The negative effect of initial high-dose methylprednisolone and tapering regimen for acute respiratory distress syndrome: a retrospective propensity matched cohort study

Clinical efficacy of invimestrocel for acute respiratory distress syndrome caused by pneumonia: Comparison with historical data using propensity score analysis

Introduction

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a life-threatening inflammatory lung injury often resulting from pneumonia. The efficacy and safety of invimestrocel in patients with pneumonia-induced ARDS have been demonstrated previously in a phase II randomized, open-label trial (the ONE-BRIDGE study). In this study, we aimed to compare data from the intervention (invimestrocel) arm of the ONE-BRIDGE study with matched historical data from a previously established cohort to provide further support for the beneficial effects of invimestrocel in patients with pneumonia-induced ARDS.

Methods

Twenty patients from the invimestrocel arm of the ONE-BRIDGE study (Invimestrocel group) and 104 from the historical cohort were included in this study. A matched historical data group (n = 20) was extracted from the historical cohort based on the propensity score analysis using age, sex, PaO2/FIO2 ratio, and high-resolution computed tomography scores. The primary outcomes measured were ventilator-free days (VFDs) during the first 28 days following treatment and mortality on days 28, 60, 90, and 180.

Results

Patients in the Invimestrocel group showed higher VFDs (14.8 ± 11.0 vs. 6.7 ± 9.4 days; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 1.4-14.7; p = 0.0110) and survival rates (log-rank testing; hazard ratio, 0.330; 95 % CI, 0.116-0.938) than those in the matched historical data group.

Conclusions

The addition of invimestrocel to the standard treatment for pneumonia-induced ARDS may result in early withdrawal from the ventilator and lower mortality. However, further randomized, blinded, and placebo-controlled studies without or addressing multiplicity are required to confirm these findings.

Efficacy of corticosteroids in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), are respiratory diseases with high morbidity and mortality. Clinical trials investigating the efficacy of corticosteroids in the treatment of ARDS often yield contradictory results. We hereby conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the efficacy of corticosteroids in ARDS management.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a search for randomized clinical trials (RCT) and observational studies that utilized corticosteroids for patients with ARDS in Web of Science, PubMed, and Embase. The primary outcome was mortality. Risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane or NOS scales. Statistical effect size was analyzed using the Mantel-Haenszel method.

RESULTS

A total of 20 studies, comprising 11 observational studies and 9 RCTs, were eligible for analysis. In RCTs, corticosteroids were associated with a reduction of mortality in ARDS patients (relative risk [RR] = 0.80, 95%CI: 0.71-0.91, p = 0.001). Further subgroup analysis indicated that specific variables, such as low-dose (RR = 0.81; 95%CI: 0.67-0.98; p = 0.034), methylprednisolone (RR = 0.70; 95%CI: 0.49-0.98; p = 0.035), and dexamethasone (RR = 0.82; 95%CI: 0.69-0.98; p = 0.029) were associated with mortality among patients receiving corticosteroids. However, in observational studies, corticosteroids increased the risk of death (RR = 1.16, 95%CI: 1.04-1.29; p = 0.001). Subgroup analysis showed that the use of high-dose corticosteroids was associated with higher patient mortality (RR = 1.20; 95%CI: 1.04-1.38; p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The efficacy of corticosteroids on the mortality of ARDS differed by the type and dosage of corticosteroids used, as well as the etiologies. Current data do not support routine use of corticosteroids in ARDS since protective effects were observed in RCTs but increased mortality was found in observational studies. More well designed and large clinical trials are needed to specify the favorable subgroups for corticosteroid therapy.

Identification of a Susceptible and High-Risk Population for Postoperative Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome in Older Adults: Machine Learning-Based Predictive Model

BACKGROUND

Systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) is a serious postoperative complication among older adult surgical patients that frequently develops into sepsis or even death. Notably, the incidences of SIRS and sepsis steadily increase with age. It is important to identify the risk of postoperative SIRS for older adult patients at a sufficiently early stage, which would allow preemptive individualized enhanced therapy to be conducted to improve the prognosis of older adult patients. In recent years, machine learning (ML) models have been deployed by researchers for many tasks, including disease prediction and risk stratification, exhibiting good application potential.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to develop and validate an individualized predictive model to identify susceptible and high-risk populations for SIRS in older adult patients to instruct appropriate early interventions.

METHODS

Data for surgical patients aged ≥65 years from September 2015 to September 2020 in 3 independent medical centers were retrieved and analyzed. The eligible patient cohort in the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University was randomly separated into an 80% training set (2882 patients) and a 20% internal validation set (720 patients). We developed 4 ML models to predict postoperative SIRS. The area under the receiver operating curve (AUC), F1 score, Brier score, and calibration curve were used to evaluate the model performance. The model with the best performance was further validated in the other 2 independent data sets involving 844 and 307 cases, respectively.

RESULTS

The incidences of SIRS in the 3 medical centers were 24.3% (876/3602), 29.6% (250/844), and 6.5% (20/307), respectively. We identified 15 variables that were significantly associated with postoperative SIRS and used in 4 ML models to predict postoperative SIRS. A balanced cutoff between sensitivity and specificity was chosen to ensure as high a true positive as possible. The random forest classifier (RF) model showed the best overall performance to predict postoperative SIRS, with an AUC of 0.751 (95% CI 0.709-0.793), sensitivity of 0.682, specificity of 0.681, and F1 score of 0.508 in the internal validation set and higher AUCs in the external validation-1 set (0.759, 95% CI 0.723-0.795) and external validation-2 set (0.804, 95% CI 0.746-0.863).

CONCLUSIONS

We developed and validated a generalizable RF model to predict postoperative SIRS in older adult patients, enabling clinicians to screen susceptible and high-risk patients and implement early individualized interventions. An online risk calculator to make the RF model accessible to anesthesiologists and peers around the world was developed.

The influence of steroid type on outcomes in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome

BACKGROUND

Recent systematic reviews and meta-analyses have suggested that low-dose steroids are effective in the treatment of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Recent guidelines recommend the use of low-dose steroids instead of high-dose steroids. These systematic reviews were conducted based on the concept that the effect of steroids is constant regardless of their type. We discuss whether the type of steroid used influences the outcomes in patients with ARDS.

MAIN BODY

From a pharmacological standpoint, methylprednisolone has little activity as a mineralocorticoid and may cause pulmonary hypertension. The results of the rank probability of our previous network meta-analysis revealed that low-dose methylprednisolone might be an optimal treatment compared to using other types of steroids or no steroids in terms of ventilator-free days. Similarly, an analysis of individual data from four randomized controlled trials suggested that low-dose methylprednisolone was associated with decreased mortality in patients with ARDS. Dexamethasone has attracted the attention of clinicians as a novel adjunct therapy for ARDS.

CONCLUSION

Recent evidence has shown that low-dose methylprednisolone may be an effective treatment option for ARDS. The timing of initiation and duration of low-dose methylprednisolone therapy should be verified in future studies.

The ROX index (Index combining the respiratory rate with oxygenation) is a prognostic factor for acute respiratory distress syndrome

BACKGROUND

There is no existing reliable and practical method for predicting the prognosis of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to clarify the association between the ROX index, which is calculated as the ratio of peripheral oxygen saturation divided by the fraction of inspired oxygen to the respiratory rate, and the prognosis of patients with ARDS under ventilator support.

METHODS

In this single-center retrospective cohort study from prospectively collected database, eligible patients were categorized into three groups based on ROX tertiles. The primary outcome was the 28-day survival, and the secondary outcome was 28-day liberation from ventilator support. We performed multivariable analysis using the Cox proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

Among 93 eligible patients, 24 (26%) patients died. The patients were divided into three groups according to the ROX index (< 7.4, 7.4-11, ≥ 11), with 13, 7, and 4 patients dying in the groups, respectively. A higher ROX index was associated with lower mortality; adjusted hazard ratios [95% CIs] for increasing tertiles of ROX index: 1[reference], 0.54[0.21-1.41], 0.23[0.074-0.72] (P = 0.011 for trend) and a higher rate of successful 28-day liberation from ventilator support; adjusted hazard ratios [95% CIs] for increasing tertiles of ROX index: 1[reference], 1.41[0.68-2.94], 2.80[1.42-5.52] (P = 0.001 for trend).

CONCLUSIONS

The ROX index at 24 h after initiating ventilator support is a predictor of outcomes in patients with ARDS and might inform initiation of more advanced treatments.

High-Dose versus Low-Dose Corticosteroids in COVID-19 Patients: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

The clinical efficacy of corticosteroids remains unclear. The primary aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the use of high-dose versus low- dose corticosteroids on the mortality rate of COVID-19 patients.

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

SETTING

Electronic search for randomized controlled trials and observational studies (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL).

PARTICIPANTS

Hospitalized adults ≥ 18 years old who were SARS-CoV-2 PCR positive.

INTERVENTIONS

High-dose and low-dose corticosteroids.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

A total of twelve studies (n=2759 patients) were included in this review. The pooled analysis demonstrated no significant difference in mortality rate between the high-dose and low-dose corticosteroids groups (n=2632; OR: 1.07 [95%CI 0.67, 1.72], p=0.77, I2=76%, trial sequential analysis=inconclusive). No significant differences were observed in the incidence of intensive care unit (ICU) admission rate (n=1544; OR: 0.77[95%CI 0.43, 1.37], p=0.37, I2= 72%), duration of hospital stay (n=1615; MD: 0.53[95%CI -1.36, 2.41], p=0.58, I2=87%), respiratory support (n=1694; OR: 1.51[95%CI 0.77, 2.96], p=0.23, I2=84%), duration of mechanical ventilation (n=419; MD: -1.44[95%CI -4.27, 1.40], p=0.32, I2=93%), incidence of hyperglycemia (n=516, OR: 0.91[95%CI 0.58, 1.43], p=0.68, I2=0%) and infection rate (n=1485, OR: 0.86[95%CI 0.64, 1.16], p=0.33, I2=29%).

CONCLUSION

The meta-analysis demonstrated high-dose corticosteroids did not reduce mortality rate. However, high-dose corticosteroids did not pose higher risk of hyperglycemia and infection rate for COVID-19 patients. Due to the inconclusive trial sequential analysis, substantial heterogeneity and low level of evidence, future large-scale randomized clinical trials are warranted to improve the certainty of evidence for the use of high-dose compared to low-dose corticosteroids in COVID-19 patients.

New insights on Effects of Glucocorticoids in SARS-CoV-2 infection

Objective

Since January 2020, the highly contagious novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 has caused a global pandemic. Severe COVID-19 leads to a massive release of proinflammatory mediators, leading to diffuse damage to the lung parenchyma, and the development of acute respiratory distress syndrome. Treatment with the highly potent glucocorticoid (GC) dexamethasone was found to be effective in reducing mortality in severely affected patients.

Methods

To review the effects of glucocorticoids in the context of COVID-19 we performed a literature search in the PubMed database using the terms COVID-19 and glucocorticoid treatment. We identified 1429 article publications related to COVID-19 and glucocorticoid published from 1.1.2020 to the present including 238 review articles and 36 Randomized Controlled Trials. From these studies, we retrieved 13 Randomized Controlled Trials and 86 review articles that were relevant to our review topics. We focused on the recent literature dealing with glucocorticoid metabolism in critically ill patients and investigating the effects of glucocorticoid therapy on the immune system in COVID-19 patients with severe lung injury.

Results

In our review, we have discussed the regulation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis in patients with critical illness, selection of a specific GC for critical illness-related GC insufficiency, and recent studies that investigated hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal dysfunction in patients with COVID-19. We have also addressed the specific activation of the immune system with chronic endogenous glucocorticoid excess, as seen in patients with Cushing syndrome, and, finally, we have discussed immune activation due to coronavirus infection and the possible mechanisms leading to improved outcomes in patients with COVID-19 treated with GCs.

Conclusion

For clinical endocrinologists prescribing GCs for their patients, a precise understanding of both the molecular- and cellular-level mechanisms of endogenous and exogenous GCs is imperative, including timing of administration, dosage, duration of treatment, and specific formulations of GCs.

Steroid treatment in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Although the most recent systematic review and meta-analyses on acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) have shown that the use of steroids decreases mortality in adult patients, its benefits and risks may differ depending on the type and dosage of the steroid. Therefore, we conducted a network meta-analysis (NMA) to compare the differences in the efficacy among different doses and types of steroids.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, CENTRAL, ICHUSHI, ClinicalTrials.gov, and WHO ICTRP databases from the earliest records to March 2021 for randomized control trials, which compared steroids with placebo or conventional therapy for ARDS. Using the random-effects model, we compared various categories of steroids (high-dose methylprednisolone, low-dose methylprednisolone, hydrocortisone, dexamethasone, and no steroid) concerning hospital mortality, incidence of infection, and ventilator-free days (VFD).

RESULTS

We analyzed nine studies involving adult patients (n = 1212). Although there were no significant differences between the groups in terms of the mortality and incidence of infection, the number of VFD were greater when using low-dose methylprednisolone than when not using any steroids (Mean difference: 6.06; 95% confidence intervals: [2.5, 10.5]). Moreover, the rank probability showed that low-dose methylprednisolone might be the optimal treatment, whereas using no steroid or high-dose methylprednisolone may be inferior to other treatments in terms of mortality, infection, and VFD.

CONCLUSION

This NMA suggested that the effect of steroids on the outcome in patients with ARDS might depend on the type of the steroid drug administered. Moreover, further studies are needed to identify the optimal type and dosage.

Respiratory mechanics in late COVID-19 ARDS - a restrictive pattern is strongly associated with death. A cohort study

INTRODUCTION

COVID-19 is associated with severe respiratory distress and high mortality. We investigated the evolution of the respiratory mechanics in COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and the occurrence of a restrictive respiratory pattern.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A retrospective, single-centre study including patients admitted to the ICU during the first wave of the pandemic (March-April 2020).

RESULTS

A total of 141 consecutive patients were included. Many patients developed a restrictive pattern of respiratory mechanics during the course of the disease. Fifty-two patients died in the hospital (36.8%). In 29 cases (58% of the deceased) death was associated with a pattern of pulmonary mechanics, indicating a restrictive evolution of ARDS. Other diagnoses related to death were pulmonary embolism (n = 7, 14%), septic shock (n = 17, 33%), and other causes (n = 10, 20%), with some patients combining at least 2 of these diagnoses. In a multivariate analysis, age (OR = 1.06; 95% CI: 1.01-1.12; P = 0.029) and the administration of steroid pulses (OR = 2.7; 95% CI: 1.1-6.8; P = 0.03) were associated with the development of a restrictive pulmonary pattern and a higher level of plasmatic interleukin-6.

CONCLUSIONS

COVID-19 ARDS is associated with high mortality associated with a specific pattern of respiratory mechanics and sustained activation of innate immunological response. Age and administration of high-dose steroid pulses are associated with this clinical picture.

Efficacy and safety of corticosteroids in acute respiratory distress syndrome: An overview of meta-analyses

BACKGROUND

Evidence-based recommendations on the efficacy and safety of corticosteroids in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) remain a therapeutic challenge. Findings from several systematic reviews and meta-analyses are inconsistent. We aimed to assess the published meta-analyses through a systematic review approach and provide further insight into the current uncertainty and also to perform an updated meta-analysis from all the available primary studies.

METHODOLOGY

We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review (PRISMA) guidelines to establish the patients, intervention, control and outcome (PICO) for reviewing published meta-analyses. Data sources such as PubMed/MEDLINE, SCOPUS, Cochrane and Google Scholar from inception to February 2021 were accessed. Prevention of ARDS, mortality, ventilator-free days, ICU stay and safety in terms of occurrence of adverse effects were the patient-related outcomes. The review also assessed meta-analysis design-related outcomes which includes the quality of meta-analysis, factors contributing to the risk of bias, extent and sources of heterogeneity, publication bias and robustness of findings. AMSTAR-2 checklist assessed the quality of published meta-analyses.

RESULTS

A total of 18 meta-analyses were reviewed comprising a total of 38 primary studies and 3760 patients. Fourteen studies were in ARDS, three in community-acquired pneumonia and one in critical care. The overall quality of meta-analyses was observed to be critically low to high. A non-significant risk of publication bias and non-significant level of heterogeneity was observed in the reviewed meta-analysis. Corticosteroid was significantly effective in preventing ARDS among CAP patients. The effect of corticosteroids on mortality was observed to be still inconsistent, whereas significant improvement was observed with ICU and ventilator outcomes compared with the control group. Our meta-analysis observed a significant reduction of mortality in RCTs (RR: 0.78; 95% CI: 0.61 to 0.99) and the duration of mechanical ventilation (MD: -4.75; 95% CI: -7.63 to -1.88); and a significant increase in ventilator-free days (MD: 6.03; 95% CI: 3.59 to 8.47) and ICU-free days (MD: 8.04; 95% CI: 2.70 to 13.38) in ARDS patients treated with corticosteroids compared with the control group.

CONCLUSION

The quality of included studies ranged from critically low to high demonstrating inconsistency in risk of bias. While older studies found no significant effect, recent meta-analyses of RCTs found a significant mortality reduction in the corticosteroid group with considerable levels of heterogeneity. The updated meta-analysis by our team found a significant reduction in mortality in the pooled estimation of RCTs but not in cohort studies. Corticosteroid therapy was effective in terms of ICU and ventilator outcomes with minimal safety concerns. Future meta-analyses should be well executed with specific research questions and well performed with minimal risk of bias to produce good quality evidence.

Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio is a powerful predictor of adult patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome who might benefit from corticosteroid therapy

BACKGROUND

There is no convincing pharmacological treatment for patients withacute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). The efficacy of corticosteroids in ARDS patients remains controversial. Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR) has displayed as a good biomarker for inflammation and immune status, and thus a prognostic marker in some critical patients of ARDS. In this study, we hypothesized that NLR could also serve as an indicator for the efficacy of corticosteroid therapy in ARDS patients.

METHODS

Subjects included in this retrospective cohort study with ARDS patients who were admitted to an academic hospital in Wuhan, China, from May 1st, 2020 to April 20th, 2021. Multivariable logisitic regression model was used to evaluate risk factors of 30-day in-hospital mortality and ventilator-free days. Multi-Cox regression model was used to assess the efficacy of corticosteroid treatment in terms of NLR cutoff value.

RESULTS

Among the 357 patients in our study, 89 (24.9%) had NLR≥14.35 and 268 (75.1%) had NLR<14.35. Among them, 53 patients with NLR≥14.35 (58.9%) received corticosteroids and 99 patients with NLR<14.35 (37.1%) received corticosteroids. Post-adjustment analysis (by APACHE II score and age) revealed that corticosteroid treatment was associated with a decreased risk of 30-day mortality in the NLR≥14.35 group but with an increased risk of death in the NLR<14.35 group. Use of corticosteroid in NLR≥14.35 group significantly increased ventilator-free days (7.0 vs. 13.0, P<0.001).

CONCLUSION

NLR may be used to help identify ARDS patients who may benefit from corticosteroid treatment. Large-sized randomized controlled trials are warranted to determine the optimal cutoff value of NLR.

Clinical phenotypes from fatal cases of acute respiratory distress syndrome caused by pneumonia

There have been no report of objective clinical characteristics or prognostic factors that predict fatal outcome of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) since the Berlin definition was published. The aim of this study is to identify clinically available predictors that distinguish between two phenotypes of fatal ARDS due to pneumonia. In total, 104 cases of Japanese patients with pneumonia-induced ARDS were extracted from our prospectively collected database. Fatal cases were divided into early (< 7 days after diagnosis) and late (≥ 7 days) death groups, and clinical variables and prognostic factors were statistically evaluated. Of the 50 patients who died within 180 days, 18 (36%) and 32 (64%) were in the early (median 2 days, IQR [1, 5]) and late (median 16 days, IQR [13, 29]) death groups, respectively. According to multivariate regression analyses, the APACHE II score (HR 1.25, 95%CI 1.12–1.39, p < 0.001) and the disseminated intravascular coagulation score (HR 1.54, 95%CI 1.15–2.04, p = 0.003) were independent prognostic factors for early death. In contrast, late death was associated with high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) score indicating early fibroproliferation (HR 1.28, 95%CI 1.13–1.42, p < 0.001) as well as the disseminated intravascular coagulation score (HR 1.24, 95%CI 1.01–1.52, p = 0.039). The extent of fibroproliferation on HRCT, and the APACHE II scores along with coagulation abnormalities, should be considered for use in predictive enrichment and personalized medicine for patients with ARDS due to pneumonia.

The Controversy About the Effects of Different Doses of Corticosteroid Treatment on Clinical Outcomes for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Patients: An Observational Study

Background: Corticosteroid usage in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) remains controversial. We aim to explore the correlation between the different doses of corticosteroid administration and the prognosis of ARDS.

Methods: All patients were diagnosed with ARDS on initial hospital admission and received systemic corticosteroid treatment for ARDS. The main outcomes were the effects of corticosteroid treatment on clinical parameters and the mortality of ARDS patients. Secondary outcomes were factors associated with the mortality of ARDS patients.

Results: 105 ARDS patients were included in this study. Corticosteroid treatment markedly decreased serum interleukin-18 (IL-18) level (424.0 ± 32.19 vs. 290.2 ± 17.14; p = 0.0003) and improved arterial partial pressure of oxygen/fraction of inspired oxygen (PaO₂/FiO₂) (174.10 ± 65.28 vs. 255.42 ± 92.49; p < 0.0001). The acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE II) score (16.15 ± 4.41 vs. 14.88 ± 4.57, p = 0.042) decreased significantly on the seventh day after systemic corticosteroid treatment. Interestingly, the serum IL-18 decreased significantly (304.52 ± 286.00 vs. 85.85 ± 97.22, p < 0.0001), whereas the improvement of PaO₂/FiO₂ (24.78 ± 35.03 vs. 97.17 ± 44.82, p < 0.001) was inconspicuous after systemic corticosteroid treatment for non-survival patients, compared with survival patients. Furthermore, the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) model revealed, when equivalent methylprednisolone usage was 146.5 mg/d, it had the best sensitivity and specificity to predict the death of ARDS. Survival analysis by Kaplan–Meier curves presented the higher 45-day mortality in high-dose corticosteroid treatment group (logrank test p < 0.0001). Multivariate Cox regression analyses demonstrated that serum IL-18 level, APACHE II score, D-dimer, and high-dose corticosteroid treatment were associated with the death of ARDS.

Conclusion: Appropriate dose of corticosteroids may be beneficial for ARDS patients through improving the oxygenation and moderately inhibiting inflammatory response. The benefits and risks should be carefully weighed when using high-dose corticosteroid for ARDS.

Trial registration: This work was registered in ClinicalTrials.gov. Name of the registry: Corticosteroid Treatment for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. Trial registration number: NCT02819453. URL of trial registry record: https://register.clinicaltrials.gov.

Early high dose corticosteroid therapy in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: a propensity score matched study

BACKGROUND

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is one of the pulmonary complications after hematopoietic cell transplantation (HSCT) with a poor prognosis. The effects of corticosteroid therapy in HSCT patients with ARDS have never been described. In this study, we aim to evaluate the effect of corticosteroid on hospital mortality and other outcomes in patients with HSCT and ARDS.

METHODS

In this bicenter retrospective study, data were collected from patients diagnosed with ARDS and HSCT. Patients were divided into an early high dose steroids group (receiving a cumulative dose ⩾480 mg of methylprednisolone or its equivalent within the first 3 days after ARDS onset) and a no early high dose steroids group. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to determine the risk factors of hospital mortality. Cox regression was performed to assess the effect of early high dose steroids on patient survival. A propensity score matched cohort was built to validate the results from the original study cohort.

RESULTS

Two hundred and sixty-four patients were included in the original study cohort; 89 (33.71%) patients received early high dose steroids; these patients had higher ventilator free days at day 28 (7.68 ± 4.32 versus 6.48 ± 4.76, p = 0.046); there was no difference in hospital mortality (64.04% versus 53.14%, p = 0.091). Patients with early high dose steroids had a higher incidence of new onset bacteremia (17.98% versus 4%, p < 0.001) and viremia (13.48% versus 3.43%, p = 0.002). The results were further confirmed in the propensity score matched cohort, except for the improvement of ventilator free days (6.02 ± 5.51 versus 5.57 ± 5.54, p = 0.643).

CONCLUSION

In this cohort of HSCT patients with ARDS, early high dose coticosteroids had no effect on hospital mortality. In addition, the incidences of new onset bacteremia and viremia were increased after early high dose steroids.The reviews of this paper are available via the supplemental material section.

Effect of corticosteroid therapy in the early phase of acute respiratory distress syndrome: a propensity-matched cohort study

BACKGROUND/AIMS

It is unclear whether corticosteroid use in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) improves survival. This study aimed to investigate whether the administration of corticosteroids to patients in the early phase of moderate to severe ARDS is associated with improved outcomes.

METHODS

We analyzed the data of patients who received corticosteroids within 7 days of the onset of ARDS between June 2006 and December 2015 at a single tertiary teaching hospital. A total of 565 patients admitted with moderate to severe ARDS were eligible. The outcomes of patients treated with methylprednisolone 40 to 180 mg/day or equivalent (n = 404) were compared to those who did not receive steroids (n = 161). The primary and secondary outcomes were 28- and 90-day mortality rates, respectively. Propensity scores were used to adjust for baseline covariates.

RESULTS

The overall mortality at 28 days was not significantly different between the corticosteroid-treated and control groups (43.8% vs. 41%, p = 0.541). At 90 days, the overall mortality rate was higher in the corticosteroid-treated group than in the control group (59.2% vs. 48.4%, p = 0.021). However, on propensity score matching, corticosteroid therapy was not associated with a higher 28-day mortality rate (odds ratio, 1.031; 95% confidence interval, 0.657 to 1.618; p = 0.895) and 90 days (odds ratio, 1.435; 95% confidence interval, 0.877 to 2.348; p = 0.151).

CONCLUSION

Corticosteroid therapy was not associated with 28- or 90-day mortality in the early phase of moderate to severe ARDS on propensity score matching analysis.

Pharmacological principles guiding prolonged glucocorticoid treatment in ARDS

Current literature addressing the pharmacological principles guiding glucocorticoid (GC) administration in ARDS is scant. This paucity of information may have led to the heterogeneity of treatment protocols and misinterpretation of available findings. GCs are agonist compounds that bind to the GC receptor (GR) producing a pharmacological response. Clinical efficacy depends on the magnitude and duration of exposure to GR. We updated the meta-analysis of randomized trials investigating GC treatment in ARDS, focusing on treatment protocols and response. We synthesized the current literature on the role of the GR in GC therapy including genomic and non-genomic effects, and integrated current clinical pharmacology knowledge of various GCs, including hydrocortisone, methylprednisolone and dexamethasone. This review addresses the role dosage, timing of initiation, mode of administration, duration, and tapering play in achieving optimal response to GC therapy in ARDS. Based on RCTs' findings, GC plasma concentration-time profiles, and pharmacodynamic studies, optimal results are most likely achievable with early intervention, an initial bolus dose to achieve close to maximal GRα saturation, followed by a continuous infusion to maintain high levels of response throughout the treatment period. In addition, patients receiving similar GC doses may experience substantial between-patient variability in plasma concentrations affecting clinical response. GC should be dose-adjusted and administered for a duration targeting clinical and laboratory improvement, followed by dose-tapering to achieve gradual recovery of the suppressed hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis. These findings have practical clinical relevance. Future RCTs should consider these pharmacological principles in the study design and interpretation of findings.

Effectiveness of glucocorticoid therapy in patients with severe coronavirus disease 2019: protocol of a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

At the end of 2019, a novel coronavirus outbreak causative organism has been subsequently designated the 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV). The effectiveness of adjunctive glucocorticoid therapy in the management of 2019-nCoV-infected patients with severe lower respiratory tract infections is not clear, and warrants further investigation.

METHODS

The present study will be conducted as an open-labeled, randomized, controlled trial. We will enrol 48 subjects from Chongqing Public Health Medical Center. Each eligible subject will be assigned to an intervention group (methylprednisolone via intravenous injection at a dose of 1-2 mg/kg/day for 3 days) or a control group (no glucocorticoid use) randomly, at a 1:1 ratio. Subjects in both groups will be invited for 28 days of follow-up which will be scheduled at four consecutive visit points. We will use the clinical improvement rate as our primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints include the timing of clinical improvement after intervention, duration of mechanical ventilation, duration of hospitalization, overall incidence of adverse events, as well as rate of adverse events at each visit, and mortality at 2 and 4 weeks.

DISCUSSION

The present coronavirus outbreak is the third serious global coronavirus outbreak in the past two decades. Oral and parenteral glucocorticoids have been used in the management of severe respiratory symptoms in coronavirus-infected patients in the past. However, there remains no definitive evidence in the literature for or against the utilization of systemic glucocorticoids in seriously ill patients with coronavirus-related severe respiratory disease, or indeed in other types of severe respiratory disease. In this study, we hope to discover evidence either supporting or opposing the systemic therapeutic administration of glucocorticoids in patients with severe coronavirus disease 2019.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, ChiCTR2000029386, http://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=48777.

A Scoring System with High-Resolution Computed Tomography to Predict Drug-Associated Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: Development and Internal Validation

Drugs can cause acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). However, there is no established clinical prediction rule for drug-associated ARDS (DARDS). We aimed to develop and validate a scoring system for DARDS prediction. We analysed data collected from a prospective, single-centre, cohort study that included ARDS patients. The ARDS diagnosis was based on the American-European Consensus Conference or Berlin definition. Drug-associated acute lung injury (DALI) was defined as previous exposure to drugs which cause ALI and presence of traditional risk factors for ALI. High-resolution computed tomography (HRCT; indicating extent of lung damage with fibroproliferation), Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II, and disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC; indicating multiorgan failure) scores and PaO₂/FiO₂ were evaluated for their ability to predict DARDS. Twenty-nine of 229 patients had DARDS. The HRCT, APACHE II, and DIC scores and PaO₂/FiO₂ were assessed. The model-based predicted probability of DARDS fitted well with the observed data, and discrimination ability, assessed through bootstrap with an area under the receiver-operating curve, improved from 0.816 to 0.875 by adding the HRCT score. A simple clinical scoring system consisting of the APACHE II score, PaO₂/FiO₂, and DIC and HRCT scores can predict DARDS. This model may facilitate more appropriate clinical decision-making.

Rationale of Hemoadsorption during Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Support

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) and extracorporeal life support are increasingly used for treating various forms of shock, lung failure, protected interventions and life support including resuscitation. Most patients on ECMO are affected by a systemic inflammatory response caused by the underlying disease as well as the ECMO support itself, which contributes to vasoplegia, multi-organ failure, deterioration and death. Unfortunately, effective strategies for control of inflammation and related organ failure and shock on ECMO are lacking. Recently, a new polystyrene-based device for hemoadsorption, which aims to reduce excessive levels of inflammatory molecules such as interleukins, cytokines as well as damage- and pathogen-associated molecular patterns, has become available. Here we summarize the rationale, available data and technical aspects of polystyrene-based hemoadsorption during ECMO support, and give recommendations based on existing experience.

Conducting trials on corticosteroid dosing for respiratory failure in the last paradise

It is interesting to find that Japanese clinicians continue to hesitate to change their practice even after accumulating evidence for the inefficacy of high-dose corticosteroid for ARDS in the Letters to the Editor discussion. Given the widespread use of the therapy even for other categories of acute hypoxemic respiratory failure with diffuse alveolar damage represented by acute exacerbation of interstitial pneumonia, Japan is the last part of the world in which efficacy of corticosteroid dosing (including pulse therapy) is assessed in those patients if they wish to continue this trend.

Clinical differences between pulmonary and extrapulmonary acute respiratory distress syndrome: a retrospective cohort study of prospectively collected data in Japan

Background

Although acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) reportedly shows various clinical phenotypes with different risk and prognostic factors, few studies have assessed the clinical features and prognosis of pulmonary and extrapulmonary ARDS. The aim of the present study was to investigate clinical differences between pulmonary and extrapulmonary ARDS.

Methods

In total, 200 patients who met the Berlin criteria and were diagnosed with ARDS between October 2004 and September 2017 were included. We classified the patients into pulmonary and extrapulmonary ARDS groups. Both groups were assessed for 60-day mortality, duration of ventilation, and other clinical features.

Results

There were 150 and 50 patients in the pulmonary and extrapulmonary ARDS groups, respectively. The two groups showed no significant differences in any assessment parameters except the serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) level, which was higher in the extrapulmonary ARDS group (P=0.01). After adjustment for potentially confounding covariates, there were no significant differences in 60-day mortality (P=0.99) and the duration of ventilation (P=0.45) between the two groups. Mortality was significantly associated with the disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) score, high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) score, and serum LDH level in the pulmonary ARDS group and the DIC score and HRCT score in the extrapulmonary ARDS group.

Conclusions

Pulmonary and extrapulmonary ARDS may be comparable in terms of the prognosis and duration of ventilation. DIC and HRCT scores may be common clinical predictors of mortality with ARDS.

Prolonged low-dose methylprednisolone treatment is highly effective in reducing duration of mechanical ventilation and mortality in patients with ARDS

An updated meta-analysis incorporating nine randomized trials (n = 816) investigating low-to-moderate dose prolonged glucocorticoid treatment in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) show moderate-to-high quality evidence that glucocorticoid therapy is safe and reduces (i) time to endotracheal extubation, (ii) duration of hospitalization, and (iii) mortality (number to treat to save one life = 7), and increases the number of days free from (i) mechanical ventilation, (ii) intensive care unit stay, and (iii) hospitalization. Recent guideline suggests administering methylprednisolone in patients with early moderate-to-severe (1 mg/kg/day) and late persistent (2 mg/kg/day) ARDS (conditional recommendation based on moderate quality of evidence).

Pirfenidone ameliorates lipopolysaccharide-induced pulmonary inflammation and fibrosis by blocking NLRP3 inflammasome activation

Acute respiratory distress syndrome(ARDS)is a severe clinical disorder characterized by its acute onset, diffuse alveolar damage, intractable hypoxemia, and non-cardiogenic pulmonary edema. Acute lung injury(ALI) can trigger persistent lung inflammation and fibrosis through activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome and subsequent secretion of mature IL-1β, suggesting that the NLRP3 inflammasome is a potential therapeutic target for ALI, for which new therapeutic approaches are needed. Our present study aims to assess whether pirfenidone,with anti-fibrotic and anti-inflammatory properties, can improve LPS-induced inflammation and fibrosis by inhibiting NLRP3 inflammasome activation. Male C57BL/6 J mice were intratracheally injected with LPS to induce ALI. Mice were administered pirfenidone by oral gavage throughout the entire experimental course. The mouse macrophage cell line (J774 A.1) was incubated with LPS and ATP, with or without PFD pre-treatment. We demonstrated that PFD remarkably ameliorated LPS-induced pulmonary inflammation and fibrosis and reduced IL-1β and TGF-β1 levels in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid(BALF). Pirfenidone substantially reduced NLRP3 and ASC expression and inhibited caspase-1 activation and IL-1β maturation in lung tissues. In vitro, the experiments revealed that PFD significantly suppressed LPS/ATP-induced production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and decreased caspase-1 activation and the level of IL-1β in J774 A.1 cells. Taken together, the administration of PFD reduced LPS-induced lung inflammation and fibrosis by blocking NLRP3 inflammasome activation and subsequent IL-1β secretion. These findings indicated that PFD can down-regulate NLRP3 inflammasome activation and that it may offer a promising therapeutic approach for ARDS patients.

Adjunctive therapy with azithromycin for moderate and severe acute respiratory distress syndrome: a retrospective, propensity score-matching analysis of prospectively collected data at a single center

Effective pharmacological therapy has not been established for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Macrolides are antibiotics with potent immunomodulatory and anti-inflammatory effects that may be beneficial in ARDS treatment. The objective of this study was to determine the adjunctive effect of azithromycin on survival for patients with ARDS. This single-center, retrospective cohort evaluation of hospitalized patients with moderate or severe ARDS was conducted to assess the impact of intravenous azithromycin on clinical outcomes using a propensity score analysis. All data were collected prospectively as part of ongoing research on the utility of high-resolution computed tomography in ARDS. The primary outcome was 90-day mortality, and the secondary analysis assessed the effect of azithromycin on time to successful discontinuation of mechanical ventilation and 28-day mortality. Of 191 eligible patients with severe or moderate ARDS, 62 were treated with azithromycin. The 62 patients treated with azithromycin and 62 not treated with azithromycin were matched and analysed. Azithromycin use was associated with a statistically significant improvement in 90-day survival rate (Hazard ratio [HR], 0.49; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.27-0.87; P = 0.015) and a shorter time to successful discontinuation of mechanical ventilation (HR, 1.74; 95% CI, 1.07-2.81; P = 0.026). The 28-day mortality rate tended to be higher in the azithromycin cohort than in the non-azithromycin cohort, but this was not statistically significant. Adjunctive intravenous azithromycin therapy was effective in patients with moderate or severe ARDS. Further prospective randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm this result.

The relationship between high-dose corticosteroid treatment and mortality in acute respiratory distress syndrome: a retrospective and observational study using a nationwide administrative database in Japan

Background

In the 1980s, randomized-controlled trials showed that high-dose corticosteroid treatment did not improve the mortality of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). However, while the diagnostic criteria for ARDS have since changed, and supportive therapies have been improved, no randomized-controlled trials have revisited this issue since 1987; thus, the effect of high-dose corticosteroid treatment may be different in this era. We evaluated the effect of high-dose corticosteroid treatment in patients with ARDS using a nationwide administrative database in Japan in a retrospective and observational study.

Methods

This study was performed with a large population using the 2012 Japanese nationwide administrative database (diagnostic procedure combination). We evaluated the mortality of ARDS patients receiving or not receiving high-dose corticosteroid treatment within 7 days of hospital admission. We employed propensity score weighting with a Cox proportional hazards model in order to minimize the bias associated with the retrospective collection of data on baseline characteristics and compared the mortality between the high-dose and non-high-dose corticosteroid groups.

Results

Data from 2707 patients were used; 927 patients were treated with high-dose corticosteroid and 1780 patients were treated without high-dose corticosteroid, within 7 days of admission. After adjusting for confounds, mortality rates within 3 months were significantly higher in the high-dose corticosteroid group compared to the non-high-dose corticosteroid group (weighted hazard ratio: 1.59; 95% CI: 1.37-1.84; P <  0.001).

Conclusions

Our results suggest that high-dose corticosteroid treatment does not improve the prognosis of patients with ARDS, even in this era. However, this study has limitations owing to its retrospective and observational design.