Focus on the role of substance P in chronic urticaria

Beyond the itch: the complex interplay of immune, neurological, and psychological factors in chronic urticaria

Chronic urticaria (CU) arises from a multifaceted interplay of immunological, neurological, and psychological components. Immune dysregulation, mediated through both immunoglobulin E (IgE)-dependent and IgE-independent pathways, plays a pivotal role in CU pathogenesis, involving key effector cells such as mast cells (MCs), basophils, and eosinophils. This dysregulation culminates in the release of histamine, prostaglandins, and other mediators, which precipitate pruritus. The chronicity of the disease leads to sustained pruritic symptoms, contributing to both central and peripheral sensitization. The excitation of the itch circuit is augmented, leading to the release of neurotransmitters and neuropeptides, which subsequently interact with immune cells. Psychological factors such as depression, anxiety, and stress exacerbate CU symptoms and diminish quality of life. These factors disrupt the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis and the autonomic nervous system (ANS). Furthermore, the act of scratching activates the reward circuit, resulting in the manifestation of the itch-scratching cycle. Current treatments, such as antihistamines, omalizumab, and cyclosporine, demonstrate variable efficacy and are often associated with adverse effects. A holistic approach addressing both psychological and physiological aspects is advocated. This review highlights the critical importance of understanding neuroimmune interactions and the influence of psychosomatic factors in CU. It aims to enhance diagnostic and therapeutic strategies by integrating psychological, neurological, and immunological perspectives.

Assesment of Salivary and Serum Levels of HBD2 in Patients with Chronic Angioedema

Background/Objectives: Human β-defensin 2 (HBD2) is a protein that plays an important role in activating the immune system by modulating spinal pathways and the inflammatory response. According to previous research, HBD2 was proven to be important in chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) (their values were significantly elevated in CSU patients, with a significant correlation between HBD2 levels and the percentage of peripheral basophils, suggesting that elevated HBD2 levels may be a potential marker of basophil and mast cell activation), which led us to additional research on the HBD2 molecule in isolated chronic angioedema. The aim of this research is to examine HBD2 values in the saliva and serum of patients with isolated angioedema, as a potential biomarker of the disease. Methods: This cross-sectional study involved a total of 102 participants, involving three groups: 33 patients with isolated chronic non-hereditary angioedema (AE) (defined as sudden onset of localized edema without chronic urticaria), 33 patients with angioedema associated with chronic urticaria (CU+AE), and 35 healthy participants (controls, CTRL). They provided a saliva sample to determine HBD2 levels using an ELISA (Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay). Subsequently, a peripheral blood sample (serum) was taken from the participants to determine HBD2 levels using the same ELISA. Results: Salivary HBD2 levels were significantly higher in those with CU+AE than in the CTRL (p = 0.019). While salivary HBD2 values differed between those with angioedema and CTRL, the serum HBD2 values did not. Also, no correlation between the levels of HBD2 in saliva and serum was found. Conclusions: Since we found that salivary HBD2 values were significantly higher in those with CU+AE than in CTRL, this points to a possible role of the HBD2 molecule in pathogenesis of AE (namely, that it induces degranulation in mast cells and vascular permeability, and has antimicrobial properties) Therefore, more research is needed to determine how reliable salivary HBD2 measurement is, as well as its significance.

Clinical values of serum neuropeptide changes in patients with chronic urticaria complicated with allergic rhinitis

AIM

Neurogenic inflammation has been recognized as an important contributing factor in the pathogenesis of allergic rhinitis. The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical values of substance P, vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP), and neuropeptide Y as biomarkers of disease severity and treatment outcomes of chronic urticaria complicated with allergic rhinitis.

METHODS

Our prospective study included 150 patients with chronic urticaria complicated with allergic rhinitis and 80 healthy control patients. Before treatment, the serum samples of all study subjects were collected and analyzed using enzyme-linked immunosorbent analysis. The intervention group received imipramine of 10 mg/day orally for 2 weeks, and the Symptom Score Reduction Index (SSRI) was used to analyze clinical outcomes, which were categorized as effectual and ineffectual.

RESULTS

Our data suggested that substance P, VIP, and neuropeptide Y were significantly correlated to each other. Lower levels of substance P, VIP, and neuropeptide Y were associated with better treatment outcomes. A good detection sensitivity (69.49%) and specificity (80.22%) could be achieved using a combination of these markers (area under curve = 0.85).

CONCLUSIONS

Our data indicates that substance P, VIP, and neuropeptide Y levels before treatment correlate strongly with the treatment outcomes of the patients, which could potentially serve as a decision support tool in clinical management of chronic urticaria complicated with allergic rhinitis.

Beyond Allergies-Updates on The Role of Mas-Related G-Protein-Coupled Receptor X2 in Chronic Urticaria and Atopic Dermatitis

Mast cells (MCs) are an important part of the immune system, responding both to pathogens and toxins, but they also play an important role in allergic diseases, where recent data show that non-IgE-mediated activation is also of relevance, especially in chronic urticaria (CU) and atopic dermatitis (AD). Skin MCs express Mas-related G-protein-coupled receptor X2 (MRGPRX2), a key protein in non-IgE-dependent MC degranulation, and its overactivity is one of the triggering factors for the above-mentioned diseases, making MRGPRX2 a potential therapeutic target. Reviewing the latest literature revealed our need to focus on the discovery of MRGPRX2 activators as well as the ongoing vast research towards finding specific MRGPRX2 inhibitors for potential therapeutic approaches. Most of these studies are in their preliminary stages, with one drug currently being investigated in a clinical trial. Future studies and improved model systems are needed to verify whether any of these inhibitors may have the potential to be the next therapeutic treatment for CU, AD, and other pseudo-allergic reactions.

Omalizumab for Patients with Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria: A Narrative Review of Current Status

Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) is a debilitating inflammatory disorder of the skin, characterized by a fluctuating natural history, a complex mechanism of action, and a significant burden on patients, including effect on quality of life, development of psychosocial disorders, and a range of comorbidities. Recent international guidelines recommend a therapeutic approach of first-line treatment with second generation H1-antihistamines and second-line treatment with the biologic omalizumab. Here, the salient aspects of CSU and current status of data for omalizumab for patients with CSU are reviewed, with a focus on mechanism of action, efficacy and real-world effectiveness (including patient outcomes, response, relapse, and remission), and safety (including consideration of the risk of anaphylaxis). The review also considers recent data on COVID-19, CSU, and omalizumab and presents our perspective on future needs. Overall, the data suggest that omalizumab is an effective and well-tolerated treatment for patients with CSU that provides benefits for a wide range of patients.

Activation of ryanodine-sensitive calcium store drives pseudo-allergic dermatitis via Mas-related G protein-coupled receptor X2 in mast cells

Mast cell (MC) activation is implicated in the pathogenesis of multiple immunodysregulatory skin disorders. Activation of an IgE-independent pseudo-allergic route has been recently found to be mainly mediated via Mas-Related G protein-coupled receptor X2 (MRGPRX2). Ryanodine receptor (RYR) regulates intracellular calcium liberation. Calcium mobilization is critical in the regulation of MC functional programs. However, the role of RYR in MRGPRX2-mediated pseudo-allergic skin reaction has not been fully addressed. To study the role of RYR in vivo, we established a murine skin pseudo-allergic reaction model. RYR inhibitor attenuated MRGPRX2 ligand substance P (SP)-induced vascular permeability and neutrophil recruitment. Then, we confirmed the role of RYR in an MC line (LAD2 cells) and primary human skin-derived MCs. In LAD2 cells, RYR inhibitor pretreatment dampened MC degranulation (detected by β-hexosaminidase retlease), calcium mobilization, IL-13, TNF-α, CCL-1, CCL-2 mRNA, and protein expression activated by MRGPRX2 ligands, namely, compound 48/80 (c48/80) and SP. Moreover, the inhibition effect of c48/80 by RYR inhibitor was verified in skin MCs. After the confirmation of RYR2 and RYR3 expression, the isoforms were silenced by siRNA-mediated knockdown. MRGPRX2-induced LAD2 cell exocytosis and cytokine generation were substantially inhibited by RYR3 knockdown, while RYR2 had less contribution. Collectively, our finding suggests that RYR activation contributes to MRGPRX2-triggered pseudo-allergic dermatitis, and provides a potential approach for MRGPRX2-mediated disorders.

Chronic urticaria and the pathogenic role of mast cells

The signs and symptoms of chronic urticaria (CU) are caused by the activation and degranulation of skin mast cells (MCs). Recent studies have added to our understanding of how and why skin MCs are involved and different in CU. Also, novel and relevant mechanisms of MC activation in CU have been identified and characterized. Finally, the use of MC-targeted and MC mediator-specific treatments has helped to better define the role of the skin environment, the contribution of specific MC mediators, and the relevance of MC crosstalk with other cells in the pathogenesis of CU. Here, we review these recent findings and their impact on our understanding of CU, with a focus on chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU). Also, we highlight open questions, issues of controversy, and unmet needs, and we suggest what studies should be performed moving forward.

Inflammation and Organ Injury the Role of Substance P and Its Receptors

Tightly controlled inflammation is an indispensable mechanism in the maintenance of cellular and organismal homeostasis in living organisms. However, aberrant inflammation is detrimental and has been suggested as a key contributor to organ injury with different etiologies. Substance P (SP) is a neuropeptide with a robust effect on inflammation. The proinflammatory effects of SP are achieved by activating its functional receptors, namely the neurokinin 1 receptor (NK1R) receptor and mas-related G protein-coupled receptors X member 2 (MRGPRX2) and its murine homolog MRGPRB2. Upon activation, the receptors further signal to several cellular signaling pathways involved in the onset, development, and progression of inflammation. Therefore, excessive SP-NK1R or SP-MRGPRX2/B2 signals have been implicated in the pathogenesis of inflammation-associated organ injury. In this review, we summarize our current knowledge of SP and its receptors and the emerging roles of the SP-NK1R system and the SP-MRGPRX2/B2 system in inflammation and injury in multiple organs resulting from different pathologies. We also briefly discuss the prospect of developing a therapeutic strategy for inflammatory organ injury by disrupting the proinflammatory actions of SP via pharmacological intervention.

Further Understanding of Neuro-Immune Interactions in Allergy: Implications in Pathophysiology and Role in Disease Progression

The complicated interaction between the central and the autonomic (sympathetic, parasympathetic, and enteric) nervous systems on the one hand and the immune system and its components, on the other hand, seems to substantially contribute to allergy pathophysiology, uncovering an under-recognized association that could have diagnostic and therapeutic potentials. Neurons connect directly with and regulate the function of many immune cells, including mast cells, the cells that have a leading role in allergic disorders. Proinflammatory mediators such as cytokines, neurotrophins, chemokines, and neuropeptides are released by immune cells, which stimulate sensory neurons. The release of neurotransmitters and neuropeptides caused by the activation of these neurons directly impacts the functional activity of immune cells and vice versa, playing a decisive role in this communication. Successful application of Pavlovian conditioning in allergic disorders supports the existence of a psychoneuroimmunological interplay in classical allergic hypersensitivity reactions. Activation of neuronal homeostatic reflexes, like sneezing in allergic rhinitis, coughing in allergic asthma, and vomiting in food allergy, offers additional evidence of a neuroimmunological interaction that aims to maintain homeostasis. Dysregulation of this interaction may cause overstimulation of the immune system that will produce profound symptoms and exaggerated hemodynamic responses that will lead to severe allergic pathophysiological events, including anaphylaxis. In this article, we have systematically reviewed and discussed the evidence regarding the role of the neuro-immune interactions in common allergic clinical modalities like allergic rhinitis, chronic rhinosinusitis, allergic asthma, food allergy, atopic dermatitis, and urticaria. It is essential to understand unknown – to most of the immunology and allergy experts – neurological networks that not only physiologically cooperate with the immune system to regulate homeostasis but also pathogenetically interact with more or less known immunological pathways, contribute to what is known as neuroimmunological inflammation, and shift homeostasis to instability and disease clinical expression. This understanding will provide recognition of new allergic phenotypes/endotypes and directions to focus on specialized treatments, as the era of personalized patient-centered medicine, is hastening apace.

Omalizumab is not just an anti-immunoglobulin E

INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE

The mechanism of omalizumab in urticaria is not literally known. Omalizumab may affect receptors on the mast cell surface in other ways, especially other than Fc epsilon RI.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty patients who were treated with omalizumab with the diagnosis of chronic urticaria were included in the study. For serum vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP), kallikrein (KAL), and substance p (SP) values, 5 mL of blood was taken from the patients. These bloods were centrifuged for 5 min and stored at -80° until the levels were measured. The changes in values measured at baseline, third month, and sixth month were analyzed by Friedman test. A value of p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant results.

RESULTS

While SP, KAL, and VIP values increased continuously, it was observed that the D-dimer value decreased.

CONCLUSION

This study shows that omalizumab can affect mast cells other than IgE. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to show the relationship between omalizumab and VIP.

Action of substance P and PAMP(9-20) on different excitation sites of MRGPRX2 induces differences in mast cell activation

MRGPRX2 on mast cells (MCs) is the target that directly mediates MC activation through the activity of small molecular substances. Previous work has attempted to prove that substance P (SP) and PAMP(9-20) induce an MRGPRX2-mediated MC degranulation reaction. However, SP activates MRGPRX2-induced histamine release, which may lead to allergic airway inflammation, while PAMP(9-20)-induced MrgprB2 activation releases more tryptase and fewer monoamines. Due to the lack of direct available comparisons, the different types of sensitizing mediators released by the action of SP and PAMP(9-20) inducing pseudo-allergic reactions via MRGPRX2 are unclear. To investigate whether the action sites of excited MRGPRX2 are different for SP and PAMP(9-20), leading to different effects, the release of inflammatory mediators was measured using MC degranulation reactions and RNA-seq assay in vitro. Mice were treated to observe local inflammation and MC degranulation in vivo. Moreover, site-directed mutagenesis was used to verify the excited sites of SP and PAMP(9-20). SP and PAMP(9-20) both activated MRGPRX2 and led MCs to release inflammatory mediators. Significantly different levels of histamine, tryptase, TNF-α, MCP-1, and other cytokines were released in vivo and in vitro. G165E, D184N, W243R, and H259Y were necessary for SP to activate MRGPRX2, while only D184N and W243R were important for PAMP(9-20). The downstream signaling pathways activated by SP and PAMP(9-20) also differed in the phosphorylation level of PKC. There were differences in the sites via which SP and PAMP(9-20) activate MRGPRX2 and also in the activated downstream signaling pathways, which led to the differences the activation of the pathways and effects of SP- and PAMP(9-20)-induced MRGPRX2 activation.

The Classification, Pathogenesis, Diagnostic Workup, and Management of Urticaria: An Update

Wheals and angioedema are the signature signs of urticaria, and itch is the key symptom. Urticaria, in most patients, is acute and resolves within days (acute urticaria, AU). Chronic urticaria (CU) can be of long duration and results not only in severely impaired quality of life but also has a socioeconomic impact due to work productivity impairment. In some patients with CU, the wheals and angioedema are induced exclusively by defined and definite triggers (chronic inducible urticaria, CIndU). In most patients with CU, wheals and angioedema develop unprompted, spontaneously (chronic spontaneous urticaria, CSU). The management of CU aims for the complete control and absence of its signs and symptoms. This is achieved, in most patients, by prophylactic treatment until spontaneous remission occurs. Modern, second-generation H1-antihistamines are the first-line therapy, with the option of updosing to fourfold, and omalizumab is used when this fails.

Unlocking the Non-IgE-Mediated Pseudo-Allergic Reaction Puzzle with Mas-Related G-Protein Coupled Receptor Member X2 (MRGPRX2)

Mas-related G-protein coupled receptor member X2 (MRGPRX2) is a class A GPCR expressed on mast cells. Mast cells are granulated tissue-resident cells known for host cell response, allergic response, and vascular homeostasis. Immunoglobulin E receptor (FcεRI)-mediated mast cell activation is a well-studied and recognized mechanism of allergy and hypersensitivity reactions. However, non-IgE-mediated mast cell activation is less explored and is not well recognized. After decades of uncertainty, MRGPRX2 was discovered as the receptor responsible for non-IgE-mediated mast cells activation. The puzzle of non-IgE-mediated pseudo-allergic reaction is unlocked by MRGPRX2, evidenced by a plethora of reported endogenous and exogenous MRGPRX2 agonists. MRGPRX2 is exclusively expressed on mast cells and exhibits varying affinity for many molecules such as antimicrobial host defense peptides, neuropeptides, and even US Food and Drug Administration-approved drugs. The discovery of MRGPRX2 has changed our understanding of mast cell biology and filled the missing link of the underlying mechanism of drug-induced MC degranulation and pseudo-allergic reactions. These non-canonical characteristics render MRGPRX2 an intriguing player in allergic diseases. In the present article, we reviewed the emerging role of MRGPRX2 as a non-IgE-mediated mechanism of mast cell activation in pseudo-allergic reactions. We have presented an overview of mast cells, their receptors, structural insight into MRGPRX2, MRGPRX2 agonists and antagonists, the crucial role of MRGPRX2 in pseudo-allergic reactions, current challenges, and the future research direction.

The Multifaceted Mas-Related G Protein-Coupled Receptor Member X2 in Allergic Diseases and Beyond

Recent research on mast cell biology has turned its focus on MRGPRX2, a new member of the Mas-related G protein-coupled subfamily of receptors (Mrgprs), originally described in nociceptive neurons of the dorsal root ganglia. MRGPRX2, a member of this group, is present not only in neurons but also in mast cells (MCs), specifically, and potentially in other cells of the immune system, such as basophils and eosinophils. As emerging new functions for this receptor are studied, a variety of both natural and pharmacologic ligands are being uncovered, linked to the ability to induce receptor-mediated MC activation and degranulation. The diversity of these ligands, characterized in their human, mice, or rat homologues, seems to match that of the receptor's interactions. Natural ligands include host defense peptides, basic molecules, and key neuropeptides such as substance P and vasointestinal peptide (known for their role in the transmission of pain and itch) as well as eosinophil granule-derived proteins. Exogenous ligands include MC secretagogues such as compound 48/80 and mastoparan, a component of bee wasp venom, and several peptidergic drugs, among which are members of the quinolone family, neuromuscular blocking agents, morphine, and vancomycin. These discoveries shed light on its capacity as a multifaceted participant in naturally occurring responses within immunity and neural stimulus perception, as in responses at the center of immune pathology. In host defense, the mice Mrgprb2 has been proven to aid mast cells in the detection of peptidic molecules from bacteria and in the release of peptides with antimicrobial activities and other immune mediators. There are several potential actions described for it in tissue homeostasis and repair. In the realm of pathologic response, there is evidence to suggest that this receptor is also involved in chronic inflammation. Furthermore, MRGPRX2 has been linked to the pathophysiology of non-IgE-mediated immediate hypersensitivity drug reactions. Different studies have shown its possible role in other allergic diseases as well, such as asthma, atopic dermatitis, contact dermatitis, and chronic spontaneous urticaria. In this review, we sought to cover its function in physiologic processes and responses, as well as in allergic and nonallergic immune disease.

Molecular Dambusters: What Is Behind Hyperpermeability in Bradykinin-Mediated Angioedema?

In the last few decades, a substantial body of evidence underlined the pivotal role of bradykinin in certain types of angioedema. The formation and breakdown of bradykinin has been studied thoroughly; however, numerous questions remained open regarding the triggering, course, and termination of angioedema attacks. Recently, it became clear that vascular endothelial cells have an integrative role in the regulation of vessel permeability. Apart from bradykinin, a great number of factors of different origin, structure, and mechanism of action are capable of modifying the integrity of vascular endothelium, and thus, may participate in the regulation of angioedema formation. Our aim in this review is to describe the most important permeability factors and the molecular mechanisms how they act on endothelial cells. Based on endothelial cell function, we also attempt to explain some of the challenging findings regarding bradykinin-mediated angioedema, where the function of bradykinin itself cannot account for the pathophysiology. By deciphering the complex scenario of vascular permeability regulation and edema formation, we may gain better scientific tools to be able to predict and treat not only bradykinin-mediated but other types of angioedema as well.

Human Mast Cell Line HMC1 Expresses Functional Mas-Related G-Protein Coupled Receptor 2

The Mas-related G-protein-coupled receptor X2 (MRGPRX2) is prominently expressed by mast cells and induces degranulation upon binding by different ligands. Its activation has been linked to various mast cell-related diseases, such as chronic spontaneous urticaria, atopic dermatitis and asthma. Therefore, inhibition of MRGPRX2 activity represents a therapeutic target for these conditions. However, the exact pathophysiology of this receptor is still unknown. In vitro research with mast cells is often hampered by the technical limitations of available cell lines. The human mast cell types LAD2 and HuMC (human mast cells cultured from CD34+ progenitor cells) most closely resemble mature human mast cells, yet have a very slow growth rate. A fast proliferating alternative is the human mast cell line HMC1, but they are considered unsuitable for degranulation assays due to their immature phenotype. Moreover, the expression and functionality of MRGPRX2 on HMC1 is controversial. Here, we describe the MRGPRX2 expression and functionality in HMC1 cells, and compare these with LAD2 and HuMC. We also propose a model to render HMC1 suitable for degranulation assays by pre-incubating them with latrunculin-B (Lat-B). Expression of MRGPRX2 by HMC1 was proven by RQ-PCR and flowcytometry, although at lower levels compared with LAD2 and HuMC. Pre-incubation of HMC1 cells with Lat-B significantly increased the overall degranulation capacity, without significantly changing their MRGPRX2 expression, phenotype or morphology. The MRGPRX2 specific compound 48/80 (C48/80) effectively induced degranulation of HMC1 as measured by CD63 membrane expression and β-hexosaminidase release, albeit in lower levels than for LAD2 or HuMC. HMC1, LAD2 and HuMC each had different degranulation kinetics upon stimulation with C48/80. Incubation with the MRGPRX2 specific inhibitor QWF inhibited C48/80-induced degranulation, confirming the functionality of MRGPRX2 on HMC1. In conclusion, HMC1 cells have lower levels of MRGPRX2 expression than LAD2 or HuMC, but are attractive for in vitro research because of their high growth rate and stable phenotype. HMC1 can be used to study MRGPRX2-mediated degranulation after pre-incubation with Lat-B, which provides the opportunity to explore MPRGRX2 biology in mast cells in a feasible way.

Current and emerging pharmacotherapy for chronic spontaneous Urticaria: a focus on non-biological therapeutics

INTRODUCTION

Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) refers to urticaria (wheals) or angioedema, which occur for a period of six weeks or longer without an apparent cause. The condition may impair the patient's quality of life.

AREAS COVERED

Treatment for CSU is mainly symptomatic. Both AAAAI/ACAAI practice parameters and EAACI/GA2LEN/EDF/WAO guidelines suggest CSU management in a stepwise manner. First-line therapy is with second-generation H₁-antihistamines. Treatment should be stepped up along the algorithm if symptoms are not adequately controlled. Increasing the dosage of second-generation H₁-antihistamines, with the addition of first-generation H₁-antihistamines, H₂ antagonist, omalizumab, ciclosporin A, or short-term corticosteroid may be necessary. New medications are being developed to treat refractory CSU. They include spleen tyrosine kinase inhibitor, Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor, prostaglandin D₂ receptor inhibitor, H₄-antihistamine, and other agents. The authors discuss these treatments and provide expert perspectives on the management of CSU.

EXPERT OPINION

Second-generation H₁-antihistamines remain the first-line therapeutic options for the management of CSU. For patients not responding to higher-dose H₁-antihistamines, international guidelines recommend the addition of omalizumab. Efficacy and safety data for newer agents are still pending. Large-scale, well-designed, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials will further provide evidence on the safety profile and efficacy of these agents in patients with CSU.

Use of biologics in chronic spontaneous urticaria - beyond omalizumab therapy?

In chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU), itchy wheals, angioedema, or both occur regularly, often daily, and for years. An effective therapy for CSU aims at achieving complete symptom control. The current guideline for the management of CSU patients recommends non-sedative anthistamines in standard or up to 4-fold higher dosages as 1 and 2 line treatment. For most CSU patients this treatment is not sufficient; for them, the anti-IgE antibody omalizumab is the therapy of choice. Although good to very good symptom control can be achieved in most cases, there are many patients with insufficient response. For these patients, but also as an alternative to therapy with omalizumab, numerous other biologicals are currently under development. In this review, we provide an overview of possible future biologic therapies for chronic urticaria.

In Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria, Comorbid Depression Linked to Higher Disease Activity, and Substance P Levels

Background: Patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria often exhibit psychiatric comorbidities including depression that contribute to the impairment of their quality of life. How CSU and depression are linked isn't well-understood. Substance P has been shown to be increased in patients with CSU and is held to contribute to the pathogenesis of depression. Methods: We measured disease activity in 30 CSU patients without depression and 30 CSU patients with depression by using the urticaria activity score. The severity of depression was assessed with the Beck Depression Inventory. We measured SP levels in these patients as well as in 30 healthy control subjects. In patients with comorbid depression, we correlated SP levels with CSU disease activity and the severity of depression. Results: In CSU patients, disease activity and the severity of depression were positively linked. UAS7 values were higher in CSU patients with comorbid depression as compared to those without (p < 0.05). SP levels were higher in CSU patients with depression than in those without (p < 0.001), but was similar in all CSU patients compared to healthy controls. SP levels weren't correlated with UAS7 values in CSU patients with depression, whereas they were weakly but significantly correlated with BDI scores (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Our results suggest that, in CSU patients with comorbid depression, CSU disease activity affects the severity of depression. CSU patients with high disease activity should be explored for comorbid depression.

Elevated MRGPRX2 Levels Related to Disease Severity in Patients With Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria

Mas-related G-protein coupled receptor-X2 (MRGPRX2), a receptor on mast cells, basophils, and eosinophils associated with immunoglobulin E (IgE)-independent degranulation, has been reported to be highly expressed on cutaneous mast cells in patients with severe chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU). We sought to investigate whether MRGPRX2 levels in the sera from CSU patients differ from those in healthy control subjects and to evaluate the clinical utility of MRGPRX2 levels in CSU patients. Severe CSU was defined as urticaria activity score over 7 days (UAS7) ≥ 28. Serum samples from 116 (73 severe and 43 non-severe) CSU patients and 50 healthy subjects were screened for MRGPRX2 using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Serum MRGPRX2 levels were significantly higher in patients with severe CSU (median [interquartile range], 16.5 [10.8–24.8]) than in healthy controls (11.7 [6.5–21.2], P = 0.036) and in non-severe CSU patients (8.7 [4.5–18.8], P = 0.002), although they did not differ between healthy subjects and non-severe CSU patients. Serum MRGPRX2 levels in CSU patients showed positive correlations with UAS7 and specific IgE against Dermatophagoides farinae in CSU subjects, whereas no correlations were observed for age, sex, urticaria duration, atopy, combined angioedema, autologous serum skin test positivity, or total IgE levels. Logistic regression analysis identified serum MRGPRX2 ≥ 12 ng/mL (odds ratio, 6.421; P = 0.002) as an independent risk factor for severe CSU, along with increased serum total IgE levels, peripheral basophil percentage, and angioedema. In conclusion, we suggest that serum MRGPRX2 could help indicate severe CSU.

COVID-19 Usurps Host Regulatory Networks

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection causes coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). SARS-CoV-2 binds the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) on the cell surface and this complex is internalized. ACE2 serves as an endogenous inhibitor of inflammatory signals associated with four major regulator systems: the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS), the complement system, the coagulation cascade, and the kallikrein-kinin system (KKS). Understanding the pathophysiological effects of SARS-CoV-2 on these pathways is needed, particularly given the current lack of proven, effective treatments. The vasoconstrictive, prothrombotic and pro-inflammatory conditions induced by SARS-CoV-2 can be ascribed, at least in part, to the activation of these intersecting physiological networks. Moreover, patients with immune deficiencies, hypertension, diabetes, coronary heart disease, and kidney disease often have altered activation of these pathways, either due to underlying disease or to medications, and may be more susceptible to SARS-CoV-2 infection. Certain characteristic COVID-associated skin, sensory, and central nervous system manifestations may also be linked to viral activation of the RAAS, complement, coagulation, and KKS pathways. Pharmacological interventions that target molecules along these pathways may be useful in mitigating symptoms and preventing organ or tissue damage. While effective anti-viral therapies are critically needed, further study of these pathways may identify effective adjunctive treatments and patients most likely to benefit.

Psychological Stress and Chronic Urticaria: A Neuro-immuno-cutaneous Crosstalk. A Systematic Review of the Existing Evidence

PURPOSE

It has been observed that certain patients with chronic spontaneous or idiopathic urticaria (CSU/CIU) have a personal history of a significant stressor before urticaria onset, while the prevalence of any psychopathology among these patients is significantly higher than in healthy individuals. Research has confirmed that skin is both an immediate stress perceiver and a target of stress responses. These complex interactions between stress, skin, and the nervous system may contribute to the onset of chronic urticaria. This systematic review investigated the association between CSU/CIU and neuroimmune inflammation with or without evidence of co-existing psychological stress from in vivo and ex vivo studies in human beings.

METHODS

PubMed and Scopus were searched to September 2019 for reports in human beings describing neuroimmune inflammation, stress, and CSU/CIU. A comprehensive search strategy was used that included all the relevant synonyms for the central concept.

FINDINGS

A total of 674 potentially relevant articles were identified. Only 13 satisfied the predefined inclusion criteria and were included in the systematic review. Five of these 13 studies evaluated the correlation between CSU/CIU, stress, and neuro-immune-cutaneous factors, while the remaining 8 focused on the association between CSU/CIU and these factors without examining any evidence of stress.

IMPLICATIONS

The complex neuro-immune-cutaneous model that involves numerous neuropeptides and neurokinins, inflammatory mediators and cells, hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis hormones, and the skin may better explain the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms involved in the onset of urticaria. In addition, the elevated psychological stress level that has been closely related to CSU/CIU could be attributed to the imbalance or irregularity of this neuro-immune-cutaneous circuit. It is still unclear and must be further investigated whether any psychological stress results in or triggers CSU/CIU onset on top of a preexisting neuroimmune dysregulation. Nevertheless, new psycho-phenotypic or neuro-endotypic CSU/CIU subsets should be considered as the era of personalized treatment strategies emerges. A better understanding of CSU/CIU pathophysiology and consideration of the patient as a whole is vital for identifying targets for new potential treatment options.

Urticaria: Collegium Internationale Allergologicum (CIA) Update 2020

This update on chronic urticaria (CU) focuses on the prevalence and pathogenesis of chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU), the expanding spectrum of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for assessing CU disease activity, impact, and control, as well as future treatment options for CU. This update is needed, as several recently reported findings have led to significant advances in these areas. Some of these key discoveries were first presented at past meetings of the Collegium Internationale Allergologicum (CIA). New evidence shows that the prevalence of CSU is geographically heterogeneous, high in all age groups, and increasing. Several recent reports have helped to better characterize two endotypes of CSU: type I autoimmune (or autoallergic) CSU, driven by IgE to autoallergens, and type IIb autoimmune CSU, which is due to mast cell (MC)-targeted autoantibodies. The aim of treatment in CU is complete disease control with absence of signs and symptoms as well as normalization of quality of life (QoL). This is best monitored by the use of an expanding set of PROMs, to which the Angioedema Control Test, the Cholinergic Urticaria Quality of Life Questionnaire, and the Cholinergic Urticaria Activity Score have recently been added. Current treatment approaches for CU under development include drugs that inhibit the effects of signals that drive MC activation and accumulation, drugs that inhibit intracellular pathways of MC activation and degranulation, and drugs that silence MCs by binding to inhibitory receptors. The understanding, knowledge, and management of CU are rapidly increasing. The aim of this review is to provide physicians who treat CU patients with an update on where we stand and where we will go. Many questions and unmet needs remain to be addressed, such as the development of routine diagnostic tests for type I and type IIb autoimmune CSU, the global dissemination and consistent use of PROMs to assess disease activity, impact, and control, and the development of more effective and well-tolerated long-term treatments for all forms of CU.

New treatments for chronic urticaria

OBJECTIVE

Chronic urticaria (CU) is a common, heterogeneous, and debilitating disease. Antihistamines and omalizumab are the mainstay therapies of CU. Additional treatment options are needed. Here, we review the off and beyond label use of licensed drugs, novel treatments that are currently under development, and promising new targets.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE was searched for recent reports of the successful use of treatments in CU and promising targets for the development of novel treatment options. We also searched ClinicalTrials.gov for recent and ongoing randomized clinical trials in CU.

STUDY SELECTIONS

Relevant articles were selected and reviewed.

RESULTS

Omalizumab, the treatment of choice in patients with antihistamine-resistant chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU), should be explored for use in chronic inducible urticaria in children younger than 12 years with CSU and at higher doses. The off-label use of dupilumab, reslizumab, mepolizumab, and benralizumab can be effective in CU. Ligelizumab and UB-221, 2 novel anti-IgE monoclonal antibodies, are in clinical trials for CU. Other promising drugs that are currently under development for CU are a chemoattractant receptor-homologous molecule expressed on T_H2 cell antagonist, a monoclonal antibody to Siglec-8 (AK002), Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors (fenebrutinib and Lou064), a spleen tyrosine kinase inhibitor, and dupilumab. Promising targets of future therapies include the Mas-related G-protein-coupled receptor X2; the histamine₄ receptor; C5a and its receptor; inhibitory mast cell receptors other than Siglec-8; interleukin 33, interleukin 25, and thymic stromal lymphopoietin, and stem cell factor.

CONCLUSION

Novel and better treatments for CU are very much needed. Some agents are in clinical trials already (eg, ligelizumab), and additional ones should be developed, making use of the many promising targets recently identified and characterized.