Perceived mental health in parents of children with rare congenital surgical diseases: a double ABCX model considering gender

Health-related quality of life and family functioning in parents of children with Barth syndrome: an application of the Double ABCX model

BACKGROUND

Living with children with disabilities has a significant impact on parental health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and family functioning. Barth syndrome (BTHS) is a rare, X-linked disorder that primarily affects males, presenting symptoms such as cardiomyopathy, neutropenia, muscle weakness, and growth delays. In this study, we investigated how a child's functional performance, family cohesion, and satisfaction with healthcare affect parents of children with BTHS.

METHODS

Thirty-three parents of children with BTHS and 31 parents of age-matched unaffected children participated in this study. The parents completed a series of questionnaires. The Double ABCX model was applied to select measurement variables for this study. An independent samples t-test was used to compare HRQoL and family functioning between the two groups. Regression analysis was conducted to determine how a child's functional performance, family cohesion, and satisfaction with healthcare affect HRQoL and family functioning of parents of children with BTHS.

RESULTS

The HRQoL and family functioning of parents of children with BTHS were significantly lower than those of unaffected children (p <.05). In the regression analysis, the child's functional performance was a significant predictor of HRQoL and family functioning (F(3, 32) = 6.047, p =.003) for parents of children with BTHS.

CONCLUSIONS

This study lays the groundwork for examining the impact of raising children with BTHS on parents and families. It is crucial for health professionals to understand the clinical features of BTHS and to consider not only the child but also the family in order to address their unmet needs and provide holistic healthcare services.

Unraveling non-participation in genomic research: A complex interplay of barriers, facilitators, and sociocultural factors

Although genomic research offering next-generation sequencing (NGS) has increased the diagnoses of rare/ultra-rare disorders, populations experiencing health disparities infrequently participate in these studies. The factors underlying non-participation would most reliably be ascertained from individuals who have had the opportunity to participate, but decline. We thus enrolled parents of children and adult probands with undiagnosed disorders who had declined genomic research offering NGS with return of results with undiagnosed disorders (Decliners, n = 21) and compared their data to those who participated (Participants, n = 31). We assessed: (1) practical barriers and facilitators, (2) sociocultural factors-genomic knowledge and distrust, and (3) the value placed upon a diagnosis by those who declined participation. The primary findings were that residence in rural and medically underserved areas (MUA) and higher number of barriers were significantly associated with declining participation in the study. Exploratory analyses revealed multiple co-occurring practical barriers, greater emotional exhaustion and research hesitancy in the parents in the Decliner group compared to the Participants, with both groups identifying a similar number of facilitators. The parents in the Decliner group also had lower genomic knowledge, but distrust of clinical research was not different between the groups. Importantly, despite their non-participation, those in the Decliner group indicated an interest in obtaining a diagnosis and expressed confidence in being able to emotionally manage the ensuing results. Study findings support the concept that some families who decline participation in diagnostic genomic research may be experiencing pile-up with exhaustion of family resources - making participation in the genomic research difficult. This study highlights the complexity of the factors that underlie non-participation in clinically relevant NGS research. Thus, approaches to mitigating barriers to NGS research participation by populations experiencing health disparities need to be multi-pronged and tailored so that they can benefit from state-of -the art genomic technologies.

Mental Health of Siblings of Children with Rare Congenital Surgical Diseases during the COVID-19 Pandemic

INTRODUCTION

 The COVID-19 pandemic has affected every aspect of our society, particularly vulnerable groups, such as families with children suffering from rare diseases. However, the psychosocial influences of COVID-19 on the healthy siblings of children with rare diseases have not been investigated yet. Thus, the study aimed to evaluate the mental health of healthy siblings of children with rare congenital surgical diseases during the COVID-19 pandemic.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

 Siblings of children with rare congenital surgical diseases were investigated cross-sectionally between April 2020 and April 2021. Data on mental health were collected using the parent-version of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ).

RESULTS

 Out of 104 families, 81 (77.88%) participated in the survey. Healthy siblings presented with comparable levels of emotional and behavioral difficulties compared with population norms before the COVID-19 pandemic. Compared with studies that surveyed child and adolescent mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic, parents of siblings in this study reported a significantly lower impairment rate. Psychosocial and disease-specific risk factors of the respective outcomes in healthy siblings were identified through regression analysis models.

CONCLUSION

 In general, health-care professionals should be aware of the possibility of siblings' mental health being at risk. Therefore, screening for psychosocial deficits may be essential in preventing psychiatric disorders in this population, especially during pandemics.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

 ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04382820 (registered April 8, 2020).

Parental mental health and child anxiety during the COVID-19 pandemic in Latin America

This study examined parents' (N = 10,141, 64% women) reports of their and their childrens' depression, anxiety, and stress in Brazil, Mexico, Colombia and Argentina. The data come from the COVID-19 Family Life Study (Ben Brik, 2020) and cohort recruited between April and December 2020. Participants completed online surveys that included the DASS-21 and the Revised Children's Manifest Anxiety Scale. Our findings indicate that socio-economically disadvantaged families fared worse in mental health during the early phases of the COVID-19 pandemic compared with families with more social and economic resources. Mothers reported higher anxiety, depression, and stress compared with fathers. Parents of adolescents and adolescents fared worse than did families with younger children. Parental physical activity was associated with better parent and child mental health of anxiety symptoms. We discuss the need to address the adverse impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on mental health in families in Latin America via coordinated mental health and psychosocial support services that are integrated into the pandemic response currently and after the pandemic subsides.

Social activity as mediator between social support and psychological quality of life among people with rare diseases: A national repetitive cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Considerable proportion of people with rare diseases (RDs) have suffered from severe mental health problems. However, specific attention on the psychological quality of life (QoL) of people with RDs is sparse. Evidence documented the benefits of social support and social activity on recipients' mental health and overall QoL, but no corresponding study answered how both social support and social activity work on the psychological QoL among people with RDs. This study aims to report the psychological QoL and evaluate the mediating role of social activity between social support and psychological QoL among people with RDs.

METHODS

Data were from two national repetitive cross-sectional surveys, conducted in China in February 2016 and February 2018. In this study, eligible people were those aged 18 or above and had clinical-diagnosed RDs. Psychological QoL was measured by the subdomain of World Health Organization Quality of Life: Brief Version. Social support was measured by the Medical Outcomes Study Social Support Survey. Social activity was measured with seven items selected from the measurement on leisure activities used by the Chinese General Social Survey. Using the mediation model, we assessed the direct and indirect (via social activity) association between social support and psychological QoL, both on overall and subtypes of RDs. We controlled for a variety of potential socioeconomic and demographic confounding factors.

RESULTS

Of the 2403 adults studied, their average score of psychological QoL was 42.49 out of 100. The psychological QoL was directly associated with received emotional/information support (coefficient = 0.159, 95% CI = [0.093, 0.231], p < 0.0001) and positive social interaction (coefficient = 0.159, 95% CI = [0.097, 0.221], p < 0.0001). The psychological QoL was indirectly (via social activity) associated with received tangible support (coefficient = -0.035, 95% CI = [-0.046, -0.025], p < 0.0001) and positive social interaction (coefficient = 0.056, 95% CI = [0.040, 0.074], p < 0.0001). Above results by subtypes of RDs were also reported.

LIMITATIONS

The causal inference was not able to be investigated due to the cross-sectional study design.

CONCLUSION

People with RDs suffered from a low psychological QoL. Social activity mediated the association between social support and psychological QoL, but its mediating role depended on the subscales of social support as well as the subtypes of RDs. Customized measures based on the type of RDs and support that will be provided could perhaps improve the psychological QoL of people with RDs directly and indirectly.

Factors of family impact in a Swedish-German cohort of children born with esophageal atresia

Background

After repair of esophageal atresia (EA), childhood survivors commonly present with digestive and respiratory morbidity, and around 55% have associated anomalies. Although it is known that these problems can reduce health-related quality of life in children with EA, less is understood about the impact on the family. We aimed to identify factors related to family impact in children with EA.

Methods

One parent each of a child with EA (2–18 years) in 180 families from Sweden and Germany answered the PedsQL™ Family Impact Module as the dependent variable. The independent variables were the child’s parent-reported health-related quality of life as measured by PedsQL™ 4.0, current symptoms, school situation, and parent/family characteristics together with child clinical data from the medical records.

Results

Stepwise multivariable regression analysis showed a multifactorial model of the total family impact scores (R² = 0.60), with independent factors being the child’s overall generic health-related quality of life, school-absence ≥ 1/month, severe tracheomalacia, a family receiving carer’s allowance, and a parent with no university/college education, p < 0.05. Logistic regression analysis showed that an increased number of symptoms in the child the preceding 4 weeks lowered the family impact scores; however, the child’s feeding (R² = 0.35) and digestive symptoms (R² = 0.25) explained more in the variation of scores than the child’s respiratory symptoms (R² = 0.09), p < 0.0001.

Conclusions

Family functioning may be a contributing factor to the maintenance of child health. The study findings suggest multifactorial explanations to family impact in children with EA, which are essential when optimizing the support to these families in clinical and psychosocial practice. Future research should explore experiences of family impact from all family members’ perspectives and multicenter studies are warranted to understand better the effectiveness of psychosocial-educational interventions to families of children with EA.

Quality of life and mental health of children with rare congenital surgical diseases and their parents during the COVID-19 pandemic

Background

COVID-19 has affected our society at large, particularly vulnerable groups, such as children suffering from rare diseases and their parents. However, the psychosocial influences of COVID-19 on these have yet to be investigated. As such, the study’s goal was to evaluate the health-related quality of life (HRQoL), quality of life (QoL), and mental health of children with rare congenital surgical diseases and their parents during the COVID-19 pandemic and lockdown measures.

Methods

A survey of n = 210 parents of children with rare congenital surgical diseases and a control group of n = 88 parents of children without rare diseases was conducted cross-sectionally between April 2020 to April 2021. Data on HRQoL, QoL, and mental health was collected using standardized psychometric questionnaires for children and parents presenting to the pediatric surgery department at a university hospital.

Results

Mothers of children with rare pediatric surgical diseases showed significantly lower QoL and significantly higher impairment in mental health than a control group and norm data. For fathers, this was solely the case for their QoL. Children’s parent-reported HRQoL and mental health were partially impaired. Social and disease-specific risk factors of the respective outcomes in affected families were identified through regression analysis models.

Conclusion

Parents of children with rare diseases report severe psychosocial impairment regarding themselves and their children during the COVID-19 pandemic. Therefore, affected families should receive attention and supportive care in the form of a family-center approach to alleviate the additional burden of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13023-021-02129-0.