Estimating loss in quality of life associated with asthma-related crisis events (ESQUARE): a cohort, observational study

The Influence of Recall and Timing of Assessment on the Estimation of Quality-Adjusted Life-Years When Health Fluctuates Recurrently

OBJECTIVES

When health fluctuates recurrently, estimating quality of life (QOL) is challenging, risking over-/underestimation due to measures' recall periods and timing. To inform how/when to capture QOL, we compared responses using different recall periods and assessment timings.

METHODS

For one 3-week chemotherapy cycle, cancer patients were randomly assigned to complete EQ-5D-5L or SF-12v2 (daily with a daily recall, weekly with a weekly recall, and at 3 weeks with a 3-week recall); a third group completed SF-12v2 daily with a 3-week recall. EQ-5D-5L and SF-6D utilities (anchored at 1 [full health] and 0 [dead]) were generated and repeated measures analysis of variance, t tests, and effect sizes were calculated to compare recall.

RESULTS

A total of 503 patients consented; all 21 daily questionnaires were completed by 84 (50%), 67 (40%), and 72 (43%) in the groups. Both measures captured fluctuations in QOL suggesting differences are due to recall effects. Mean daily scores were greater than scores for the past week on days 7, 14, and 21 (P < .0001). Utility was underestimated (by 0.0782, 0.0374, and 0.0437) for EQ-5D-5L and (0.0387, 0.0266, and 0.0304) for SF-6D, with the EQ-5D-5L comparison on day 7 reaching a minimally important difference. The "past 3 weeks" generated the lowest scores (P < .0001), with utility underestimated by 0.0746 (EQ-5D-5L) and 0.0310 (SF-6D), heavily skewed by the first treatment week.

CONCLUSIONS

The current practice of using a single estimate at the beginning or end of a cycle with a daily (EQ-5D-5L) or longer (SF-12/SF-36) recall could bias cost-effectiveness estimates. QOL should be captured frequently with short recall when fluctuations are likely and less frequently with longer recall in stable periods.

Randomised controlled trial for the titration of oral corticosteroids using markers of inflammation in severe asthma

INTRODUCTION

Biomarkers are used to select biologic therapies for patients with severe asthma, but not to regularly adjust therapy, especially oral corticosteroids (OCS).

OBJECTIVE

Our goal was to test the efficacy of an algorithm to guide the titration of OCS using blood eosinophil count and fraction of exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) levels.

DESIGN, PARTICIPANTS, INTERVENTIONS AND SETTING

This proof-of-concept prospective randomised controlled trial assigned adult participants with severe uncontrolled asthma (n=32) to biomarker-based management (BBM) where OCS dose was adjusted based on a composite biomarker score comprised of blood eosinophil count and FeNO, or a standard best practice (SBP) arm. The study was conducted at the Hunter Medical Research Institute, Newcastle, Australia. Participants were recruited from the local Severe Asthma Clinic and were blinded to their study allocation.

MAIN OUTCOME

The coprimary outcomes were number of severe exacerbations and time to first severe exacerbation assessed over 12 months.

RESULTS

There was a longer median time to first severe exacerbation with BBM, although not significant (295 vs 123 days, Adj. HR: 0.714; 95% CI: 0.25 to 2.06; p=0.533). The relative risk of a severe exacerbation in BBM (n=17) vs SBP (n=15) was 0.88 (Adj.; 95% CI: 0.47 to 1.62; p=0.675) with a mean exacerbation rate per year of 1.2 and 2.0, respectively. There was a significant reduction in the proportion of patients requiring an emergency department (ED) visit using BBM (OR 0.09, 95% CI: 0.01 to 0.91; p=0.041). There was no difference in the cumulative OCS dose used between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

A treatment algorithm to adjust OCS using blood eosinophil count and FeNO is feasible in a clinical setting and resulted in a reduced odds of an ED visit. This warrants further study to optimise the use of OCS in the future.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

This trial was registered with the Australia and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12616001015437).

Health related quality of life in adults with asthma: a systematic review to identify the values of EQ-5D-5L instrument

INTRODUCTION

The EQ-5D is the most popular generic preference-based instrument used for asthma patients. This study aims to explore the psychometric properties of the EQ-5D-5L instrument in patients with asthma and identify the EQ-5D-5L scores in these patients.

METHOD

PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar and CEA Registry were searched with English language from 2009 until April 2020. Retrieved studies were checked against the inclusion criteria. Reference lists of the included articles were also reviewed. The quality of included articles was evaluated using Mitton checklist and the data were extracted by a reviewer and were checked by a second reviewer. Meta-analysis was done to calculate the overall scores based on type of asthma control.

RESULTS

A total of 17 articles were included. The EQ-5D-5L scores ranged from 0.45 to 0.93 and the VAS scores ranged from 35.67 to 83.80. The EQ-5D-5L is higher in well-controlled (0.88, 95% CI: 0.81-0.96, P = 0.0001) than partly controlled (0.80, 95% CI: 0.74-0.85, P = 0.001) and poorly controlled asthma (0.72, 95% CI: 0.67-0.77, P = 0.01). Validity in two studies was weak and, in other studies, it was moderate to strong. Responsiveness of the EQ-5D-5L, that was shown in a study, was less than other generic instruments, and reliability was adequate in only study that had been reported. Ceiling effects were between 8.30% to 35%.

CONCLUSION

Higher score of the EQ-5D-5L was consistent with well-controlled asthma patients and those with lower severity of asthma. The assessment of psychometric properties of the EQ-5D-5L needs further observations.

Acupuncture for chronic persistent asthma based on the theory of Meridian-viscera Association: study protocol for a multi-center randomized controlled trial in China

Background

Acupuncture is effective in symptom and quality of life improvement of chronic asthma, but the efficacy differences between different acupoints are uncertain. In terms of the theory of Meridian-viscera Association, the study aims to investigate the different effectiveness between acupoints in Lung meridian and the acupoints in Heart meridian, so as to provide the evidence to develop a better prescription of the acupuncture treatment of chronic persistent asthma.

Methods

This study is a multicentral randomized controlled trial. A total of 68 chronic persistent asthma patients will be randomly allocated into two groups: the Lung meridian group and the Heart meridian group. This trial will include a 2-week baseline period, a 4-week treatment period with 12 sessions’ acupuncture, and an 8-week follow-up period. The primary outcome is the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ). Secondary outcomes are the Asthma Control Test (ACT), Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF), and Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 s (FEV1). The AQLQ and ACT will be collected at baseline, week 4, week 8, and week 12 after randomization. PEF, FEV1, the Self-rating Anxiety Scale (SAS), and the Self-rating Depression Scale (SDS) will be assessed at baseline and week 4.

Discussion

The results will provide evidence for acupuncture prescription selection and the clinical efficacy improvement. The results of this trial will also be used to determine whether or not a full definitive trial will go ahead, which will further confirm the theory of Meridian-viscera Association.

Trial registration

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (http://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=43803) ChiCTR1900027284. Registered on 7 November 2019

Supplementary information

Supplementary information accompanies this paper at 10.1186/s13063-020-04844-8.

The construct validity and responsiveness of the EQ-5D-5L, AQL-5D and a bespoke TTO in acute asthmatics

PURPOSE

Measuring quality of life in acute asthmatics is challenging, especially when asthma attacks can occur sporadically. Several questionnaires can be used to measure quality of life in this patient group; however, psychometric testing is limited on questionnaires that can be used to estimate Quality Adjusted Life years. The objective of this study is to assess the construct validity (convergent and discriminative validity) and responsiveness of the EuroQol-5-Dimensions 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L), Asthma Quality of Life Utility Index-5 Dimensions (AQL-5D) and Time Trade-Off (TTO) in acute asthma patients.

METHODS

Data from a prospective cohort study were used to test the validity and responsiveness of the EQ-5D-5L, AQL-5D and TTO in asthma patients who were recruited from UK accident & emergency departments or hospital wards. The spearman's rank correlation coefficient, the Kruskal-Wallis test statistic and the standardized response mean were used to test for convergent validity, discriminative validity and responsiveness, respectively.

RESULTS

One hundred and twenty-one participants were included in the available case analysis. The EQ-5D-5L and AQL-5D showed moderate to strong correlations for convergent validity at baseline, week 4 and week 8. The AQL-5D and TTO showed moderate correlations at week 4 and week 8. No statistical significance was observed for discriminative validity at baseline. Both the EQ-5D-5L and the AQL-5D also showed that they were sensitive to change for the recovery responses.

CONCLUSIONS

The EQ-5D-5L and AQL-5D showed stronger construct validity and responsiveness compared to the TTO. Therefore, both the EQ-5D-5L and AQL-5D should be considered for use in future economic evaluations.