1
|
Fang L, Teng J, Lin Q, Bai Z, Liu S, Guan D, Li B, Gao Y, Hou Y, Gong M, Pan Z, Yu Y, Clark EL, Smith J, Rawlik K, Xiang R, Chamberlain AJ, Goddard ME, Littlejohn M, Larson G, MacHugh DE, O'Grady JF, Sørensen P, Sahana G, Lund MS, Jiang Z, Pan X, Gong W, Zhang H, He X, Zhang Y, Gao N, He J, Yi G, Liu Y, Tang Z, Zhao P, Zhou Y, Fu L, Wang X, Hao D, Liu L, Chen S, Young RS, Shen X, Xia C, Cheng H, Ma L, Cole JB, Baldwin RL, Li CJ, Van Tassell CP, Rosen BD, Bhowmik N, Lunney J, Liu W, Guan L, Zhao X, Ibeagha-Awemu EM, Luo Y, Lin L, Canela-Xandri O, Derks MFL, Crooijmans RPMA, Gòdia M, Madsen O, Groenen MAM, Koltes JE, Tuggle CK, McCarthy FM, Rocha D, Giuffra E, Amills M, Clop A, Ballester M, Tosser-Klopp G, Li J, Fang C, Fang M, Wang Q, Hou Z, Wang Q, Zhao F, Jiang L, Zhao G, Zhou Z, Zhou R, Liu H, Deng J, Jin L, Li M, Mo D, Liu X, Chen Y, Yuan X, Li J, Zhao S, Zhang Y, Ding X, Sun D, et alFang L, Teng J, Lin Q, Bai Z, Liu S, Guan D, Li B, Gao Y, Hou Y, Gong M, Pan Z, Yu Y, Clark EL, Smith J, Rawlik K, Xiang R, Chamberlain AJ, Goddard ME, Littlejohn M, Larson G, MacHugh DE, O'Grady JF, Sørensen P, Sahana G, Lund MS, Jiang Z, Pan X, Gong W, Zhang H, He X, Zhang Y, Gao N, He J, Yi G, Liu Y, Tang Z, Zhao P, Zhou Y, Fu L, Wang X, Hao D, Liu L, Chen S, Young RS, Shen X, Xia C, Cheng H, Ma L, Cole JB, Baldwin RL, Li CJ, Van Tassell CP, Rosen BD, Bhowmik N, Lunney J, Liu W, Guan L, Zhao X, Ibeagha-Awemu EM, Luo Y, Lin L, Canela-Xandri O, Derks MFL, Crooijmans RPMA, Gòdia M, Madsen O, Groenen MAM, Koltes JE, Tuggle CK, McCarthy FM, Rocha D, Giuffra E, Amills M, Clop A, Ballester M, Tosser-Klopp G, Li J, Fang C, Fang M, Wang Q, Hou Z, Wang Q, Zhao F, Jiang L, Zhao G, Zhou Z, Zhou R, Liu H, Deng J, Jin L, Li M, Mo D, Liu X, Chen Y, Yuan X, Li J, Zhao S, Zhang Y, Ding X, Sun D, Sun HZ, Li C, Wang Y, Jiang Y, Wu D, Wang W, Fan X, Zhang Q, Li K, Zhang H, Yang N, Hu X, Huang W, Song J, Wu Y, Yang J, Wu W, Kasper C, Liu X, Yu X, Cui L, Zhou X, Kim S, Li W, Im HK, Buckler ES, Ren B, Schatz MC, Li JJ, Palmer AA, Frantz L, Zhou H, Zhang Z, Liu GE. The Farm Animal Genotype-Tissue Expression (FarmGTEx) Project. Nat Genet 2025; 57:786-796. [PMID: 40097783 DOI: 10.1038/s41588-025-02121-5] [Show More Authors] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2024] [Accepted: 02/06/2025] [Indexed: 03/19/2025]
Abstract
Genetic mutation and drift, coupled with natural and human-mediated selection and migration, have produced a wide variety of genotypes and phenotypes in farmed animals. We here introduce the Farm Animal Genotype-Tissue Expression (FarmGTEx) Project, which aims to elucidate the genetic determinants of gene expression across 16 terrestrial and aquatic domestic species under diverse biological and environmental contexts. For each species, we aim to collect multiomics data, particularly genomics and transcriptomics, from 50 tissues of 1,000 healthy adults and 200 additional animals representing a specific context. This Perspective provides an overview of the priorities of FarmGTEx and advocates for coordinated strategies of data analysis and resource-sharing initiatives. FarmGTEx aims to serve as a platform for investigating context-specific regulatory effects, which will deepen our understanding of molecular mechanisms underlying complex phenotypes. The knowledge and insights provided by FarmGTEx will contribute to improving sustainable agriculture-based food systems, comparative biology and eventual human biomedicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lingzhao Fang
- Center for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
| | - Jinyan Teng
- State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Qing Lin
- Center for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
- State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zhonghao Bai
- Center for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Shuli Liu
- Westlake Laboratory of Life Sciences and Biomedicine, Hangzhou, China
- School of Life Sciences, Westlake University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Dailu Guan
- Department of Animal Science, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, USA
| | - Bingjie Li
- Department of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, Scotland's Rural College, Midlothian, UK
| | - Yahui Gao
- State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yali Hou
- Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Mian Gong
- Center for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
- Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Zhangyuan Pan
- Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Ying Yu
- National Engineering Laboratory for Animal Breeding, State Key Laboratory of Animal Biotech Breeding, Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China
| | - Emily L Clark
- The Roslin Institute and Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush, Midlothian, UK
| | - Jacqueline Smith
- The Roslin Institute and Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush, Midlothian, UK
| | - Konrad Rawlik
- Baillie Gifford Pandemic Science Hub, Centre for Inflammation Research, Institute for Regeneration and Repair, the University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Ruidong Xiang
- Agriculture Victoria Research, AgriBio, Centre for AgriBioscience, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia
- Cambridge Baker Systems Genomics Initiative, Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- School of Agriculture, Food and Ecosystem Sciences, the University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Amanda J Chamberlain
- Agriculture Victoria Research, AgriBio, Centre for AgriBioscience, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia
- School of Applied Systems Biology, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia
| | - Michael E Goddard
- Agriculture Victoria Research, AgriBio, Centre for AgriBioscience, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia
- School of Agriculture, Food and Ecosystem Sciences, the University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Mathew Littlejohn
- Research and Development, Livestock Improvement Corporation, Hamilton, New Zealand
- AL Rae Centre for Genetics and Breeding, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand
| | - Greger Larson
- The Palaeogenomics and Bio-Archaeology Research Network, School of Archaeology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - David E MacHugh
- UCD School of Agriculture and Food Science, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin, Ireland
- UCD Conway Institute of Biomolecular and Biomedical Research, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin, Ireland
- UCD One Health Centre, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin, Ireland
| | - John F O'Grady
- UCD School of Agriculture and Food Science, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Peter Sørensen
- Center for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Goutam Sahana
- Center for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Mogens Sandø Lund
- Center for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Zhihua Jiang
- Department of Animal Sciences and Center for Reproductive Biology, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, USA
| | - Xiangchun Pan
- State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Wentao Gong
- State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Haihan Zhang
- College of Animal Science and Technology, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha, China
| | - Xi He
- College of Animal Science and Technology, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha, China
| | - Yuebo Zhang
- College of Animal Science and Technology, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha, China
| | - Ning Gao
- College of Animal Science and Technology, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha, China
| | - Jun He
- College of Animal Science and Technology, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha, China
| | - Guoqiang Yi
- Shenzhen Branch, Guangdong Laboratory of Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Key Laboratory of Livestock and Poultry Multi-omics of MARA, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen, China
| | - Yuwen Liu
- Shenzhen Branch, Guangdong Laboratory of Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Key Laboratory of Livestock and Poultry Multi-omics of MARA, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen, China
| | - Zhonglin Tang
- Shenzhen Branch, Guangdong Laboratory of Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Key Laboratory of Livestock and Poultry Multi-omics of MARA, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen, China
| | - Pengju Zhao
- Hainan Institute, Zhejiang University, Yongyou Industry Park, Yazhou Bay Sci-Tech City, Sanya, China
| | - Yang Zhou
- Key Laboratory of Agricultural Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction of the Ministry of Education, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China
- Yazhouwan National Laboratory, Sanya, China
| | - Liangliang Fu
- Key Laboratory of Agricultural Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction of the Ministry of Education, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China
| | - Xiao Wang
- Institute of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Jinan, China
| | - Dan Hao
- Poultry Institute, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Jinan, China
| | - Lei Liu
- Yazhouwan National Laboratory, Sanya, China
| | - Siqian Chen
- National Engineering Laboratory for Animal Breeding, State Key Laboratory of Animal Biotech Breeding, Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China
| | - Robert S Young
- Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
- Zhejiang University-University of Edinburgh Institute, Zhejiang University, Haining, P. R. China
| | - Xia Shen
- Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
- State Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, Center for Evolutionary Biology, School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
- Center for Intelligent Medicine Research, Greater Bay Area Institute of Precision Medicine (Guangzhou), Fudan University, Guangzhou, China
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Charley Xia
- Lothian Birth Cohort studies, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
- Department of Psychology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Hao Cheng
- Department of Animal Science, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, USA
| | - Li Ma
- Department of Animal and Avian Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA
| | - John B Cole
- Council on Dairy Cattle Breeding, Bowie, MD, USA
- Department of Animal Sciences, Donald Henry Barron Reproductive and Perinatal Biology Research Program and the Genetics Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
- Department of Animal Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA
| | - Ransom L Baldwin
- Animal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory, Henry A. Wallace Beltsville Agricultural Research Center, Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD, USA
| | - Cong-Jun Li
- Animal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory, Henry A. Wallace Beltsville Agricultural Research Center, Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD, USA
| | - Curtis P Van Tassell
- Animal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory, Henry A. Wallace Beltsville Agricultural Research Center, Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD, USA
| | - Benjamin D Rosen
- Animal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory, Henry A. Wallace Beltsville Agricultural Research Center, Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD, USA
| | - Nayan Bhowmik
- Animal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory, Henry A. Wallace Beltsville Agricultural Research Center, Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD, USA
| | - Joan Lunney
- Animal Parasitic Diseases Laboratory, BARC, NEA, ARS, USDA, Beltsville, MD, USA
| | - Wansheng Liu
- Department of Animal Science, Center for Reproductive Biology and Health, College of Agricultural Sciences, the Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA
| | - Leluo Guan
- Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
- Faculty of Land and Food Systems, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Xin Zhao
- Department of Animal Science, McGill University, Sainte-Anne-de-Bellevue, Quebec, Canada
| | - Eveline M Ibeagha-Awemu
- Sherbrooke Research and Development Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada
| | - Yonglun Luo
- Department of Biomedicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
- Steno Diabetes Center Aarhus, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Lin Lin
- Department of Biomedicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
- Steno Diabetes Center Aarhus, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Oriol Canela-Xandri
- MRC Human Genetics Unit at the Institute of Genetics and Cancer, the University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Martijn F L Derks
- Animal Breeding and Genomics, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands
| | | | - Marta Gòdia
- Animal Breeding and Genomics, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands
| | - Ole Madsen
- Animal Breeding and Genomics, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands
| | - Martien A M Groenen
- Animal Breeding and Genomics, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands
| | - James E Koltes
- Department of Animal Science, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, USA
| | | | | | - Dominique Rocha
- GABI, AgroParisTech, INRAE, Paris-Saclay University, Jouy-en-Josas, France
| | - Elisabetta Giuffra
- GABI, AgroParisTech, INRAE, Paris-Saclay University, Jouy-en-Josas, France
| | - Marcel Amills
- Department of Animal Genetics, Centre for Research in Agricultural Genomics, CSIC-IRTA-UAB-UB, Campus de la Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain
- Departament de Ciència Animal i dels Aliments, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain
| | - Alex Clop
- Department of Animal Genetics, Centre for Research in Agricultural Genomics, CSIC-IRTA-UAB-UB, Campus de la Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain
- Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Maria Ballester
- Animal Breeding and Genetics Programme, Institut de Recerca i Tecnologia Agroalimentàries (IRTA), Torre Marimon, Caldes de Montbui, Spain
| | | | - Jing Li
- Center for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
- School of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Kunming University, Kunming, China
| | - Chao Fang
- LC-Bio Technologies, Co., Ltd, Hangzhou, China
| | - Ming Fang
- Key Laboratory of Healthy Mariculture for the East China Sea, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Jimei University, Xiamen, China
| | - Qishan Wang
- College of Animal Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Zhuocheng Hou
- National Engineering Laboratory for Animal Breeding, State Key Laboratory of Animal Biotech Breeding, Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China
| | - Qin Wang
- National Engineering Laboratory for Animal Breeding, State Key Laboratory of Animal Biotech Breeding, Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China
| | - Fuping Zhao
- Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Lin Jiang
- Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Guiping Zhao
- Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Zhengkui Zhou
- Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Rong Zhou
- Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Hehe Liu
- College of Animal Science and Technology, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China
| | - Juan Deng
- College of Animal Science and Technology, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China
| | - Long Jin
- College of Animal Science and Technology, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China
| | - Mingzhou Li
- College of Animal Science and Technology, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China
| | - Delin Mo
- State Key Laboratory of Biocontrol, School of Life Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xiaohong Liu
- State Key Laboratory of Biocontrol, School of Life Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yaosheng Chen
- State Key Laboratory of Biocontrol, School of Life Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xiaolong Yuan
- State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jiaqi Li
- State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Shuhong Zhao
- Key Laboratory of Agricultural Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction of the Ministry of Education, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China
- Yazhouwan National Laboratory, Sanya, China
| | - Yi Zhang
- National Engineering Laboratory for Animal Breeding, State Key Laboratory of Animal Biotech Breeding, Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China
| | - Xiangdong Ding
- National Engineering Laboratory for Animal Breeding, State Key Laboratory of Animal Biotech Breeding, Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China
| | - Dongxiao Sun
- National Engineering Laboratory for Animal Breeding, State Key Laboratory of Animal Biotech Breeding, Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China
| | - Hui-Zeng Sun
- Key Laboratory of Dairy Cow Genetic Improvement and Milk Quality Research of Zhejiang Province, College of Animal Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Cong Li
- College of Animal Science and Technology, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, China
| | - Yu Wang
- College of Animal Science and Technology, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, China
| | - Yu Jiang
- College of Animal Science and Technology, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, China
| | - Dongdong Wu
- Key Laboratory of Genetic Evolution and Animal Models, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, China
| | - Wenwen Wang
- Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory for Livestock Germplasm Innovation and Utilization, College of Animal Science, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai'an, China
| | - Xinzhong Fan
- Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory for Livestock Germplasm Innovation and Utilization, College of Animal Science, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai'an, China
| | - Qin Zhang
- Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory for Livestock Germplasm Innovation and Utilization, College of Animal Science, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai'an, China
| | - Kui Li
- Shenzhen Branch, Guangdong Laboratory of Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Key Laboratory of Livestock and Poultry Multi-omics of MARA, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen, China
| | - Hao Zhang
- National Engineering Laboratory for Animal Breeding, State Key Laboratory of Animal Biotech Breeding, Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China
| | - Ning Yang
- National Engineering Laboratory for Animal Breeding, State Key Laboratory of Animal Biotech Breeding, Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China
| | - Xiaoxiang Hu
- State Key Laboratory of Animal Biotech Breeding, College of Biological Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China
| | - Wen Huang
- Department of Animal Science, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA
| | - Jiuzhou Song
- Department of Animal and Avian Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA
| | - Yang Wu
- Institute of Rare Diseases, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Jian Yang
- Westlake Laboratory of Life Sciences and Biomedicine, Hangzhou, China
- School of Life Sciences, Westlake University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Weiwei Wu
- Institute of Animal Science, Xinjiang Academy of Animal Science, Ürümqi City, China
| | - Claudia Kasper
- Animal GenoPhenomics, Animal Production Systems and Animal Health, Agroscope Posieux, Fribourg, Switzerland
| | - Xinfeng Liu
- Center for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
- State Key Laboratory of Herbage Improvement and Grassland Agro-ecosystem, College of Ecology, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| | - Xiaofei Yu
- College of Marine Life Sciences, Ocean University of China, Qingdao, China
| | - Leilei Cui
- School of Life Sciences, Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
- Jiangxi Province Key Laboratory of Aging and Disease, Human Aging Research Institute and School of Life Science, Nanchang University, Jiangxi, China
| | - Xiang Zhou
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Seyoung Kim
- Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Wei Li
- Division of Computational Biomedicine, Department of Biological Chemistry, School of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA
| | - Hae Kyung Im
- Department of Medicine and Human Genetics, the University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Edward S Buckler
- Section of Plant Breeding and Genetics, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA
- Institute for Genomic Diversity, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA
- Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Ithaca, NY, USA
| | - Bing Ren
- Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, Center for Epigenomics, Moores Cancer Center and Institute of Genomic Medicine, University of California San Diego, School of Medicine, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Michael C Schatz
- Department of Computer Science, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Jingyi Jessica Li
- Department of Statistics and Data Science, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| | - Abraham A Palmer
- Department of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
- Institute for Genomic Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
| | - Laurent Frantz
- Palaeogenomics Group, Institute of Palaeoanatomy, Domestication Research and the History of Veterinary Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich, Germany.
- School of Biological and Behavioural Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
| | - Huaijun Zhou
- Department of Animal Science, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, USA.
| | - Zhe Zhang
- State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.
| | - George E Liu
- Animal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory, Henry A. Wallace Beltsville Agricultural Research Center, Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lee SH, Lim KS, Lee H, Heo J, Kim J, Kim SH, Kim SH, Park JE, Lim D, Oh JD, Kim BM, Yoo SW, Shin D, Kim JM. The vision of big data recirculation for smart livestock farming in South Korea. JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY 2025; 67:303-313. [PMID: 40264530 PMCID: PMC12010223 DOI: 10.5187/jast.2025.e21] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2024] [Revised: 02/06/2025] [Accepted: 02/14/2025] [Indexed: 04/24/2025]
Abstract
A smart livestock farm is a livestock farm where information and communication technology systems are used. Based on the measured data, these systems can make decisions regarding all processes, including stocking, breeding, shipping, and evaluation. The data generated from smart livestock farms have increased the complexity and diversity of phenotypes. Fused data that integrate environmental and phenotypic information from smart livestock farms with genetic data are valuable for detailed applications in breeding and specifications, as they help understand complex and organic phenotypes and environments. However, their effectiveness is limited by restrictions on data sharing and non-standardized formats. This limitation leads to other restrictions against researchers, such as restrictions on the range of projects, the supply of new technologies or farm species, and policy development or application restrictions. Therefore, promoting a recirculating environment to increase productivity, developing climate-adapted livestock, and implementing policies are necessary. We discuss the smart livestock farm from the perspective of 'Phenotype = Genetic value + Environment value'. The dissemination of smart livestock big data and essential components, such as data warehouses, is outlined.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seung-Hoon Lee
- The Korean Society of Animal Big Data
Research, Korean Society of Animal Science and Technology,
Seoul 06367, Korea
- Department of Animal Science and
Technology, Chung-Ang University, Anseong 17546, Korea
| | - Kyu-Sang Lim
- The Korean Society of Animal Big Data
Research, Korean Society of Animal Science and Technology,
Seoul 06367, Korea
- Department of Animal Resources Science,
Kongju National University, Yesan 32439, Korea
| | - Hakkyo Lee
- The Korean Society of Animal Big Data
Research, Korean Society of Animal Science and Technology,
Seoul 06367, Korea
- Department of Animal Biotechnology,
Jeonbuk National University, Jeonju 54896, Korea
| | - Jaeyoung Heo
- The Korean Society of Animal Big Data
Research, Korean Society of Animal Science and Technology,
Seoul 06367, Korea
- Department of Animal Biotechnology,
Jeonbuk National University, Jeonju 54896, Korea
| | - Jaemin Kim
- The Korean Society of Animal Big Data
Research, Korean Society of Animal Science and Technology,
Seoul 06367, Korea
- Division of Applied Life Science,
Gyeongsang National University, Jinju 52828, Korea
| | - Seon-Ho Kim
- The Korean Society of Animal Big Data
Research, Korean Society of Animal Science and Technology,
Seoul 06367, Korea
- Department of Animal Science and
Technology, Sunchon National University, Suncheon 57922,
Korea
| | - Sung-Hak Kim
- The Korean Society of Animal Big Data
Research, Korean Society of Animal Science and Technology,
Seoul 06367, Korea
- Department of Animal Science, Chonnam
National University, Gwangju 61186, Korea
| | - Jong-Eun Park
- The Korean Society of Animal Big Data
Research, Korean Society of Animal Science and Technology,
Seoul 06367, Korea
- Department of Animal Biotechnology,
College of Applied Life Science, Jeju National University,
Jeju 63243, Korea
| | - Dajeong Lim
- The Korean Society of Animal Big Data
Research, Korean Society of Animal Science and Technology,
Seoul 06367, Korea
- Department of Animal Resources Science,
Chungnam National University, Daejeon 34134, Korea
| | - Jae-Don Oh
- The Korean Society of Animal Big Data
Research, Korean Society of Animal Science and Technology,
Seoul 06367, Korea
- Department of Biotechnology, Hankyong
National University, Anseong 17579, Korea
| | - Bu-Min Kim
- The Korean Society of Animal Big Data
Research, Korean Society of Animal Science and Technology,
Seoul 06367, Korea
- National Institute of Animal Science,
Rural Development Administration, Wanju 55315, Korea
| | - Song-Won Yoo
- The Korean Society of Animal Big Data
Research, Korean Society of Animal Science and Technology,
Seoul 06367, Korea
- Korea Institute for Animal Products
Quality Evaluation, Sejong 30100, Korea
| | - Donghyun Shin
- The Korean Society of Animal Big Data
Research, Korean Society of Animal Science and Technology,
Seoul 06367, Korea
- Department of Agricultural Convergence
Technology, Jeonbuk National University, Jeonju 54896,
Korea
| | - Jun-Mo Kim
- The Korean Society of Animal Big Data
Research, Korean Society of Animal Science and Technology,
Seoul 06367, Korea
- Department of Animal Science and
Technology, Chung-Ang University, Anseong 17546, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Andersen LK, Thompson NF, Abernathy JW, Ahmed RO, Ali A, Al-Tobasei R, Beck BH, Calla B, Delomas TA, Dunham RA, Elsik CG, Fuller SA, García JC, Gavery MR, Hollenbeck CM, Johnson KM, Kunselman E, Legacki EL, Liu S, Liu Z, Martin B, Matt JL, May SA, Older CE, Overturf K, Palti Y, Peatman EJ, Peterson BC, Phelps MP, Plough LV, Polinski MP, Proestou DA, Purcell CM, Quiniou SMA, Raymo G, Rexroad CE, Riley KL, Roberts SB, Roy LA, Salem M, Simpson K, Waldbieser GC, Wang H, Waters CD, Reading BJ. Advancing genetic improvement in the omics era: status and priorities for United States aquaculture. BMC Genomics 2025; 26:155. [PMID: 39962419 PMCID: PMC11834649 DOI: 10.1186/s12864-025-11247-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2024] [Accepted: 01/15/2025] [Indexed: 02/20/2025] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The innovations of the "Omics Era" have ushered in significant advancements in genetic improvement of agriculturally important animal species through transforming genetics, genomics and breeding strategies. These advancements were often coordinated, in part, by support provided over 30 years through the 1993-2023 National Research Support Project 8 (NRSP8, National Animal Genome Research Program, NAGRP) and affiliate projects focused on enabling genomic discoveries in livestock, poultry, and aquaculture species. These significant and parallel advances demand strategic planning of future research priorities. This paper, as an output from the May 2023 Aquaculture Genomics, Genetics, and Breeding Workshop, provides an updated status of genomic resources for United States aquaculture species, highlighting major achievements and emerging priorities. MAIN TEXT Finfish and shellfish genome and omics resources enhance our understanding of genetic architecture and heritability of performance and production traits. The 2023 Workshop identified present aims for aquaculture genomics/omics research to build on this progress: (1) advancing reference genome assembly quality; (2) integrating multi-omics data to enhance analysis of production and performance traits; (3) developing resources for the collection and integration of phenomics data; (4) creating pathways for applying and integrating genomics information across animal industries; and (5) providing training, extension, and outreach to support the application of genome to phenome. Research focuses should emphasize phenomics data collection, artificial intelligence, identifying causative relationships between genotypes and phenotypes, establishing pathways to apply genomic information and tools across aquaculture industries, and an expansion of training programs for the next-generation workforce to facilitate integration of genomic sciences into aquaculture operations to enhance productivity, competitiveness, and sustainability. CONCLUSION This collective vision of applying genomics to aquaculture breeding with focus on the highlighted priorities is intended to facilitate the continued advancement of the United States aquaculture genomics, genetics and breeding research community and industries. Critical challenges ahead include the practical application of genomic tools and analytical frameworks beyond academic and research communities that require collaborative partnerships between academia, government, and industry. The scope of this review encompasses the use of omics tools and applications in the study of aquatic animals cultivated for human consumption in aquaculture settings throughout their life-cycle.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Ridwan O Ahmed
- Department of Animal and Avian Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA
| | - Ali Ali
- Department of Animal and Avian Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA
| | | | - Benjamin H Beck
- USDA-ARS Aquatic Animal Health Research Unit, Auburn, AL, USA
| | - Bernarda Calla
- USDA-ARS Pacific Shellfish Research Unit, Newport, OR, USA
| | - Thomas A Delomas
- USDA-ARS National Cold Water Marine Aquaculture Center, Kingston, RI, USA
| | - Rex A Dunham
- School of Fisheries, Aquaculture, and Aquatic Sciences, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, USA
| | | | - S Adam Fuller
- USDA-ARS Harry K Dupree Stuttgart National Aquaculture Research Center, Stuttgart, AR, USA
| | - Julio C García
- USDA-ARS Aquatic Animal Health Research Unit, Auburn, AL, USA
| | - Mackenzie R Gavery
- Environmental and Fishery Sciences Division, NOAA Northwest Fisheries Science Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Christopher M Hollenbeck
- Texas A&M AgriLife Research, College Station, TX, USA
- Texas A&M University - Corpus Christi, Corpus Christi, TX, USA
| | - Kevin M Johnson
- California Sea Grant, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
- Biological Sciences Department, Center for Coastal Marine Sciences, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, CA, USA
| | | | - Erin L Legacki
- USDA-ARS National Cold Water Marine Aquaculture Center, Orono, ME, USA
| | - Sixin Liu
- USDA-ARS National Center for Cool and Cold Water Aquaculture, Kearneysville, WV, USA
| | - Zhanjiang Liu
- Department of Biology, Tennessee Technological University, Cookeville, TN, USA
| | - Brittany Martin
- USDA-ARS Aquatic Animal Health Research Unit, Auburn, AL, USA
| | - Joseph L Matt
- Texas A&M University - Corpus Christi, Corpus Christi, TX, USA
| | - Samuel A May
- USDA-ARS National Cold Water Marine Aquaculture Center, Orono, ME, USA
| | - Caitlin E Older
- USDA-ARS Warmwater Aquaculture Research Unit, Stoneville, MS, USA
| | - Ken Overturf
- USDA-ARS Small Grains and Potato Germplasm Research, Hagerman, ID, USA
| | - Yniv Palti
- USDA-ARS National Center for Cool and Cold Water Aquaculture, Kearneysville, WV, USA
| | | | - Brian C Peterson
- USDA-ARS National Cold Water Marine Aquaculture Center, Orono, ME, USA
| | | | - Louis V Plough
- USDA-ARS Pacific Shellfish Research Unit, Newport, OR, USA
- Horn Point Laboratory, University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science, Cambridge, MD, USA
| | - Mark P Polinski
- USDA-ARS National Cold Water Marine Aquaculture Center, Orono, ME, USA
| | - Dina A Proestou
- USDA-ARS National Cold Water Marine Aquaculture Center, Kingston, RI, USA
| | | | | | - Guglielmo Raymo
- Department of Animal and Avian Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA
| | | | - Kenneth L Riley
- Office of Aquaculture, NOAA Fisheries, Silver Spring, MD, USA
| | | | - Luke A Roy
- School of Fisheries, Aquaculture, and Aquatic Sciences, Auburn University, Alabama Fish Farming Center, Greensboro, AL, USA
| | - Mohamed Salem
- Department of Animal and Avian Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA
| | - Kelly Simpson
- USDA-ARS Aquatic Animal Health Research Unit, Auburn, AL, USA
| | | | | | - Charles D Waters
- NOAA Alaska Fisheries Science Center Auke Bay Laboratories, Juneau, AK, USA
| | - Benjamin J Reading
- Department of Applied Ecology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hafner A, DeLeo V, Deng CH, Elsik CG, S Fleming D, Harrison PW, Kalbfleisch TS, Petry B, Pucker B, Quezada-Rodríguez EH, Tuggle CK, Koltes JE. Data reuse in agricultural genomics research: challenges and recommendations. Gigascience 2025; 14:giae106. [PMID: 39804724 PMCID: PMC11727710 DOI: 10.1093/gigascience/giae106] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2024] [Revised: 09/17/2024] [Accepted: 11/26/2024] [Indexed: 01/16/2025] Open
Abstract
The scientific community has long benefited from the opportunities provided by data reuse. Recognizing the need to identify the challenges and bottlenecks to reuse in the agricultural research community and propose solutions for them, the data reuse working group was started within the AgBioData consortium framework. Here, we identify the limitations of data standards, metadata deficiencies, data interoperability, data ownership, data availability, user skill level, resource availability, and equity issues, with a specific focus on agricultural genomics research. We propose possible solutions stakeholders could implement to mitigate and overcome these challenges and provide an optimistic perspective on the future of genomics and transcriptomics data reuse.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alenka Hafner
- Department of Biology, Frear North, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, 16802, US
- Intercollege Graduate Degree Program in Plant Biology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, 16802, US
| | | | - Cecilia H Deng
- New Cultivar Innovation, The New Zealand Institute for Plant and Food Research Limited, Auckland, 1025, New Zealand
| | - Christine G Elsik
- Division of Animal Sciences and Division of Plant Science & Technology, University of Missouri, MO, 65211, US
- Institute for Data Science & Informatics, University of Missouri, MO, 65211, US
| | - Damarius S Fleming
- Animal Parasitic Diseases Laboratory, United States Department of Agriculture Agricultural Research Service, Beltsville, MD, 20705, US
| | - Peter W Harrison
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, CB10 1SD, UK
| | - Theodore S Kalbfleisch
- Department of Veterinary Science, Martin-Gatton College of Agriculture, Food, and Environment, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, 40202, US
| | - Bruna Petry
- Department of Animal Science, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, 50011, US
| | - Boas Pucker
- Institute of Plant Biology & BRICS, TU Braunschweig, Braunschweig, 38106, Germany
| | - Elsa H Quezada-Rodríguez
- Departamento de Producción Agrícola y Animal, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana-Xochimilco, Ciudad de México, 04510, México
- Centro de Ciencias de la Complejidad, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad de México, 04510, México
| | | | - James E Koltes
- Department of Animal Science, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, 50011, US
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Lee SH, Kim JM. Genome to phenome Association for Pork Belly Parameters Elucidates Three Regulation Distinctions: Adipogenesis, muscle formation, and their transcription factors. Meat Sci 2024; 217:109617. [PMID: 39116533 DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2024.109617] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2024] [Revised: 05/21/2024] [Accepted: 07/26/2024] [Indexed: 08/10/2024]
Abstract
Genome to phenome analysis is necessary in livestock areas because of its various and complex phenotypes. Pork belly is a favorable part of meat worldwide, including East Asia. A previous study has suggested that the three key transcription factors (ZNF444, NFYA and PPARG) affecting pork belly traits include total volume, the volume of total fat and muscle, and component muscles of the corresponding slice. However, other transcription factor genes affecting each slice other than pork belly component traits still needed to be identified. Thus, we aimed to analyze pork belly components at the genome to phenome level for identifying key transcription factor genes and their co-associated networks. The range of node numbers against each component trait via the association weight matrix was from 598 to 3020. Premised on the result, an in silico functional approach was performed. Each co-association network enriched three key transcription factors in adipogenesis and skeletal muscle proliferation, mesoderm development, metabolism, and gene transcription. The three key transcription factors and their related genes may be useful in comprehending their effect of pork belly construction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seung-Hoon Lee
- Department of Animal Science and Technology, Chung-Ang University, Anseong, Gyeonggi-do 17546, Republic of Korea
| | - Jun-Mo Kim
- Department of Animal Science and Technology, Chung-Ang University, Anseong, Gyeonggi-do 17546, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Luo L, Ye P, Lin Q, Liu M, Hao G, Wei T, Sahu SK. From sequences to sustainability: Exploring dipterocarp genomes for oleoresin production, timber quality, and conservation. PLANT SCIENCE : AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PLANT BIOLOGY 2024; 346:112139. [PMID: 38838990 DOI: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2024.112139] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/25/2023] [Revised: 04/23/2024] [Accepted: 05/29/2024] [Indexed: 06/07/2024]
Abstract
Dipterocarp species dominate tropical forest ecosystems and provide key ecological and economic value through their use of aromatic resins, medicinal chemicals, and high-quality timber. However, habitat loss and unsustainable logging have endangered many Dipterocarpaceae species. Genomic strategies provide new opportunities for both elucidating the molecular pathways underlying these desirable traits and informing conservation efforts for at-risk taxa. This review summarizes the progress in dipterocarp genomics analysis and applications. We describe 16 recently published Dipterocarpaceae genome sequences, representing crucial genetic blueprints. Phylogenetic comparisons delineate evolutionary relationships among species and provide frameworks for pinpointing functional changes underlying specialized metabolism and wood development patterns. We also discuss connections revealed thus far between specific gene families and both oleoresin biosynthesis and wood quality traits-including the identification of key terpenoid synthases and cellulose synthases likely governing pathway flux. Moreover, the characterization of adaptive genomic markers offers vital resources for supporting conservation practices prioritizing resilient genotypes displaying valuable oleoresin and timber traits. Overall, progress in dipterocarp functional and comparative genomics provides key tools for addressing the intertwined challenges of preserving biodiversity in endangered tropical forest ecosystems while sustainably deriving aromatic chemicals and quality lumber that support diverse human activities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liuming Luo
- State Key Laboratory of Agricultural Genomics, Key Laboratory of Genomics, Ministry of Agriculture, BGI Research, Shenzhen 518083, China; College of Life Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China
| | - Peng Ye
- College of Life Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China
| | - Qiongqiong Lin
- State Key Laboratory of Agricultural Genomics, Key Laboratory of Genomics, Ministry of Agriculture, BGI Research, Shenzhen 518083, China; College of Life Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China
| | - Min Liu
- State Key Laboratory of Agricultural Genomics, Key Laboratory of Genomics, Ministry of Agriculture, BGI Research, Shenzhen 518083, China; BGI Research, Wuhan 430074, China
| | - Gang Hao
- College of Life Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China
| | - Tong Wei
- State Key Laboratory of Agricultural Genomics, Key Laboratory of Genomics, Ministry of Agriculture, BGI Research, Shenzhen 518083, China; BGI Research, Wuhan 430074, China
| | - Sunil Kumar Sahu
- State Key Laboratory of Agricultural Genomics, Key Laboratory of Genomics, Ministry of Agriculture, BGI Research, Shenzhen 518083, China; BGI Research, Wuhan 430074, China.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ghavi Hossein-Zadeh N. An overview of recent technological developments in bovine genomics. Vet Anim Sci 2024; 25:100382. [PMID: 39166173 PMCID: PMC11334705 DOI: 10.1016/j.vas.2024.100382] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/22/2024] Open
Abstract
Cattle are regarded as highly valuable animals because of their milk, beef, dung, fur, and ability to draft. The scientific community has tried a number of strategies to improve the genetic makeup of bovine germplasm. To ensure higher returns for the dairy and beef industries, researchers face their greatest challenge in improving commercially important traits. One of the biggest developments in the last few decades in the creation of instruments for cattle genetic improvement is the discovery of the genome. Breeding livestock is being revolutionized by genomic selection made possible by the availability of medium- and high-density single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) arrays coupled with sophisticated statistical techniques. It is becoming easier to access high-dimensional genomic data in cattle. Continuously declining genotyping costs and an increase in services that use genomic data to increase return on investment have both made a significant contribution to this. The field of genomics has come a long way thanks to groundbreaking discoveries such as radiation-hybrid mapping, in situ hybridization, synteny analysis, somatic cell genetics, cytogenetic maps, molecular markers, association studies for quantitative trait loci, high-throughput SNP genotyping, whole-genome shotgun sequencing to whole-genome mapping, and genome editing. These advancements have had a significant positive impact on the field of cattle genomics. This manuscript aimed to review recent advances in genomic technologies for cattle breeding and future prospects in this field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Navid Ghavi Hossein-Zadeh
- Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, University of Guilan, Rasht, 41635-1314, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Zhou W, Yang T, Zeng L, Chen J, Wang Y, Guo X, You L, Liu Y, Du W, Yang F, Hua C, Cai J, van Hintum T, Liu H, Gu Y, Wei X, Wei T. LettuceDB: an integrated multi-omics database for cultivated lettuce. Database (Oxford) 2024; 2024:baae018. [PMID: 38557635 PMCID: PMC10984620 DOI: 10.1093/database/baae018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2023] [Revised: 02/01/2024] [Accepted: 02/29/2024] [Indexed: 04/04/2024]
Abstract
Crop genomics has advanced rapidly during the past decade, which generated a great abundance of omics data from multi-omics studies. How to utilize the accumulating data becomes a critical and urgent demand in crop science. As an attempt to integrate multi-omics data, we developed a database, LettuceDB (https://db.cngb.org/lettuce/), aiming to assemble multidimensional data for cultivated and wild lettuce germplasm. The database includes genome, variome, phenome, microbiome and spatial transcriptome. By integrating user-friendly bioinformatics tools, LettuceDB will serve as a one-stop platform for lettuce research and breeding in the future. Database URL: https://db.cngb.org/lettuce/.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wenhui Zhou
- College of Life Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
- BGI Research, Wuhan 430074, China
- State Key Laboratory of Agricultural Genomics, Key Laboratory of Genomics, Ministry of Agriculture, BGI Research, Shenzhen 518083, China
| | - Tao Yang
- China National GeneBank, BGI Research, Shenzhen 518120, China
- Guangdong Genomics Data Center, BGl research, Shenzhen 518120, China
| | - Liucui Zeng
- BGI Research, Wuhan 430074, China
- South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China
| | - Jing Chen
- China National GeneBank, BGI Research, Shenzhen 518120, China
| | - Yayu Wang
- State Key Laboratory of Agricultural Genomics, Key Laboratory of Genomics, Ministry of Agriculture, BGI Research, Shenzhen 518083, China
| | - Xing Guo
- BGI Research, Wuhan 430074, China
- State Key Laboratory of Agricultural Genomics, Key Laboratory of Genomics, Ministry of Agriculture, BGI Research, Shenzhen 518083, China
| | - Lijin You
- China National GeneBank, BGI Research, Shenzhen 518120, China
| | - Yiqun Liu
- China National GeneBank, BGI Research, Shenzhen 518120, China
| | - Wensi Du
- China National GeneBank, BGI Research, Shenzhen 518120, China
| | - Fan Yang
- China National GeneBank, BGI Research, Shenzhen 518120, China
| | - Cong Hua
- BGI Research, Wuhan 430074, China
- China National GeneBank, BGI Research, Shenzhen 518120, China
| | - Jia Cai
- BGI Research, Wuhan 430074, China
- China National GeneBank, BGI Research, Shenzhen 518120, China
| | - Theo van Hintum
- Centre for Genetic Resources, the Netherlands, P.O. Box 16, Wageningen 6700 AA, The Netherlands
| | - Huan Liu
- State Key Laboratory of Agricultural Genomics, Key Laboratory of Genomics, Ministry of Agriculture, BGI Research, Shenzhen 518083, China
| | - Ying Gu
- BGI Research, Wuhan 430074, China
- State Key Laboratory of Agricultural Genomics, Key Laboratory of Genomics, Ministry of Agriculture, BGI Research, Shenzhen 518083, China
| | - Xiaofeng Wei
- China National GeneBank, BGI Research, Shenzhen 518120, China
- Guangdong Genomics Data Center, BGl research, Shenzhen 518120, China
| | - Tong Wei
- BGI Research, Wuhan 430074, China
- State Key Laboratory of Agricultural Genomics, Key Laboratory of Genomics, Ministry of Agriculture, BGI Research, Shenzhen 518083, China
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Tuggle CK, Clarke JL, Murdoch BM, Lyons E, Scott NM, Beneš B, Campbell JD, Chung H, Daigle CL, Das Choudhury S, Dekkers JCM, Dórea JRR, Ertl DS, Feldman M, Fragomeni BO, Fulton JE, Guadagno CR, Hagen DE, Hess AS, Kramer LM, Lawrence-Dill CJ, Lipka AE, Lübberstedt T, McCarthy FM, McKay SD, Murray SC, Riggs PK, Rowan TN, Sheehan MJ, Steibel JP, Thompson AM, Thornton KJ, Van Tassell CP, Schnable PS. Current challenges and future of agricultural genomes to phenomes in the USA. Genome Biol 2024; 25:8. [PMID: 38172911 PMCID: PMC10763150 DOI: 10.1186/s13059-023-03155-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2023] [Accepted: 12/21/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024] Open
Abstract
Dramatic improvements in measuring genetic variation across agriculturally relevant populations (genomics) must be matched by improvements in identifying and measuring relevant trait variation in such populations across many environments (phenomics). Identifying the most critical opportunities and challenges in genome to phenome (G2P) research is the focus of this paper. Previously (Genome Biol, 23(1):1-11, 2022), we laid out how Agricultural Genome to Phenome Initiative (AG2PI) will coordinate activities with USA federal government agencies expand public-private partnerships, and engage with external stakeholders to achieve a shared vision of future the AG2PI. Acting on this latter step, AG2PI organized the "Thinking Big: Visualizing the Future of AG2PI" two-day workshop held September 9-10, 2022, in Ames, Iowa, co-hosted with the United State Department of Agriculture's National Institute of Food and Agriculture (USDA NIFA). During the meeting, attendees were asked to use their experience and curiosity to review the current status of agricultural genome to phenome (AG2P) work and envision the future of the AG2P field. The topic summaries composing this paper are distilled from two 1.5-h small group discussions. Challenges and solutions identified across multiple topics at the workshop were explored. We end our discussion with a vision for the future of agricultural progress, identifying two areas of innovation needed: (1) innovate in genetic improvement methods development and evaluation and (2) innovate in agricultural research processes to solve societal problems. To address these needs, we then provide six specific goals that we recommend be implemented immediately in support of advancing AG2P research.
Collapse
|
10
|
Xie S, Isaacs K, Becker G, Murdoch BM. A computational framework for improving genetic variants identification from 5,061 sheep sequencing data. J Anim Sci Biotechnol 2023; 14:127. [PMID: 37779189 PMCID: PMC10544426 DOI: 10.1186/s40104-023-00923-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2023] [Accepted: 08/01/2023] [Indexed: 10/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pan-genomics is a recently emerging strategy that can be utilized to provide a more comprehensive characterization of genetic variation. Joint calling is routinely used to combine identified variants across multiple related samples. However, the improvement of variants identification using the mutual support information from multiple samples remains quite limited for population-scale genotyping. RESULTS In this study, we developed a computational framework for joint calling genetic variants from 5,061 sheep by incorporating the sequencing error and optimizing mutual support information from multiple samples' data. The variants were accurately identified from multiple samples by using four steps: (1) Probabilities of variants from two widely used algorithms, GATK and Freebayes, were calculated by Poisson model incorporating base sequencing error potential; (2) The variants with high mapping quality or consistently identified from at least two samples by GATK and Freebayes were used to construct the raw high-confidence identification (rHID) variants database; (3) The high confidence variants identified in single sample were ordered by probability value and controlled by false discovery rate (FDR) using rHID database; (4) To avoid the elimination of potentially true variants from rHID database, the variants that failed FDR were reexamined to rescued potential true variants and ensured high accurate identification variants. The results indicated that the percent of concordant SNPs and Indels from Freebayes and GATK after our new method were significantly improved 12%-32% compared with raw variants and advantageously found low frequency variants of individual sheep involved several traits including nipples number (GPC5), scrapie pathology (PAPSS2), seasonal reproduction and litter size (GRM1), coat color (RAB27A), and lentivirus susceptibility (TMEM154). CONCLUSION The new method used the computational strategy to reduce the number of false positives, and simultaneously improve the identification of genetic variants. This strategy did not incur any extra cost by using any additional samples or sequencing data information and advantageously identified rare variants which can be important for practical applications of animal breeding.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shangqian Xie
- Department of Animal, Veterinary & Food Sciences, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID, USA
| | | | - Gabrielle Becker
- Department of Animal, Veterinary & Food Sciences, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID, USA
| | - Brenda M Murdoch
- Department of Animal, Veterinary & Food Sciences, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Smith TPL, Bickhart DM, Boichard D, Chamberlain AJ, Djikeng A, Jiang Y, Low WY, Pausch H, Demyda-Peyrás S, Prendergast J, Schnabel RD, Rosen BD. The Bovine Pangenome Consortium: democratizing production and accessibility of genome assemblies for global cattle breeds and other bovine species. Genome Biol 2023; 24:139. [PMID: 37337218 DOI: 10.1186/s13059-023-02975-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2022] [Accepted: 05/19/2023] [Indexed: 06/21/2023] Open
Abstract
The Bovine Pangenome Consortium (BPC) is an international collaboration dedicated to the assembly of cattle genomes to develop a more complete representation of cattle genomic diversity. The goal of the BPC is to provide genome assemblies and a community-agreed pangenome representation to replace breed-specific reference assemblies for cattle genomics. The BPC invites partners sharing our vision to participate in the production of these assemblies and the development of a common, community-approved, pangenome reference as a public resource for the research community ( https://bovinepangenome.github.io/ ). This community-driven resource will provide the context for comparison between studies and the future foundation for cattle genomic selection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy P L Smith
- US Meat Animal Research Center, USDA-ARS, Clay Center, NE, 68933, USA
| | | | - Didier Boichard
- Université Paris-Saclay, INRAE, AgroParisTech, GABI, 78350, Jouy-en-Josas, France
| | - Amanda J Chamberlain
- Agriculture Victoria, AgriBio, Centre for AgriBioscience, Bundoora, VIC, 3083, Australia
- School of Applied Systems Biology, La Trobe University, Bundoora, VIC, 3083, Australia
| | - Appolinaire Djikeng
- Centre for Tropical Livestock Genetics and Health, ILRI Kenya, Nairobi, 30709-00100, Kenya
- Centre for Tropical Livestock Genetics and Health, Easter Bush, Midlothian, EH25 9RG, UK
| | - Yu Jiang
- Center for Ruminant Genetics and Evolution, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, 712100, China
| | - Wai Y Low
- The Davies Research Centre, School of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, University of Adelaide, Roseworthy, SA, 5371, Australia
| | - Hubert Pausch
- Animal Genomics, ETH Zurich, Universitaetstrasse 2, 8092, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Sebastian Demyda-Peyrás
- Departamento de Producción Animal, Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, 1900, La Plata, Argentina
- Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas Y Tecnológicas (CONICET), CCT-La Plata, 1900, La Plata, Argentina
| | - James Prendergast
- Centre for Tropical Livestock Genetics and Health, Easter Bush, Midlothian, EH25 9RG, UK
- The Roslin Institute, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush, Midlothian, EH25 9RG, UK
| | - Robert D Schnabel
- Division of Animal Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, 65211, USA
| | - Benjamin D Rosen
- Animal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory, USDA-ARS, Beltsville, MD, 20705, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Yang Z, Wang S, Wei L, Huang Y, Liu D, Jia Y, Luo C, Lin Y, Liang C, Hu Y, Dai C, Guo L, Zhou Y, Yang QY. BnIR: A multi-omics database with various tools for Brassica napus research and breeding. MOLECULAR PLANT 2023; 16:775-789. [PMID: 36919242 DOI: 10.1016/j.molp.2023.03.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 66] [Impact Index Per Article: 33.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2022] [Revised: 02/15/2023] [Accepted: 03/09/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
In the post-genome-wide association study era, multi-omics techniques have shown great power and potential for candidate gene mining and functional genomics research. However, due to the lack of effective data integration and multi-omics analysis platforms, such techniques have not still been applied widely in rapeseed, an important oil crop worldwide. Here, we report a rapeseed multi-omics database (BnIR; http://yanglab.hzau.edu.cn/BnIR), which provides datasets of six omics including genomics, transcriptomics, variomics, epigenetics, phenomics, and metabolomics, as well as numerous "variation-gene expression-phenotype" associations by using multiple statistical methods. In addition, a series of multi-omics search and analysis tools are integrated to facilitate the browsing and application of these datasets. BnIR is the most comprehensive multi-omics database for rapeseed so far, and two case studies demonstrated its power to mine candidate genes associated with specific traits and analyze their potential regulatory mechanisms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhiquan Yang
- National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Hubei Hongshan Laboratory, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China; Hubei Key Laboratory of Agricultural Bioinformatics, College of Informatics, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China; Innovative Center of Molecular Genetics and Evolution, School of Life Sciences, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510405, China
| | - Shengbo Wang
- National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Hubei Hongshan Laboratory, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China; Hubei Key Laboratory of Agricultural Bioinformatics, College of Informatics, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China
| | - Lulu Wei
- National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Hubei Hongshan Laboratory, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China; Hubei Key Laboratory of Agricultural Bioinformatics, College of Informatics, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China
| | - Yiming Huang
- National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Hubei Hongshan Laboratory, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China; Hubei Key Laboratory of Agricultural Bioinformatics, College of Informatics, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China
| | - Dongxu Liu
- National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Hubei Hongshan Laboratory, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China; Hubei Key Laboratory of Agricultural Bioinformatics, College of Informatics, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China
| | - Yupeng Jia
- National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Hubei Hongshan Laboratory, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China; Hubei Key Laboratory of Agricultural Bioinformatics, College of Informatics, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China
| | - Chengfang Luo
- National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Hubei Hongshan Laboratory, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China; Hubei Key Laboratory of Agricultural Bioinformatics, College of Informatics, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China
| | - Yuchen Lin
- National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Hubei Hongshan Laboratory, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China; Hubei Key Laboratory of Agricultural Bioinformatics, College of Informatics, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China
| | - Congyuan Liang
- National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Hubei Hongshan Laboratory, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China; Hubei Key Laboratory of Agricultural Bioinformatics, College of Informatics, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China
| | - Yue Hu
- National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Hubei Hongshan Laboratory, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China; Hubei Key Laboratory of Agricultural Bioinformatics, College of Informatics, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China
| | - Cheng Dai
- National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Hubei Hongshan Laboratory, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China
| | - Liang Guo
- National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Hubei Hongshan Laboratory, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China
| | - Yongming Zhou
- National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Hubei Hongshan Laboratory, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China
| | - Qing-Yong Yang
- National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Hubei Hongshan Laboratory, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China; Hubei Key Laboratory of Agricultural Bioinformatics, College of Informatics, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China.
| |
Collapse
|