmission, mechanical properties, and biocompatibility) and capability to load and release atorvastatin. Three sterilization protocols (steam heat, gamma radiation, and high hydrostatic pressure) were implemented and their effects on hydrogel properties were evaluated. Copolymerization of AEMA and, particularly, APMA endowed the hydrogels with a high affinity for atorvastatin (up to 11 mg/g; K_N/W > 200). Only high hydrostatic pressure sterilization preserved atorvastatin stability and hydrogel performance. Permeability studies through the porcine cornea and sclera tissues revealed that the amount of atorvastatin accumulated in the cornea and sclera could be effective to treat ocular surface diseases.

Therapeutic implications of statins in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a review of current literature

Statins are one of the standard treatments to prevent cardiovascular events such as coronary artery disease and heart failure (HF). However, data on the use of statins to improve clinical outcomes in patients with established HF remains controversial. We summarized available clinical studies which investigated the effects of statins on clinical outcomes in patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Statins possess many pleiotropic effects in addition to lipid-lowering properties that positively affect the pathophysiology of HF. In HFrEF, data from two large randomized placebo-controlled trials did not show benefits of statins on mortality of patients with HFrEF. However, more recent prospective cohort studies and meta-analyses have shown decreased risk of mortality as well as cardiovascular hospitalization with statins treatment. In HFpEF, most prospective and retrospective cohort studies as well as meta analyses have consistently reported positive effects of statins, including reducing mortality and improving other clinical outcomes. Current evidence also suggests better outcomes with lipophilic statins in patients with HF. In summary, statins might be effective in improving survival and other clinical outcomes in patients with HF, especially for patients with HFpEF. Lipophilic statins might also be more beneficial for HF patients. Based on current evidence, statins did not cause harm and should be continued in HF patients who are already taking the medication. Further randomized controlled trials are needed to clarify the benefits of statins in HF patients.

Correction to: Association of statin use and clinical outcomes in heart failure patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

An amendment to this paper has been published and can be accessed via the original article.

Comparative Effect of Statins and Omega-3 Supplementation on Cardiovascular Events: Meta-Analysis and Network Meta-Analysis of 63 Randomized Controlled Trials Including 264,516 Participants

Statins and omega-3 supplementation have been recommended for cardiovascular disease prevention, but comparative effects have not been investigated. This study aimed to summarize current evidence of the effect of statins and omega-3 supplementation on cardiovascular events. A meta-analysis and a network meta-analysis of 63 randomized controlled trials were used to calculate pooled relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the effects of specific statins and omega-3 supplementation compared with controls. Overall, the statin group showed significant risk reductions in total cardiovascular disease, coronary heart disease, myocardial infarction, and stroke; however, omega-3 supplementation significantly decreased the risks of coronary heart disease and myocardial infarction only, in the comparison with the control group. In comparison with omega-3 supplementation, pravastatin significantly reduced the risks of total cardiovascular disease (RR = 0.81, 95% CI = 0.72–0.91), coronary heart disease (RR = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.60–0.94), and myocardial infarction (RR = 0.71, 95% CI = 0.55–0.94). Risks of total cardiovascular disease, coronary heart disease, myocardial infarction, and stroke in the atorvastatin group were statistically lower than those in the omega-3 group, with RRs (95% CIs) of 0.80 (0.73–0.88), 0.64 (0.50–0.82), 0.75 (0.60–0.93), and 0.81 (0.66–0.99), respectively. The findings of this study suggest that pravastatin and atorvastatin may be more beneficial than omega-3 supplementation in reducing the risk of total cardiovascular disease, coronary heart disease, and myocardial infarction.

The Molecular and Cellular Mechanisms Associated with a Microvascular Inflammation in the Pathogenesis of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a severe disease with an often unfavorable outcome. The prevalence of HFpEF continues to increase, while effective treatment options remain elusive. All the medical strategies used to improve the outcome in a heart failure with reduced ejection fraction proved ineffective in HFpEF, which was probably due to the different mechanisms of development of these two types of heart failure and the diversity of the HFpEF phenotypes. According to the current paradigm of HFpEF development, a chronic mild pro-inflammatory state causes a coronary microvascular endothelial inflammation, with further myocardial fibrosis and diastolic dysfunction progression. This inflammatory paradigm of HFpEF has been confirmed with some evidence, and suppressing the inflammation may become a novel strategy for treating and managing HFpEF. This review summarizes current concepts about a microvascular inflammation in hypertrophied myocardium and provides a translational perspective of the anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory approaches in HFpEF.