1
|
Moledina Z, McPhee M, Ravenscroft JC, Healy E, Radley K, Thomas KS, Burden-Teh E, Healy E, Hepburn T, Layfield C, Layton A, Leighton P, Leng S, Mitchell ME, Northover G, Radley K, Ramesh MG, Ravenscroft JC, Sach T, Santer M, Thomas KS, Thompson A, Whitehouse H, Williams HC. How is oral isotretinoin prescribed for the treatment of acne vulgaris? Results from a UK Dermatology Clinical Trials Network (UKDCTN) and British Dermatological Nursing Group (BDNG) survey of health professionals. Clin Exp Dermatol 2023; 48:20-23. [PMID: 36669181 DOI: 10.1093/ced/llac015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2022] [Revised: 07/12/2022] [Accepted: 09/15/2022] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
We undertook a survey of UK healthcare professionals through the UK Dermatology Clinical Trials Network and British Dermatological Nursing Group to understand clinicians' routine practice of prescribing oral isotretinoin for treatment of acne vulgaris. We also wanted to understand clinicians' experiences and views on prescribing low daily dose regimens. Overall, the survey showed that clinicians adopted a patient-centred approach when deciding isotretinoin dosing. The rationale for using a low-dose regimen varied, but was focused on patient wellbeing during treatment. Some clinicians were concerned that use of a low-dose regimen could be less effective and lead to longer treatment durations. The survey results will be useful to inform a clinical trial investigating the effectiveness and safety of low daily dose isotretinoin for the treatment of acne.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zahra Moledina
- Department of Dermatology, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, UK
| | - Margaret McPhee
- Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, UK
| | - Jane C Ravenscroft
- Department of Paediatric Dermatology, Nottingham Children's Hospital, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, UK
| | - Eugene Healy
- Department of Dermatopharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, UK
| | - Kathy Radley
- Department of Clinical, Pharmaceutical and Biological Science, School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, UK
| | - Kim S Thomas
- Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, UK
| | - Esther Burden-Teh
- Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Greenwell K, Sivyer K, Howells L, Steele M, Ridd MJ, Roberts A, Ahmed A, Lawton S, Langan SM, Hooper J, Wilczynska S, Leighton P, Griffiths G, Sach T, Little P, Williams HC, Thomas KS, Yardley L, Santer M, Muller I. 'Eczema shouldn't control you; you should control eczema': qualitative process evaluation of online behavioural interventions to support young people and parents/carers of children with eczema. Br J Dermatol 2022; 188:506-513. [PMID: 36745562 DOI: 10.1093/bjd/ljac115] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Revised: 11/21/2022] [Accepted: 11/26/2022] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is a lack of well-conducted randomized controlled trials evaluating the effectiveness of theory-based online interventions for eczema. To address these deficiencies, we previously developed and demonstrated the effectiveness of two online behavioural interventions: Eczema Care Online for parents/carers of children with eczema, and Eczema Care Online for young people with eczema. OBJECTIVES To explore the views and experiences of people who have used the Eczema Care Online interventions to provide insights into how the interventions worked and identify contextual factors that may impede users' engagement with the interventions. METHODS Qualitative semistructured interviews were conducted with 17 parents/carers of children with eczema and 17 young people with eczema. Participants were purposively sampled from two randomized controlled trials of the interventions and recruited from GP surgeries in England. Transcripts were analysed using inductive thematic analysis, and intervention modifications were identified using the person-based approach table of changes method. RESULTS Both young people and parents/carers found the interventions easy to use, relatable and trustworthy, and perceived that they helped them to manage their eczema, thus suggesting that Eczema Care Online may be acceptable to its target groups. Our analysis suggested that the interventions may reduce eczema severity by facilitating empowerment among its users, specifically through improved understanding of, and confidence in, eczema management, reduced treatment concerns, and improved treatment adherence and management of irritants/triggers. Reading about the experiences of others with eczema helped people to feel 'normal' and less alone. Some (mainly young people) expressed firmly held negative beliefs about topical corticosteroids, views that were not influenced by the intervention. Minor improvements to the design and navigation of the Eczema Care Online interventions and content changes were identified and made, ready for wider implementation. CONCLUSIONS People with eczema and their families can benefit from reliable information, specifically information on the best and safest ways to use their eczema treatments early in their eczema journey. Together, our findings from this study and the corresponding trials suggest wider implementation of Eczema Care Online (EczemaCareOnline.org.uk) is justified.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kate Greenwell
- Centre for Clinical and Community Applications of Health Psychology, Faculty of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Katy Sivyer
- Centre for Clinical and Community Applications of Health Psychology, Faculty of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Laura Howells
- Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology, Lifespan and Population Health, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Mary Steele
- Primary Care Research Centre, Primary Care, Population Sciences and Medical Education Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Matthew J Ridd
- Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Amanda Roberts
- Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology, Lifespan and Population Health, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Amina Ahmed
- Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology, Lifespan and Population Health, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Sandra Lawton
- Department of Dermatology, Rotherham NHS Foundation Trust, Rotherham, UK
| | - Sinéad M Langan
- Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Julie Hooper
- Primary Care Research Centre, Primary Care, Population Sciences and Medical Education Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Sylvia Wilczynska
- Primary Care Research Centre, Primary Care, Population Sciences and Medical Education Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Paul Leighton
- Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology, Lifespan and Population Health, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | | | - Tracey Sach
- Health Economics Group, Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, UK
| | - Paul Little
- Primary Care Research Centre, Primary Care, Population Sciences and Medical Education Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Hywel C Williams
- Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology, Lifespan and Population Health, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Kim S Thomas
- Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology, Lifespan and Population Health, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Lucy Yardley
- Centre for Clinical and Community Applications of Health Psychology, Faculty of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.,School of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Miriam Santer
- Primary Care Research Centre, Primary Care, Population Sciences and Medical Education Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Ingrid Muller
- Primary Care Research Centre, Primary Care, Population Sciences and Medical Education Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Radford KA, McKevitt C, Clarke S, Powers K, Phillips J, Craven K, Watkins C, Farrin A, Holmes J, Cripps R, McLellan V, Sach T, Brindle R, Holloway I, Hartley S, Bowen A, O'Connor RJ, Stevens J, Walker M, Murray J, Shone A, Clarke D. RETurn to work After stroKE (RETAKE) Trial: protocol for a mixed-methods process evaluation using normalisation process theory. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e053111. [PMID: 35292493 PMCID: PMC8928258 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053111] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This mixed-method process evaluation underpinned by normalisation process theory aims to measure fidelity to the intervention, understand the social and structural context in which the intervention is delivered and identify barriers and facilitators to intervention implementation. SETTING RETurn to work After stroKE (RETAKE) is a multicentre individual patient randomised controlled trial to determine whether Early Stroke Specialist Vocational Rehabilitation (ESSVR) plus usual care is a clinically and cost-effective therapy to facilitate return to work after stroke, compared with usual care alone. This protocol paper describes the embedded process evaluation. PARTICIPANTS AND OUTCOME MEASURES Intervention training for therapists will be observed and use of remote mentor support reviewed through documentary analysis. Fidelity will be assessed through participant questionnaires and analysis of therapy records, examining frequency, duration and content of ESSVR sessions. To understand the influence of social and structural contexts, the process evaluation will explore therapists' attitudes towards evidence-based practice, competency to deliver the intervention and evaluate potential sources of contamination. Longitudinal case studies incorporating non-participant observations will be conducted with a proportion of intervention and usual care participants. Semistructured interviews with stroke survivors, carers, occupational therapists, mentors, service managers and employers will explore their experiences as RETAKE participants. Analysis of qualitative data will draw on thematic and framework approaches. Quantitative data analysis will include regression models and descriptive statistics. Qualitative and quantitative data will be independently analysed by process evaluation and Clinical Trials Research Unit teams, respectively. Linked data, for example, fidelity and describing usual care will be synthesised by comparing and integrating quantitative descriptive data with the qualitative findings. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Approval obtained through the East Midlands-Nottingham 2 Research Ethics Committee (Ref: 18/EM/0019) and the National Health ServiceResearch Authority. Dissemination via journal publications, stroke conferences, social media and meetings with national Stroke clinical leads. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ISRCTN12464275.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathryn A Radford
- Centre for Rehabilitation and Ageing Research, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Christopher McKevitt
- Department of Public Health Sciences, School of Population Health and Environmental Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Sara Clarke
- Centre for Rehabilitation and Ageing Research, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Katie Powers
- Centre for Rehabilitation and Ageing Research, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Julie Phillips
- Centre for Rehabilitation and Ageing Research, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Kristelle Craven
- Centre for Rehabilitation and Ageing Research, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Caroline Watkins
- Faculty of Health and Care, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, Lancashire, UK
| | - Amanda Farrin
- Clinical Trials Research Unit (CTRU), University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Jain Holmes
- Centre for Rehabilitation and Ageing Research, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Rachel Cripps
- Department of Public Health Sciences, School of Population Health and Environmental Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Vicki McLellan
- Clinical Trials Research Unit (CTRU), University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Tracey Sach
- Health Economics Group, Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, Norfolk, UK
| | - Richard Brindle
- Clinical Trials Research Unit (CTRU), University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Ivana Holloway
- Clinical Trials Research Unit (CTRU), University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Suzanne Hartley
- Clinical Trials Research Unit (CTRU), University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Audrey Bowen
- Division of Neuroscience and Experimental Psychology, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Rory J O'Connor
- Academic Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Judith Stevens
- Centre for Rehabilitation and Ageing Research, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Marion Walker
- Centre for Rehabilitation and Ageing Research, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - John Murray
- Centre for Rehabilitation and Ageing Research, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Angela Shone
- Research and Innovation, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - David Clarke
- Academic Unit for Ageing and Stroke Research, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Logan PA, Horne JC, Gladman JRF, Gordon AL, Sach T, Clark A, Robinson K, Armstrong S, Stirling S, Leighton P, Darby J, Allen F, Irvine L, Wilson ECF, Fox C, Conroy S, Mountain G, McCartney K, Godfrey M, Sims E. Multifactorial falls prevention programme compared with usual care in UK care homes for older people: multicentre cluster randomised controlled trial with economic evaluation. BMJ 2021; 375:e066991. [PMID: 34876412 PMCID: PMC8649897 DOI: 10.1136/bmj-2021-066991] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To determine the clinical and cost effectiveness of a multifactorial fall prevention programme compared with usual care in long term care homes. DESIGN Multicentre, parallel, cluster randomised controlled trial. SETTING Long term care homes in the UK, registered to care for older people or those with dementia. PARTICIPANTS 1657 consenting residents and 84 care homes. 39 were randomised to the intervention group and 45 were randomised to usual care. INTERVENTIONS Guide to Action for Care Homes (GtACH): a multifactorial fall prevention programme or usual care. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Primary outcome measure was fall rate at 91-180 days after randomisation. The economic evaluation measured health related quality of life using quality adjusted life years (QALYs) derived from the five domain five level version of the EuroQoL index (EQ-5D-5L) or proxy version (EQ-5D-5L-P) and the Dementia Quality of Life utility measure (DEMQOL-U), which were self-completed by competent residents and by a care home staff member proxy (DEMQOL-P-U) for all residents (in case the ability to complete changed during the study) until 12 months after randomisation. Secondary outcome measures were falls at 1-90, 181-270, and 271-360 days after randomisation, Barthel index score, and the Physical Activity Measure-Residential Care Homes (PAM-RC) score at 91, 180, 270, and 360 days after randomisation. RESULTS Mean age of residents was 85 years. 32% were men. GtACH training was delivered to 1051/1480 staff (71%). Primary outcome data were available for 630 participants in the GtACH group and 712 in the usual care group. The unadjusted incidence rate ratio for falls between 91 and 180 days was 0.57 (95% confidence interval 0.45 to 0.71, P<0.001) in favour of the GtACH programme (GtACH: six falls/1000 residents v usual care: 10 falls/1000). Barthel activities of daily living indices and PAM-RC scores were similar between groups at all time points. The incremental cost was £108 (95% confidence interval -£271.06 to 487.58), incremental QALYs gained for EQ-5D-5L-P was 0.024 (95% confidence interval 0.004 to 0.044) and for DEMQOL-P-U was 0.005 (-0.019 to 0.03). The incremental costs per EQ-5D-5L-P and DEMQOL-P-U based QALY were £4544 and £20 889, respectively. CONCLUSIONS The GtACH programme was associated with a reduction in fall rate and cost effectiveness, without a decrease in activity or increase in dependency. TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN34353836.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pip A Logan
- School of Medicine, Queens Medical Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK
- Nottingham CityCare Partnership, Nottingham, UK
- NIHR Applied Research Collaboration - East Midlands, Nottingham, UK
- NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham, UK
| | - Jane C Horne
- School of Medicine, Queens Medical Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK
| | - John R F Gladman
- School of Medicine, Queens Medical Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK
- NIHR Applied Research Collaboration - East Midlands, Nottingham, UK
- NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham, UK
- Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | - Adam L Gordon
- School of Medicine, Queens Medical Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK
- NIHR Applied Research Collaboration - East Midlands, Nottingham, UK
- NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham, UK
- University Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation Trust, Derby, UK
| | - Tracey Sach
- Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - Allan Clark
- Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - Katie Robinson
- School of Medicine, Queens Medical Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK
- Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | - Sarah Armstrong
- School of Medicine, Queens Medical Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK
| | - Sue Stirling
- Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - Paul Leighton
- School of Medicine, Queens Medical Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK
| | - Janet Darby
- School of Medicine, Queens Medical Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK
| | - Fran Allen
- School of Medicine, Queens Medical Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK
| | | | - Ed C F Wilson
- Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - Chris Fox
- Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | | | | | - Karen McCartney
- School of Medicine, Queens Medical Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK
| | | | - Erika Sims
- Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Renz S, Chinnery F, Stuart B, Day L, Muller I, Soulsby I, Nuttall J, Thomas K, Thomas KS, Sach T, Stanton L, Ridd MJ, Francis N, Little P, Eminton Z, Griffiths G, Layton AM, Santer M. Spironolactone for adult female acne (SAFA): protocol for a double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III randomised study of spironolactone as systemic therapy for acne in adult women. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e053876. [PMID: 34446504 PMCID: PMC8395279 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053876] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Acne is one of the most common inflammatory skin diseases worldwide and can have significant psychosocial impact and cause permanent scarring. Spironolactone, a potassium-sparing diuretic, has antiandrogenic properties, potentially reducing sebum production and hyperkeratinisation in acne-prone follicles. Dermatologists have prescribed spironolactone for acne in women for over 30 years, but robust clinical study data are lacking. This study seeks to evaluate whether spironolactone is clinically effective and cost-effective in treating acne in women. METHODS AND ANALYSIS Women (≥18 years) with persistent facial acne requiring systemic therapy are randomised to receive one tablet per day of 50 mg spironolactone or a matched placebo until week 6, increasing to up to two tablets per day (total of 100 mg spironolactone or matched placebo) until week 24, along with usual topical therapy if desired. Study treatment stops at week 24; participants are informed of their treatment allocation and enter an unblinded observational follow-up period for up to 6 months (up to week 52 after baseline). Primary outcome is the Acne-specific Quality of Life (Acne-QoL) symptom subscale score at week 12. Secondary outcomes include Acne-QoL total and subscales; participant acne self-assessment recorded on a 6-point Likert scale at 6, 12, 24 weeks and up to 52 weeks; Investigator's Global Assessment at weeks 6 and 12; cost and cost effectiveness are assessed over 24 weeks. Aiming to detect a group difference of 2 points on the Acne-QoL symptom subscale (SD 5.8, effect size 0.35), allowing for 20% loss to follow-up, gives a sample size of 398 participants. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION This protocol was approved by Wales Research Ethics Committee (18/WA/0420). Follow-up to be completed in early 2022. Findings will be disseminated to participants, peer-reviewed journals, networks and patient groups, on social media, on the study website and the Southampton Clinical Trials Unit website to maximise impact. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ISRCTN12892056;Pre-results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susanne Renz
- Southampton Clinical Trials Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Fay Chinnery
- Southampton Clinical Trials Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Beth Stuart
- Southampton Clinical Trials Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
- Primary Care Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine, School of Primary Care, Population Sciences and Medical Education, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Laura Day
- Southampton Clinical Trials Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Ingrid Muller
- Primary Care Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine, School of Primary Care, Population Sciences and Medical Education, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | | | - Jacqui Nuttall
- Southampton Clinical Trials Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Karen Thomas
- Acne Support, PPI representative, Cambridgeshire, UK
| | - Kim Suzanne Thomas
- School of Medicine, Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Tracey Sach
- Health Economics Group, Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - Louise Stanton
- Southampton Clinical Trials Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Matthew J Ridd
- Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol Faculty of Health Sciences, Bristol, UK
| | - Nick Francis
- Primary Care Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine, School of Primary Care, Population Sciences and Medical Education, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Paul Little
- Primary Care Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine, School of Primary Care, Population Sciences and Medical Education, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Zina Eminton
- Southampton Clinical Trials Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Gareth Griffiths
- Southampton Clinical Trials Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | | | - Miriam Santer
- Primary Care Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine, School of Primary Care, Population Sciences and Medical Education, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Thorn JC, Davies CF, Brookes ST, Noble SM, Dritsaki M, Gray E, Hughes DA, Mihaylova B, Petrou S, Ridyard C, Sach T, Wilson ECF, Wordsworth S, Hollingworth W. Content of Health Economics Analysis Plans (HEAPs) for Trial-Based Economic Evaluations: Expert Delphi Consensus Survey. Value Health 2021; 24:539-547. [PMID: 33840432 PMCID: PMC8024512 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2020.10.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2020] [Revised: 09/23/2020] [Accepted: 09/12/2020] [Indexed: 05/21/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Health economics analysis plans (HEAPs) currently lack consistency, with uncertainty surrounding appropriate content. We aimed to develop a list of essential items that should be included in HEAPs for economic evaluations conducted alongside randomized trials. METHODS A list of potential items for inclusion was developed by examining existing HEAPs. An electronic Delphi survey was conducted among professional health economists. Respondents were asked to rate potential items from 1 (least important) to 9 (most important), suggest additional items, and comment on proposed items (round 1). A second survey (round 2) was emailed to participants, including the participant's own scores from round 1 along with summary results from the whole panel; participants were asked to rerate each item. Consensus criteria for inclusion in the final list were predefined as >70% of participants rating an item 7-9 and <15% rating it 1-3 after round 2. A final item selection meeting was held to scrutinize the results and adjudicate on items lacking consensus. RESULTS 62 participants completed round 1 of the survey. The initial list included 72 potential items; all 72 were carried forward to round 2, and no new items were added. 48 round 1 respondents (77.4%) completed round 2 and reached consensus on 53 items. At the final meeting, the expert panel (n = 9) agreed that 58 items should be included in the essential list, moved 9 items to an optional list, and dropped 5 items. CONCLUSIONS Via expert consensus opinion, this study identified 58 items that are considered essential in a HEAP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanna C Thorn
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
| | - Charlotte F Davies
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Sara T Brookes
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Sian M Noble
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Melina Dritsaki
- Oxford Clinical Trials Research Unit, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology, and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Ewan Gray
- Edinburgh Clinical Trials Unit, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh
| | - Dyfrig A Hughes
- Centre for Health Economics and Medicines Evaluation, Bangor University, Bangor, UK
| | - Borislava Mihaylova
- Health Economics Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Institute of Population Health Sciences, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK; Oxford National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, The Joint Research Office, Oxford, UK
| | - Stavros Petrou
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK & Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Colin Ridyard
- Centre for Health Economics and Medicines Evaluation, Bangor University, Bangor, UK
| | - Tracey Sach
- Health Economics Group, Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - Edward C F Wilson
- Health Economics Group, Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - Sarah Wordsworth
- Health Economics Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Oxford National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, The Joint Research Office, Oxford, UK
| | - William Hollingworth
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Muller I, Stuart B, Sach T, Hooper J, Wilczynska S, Steele M, Greenwell K, Sivyer K, Yardley L, Williams HC, Chalmers JR, Leighton P, Howells LM, Ridd MJ, Lawton S, Griffiths G, Nuttall J, Langan SM, Roberts A, Ahmed A, Kirk H, Becque T, Little P, Thomas KS, Santer M. Supporting self-care for eczema: protocol for two randomised controlled trials of ECO (Eczema Care Online) interventions for young people and parents/carers. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e045583. [PMID: 33550268 PMCID: PMC7925854 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045583] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2020] [Revised: 12/22/2020] [Accepted: 01/20/2021] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Eczema care requires management of triggers and various treatments. We developed two online behavioural interventions to support eczema care called ECO (Eczema Care Online) for young people and ECO for families. This protocol describes two randomised controlled trials (RCTs) aimed to evaluate clinical and cost-effectiveness of the two interventions. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Design: Two independent, pragmatic, unmasked, parallel group RCTs with internal pilots and nested health economic and process evaluation studies. Setting: Participants will be recruited from general practitioner practices in England. Participants: Young people aged 13-25 years with eczema and parents and carers of children aged 0-12 years with eczema, excluding inactive or very mild eczema (five or less on Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM)). Interventions: Participants will be randomised to online intervention plus usual care or to usual eczema care alone. Outcome measures: Primary outcome is eczema severity over 24 weeks measured by POEM. Secondary outcomes include POEM 4-weekly for 52 weeks, quality of life, eczema control, itch intensity (young people only), patient enablement, health service and treatment use. Process measures include treatment adherence, barriers to adherence and intervention usage. Our sample sizes of 303 participants per trial are powered to detect a group difference of 2.5 (SD 6.5) in monthly POEM scores over 24 weeks (significance 0.05, power 0.9), allowing for 20% loss to follow-up. Cost-effectiveness analysis will be from a National Health Service and personal social service perspective. Qualitative and quantitative process evaluation will help understand the mechanisms of action and participant experiences and inform implementation. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The study has been approved by South Central Oxford A Research Ethics Committee (19/SC/0351). Recruitment is ongoing, and follow-up will be completed by mid-2022. Findings will be disseminated to participants, the public, dermatology and primary care journals, and policy makers. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ISRCTN79282252.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ingrid Muller
- School of Primary Care, Population Health and Medical Education, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Beth Stuart
- School of Primary Care, Population Health and Medical Education, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Tracey Sach
- Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - Julie Hooper
- School of Primary Care, Population Health and Medical Education, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Sylvia Wilczynska
- School of Primary Care, Population Health and Medical Education, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Mary Steele
- Department of Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Kate Greenwell
- Department of Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Katy Sivyer
- Department of Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
- Department of Psychology, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, UK
| | - Lucy Yardley
- Department of Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
- School of Experimental Psychology, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Hywel C Williams
- Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Joanne R Chalmers
- Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Paul Leighton
- Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Laura M Howells
- Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Matthew J Ridd
- Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol Faculty of Health Sciences, Bristol, UK
| | - Sandra Lawton
- Department of Dermatology, Rotherham NHS Foundation Trust, Rotherham, UK
| | - Gareth Griffiths
- Southampton Clinical Trials Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Jacqui Nuttall
- Southampton Clinical Trials Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Sinead M Langan
- Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Amanda Roberts
- Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Amina Ahmed
- Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Hayden Kirk
- Neurological Rehabilitation, Solent NHS Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Taeko Becque
- School of Primary Care, Population Health and Medical Education, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Paul Little
- School of Primary Care, Population Health and Medical Education, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Kim S Thomas
- Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Miriam Santer
- School of Primary Care, Population Health and Medical Education, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Desborough JA, Clark A, Houghton J, Sach T, Shaw V, Kirthisingha V, Holland RC, Wright DJ. Clinical and cost effectiveness of a multi-professional medication reviews in care homes (CAREMED)†. International Journal of Pharmacy Practice 2020; 28:626-634. [DOI: 10.1111/ijpp.12656] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2019] [Revised: 06/16/2020] [Accepted: 06/17/2020] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Objectives
With 70% of care home residents experiencing a medication error every day in the UK, better multi-professional working between medical practitioners, pharmacists and care homes was recommended. The aim of this study was to determine the effectiveness (falls reduction) and cost-effectiveness, of a multi-professional medication review (MPMR) service in care homes for older people.
Method
A total of care homes in the East of England were cluster randomised to ‘usual care’ or two multi-professional (General practitioner, clinical pharmacist and care homes staff) medication reviews during the 12-month trial period. Target recruitment was 900 residents with 10% assumed loss to follow-up. Co-primary outcome measures were number of falls and potentially inappropriate prescribing assessed by the Screening Tool of Older Persons Prescriptions.
Key findings
A total of 826 care home residents were recruited with 324 lost to follow-up for at least one primary outcome measure. The mean number of falls per resident per annum was 3.3 for intervention and 3.0 for control (P = 0.947). Each resident was found to be prescribed 0.69 (intervention) and 0.85 (control) potentially inappropriate medicines after 12 months (P = 0.046). No significant difference identified in emergency hospital admissions or deaths. Estimated unadjusted incremental mean cost per resident was £374.26 higher in the intervention group.
Conclusions
In line with other medication review based interventions in care homes, two MPMRs improved medication appropriateness but failed to demonstrate improvements in clinical outcomes. From a health system perspective costs where estimated to increase overall and therefore a different model of medicines management is required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Allan Clark
- Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norfolk, UK
| | - Julie Houghton
- School of Pharmacy, University of East Anglia, Norfolk, UK
| | - Tracey Sach
- Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norfolk, UK
| | - Val Shaw
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | | | - Richard C Holland
- Leicester Medical School, George Davies Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - David J Wright
- School of Pharmacy, University of East Anglia, Norfolk, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Crossman-Barnes CJ, Sach T, Wilson A, Barton G. The construct validity and responsiveness of the EQ-5D-5L, AQL-5D and a bespoke TTO in acute asthmatics. Qual Life Res 2020; 29:619-627. [PMID: 31676971 PMCID: PMC7028833 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-019-02345-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/21/2019] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Measuring quality of life in acute asthmatics is challenging, especially when asthma attacks can occur sporadically. Several questionnaires can be used to measure quality of life in this patient group; however, psychometric testing is limited on questionnaires that can be used to estimate Quality Adjusted Life years. The objective of this study is to assess the construct validity (convergent and discriminative validity) and responsiveness of the EuroQol-5-Dimensions 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L), Asthma Quality of Life Utility Index-5 Dimensions (AQL-5D) and Time Trade-Off (TTO) in acute asthma patients. METHODS Data from a prospective cohort study were used to test the validity and responsiveness of the EQ-5D-5L, AQL-5D and TTO in asthma patients who were recruited from UK accident & emergency departments or hospital wards. The spearman's rank correlation coefficient, the Kruskal-Wallis test statistic and the standardized response mean were used to test for convergent validity, discriminative validity and responsiveness, respectively. RESULTS One hundred and twenty-one participants were included in the available case analysis. The EQ-5D-5L and AQL-5D showed moderate to strong correlations for convergent validity at baseline, week 4 and week 8. The AQL-5D and TTO showed moderate correlations at week 4 and week 8. No statistical significance was observed for discriminative validity at baseline. Both the EQ-5D-5L and the AQL-5D also showed that they were sensitive to change for the recovery responses. CONCLUSIONS The EQ-5D-5L and AQL-5D showed stronger construct validity and responsiveness compared to the TTO. Therefore, both the EQ-5D-5L and AQL-5D should be considered for use in future economic evaluations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Tracey Sach
- Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - Andrew Wilson
- Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - Garry Barton
- Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Mohindru B, Turner D, Sach T, Bilton D, Carr S, Archangelidi O, Bhadhuri A, Whitty JA. Health State Utility Data in Cystic Fibrosis: A Systematic Review. Pharmacoecon Open 2020; 4:13-25. [PMID: 31054048 PMCID: PMC7018933 DOI: 10.1007/s41669-019-0144-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/02/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Cystic fibrosis (CF) is a life-limiting, hereditable condition, with the highest prevalence in Europe. CF treatments have led to improvements in clinical symptoms, disease management and decelerated disease progression. However, little is known about the health state utility (HSU) associated with CF disease states, adverse events, and changes in disease severity. Although HSU data have contributed to existing health economic modelling studies, a lack of such data have been highlighted. This systematic review aims to provide a summary of HSU-related research in CF and highlight related research gaps. METHODS Online searches were performed in six databases and studies in any of the following categories were included: (1) estimation of HSUs in CF; (2) mapping studies between patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and HSUs; (3) economic evaluations on the management of CF that report primary HSU data; and (4) any CF clinical trial that reported HSU as an outcome. RESULTS A total of 17 studies were reviewed, of which 12 provided HSU values for specific CF populations. The remaining five articles provided HSU data that were broken down by CF relevant health states, including lung transplantations, pulmonary exacerbation (PEx) events and forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1). CONCLUSION Current HSU data in CF are limited and there is considerable scope for further research, both in providing HSU values for CF and in investigating methods for HSU elicitation/evaluation in CF populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bishal Mohindru
- Norwich Medical School, Norwich Research Park, University of East Anglia, Norwich Norfolk, NR4 7TJ, UK.
| | - David Turner
- Norwich Medical School, Norwich Research Park, University of East Anglia, Norwich Norfolk, NR4 7TJ, UK
| | - Tracey Sach
- Norwich Medical School, Norwich Research Park, University of East Anglia, Norwich Norfolk, NR4 7TJ, UK
| | - Diana Bilton
- Imperial College London, Emmanuel Kaye Building, 1B Manresa Road, London, SW3 6LR, UK
| | - Siobhan Carr
- Imperial College London, Emmanuel Kaye Building, 1B Manresa Road, London, SW3 6LR, UK
| | | | - Arjun Bhadhuri
- The University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK
| | - Jennifer A Whitty
- Norwich Medical School, Norwich Research Park, University of East Anglia, Norwich Norfolk, NR4 7TJ, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
McManus E, Turner D, Sach T. Can You Repeat That? Exploring the Definition of a Successful Model Replication in Health Economics. Pharmacoeconomics 2019; 37:1371-1381. [PMID: 31531833 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-019-00836-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/22/2023]
Abstract
The International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR) modelling taskforce suggests decision models should be thoroughly reported and transparent. However, the level of transparency and indeed how transparency should be assessed are yet to be defined. One way may be to attempt to replicate the model and its outputs. The ability to replicate a decision model could demonstrate adequate reporting transparency. This review aims to explore published definitions of replication success across all scientific disciplines and to consider how such a definition should be tailored for use in health economic models. A literature review was conducted to identify published definitions of a 'successful replication'. Using these as a foundation, several definitions of replication success were constructed, to be applicable to replications of economic decision models, with the associated strengths and weaknesses of such definitions discussed. A substantial body of literature discussing replicability was found; however, relatively few studies, ten, explicitly defined a successful replication. These definitions varied from subjective assessments to expecting exactly the same results to be reproduced. Whilst the definitions that have been found may help to construct a definition specific to health economics, no definition was found that completely encompassed the unique requirements for decision models. Replication is widely discussed in other scientific disciplines; however, as of yet, there is no consensus on how replicable models should be within health economics or what constitutes a successful replication. Replication studies can demonstrate how transparently a model is reported, identify potential calculation errors and inform future reporting practices. It may therefore be a useful adjunct to other transparency or quality measures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma McManus
- Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, NR4 7TJ, UK.
| | - David Turner
- Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, NR4 7TJ, UK
| | - Tracey Sach
- Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, NR4 7TJ, UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
McManus E, Turner D, Gray E, Khawar H, Okoli T, Sach T. Barriers and Facilitators to Model Replication Within Health Economics. Value Health 2019; 22:1018-1025. [PMID: 31511178 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2019.04.1928] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2018] [Revised: 04/09/2019] [Accepted: 04/28/2019] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Model replication is important because it enables researchers to check research integrity and transparency and, potentially, to inform the model conceptualization process when developing a new or updated model. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to evaluate the replicability of published decision analytic models and to identify the barriers and facilitators to replication. METHODS Replication attempts of 5 published economic modeling studies were made. The replications were conducted using only publicly available information within the manuscripts and supplementary materials. The replicator attempted to reproduce the key results detailed in the paper, for example, the total cost, total outcomes, and if applicable, incremental cost-effectiveness ratio reported. Although a replication attempt was not explicitly defined as a success or failure, the replicated results were compared for percentage difference to the original results. RESULTS In conducting the replication attempts, common barriers and facilitators emerged. For most case studies, the replicator needed to make additional assumptions when recreating the model. This was often exacerbated by conflicting information being presented in the text and the tables. Across the case studies, the variation between original and replicated results ranged from -4.54% to 108.00% for costs and -3.81% to 0.40% for outcomes. CONCLUSION This study demonstrates that although models may appear to be comprehensively reported, it is often not enough to facilitate a precise replication. Further work is needed to understand how to improve model transparency and in turn increase the chances of replication, thus ensuring future usability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma McManus
- Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, England, UK.
| | - David Turner
- Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, England, UK
| | - Ewan Gray
- Division of Population Health, Health Services Research & Primary Care, The University of Manchester, Manchester, England, UK
| | - Haseeb Khawar
- Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, England, UK
| | - Toochukwu Okoli
- Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, England, UK
| | - Tracey Sach
- Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, England, UK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Crossman-Barnes CJ, Sach T, Wilson A, Barton G. Estimating loss in quality of life associated with asthma-related crisis events (ESQUARE): a cohort, observational study. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2019; 17:58. [PMID: 30971261 PMCID: PMC6458613 DOI: 10.1186/s12955-019-1138-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2018] [Accepted: 04/02/2019] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Evidence of quality of life implications of asthma attacks are limited, particularly when measured on a utility scale, which enables calculating Quality-Adjusted Life-Years (QALYs) and comparisons with other health conditions and services. Therefore, this study sought to estimate the utility loss associated with an asthma-related crisis event (accident and emergency (A&E) attendance or hospital admission). Methods Participants were recruited in a cohort study from A&E and hospital admissions at three UK hospitals. They completed the EuroQol-5 Dimensions 5-Level (EQ-5D-5 L), Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ), Time trade-off (TTO), and peak flow and symptom diary over 8 weeks, where three different methods (EQ-5D-5 L, AQLQ, and TTO), were used to estimate utilities. The mean difference between two time points were estimated using the Wilcoxon signed rank test. Results From baseline to week 8, mean increases (95% CI) were estimated to be 0.086 (0.019–0.153), 0.154 (0.112–0.196) and 0.132 (0.063–0.201) for EQ-5D-5 L, AQL-5D (preference-based measure derived from AQLQ), and TTO respectively over 8 weeks (p < 0.01). Conclusion Asthma crisis events are estimated to be associated with a mean utility loss of between 0.086 and 0.132. The utility decrement can be used to assign values to asthma-related crisis events, which can enhance economic evaluations. Trial registration NCT02771678. Registered 13 May 2016. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12955-019-1138-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Tracey Sach
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, NR4 7TJ, UK
| | - Andrew Wilson
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, NR4 7TJ, UK
| | - Garry Barton
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, NR4 7TJ, UK
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Radford K, Sutton C, Sach T, Holmes J, Watkins C, Forshaw D, Jones T, Hoffman K, O'Connor R, Tyerman R, Merchán-Baeza JA, Morris R, McManus E, Drummond A, Walker M, Duley L, Shakespeare D, Hammond A, Phillips J. Early, specialist vocational rehabilitation to facilitate return to work after traumatic brain injury: the FRESH feasibility RCT. Health Technol Assess 2019; 22:1-124. [PMID: 29863459 DOI: 10.3310/hta22330] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Up to 160,000 people incur traumatic brain injury (TBI) each year in the UK. TBI can have profound effects on many areas of human functioning, including participation in work. There is limited evidence of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of vocational rehabilitation (VR) after injury to promote early return to work (RTW) following TBI. OBJECTIVE To assess the feasibility of a definitive, multicentre, randomised controlled trial (RCT) of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of early, specialist VR plus usual care (UC) compared with UC alone on work retention 12 months post TBI. DESIGN A multicentre, feasibility, parallel-group RCT with a feasibility economic evaluation and an embedded mixed-methods process evaluation. Randomisation was by remote computer-generated allocation. SETTING Three NHS major trauma centres (MTCs) in England. PARTICIPANTS Adults with TBI admitted for > 48 hours and working or studying prior to injury. INTERVENTIONS Early specialist TBI VR delivered by occupational therapists (OTs) in the community using a case co-ordination model. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Self-reported RTW 12 months post randomisation, mood, functional ability, participation, work self-efficacy, quality of life and work ability. Feasibility outcomes included recruitment and retention rates. Follow-up was by postal questionnaires in two centres and face to face in one centre. Those collecting data were blind to treatment allocation. RESULTS Out of 102 target participants, 78 were recruited (39 randomised to each arm), representing 39% of those eligible and 5% of those screened. Approximately 2.2 patients were recruited per site per month. Of those, 56% had mild injuries, 18% had moderate injuries and 26% had severe injuries. A total of 32 out of 45 nominated carers were recruited. A total of 52 out of 78 (67%) TBI participants responded at 12 months (UC, n = 23; intervention, n = 29), completing 90% of the work questions; 21 out of 23 (91%) UC respondents and 20 out of 29 (69%) intervention participants returned to work at 12 months. Two participants disengaged from the intervention. Face-to-face follow-up was no more effective than postal follow-up. RTW was most strongly related to social participation and work self-efficacy. It is feasible to assess the cost-effectiveness of VR. Intervention was delivered as intended and valued by participants. Factors likely to affect a definitive trial include deploying experienced OTs, no clear TBI definition or TBI registers, and repatriation of more severe TBI from MTCs, affecting recruitment of those most likely to benefit/least likely to drop out. LIMITATIONS Target recruitment was not reached, but mechanisms to achieve this in future studies were identified. Retention was lower than expected, particularly in UC, potentially biasing estimates of the 12-month RTW rate. CONCLUSIONS This study met most feasibility objectives. The intervention was delivered with high fidelity. When objectives were not met, strategies to ensure feasibility of a full trial were identified. Future work should test two-stage recruitment and include resources to recruit from 'spokes'. A broader measure covering work ability, self-efficacy and participation may be a more sensitive outcome. TRIAL REGISTRATION Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN38581822. FUNDING This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 22, No. 33. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kate Radford
- Division of Rehabilitation and Ageing, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Chris Sutton
- Faculty of Health and Wellbeing, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK
| | - Tracey Sach
- Health Economics Group, Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - Jain Holmes
- Division of Rehabilitation and Ageing, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Caroline Watkins
- Faculty of Health and Wellbeing, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK
| | - Denise Forshaw
- Faculty of Health and Wellbeing, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK
| | - Trevor Jones
- Division of Rehabilitation and Ageing, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Karen Hoffman
- Centre for Trauma Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Rory O'Connor
- Academic Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Ruth Tyerman
- Community Head Injury Service, Buckinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust, Aylesbury, UK
| | | | - Richard Morris
- Division of Rehabilitation and Ageing, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Emma McManus
- Health Economics Group, Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - Avril Drummond
- Division of Rehabilitation and Ageing, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Marion Walker
- Division of Rehabilitation and Ageing, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Lelia Duley
- Division of Rehabilitation and Ageing, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | | | - Alison Hammond
- Health Sciences Research Centre, University of Salford, Salford, UK
| | - Julie Phillips
- Division of Rehabilitation and Ageing, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Mohindru B, Turner D, Sach T, Bilton D, Carr S, Archangelidi O, Bhadhuri A, Whitty JA. Health economic modelling in Cystic Fibrosis: A systematic review. J Cyst Fibros 2019; 18:452-460. [PMID: 30738801 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcf.2019.01.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2018] [Revised: 01/03/2019] [Accepted: 01/21/2019] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Cystic Fibrosis (CF) is a heritable chronic condition. Due to the genetic and progressive nature of CF, a number of interventions are available for the condition. In the United Kingdom (U.K.) average annual cost of CF treatment is between €49,000 to €76,000 (2012) per patient [1]. A review of health economic modelling studies is warranted to provide decision makers and researchers with an in depth understanding of modelling practices in CF and guidance for future research. METHODS Online searches were performed in the 5 databases, studies were included if they were: a) Model based economic evaluation for management of Cystic Fibrosis. Articles were restricted to English language only, but no restriction was applied on publication year. RESULTS Nine studies were reviewed, most were Markov cohort models. Models evaluated pharmaceutical interventions and drug adherence. Modelling structure was consistent across most articles and a range of sources were used to populate the models. Cost and utility data were based on different sources and elicitation methods respectively. The majority of models failed to incorporate significant health events which impact both cost and disease progression. CONCLUSION In our review we observed a lack of, application of European Medicines Agency (EMA) guidelines for clinical trial endpoints, model structure justifications and lastly, health-related quality of life derived utility information around important clinical events. Future work around conceptual modelling of CF progression, utility valuation of significant health events and meeting EMA guidelines for trial reporting is encouraged.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bishal Mohindru
- Norwich Medical School, Norwich Research Park, University of East Anglia, Norwich, Norfolk NR4 7TJ, UK.
| | - David Turner
- Norwich Medical School, Norwich Research Park, University of East Anglia, Norwich, Norfolk NR4 7TJ, UK
| | - Tracey Sach
- Norwich Medical School, Norwich Research Park, University of East Anglia, Norwich, Norfolk NR4 7TJ, UK
| | - Diana Bilton
- Imperial College London, Emmanuel Kaye Building, 1B Manresa Road, London SW3 6LR, UK
| | - Siobhan Carr
- Imperial College London, Emmanuel Kaye Building, 1B Manresa Road, London SW3 6LR, UK
| | | | - Arjun Bhadhuri
- The University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK
| | - Jennifer A Whitty
- Norwich Medical School, Norwich Research Park, University of East Anglia, Norwich, Norfolk NR4 7TJ, UK
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Irvine A, Jones A, Beattie P, Baron S, Browne F, Ashoor F, O'Neill L, Rosala-Hallas A, Sach T, Spowart C, Taams L, Walker C, Wan M, Webb N, Williamson P, Flohr C. The TREatment of severe Atopic eczema Trial (TREAT). Br J Dermatol 2018. [DOI: 10.1111/bjd.17052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
17
|
Irvine AD, Jones AP, Beattie P, Baron S, Browne F, Ashoor F, O'Neill L, Rosala-Hallas A, Sach T, Spowart C, Taams L, Walker C, Wan M, Webb N, Williamson P, Flohr C. A randomized controlled trial protocol assessing the effectiveness, safety and cost-effectiveness of methotrexate vs. ciclosporin in the treatment of severe atopic eczema in children: the TREatment of severe Atopic eczema Trial (TREAT). Br J Dermatol 2018; 179:1297-1306. [PMID: 29727479 DOI: 10.1111/bjd.16717] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/23/2018] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Oral systemic immunomodulatory medication is regularly used off-licence in children with severe atopic eczema. However, there is no firm evidence regarding the effectiveness, safety, cost-effectiveness and impact on quality of life from an adequately powered randomized controlled trial (RCT) using systemic medication in children. OBJECTIVES To assess whether there is a difference in the speed of onset, effectiveness, side-effect profile and reduction in flares post-treatment between ciclosporin (CyA) and methotrexate (MTX), and also the cost-effectiveness of the drugs. Treatment impact on quality of life will also be examined in addition to whether FLG genotype influences treatment response. In addition, the trial studies the immune-metabolic effects of CyA and MTX. METHODS Multicentre, parallel group, assessor-blind, pragmatic RCT of 36 weeks' duration with a 24-week follow-up period. In total, 102 children aged 2-16 years with moderate-to-severe atopic eczema, unresponsive to topical treatment will be randomized (1 : 1) to receive MTX (0·4 mg kg-1 per week) or CyA (4 mg kg-1 per day). RESULTS The trial has two primary outcomes: change from baseline to 12 weeks in Objective Severity Scoring of Atopic Dermatitis (o-SCORAD) and time to first significant flare following treatment cessation. CONCLUSIONS This trial addresses important therapeutic questions, highlighted in systematic reviews and treatment guidelines for atopic eczema. The trial design is pragmatic to reflect current clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A D Irvine
- Clinical Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.,Paediatric Dermatology, Our Lady's Children Hospital Crumlin, Dublin, Ireland.,National Children's Research Centre, Crumlin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - A P Jones
- Clinical Trials Research Centre, Department of Biostatistics, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, U.K
| | - P Beattie
- Royal Hospital for Children NHS Trust, Glasgow, U.K
| | - S Baron
- Unit for Population-Based Dermatology Research, St John's Institute of Dermatology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London, London, U.K
| | - F Browne
- Paediatric Dermatology, Our Lady's Children Hospital Crumlin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - F Ashoor
- Clinical Trials Research Centre, Department of Biostatistics, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, U.K
| | - L O'Neill
- Biochemistry, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - A Rosala-Hallas
- Clinical Trials Research Centre, Department of Biostatistics, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, U.K
| | - T Sach
- Health Economics Group, Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, U.K
| | - C Spowart
- Clinical Trials Research Centre, Department of Biostatistics, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, U.K
| | - L Taams
- Centre for Molecular and Cellular Biology of Inflammation, King's College London, London, U.K
| | - C Walker
- Unit for Population-Based Dermatology Research, St John's Institute of Dermatology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London, London, U.K
| | - M Wan
- Unit for Population-Based Dermatology Research, St John's Institute of Dermatology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London, London, U.K
| | - N Webb
- Renal Research Laboratories, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester, U.K
| | - P Williamson
- Clinical Trials Research Centre, Department of Biostatistics, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, U.K
| | - C Flohr
- Unit for Population-Based Dermatology Research, St John's Institute of Dermatology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London, London, U.K
| | -
- Unit for Population-Based Dermatology Research, St John's Institute of Dermatology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London, London, U.K
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Horne JC, Robinson K, Sims E, Stirling S, Sach T, Armstrong S, Logan PA. 24IMPROVING TRIAL RECRUITMENT IN CARE HOMES: THE FALLS IN CARE HOME (FINCH) EXPERIENCE. Age Ageing 2018. [DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afy124.04] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | - K Robinson
- Research and Innovation, Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust
| | - E Sims
- Norwich Clinical Trials Units, University of East Anglia, UK
| | - S Stirling
- Norwich Clinical Trials Units, University of East Anglia, UK
| | - T Sach
- Norwich Clinical Trials Units, University of East Anglia, UK
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Crossman‐Barnes C, Peel A, Fong‐Soe‐Khioe R, Sach T, Wilson A, Barton G. Economic evidence for nonpharmacological asthma management interventions: A systematic review. Allergy 2018; 73:1182-1195. [PMID: 29105788 PMCID: PMC6033175 DOI: 10.1111/all.13337] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/15/2017] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Asthma management, education and environmental interventions have been reported as cost‐effective in a previous review (Pharm Pract (Granada), 2014;12:493), but methods used to estimate costs and outcomes were not discussed in detail. This review updates the previous review by providing economic evidence on the cost‐effectiveness of studies identified after 2012, and a detailed assessment of the methods used in all identified studies. Twelve databases were searched from 1990 to January 2016, and studies included economic evaluations, asthma subjects and nonpharmacological interventions written in English. Sixty‐four studies were included. Of these, 15 were found in addition to the earlier review; 53% were rated fair in quality and 47% high. Education and self‐management interventions were the most cost‐effective, in line with the earlier review. Self‐reporting was the most common method used to gather resource‐use data, accompanied by bottom‐up approaches to estimate costs. Main outcome measures were asthma‐related hospitalizations (69%), quality of life (41%) and utility (38%), with AQLQ and the EQ‐5D being the most common questionnaires measured prospectively at fixed time points. More rigorous costing methods are needed with a more common quality of life tool to aid greater replicability and comparability amongst asthma studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - A. Peel
- Norwich Medical School University of East Anglia Norwich UK
| | | | - T. Sach
- Norwich Medical School University of East Anglia Norwich UK
| | - A. Wilson
- Norwich Medical School University of East Anglia Norwich UK
| | - G. Barton
- Norwich Medical School University of East Anglia Norwich UK
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Haines RH, Thomas KS, Montgomery AA, Ravenscroft JC, Akram P, Chalmers JR, Whitham D, Duley L, Eleftheriadou V, Meakin G, Mitchell EJ, White J, Rogers A, Sach T, Santer M, Tan W, Hepburn T, Williams HC, Batchelor J. Home interventions and light therapy for the treatment of vitiligo (HI-Light Vitiligo Trial): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open 2018; 8:e018649. [PMID: 29615444 PMCID: PMC5893933 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018649] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Vitiligo is a condition resulting in white patches on the skin. People with vitiligo can suffer from low self-esteem, psychological disturbance and diminished quality of life. Vitiligo is often poorly managed, partly due to lack of high-quality evidence to inform clinical care. We describe here a large, independent, randomised controlled trial (RCT) assessing the comparative effectiveness of potent topical corticosteroid, home-based hand-held narrowband ultraviolet B-light (NB-UVB) or combination of the two, for the management of vitiligo. METHODS AND ANALYSIS The HI-Light Vitiligo Trial is a multicentre, three-arm, parallel group, pragmatic, placebo-controlled RCT. 516 adults and children with actively spreading, but limited, vitiligo are randomised (1:1:1) to one of three groups: mometasone furoate 0.1% ointment plus dummy NB-UVB light, vehicle ointment plus NB-UVB light or mometasone furoate 0.1% ointment plus NB-UVB light. Treatment of up to three patches of vitiligo is continued for up to 9 months with clinic visits at baseline, 3, 6 and 9 months and four post-treatment questionnaires.The HI-Light Vitiligo Trial assesses outcomes included in the vitiligo core outcome set and places emphasis on participants' views of treatment success. The primary outcome is proportion of participants achieving treatment success (patient-rated Vitiligo Noticeability Scale) for a target patch of vitiligo at 9 months with further independent blinded assessment using digital images of the target lesion before and after treatment. Secondary outcomes include time to onset of treatment response, treatment success by body region, percentage repigmentation, quality of life, time-burden of treatment, maintenance of response, safety and within-trial cost-effectiveness. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Approvals were granted by East Midlands-Derby Research Ethics Committee (14/EM/1173) and the MHRA (EudraCT 2014-003473-42). The trial was registered 8 January 2015 ISRCTN (17160087). Results will be published in full as open access in the NIHR Journal library and elsewhere. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ISRCTN17160087.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel H Haines
- Nottingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
| | - Kim S Thomas
- Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Alan A Montgomery
- Nottingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
| | - Jane C Ravenscroft
- Department of Paediatric Dermatology, Nottingham Children's Hospital, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | - Perways Akram
- Department of Medical Physics and Clinical Engineering, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | - Joanne R Chalmers
- Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Diane Whitham
- Nottingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Nottingham, Nottingham Health Science Partners, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
| | - Lelia Duley
- Nottingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Nottingham, Nottingham Health Science Partners, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
| | | | - Garry Meakin
- Nottingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
| | - Eleanor J Mitchell
- Nottingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
| | - Jennifer White
- Nottingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
| | - Andy Rogers
- Department of Medical Physics and Clinical Engineering, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | - Tracey Sach
- Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - Miriam Santer
- Primary Care and Population Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Wei Tan
- Nottingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
| | - Trish Hepburn
- Nottingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
| | - Hywel C Williams
- Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Jonathan Batchelor
- Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Sach T. Safety gains don't translate into reduced costs or increased QALYs for doxycycline compared with prednisolone for patients with bullous pemphigoid. Br J Dermatol 2018; 178:320-321. [DOI: 10.1111/bjd.16226] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- T. Sach
- Health Economics Group; Norwich Medical School; University of East Anglia; Norwich NR4 7TJ U.K
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objective of this systematic review was to identify and assess the quality of published economic decision-analytic models within atopic eczema against best practice guidelines, with the intention of informing future decision-analytic models within this condition. METHODS A systematic search of the following online databases was performed: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, NHS Economic Evaluation Database, EconLit, Scopus, Health Technology Assessment, Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Registry and Web of Science. Papers were eligible for inclusion if they described a decision-analytic model evaluating both the costs and benefits associated with an intervention or prevention for atopic eczema. Data were extracted using a standardised form by two independent reviewers, whilst quality was assessed using the model-specific Philips criteria. RESULTS Twenty-four models were identified, evaluating either preventions (n = 12) or interventions (n = 12): 14 reported using a Markov modelling approach, four utilised decision trees and one a discrete event simulation, whilst five did not specify the approach. The majority, 22 studies, reported that the intervention was dominant or cost effective, given the assumptions and analytical perspective taken. Notably, the models tended to be short-term (16 used a time horizon of ≤1 year), often providing little justification for the limited time horizon chosen. The methodological and reporting quality of the studies was generally weak, with only seven studies fulfilling more than 50% of their applicable Philips criteria. CONCLUSIONS This is the first systematic review of decision models in eczema. Whilst the majority of models reported favourable outcomes in terms of the cost effectiveness of the new intervention, the usefulness of these findings for decision-making is questionable. In particular, there is considerable scope for increasing the range of interventions evaluated, for improving modelling structures and reporting quality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma McManus
- Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, NR4 7TJ, UK
| | - Tracey Sach
- Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, NR4 7TJ, UK.
| | - Nick Levell
- Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Norwich, NR4 7UY, UK
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Affiliation(s)
- E McManus
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, NR4 7TJ, U.K
| | - T Sach
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, NR4 7TJ, U.K
| | - N J Levell
- Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Colney Lane, Norwich, NR4 7UY, U.K
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Turner D, Carter T, Sach T, Guo B, Callaghan P. Cost-effectiveness of a preferred intensity exercise programme for young people with depression compared with treatment as usual: an economic evaluation alongside a clinical trial in the UK. BMJ Open 2017; 7:e016211. [PMID: 29180592 PMCID: PMC5719311 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016211] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2017] [Revised: 08/01/2017] [Accepted: 09/05/2017] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To assess the cost-effectiveness of preferred intensity exercise programme for young people with depression compared with a treatment as usual control group. DESIGN A 'within trial' cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analysis conducted alongside a randomised controlled trial. The perspective of the analysis was the UK National Health Service and social services. SETTING The intervention was provided in a community leisure centre setting. PARTICIPANTS 86 young people aged 14-17 years attending Tier 2 and Tier 3 CAMHS (Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services) outpatient services presenting with depression. INTERVENTIONS The intervention comprised 12 separate sessions of circuit training over a 6-week period. Sessions were supervised by a qualified exercise therapist. Participants also received treatment as usual. The comparator group received treatment as usual. RESULTS We found improvements in the Children's Depression Inventory-2 (CDI-2) and estimated cost-effectiveness at £61 per point improvement in CDI-2 for the exercise group compared with control. We found no evidence that the exercise intervention led to differences in quality-adjusted life years (QALY). QALYs were estimated using the EQ-5D-5L (5-level version of EuroQol-5 dimension). CONCLUSIONS There is evidence that exercise can be an effective intervention for adolescents with depression and the current study shows that preferred intensity exercise could also represent a cost-effective intervention in terms of the CDI-2. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT01474837.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Turner
- Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - Tim Carter
- School of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Tracey Sach
- Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - Boliang Guo
- Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Affiliation(s)
- Emma McManus
- Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
| | - Tracey Sach
- Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Heinl D, Prinsen CAC, Sach T, Drucker AM, Ofenloch R, Flohr C, Apfelbacher C. Measurement properties of quality-of-life measurement instruments for infants, children and adolescents with eczema: a systematic review. Br J Dermatol 2017; 176:878-889. [PMID: 27543747 DOI: 10.1111/bjd.14966] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/01/2016] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Quality of life (QoL) is one of the core outcome domains identified by the Harmonising Outcome Measures for Eczema (HOME) initiative to be assessed in every eczema trial. There is uncertainty about the most appropriate QoL instrument to measure this domain in infants, children and adolescents. OBJECTIVES To systematically evaluate the measurement properties of existing measurement instruments developed and/or validated for the measurement of QoL in infants, children and adolescents with eczema. METHODS A systematic literature search in PubMed and Embase, complemented by a thorough hand search of reference lists, retrieved studies on measurement properties of eczema QoL instruments for infants, children and adolescents. For all eligible studies, we judged the adequacy of the measurement properties and the methodological study quality with the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) checklist. Results from different studies were summarized in a best-evidence synthesis and formed the basis to assign four degrees of recommendation. RESULTS Seventeen articles, three of which were found by hand search, were included. These 17 articles reported on 24 instruments. No instrument can be recommended for use in all eczema trials because none fulfilled all required adequacy criteria. With adequate internal consistency, reliability and hypothesis testing, the U.S. version of the Childhood Atopic Dermatitis Impact Scale (CADIS), a proxy-reported instrument, has the potential to be recommended depending on the results of further validation studies. All other instruments, including all self-reported ones, lacked significant validation data. CONCLUSIONS Currently, no QoL instrument for infants, children and adolescents with eczema can be highly recommended. Future validation research should primarily focus on the CADIS, but also attempt to broaden the evidence base for the validity of self-reported instruments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Heinl
- Department of Medical Sociology, Institute of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, University of Regensburg, Dr.-Gessler-Str. 17, 93051, Regensburg, Germany
| | - C A C Prinsen
- VU University Medical Center, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, EMGO+ Institute for Health and Care Research, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - T Sach
- Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, U.K
| | - A M Drucker
- Department of Dermatology, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, U.S.A
| | - R Ofenloch
- Department of Clinical Social Medicine, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - C Flohr
- St John's Institute of Dermatology, Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London, London, U.K
| | - C Apfelbacher
- Department of Medical Sociology, Institute of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, University of Regensburg, Dr.-Gessler-Str. 17, 93051, Regensburg, Germany.,Division of Public Health and Primary Care, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Falmer, U.K
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Sahota O, Pulikottil-Jacob R, Marshall F, Montgomery A, Tan W, Sach T, Logan P, Kendrick D, Watson A, Walker M, Waring J. The Community In-reach Rehabilitation and Care Transition (CIRACT) clinical and cost-effectiveness randomisation controlled trial in older people admitted to hospital as an acute medical emergency. Age Ageing 2017; 46:26-32. [PMID: 28180236 PMCID: PMC5377906 DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afw149] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2015] [Accepted: 07/06/2016] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective to compare the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a Community In-reach Rehabilitation and Care Transition (CIRACT) service with the traditional hospital-based rehabilitation (THB-Rehab) service. Design pragmatic randomised controlled trial with an integral health economic study. Settings large UK teaching hospital, with community follow-up. Subjects frail older people aged 70 years and older admitted to hospital as an acute medical emergency. Measurements Primary outcome: hospital length of stay; secondary outcomes: readmission, day 91-super spell bed days, functional ability, co-morbidity and health-related quality of life; cost-effectiveness analysis. Results a total of 250 participants were randomised. There was no significant difference in length of stay between the CIRACT and THB-Rehab service (median 8 versus 9 days; geometric mean 7.8 versus 8.7 days, mean ratio 0.90, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.74–1.10). Of the participants who were discharged from hospital, 17% and 13% were readmitted within 28 days from the CIRACT and THB-Rehab services, respectively (risk difference 3.8%, 95% CI −5.8% to 13.4%). There were no other significant differences in any of the other secondary outcomes between the two groups. The mean costs (including NHS and personal social service) of the CIRACT and THB-Rehab service were £3,744 and £3,603, respectively (mean cost difference £144; 95% CI −1,645 to 1,934). Conclusion the CIRACT service does not reduce major hospital length of stay nor reduce short-term readmission rates, compared to the standard THB-Rehab service; however, a modest (<2.3 days) effect cannot be excluded. Further studies are necessary powered with larger sample sizes and cluster randomisation. Trial registration ISRCTN 94393315, 25th April 2013
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Opinder Sahota
- Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham NG7 2UH, UK
- Address correspondence to: Opinder Sahota. Tel: 07812 268609.
| | | | - Fiona Marshall
- University of Nottingham Business School, Jubilee Campus, Nottingham NG8 1BB, UK
| | - Alan Montgomery
- School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, NottinghamNG7 2UH, UK
| | - Wei Tan
- School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, NottinghamNG7 2UH, UK
| | - Tracey Sach
- Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, NorwichNR4 7TJ, UK
| | - Pip Logan
- School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, NottinghamNG7 2UH, UK
| | - Denise Kendrick
- School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, NottinghamNG7 2UH, UK
| | - Alison Watson
- Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham NG7 2UH, UK
| | - Maria Walker
- Nottingham CityCare Partnership CIC, Nottingham NG1 6GN, UK
| | - Justin Waring
- University of Nottingham Business School, Jubilee Campus, Nottingham NG8 1BB, UK
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Chalmers J, Simpson E, Apfelbacher C, Thomas K, Kobyletzki L, Schmitt J, Singh J, Svensson Å, Williams H, Abuabara K, Aoki V, Ardeleanu M, Awici‐Rasmussen M, Barbarot S, Berents T, Block J, Bragg A, Burton T, Bjerring Clemmensen K, Creswell‐Melville A, Dinesen M, Drucker A, Eckert L, Flohr C, Garg M, Gerbens L, Graff A, Hanifin J, Heinl D, Humphreys R, Ishii H, Kataoka Y, Leshem Y, Marquort B, Massuel M, Merhand S, Mizutani H, Murota H, Murrell D, Nakahara T, Nasr I, Nograles K, Ohya Y, Osterloh I, Pander J, Prinsen C, Purkins L, Ridd M, Sach T, Schuttelaar MA, Shindo S, Smirnova J, Sulzer A, Synnøve Gjerde E, Takaoka R, Vestby Talmo H, Tauber M, Torchet F, Volke A, Wahlgren C, Weidinger S, Weisshaar E, Wollenberg A, Yamaga K, Zhao C, Spuls P. Report from the fourth international consensus meeting to harmonize core outcome measures for atopic eczema/dermatitis clinical trials (HOME initiative). Br J Dermatol 2016; 175:69-79. [DOI: 10.1111/bjd.14773] [Citation(s) in RCA: 98] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/08/2016] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
|
29
|
Heinl D, Prinsen CAC, Deckert S, Chalmers JR, Drucker AM, Ofenloch R, Humphreys R, Sach T, Chamlin SL, Schmitt J, Apfelbacher C. Measurement properties of adult quality-of-life measurement instruments for eczema: a systematic review. Allergy 2016; 71:358-70. [PMID: 26564008 DOI: 10.1111/all.12806] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/06/2015] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Harmonising Outcome Measures for Eczema (HOME) initiative has identified quality of life (QoL) as a core outcome domain to be evaluated in every eczema trial. It is unclear which of the existing QoL instruments is most appropriate for this domain. Thus, the aim of this review was to systematically assess the measurement properties of existing measurement instruments developed and/or validated for the measurement of QoL in adult eczema. METHODS We conducted a systematic literature search in PubMed and Embase identifying studies on measurement properties of adult eczema QoL instruments. For all eligible studies, we assessed the adequacy of the measurement properties and the methodological quality with the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) checklist. A best evidence synthesis summarizing findings from different studies was the basis to assign four degrees of recommendation (A-D). RESULTS A total of 15 articles reporting on 17 instruments were included. No instrument fulfilled the criteria for category A. Six instruments were placed in category B, meaning that they have the potential to be recommended depending on the results of further validation studies. Three instruments had poor adequacy in at least one required adequacy criterion and were therefore put in category C. The remaining eight instruments were minimally validated and were thus placed in category D. CONCLUSIONS Currently, no QoL instrument can be recommended for use in adult eczema. The Quality of Life Index for Atopic Dermatitis (QoLIAD) and the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) are recommended for further validation research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D. Heinl
- Medical Sociology; Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine; University of Regensburg; Regensburg Germany
| | - C. A. C. Prinsen
- VU University Medical Center; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics; EMGO+ Institute for Health and Care Research; Amsterdam The Netherlands
| | - S. Deckert
- Centre for Evidence-based Healthcare; Medizinische Fakultät Carl Gustav Carus; TU Dresden; Dresden Germany
| | - J. R. Chalmers
- Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology; University of Nottingham; Nottingham UK
| | - A. M. Drucker
- Division of Dermatology; University Health Network; Toronto ON Canada
| | - R. Ofenloch
- Department of Clinical Social Medicine; University Hospital Heidelberg; Heidelberg Germany
| | | | - T. Sach
- Norwich Medical School; University of East Anglia; Norwich UK
| | - S. L. Chamlin
- Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago; Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine; Chicago IL USA
| | - J. Schmitt
- Centre for Evidence-based Healthcare; Medizinische Fakultät Carl Gustav Carus; TU Dresden; Dresden Germany
| | - C. Apfelbacher
- Medical Sociology; Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine; University of Regensburg; Regensburg Germany
- Division of Public Health and Primary Care; Brighton and Sussex Medical School; Falmer UK
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Heinl D, Prinsen CAC, Drucker AM, Ofenloch R, Humphreys R, Sach T, Flohr C, Apfelbacher C. Measurement properties of quality of life measurement instruments for infants, children and adolescents with eczema: protocol for a systematic review. Syst Rev 2016; 5:25. [PMID: 26860189 PMCID: PMC4748496 DOI: 10.1186/s13643-016-0202-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2015] [Accepted: 02/02/2016] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Eczema is a common chronic or chronically relapsing, inflammatory skin disease that exerts a substantial negative impact on quality of life (QoL). The Harmonising Outcome Measures for Eczema (HOME) initiative has used a consensus-based process which identified QoL as one of the four core outcome domains to be assessed in all eczema clinical trials. A number of measurement instruments exist to measure QoL in infants, children, and adolescents with eczema, and there is a great variability in both content and quality of the instruments used. Therefore, the objective of the proposed research is to comprehensively and systematically assess the measurement properties of the existing measurement instruments that were developed and/or validated for the measurement of patient-reported QoL in infants, children, and adolescents with eczema. METHODS/DESIGN This study is a systematic review of the measurement properties of patient-reported measures of QoL developed and/or validated for infants, children, and adolescents with eczema. A systematic literature search will be carried out in MEDLINE via PubMed and EMBASE using a selection of relevant search terms. Eligible studies will be primary empirical studies evaluating, describing, or comparing measurement properties of QoL instruments for infants, children, and adolescents with eczema. Two reviewers will independently perform eligibility assessment and data abstraction. Evidence tables will be used to record study characteristics, instrument characteristics, measurement properties, and interpretability. The adequacy of the measurement properties will be assessed using predefined criteria. The COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) checklist will be used to evaluate the methodological quality of included studies. A best evidence synthesis will be undertaken if more than one study has examined a particular measurement property. DISCUSSION The proposed systematic review will yield a comprehensive assessment of measurement properties of existing QoL instruments in infants, children, and adolescents with eczema. The results will serve as a basis to recommend a QoL measurement instrument for infants, one for children, and one for adolescents for use in future clinical trials. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION PROSPERO CRD42015023483.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Heinl
- Medical Sociology, Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
| | - Cecilia A C Prinsen
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, EMGO+ Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Aaron M Drucker
- Department of Dermatology, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
| | - Robert Ofenloch
- Department of Clinical Social Medicine, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
| | | | - Tracey Sach
- Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
| | - Carsten Flohr
- St John's Institute of Dermatology, King's College London, London, UK.
| | - Christian Apfelbacher
- Medical Sociology, Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany. .,Division of Public Health and Primary Care, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Falmer, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Sahota O, Pulikottil-Jacob R, Marshall F, Montgomery A, Tan W, Sach T, Logan P, Kendrick D, Watson A, Walker M, Waring J. Comparing the cost-effectiveness and clinical effectiveness of a new community in-reach rehabilitation service with the cost-effectiveness and clinical effectiveness of an established hospital-based rehabilitation service for older people: a pragmatic randomised controlled trial with microcost and qualitative analysis – the Community In-reach Rehabilitation And Care Transition (CIRACT) study. Health Serv Deliv Res 2016. [DOI: 10.3310/hsdr04070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BackgroundOlder people represent a significant proportion of patients admitted to hospital as a medical emergency. Compared with the care of younger patients, their care is more challenging, their stay in hospital is much longer, their risk of hospital-acquired problems is much higher and their 28-day readmission rate is much greater.ObjectiveTo compare the clinical effectiveness, microcosts and cost-effectiveness of a Community In-reach Rehabilitation And Care Transition (CIRACT) service with the traditional hospital-based rehabilitation (THB-Rehab) service in patients aged ≥ 70 years.MethodsA pragmatic randomised controlled trial with an integral health economic study and parallel qualitative appraisal was undertaken in a large UK teaching hospital, with community follow-up. Participants were individually randomised to the intervention (CIRACT service) or standard care (THB-Rehab service). The primary outcome was hospital length of stay; secondary outcomes were readmission within 28 and 91 days post discharge and super spell bed-days (total time in NHS care), functional ability, comorbidity and health-related quality of life, all measured at day 91, together with the microcosts and cost-effectiveness of the two services. A qualitative appraisal provided an explanatory understanding of the organisation, delivery and experience of the CIRACT service from the perspective of key stakeholders and patients.ResultsIn total, 250 participants were randomised (n = 125 CIRACT service,n = 125 THB-Rehab service). There was no significant difference in length of stay between the CIRACT service and the THB-Rehab service (median 8 vs. 9 days). There were no significant differences between the groups in any of the secondary outcomes. The cost of delivering the CIRACT service and the THB-Rehab service, as determined from the microcost analysis, was £302 and £303 per patient respectively. The overall mean costs (including NHS and personal social service costs) of the CIRACT and THB-Rehab services calculated from the Client Service Receipt Inventory were £3744 and £3603 respectively [mean cost difference £144, 95% confidence interval –£1645 to £1934] and the mean quality-adjusted life-years for the CIRACT service were 0.846 and for the THB-Rehab service were 0.806. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) from a NHS and Personal Social Services perspective was £2022 per quality-adjusted life-year. Although the CIRACT service was highly regarded by those who were most involved with it, the emergent configuration of the service working across organisational and occupational boundaries was not easily incorporated by the current established community services.ConclusionsThe CIRACT service did not reduce hospital length of stay or short-term readmission rates compared with the standard THB-Rehab service, although it was highly regarded by those who were most involved with it. The estimated ICER appears cost-effective although it is subject to much uncertainty, as shown by points spanning all four quadrants of the cost-effectiveness plane. Microcosting work-sampling methodology provides a useful method to estimate the cost of service provision. Limitations in sample size, which may have excluded a smaller reduction in length of stay, and lack of blinding, which may have introduced some cross-contamination between the two groups, must be recognised. Reducing hospital length of stay and hospital readmissions remains a priority for the NHS. Further studies are necessary, which should be powered with larger sample sizes and use cluster randomisation (to reduce bias) but, more importantly, should include a more integrated community health-care model as part of the CIRACT team.Trial registrationCurrent Controlled Trials ISRCTN94393315.FundingThe National Institute for Health Research Health Services and Delivery Research programme.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Opinder Sahota
- Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | | | - Fiona Marshall
- University of Nottingham Business School, Nottingham, UK
| | - Alan Montgomery
- School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Wei Tan
- School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Tracey Sach
- Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - Pip Logan
- School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Denise Kendrick
- School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Alison Watson
- Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | | | - Justin Waring
- University of Nottingham Business School, Nottingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Radford KA, Phillips J, Jones T, Gibson A, Sutton C, Watkins C, Sach T, Duley L, Walker M, Drummond A, Hoffman K, O'Connor R, Forshaw D, Shakespeare D. Facilitating return to work through early specialist health-based interventions (FRESH): protocol for a feasibility randomised controlled trial. Pilot Feasibility Stud 2015; 1:24. [PMID: 27965803 PMCID: PMC5154052 DOI: 10.1186/s40814-015-0017-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2014] [Accepted: 05/29/2015] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Over one million people sustain traumatic brain injury each year in the UK and more than 10 % of these are moderate or severe injuries, resulting in cognitive and psychological problems that affect the ability to work. Returning to work is a primary rehabilitation goal but fewer than half of traumatic brain injury survivors achieve this. Work is a recognised health service outcome, yet UK service provision varies widely and there is little robust evidence to inform rehabilitation practice. A single-centre cohort comparison suggested better work outcomes may be achieved through early occupational therapy targeted at job retention. This study aims to determine whether this intervention can be delivered in three new trauma centres and to conduct a feasibility, randomised controlled trial to determine whether its effects and cost effectiveness can be measured to inform a definitive trial. Methods/design Mixed methods study, including feasibility randomised controlled trial, embedded qualitative studies and feasibility economic evaluation will recruit 102 people with traumatic brain injury and their nominated carers from three English UK National Health Service (NHS) trauma centres. Participants will be randomised to receive either usual NHS rehabilitation or usual rehabilitation plus early specialist traumatic brain injury vocational rehabilitation delivered by an occupational therapist. The primary objective is to assess the feasibility of conducting a definitive trial; secondary objectives include measurement of protocol integrity (inclusion/exclusion criteria, intervention adherence, reasons for non-adherence) recruitment rate, the proportion of eligible patients recruited, reasons for non-recruitment, spectrum of TBI severity, proportion of and reasons for loss to follow-up, completeness of data collection, gains in face-to-face Vs postal data collection and the most appropriate methods of measuring primary outcomes (return to work, retention) to determine the sample size for a larger trial. Discussion To our knowledge, this is the first feasibility randomised controlled trial of a vocational rehabilitation health intervention specific to traumatic brain injury. The results will inform the design of a definitive trial. Trial registration The trial is registered ISRCTN Number 38581822. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s40814-015-0017-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathryn A Radford
- Division of Rehabilitation and Ageing, School of Medicine, Medical School Queen's Medical Centre, B-Floor, Nottingham, NG7 2UH UK
| | - Julie Phillips
- Division of Rehabilitation and Ageing, School of Medicine, Medical School Queen's Medical Centre, B-Floor, Nottingham, NG7 2UH UK
| | | | - Ali Gibson
- Lancashire Clinical Trials Unit, School of Health, University of Central Lancashire, Brook Building, Room 217, Preston, PR1 2HE UK
| | - Chris Sutton
- Lancashire Clinical Trials Unit, School of Health, University of Central Lancashire, Brook Building, Room 217, Preston, PR1 2HE UK
| | - Caroline Watkins
- Lancashire Clinical Trials Unit, School of Health, University of Central Lancashire, Brook Building, Room 217, Preston, PR1 2HE UK
| | - Tracey Sach
- Health Economics Group, Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, CD Annex 1.13, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, NR4 7TJ UK
| | - Lelia Duley
- Nottingham Clinical Trials Unit, Nottingham Health Science Partners, C Floor, South Block, QMC, Nottingham, NG7 2UH UK
| | - Marion Walker
- Division of Rehabilitation and Ageing, School of Medicine, Medical School Queen's Medical Centre, B-Floor, Nottingham, NG7 2UH UK
| | - Avril Drummond
- School of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham Queen's Medical Centre (QMC), A Floor, Nottingham, NG7 2UH UK
| | - Karen Hoffman
- Trauma Science, Royal London Hospital, Ward 12D, Whitechapel, E1 1BB London UK
| | - Rory O'Connor
- Academic Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Leeds Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Leeds, Level D, Martin Wing, Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds, LS1 3EX UK
| | - Denise Forshaw
- Lancashire Clinical Trials Unit, School of Health, University of Central Lancashire, Brook Building, Room 217, Preston, PR1 2HE UK
| | - David Shakespeare
- Preston Neuro-Rehab Unit, Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, 32A Watling St, Preston, Lancashire PR2 8DY UK
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Apfelbacher CJ, Heinl D, Prinsen CAC, Deckert S, Chalmers J, Ofenloch R, Humphreys R, Sach T, Chamlin S, Schmitt J. Measurement properties of adult quality-of-life measurement instruments for eczema: protocol for a systematic review. Syst Rev 2015; 4:48. [PMID: 25927828 PMCID: PMC4403900 DOI: 10.1186/s13643-015-0041-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2015] [Accepted: 04/02/2015] [Indexed: 01/29/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Eczema is a common chronic or chronically relapsing skin disease that has a substantial impact on quality of life (QoL). By means of a consensus-based process, the Harmonising Outcome Measures in Eczema (HOME) initiative has identified QoL as one of the four core outcome domains to be assessed in all eczema trials (Allergy 67(9):1111-7, 2012). Various measurement instruments exist to measure QoL in adults with eczema, but there is a great variability in both content and quality (for example, reliability and validity) of the instruments used, and it is not always clear if the best instrument is being used. Therefore, the aim of the proposed research is a comprehensive systematic assessment of the measurement properties of the existing measurement instruments that were developed and/or validated for the measurement of patient-reported QoL in adults with eczema. METHODS/DESIGN This study is a systematic review of the measurement properties of patient-reported measures of QoL developed and/or validated for adults with eczema. Medline via PubMed and EMBASE will be searched using a selection of relevant search terms. Eligible studies will be primary empirical studies evaluating, describing, or comparing measurement properties of QoL instruments for adult patients with eczema. Eligibility assessment and data abstraction will be performed independently by two reviewers. Evidence tables will be generated for study characteristics, instrument characteristics, measurement properties, and interpretability. The quality of the measurement properties will be assessed using predefined criteria. Methodological quality of studies will be assessed using the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) checklist. A best evidence synthesis will be undertaken if more than one study has investigated a particular measurement property. DISCUSSION The proposed systematic review will produce a comprehensive assessment of measurement properties of existing QoL instruments in adult patients with eczema. We aim to identify one best currently available instrument to measure QoL in eczema patients. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION PROSPERO CRD42015017138.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian J Apfelbacher
- Medical Sociology, Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, University of Regensburg, 93051, Regensburg, Germany. .,Division of Public Health and Primary Care, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Falmer, BN1 9PH, UK.
| | - Daniel Heinl
- Medical Sociology, Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, University of Regensburg, 93051, Regensburg, Germany.
| | - Cecilia A C Prinsen
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, EMGO+ Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, 1081 BT, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Stefanie Deckert
- Centre for Evidence-based Healthcare, Medizinische Fakultät Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, 01307, Dresden, Germany.
| | - Joanne Chalmers
- Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology, The University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2NR, UK.
| | - Robert Ofenloch
- Department of Clinical Social Medicine, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69115, Heidelberg, Germany.
| | | | - Tracey Sach
- Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, NR4 7TJ, UK.
| | - Sarah Chamlin
- Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA.
| | - Jochen Schmitt
- Centre for Evidence-based Healthcare, Medizinische Fakultät Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, 01307, Dresden, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Watson A, Charlesworth L, Jacob R, Kendrick D, Logan P, Marshall F, Montgomery A, Sach T, Tan W, Walker M, Waring J, Whitham D, Sahota O. The Community In-Reach and Care Transition (CIRACT) clinical and cost-effectiveness study: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials 2015; 16:41. [PMID: 25886822 PMCID: PMC4327808 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-015-0551-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2014] [Accepted: 01/06/2015] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Older people represent a significant proportion of patients admitted to hospital. Their care compared to younger patients is more challenging, length of stay is longer, risk of hospital-acquired problems higher and the risk of being re-admitted within 28 days greater. This study aims to compare a Community In-Reach and Care Transition (CIRACT) service with Traditional Hospital Based rehabilitation (THB-Rehab) provided to the older person. The CIRACT service differs from the THB-rehab service in that they are able to provide more intensive hospital rehabilitation, visiting patients daily, and are able to continue with the patient's rehabilitation following discharge allowing a seamless, integrated discharge working alongside community providers. A pilot comparing the two services showed that the CIRACT service demonstrated reduced length of stay and reduced re-admission rates when analysed over a four-month period. METHODS/DESIGN This trial will evaluate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of the CIRACT service, conducted as a randomised controlled trial (RCT) with an integral qualitative mechanism and action study designed to provide the explanatory and theoretical components on how the CIRACT service compares to current practice. The RCT element consists of 240 patients over 70 years of age, being randomised to either the THB therapy group or the CIRACT service following an unplanned hospital admission. The primary outcome will be hospital length of stay from admission to discharge from the general medical elderly care ward. Additional outcome measures including the Barthel Index, Charlson Co-morbidity Scale, EuroQoL-5D and the modified Client Service Receipt Inventory will be assessed at the time of recruitment and repeated at 91 days post-discharge. The qualitative mechanism and action study will involve a systematic programme of organisational profiling, observations of work processes, interviews with key informants and care providers and tracking of participants. In addition, a within-trial economic evaluation will be undertaken comparing the CIRACT and THB-rehab services to determine cost-effectiveness. DISCUSSION The outcome of the study will inform clinical decision-making, with respect to allocation of resources linked to hospital discharge planning and re-admissions, in a resource intensive and growing group of patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION Registered with the ISRCTN registry ( ISCRCTN94393315 ) on 25 April 2013 (version 3.1, 11 September 2014).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alison Watson
- Queens Medical Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals, Derby Road, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, England.
| | - Lisa Charlesworth
- Nottingham Clinical Trials Unit|, University of Nottingham, Queens Medical Centre, Derby Road, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, England.
| | - Ruth Jacob
- Health Sciences, University of Warwick, University Road, Coventry, CV4 7AL, England.
| | - Denise Kendrick
- School of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Queens Medical Centre, Derby Road, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, England.
| | - Philippa Logan
- School of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Queens Medical Centre, Derby Road, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, England.
| | - Fiona Marshall
- Nottingham University Business School, Jubilee Campus, Nottingham, NG8 1BB, England.
| | - Alan Montgomery
- School of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Queens Medical Centre, Derby Road, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, England.
| | - Tracey Sach
- School of Medicine, Health Policy and Practice, Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, NR4 7TJ, England.
| | - Wei Tan
- Nottingham Clinical Trials Unit|, University of Nottingham, Queens Medical Centre, Derby Road, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, England.
| | - Maria Walker
- Nottingham City Care Partnership, 1 Standard Court, Park Row, Nottingham, NG1 6GN, England.
| | - Justin Waring
- Nottingham University Business School, Jubilee Campus, Nottingham, NG8 1BB, England.
| | - Diane Whitham
- Nottingham Clinical Trials Unit|, University of Nottingham, Queens Medical Centre, Derby Road, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, England.
| | - Opinder Sahota
- Queens Medical Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals, Derby Road, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, England.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Watson M, Holland R, Ferguson J, Porteous T, Sach T, Cleland J, Bond C, Wright D. Managing minor ailments: Patients’ health-seeking behaviour and the role of community pharmacy. Res Social Adm Pharm 2014. [DOI: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2014.07.082] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
36
|
Sahota O, Drummond A, Kendrick D, Grainge MJ, Vass C, Sach T, Gladman J, Avis M. REFINE (REducing Falls in In-patieNt Elderly) using bed and bedside chair pressure sensors linked to radio-pagers in acute hospital care: a randomised controlled trial. Age Ageing 2014; 43:247-53. [PMID: 24141253 PMCID: PMC3927772 DOI: 10.1093/ageing/aft155] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: falls in hospitals are a major problem and contribute to substantial healthcare burden. Advances in sensor technology afford innovative approaches to reducing falls in acute hospital care. However, whether these are clinically effective and cost effective in the UK setting has not been evaluated. Methods: pragmatic, parallel-arm, individual randomised controlled trial of bed and bedside chair pressure sensors using radio-pagers (intervention group) compared with standard care (control group) in elderly patients admitted to acute, general medical wards, in a large UK teaching hospital. Primary outcome measure number of in-patient bedside falls per 1,000 bed days. Results: 1,839 participants were randomised (918 to the intervention group and 921 to the control group). There were 85 bedside falls (65 fallers) in the intervention group, falls rate 8.71 per 1,000 bed days compared with 83 bedside falls (64 fallers) in the control group, falls rate 9.84 per 1,000 bed days (adjusted incidence rate ratio, 0.90; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.66–1.22; P = 0.51). There was no significant difference between the two groups with respect to time to first bedside fall (adjusted hazard ratio (HR), 0.95; 95% CI: 0.67–1.34; P= 0.12). The mean cost per patient in the intervention group was £7199 compared with £6400 in the control group, mean difference in QALYs per patient, 0.0001 (95% CI: −0.0006–0.0004, P= 0.67). Conclusions: bed and bedside chair pressure sensors as a single intervention strategy do not reduce in-patient bedside falls, time to first bedside fall and are not cost-effective in elderly patients in acute, general medical wards in the UK. Trial registration: isrctn.org identifier: ISRCTN44972300.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Opinder Sahota
- Department of Health Care of Older People, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, QMC Campus, Derby Road, Nottingham, NG72UH Nottingham, UK
- Address correspondence to: O. Sahota. Tel: 0115 9249924; Fax: 0115 9709947.
| | - Avril Drummond
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Denise Kendrick
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Matthew J. Grainge
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Catherine Vass
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Tracey Sach
- Health Policy and Practice, School of Medicine, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - John Gladman
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Mark Avis
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Wright D, Wickham J, Sach T. Problem-based learning: an exploration of student opinions on its educational role in one UK pharmacy undergraduate curriculum. Int J Pharm Pract 2013; 22:223-30. [PMID: 23937188 DOI: 10.1111/ijpp.12060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2012] [Accepted: 07/13/2013] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Problem-based learning (PBL) was introduced into the first 3 years of the undergraduate degree course at the University of East Anglia (UEA) to both enhance the student learning experience and to enable it to meet external course accreditation criteria. Evidence to support both of these assertions is required. The objective was to determine student opinions on the value of PBL and the PBL learning process at one UK school of pharmacy. METHOD Utilising the professional accreditation criteria for UK schools of pharmacy a questionnaire was devised and piloted before being given to all UEA undergraduate pharmacy students for self-completion. The most appropriate method of dissemination was determined from a student-led focus group. KEY FINDINGS A total of 201/329 (61.1%) students responded. The majority of students agreed that PBL improved their team working (83.1%), oral communication (89.1%) and problem-solving skills (61.7%). Additionally PBL improved students' ability to identify and address ethical dilemmas (74.5%) as well as enhancing their ability to manage their own learning (67.6%). Male students and those with a stated preference for team working were found to prefer PBL. CONCLUSION Students generally believe that PBL develops a number of key skills and consequently inclusion of PBL alongside traditional teaching methods enables the school to meet a number of degree accreditation criteria. Male students, those who enjoyed team working and working with their current group were more positive about PBL. Further work is required to improve the experience for all students.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Wright
- School of Pharmacy, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Paudyal V, Watson MC, Sach T, Porteous T, Bond CM, Wright DJ, Cleland J, Barton G, Holland R. Are pharmacy-based minor ailment schemes a substitute for other service providers? A systematic review. Br J Gen Pract 2013; 63:e472-81. [PMID: 23834884 PMCID: PMC3693804 DOI: 10.3399/bjgp13x669194] [Citation(s) in RCA: 80] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2012] [Revised: 12/31/2012] [Accepted: 02/13/2013] [Indexed: 10/31/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pharmacy-based minor ailment schemes (PMASs) have been introduced throughout the UK to reduce the burden of minor ailments on high-cost settings, including general practice and emergency departments. AIM This study aimed to explore the effect of PMASs on patient health- and cost-related outcomes; and their impact on general practices. DESIGN AND SETTING Community pharmacy-based systematic review. METHOD Standard systematic review methods were used, including searches of electronic databases, and grey literature from 2001 to 2011, imposing no restrictions on language or study design. Reporting was conducted in the form recommended in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement and checklist. RESULTS Thirty-one evaluations were included from 3308 titles identified. Reconsultation rates in general practice, following an index consultation with a PMAS, ranged from 2.4% to 23.4%. The proportion of patients reporting complete resolution of symptoms after an index PMAS consultation ranged from 68% to 94%. No study included a full economic evaluation. The mean cost per PMAS consultation ranged from £1.44 to £15.90. The total number of consultations and prescribing for minor ailments at general practices often declined following the introduction of PMAS. CONCLUSION Low reconsultation and high symptom-resolution rates suggest that minor ailments are being dealt with appropriately by PMASs. PMAS consultations are less expensive than consultations with GPs. The extent to which these schemes shift demand for management of minor ailments away from high-cost settings has not been fully determined. This evidence suggests that PMASs provide a suitable alternative to general practice consultations. Evidence from economic evaluations is needed to inform the future delivery of PMASs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vibhu Paudyal
- Division of Medical and Dental Education, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Vass CD, Sahota O, Drummond A, Kendrick D, Grainge M, Gladman J, Sach T, Avis M, O'Halloran AM, King-Kallimanis B, Kenny RA, Kumar A, Carpenter H, Morris R, Iliffe S, Kendrick D, Bamford C, Parry S, Deary V, Finch T, Cronin H, Savva G, O'Regan C, Donoghue OA, Kearney P, Kenny RA, Sutton GM, Hussain R, Bhangu J, King-Kallimanis B, Cunningham C, Kenny RA, Duggan E, Finucane C, Cronin H, O'Regan C, Savva G, Loughman J, Kenny RA, Donoghue OA, Horgan F, Savva G, Cronin H, O'Regan C, Kenny RA, Shipway DJH, Shipway MDH, Shah M, Jenkin RP, Wang Q, Chua EC. Falls, fractures and trauma. Age Ageing 2013. [DOI: 10.1093/ageing/aft019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
40
|
Radford K, Phillips J, Drummond A, Sach T, Walker M, Tyerman A, Haboubi N, Jones T. Return to work after traumatic brain injury: Cohort comparison and economic evaluation. Brain Inj 2013; 27:507-20. [DOI: 10.3109/02699052.2013.766929] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
|
41
|
Coupland CAC, Dhiman P, Barton G, Morriss R, Arthur A, Sach T, Hippisley-Cox J. A study of the safety and harms of antidepressant drugs for older people: a cohort study using a large primary care database. Health Technol Assess 2011; 15:1-202, iii-iv. [PMID: 21810375 DOI: 10.3310/hta15280] [Citation(s) in RCA: 87] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to establish the relative safety and balance of risks for antidepressant treatment in older people. The study objectives were to (1) determine relative and absolute risks of predefined adverse events in older people with depression, comparing classes of antidepressant drugs [tricyclic and related antidepressants (TCAs), selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs) and other antidepressants] and commonly prescribed individual drugs with non-use of antidepressant drugs; (2) directly compare the risk of adverse events for SSRIs with TCAs; (3) determine associations with dose and duration of antidepressant medication; (4) describe patterns of antidepressant use in older people with depression; and (5) estimate costs of antidepressant medication and primary care visits. DESIGN A cohort study of patients aged 65 years and over diagnosed with depression. SETTING The study was based in 570 general practices in the UK supplying data to the QResearch database. PARTICIPANTS Patients diagnosed with a new episode of depression between the ages of 65 and 100 years, from 1 January 1996 to 31 December 2007. Participants were followed up until 31 December 2008. INTERVENTIONS The exposure of interest was treatment with antidepressant medication. Antidepressant drugs were grouped into the major classes and commonly prescribed individual drugs were identified. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES There were 13 predefined outcome measures: all-cause mortality, sudden cardiac death, suicide, attempted suicide/self-harm, myocardial infarction, stroke/transient ischaemic attack (TIA), falls, fractures, upper gastrointestinal bleeding, epilepsy/seizures, road traffic accidents, adverse drug reactions and hyponatraemia. RESULTS In total, 60,746 patients were included in the study cohort. Of these, 54,038 (89.0%) received at least one prescription for an antidepressant during follow-up. The associations with the adverse outcomes were significantly different between the classes of antidepressant drugs for seven outcomes. SSRIs were associated with the highest adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) for falls [1.66, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.58 to 1.73] and hyponatraemia (1.52, 95% CI 1.33 to 1.75), and the group of other antidepressants was associated with the highest HRs for all-cause mortality (1.66, 95% CI 1.56 to 1.77), attempted suicide/self-harm (5.16, 95% CI 3.90 to 6.83), stroke/TIA (1.37, 95% CI 1.22 to 1.55), fracture (1.63, 95% CI 1.45 to 1.83) and epilepsy/seizures (2.24, 95% CI 1.60 to 3.15) compared with when antidepressants were not being used. TCAs did not have the highest HR for any of the outcomes. There were also significantly different associations between the individual drugs for seven outcomes, with trazodone, mirtazapine and venlafaxine associated with the highest rates for several of these outcomes. The mean incremental cost (for all antidepressant prescriptions) ranged between £51.58 (amitriptyline) and £641.18 (venlafaxine) over the 5-year post-diagnosis period. CONCLUSIONS This study found associations between use of antidepressant drugs and a number of adverse events in older people. There was no evidence that SSRIs or drugs in the group of other antidepressants were associated with a reduced risk of any of the adverse outcomes compared with TCAs; however, they may be associated with an increased risk for certain outcomes. Among individual drugs trazodone, mirtazapine and venlafaxine were associated with the highest rates for some outcomes. Indication bias and residual confounding may explain some of the study findings. The risks of prescribing antidepressants need to be weighed against the potential benefits of these drugs. FUNDING The National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C A C Coupland
- Division of Primary Care, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Desborough J, Houghton J, Wood J, Wright D, Holland R, Sach T, Ashwell S, Shaw V. Multi-professional clinical medication reviews in care homes for the elderly: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial with cost effectiveness analysis. Trials 2011; 12:218. [PMID: 21974834 PMCID: PMC3205028 DOI: 10.1186/1745-6215-12-218] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2011] [Accepted: 10/05/2011] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Evidence demonstrates that measures are needed to optimise therapy and improve administration of medicines in care homes for older people. The aim of this study is to determine the clinical and cost effectiveness of a novel model of multi-professional medication review. METHODS A cluster randomised controlled trial design, involving thirty care homes. In line with current practice in medication reviews, recruitment and consent will be sought from general practitioners and care homes, rather than individual residents. Care homes will be segmented according to size and resident mix and allocated to the intervention arm (15 homes) or control arm (15 homes) sequentially using minimisation. Intervention homes will receive a multi-professional medication review at baseline and at 6 months, with follow-up at 12 months. Control homes will receive usual care (support they currently receive from the National Health Service), with data collection at baseline and 12 months. The novelty of the intervention is a review of medications by a multi-disciplinary team. Primary outcome measures are number of falls and potentially inappropriate prescribing. Secondary outcome measures include medication costs, health care resource use, hospitalisations and mortality. The null hypothesis proposes no difference in primary outcomes between intervention and control patients. The primary outcome variable (number of falls) will be analysed using a linear mixed model, with the intervention specified as a fixed effect and care homes included as a random effect. Analyses will be at the level of the care home. The economic evaluation will estimate the cost-effectiveness of the intervention compared to usual care from a National Health Service and personal social services perspective.The study is not measuring the impact of the intervention on professional working relationships, the medicines culture in care homes or the generic health-related quality of life of residents. DISCUSSION This study will establish the effectiveness of a new model of multi-professional clinical medication reviews in care homes, using novel approaches to recruitment and consent. It is the first study to undertake an examination of direct patient outcomes, together with an economic analysis. TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN: ISRCTN90761620.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James Desborough
- School of Pharmacy, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, Norfolk, NR4 7TJ, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Desborough JA, Sach T, Bhattacharya D, Holland RC, Wright DJ. A cost-consequences analysis of an adherence focused pharmacist-led medication review service. Int J Pharm Pract 2011; 20:41-9. [PMID: 22236179 DOI: 10.1111/j.2042-7174.2011.00161.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The aim of this project was to conduct an economic evaluation of the Norfolk Medicines Support Service (NMSS), a pharmacist-led medication review service for patients identified in primary care as non-adherent. METHODS The cost-consequences analysis was based on a before and after evaluation of the NMSS. Participants completed a self-reported adherence and health-related quality of life questionnaire prior to the review, at 6 weeks and 6 months. Service provision, prescribing and secondary care costs were considered and the mean cost before and after the intervention was calculated. KEY FINDINGS One-hundred and seventeen patients were included in the evaluation. The mean cost per patient of prescribing and hospital admissions in the 6 months prior to the intervention was £2190 and in the 6 months after intervention £1883. This equates to a mean cost saving of £307 per patient (parametric 95% confidence interval: £1269 to £655). The intervention reduced emergency hospital admissions and increased medication adherence but no significant change in health-related quality of life was observed. CONCLUSION The costs of providing this medication review service were offset by the reduction in emergency hospital admissions and savings in medication cost, assuming the findings of the evaluation were real and the regression to the mean phenomenon was not involved. This cost-consequences approach provides a transparent descriptive summary for decision-makers to use as the basis for resource allocation decisions.
Collapse
|
44
|
Conroy S, Kendrick D, Harwood R, Gladman J, Coupland C, Sach T, Drummond A, Youde J, Edmans J, Masud T. A multicentre randomised controlled trial of day hospital-based falls prevention programme for a screened population of community-dwelling older people at high risk of falls. Age Ageing 2010; 39:704-10. [PMID: 20823124 PMCID: PMC2956530 DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afq096] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective: to determine the clinical effectiveness of a day hospital-delivered multifactorial falls prevention programme, for community-dwelling older people at high risk of future falls identified through a screening process. Design: multicentre randomised controlled trial. Setting: eight general practices and three day hospitals based in the East Midlands, UK. Participants: three hundred and sixty-four participants, mean age 79 years, with a median of three falls risk factors per person at baseline. Interventions: a day hospital-delivered multifactorial falls prevention programme, consisting of strength and balance training, a medical review and a home hazards assessment. Main outcome measure: rate of falls over 12 months of follow-up, recorded using self-completed monthly diaries. Results: one hundred and seventy-two participants in each arm contributed to the primary outcome analysis. The overall falls rate during follow-up was 1.7 falls per person-year in the intervention arm compared with 2.0 falls per person-year in the control arm. The stratum-adjusted incidence rate ratio was 0.86 (95% CI 0.73–1.01), P = 0.08, and 0.73 (95% CI 0.51–1.03), P = 0.07 when adjusted for baseline characteristics. There were no significant differences between the intervention and control arms in any secondary outcomes. Conclusion: this trial did not conclusively demonstrate the benefit of a day hospital-delivered multifactorial falls prevention programme, in a population of older people identified as being at high risk of a future fall.
Collapse
|
45
|
Irvine L, Conroy SP, Sach T, Gladman JRF, Harwood RH, Kendrick D, Coupland C, Drummond A, Barton G, Masud T. Cost-effectiveness of a day hospital falls prevention programme for screened community-dwelling older people at high risk of falls. Age Ageing 2010; 39:710-6. [PMID: 20833862 PMCID: PMC2956532 DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afq108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: multifactorial falls prevention programmes for older people have been proved to reduce falls. However, evidence of their cost-effectiveness is mixed. Design: economic evaluation alongside pragmatic randomised controlled trial. Intervention: randomised trial of 364 people aged ≥70, living in the community, recruited via GP and identified as high risk of falling. Both arms received a falls prevention information leaflet. The intervention arm were also offered a (day hospital) multidisciplinary falls prevention programme, including physiotherapy, occupational therapy, nurse, medical review and referral to other specialists. Measurements: self-reported falls, as collected in 12 monthly diaries. Levels of health resource use associated with the falls prevention programme, screening (both attributed to intervention arm only) and other health-care contacts were monitored. Mean NHS costs and falls per person per year were estimated for both arms, along with the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) and cost effectiveness acceptability curve. Results: in the base-case analysis, the mean falls programme cost was £349 per person. This, coupled with higher screening and other health-care costs, resulted in a mean incremental cost of £578 for the intervention arm. The mean falls rate was lower in the intervention arm (2.07 per person/year), compared with the control arm (2.24). The estimated ICER was £3,320 per fall averted. Conclusions: the estimated ICER was £3,320 per fall averted. Future research should focus on adherence to the intervention and an assessment of impact on quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa Irvine
- School of Medicine, Health Policy and Practice, University of East Anglia, Norwich, Norfolk NR4 7TJ, UK
- Address correspondence to: S. Conroy.
| | - Simon P. Conroy
- Leicester Royal Infirmary, University of Leicester School of Medicine, Room 540, Clinical Sciences Building, PO Box 65, Leicester LE2 7LX, UK
| | - Tracey Sach
- School of Medicine, Health Policy and Practice, University of East Anglia, Norwich, Norfolk NR4 7TJ, UK
| | - John R. F. Gladman
- School of Community Health Sciences, University of Nottingham Medical School, Nottingham NG7 2UH, UK
| | - Rowan H. Harwood
- Department of Medicine for Older People, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, South Block,Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK
| | - Denise Kendrick
- School of Community Health Sciences, University of Nottingham Medical School, Nottingham NG7 2UH, UK
| | - Carol Coupland
- School of Community Health Sciences, University of Nottingham Medical School, Nottingham NG7 2UH, UK
| | - Avril Drummond
- School of Community Health Sciences, University of Nottingham Medical School, Nottingham NG7 2UH, UK
| | - Garry Barton
- School of Medicine, Health Policy and Practice, University of East Anglia, Norwich, Norfolk NR4 7TJ, UK
| | - Tahir Masud
- Department of Medicine for Older People, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, South Block,Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Beavan J, Conroy SP, Harwood R, Gladman JRF, Leonardi-Bee J, Sach T, Bowling T, Sunman W, Gaynor C. Does looped nasogastric tube feeding improve nutritional delivery for patients with dysphagia after acute stroke? A randomised controlled trial. Age Ageing 2010; 39:624-30. [PMID: 20667840 DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afq088] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND nasogastric tube (NGT) feeding is commonly used after stroke, but its effectiveness is limited by frequent dislodgement. OBJECTIVE the objective of the study was to evaluate looped NGT feeding in acute stroke patients with dysphagia. METHODS this was a randomised controlled trial of 104 patients with acute stroke fed by NGT in three UK stroke units. NGT was secured using either a nasal loop (n = 51) or a conventional adhesive dressing (n = 53). The main outcome measure was the proportion of prescribed feed and fluids delivered via NGT in 2 weeks post-randomisation. Secondary outcomes were frequency of NGT insertions, treatment failure, tolerability, adverse events and costs at 2 weeks; mortality; length of hospital stay; residential status; and Barthel Index at 3 months. RESULTS participants assigned to looped NGT feeding received a mean 17% (95% confidence interval 5-28%) more volume of feed and fluids, required fewer NGTs (median 1 vs 4), and had fewer electrolyte abnormalities than controls. There was more minor nasal trauma in the loop group. There were no differences in outcomes at 3 months. Looped NGT feeding cost 88 pounds sterling more per patient over 2 weeks than controls. CONCLUSION looped NGT feeding improves delivery of feed and fluids and reduces NGT reinsertion with little additional cost.
Collapse
|
47
|
Logan PA, Coupland CAC, Gladman JRF, Sahota O, Stoner-Hobbs V, Robertson K, Tomlinson V, Ward M, Sach T, Avery AJ. Community falls prevention for people who call an emergency ambulance after a fall: randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2010; 340:c2102. [PMID: 20460331 PMCID: PMC2868162 DOI: 10.1136/bmj.c2102] [Citation(s) in RCA: 65] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate whether a service to prevent falls in the community would help reduce the rate of falls in older people who call an emergency ambulance when they fall but are not taken to hospital. DESIGN Randomised controlled trial. SETTING Community covered by four primary care trusts, England. PARTICIPANTS 204 adults aged more than 60 living at home or in residential care who had fallen and called an emergency ambulance but were not taken to hospital. INTERVENTIONS Referral to community fall prevention services or standard medical and social care. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcome was the rate of falls over 12 months, ascertained from monthly diaries. Secondary outcomes were scores on the Barthel index, Nottingham extended activities of daily living scale, and falls efficacy scale at baseline and by postal questionnaire at 12 months. Analysis was by intention to treat. RESULTS 102 people were allocated to each group. 99 (97%) participants in the intervention group received the intervention. Falls diaries were analysed for 88.6 person years in the intervention group and 84.5 person years in the control group. The incidence rates of falls per year were 3.46 in the intervention group and 7.68 in the control group (incidence rate ratio 0.45, 95% confidence interval 0.35 to 0.58, P<0.001). The intervention group achieved higher scores on the Barthel index and Nottingham extended activities of daily living and lower scores on the falls efficacy scale (all P<0.05) at the 12 month follow-up. The number of times an emergency ambulance was called because of a fall was significantly different during follow-up (incidence rate ratio 0.60, 95% confidence interval 0.40 to 0.92, P=0.018). CONCLUSION A service to prevent falls in the community reduced the fall rate and improved clinical outcome in the high risk group of older people who call an emergency ambulance after a fall but are not taken to hospital. TRIAL REGISTRATION Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN67535605.
Collapse
|
48
|
Qureshi N, Armstrong S, Saukko P, Sach T, Middlemass J, Evans PH, Kai J, Farrimond H, Humphries SE. Realising the potential of the family history in risk assessment and primary prevention of coronary heart disease in primary care: ADDFAM study protocol. BMC Health Serv Res 2009; 9:184. [PMID: 19821989 PMCID: PMC2765435 DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-9-184] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2009] [Accepted: 10/12/2009] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Coronary heart disease (CHD) is the leading cause of death in the developed world, and its prevention a core activity in current UK general practice. Currently, family history is not systematically integrated into cardiovascular risk assessment in the UK, Europe or the US. Further, primary health care professionals' lack the confidence to interpret family history information and there is a low level of recording of family history information in General Practice (GP) records. Primary prevention of CHD through lifestyle advice has sometimes yielded modest results although, for example, behavioural interventions targeted at "at risk" patients have produced encouraging findings. A family history approach, targeted at those requesting CHD assessment, could motivate lifestyle change. The project will assess the clinical value of incorporating systematic family history information into CHD risk assessment in primary care, from the perspective of the users of this service, the health care practitioners providing this service, and the National Health Service. METHODS/DESIGN The study will include three distinct phases: (1) cross-sectional survey to ascertain baseline information on current recording of family information; (2) through an exploratory matched-pair cluster randomised study, with nested qualitative semi-structured interview and focus group study, to assess the impact of systematic family history recording on participants' and primary care professionals' experience; (3) develop an economic model of the costs and benefits of incorporating family history into CHD risk assessment. DISCUSSION On completion of the project, users and primary care practitioners will be more informed of the value and utility of including family history in CHD risk assessment. Further, this approach will also act as a model of how familial risk information can be integrated within mainstream primary care preventive services for common chronic diseases. TRIAL REGISTRATION Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN17943542.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nadeem Qureshi
- Division of Primary Care, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Sarah Armstrong
- Trent Research and Development Support Unit, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Paula Saukko
- Department of Social Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK
| | - Tracey Sach
- School of Chemical Sciences and Pharmacy, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - Jo Middlemass
- Research and Development Department, Nottinghamshire County Teaching Primary Care Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | - Phil H Evans
- Peninsula Medical School, Universities of Exeter and Plymouth, UK
| | - Joe Kai
- Division of Primary Care, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Hannah Farrimond
- EGENIS (ESRC Centre for Genomics in Society), University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Steve E Humphries
- Centre for Cardiovascular Genetics, British Heart Foundation Laboratories, Royal Free and University College London Medical School, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Vass CD, Sahota O, Drummond A, Kendrick D, Gladman J, Sach T, Avis M, Grainge M. REFINE (Reducing Falls in In-patient Elderly)--a randomised controlled trial. Trials 2009; 10:83. [PMID: 19744323 PMCID: PMC2753618 DOI: 10.1186/1745-6215-10-83] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2009] [Accepted: 09/10/2009] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Falls in hospitals are common, resulting in injury and anxiety to patients, and large costs to NHS organisations. More than half of all in-patient falls in elderly people in acute care settings occur at the bedside, during transfers or whilst getting up to go to the toilet. In the majority of cases these falls are unwitnessed. There is insufficient evidence underpinning the effectiveness of interventions to guide clinical staff regarding the reduction of falls in the elderly inpatient. New patient monitoring technologies have the potential to offer advances in falls prevention. Bedside sensor equipment can alert staff, not in the immediate vicinity, to a potential problem and avert a fall. However no studies utilizing this assistive technology have demonstrated a significant reduction in falls rates in a randomised controlled trial setting. METHODS/DESIGN The research design is an individual patient randomised controlled trial of bedside chair and bed pressure sensors, incorporating a radio-paging alerting mode to alert staff to patients rising from their bed or chair, across five acute elderly care wards in Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust. Participants will be randomised to bedside chair and bed sensors or to usual care (without the use of sensors). The primary outcome is the number of bedside in-patient falls. DISCUSSION The REFINE study is the first randomised controlled trial of bedside pressure sensors in elderly inpatients in an acute NHS Trust. We will assess whether falls can be successfully and cost effectively reduced using this technology, and report on its acceptability to both patients and staff.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine D Vass
- Department of Ageing and Rehabilitation, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK
| | - Opinder Sahota
- Department of Health Care of the Older Person, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK
| | - Avril Drummond
- Department of Ageing and Rehabilitation, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK
| | - Denise Kendrick
- Primary Care Research, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK
| | - John Gladman
- Department of Ageing and Rehabilitation, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK
| | - Tracey Sach
- School of Chemical Sciences and Pharmacy, University of East Anglia, Norwich, NR4 7TJ, UK
| | - Mark Avis
- School of Nursing, Midwifery and Physiotherapy, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK
| | - Matthew Grainge
- School of Community Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Siriwardena AN, Apekey T, Tilling M, Harrison A, Dyas JV, Middleton HC, Ørner R, Sach T, Dewey M, Qureshi ZM. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of an educational intervention for practice teams to deliver problem focused therapy for insomnia: rationale and design of a pilot cluster randomised trial. BMC Fam Pract 2009; 10:9. [PMID: 19171070 PMCID: PMC2636763 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2296-10-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2009] [Accepted: 01/26/2009] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Sleep problems are common, affecting over a third of adults in the United Kingdom and leading to reduced productivity and impaired health-related quality of life. Many of those whose lives are affected seek medical help from primary care. Drug treatment is ineffective long term. Psychological methods for managing sleep problems, including cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia (CBTi) have been shown to be effective and cost effective but have not been widely implemented or evaluated in a general practice setting where they are most likely to be needed and most appropriately delivered. This paper outlines the protocol for a pilot study designed to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of an educational intervention for general practitioners, primary care nurses and other members of the primary care team to deliver problem focused therapy to adult patients presenting with sleep problems due to lifestyle causes, pain or mild to moderate depression or anxiety. METHODS AND DESIGN This will be a pilot cluster randomised controlled trial of a complex intervention. General practices will be randomised to an educational intervention for problem focused therapy which includes a consultation approach comprising careful assessment (using assessment of secondary causes, sleep diaries and severity) and use of modified CBTi for insomnia in the consultation compared with usual care (general advice on sleep hygiene and pharmacotherapy with hypnotic drugs). Clinicians randomised to the intervention will receive an educational intervention (2 x 2 hours) to implement a complex intervention of problem focused therapy. Clinicians randomised to the control group will receive reinforcement of usual care with sleep hygiene advice. Outcomes will be assessed via self-completion questionnaires and telephone interviews of patients and staff as well as clinical records for interventions and prescribing. DISCUSSION Previous studies in adults have shown that psychological treatments for insomnia administered by specialist nurses to groups of patients can be effective within a primary care setting. This will be a pilot study to determine whether an educational intervention aimed at primary care teams to deliver problem focused therapy for insomnia can improve sleep management and outcomes for individual adult patients presenting to general practice. The study will also test procedures and collect information in preparation for a larger definitive cluster-randomised trial. The study is funded by The Health Foundation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Niroshan Siriwardena
- Faculty of Health, Life & Social Sciences, University of Lincoln Brayford Pool, Lincoln, UK.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|