Prehabilitation of elderly frail or pre-frail patients prior to elective surgery (PRAEP-GO): study protocol for a randomized, controlled, outcome assessor-blinded trial

Impact of frailty on outcomes after cardiac surgery

OBJECTIVE

The study objective was to evaluate whether increasing frailty, as measured by the Clinical Frailty Scale, was associated with an increased risk of hospital mortality for patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

METHODS

A retrospective binational cohort study of 46,928 patients who underwent cardiac surgery in Australia and New Zealand was conducted. The primary exposure, frailty, was measured using the Clinical Frailty Scale. Associations between frailty and the primary outcome, hospital mortality, were evaluated using multivariable, mixed effects logistic regression models. Secondary outcomes including hospital and intensive care unit length of stay, invasive ventilation hours, need for renal replacement therapy and tracheostomy, and nonhome discharge were also evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 3122 of 46,928 patients (6.7%) were classified as frail (Clinical Frailty Scale 5-8), and 93.3% (43,806/46,928) were nonfrail (Clinical Frailty Scale 1-4). Raw mortality was 4.2% (132/3122) in the frail group and 1.05% (461/43,806) in the nonfrail group. After multivariable adjustment for illness severity, age, elective status, type of surgery, hospital type, and country, frailty was significantly associated with increased hospital mortality (odds ratio, 2.879, 95% CI, 2.284-3.629, P < .001). Increasing Clinical Frailty Scale was also significantly associated with a higher risk of secondary outcomes, including length of stay in the hospital and intensive care unit, receipt of renal replacement therapy and tracheostomy, and increased duration of mechanical ventilation.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated that increasing Clinical Frailty Scale was strongly associated with increased hospital mortality, hospital and intensive care unit length of stay, invasive ventilation hours, renal replacement therapy, and tracheostomy insertion among patients undergoing cardiac surgery in Australia and New Zealand.

Microvascular free flaps in head and neck reconstruction: an analysis of outcomes in elderly patients

OBJECTIVES

Maxillofacial reconstruction using microvascular free flaps is a well-established procedure to restore facial defects across various patients. Elderly patients face increased perioperative risks due to higher prevalence of comorbidities. This study aims to evaluate the characteristics of patients aged ≥ 75 years and assess the impact of advanced age on outcomes in microvascular free flap reconstruction for head and neck defects.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients who underwent microvascular free flap head and neck reconstruction between April 2017 and July 2023. After matching, patients aged ≥ 75 were compared to those < 75 years regarding comorbidities, surgical and treatment variables, complication rates and outcomes. Multivariate models were developed to test the influence of age on flap complications.

RESULTS

1050 patients met the inclusion criteria. 290 patients (28%) were ≥ 75 years old. Following case matching, 580 patients (276 females, mean age 74.1 ± 8.9 years) were included in the analysis. Patients ≥ 75 years had higher rates of comorbidities, co-medications and postoperative delirium. No significant differences were observed in flap complications between both groups in univariate analysis. Although one multivariate model suggested a potential non-linear effect of age on flap complications, this was not validated in another model.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the increased prevalence of comorbidities and perioperative risk factors, microvascular free flap reconstruction remains a safe and viable procedure for elderly patients when performed in a structured setting at a high-volume center, as complication rates do not appear to be directly influenced by age.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Free Flap surgery is a safe procedure in elderly patients.

Influence of frailty status on the incidence of intraoperative hypotensive events in elective surgery: Hypo-Frail, a single-centre retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Frailty is a predictor of morbidity and mortality in older patients. This study aimed to investigate the influence of frailty status on likelihood, rate, duration, and severity of intraoperative hypotension (IOH), which can lead to severe organ dysfunction.

METHODS

Surgical patients (≥70 yr old) with preoperative frailty assessment were analysed retrospectively. Frailty status was defined as robust, prefrail, or frail based on modified Fried criteria. IOH was defined as mean arterial pressure <65 mm Hg. For likelihood, rate, duration, and severity of IOH, logistic and Poisson regression were used.

RESULTS

We included 2495 patients. There was no significant difference in likelihood of IOH. An increase of 9% in rate of IOH during surgery for prefrail (incidence rate ratio [IRR] 1.09 [95% CI 1.03-1.16], P=0.002), and 16% increase for frail patients (IRR 1.16 [1.04-1.29], P=0.007) was observed. During anaesthesia induction, prefrail patients exhibited a 28% increase in IOH (IRR 1.28 [1.12-1.47], P<0.001). Although there were no differences in the severity of IOH if surgery or anaesthesia induction duration was taken into account, frailty status was associated with a 15% longer time-weighted duration of IOH during anaesthesia induction (IRR 1.15 [1.06-1.24], P=0.001). Mediator analysis revealed that frailty status accounted for >90% after considering number of measured blood pressures and surgical duration and >70% after accounting for total propofol dose.

CONCLUSIONS

Prefrail and frail patients aged ≥70 yr experienced up to 16% more IOH during surgery and 28% more during anaesthesia induction compared with robust patients. Preoperative optimisation (prehabilitation) and modification of intraoperative management (e.g. invasive blood pressure management) have the potential to reduce IOH in prefrail and frail patients.

The effect of pre-habilitation programs on surgical outcomes among patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery

Pre-habilitation programs, designed to optimize physical, nutritional and psychological health before surgery, show promise in improving outcomes for elective cardiac surgery. This randomized controlled trial assessed the impact of a 4-week prehabilitation program on 100 patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery, comparing it to standard preoperative care. The prehabilitation group experienced significantly fewer postoperative complications (12% vs. 28%, p = 0.016), shorter hospital stays (6.4 ± 1.8 days vs. 8.2 ± 2.1 days, p < 0.001) and improved 30-day functional recovery (p = 0.005). These findings demonstrate that prehabilitation enhances recovery, reduces complications and shortens hospitalization, supporting its inclusion in preoperative protocols for elective cardiac surgery.

Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of prehabilitation for elderly frail patients prior to elective surgery: a qualitative study with healthcare professionals

BACKGROUND

Prehabilitation aims to enhance functional capacity before surgery, minimise complications and achieve a better postoperative outcome. This can be particularly useful for older, frail patients to better tolerate surgery. The aim of this study was to identify what barriers and facilitators healthcare professionals in Germany experienced in the implementation and delivery of the multimodal prehabilitation programme "PRAEP-GO" for (pre-)frail adults aged 70 years and older to inform the implementation of prehabilitation into standard care.

METHODS

A nested descriptive qualitative study was conducted using semi-structured face-to-face interviews with healthcare professionals involved in the PRAEP-GO trial from the Berlin and Brandenburg region in Germany. Transcripts were analysed using Kuckartz' qualitative content analysis. Results were interpreted and synthesised using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, a theoretical framework to allow their application to a more general context.

RESULTS

A total of 14 interviews were conducted. Seven therapists (physio-, ergo-, sports therapy), five physicians and two employees from other professions with mainly administrative and organisational tasks in the project. All identified barriers and facilitating factors could be assigned to the themes of organisation, prehabilitation, cooperation and communication between healthcare professionals and with patients. Much optimisation potential was found regarding organisational aspects, e.g. addressing perceived staff shortages and optimising the patient pathway. Furthermore, it became apparent that communication and cooperation between professionals but also with patients need to be improved. More evidence regarding prehabilitation should be provided to convince professionals more. Prehabilitation should be multimodal and individualised, including the programme duration. Officially introducing prehabilitation into standard care would facilitate its delivery.

DISCUSSION

These findings underscore the fact that successful implementation of prehabilitation programmes, such as PRAEP-GO, requires sufficient organisational infrastructure, human resources, access to knowledge, an adaptable and individualised programme design as well as good communication among professionals and with patients. The transferability of the findings is limited by the absence of nutritionists and resulting overrepresentation of other therapists in the sample. To further convince professionals and patients of the concept of prehabilitation, more research is needed to build a solid evidence base that will ensure greater awareness and, thus, more motivation and cooperation among professionals and patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Open Science Framework (osf.io/ksfgj).

Impact of FRAilty screening and Geriatric assessment and INtervention in older patients with epithelial Ovarian Cancer: A multicenter randomized clinical trial protocol (FRAGINOC)

INTRODUCTION

Radical surgery combined with chemotherapy is the only potential curative treatment of patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). However, 43% of older Danish patients with EOC are not referred to surgery due to frailty, age, or fear of complications. Comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) has demonstrated ability to reduce frailty in older patients, but there is a knowledge gap regarding its effect before or during treatment in older adults with EOC. This protocol presents a randomized controlled trial (RCT), which evaluates the effect of CGA-based interventions including individualized physical exercise therapy in older adults with EOC during neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This RCT will include patients aged ≥70 years with primary EOC referred to NACT. Patients will be randomized 1:1 to intervention or standard of care, along with neoadjuvant antineoplastic treatment. Stratification for performance status and center of inclusion will be performed. In the intervention arm, a geriatrician will perform CGA and corresponding geriatric interventions and patients will undergo an individualized home-based exercise program managed by a physiotherapist. All patients will be evaluated with Geriatric-8, modified Geriatric-8, clinical frailty scale, and physical tests at randomization. Predictive values (positive/negative) will be evaluated for CGA detected impairments. The primary endpoint is the proportion of patients referred to interval debulking surgery (IDS). Secondary endpoints include the proportion who complete oncological treatment, improvements in physical tests, quality of life measured by European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer-Quality of Life questionnaires at inclusion, after three cycles of chemotherapy, and at end of chemotherapy treatment. Furthermore, the association between results of geriatric screening tests, CGA, and physical tests with complication rate and progression free survival will be examined. The primary outcome will be analyzed with logistic regression in the intention-to-treat population. Power calculations reveal the need to enroll 216 patients.

DISCUSSION

The present study examines whether CGA-based interventions including individualized physical exercise can increase the referral rate for potential curative IDS in older patients with EOC. If successful, this will result in more patients undergoing surgery and completing chemotherapy, preventing complications, and ultimately improving quality of life and survival. The study setup may establish the basis for direct clinical implementation if proven effective.

Cost-effectiveness of prehabilitation of elderly frail or pre-frail patients prior to elective surgery (PRAEP-GO) versus usual care - Protocol for a health economic evaluation alongside a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Prehabilitation aims to improve patients' functional capacity before surgery to reduce perioperative complications, promote recovery and decrease probability of disability. The planned economic evaluation is performed alongside a large German multi-centre pragmatic, two-arm parallel-group, randomized controlled trial on prehabilitation for frail elderly patients before elective surgery compared to standard care (PRAEP-GO RCT). The aim is to determine the cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of prehabilitation for frail elderly before an elective surgery.

METHODS

The planned health economic evaluation comprises cost-effectiveness, and cost-utility analyses. Analyses are conducted in the German context from different perspectives including the payer perspective, i.e. the statutory health insurance, the societal perspective and the health care provider perspective. Data on outcomes and costs, are collected alongside the ongoing PRAEP-GO RCT. The trial population includes frail or pre-frail patients aged ≥70 years with planned elective surgery. The intervention consists of frailty screening (Fried phenotype), a shared decision-making conference determining modality (physiotherapy and unsupervised physical exercises, nutrition counselling, etc.) and setting (inpatient, day care, outpatient etc.) of a 3-week individual multimodal prehabilitation prior to surgery. The control group receives standard preoperative care. Costs include the intervention costs, the costs of the index hospital stay for surgery, and health care resources consumed during a 12-month follow-up. Clinical effectiveness outcomes included in the economic evaluation are the level of care dependency, the degree of disability as measured by the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0), quality-adjusted life years (QALY) derived from the EQ-5D-5L and the German utility set, and complications occurring during the index hospital stay. Each adopted perspective considers different types of costs and outcomes as outlined in the protocol. All analyses will feature Intention-To-Treat analysis. To explore methodological and parametric uncertainties, we will conduct probabilistic and deterministic sensitivity analyses. Subgroup analyses will be performed as secondary analyses.

DISCUSSION

The health economic evaluation will provide insights into the cost-effectiveness of prehabilitation in older frail populations, informing decision-making processes and contributing to the evidence base in this field. Potential limitation includes a highly heterogeneous trial population.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PRAEP-GO RCT: NCT04418271; economic evaluation: OSF ( https://osf.io/ecm74 ).

The impact of prehabilitation on outcomes in frail and high-risk patients undergoing major abdominal surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Prehabilitation comprises multidisciplinary preoperative interventions including exercise, nutritional optimisation and psychological preparation aimed at improving surgical outcomes. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine the impact of prehabilitation on postoperative outcomes in frail and high-risk patients undergoing major abdominal surgery.

METHODS

Embase, Medline, CINAHAL and Cochrane databases were searched from January 2010 to January 2023 for randomised clinical trials (RCTs) and observational studies evaluating unimodal (exercise) or multimodal prehabilitation programmes. Meta-analysis was limited to length of stay (primary end point), severe postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo Classification ≥ Grade 3) and the 6-minute walk test (6MWT). The analysis was performed using RevMan v5.4 software.

RESULTS

Sixteen studies (6 RCTs, 10 observational) reporting on 3339 patients (1468 prehabilitation group, 1871 control group) were included. The median (interquartile range) age was 74.0 (71.0-78.4) years. Multimodal prehabilitation was applied in fifteen studies and unimodal in one. Meta-analysis of nine studies showed a reduction in hospital length of stay (weighted mean difference -1.07 days, 95 % CI -1.60 to -0.53 days, P < 0.0001, I2 = 19 %). Ten studies addressed severe complications and a meta-analysis suggested a decline in occurrence by up to 44 % (odds ratio 0.56, 95 % CI 0.37 to 0.82, P < 0.004, I2 = 51 %). Four studies provided data on preoperative 6MWT. The pooled weighted mean difference was 40.1 m (95 % CI 32.7 to 47.6 m, P < 0.00001, I2 = 24 %), favouring prehabilitation.

CONCLUSION

Given the significant impact on shortening length of stay and reducing severe complications, prehabilitation should be encouraged in frail, older and high-risk adult patients undergoing major abdominal surgery.

Does prehabilitation before esophagectomy improve postoperative outcomes? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Esophagectomy for esophageal cancer is associated with high morbidity. It remains unclear whether prehabilitation, a strategy aimed at optimizing patients' physical and mental functioning prior to surgery, improves postoperative outcomes. A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the effect of prehabilitation on post-operative outcomes after esophagectomy. Data sources included Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and PEDro, with information from 1 January 2000 to 5 August 2023. The analysis included randomized controlled trials and observational studies that compared prehabilitation interventions to standard care prior to esophagectomy. A random effects model was used to generate a pooled estimate for pairwise meta-analysis, meta-analysis of proportions, and meta-analysis of means. A total of 1803 patients were included with 584 in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 1219 in observational studies. In the randomized evidence, there were no significant differences between prehabilitation and control in the odds of postoperative pneumonia (15.0 vs. 18.9%, odds ratio (OR) 1.06 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.66;1.72]) or pulmonary complications (14 vs. 25.6%, OR 0.68 [95% CI: 0.32;1.45]). In the observational data, there was a reduction in both postoperative pneumonia (22.5 vs. 32.9%, OR 0.48 [95% CI: 0.28;0.83]) and pulmonary complications (26.1 vs. 52.3%, OR 0.35 [95% CI: 0.17;0.75]) with prehabilitation. Hospital and intensive care unit length of stay (days), operative mortality, and severe complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥ 3) did not differ between groups in both the randomized data and observational data. Prehabilitation demonstrated reductions in postoperative pneumonia and pulmonary complications in observational studies, but not RCTs. The overall certainty of these findings is limited by the low quality of the available evidence.

Protecting the Brain While Healing Hearts: The Protective Role of Cognitive Reserve in Cardiac Surgery

OBJECTIVE

One of the most significant complications following coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is postoperative cognitive decline (POCD). CABG patients frequently experience considerable postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD), including decline in attention, orientation, memory, judgment, and social functioning.

DESIGN

These negative effects may potentially be resolved by a protective factor, cognitive reserve (CR) that has been considered to function as a buffer against the consequences of neuropathology.

SETTING

We explored the frequency of POCD and CR in coronary artery disease patients undergoing CABG. We hypothesized that high levels of CR would protect against POCD after cardiac surgery.

PARTICIPANTS

We assessed 101 patients before surgery, and 4 months after cardiopulmonary bypass surgery with the use of extracorporeal circulation.

MEASUREMENTS

Measures of cognitive functions, CR, anxiety, and depression were included in the assessment.

RESULTS

Each patient was placed in the high (n = 50) or low CR (n = 51) group, based on median split. Chi-square tests effect showed that patients with low CR were more likely to a great extend to demonstrate postsurgical cognitive decline in attention, memory, visuospatial perception and executive functions than patients with high CR upon postsurgery neuropsychological assessment.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that CR can forecast neuropsychological outcomes of cardiac surgery, recognizing the patients with low CR and help them to participate to interventions programs that could slow cognitive aging or reduce the risk of dementia and enhance their overall postsurgical functional outcome.

Community-based prehabilitation in older patients and high-risk patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery

INTRODUCTION

Prehabilitation before colorectal cancer (CRC) surgery is promising to prevent complications and to enhance recovery, especially in patients aged 70 or older or in patients with an American Society of Anaesthesiologist (ASA) physical classification score 3-4, for whom surgery is associated with higher postoperative complications and long-lasting adverse effects on functional performance.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A cohort study was conducted in a large teaching hospital in Alkmaar, the Netherlands. Fifty CRC patients (≥70 years or ASA 3-4) underwent multimodal prehabilitation between September 2020 and July 2021. The reference group comprised 50 patients (≥70 years or ASA 3-4) from a historical cohort receiving CRC surgery without prehabilitation (March 2020-August 2020). The primary outcome was 90-day postoperative complication rate. Secondary outcomes were length of stay, 90-day readmission and mortality rates and functional outcome in the prehabilitation group.

RESULTS

One patient in the prehabilitation group decided not to undergo surgery. Of the remaining 49 patients, 48 (98.0 %) received prehabilitation for at least 3 weeks. Of these patients, 32.7 % developed postoperative complications, compared to 58 % in the reference group (p = 0.015), and none were readmitted, in contrast to 6 reference group patients (12.0 %, p = 0.012). Length of stay and mortality did not differ significantly. Six weeks postoperatively, all functional outcomes in the prehabilitation group were significantly higher than at baseline.

CONCLUSIONS

Prehabilitation reduced postoperative complications and improved short-term functional outcomes in older and high-risk patients receiving CRC surgery. Further research should investigate the maintenance of long-term enhanced lifestyle and the effects of tailor-made programs.

Preoperative Optimization for Abdominal Wall Reconstruction

Patients requiring abdominal wall reconstruction may have medical comorbidities and/or complex defects. Comorbidities such as smoking, diabetes, obesity, cirrhosis, and frailty have been associated with an increased risk of postoperative complications. Prehabilitation strategies are variably associated with improved outcomes. Large hernia defects and loss of domain may present challenges in achieving fascial closure, an important part of restoring abdominal wall function. Prehabilitation of the abdominal wall can be achieved with the use of botulinum toxin A, and preoperative progressive pneumoperitoneum.

Application of MFI-5 in severe complications and unfavorable outcomes after radical resection of colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Frailty is considered a characteristic manifestation of physiological decline in multiple organ systems, which significantly increases the vulnerability of elderly individuals with colorectal cancer (CRC) and is associated with a poor prognosis. While studies have demonstrated that the 11-factor Modified Frailty Index (mFI-11) can effectively predict adverse outcomes following radical resection of CRC, there is a lack of research on the applicability of the 5-factor Modified Frailty Index (mFI-5) within this patient population.

METHODS

In this retrospective analysis, we examined a cohort of CRC patients aged 65 years and above who had undergone radical resection. For each patient, we calculated their mFI-5 score, considering a score of ≥ 2 as an indication of frailty. We conducted univariate and multivariate analyses to assess the association between the mFI-5 and adverse outcomes as well as postoperative complications.

RESULTS

Patients with an mFI-5 score ≥ 2 exhibited a significantly higher incidence of serious postoperative complications (53% vs. 30%; P = 0.001) and experienced a longer hospital stay [19.00 (15.00-24.50) vs. 17.00 (14.00-20.00); P < 0.05]. Notably, an mFI-5 score greater than 2 emerged as an independent risk factor for severe postoperative complications (odds ratio: 2.297; 95% confidence interval: 1.216 to 4.339; P = 0.01). Furthermore, the mFI-5 score displayed predictive capabilities for severe postoperative complications with an area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of 0.629 (95% confidence interval: 0.551 to 0.707; P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The mFI-5 demonstrates a high level of sensitivity in predicting serious complications, prolonged hospital stays, and mortality following radical resection of colorectal carcinoma. As a practical clinical assessment tool, the mFI-5 enables the identification of high-risk patients and facilitates preoperative optimization.

Prehabilitation in older patients prior to elective cardiac procedures (PRECOVERY): study protocol of a multicenter randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have demonstrated the efficacy of rehabilitation after a cardiovascular procedure. Especially older and multimorbid patients benefit from rehabilitation after a cardiac procedure. Prehabilitation prior to cardiac procedures may also have positive effects on patients' pre- and postoperative outcomes. Results of a current meta-analysis show that prehabilitation prior to cardiac procedures can improve perioperative outcomes and alleviate adverse effects. Germany currently lacks a structured cardiac prehabilitation program for older patients, which is coordinated across healthcare sectors.

METHODS

In a randomized, controlled, two-arm parallel group, assessor-blinded multicenter intervention trial (PRECOVERY), we will randomize 422 patients aged 75 years or older scheduled for an elective cardiac procedure (e.g., coronary artery bypass graft surgery or transcatheter aortic valve replacement). In PRECOVERY, patients randomized to the intervention group participate in a 2-week multimodal prehabilitation intervention conducted in selected cardiac-specific rehabilitation facilities. The multimodal prehabilitation includes seven modules: exercise therapy, occupational therapy, cognitive training, psychosocial intervention, disease-specific education, education with relatives, and nutritional intervention. Participants in the control group receive standard medical care. The co-primary outcomes are quality of life (QoL) and mortality after 12 months. QoL will be measured by the EuroQol 5-dimensional questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L). A health economic evaluation using health insurance data will measure cost-effectiveness. A mixed-methods process evaluation will accompany the randomized, controlled trial to evaluate dose, reach, fidelity and adaptions of the intervention.

DISCUSSION

In this study, we investigate whether a tailored prehabilitation program can improve long-term survival, QoL and functional capacity. Additionally, we will analyze whether the intervention is cost-effective. This is the largest cardiac prehabilitation trial targeting the wide implementation of a new form of care for geriatric cardiac patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS; http://www.drks.de ; DRKS00030526). Registered on 30 January 2023.

Cost-effectiveness of prehabilitation prior to elective surgery: a systematic review of economic evaluations

BACKGROUND

Prehabilitation aims at enhancing patients' functional capacity and overall health status to enable them to withstand a forthcoming stressor like surgery. Our aim was to synthesise the evidence on the cost-effectiveness of prehabilitation for patients awaiting elective surgery compared with usual preoperative care.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Embase, the CRD database, ClinicalTrials.gov, the WHO ICTRP and the dissertation databases OADT and DART. Studies comparing prehabilitation for patients with elective surgery to usual preoperative care were included if they reported cost outcomes. All types of economic evaluations (EEs) were included. The primary outcome of the review was cost-effectiveness based on cost-utility analyses (CUAs). The risk of bias of trial-based EEs was assessed with the Cochrane risk of bias 2 tool and the ROBINS-I tool and the credibility of model-based EEs with the ISPOR checklist. Methodological quality of full EEs was assessed using the CHEC checklist. The EEs' results were synthesised narratively using vote counting based on direction of effect.

RESULTS

We included 45 unique studies: 25 completed EEs and 20 ongoing studies. Of the completed EEs, 22 were trial-based and three model-based, corresponding to four CUAs, three cost-effectiveness analyses, two cost-benefit analyses, 12 cost-consequence analyses and four cost-minimization analyses. Three of the four trial-based CUAs (75%) found prehabilitation cost-effective, i.e. more effective and/or less costly than usual care. Overall, 16/25 (64.0%) EEs found prehabilitation cost-effective. When excluding studies of insufficient credibility/critical risk of bias, this number reduced to 14/23 (60.9%). In 8/25 (32.0%), cost-effectiveness was unclear, e.g. because prehabilitation was more effective and more costly, and in one EE prehabilitation was not cost-effective.

CONCLUSIONS

We found some evidence that prehabilitation for patients awaiting elective surgery is cost-effective compared to usual preoperative care. However, we suspect a relevant risk of publication bias, and most EEs were of high risk of bias and/or low methodological quality. Furthermore, there was relevant heterogeneity depending on the population, intervention and methods. Future EEs should be performed over a longer time horizon and apply a more comprehensive perspective.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42020182813.