MicroRNA profiling of primary pulmonary enteric adenocarcinoma in members from the same family reveals some similarities to pancreatic adenocarcinoma-a step towards personalized therapy

Case report: Target and immunotherapy of a lung adenocarcinoma with enteric differentiation, EGFR mutation, and high microsatellite instability

Background

Pulmonary enteric adenocarcinoma (PEAC) is a rare histological subtype of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with a predominant (>50%) enteric differentiation component. The frequency of high microsatellite instability (MSI-H) is very low in lung cancer. EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors and immunotherapy are standard treatment for NSCLC patients, but their effectiveness in lung adenocarcinoma with pulmonary enteric differentiation is unknown.

Case presentation

This report describes a 66-year-old man who was initially diagnosed with metastatic lung adenocarcinoma with EGFR mutation based on pleural fluid. A lung biopsy was obtained after 17 months of first-line icotinib treatment. Histological analysis of biopsy samples and endoscopic examination resulted in a diagnosis of adenocarcinoma with enteric differentiation. Next-generation sequencing of 1,021 genes showed EGFR E19del, T790M, and MSI-H, while immunohistochemical assay showed proficient expression of mismatch repair (MMR) proteins. Consequently, the patient was treated with osimertinib and had a progression-free survival (PFS) of 3 months. His treatment was changed to chemotherapy with/without bevacizumab for 6.5 months. Then, the patient was treated with one cycle of camrelizumab monotherapy and camrelizumab plus chemotherapy, respectively. The tumor continued to grow, and the patient suffered pneumonia, pulmonary fungal infections, and increased hemoptysis. He received gefitinib and everolimus and died 2 months later and had an overall survival of 30 months.

Conclusion

In summary, our case describes a rare pulmonary enteric adenocarcinoma with an EGFR-activating mutation and MSI-H, responding to an EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor and poorly benefiting from an immune checkpoint inhibitor.

Primary pulmonary enteric adenocarcinoma presenting as a solitary skull mass

Pulmonary enteric adenocarcinoma (PEAC) is a rare, aggressive variant of lung adenocarcinoma with early metastatic potential. We present the case of a male smoker in his 50s who presented with right-sided numbness, pain and headache. Imaging revealed a destructive skull base mass invading the right sphenoid sinus. Histopathology was consistent with PEAC. The diagnosis was metastatic PEAC with a distant spread to the skull and represents the first case reported in the literature. We present an associated literature review of the clinical presentation, histological features and management of PEAC with skull metastasis. Metastasis should be considered when evaluating any persistent cranial lesion. Diagnosis requires thorough clinical, radiological and pathological assessment. Treatment involves surgical resection, chemoradiation and targeted therapy. Prognosis directly correlates with clinical stage at presentation. This case highlights the importance of careful evaluation of skull lesions, even in patients without known primary malignancy. Early diagnosis and multimodal therapy may improve outcomes.

Development and validation of a decision tree for distinguishing pulmonary adenocarcinomas with mucinous features and metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Diagnosis of mucinous carcinomas in the lung on transbronchial biopsy or fine-needle aspiration (FNA) samples can be difficult for the pathologist, because primary and metastatic tumors can have similar morphological, immunohistochemical, and molecular characteristics. Correct diagnosis is key to determine appropriate therapy and to distinguish primary from metastatic disease. This distinction often falls to the pathologist in patients with a history of mucinous adenocarcinoma of the colon. Despite its drawbacks, immunohistochemistry is often employed to help assign a primary site for mucinous adenocarcinomas in the lung. However, the published data in this regard is limited to studies that use only a handful of markers.

METHODS

The authors examined the staining characteristics and heterogeneity of CK7, TTF-1, NapsinA, CK20, CDX2, and SATB2 in resection specimens of pulmonary adenocarcinomas with mucinous features and metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma.

RESULTS

Based on the heterogeneity, sensitivity, and specificity in this cohort, the authors developed a decision tree based on TTF-1, SATB2, CDX2, and CK7 to categorize tumors as primary or metastatic lesions. Validation of the decision tree in FNA specimens from the lungs and lung-draining lymph nodes showed 84% concurrence in cases from the lung and 100% concurrence in cases from the lymph node. In cases where the algorithm assigned a primary site, it was 95% accurate compared to the multidisciplinary diagnosis.

CONCLUSIONS

This method holds promise in distinguishing primary versus metastatic lesions in resection, biopsy, and FNA samples from the lungs.

Clinical presentation and outcome of patients with enteric-type adenocarcinoma of the lung: A pooled analysis of published cases

Enteric-type adenocarcinoma of the lung (lung-ETAC, former pulmonary enteric adenocarcinoma, PEAC) is a rare subtype of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), which shares morphological and immunohistochemical features with lung and colorectal adenocarcinoma. Few data are available on patient prognosis, possible prognostic factors and systemic approach to metastatic disease. We performed a pooled analysis and a systematic review of published lung-ETAC, along with an additional case description. Thirty-one eligible publications were identified, providing data from 126 patients. In the 127 patients overall analyzed, median overall survival (OS) was 56.0 (range 36.7-75.3) months in early-stage patients and 14.0 (range 4.5-23.5) months in those with advanced/metastatic disease. Median disease-free survival (DFS) after radical surgery was 24 (range 22.6-35.1) months. Smoking status (HR 4.304, 95% CI: 1.261-14.693, p = 0.020) and node involvement (HR 1.853, 95% CI: 1.179-2.911, p = 0.007) were the negative independent prognostic factors at multivariate analysis. As regards systemic therapies for advanced cases, no firm conclusions were drawn about the efficacy of lung cancer-oriented chemotherapy regimens as opposed to colon cancer-oriented ones. Molecular analysis of lung-ETAC revealed a relatively high mutational rate, with alterations in several druggable molecular pathways, KRAS and NRAS (31%) were the most frequently mutated oncogenes, followed by ROS1 (15%), RET (13%), BRAF (11%), EGFR (8%) and ALK (6%). Moreover, 3 (15%) out of 20 cases showed DNA mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR). In conclusion, advanced lung-ETAC patients appeared to have a better prognosis compared to other subtypes of NSCLC. Moreover, the mutational rate and microsatellite instability found in lung-ETACs suggest that a significant proportion of these patients could benefit from target therapies and immunotherapy.

Clinical features and prognosis of pulmonary enteric adenocarcinoma: A retrospective study in China and the SEER database

Objective

Pulmonary enteric adenocarcinoma (PEAC) is a rare subtype of pulmonary adenocarcinoma that lacks effective treatment. The purpose of this research was to investigate the clinical characteristics, treatment, and prognosis of PEAC, as well as the impact of relevant factors on survival, thus providing a reference for the clinical management of patients with this disease.

Methods

For this study, we gathered clinical data from 26 patients with PEAC in the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University from June 2014 to June 2021. We used SEER*Stat software V8.3.5 to download the PEAC patients from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. In total, 20 patients were identified. Clinical data, including general information, imaging findings, and treatment protocols, were obtained, together with a follow-up of disease regression. The relevant clinical data were then analyzed.

Results

It included 12 males and 14 females out of 26 patients from China, whose mean age was (62.73 ± 11.89) years; 20 were in the lower lung, 11 were stage I-II, and 15 were stage III-IV. Five had EGFR mutations, and four had KRAS mutations. In terms of treatment, patients with stage I-II were primarily treated by surgery, and patients with stage III-IV were treated mostly by chemotherapy. We extended the follow-up date to January 2022. On completion of the follow-up visit, 11 patients died, and the remaining 15 patients survived. The overall survival (OS) of 26 patients was 2.0-76.0 months, while the mean was 53.1 months, and the median OS (mOS) was 38.0 months (95% CI:1.727-74.273). In the case of progression-free survival (PFS) times, it was 2.0-76.0 months, with a mean PFS of 31.0 months and a median PFS (mPFS) of 8.0 months (95% CI:4.333-11.667). The PFS of the 15 patients in stage III-IV was 2.0-17 months, while the mean PFS was 6.5 months and the mPFS was 6.0 months (95% CI:4.512-7.488). Out of the 20 patients identified in the SEER database, the average age was 69.9 years, with 14 males and 6 females. Of these patients, 8 were diagnosed with stage I-II, while the remaining 11 were diagnosed with stage III-IV. 10 underwent surgery, 4 received radiation therapy, and 9 received chemotherapy. The mean OS of the 20 patients was 67.5 months, mOS was 28.0 months (95% CI: 9.664- 46.336). For patients diagnosed with stage III-IV, the mean OS was 14.8 months and mOS was 20 months (95% CI: 4.713-35.287).

Conclusion

PEAC is rare, and the prognosis is determined mainly by the stage; patients who undergo surgery in stage I-II have a better prognosis.

Genetic mutation profiles and immune microenvironment analysis of pulmonary enteric adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary enteric adenocarcinoma (PEAC) has distinctive clinical outcomes, radiographic, pathological and molecular characteristics. The prognosis of patients with PEAC was poor. However, molecular profiles and therapeutic biomarkers of PEAC remain elusive.

METHODS

In the present study, the hospitalized patients with PEAC admitted to Tongji Hospital in Wuhan from January 1, 2014 to November 20, 2020 were retrospectively enrolled and followed until December 10, 2020. Comprehensive genomic profiling of tumor tissue from the PEAC patients were performed and compared with lung adenocarcinoma, colorectal cancer and metastatic colorectal carcinoma. Tumor immune microenvironment analysis were evaluated.

RESULTS

There were 10 patients with PEAC enrolled. 70% of patients were male and the median age of onset was 63 years (interquartile range, 55-72). There were six early-stage patients (Stage IA to IIB) and four stage IV patients. Molecular analysis revealed the most common gene mutations included TP53 (57%, 4/7) and KRAS (57%, 4/7) mutations. There were 40% mutations occurred in genes encoding receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs). 100% of patients (8/8) were microsatellite stability (MSS). The median level of TMB was 6.0 (interquartile range, 4.5-7.0) mutations/Mb. Three of 10 patients showed low PD-L1 expression (tumor proportion score < 10%) and the others were PD-L1 negative. A small subset of CD8+, CD3+, CD68+ T cells were observed and were mainly distributed in the cancer stroma.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated that PEAC was characterized by low-frequency RTK gene mutation, high KRAS mutation, low PD-L1 expression, low TMB, and low CD8+ T cells infiltration.

MicroRNA expression profiling with a droplet digital PCR assay enables molecular diagnosis and prognosis of cancers of unknown primary

Metastasis is responsible for the majority of cancer‐related deaths. Particularly, challenging is the management of metastatic cancer of unknown primary site (CUP), whose tissue of origin (TOO) remains undetermined even after extensive investigations and whose therapy is rather unspecific and poorly effective. Molecular approaches to identify the most probable TOO of CUPs can overcome some of these issues. In this study, we applied a predetermined set of 89 microRNAs (miRNAs) to infer the TOO of 53 metastatic cancers of unknown or uncertain origin. The miRNA expression was assessed with droplet digital PCR in 159 samples, including primary tumors from 17 tumor classes (reference set) and metastases of known and unknown origin (test set). We combined two different statistical models for class prediction to obtain the most probable TOOs: the nearest shrunken centroids approach of Prediction Analysis of Microarrays (PAMR) and the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) models. The molecular test was successful for all formalin‐fixed paraffin‐embedded samples and provided a TOO identification within 1 week from the biopsy procedure. The most frequently predicted origins were gastrointestinal, pancreas, breast, lung, and bile duct. The assay was applied also to multiple metastases from the same CUP, collected from different metastatic sites: The predictions showed a strong agreement, intrinsically validating our assay. The final CUPs' TOO prediction was compared with the clinicopathological hypothesis of primary site. Moreover, a panel of 13 miRNAs proved to have prognostic value and be associated with overall survival in CUP patients. Our study demonstrated that miRNA expression profiling in CUP samples could be employed as diagnostic and prognostic test. Our molecular analysis can be performed on request, concomitantly with standard diagnostic workup and in association with genetic profiling, to offer valuable indications about the possible primary site, thereby supporting treatment decisions.

Pulmonary enteric adenocarcinoma

•

Synthetically expounded the clinical characteristics of PEAC.

•

Systematically described the differentiation of PEAC from primary lung adenocarcinoma and MCRC.

•

Found patients with PEAC may have high frequencies of HER2 and MMR mutations.

•

Proposed a new conjecture that patients with PEAC might benefit from anti-HER2 therapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Pulmonary enteric adenocarcinoma (PEAC) is an exceptionally rare subtype of non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). It is characterized by pathological features similar to those of colorectal adenocarcinoma. Most patients with PEAC have almost no special clinical manifestations, and it is often difficult to differentiate from metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma (MCRC). As a special type of lung adenocarcinoma, PEAC has unique mutation expression and immune characteristics; its mutation profile shows higher Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene (KRAS), human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2) , DNA mismatch repair(MMR) mutation rates, and much lower epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) rate. So in the future, targeted therapy may tend to be a new light in the treatment of PEAC. As for immunohistochemistry (IHC), CDX-2, villin, and CK7 are significantly positive in PEAC. This review focuses on the pathologic features, immunohistochemical examination, mutation analysis, diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of PEAC.

Pulmonary enteric adenocarcinoma: a literature review

Pulmonary enteric adenocarcinoma (PEAC) is an extremely rare type of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with a histologic pattern that mimics metastatic colorectal cancer (MCC). The main clinical symptoms in PEAC patients are dyspnoea, coughing, hemoptysis, and chest and back pain. The first article about PEAC appeared in 1991 in the form of a case report. As a variant of invasive lung carcinoma, only a small number of case reports and clinical research studies have been carried out, and the only one guidance on diagnosis and treatment is the WHO Tumor Classification book. It is important for doctors to distinguish PEAC from MCC to extend survival time and improve the quality of life. We reviewed the existing literature regarding the diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of PEAC to provide some valuable clinical references.

Pulmonary enteric adenocarcinoma: an overview

Most commonly described as sporadic, pulmonary adenocarcinoma with enteric differentiation (PAED) is a rare variant of invasive lung cancer recently established and recognised by the World Health Organization. This tumour is highly heterogeneous and shares several morphological features with pulmonary and colorectal adenocarcinomas. Our objective is to summarise current research on PAED, focusing on its immunohistochemical and molecular features as potential tools for differential diagnosis from colorectal cancer, as well as prognosis definition and therapeutic choice. PAED exhibits an 'entero-like' pathological morphology in more than half cases, expressing at least one of the typical immunohistochemical markers of enteric differentiation, namely CDX2, CK20 or MUC2. For this reason, this malignancy appears often indistinguishable from a colorectal cancer metastasis, making the differential diagnosis laborious. Although standard diagnostic criteria have not been established yet, in the past few years, a number of approaches have been addressed, aimed at defining specific immunohistochemical and molecular signatures. Based on previously published literature, we have collected and analysed molecular and immunohistochemical data on this rare neoplasm, and have described the state of the art on diagnostic criteria as well as major clinical and therapeutic implications.The analysis of data from 295 patients from 58 published articles allowed us to identify the most represented immunohistochemical and molecular markers, as well as major differences between Asian PAEDs and those diagnosed in European/North American countries. The innovative molecular approaches, exploring driver mutations or new gene alterations, could help to identify rare prognostic factors and guide future tailored therapeutic approaches to this rare neoplasm.

Cutaneous metastasis as a primary presentation of a pulmonary enteric adenocarcinoma

Background:

Primary pulmonary enteric adenocarcinoma (PEAC) is a rare non-small cell lung cancer subtype sharing morphologic and immunohistochemical features with colorectal adenocarcinoma. Given the frequency of lung metastases in colorectal cancer, the differential diagnosis of PEAC according to routine morphological and immunohistochemical findings may be difficult. Genome sequence by next-generation sequencing has recently introduced new perspectives to better define the diagnosis and tumor sensitivity to treatments, while the rarity of this subtype of cancer still limits the current knowledge of its molecular features and provides no information to address patients to tailored therapies.

Methods:

We diagnosed a rare case of subcutaneous metastasis as a first symptom of a PEAC. Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded samples of the primary tumor and subcutaneous metastases were examined by immunohistochemistry, and subsequently by targeted next-generation sequencing analysis.

Results:

Morphological and immunohistochemical findings suggested a rare case of metastatic pulmonary adenocarcinoma with enteric aspects. Next-generation sequencing analysis performed on both the primary tumor sample and the cutaneous lesion identified two pathogenic variants on CDKN2A and KRAS in both of them. However, the metastasis showed two additional pathogenic mutations located in SMAD4 and FLT3 genes.

Conclusions:

We describe for the first time an extensive molecular analysis on a rare case of PEAC with an unusual cutaneous metastasis. Our observation suggests that a specific pattern of mutations is harbored in this neoplasm, and that additional molecular studies may provide further information to identify prognostic and hopefully predictive genes of response to treatment.

Differential diagnosis of pulmonary enteric adenocarcinoma and metastatic colorectal carcinoma with the assistance of next-generation sequencing and immunohistochemistry

PURPOSE

Pulmonary enteric adenocarcinoma (PEAC), defined as tumors with an enteric component exceeding 50% and a histological morphology similar to colorectal cancer (CRC) and metastatic colorectal carcinoma (MCC), is an extremely rare primary lung adenocarcinoma, which was recently recognized by World Health Organization (WHO). Adenocarcinomas with intestinal differentiation have also been described in other anatomic sites, including paranasal sinuses, extrahepatic biliary tree, uterine and cervix, ovary. The morphologic spectrum and immunohistochemical profiles of PEAC overlap with those of colonic adenocarcinomas, the diagnosis of PEAC remains challenging. Currently, colonoscopy has to be performed to confirm the diagnosis, resulting in low compliance due to its invasiveness. Due to the rareness of PEAC, its molecular signature has not been comprehensively examined.

METHODS

In this study, we investigated the molecular signatures associated with PEAC and its histological counterparts, CRC and MCC using capture-based targeted sequencing.

RESULTS

We revealed that 12/13 (92.31%) PEAC patients harbored mutations in well-established driver genes for non-small cell lung cancer and none of them had mutations unique to CRC. Furthermore, 13/15 (86.7%) of MCC harbored mutations that are frequently seen in CRC.

CONCLUSION

Collectively, our study showed that PEAC, exhibiting a similar mutational profile with NSCLC, showed a distinctive signature from CRC and MCC. Furthermore, we derived a classification model, intergrading both IHC markers and genetic signature, to accurately diagnose PEAC.

Distinctive features of immunostaining and mutational load in primary pulmonary enteric adenocarcinoma: implications for differential diagnosis and immunotherapy

Background

Primary pulmonary enteric adenocarcinoma (PEAC) is an extremely rare variant of invasive lung cancer. It is highly heterogeneous while shares some common morphologic and immunohistochemical features with usual pulmonary adenocarcinoma (PAC) and colorectal adenocarcinoma (CRAC), making the differential diagnosis difficult. At present there are only limited studies about distinctive features of primary PEAC and the results are often inconsistent.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed total 129 primary PEACs and 50 CRACs that were published since 1991 or diagnosed in our centre. Among them eight typical samples of primary PEACs and usual PACs were detected by targeted exome sequencing.

Results

The combination of CK7⁺/CDX2⁺ acquires high sensitivity (71.3%) and specificity (82%) in differential diagnosis of PEACs from CRAC. The primary PEACs harbor a high incidence of KRAS mutation but almost absent of EGFR mutation. Moreover, compared with usual PACs, the primary PEACs have higher nonsynonymous tumor mutation burden and more frequent MMR mutation.

Conclusions

The combination of CK7⁺/CDX2⁺ immunostaining and the distinctive genetic signatures, including low incidence of sensitivity genes mutations and high tumor mutation burden, is an important supplementary to the clinical differential diagnosis of primary PEACs. Our findings thus have significant implications for development of individualized treatment strategy in these patients.

MicroRNA-150 promotes cell proliferation, migration, and invasion of cervical cancer through targeting PDCD4

Recent studies have showed that microRNA-150 (miR-150) is up-regulated in various cancers including cervical cancer. However, the specific mechanism of miR-150 in the regulation of cell proliferation, migration and invasion is still unclear. In this study, a total of 150 cervical cancer samples, including 50 cervical cancer tissues, 50 corresponding adjacent non-neoplastic tissues, and 50 serum samples were collected from cervical cancer patients. 50 matched normal tissues and 50 serum samples were collected from the control group. MiR-150 was evaluated by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR). Programmed cell death protein 4 (PDCD4) was evaluated by qRT-PCR and western blot. Cell migration and invasion were assessed by transwell assays. Proliferative abilities were determined by MTT assays. Luciferase reporter assay was employed to validate the direct target of PDCD4 by miR-150. We found that miR-150 was increased in cervical cancer specimens. In contrast, PDCD4 was decreased in cervical cancer tissues. MiR-150 promoted cell migration, invasion and proliferation through targeting PDCD4. These results collectively indicated that miR-150 might be used as a potential therapeutic biomarker in cervical cancer.

Clinicopathological, radiographic, and oncogenic features of primary pulmonary enteric adenocarcinoma in comparison with invasive adenocarcinoma in resection specimens

Primary pulmonary enteric adenocarcinoma (PEAC) is a rare subtype of primary lung adenocarcinoma. However, it is not known whether there are any distinctive clinical or molecular features.PEACs were retrospectively identified in 28 patients from July 2014 to June 2016. We compared the clinicopathological, radiographic, and oncogenic characteristics of PEAC and primary pulmonary invasive adenocarcinoma (IAC).A total of 28 PEAC patients and 92 IAC patients were compared. PEAC occurred more frequently in males (P = .008), in older patients (P = .041), in those with larger lesions (P = .001), and in those in a more advanced stage (P = .011). Radiologically, PEAC patients had larger lesions (P = .025) and more solid (P = .006); however, there were no statistically significant differences in lobulation, spiculation, pleural indentation, pleural effusion, and lymphadenopathy between PEAC and IAC. PEAC had higher values of carcinoembryonic antigen (P = .008) and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (P < .001) than IAC. PEAC had a higher incidence (40% vs 63%, P < .001) of Kristen rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS) mutations and a lower incidence (10.71% vs 3.3%, P < .001) of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations. Villin may be a useful marker in the differential diagnosis of PEAC. KRAS mutations occurred more frequently in PEACs, which are cytokeratin 7-negative (P = .032). EGFR mutation rates were higher in PEACs, which are cytokeratin 20- and caudal type homeobox transcription factor 2-negative (P = .041).PEAC is a rare and heterogeneous nonsmall-cell lung cancer subgroup with distinctive clinicopathological, radiographic, and molecular features. These results need to be further confirmed in future studies.

Lung Cancer: Understanding Its Molecular Pathology and the 2015 WHO Classification

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide due to late diagnoses and limited treatment interventions. Recently, comprehensive molecular profiles of lung cancer have been identified. These novel characteristics have enhanced the understanding of the molecular pathology of lung cancer. The identification of driver genetic alterations and potential molecular targets has resulted in molecular-targeted therapies for an increasing number of lung cancer patients. Thus, the histopathological classification of lung cancer was modified in accordance with the increased understanding of molecular profiles. This review focuses on recent developments in the molecular profiling of lung cancer and provides perspectives on updated diagnostic concepts in the new 2015 WHO classification. The WHO classification will require additional revisions to allow for reliable, clinically meaningful tumor diagnoses as we gain a better understanding of the molecular characteristics of lung cancer.

Diagnostic and Therapeutic Potential of MicroRNAs in Lung Cancer

Lung cancer is the leading cause of deaths resulting from cancer owing to late diagnosis and limited treatment intervention. MicroRNAs are short, non-coding RNA molecules that regulate gene expression post-transcriptionally by translational repression or target messenger RNA degradation. Accumulating evidence suggests various roles for microRNAs, including development and progression of lung cancers. Because microRNAs are degraded to a much lesser extent in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded specimens and are present not only in tumor tissues but also in body fluids, there is an increased potential in microRNA analyses for cancer research. In this review, recent studies of microRNA are introduced and briefly summarized, with a focus on the association of microRNAs with histological subtypes, genetic driver alterations, therapeutically-targeted molecules, and carcinogens. The reported circulating microRNA signature for the early detection of lung cancer and the implications of microRNAs as the modulators of tumor immune response are also introduced.

Pulmonary adenocarcinoma with mucin production modulates phenotype according to common genetic traits: a reappraisal of mucinous adenocarcinoma and colloid adenocarcinoma

Whether invasive mucinous adenocarcinoma (IMA) and colloid adenocarcinoma (ICA) of the lung represent separate tumour entities, or simply lie within a spectrum of phenotypic variability, is worth investigating. Fifteen ICA, 12 IMA, 9 ALK‐rearranged adenocarcinomas (ALKA), 8 non‐mucinous KRAS‐mutated adenocarcinomas (KRASA) and 9 mucinous breast adenocarcinomas (MBA) were assessed by immunohistochemistry for alveolar (TTF1, cytoplasmic MUC1), intestinal (CDX‐2, MUC2), gastric (membrane MUC1, MUC6), bronchial (MUC5AC), mesenchymal (vimentin), neuroendocrine (chromogranin A, synaptophysin), sex steroid hormone‐related (oestrogen and progesterone receptors), pan‐mucinous (HNF4A) and pan‐epithelial (keratin 7) lineage biomarkers and by targeted next generation sequencing (TNGS) for 50 recurrently altered cancer genes. Unsupervised clustering analysis using molecular features identified cluster 1 (IMA and ICA), cluster 2 (ALKA and KRASA) and cluster 3 (MBA) (p < 0.0001). Cluster 1 showed four histology‐independent sub‐clusters (S1 to S4) pooled by HFN4A and MUC5AC but diversely reacting for TTF1, MUC1, MUC2, MUC6 and CDX2. Sub‐cluster S1 predominantly featured intestinal‐alveolar, S2 gastrointestinal, S3 gastric and S4 alveolar differentiation. In turn, KRASA and ALKA shared alveolar lineage alongside residual MUC5AC expression, with additional focal CDX2 and diffuse vimentin, respectively. A proximal‐to‐distal scheme extending from terminal (TB) and respiratory (RB) bronchioles to alveolar cells was devised, where S3 originated from distal TB (cellular mucinous adenocarcinoma), S2 from proximal RB (secreting mucinous adenocarcinoma), S1 from intermediate RB (mucin lake‐forming colloid adenocarcinoma), S4 from distal RB (colloid alveolar adenocarcinoma), KRASA from juxta‐alveolar RB (KRAS‐mutated non‐mucinous adenocarcinoma) and ALKA from juxta‐bronchial alveolar cells (ALK‐translocated adenocarcinoma). TNGS analysis showed KRAS, LKB1, TP53, APC and CDKN2A mutation predominance. In conclusion, IMA and ICA are basket categories, which likely originate from distinct domains of stem/progenitor cells spatially distributed along bronchioles upon common molecular features and genetic alterations.

Pulmonary adenocarcinoma with enteric differentiation: Dissecting oncogenic genes alterations with DNA sequencing and FISH analysis

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary Adenocarcinoma with Enteric Differentiation (PAED) is a rare subtype of adenocarcinoma of emerging interest, recently introduced in the 2015 WHO classification. However, little is known about major molecular signatures of this class of adenocarcinomas and information about new biomarkers totally lack.

METHODS

We examined the NRAS, PIK3CA, EGFR, KRAS and BRAF status through mass spectrometry sequencing and ALK rearrangement by FISH in a series of 8 PAEDs.

RESULTS

1/8 (12.5%) case had a simultaneous PIK3CA mutation (E545K) and an EML4-ALK translocation. KRAS gene showed a mutation in the codon 12 in 4/8 of PAED (50%), NRAS, BRAF and EGFR genes were wild type in all tumor samples.

CONCLUSIONS

We concluded that PIK3CA mutations and ALK rearrangement occur also in PAEDs, while NRAS mutations might be a very rare event similarly to pulmonary adenocarcinomas of conventional type. KRAS is the prevailing gene mutated in this class of adenocarcinoma.