Potential benefit of osismertinib plus bevacizumab in leptomeningeal metastasis with EGFR mutant non-small-cell lung cancer

Combination of antiangiogenic and systemic therapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: before and after progression to leptomeningeal metastasis

Leptomeningeal metastasis (LM) is the most devastating complication of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and its incidence is increasing. We investigated the survival outcomes of patients with NSCLC who received combined antiangiogenic and systemic therapies before and after LM progression and explored survival-associated factors. Patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant or wild-type NSCLC-LM receiving systemic therapy were included. Survival outcomes were analyzed separately for patients who received different therapies before and after LM progression. The primary outcomes were the median time from NSCLC diagnosis to LM (LM-free survival [mLFS]) and overall survival (mOS). The mLFS and mOS of the 77 enrolled patients after receiving EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) plus antiangiogenic drugs were 19.0 and 21.9 months, respectively, which were significantly longer than those of the patients in the EGFR-TKI monotherapy group (14.0 and 8.3 months, respectively; P values for mLFS and mOS were 0.035 and 0.038, respectively). In patients receiving platinum-based chemotherapy, significantly longer mLFS and mOS were not dependent on antiangiogenic therapy. Metastatic counts at more than three sites were associated with a shorter LFS, and liver metastasis was an independent predictor of worse OS. Combining antiangiogenic and systemic therapies, particularly EGFR-TKIs, may prolong LFS and OS in NSCLC-LM, whereas metastatic counts at more than three sites and liver metastasis may be adverse prognostic factors.

The research progress on meningeal metastasis in solid tumors

Meningeal metastasis (MM), particularly Leptomeningeal metastases (LM), represents the advanced stage of solid tumors and poses a significant threat to patients' lives. Moreover, it imposes a substantial burden on society. LM represents the ultimate and most fatal stage of solid tumors, inflicting devastating consequences on patients and imposing a substantial burden on society. The incidence of LM continues to rise annually, emphasizing the urgent need for early recognition and treatment initiation in individuals with LM to significantly extend overall patient survival. Despite rapid advancements in current LM detection and treatment methods, the diagnosis of LM remains constrained by several limitations such as low diagnostic efficiency, the therapeutic outcomes remain suboptimal. Furthermore, there is currently no universally recognized industry standard for LM treatment, further underscoring its status as an unresolved challenge in tumor management. Additionally, progress towards elucidating the mechanisms underlying MM has stagnated. Therefore, this review aims to comprehensively summarize recent research advances pertaining to MM in solid tumors by elucidating its underlying mechanisms, exploring diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers while addressing existing research challenges.

Synergistic antitumor effects of atorvastatin and chemotherapies: In vitro and in vivo studies

Atorvastatin (ATOR) acts on certain antitumor pathways; the consequences of chemotherapies continue to be a major concern, notwithstanding the increased efficacy provided by contemporary therapies. This study investigated the synergistic effects and underlying mechanisms of different treatment protocols using ATOR on the THP-1 cell line and on lung cancer in mice. For the in vitro study, an MTT assay was performed, and then different combinations against the THP-1 cell line were used as follows: non-treated cells, THP-1/ATOR IC50, THP-1/cytarabine (CYT) IC50, THP-1/doxorubicin (DOX) IC50, THP-1/DOX/CYT, THP-1/ATOR/CYT, THP-1/ATOR/DOX, and THP-1/ATOR/CYT/DOX. For the in vivo study, CD-1 male mice were used; G1 was the normal control. Gs2-5 were administered with urethane (Ure) and butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT). G2 was the positive control. G3 was treated with ATOR (20 mg/kg). G4 was treated with Bevacizumab (Bev) (5 mg/kg). G5 was co-treated with ATOR/Bev. Histopathological and immunohistochemical investigations, flow cytometry and molecular analysis of PI3K, Akt, and mTOR genes were performed after different treatment protocols. The results showed that different combinatorial treatment settings of ATOR in vitro increase the apoptotic-inducing capacity and cell cycle arrest. Co-treatment with ATOR and Bev led to a significant decrease in S-phase and G2/M percentages. Furthermore, in vivo co-treatment with ATOR/Bev decreased tumor incidence and size with a significant reduction of the immunohistochemical PCNA (LI%) in lung parenchyma, targeting PI3K/Akt/mTOR, and VEGF-A signaling pathways. Co-treatment with ATOR and chemotherapies led to cell cycle arrest, modulation of the PI3K/Akt/mTOR, and VEGF-A signaling pathways in tumor cells.

Efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors for advanced non-small cell lung cancer with leptomeningeal metastases harboring targetable mutations

Background

Driver gene-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients are prone to develop leptomeningeal metastasis (LM), leading to an extremely high mortality. The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) treatments for patients with NSCLC and LM harboring targetable mutations.

Methods

We retrospectively collected records of patients with NSCLC harboring targetable mutations and prescribed ICIs following the diagnosis of LM at Huashan Hospital, Fudan University. In addition, we reviewed relevant literature and enrolled patients who met the inclusion criteria. Clinical characteristics were statistically analyzed, and the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test were employed to assess the median progression-free survival (mPFS) and median overall survival (mOS).

Results

A total of 37 patients with NSCLC harboring targetable mutations who received ICIs after LM diagnosis were included. The median age of the enrolled patients was 54 years (range, 33-70 years), and 62.2% were female. Following ICI administration, the intracranial objective response rate (iORR) and intracranial disease control rate (iDCR) for all enrolled patients were 18.9% and 62.2%, respectively. The mPFS of all patients was 2.5 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 2.166-2.834 months] and the mOS was 5.8 months (95% CI: 5.087-6.513 months). Both univariate and multivariate analyses revealed a significant increase in mOS or individuals who had previously undergone cranial radiation therapy compared to those who had not. Furthermore, different histology molecular types were found to be potentially associated with survival time.

Conclusions

Some patients with NSCLC harboring targetable gene mutations following LM diagnosis may benefit from ICI treatment with relatively good tolerance. However, further screening of the most suitable patient populations for ICIs is required.

Osimertinib is associated with improved outcomes in pre-treated non-small cell lung cancer leptomeningeal metastases: A systematic review and meta-analysiss

Purpose

Leptomeningeal metastasis (LM) is a severe complication of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In patients with NSCLC LM harboring epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations, osimertinib is favored over alternative EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). However, the efficacy of osimertinib relative to other EGFR-TKIs is not well established for patients with LM. We aimed to compare the efficacy of EGFR-TKIs in EGFR-mutated NSCLC LM.

Methods

This systematic review and meta-analysis performed according to PRISMA guidelines included studies of adult patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC and a diagnosis of LM who received an EGFR-TKI for the treatment of LM. We searched Medline ALL, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Scopus, and Web of Science Core Collection. The evaluation of biases was done by using the Ottawa-Newscastle scale. The hazard ratio was used as the parameter of interest for overall survival (OS) and central nervous system-specific progression-free survival (PFS).

Results

128 publications were included with 243 patients and 282 lines of EGFR-TKI for NSCLC LM that met inclusion criteria. The median PFS in patients receiving any EGFR-TKI was 9.1 months, and the median OS was 14.5 months. In univariate analyses of the entire cohort, osimertinib treatment demonstrated significantly prolonged PFS, but not OS, compared to other EGFR-TKIs. Osimertinib demonstrated significantly prolonged PFS and OS in the subset of patients who were previously treated with EGFR-TKIs, but not in EGFR-TKI naïve patients.

Conclusion

Osimertinib is associated with improved outcomes compared to other EGFR-TKIs, particularly in patients previously treated with EGFR-TKIs. An important limitation is that most patients were derived from retrospective reports. These results highlight the need for prospective studies for this difficult-to-treat patient population.

Effectiveness of high-dose third-generation EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors in treating EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer patients with leptomeningeal metastasis

BACKGROUND

Leptomeningeal metastasis (LM) is associated with an extremely poor prognosis in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The third-generation EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), currently the preferred drug of choice, have significantly improved treatment outcomes in these patients. However, the optimal dose of third-generation EGFR-TKIs for clinical use remains undetermined in NSCLC patients with LM.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes of 105 patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC and cytologically confirmed LM who had received third-generation EGFR-TKI treatment after LM diagnosis. Patients were stratified into high- and standard-dose groups based on the treatment dose of third-generation EGFR-TKI. Subsequent treatments for LM were collected, particularly the efficacy of different doses of third-generation EGFR-targeted drugs.

RESULTS

The median follow-up period was 28.7 months (range 0.6-40.2) at the cut-off date of August 27, 2023. The 105 included patients who received third-generation EGFR-TKI treatment had a clinical response rate (CRR) of 54.3 % (57/105), and the median overall survival (OS) from LM diagnosis was 12.3 months (95 % confidence interval [CI] = 10.0-15.0). Among them, 46 (43.8 %) patients received a high-dose regimen, and the remaining 59 (56.2 %) patients were treated with standard-dose drugs. Patients treated with high-dose third-generation EGFR-TKIs showed a higher CRR and longer OS than those treated with standard-dose therapy (65.2 % vs. 45.8 %, p = 0.047; 15.0 vs. 10.2 months, p = 0.014). Importantly, high-dose third-generation EGFR-TKI showed superior OS than standard-dose treatment in all subgroups (prior first-/second-generation EGFR-TKI resistance group, 19.5 vs. 9.8 months, p = 0.047; third-generation EGFR-TKI resistance group, 10.0 vs. 4.3 months, p = 0.045; EGFR-TKI naive group, not reach vs. 15.6 months, p = 0.031). Multivariate analysis revealed that high-dose third-generation EGFR-TKIs, intrathecal chemotherapy, previous TKI treatment history, and Karnofsky Performance Status score were independent predictors of OS (all p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

High-dose third-generation EGFR-TKIs are effective treatments for NSCLC patients with EGFR mutations and LM, regardless of previous EGFR-TKI exposure.

Comparison of clinical outcomes of osimertinib and first-generation EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in TKI-untreated EGFR-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer with leptomeningeal metastases

BACKGROUND

Leptomeningeal metastases (LM) are devastating complications of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Although osimertinib, a third-generation EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), has better penetration into the central nervous system than first-generation EGFR-TKIs, data on the distinct activity of EGFR-TKIs in untreated advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC with LM are lacking.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed patients treated with EGFR-TKIs for TKI-untreated common EGFR-mutated NSCLC with LM between July 2002 and July 2021 at the National Cancer Center Hospital. The patients were divided into two groups: patients treated with osimertinib (Osi group) and those treated with gefitinib or erlotinib [first-generation (1G)-TKI group].

RESULTS

Of the 967 patients, 71 were eligible, including 29 in the Osi group and 42 in the 1G-TKI group. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in the Osi group were better than those in the 1G-TKI group (PFS: 16.9 months versus 8.6 months, P = 0.007, and OS: 26.6 months versus 20.0 months, P = 0.158). The LM-overall response rate (ORR) and LM-PFS were significantly better in the Osi group than in the 1G-TKI group (LM-ORR: 62.5% versus 25.7%, P = 0.007; LM-PFS: 23.4 months versus 12.1 months, P = 0.021). In the subgroup analysis of EGFR mutation status, LM-PFS for patients with exon 19 deletion was significantly longer in the Osi group than in the 1G-TKI group (32.7 months versus 13.4 months, P = 0.013), whereas those with L858R mutation in exon 21 did not differ between the two groups. In the multivariate analysis, osimertinib and exon 19 deletion were significant factors for better LM-PFS and OS.

CONCLUSION

Osimertinib can be more effective for untreated common EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients with LM, especially those with exon 19 deletion, compared to first-generation TKIs.

Intrathecal chemotherapy combined with systemic therapy in patients with refractory leptomeningeal metastasis of non-small cell lung cancer: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Leptomeningeal metastasis (LM) is the most devastating complication of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and its incidence is increasing. There is currently no standard treatment for LM, and the efficacy of traditional intravenous drug treatment is low, making refractory LM a difficult problem. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of intrathecal chemotherapy (IC)-based regimens in patients with refractory LM.

METHODS

We retrospectively enrolled NSCLC patients with confirmed LM who received IC and systemic therapy at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University from December 2017 to July 2022. We analysed overall survival (OS), intracranial progression-free survival (iPFS), clinical response, and safety in these patients.

RESULTS

A total of 41 patients were enrolled. The median number of IC treatments was seven (range: 2-22). Seven patients received intrathecal methotrexate, and 34 patients received intrathecal pemetrexed. Clinical manifestations related to LM improved after IC and systemic therapy in 28 (68.3%) patients. The median iPFS in the whole cohort was 8 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 6.4-9.7 months), and the median OS was 10.1 months (95% CI: 6.8-13.4 months). Multivariate analysis of the 41 patients with LM using a Cox proportional risk model showed that bevacizumab was an independent prognostic factor in patients treated with combination therapy (p = 0.002; hazard ratio [HR] 0.240; 95% CI: 0.097-0.595). Poor ECOG performance status remained a significant predictor of poor prognosis for survival (p = 0.048; HR 2.560; 95% CI: 1.010-6.484). Myelosuppression was the major adverse event over all IC dose levels. There were 18 cases of myelosuppression, 15 cases of leukopenia, and nine cases of thrombocytopenia. Eleven patients had myelosuppression above grade 3, including four with thrombocytopenia and seven with leukopenia.

CONCLUSIONS

Combination therapy based on IC had good curative effects, was safe to use, and was associated with prolonged survival in NSCLC patients with LM. The use of bevacizumab is a good prognostic factor for NSCLC LM patients with combination therapy.

Leptomeningeal Metastasis from Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer and Current Landscape of Treatments

Leptomeningeal metastasis (LM), also known as leptomeningeal carcinomatosis (LC), is a devastating complication of metastatic cancer that occurs when neoplastic cells invade the meningeal space. Diagnosis of LM remains challenging given the heterogeneous signs and symptoms at presentation and requires thorough neurological examination, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis, and MRI of the brain and spine with gadolinium. Detecting neoplastic cells in the CSF is the gold standard for diagnosing leptomeningeal metastases; however, it has low sensitivity and may require multiple CSF samples. New emerging technologies, such as liquid biopsy of CSF, have increased sensitivity and specificity for detecting circulating tumor cells in CSF. The management of LM in patients with NSCLC requires an individualized multidisciplinary approach. Treatment options include surgery for ventricular shunt placement, radiation therapy to bulky or symptomatic disease sites, systemic or intrathecal chemotherapy, molecularly targeted agents, and, more recently, immunotherapy. Targeting actionable mutations in LM from NSCLC, such as EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors or anaplastic lymphoma kinase gene rearrangement inhibitors, has shown encouraging results in terms of disease control and survival. Although there are limited data regarding the use of immunotherapy in LM, immunotherapy has produced promising results in several case reports. In this review, we focused on the epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical presentation, diagnosis, and current treatment strategies, with a special emphasis on novel agents, including targeted therapies and immunotherapy of LM in patients with NSCLC.

Osimertinib and Bevacizumab Cotreatment for Untreated EGFR-Mutated NSCLC With Malignant Pleural or Pericardial Effusion (SPIRAL II): A Single-Arm, Open-Label, Phase 2 Clinical Trial

Introduction

First-line treatment of EGFR-mutated NSCLC with erlotinib plus antiangiogenic inhibitor exhibits promising results. However, the efficacy of this combination has not been fully investigated. Therefore, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of osimertinib plus bevacizumab in patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC complicated with malignant pleural or pericardial effusion (MPE) for whom combination therapy may be particularly effective.

Methods

This single-arm, open-label, phase 2 study aimed to investigate the clinical benefits of the bevacizumab (15 mg/kg) and osimertinib (80 mg) combination in the first-line setting for advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC with MPE. The primary end point of this study was 1-year progression-free survival (PFS). The secondary end points were objective response rate, PFS, overall survival, drainage-free survival without the need for thoracic or pericardial drainage, and safety.

Results

Between January 2019 and August 2020, a total of 31 patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC were enrolled from Japan in the study. The median PFS was 8.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 5.3-11.3), the 1-year PFS was 32.1% (80% CI: 21.4-43.3), and the objective response rate was 74.2% (95% CI: 56.8-86.3). The median overall survival was not reached. The median drainage-free survival was 18.4 months (95% CI: 10.3-not estimable). Anorexia was the most common grade 3 or higher adverse event (four patients, 12.9%), followed by fatigue and dyspnea (three patients, 9.7%). No treatment-related deaths were recorded.

Conclusions

Osimertinib and bevacizumab combination in patients with advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC with MPE were safe but did not effectively increase PFS when compared with the inferred value from previous literature.