European principles of inhibitor management in patients with haemophilia

Simoctocog alfa (Nuwiq®) in children: early steps in life's journey for people with severe hemophilia A

People with severe hemophilia A usually experience their first bleed early in life. In children with severe hemophilia A, primary prophylaxis is recommended to prevent recurrent and potentially life-threatening bleeds that significantly impact day-to-day life. Factor VIII (FVIII) prophylaxis is well-established in children and has been shown to reduce the development of hemophilic arthropathy. However, a major challenge of FVIII therapy is the development of neutralizing anti-FVIII antibodies (FVIII inhibitors). Simoctocog alfa (Nuwiq®) is a human cell line-derived recombinant FVIII (rFVIII) whose immunogenicity, efficacy, and safety have been studied in 167 children with severe hemophilia A across two prospective clinical trials and their long-term extensions. In 105 previously untreated children, the inhibitor rate of 16.2% for high-titer inhibitors (26.7% for all inhibitors) was lower than published rates for hamster cell line-derived rFVIII products. There was no inhibitor development in previously untreated children with non-null F8 mutations and in previously treated children. In a case series of 10 inhibitor patients, 8 (80%) underwent successful immune tolerance induction with simoctocog alfa with a median time to undetectable inhibitor of 3.5 months. In an analysis of 96 children who enrolled in the extension studies and received long-term simoctocog alfa prophylaxis for up to 5 years, median spontaneous, joint, and total annualized bleeding rates were 0.3, 0.4, and 1.8, respectively. No thromboembolisms were reported in any of the 167 children, and there were no treatment-related deaths. Optimal care of children should consider several factors, including minimization of inhibitor development risk, maintaining tolerance to FVIII, highly effective bleed prevention and treatment, safety, and impact on long-term outcomes such as bone and joint health. In this context we review the pediatric clinical data and ongoing studies with simoctocog alfa.

Assessing the value of bypassing agent therapy used prophylactic versus on-demand, during immune tolerance induction for treatment of inhibitors: a retrospective chart review

BACKGROUND

Haemophilia A is a bleeding disorder caused by deficiency of coagulation factor VIII (FVIII) which leads to severe and repeated bleedings. There is a need to understand the optimal treatment pathway for FVIII inhibitors with the use of immune tolerance induction (ITI) and the role of haemostatic 'bypassing' agents (BPA) on-demand (OD) or prophylactically (Px). The aim of this study was to gain a better understanding of the real-world use of BPA therapy administered prophylactically or on-demand concomitant with ITI, for the treatment of an inhibitor to FVIII replacement therapy in patients with severe haemophilia A.

METHODS

Retrospective observational data were used to capture disease management information for patients who were aged 16 or under and had received ITI and BPA treatment for their most recent inhibitor from Jan-2015 to Jan-2019, for 47 patients in the UK and Germany. Descriptive comparisons of the clinical effectiveness and resource utilisation of Px and OD BPA therapy during ITI were conducted.

RESULTS

During ITI and BPA treatment, for an inhibitor, bleeding events averaged 1.5 and 1.2 for Px and OD treatment respectively. Compared to only BPA therapy we see 3.4 and 1.4 bleeding events for Px and OD respectively during an inhibitor.

CONCLUSION

Baseline disease characteristics differed between BPA therapy cohorts and this resulted in higher clinical effectiveness of ITI treatment alongside BPA Px than BPA OD during an inhibitor.

Hemophilia a patients with inhibitors: Mechanistic insights and novel therapeutic implications

The development of coagulation factor VIII (FVIII) inhibitory antibodies is a serious complication in hemophilia A (HA) patients after FVIII replacement therapy. Inhibitors render regular prophylaxis ineffective and increase the risk of morbidity and mortality. Immune tolerance induction (ITI) regimens have become the only clinically proven therapy for eradicating these inhibitors. However, this is a lengthy and costly strategy. For HA patients with high titer inhibitors, bypassing or new hemostatic agents must be used in clinical prophylaxis due to the ineffective ITI regimens. Since multiple genetic and environmental factors are involved in the pathogenesis of inhibitor generation, understanding the mechanisms by which inhibitors develop could help identify critical targets that can be exploited to prevent or eradicate inhibitors. In this review, we provide a comprehensive overview of the recent advances related to mechanistic insights into anti-FVIII antibody development and discuss novel therapeutic approaches for HA patients with inhibitors.

Immune Tolerance Induction (ITI) with a pdFVIII/VWF Concentrate (octanate) in 100 Patients in the Observational ITI (ObsITI) Study

Background  Immune tolerance induction (ITI) with repeated factor VIII (FVIII) administration is the only strategy proven to eradicate inhibitors. The observational ITI study is evaluating ITI with a range of FVIII products.

Methods  This subgroup analysis reports prospective interim data for patients treated with a plasma-derived, von Willebrand factor-stabilized FVIII concentrate (pdFVIII/VWF, octanate). Complete success (CS) of ITI required achievement of three criteria: inhibitor titer < 0.6 BU/mL; FVIII recovery ≥ 66%; FVIII half-life ≥6 hours. Partial success (PS) required achievement of two criteria and partial response (PR) one. ITI success was defined as CS or PS. Data were analyzed for patients who achieved CS, had 36 months' observation, or failed ITI.

Results  One-hundred prospectively enrolled patients were included in the analysis; 91 had poor prognosis factors for ITI success. The mean (standard deviation) daily ITI dose was 116.4 (61.1) IU FVIII/kg in 14 low responders (< 5 BU/mL) and 173.7 (112.0) IU FVIII/kg in 86 high responders (≥ 5 BU/mL). Inhibitor titers < 0.6 BU/mL were achieved in 71% of patients in a median of 4.01 months, accompanied by a 93% reduction in bleeding rate. ITI success was achieved by 70% of patients and 56 of 72 (78%) primary (first-line) ITI patients. PR was achieved by 5 patients; ITI failed in 25 patients. PS and CS were achieved in a median of 5.55 and 11.25 months, respectively.

Conclusions  ITI with pdFVIII/VWF led to rapid eradication of FVIII inhibitors, normalization of FVIII pharmacokinetics in the majority of patients, and a significant reduction in bleeding rates.

Changing paradigms of hemophilia care across larger specialized treatment centers in the European region

Introduction:

In early 2021, the European Collaborative Haemophilia Network (ECHN) conducted a survey to determine whether the paradigms of care across the European region have changed with the introduction of novel therapies for people with hemophilia.

Methods:

We conducted a survey in 19 ECHN centers from 17 countries in the European region. The aim was to track recent changes in the hemophilia treatment landscape, determine the impact of these changes on hemophilia treatment centers and comprehensive care centers in the region, and to look into the future of care as applied to people with hemophilia. The survey was structured to include three key areas: demographics and organization; current challenges and opportunities; and future directions.

Discussion:

Our survey provides a snapshot of the current approach to hemophilia treatment that highlights a move toward preventive, rather than reactive care, but that also raises a number of key concerns related to costs and accessibility (particularly as related to novel therapies), time limitations for clinical research, and ongoing issues regarding human resources (particularly in terms of new doctors entering the field) and availability of laboratory resources as the use of novel therapies (some with unique modes of action and unusual adverse events, some with specialized monitoring requirements) becomes commonplace.

Conclusion:

While our survey suggests that specialized care will continue to play a central role in the management of hemophilia, the standards and protocols, as well as the centers themselves, will have to continue to evolve if they are to continue to provide the highest level of care. To meet this requirement, there is a clear need for engaging, ongoing education programs for healthcare professionals working in the field of hemophilia that can be adjusted to the changing landscape of hemophilia therapy and monitoring.

Long-term efficacy and safety of subcutaneous concizumab prophylaxis in hemophilia A and hemophilia A/B with inhibitors

Despite current treatments, there remains an unmet need for patients with hemophilia. The main parts of two phase 2 trials established clinical proof-of-concept for once-daily, subcutaneous concizumab prophylaxis in patients with hemophilia A/B with inhibitors (HAwI/HBwI; explorer4) and severe hemophilia A without inhibitors (HA; explorer5,). Here, we present results from extension parts of these trials, included to evaluate longer-term safety and efficacy. Both trials included main (≥24 weeks) and extension parts (52-102 weeks), with patients receiving 0.15 mg/kg concizumab with potential dose escalation to 0.20 or 0.25 mg/kg if they experienced ≥3 treated spontaneous bleeds within 12 weeks. Endpoints included annualized bleeding rate (ABR), adverse events (AEs), and anti-drug antibody (ADA) occurrence. Thromboembolic events were AEs of special interest. Thirty-six patients with HA, 15 with HAwI and 10 with HBwI were exposed to concizumab. Estimated ABRs during the main+extension parts at last dose level were 4.8 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.2-7.2) and 6.4 (95% CI: 4.1-9.9) in explorer4 and explorer5, respectively (spontaneous ABRs were 1.8 [95% CI: 1.2-2.6] and 2.1 [95% CI: 1.3-3.3]). Most AEs were mild, with no deaths, events leading to withdrawal or thromboembolic events. ADAs developed in 25% of patients and were low titer and transient with no observed clinical effect in most cases. Results of the main+extension parts of these trials were consistent with the main parts. Ongoing phase 3 trials will further evaluate concizumab as a once-daily, subcutaneous treatment across hemophilia subtypes. Trials registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03196284; NCT03196297).

Immune tolerance induction in the era of emicizumab - still the first choice for patients with haemophilia A and inhibitors?

INTRODUCTION

The development of inhibitory antibodies is a severe complication of clotting factor replacement therapy in patients with severe haemophilia A (HA). Current World Federation of Hemophilia (WFH) guidelines for haemophilia care indicate that eradication of inhibitors is best achieved through immune tolerance induction (ITI) therapy.

AIM

The European Collaborative Haemophilia Network conducted a survey to determine whether ITI is still used in the routine management of patients with HA, and whether the availability of emicizumab prophylaxis has influenced treatment decisions.

METHODS

The survey was conducted in late 2020/early 2021 in 18 centres representing 17 countries in the Europe/Middle East region treating a total of 4955 patients, and included sections specific to patient and centre demographics, treatment protocols (both ITI and prophylactic), inhibitor development and initiation of ITI, treatment success, and the incidence of adverse events.

RESULTS

While our results indicate that ITI can still be considered a mainstay of treatment for patients with HA with inhibitors, less than daily dosing of ITI in combination with emicizumab prophylaxis is becoming commonplace across the spectrum of disease severity, with initiation being guided by bleeding patterns. The most frequently cited reasons for not initiating emicizumab prophylaxis were availability or reimbursement issues.

CONCLUSION

ITI remains a mainstay for haemophilia treatment of patients with HA with inhibitors, but emicizumab has become a preferred first-line approach to protect against bleeds and represents an alternative to burdensome ITI in certain patient groups.

Predictors of inhibitor eradication by primary immune tolerance induction in severe haemophilia A with high responding inhibitors

BACKGROUND

Immune tolerance induction (ITI) is the only proven strategy to eradicate factor VIII inhibitors in patients with haemophilia A (HA).

AIM

To identify patients and treatment options with the highest chance of inhibitor eradication by primary ITI.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In the frame of the Italian ITI Registry, carried out from 1995 to 2015 (last follow-up 2018), 137 primary ITI courses in severe HA patients (90/137 with poor prognosis) were analysed for predictors of outcome (complete/partial response or failure). Sixty-six of them (48%) were prospectively evaluated.

RESULTS

ITI was successful in 91/137 patients (66.4%) and 70 (51.1%) achieved complete response within 11 months (median). Historical peak titres ≤200 BU/ml (P = .033), inhibitor titres ≤5 BU/ml at ITI start (P = .001), peak titres ≤100 BU/ml during ITI (P < .001) and missense mutations and small insertions/deletions of FVIII gene (P = .027) predicted complete inhibitor eradication. A score that considers the cumulative number of these variables predicted complete response with positive predictive values up to .81 at ITI start and .91 during ITI, respectively. Patients who had no bleeding (OR, 3.45, 95% CI: 1.4-8.6) nor other adverse events (OR 2.6, 95%CI: 1.3-5.3) during ITI had higher chances of complete response. During the 120-month follow-up (median), 2/70 patients who had achieved complete response relapsed (2.9%).

CONCLUSIONS

This Registry, with a centralized review of outcomes, homogeneous data collection (half of which prospective) and long-term follow-up, provides insights for optimizing ITI, with a rationale for further studies in the currently evolving scenario of inhibitor management in HA patients.

Design of an international investigator-initiated study on MOdern Treatment of Inhibitor-positiVe pATiEnts with haemophilia A (MOTIVATE)

Background:

Inhibitor development is the most serious treatment-related complication of replacement coagulation factor VIII (FVIII) therapy for patients with haemophilia A. Immune tolerance induction (ITI), which involves intensive and prolonged treatment with plasma-derived or recombinant FVIII, is the only clinically proven strategy for eradication of inhibitors. The bispecific antibody emicizumab is approved for use in patients with and without inhibitors to prevent bleeding but does not eliminate inhibitors. MOTIVATE (www.motivate-study.com) aims to capture different approaches to the treatment and management of patients with haemophilia A and inhibitors, document current ITI approaches from real-world clinical experience, and evaluate the efficacy and safety of ITI, emicizumab prophylaxis and ITI with emicizumab prophylaxis.

Methods:

The investigator-initiated MOTIVATE study [ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04023019; EudraCT 2019-003427-38] will investigate in real-life clinical practice the management of patients with haemophilia A of any severity who have developed inhibitors to FVIII. All treatment is at the investigator’s discretion. The following treatment approaches will be evaluated: Group 1 – ITI with Nuwiq^®, octanate^® or wilate^® and aPCC/rFVIIa if needed to treat bleeding episodes (BEs) or during surgery or for prophylaxis; Group 2 – ITI with Nuwiq^®, octanate^® or wilate^® and emicizumab prophylaxis and aPCC/rFVIIa if needed to treat BEs or during surgery; Group 3 – routine prophylaxis with emicizumab, aPCC or rFVIIa without ITI and aPCC/rFVIIa if needed to treat BEs or during surgery. Patients will not be randomised to a treatment group and may change groups during the study.

Conclusions:

It is planned to enrol 120 patients who will be followed for up to 5 years. Optional sub-studies will explore factors that may influence ITI results as well as the impact of different treatment approaches on important aspects of patient health, including joint and bone health and the risk of thrombotic events.

Efficacy, Safety and Pharmacokinetic Results of a Phase III, Open-Label, Multicenter Study with a Plasma-Derived Von Willebrand Factor (VWF)/Factor VIII (FVIII) Concentrate in Pediatric Patients <12 Years of Age with Hemophilia A (SWIFTLY-HA Study)

Background

Plasma-derived von Willebrand factor/factor VIII (pdVWF/FVIII; VONCENTO^®, CSL Behring) is a high-concentration, low-volume, high-purity concentrate, with a high level of VWF high-molecular-weight multimers and a VWF/FVIII ratio of ~2.4:1.

Methods

This study (NCT01229007) investigated the pharmacokinetics (PK), efficacy and safety of pdVWF/FVIII in 35 previously treated (minimum 20 exposure days [EDs]) pediatric patients (<12 years) with severe hemophilia A. PK was evaluated with a single 50 IU FVIII/kg dose of pdVWF/FVIII. Efficacy and safety analyses were performed during on-demand treatment (n=17) or prophylaxis (n=18) for up to 100 EDs with a maximum study duration of 12 months.

Results

PK profiles were similar for patients aged <6 years and those aged 6–12 years, and, as expected, the youngest patients had an increased clearance. On-demand patients reported 320 non-surgical bleeding (NSB) events and received a median number of 29.0 infusions (median dose 34.2 IU FVIII/kg). Hemostatic efficacy was assessed by the investigator as excellent/good in all cases (24%/76%). The 18 patients in the prophylaxis arm experienced 173 NSB events (97 NSBs [56%] in three patients). Five patients (28%) had no NSB events. Overall, patients received a median number of 92 infusions (median dose 30.6 IU FVIII/kg). The majority of bleeds (92%) were successfully controlled with only one infusion. Hemostatic efficacy was assessed by the investigator as excellent (86%) or good (14%). Inhibitors occurred in three patients of which two were transient (low titer) and one persisted (high titer). These three patients had known risk factors for inhibitor development.

Conclusion

This study demonstrated comparable PK profiles for pediatric patients aged <6 years and aged 6–12 years, and an excellent efficacy and safety profile in this population. The adverse events reported were mostly mild to moderate with inhibitor rates within the expected incidence range.

Expert opinion on the UK standard of care for haemophilia patients with inhibitors: a modified Delphi consensus study

Background and Aims:

Despite advances in haemophilia care, inhibitor development remains a significant complication. Although viable treatment options exist, there is some divergence of opinion in the appropriate standard approach to care and goals of treatment. The aim of this study was to assess consensus on United Kingdom (UK) standard of care for child and adult haemophilia patients with inhibitors.

Methods:

A modified Delphi study was conducted using a two-round online survey. A haemophilia expert steering committee and published literature informed the Round 1 questionnaire. Invited participants included haematologists, haemophilia nurses and physiotherapists who had treated at least one haemophilia patient with inhibitors in the past 5 years. Consensus for 6-point Likert scale questions was pre-defined as ⩾70% participants selecting 1–2 (disagreement) or 5–6 (agreement).

Results:

In all, 46.7% and 35.9% questions achieved consensus in Rounds 1 (n = 41) and 2 (n = 34), respectively. Consensus was reached on the importance of improving quality of life (QoL) and reaching clinical goals such as bleed prevention, eradication of inhibitors and pain management. There was agreement on criteria constituting adequate/inadequate responses to immune tolerance induction (ITI) and the appropriate factor VIII dose to address suboptimal ITI response. Opinions varied on treatment aims for adults and children/adolescents, when to offer prophylaxis with bypassing agents and expectations of prophylaxis. Consensus was also lacking on appropriate treatment for mild/moderate patients with inhibitors.

Conclusion:

UK healthcare professionals appear to be aligned on the clinical goals and role of ITI when managing haemophilia patients with inhibitors, although novel treatment developments may require reassessment of these goals. Lack of consensus on prophylaxis with bypassing agents and management of mild/moderate cases identifies a need for further research to establish more comprehensive, evidence-based treatment guidance, particularly for those patients who are unable/prefer not to receive non-factor therapies.

[Congenital coagulation disorders in neurosurgical patients. Literature review and case series]

Congenital coagulation disorders account about 1-2% and can pose a serious risk for neurosurgical patients. Indeed, coagulation management in these patients is essential to ensure normal hemostasis. Analysis of available literature devoted to this issue and case series of neurosurgical patients with congenital coagulation disorders. Literature data were obtained from the PubMed, Cochrane Library, Medline and Google Scholar databases for the period from 2019 to 2020. Over 200 reports devoted to our scientific issue were selected. We determined the key features of perioperative management of neurosurgical patients with congenital coagulation disorders. We have also analyzed 10 similar patients for the period from 2008 to 2020. Comprehensive analysis of anamnesis, adequate diagnosis, perioperative planning and multidisciplinary approach are essential for successful elective surgery in patients with congenital coagulation disorders.

Establishment of a framework for assessing mortality in persons with congenital hemophilia A and its application to an adverse event reporting database

BACKGROUND

Despite recent therapeutic advances, life expectancy in persons with congenital hemophilia A (PwcHA) remains below that of the non-HA population. As new therapies are introduced, a uniform approach to the assessment of mortality is required for comprehensive evaluation of risk-benefit profiles, timely identification of emerging safety signals, and comparisons between treatments.

OBJECTIVES

Develop and test a framework for consistent reporting and analysis of mortality across past, current, and future therapies.

PATIENTS/METHODS

We identified known causes of mortality in PwcHA through literature review, analysis of the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database, and expert insights. Leading causes of death in general populations are those recognized by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the World Health Organization. We developed an algorithm for assessing fatalities in PwcHA and used this to categorize FAERS data as a proof of concept.

RESULTS

PwcHA share mortality causes with the non-HA population including cardiovascular disease, malignancy, infections, pulmonary disease, dementias, and trauma/suicide. Causes associated with HA include hemorrhage, thrombosis, human immunodeficiency virus, hepatitis C virus, and liver dysfunction. We propose an algorithm employing these classes to categorize fatalities and use it to classify FAERS fatality data between 01/01/2000 and 03/31/2020; the most common causes were hemorrhage (22.2%) and thrombosis (10.4%).

CONCLUSIONS

A conceptual framework for examining mortality in PwcHA receiving any hemophilia therapy is proposed to analyze and interpret fatalities, enabling consistent and objective assessment. Application of the framework using FAERS data suggests a generally consistent pattern of reported mortality across HA treatments, supporting the utility of this unified approach.

Origins, Development, Current Challenges and Future Directions with Activated Prothrombin Complex Concentrate for the Treatment of Patients with Congenital Haemophilia with Inhibitors

Congenital haemophilia A (HA) is caused by deficiency of coagulation factor VIII (FVIII) activity, leading to spontaneous or traumatic bleeding events. While FVIII replacement therapy can treat and prevent bleeds, approximately 30% of patients with severe HA develop inhibitor antibodies that render FVIII replacement therapy ineffective. The bypassing agents (BPAs), activated prothrombin complex concentrate (aPCC) and recombinant activated FVII, first approved in 1977 and 1996, respectively, act to generate thrombin independent of pathways that involve factors IX and VIII. Both may be used in patients with congenital haemophilia and inhibitors (PwHIs) for the treatment and prevention of acute bleeds and quickly became standard of care. However, individual patients respond differently to different agents. While both agents are approved for on-demand treatment and perioperative management for patients with congenital haemophilia with inhibitors, aPCC is currently the only BPA approved worldwide for prophylaxis in PwHI. Non-factor therapies (NFTs) have a mechanism of action distinct from BPAs and have reported higher efficacy rates as prophylactic regimens. Nonetheless, treatment challenges remain with NFTs, particularly regarding the potential for synergistic action on thrombin generation with concomitant use of other haemostatic agents, such as BPAs, for the treatment of breakthrough bleeds and in perioperative management. Concomitant use of NFTs with other haemostatic agents could increase the risk of adverse events such as thromboembolic events or thrombotic microangiopathy. This review focuses on the origins, development and on-going role of aPCC in the evolving treatment landscape in the management of PwHI.

Real-world evidence on health resource use among patients with haemophilia and inhibitor exhibiting severe bleeding episodes

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to explore real-world evidence on health resource use (HRU) spending on patients with haemophilia and inhibitor.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Medical records from 1990 to 2019 of patients with haemophilia and inhibitor from three comprehensive haemophilia treatment centres were retrospectively retrieved.

RESULTS

In all, 31 patients with haemophilia (A = 30, B = 1) and inhibitor ≥5 BU were included. The mean initial inhibitor of 95.4 BU was detected at the mean age of 6.7 years. The mean number of annual hospitalisations was 3.9. A total of 795 bleeding episodes (major =125, minor =670) were evaluated. The treatment included bypassing agents or plasma exchange before administering high-dose factor VIII concentrate and intervention or surgery. Six patients succumbed to bleeding at the mean age of 17.2 years. Nineteen surviving patients experienced multiple morbidity except six patients with successful and partially successful immune tolerance induction (ITI). The mean (SD) annual total medical consumption for episodic treatment and successful ITI per patient with haemophilia A were 30,804 (81,332) USD and 55,531 (100,566) USD, respectively. Only episodic treatment was paid by the government budget for limited amounts of bypassing agents.

CONCLUSION

Management for patients with haemophilia and inhibitor exhibiting severe bleeding is challenging for medical personnel in countries having limited resources over decades. The real-world data will be used to negotiate with the government to increase budget for adequate bypassing agents or nonreplacement therapy and to include ITI in the national haemophilia treatment.

Outcomes in children with hemophilia A with inhibitors: Results from a noninterventional study

BACKGROUND

Data regarding management of pediatric persons with hemophilia A (PwHA) with factor VIII (FVIII) inhibitors are limited. This prospective noninterventional study (NCT02476942) evaluated annualized bleeding rates (ABRs), safety, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in pediatric PwHA with FVIII inhibitors.

PROCEDURE

PwHA aged <12 years with current FVIII inhibitors and high-titer inhibitor history were enrolled. Participants remained on usual treatment; no interventions were applied. Outcomes included ABR, safety, and HRQoL.

RESULTS

Twenty-four PwHA aged 2-11 years (median 7.5) were enrolled and monitored for 8.7-44.1 weeks (median 23.4). In the episodic (n = 10) and prophylactic (n = 14) groups, respectively, 121 of 185 (65.4%) and 101 of 186 (54.3%) bleeds were treated using activated prothrombin complex concentrate (aPCC) and/or recombinant activated FVII (rFVIIa). ABRs (95% confidence interval) were 19.4 (13.2-28.4) and 18.5 (14.2-24.0) for treated bleeds, and 32.7 (20.5-52.2) and 33.1 (22.4-48.9) for all bleeds, respectively. Most prophylactic group participants (92.9%) were prescribed aPCC; 50% adhered to their prescribed treatment regimen. Adherence to prophylactic rFVIIa was not assessed. Serious adverse events included hemarthrosis (12.5%) and mouth hemorrhage (12.5%); the most common nonserious adverse event was viral upper respiratory tract infection (12.5%). HRQoL showed functional impairment at baseline; scores remained stable throughout, with little intergroup variation.

CONCLUSIONS

ABRs remained high in pediatric PwHA with inhibitors receiving standard treatment. This study demonstrates the need for more effective treatments, with reduced treatment burden, to prevent bleeds, increase prophylaxis adherence, and improve patient outcomes.

Optimizing the management of patients with haemophilia A and inhibitors in the era of emicizumab: Recommendations from a German expert panel

Standard treatment of haemophilia A is based on replacing the missing coagulation factor VIII (FVIII) to treat and prevent bleeding episodes. The most challenging complication of FVIII therapy is the development of neutralizing antibodies (inhibitors) that can render treatment ineffective. Eradication of the inhibitor through immune tolerance induction (ITI) remains the most effective strategy for managing these patients. Bypassing agents can be used to help restore haemostasis in inhibitor patients. Several novel agents have recently been developed, such as the FVIII mimetic agent emicizumab, which has been effective in reducing the annualized bleeding rate in haemophilia A patients with inhibitors. When coadministered with repetitive high doses of activated prothrombin complex concentrate (ie >100 U/kg/d for ≥24 hours), emicizumab was associated with thrombotic microangiopathy and thrombosis events. As a consequence the United Kingdom Haemophilia Centres Doctors' Organisation (UKHCDO) issued the first guidance on the treatment of bleeding episodes in patients receiving emicizumab. To build on and extend this work, a panel of German haemophilia specialists met to discuss the UK guidance, review current evidence and provide additional guidance for German healthcare professionals on how to optimize the management of patients with haemophilia A receiving emicizumab. Recommendations are provided on the use of bypassing and other agents to manage breakthrough bleeding, ITI in the emicizumab era, haemostatic support during surgery and issues relating to laboratory monitoring.

Treatment Options in Hemophilia

BACKGROUND

Approximately 4550 persons were under treatment for hemophilia in Germany in 2017. The condition is currently treated with intravenous supplementa- tion of the missing clotting factor, either prophylactically or as needed. Newer treat- ment options rely on novel mechanisms of action.

METHODS

This review is based on pertinent publications retrieved by a selective search in MEDLINE/PubMed, as well as on expert opinions and the recommenda- tions of specialty societies.

RESULTS

Randomized controlled trials have shown that, in children aged 30 months to 6 years, prophylactic clotting-factor supplementation yields a markedly lower an- nual rate of hemorrhage than supplementation as needed: 3.27 (standard deviation [SD] 6.24) for the former vs. 17.69 (SD 9.25) for the latter. A similar large effect was seen in patients aged 12 to 50 years, with hemorrhage rates of 1.9 (SD 4.1) vs. 28.7 (SD 18.8). Clotting-factor preparations with longer half-lives make it possible to lessen the frequency of administration and to prevent subtherapeutic factor levels. A number of alternatives to clotting-factor supplementation have recently been approved or are currently being clinically tested. These new drugs are injected sub- cutaneously and have a longer half-life, possibly enabling better protection against bleeding than the current standard treatment. A further advantage of some of these drugs is that they can be given even in the presence of inhibitors to factor VIII. In addition, initial (phase I) clinical trials of gene therapy have been performed suc- cessfully for both hemophilia A and hemophilia B.

CONCLUSION

Now that new alternatives to classic supplementation therapy are be- coming available, pertinent treatment algorithms for patients with hemophilia will have to be developed. It is still unclear to what extent the new drugs might supplant clotting factor supplementation as the first line of treatment.

Social support and resilience in persons with severe haemophilia: An interpretative phenomenological analysis

Introduction

Haemophilia is a hereditary haemorrhagic disorder characterized by deficiency or dysfunction of coagulation factors. Recurrent joint and muscle bleeds lead to progressive musculoskeletal damage. Haemophilia affects patients physically but also socially and psychologically. Traumatic experiences, chronic stress and illnesses can lead to mental disorders, but many persons with haemophilia maintain a highly positive outlook.

Aim

To explore qualitatively which coping mechanisms persons with haemophilia use and in what way they help them to live with their diagnosis.

Methods

We recruited five adults with haemophilia and conducted semi‐structured face‐to‐face interviews. Transcripts were analysed using interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA).

Results

Two core themes emerged from the analysis: social support as an external factor and resilience as an internal factor of coping with the disease. Persons with haemophilia usually need help with health‐related complications, and this affects the social support they require. Their wider support network tends to involve family and friends but also healthcare professionals and other specialists. This network provides practical help but also functions as an important psychological protective factor. An unexpected finding was that persons with haemophilia want not only to receive support but are also keen to offer support to others.

Conclusion

These findings can help identify persons who provide most support to people suffering from haemophilia. Haemophilic centres should include in their teams psychologists and social workers and offer individual and group therapy to their clients, group meetings for friends and families of persons with haemophilia, provide learning resources to teachers aiming to incorporate children with haemophilia in their peer group, and organize Balint groups for physicians, psychologists and other healthcare professionals.

[Clinical study on factor Ⅷ inhibitor in children with hemophilia A]

目的

探讨血友病A（HA）患儿凝血因子Ⅷ（FⅧ）抑制物产生的相关因素及抑制物产生前后出血与关节病表现的差异。

方法

对2015年1月至2018年8月河南省血友病管理中心登记收治的381例16岁以下HA患儿进行回顾性分析。

结果

381例HA患儿中，轻型116例（30.4%），中间型196例（51.4%），重型69例（18.1%）。FⅧ抑制物阳性患者54例（14.2%），高滴度、低滴度分别为22、32例。血友病家族史与FⅧ抑制物阳性相关[P<0.001，OR=3.299（95%CI 1.743~5.983）]；高强度暴露与FⅧ抑制物的产生相关[P=0.002，OR=2.587（95%CI 1.414~4.731）]。高强度暴露与高滴度FⅧ抑制物产生相关[P=0.001，OR=8.689（95%CI 2.464~30.638）]。54例HA患者产生抑制物后，总体关节年出血率、创伤性年出血率增加（z=−3.440，P=0.001；z=−2.232，P=0.026），而非关节年出血率、自发性年出血率与抑制物产生前比较差异无统计学意义（z=−1.342，P=0.180；z=−1.414，P=0.157）。关节超声评分较产生抑制物前差异无统计学意义（z=−0.632，P=0.527）。

结论

血友病家族史、高强度暴露可增加HA患儿发生FⅧ抑制物的风险，且高强度暴露可增加HA患者出现高滴度抑制物的风险。