Development and validation of a real-time PCR assay for the detection of clinical acanthamoebae

Chitosan nanoparticles improve the effectivity of miltefosine against Acanthamoeba

BACKGROUND

Acanthamoeba keratitis (AK) is a corneal sight-threatening infection caused by the free-living amoebae of the genus Acanthamoeba. Early and appropriate treatment significantly impacts visual outcomes. Mucoadhesive polymers such as chitosan are a potential strategy to prolong the residence time and bioavailability of the encapsulated drugs in the cornea. Regarding the recent administration of miltefosine (MF) for treating resistant AK, in the present study, we synthesized miltefosine-loaded chitosan nanoparticles (MF-CS-NPs) and evaluated them against Acanthamoeba.

METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

Chitosan nanoparticles (CNPs) were prepared using the ionic gelation method with negatively charged tripolyphosphate (TPP). The zeta-potential (ZP) and the particle size of MF-CS-NPs were 21.8±3.2 mV and 46.61±18.16 nm, respectively. The release profile of MF-CS-NPs indicated linearity with sustained drug release. The cytotoxicity of MF-CS-NPs on the Vero cell line was 2.67 and 1.64 times lower than free MF at 24 and 48 hours. This formulation exhibited no hemolytic activity in vitro and ocular irritation in rabbit eyes. The IC50 of MF-CS-NPs showed a significant reduction by 2.06 and 1.69-fold in trophozoites at 24 and 48 hours compared to free MF. Also, the MF-CS-NPs IC50 in the cysts form was slightly decreased by 1.26 and 1.21-fold at 24 and 48 hours compared to free MF.

CONCLUSIONS

The MF-CS-NPs were more effective against the trophozoites and cysts than free MF. The nano-chitosan formulation was more effective on trophozoites than the cysts form. MF-CS-NPs reduced toxicity and improved the amoebicidal effect of MF. Nano-chitosan could be an ideal carrier that decreases the cytotoxicity of miltefosine. Further analysis in animal settings is needed to evaluate this nano-formulation for clinical ocular drug delivery.

New Frontiers in Acanthamoeba Keratitis Diagnosis and Management

Acanthamoeba Keratitis (AK) is a severe corneal infection caused by the Acanthamoeba species of protozoa, potentially leading to permanent vision loss. AK requires prompt diagnosis and treatment to mitigate vision impairment. Diagnosing AK is challenging due to overlapping symptoms with other corneal infections, and treatment is made complicated by the organism's dual forms and increasing virulence, and delayed diagnosis. In this review, new approaches in AK diagnostics and treatment within the last 5 years are discussed. The English-language literature on PubMed was reviewed using the search terms "Acanthamoeba keratitis" and "diagnosis" or "treatment" and focused on studies published between 2018 and 2023. Two hundred sixty-five publications were initially identified, of which eighty-seven met inclusion and exclusion criteria. This review highlights the findings of these studies. Notably, advances in PCR-based diagnostics may be clinically implemented in the near future, while antibody-based and machine-learning approaches hold promise for the future. Single-drug topical therapy (0.08% PHMB) may improve drug access and efficacy, while oral medication (i.e., miltefosine) may offer a treatment option for patients with recalcitrant disease.

Diagnosis of Acanthamoeba Keratitis: Past, Present and Future

Acanthamoeba keratitis (AK) is a painful and sight-threatening parasitic corneal infection. In recent years, the incidence of AK has increased. Timely and accurate diagnosis is crucial during the management of AK, as delayed diagnosis often results in poor clinical outcomes. Currently, AK diagnosis is primarily achieved through a combination of clinical suspicion, microbiological investigations and corneal imaging. Historically, corneal scraping for microbiological culture has been considered to be the gold standard. Despite its technical ease, accessibility and cost-effectiveness, the long diagnostic turnaround time and variably low sensitivity of microbiological culture limit its use as a sole diagnostic test for AK in clinical practice. In this review, we aim to provide a comprehensive overview of the diagnostic modalities that are currently used to diagnose AK, including microscopy with staining, culture, corneal biopsy, in vivo confocal microscopy, polymerase chain reaction and anterior segment optical coherence tomography. We also highlight emerging techniques, such as next-generation sequencing and artificial intelligence-assisted models, which have the potential to transform the diagnostic landscape of AK.

Impact of implementation of polymerase chain reaction on diagnosis, treatment, and clinical course of Acanthamoeba keratitis

PURPOSE

Acanthamoeba keratitis (AK) is a painful and possibly sight-threatening ocular infection. While the correct diagnosis and specific treatment in the early stages significantly improve the prognosis, the disease is often misdiagnosed and in clinical examination confused with other forms of keratitis. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for the detection of AK was first introduced in our institution in December 2013 to improve the timely diagnosis of AK. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of implementation of Acanthamoeba PCR on the diagnosis and treatment of the disease in a German tertiary referral center.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients treated for Acanthamoeba keratitis between 1st of January 1993 and 31st of December 2021 in the Department of Ophthalmology of the University Hospital Duesseldorf were identified retrospectively via in-house registries. Evaluated parameters include age, sex, initial diagnosis, method of correct diagnosis, duration of symptoms until correct diagnosis, contact lens use, visual acuity, and clinical findings as well as medical and surgical therapy by keratoplasty (pKP). In order to assess the impact of implementation of Acanthamoeba PCR, the cases were divided into two groups (before (pre-PCR group) and after PCR implementation (PCR group).

RESULTS

Seventy-five patients with Acanthamoeba keratitis were included (69.3% female, median age 37 years). Eighty-four percent (63/75) of all patients were contact lens wearers. Until PCR was available, 58 patients with Acanthamoeba keratitis were diagnosed either clinically (n = 28), by histology (n = 21), culture (n = 6), or confocal microscopy (n = 2) with a median duration until diagnosis of 68 (18; 109) days. After PCR implementation, in 17 patients, the diagnosis was established with PCR in 94% (n = 16) and median duration until diagnosis was significantly shorter with 15 (10; 30.5) days. A longer duration until correct diagnosis correlated with a worse initial visual acuity (p = 0.0019, r = 0.363). The number of pKP performed was significantly lower in the PCR group (5/17; 29.4%) than in the pre-PCR group (35/58; 60.3%) (p = 0.025).

CONCLUSIONS

The choice of diagnostic method and especially the application of PCR have a significant impact on the time to diagnosis and on the clinical findings at the time of confirmation of diagnosis and the need for penetrating keratoplasty. In contact lens-associated keratitis, the first crucial step is to take AK into consideration and perform a PCR test as timely confirmation of diagnosis of AK is imperative to prevent long-term ocular morbidity.

Akanthamöbenkeratitiden in Jugendlichen mit Orthokeratologielinsen

Hintergrund

Durch die rasant steigende Prävalenz der Myopie kommen zunehmend progressionshemmende Verfahren zum Einsatz. Auch die Orthokeratologie, basierend auf dem Ansatz des peripheren Defokus, erlebt eine Renaissance. Die gefährlichste Nebenwirkung der Orthokeratologie ist die mikrobielle Keratitis, unter ihnen eine Infektion mit Akanthamöben, welche oft spät diagnostiziert wird und potenziell visusbedrohende Verläufe nehmen kann.

Material und Methode

Diese Fallserie beschreibt die Diagnosefindung und den Behandlungsverlauf der Akanthamöbenkeratitis bei jugendlichen Patient*innen mit Orthokeratologielinsen, welche an der Spezialambulanz für Hornhauterkrankungen der Universitätsklinik für Augenheilkunde und Optometrie an der Medizinischen Universität Wien im Zeitraum eines Jahres betreut wurden.

Resultate

Vier Fälle von orthokeratologieassoziierten Akanthamöbenkeratitiden wurden mittels kornealer Konfokalmikroskopie und mikrobiologischer Verfahren zwischen August 2021 und August 2022 diagnostiziert. Die intensive Stufentherapie umfasste ein hochdosiertes, topisches Biguanid in Kombination mit einem Diamidinderivat, welches in der ersten Therapiephase mit antibakteriellen und antifungalen Augentropfen kombiniert wurde. Der Therapieverlauf und -erfolg wurde mittels der kornealen Konfokalmikroskopie beurteilt, und entsprechend angepasst.

Schlussfolgerung

Die Akanthamöbenkeratitis ist ein ernst zu nehmendes Erkrankungsbild im Zusammenhang mit Orthokeratologielinsen. Im Hinblick auf das Alter der Zielgruppe dieser myopieprogressionshemmenden Therapie sollte, neben sorgfältiger Patientenselektion, auf eine detaillierte Schulung der Kontaktlinsenträger in der Handhabung der Linsen sowie auf ein erhöhtes Bewusstsein für Zeichen einer frühen Infektion besonderes Augenmerk gelegt werden. Da alternative Möglichkeiten zur Myopieprophylaxe bestehen, müssen PatentInnen auf das Risiko der jeweiligen Methode hingewiesen werden.

Real-Time PCR for the Diagnosis of Acanthamoeba Genotype T4

Acanthamoeba spp. are ubiquitous and opportunistic free-living amoebae (FLA) that can cause Acanthamoeba keratitis and other infections in the human host. A quick and efficient diagnosis is often challenging. Our study aimed to establish a qPCR assay to detect and, at the same time, quantify the predominant Acanthamoeba genotype T4. DNA from clinical corneal scrapings and Acanthamoeba reference strains, including genotypes T3, T4, T5, T6, T10, T11, and T12, were used to develop the new T4 assay and it was compared to published protocols and one commercial kit for evaluation. The T4 assay showed no amplification with Acanthamoeba genotypes T3, T5, T6, T10, T11, and T12. The efficiencies ranged from 92.01 to 97.59% (R² of 0.9768 to 0.9951). The calculated LOD range was 3.63 to 33.27 cells/µL. The protocol published by Qvarnstrom and colleagues was more sensitive compared to the other assays, and an overall good agreement was observed between the new T4 and the Qvarnstrom assays. We successfully developed and validated a genotype T4 assay that could be run in duplex with the Qvarnstrom assay to reliably and simultaneously diagnose Acanthamoeba genotype T4 and other genotypes from clinical samples.

Surveillance of Amoebic Keratitis-Causing Acanthamoebae for Potential Bacterial Endosymbionts in Ontario, Canada

Acanthamoeba spp. are the causative pathogens of several infections, including amoebic keratitis (AK), a vision-threatening infection. Acanthamoebae from corneal specimens of patients with AK harbor bacterial endosymbionts, which may increase virulence. We sought to understand the spectrum of bacterial endosymbionts present in clinical isolates of Acanthamoeba spp. identified in our reference parasitology laboratory. Isolates of Acanthamoeba spp. obtained from our biobank of anonymized corneal scrapings were screened for potential endosymbionts by PCR using primer pairs detecting bacteria belonging to orders Chlamydiales, Rickettsiales, or Legionellales and pan16S primers. Three primer pairs specific to the 18s rRNA gene of Acanthamoeba spp. were used for the amplification of Acanthamoeba DNA used for sequencing. Sanger sequencing of all PCR products was performed, followed by BLAST analysis for species identification. We screened 26 clinical isolates of Acanthamoeba spp. for potential endosymbionts. Five isolates (19%) were found to contain bacterial DNA belonging to Legionellales. Three (11%) contained members of the Rickettsiales and Pseudomonas genticulata was detected in a Rickettsia-positive sample. One strain (4%) contained Neochlamydia hartmannellae, a member of the Chlamydiales order. Bacterial endosymbionts are prevalent in clinical strains of Acanthamoeba causing AK isolated from corneal scrapings. The demonstration of these organisms in clinical Acanthamoeba isolates supports a potential exploration of anti-endosymbiont therapeutics as an adjuvant therapy in the treatment of AK.

Diagnostic methods for the etiological assessment of infectious corneal pathology (Review)

Infectious keratitis is a leading cause of visual morbidity, including blindness, all across the globe, especially in developing countries. Prompt and adequate treatment is mandatory to maintain corneal integrity and to recover the best possible final visual acuity. Although in most of the cases practitioners chose to employ empirical broad-spectrum antimicrobial medication that is usually effective, in some instances, they face the need to identify the causative agent to establish the appropriate therapy. An extensive search was conducted on published literature before December 2020 concerning the main laboratory investigations used to identify the microbial agents found in infectious keratitis, their indications, advantages, and disadvantages, as well as the results reported by other studies concerning different diagnostic tools. At present, the gold standard for diagnosis is still considered to be the isolation of microorganisms in cultures, along with the examination of smears, but other newer techniques, such as polymerase chain reaction (PCR), next-generation sequencing (NGS), and in vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM) have gained popularity in the last decades. Currently, these newer methods have proved to be valuable adjuvants in making the diagnosis, but technological advances hold promise that, in the future, these methods will have increased performance and availability, and may become the new gold standard, replacing the classic cultures and smears.

Diagnostic armamentarium of infectious keratitis: A comprehensive review

Infectious keratitis (IK) represents the leading cause of corneal blindness worldwide, particularly in developing countries. A good outcome of IK is contingent upon timely and accurate diagnosis followed by appropriate interventions. Currently, IK is primarily diagnosed on clinical grounds supplemented by microbiological investigations such as microscopic examination with stains, and culture and sensitivity testing. Although this is the most widely accepted practice adopted in most regions, such an approach is challenged by several factors, including indistinguishable clinical features shared among different causative organisms, polymicrobial infection, long diagnostic turnaround time, and variably low culture positivity rate. In this review, we aim to provide a comprehensive overview of the current diagnostic armamentarium of IK, encompassing conventional microbiological investigations, molecular diagnostics (including polymerase chain reaction and mass spectrometry), and imaging modalities (including anterior segment optical coherence tomography and in vivo confocal microscopy). We also highlight the potential roles of emerging technologies such as next-generation sequencing, artificial intelligence-assisted platforms. and tele-medicine in shaping the future diagnostic landscape of IK.

Efficient nested-PCR-based method development for detection and genotype identification of Acanthamoeba from a small volume of aquatic environmental sample

Acanthamoeba spp. are opportunistic human pathogens that cause granulomatous amoebic encephalitis and keratitis, and their accurate detection and enumeration in environmental samples is a challenge. In addition, information regarding the genotyping of Acanthamoeba spp. using various PCR methods is equally critical. Therefore, considering the diverse niches of habitats, it is necessary to develop an even more efficient genotyping method for Acanthamoeba spp. detection. This study improved the sensitivity of detection to avoid underestimation of Acanthamoeba spp. occurrence in aquatic environmental samples, and to accurately define the pathogenic risk by developing an efficient PCR method. In this study, a new nested genotyping method was established and compared with various PCR-based methods using in silico, lab, and empirical tests. The in silico test showed that many PCR-based methods could not successfully align specific genotypes of Acanthamoeba, except for the newly designed nested PCR and real-time PCR method. Furthermore, 52 water samples from rivers, reservoirs, and a river basin in Taiwan were analysed by six different PCR methods and compared for genotyping and detection efficiency of Acanthamoeba. The newly developed nested-PCR-based method of genotyping was found to be significantly sensitive as it could effectively detect the occurrence of Acanthamoeba spp., which was underestimated by the JDP-PCR method. Additionally, the present results are consistent with previous studies indicating that the high prevalence of Acanthamoeba in the aquatic environment of Taiwan is attributed to the commonly found T4 genotype. Ultimately, we report the development of a small volume procedure, which is a combination of recent genotyping PCR and conventional real-time PCR for enumeration of aquatic Acanthamoeba and acquirement of biologically meaningful genotyping information. We anticipate that the newly developed detection method will contribute to the precise estimation, evaluation, and reduction of the contamination risk of pathogenic Acanthamoeba spp., which is regularly found in the water resources utilised for domestic purposes.

Microbiological diagnosis of Acanthamoebic keratitis: experience from tertiary care center of North India

Acanthamoeba keratitis (AK) is a painful vision-threatening infection caused by pathogenic free-living Acanthamoeba. Due to the non-specific clinical presentation, this condition tends to be misdiagnosed by clinicians. A timely diagnosis is crucial for favorable visual outcome. Three hundred patients with suspected microbial keratitis presenting to the Advanced Eye Center at our tertiary care center in North India during the period from 2014 to 2018 were included. Patient's corneal scrapings, contact lens, lens solution, lens case, and tears were processed for microscopic examination by Giemsa and Calcofluor staining, non-nutrient agar (NNA) culture and molecular diagnosis by conventional PCR (cPCR) and Real-time PCR (qPCR). 18S rDNA gene sequencing was done to assess phylogenetic relationship. AK was found in 3.6% (11/300) of non-bacterial non-fungal keratitis patients. Among microbiological techniques, microscopy for Acanthamoeba was positive in 7 cases, NNA culture was positive in 9 cases and 11 cases were detected both by cPCR and qPCR. The sensitivity of microscopy, culture, cPCR and qPCR was 63.64%, 81.82 %, 100%, and 100% respectively whereas specificity was 100% for all the tests. 18S rDNA sequencing revealed that A. castellanii was the predominant species and isolates were genetically distinct. AK should be considered in the differential diagnosis of infectious keratitis. Molecular tests are useful for rapid, sensitive and specific diagnosis and must be included in workup of keratitis.

PCR and culture for diagnosis of Acanthamoeba keratitis

Background/Aims

Acanthamoeba keratitis (AK) is a rare but sight-threatening infection. Molecular diagnosis of corneal scraping has improved the diagnosis of AK. Different molecular targets and conditions have been used in diagnosis thus far. In this study, we prospectively compared the performance of five PCR assays on corneal samples for the diagnosis of AK.

Methods

1217 corneal scraping samples were obtained from patients, for whom an AK was suspected. Sample processing involved both molecular diagnostics and culture. Acanthamoeba PCR assays detected different regions of the Acanthamoeba nuclear small-subunit rRNA gene: three final point PCR assays using Nelson, ACARNA and JDP1–JDP2 pairs of primers, and two real-time PCR assays using Acant primer-probe. Human DNA and internal control were co-amplified in the real-time PCR assay to ensure scraping quality and the absence of inhibitors. In the absence of a gold standard, the performance of each test was evaluated using latent class analysis. Genotypes of Acanthamoeba isolates were also characterised.

Results

Estimated prevalence of AK was 1.32%. The sensitivity of Acanthamoeba diagnostic PCRs (73.3% to 86.7%) did not differ significantly from that of culture (66.7%), or according to the target sequence or the technology. Sensitivity could be increased to 93.8% or 100% by combining two or three assays, respectively. PCR specificity (99.3% to 100%) differed between the assays. T4 was the predominant Acanthamoeba genotype (84.6%).

Conclusions

Culture and a single PCR assay could lead to misdiagnosing AK. A combination of different PCR assays and improved sample quality could increase diagnosis sensitivity.