Vasopressor Choice and Timing in Vasodilatory Shock

[Vasoactive agents in septic shock-individualized strategies]

Hemodynamic stabilization and preservation of organ perfusion are central elements in the management of septic shock. This is achieved by fluid resuscitation and by administration of vasoactive agents. Current guidelines recommend norepinephrine as the first-line vasoactive substance. In cases of high norepinephrine requirements the addition of nonadrenergic vasopressors is recommended. Furthermore, evidence suggests that early use of complementary vasoactive substances may provide additional benefits. Such a regimen, in terms of a broad-spectrum vasopressor approach, appears physiologically plausible. Post hoc analyses of studies investigating vasopressin or angiotensin II also suggest that specific subphenotypes may particularly benefit from individual vasoactive agents. Adjunctive therapy with hydrocortisone and fludrocortisone can improve vasopressor responsiveness and reduce mortality. In cases of cardiac dysfunction, a trial with dobutamine or a switch from norepinephrine to epinephrine is recommended. To enhance inodilator effects, milrinone or levosimendan may represent additional therapeutic options for certain patients. Although short-acting beta-blockers are not part of the standard treatment for septic shock, they may, in selected cases, contribute to hemodynamic improvement in patients with inadequately high sinus tachycardia or atrial tachyarrhythmias. Based on pathophysiological considerations and the currently available evidence, targeted use of specific vasoactive substances in defined subphenotypes may be justified. An initial broad-spectrum vasopressor strategy incorporating biomarkers such as renin and patient-specific characteristics followed by a focused de-escalation approach could represent a promising concept. However, the effectiveness of these strategies requires further investigation in randomized controlled trials.

Ascorbic acid and microcirculation in cardiothoracic surgery: a pilot feasibility trial and matched cohort study

BACKGROUND

Ascorbic acid is an essential cofactor of catecholamine synthesis that increases capillary bed density and improves microcirculation perfusion. We hypothesized early ascorbic acid administration in cardiothoracic surgery would preserve the microcirculatory integrity and minimize postoperative vasoplegia.

METHODS

This was a single-arm pilot feasibility study of adults undergoing septal myectomy combined with valve intervention or alone using cardiopulmonary bypass. Intravenous ascorbic acid 1,500 mg was administered before and immediately following cardiopulmonary bypass and every 6 h after for 12 doses. Three historical controls were identified and matched to each trial participant on age, gender, body mass index, preoperative ejection fraction, surgery performed, and time on cardiopulmonary bypass. The feasibility endpoint was a composite of successful and timely 1) ascorbic acid administration, 2) laboratory assessment, and 3) microcirculation measurements across the perioperative phases of care. Clinical endpoints included vasoplegia incidence, acute kidney injury, and lengths of stay compared to controls.

RESULTS

Fifteen patients were enrolled and compared to 45 historically matched controls. Participants' median baseline plasma ascorbic acid concentration was 0.5 (0.3, 0.9) mg/dL. Four (27%) patients had suboptimal concentrations. Eleven participants (75%) did not meet the feasibility composite endpoint due to the inability of microcirculation measurement. Incidence of vasoplegia and acute kidney injury, vasopressor duration, and lengths of stay were similar between participants and historical controls. No drug-related adverse events were noted.

CONCLUSIONS

Timely microcirculation measurements were challenging in the complex cardiothoracic surgery environment. Compared to historical controls, no meaningful differences in clinical endpoints were noted with ascorbic acid treatment. The utility of ascorbic acid on post-cardiopulmonary bypass vasoplegia remains unclear.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03744702, registered on November 14, 2018).

Effect of early adjunctive vasopressin initiation for septic shock patients: a target trial emulation

BACKGROUND

In septic shock, the optimal timing of adjunctive vasopressin initiation shock is unknown. We aimed to assess the effect of its early initiation for patients with septic shock.

METHODS

We conducted a multicenter target trial emulation to estimate the intensive care unit (ICU) mortality effect of early (≤ 6 h) adjunctive vasopressin compared with usual care. Eligible patients had septic shock diagnosed within 6 h of ICU admission. The primary outcome of this study was 30-day ICU mortality. Subgroup analyses were conducted to test the interaction of early vasopressin start with peak norepinephrine-equivalent dose (NED) at 6 h, APACHE score, peak lactate at 6 h and invasive mechanical ventilation. Secondary outcomes were the impact of delayed vasopressin introduction on 30-day ICU mortality and effect of NED at vasopressin start on 30-day ICU mortality. We used the parametric g-formula to emulate a target trial.

RESULTS

Overall, 3,105 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Mean age was 62 years and mean APACHE III score was 83. In the first six hours of vasopressor therapy, 1,864 (60%) patients were invasively ventilated. Estimated 30-day ICU mortality was 19.34% (95%CI, 17.0 to 21.68) in the no vasopressin group and 18.45% (95%CI, 16.26 to 20.63) in the early vasopressin group; relative risk 0.95 (95%CI, 0.93 to 0.98). The estimated 30-day ICU mortality effect of starting vasopressin was particularly strong at lower norepinephrine doses (< 0.25 µg.kg-1.min-1) and significant at lower norepinephrine doses than recommended by the Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines. Vasopressin administration progressively increased over the study period, from 35.2% (95%CI, 30.0 to 40.5) in 2015 to 45.1% (95%CI, 40.7 to 49.6) in 2021 (ß =  + 1.3% per year; 95%CI, + 0.46 to + 2.16, p = 0.011). Patients had progressively lower norepinephrine equivalent dose (ß = - 0.05 µg.kg-1.min-1 per year; 95%CI, - 0.09 to - 0.002, p = 0.038) and lower total SOFA score (ß = - 0.1 point per year; 95%CI, - 0.18 to - 0.07, p < 0.001) at vasopressin start.

CONCLUSIONS

In this emulation of a hypothetical target trial, patients with septic shock benefited from early vasopressin administration. These findings can help design prospective randomised-control trials of early adjunctive vasopressin use in septic shock.

ADJUNCTIVE VASOPRESSORS AND SHORT-TERM MORTALITY IN ADULTS WITH SEPTIC SHOCK: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS

ABSTRACT

Background: Adjunctive vasopressors are added to norepinephrine in one-third of adults with septic shock in the United States. However, effectiveness of this approach is unclear, and treatment recommendations are based on indirect evidence. We sought to synthesize the direct evidence for adjunctive vasopressor administration in adults with septic shock. Methods: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception to June 7, 2023. We included randomized clinical trials of adults with septic shock comparing adjunctive treatment with a vasopressin analogue, angiotensin II, methylene blue, hydroxocobalamin, or catecholamine analog to standard care vasopressors. The primary outcome was short-term mortality (at or before 28-30 days or intensive care discharge). Secondary outcomes included kidney replacement therapy, digital/peripheral ischemia, and venous thromboembolism. Random-effects meta-analyses were conducted to derive risk ratios (RRs) and 95% CIs. The certainty of the evidence was assessed using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation. Results: Of 6,763 records, 17 trials (3,813 participants) were included. Compared with standard care, adjunctive vasopressor administration may reduce short-term mortality risk (RR, 0.92 [95% CI, 0.85-1.00], low certainty, 17 trials [3618 participants]) and likely reduces kidney replacement therapy receipt (RR, 0.92 [95% CI, 0.84-1.01], moderate certainty, eight trials [2,408 participants]). Adjunctive vasopressor treatment may increase risk of digital/peripheral ischemia (RR, 2.44 [95% CI, 1.17-5.10], low certainty, nine trials [2,981 participants]) and venous thromboembolism (RR, 16.48 [95% CI, 0.96-283.17], low certainty, one trial [321 participants]). There was some evidence that the pooled estimate for short-term mortality was different (interaction P = 0.13) for trials adjudicated as low risk of bias (RR, 0.95 [95% CI, 0.87-1.05]) compared with trials adjudicated as some concerns or high risk of bias (RR, 0.82 [95% CI, 0.69-0.97]). The findings were robust to multiple sensitivity and subgroup analyses. Conclusions: In adults with septic shock, adjunctive vasopressors may lower short-term death risk and likely lower kidney replacement therapy risk, but may increase risk of adverse effects. In the United States, adjunctive vasopressor use prevalence in septic shock is disconnected from the low evidence certainty for a favorable mortality-to-risk profile.

Hemodynamic effects of adjunct arginine vasopressin to norepinephrine in septic shock: insights from a prospective multicenter registry study

BACKGROUND

The Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines suggest adding arginine vasopressin (AVP) when norepinephrine (NE) doses reach 0.25-0.50 µg/kg/min in septic shock patients. However, relying solely on a NE threshold has limitations, as other factors may be valuable in guiding AVP therapy during septic shock. Therefore, we aimed to identify additional patient characteristics associated with AVP hemodynamic responsiveness.

METHODS

A multicenter, prospective, observational study was conducted among adult ICU patients who met the predefined criteria for septic shock (not reaching the individual target mean arterial pressure despite adequate fluid resuscitation and NE base dose > 0.25 µg/kg/min) and received AVP therapy. AVP hemodynamic responsiveness was the primary study outcome, defined as stabilization or decrease of NE infusion rate two hours after initiating AVP. Secondary outcomes included shock duration and rebound hypotension following termination of AVP infusion. Univariate and multivariable regression analyses were performed to detect associations between characteristics and outcomes.

RESULTS

Between May 2020 and October 2023, 200 septic shock patients originating from 11 different ICUs were included. Of these, 153 (79%) met the definition for AVP hemodynamic responsiveness. Obesity and hyperlactatemia was negatively associated with AVP-response (adjusted Odds Ratio [aOR] 0.30, 95%CI 0.14-0.65 and aOR 0.86, 95%CI 0.75-0.99, respectively), while a NE infusion rate ≥ 0.30 µg/kg/min showed positive odds of AVP response (aOR 2.33, 95%CI 1.06-5.14). Incidence of new-onset atrial fibrillation was lower in AVP responders than non-responders (4% vs. 14%, p = 0.013). Higher body mass index (BMI) , NE infusion rate and duration prior to AVP initiation was associated with longer shock duration (aOR 1.06, 95%CI 1.02-1.11, aOR 1.12, 95%CI 1.01-1.25, and 1.01 95% CI 1.00-1.03, respectively), while higher pH associated with lower likelihood of prolonged shock (aOR 0.80, 95%CI 0.64-0.99). Rebound hypotension occurred in 9% when AVP was terminated, and AVP duration > 24 h was negatively associated with rebound hypotension (OR 0.22, 95%CI 0.05-0.85).

CONCLUSIONS

Arterial lactate, pH, BMI, and NE duration and dose were associated with AVP responsiveness and shock duration during septic shock, and rebound hypotension occurred in 9% during recovery. Our findings suggest that beyond NE thresholds, specific factors could be considered to optimize adjunctive AVP therapy in septic shock patients.

Catecholamines in sepsis: pharmacological insights and clinical applications-a narrative review

Catecholamines, essential neurotransmitters and hormones, play a critical role in the body's physiological response to stress and are pivotal in the management of various clinical conditions, particularly in critical care settings. This narrative review delves into the pharmacological properties of catecholamines, including their mechanisms of action, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics. Key clinical applications of catecholamines, especially in the cardiovascular and immune systems, are highlighted, emphasizing their roles in modulating heart rate, vascular tone, and immune responses during critical conditions such as sepsis and septic shock. Additionally, the review explores catecholamines' immunomodulatory effects and their interactions with other therapeutic agents, such as corticosteroids, in the management of septic shock. Further research is suggested to optimize catecholamine usage and improve patient outcomes in critical care settings.

Early high-dose vasopressors in refractory septic shock: A cohort study

PURPOSE

Septic shock refractory to high-dose vasopressors confers unacceptably high mortality, however, the impact of timing of peak vasopressor dose exposure on outcomes is unknown.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included adults who required a vasopressor dose ≥0.5 μg/kg/min norepinephrine-equivalents in the first 24 h of septic shock. We used the median time to peak vasopressor dose to stratify patients into 'early' and 'late' groups. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression was used to assess the impact of time to peak vasopressor exposure on mortality.

RESULTS

The median time to peak vasopressor dose exposure was 6 (3,13) hours, defining the early (n = 351) and late (n = 351) groups. In the severity-adjusted multivariable analysis, the early group was less likely to die within 28 days (HR 0.76, 95 % CI 0.58-0.99). The early group experienced significantly more days alive and free from renal replacement therapy, vasopressors, mechanical ventilation, and quicker independence from vasopressors (HR 1.40, 95 % CI 1.17-1.69). Mesenteric ischemia and arrhythmias were more frequent in the late group.

CONCLUSIONS

In vasopressor-refractory septic shock, achieving the peak vasopressor dose within the first six hours of shock onset was associated with reduced mortality and more days alive and free from organ-support therapies.

Vasoplegia in Heart, Lung, or Liver Transplantation: A Narrative Review

Vasoplegia is a pathophysiologic state of hypotension in the setting of normal or high cardiac output and low systemic vascular resistance despite euvolemia and high-dose vasoconstrictors. Vasoplegia in heart, lung, or liver transplantation is of particular interest because it is common (approximately 29%, 28%, and 11%, respectively), is associated with adverse outcomes, and because the agents used to treat vasoplegia can affect immunosuppressive and other drug metabolism. This narrative review discusses the pathophysiology, risk factors, and treatment of vasoplegia in patients undergoing heart, lung, and liver transplantation. Vasoplegia in this patient population is associated with acute kidney injury, hospital length of stay, and even survival. The mechanisms of vasoplegia in this patient population likely involve multiple pathways, including nitric oxide synthase, cyclic guanylate cyclase, cytokine release, hydrogen sulfide, adrenal axis abnormalities, and vasopressin deficiency. Contributors to vasoplegia in this population include mechanical circulatory support such as extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and cardiopulmonary bypass, organ ischemia time, preexisting infection, and medications such as angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, and excessive sedation. Treatment of vasoplegia in this population begins with conventional catecholamines and vasopressin analogs. Occasionally, agents, including methylene blue, hydroxocobalamin, and angiotensin II, are administered. Though retrospective literature suggests a hemodynamic response to these agents in the transplant population, minimal evidence is available to guide management. In what follows, we discuss the treatment of vasoplegia in the heart, lung, and liver transplant populations based on patient characteristics and potential risk factors associated with non-catecholamine agents.

Higher circulating ACE2 and DPP3 but reduced ACE and angiotensinogen in hyperreninemic sepsis patients

Sepsis and septic shock are global healthcare problems associated with high mortality rates. Activation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) is an early event in sepsis, and elevated renin may be predictive of worse outcomes. In a subset of sepsis patients enrolled in the Vitamin C, Thiamine and Steroids in Sepsis (VICTAS) trial, elevated levels of active renin (median value > 189 pg/mL or 5.1 pM) at baseline (day 0) were strongly associated with mortality; however, corresponding plasma levels of the vasopressor hormone Angiotensin II were not substantially increased nor was Angiotensin II associated with disease severity. The current study assessed RAAS components that may impact the Angiotensin II response in control subjects, normal renin sepsis (NRS, renin < 5.1 pM) and high renin sepsis (HRS, renin > 5.1 pM) patients. NRS and HRS subjects exhibited a similar reduction in ACE (40%), but increased levels of ACE2 and DPP3. The ACE to DPP3 ratio was higher in controls but this relationship was reversed in both NRS and HRS subjects. Intact angiotensinogen was 50% lower in the HRS than control or NRS subjects, whereas the intact angiotensinogen to renin ratio was <10% of control or NRS subjects. We conclude that altered expression of ACE, ACE2, DPP3 and angiotensinogen may attenuate the expected increase in Angiotensin II, particularly in sepsis subjects with high renin concentrations.

Haemodynamic management of septic shock

Septic shock is a significant challenge in the management of patients with burns and traumatic injuries when complicated by infection, necessitating prompt and effective haemodynamic support. This review provides a comprehensive overview of current strategies for vasopressor and fluid management in septic shock, with the aim to optimize patient outcomes. With regard to vasopressor management, we elaborate on the pharmacologic profiles and clinical applications of catecholamines, vasopressin derivatives, angiotensin II, and other vasoactive agents. Noradrenaline remains central to septic shock management. The addition of vasopressin, when sequentially added to noradrenaline, offers a non-catecholaminergic vasoactive effect with some clinical benefits and risks of adverse effects. Emerging agents such as angiotensin II and hydroxocobalamin are highlighted for their roles in catecholamine-resistant vasodilatory shock. Next, for fluid management, crystalloids are currently preferred for initial resuscitation, with balanced crystalloids showing benefits over saline. The application of albumin in septic shock warrants further research. High-quality evidence does not support large-volume fluid resuscitation, and an individualized strategy based on haemodynamic parameters, including lactate clearance and capillary refill time, is recommended. The existing knowledge suggests that early vasopressor initiation, particularly noradrenaline, may be critical in cases where fluid resuscitation takes inadequate effect. Management of refractory septic shock remains challenging, with novel agents like angiotensin II and methylene blue showing potential in recent studies. In conclusion, Further research is needed to optimize haemodynamic management of septic shock, particularly in developing novel vasopressor usage and fluid management approaches.

Oral blood pressure augmenting agents for intravenous vasopressor weaning

Intravenous (IV) vasopressors are essential in the management of hypotension and shock. Initiation of oral vasoactive agents to facilitate weaning of IV vasopressors to liberate patients from the intensive care unit is common despite conflicting evidence regarding the benefits of this practice. While midodrine appears to be the most frequently studied oral vasoactive agent for this purpose, its adverse effect profile may preclude its use in certain populations. In addition, some patients may require persistent use of IV vasopressors for hypotension refractory to midodrine. The use of additional and alternative oral vasoactive agents bearing different mechanisms of action is emerging. This article provides a comprehensive review of the pharmacology, clinical uses, dosing strategies, and safety considerations of oral vasoactive agents and their application in the intensive care setting.

Vasopressor Therapy

Vasopressor therapy represents a key part of intensive care patient management, used to increase and maintain vascular tone and thus adequate tissue perfusion in patients with shock. Norepinephrine is the preferred first-line agent because of its reliable vasoconstrictor effects, with minimal impact on heart rate, and its mild inotropic effects, helping to maintain cardiac output. Whichever vasopressor is used, its effects on blood flow must be considered and excessive vasoconstriction avoided. Other vasoactive agents include vasopressin, which may be considered in vasodilatory states, and angiotensin II, which may be beneficial in patients with high renin levels, although more data are required to confirm this. Dobutamine should be considered, along with continued fluid administration, to help maintain adequate tissue perfusion in patients with reduced oxygen delivery. In this narrative review, we consider the different vasopressor agents, focusing on the importance of tailoring therapy to the individual patient and their hemodynamic response.

Comparison of Early and Late Norepinephrine Administration in Patients With Septic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Vasopressor administration at an appropriate time is crucial, but the optimal timing remains controversial.

RESEARCH QUESTION

Does early vs late norepinephrine administration impact the prognosis of septic shock?

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Searches were conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and KMbase databases. We included studies of adults with sepsis and categorized patients into an early and late norepinephrine group according to specific time points or differences in norepinephrine use protocols. The primary outcome was overall mortality. The secondary outcomes included length of stay in the ICU, days free from ventilator use, days free from renal replacement therapy, days free from vasopressor use, adverse events, and total fluid volume.

RESULTS

Twelve studies (four randomized controlled trials [RCTs] and eight observational studies) comprising 7,281 patients were analyzed. For overall mortality, no significant difference was found between the early norepinephrine group and late norepinephrine group in RCTs (OR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.41-1.19) or observational studies (OR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.54-1.29). In the two RCTs without a restrictive fluid strategy that prioritized vasopressors and lower IV fluid volumes, the early norepinephrine group showed significantly lower mortality than the late norepinephrine group (OR, 0.49; 95%, CI, 0.25-0.96). The early norepinephrine group demonstrated more mechanical ventilator-free days in observational studies (mean difference, 4.06; 95% CI, 2.82-5.30). The incidence of pulmonary edema was lower in the early norepinephrine group in the three RCTs that reported this outcome (OR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.25-0.74). No differences were found in the other secondary outcomes.

INTERPRETATION

Overall mortality did not differ significantly between early and late norepinephrine administration for septic shock. However, early norepinephrine administration seemed to reduce pulmonary edema incidence, and mortality improvement was observed in studies without fluid restriction interventions, favoring early norepinephrine use.

Hydroxocobalamin Versus Methylene Blue for Treatment of Vasoplegic Shock Following Cardiopulmonary Bypass: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

To summarize the evidence of the hemodynamic effects and vasopressor requirements of adult cardiac surgery patients with vasoplegic shock treated with hydroxocobalamin or methylene blue.

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

SETTING

Multi-institutional.

PARTICIPANTS

Adult cardiac surgery patients with vasoplegic shock.

INTERVENTIONS

Administration of hydroxocobalamin or methylene blue.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

A total of 263 patients in four retrospective observational studies were included in a pooled analysis. There was no significant difference in the primary outcome, vasopressor requirement at 1 hour (mean difference [MD]: 0.00 mcg/kg/min norepinephrine equivalent [NEE], 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.09 to 0.08). Hydroxocobalamin was associated with a significant improvement in mean arterial pressure at 1 hour (MD: 5.30 mmHg, 95% CI: 2.98 to 7.62), total vasopressor dose at 1 hour (MD: -0.13 mcg/kg/min NEE, 95% CI: -0.25 to -0.01), total vasopressor at 6 hours (MD: -0.15 mcg/kg/min NEE, 95% CI: -0.21 to -0.08). No differences were observed in systemic vascular resistance or mortality between groups. Three studies were deemed at moderate risk of bias and one at serious risk.

CONCLUSIONS

Hydroxocobalamin has been shown to have a beneficial effect on hemodynamics and vasopressor requirements in vasoplegic cardiac surgery patients compared with methylene blue, although evidence is limited, and further well-powered randomized controlled trials are required.

[Initial diagnosis and treatment of shock]

BACKGROUND

Structured procedures have been established internationally for the initial clinical care of patients with traumatic injuries. Comparable concepts have not yet been applied to the initial clinical care of life-threatening nontraumatic emergencies. In 2022, a working group of the German Society for Acute and Emergency Medicine (DGINA) presented the Advanced Critical Illness Life Support (ACiLS) concept for the care of nontraumatic emergencies and offers corresponding training courses.

OBJECTIVE

To present systematic clinical first aid for patients with the leading symptom of shock according to the ACiLS concept.

RESULT

The (PR_E-)AUD2IT basic algorithm used in the ACiLS concept divides the initial care of a critically ill patient into the elements of preparation, resources, initial care, medical history, examination, differential diagnosis, diagnostics, interpretation and to do, interrupted by three team time-out elements for structured communication. The use of this concept is demonstrated here using the example of shock.

CONCLUSION

The ACiLS concept has the potential to improve the quality of initial care of nontraumatic emergencies in emergency department shock rooms and intensive care units. Further evaluations in practice and training capacities are essential.

Clinical Response to Third-Line Angiotensin-II vs Epinephrine in Septic Shock: A Propensity-Matched Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

The appropriate third-line vasopressor in septic shock patients receiving norepinephrine and vasopressin is unknown. Angiotensin-II (AT-II) offers a unique mechanism of action to traditionally used vasopressors in septic shock.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of third-line AT-II to epinephrine in patients with septic shock.

METHODS

A single-center, retrospective cohort study of critically ill patients was performed between April 1, 2019 and July 31, 2022. Propensity-matched (2:1) analysis compared adults with septic shock who received third-line AT-II to controls who received epinephrine following norepinephrine and vasopressin. The primary outcome was clinical response 24 hours after third-line vasopressor initiation. Additional efficacy and safety outcomes were investigated.

RESULTS

Twenty-three AT-II patients were compared with 46 epinephrine patients. 47.8% of AT-II patients observed a clinical response at hour 24 compared with 28.3% of epinephrine patients (P = 0.12). In-hospital mortality (65.2% vs 73.9%, P = 0.45), cardiac arrhythmias (26.1% vs 26.1%, P = 0.21), and thromboembolism (4.3% vs 2.2%, P = 0.61) were not observed to be statistically different between groups.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Administration of AT-II as a third-line vasopressor agent in septic shock patients was not associated with significantly improved clinical response at hour 24 compared with epinephrine. Although underpowered to detect meaningful differences, the clinical observations of this study warrant consideration and further investigation of AT-II as a third-line vasopressor in septic shock.

Prognostic evaluation of the norepinephrine equivalent score and the vasoactive-inotropic score in patients with sepsis and septic shock: a retrospective cohort study

Background

This study investigated the association between vasoactive medication exposure and mortality risk in patients with sepsis using the norepinephrine equivalent (NEE) score and vasoactive-inotropic score (VIS).

Methods

This retrospective cohort study included adult patients with sepsis requiring vasoactive agents. The data were extracted from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV database. The primary outcome was 28-day mortality. Multivariate Cox regression was used to elucidate the relationship between vasoactive medication exposure and 28-day mortality, as quantified by the VIS and NEE score. Hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for 28-day mortality were generated, and forest plots were constructed to present the results of univariate and multivariate analyses. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to analyze the cumulative incidence of 28-day mortality. A nomogram was constructed to predict the prognosis of patients with sepsis.

Results

The present study encompassed 9,032 patients diagnosed with sepsis who received vasoactive therapy, of which 4,229 patients were further analyzed at the second hour after the onset of sepsis. Distinct variations in demographic data were observed between survivors (n = 3,265, 77.21%) and non-survivors (n = 964, 22.79%). Multivariate analysis indicated that several factors, including VIS >15.04 (p = 0.001), NEE >0.10 (p < 0.001), heart rate (p = 0.045), mean arterial pressure (p = 0.009), respiratory rate (p < 0.001), oxygen saturation (p < 0.001), blood urea nitrogen (BUN) (p = 0.001), and the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (p < 0.001), were significantly associated with 28-day mortality in the patients with sepsis. The NEE score, respiratory rate, oxygen saturation, and BUN were incorporated into the nomogram model with a concordance index of 0.779 and an area under the curve of 0.802 (95% CI 0.787-0.818).

Conclusion

We found that the VIS and NEE score had favorable values for predicting mortality risk in patients with sepsis in the intensive care units. The VIS and NEE score in the second hour after sepsis onset were independently associated with 28-day mortality in patients with sepsis.

ANGIOTENSIN II IN THE TREATMENT OF DISTRIBUTIVE SHOCK: A SYSTEMATIC-REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS

ABSTRACT

Objective: While nonnorepinephrine vasopressors are increasingly used as a rescue therapy in cases of norepinephrine-refractory shock, data on their efficacy are limited. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to synthesize existing literature on the efficacy of angiotensin II (ATII) in distributive shock. Methods: We preregistered our meta-analysis with PROSPERO (CRD42023456136). We searched PubMed, Scopus, and gray literature for studies presenting outcomes on ATII use in distributive shock. The primary outcome of the meta-analysis was all-cause mortality. We used a random effects model to calculate pooled risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: By incorporating data from 1,555 patients included in 10 studies, we found that however, all-cause mortality was similar among patients receiving ATII and controls (RR = 1.02; 95% CI: 0.89 to 1.16, P = 0.81), the reduction in norepinephrine or norepinephrine-equivalent dose at 3 h after treatment initiation was greater among patients receiving ATII (MD = -0.06; 95% CI: -0.11 to -0.02, P = 0.008), while there were no higher rates of adverse events reported among ATII patients. Conclusions: While ATII did not reduce mortality among distributive shock patients, it allowed for significant adjunctive vasopressor reduction at 3 h without an increase in reported adverse events, deeming it a viable alternative for the increasingly adopted multimodal vasopressor for minimizing catecholamine exposure and its adverse events.

PLASMA DYNAMICS OF NEUTROPHIL EXTRACELLULAR TRAPS AND CELL-FREE DNA IN SEPTIC AND NONSEPTIC VASOPLEGIC SHOCK: A PROSPECTIVE COMPARATIVE OBSERVATIONAL COHORT STUDY

ABSTRACT

Background: The association between neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) and the requirement for vasopressor and inotropic support in vasoplegic shock is unclear. This study aimed to investigate the dynamics of plasma levels of NETs and cell-free DNA (cfDNA) up to 48 h after the admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) for management of vasoplegic shock of infectious (SEPSIS) or noninfectious (following cardiac surgery, CARDIAC) origin. Methods: This is a prospective, observational study of NETs and cfDNA plasma levels at 0H (admission) and then at 12H, 24H, and 48H in SEPSIS and CARDIAC patients. The vasopressor inotropic score (VIS), the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score, and time spent with invasive ventilation, in ICU and in hospital, were recorded. Associations between NETs/cfDNA and VIS and SOFA were analyzed by Spearman's correlation (rho), and between NETs/cfDNA and ventilation/ICU/hospitalization times by generalized linear regression. Results: Both NETs and cfDNA remained elevated over 48 h in SEPSIS (n = 46) and CARDIAC (n = 30) patients, with time-weighted average concentrations greatest in SEPSIS (NETs median difference 0.06 [0.02-0.11], P = 0.005; cfDNA median difference 0.48 [0.20-1.02], P < 0.001). The VIS correlated to NETs (rho = 0.3-0.60 in SEPSIS, P < 0.01, rho = 0.36-0.57 in CARDIAC, P ≤ 0.01) and cfDNA (rho = 0.40-0.56 in SEPSIS, P < 0.01, rho = 0.38-0.47 in CARDIAC, P < 0.05). NETs correlated with SOFA. Neither NETs nor cfDNA were independently associated with ventilator/ICU/hospitalization times. Conclusion: Plasma levels of NETs and cfDNA correlated with the dose of vasopressors and inotropes administered over 48 h in patients with vasoplegic shock from sepsis or following cardiac surgery. NETs levels also correlated with organ dysfunction. These findings suggest that similar mechanisms involving release of NETs are involved in the pathophysiology of vasoplegic shock irrespective of an infectious or noninfectious etiology.

Effect of norepinephrine and phenylephrine on prothrombotic response in patients undergoing cesarean section under spinal anesthesia: protocol for a randomized, double-blind, controlled study

BACKGROUND

Norepinephrine and phenylephrine are commonly used vasoactive drugs to treat hypotension during the perioperative period. The increased release of endogenous norepinephrine elicits prothrombotic changes, while parturients are generally in a hypercoagulable state. Therefore, this trial aims to investigate whether there is a disparity between equivalent doses of prophylactic norepinephrine infusion and phenylephrine infusion on prothrombotic response in patients undergoing cesarean section under spinal anesthesia.

METHODS

Sixty-six eligible parturients will be recruited for this trial and randomly assigned to the norepinephrine or phenylephrine group. The "study drug" will be administered at a rate of 15 ml/h starting from the intrathecal injection. The primary outcome are plasma coagulation factor VIII activity (FVIII: C), fibrinogen, and D-dimer levels. The secondary outcomes include hemodynamic variables and umbilical artery blood pH value.

DISCUSSION

Our study is the first trial comparing the effect of norepinephrine and phenylephrine on prothrombotic response in patients undergoing cesarean section under spinal anesthesia. Positive or negative results will all help us better understand the impact of vasoactive drugs on patients. If there are any differences, this trial will provide new evidence for maternal choice of vasoactive medications in the perioperative period.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR2300077164. Registered on 1 November 2023. https://www.chictr.org.cn/ .

2024 AAHA Fluid Therapy Guidelines for Dogs and Cats

Fluids are drugs used in veterinary patients capable of producing beneficial therapeutic or inadvertent harmful effects within the body's intravascular, interstitial, and intracellular fluid spaces. The individualized design of a fluid therapy plan requires careful patient assessment and targeted selection of proper fluid types, administration routes, and rates, along with adjustments during therapy tailored specifically as per the individual patient's fluid requirement and therapeutic response. Personalized fluid prescriptions and vigilant patient monitoring help avoid patient morbidity from body fluid deficiencies, fluid excess, and electrolyte derangements and support better patient outcomes. These guidelines provide an overview of fluid dynamics within the fluid spaces of the body, describe various types of fluids and their uses, and outline recommendations for fluid administration for resuscitation, rehydration, and maintenance purposes. The guidelines also outline approaches to fluid therapy for anesthetized patients and reiterate the recommendations of reduced fluid rates in this population of patients. Additionally, the guidelines include practical fluid therapy strategies for patients with various common disorders. The goal of these guidelines is to help veterinary professionals safely and effectively prescribe and administer fluid therapy for canine and feline patients.

Mean arterial pressure to norepinephrine equivalent dose ratio for predicting renal replacement therapy requirement: a retrospective analysis from the MIMIC-IV

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to assess the predictive value of the ratio of mean arterial pressure (MAP) to the corresponding peak rate of norepinephrine equivalent dose (NEQ) within the first day in patients with shock for the subsequent renal replacement therapy (RRT) requirement.

METHODS

Patients were identified using the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV (MIMIC-IV) database. The relationship was investigated using a restricted cubic spline curve, and propensity score matching(PSM) was used to eliminate differences between groups. Odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using logistic regression. Variable significance was assessed using extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated.

RESULTS

Of the 5775 patients, 301 (5.2%) received RRT. The MAP/NEQ index showed a declining L-shaped relationship for RRT. After PSM, the adjusted OR per 100 mmHg/mcg/kg/min for RRT was 0.93(95% CI 0.88-0.98). The most influential factors for RRT were fluid balance, baseline creatinine, and the MAP/NEQ index. The threshold for the MAP/NEQ index predicting RRT was 161.7 mmHg/mcg/kg/min (specificity: 65.8%, sensitivity: 74.8%) with an area under the ROC curve of 75.9% (95% CI 73.1-78.8).

CONCLUSIONS

The MAP/NEQ index served as an alternative predictor of RRT necessity based on the NEQ for adult patients who received at least one vasopressor over 6 h within the first 24 h of intensive care unit(ICU) admission. Dynamic modulation of the MAP/NEQ index by the synergistic use of various low-dose vasopressors targeting urine output may be beneficial for exploring individualized optimization of MAP.

Diagnosis and Management of Vasoplegia in Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support: A Narrative Review

Refractory vasodilatory shock, or vasoplegia, is a pathophysiologic state observed in the intensive care unit and operating room in patients with a variety of primary diagnoses. Definitions of vasoplegia vary by source but are qualitatively defined clinically as a normal or high cardiac index and low systemic vascular resistance causing hypotension despite high-dose vasopressors in the setting of euvolemia. This definition can be difficult to apply to patients undergoing mechanical circulatory support (MCS). A large body of mostly retrospective literature exists on vasoplegia in the non-MCS population, but the increased use of temporary MCS justifies an examination of vasoplegia in this population. MCS, particularly extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, adds complexity to the diagnosis and management of vasoplegia due to challenges in determining cardiac output (or total blood flow), lack of clarity on appropriate dosing of noncatecholamine interventions, increased thrombosis risk, the difficulty in determining the endpoints of adequate volume resuscitation, and the unclear effects of rescue agents (methylene blue, hydroxocobalamin, and angiotensin II) on MCS device monitoring and function. Care teams must combine data from invasive and noninvasive sources to diagnose vasoplegia in this population. In this narrative review, the available literature is surveyed to provide guidance on the diagnosis and management of vasoplegia in the temporary MCS population, with a focus on noncatecholamine treatments and special considerations for patients supported by extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, transvalvular heart pumps, and other ventricular assist devices.

Dysfunction of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system in human septic shock

Sepsis and septic shock are global healthcare problems associated with mortality rates of up to 40% despite optimal standard-of-care therapy and constitute the primary cause of death in intensive care units worldwide. Circulating biomarkers of septic shock severity may represent a clinically relevant approach to individualize those patients at risk for worse outcomes early in the course of the disease, which may facilitate early and more precise interventions to improve the clinical course. However, currently used septic shock biomarkers, including lactate, may be non-specific and have variable impact on prognosis and/or disease management. Activation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) is likely an early event in septic shock, and studies suggest that an elevated level of renin, the early and committed step in the RAAS cascade, is a better predictor of worse outcomes in septic shock, including mortality, than the current standard-of-care measure of lactate. Despite a robust increase in renin, other elements of the RAAS, including endogenous levels of Ang II, may fail to sufficiently increase to maintain blood pressure, tissue perfusion, and protective immune responses in septic shock patients. We review the current clinical literature regarding the dysfunction of the RAAS in septic shock and potential therapeutic approaches to improve clinical outcomes.

asopressin nitiation as a econd-Line Vasoressor in Early eptic hock (VISPSS)

BACKGROUND

Vasopressin is recommended as a second-line vasoactive agent for the management of septic shock; however, a paucity of data to guide its optimal use remains. The aim was to evaluate the effect of time-to vasopressin initiation and norepinephrine (NE) dose at vasopressin initiation on clinical outcomes in patients presenting with septic shock.

METHODS

This was a multi-centered, retrospective, observational study conducted in patients with septic shock. Patients were divided into 2 groups: patients initiated on vasopressin when NE-equivalent dose (NEE) < 0.25 mcg/kg/min or ≥ 0.25 mcg/kg/min. The primary outcome was time-to-vasopressor discontinuation (hours). Secondary outcomes included 28-day in-hospital mortality, intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (LOS), fluid balance after 72 hours, and the change in NEE at 12 hours.

RESULTS

A total of 302 patients were included in this study. After propensity-score matching, 73 patients in each group were identified for analysis. There was no significant difference in the time-to-vasopressor discontinuation (hours) between the groups (88.8 [55-187.5] vs 86.7 [47-172]); p = 0.7815). Fluid balance (mL) at 72 hours was significantly lower when vasopressin was initiated at NEE < 0.25 mcg/kg/min (1769 [71-7287] vs 5762 [1463-8813]; p = 0.0077). A multivariable linear regression showed shorter time to shock resolution with earlier vasopressin initiation, defined as within 4 hours (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

In this propensity-score matched cohort, vasopressin initiation at NEE < 0.25 mcg/kg/min was not associated with shorter vasopressor duration. There was a lower fluid balance at 72 hours when vasopressin was initiated at lower NE doses.

Position Paper on the Reporting of Norepinephrine Formulations in Critical Care from the Society of Critical Care Medicine and European Society of Intensive Care Medicine Joint Task Force

OBJECTIVES

To provide guidance on the reporting of norepinephrine formulation labeling, reporting in publications, and use in clinical practice.

DESIGN

Review and task force position statements with necessary guidance.

SETTING

A series of group conference calls were conducted from August 2023 to October 2023, along with a review of the available evidence and scope of the problem.

SUBJECTS

A task force of multinational and multidisciplinary critical care experts assembled by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine.

INTERVENTIONS

The implications of a variation in norepinephrine labeled as conjugated salt (i.e., bitartrate or tartrate) or base drug in terms of effective concentration of norepinephrine were examined, and guidance was provided.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

There were significant implications for clinical care, dose calculations for enrollment in clinical trials, and results of datasets reporting maximal norepinephrine equivalents. These differences were especially important in the setting of collaborative efforts across countries with reported differences.

CONCLUSIONS

A joint task force position statement was created outlining the scope of norepinephrine-dose formulation variations, and implications for research, patient safety, and clinical care. The task force advocated for a uniform norepinephrine-base formulation for global use, and offered advice aimed at appropriate stakeholders.

The scientific rationale and study protocol for the DPP3, Angiotensin II, and Renin Kinetics in Sepsis (DARK-Sepsis) randomized controlled trial: serum biomarkers to predict response to angiotensin II versus standard-of-care vasopressor therapy in the treatment of septic shock

BACKGROUND

Data to support the use of specific vasopressors in septic shock are limited. Since angiotensin II (AT2) was approved by the Food and Drug Administration in 2017, multiple mechanistically distinct vasopressors are available to treat septic shock, but minimal data exist regarding which patients are most likely to benefit from each agent. Renin and dipeptidyl peptidase 3 (DPP3) are components of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system which have been shown to outperform lactate in predicting sepsis prognosis, and preliminary data suggest they could prove useful as biomarkers to guide AT2 use in septic shock.

METHODS

The DARK-Sepsis trial is an investigator-initiated industry-funded, open-label, single-center randomized controlled trial of the use of AT2 versus standard of care (SOC) vasopressor therapy in patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) with vasodilatory shock requiring norepinephrine ≥ 0.1 mcg/kg/min. In both groups, a series of renin and DPP3 levels will be obtained over the first 24 h of treatment with AT2 or SOC. The primary study outcome will be the ability of these biomarkers to predict response to vasopressor therapy, as measured by change in total norepinephrine equivalent dose of vasopressors at 3 h post-drug initiation or the equivalent timepoint in the SOC arm. To determine if the ability to predict vasopressor response is specific to AT2 therapy, the primary analysis will be the ability of baseline renin and DPP3 levels to predict vasopressor response adjusted for treatment arm (AT2 versus control) and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores. Secondary outcomes will include rates of acute kidney injury, need for mechanical ventilation and kidney replacement therapy, lengths of stay in the ICU and hospital, ICU and hospital mortality, and rates of prespecified adverse events.

DISCUSSION

With an armamentarium of mechanistically distinct vasopressor agents now available, sub-phenotyping patients using biomarkers has the potential to improve septic shock outcomes by enabling treatment of the correct patient with the correct vasopressor at the correct time. However, this approach requires validation in a large definitive multicenter trial. The data generated through the DARK-Sepsis study will prove crucial to the optimal design and patient enrichment of such a pivotal trial.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05824767. Registered on April 24, 2023.

Angiotensin ii therapy in refractory septic shock: which patient can benefit most? A narrative review

Patients with septic shock who experience refractory hypotension despite adequate fluid resuscitation and high-dose noradrenaline have high mortality rates. To improve outcomes, evidence-based guidelines recommend starting a second vasopressor, such as vasopressin, if noradrenaline doses exceed 0.5 µg/kg/min. Recently, promising results have been observed in treating refractory hypotension with angiotensin II, which has been shown to increase mean arterial pressure and has been associated with improved outcomes. This narrative review aims to provide an overview of the pathophysiology of the renin-angiotensin system and the role of endogenous angiotensin II in vasodilatory shock with a focus on how angiotensin II treatment impacts clinical outcomes and on identifying the population that may benefit most from its use.

Management of Vasoplegic Shock in the Cardiovascular Intensive Care Unit after Cardiac Surgery

Vasoplegic shock after cardiac surgery is characterized by hypotension, a high cardiac output, and vasodilation. Much of the understanding of this pathologic state is informed by the understanding of septic shock. Adverse outcomes and mortality are increased with vasoplegic shock. Early recognition and a systematic approach to its management are critical. The need for vasopressors to sustain an adequate blood pressure as well as pharmacologic adjuncts to mitigate the inflammatory inciting process are necessary. The rationale behind vasopressor escalation and consideration of adjuncts are discussed.

Severe Refractory Vasoplegic Shock Syndrome after OPCABG Successfully Treated with Hydroxycobalamin: A Case Report and Review of the Literature

BACKGROUND

Vasoplegic shock syndrome (VSS) after an off-pump coronary artery bypass graft (OPCABG) is an extremely rare condition. Inotropic support is usually the first-line therapy, though it can precipitate several complications or be ineffective. We report the first case of severe refractory VSS after OPCABG successfully treated with hydroxycobalamin.

METHODS

A 77-year-old gentleman underwent OPCABG for three vessels coronary artery disease. Preoperative LV ejection fraction was 28%, and the patient before surgery started sacubitril/valsartan titrated, then, at the highest dose. Surgery was uneventful and, by the end of the procedure, TEE showed improved biventricular contractility.

RESULTS

The patient was transferred to the ICU without inotropic support, but soon developed hypotension. TEE ruled out pericardial tamponade and confirmed fair contractility. Norepinephrine was titrated to a medium-high dose, vasopressin was started and a Swan-Ganz catheter was placed. SVR was 480 dyn·s·cm-5. Despite aggressive pharmacologic treatment (including methylprednisolone and methylene blue), no improvements were noticed. Ten grams of hydroxycobalamin were administered. One hour later, hemodynamic status re-assessment showed SVR > 800 dyn·s·cm-5. Afterward, vasopressors were gradually reduced.

CONCLUSIONS

Our case demonstrated the importance of adequate early treatment in VSS after OPCABG. This case report shows, for the first time, that hydroxycobalamin was effectively used to restore homeostasis.

Precision fluid and vasoactive drug therapy for critically ill patients

There are several clinical practice guidelines concerning the use of fluid and vasoactive drug therapies in critically ill adult patients, but the recommendations in these guidelines are often based on low-quality evidence. Further, some were compiled prior to the publication of landmark clinical trials, particularly in the comparison of balanced crystalloid and normal saline. An important consideration in the treatment of critically ill patients is the application of precision medicine to provide the most effective care to groups of patients most likely to benefit from the therapy. Although not currently widely integrated into these practice guidelines, the utility of precision medicine in critical illness is a recognized research priority for fluid and vasoactive therapy management. The purpose of this narrative review was to illustrate the evaluation and challenges of providing precision fluid and vasoactive therapies to adult critically ill patients. The review includes a discussion of important investigations published after the release of currently available clinical practice guidelines to provide insight into how recommendations and research priorities may change future guidelines and bedside care for critically ill patients.

Tris-Hydroxymethyl Aminomethane in Critically Ill Adults: A Systematic Review

Tris-hydroxymethyl aminomethane (THAM) is an amino alcohol used clinically to buffer acid loads and raise pH in acidotic conditions. Unlike sodium bicarbonate, which increases plasma sodium levels with use and produces carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) as part of the buffering process, THAM does neither. Although not widely used in modern critical care and unavailable for clinical use in 2016, THAM has been available in the United States since 2020. Clinical experience and existing literature suggest that THAM may have clinical utility in acid-base management in conditions such as liver transplantation where rising sodium levels during perioperative care may be dangerous, and in managing acid-base derangements during care of patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). To clarify the evidence base supporting the clinical use of THAM, we conducted a systematic review to assess the efficacy and safety of THAM as a buffering agent in critically ill adults using Ovid EBM Reviews, Ovid Embase, Ovid Medline, Scopus, and Web of Science Core Collection. Randomized-, crossover-, retrospective cohort-, parallel-designed clinical trials, case series, and case reports of adult patients who received THAM in the operative or critical care setting were included. Conference abstracts of qualifying study designs were also included. Two independent reviewers extracted the data regarding the study details, demographics, treatment, and outcomes data. A third reviewer adjudicated discrepancies. A total of 21 studies including 3 randomized controlled trials, 5 observational studies, 4 case series, and 9 case reports met inclusion criteria. Eight studies (38%) were abstracts published in conference proceedings. In total, 417 critically ill patients received THAM to treat acidosis in critically ill surgical and nonsurgical patients, during liver transplantation, and in ARDS. In general, THAM corrected acidosis with an efficacy equivalent to sodium bicarbonate and did so with less hypercarbia and hypernatremia. Adverse effects of THAM included hyperkalemia, hypoglycemia, ventilator depression, and tissue damage with extravasation. We conclude that THAM may have potential advantages in some critical care settings, but that clinical evidence is limited, and high-quality evaluations are necessary.

Vasopressin in Sepsis and Other Shock States: State of the Art

This review of the use of vasopressin aims to be comprehensive and highly practical, based on the available scientific evidence and our extensive clinical experience with the drug. It summarizes controversies about vasopressin use in septic shock and other vasodilatory states. Vasopressin is a natural hormone with powerful vasoconstrictive effects and is responsible for the regulation of plasma osmolality by maintaining fluid homeostasis. Septic shock is defined by the need for vasopressors to correct hypotension and lactic acidosis secondary to infection, with a high mortality rate. The Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines recommend vasopressin as a second-line vasopressor, added to norepinephrine. However, these guidelines do not address specific debates surrounding the use of vasopressin in real-world clinical practice.

Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock: What Have We Learned in the Last Two Decades?

Sepsis is a clinical syndrome encompassing physiologic and biological abnormalities caused by a dysregulated host response to infection. Sepsis progression into septic shock is associated with a dramatic increase in mortality, hence the importance of early identification and treatment. Over the last two decades, the definition of sepsis has evolved to improve early sepsis recognition and screening, standardize the terms used to describe sepsis and highlight its association with organ dysfunction and higher mortality. The early 2000s witnessed the birth of early goal-directed therapy (EGDT), which showed a dramatic reduction in mortality leading to its wide adoption, and the surviving sepsis campaign (SSC), which has been instrumental in developing and updating sepsis guidelines over the last 20 years. Outside of early fluid resuscitation and antibiotic therapy, sepsis management has transitioned to a less aggressive approach over the last few years, shying away from routine mixed venous oxygen saturation and central venous pressure monitoring and excessive fluids resuscitation, inotropes use, and red blood cell transfusions. Peripheral vasopressor use was deemed safe and is rising, and resuscitation with balanced crystalloids and a restrictive fluid strategy was explored. This review will address some of sepsis management's most important yet controversial components and summarize the available evidence from the last two decades.

Intraoperative arterial pressure management: knowns and unknowns

Preventing postoperative organ dysfunction is integral to the practice of anaesthesia. Although intraoperative hypotension is associated with postoperative end organ dysfunction, there remains ambiguity with regards to its definition, targets, thresholds for initiating treatment, and ideal treatment modalities.

Blood Pressure Goals in Critically Ill Patients

Blood pressure goals in the intensive care unit (ICU) have been extensively investigated in large datasets and have been associated with various harm thresholds at or greater than a mean pressure of 65 mm Hg. While it is difficult to perform interventional randomized trials of blood pressure in the ICU, important evidence does not support defense of a higher pressure, except in retrospective database analyses. Perfusion pressure may be a more important target than mean pressure, even more so in the vulnerable patient population. In the cardiac ICU, blood pressure targets are tailored to specific cardiac pathophysiology and patient characteristics. Generally, the goal is to maintain adequate blood pressure within a certain range to support cardiac function and to ensure end organ perfusion. Individualized targets demand the use of both invasive and noninvasive monitoring modalities and frequent titration of medications and/or mechanical circulatory support where necessary. In this review, we aim to identify appropriate blood pressure targets in the ICU, recognizing special patient populations and outlining the risk factors and predictors of end organ failure.

Early administration of multiple vasopressors is associated with better survival in patients with sepsis: a propensity score-weighted study

BACKGROUND

The association between the timing of administration of multiple vasopressors and patient outcomes has not been investigated.

METHODS

This study used data from the MIMIC-IV database. Patients with sepsis who were administered two or more vasopressors were included. The principal exposure was the last norepinephrine dose when adding a second vasopressor. The cohort was divided into early (last norepinephrine dose < 0.25 μg/kg/min) and normal (last norepinephrine dose ≥ 0.25 μg/kg/min) groups. The primary outcome was 28-day mortality. Multivariable Cox analyses, propensity score matching, stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting (sIPTW), and restricted cubic spline (RCS) curves were used.

RESULTS

Overall, 1,437 patients who received multiple vasopressors were included. Patients in the early group had lower 28-day mortality (HR: 0.76; 95% CI: 0.65-0.89; p < 0.001) than those in the single group, with similar results in the propensity score-matched (HR: 0.80; 95% CI: 0.68-0.94; p = 0.006) and sIPTW (HR: 0.75; 95% CI: 0.63-0.88; p < 0.001) cohorts. RCS curves showed that the risk of 28-day mortality increased as the last norepinephrine dose increased.

CONCLUSIONS

The timing of secondary vasopressor administration is strongly associated with the outcomes of patients with sepsis.

Initiating angiotensin II at lower vasopressor doses in vasodilatory shock: an exploratory post-hoc analysis of the ATHOS-3 clinical trial

BACKGROUND

High dose vasopressors portend poor outcome in vasodilatory shock. We aimed to evaluate the impact of baseline vasopressor dose on outcomes in patients treated with angiotensin II (AT II).

METHODS

Exploratory post-hoc analysis of the Angiotensin II for the Treatment of High-Output Shock (ATHOS-3) trial data. The ATHOS-3 trial randomized 321 patients with vasodilatory shock, who remained hypotensive (mean arterial pressure of 55-70 mmHg) despite receiving standard of care vasopressor support at a norepinephrine-equivalent dose (NED) > 0.2 µg/kg/min, to receive AT II or placebo, both in addition to standard of care vasopressors. Patients were grouped into low (≤ 0.25 µg/kg/min; n = 104) or high (> 0.25 µg/kg/min; n = 217) NED at the time of study drug initiation. The primary outcome was the difference in 28-day survival between the AT II and placebo subgroups in those with a baseline NED ≤ 0.25 µg/kg/min at the time of study drug initiation.

RESULTS

Of 321 patients, the median baseline NED in the low-NED subgroup was similar in the AT II (n = 56) and placebo (n = 48) groups (median of each arm 0.21 µg/kg/min, p = 0.45). In the high-NED subgroup, the median baseline NEDs were also similar (0.47 µg/kg/min AT II group, n = 107 vs. 0.45 µg/kg/min placebo group, n = 110, p = 0.75). After adjusting for severity of illness, those randomized to AT II in the low-NED subgroup were half as likely to die at 28-days compared to placebo (HR 0.509; 95% CI 0.274-0.945, p = 0.03). No differences in 28-day survival between AT II and placebo groups were found in the high-NED subgroup (HR 0.933; 95% CI 0.644-1.350, p = 0.71). Serious adverse events were less frequent in the low-NED AT II subgroup compared to the placebo low-NED subgroup, though differences were not statistically significant, and were comparable in the high-NED subgroups.

CONCLUSIONS

This exploratory post-hoc analysis of phase 3 clinical trial data suggests a potential benefit of AT II introduction at lower doses of other vasopressor agents. These data may inform design of a prospective trial.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The ATHOS-3 trial was registered in the clinicaltrials.gov repository (no. NCT02338843). Registered 14 January 2015.

Emerging concepts in the care of patients with cirrhosis and septic shock

Septic shock impacts approximately 6% of hospitalized patients with cirrhosis and is associated with high rates of morbidity and mortality. Although a number of landmark clinical trials have paved the way for incremental improvements in the diagnosis and management of septic shock in the general population, patients with cirrhosis have largely been excluded from these studies and critical knowledge gaps continue to impact the care of these individuals. In this review, we discuss nuances in the care of patients with cirrhosis and septic shock using a pathophysiology-based approach. We illustrate that septic shock may be challenging to diagnose in this population in the context of factors such as chronic hypotension, impaired lactate metabolism, and concomitant hepatic encephalopathy. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the application of routine interventions such as intravenous fluids, vasopressors, antibiotics, and steroids should be carefully considered among those with decompensated cirrhosis in light of hemodynamic, metabolic, hormonal, and immunologic disturbances. We propose that future research should include and characterize patients with cirrhosis in a systematic manner, and clinical practice guidelines may need to be refined accordingly.

Hydroxocobalamin for Vasodilatory Hypotension in Shock: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis for Comparison to Methylene Blue

Hydroxocobalamin inhibits nitric oxide-mediated vasodilation, and has been used in settings of refractory shock. However, its effectiveness and role in treating hypotension remain unclear. The authors systematically searched Ovid Medline, Embase, EBM Reviews, Scopus, and Web of Science Core Collection for clinical studies reporting on adult persons who received hydroxocobalamin for vasodilatory shock. A meta-analysis was performed with random-effects models comparing the hemodynamic effects of hydroxocobalamin to methylene blue. The Risk of Bias in Nonrandomized Studies of Interventions tool was used to assess the risk of bias. A total of 24 studies were identified and comprised mainly of case reports (n = 12), case series (n = 9), and 3 cohort studies. Hydroxocobalamin was applied mainly for cardiac surgery vasoplegia, but also was reported in the settings of liver transplantation, septic shock, drug-induced hypotension, and noncardiac postoperative vasoplegia. In the pooled analysis, hydroxocobalamin was associated with a higher mean arterial pressure (MAP) at 1 hour than methylene blue (mean difference 7.80, 95% CI 2.63-12.98). There were no significant differences in change in MAP (mean difference -4.57, 95% CI -16.05 to 6.91) or vasopressor dosage (mean difference -0.03, 95% CI -0.12 to 0.06) at 1 hour compared to baseline between hydroxocobalamin and methylene blue. Mortality was also similar (odds ratio 0.92, 95% CI 0.42-2.03). The evidence supporting the use of hydroxocobalamin for shock is limited to anecdotal reports and a few cohort studies. Hydroxocobalamin appears to positively affect hemodynamics in shock, albeit similar to methylene blue.

Timing of vasopressin initiation and mortality in patients with septic shock: analysis of the MIMIC-III and MIMIC-IV databases

BACKGROUND

vasopressin is commonly used as a second-line vasopressor for patients with septic shock, but the optimal timing of initiation is uncertain. This study was designed to investigate when vasopressin initiation may be beneficial for 28-day mortality in septic shock patients.

METHODS

This was a retrospective observational cohort study from the MIMIC-III v1.4 and MIMIC-IV v2.0 databases. All adults diagnosed with septic shock according to Sepsis-3 criteria were included. Patients were stratified into two groups based on norepinephrine (NE) dose at the time of vasopressin initiation, defined as the low doses of NE group (NE<0.25 µg/kg/min) and the high doses of NE group (NE ≥ 0.25 µg/kg/min). The primary end-point was 28-day mortality after diagnosis of septic shock. The analysis involved propensity score matching (PSM), multivariable logistic regression, doubly robust estimation, the gradient boosted model, and an inverse probability-weighting model.

RESULTS

A total of 1817 eligible patients were included in our original cohort (613 in the low doses of NE group and 1204 in the high doses of NE group). After 1:1 PSM, 535 patients from each group with no difference in disease severity were included in the analysis. The results showed that vasopressin initiation at low doses of NE was associated with reduced 28-day mortality (odds ratio [OR] 0.660, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.518-0.840, p < 0.001). Compared with patients in the high doses of NE group, patients in the low doses of NE group received significantly shorter duration of NE, with less intravenous fluid volume on the first day after initiation of vasopressin, more urine on the second day, and longer mechanical ventilation-free days and CRRT-free days. Nevertheless, there were no significant differences in hemodynamic response to vasopressin, duration of vasopressin, and ICU or hospital length of stay.

CONCLUSIONS

Among adults with septic shock, vasopressin initiation when low-dose NE was used was associated with an improvement in 28-day mortality.

Early adjunctive methylene blue in patients with septic shock: a randomized controlled trial

PURPOSE

Methylene blue (MB) has been tested as a rescue therapy for patients with refractory septic shock. However, there is a lack of evidence on MB as an adjuvant therapy, its' optimal timing, dosing and safety profile. We aimed to assess whether early adjunctive MB can reduce time to vasopressor discontinuation in patients with septic shock.

METHODS

In this single-center randomized controlled trial, we assigned patients with septic shock according to Sepsis-3 criteria to MB or placebo. Primary outcome was time to vasopressor discontinuation at 28 days. Secondary outcomes included vasopressor-free days at 28 days, days on mechanical ventilator, length of stay in ICU and hospital, and mortality at 28 days.

RESULTS

Among 91 randomized patients, forty-five were assigned to MB and 46 to placebo. The MB group had a shorter time to vasopressor discontinuation (69 h [IQR 59-83] vs 94 h [IQR 74-141]; p < 0.001), one more day of vasopressor-free days at day 28 (p = 0.008), a shorter ICU length of stay by 1.5 days (p = 0.039) and shorter hospital length of stay by 2.7 days (p = 0.027) compared to patients in the control group. Days on mechanical ventilator and mortality were similar. There were no serious adverse effects related to MB administration.

CONCLUSION

In patients with septic shock, MB initiated within 24 h reduced time to vasopressor discontinuation and increased vasopressor-free days at 28 days. It also reduced length of stay in ICU and hospital without adverse effects. Our study supports further research regarding MB in larger randomized clinical trials. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov registration number NCT04446871 , June 25, 2020, retrospectively registered.