Smoking and timing of cessation on postoperative pulmonary complications after curative-intent lung cancer surgery

Risk factors for pneumonia after radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

The objective is to systematically gather relevant research to determine and quantify the risk factors and pooled prevalence for pneumonia after a radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

METHODS

The reporting procedures of this meta-analysis conformed to the PRISMA 2020. Chinese Wan Fang data, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Chinese Periodical Full-text Database (VIP), Embase, Scopus, CINAHL, Ovid MEDLINE, PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library from inception to January 20, 2024, were systematically searched for cohort or case-control studies that reported particular risk factors for pneumonia after radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer. The pooled prevalence of pneumonia was estimated alongside risk factor analysis. The quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale after the chosen studies had been screened and the data retrieved. RevMan 5.4 and R 4.4.2 were the program used to perform the meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Our study included data from 20,840 individuals across 27 trials. The pooled prevalence of postoperative pneumonia was 11.0% (95% CI = 8.0% ~ 15.0%). Fifteen risk factors were statistically significant, according to pooled analyses. Several factors were identified to be strong risk factors, including smoking history (OR 2.71, 95% CI = 2.09 ~ 3.50, I2 = 26%), prolonged postoperative nasogastric tube retention (OR 2.25, 95% CI = 1.36-3.72, I2 = 63%), intraoperative bleeding ≥ 200 ml (OR 2.21, 95% CI = 1.15-4.24, I2 = 79%), diabetes mellitus (OR 4.58, 95% CI = 1.84-11.38, I2 = 96%), male gender (OR 3.56, 95% CI = 1.50-8.42, I2 = 0%), total gastrectomy (OR 2.59, 95% CI = 1.83-3.66, I2 = 0%), COPD (OR 4.72, 95% CI = 3.80-5.86, I2 = 0%), impaired respiratory function (OR 2.72, 95% CI = 1.58-4.69, I2 = 92%), D2 lymphadenectomy (OR 4.14, 95% CI = 2.29-7.49, I2 = 0%), perioperative blood transfusion (OR 4.21, 95% CI = 2.51-7.06, I2 = 90%), and hypertension (OR 2.21, 95% CI = 1.29-3.79, I2 = 0%). Moderate risk factors included excessive surgery duration (OR 1.51, 95% CI = 1.25-1.83, I2 = 90%), advanced age (OR 1.91, 95% CI = 1.42-2.58, I2 = 94%), nutritional status (OR 2.62, 95% CI = 1.55-4.44, I2 = 71%), and history of pulmonary disease (OR 1.61, 95% CI = 1.17-2.21, I2 = 79%).

CONCLUSIONS

This study identified 15 independent risk factors significantly associated with pneumonia after radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer, with a pooled prevalence of 11.0%. These findings emphasize the importance of targeted preventive strategies, including preoperative smoking cessation, nutritional interventions, blood glucose and blood pressure control, perioperative respiratory training, minimizing nasogastric tube retention time, and optimizing perioperative blood transfusion strategies. For high-risk patients, such as the elderly, those undergoing prolonged surgeries, experiencing excessive intraoperative blood loss, undergoing total gastrectomy, or receiving open surgery, close postoperative monitoring is essential. Early recognition of pneumonia signs and timely intervention can improve patient outcomes and reduce complications.

Impact of smoking habits on postoperative outcomes following lung surgery for cancer: results from the Epithor database

OBJECTIVES

Smoking is a modifiable risk factor for lung resections but to what extent preoperative smoking cessation reduces that risk remains unclear. The study hypothesis was that the potential benefit of smoking cessation can be assessed by measuring the risk difference between active and former smokers in a large cohort of patients.

METHODS

Data were extracted from the French Society of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeons (Société Française de Chirurgie Thoracique et Cardiovasculaire) database. The study cohort comprised patients who underwent lung resection for cancer from January 2002 to December 2020 and for which information on smoking status was available. The risk of overall and specific postoperative complications according to smoking status was defined by logistic regression models, and results were presented in terms of odds ratios (ORs) and relative 95% confidence intervals (CIs) adjusted for confounding factors.

RESULTS

Of the 7204 analysed patients at the time of their operations, 20.2% were active smokers, 60.7% were ex-smokers and 19.1% were never smokers. Compared to former smokers, active smokers experienced a higher rate of respiratory complications (OR 1.5, CI 1.2-1.7) and infections (OR 1.6, CI 1.3-1.9). Postoperative atelectasis was significantly reduced in former smokers (3%) compared to active smokers (6.9%, P < 0.01). In active smokers, the risk was related to the level of exposure, being higher for smokers of more than 40 pack-year.

CONCLUSIONS

After lung surgery, active smokers experience a higher risk of respiratory complications, infections and prolonged air leak compared to former smokers. This risk seems to be related to the level of exposure.

Smoking and Complications After Cancer Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Importance

Surgical cancer treatments may be delayed for patients who smoke over concerns for increased risk of complications. Quantifying risks for people who had recently smoked can inform any trade-offs of delaying surgery.

Objective

To investigate the association between smoking status or smoking cessation time and complications after cancer surgery.

Data Sources

Embase, CINAHL, Medline COMPLETE, and Cochrane Library were systematically searched for studies published from January 1, 2000, to August 10, 2023.

Study Selection

Observational and interventional studies comparing the incidence of complications in patients undergoing cancer surgery who do and do not smoke.

Data Extraction and Synthesis

Two reviewers screened results and extracted data according to the Meta-Analyses of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) reporting guidelines. Data were pooled with a random-effects model and adjusted analysis was performed.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The odds ratio (OR) of postoperative complications (of any type) for people who smoke currently vs in the past (4-week preoperative cutoff), currently smoked vs never smoked, and smoked within shorter (2-week cutoff) and longer (1-year cutoff) time frames.

Results

The meta-analyses across 24 studies with a pooled sample of 39 499 participants indicated that smoking within 4 weeks preoperatively was associated with higher odds of postoperative complications compared with ceasing smoking for at least 4 weeks (OR, 1.31 [95% CI, 1.10-1.55]; n = 14 547 [17 studies]) and having never smoked (OR, 2.83 [95% CI, 2.06-3.88]; n = 9726 [14 studies]). Within the shorter term, there was no statistically significant difference in postoperative complications between people who had smoked within 2 weeks preoperatively and those who had stopped between 2 weeks and 3 months in postoperative complications (OR, 1.19 [95% CI, 0.89-1.59]; n = 5341 [10 studies]), although the odds of complications among people who smoked within a year of surgery were higher compared with those who had quit smoking for at least 1 year (OR, 1.13 [95% CI, 1.00-1.29]; N = 31 238 [13 studies]). The results from adjusted analyses were consistent with the key findings.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this systematic review and meta-analysis of smoking cessation and complications after cancer surgery, people with cancer who had stopped smoking for at least 4 weeks before surgery had fewer postoperative complications than those smoking closer to surgery. High quality, intervention-based evidence is needed to identify the optimal cessation period and inform clinicians on the trade-offs of delaying cancer surgery.

Guidelines for preoperative pulmonary function assessment in patients with lung cancer who will undergo surgery (The Japanese Association for Chest Surgery)

This article translates the guidelines for preoperative pulmonary function assessment in patients with lung cancer who will undergo surgery, established by the Japanese Association of Chest Surgery on May 17, 2021, from Japanese to English. The last version of these guidelines was created on April 5, 2011. Over the past decade, changes in clinical practice have occurred that do not align with the current guidelines, prompting a revision in conjunction with the introduction of new evidence this time. This guideline was developed with reference to the internationally adopted GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) system. Extraction of evidence, systematic review, and quality assessment are entrusted to each guideline review committee and the Pulmonary Function Assessment Working Group. Committee members are also responsible for determining the selection of evidence and the extraction period, with a particular emphasis on adopting items considered to be of special importance. The recommended assessment and management is categorized into a general overview, pulmonary function assessment, cardiopulmonary exercise test, pulmonary function assessment for lung cancer with interstitial pneumonia, preoperative smoking cessation, and pulmonary rehabilitation. These are described by the strength of recommendation, the strength of evidence, and the consensus rate.

Preoperative smoking cessation interventions: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Smoking is the leading single cause of preventable death in England and also increases the risk of postoperative complications. The preoperative period is a potential opportunity to introduce smoking cessation interventions to smokers to reduce the risk of postoperative complications. A systematic search was conducted to find all studies that investigated the effectiveness of preoperative smoking cessation interventions. The primary outcome was smoking cessation at surgical time to the last follow-up, and the secondary outcome was postoperative complications that required treatment or ICU admission. A random-effects meta-analysis was used to synthesize the outcomes. Sixteen studies were included in the review (3505 participants), and 14 studies were included in the meta-analysis (2940 randomized participants). The quality of evidence was moderate due to the high risk of bias and heterogeneity. We found that patients who were provided with a smoking cessation intervention had significantly increased odds of quitting smoking by the time of surgery compared with usual care, with a reported relative risk (95% CI) 1.64 (1.30-2.07) and at the longest follow-ups with RR (95% CI) 1.38 (1.12-1.70). Moreover, there was no difference found in the rate of postoperative complications between intervention and control conditions with RR (95% CI) 0.81 (0.62-1.06). The use of standardized outcome measurements is recommended to reduce heterogeneity for future studies, and further investigation focusing on patient perspectives is needed.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42023423202.

The prevalence and associated factors of intraoperative hypotension following thoracic surgery in resources limited area, 2023: multicentre approach

Background

Hypotension is an independent predictor of long-term patient morbidity and duration of hospital stay. Multiple factors contribute to the development of intraoperative hypotension. Prevention and treatment of these factors may reduce patients' hypotension and its associated morbidity and mortality. This study aimed to assess the prevalence and associated factors of intraoperative hypotension in patients undergoing elective thoracic surgery.

Methods

This institution-based cross-sectional study was conducted among 174 adult patients who underwent elective thoracic surgery. A systematic random sampling technique was used, and quantitative data were collected through interviews and data retrieval from charts via a pretested questionnaire. Both bivariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to evaluate the associations between independent and dependent variables. The level of statistical significance was defined as a P-value less than 0.05. The data were entered into Info 7.2.1 and analyzed via SPSS version 26 software, which was used to calculate descriptive statistics, and bivariate and multivariate logistic regression were performed.

Results

In general, information was collected from 174 patients during the study period. The results of the present study revealed that 65 (41%) patients developed intraoperative hypotension (95% CI: 36.43-48%). Intraoperative blood loss was significantly associated with intraoperative hypotension [AOR=9.58, 95% CI (2.57-35.8)] (P=0.001).

Conclusion and Recommendation

The findings of this study revealed high rates of intraoperative hypotension episodes, which were 41%, in patients who underwent elective thoracic surgery. Age, ASA class, type of intraoperative blood loss, type of procedure pre-existence comorbidity, and duration of surgery were predictors of intraoperative hypotension in patients who underwent elective thoracic surgery. The anaesthetist's, surgeon, and PACU staff's understanding of these factors is very crucial for close follow-up of this group of patients.

Timing effects of short-term smoking cessation on lung cancer postoperative complications: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Preoperative smoking cessation may reduce postoperative complications in patients with lung cancer. However, the optimal duration of short-term preoperative smoking cessation remains unclear.

METHODS

Three databases, PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library, were searched for studies published up to April 5, 2024. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale was used to assess the risk of bias. The included studies compared the incidence of postoperative complications between patients with different preoperative smoking cessation times and those with persistent preoperative smoking. A meta-analysis of postoperative complications and events such as pneumonia was performed in patients with lung cancer.

RESULTS

Fourteen studies met the inclusion criteria and included a total of 50,741 patients who had undergone pulmonary resection. The meta-analysis showed that preoperative smoking cessation of > 2 weeks and < 1 month did not reduce the incidence of postoperative complications (odds ratio [OR] 1.05; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.76-1.44; P = 0.78) and pneumonia (OR 0.98; 95% CI 0.60-1.61; P = 0.95). Moreover, preoperative smoking cessation for > 1 month was effective in reducing the incidence of postoperative complications (OR 0.72; 95% CI 0.63-0.83; P < 0.01) as well as pneumonia (OR 0.80; 95% CI 0.49-1.33; P = 0.40).

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis suggests that preoperative smoking cessation for > 1 month is effective in reducing complications and pneumonia after pulmonary resection in patients with lung cancer, especially as video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) and robotic-assisted surgery become more common.

[Chinese Expert Consensus on Perioperative Pulmonary Rehabilitation Training for Lung Cancer]

Perioperative pulmonary rehabilitation may effectively reduce the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications and improve the quality of life of lung cancer patients and its clinical application value in lung cancer patients has been widely recognized. However, there is still no international consensus or guideline for pulmonary rehabilitation regimen, lacking standardized criteria when pulmonary rehabilitation applied in perioperative clinical practice for lung cancer. The consensus provides implementation regimen and process of pulmonary rehabilitation, aiming to promote the reasonable and standardized application of perioperative pulmonary rehabilitation training in clinical practice, sequentially enable patients to maximize benefits from the rehabilitation.
.

Incidence and risk factors of pulmonary complications after lung cancer surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) are associated with high mortality rates after lung cancer surgery. Although some studies have discussed the different risk factors for PPCs, the relationship between these factors and their impact on PPCs remains unclear. Hence, this study aimed to systematically summarize the incidence and determine the risk factors for PPCs. We conducted a systematic search of five English and four Chinese databases from their inception to April 1, 2023. A total of 34 articles (8 cohort studies and 26 case-control studies) (n = 31696, 5833 with PPCs) were included in the analysis. The primary outcome was the incidence of PPC. The secondary outcome was the odds ratio (OR) of PPCs based on the identified risk factors calculated by RevMan 5.4. A narrative descriptive summary of the study results was presented when pooling the results or conducting a meta-analysis was not possible. The pooled incidence of PPCs was 18.4 %. This meta-analysis demonstrated that TNM staging (OR 4.29, 95 % CI 2.59-7.13), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (OR 2.47, 95 % CI 1.80-3.40), smoking history (OR 2.37, 95 % CI 1.33-4.21), poor compliance with respiratory rehabilitation (OR 1.64, 95 % CI 1.17-2.30), male sex (OR 1.62, 95 % CI 1.28-2.04), diabetes (OR 1.56, 95 % CI 1.07-2.27), intraoperative bleeding volume (OR 1.44, 95 % CI 1.02-2.04), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score (ECOG) > 1 (OR 1.37, 95 % CI 1.04-1.80), history of chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy (OR 1.32, 95 % CI 1.03-1.70), older age (OR 1.18, 95 % CI 1.11-1.24), and duration of surgery (OR 1.07, 95 % CI 1.04-1.10) were significantly associated with a higher risk of PPCs. In contrast, the peak expiratory flow rate (PEF) (OR 0.99, 95 % CI 0.98-0.99) was a protective factor. Clinicians should implement targeted and effective interventions to prevent the occurrence of PPCs.

Disparity in Treatment Receipt by Race and Treatment Guideline Revision Years for Stage 1A Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients in the US

INTRODUCTION

Treatment guideline revision introduced by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) is referred to by about 95% of the United States (US) oncologists in treatment decision-making for stage 1A non-small cell lung cancer. It is vital to account for this factor that affects the standard treatment receipt among stage 1A patients, with about a 75% survival rate if treated on time. The first choice for medically fit patients is lobectomy; however, over the decades since the initial guidelines were published, several medical advances have introduced trends in treatment receipt along with other sociodemographic factors that could help identify survival outcomes associated with treatment receipt. Establishing the role of treatment guideline revision years is important to determine a close to true causal relationship in racial treatment disparities.

METHODS

US national cancer registry data for all US counties and historical Area Health Resource Files for the study period 1988-2015 were utilized. Logistic regression analysis was adjusted for clustering of standard errors at the state level and for time-invariant unobserved factors for the year of diagnosis and county. The time-invariant unobservable for each year of diagnosis and county specificity were accounted for by including their dummy variables in the regression model with standard errors clustered at the state level.

RESULTS

Black patients, Medicaid beneficiaries, large fringe metropolitan residents, and those diagnosed post-2007 treatment revisions years are less likely to receive lobectomy, which is the standard treatment guideline for medically fit patients.

CONCLUSION

The study concludes that there exists a difference in treatment type received among stage 1A NSCLC patients in the US by race, socioeconomic status, and treatment guideline revisions.

Surgery challenges and postoperative complications of lung cancer after neoadjuvant immunotherapy

BACKGROUND

In China, real-world data on surgical challenges and postoperative complications after neoadjuvant immunotherapy of lung cancer are limited.

METHODS

Patients were retrospectively enrolled from January 2018 to January 2023, and their clinical and pathological characters were subsequently analyzed. Surgical difficulty was categorized into a binary classification according to surgical duration: challenging or routine. Postoperative complications were graded using Clavien-Dindo grades. Logistic regression was used to identify risk factors affecting the duration of surgery and postoperative complications greater than Clavien-Dindo grade 2.

RESULTS

In total, 261 patients were included. Of these, stage III patients accounted for 62.5% (163/261) at initial diagnosis, with 25.3% (66/261) at stage IIIB. Central-type non-small-cell lung cancer accounted for 61.7% (161/261). One hundred and forty patients underwent video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery and lobectomy accounted for 53.3% (139/261) of patients. Surgical time over average duration was defined as challenging surgeries, accounting for 43.7%. The postoperative complications rate of 261 patients was only 22.2%. Smoking history (odds ratio [OR] = 9.96, 95% [CI] 1.15-86.01, p = 0.03), chemoimmunotherapy (OR = 2.89, 95% CI 1.22-6.86, p = 0.02), and conversion to open surgery (OR = 11.3, 95% CI 1.38-92.9, p = 0.02) were identified as independent risk factors for challenging surgeries, while pneumonectomy (OR = 0.36, 95% CI 0.15-0.86, p= 0.02) was a protective factor. Meanwhile, pneumonectomy (OR = 7.51, 95% CI 2.40-23.51, p < 0.01) and challenging surgeries (OR = 5.53, 95% CI 1.50-20.62, p = 0.01) were found to be risk factors for postoperative complications greater than Clavien-Dindo grade 2.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to immunotherapy alone or in combination with apatinib, neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy could increase the difficulty of surgery while the incidence of postoperative complications remained acceptable. The conversion to open surgery and pneumonectomy after neoadjuvant immunotherapy should be reduced.

Postoperative Tobacco Cessation Improves Quality of Life, Lung Function and Long-Term Survival in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients

OBJECTIVES

About 90% of all non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cases are associated with inhalative tabacco smoking. Half of patients continue smoking during lung cancer therapy. We examined the effects of postoperative smoking cessation on lung function, quality of life (QOL) and long-term survival.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In total, 641 patients, who underwent lobectomy between 2012 and 2019, were identified from our single institutional data base. Postoperatively, patients that actively smoked at the time of operation were offered a structured 'smoking cessation' program. For this retrospective analysis, two patient groups (total n = 90) were selected by pair matching. Group A (n = 60) had no postoperative tobacco smoking. Group B (n = 30) involved postoperative continued smoking. Lung function (FEV1, DLCO) and QOL ('SF-36' questionnaire) were measured 12 months postoperatively. We compared long-term outcomes using Kaplan-Meier curves.

RESULTS

The mean age in group A was 62.6 ± 12.5 years and that in group B was 64.3 ± 9.7 years (p = 0.82); 64% and 62%, respectively, were male (p = 0.46). Preoperative smoking habits were similar ('pack years': group A, 47 ± 31; group B, 49 ± 27; p = 0.87). All relevant baseline characteristics we collected were similar (p > 0.05). One year after lobectomy, FEV1 was reduced by 15% in both groups (p = 0.98). Smoking cessation was significantly associated with improved DLCO (group A: 11 ± 16%; group B: -5 ± 14%; p <0.001) and QOL (vitality (VT): +10 vs. -10, p = 0.017; physical role function (RP): +8 vs. -17, p = 0.012; general health perceptions (GH): +12 vs. -5, p = 0.024). Patients who stopped smoking postoperatively had a significantly superior overall survival (median survival: 89.8 ± 6.8 [95% CI: 76.6-103.1] months vs. 73.9 ± 3.6 [95% CI: 66.9-80.9] months, p = 0.034; 3-year OS rate: 96.2% vs. 81.0%, p = 0.02; 5-year OS rate: 80.0% vs. 64.0%, p = 0.016). The hazard ratio (HR) was 2.31 [95% CI: 1.04-5.13] for postoperative smoking versus tobacco cessation.

CONCLUSION

Postoperative smoking cessation is associated with improved quality of life and lung function testing. Notably, a significant increase in long-term survival rates among non-smoking NSCLC patients was observed. These findings could serve as motivation for patients to successfully complete a non-smoking program.

Evaluation of preoperative cardiopulmonary reserve and surgical risk of patients undergoing lung cancer resection

Lung cancer represents the second most frequent neoplasm and the leading cause of neoplastic death among both women and men, causing almost 25% of all cancer deaths. Patients undergoing lung resection-both for primary and secondary tumors-require careful preoperative cardiopulmonary functional evaluation to confirm the safety of the planned resection, to assess the maximum tolerable volume of resection or to exclude surgery, thus shifting the therapeutic approach toward less invasive options. Cardiopulmonary reserve, pulmonary lung function and mechanical respiratory function represent the cornerstones of preoperative assessment of patients undergoing major lung resection. Spirometry with carbon monoxide diffusing capacity, split function tests, exercise tests and cardiologic evaluation are the gold standard instruments to safely assess the entire cardiorespiratory function before pulmonary resection. Although pulmonary mechanical and parenchymal function, together with cardiorespiratory compliance represent the mainstay of preoperative evaluation in thoracic surgery, the variables that are responsible for fitness in patients who have undergone lung resection have expanded and are being continually investigated. Nevertheless, because of the shift to older patients who undergo lung resection, a global approach is required, taking into consideration variables like frailty status and likelihood of postoperative functional deterioration. Finally, the decision to go ahead with surgery in fragile patients being consideredfor lung resection should be evaluated in a multispecialty preoperative discussion to provide a personalized risk stratification. The aim of this review is to focus on preoperative evaluation of cardiopulmonary reserve and surgical risk stratification of patients candidate for lung cancer resection. It does so by a literature search of clinical guidelines, expert consensus statements, meta-analyses, clinical recommendations, book chapters and randomized trials (1980-2022).

Neoadjuvant therapy in non-small cell lung cancer: basis, promise, and challenges

Introduction

Survival rates for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remain poor despite the decade-long established standard of surgical resection and systemic adjuvant therapy. Realizing this, researchers are exploring novel therapeutic targets and deploying neoadjuvant therapies to predict and improve clinical and pathological outcomes in lung cancer patients. Neoadjuvant therapy is also increasingly being used to downstage disease to allow for resection with a curative intent. In this review, we aim to summarize the current and developing landscape of using neoadjuvant therapy in the management of NSCLC.

Methods

The PubMed.gov and the ClinicalTrials.gov databases were searched on 15 January 2023, to identify published research studies and trials relevant to this review. One hundred and seven published articles and seventeen ongoing clinical trials were selected, and relevant findings and information was reviewed.

Results & Discussion

Neoadjuvant therapy, proven through clinical trials and meta-analyses, exhibits safety and efficacy comparable to or sometimes surpassing adjuvant therapy. By attacking micro-metastases early and reducing tumor burden, it allows for effective downstaging of disease, allowing for curative surgical resection attempts. Research into neoadjuvant therapy has necessitated the development of surrogate endpoints such as major pathologic response (MPR) and pathologic complete response (pCR) allowing for shorter duration clinical trials. Novel chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and targeted therapy agents are being tested at a furious rate, paving the way for a future of personalized systemic therapy in NSCLC. However, challenges remain that prevent further mainstream adoption of preoperative (Neoadjuvant) therapy. These include the risk of delaying curative surgical resection in scenarios of adverse events or treatment resistance. Also, the predictive value of surrogate markers of disease cure still needs robust verification. Finally, the body of published data is still limited compared to adjuvant therapy. Addressing these concerns with more large scale randomized controlled trials is needed.

Does postoperative pulmonary infection correlate with intestinal flora following gastric cancer surgery? - a nested case-control study

Introduction

The primary objective of this study was to investigate the potential correlation between gut microbes and postoperative pulmonary infection in gastric cancer patients. Additionally, we aimed to deduce the mechanism of differential functional genes in disease progression to gain a better understanding of the underlying pathophysiology.

Methods

A nested case-control study design was utilized to enroll patients with gastric cancer scheduled for surgery at West China Hospital of Sichuan University. Patients were categorized into two groups, namely, the pulmonary infection group and the control group, based on the development of postoperative pulmonary infection. Both groups were subjected to identical perioperative management protocols. Fecal samples were collected 24 h postoperatively and upon pulmonary infection diagnosis, along with matched controls. The collected samples were subjected to 16S rDNA and metagenomic analyses, and clinical data and blood samples were obtained for further analysis.

Results

A total of 180 fecal specimens were collected from 30 patients in both the pulmonary infection and control groups for 16S rDNA analysis, and 3 fecal samples from each group were selected for metagenomic analysis. The study revealed significant alterations in the functional genes of the intestinal microbiome in patients with postoperative pulmonary infection in gastric cancer, primarily involving Klebsiella, Enterobacter, Ruminococcus, and Collinsella. During postoperative pulmonary infection, gut flora and inflammatory factors were found to be associated with the lipopolysaccharide synthesis pathway and short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) synthesis pathway.

Discussion

The study identified enriched populations of Klebsiella, Escherella, and intestinal bacteria during pulmonary infection following gastric cancer surgery. These bacteria were found to regulate the lipopolysaccharide synthesis pathway, contributing to the initiation and progression of pulmonary infections. Inflammation modulation in patients with postoperative pulmonary infection may be mediated by short-chain fatty acids. The study also revealed that SCFA synthesis pathways were disrupted, affecting inflammation-related immunosuppression pathways. By controlling and maintaining intestinal barrier function, SCFAs may potentially reduce the occurrence of pulmonary infections after gastric cancer surgery. These findings suggest that targeting the gut microbiome and SCFA synthesis pathways may be a promising approach for preventing postoperative pulmonary infections in gastric cancer patients.

Distance of Residence From the Cancer Center Influences Perioperative Outcomes After Robotic-Assisted Pulmonary Lobectomy?

Introduction

Increased distance of residence from the hospital has been previously associated with worse postoperative outcomes, especially increased hospital length of stay (LOS) after elective surgery in the USA as well as after pulmonary lobectomy in Japan. We sought to determine if the distance from our cancer center affects postoperative outcomes after robotic-assisted pulmonary lobectomy.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 449 patients who underwent robotic-assisted pulmonary lobectomy by one surgeon for known or suspected lung cancer. Two patients were excluded due to incomplete data. Each patient’s residential ZIP code was used to determine the distance of their primary residence from our cancer center. Group 1 consisted of patients living less than 120 miles away while Group 2 consisted of patients living more than 120 miles away. Demographic factors, preoperative comorbidities, the incidence of postoperative complications, chest tube duration, and hospital LOS were compared by the Pearson chi-square or Kruskal-Wallis tests, and Kaplan-Meier survival was compared by Cox regression. Statistical significance was established as p≤0.05.

Results

Group 1 was found to have a higher mean body mass index (BMI) (28.3 kg/m²) than Group 2 (27.0 kg/m²; p=.031). Group 1 also tended to have a higher rate of preoperative hypertension (HTN; 59%) than Group 2 (47%; p=.018). No other preoperative comorbidities were significant. Median hospital LOS was found to differ between Group 1 (4 days) and Group 2 (5 days; p=.048). Postoperative complication rates did not differ between Group 1 (35%) and Group 2 (40%; p=.370). Median chest tube durations for Group 1 (4 days) vs. Group 2 (4 days) did not differ (p=.093). Five-year overall survival (OS) did not differ between the two groups (p=.550).

Conclusions

Longer distance from patient residence to our cancer center was associated with higher BMI, higher rates of preoperative HTN, and longer LOS. Postoperative complication rates, chest tube duration, and five-year OS were not significantly affected by distance. These results supported similar results in a Japanese study that indicated distance extends the LOS, regardless of the type of transportation used by patients. Further research analyzing the effects of socioeconomic status and insurance coverage on perioperative outcomes should be conducted to identify subpopulations in the USA that suffer disparities in access to and delivery of healthcare.

Feasibility study of a randomised controlled trial of preoperative and postoperative nutritional supplementation in major lung surgery

OBJECTIVES

Malnutrition and weight loss are important risk factors for complications after lung surgery. However, it is uncertain whether modifying or optimising perioperative nutritional state with oral supplements results in a reduction in malnutrition, complications or quality of life.

DESIGN

A randomised, open label, controlled feasibility study was conducted to assess the feasibility of carrying out a large multicentre randomised trial of nutritional intervention. The intervention involved preoperative carbohydrate-loading drinks (4×200 mL evening before surgery and 2×200 mL the morning of surgery) and early postoperative nutritional protein supplement drinks two times per day for 14 days compared with the control group receiving an equivalent volume of water.

SETTING

Single adult thoracic centre in the UK.

PARTICIPANTS

All adult patients admitted for major lung surgery. Patients were included if were able to take nutritional drinks prior to surgery and give written informed consent. Patients were excluded if they were likely unable to complete the study questionnaires, they had a body mass index <18.5 kg/m², were receiving parenteral nutrition or known pregnancy.

RESULTS

All patients presenting for major lung surgery were screened over a 6-month period, with 163 patients screened, 99 excluded and 64 (41%) patients randomised. Feasibility criteria were met and the study completed recruitment 5 months ahead of target. The two groups were well balanced and tools used to measure outcomes were robust. Compliance with nutritional drinks was 97% preoperatively and 89% postoperatively; 89% of the questionnaires at 3 months were returned fully completed. The qualitative interviews demonstrated that the trial and the intervention were acceptable to patients. Patients felt the questionnaires captured their experience of recovery from surgery well.

CONCLUSION

A large multicentre randomised controlled trial of nutritional intervention in major lung surgery is feasible and required to test clinical efficacy in improving outcomes after surgery.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ISRCTN16535341.

Clinical guide to perioperative management for videothoracoscopy lung resection (Section of Cardiac, Vascular and Thoracic Anesthesia, SEDAR; Spanish Society of Thoracic Surgery, SECT; Spanish Society of Physiotherapy)

The introduction of video-assisted thoracoscopic (VATS) techniques has led to a new approach in thoracic surgery. VATS is performed by inserting a thoracoscope through a small incisions in the chest wall, thus maximizing the preservation of muscle and tissue. Because of its low rate of morbidity and mortality, VATS is currently the technique of choice in most thoracic procedures. Lung resection by VATS reduces prolonged air leaks, arrhythmia, pneumonia, postoperative pain and inflammatory markers. This reduction in postoperative complications shortens hospital length of stay, and is particularly beneficial in high-risk patients with low tolerance to thoracotomy. Compared with conventional thoracotomy, the oncological results of VATS surgery are similar or even superior to those of open surgery. This aim of this multidisciplinary position statement produced by the thoracic surgery working group of the Spanish Society of Anesthesiology and Reanimation (SEDAR), the Spanish Society of Thoracic Surgery (SECT), and the Spanish Association of Physiotherapy (AEF) is to standardize and disseminate a series of perioperative anaesthesia management guidelines for patients undergoing VATS lung resection surgery. Each recommendation is based on an in-depth review of the available literature by the authors. In this document, the care of patients undergoing VATS surgery is organized in sections, starting with the surgical approach, and followed by the three pillars of anaesthesia management: preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative anaesthesia.

Impact of smoking status and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease on pulmonary complications post lung cancer surgery

Introduction

Smoking and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are associated with an increased risk of post-operative pulmonary complications (PPCs) following lung cancer resection. It remains unclear whether smoking cessation reduces this risk.

Methods

Retrospective review of a large, prospectively collected database of over 1000 consecutive resections for lung cancer in a quaternary lung cancer centre over a 23-year period.

Results

One thousand and thirteen patients underwent curative-intent lobectomy or pneumonectomy between 1995 and 2018. Three hundred and sixty-two patients (36%) were ex-smokers, 314 (31%) were current smokers and 111 (11%) were never smokers. A pre-operative diagnosis of COPD was present in 57% of current smokers, 57% of ex-smokers and 20% of never smokers. Just over 25% of patients experienced a PPC. PPCs were more frequent in current smokers compared to never smokers (27% vs 17%, p = 0.036), however, no difference was seen between current and ex-smokers (p = 0.412) or between never and ex-smokers (p = 0.113). Those with a diagnosis of COPD, independent of smoking status, had a higher frequency of both PPCs (65% vs 35%, p<0.01) and overall complications (60% vs 40%, p<0.01) as well as a longer length of hospital stay (10 vs 9 days, p<0.01).

Conclusion

Smoking and COPD are both associated with a higher rate of PPCs post lung cancer resection. COPD, independent of smoking status, is also associated with an increased overall post-operative complication rate and length of hospital stay. An emphasis on COPD treatment optimisation, rather than smoking cessation in isolation, may help improve post-operative outcomes.

[The role of the intensive care unit after thoracic surgery]

Lung (bronchial) cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related death in Western countries today. Thoracic surgery represents a major therapeutic strategy and the various advances made in recent years have made it possible to develop less and less invasive techniques. That said, the postoperative period may be lengthy, post-surgical approaches need to be more precisely codified, and it matters that the different interventions involved be supported by sound scientific evidence. To date, however, there exists no evidence that preventive postoperative admission to intensive care is beneficial for patients having undergone lung resection surgery without immediate complications. A stratification of the risk of complications taking into consideration the patient's general state of health (e.g., nutritional status, degree of autonomy, etc.), comorbidities and type of surgery could be a useful predictive tool regarding the need for postoperative intensive care. However, serious post-operative complications remain relatively frequent and post-operative management of these intensive care patients is liable to become complex and long-lasting. In the aftermath of the validation of "enhanced recovery after surgery" (ERAS) in thoracic surgery, new protocols are needed to optimize management of patients having undergone pulmonary resection. This article focuses on the main postoperative complications and more broadly on intensive care patient management following thoracic surgery.

Perioperative Pulmonary Atelectasis: Part II. Clinical Implications

The development of pulmonary atelectasis is common in the surgical patient. Pulmonary atelectasis can cause various degrees of gas exchange and respiratory mechanics impairment during and after surgery. In its most serious presentations, lung collapse could contribute to postoperative respiratory insufficiency, pneumonia, and worse overall clinical outcomes. A specific risk assessment is critical to allow clinicians to optimally choose the anesthetic technique, prepare appropriate monitoring, adapt the perioperative plan, and ensure the patient's safety. Bedside diagnosis and management have benefited from recent imaging advancements such as lung ultrasound and electrical impedance tomography, and monitoring such as esophageal manometry. Therapeutic management includes a broad range of interventions aimed at promoting lung recruitment. During general anesthesia, these strategies have consistently demonstrated their effectiveness in improving intraoperative oxygenation and respiratory compliance. Yet these same intraoperative strategies may fail to affect additional postoperative pulmonary outcomes. Specific attention to the postoperative period may be key for such outcome impact of lung expansion. Interventions such as noninvasive positive pressure ventilatory support may be beneficial in specific patients at high risk for pulmonary atelectasis (e.g., obese) or those with clinical presentations consistent with lung collapse (e.g., postoperative hypoxemia after abdominal and cardiothoracic surgeries). Preoperative interventions may open new opportunities to minimize perioperative lung collapse and prevent pulmonary complications. Knowledge of pathophysiologic mechanisms of atelectasis and their consequences in the healthy and diseased lung should provide the basis for current practice and help to stratify and match the intensity of selected interventions to clinical conditions.

Do ARISCAT scores help to predict the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications in elderly patients after upper abdominal surgery? An observational study at a single university hospital

Background

The incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) is increasing in line with the rise in the number of surgical procedures performed on geriatric patients. In this study, we determined the incidence and risk factors of PPCs in elderly Thai patients who underwent upper abdominal procedures, and we investigated whether the Assess Respiratory Risk in Surgical Patients in Catalonia (ARISCAT) score helps to predict PPCs in Thais.

Methods

A retrospective study was conducted on upper abdominal surgical patients aged over 65 years who had been admitted to the surgical ward of Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Thailand, between January 2016 and December 2019. Data were collected on significant PPCs using the European Perioperative Clinical Outcome definitions. To identify risk factors, evaluations were made of the relationships between the PPCs and various preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative factors, including ARISCAT scores.

Results

In all, 1100 elderly postoperative patients were analyzed. Their mean age was 73.6 years, and 48.5% were male. Nearly half of their operations were laparoscopic cholecystectomies. The incidence of PPCs was 7.7%, with the most common being pleural effusion, atelectasis, and pneumonia. The factors associated with PPCs were preoperative oxygen saturation less than 96% (OR = 2.6, 1.2–5.5), albumin level below 3.5 g/dL (OR = 1.7, 1.0–2.8), duration of surgery exceeding 3 h (OR = 2.0, 1.0–4.2), and emergency surgery (OR = 2.8, 1.4–5.8). There was a relationship between ARISCAT score and PPC incidence, with a correlation coefficient of 0.226 (P < 0.001). The area under the curve was 0.72 (95% CI, 0.665–0.774; P < 0.001).

Conclusions

PPCs are common in elderly patients. They are associated with increased levels of postoperative morbidities and extended ICU and hospital stays. Using the ARISCAT score as an assessment tool facilitates the classification of Thai patients into PPC risk groups. The ARISCAT scoring system might be able to be similarly applied in other Southeast Asian countries.

Impact of Family and Social Network on Tobacco Cessation Amongst Cancer Patients

Continued smoking after a cancer diagnosis adversely affects outcomes, including recurrence of the primary cancer and/or the development of second primary cancers. Despite this, prevalence of smoking is high in cancer survivors and higher in survivors of tobacco-related cancers. The diagnosis of cancer provides a teachable moment, and social networks, such as family, friends, and social groups, seem to play a significant role in smoking habits of cancer patients. Interventions that involve members of patients’ social network, especially those who also smoke, might improve tobacco cessation rates. Very few studies have been conducted to evaluate and target patients’ social networks. Yet, many studies have demonstrated that cancer survivors who received higher levels of social support were less likely to be current smokers. Clinicians should be doing as much as they can to encourage smoking cessation in both patients and relevant family members. Research aimed at influencing smoking behavioral change in the entire family is needed to increase cessation intervention success rate, which can ultimately improve the health and longevity of patients as well as their family members.

Elevated preoperative suPAR is a strong and independent risk marker for postoperative complications in patients undergoing major noncardiac surgery (SPARSE)

BACKGROUND

Patients undergoing major surgery are often at risk of developing postoperative complications. We investigated whether a preoperative marker of chronic inflammation, soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor, can aid in identifying patients at high risk for postoperative complications, morbidity, and mortality.

METHODS

In this prospective observational study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03851965), EDTA blood was collected from consecutive adult White patients scheduled for major noncardiac surgery with expected duration ≥2 hours under general anesthesia. Inclusion criteria were age ≥18 years and American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I to IV. Plasma soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor levels were determined using the suPARnostic quick triage lateral flow assay. The primary endpoint was postoperative complications defined as presence of any complication and/or admission to intensive care unit and/or mortality within the first 90 postoperative days.

RESULTS

Preoperative soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor had an odds ratio of 1.50 (95% confidence interval: 1.24-1.82) for every ng/mL increase. When including age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, C-reactive protein, and grouped soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor in multivariate analysis, patients with soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor between 5.5 and 10 ng/mL had an odds ratio of 11.2 (confidence interval: 3.1-40.8) and patients with soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor >10 ng/mL had an odds ratio of 19.9 (95% confidence interval: 4.3-92.9) compared to patients with soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor ≤5.5 ng/mL, respectively. Receiver operating characteristic analysis of soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor showed an area under the curve of 0.82 (confidence interval: 0.72-0.91). Receiver operating characteristic analysis combining age, sex, C-reactive protein levels, and American Society of Anesthesiologists score and had an area under the curve of 0.71 (95% confidence interval: 0.61-0.82). Adding soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor to this model increased the area under the curve to 0.83 (95% confidence interval: 0.74-0.92) (P = .033).

CONCLUSION

Preoperative soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor provided strong and independent predictive value on postoperative complications in White patients undergoing major noncardiac surgery.

Effects of Smoking, Obesity, and Pulmonary Function on Home Oxygen Use after Curative Lung Cancer Surgery

RATIONALE

Lung cancer surgical morbidity has been decreasing, increasing attention to quality-of-life measures. A chronic sequela of lung cancer surgery is use of postoperative oxygen at home after discharge. Prospective studies are needed to identify risk predictors for home oxygen(HO2) use after curative lung cancer surgery.

OBJECTIVES

To prospectively assess risk factors for postoperative oxygen use and post-surgical morbidity in patients undergoing curative lung cancer surgery. We hypothesized that obesity, poor pre-operative pulmonary function, and smoking status would contribute to the risk of postoperative oxygen use.

METHODS

Patients undergoing surgery for first primary non-small cell lung cancer at Mount Sinai, from 2016 to 2020. Univariate, multivariable logistic regression analyses and adjusted odds ratio and 95% confidence intervals were assessed.

RESULTS

Of the 433 patients diagnosed with pathologic stage I non-small cell lung cancer, 63 (14.5%) were discharged with HO2. Using multivariable analyses, body mass index (OR for BMI25-30=4.0, 95% CI:1.6-11.2, p = 0.005 and OR for BMI≥ 30=6.1, 95% CI:2.4-17.5, p<0.001)and pre-operative diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide(DLCO) (OR for DLCO<40=24.9, 95% CI:3.6-234.1, p=0.002 and OR for DLCO 40-59=3.1, 95% CI:1.3-7.2, p=0.008) were significant independent risk factors associated with risk of home oxygen after controlling for other covariates. Although current smoking significantly increased the risk in the univariate analysis, it was no longer significant in the multivariable model.

CONCLUSIONS

Obesity and diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide were significant as risk factors for oxygen use at home after discharge. These findings allow for identification of patients at risk of being discharged with home oxygen after lung resection surgery.

Long-term Outcomes After Lung Cancer Resection in Smokers: Analysis of the National Lung Screening Trial

BACKGROUND

Smoking is a known risk factor for perioperative complications after lung resection; however, little data exists looking at the impact of smoking status (current versus former) on long-term oncologic outcomes after lung cancer surgery. We sought to compare overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and cancer-specific mortality (CSM) in current and former smokers using data from the National Lung Screening Trial (NLST). Additionally, we performed subset analysis in current smokers in order to evaluate the effect of modern surgical techniques on long-term outcomes.

METHODS

Patients with clinical stage IA or IB NSCLC who underwent upfront resection within 180 days of diagnosis were identified in the NLST database. Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to assess differences in patient and treatment characteristics with respect to OS and PFS, with a cause-specific hazard model used for CSM.

RESULTS

A total of 593 patients were included in the study (269 former smokers, 324 current smokers). Lobar resection (LR) was performed more often than sublobar resection (SLR) (481 vs. 112), and thoracotomy was performed more often than thoracoscopy (482 vs. 86). Comparison of current versus former smokers showed no difference in OS or PFS after resection. Higher CSM was seen in current smokers (p = 0.049). Subset analysis of current smokers revealed no difference in OS or PFS between sub-lobar and lobar resection or thoracotomy and thoracoscopy. Although higher CSM was associated with thoracoscopy versus thoracotomy in this group, this finding was limited by a relatively small thoracoscopy sample size of 44 patients (p = 0.026).

CONCLUSION

Our analysis of the NLST database shows no significant difference in OS and PFS when comparing current and former smokers undergoing resection for stage I NSCLC. Active smoking status was associated with higher CSM. Subset analysis of current smokers showed no difference in OS or PFS between sub-lobar and lobar resection or thoracotomy and thoracoscopy. Higher CSM was seen in current smokers who underwent thoracoscopy compared to thoracotomy; however, this finding was limited by a small sample size.

The Value of Residual Volume/Total Lung Capacity as an Indicator for Predicting Postoperative Lung Function in Non-Small Lung Cancer

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is one of the most frequently occurring concomitant diseases in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). It is characterized by small airways and the hyperinflation of the lung. Patients with hyperinflated lung tend to have more reserved lung function than conventionally predicted after lung cancer surgery. The aim of this study was to identify other indicators in predicting postoperative lung function after lung resection for lung cancer. Patients with NSCLC who underwent curative lobectomy with mediastinal lymph node dissection from 2017 to 2019 were included. Predicted postoperative FEV₁ (ppoFEV₁) was calculated using the formula: preoperative FEV₁ × (19 segments-the number of segments to be removed) ÷ 19. The difference between the measured postoperative FEV₁ and ppoFEV₁ was defined as an outcome. Patients were categorized into two groups: preserved FEV₁ if the difference was positive and non-preserved FEV₁, if otherwise. In total, 238 patients were included: 74 (31.1%) in the FEV₁ non-preserved group and 164 (68.9%) in the FEV₁ preserved group. The proportion of preoperative residual volume (RV)/total lung capacity (TLC) ≥ 40% in the FEV₁ non-preserved group (21.4%) was lower than in the preserved group (36.1%) (p = 0.03). In logistic regression analysis, preoperative RV/TLC ≥ 40% was related to postoperative FEV1 preservation. (adjusted OR, 2.02, p = 0.041). Linear regression analysis suggested that preoperative RV/TLC was positively correlated with a significant difference. (p = 0.004) Preoperative RV/TLC ≥ 40% was an independent predictor of preserved lung function in patients undergoing curative lobectomy with mediastinal lymph node dissection. Preoperative RV/TLC is positively correlated with postoperative lung function.

Preoperative risk factors for postoperative pneumonia following primary Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study is to evaluate risk factors for pneumonia following THA and TKA.

METHODS

Patients were identified from the American College of Surgeons National Quality Improvement Database (NSQIP) who experienced postoperative pneumonia after undergoing primary THA and TKA.

RESULTS

Many characteristics including old age, anemia, diabetes, cardiac comorbidities, dialysis, and smoking were independent risk factors for postoperative pneumonia after THA or TKA.

CONCLUSION

This analysis offers new evidence on risk factors associated with the development of pneumonia after THA and TKA. These risk factors can help guide clinicians in preventing postoperative pneumonia after THA and TKA.

Modern Perioperative Practices May Mitigate Effects of Continued Smoking Among Lung Cancer Patients

BACKGROUND

Though smokers are at an increased risk for postoperative pulmonary complications following thoracic surgery, the relationship between cessation timing and postoperative pulmonary complications has not been explored in an era of enhanced recovery protocols and active tobacco cessation programs. Because a strong preference exists among thoracic surgeons to delay surgery to continued smokers, we sought to evaluate this relationship in a modern era.

METHODS

Patients undergoing lung resection for a diagnosis of non-small cell lung cancer from 2012-2017 were identified. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate preoperative tobacco cessation timing to determine the impact upon postoperative pulmonary complications.

RESULTS

1038 ever-smokers were identified. Patients were current smokers in 30 (3%) instances, and among former smokers, the preoperative cessation interval was 0-14 days in 10% (104), >14 days-1 month in 6% (62), >1 month-1 year in 18% (189), >1-5 years in 10% (107), and >5 years in 53% (546). Pulmonary complications were experienced by 269 (26%) patients. Multivariable analysis revealed that no group of recent or long-term quitters experienced superior outcomes in terms of pulmonary complications, when evaluating various periods of abstinence in comparison to continued smokers and active quitters.

CONCLUSIONS

In an era of enhanced recovery protocols, minimally invasive surgery, and active tobacco cessation programs which may help patients to cut back, our data do not support the practice of delaying or denying surgery to patients who have difficulty quitting completely. Perioperative cessation counseling should be aimed at long-term benefits, including reduction of disease recurrence and secondary malignancies.

Clinical guide to perioperative management for videothoracoscopy lung resection (Section of Cardiac, Vascular and Thoracic Anesthesia, SEDAR; Spanish Society of Thoracic Surgery, SECT; Spanish Society of Physiotherapy)

The introduction of video-assisted thoracoscopic (VATS) techniques has led to a new approach in thoracic surgery. VATS is performed by inserting a thoracoscope through a small incisions in the chest wall, thus maximizing the preservation of muscle and tissue. Because of its low rate of morbidity and mortality, VATS is currently the technique of choice in most thoracic procedures. Lung resection by VATS reduces prolonged air leaks, arrhythmia, pneumonia, postoperative pain and inflammatory markers. This reduction in postoperative complications shortens hospital length of stay, and is particularly beneficial in high-risk patients with low tolerance to thoracotomy. Compared with conventional thoracotomy, the oncological results of VATS surgery are similar or even superior to those of open surgery. This aim of this multidisciplinary position statement produced by the thoracic surgery working group of the Spanish Society of Anesthesiology and Reanimation (SEDAR), the Spanish Society of Thoracic Surgery (SECT), and the Spanish Association of Physiotherapy (AEF) is to standardize and disseminate a series of perioperative anaesthesia management guidelines for patients undergoing VATS lung resection surgery. Each recommendation is based on an in-depth review of the available literature by the authors. In this document, the care of patients undergoing VATS surgery is organized in sections, starting with the surgical approach, and followed by the three pillars of anaesthesia management: preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative anaesthesia.

Variability in Smoking Status for Lobectomy Among Society of Thoracic Surgeons Database Participants

BACKGROUND

Current smokers undergoing lobectomy are at greater risk of complications than are former smokers. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) composite score for rating program performance for lobectomy adjusts for smoking status, a modifiable risk factor. This study examined variability in the proportion of current smokers undergoing lobectomy among STS database participants. Additionally, the study determined whether each participant's rating changed if smoking was excluded from the risk adjustment model.

METHODS

This is a retrospective analysis of the STS cohort used to develop the composite score for rating program performance for lobectomy. The study summarized the variability among STS database participants for performing lobectomy on current smokers and compared star ratings developed from models with and without smoking status.

RESULTS

There were 24,912 patients with smoking status data: 23% current smokers, 62% former smokers, and 15% never smokers. There was significant variability among participants in the proportion of current smokers undergoing lobectomy (3% to 48.6%; P < .001). Major morbidity or mortality (composite) was greater in current smokers (12.1%) than in former smokers (8.6%) and never smokers (4.2%) (P < .001). Using the current risk adjustment model, participant star ratings were as follows: 1 star, n = 6 (3.2%); 2 stars, n = 170 (91.4%); and 3 stars, n = 10 (5.4%). When smoking status was excluded from the model, 1 participant shifted from a 2-star to a 3-star program.

CONCLUSIONS

There is substantial variability among STS database participants with regard to the proportion of current smokers undergoing lobectomy. However, exclusion of smoking status from the model did not significantly affect participant star rating.

Preoperative evaluation and indications for pulmonary metastasectomy

Pulmonary metastasectomy (PM) is an established treatment that can provide improved long-term survival for patients with metastatic tumor(s) in the lung. In the current era, where treatment options other than PM such as stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), immunotherapy, and molecular-targeted therapy are available, thoracic surgeons should review the approach to the preoperative evaluation and the indications. Preoperative evaluation consists of history and physical examinations, physiological tests, and radiological examinations. Radiological examinations serve to identify the differential diagnosis of the pulmonary nodules, evaluate their precise number, location, and features, and search for extra thoracic metastases. The indication of PM should be considered from both physiological and oncological points of view. The general criteria for PM are as follows; (I) the patient has a good general condition, (II) the primary malignancy is controlled, (III) there is no other extrapulmonary metastases, and (IV) the pulmonary lesion(s) are thought to be completely resectable. In addition to the general eligibility criteria of PM, prognostic factors of each tumor type should be considered when deciding the indication for PM. When patients have multiple poor prognostic factors and/or a short disease-free interval (DFI), thoracic surgeons should not hesitate to observe the patient for a certain period before deciding on the indication for PM. A multidisciplinary discussion is needed in order to decide the indication for PM.

The Association of Preoperative Smoking With Postoperative Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Preoperative smoking is an easily modifiable risk factor and has associations with increased postoperative morbidity and mortality. It is important to clarify these risks for specific procedures to provide improved and evidence-based quality of care. The purpose of the present study aims to identify the associations between preoperative smoking and 30-day postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty.

METHODS

We used R statistics to conduct a multivariable logistic regression analysis followed by a propensity score matching analysis to explore the association between preoperative smoking and postoperative outcomes.

RESULTS

A final cohort of 67,897 patients who underwent total hip arthroplasty was selected for analysis. After adjusting for potential confounders, the odds of postoperative pulmonary complications (odds ratio [OR], 1.352; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.075-1.700; P = .01), infectious complications (OR, 1.310; 95% CI, 1.094-1.567; P = .003), and extended hospital stay (OR, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.099-1.251; P < .001) were all significantly higher in the smoking population. After propensity matching these cohorts, both infectious complications (P = .017) and extended hospital stays (P = .001) were significantly higher in smoking patients.

CONCLUSIONS

After controlling for potential confounding variables, our multivariable regression analysis revealed a significant increase in pulmonary and infectious complications as well as significantly longer hospital stays in our smoking population. When using a propensity score matching analysis, an increase in infectious complications as well as extended hospital stay was observed. Given the concerning prevalence of smoking in the United States, our data provide updated information toward a growing mass of literature supporting smoking cessation before surgical operations.

Preoperative Cumulative Smoking Dose on Lung Cancer Surgery in a Japanese Nationwide Database

BACKGROUND

Smoking is a known risk factor for postoperative mortality and morbidity. However, the significance of cumulative smoking dose in preoperative risk assessment has not been established. We examined the influence of preoperative cumulative smoking dose on surgical outcomes after lobectomy for primary lung cancer.

METHODS

A total of 80,989 patients with primary lung cancer undergoing lobectomy from 2014 to 2016 were enrolled. Preoperative cumulative smoking dose was categorized by pack-years (PY): nonsmokers, PY = 0; light smokers, 0 < PY < 10; moderate smokers, 10 ≤ PY < 30; and heavy smokers, 30 ≤ PY. The risk of short-term outcomes was assessed according to PY by multivariable analysis adjusted for other covariates.

RESULTS

Postoperative 30-day mortality, as well as pulmonary, cardiovascular, and infectious complications, increased with preoperative PY. Multivariable analysis revealed that the odds ratios (ORs) for postoperative mortality compared with nonsmokers were 1.76 for light smokers (P = .044), 1.60 for moderate smokers (P = .026), and 1.73 for heavy smokers (P = .003). The ORs for pulmonary complications compared with nonsmokers were 1.20 for light smokers (P = .022), 1.40 for moderate smokers (P < .001), and 1.72 for heavy smokers (P < .001). Heavy smokers had a significantly increased risk of postoperative cardiovascular (OR, 1.26; P = .002) and infectious (OR, 1.39; P = .007) complications compared with nonsmokers.

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of mortality and morbidity after lung resection could be predicted according to preoperative cumulative smoking dose. These findings contribute to the development of strategies in perioperative management of lung resection patients.

Engagement and Effectiveness of a Smoking Cessation Quitline Intervention in a Thoracic Surgery Clinic

Importance

Smoking quitline programs effectively promote smoking cessation in outpatient primary care settings.

Objective

To examine the factors associated with smoking quitline engagement and smoking cessation among patients undergoing thoracic surgery who consented to a quitline electronic referral.

Design, Setting, and Participants

A retrospective cohort study was conducted from January 1, 2014, to December 31, 2018, among 111 active smoking patients referred to the quitline from a thoracic surgery outpatient clinic visit. Patients were divided into operative and nonoperative cohorts.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Primary outcomes were engagement rates in the quitline program and successful smoking cessation. Secondary outcomes were self-reported point prevalence abstinence at 1 month and 6 months after the smoking quit date.

Results

Of 111 patients (62 men; mean [SD] age, 61.8 [11.2] years) who had a quitline referral, 58 (52%) underwent surgery, and 32 of these 58 patients (55%) participated in the program. Of the 53 nonoperative patients (48%), 24 (45%) participated in the program. In the operative cohort, there was no difference in the smoking cessation rate between quitline participants and nonparticipants (21 of 32 [66%] vs 16 of 6 [62%]; P = .79) or in point prevalence abstinence at 1 month (23 of 32 [72%] vs 14 of 25 [56%]; P = .27) or 6 months (14 of 28 [50%] vs 6 of 18 [33%]; P = .36). Similarly, in the nonoperative cohort, there was no difference in the smoking cessation rate between quitline participants and nonparticipants (8 of 24 [33%] vs 11 of 29 [38%]; P = .78) or in point prevalence abstinence at 1 month (7 of 24 [29%] vs 8 of 27 [30%]; P = .99) or 6 months (6 of 23 [26%] vs 6 of 25 [24%]; P = .99). Regardless of quitline participation, operative patients had a 1.8-fold higher proportion of successful smoking cessation compared with nonoperative patients (37 of 58 [64%] vs 19 of 53 [36%]; P = .004) as well as a 2.2-fold higher proportion of 1-month point prevalence abstinence (37 of 57 [65%] vs 15 of 51 [29%]; P < .001) and a 1.8-fold higher proportion of 6-month point prevalence abstinence (20 of 45 [44%] vs 12 of 48 [25%]; P = .05). Having surgery doubled the odds of smoking cessation (odds ratio, 2.44; 95% CI, 1.06-5.64; P = .04) and quitline engagement tripled the odds of remaining smoke free at 6 months (odds ratio, 3.57; 95% CI, 1.03-12.38; P = .04).

Conclusions and Relevance

Patients undergoing thoracic surgery were nearly twice as likely to quit smoking as those who did not have an operation, and smoking quitline participation further augmented point prevalence abstinence. Improved smoking cessation rates, even among nonoperative patients, were associated with appropriate outpatient counseling and intervention.

Guidelines on enhanced recovery after pulmonary lobectomy

OBJECTIVE

To establish recommendations for optimisation of the management of patients undergoing pulmonary lobectomy, particularly Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS).

DESIGN

A consensus committee of 13 experts from the French Society of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine (Soci,t, franOaise d'anesth,sie et de r,animation, SFAR) and the French Society of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery (Soci,t, franOaise de chirurgie thoracique et cardiovasculaire, SFCTCV) was convened. A formal conflict-of-interest policy was developed at the onset of the process and enforced throughout. The entire guidelines process was conducted independently of any industry funding. The authors were advised to follow the principles of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system to guide assessment of quality of evidence.

METHODS

Five domains were defined: 1) patient pathway and patient information; 2) preoperative management and rehabilitation; 3) anaesthesia and analgesia for lobectomy; 4) surgical strategy for lobectomy; and 5) enhanced recovery after surgery. For each domain, the objective of the recommendations was to address a number of questions formulated according to the PICO model (Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome). An extensive literature search on these questions was carried out and analysed using the GRADE® methodology. Recommendations were formulated according to the GRADE® methodology, and were then voted by all experts according to the GRADE grid method.

RESULTS

The SFAR/SFCTCV guideline panel provided 32 recommendations on the management of patients undergoing pulmonary lobectomy. After two voting rounds and several amendments, a strong consensus was reached for 31 of the 32 recommendations and a moderate consensus was reached for the last recommendation. Seven of these recommendations present a high level of evidence (GRADE 1+), 23 have a moderate level of evidence (18 GRADE 2+ and 5 GRADE 2-), and 2 correspond to expert opinions. Finally, no recommendation was provided for 2 of the questions.

CONCLUSIONS

A strong consensus was expressed by the experts to provide recommendations to optimise the whole perioperative management of patients undergoing pulmonary lobectomy.

The influence of tobacco load versus smoking status on outcomes following lobectomy for lung cancer in a statewide quality collaborative

BACKGROUND

Collaborative quality consortia can facilitate implementation of quality measures arising from clinical databases. Our statewide general thoracic surgery (GTS) collaborative investigated the influences of cigarette smoking status on mortality and major morbidity following lobectomy for lung cancer.

METHODS

Society of Thoracic Surgeons General Thoracic Surgery Database records were identified from 14 institutions participating in a statewide thoracic surgical quality collaborative between 2012 and 2017. We excluded patients with nonelective procedures, stage 0 tumors, American Society of Anesthesiologists class VI disease, and missing clinical characteristics. Outcomes analysis included the combined mortality and major postoperative morbidity rates and the influence of patient characteristics, including smoking status, on composite rate and on postoperative complications.

RESULTS

The study cohort included 2267 patient records for analysis. Overall combined mortality and major morbidity rate was 10.2% (n = 231). Postoperative 30-day mortality was 1.5%, and major morbidity 9.6%. Significant predictors of the combined outcome included male sex (P = .004), body mass index (P < .001), Zubrod score (P = .02), smoking pack-years (P = .03), and thoracotomy (P < .001). Higher American Society of Anesthesiologists disease class and advanced tumor stage were marginally associated with worse combined outcome (P = .06). Smoking status; that is, current, past (no smoking within 30 days), or never smoked, was not associated with worse combined outcome (P = .56) and had no significant influence on major complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Smoking status was not associated with worse outcomes; however, smoking dose (pack-years) was associated with worse combined mortality and major morbidity. A statewide quality collaborative provides constructive feedback for participating institutions and surgeons, promoting quality improvement in perioperative patient care strategies and improved outcomes.

Tobacco Use and Treatment among Cancer Survivors

Tobacco use is causally associated with the risk of developing multiple health conditions, including over a dozen types of cancer, and is responsible for 30% of cancer deaths in the U [...].

Pre-operative patient optimization to prevent postoperative pulmonary complications-Insights and roles for the respiratory therapist: A narrative review

Background

The preoperative period has gained recognition as a crucial time to identify and manage preoperative medical conditions for preventing perioperative complications. Consequently, preoperative clinics have now become an essential component of perioperative care at many large hospitals. As the prevalence of preoperative clinics continues to grow, and the field of perioperative medicine progresses, respiratory therapists (RTs) will inevitably find a growing role to participate in preoperative patient optimization to mitigate pulmonary complications.

Methods

Keyword searches on perioperative pulmonary complications were conducted on the Medline database via PubMed and identified over 2000 candidate articles for review. Articles were included if they were English only and resulted with one or more of the following search terms; pulmonary complications, postoperative complications, postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs), prehabilitation, incentive spirometry, smoking cessation, noninvasive ventilation. Preference was given for meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials, and systematic reviews. Publications within the past two decades were given additional preference toward final inclusion. The authors discussed eligible articles in group meetings over the span of multiple years to assess relevance and quality of data for narrowing eligible articles to the final selection of publications for the review.

Findings

The following narrative review examines preoperative optimization strategies to prevent PPCs and highlight areas where RTs may play a key role. After examining challenges in defining PPCs, the review examines key risk models available to predict PPCs and their implications for subsequent discussion on preventive measures that RTs may assist with in a multidisciplinary team.

Conclusion

RTs can reduce the health care burden of PPCs by assisting fellow perioperative clinicians in providing respiratory care for patients with premorbid conditions. While much of our review focused on pre-existing pulmonary pathologies and both the pharmacological and nonpharmacological optimization of these pathologies, there are other factors contributing to PPCs deserving future exploration.

Interactions between the enhanced recovery after surgery pathway and risk factors for lung infections after pulmonary malignancy operation

Background

Lung infection is a common complication after thoracic surgery and can lead to severe consequences. Our study was designed to explore the risk factors for postoperative lung infections (POLI) following pulmonary malignancy operation and assess the protective effect of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) and their potential interactive relationships.

Methods

A retrospective study included 1,768 patients who underwent surgery between 2013 and 2017 in Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine was performed. Uni- and multivariate analyses were performed to identify risk factors. Andersson’s model was applied to evaluate the additive interaction between these factors.

Results

Smoking [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.178–2.198], preoperative heart disease (95% CI: 1.448–4.091), and massive intraoperative blood loss (95% CI: 1.568–3.674) were independent risk factors for postoperative lung infections (POLI), whereas ERAS implementation was protective (95% CI: 0.249–0.441). Interaction analyses indicated that non-ERAS was reciprocally independent with smoking and surgical procedure. It had a synergistic interaction with heart disease [attributable proportion due to interaction (AP) =0.540 (95% CI: 0.179–0.901), synergy index (S) =2.580 (95% CI: 1.016–6.551)], and poor lung function [AP =0.395 (95% CI: 0.016–0.775)], as well as a tendency of antagonistic interaction with blood loss.

Conclusions

Intraoperative blood loss, heart disease, and smoking are independent risk factors of POLI. ERAS implementation is a protective factor and is firstly verified to be more effective on reducing POLI in patients with heart diseases, poor lung function, and less intraoperative blood loss. We provide evidences to implement ERAS and a clue of the most optimal indications for ERAS.

[Approaches to the pre-operative functional assessment of patients with lung cancer and preoperative rehabilitation]

Surgery is the best treatment for early lung cancer but requires a preoperative functional evaluation to identify patients who may be at a high risk of complications or death. Guideline algorithms include a cardiological evaluation, a cardiopulmonary assessment to calculate the predicted residual lung function, and identify patients needing exercise testing to complete the evaluation. According to most expert opinion, exercise tests have a very high predictive value of complications. However, since the publication of these guidelines, minimally-invasive surgery, sublobar resections, prehabilitation and enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programmes have been developed. Implementation of these techniques and programs is associated with a decrease in postoperative mortality and complications. In addition, the current guidelines and the cut-off values they identified are based on early series of patients, and are designed to select patients before major lung resection (lobectomy-pneumonectomy) performed by thoracotomy. Therefore, after a review of the current guidelines and a brief update on prehabilitation (smoking cessation, exercise training and nutritional aspects), we will discuss the need to redefine functional criteria to select patients who will benefit from lung surgery.

Protocol for a feasibility study of smoking cessation in the surgical pathway before major lung surgery: Project MURRAY

INTRODUCTION

Smoking prior to major thoracic surgery is the biggest risk factor for development of postoperative pulmonary complications, with one in five patients continuing to smoke before surgery. Current guidance is that all patients should stop smoking before elective surgery yet very few are offered specialist smoking cessation support. Patients would prefer support within the thoracic surgical pathway. No study has addressed the effectiveness of such an intervention in this setting on cessation. The overall aim is to determine in patients who undergo major elective thoracic surgery whether an intervention integrated (INT) into the surgical pathway improves smoking cessation rates compared with usual care (UC) of standard community/hospital based NHS smoking support. This pilot study will evaluate feasibility of a substantive trial.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

Project MURRAY is a trial comparing the effectiveness of INT and UC on smoking cessation. INT is pharmacotherapy and a hybrid of behavioural support delivered by the trained healthcare practitioners (HCPs) in the thoracic surgical pathway and a complimentary web-based application. This pilot study will evaluate the feasibility of a substantive trial and study processes in five adult thoracic centres including the University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust. The primary objective is to establish the proportion of those eligible who agree to participate. Secondary objectives include evaluation of study processes. Analyses of feasibility and patient-reported outcomes will take the form of simple descriptive statistics and where appropriate, point estimates of effects sizes and associated 95% CIs.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The study has obtained ethical approval from NHS Research Ethics Committee (REC number 19/WM/0097). Dissemination plan includes informing patients and HCPs; engaging multidisciplinary professionals to support a proposal of a definitive trial and submission for a full application dependent on the success of the study.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT04190966.