Sex and interleukin-6 are prognostic factors for autoimmune toxicity following treatment with anti-CTLA4 blockade

Plasma protein dynamics during ipilimumab treatment in metastatic melanoma: associations with tumor response, adverse events and survival

The immune checkpoint inhibitor ipilimumab provides long term survival in some metastatic melanoma patients, but the majority has no benefit, and may experience serious side effects. Here, we investigated the dynamics of plasma cytokine concentrations and their potential utility for predicting treatment response, adverse events and overall survival (OS) in patients with metastatic melanoma undergoing ipilimumab monotherapy. A cohort of 148 patients was examined, with plasma samples collected prior to treatment initiation and at the end of the first and second treatment cycles. Concentrations of 48 plasma proteins were measured using a multiplex immunoassay. The results revealed a general increase in cytokine levels following the first ipilimumab dose, consistent with immune activation. Patients not responding to treatment exhibited significantly elevated baseline levels of G-CSF, IL-2RA, MIP-1a, and SCF, compared to tumor responders (p < 0.05). Furthermore, high levels of IL-2RA, IFNγ, PDGF-bb and MIG were linked to inferior OS, while high concentrations of MIF and RANTES were associated with improved OS (p < 0.05). A multivariate model containing CRP, LDH, ECOG, IL-2RA and PDGF-bb identified a subgroup of patients with poor OS. Patients who experienced severe immune-related adverse events within three months of treatment initiation had higher baseline concentrations of several cytokines, indicating a potential association between preexisting inflammation and adverse events. These findings indicate that the first dose of ipilimumab induces a systemic response with increased levels of circulating cytokines and suggest candidate biomarkers for clinical response, immune-mediated toxicity and survival. Further studies in independent patient cohorts are required to confirm the findings.

A review of immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated myocarditis: Epidemiology, pathogenesis, and biomarkers

Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) have demonstrated efficacy in treating various cancers by modulating the immune system, but this can lead to immune-related adverse events (irAEs), including myocarditis. ICI-associated myocarditis is a rare but highly lethal irAE with a short mean time to onset, and difficult to diagnose early due to nonspecific symptoms and lack of biomarkers. This review highlights the need for improved recognition and management of ICI-associated myocarditis, summarizing recent advances in immunology, pathology, and biomarker research. We discuss the epidemiology, clinical features, immunological mechanisms, and roles of biomarkers in diagnosis and risk stratification. Traditional biomarkers like cTnI and hs-cTnT are sensitive but lack specificity, while emerging biomarkers like miR-155 show tissue specificity. Inflammatory markers such as NLR and CRP aid prognosis but have limited diagnostic value.

Autoimmune-related adverse events induced by immune checkpoint inhibitors

Targeted immunotherapies, particularly immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), have transformed cancer treatment by significantly improving patient response and survival rates. However, ICIs could disrupt self-tolerance, inducing the development of immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Most irAEs are classified as autoimmune conditions mediated by ICI-activated CD8+ cytotoxic T cells or activated B cells producing pathogenic autoantibodies. These irAEs phenotypically resemble spontaneous autoimmune disease and lead to considerable morbidity, health care costs, and compromised treatment efficacy. With the widespread use and new emergence of ICIs, the spectrum of ICI-induced irAEs has become increasingly extensive and complex. Concurrently, research in this field is advancing rapidly, a review summarizing the latest progress on irAEs is timely and essential. In this review, we highlight numerous recent research advances, covering the epidemiology, immune mechanisms, and diverse manifestations of irAEs, with a particular focus on organ-specific autoimmunity. We also discuss current strategies, challenges, and future directions for the prevention and therapeutic management of these adverse events.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors and Immunosuppressive Tumor Microenvironment: Current Challenges and Strategies to Overcome Resistance

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are shown to improve cancer treatment effectiveness by boosting the immune system of the patient. Nevertheless, the unique and highly suppressive TME poses a significant challenge, causing heterogeneity of response or resistance in a considerable number of patients. This review focuses on the evasive attributes of the TME. Immune evasion mechanism in TME include immunosuppressive cells, cytokine and chemokine signaling, metabolic alterations and overexpression of immune checkpoint molecules such as PD-1, CTLA-4, LAG-3, TIM-3, TIGIT, BTLA and their interactions within the TME. In addition, this review focuses on the overcoming resistance by targeting immunosuppressive cells, normalizing tumor blood vessels, blocking two or three checkpoints simultaneously, combining vaccines, oncolytic viruses and metabolic inhibitors with ICIs or other therapies. This review also focuses on the necessity of finding predictive markers for the stratification of patients and to check response of ICIs treatment. It remains to be made certain by new research and intelligent innovations how these discoveries of the TME and its interplay facilitate ICI treatment and change the face of cancer treatment.

Management of immune-related myocarditis, myositis and myasthenia gravis (MMM) overlap syndrome: a single institution case series and literature review

Background

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized the treatment of various malignancies, particularly melanoma. However, immune-related adverse events (irAEs) pose significant challenges, particularly in cases of severe toxicity syndromes. One such life-threatening irAE is the myocarditis, myositis, and myasthenia gravis (MMM) overlap syndrome, which occurs in less than 1% of patients but has in-hospital mortality rates ranging from 40 to 60%. Due to its rarity and complexity, early recognition and a multidisciplinary approach are critical to improving outcomes.

Methods

We present a single-institution case series of four patients diagnosed with MMM overlap syndrome following ICI therapy. Clinical presentation, laboratory findings, imaging, and electrophysiological tests were analyzed to confirm the diagnosis. Therapeutic interventions-including corticosteroids, intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIG), plasma exchange (PLEX), tocilizumab, and rituximab- were evaluated in terms of efficacy and clinical outcomes.

Results

The onset of MMM syndrome varied from 2 to 4 weeks after initiating ICI therapy. Patients presented with rapidly progressive symptoms, including ptosis, bulbar dysfunction, respiratory distress, myopathy, and cardiac conduction abnormalities. Immunosuppressive therapy with high-dose corticosteroids was initiated in all cases. Additional immunomodulatory treatments (IVIG, tocilizumab, PLEX, and rituximab) were administered based on clinical deterioration and autoimmune profile. Two patients achieved complete recovery, one remains on maintenance immunosuppression, and one died due to respiratory failure despite aggressive treatment.

Conclusion

MMM overlap syndrome is a severe and often fatal irAE associated with ICI therapy. Early identification, aggressive immunosuppressive treatment, and individualized therapeutic strategies are essential to optimize patient outcomes. Further research is needed to refine diagnostic criteria, identify predictive biomarkers, and establish standardized treatment protocols.

The Current and Future of Biomarkers of Immune Related Adverse Events

With their groundbreaking clinical responses, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have ushered in a new chapter in cancer therapeutics. However, they are often associated with life-threatening or organ-threatening autoimmune/autoinflammatory phenomena, collectively termed immune-related adverse events (irAEs). In this review, we will first describe the mechanisms of action of ICIs as well as irAEs. Next, we will review biomarkers for predicting the development of irAEs or stratifying risks.

Advancements in immunotherapy for gastric cancer: Unveiling the potential of immune checkpoint inhibitors and emerging strategies

Gastric cancer (GC) is linked to high morbidity and mortality rates. Approximately two-thirds of GC patients are diagnosed at an advanced or metastatic stage. Conventional treatments for GC, including surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy, offer limited prognostic improvement. Recently, immunotherapy has gained attention for its promising therapeutic effects in various tumors. Immunotherapy functions by activating and regulating the patient's immune cells to target and eliminate tumor cells, thereby reducing the tumor burden in the body. Among immunotherapies, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are the most advanced. ICIs disrupt the inhibitory protein-small molecule (PD-L1, CTLA4, VISTA, TIM-3 and LAG3) interactions produced by immune cells, reactivating these cells to recognize and attack tumor cells. However, adverse reactions and resistance to ICIs hinder their further clinical and experimental development. Therefore, a comprehensive understanding of the advancements in ICIs for GC is crucial. This article discusses the latest developments in clinical trials of ICIs for GC and examines combination therapies involving ICIs (targeted therapy, chemotherapy, radiotherapy), alongside ongoing clinical trials. Additionally, the review investigates the tumor immune microenvironment and its role in non-responsiveness to ICIs, highlighting the function of tumor immune cells in ICI efficacy. Finally, the article explores the prospects and limitations of new immunotherapy-related technologies, such as tumor vaccines, nanotechnologies, and emerging therapeutic strategies, aiming to advance research into personalized and optimized immunotherapy for patients with locally advanced gastric cancer.

Association of HLA-A*02:01 type with efficacy and toxicity of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy in melanoma patients: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are highly effective but may induce severe or even fatal and unpredictable immune-related adverse events (irAEs). It is unclear whether human leukocyte antigen (HLA) genes contribute to the susceptibility of developing irAEs during ICI therapy.

METHODS

This multicentre retrospective study investigated the association of irAE and outcome with HLA-A*02:01 status in a cohort of 97 patients with metastatic melanoma undergoing ICI therapy. Organ-specific irAEs and therapy outcome as assessed by response rate, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were analysed depending on HLA type HLA-A*02:01. For the outcome only patients with cutaneous melanoma were analysed. Chi square test, exact fisher test, Kruskal Wallis test and log rank test were employed for statistical analysis (p ≤ 0.05).

RESULTS

The cohort included 38 HLA-A*02:01 positive (39.2%) and 59 HLA-A*02:01 negative (60.8%) patients. Data showed no evidence of an association of HLA-A*02:01 with organ-specific irAEs except for a numerical difference in immune-related colitis. Furthermore, response rates of the subgroup of patients with metastatic cutaneous melanoma did not differ between the two cohorts. The median PFS was 5 months and 8 months in HLA-A*02:01 positive and negative patients with cutaneous melanoma, respectively.

CONCLUSION

HLA-A*02:01 was not associated with specific checkpoint inhibitor-induced organ toxicity in this cohort of HLA-A-typed melanoma patients. Interestingly, in the relatively small subgroup of patients with cutaneous melanoma an earlier progression in HLA-A*02:01 positive patients was observed, however not in the long term. These findings are exploratory due to the limited sample size and require validation in larger, prospective cohorts.

Sex-Related Differences in Immunotherapy Toxicities: Insights into Dimorphic Responses

Significant sex-based differences exist in the immune system and antitumor immune responses, potentially leading to variations in both the efficacy and toxicity of anticancer immunotherapies. Women generally mount stronger innate and adaptive immune responses than men, which can result in more severe immune-related adverse events (irAEs) during treatments with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). However, the importance of sex dimorphism in the safety of cancer immunotherapy remains underexplored in clinical oncology, despite its profound implications for treatment outcomes. Our review highlights the critical influence of biological sex on pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and immune responses, shaping ICI efficacy and the prevalence, type, and severity of irAEs. Integrating sex as a critical variable in cancer treatment and clinical trial design is essential for personalizing therapeutic strategies, bridging existing knowledge gaps, and enhancing survival rates and quality of life for patients across genders.

Revolutionary Cancer Therapy for Personalization and Improved Efficacy: Strategies to Overcome Resistance to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy

Cancer remains a significant public health issue worldwide, standing as a primary contributor to global mortality, accounting for approximately 10 million fatalities in 2020 [...].

Analysis of risk factors for immune-related adverse events induced by immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment in cancer: A comprehensive systematic review

BACKGROUND

Immune-related adverse events (irAE) pose challenges to the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). While risk factors for irAE are emerging, most studies are small, retrospective analyses that seldom report on diverse cancers or rare irAE. This paper reports a systematic review that summarises literature on irAE risk factors across cancers and proposes a categorisation approach.

METHOD

A systematic search was conducted in Medline OVID, Embase and Web of Science databases following PRISMA guidelines (CRD42022310127). Original research published in peer-reviewed journals between January 2017-Decmeber 2021 were selected. Eligible studies included patients with any cancer and evaluated any potential risk factor for any grade/type of irAE. Study design, sample size, and method for analysing association between irAE and risk factors were compared.

RESULTS

A total of 293 eligible studies containing 305,879 patients receiving ICI reported irAE in 58,291 patients (19.1 %). There were 221 retrospective, 55 prospective studies, and 17 systematic reviews/meta-analyses. Eighteen studies evaluated the predictive validity of models. Proposed risk factors were grouped based on common themes and underlying aetiology: 1) patient, 2) laboratory, 3) medical history, 4) cancer-related, 5) clinical score, 6) medications, and 7) imaging features. Opposing associations were reported between advancing age and irAE risk.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review provides a comprehensive overview of evidence on irAE risk factors across a large patient population. Studies were heterogeneous resulting from variations in design, sample size and analysis method, and lack generalisability due to statistically underpowered evidence. We propose an approach to categorise potential irAE risk factors to support ongoing collaborative research.

Immune-mediated colitis after immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have led to improved outcome in patients with various types of cancer. Due to inhibition of physiological anti-inflammatory mechanisms, patients treated with ICIs may develop autoimmune inflammation of the colon, associated with morbidity, decreased quality of life (QoL), and mortality. In this review, we summarize clinical and pathophysiological aspects of immune-mediated colitis (ImC), highlighting novel treatment options. In the colon, ICIs trigger resident and circulating T cell activation and infiltration of myeloid cells. In addition, the gut microbiota critically contribute to intestinal immune dysregulation and loss of barrier function, thereby propagating local and systemic inflammation. Currently available therapies for ImC include corticosteroids, antitumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α)- and anti-integrin α4β7 antibodies. Given that systemic immunosuppression might impair antitumor immune responses, novel therapeutic approaches are urgently needed.

Dietary inflammatory index predicts cancer mortality in male patients but not female patients: Results from NHANES 1999 to 2014

This study explored sex differences between dietary inflammatory index (DII) and cancer prognosis and their mechanisms. We hypothesized that association between dietary inflammatory index and cancer prognosis differs by sex. The study included 2874 adults with cancer from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey covering 1999 to 2014. Mortality status was linked to National Death Index mortality data through 31 December 2019. Cox proportional hazards regression models were applied to calculate hazard risk and 95% confidence intervals (Cis) in male patients and female patients. Sex-specific cancer and nonsex-specific cancer subgroup analyses were performed, and the role of C-reactive protein in sex differences was analyzed. The Cancer Genome Atlas pan-cancer transcriptome data were combined to explore the biological mechanisms of the sex differences. Multivariate Cox regression showed higher DII in male patients correlated with increased all-cause mortality (hazard risk highest vs lowest quartile = 1.57 [95% confidence intervals 1.24-1.98]; P for trend <.01), but not in female patients (P = .44). For sex-specific cancers, higher DII potentially correlated with increased mortality in prostate cancer (unadjusted P for trend = .04), but not in breast (P = .83), ovarian (P = .49), or cervical cancers (P = .91). In melanoma and colon cancer, higher DII correlated with increased mortality in male patients but not female patients. Serum C-reactive protein, interleukin-1 binding, interleukin-35 pathway, and programmed cell death protein 1 pathway may contribute to these sex differences. In conclusion, sex differences exist between DII and mortality risk in cancer patients.

Analysis of risk factors for immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated liver injury: a retrospective analysis based on clinical study and real-world data

BACKGROUND

Immune-mediated hepatotoxicity (IMH) induced by immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) can lead to fatal outcomes. Exploring the risk factors associated with IMH is crucial for the early identification and management of immune-related adverse events (irAEs).

METHODS

Screening IMH-influencing factors by applying meta-analysis to clinical research data. Utilizing FAERS data, ICIs-related IMH prediction models were developed using two types of variables (full variables and optimal variables screened by univariate logistic regression) and nine machine learning algorithms (logistic regression, decision tree, random forest, gradient boosting decision tree, extreme gradient boosting, K-Nearest Neighbor, bootstrap aggregation, adaptive boosting, and extremely randomized trees). Comparing the nine machine learning algorithms and screening the optimal model while using SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) analysis to interpret the results of the optimal machine learning model.

RESULTS

A total of 17 studies (10,135 patients) were included. The results showed that ICIs combination therapy (OR = 5.10, 95% CI: 1.68-15.48) and history of ICIs treatment (OR = 3.58, 95% CI: 2.08-6.14) were significantly associated with the risk of all-grade IMH. Patients aged 56-63 years (MD = - 5.09, 95% CI: - 9.52 to - 0.67) were significantly associated with the risk of ≥ grade 3 IMH. The liver adverse reaction prediction model included a total of 51,555 patients from the FAERS database, of which 4607 cases were liver adverse reactions. Univariate logistic regression analysis ultimately screened eight optimal variables, with females, report areas, cancer type, ICIs drug type, concomitant autoimmune disease, the concomitant use of anti-hypertension drugs, and the concomitant use of CTLA-4 inhibitors or targeted therapy drugs being significant influencing factors. The performance of the model after the variables were screened by univariate logistic regression was slightly worse than that of the model with full variables. Among the best-performing liver adverse reaction prediction models was GBDT (training set AUC = 0.82, test set AUC = 0.79). The top 3 key predictors in the GBDT model were report areas, disease type, and ICIs drug type.

CONCLUSION

In clinical studies, we found that age between 56 and 63 years, ICIs combination therapy, and history of ICIs treatment were significantly associated with an increased risk of IMH. In the FAERS database, we observed that females, report areas, cancer type, ICIs drug type, concomitant autoimmune disease, the concomitant use of anti-hypertension drugs, and the concomitant use of CTLA-4 inhibitors or targeted therapy drugs may be potential risk factors for ICIs-related hepatic irAEs. The predictive model for ICIs-related liver adverse reactions established in this study has good performance and potential clinical applications.

Immune-related adverse events with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors: insights from a real-world cohort of 2523 patients

Purpose

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have significantly changed cancer therapy, improving patient survival rates and clinical outcomes. Nevertheless, the use of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors can result in immune-related adverse events (irAEs). This study aims to investigate the prevalence and associated risk factors of irAEs in a real-world setting, as well as to assess their effects on optimal therapeutic outcomes.

Methods

A retrospective analysis involved 2523 patients with cancer who received inpatient PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors treatment between January 2018 and December 2022. We documented patients' demographic and clinical characteristics, PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitors, treatment modalities, incidences, timing, and severity of irAEs, and efficacy outcomes by reviewing inpatient records. Patients were categorized into an irAEs group and a non-irAEs group, with the former further subdivided into a multiple irAEs group and a single irAE group. Chi-square tests were employed to evaluate differences in baseline characteristics and efficacy outcomes between the irAEs and non-irAEs groups, as well as between the multiple and single irAE groups. Additionally, logistic regression analysis was utilized to identify risk factors linked to irAEs.

Results

Among 2523 eligible patients, 1096 reported 1802 irAEs, with an incidence incidence of 43.4%. Among 1096 individuals, 92.1% were classified as grade 1-2, while 7.9% were grade 3 or higher. IrAEs affected various organ systems, with endocrine toxicity (17.7%), hepatic toxicity (17.2%), and hematologic toxicity (11.4%) being the most common. 20.5% patients experienced multi-system irAEs. The average time for patients to develop irAEs was within four treatment cycles. Significant differences in patient gender, age, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS), comorbidities, PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitors, and treatment modalities were observed between the irAEs and non-irAEs groups, but not between the multiple irAEs and single irAE groups. Compared to the non-irAEs group, the irAEs group exhibited a higher objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR), and the multiple irAEs group also showed a higher ORR than the single irAE group.

Conclusion

This real-world study indicated that the occurrence of irAEs is related to patient gender, age, ECOG PS, comorbidities, PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors, and treatment modalities. The occurrence of irAEs may be associated with better treatment benefits.

Insight of immune checkpoint inhibitor related myocarditis

As the understanding of immune-related mechanisms in the development and progression of cancer advances, immunotherapies, notably Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICIs), have become integral in comprehensive cancer treatment strategies. ICIs reactivate T-cell cytotoxicity against tumors by blocking immune suppressive signals on T cells, such as Programmed Death-1 (PD-1) and Cytotoxic T-lymphocyte Antigen-4 (CTLA-4). Despite their beneficial effects, ICIs are associated with immune-related adverse events (irAEs), manifesting as autoimmune side effects across various organ systems. A particularly alarming irAE is life-threatening myocarditis. This rare but severe side effect of ICIs leads to significant long-term cardiac complications, including arrhythmias and heart failure, and has been observed to have a mortality rate of up to 50% in affected patients. This greatly limits the clinical application of ICI-based immunotherapy. In this review, we provide a comprehensive summary of the current knowledge regarding the diagnosis and management of ICI-related myocarditis. We also discuss the utility of preclinical mouse models in understanding and addressing this critical challenge.

Osimertinib exacerbates immune checkpoint inhibitor-related severe adverse events by activating the IL-6/JAK/STAT3 pathway in macrophages

OBJECTIVE

The combination of epithelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) leads to an increased incidence of severe immune-related adverse events (irAEs). However, the mechanisms underlying macrophages in irAEs have not been elucidated.

METHODS

An osimertinib and ICI-induced irAE mouse model was constructed. Lung micro-CT scans were used to assess the degree of inflammatory infiltration. Hematoxylin-eosin staining was used to analyze the histopathologic inflammatory infiltration in mouse liver and lung tissues. Flow cytometry was used to detect the percentages of T cells, NK cells, and macrophages and the expression of EGFR. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was used to detect the serum interleukin (IL)-6, alanine transaminase (ALT), ferritin, and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α levels. Total RNA extracted from mouse liver macrophages was analyzed by RNA-seq. Simple Western blot analysis was used to detect the IL-6/JAK/STAT3 pathway activation state.

RESULTS

Osimertinib combined with ICIs upregulated EGFR expression on macrophages with increased serum IL-6, ALT, and ferritin levels. RNA-seq and simple Western blot analysis of mouse liver macrophages confirmed that that the IL-6/JAK/STAT3 pathway was activated in the combination treatment group. Ruxolitinib blocked the IL-6/JAK/STAT3 pathway and significantly decreased the serum IL-6, ALT, and ferritin levels in the combination treatment group.

CONCLUSIONS

An osimertinib and ICI-induced irAE mouse model was constructed that showed osimertinib combined with ICIs inhibited EGFR phosphorylation and activated the IL-6/JAK/STAT3 signaling pathway in mouse liver macrophages, which led to the release of relevant cytokines.

Peptic ulcer induced by immune checkpoint inhibitors successfully treated with glucocorticoids: A report of three cases and a literature review

In recent decades, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have emerged as safer and less disruptive alternatives to conventional chemotherapy and radiotherapy for certain patients with tumours. ICIs serve a synergistic role alongside conventional therapies by manipulating the immune system to recognise and target tumour cells. However, excessive activation of the immune system can lead to immune-related adverse events including pneumonia, myocarditis and colitis, which pose serious and even fatal risks. In the present case series, three patients with a thoracic tumour with an ICI-induced peptic ulcer triggered by programmed cell death protein 1 antibodies (diagnosed by gastrointestinal endoscopy) are presented. These cases were successfully treated with corticosteroids. The diagnostic and treatment processes undertaken for these patients underscore the requirement to comprehensively understand the mechanism of ICI-induced peptic ulcer. Moreover, the relevant literature was also reviewed in the present study.

Clinical characteristics and influencing factors of anti-PD-1/PD-L1-related severe cardiac adverse event: based on FAERS and TCGA databases

Combining the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) and the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) databases, we aim to explore the factors that influence anti-programmed cell death protein-1 inhibitors/programmed death-ligand-1 (PD-1/PD-L1) related severe cardiac adverse events (cAEs). We obtained anti-PD-1/PD-L1 adverse event reports from January 2014 to December 2022 from the FAERS database. Disproportionality analysis was performed to find anti-PD-1/PD-L1-related cAEs using the proportional reporting ratio (PRR). We were exploring influencing factors based on multivariate logistic regression analysis. Finally, we utilized a strategy that combines FAERS and TCGA databases to explore the potential immune and genetic influencing factors associated with anti-PD-1/PD-L1-related severe cAEs. Reports of severe cAEs accounted for 7.10% of the overall anti-PD-1/PD-L1 adverse event reports in the FAERS database. Immune-mediated myocarditis (PRR = 77.01[59.77-99.23]) shows the strongest toxic signal. The elderly group (65-74: OR = 1.34[1.23-1.47], ≥ 75: OR = 1.64[1.49-1.81]), male (OR = 1.14[1.05-1.24]), anti-PD-L1 agents (OR = 1.17[1.03-1.33]), patients with other adverse events (OR = 2.38[2.17-2.60]), and the concomitant use of proton pump inhibitor (OR = 1.29[1.17-1.43]), nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (OR = 1.17[1.04-1.31]), or antibiotics (OR = 1.24[1.08-1.43]) may increase the risk of severe cAEs. In addition, PD-L1 mRNA (Rs = 0.71, FDR = 2.30 × 10- 3) and low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 3 (LRP3) (Rs = 0.82, FDR = 2.17 × 10- 2) may be immune and genetic influencing factors for severe cAEs. Severe cAEs may be related to antigen receptor-mediated signalling pathways. In this study, we found that age, gender, anti-PD-1/PD-L1 agents, concomitant other adverse events, concomitant medication, PD-L1 mRNA, and LRP3 may be influencing factors for anti-PD-1/PD-L1-related severe cAEs. However, our findings still require a large-scale prospective cohort validation.

Rethinking Immune Check Point Inhibitors Use in Liver Transplantation: Implications and Resistance

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized cancer therapy, including the two most common liver tumors, hepatocellular carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma, but their use in the peri-transplantation period is controversial. ICI therapy aims to heighten cytotoxic T lymphocytes response against tumors. However, tumor recurrence is common owing to tumor immune response escape involving ablation of CTL response by interfering with antigen presentation, triggering CLT apoptosis and inducing epigenetic changes that promote ICI therapy resistance. ICI can also affect tissue resident memory T cell population, impact tolerance in the post-transplant period, and induce acute inflammation risking graft survival post-transplant. Their interaction with immunosuppression may be key in reducing tumor burden and may thus, require multimodal therapy to treat these tumors. This review summarizes ICI use in the liver transplantation period, their impact on tolerance and resistance, and new potential therapies for combination or sequential treatments for liver tumors.

Immune-related events in individuals with solid tumors on immunotherapy associate with Th17 and Th2 signatures

BACKGROUNDImmune-related adverse events (irAEs) and their associated morbidity/mortality are a key concern for patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Prospective evaluation of the drivers of irAEs in a diverse pan-tumor cohort is needed to identify patients at greatest risk and to develop rational treatment and interception strategies.METHODSIn an observational study, we prospectively collected blood samples and performed regular clinical evaluations for irAEs in patients receiving ICI therapy as standard of care for solid tumors. We performed in-parallel analysis of cytokines by Luminex immunoassay and circulating immune cells by cytometry by time-of-flight (CyTOF) at baseline and on treatment to investigate mechanisms of irAEs.RESULTSWe enrolled 111 patients, of whom 40.5% developed a symptomatic irAE (grade ≥ 2). Development of a grade ≥ 2 irAE was positively associated with the use of combination ICI and a history of an autoimmune disorder. Early changes in T helper 17 (Th17) (IL-6, IL-17f), type 2 (IL-5, IL-13, IL-25), and type 1 (TNF-α) cytokine signatures and congruent on-treatment expansions of Th17 and Th2 effector memory (Th2EM) T cell populations in peripheral blood were positively associated with the development of grade ≥2 irAEs. IL-6 levels were also associated with inferior cancer-specific survival and overall survival.CONCLUSIONSIn a diverse, prospective pan-tumor cohort, Th17 and Th2 skewing during early ICI treatment was associated with the development of clinically relevant irAEs but not antitumor responses, providing possible targets for monitoring and therapeutic interventions.FUNDINGJohns Hopkins Bloomberg-Kimmel Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, the NCI SPORE in Gastrointestinal Cancers (P50 CA062924), NCI grant (R50CA243627 to LD), the NIH Center Core Grant (P30 CA006973), Swim Across America (to MY), NIAMS (K23AR075872 to LC), and imCORE-Genentech grant 137515 (to Johns Hopkins Medicine on behalf of MY).

The Role of Aging and Senescence in Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Response and Toxicity

Cellular senescence accumulates with age and has been shown to impact numerous physiological and pathological processes, including immune function. The role of cellular senescence in cancer is multifaceted, but the impact on immune checkpoint inhibitor response and toxicity has not been fully evaluated. In this review, we evaluate the impact of cellular senescence in various biological compartments, including the tumor, the tumor microenvironment, and the immune system, on immune checkpoint inhibitor efficacy and toxicity. We provide an overview of the impact of cellular senescence in normal and pathological contexts and examine recent studies that have connected aging and cellular senescence to immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment in both the pre-clinical and clinical contexts. Overall, senescence plays a multi-faceted, context-specific role and has been shown to modulate immune-related adverse event incidence as well as immune checkpoint inhibitor response.

Elevated IL-6 and Tumor Necrosis Factor-α in Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Myocarditis

INTRODUCTION

The impact of peripheral cytokine levels on the prognosis and treatment of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) myocarditis has not been well studied.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to identify cytokines that can prognosticate and direct the treatment of ICI myocarditis.

METHODS

This was a single-center, retrospective cohort study of patients with ICI myocarditis who had available peripheral cytokine levels between January 2011 and May 2022. Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) were defined as a composite of heart failure with/without cardiogenic shock, arterial thrombosis, life-threatening arrhythmias, pulmonary embolism, and sudden cardiac death.

RESULTS

In total, 65 patients with ICI myocarditis had cytokine data available. Patients were mostly males (70%), with a mean age of 67.8 ± 12.7 years. Interleukin (IL)-6 and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) were the most common cytokines to be elevated with 48/65 (74%) of patients having a peak IL-6 above normal limits (>5 pg/mL) and 44/65 (68%) of patients with peak TNF-α above normal limits (>22 pg/mL). Patients with elevated peak IL-6 had similar 90-day mortality and MACE outcomes compared to those without (10.4% vs. 11.8%, p = 0.878 and 8.8% vs. 17.7%, p = 0.366, respectively). Similarly, those with elevated peak TNF-α had similar 90-day mortality and MACEs compared to those without (29.6% vs. 14.3%, p = 0.182 and 13.6% vs. 4.8%, p = 0.413, respectively). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis also showed that there was not a significant difference between MACE-free survival when comparing elevated and normal IL-6 and TNF-α levels (p = 0.182 and p = 0.118, respectively). MACEs and overall survival outcomes were similar between those who received infliximab and those who did not among all patients and those with elevated TNF-α (p-value 0.70 and 0.83, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Peripheral blood levels of IL-6 and TNF-α are the most commonly elevated cytokines in patients with ICI myocarditis. However, their role in the prognostication and guidance of immunomodulatory treatment is currently limited.

Kinetics of IFNγ-Induced Cytokines and Development of Immune-Related Adverse Events in Patients Receiving PD-(L)1 Inhibitors

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have the potential to trigger unpredictable immune-related adverse events (irAEs), which can be severe. The underlying mechanisms of these events are not fully understood. As PD-L1 is upregulated by IFN, the heightened immune activation resulting from PD-1/PD-L1 inhibition may enhance the IFN response, triggering the expression of IFN-inducible genes and contributing to irAE development and its severity. In this study, we investigated the interplay between irAEs and the expression of IFN-inducible chemokines and cytokines in 134 consecutive patients with solid tumours treated with PD-(L)1 inhibitors as monotherapy or in combination with chemotherapy or other immunotherapy agents. We compared the plasma levels of IFN-associated cytokines (CXCL9/10/11, IL-18, IL-10, IL-6 and TGFβ) at various time points (at baseline, at the onset of irAE and previous to irAE onset) in three patient groups categorized by irAE development and severity: patients with serious irAEs, mild irAEs and without irAEs after PD-(L)1 inhibitors. No differences were observed between groups at baseline. However, patients with serious irAEs exhibited significant increases in CXCL9/10/11, IL-18 and IL-10 levels at the onset of the irAE compared to baseline. A network analysis and correlation patterns highlighted a robust relationship among these chemokines and cytokines at serious-irAE onset. Combining all of the analysed proteins in a cluster analysis, we identified a subgroup of patients with a higher incidence of serious irAEs affecting different organs or systems. Finally, an ROC analysis and a decision tree model proposed IL-18 levels ≥ 807 pg/mL and TGFβ levels ≤ 114 pg/mL as predictors for serious irAEs in 90% of cases. In conclusion, our study elucidates the dynamic changes in cytokine profiles associated with serious irAE development during treatment with PD-(L)1 inhibitors. The study's findings offer valuable insights into the intricate IFN-induced immune responses associated with irAEs and propose potential predictive markers for their severity.

The Current and Future of Biomarkers of Immune Related Adverse Events

With their groundbreaking clinical responses, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have ushered in a new chapter in cancer therapeutics. However, they are often associated with life-threatening or organ-threatening autoimmune/autoinflammatory phenomena, collectively termed immune-related adverse events (irAEs). In this review, we will first describe the mechanisms of action of ICIs as well as irAEs. Next, we will review biomarkers for predicting the development of irAEs or stratifying risks.

Immune-Related Adverse Events Due to Cancer Immunotherapy: Immune Mechanisms and Clinical Manifestations

The landscape of cancer treatment has undergone a significant transformation with the introduction of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICIs). Patients undergoing these treatments often report prolonged clinical and radiological responses, albeit with a potential risk of developing immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Here, we reviewed and discussed the mechanisms of action of ICIs and their pivotal role in regulating the immune system to enhance the anti-tumor immune response. We scrutinized the intricate pathogenic mechanisms responsible for irAEs, arising from the evasion of self-tolerance checkpoints due to drug-induced immune modulation. We also summarized the main clinical manifestations due to irAEs categorized by organ types, detailing their incidence and associated risk factors. The occurrence of irAEs is more frequent when ICIs are combined; with neurological, cardiovascular, hematological, and rheumatic irAEs more commonly linked to PD1/PD-L1 inhibitors and cutaneous and gastrointestinal irAEs more prevalent with CTLA4 inhibitors. Due to the often-nonspecific signs and symptoms, the diagnosis of irAEs (especially for those rare ones) can be challenging. The differential with primary autoimmune disorders becomes sometimes intricate, given the clinical and pathophysiological similarities. In conclusion, considering the escalating use of ICIs, this area of research necessitates additional clinical studies and practical insights, especially the development of biomarkers for predicting immune toxicities. In addition, there is a need for heightened education for both clinicians and patients to enhance understanding and awareness.

Biomarkers for immune-related adverse events in cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors

Although immune checkpoint inhibitors have greatly improved cancer therapy, they also cause immune-related adverse events, including a wide range of inflammatory side effects resulting from excessive immune activation. Types of immune-related adverse events are diverse and can occur in almost any organ, with different frequencies and severities. Furthermore, immune-related adverse events may occur within the first few weeks after treatment or even several months after treatment discontinuation. Predictive biomarkers include blood cell counts and cell surface markers, serum proteins, autoantibodies, cytokines/chemokines, germline genetic variations and gene expression profiles, human leukocyte antigen genotype, microRNAs and the gut microbiome. Given the inconsistencies in research results and limited practical utility, there is to date no established biomarker that can be used in routine clinical practice, and additional investigations are essential to demonstrate efficacy and subsequently facilitate integration into routine clinical use.

Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio: Markers predicting immune-checkpoint inhibitor efficacy and immune-related adverse events

We conducted a comprehensive review of existing prediction models pertaining to the efficacy of immune-checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) and the occurrence of immune-related adverse events (irAEs). The predictive potential of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) in determining ICI effectiveness has been extensively investigated, while limited research has been conducted on predicting irAEs. Furthermore, the combined model incorporating NLR and PLR, either with each other or in conjunction with additional markers such as carcinoembryonic antigen, exhibits superior predictive capabilities compared to individual markers alone. NLR and PLR are promising markers for clinical applications. Forthcoming models ought to incorporate established efficacious models and newly identified ones, thereby constituting a multifactor composite model. Furthermore, efforts should be made to explore effective clinical application approaches that enhance the predictive accuracy and efficiency.

Immune-Related Colitis Is Associated with Fecal Microbial Dysbiosis and Can Be Mitigated by Fecal Microbiota Transplantation

Colitis induced by treatment with immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), termed irColitis, is a substantial cause of morbidity complicating cancer treatment. We hypothesized that abnormal fecal microbiome features would be present at the time of irColitis onset and that restoring the microbiome with fecal transplant from a healthy donor would mitigate disease severity. Herein, we present fecal microbiota profiles from 18 patients with irColitis from a single center, 5 of whom were treated with healthy-donor fecal microbial transplantation (FMT). Although fecal samples collected at onset of irColitis had comparable α-diversity to that of comparator groups with gastrointestinal symptoms, irColitis was characterized by fecal microbial dysbiosis. Abundances of Proteobacteria were associated with irColitis in multivariable analyses. Five patients with irColitis refractory to steroids and biologic anti-inflammatory agents received healthy-donor FMT, with initial clinical improvement in irColitis symptoms observed in four of five patients. Two subsequently exhibited recurrence of irColitis symptoms following courses of antibiotics. Both received a second "salvage" FMT that was, again, followed by clinical improvement of irColitis. In summary, we observed distinct microbial community changes that were present at the time of irColitis onset. FMT was followed by clinical improvements in several cases of steroid- and biologic-agent-refractory irColitis. Strategies to restore or prevent microbiome dysbiosis in the context of immunotherapy toxicities should be further explored in prospective clinical trials.

Lipidomics reveals immune-related adverse events in NSCLC patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitor

There is a lack of reliable biomarkers to predict and identify the risk of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients undergoing immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment. This study aims to explore potential biomarkers using lipidomics to identify and predict the risk of irAEs in NSCLC patients receiving ICI treatment. This prospective study enrolled 94 NSCLC patients with IIIB/IV stage NSCLC who underwent first-line chemotherapy in combination with ICI treatment. The prediction cohort consisted of plasma samples collected from 60 patients before ICI treatment, and the occurrence of irAE was monitored within 6 months of initiating first-line ICI therapy. The validation cohort comprised 34 patients, with plasma samples obtained from 15 patients who did not develop irAE at 6 months of ICI treatment and plasma samples collected from 19 irAE patients at the onset of irAE. Through non-targeted lipidomics and semi-targeted lipid quantification analysis, we identify 11 differentially metabolized lipids and further screened these lipids with the area under the curve (AUC) > 0.7 to predict the occurrence of irAEs in NSCLC patients following ICI treatment. The results showed that the biomarker panel consisting of 9 lipids (LPC-18:2, PC-40:6, LPC-22:6, LPC-O-18:0, PS-38:0, PC-38:6, PC-37:6, PC-36:5,LPC-17:0) exhibited a good AUC of 0.859 in the prediction and 0.940 in the validation cohort phase of the receiver operating characteristic curve; The study utilizes plasma lipidomics to develop a rapid and effective prediction model for identifying irAEs in advanced NSCLC patients who treatment with first-line chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy.

Predictive Factors in Metastatic Melanoma Treated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: From Clinical Practice to Future Perspective

The introduction of immunotherapy revolutionized the treatment landscape in metastatic melanoma. Despite the impressive results associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), only a portion of patients obtain a response to this treatment. In this scenario, the research of predictive factors is fundamental to identify patients who may have a response and to exclude patients with a low possibility to respond. These factors can be host-associated, immune system activation-related, and tumor-related. Patient-related factors can vary from data obtained by medical history (performance status, age, sex, body mass index, concomitant medications, and comorbidities) to analysis of the gut microbiome from fecal samples. Tumor-related factors can reflect tumor burden (metastatic sites, lactate dehydrogenase, C-reactive protein, and circulating tumor DNA) or can derive from the analysis of tumor samples (driver mutations, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, and myeloid cells). Biomarkers evaluating the immune system activation, such as IFN-gamma gene expression profile and analysis of circulating immune cell subsets, have emerged in recent years as significantly correlated with response to ICIs. In this manuscript, we critically reviewed the most updated literature data on the landscape of predictive factors in metastatic melanoma treated with ICIs. We focus on the principal limits and potentiality of different methods, shedding light on the more promising biomarkers.

Key Determinants of Immune-Mediated Adverse Reactions to Oncology Drugs

To overcome the epidemiological severity of cancer, developing effective treatments is urgently required. In response, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been revealed as a promising resolution for treatment-resistant cancers across the world. Yet, they have both advantages and disadvantages, bringing therapeutic benefits while simultaneously inducing toxicity, and in particular, immune-mediated adverse drug reactions (imADRs), to the human body. These imADRs can be pathogenic and sometimes lethal, hampering health prediction and monitoring following the provision of ICI treatment. Therefore, it is necessary to collectively identify the determinant factors that contribute to these imADRs induced by ICIs. This article evaluated treatment-, tumor-, and patient-related determinants, and indicated a research gap for future investigations on the pathogenic mechanism of imADRs and translational conversion of determinants into clinical biomarkers to aid pharmacovigilance and cancer therapies.

New perspectives in cancer immunotherapy: targeting IL-6 cytokine family

Chronic inflammation has been recognized as a canonical cancer hallmark. It is orchestrated by cytokines, which are master regulators of the tumor microenvironment (TME) as they represent the main communication bridge between cancer cells, the tumor stroma, and the immune system. Interleukin (IL)-6 represents a keystone cytokine in the link between inflammation and cancer. Many cytokines from the IL-6 family, which includes IL-6, oncostatin M, leukemia inhibitory factor, IL-11, IL-27, IL-31, ciliary neurotrophic factor, cardiotrophin 1, and cardiotrophin-like cytokine factor 1, have been shown to elicit tumor-promoting roles by modulating the TME, making them attractive therapeutic targets for cancer treatment.The development of immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) immunotherapies has radically changed the outcome of some cancers including melanoma, lung, and renal, although not without hurdles. However, ICB shows limited efficacy in other solid tumors. Recent reports support that chronic inflammation and IL-6 cytokine signaling are involved in resistance to immunotherapy. This review summarizes the available preclinical and clinical data regarding the implication of IL-6-related cytokines in regulating the immune TME and the response to ICB. Moreover, the potential clinical benefit of combining ICB with therapies targeting IL-6 cytokine members for cancer treatment is discussed.

Construction and Evaluation of Clinical Prediction Model for Immunotherapy-related Adverse Events and Clinical Benefit in Cancer Patients Receiving Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Based on Serum Cytokine Levels

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized the therapeutic landscape of cancer therapy. This study aimed to develop novel risk classifiers to predict the risk of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) and the probability of clinical benefits. Patients with cancer who received ICIs from the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi 'an Jiaotong University from November 2020 to October 2022 were recruited and followed up. Logistic regression analyses were performed to identify independent predictive factors for irAEs and clinical response. Two nomograms were developed to predict the irAEs and clinical responses of these individuals, with a receiver operating characteristic curve to assess their predictive ability. Decision curve analysis was performed to estimate the clinical utility of the nomogram. This study included 583 patients with cancer. Among them, 111 (19.0%) developed irAEs. Duration of treatment (DOT)>3 cycles, hepatic-metastases, IL2>2.225 pg/mL, and IL8>7.39 pg/mL were correlated with higher irAEs risk. A total of 347 patients were included in the final efficacy analysis, with an overall clinical benefit rate of 39.7%. DOT>3 cycles, nonhepatic-metastases, and irAEs and IL8>7.39 pg/mL were independent predictive factors of clinical benefit. Ultimately, 2 nomograms were successfully established to predict the probability of irAEs and their clinical benefits. Ultimately, 2 nomograms were successfully established to predict the probability of irAEs and clinical benefits. The receiver operating characteristic curves yielded acceptable nomogram performance. Calibration curves and decision curve analysis supported the hypothesis that nomograms could provide more significant net clinical benefits to these patients. Specific baseline plasma cytokines were closely correlated with irAEs and clinical responses in these individuals.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Induced (Type 3) Autoimmune Pancreatitis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have revolutionized cancer care and work primarily by blocking CTLA-4 (cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4), and/or PD-1 (programmed cell death protein 1), and/or PD-L1 (programmed death-ligand 1), thereby providing highly efficacious anti-tumor activity. However, this unmitigated immune response can also trigger immune related adverse events (irAEs) in multiple organs, with pancreatic irAEs (now referred to as type 3 Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) being infrequent.

RECENT FINDINGS

Type 3 AIP is a drug-induced, immune mediated progressive inflammatory disease of the pancreas that may have variable clinical presentations viz., an asymptomatic pancreatic enzyme elevation, incidental imaging evidence of pancreatitis, painful pancreatitis, or any combination of these subtypes. Management is largely supportive with intravenous fluid hydration, pain control and holding the inciting medication. Steroids have not been shown to demonstrate a clear benefit in acute management. A rapid development pancreatic atrophy is observed on imaging as early as 1 year post initial injury. Type 3 AIP is a chronic inflammatory disease of the pancreas that though predominantly asymptomatic and mild in severity can lead to rapid organ volume loss regardless of type of clinical presentation and despite steroid therapy.

Effects of Nanosecond Pulsed Electric Field on Immune Checkpoint Receptors in Melanoma Cells

Checkpoint molecules such as PD-1, LAG-3, and TIM-3 are currently under extensive investigation for their roles in the attenuation of the immune response in cancer. Various methods have been applied to overcome the challenges in this field. This study investigated the effects of nanosecond pulsed electric field (nsPEF) treatment on the expression of immune checkpoint molecules in A375 and C32 melanoma cells. The researchers found that the nsPEF treatment was able to enhance membrane permeabilization and morphological changes in the cell membrane without being cytotoxic. We found that the effects of nsPEFs on melanoma included (1) the transport of vesicles from the inside to the outside of the cells, (2) cell contraction, and (3) the migration of lipids from inside the cells to their peripheries. The treatment increased the expression of PD-1 checkpoint receptors. Furthermore, we also observed potential co-localization or clustering of MHC class II and PD-1 molecules on the cell surface and the secretion of cytokines such as TNF-α and IL-6. These findings suggest that nsPEF treatment could be a viable approach to enhance the delivery of therapeutic agents to cancer cells and to modulate the tumor microenvironment to promote an antitumor immune response. Further studies are needed to explore the mechanisms underlying these effects and their impacts on the antitumor immune response, and to investigate the potential of nsPEF treatment in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors to improve clinical outcomes for cancer patients.

Biomarkers of immune checkpoint inhibitor response and toxicity: Challenges and opportunities

Immune checkpoint inhibitors have transformed cancer therapy, but their optimal use is still constrained by lack of response and toxicity. Biomarkers of response may facilitate drug development by allowing appropriate therapy selection and focusing clinical trial enrollment. However, aside from PD-L1 staining in a subset of tumors and rarely mismatch repair deficiency, no biomarkers are routinely used in the clinic. In addition, severe toxicities may cause severe morbidity, therapy discontinuation, and even death. Here, we review the state of the field with a focus on our research in therapeutic biomarkers and toxicities from immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Associated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have transformed the therapeutic approach to diverse malignancies, leading to substantial enhancements in patient prognosis. However, along with their benefits, ICIs also increase the incidence of immune-related adverse events (irAEs). In the present paper, we highlight four cases of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) as an uncommon manifestation of toxicity induced by ICIs. Although diagnosed with different malignancies, the patients were undergoing ICI therapy when they developed CTS-consistent side effects accompanied by severe neuropathy. Prompt treatment with corticosteroids, intravenous immunoglobulins, or methotrexate resulted in complete symptomatic relief for all patients. This article therefore emphasizes the importance of recognizing and managing rare adverse events associated with ICI use to ensure optimal patient care.

T-cell receptor beta variable gene polymorphism predicts immune-related adverse events during checkpoint blockade immunotherapy

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors have revolutionized cancer treatment. However, they are associated with a unique spectrum of side effects, called immune-related adverse events (irAEs), which can cause significant morbidity and quickly progress to severe or life-threatening events if not treated promptly. Identifying predictive biomarkers for irAEs before immunotherapy initiation is therefore a critical area of research. Polymorphisms within the T-cell receptor beta (TCRB) variable (TRBV) gene have been implicated in autoimmune disease and may be mechanistically linked to irAEs. However, the repetitive nature of the TCRB locus and incomplete genome assembly has hampered the evaluation of TRBV polymorphisms in the past.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We used a novel method for long-amplicon next generation sequencing of rearranged TCRB chains from peripheral blood total RNA to evaluate the link between TRBV polymorphisms and irAEs in patients treated with immunotherapy for cancer. We employed multiplex PCR to create amplicons spanning the three beta chain complementarity-determining regions (CDR) regions to enable detection of polymorphism within the germline-encoded framework and CDR1 and CDR2 regions in addition to CDR3 profiling. Resultant amplicons were sequenced via the Ion Torrent and TRBV allele profiles constructed for each individual was correlated with irAE annotations to identify haplotypes associated with severe irAEs (≥ grade 3).

RESULTS

Our study included 81 patients who had irAEs when treated with immunotherapy for cancer. By using principal component analysis of the 81 TRBV allele profiles followed by k-means clustering, we identified six major TRBV haplotypes. Strikingly, we found that one-third of this cohort possessed a TRBV allele haplotype that appeared to be protective against severe irAEs.

CONCLUSION

The data suggest that long-amplicon TCRB repertoire sequencing can potentially identify TRBV haplotype groups that correlate with the risk of severe irAEs. Germline-encoded TRBV polymorphisms may serve as a predictive biomarker of severe irAEs.

Therapeutic drug monitoring of immune checkpoint inhibitors: based on their pharmacokinetic properties and biomarkers

As a new means of oncology treatment, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) can improve survival rates in patients with resistant or refractory tumors. However, there are obvious inter-individual differences in the unsatisfactory response rate, drug resistance rate and the occurrence of immune-related adverse events (irAE). These questions have sparked interest in researchers looking for a way to screen sensitive populations and predict efficacy and safety. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is a way to ensure the safety and effectiveness of medication by measuring the concentration of drugs in body fluids and adjusting the medication regimen. It has the potential to be an adjunctive means of predicting the safety and efficacy of ICIs treatment. In this review, the author outlined the pharmacokinetic (PK) characteristics of ICIs in patients. The feasibility and limitations of TDM of ICIs were discussed by summarizing the relationships between the pharmacokinetic parameters and the efficacy, toxicity and biomarkers.

Updates in toxicities associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors

INTRODUCTION

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have become a pillar of treatment for numerous cancers with increasing use in combination with other ICIs and in earlier stages of disease treatment. Although effective, ICI use is accompanied by a milieu of potentially bothersome or even life-threatening toxicities known as immune-related adverse events (irAEs), necessitating careful monitoring and early intervention.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, we provide an overview of recent advances surrounding toxicity pathophysiology and treatment in the context of relevant organ systems. An emphasis on current treatments by toxicity, as well as updates on steroid-refractory toxicities, chronic toxicities, and biomarkers will be a focus of this update on the current understanding of irAEs.

EXPERT OPINION

ICI toxicities are a major limitation on the deployment of multi-agent ICI regimens and are thus a major priority to understand, treat, and prevent. Recent developments have led to greater understanding of the pathophysiology of these events, which may lead to improved prevention or mitigation strategies. Further, early studies have also suggested steroid-sparing approaches that may be useful. Ultimately, preventing and managing irAEs will be a key goal toward successful ICI treatment across a broader range of patients with cancer.

Prognostic factors of toxicity of immune checkpoint inhibitors in nonsmall cell lung cancer and small cell lung cancer patients: The ToxImmune study

BACKGROUND

Immunotherapy alone or in combination has clearly improved the survival of patients with lung cancer. However, it may also be responsible for adverse events impacting these patients' quality of life. The ToxImmune study aims to identify prognostic factors that can help to predict immune-related adverse events.

METHODS

We included all patients aged 18 years and older who had received at least one dose of immune checkpoint inhibitors, with or without other therapy, between June 2015 and December 2020 and were diagnosed with nonsmall cell lung cancer or small-cell lung cancer. Patients' baseline demographic characteristics, biological blood markers, and imaging by PET-scanner were collected from electronic medical records. All adverse events (AEs) and immune-related AEs (irAEs) were recorded (Common Terminology Criteria For Adverse Events V.5.0).

RESULTS

Sixty-four patients were included, of whom 60 (94%) presented at least one irAE. The incidence of Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade 2 and grade 3-4 was 34% and 8% respectively. Female sex, Primitive Tumor Standardized Uptake Value Max (SUVmax) <5, number of metastases ≥3 and immunotherapy received after the first line were found to be significant risk factors for immune-related adverse events. Based on the number of risk factors, the ToxImmune score predicts the risk of having a grade ≥2 adverse event (primitive tumor SUV ≥ 5 = 0 vs. primitive tumor SUV <5 = 1, number of metastases <3 = 0 vs. number of metastases ≥3 = 1 and L1 = 0 vs. L1 ≥ 1). The incidence of grade ≥2 adverse events was 20%, 55% and 90% with ToxImmune scores 0, 1 and = 2 respectively (p = .003). Median progression-free survival (PFS) times were 19.2 months, 6.64 months and 2.63 months for ToxImmune scores 0, 1 and = 2 respectively, p = .13. Median overall survival times were 22.6 months, 16.4 months and 9.8 months for ToxImmune scores 0, 1 and ≥2 respectively, p = .24. The disease control rate (DRR) was 78% in ToxIummune score 0 group, and 50% in ToxImmune score 1 and ≥2 groups (p = .363).

CONCLUSION

The ToxImmune score, which is grounded on objective clinical parameters, indicates that cases with a high score had an advanced threat of severe adverse events. The ToxImmune score could therefore be used in clinical practice to identify patients treated for lung cancer with immunotherapy and at risk of severe AE.

An updated review of gastrointestinal toxicity induced by PD-1 inhibitors: from mechanisms to management

PD-1 inhibitors, as one of commonly used immune checkpoint inhibitors, enable T-cell activation and prevent immune escape by blocking the PD-1/PD-L1 signaling pathway. They have transformed the treatment landscape for cancer in recent years, due to the advantages of significantly prolonging patients' survival and improving their life quality. However, the ensuing unpredictable immune-related adverse effects (irAEs) plague clinicians, such as colitis and even potentially fatal events like intestinal perforation and obstruction. Therefore, understanding the clinical manifestations and grading criteria, underlying mechanisms, available diverse therapies, accessible biomarkers, and basis for risk stratification is of great importance for the management. Current evidence suggests that irAEs may be a marker of clinical benefit to immunotherapy in patients, so whether to discontinue PD-1 inhibitors after the onset of irAEs and rechallenge after remission of irAEs requires further evaluation of potential risk-reward ratios as well as more data from large-scale prospective studies to fully validate. At the end, the rare gastrointestinal toxicity events caused by PD-1 inhibitors are also sorted out. This review provides a summary of available data on the gastrointestinal toxicity profile caused by PD-1 inhibitors, with the aim of raising clinicians' awareness in daily practice, so that patients can safely benefit from therapy.

Immune-related adverse effects of checkpoint immunotherapy and implications for the treatment of patients with cancer and autoimmune diseases

During the past decade, there has been a revolution in cancer therapeutics by the emergence of antibody-based immunotherapies that modulate immune responses against tumors. These therapies have offered treatment options to patients who are no longer responding to classic anti-cancer therapies. By blocking inhibitory signals mediated by surface receptors that are naturally upregulated during activation of antigen-presenting cells (APC) and T cells, predominantly PD-1 and its ligand PD-L1, as well as CTLA-4, such blocking agents have revolutionized cancer treatment. However, breaking these inhibitory signals cannot be selectively targeted to the tumor microenvironment (TME). Since the physiologic role of these inhibitory receptors, known as immune checkpoints (IC) is to maintain peripheral tolerance by preventing the activation of autoreactive immune cells, IC inhibitors (ICI) induce multiple types of immune-related adverse effects (irAEs). These irAEs, together with the natural properties of ICs as gatekeepers of self-tolerance, have precluded the use of ICI in patients with pre-existing autoimmune diseases (ADs). However, currently accumulating data indicates that ICI might be safely administered to such patients. In this review, we discuss mechanisms of well established and newly recognized irAEs and evolving knowledge from the application of ICI therapies in patients with cancer and pre-existing ADs.

Immunotherapy in oncology and the kidneys: a clinical review of the evaluation and management of kidney immune-related adverse events

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are now widely used in the treatment of many cancers, and currently represent the standard of care for multiple malignancies. These agents enhance the T cell immune response to target cancer tissues, and have demonstrated considerable benefits for cancer outcomes. However, despite these improved outcomes, there are important kidney immune-related adverse events (iRAEs) associated with ICI. Acute tubulo-interstitial nephritis remains the most frequent kidney iRAE, however glomerular lesions and electrolytes disturbances are increasingly being recognized and reported. In this review, we summarize clinical features and identify risk factors for kidney iRAEs, and discuss the current understanding of pathophysiologic mechanisms. We highlight the evidence basis for guideline-recommended management of ICI-related kidney injury as well as gaps in current knowledge. We advocate for judicious use of kidney biopsy to identify ICI-associated kidney injury, and early use of corticosteroid treatment where appropriate. Selected patients may also be candidates for re-challenge with ICI therapy after a kidney iRAE, in view of current data on recurrent rates of kidney injury. Risk of benefits of re-challenge must be considered on an individual considering patient preferences and prognosis. Lastly, we review current knowledge of ICI use in the setting of patients with end-stage kidney disease, including kidney transplant recipients and those receiving dialysis, which suggest that these patients should not be summarily excluded from the potential benefits of these cancer therapies.

Selective immune suppression using interleukin-6 receptor inhibitors for management of immune-related adverse events

BACKGROUND

Management of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) is important as they cause treatment interruption or discontinuation, more often seen with combination immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy. Here, we retrospectively evaluated the safety and effectiveness of anti-interleukin-6 receptor (anti-IL-6R) as therapy for irAEs.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective multicenter study evaluating patients diagnosed with de novo irAEs or flare of pre-existing autoimmune disease following ICI and were treated with anti-IL-6R. Our objectives were to assess the improvement of irAEs as well as the overall tumor response rate (ORR) before and after anti-IL-6R treatment.

RESULTS

We identified a total of 92 patients who received therapeutic anti-IL-6R antibodies (tocilizumab or sarilumab). Median age was 61 years, 63% were men, 69% received anti-programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) antibodies alone, and 26% patients were treated with the combination of anti-cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4 and anti-PD-1 antibodies. Cancer types were primarily melanoma (46%), genitourinary cancer (35%), and lung cancer (8%). Indications for using anti-IL-6R antibodies included inflammatory arthritis (73%), hepatitis/cholangitis (7%), myositis/myocarditis/myasthenia gravis (5%), polymyalgia rheumatica (4%), and one patient each with autoimmune scleroderma, nephritis, colitis, pneumonitis and central nervous system vasculitis. Notably, 88% of patients had received corticosteroids, and 36% received other disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) as first-line therapies, but without adequate improvement. After initiation of anti-IL-6R (as first-line or post-corticosteroids and DMARDs), 73% of patients showed resolution or change to ≤grade 1 of irAEs after a median of 2.0 months from initiation of anti-IL-6R therapy. Six patients (7%) stopped anti-IL-6R due to adverse events. Of 70 evaluable patients by RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) V.1.1 criteria; the ORR was 66% prior versus 66% after anti-IL-6R (95% CI, 54% to 77%), with 8% higher complete response rate. Of 34 evaluable patients with melanoma, the ORR was 56% prior and increased to 68% after anti-IL-6R (p=0.04).

CONCLUSION

Targeting IL-6R could be an effective approach to treat several irAE types without hindering antitumor immunity. This study supports ongoing clinical trials evaluating the safety and efficacy of tocilizumab (anti-IL-6R antibody) in combination with ICIs (NCT04940299, NCT03999749).

Immune-related adverse events of immune checkpoint inhibitors: a review

Since the first Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor was developed, tumor immunotherapy has entered a new era, and the response rate and survival rate of many cancers have also been improved. Despite the success of immune checkpoint inhibitors, resistance limits the number of patients who can achieve a lasting response, and immune-related adverse events complicate treatment. The mechanism of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) is unclear. We summarize and discuss the mechanisms of action of immune checkpoint inhibitors, the different types of immune-related adverse events and their possible mechanisms, and describe possible strategies and targets for prevention and therapeutic interventions to mitigate them.

Checkpoint Inhibitor-Induced Colitis: An Update

Immunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) nowadays has indications for several solid tumors. The current targets for ICIs are CTLA-4, PD-1, and PD-L1 receptors. Despite the clinical advantages derived from ICIs, a variety of side effects are linked to overstimulation of the immune system. Among these, ICI-related colitis is one of the most common, with a disabling impact on the patient. Diarrhea, abdominal pain, abdominal distension, cramping, and hematochezia are the most common ICI enterocolitis presenting symptoms. The most frequently used grading system for assessment of the severity of ICI enterocolitis is called the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grading. With regard to the histological picture, there is no specific feature; however, microscopic damage can be classified into five types: (1) acute active colitis, (2) chronic active colitis, (3) microscopic colitis-like, (4) graft-versus-host disease-like, and (5) other types. Supportive therapy (oral hydration, a bland diet without lactose or caffeine, and anti-diarrheal agents) is indicated in mild colitis. Symptomatic treatment alone or with loperamide, a low-fiber diet, and spasmolytics are recommended for low-grade diarrhea. In more severe cases, corticosteroid treatment is mandatory. In refractory cases, off-label use of biological therapies (infliximab or vedolizumab) was proposed.

Risk factors for cardiovascular adverse events from immune checkpoint inhibitors

Immune-related adverse events (irAEs), including skin injury, liver and kidney injury, colitis, as well as cardiovascular adverse events, are a series of complications arising during the treatment of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Cardiovascular events are the most urgent and the most critical, as they can end life in a short period of time. With the widespread use of ICIs, the number of immune-related cardiovascular adverse events (irACEs) induced by ICIs has increased. More attention has been paid to irACEs, especially regarding cardiotoxicity, the pathogenic mechanism, diagnosis and treatment. This review aims to assess the risk factors for irACEs, to raise awareness and help with the risk assessment of irACEs at an early stage.

Immunotherapy of thymic epithelial tumors: molecular understandings and clinical perspectives

Immunotherapy has emerged to play a rapidly expanding role in the treatment of cancers. Currently, many clinical trials of therapeutic agents are on ongoing with majority of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) especially programmed death receptor 1 (PD-1) and its ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors. PD-1 and PD-L1, two main immune checkpoints, are expressed at high levels in thymic epithelial tumors (TETs) and could be predictors of the progression and immunotherapeutic efficacy of TETs. However, despite inspiring efficacy reported in clinical trials and clinical practice, significantly higher incidence of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) than other tumors bring challenges to the administration of ICIs in TETs. To develop safe and effective immunotherapeutic patterns in TETs, understanding the clinical properties of patients, the cellular and molecular mechanisms of immunotherapy and irAEs occurrence are crucial. In this review, the progress of both basic and clinical research on immune checkpoints in TETs, the evidence of therapeutic efficacy and irAEs based on PD-1 /PD-L1 inhibitors in TETs treatment are discussed. Additionally, we highlighted the possible mechanisms underlying irAEs, prevention and management strategies, the insufficiency of current research and some worthy research insights. High PD-1/PD-L1 expression in TETs provides a rationale for ICI use. Completed clinical trials have shown an encouraging efficacy of ICIs, despite the high rate of irAEs. A deeper mechanism understanding at molecular level how ICIs function in TETs and why irAEs occur will help maximize the immunotherapeutic efficacy while minimizing irAEs risks in TET treatment to improve patient prognosis.