Demographic factors in hip fracture incidence and mortality rates in California, 2000-2011

Association Between Prehip Fracture Antidepressant Use and Posthip Fracture Length of Hospital Stay in Medicare Beneficiaries and Assessing Sex Differences

OBJECTIVE

Antidepressants are the first-line treatment for depression among older adults. While antidepressants are associated with increased risk of falls and fractures in older adults, their effect on outcomes after fall-related injuries such as hip fracture, and whether these effects differ by sex, is unknown. Thus, the purpose of this study was to examine the association between prefracture antidepressant use and hospital length of stay (LOS) among hip fracture survivors, and related sex differences.

METHODS

Participants included 17,936 community-dwelling Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries with depression and hospitalization claim for hip fracture surgery between 2010 and 2017. Ordinal logistic regression estimated the association between prefracture antidepressant use and hospital LOS in days, categorized into three groups (1-4, 5-8, and 8+ days) during the 30-day postfracture period, adjusting for demographic, medical, facility, and geographic factors. A sex-by-antidepressant use interaction term was included to examine effect heterogeneity by sex.

RESULTS

Prefracture antidepressant users (47%, n = 8,350) were more likely to be younger, White females. The adjusted ordinal logistic regression showed beneficiaries who used antidepressants had 8% higher odds of being in a shorter hospital LOS category compared to non-users (OR = 1.08; 95% CI = 1.02, 1.14; p=0.01). The sex-by-antidepressant use interaction was not statistically significant (p=0.92).

CONCLUSIONS

Among older adults with depression who subsequently experienced a hip fracture, antidepressant use of >30 days in the 6 months prior to fracture was associated with a shorter hospital LOS. These findings indicate that use of antidepressants does not prolong early recovery from hip fracture and may be protective.

The observation that older men suffer from hip fracture at DXA T-scores higher than older women and a proposal of a new low BMD category, osteofrailia, for predicting fracture risk in older men

The clinical significance of osteoporosis lies in the occurrence of fragility fractures (FFx), and the most relevant fracture site is the hip. The T-score is defined as follows: (BMDpatient-BMDyoung adult mean)/SDyoung adult population, where BMD is bone mineral density and SD is the standard deviation. When the femoral neck (FN) is measured in adult Caucasian women, a cutpoint value of patient BMD of 2.5 SD below the young adult mean BMD results in a prevalence the same as the lifetime risk of hip FFx for Caucasian women. The FN T-score criterion for classifying osteoporosis in older Caucasian men has been provisionally recommended to be - 2.5, but debates remain. Based on a systematic literature review, we noted that older men suffer from hip FFx at a FN T-score approximately 0.5-0.6 higher than older women. While the mean hip FFx FN T-score of around - 2.9 for women lies below - 2.5, the mean hip FF FN T-score of around - 2.33 for men lies above - 2.5. This is likely associated with that older male populations have a higher mean T-score than older female populations. We propose a new category of low BMD status, osteofrailia, for older Caucasian men with T-score ≤  - 2 (T-score ≤  - 2.1 for older Chinese men) who are likely to suffer from hip FFx. The group with T-score ≤  - 2 for older Caucasian men is comparable in prevalence to the group with T-score ≤  - 2.5 for older Caucasian women. However, older men in such category on average have only half the FFx risk as that of older women with osteoporotic T-score.

Social vulnerability index enhances FRAX prediction of hip fractures in fall patients

The Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX), widely used for predicting the 10-year likelihood of hip fractures, does not incorporate factors like prior falls and sociodemographic characteristics, notably the Social Vulnerability Index (SVI). Recognizing these limitations, we aim to evaluate the predictive accuracy of FRAX by integrating fall frequency, fall energy, and SVI into the model for assessing the risk of fall-induced hip fractures. A retrospective case-control study was conducted, and patients aged ≥ 40 years with a documented diagnosis of a fall-induced hip fracture were age-matched with controls with a history of falls without an associated hip fracture. Basic demographic data, along with information about the number of prior falls and the energy of the current falls, were collected. The FRAX and SVI were calculated accordingly. Logistic regression analysis was employed to identify significant predictors. The performance of the models was evaluated and reported using appropriate metrics. Baseline characteristics of the dataset were presented as medians with interquartile ranges (IQR) or as percentages, where applicable. The significance of the identified variables was quantified using Odds Ratio (OR) along with their 95% Confidence Interval (CI). A p-value threshold of 0.05 was set for statistical significance. A total of 261 patients per group were included with a median age of 74 (IQR 67-80) and 72 (IQR 62-83) years. The FRAX score was significantly associated with the likelihood of experiencing a fall-induced hip fracture, as indicated by an OR of 1.06 (CI: 1.03-1.09). Participants with a one-time history of falls had an OR of 1.58 (CI: 1.02-2.37), compared to 1.84 (CI: 1.09-3.1) for those with multiple falls. The White participants, along with the Housing Type and Transportation domain of the SVI, also demonstrated to play a role (OR = 2.85 (CI: 1.56-5.2) and OR = 0.3 (CI: 0.12-0.8), respectively). This study underscored the significance of factors such as fall frequency, SVI, and race in predicting fall-induced hip fractures. It also highlighted the need for further refinement of the FRAX tool. We recommend that future research should be focused on validating the impact of these sociodemographic and fall characteristics on a broader scale, along with exploring the implications of clinical surrogates related to falls.

Association between markers of inflammation and outcomes after hip fracture surgery: analysis of routinely collected electronic healthcare data

BACKGROUND

Risk assessment tools such as the Nottingham Hip Fracture Score (NHFS) are crucial in guiding prognostic discussions and benchmarking in hip fracture care. These scores have scope to be improved, which may help identify higher-risk patients at admission. We investigated the role of inflammatory biomarkers, which are routinely collected at admission, in predicting post-operative outcomes following hip fracture. We subsequently combined these biomarkers with the NHFS to see if we could enhance risk prediction.

METHODS

We analysed data from patients admitted to a trauma unit with hip fracture between 2015 and 2020 who underwent operative management. National hip fracture database (NHFD) data, including the NHFS, were linked with admission biomarkers: albumin, C-reactive protein (CRP), neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and monocyte-lymphocyte ratio (MLR). Following univariate and multivariate analyses, the discrimination of the NHFS with and without each biomarker was assessed for 30-day mortality, length of stay (LOS), and failure to return home at 30 days.

RESULTS

We analysed 1039 patients, 719 (69.2%) were female and the mean age was 82.5 years (SD 8.1, range 60-104). In multivariate analysis, higher CRP was associated with higher 30-day mortality (odds ratio (OR) 1.23, 95%, confidence interval (CI) 1.04-1.44, p = 0.013); higher albumin was associated with lower 30-day mortality (OR 0.86, 95%CI 0.81-0.91, p < 0.001). Independent predictors of not returning home at 30 days included albumin (OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.91-0.98) and NLR (OR 1.44, 95% CI 1.14-1.81). NLR and MLR were significantly associated with prolonged LOS but not 30-day mortality. A composite variable of NHFS and albumin had better discrimination for 30-day mortality than NHFS alone (c-statistics 0.74, 95% CI 0.68-0.80 vs. 0.68, 95% CI 0.62-0.75, respectively). CRP, NLR and MLR did not improve discrimination for any outcome when added to NHFS.

CONCLUSIONS

Albumin, but not other markers of inflammation, enhances risk prediction after hip fracture when added to the NHFS. Routine recording of albumin at admission may have a future role in an enhanced risk scoring system for prognostication in hip fracture surgery.

Temporal and regional trends of fractures in the United States: A review of the global burden of disease database

Background

Musculoskeletal diseases, including bone fractures, are a significant contributor to global disability. Understanding temporal and regional trends in bone fractures is crucial for effective healthcare planning and resource allocation. We sought to analyze recent epidemiological trends of different types of fractures in the United States and determine correlations and associations between fracture trends and potential influencing demographic factors (i.e. age, sex, regional-specific).

Methods

Data from the Global Burden of Disease Database were analyzed to examine fracture incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability (YLDs). Statistical analyses were conducted to determine temporal trends and sex-based differences.

Results

The analysis revealed significant increases in hip fractures and decreases in pelvic fractures over time. Fractures of the patella, tibia, fibula, and ankle remain prevalent across all regions and sexes, with notable variations.

Conclusions

These findings underscore the importance of targeted interventions and resource allocation to address the burden of fractures on public health. Despite limitations, this study provides critical insights into fracture epidemiology, guiding future prevention and management strategies.

Majority of hip fragility fractures among older people can be predicted by a DXA examination: an updated analysis of literature results and empirical Chinese data with a focus on the validation of the newly proposed osteofrailia criterion for men

Background

How different gender-specific bone mineral density cutpoint T-scores are associated with different hip fragility fracture (FFx) prediction sensitivity has not been well studied. This article presents an updated analysis of hip FFx prediction among older people by a dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) measure, using literature results and our own Chinese data.

Methods

We systematically searched literature reports on DXA T-score results measured at the timepoint of a hip FFx. With osteoporotic fractures in women (MsOS) and in men (MrOS) Hong Kong studies, at baseline 2,000 Chinese women (mean: 72.5 years) and 2,000 Chinese men (mean: 72.3 years) were recruited. Female participants were followed up for 8.8±1.5 years, and 69 FFx were recorded. Male participants were followed up for 9.9±2.8 years, and 63 hip FFx were recorded.

Results

Ten articles published femoral neck (FN) and/or total hip (TH) T-score at the timepoint of a hip FFx with separated females' or males' T-score data. We estimated that, if a DXA exam were taken shortly before the FFx accident, females' FN, females' TH, males' FN, or males' TH T-scores on average predicted 66.9%, 70.4%, 66.5%, and 67.8% of the hip FFx. For the MsOS and MrOS Hong Kong studies, a combination of baseline FN and TH T-score predicted >50% of the cases with a follow-up hip FFx. A combination of baseline FN T-score, TH T-score, lumbar spine T-score, and spine fracture-like deformity assessment predicted 68.1% of the female cases with a follow-up hip FFx, and 63.4% of the male cases with a follow-up hip FFx.

Conclusions

If a DXA scan is regularly performed, approximately 70% of the hip FFx incidents can be predicted for older women and men.

Risk factors associated with 1-year mortality after osteoporotic hip fracture in Hawai'i: higher mortality risk among Native Hawaiians and other Pacific Islanders

We studied factors affecting osteoporotic hip fracture mortality in Hawai'i, a region with unique geography and racial composition. Men, older adults, higher ASA score, lower BMI, and NHPI race were associated with higher mortality. This is the first study demonstrating increased mortality risk after hip fracture in NHPI patients.

PURPOSE

To estimate mortality rates and identify specific risk factors associated with 1-year mortality after osteoporotic hip fracture in Hawai'i.

METHODS

A retrospective review of adults (≥ 50 years) hospitalized with an osteoporotic hip fracture at a large multicenter healthcare system in Hawai'i from 2011 to 2019. The Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests examined survival probability by sex, age group, race/ethnicity, primary insurance, body mass index (BMI), and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification. After accounting for potential confounders, adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were obtained from Cox proportional hazards regression models.

RESULTS

We identified 1755 cases of osteoporotic hip fracture. The cumulative mortality rate 1 year after fracture was 14.4%. Older age (aHR 3.50; 95% CI 2.13-5.76 for ≥ 90 vs 50-69), higher ASA score (aHR 5.21; 95% CI 3.09-8.77 for ASA 4-5 vs 1-2), and Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander (NHPI) race (aHR 1.84; 95% CI 1.10-3.07 vs. White) were independently associated with higher mortality risk. Female sex (aHR 0.64; 95% CI 0.49-0.84 vs male sex) and higher BMI (aHR 0.35; 95% CI 0.18-0.68 for obese vs underweight) were associated with lower mortality risk.

CONCLUSION

In our study, men, older adults, higher ASA score, lower BMI, and NHPI race were associated with significantly higher mortality risk after osteoporotic hip fracture. NHPIs are an especially vulnerable group and comprise a significant portion of Hawai'i's population. Further research is needed to address the causes of higher mortality and interventions to reduce hip fractures and associated mortality.

Bone Density Screening Rates Among Medicare Beneficiaries: An Analysis with a focus on Asian Americans

PURPOSE

To report osteoporosis screening utilization rates among Asian American (AsA) populations in the USA.

METHODS

We retrospectively assessed the use of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) screening using the Medicare 5% Research Identifiable Files. Using Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes indicative of a DXA scan, we identified patients recommended for DXA screening according to the ACR-SPR-SSR Practice Parameters (females ≥ 65 years, males ≥ 70 years). Sociodemographic factors and their association with screening were evaluated using chi-square tests.

RESULTS

There were 80,439 eligible AsA beneficiaries, and 12,102 (15.1%) received osteoporosis screening. DXA rate for women was approximately four times greater than the rate for men (19.8% vs. 5.0%; p < 0.001). AsA beneficiaries in zip codes with higher mean household income (MHI) were more likely to have DXA than those in lower MHI areas (17.6% vs. 14.3%, p < 0.001). AsA beneficiaries aged < 80 were more likely to receive DXA (15.5%) than those aged ≥ 80 (14.1%, p < 0.001). There were 2,979,801 eligible non-AsA beneficiaries, and 496,957 (16.7%) received osteoporosis screening during the study period. Non-Hispanic white beneficiaries had the highest overall screening rate (17.5%), followed by North American Native (13.0%), Black (11.8%), and Hispanic (11.1%) beneficiaries. Comparing AsA to non-AsA populations, there were significantly lower DXA rates among AsA beneficiaries when controlling for years of Medicare eligibility, patient age, sex, location, and mean income (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

We found lower than expected DXA screening rates for AsA patients. A better understanding of the barriers and facilitators to AsA osteoporosis screening is needed to improve patient care.

The impact of ethnicity on care and outcome after hip fracture in England and Wales

Aims

To determine if patient ethnicity among patients with a hip fracture influences the type of fracture, surgical care, and outcome.

Methods

This was an observational cohort study using a linked dataset combining data from the National Hip Fracture Database and Hospital Episode Statistics in England and Wales. Patients' odds of dying at one year were modelled using logistic regression with adjustment for ethnicity and clinically relevant covariates.

Results

A total of 563,640 patients were included between 1 April 2011 and 1 October 2020. Of these, 476,469 (85%) had a coded ethnicity for analysis. Non-white patients tended to be younger (mean 81.2 vs 83.0 years), and were more commonly male (34.9% vs 28.5%; p < 0.001). They were less likely to be admitted from institutional care (12.9% vs 21.8%; p < 0.001), to have normal cognition (53.3% vs 62.0%; p < 0.001), and to be free of comorbidities (22.0% vs 26.8%; p < 0.001), but were more likely to be from the most deprived areas (29.4% vs 17.3%; p < 0.001). Non-white patients were more likely to experience delay to surgery for medical reasons (14.8% vs 12.7%; p < 0.001), more likely to be treated with an intramedullary nail or a sliding hip screw (52.5% vs 45.1%; p < 0.001), and less likely to be mobilized by the day after surgery (74.3% vs 79.0%; p < 0.001). Mortality was higher among non-white inpatients (9.2% vs 8.4% for white), but was lower at one year after hip fracture (26.6% vs 30.3%).

Conclusion

Our study identified serious problems with the quality of NHS ethnicity data. Despite this, we have shown that there is complex variation in case-mix and hip fracture morphology between ethnic groups. We have also identified variations in care received between ethnic groups, and that disparities in healthcare may contribute to poorer outcome. Inpatient mortality is higher in non-white patients, although this finding reverses after discharge, and one-year mortality is lower. Patients from ethnic minority backgrounds experience disparities in healthcare, however at one year postoperatively non-white patients have a statistically significant lower mortality after controlling for relevant clinical covariates.

Nonunion Fractures: Trends in Epidemiology and Treatment of Femur Fractures, 2017-2022

BACKGROUND

The incidence of femur fractures has increased in recent years, along with the rate of surgery and subsequent nonunion following these fractures. Nonunion is a significant concern due to the burden it places on both patients and the healthcare system. This study aims to investigate the demographic factors associated with femoral shaft fracture nonunion by comparing two surgical management approaches: open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) with plating versus closed reduction and fixation using intramedullary nailing (IMN).

METHODS

The TriNetX database was queried using current procedural terminology (CPT) codes for surgical repair of femoral shaft fractures (FSFs), including IMN surgery (CPT: 27506) and femur ORIF (CPT: 27507). The subsequent chronological nonunion cases were identified using the 10th revision of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10) codes for femoral nonunion (S72.301K, S72.302K). Results were analyzed both descriptively and comparatively to assess differences among patients. Factors considered included age, sex, ethnicity, race, smoking status, and the type of surgical management (ORIF versus nailing) across the six-year study period.

RESULTS

From 2017 to 2022, the prevalence of femoral shaft fracture surgeries increased for both IMN and ORIF. The rate of nonunion was 2.1% following IMN and 1.7% following ORIF. The mean age for nonunion was 54 years (SD: 20) following IMN and 63 years (SD: 18) following ORIF. Patients with a positive smoking history had higher rates of nonunion compared to those without.

CONCLUSION

Our study revealed a relatively consistent rate of FSFs and nonunion over the six-year period. However, with a growing population, the absolute number of cases is steadily increasing, underscoring the burden on the healthcare system. This study contributes to the growing body of literature focused on improving patient outcomes and promoting health equity in fracture management practices.

Conversion of a Failed Hip Hemiarthroplasty to Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background

Hip hemiarthroplasty (HA) and total hip arthroplasty (THA) are common treatments for femoral neck fractures in elderly patients. Despite HA's advantages of shorter operative times, less blood loss, and lower initial costs compared to primary THA, it may lead to conversion THA (cTHA). Our objectives are to evaluate the impact of conversion from HA to THA on Harris hip scores (HHS), compare complication rates between cTHA, revision THA, and primary THA, and assess the rates and types of complications following cTHA.

Methods

A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed, evaluating studies published until 2023, with inclusion criteria entailing studies that explored outcomes and complications following cTHA of failed HA. Data extraction focused on variables such as postoperative HHS and complication rates, including periprosthetic joint infection, periprosthetic fracture, dislocation, stem loosening, acetabular loosening, and overall revision.

Results

This study included 28 retrospective studies (4699 hips), showing a mean increase in HHS by 39.1 points, indicating a significant improvement from preoperative levels. Complication rates were detailed, with a 6.4% rate of periprosthetic joint infection, 2.2% for periprosthetic fracture, 7.6% dislocation, 1.6% stem loosening, 1.9% acetabular loosening, and an overall re-revision rate of 8.7%.

Conclusions

Conversion from HA to THA generally results in improved functional outcomes, as evidenced by HHS improvements. Despite the positive impact on HHS, cTHAs are associated with notable risks of complications and the need for further revision surgeries.

Level of Evidence

IV.

Higher rates of intraoperative fractures with compaction broaching compared to conventional broaching during hip hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fractures

PURPOSE

Intraoperative periprosthetic femoral fracture (IPFF) is a known iatrogenic complication during hemiarthroplasty (HA) which may lead to inferior outcomes. The risk factors for IPFF during HA in displaced femoral neck fractures (FNF) remains to be fully elucidated. This study aims to compare IPFF rates between compaction broaching and conventional broaching techniques for cementless HA in FNF.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed institutional surgical data of patients who underwent cementless HA for displaced FNF from January 2010 to January 2022. Patients were stratified into two groups based on the broaching system: conventional broaching and compaction broaching. The presence, location, and treatment of IPFF were assessed for both groups. Effect of IPFF on postoperative weight-bearing status, mortality readmission and revision rates were compared between groups.

RESULTS

A total of 1,586 patients included in the study. 1252 patients (78.9%) in the conventional broaching group and 334 patients (21.1%) in the compaction broaching group. A total of 104 IPFF were found (6.5%). As compared to conventional broaching, compaction broaching was associated with significant higher IPFF rates (12.9% vs. 4.9%, p < 0.001, OR 2.84, CI 1.88-4.30). The location of the IPFF was similar between groups (p = 0.366), as well as the intraoperative treatment (p = 0.103) and postoperative weight-bearing status (p = 0.640). Surgical time, mortality rates, readmission rates and revision rates were comparable between groups. In a multivariate regression analysis, compaction broaching (OR, 4.24; p < 0.001) was independently associated with IPFF.

CONCLUSIONS

This study reveals higher rates of IPFF associated with compaction broaching. Although this finding may have minimal clinical relevance, surgeons should consider these results when considering implant selection.

Perioperative and Postoperative Outcomes of Proximal Hip Fracture: A Comparison of Orthopedic and Geriatric Care Models

Introduction Orthogeriatric patients with femur fractures, despite their multiple comorbidities and associated healthcare costs, have a promising new approach. This approach suggests that most patients should be hospitalized in the geriatric department, with daily orthopedic follow-up. The potential for lower mortality rates through orthogeriatric co-management and dual care is a reason for hope in our field. Methods This study is retrospective and involved 285 patients with proximal hip fractures. Two treatment models were compared: hospitalization in orthopedic and geriatric departments with different treatment protocols. The study analyzed demographic data and postoperative outcomes. It also included an analysis of 26 patients who received conservative treatment. Results Our study revealed significant differences between patients hospitalized in the orthopedic and geriatric departments. Geriatric department patients, who were significantly older and had higher comorbidities, experienced extended hospitalization and higher mortality rates during hospitalization, at 30 days, and at one-year follow-up (p<0.05). Notably, a significantly higher proportion of geriatric patients were discharged to home rehabilitation at the end of hospitalization compared to orthopedic patients (17.5% vs. 7.4%; p<0.01). Among non-operated patients, the mortality rate was 57.7% compared to 16.5% in patients who underwent surgery during the one-year follow-up. Discussion Our study suggests that elderly patients with hip fractures may benefit from management in the geriatric department. Despite experiencing significantly longer hospital stays, these patients have a higher likelihood of being discharged home compared to those managed in the orthopedic department. These findings have important implications for the care of orthogeriatric patients and may help guide future treatment strategies.

Age as a Risk Factor for Intraoperative Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures in Cementless Hip Hemiarthroplasty for Femoral Neck Fractures: A Retrospective Analysis

Background

Understanding the risk factors and outcomes of intraoperative periprosthetic femoral fractures (IPFF) during hip arthroplasty is crucial for appropriate perioperative management. Previous studies have identified risk factors for IPFF in total hip arthroplasty patients, but data for hip hemiarthroplasty (HA) is lacking. The aim of this study was to determine the age associated with increased rates of IPFF in patients undergoing HA.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed patients aged 65 years and above who underwent a cementless HA for a displaced femoral neck fracture and had a minimum of 1-year follow-up. Patients were stratified into five age groups (65-79, 80-84, 85-89, 90-94, and ≥ 95 years) and further divided into two subgroups (under 95 years and 95 years or older). The presence, location, and treatment of IPFF, as well as the effect of IPFF on the postoperative weight-bearing status, were compared between groups. A multivariate logistic regression was also performed. A total of 1,669 met the inclusion criteria and were included in the study.

Results

The rates of IPFF were significantly higher for patients 95 years or older (p = 0.030). However, fracture location (greater trochanter fractures, p = 0.839; calcar fractures, p = 0.394; and femoral shaft fractures p = 0.110), intraoperative treatment (p = 0.424), and postoperative weight-bearing status (p = 0.229) were similar between the groups. While mortality and nonorthopedic-related readmissions were significantly higher for patients 95 years or older, orthopedic-related readmissions (p = 0.148) and revisions at the latest follow-up (p = 0.253) were comparable between groups. In a regression analysis, age over 95 years (odds ratio, 2.049; p = 0.049) and body mass index (odds ratio, 0.935; p = 0.016) were independently associated with IPFF.

Conclusions

The findings of this study suggest that age over 95 years is a significant, independent risk factor for IPFF in patients undergoing cementless HA. Although we were unable to show an impact on perioperative outcomes and orthopedic complications, when operating on patients 95 years or older, surgeons should be aware of the increased risk of IPFF and consider the use of stem designs and fixation types associated with decreased IPFF rates.

Comparing survival rates and mortality in operative versus nonoperative treatment for femoral neck fractures among Alzheimer's disease patients: A retrospective cohort study

Introduction

Addressing femoral neck fractures resulting from ground-level falls in older adults with Alzheimer's disease (AD) involves a personalized treatment plan. There is considerable ongoing debate concerning the relative advantages and disadvantages of surgical treatment (internal fixation or arthroplasty) vs nonoperative treatment for femoral neck fractures in older persons with AD.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study compared the mortality, hazard ratio, and survival rate between operative and nonoperative treatments, controlling for patients' demographic information and baseline health status. The study population consisted of Optum beneficiaries diagnosed with AD who experienced an initial femoral neck fracture claim between January 1, 2012, and December 31, 2017. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were applied to compare the treatment groups' post-fracture survival rates and mortality. Cox regression was used to examine the survival period by controlling the covariates.

Results

Out of the 4157 patients with AD with femoral neck fractures, 59.8% were women (n = 2487). The median age was 81 years. The 1-year survival rate for nonoperative treatment (70.19%) was lower than that for internal fixation (75.27%) and arthroplasty treatment (82.32%). Compared with the nonoperative group, arthroplasty surgical treatment had significant lower hazard risk of death (arthroplasty hazard ratio: 0.850, 95% CI: 0.728-0.991, P < 0.05).

Discussion

The findings suggest that the operative treatment group experiences higher survival rates and lower mortality rates than the nonoperative group. This paper provides insights into treatment outcomes of older adults with AD receiving medical care for femoral neck fractures.

Postoperative outcomes, predictors and trends of mortality and morbidity in patients undergoing hip fracture surgery with underlying aortic stenosis: a nationwide inpatient sample analysis

BACKGROUND

Hip fractures frequently necessitate hospitalization, especially among patients aged 75 and above who might concurrently suffer from aortic stenosis (AS). This study focuses on postoperative outcomes, potential determinants of morbidity and mortality, as well as evolving trends in patients with AS undergoing surgical repair of hip fractures.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample from 2008 to 2019 was conducted. Hip fracture cases were identified, and a subgroup with AS was isolated using the ICD-9 and ICD-10 diagnostic codes. We compared baseline characteristics, postoperative in-hospital outcomes and trends in mortality and morbidity between patients with and without AS.

RESULTS

From the dataset, 2,834,919 patients with hip fracture were identified on weighted analysis. Of these, 94,270 (3.3%) were found to have concurrent AS. The AS cohort was characterized by higher mean age and elevated burden of cardiovascular comorbidities, such as coronary artery disease, peripheral vascular disease, pulmonary hypertension, congestive heart failure and cardiac arrhythmias. Postoperative mortality following hip fracture surgery was greater in the AS groups compared to non-AS group (3.3% vs 1.57%, p < 0.001). Risk factors such as congestive heart failure (OR, 2.3[CI, 2.1-2.6]), age above 85 years (OR, 3.2[CI, 2.2-4.7]), cardiac arrhythmias (OR, 2.4[CI, 2.2-2.6]), end-stage renal disease (OR, 3.4[CI, 2.7-4.1]), malnutrition (OR, 2.3[CI, 2.1-2.7]) and AS (OR, 1.2[CI, 1.08-1.5] were associated with increased adjusted odds of postoperative mortality. AS was linked to higher adjusted odds of postoperative mortality (OR, 1.2 [CI, 1.1-1.5]) and complications such as acute myocardial infarction (OR, 1.2 [CI, 1.01-1.4]), cardiogenic shock (OR, 2.0[CI, 1.4-2.9]) and acute renal failure (OR, 1.1[CI, 1.02-1.2]). While hospital stay duration was comparable in both groups (average 5 days), the AS group incurred higher costs (mean $50,673 vs $44,607). The presence of acute heart failure in patients with AS and hip fracture significantly increased mortality, hospital stay, and cost. A notable decline in postoperative in-hospital mortality was observed in both groups from 2008-2019 though the rate of major in-hospital complications rose.

CONCLUSION

AS significantly influences postoperative in-hospital mortality and complication rates in hip fracture patients. While a reduction in postoperative mortality was observed in both AS and non-AS cohorts, the incidence of major in-hospital complications increased across both groups.

Disparities in the Epidemiology and Management of Fragility Hip Fractures

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this review is to synthesize the recently published scientific evidence on disparities in epidemiology and management of fragility hip fractures.

RECENT FINDINGS

There have been a number of investigations focusing on the presence of disparities in the epidemiology and management of fragility hip fractures. Race-, sex-, geographic-, socioeconomic-, and comorbidity-based disparities have been the primary focus of these investigations. Comparatively fewer studies have focused on why these disparities may exist and interventions to reduce disparities. There are widespread and profound disparities in the epidemiology and management of fragility hip fractures. More studies are needed to understand why these disparities exist and how they can be addressed.

Osteoporosis and Fracture Risk among Older US Asian Adults

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review summarizes the current knowledge regarding osteoporosis and fracture among older US Asian adults.

RECENT FINDINGS

Asian adults have lower (areal) bone density than non-Hispanic White adults and thus are more likely to be diagnosed and treated for osteoporosis, despite their lower risk of hip fracture. The latter may relate to favorable characteristics in hip geometry, volumetric bone density, and bone microarchitecture; lower risk of falls; and other clinical factors. The fracture risk calculator FRAX accounts for the lower risk of hip fracture among US Asian adults. However, data on major osteoporotic fracture risk remain limited. Fracture rates also vary by Asian subgroup, which may have implications for fracture risk assessment. Furthermore, among women receiving bisphosphonate drugs, Asian race is a risk factor for atypical femur fracture, an uncommon complication associated with treatment duration. Recent clinical trial efficacy data pertaining to lower bisphosphonate doses and longer dosing intervals may be relevant for Asian adults. More research is needed to inform osteoporosis care of US Asian adults, including risk-benefit considerations and the optimal duration of bisphosphonate treatment. Greater evidence-based guidance for primary fracture prevention among US Asian adults will ensure health equity in the prevention of osteoporotic fractures.

Does previous fragility fracture impact upon mortality in a hip fracture cohort? a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Fragility fractures are described as fractures resulting from low-energy trauma and are considered diagnostic of reduced bone mineral density or osteoporosis. They often present as hip fractures with hip fractures remaining a common but devastating injury among older patients. Many factors influence a patient's risk of hip fracture and their subsequent risk of death.

AIM

In this study, we examined if previous fragility fracture impacts upon mortality after hip fracture.

METHODS

This was a retrospective single-center cohort study of patients included in the Irish Hip Fracture registry over a 5-year time period. Epidemiological data including gender, age, type of fracture, type of surgery, bone protection medication, American Society of Anesthetics (ASA) grade, and post-fracture outcomes including death at 30 days and death at 1 year were recorded. The presence or absence of a previous fragility fracture was examined to explore if a previous fragility fracture was an independent predictor of mortality.

RESULTS

There were 964 patients included, and 290 of whom had sustained a previous fragility fracture; 289 patients were males and 675 females, 33 patients had died in the 30 days following their surgery, and 180 patients had died within 1 year. We found statistically significant results for gender and age but not for previous fragility fracture influencing mortality (p value 0.230).

CONCLUSION

We found that previous fragility fracture does not impact upon mortality in a hip fracture cohort. However, gender and age did impact upon mortality in this study.

Predictive Value of Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment Scores for Mortality in Patients With Hip Fracture: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Objective To assess the predictive value of three scoring systems, namely the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification, the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS), and the Nottingham Hip Fracture Score (NHFS), in predicting mortality among patients with hip fractures. Materials and methods This retrospective cohort study included 628 participants aged 60 years and above who sought treatment at a UK hospital between January 2018 and December 2018. Data on age, gender, mortality, and assessment scores were collected. The area under the curve was calculated for each receiver operator characteristic (ROC). Cross-tabulation was performed to examine the association between various assessment scores and mortality using the chi-square test. Results The mean age was 80.80±11.18 years. Females were 408 (64.97%). Higher CFS (p<0.001) and NHFS (p<0.001) scores were significantly associated with mortality, while the ASA score did not show a significant association (p=0.225). The calculated area under the curve (AUC) values were as follows: 0.71 (95% CI: 0.65 to 0.76) for CFS, 0.46 (95% CI: 0.39 to 0.53) for NHFS, and 0.41 (95% CI: 0.34 to 0.48) for the ASA score. Utilizing a cut-off of ≥6 for CFS, 57 individuals (98.3%) in the 30-day mortality group were correctly identified. Similarly, the ROC analysis determined a ≥5 cut-off for NHFS accurately predicting 50 patients (86.2%) who deceased within 30 days. Applying an ASA ≥3 cut-off resulted in a predictive mortality rate of 56 (96.6%). The NHFS score demonstrated the highest predictive capability for mortality, with patients scoring ≥5 having a significantly higher risk of mortality compared to those with a score <5. Conclusion This study showed robust correlations between high CFS (≥6) and NHFS (≥5), and mortality within the hip fracture patient cohort.

Mortality following proximal femoral fractures in elderly patients: a large retrospective cohort study of incidence and risk factors

BACKGROUND

Global prevalence of osteoporosis and fragility fractures is increasing due to the aging population. Proximal femoral fractures are among the most common orthopedic conditions in elderly that significantly cause health deterioration and mortality. Here, we aimed to evaluate the mortality rates and risk factors, besides the functional outcomes after these injuries.

METHODS

In a retrospective cohort study, all patients admitted with a femoral neck or intertrochanteric fracture between 2016 and the end of 2018 were enrolled in this study. Medical records were reviewed to include patients over 60 years of age who had a proximal femoral fracture and had a complete medical record and radiographs. Exclusion criteria included patients with pathological fractures, cancer under active treatment, follow-up loss, and patient access loss. Demographic and clinical features of patients alongside the details of fracture and patient management were recorded and analyzed. In-hospital and post-discharge mortalities due to included types of fractures at one and 12 months were the primary outcome. Modified Harris Hip Scores (mHHS) was the measure of functional outcome.

RESULTS

A total of 788 patients including 412 females (52.3%) and 376 males (47.7%) with a mean age of 76.05 ± 10.01 years were included in this study. Among patients, 573 (72.7%) had an intertrochanteric fracture, while 215 (27.3%) had a femoral neck fracture, and 97.1% of all received surgical treatment. With a mean follow-up of 33.31 months, overall mortality rate was 33.1%, and 5.7% one-month and 20.2% 12-months rates. Analysis of 1-month mortality showed a significant mortality difference in patients operated after 48 h of fracture (p = 0.01) and in patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) scores of 3-4 compared to ASA scores of 1-2 (p = 0.001). One-year mortality data showed that the mortality rate in femoral neck fractures was lower compared to other types of fracture. Surgical delay of > 48 h, ASA scores of 3-4, and treatment by proximal femoral plate were associated with shorter survival. The overall mean mHHS score was 53.80 ± 20.78.

CONCLUSION

We found several risk factors of mortality, including age ≥ 80 years, a > 48-hour delay to surgery, and pre-operative ASA scores of 3-4 in patients with proximal femoral fracture. Furthermore, the use of a proximal femoral plate was a significant risk factor for mortality and lower mHHS scores.

Racial and ethnic difference in the risk of fractures in the United States: a systematic review and meta-analysis

This systematic review and meta-analysis examined the association between race and ethnicity and fracture risk in the United States. We identified relevant studies by searching PubMed and EMBASE for studies published from the databases' inception date to December 23, 2022. Only observational studies conducted in the US population that reported the effect size of racial-ethnic minority groups versus white people were included. Two investigators independently conducted literature searches, study selection, risk of bias assessment, and data abstraction; discrepancies were resolved by consensus or consultation of a third investigator. Twenty-five studies met the inclusion criteria, and the random-effects model was used to calculate the pooled effect size due to heterogeneity between the studies. Using white people as the reference group, we found that people of other races and ethnic groups had a significantly lower fracture risk. In Black people, the pooled relative risk (RR) was 0.46 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.43-0.48, p < 0.0001). In Hispanics, the pooled RR was 0.66 (95% CI, 0.55-0.79, p < 0.0001). In Asian Americans, the pooled RR was 0.55 (95% CI, 0.45-0.66, p < 0.0001). In American Indians, the pooled RR was 0.80 (95% CI, 0.41-1.58, p = 0.3436). Subgroup analysis by sex in Black people revealed the strength of association was greater in men (RR = 0.57, 95% CI = 0.51-0.63, p < 0.0001) than in women (RR = 0.43, 95% CI = 0.39-0.47, p < 0.0001). Our findings suggest that people of other races and ethnic groups have a lower fracture risk than white people.

Timing and safety of hip fracture surgery in patients on direct-acting oral anticoagulants

Background

Many geriatric patients presenting for emergency hip fracture surgery are on direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) most of which are not easily reversible. A safe policy was required to reduce delays to surgery. Prior to institution of our hospital's protocol in January 2021, most of these patients had surgery after 48 h following the last dose of DOAC due to concerns about increased perioperative blood loss.

Methods

This was a prospective closed loop audit of the protocol-surgery within 24 h from last dose of DOAC (if creatinine clearance >50 ml/min) with administration of 1-g of tranexamic acid at anesthesia induction. 131 eligible patients (DOAC, n = 22; no anticoagulation, n = 109) between January-June 2021 who had emergency hip fracture surgery were identified. Primary outcome measures were peri-operative blood loss, transfusion requirements and policy compliance. Secondary outcome measures were 30-day mortality, thrombotic complications and wound bleeding.

Results

Compliance with surgical timing and tranexamic acid administration were 55% and 81% respectively after the second audit cycle. The mean estimated blood loss (EBL) in the DOAC group versus the non-anticoagulated control group was 500 ml and 330 ml respectively. The difference between these groups was statistically significant at an alpha level of 5% (P = 0.0115, 95% CI 38.48-299.16). The difference for intra-operative (RR 3.43; 95% CI 1.68-7.01) and post-operative blood transfusion (RR 2.10; 95% CI 1.23-3.58) for the 2 groups was also statistically significant. However, there was no case of massive blood transfusion in both groups. The DOAC group had a lower risk for 30-day mortality (RR 0.71; 95% CI 0.09-5.46). There was no major thrombotic complication in the DOAC group.

Conclusion

This audit has shown that this protocol is safe although clinicians should anticipate some degree of increased intra-operative blood loss. We will recommend continuation of this policy with sustained safety monitoring in order to reduce delays to surgery.

COVID-19 Vaccination: Does It Alter Postoperative Mortality and Morbidity in Hip Fractures?

Introduction The primary aim of our study was to evaluate the impact of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination on mortality in patients with hip fractures by comparing it to those who are unvaccinated. Our secondary objective was to compare the impact on postoperative morbidity parameters like length of hospital stay and complications. Methods A total of 619 hip fractures were divided into the 'Vaccinated group' consisting of 300 patients who had COVID-19 vaccination and the 'Unvaccinated group' consisting of 319 patients who were not vaccinated. Patient demographic variables, Nottingham hip fracture score, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade, type of anaesthesia used, and Charlson Comorbidity Index were collected. Our primary outcome measures were 30- and 90-day mortality. Secondary outcome measures included postoperative complications like thromboembolic complications, cardiac, and respiratory complications, etc. Mortality among the COVID-positive patients was also compared between the groups. Results Thirty-day postoperative mortality was higher in the unvaccinated group at 13.2% than in the vaccinated group at 5.3%. A similar increase in 90-day mortality was also observed in the unvaccinated group at 24.8% when compared to 14.7% in the vaccinated group(p<0.001). Despite having a higher baseline prevalence of cardiac comorbidities, the Vaccinated group had fewer post-operative cardiac, thromboembolic, and neurological complications (p>0.05). Moreover, electrolyte imbalance and AKI were also seen in fewer patients in the vaccinated group compared to the control group (p<0.05). Furthermore, it was found that among the vaccinated patients who did have perioperative COVID-19 infection, the 30-day mortality was significantly lower (10%) compared to the control group (31.2%) (p<0.001). Similarly, 90-day mortality was significantly lower (25%) compared to the control group (43.75%) (p<0.001). Conclusion Vaccination against COVID-19 independently reduced mortality and morbidity among patients with hip fractures when compared to those who are not vaccinated. Furthermore, it decreased the risk of acquiring COVID-19, and subsequent postoperative complications. Among those who are infected with COVID-19 despite vaccination, the mortality was significantly lesser.

The incidence of musculoskeletal injuries: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Aims

The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to gather epidemiological information on selected musculoskeletal injuries and to provide pooled injury-specific incidence rates.

Methods

PubMed (National Library of Medicine) and Scopus (Elsevier) databases were searched. Articles were eligible for inclusion if they reported incidence rate (or count with population at risk), contained data on adult population, and were written in English language. The number of cases and population at risk were collected, and the pooled incidence rates (per 100,000 person-years) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated by using either a fixed or random effects model.

Results

The screening of titles yielded 206 articles eligible for inclusion in the study. Of these, 173 (84%) articles provided sufficient information to be included in the pooled incidence rates. Incidences of fractures were investigated in 154 studies, and the most common fractures in the whole adult population based on the pooled incidence rates were distal radius fractures (212.0, 95% CI 178.1 to 252.4 per 100,000 person-years), finger fractures (117.1, 95% CI 105.3 to 130.2 per 100,000 person-years), and hip fractures (112.9, 95% CI 82.2 to 154.9 per 100,000 person-years). The most common sprains and dislocations were ankle sprains (429.4, 95% CI 243.0 to 759.0 per 100,000 person-years) and first-time patellar dislocations (32.8, 95% CI 21.6 to 49.7 per 100,000 person-years). The most common injuries were anterior cruciate ligament (17.5, 95% CI 6.0 to 50.2 per 100,000 person-years) and Achilles (13.7, 95% CI 9.6 to 19.5 per 100,000 person-years) ruptures.

Conclusion

The presented pooled incidence estimates serve as important references in assessing the global economic and social burden of musculoskeletal injuries. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2022;11(11):814–825.

Analyzing the Risk Factors of Mortality after Osteoporotic Hip Fractures Using the National Health Insurance Service Sample Cohort 2.0 Database

Purpose

The purpose of this study is to determine risk factors that affect mortality following osteoporotic hip fracture in patients 50 years or older using the National Health Insurance Service (NHIS) sample cohort 2.0 database.

Materials and Methods

Data from 2,533 patients who satisfied the inclusion criteria for the NHIS sample cohort 2.0 database were used in this study. Data from patients who suffered osteoporotic hip fractures between 2002-2015 were used. An analysis of correlations between the incidence of osteoporotic hip fractures and various factors (sex, age, underlying diseases, etc.) was performed. Analysis of the associations between the mortality of osteoporotic hip fracture and the various factors with hazard ratio (HR) was performed using Cox regression models.

Results

Patient observation continued for an average of 38.12±32.09 months. During the observation period, a higher incidence of hip fracture was observed in women; however, higher mortality following the fracture was observed in men (HR=0.728; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.635-0.836). The incidence and mortality of fractures increased when there were increasing age, more than three underlying diseases (HR=1.945; 95% CI, 1.284-2.945), cerebrovascular diseases (HR=1.429; 95% CI, 1.232-1.657), and renal diseases (HR=1.248; 95% CI, 1.040-1.497). Also, higher mortality was observed in patients who were underweight (HR=1.342; 95% CI, 1.079-1.669), current smokers (HR=1.338; 95% CI, 1.104-1.621), and inactivity (HR=1.379; 95% CI, 1.189-1.601).

Conclusion

Male gender, the presence of cerebrovascular or kidney disease, a more than three underlying diseases, underweight, a current smoker, and inactivity were risk factors that increased mortality.

Learning From England's Best Practice Tariff: Process Measure Pay-for-Performance Can Improve Hip Fracture Outcomes

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to evaluate England's Best Practice Tariff (BPT) and consider potential implications for Medicare patients should the US adopt a similar plan.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Since the beginning of the Affordable Care Act, Medicare has renewed efforts to improve the outcomes of older adults through introduction of an expanding set of alternative-payment models. Among trauma patients, recommended arrangements met with mixed success given concerns about the heterogeneous nature of trauma patients and resulting outcome variation. A novel approach taken for hip fractures in England could offer a viable alternative.

METHODS

Linear regression, interrupted time-series, difference-in-difference, and counterfactual models of 2000 to 2016 Medicare (US), HES-APC (England) death certificate-linked claims (≥65 years) were used to: track US hip fracture trends, look at changes in English hip fracture trends before-and-after BPT implementation, compare changes in US-versus-English mortality, and estimate total/theoretical lives saved.

RESULTS

A total of 806,036 English and 3,221,109 US hospitalizations were included. After BPT implementation, England's 30-day mortality decreased by 2.6 percentage-points (95%CI: 1.7-3.5) from a baseline of 9.9% (relative reduction 26.3%). 90- and 365-day mortality decreased by 5.6 and 5.4 percentage-points. 30/90/365-day readmissions also declined with a concurrent shortening of hospital length-of-stay. From 2000 to 2016, US outcomes were stagnant (P > 0.05), resulting in an inversion of the countries' mortality and >38,000 potential annual US lives saved.

CONCLUSIONS

Process measure pay-for-performance led to significant improvements in English hip fracture outcomes. As efforts to improve US older adult health continue to increase, there are important lessons to be learned from a successful initiative like the BPT.

Bisphosphonates and the risk of atypical femur fractures

Bisphosphonates are effective in reducing hip and other fractures. However, concerns about atypical femur fractures (AFFs) have contributed to substantially decreased bisphosphonate use, and hip fracture rates may be increasing. Despite this impact, important uncertainties remain regarding AFF risks including the association between bisphosphonate use and other risk factors such as BMD, age, weight, and race. To address this evidence gap, a cohort study of 196,129 women ≥50 years of age in the Southern California Kaiser Permanente HMO women (with ≥1 bisphosphonate prescription) were studied; the primary outcome was radiographically-adjudicated AFF between 2007 and 2017. Risk factors including bisphosphonate use and race were obtained from electronic health records. Multivariable Cox models were used for analysis. Benefit-risk was modeled for 1-10 years of bisphosphonates to compare fractures prevented vs. AFFs associated. Among 196,129 women, 277 (0.1%) sustained AFFs. After multivariable adjustment, AFF risk increased with longer bisphosphonate duration: hazard ratio (HR) increased from HR = 8.9 (95%CI: 2.8,28) for 3-5 years to HR = 43.5 (13.7138.1) for >8 years. Hip BMD, surprisingly, was not associated with AFF risk. Other risk factors included Asian ancestry (HR = 4.8 (3.6, 6.6)), short stature, overweight, and glucocorticoid use. Bisphosphonate discontinuation was associated with rapid decrease in AFF risk. Decreases in osteoporotic and hip fractures risk during 1-10 years of bisphosphonates far outweighed the increase AFF risk in Caucasians, but less so in Asians. In Caucasians, after 3 years 149 hip fractures were prevented with 2 AFFs associated compared to 91 and 8 in Asians. The evidence for several potential mechanisms is summarized with femoral geometry being the most likely to explain AFF risk differences between Asians and Caucasians. The results from this new study add to the evidence base for AFF risk factors and will help inform clinical decision-making for individual patients about initiation and duration of bisphosphonate therapy and drug holidays.

Comorbidity and the association with 1-year mortality in hip fracture patients: can the ASA score and the Charlson Comorbidity Index be used interchangeably?

Background

Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) has been suggested to be associated with mortality in hip fracture patients, to the same extent as more expensive and time-consuming tools. However, even CCI might be too time-consuming in a clinical setting.

Aim

To investigate whether the American Society of Anaesthesiologists score (ASA score), a simple grading from the anaesthesiologist’s examination, is comparable with CCI in the association with 1-year mortality after a hip fracture.

Methods

The study population was patients 60 + years registered in the Swedish Hip Fracture Registry with a first-time hip fracture between 1997 and 2017 (N = 165,596). The outcome was 1-year mortality, and the exposures were ASA score and CCI. The association between comorbidity and mortality was described with Kaplan–Meier curves and analyzed with Cox proportional hazards models.

Results

The Kaplan–Meier curves showed a stepwise increase in mortality for increasing values of both ASA and CCI. The Hazard Ratios (HRs) for the highest ASA (4–5) were 3.8 (95% Confidence Interval 3.5–4.2) for women and 3.2 (2.8–3.6) for men in the fully adjusted models. Adjusted HRs for the highest CCI (4 +) were 3.6 (3.3–3.9) for women and 2.5 (2.3–2.7) for men. Reference was the lowest score value for both tools. The correlation between the tools was moderate.

Conclusions

Both ASA and CCI show a similar stepwise association with 1-year mortality in hip fracture patients, despite measuring different factors and capturing different individuals at risk. Since the ASA score is already accessible for health care staff, it might be preferable to aid in prioritizing vulnerable hip fracture patients at risk of adverse outcomes.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40520-021-01896-x.

Pre-fracture Mobility Using Standardized Scale as an Early Indicator of High Health Risk in Patients with a Hip Fracture

Hip fracture in older adults is associated with poor prognosis. We tested the hypothesis that a single standardized measure, pre-fracture mobility, can be used as an early indicator of patients at high health risk after a hip fracture. Analysis of prospectively collected data of older adults admitted with a hip fracture between April-2009 and June-2019 in a single NHS hospital, UK. Pre-fracture mobility status (freely mobile, mobilising outdoors with one aid or with two aids, and limited to indoors), was used to predict length of stay (LOS) and mortality in hospital, and discharge destination. Among 3073 (2231 women, 842 men) admitted from their own home (mean ± SD age = 82.7 ± 9.3 yr), 159 died and 2914 survived to discharge: 1834 back to their home, 772 to rehabilitation, 66 to residential care, 141 to nursing care and 101 to unknown destinations. Compared with LOS of 15.9 ± 15.6 days in patients who mobilised freely before fracture (reference), those who were able to mobilise outdoors with one aid stayed 3.5 days, and those with two aids or confined to indoor mobility stayed one week longer in hospital. In-patient mortality was increased among patients who mobilised outdoors with two aids: OR = 2.1 (95%CI = 1.3–3.3), and those limited to indoors: OR = 2.1 (1.3–1.5). Finally, a change in residence on discharge was more likely in those who mobilised outdoors with two aids (OR = 1.8, 95%CI = 1.2–2.6), and those limited to indoors (OR = 1.9, 95%CI = 1.2–2.9). In conclusion, pre-fracture mobility may be a useful early indicator for identifying patients at increased risk of adverse outcomes after an acute hip fracture.

Life expectancy of older people living in aged care facilities after a hip fracture

To the authors’ knowledge, no study has been conducted on life expectancy for aged care facility residents with hip fracture. We assessed life expectancy of 240 residents of aged care facilities in Australia who experienced recent hip fracture treated with surgery. 149 deaths occurred over a mean follow-up of 1.2 years. Being female and having better cognition were associated with longer life expectancy. Increased age was associated with shorter life expectancy. The cumulative mortality rate within three months after hip fracture was 25.0% while the cumulative mortality rate for the whole study period was 62.1%. Life expectancy was 8.2 years, 4.8 years and 2.8 years for 70, 80 and 90-years old female patients. Life expectancy was 3.8 years, 2.2 years and 1.3 years for 70, 80 and 90 years old male patients, respectively. In conclusion, age, gender and cognition level were associated with life expectancy of hip fracture patients living in aged care facilities and their life expectancy was much shorter than that of the general Australian population.

Effect of Nonsurgical Versus Surgical Management on Geriatric Hip Fracture Mortality of Hispanic-American Male Veterans

Introduction

The effect of surgical vs nonsurgical management on hip fracture mortality of Hispanic-American male veterans has not been rigorously studied. Hence, we examined the mortality and life expectancy effect of nonsurgical vs surgical management after hip fracture in a geriatric Hispanic-American male veterans’ population.

Material and Methods

This was a retrospective cohort study of Hispanic-American male veterans who were 65 years of age or older and suffered a femoral neck or intertrochanteric fracture from January 2008 to December 2015. Analysis between a surgical cohort (cannulated screw fixation, hemiarthroplasty, total hip arthroplasty, or cephalomedullary nail) and a non-surgical cohort was performed. In-hospital, 30-day, one-year, and two-year mortality were compared between both groups.

Results

Out of 268 patients with hip fracture, 159 (59.2%) were treated surgically and 109 (40.8%) non-surgically. The overall in-hospital (9.2% vs 1.9%, P = .009), 30-day (17.4% vs 5.0%, P = .002), one-year (48.6% vs 23.3%, P < .001), and two-year (63.3% vs 36.5%, P < .001) mortality rate was found to be higher for the nonoperative group. The average life expectancy of the nonoperative cohort was significantly shorter than those who were managed surgically (216 days vs 260 days, P < .001).

Discussion and Conclusion

This study shows a higher mortality rate and lower life expectancy in geriatric male patients who were treated nonsurgically in a Veterans Health Affair hospital facility that mostly serves Hispanic-American veterans. Our results provide an expansion to the findings of other geriatric studies on hip fracture with focus in a Hispanic-American veteran male population.

Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Bone Health and Outcomes in the United States

Osteoporosis is a bone disease classified by deterioration of bone microarchitecture and decreased bone strength, thereby increasing subsequent risk of fracture. In the United States, approximately 54 million adults aged 50 years and older have osteoporosis or are at risk due to low bone mass. Osteoporosis has long been viewed as a chronic health condition affecting primarily non-Hispanic white (NHW) women; however, emerging evidence indicates racial and ethnic disparities in bone outcomes and osteoporosis management. The primary objective of this review is to describe disparities in bone mineral density (BMD), prevalence of osteoporosis and fracture, as well as in screening and treatment of osteoporosis among non-Hispanic black (NHB), Hispanic, and Asian adults compared with NHW adults living on the US mainland. The following areas were reviewed: BMD, osteoporosis prevalence, fracture prevalence and incidence, postfracture outcomes, DXA screening, and osteoporosis treatments. Although there are limited studies on bone and fracture outcomes within Asian and Hispanic populations, findings suggest that there are differences in bone outcomes across NHW, NHB, Asian, and Hispanic populations. Further, NHB, Asian, and Hispanic populations may experience suboptimal osteoporosis management and postfracture care, although additional population-based studies are needed. There is also evidence that variation in BMD and osteoporosis exists within major racial and ethnic groups, highlighting the need for research in individual groups by origin or background. Although there is a clear need to prioritize future quantitative and qualitative research in these populations, initial strategies for addressing bone health disparities are discussed. © 2021 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR).

Reviewing acute hip fractures in adults

ABSTRACT

Hip fractures are considered a significant public health issue, representing a substantial burden on our healthcare system and society. They are one of the leading causes of disability among older adults, especially women. Globally, an estimated 18% of women and 6% of men will be affected by hip fractures at some time in life. Hip fractures are a major cause of long-term disability among older adults and more significant than mortality, as only 60% of patients regain their preinjury level of mobility. This has detrimental effects on quality of life and activities of daily living, imposing a level of dependence that has personal, social, and systemic consequences.

Does Superior Bone Health Promote a Longer Lifespan?

INTRODUCTION

Public health achievements throughout the last century have resulted in a steady increase in life expectancy. An emergent subset has distinguished themselves, living well beyond the ninth decade by avoiding or delaying the onset of most age-related diseases, including bone diseases and fractures. In this study, we evaluated the bone health of the oldest community-dwelling individuals living in rural Arkansas.

METHODS

299 patients aged ≥90 years were retrospectively reviewed for recorded fractures within 12 years prior to the investigation period. Records were also examined for medications and test results pertinent to bone health, including thyroid stimulating hormone, vitamin D levels, hematocrit, hemoglobin, body mass index, and bone densitometric values.

RESULTS

68 patients (23%) had at least one fracture documented, and 15 had >1 fracture. 40% of patients with fractures had osteoporosis and 28% had osteopenia, respectively. 232 patients (78%) had no documented fractures, and of these, only 18% had osteoporosis and 16% had osteopenia. No significant clinical markers were found among the very old to explain the relatively low occurrence of fractures.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients over 90 years of age had an overall low prevalence of fractures and relative preservation of bone health, suggesting a preserved bone molecular profile in these individuals. Epigenetic factors and activity levels might also have favorably affected bone health. The low percentage of osteoporosis and fractures likely reduced the morbidity and mortality in this population, potentially contributing to their overall longevity.

Sex differences in incidence rate, and temporal changes in surgical management and adverse events after hip fracture surgery in Denmark 1997-2017: a register-based study of 153,058 hip fracture patients

Background and purpose - Extensive research and national multidisciplinary programs have striven to introduce uniform standards of treatment and mitigate mortality and adverse events after hip fracture surgery over the past decades. A large-scale overview of temporal developments in hip fracture surgery and care is warranted.Patients and methods - We studied Danish patients aged ≥ 60 years, sustaining their first ever hip fracture between 1997 and 2017. Patients were identified from the Danish National Patient Registry (DNPR). Incidence rates of first hip fracture were calculated per 1,000 patient-years and stratified by age group and sex. Information on pre-injury living settings, comorbidities, and medications were obtained from national administrative registers. Type of fracture and treatment choice were recorded, and patients were followed for 1 year to observe mortality, readmission, and surgical complications.Results - Data from 153,058 patients was analyzed. Incidence rate decreased in both sexes, but only led to a reduction in the annual number of hip fractures in the female population. Choice of surgery shifted away from sliding hip screws and parallel implants (SHS-PI), towards intramedullary nailing and hemi-/arthroplasties for trochanteric and femoral neck fractures, respectively. Pre-injury diagnosed morbidity and 1-year readmissions increased contrary to mortality. Median age remained stable around 83 (IQR 77-88) for women and 80 (IQR 73-86) for men.Interpretation - Over the past 2 decades important aspects of hip fracture management have improved. However, sex differences were observed, and men remain more vulnerable than women in terms of morbidity, mortality, and incidence rate.

Influence of surgical quality (according to postoperative radiography) on mortality, complications and recovery of walking ability in 1425 hip fracture patients

PURPOSE

To evaluate the influence of surgical quality (as evaluated in the post-surgical radiographic control) on mortality, complications and recovery of walking ability in patients older than 64 years with hip fracture.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Retrospective observational study of a single-center, consecutive cohort of 1425 patients operated from December/2012 to March/2018. Average age was 85.66±7.13 (65-108) years and 966 (67.86%) were female. Extracapsular fractures (811 cases, 56.91%) were fixed with trochanteric nails (Affixus-DePuy / PFNA-Synthes) (795 cases) or sliding-hip-screw-plates (Biomet) (16 patients). Intracapsular fractures (614, 43.09%) were treated with cannulated screws (Smith-Nephew) (134 cases) or with arthroplasty (472 bipolar and 8 total hip, Furlong-JRI or Exeter-Stryker). Postoperative radiographs were used to determine surgical quality (reduction, compression, screw position, tip-apex, stem position, Voss, intraoperative fracture). Patients were followed clinically and radiographically in outpatient clinic after 1, 3, 6, and 12 months.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Bivariate analysis (Pearson, Fischer, Mann-Whitney, Wilcoxon) was applied to study statistically significant relations, and Relative Risks (RR) were calculated.

RESULTS

196 patients (13.75%) died along follow-up, and poor reduction was found to be a risk factor for mortality both in trochanteric nail group (p=0.0495) (RR 1.510, 1.01-2.26) and in cannulated screw group (p=0.0023) (RR 6.48, 2.40-17.53); this is a previously non-published risk factor. Surgical complications included 33 infections (2.36%), 12 non-unions (1.27%), 12 cut-outs (1.47%), 7 broken nails (0.86%), 21 hemiarthroplasty dislocations (4.37%), and 8 ischemic necrosis of the femoral head (5.97%). The significant risk factors were: poor reduction for trochanteric nail breakage (p=0.041) (RR 4.47, 1.13-17.67), poor reduction for non-union in cannulated screws (p=0.035) (RR 10.91, 1.70-70.09), as well as "tip-apex distance" over 25mm in trochanteric fractures for "cut-out" type of fixation failure (p=0.0159) (RR 3.84, 1.19-12.40). Previous walking ability was restored in 564 patients (39.58%) and worsened in 581 (40.77%), but statistical relationships were not found, although follow-up data were inadequate in 212 cases (14.88%).

CONCLUSIONS

Appropriate reduction of hip fractures is a significant step to reduce mortality, nail breakage and non-union. Adequate position of sliding screw (avoiding tip-apex distances over 25mm) is important to reduce "cut-out" in trochanteric fractures.

Race/ethnic difference in trabecular bone score in midlife women: The Study of Women's Health Across the Nation (SWAN)

There was no difference in Trabecular Bone Score (TBS) comparing White and Black women after adjusting for body mass index (BMI) and diabetes status. Japanese women had lower TBS than White women. Our results diverge from established differences in fracture rates by race/ethnicity.

INTRODUCTION

The TBS was developed as an indirect measure of vertebral bone microarchitecture derived from texture analysis of lumbar spine DXA scans. There is little information on race/ethnic differences in TBS.

METHODS

We compared TBS in 656 White, 492 Black, and 268 Japanese pre- and early perimenopausal women. We used a beta version of TBS that accounts for tissue thickness using DXA measured soft tissue thickness rather than BMI. The relation between BMI and tissue thickness corrected TBS differed by BMI; we used a three-segment linear spline to adjust for BMI.

RESULTS

The women were, on average, 46.5 years of age; 50% were premenopausal. In BMI and diabetes adjusted models, there was no difference in TBS between White and Black women. TBS was modestly (2%) lower in the Japanese women compared to White women, p = 0.04. In a sensitivity analysis, restricting the analysis to those with BMI 24-31 kg/m², results were similar.

CONCLUSIONS

TBS was similar in Black and White women after accounting for tissue thickness and adjusting for BMI, diabetes, and other covariates. The Japanese women had modestly lower TBS. These results diverge from established race/ethnic differences in fracture rates and areal bone mineral density, underscoring the need for further studies.

Trends in Hip Fracture Incidence, Recurrence, and Survival by Education and Comorbidity: A Swedish Register-based Study

BACKGROUND

Hip fractures are common and severe conditions among older individuals, associated with high mortality, and the Nordic countries have the highest incidence rates globally. With this study, we aim to present a comprehensive picture of trends in hip fracture incidence and survival in the older Swedish population stratified by education, birth country, and comorbidity level.

METHODS

This study is based on a linkage of several population registers and included the entire population over the age of 60 living in Sweden. We calculated age-standardized incidence rates for first and recurrent hip fractures as well as age-standardized proportions of patients surviving 30 and 365 days through the time period 1998 to 2017. We calculated all outcomes for men and women in the total population and in each population stratum.

RESULTS

Altogether, we observed 289,603 first hip fractures during the study period. Age-standardized incidence rates of first and recurrent fractures declined among men and women in the total population and in each educational-, birth country-, and comorbidity group. Declines in incidence were more pronounced for recurrent than for first fractures. Approximately 20% of women and 30% of men died within 1 year of their first hip fracture. Overall, survival proportions remained constant throughout the study period but improved when taking into account comorbidity level.

CONCLUSIONS

Hip fracture incidence has declined across the Swedish population, but mortality after hip fracture remained high, especially among men. Hip fracture patients constitute a vulnerable population group with increasing comorbidity burden and high mortality risk.

Analysis of factors among 30-day and 1-year mortality rates in patients with borderline stable-unstable intertrochanteric hip fracture

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the possible effects of surgical procedures on mortality and to identify the possible risk factors for mortality in the management of geriatric hip fractures.

METHODS

A total of 191 patients (105 women and 86 men; mean age 82.26±9.681 [60-108] years) with AO/OTA 31A2.2 intertrochanteric fractures and treated with sliding hip screw, proximal femoral nail, or hemiarthroplasty were included in this retrospective cohort study. The treatment type was decided by the responsible surgeon according to the patients' pre-injury activity level, bone quality, and features of the fracture. Age, sex, type of fracture, type of surgery performed, American society of anesthesiology (ASA) grade, type of anesthesia, time to surgery, type of physical therapy, length of hospital stay, and number of comorbidities were documented. We evaluated the 30-day and 1-year mortality of patients treated with sliding hip screw (SHS), proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFN-A), or hemiarthroplasty and identified the possible risk factors for mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 49 patients underwent SHS, 58 underwent PFN-A, and 84 underwent hemiarthroplasty. Of these, 2 patients with SHS, 2 with PFN-A, and 11 with hemiarthroplasty died within 30 days after surgery, whereas 7 patients with SHS, 15 with PFN-A, and 23 with hemiarthroplasty died 1 year after surgery. The 30-day and 1-year overall mortality rates were 7.9% and 23.6%, respectively. Both the 30-day and 1-year mortality risks were higher in patients undergoing hemiarthroplasty than in patients undergoing SHS (p=0.068 versus 0.058). The 30-day mortality was higher in patients receiving general anesthesia than in those receiving combined spinal and epidural anesthesia (p=0.009). The 1-year mortality risk was higher in patients with ASA grade 4 than in those with grade 1 and 2 (p=0.045). Advanced age (p=0.022) and male sex (p=0.007) were also found to be the risk factors for 1-year mortality.

CONCLUSION

We demonstrated that higher ASA grade, male sex, general anesthesia, and hemiarthroplasty procedures are associated with higher mortality rates in elderly patients with hip fractures. Thus, we highly recommend orthopedic surgeons to consider all these factors in the management of intertrochanteric hip fractures in the geriatric population.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, Prognostic Study.

Elderly Patients With Isolated Hip Fracture Requiring Surgical Intervention: Does Admitting Service Matter?

The American College of Surgeons requires trauma centers to track the number of injured patients admitted to a surgical service as well as nonsurgical admissions (NSAs) as a quality marker. We aim to compare the relationship between admitting service and outcomes in patients with isolated hip fracture (IHF). A 4-year retrospective cohort review of data collected from a single institution's trauma registry for adult patients with IHF was done. Patients were stratified into 2 groups based on admission to a surgical service versus NSA. Demographic and outcome variables including age, gender, Injury Severity Score (ISS), intensive care unit length of stay (ICU-LOS), deep venous thrombosis (DVT), and mortality rates were compared. Analysis of variance and χ test were used for data analysis with statistical significance defined as p < .05. A total of 629 patients with IHF were admitted. Of those, 30 (4.8%) were admitted to a surgical service and 599 (95.2%) were NSAs. Patients admitted to a surgical service were younger but average ISS was similar in both groups. Those admitted to a surgical service had a significantly shorter ICU-LOS than NSA patients (2.97 days vs. 4.91, p < .001). Readmission rate at 30 days (3.3% vs. 1.2%, p > .05) and DVT rates (0% vs. 0.4%, p > .05) were similar between groups. Mortality rates did not differ between groups (3.3% vs. 2.2%, p > .05). Patients with hip fracture requiring surgical intervention admitted to a trauma service have a shorter ICU-LOS than those admitted to nonsurgical services. Other quality markers were similar.

Association between falling direction and age in older patients with hip fractures

BACKGROUND

The incidence of fall-related hip fractures in old patients aged over 85 years was reported to be higher than that in old patients aged between 65 and 84 years; however, there are no known studies that reported differences of these age groups with respect to the falling situation.

OBJECTIVE

This study investigated the association between age and falling direction in patients with hip fractures.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This study analyzed the medical records of older patients with fall-related hip fractures who were hospitalized in 2011-2018. Demographic (sex, age, and body mass index, BMI), medical and clinical (body mineral density, type of fracture, and cognitive function), and lifestyle variables (use of assistive device for locomotion and place of residence) and characteristics of falling (direction and location) were extracted. These were compared between the patients aged between 65 and 84 years (65-84 group) and over 85 years (85+ group). Multivariable logistic regression analysis was conducted to investigate associations with each falling direction (forward, sideways, and backward) with other variables.

RESULTS

Compared with the 65-84 group, the proportion of hip fractures due to sideways falls was lower in the 85+ group (P < 0.05) while the proportion of hip fractures due to backward falls was higher in the 85+ group. The multivariable logistic regression analysis showed the sideways and backward falling were only associated with the age group.

CONCLUSION

These results suggested that the falling direction was associated with age but not with other variables investigated in this study in older patients with hip fractures.

Survival After Hip Fracture: A Comparative Analysis Between a Private and a Public Health Center in Chile

Purpose

The purpose of the study is to compare the survival after hip fracture in patients older than 50 years after hip fracture between a private and a public health center in Chile. We hypothesize that treatment at a private health center (PRH) may be associated with lower one-year mortality and longer median survival time after hip fracture (adjusted by gender and age) compared to a public health center (PLH).

Methods

PRH and PLH patients who were coded with a diagnosis of hip fracture were included in this study. PRH patients were included between 2002 to 2018, and PLH patients were included from 2012 to 2018. One-year mortality was estimated by logistic regression; meanwhile, median survival time was estimated by exponential regression. A survival analysis study was designed and approved by our institutional ethics review board.

Results

A total of 2130 patients were included in the PLH cohort, and a total of 1110 patients were included in the PRH. The one-year mean mortality, adjusted by age and gender, was 0.23 (range: 0.21 to 0.25) in the PLH and 0.16 (range: 0.13 to 0.18) in the PRH cohort. The median survival time, adjusted by age and gender, was 4.2 years (range: 4.1 to 4.4) in the PLH and 6.8 years (range: 6.3 to 7.29) in the PRH cohort.

Conclusion

Patients older than 50 years treated in a private health center have a higher median survival time and a lower probability of dying one year after a hip fracture.

The Ability of the Nottingham Hip Fracture Score to Predict Mobility, Length of Stay and Mortality in Hospital, and Discharge Destination in Patients Admitted with a Hip Fracture

The Nottingham Hip Fracture Score (NHFS) has been developed for predicting 30-day and 1-year mortality after hip fracture. We hypothesise that NHFS may also predict other adverse events. Data from 666 patients (190 men, 476 women), aged 60.2-103.4 years, admitted with a hip fracture to a single centre from 1/10/2015 and 7/12/2017 were analysed. The ability of NHFS to predict mobility within 1 day after surgery, length of stay (LOS) find mortality, and discharge destination was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic curves and two-graph plots. The area under the curve (95% confidence interval [CI]) for predicting mortality was 67.4% (58.4-76.4%), prolonged LOS was 59.0% (54.0-64.0%), discharge to residential/nursing care was 62.3% (54.0-71.5%), and any two of failure to mobilise, prolonged LOS or discharge to residential/nursing care was 64.8% (59.0-70.6%). NHFS thresholds at 4 and 7 corresponding to the lower and upper limits of intermediate range where sensitivity and specificity equal 90% were identified for mortality and prolonged LOS, and 4 and 6 for discharge to residential/nursing care, which were used to create three risk categories. Compared with the low risk group (NHFS = 0-4), the high risk group (NHFS = 7-10 or 6-10) had increased risk of in-patient mortality: rates = 2.0% versus 7.1%, OR (95% CI) = 3.8 (1.5-9.9), failure to mobilise within 1 day of surgery: rates = 18.9% versus 28.3%, OR = 1.7 (1.0-2.8), prolonged LOS (> 17 days): rates = 20.3% versus 33.9%, OR = 2.2 (1.3-3.3), discharge to residential/nursing care: rates = 4.5% vs 12.3%, OR = 3.0 (1.4-6.4), and any two of failure to mobilise, prolonged LOS or discharge to residential/nursing care: rates = 10.5% versus 28.6%, 3.4 (95% CI 1.9-6.0), and stayed 4.1 days (1.5-6.7 days) longer in hospital. High NHFS associates with increased risk of mortality, prolonged LOS and discharge to residential/nursing care, lending further support for its use to identify adverse events.

Survival analysis after hip fracture: higher mortality than the general population and delayed surgery increases the risk at any time

PURPOSE

To estimate survival curves in patients with hip fracture according to gender, age, type of fracture, and waiting time for surgery and to compare them with the life expectancy of the general population. The study hypothesis is that survival after hip fractures is significantly lower than in the general population, especially in cases that underwent delayed surgery, regardless of age and gender.

METHODS

A survival analysis study was designed and approved by our institutional ethics review board. All patients who were coded with a diagnosis of hip fracture from 2002 to 2018 were included in the study. A total of 1176 patients were included, and the median age was 81 years (18-105 years). Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests were performed to compare survival curves between those who underwent surgery on time and those with surgical delays. An exponential multivariate regression model was estimated, and a hazard ratio (HR) was reported for age, gender, and wait time for surgery. A significance of 5% was used, and a confidence interval level of 95% was reported.

RESULTS

The Kaplan-Meier curves for delayed surgery (log-rank, p = 0.00) and the age group (log-rank, p = 0.00) were significantly different. Exponential regression estimated an HR 1.05 (1.05-1.07) for age, HR 1.80 (1.51-2.13) for men, and HR 1.93 (1.61-2.31) for each day of wait for surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

The 2 significant findings of this study are that hip fracture patients over 40 years old have a higher risk of dying at any time compared to the general population and that the waiting time for surgery (a modifiable factor) decreases survival rates at any time.

Atypical Femur Fracture Risk versus Fragility Fracture Prevention with Bisphosphonates

BACKGROUND

Bisphosphonates are effective in reducing hip and osteoporotic fractures. However, concerns about atypical femur fractures have contributed to substantially decreased bisphosphonate use, and the incidence of hip fractures may be increasing. Important uncertainties remain regarding the association between atypical femur fractures and bisphosphonates and other risk factors.

METHODS

We studied women 50 years of age or older who were receiving bisphosphonates and who were enrolled in the Kaiser Permanente Southern California health care system; women were followed from January 1, 2007, to November 30, 2017. The primary outcome was atypical femur fracture. Data on risk factors, including bisphosphonate use, were obtained from electronic health records. Fractures were radiographically adjudicated. Multivariable Cox models were used. The risk-benefit profile was modeled for 1 to 10 years of bisphosphonate use to compare associated atypical fractures with other fractures prevented.

RESULTS

Among 196,129 women, 277 atypical femur fractures occurred. After multivariable adjustment, the risk of atypical fracture increased with longer duration of bisphosphonate use: the hazard ratio as compared with less than 3 months increased from 8.86 (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.79 to 28.20) for 3 years to less than 5 years to 43.51 (95% CI, 13.70 to 138.15) for 8 years or more. Other risk factors included race (hazard ratio for Asians vs. Whites, 4.84; 95% CI, 3.57 to 6.56), height, weight, and glucocorticoid use. Bisphosphonate discontinuation was associated with a rapid decrease in the risk of atypical fracture. Decreases in the risk of osteoporotic and hip fractures during 1 to 10 years of bisphosphonate use far outweighed the increased risk of atypical fracture among Whites but less so among Asians. After 3 years, 149 hip fractures were prevented and 2 bisphosphonate-associated atypical fractures occurred in Whites, as compared with 91 and 8, respectively, in Asians.

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of atypical femur fracture increased with longer duration of bisphosphonate use and rapidly decreased after bisphosphonate discontinuation. Asians had a higher risk than Whites. The absolute risk of atypical femur fracture remained very low as compared with reductions in the risk of hip and other fractures with bisphosphonate treatment. (Funded by Kaiser Permanente and others.).

Racial Disparity in Time to Surgery and Complications for Hip Fracture Patients

Backgroud

Racial and ethnic disparities in orthopedic surgery may be associated with worse perioperative complications. For patients with hip fractures, studies have shown that early surgery, typically within 24 to 48 hours of admission, may decrease postoperative morbidity and mortality. Our objective was to determine whether race is associated with longer time to surgery from hospital presentation and increased postoperative complications.

Methods

We queried the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database from 2011 to 2017 for patients (> 65 years) with hip fractures who underwent surgical fixation. Patients were identified using Current Procedural Terminology codes (27235, 27236, 27244, and 27245). Delayed surgery was defined as time to surgery from hospital admission that was greater than 48 hours. Time to surgery was compared between races using analysis of variance. A multivariate logistic regression analysis adjusting for comorbidities, age, sex, and surgery was performed to determine the likelihood of delayed surgery and rate of postoperative complications.

Results

A total of 58,456 patients who underwent surgery for a hip fracture were included in this study. Seventy-two percent were female patients and the median age was 87 years. The median time to surgery across all patients was 24 hours. African Americans had the longest time to surgery (30.4 ± 27.6 hours) compared to Asians (26.5 ± 24.6 hours), whites (25.8 ± 23.4 hours), and other races (22.7 ± 22.0 hours) (p < 0.001). After adjusting for comorbidities, age, sex, and surgery, there was a 43% increase in the odds of delayed surgery among American Africans compared to whites (odds ratio, 1.43; 95% confidence interval, 1.29-1.58; p < 0.001). Despite higher odds of reintubation, pulmonary embolism, renal insufficiency or failure, and cardiac arrest in African Americans, mortality was significantly lower compared to white patients (4.41% vs. 6.02%, p < 0.001). Asian Americans had the lowest mortality rate (3.84%).

Conclusions

A significant disparity in time to surgery and perioperative complications was seen amongst different races with only African Americans having a longer time to surgery than whites. Further study is needed to determine the etiology of this disparity and highlights the need for targeted strategies to help at-risk patient populations.