A semiquantitative color Doppler ultrasound scoring system for evaluation of synovitis in joints of patients with blood-induced arthropathy

Global trends in hemophilic arthropathy research: a bibliometric and visualization analysis

Background

Hemophilic arthropathy (HA), a common complication of hemophilia caused by recurrent hemarthrosis, significantly impacts patients' quality of life. Despite ongoing research, a comprehensive overview of research trends for HA is lacking. Therefore, this study utilizes bibliometrics and knowledge mapping techniques to visually analyze the current status and developmental trends of HA-related research, and analyzed and predicted future research hotspots.

Methods

A bibliometric analysis was conducted using the Web of Science Core Collection database. Data on publications, author names, countries, research institutions, journals, and keywords were extracted and visualized using Bibliometrix, VOSviewer, and CiteSpaces.

Results

The number of HA-related publications has increased steadily over time. United States was found to be the leading country in terms of publications and international collaborations. HEMOPHILIA was found to be the most influential journal and Hospital Universitario La Paz to be the leading institution conducting HA-related research. Rodriguez-Merchan EC was identified as the most prominent researcher in the field. Keyword analysis identified five main research clusters, namely, quality of life and management, pathogenesis, classification and functional assessment, replacement surgery, and ankle arthritis treatment.

Conclusion

This bibliometric analysis provides a comprehensive overview of the research trends for HA. Future studies must focus on elucidating the underlying mechanisms of HA, developing early diagnostic biomarkers, and exploring personalized treatment strategies to improve patient outcomes. Our study offers valuable insights to researchers to facilitate the identification of emerging trends and prioritization of future research directions.

Optimizing long-term joint health in the treatment of hemophilia

INTRODUCTION

The improved quality of care and increased drug availability have shifted the goal of treating people with hemophilia from life-threatening bleeding prevention to joint health preservation and quality of life amelioration. Many tools are now available to the clinician in order to optimize the management of hemophilic arthropathy.

AREAS COVERED

This paper reviews the pivotal role of ultrasound evaluation in early detection of joint bleeding and differential diagnosis of joint pain, with a focus on the feasibility of a long-term monitoring of joint health through the use of artificial intelligence and telemedicine. The literature search methodology included using keywords to search in PubMed and Google Scholar, and articles used were screened by the coauthors of this review.

EXPERT OPINION

Joint ultrasound is a practical point-of-care tool with many advantages, including immediate correlation between imaging and clinical presentation, and dynamic evaluation of multiple joints. The potential of telemedicine care, coupled with a point-of-care detection device assisted by artificial intelligence, holds promises for even earlier diagnosis and treatment of joint bleeding. A multidisciplinary approach including early intervention by physical medicine and rehabilitation (PMR) physicians and physiotherapists is crucial to ensure the best possible quality of life for the patient.

A long term outcomes analysis of severe haemophilia A boys receiving 4 years prophylaxis on the Chinese Haemophilia Individualized escalating low dose Prophylaxis (CHIPS)

BACKGROUND

The Chinese Haemophilia Individualized Prophylaxis Study (CHIPS), which was launched in 2016, reported a significant reduction in haemarthrosis over a one-year study. However, its long-term efficacy requires verification. This paper summarizes the clinical outcomes of 18 severe haemophilia A (SHA) patients who completed one year on the CHIPS and 3 more years of follow-up.

METHODS

Clinical follow-up was based on the CHIPS protocol (from July 2018 to July 2021). Escalation was based on index joint bleeding, and serial ultrasound (greyscale and colour Doppler) examinations of the index joints (both sides of the ankles, knees and elbows) were conducted every 6 months via a scoring system.

RESULTS

A total of 18 SHA patients completed the 3-year study. Fifteen patients dropped out due to the financial crisis during the COVID-19 pandemic in China. The median age was 5.4 (range 4.3-6.9) years. A significant reduction in haemarthrosis was achieved, with mean annual bleeding rates reduced from 18.9 ± 2.8 to 1.7 ± 0.4 (p < 0.001), annual joint bleeding rates from 3.1 ± 0.7 to1.2 ± 0.3 (p < 0.028). 5 out of 8 target joint resolved. Sixteen doses were escalated. At study exit, the heterogeneous treatment outcomes of the SHA boys were 5 at step 4 (20-25 lU/kg, every other day), 10 at step 3 (15-20 IU/kg, 3×/week), 2 at step 2 (10-15 lU/kg, 3×/week) and 1 at step 1 (10-15 lU/kg, 2×/week). The mean FVIII consumption was 2964 IU/kg/year, with savings. The quality of life improved, with Canadian Haemophilia Outcomes-Kids Life Assessment Tool (CHO-KLAT, Chinese Version 2.0) scores ranging from 68.8 to 78.8. There was no change in the ultrasound score.

CONCLUSION

Our follow-up data on the 18 SHA boys after completing one year on the CHIPS verify the long-term efficacy of the CHIPS for haemarthrosis reduction, joint health preservation, improvement in the quality of life of the boys and cost savings.

Individualised prophylaxis based on personalised target trough FVIII level optimised clinical outcomes in paediatric patients with severe haemophilia A

INTRODUCTION

As standard care of severe haemophilia A (SHA), prophylaxis should be individualised.

AIM

This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of this new-proposed individualised prophylaxis protocol.

METHODS

Boys with SHA were enrolled and followed a PK-guided, trough-level escalating protocol of prophylaxis after a six-month observational period. In the next 2 years, clinical assessments including joint bleeds, ultrasound (US) scores and Haemophilia Joint Health Score (HJHS) in both sides of ankles, knees and elbows were conducted every 6 months as a scoring system, which determined whether the trough level's escalation. Adjustment of dosing regimen was based on WAPPS-Hemo.

RESULTS

Fifty-eight SHA boys were finally analysed. Their age and bodyweight were 5.3(2.8,6.9) years and 21.5(16,25) kg. During the study, 47 escalations were conducted. At study exit, the patient number and proportion of different trough level groups were: < 1 IU/dl, 17.2% (10/58); 1-3 IU/dl, 53.5% (31/58); 3-5 IU/dl, 15.5% (9/58); > 5 IU/dl, 13.8% (8/58). Significantly reduced annualised bleeding rate [4(0,8) to 0(0,2), p < .0001] and annualised joint bleeding rate [2(0,4) to 0(0,.25), p < .0001] was observed at study exit as well as the continuous trend of increased zero bleeding proportion (ZBP) (27.6%-69.0%) and zero joint bleeding proportion (46.5%-81.3%). Besides, 85% (6/7) of the target joints vanished. Statistical improvements of US scores (p = .04) and HJHS (p = .02) were also reported at study exit.

CONCLUSION

Our results showed the effectiveness of our protocol based on individualised target trough level and emphasise the importance of personalised prophylaxis.

Exploration of the minimum necessary FVIII level at different physical activity levels in pediatric patients with hemophilia A

BACKGROUND

Physical activity can increase joint stability and reduce the risk of injury in hemophilia patients. There is limited clinical data on target trough FVIII levels during physical activity in hemophilia A patients. Hence, this study aimed to explore the target trough FVIII level required to avoid bleeding during different physical activities in hemophilia A patients.

METHODS

Patients with severe or moderate hemophilia A, who underwent pharmacokinetics (PK) tests at our center were enrolled in this study. Physical activities and clinical information such as bleeding were recorded. The FVIII level during physical activity was calculated by the WAPPS-Hemo.

RESULTS

A total of 105 patients were enrolled in this study. A total of 373 physical activities were recorded, of which 57.6% (215/373) was low-risk activities and the remaining 42.4% (158/373) was medium-risk activities. Most common physical activities were bicycling (59.0%), swimming (43.8%), running (48.6%), and jumping rope (41.0%). The FVIII trough level of low-risk physical activity was 3.8 IU/dl (AUC = 0.781, p = 0.002) and moderate-risk physical activity was 7.7 IU/dl (AUC = 0.809, p < 0.001). FVIII trough levels [low-risk activities: 6.1 (3.1, 13.2) IU/dl vs. 7.7 (2.3, 10.5) IU/dl, moderate-risk activities: 9.6 (5.8, 16.9) IU/dl vs. 10.2 (5.5, 11.0) IU/dl] were not statistically different between the mild arthropathy group and the moderate-severe arthropathy group. Multiple bleeding risk tended to increase with physical activities classified as moderate-risk (OR [95% CI]: 3.815 [1.766-8.238], p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The minimum necessary FVIII level increased with higher risk physical activity, irrespective of arthropathy.

Significant reduction in hemarthrosis in boys with severe hemophilia A: The China hemophilia individualized low-dose secondary prophylaxis study

INTRODUCTION

In countries with restricted access to clotting factor concentrates, early implementation of low-dose prophylaxis is recommended over episodic treatment.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this 1-year prospective secondary prophylaxis study was to evaluate the efficacy of a dose/frequency escalating protocol in young boys with hemophilia A in China.

METHODS

Boys were started on a low-dose protocol (minimum 10-15 IU/kg of factor VIII [FVIII] twice weekly). Escalation was based on index joint bleeding, swelling/persistent joint swelling, and serial ultrasound (gray scale and color Doppler) examinations of index joints.

RESULTS

Thirty-three boys, median age 4.8 years (interquartile range, 3.8-6.1) were enrolled in a 3-month observation period that preceded a 1-year prophylaxis phase. A significant reduction in total bleeding events (43.0%, P = .001), index joint bleeds (53.2%, P = .002), and target index joint bleeds (70.0%, P = 0.02) was observed during the prophylaxis phase. During the prophylaxis period, 40% of target joints resolved. The percentage of boys with zero index joint bleeds increased significantly (P = .004) from 51.5% during the observation phase to 81.8% in last quarter of the prophylaxis phase (months 10-12). There was no progression of arthropathy based on physical examination (Hemophilia Joint Health Score), X-ray, and ultrasound obtained at entry into the prophylaxis phase and at study exit. The median FVIII consumption over the prophylaxis phase was 1786 IU/kg/y.

CONCLUSION

A low-dose, individualized prophylaxis protocol, guided by individual bleeding profiles and serial assessment of joint status, enables escalation of treatment intensity in boys with severe hemophilia A, leading to a significant reduction in bleeding events and reduction in target joint bleeding.