Synaptonemal complex protein 3 is associated with lymphangiogenesis in non-small cell lung cancer patients with lymph node metastasis

Advances in lymphatic metastasis of non-small cell lung cancer

Lung cancer is a deeply malignant tumor with high incidence and mortality. Despite the rapid development of diagnosis and treatment technology, abundant patients with lung cancer are still inevitably faced with recurrence and metastasis, contributing to death. Lymphatic metastasis is the first step of distant metastasis and an important prognostic indicator of non-small cell lung cancer. Tumor-induced lymphangiogenesis is involved in the construction of the tumor microenvironment, except promoting malignant proliferation and metastasis of tumor cells, it also plays a crucial role in individual response to treatment, especially immunotherapy. Thus, this article reviews the current research status of lymphatic metastasis in non-small cell lung cancer, in order to provide some insights for the basic research and clinical and translational application in this field.

Cysteine protease inhibitor S promotes lymph node metastasis of esophageal cancer cells via VEGF-MAPK/ERK-MMP9/2 pathway

Cysteine protease inhibitor S (CST4) plays a pivotal role in the regulation of growth, invasion, and metastasis of a variety of malignancies. However, the potential mechanism behind how CST4 contributes to CST4 in lymph node metastasis (LNM) and tumor-associated lymphangiogenesis of esophageal cancer (EC) cells has not been elucidated previously. Short hairpin RNA technique was utilized to upregulate the CST4 gene expression. Different experiments, including the tubule formation assay and immunofluorescence, were conducted to observe the cellular behavior. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and Western blot analyses were employed to determine the expression levels of relevant proteins. In our study, we discovered that high expression of CST4 in EC cells had multiple effects. It stimulated cell proliferation, invasion, and migration and caused epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT). Moreover, it also inhibited the apoptosis of EC cells and caused them to stagnate in the G2/M phase. High expression of CST4 promoted the secretion of lymphangiogenic markers (TGFβ1, VEGF, VEGF-C/D) in EC cells. In addition, high expression of CST4 in EC cells not only enhanced the proliferation and migration of HLECs, but also stimulated the lumen formation and F-actin expression and rearrangement of HLECs. The elevated expression of CST4 also facilitated the secretion of p-ERK1/2, MMP9, and MMP-2 in HLECs. However, various tumor-promoting effects of high expression of CST4 on HLECs could be inhibited by VEGF inhibitors in EC cells. Overall, our findings indicate that CST4 plays a significant role in the accumulation, migration, and EMT of EC cells. CST4 can activate the VEGF-MAPK/ERK-MMP9/2 signaling axis to promote LNM and lymphangiogenesis in EC.

The postoperative prognosis of skip-N2 metastasis is favorable in small-cell lung carcinoma patients with pathological N2 classification: a propensity-score-adjusted retrospective multicenter study

Background

The study on skip-N2 metastasis in small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is lacking. Therefore, this study aimed to explore the prognostic significance of skip-N2 metastasis based on a multicenter cohort.

Methods

We collected 176 SCLC patients with pathological categories T1-4N1-2M0 from four hospitals in China. Survival curves were drawn through the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by the log-rank test. The Cox regression method was used to calculate the hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval of the characteristics for cancer-specific survival (CSS). Two propensity-score methods were used to reduce the bias, including the inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) and propensity-score matching (PSM).

Results

This multicenter database included 64 pN1 patients, 63 non-skip-N2 cases, and 49 skip-N2 cases. Skip-N2 and the non-skip-N2 patients had gap CSS rates (skip-N2 no versus yes: 41.0% versus 62.0% for 1-year CSS, 32.0% versus 46.0% for 2-year CSS, and 20.0% versus 32.0% for 3-year CSS). After PSM, there were 32 pairs of patients to compare survival differences between N2 and skip-N2 diseases, and 34 pairs of patients to compare prognostic gaps between N1 and skip-N2 diseases, respectively. The results of IPTW and PSM both suggested that skip-N2 cases had better survival outcomes than the non-skip-N2 cases (IPTW-adjusted HR = 0.578; PSM-adjusted HR = 0.510; all log-rank p < 0.05). Besides, the above two analytic methods showed no difference in prognoses between pN1 and skip-N2 diseases (all log-rank p > 0.05).

Conclusions

Skip-N2 patients were confirmed to have a better prognosis than non-skip-N2 patients. Besides, there was no survival difference between pN1 and skip-N2 cases. Therefore, we propose that the next tumor-node-metastasis staging system needs to consider the situation of skip metastasis with lymph nodes in SCLC.

Meiotic chromosome organization and its role in recombination and cancer

Chromosomes adopt specific conformations to regulate various cellular processes. A well-documented chromosome configuration is the highly compacted chromosome structure during metaphase. More regional chromatin conformations have also been reported, including topologically associated domains encompassing mega-bases of DNA and local chromatin loops formed by kilo-bases of DNA. In this review, we discuss the changes in chromatin conformation taking place between somatic and meiotic cells, with a special focus on the establishment of a proteinaceous structure, called the chromosome axis, at the beginning of meiosis. The chromosome axis is essential to support key meiotic processes such as chromosome pairing, homologous recombination, and balanced chromosome segregation to transition from a diploid to a haploid stage. We review the role of the chromosome axis in meiotic chromatin organization and provide a detailed description of its protein composition. We also review the conserved and distinct roles between species of axis proteins in meiotic recombination, which is a major factor contributing to the creation of genetic diversity and genome evolution. Finally, we discuss situations where the chromosome axis is deregulated and evaluate the effects on genome integrity and the consequences from protein deregulation in meiocytes exposed to heat stress, and aberrant expression of genes encoding axis proteins in mammalian somatic cells associated with certain types of cancers.

Meiotic Genes and DNA Double Strand Break Repair in Cancer

Tumor cells show widespread genetic alterations that change the expression of genes driving tumor progression, including genes that maintain genomic integrity. In recent years, it has become clear that tumors frequently reactivate genes whose expression is typically restricted to germ cells. As germ cells have specialized pathways to facilitate the exchange of genetic information between homologous chromosomes, their aberrant regulation influences how cancer cells repair DNA double strand breaks (DSB). This drives genomic instability and affects the response of tumor cells to anticancer therapies. Since meiotic genes are usually transcriptionally repressed in somatic cells of healthy tissues, targeting aberrantly expressed meiotic genes may provide a unique opportunity to specifically kill cancer cells whilst sparing the non-transformed somatic cells. In this review, we highlight meiotic genes that have been reported to affect DSB repair in cancers derived from somatic cells. A better understanding of their mechanistic role in the context of homology-directed DNA repair in somatic cancers may provide useful insights to find novel vulnerabilities that can be targeted.

Tools used to assay genomic instability in cancers and cancer meiomitosis

Genomic instability is a defining characteristic of cancer and the analysis of DNA damage at the chromosome level is a crucial part of the study of carcinogenesis and genotoxicity. Chromosomal instability (CIN), the most common level of genomic instability in cancers, is defined as the rate of loss or gain of chromosomes through successive divisions. As such, DNA in cancer cells is highly unstable. However, the underlying mechanisms remain elusive. There is a debate as to whether instability succeeds transformation, or if it is a by-product of cancer, and therefore, studying potential molecular and cellular contributors of genomic instability is of high importance. Recent work has suggested an important role for ectopic expression of meiosis genes in driving genomic instability via a process called meiomitosis. Improving understanding of these mechanisms can contribute to the development of targeted therapies that exploit DNA damage and repair mechanisms. Here, we discuss a workflow of novel and established techniques used to assess chromosomal instability as well as the nature of genomic instability such as double strand breaks, micronuclei, and chromatin bridges. For each technique, we discuss their advantages and limitations in a lab setting. Lastly, we provide detailed protocols for the discussed techniques.

Cancer testis antigens and genomic instability: More than immunology

Cancer testis antigens or genes (CTA, CTG) are predominantly expressed in adult testes while silenced in most or all somatic tissues with sporadic expression in many human cancers. Concerted misexpression of numerous CTA/CTGs is rarely observed. This finding argues against the germ cell theory of cancer. A surprising number of CTA/CTGs are involved in meiotic chromosome metabolism and specifically in meiotic recombination. Recent discoveries with a group of CTGs established that their misexpression in somatic cells results in genomic instability by interfering with homologous recombination (HR), a DNA repair pathway for complex DNA damage such as DNA double-stranded breaks, interstrand crosslinks, and single-stranded DNA gaps. HR-deficient tumors have specific vulnerabilities and show synthetic lethality with inhibition of polyADP-ribose polymerase, opening the possibility that expression of CTA/CTGs that result in an HR-defect could be used as an additional biomarker for HR status. Here, we review the repertoire of CTA/CTGs focusing on a cohort that functions in meiotic chromosome metabolism by interrogating relevant cancer databases and discussing recent discoveries.

Interaction between SCP3 and JAB1 Confers Cancer Therapeutic Resistance and Stem-like Properties through EGF Expression

Synaptonemal complex protein 3 (SCP3), a member of the Cor1 family, has been implicated in cancer progression, and therapeutic resistance, as well as cancer stem cell (CSC)-like properties. Previously, we demonstrated that SCP3 promotes these aggressive phenotypes via hyperactivation of the AKT signaling pathway; however, the underlying mechanisms responsible for SCP3-induced AKT activation remain to be elucidated. In this study, we demonstrated that the EGF-EGFR axis is the primary route through which SCP3 acts to activate AKT signaling. SCP3 triggers the EGFR-AKT pathway through transcriptional activation of EGF. Notably, neutralization of secreted EGF by its specific monoclonal antibody reversed SCP3-mediated aggressive phenotypes with a concomitant reversal of EGFR-AKT activation. In an effort to elucidate the molecular mechanisms underlying SCP3-induced transcriptional activation of EGF, we identified Jun activation domain-binding protein 1 (JAB1) as a binding partner of SCP3 using a yeast two-hybrid (Y2H) assay system, and we demonstrated that SCP3 induces EGF transcription through physical interaction with JAB1. Thus, our findings establish a firm molecular link among SCP3, EGFR, and AKT by identifying the novel roles of SCP3 in transcriptional regulation. We believe that these findings hold important implications for controlling SCP3^high therapeutic-refractory cancer.

Synaptonemal complex proteins modulate the level of genome integrity in cancers

The synaptonemal complex (SC) is a proteinaceous structure that is transiently formed during meiosis to promote homologous recombination between maternal and paternal chromosomes. As this structure is required only for meiotic recombination, the proteins constituting the complex are almost undetectable in normal somatic cells, but they can be expressed under the conditions in which the transcriptional machinery is deregulated. Accumulating evidence indicates that they are epigenetically expressed in cancers of various origin. Not surprisingly, in contrast to their meiotic roles, the somatic roles of the SC proteins remain to be investigated. However, it has recently been reported that SYCP3 and SYCE2 control DNA double‐strand break repair negatively and positively, respectively, suggesting that the ectopic expression of the SC proteins in somatic cells could be associated with the maintenance of genomic instability. Thus, it is highly likely that the investigation of the somatic roles of the SC proteins would improve our understanding of the mechanisms underlying tumor development.

Tumor-associated macrophage, angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis markers predict prognosis of non-small cell lung cancer patients

BACKGROUND

The tumor microenvironment (TME) is a critical player in tumor progression, metastasis and therapy outcomes. Tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) are a well-recognized core element of the TME and generally characterized as M2-like macrophages. TAMs are believed to contribute to tumor progression, but the mechanism behind this remains unclear. We aimed to investigate the clinical, angiogenic, and lymphangiogenic significance of TAMs in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

Utilizing combined immunohistochemistry and digital image analysis, we assessed CD68, CD163, VEGF-A, and VEGF-C expression in 349 patients with NSCLC. Subsequently, the potential association between M2 TAMs and angiogenic VEGF-A and/or lymphangiogenic VEGF-C was evaluated for its prognostic value. Furthermore, the effects of M2 TAMs on angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis were explored via an in vitro co-culture system.

RESULTS

CD68 and CD163 expression were found to directly correlate with VEGF-A and/or VEGF-C expression (all p < 0.001). Furthermore, elevated M2 ratio (CD163+/CD68+) was significantly associated with poor overall survival (p = 0.023). Dual expression of M2 ratio^high and VEGF-C^high (M2 ratio^highVEGF-C^high) was correlated with worse overall survival (p = 0.033). Multivariate analysis revealed that M2 ratio^high [HR (95% CI) = 1.53 (1.01-2.33), p = 0.046] and combined M2 ratio^highVEGF-C^high expression [HR (95% CI) = 2.01 (1.28-3.16), p = 0.003] were independent predictors of poor overall survival. Notably, we confirmed that M2 macrophages significantly enhanced the protein and mRNA expression of both VEGF-A and VEGF-C, while M1 macrophages induced only mRNA expression of VEGF-A in A549 cells.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that TAMs are significantly associated with angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis, contributing to the progression of NSCLC. Furthermore, elevated M2 ratio, similar to combined high M2 ratio and high VEGF-C expression, is a strong indicator of poor prognosis in patients with NSCLC, providing insight for future TAM-based immunotherapy strategies.

The Roles of Non-Coding RNAs in Tumor-Associated Lymphangiogenesis

Simple Summary

The lymphatic system plays key roles in the bodies’ defence against disease, including cancer. The expansion of this system is termed lymphangiogenesis and it is orchestrated by factors and conditions within the microenvironment. One approach to prevent cancer progression is by interfering with these microenvironment factors that promote this process and that facilitate the spread of cancer cells to distant organs. One of these factors are non-coding RNAs. This review will summarize recent findings of the distinct roles played by non-coding RNAs in the lymphatic system within normal tissues and tumours. Understanding the mechanisms involved in this process can provide new avenues for therapeutic intervention for inhibiting the spread of cancer.

Abstract

Lymphatic vessels are regarded as the ”forgotten” circulation. Despite this, growing evidence has shown significant roles for the lymphatic circulation in normal and pathological conditions in humans, including cancers. The dissemination of tumor cells to other organs is often mediated by lymphatic vessels that serve as a conduit and is often referred to as tumor-associated lymphangiogenesis. Some of the most well-studied lymphangiogenic factors that govern tumor lymphangiogenesis are the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF-C/D and VEGFR-2/3), neuroplilin-2 (NRP2), fibroblast growth factor (FGF), and hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), to name a few. However, recent findings have illustrated that non-coding RNAs are significantly involved in regulating gene expression in most biological processes, including lymphangiogenesis. In this review, we focus on the regulation of growth factors and non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) in the lymphatic development in normal and cancer physiology. Then, we discuss the lymphangiogenic factors that necessitate tumor-associated lymphangiogenesis, with regards to ncRNAs in various types of cancer. Understanding the different roles of ncRNAs in regulating lymphatic vasculature in normal and cancer conditions may pave the way towards the development of ncRNA-based anti-lymphangiogenic therapy.

Prognostic significance of USP10 and p14ARF expression in patients with colorectal cancer

Ubiquitin-specific proteases (USPs) play an important role in fundamental cellular processes. Among these, USP10 is known for its association with tumor development and progression of multiple cancers. We aimed to investigate the clinical significance of USP10 expression in colorectal cancer and examined the potential link between USP10 and p14ARF in patients with colorectal cancer. USP10 and p14ARF protein expression was assessed via immunohistochemistry (IHC) on a tissue microarray from 280 colorectal cancer cases. IHC scores were evaluated by digital image analysis and compared with patients' outcomes. In addition, we examined DNA hypermethylation in colorectal cancer cell lines and tissues, which were matched with adjacent normal colon samples. USP10 expression was lost (USP10^loss) in 18.6% of samples (52/280 cases), which was linked to lymphovascular invasion (p = 0.019) and distant metastases (p < 0.001). Similarly, loss of p14ARF expression (p14ARF^loss) was associated with more advanced tumors. USP10 expression correlated positively with p14ARF expression (r = 0.617, p < 0.001). USP10^loss, p14ARF^loss, and dual loss of USP10 and p14ARF were significantly associated with shorter disease-free survival and overall survival in comparison to USP10^intact, p14ARF^intact, and dual loss of USP10 and p14ARF, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that USP10^loss (p = 0.030) and dual loss of USP10 and p14ARF (p = 0.014) are independent prognostic factors for poor disease-free survival in colorectal cancer patients. Furthermore, aberrant hypermethylation of the USP10 promoter region was found in colorectal cancer cell lines and tissues. The present results suggest that USP10^loss is a potential prognostic marker for colorectal cancer.

The ectopic expression of meiCT genes promotes meiomitosis and may facilitate carcinogenesis

Cancer meiomitosis is defined as the concurrent activation of both mitotic and meiotic machineries in neoplastic cells that confer a selective advantage together with increased genomic instability. MeiCT (meiosis-specific cancer/testis) genes that perform specialized functions in the germline events required for the first meiotic division are ectopically expressed in several cancers. Here we describe the expression profiles of meiCT genes and proteins across a number of cancers and review the proposed mechanisms that increase aneuploidy and elicit reduction division in polyploid cells. These mechanisms are centered on the overexpression and function of meiCT proteins in cancers under various conditions that includes a response to genotoxic stress. Since meiCT genes are transcriptionally repressed in somatic cells, their target offers a promising therapeutic approach with limited toxicity to healthy tissues. Throughout the review, we provide a detailed description of the roles for each gene in the context of meiosis and we discuss proposed functions and outcomes resulting from their ectopic reactivation in cancer.

Meiotic gene activation in somatic and germ cell tumours

Background

Germ cell tumours are uniquely associated with the gametogenic tissues of males and females. A feature of these cancers is that they can express genes that are normally tightly restricted to meiotic cells. This aberrant gene expression has been used as an indicator that these cancer cells are attempting a programmed germ line event, meiotic entry. However, work in non‐germ cell cancers has also indicated that meiotic genes can become aberrantly activated in a wide range of cancer types and indeed provide functions that serve as oncogenic drivers. Here, we review the activation of meiotic factors in cancers and explore commonalities between meiotic gene activation in germ cell and non‐germ cell cancers.

Objectives

The objectives of this review are to highlight key questions relating to meiotic gene activation in germ cell tumours and to offer possible interpretations as to the biological relevance in this unique cancer type.

Materials and Methods

PubMed and the GEPIA database were searched for papers in English and for cancer gene expression data, respectively.

Results

We provide a brief overview of meiotic progression, with a focus on the unique mechanisms of reductional chromosome segregation in meiosis I. We then offer detailed insight into the role of meiotic chromosome regulators in non‐germ cell cancers and extend this to provide an overview of how this might relate to germ cell tumours.

Conclusions

We propose that meiotic gene activation in germ cell tumours might not indicate an unscheduled attempt to enter a full meiotic programme. Rather, it might simply reflect either aberrant activation of a subset of meiotic genes, with little or no biological relevance, or aberrant activation of a subset of meiotic genes as positive tumour evolutionary/oncogenic drivers. These postulates provide the provocation for further studies in this emerging field.

Lymphatic vessel density as a prognostic indicator in Asian NSCLC patients: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

To determine the association of lymphatic vessel density (LVD) with the prognosis of Asian non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients via a meta-analysis.

METHODS

Eligible studies were selected by searching PubMed and EMBASE from inception to July 25, 2017. The reference lists of the retrieved articles were also consulted. The information was independently screened by two authors. When heterogeneity was significant, a random-effects model was used to determine overall pooled risk estimates.

RESULTS

A total of 15 studies with 1075 patients were finally included in the meta-analysis. LVD was positively associated with the prognosis of NSCLC in the overall analysis (hazard ratio (HR) 1.14, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 1.02-1.27, p = 0.000, I² = 73.2%). Subgroup analyses were performed on 5 VEGFR-3 groups (p = 0.709, I² = 0.0%), 3 LYVE-1 groups (p = 0.01, I² = 86.4%), 5 D2-40 groups (p = 0.019, I² = 66.2%), and 2 podoplanin groups (p = 0.094, I² = 64.5%). Sensitivity analysis indicated robust results. There was no publication bias.

CONCLUSIONS

LVD is an indicator of poor prognosis in Asian NSCLC patients.

Progranulin promotes lymphangiogenesis through VEGF-C and is an independent risk factor in human esophageal cancers

Lymph node metastasis is one of the most important predictors of the prognosis for esophageal cancer (EC) patients. However, the mechanism underlying the lymph node metastasis is largely unknown. Progranulin (PGRN) is shown to be highly expressed in various types of cancers and could promote the angiogenesis and epithelial-mesenchymal transition of cancer cells in previous studies. However, the expression status of PGRN and its effects on the lymphangiogenesis in EC are largely unclear. In this study, we show for the first time that PGRN is expressed in EC tissue samples and cell lines and could promote the expression of VEGF-C in vitro, a well-known lymphangiogenesis inducer, through the putative signaling transducers p-ERK and p-AKT. Besides, increased levels of PGRN are correlated with lymph node metastasis, high levels of lymph microvessel density, and lymph vessel space invasion in tissue samples of EC patients. In addition, Cox proportional risk model shows that patients with high levels of PGRN would have 2-fold increases in 5-year mortality compared with patients with low levels of PGRN. Finally, we establish a clinically useful nomogram to predict the possibility of mortality for individual EC patients. In conclusion, PGRN may play an important role in the lymphangiogenesis through activation of VEGF-C in the EC patients.

Targeting Cyclin D-CDK4/6 Sensitizes Immune-Refractory Cancer by Blocking the SCP3-NANOG Axis

Immunoediting caused by antitumor immunity drives tumor cells to acquire refractory phenotypes. We demonstrated previously that tumor antigen-specific T cells edit these cells such that they become resistant to CTL killing and enrich NANOG^high cancer stem cell-like cells. In this study, we show that synaptonemal complex protein 3 (SCP3), a member of the Cor1 family, is overexpressed in immunoedited cells and upregulates NANOG by hyperactivating the cyclin D1-CDK4/6 axis. The SCP3-cyclin D1-CDK4/6 axis was preserved across various types of human cancer and correlated negatively with progression-free survival of cervical cancer patients. Targeting CDK4/6 with the inhibitor palbociclib reversed multiaggressive phenotypes of SCP3^high immunoedited tumor cells and led to long-term control of the disease. Collectively, our findings establish a firm molecular link of multiaggressiveness among SCP3, NANOG, cyclin D1, and CDK4/6 and identify CDK4/6 inhibitors as actionable drugs for controlling SCP3^high immune-refractory cancer.Significance: These findings reveal cyclin D1-CDK4/6 inhibition as an effective strategy for controlling SCP3^high immune-refractroy cancer. Cancer Res; 78(10); 2638-53. ©2018 AACR.