Effectiveness of polymyxin B hemoperfusion for sepsis depends on the baseline SOFA score: a nationwide observational study

Current status and trends in ERCP and post-ERCP pancreatitis in Japan: a nationwide observational study

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is indispensable for the management of biliary and pancreatic diseases but carries a high risk of post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP). This study aimed to clarify the current status and temporal trends of ERCP and PEP in Japan, including preventive measures.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective, population-based cohort study using the Diagnosis Procedure Combination database from April 1, 2016, to March 31, 2023. Trend analyses were performed for ERCP, PEP, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and protease inhibitors. Additionally, factors associated with PEP and severe PEP were evaluated.

RESULTS

Among the 1,073,513 ERCP cases, PEP and severe PEP incidences were 85,212 (7.9%) and 4841 cases (0.5%), respectively. The mortality rate was 0.5% for severe PEP and 0.2% for non-severe cases. The number of ERCP procedures and the proportion of therapeutic ERCP increased over time. The incidence of PEP declined from 9.1% in the fiscal year 2016-2017 to 6.4% in the fiscal year 2022, while the incidence of severe PEP decreased from 0.5 to 0.33% over the same period. The usage rate of rectal NSAIDs increased from 16.4 to 27.6%, whereas that of protease inhibitors decreased from 70.5 to 53.5%. The administration of rectal NSAIDs at doses of 20-25 mg and 50 mg was associated with a reduced risk of severe PEP.

CONCLUSIONS

The number of ERCP procedures and the proportion of therapeutic ERCP have increased, whereas the incidences of PEP and severe PEP have decreased. Rectal NSAIDs may prevent the progression of PEP to severe disease.

Outcomes and cost-effectiveness of intermediate care units for patients discharged from the intensive care unit: a nationwide retrospective observational study

BACKGROUND

The clinical and economic impacts of intermediate care units (IMCUs) on intensive care unit (ICU)-discharged patients remain unclear due to inconsistent outcomes in previous studies. Under Japan's National Health Insurance Scheme, ICUs are categorized by staffing intensity (high or low). Using a nationwide inpatient database in Japan, we evaluated the clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness of IMCUs for ICU-discharged patients.

METHODS

This retrospective observational study used a Japanese administrative database to identify patients admitted to the high-intensity ICU in hospitals with IMCUs between April 2020 and March 2023. Patients were categorized into the IMCU (IMCU group) and general ward (non-IMCU) groups. Propensity scores were estimated using a logistic regression model incorporating 14 variables, including patient demographics, and treatments received during ICU stay. One-to-one propensity score matching balanced baseline characteristics of each group. Clinical outcomes were compared between both groups, including in-hospital mortality, ICU readmission, length of ICU stay, length of hospital stay, and total medical costs. Surgical status and surgical area (e.g., cardiovascular) were considered in subgroup analyses. Data analyses were conducted using the chi-square test for categorical variables and t-test for continuous variables.

RESULTS

Overall, 162,243 eligible patients were categorized into the IMCU (n = 21,548) and non-IMCU (n = 140,695) groups. Propensity score matching generated 18,220 pairs. The IMCU group had lower in-hospital mortality and ICU readmission rates than the non-IMCU group. However, total costs were higher in the IMCU group. Subgroup analyses revealed the IMCU group had significantly lower mortality and lower total costs than the non-IMCU group in the cardiovascular [open thoracotomy] surgery subgroup.

CONCLUSIONS

Discharge to an IMCU is associated with lower in-hospital mortality and ICU readmission rates compared to general ward discharge. High-risk subgroups, such as cardiovascular surgery patients, experienced cost-effective benefits from IMCU care. These findings highlight an association between IMCU admission and improved patient outcomes, suggesting a potential role in optimizing resource use in intensive care. Given the likelihood of selection bias in admission allocation, these findings should be interpretation with caution.

Which of Vonoprazan Alone or Intravenous Proton Pump Inhibitor Followed by Vonoprazan Is Optimal for Reducing Delayed Bleeding in Gastric Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection?

INTRODUCTION

In gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), both vonoprazan alone and intravenous proton pump inhibitor (PPI) followed by vonoprazan have lower delayed bleeding risk than PPI alone. This study aimed to clarify an optimal acid-suppressive method in gastric ESD.

METHODS

This population-based cohort study included patients who underwent gastric ESD on only vonoprazan (vonoprazan alone group) or intravenous PPI followed by vonoprazan (intravenous PPI group) using the Diagnosis Procedure Combination database in Japan between 2014 and 2021. The primary outcome was delayed bleeding. To balance the two comparison groups, propensity score matching (PSM), based on 18 variables, was performed; subsequently, to compare the bleeding outcome, logistic regression analysis was performed.

RESULTS

Of 63,952 patients, 24,710 pairs were compared following PSM. The delayed bleeding risk in the vonoprazan alone group was similar to that in the intravenous PPI group (odds ratio [OR], 1.00; 95% confidence interval, 0.93-1.08; delayed bleeding rate, 5.9% vs. 5.9%). The results were consistent in some sensitivity and subgroup analyses; however, the result was modified by the status of antithrombotic agents (p for interaction = 0.029). In additional analyses, in patients with antithrombotic agent, the vonoprazan alone group had a higher delayed bleeding risk than the intravenous PPI group (OR, 1.15).

CONCLUSION

Both vonoprazan alone and intravenous PPI followed by vonoprazan might be acceptable in gastric ESD when antithrombotic agents were not administered, whereas intravenous PPI followed by vonoprazan might be favorable in patients with antithrombotic agents.

Optimal direct oral anticoagulant for upper gastrointestinal endoscopic submucosal dissection

BACKGROUND

The patients taking direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are at high risk for developing ischemic stroke and delayed bleeding in upper gastrointestinal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). We aimed to identify the optimal DOAC based on both adverse events in upper gastrointestinal ESD.

METHODS

A retrospective population-based cohort study was conducted using the Diagnosis Procedure Combination database in Japan. We included patients on a DOAC undergoing upper gastrointestinal ESD between 2012 and 2021. The primary outcomes were ischemic stroke occurring after upper gastrointestinal ESD and delayed bleeding in gastroduodenal and esophageal ESD. Inverse probability weightings were applied to balance the four DOAC groups (dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban), and logistic regression analyses were performed to compare the outcomes.

RESULTS

We analyzed 9729 patients on a DOAC undergoing upper gastrointestinal ESD. Ischemic stroke developed after upper gastrointestinal ESD in 1.4%, 0.7%, 0.6%, and 0.8% of patients taking dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban, respectively, after weighting. Rivaroxaban and apixaban showed significantly lower risk of ischemic stroke compared with dabigatran (odds ratio, 0.15 and 0.12, respectively) in standard doses. The delayed bleeding developed after gastroduodenal ESD in 7.6%, 14.6%, 19.2%, and 17.3% of patients taking each DOAC, respectively, with the lowest risk in dabigatran, followed by rivaroxaban. A similar pattern was observed in delayed bleeding in esophageal ESD (3.2%, 5.4%, 7.5%, and 5.5% in each DOAC), but with no significant results.

CONCLUSIONS

Rivaroxaban might be an optimal DOAC for upper gastrointestinal ESD showing a lower risk for both ischemic stroke and delayed bleeding.

Beyond conventional care: The therapeutic potential of hemoperfusion in severe COVID-19

BACKGROUND

Hemoperfusion (HP) is an extracorporeal blood purification modality utilized to remove small- to medium-sized molecules, such as toxins and cytokines, that are difficult to remove by conventional hemodialysis. In clinical practice, HP has been successfully used as a salvage therapy for drug overdose and occasionally in patients with liver failure and sepsis.

AIM

To summarize the clinical outcomes of a series of patients with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) who received HP.

METHODS

Here, we summarize the clinical outcomes of a series of 18 patients with severe COVID-19 who received HP in our institution during the COVID-19 pandemic. A review of the literature was also performed.

RESULTS

HP was well-tolerated, and after an average of three sessions, respiratory and cardiovascular parameters as well as blood inflammatory markers improved in most patients. Ten patients were discharged alive. Our literature search identified a total of 20 studies (873 patients) in which HP was used for COVID-19. Nine studies reported improvements in respiratory parameters, and 13 studies (438 patients in total) reported better survival rates in patients undergoing HP.

CONCLUSION

HP was well-tolerated in patients with severe COVID-19, and most studies reported improved clinical parameters, including better survival rates, when HP was used in patients with severe COVID-19. Further research, especially prospective studies, is needed to evaluate the utility of HP as an early and supportive therapy for critically ill patients due to infectious diseases, such as those with COVID-19 or severe sepsis.

Hemoadsorption: consensus report of the 30th Acute Disease Quality Initiative workgroup

Adsorption-based extracorporeal therapies have been subject to technical developments and clinical application for close to five decades. More recently, new technological developments in membrane and sorbent manipulation have made it possible to deliver more biocompatible extracorporeal adsorption therapies to patients with a variety of conditions. There are several key rationales based on physicochemical principles and clinical considerations that justify the application and investigation of such therapies as evidenced by multiple ex vivo, experimental and clinical observations. Accordingly, unspecific adsorptive extracorporeal therapies have now been applied to the treatment of a wide array of conditions from poisoning to drug overdoses, to inflammatory states and sepsis, and acute or chronic liver and kidney failure. In response to the rapidly expanding knowledge base and increased clinical evidence, we convened an Acute Disease Quality Initiative consensus conference dedicated to such treatment. The data show that hemoadsorption has clinically acceptable short-term biocompatibility and safety, technical feasibility and experimental demonstration of specified target molecule removal. Pilot studies demonstrate potentially beneficial effects on physiology and larger studies of endotoxin-based hemoadsorption have identified possible target phenotypes for larger randomized controlled trials. Moreover, in a variety of endogenous and exogenous intoxications, removal of target molecules has been confirmed in vivo. However, some studies have raised concerns about harm, or failed to deliver benefits. Thus, despite many achievements, modern hemoadsorption remains a novel and experimental intervention with limited data, and a large research agenda.

[Extracorporeal procedures in sepsis]

Sepsis and septic shock are frequent and severe clinical pictures in intensive care medicine that result from a dysregulated immune response to an infection and cause a high mortality rate. This article provides an overview of the various extracorporeal procedures used to treat sepsis. Various procedures are used to treat sepsis and septic shock. These include high-volume hemofiltration (HVHF), very high-volume hemofiltration (VHVHF), high cut-off filter (HCO), polymyxin B hemoperfusion and cytokine adsorption filters. The HVHF and VHVHF remove inflammatory mediators but show no significant benefit in terms of stabilization and survival in sepsis patients. The HCO filters effectively eliminate cytokines but so far there is no evidence of a survival benefit. Polymyxin B hemoperfusion shows promising results in initial studies in certain patient groups, while evidence for cytokine adsorption filters is limited. Combined plasma filtration and adsorption (CPFA) and therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) have so far shown promising results in small studies. Although CPFA shows no survival benefit, TPE may have protective effects on the vascular glycocalyx. Extracorporeal procedures carry risks such as thrombosis and loss of proteins and clotting factors. The therapeutic benefit of these procedures in the treatment of sepsis remains unclear and further prospective randomized multicenter studies are needed to evaluate their efficacy and safety. There are currently no guideline recommendations for the routine use of these procedures in sepsis.

Outcomes of extracorporeal blood purification with oXiris® membrane in critically ill patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy of the novel oXiris® membrane in critically ill adult patients.

METHODS

We systematically searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL from inception to 01/06/2023 for relevant randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomised studies of intervention (NRSI). The primary outcome was overall mortality. Random effect meta-analyses were conducted in RevMan 5.4.1. Study quality was evaluated using Cochrane's risk of bias tool. (PROSPERO: CRD42023389198).

RESULTS

Ten studies (2 RCTs and 8 NRSIs) with 481 patients were included. None had low risk of bias. Treatment using oXiris® was associated with reduced overall mortality (RR 0.78, 95%CI 0.62-0.98; p = 0.03; 6 NRSI). One RCT reported 28-day mortality, finding no significant difference between groups. Besides, pooled NRSIs results showed significant reductions in SOFA scores, norepinephrine dosage, and several inflammatory biomarkers (C-reactive protein [CRP], lactate, and interleukin-6 [IL-6]) post oXiris® treatment. However, other clinical outcomes (ICU and hospital length of stay, mechanical ventilation duration) were similar between groups.

CONCLUSION

In critically ill patients, the use of oXiris® membrane was associated with reduced overall mortality, norepinephrine dosage, CRP, IL-6, lactate levels, along with improved organ function. However, the certainty of evidence was very low, necessitating high-quality RCTs to further evaluate its efficacy in this population.

Current perspectives in the management of sepsis and septic shock

Within patients with sepsis, there exists significant heterogeneity, and while all patients should receive conventional therapy, there are subgroups of patients who may benefit from specific therapies, often referred to as rescue therapies. Therefore, the identification of these specific patient subgroups is crucial and lays the groundwork for the application of precision medicine based on the development of targeted interventions. Over the years, efforts have been made to categorize sepsis into different subtypes based on clinical characteristics, biomarkers, or underlying mechanisms. For example, sepsis can be stratified into different phenotypes based on the predominant dysregulated host response. These phenotypes can range from hyperinflammatory states to immunosuppressive states and even mixed phenotypes. Each phenotype may require different therapeutic approaches to improve patient outcomes. Rescue strategies for septic shock may encompass various interventions, such as immunomodulatory therapies, extracorporeal support (e.g., ECMO), or therapies targeted at specific molecular or cellular pathways involved in the pathophysiology of sepsis. In recent years, there has been growing interest in precision medicine approaches to sepsis and phenotype identification. Precision medicine aims to tailor treatments to each individual patient based on their unique characteristics and disease mechanisms.

The role of polymyxin B-immobilized hemoperfusion in reducing mortality and enhancing hemodynamics in patients with sepsis and septic shock: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Purpose

Polymyxin B-immobilized hemoperfusion (PMX-HP) is a therapeutic strategy for removing circulating endotoxins from patients with sepsis or septic shock. However, the survival advantage of PMX-HP treatment remains controversial for patients with sepsis/septic shock. Therefore, this study collected all the clinical trials to assess the effect and the safety of PMX-HP treatment.

Methods

PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched for eligible trials fromtheir inception through June 30, 2023. All clinical trials that investigated the effect of polymyxin B hemoperfusion in patients who died with sepsis or septic shock within 28-day mortality were eligible. The Cochrane Risk of Bias Assessment instrument and the ROBINS-I tool were used to assess the risk of bias.

Results

A total of 30 trials, including 25680 adult patients, were included. PMX-HP decreased 28-day mortality (OR 0.75, 95 % CI 0.65-0.88; p＜0.00001). Subgroup analysis revealed that 28-day mortality was significantly reduced after PMX-HP treatment in the mixed infection site group and in the age under 70 years old group. PMX-HP might also lower endotoxin levels (MD -1.22, 95 % CI -1.62 - 0.81, p < 0.00001) and improve SOFA scores (MD -2.11, 95 % CI -3.80- 0.43, p = 0.01). PMX-HP was not linked to the development of significant adverse events (p = 0. 05).

Conclusion

Our findings suggest that PMX-HP therapy can reduce 28-day mortality in individuals with sepsis or septic shock. The therapeutic effect may be due to the ability of PMX-HP to lower endotoxin levels and enhance hemodynamics. However, further assessment of the clinical effects of PMX-HP on sepsis or septic shock is required.

VASOPRESSOR REDUCTION EFFECT OF POLYMYXIN B HEMOPERFUSION IN PATIENTS WITH PERITONITIS-INDUCED SEPTIC SHOCK: A PROPENSITY SCORE-MATCHED ANALYSIS

ABSTRACT

Background : This study aimed to evaluate the effect of polymyxin B hemoperfusion (PMX-HP) in patients with peritonitis-induced septic shock who still required high-dose vasopressors after surgical source control. Methods : This retrospective study included adult patients admitted to the surgical intensive care unit (ICU) at Seoul National University Hospital between July 2014 and February 2021 who underwent major abdominal surgery to control the source of sepsis. Patients were divided into two groups based on whether PMX-HP was applied after surgery or not. The primary and secondary endpoints were the vasopressor reduction effect, and in-ICU mortality, respectively. Propensity score matching was performed to compare the vasopressor reduction effect. Results : A total of 338 patients met the inclusion criteria, of which 23 patients underwent PMX-HP postoperatively, whereas 315 patients did not during the study period. Serum norepinephrine concentration decreased over time regardless of whether PMX-HP was applied. However, it decreased more rapidly in the PMX-HP(+) group than in the PMX-HP(-) group. There were no significant differences in demographics including age, sex, body mass index, and most underlying comorbidities between the two groups. Risk factors for in-ICU mortality were identified by comparing patient characteristics and perioperative factors between the two groups using multivariate analysis. Conclusion : For patients with peritonitis-induced septic shock, PMX-HP rapidly reduces the requirement of vasopressors immediately after surgery but does not reduce in-ICU mortality. This effect could potentially accelerate recovery from shock, reduce sequelae from vasopressors, and ultimately improve quality of life after discharge.

Intensive care unit mortality and cost-effectiveness associated with intensivist staffing: a Japanese nationwide observational study

BACKGROUND

Japan has four types of intensive care units (ICUs) that are divided into two categories according to the management fee charged per day: ICU management fees 1 and 2 (ICU1/2) (equivalent to high-intensity staffing) and 3 and 4 (ICU3/4) (equivalent to low-intensity staffing). Although ICU1/2 charges a higher rate than ICU3/4, no cost-effectiveness analysis has been performed for ICU1/2. This study evaluated the clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness of ICU1/2 compared with those of ICU3/4.

METHODS

This retrospective observational study used a nationwide Japanese administrative database to identify patients admitted to ICUs between April 2020 and March 2021 and divided them into the ICU1/2 and ICU3/4 groups. The ICU mortality rates and in-hospital mortality rates were determined, and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) (Japanese Yen (JPY)/QALY), defined as the difference between quality-adjusted life year (QALY) and medical costs, was compared between ICU1/2 and ICU3/4. Data analysis was performed using the Chi-squared test; an ICER of < 5 million JPY/QALY was considered cost-effective.

RESULTS

The ICU1/2 group (n = 71,412; 60.7%) had lower ICU mortality rates (ICU 1/2: 2.6% vs. ICU 3/4: 4.3%, p < 0.001) and lower in-hospital mortality rates (ICU 1/2: 6.1% vs. ICU 3/4: 8.9%, p < 0.001) than the ICU3/4 group (n = 46,330; 39.3%). The average cost per patient of ICU1/2 and ICU3/4 was 2,249,270 ± 1,955,953 JPY and 1,682,546 ± 1,588,928 JPY, respectively, with a difference of 566,724. The ICER was 718,659 JPY/QALY, which was below the cost-effectiveness threshold.

CONCLUSIONS

ICU1/2 is associated with lower ICU patient mortality than ICU3/4. Treatments under ICU1/2 are more cost-effective than those under ICU3/4, with an ICER of < 5 million JPY/QALY.

Endotoxic Septic Shock: Diagnosis and Treatment

Endotoxin, also referred to as lipopolysaccharide (LPS), is a potent stimulator of the inflammatory cascade which may progress to sepsis and septic shock. The term endotoxic septic shock has been used for patients who have a clinical phenotype that is characterized by high endotoxin activity in addition to a high burden of organ failure; especially a pattern of organ failure including hepatic dysfunction, acute kidney injury, and various forms of endothelial dysfunction. Endotoxic septic shock has been a target for drug therapy for decades with no success. A likely barrier to their success was the inability to quantify endotoxin in the bloodstream. The Endotoxin Activity Assay (EAA) is positioned to change this landscape. In addition, medical devices using adsorptive technology in an extra-corporeal circulation has been shown to remove large quantities of endotoxin from the bloodstream. Focusing on the use of EAA to determine high concentrations of endotoxin will allow patients with endotoxic septic shock to be identified quickly and these patients may benefit most from removal of endotoxin using extracorporeal methods.

Bayesian methods: a potential path forward for sepsis trials

BACKGROUND

Given the success of recent platform trials for COVID-19, Bayesian statistical methods have become an option for complex, heterogenous syndromes like sepsis. However, study design will require careful consideration of how statistical power varies using Bayesian methods across different choices for how historical data are incorporated through a prior distribution and how the analysis is ultimately conducted. Our objective with the current analysis is to assess how different uses of historical data through a prior distribution, and type of analysis influence results of a proposed trial that will be analyzed using Bayesian statistical methods.

METHODS

We conducted a simulation study incorporating historical data from a published multicenter, randomized clinical trial in the US and Canada of polymyxin B hemadsorption for treatment of endotoxemic septic shock. Historical data come from a 179-patient subgroup of the previous trial of adult critically ill patients with septic shock, multiple organ failure and an endotoxin activity of 0.60-0.89. The trial intervention consisted of two polymyxin B hemoadsorption treatments (2 h each) completed within 24 h of enrollment.

RESULTS

In our simulations for a new trial of 150 patients, a range of hypothetical results were observed. Across a range of baseline risks and treatment effects and four ways of including historical data, we demonstrate an increase in power with the use of clinically defensible incorporation of historical data. In one possible trial result, for example, with an observed reduction in risk of mortality from 44 to 37%, the probability of benefit is 96% with a fixed weight of 75% on prior data and 90% with a commensurate (adaptive-weighting) prior; the same data give an 80% probability of benefit if historical data are ignored.

CONCLUSIONS

Using Bayesian methods and a biologically justifiable use of historical data in a prior distribution yields a study design with higher power than a conventional design that ignores relevant historical data. Bayesian methods may be a viable option for trials in critical care medicine where beneficial treatments have been elusive.

Trends and clinical characteristics of pediatric acute pancreatitis patients in Japan: A comparison with adult cases based on a national administrative inpatient database

BACKGROUND

/Objectives: Pediatric acute pancreatitis (AP) is not as rare as previously thought, and an increased incidence thereof has been reported. We aimed to clarify the trends and clinical characteristics of pediatric AP in Japan.

METHODS

We utilized the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination inpatient database for patients admitted between April 2012 and March 2021, and extracted the data of patients whose principal diagnosis was AP (ICD-10 code K85) or in whom AP accounted for most of the medical expenses. Patients were classified into pediatric (≤18 years) and adult (age >18 years) groups.

RESULTS

We included 3941 AP cases in pediatrics and 212,776 in adults. AP cases accounted for 0.08 % of all admissions in pediatrics and 0.33 % in adults, with upward trends during the study period. The proportion of AP patients among all admissions was increased with advancing age in pediatrics. Compared to adults, pediatric AP patients had a smaller proportion of severe cases (22.9 % vs. 28.7 %; P < 0.001), fewer interventions for late complications (0.2 % vs. 1.3 %; P < 0.001), shorter hospital stays (mean 16.6 days vs. 18.0 days; P = 0.001), lower overall mortality (0.7 % vs. 2.9 %; P < 0.001), and lower mortality in severe cases (1.3 % vs. 5.6 %; P < 0.001). Pediatric cases were more frequently transferred from other institutions and treated at academic hospitals than adults (both P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

There was an upward trend in the proportion of AP among all admissions in pediatrics, with a lower risk of complications and mortality than adult cases.

Effectiveness of Antibiotics for Uncomplicated Diverticulitis: A Retrospective Investigation Using a Nationwide Database in Japan

INTRODUCTION

The efficacy of antibiotics for diverticulitis without abscess or peritonitis (uncomplicated diverticulitis) is controversial. We aimed to investigate the effectiveness of antibiotics for uncomplicated diverticulitis.

METHODS

We collected admission data for patients with acute uncomplicated diverticulitis using a nationwide database. We divided eligible admissions into two groups according to antibiotic initiation within 2 days after admission (antibiotic group vs. nonantibiotic group). We conducted propensity score matching and compared the rates of surgery (intestinal resection and stoma creation), in-hospital death, and medical costs between the groups. We also performed multivariate analysis to identify the clinical factors that affect surgery.

RESULTS

We enrolled 131,936 admissions; among these, we obtained 6,061 pairs after propensity score matching. Rates of both intestinal resection and stoma creation in the antibiotic group were lower than those in the nonantibiotic group (0.61 vs. 3.09%, p < 0.0001, and 0.08 vs. 0.26%, p = 0.027, respectively). Median costs in the antibiotic group were higher than those in the nonantibiotic group (315,820 JPY vs. 300,175 JPY, p < 0.0001, respectively). Multivariate analysis showed that non-initiation of antibiotics within 2 days after admission was a clinical factor that increased the risk of intestinal resection (odds ratio [OR] = 5.19, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 4.38-6.16, p < 0.0001) and stoma creation (OR = 2.68, 95% CI: 1.53-4.70, p = 0.0006).

CONCLUSION

Our results indicated that antibiotics for uncomplicated diverticulitis expected to have moderate to severe disease activity may reduce the risk of intestinal resection and stoma creation. Further investigations are warranted.

The role of endotoxin in septic shock

Septic shock can be caused by a variety of mechanisms including direct effects of bacterial toxins such as endotoxin. Annually, approximately 5-7 million patients worldwide develop sepsis with very high endotoxin activity in the blood and more than half die. The term endotoxic septic shock has been used for these patients but it is important to emphasize that endotoxin may be a factor in all forms of septic shock including non-bacterial etiologies like COVID-19 since translocation of bacterial products is a common feature of septic shock. A pattern of organ failure including hepatic dysfunction, acute kidney injury and various forms of endothelial dysfunction ranging from disseminated intravascular coagulation to thrombotic microangiopathy characterize endotoxic septic shock. However, while characteristic, the clinical phenotype is not unique to patients with high endotoxin, and the diagnosis relies on the measurement of endotoxin activity in addition to clinical assessment. Therapies for endotoxic septic shock are limited with immune modulating therapies under investigation and extracorporeal blood purification still controversial in many parts of the world.

Endotoxin removal therapy with Polymyxin B immobilized fiber column: a single center experience from EUPHAS2 registry

Although the precise clinical indication for initiation of PMX-HA is widely debated in the literature, a proper patient selection and timing of treatment delivery might play a critical role in the clinical course of a specific subphenotype of septic shock (endotoxic shock). In light of this view, since 2019, we have introduced in our clinical practice a diagnostic-therapeutic flowchart to select patients that can benefit the most from the treatment proposed. In addition, we reported in this study our experience of PMX-HA in a cohort of critically ill patients admitted to our intensive care unit (ICU). We analyzed a single centre, retrospective, observational web-based database (extracted from the EUPHAS2 registry) of critically ill patients admitted to the ICU between January 2016 and May 2021 who were affected by endotoxic shock. Patients were divided according to the diagnostic-therapeutic flowchart in two groups: Pre-Flowchart (Pre-F) and Post-Flowchart (Post-F). From January 2016 to May 2021, 61 patients were treated with PMX-HA out of 531 patients diagnosed with septic shock and of these, fifty patients (82%) developed AKI during their ICU stay. The most common source of infection was secondary peritonitis (36%), followed by community-acquired pneumonia (29%). Fifty-five (90%) out of 61 patients received a second PMX-HA treatment, with a statistically significant difference between the two groups (78% of the Pre-F vs. 100% of the Post-F group, p = 0.005). In both groups, between T0 and T120, the Endotoxin Activity Assay (EAA) decreased, while the SOFA score, mean arterial pressure (MAP), and Vasoactive Inotropic Score (VIS) improved with no statistically significant difference. Furthermore, when performing a propensity score matching analysis to compare mortality between the two groups, statistically significant lower ICU and 90-day mortalities were observed in the Post-F group [p = 0.016]. Although in this experienced centre data registry, PMX-HA was associated with organ function recovery, hemodynamic improvement, and current EAA level reduction in critically ill patients with endotoxic shock. Following propensity score-matched analysis, ICU mortality and 90-day mortalities were lower in the diagnostic-therapeutic flowchart group when considering two temporal groups based on strict patient selection criteria and timing to achieve PMX. Further Randomised Control Trials focused on centre selection, adequate training and a flowchart of action when assessing extracorporeal blood purification use should be performed.

Validity of the total SOFA score in patients ≥ 80 years old acutely admitted to intensive care units: a post-hoc analysis of the VIP2 prospective, international cohort study

BACKGROUND

Little is known about the performance of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score in older critically ill adults. We aimed to evaluate the prognostic impact of physiological disturbances in the six organ systems included in the SOFA score.

METHODS

We analysed previously collected data from a prospective cohort study conducted between 2018 and 2019 in 22 countries. Consecutive patients ≥ 80 years old acutely admitted to intensive care units (ICUs) were eligible for inclusion. Patients were followed up for 30 days after admission to the ICU. We used logistic regression to study the association between increasing severity of organ dysfunction and mortality.

RESULTS

The median SOFA score among 3882 analysed patients was equal to 6 (IQR: 4-9). Mortality was equal to 26.1% (95% CI 24.7-27.5%) in the ICU and 38.7% (95% CI 37.1-40.2%) at day 30. Organ failure defined as a SOFA score ≥ 3 was associated with variable adjusted odds ratios (aORs) for ICU mortality dependant on the organ system affected: respiratory, 1.53 (95% CI 1.29-1.81); cardiovascular 1.69 (95% CI 1.43-2.01); hepatic, 1.74 (95% CI 0.97-3.15); renal, 1.87 (95% CI 1.48-2.35); central nervous system, 2.79 (95% CI 2.34-3.33); coagulation, 2.72 (95% CI 1.66-4.48). Modelling consecutive levels of organ dysfunction resulted in aORs equal to 0.57 (95% CI 0.33-1.00) when patients scored 2 points in the cardiovascular system and 1.01 (0.79-1.30) when the cardiovascular SOFA equalled 3.

CONCLUSIONS

Different components of the SOFA score have different prognostic implications for older critically ill adults. The cardiovascular component of the SOFA score requires revision.

Endotoxin activity trend and multi-organ dysfunction in critically ill patients with septic shock, who received Polymyxin-B hemadsorption: A multicenter, prospective, observational study

BACKGROUND

The baseline endotoxin activity (EAT0) may predict the outcome of critically ill septic patients who receive Polymyxin-B hemadsorption (PMX-HA), however, the clinical implications of specific EA trends remain unknown.

METHODS

Subgroup analysis of the prospective, multicenter, observational study EUPHAS2. We included 50 critically ill patients with septic shock and EAT0 ≥ 0.6, who received PMX-HA. The primary outcome of the study was the EA and SOFA score progression from T0 to 120 h afterwards (T120). Secondary outcomes included the EA and SOFA score progression in whom had EA at 48 h (EAT48) < 0.6 (EA responders, EA-R) versus who had not (EA non-responders, EA-NR).

RESULTS

Septic shock was mainly caused by 27 abdominal (54%) and 17 pulmonary (34%) infections, predominantly due to Gram negative bacteria (39 patients, 78%). The SAPS II score was 67.5 [52.8-82.3] and predicted a mortality rate of 75%. Between T0 and T120, the EA decreased (p < 0.001), while the SOFA score and the Inotropic Score (IS) improved (p < 0.001). In comparison with EA-NR (18 patients, 47%), the EA-R group (23 patients, 53%) showed faster IS improvement and lower requirement of continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) during the ICU stay. Overall hospital mortality occurred in 18 patients (36%).

CONCLUSIONS

In critically ill patients with septic shock and EAT0 ≥ 0.6 who received PMX-HA, EA decreased and SOFA score improved over 120 h. In whom high EA resolved within 48 h, IS improvement was faster and CRRT requirement was lower compared with patients with EAT48 ≥ 0.6.

Targeted therapy using polymyxin B hemadsorption in patients with sepsis: a post-hoc analysis of the JSEPTIC-DIC study and the EUPHRATES trial

BACKGROUND

Polymyxin B hemadsorption (PMX-HA) reduces blood endotoxin levels, but characteristics of patients with sepsis likely to benefit from PMX-HA are not well known. We sought to identify patient subgroups likely to benefit from PMX-HA.

METHODS

We retrospectively identified 1911 patients with sepsis from a retrospective observational study in Japan (the JSEPTIC-DIC study) and 286 patients with endotoxemic septic shock from a randomized controlled trial in North America that restricted patients to those with high endotoxin activity (the EUPHRATES trial). We applied the machine learning-based causal forest model to the JSEPTIC-DIC cohort to investigate heterogeneity in treatment effects of PMX-HA on 28-day survival after adjusting for potential confounders and ascertain the best criteria for PMX-HA use. The derived criteria for targeted therapy by PMX-HA were validated using the EUPHRATES trial cohort.

RESULTS

The causal forest model revealed heterogeneity in treatment effects of PMX-HA. Since patients having higher treatment effects were more likely to have severe coagulopathy and hyperlactatemia, we identified the potential treatment targets of PMX-HA as patients with PT-INR > 1.4 or lactate > 3 mmol/L. In the EUPHRATES trial cohort, PMX-HA use on the targeted subpopulation (75% of all patients) was significantly associated with higher 28-day survival (PMX-HA vs. control, 68% vs. 52%; treatment effect of PMX-HA, + 16% [95% CI + 2.2% to + 30%], p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Abnormal coagulation and hyperlactatemia in septic patients with high endotoxin activity appear to be helpful to identify patients who may benefit most from PMX-HA. Our findings will inform enrollment criteria for future interventional trials targeting patients with coagulopathy and hyperlactatemia.

Mortality Risk Prediction in Abdominal Septic Shock Treated with Polymyxin-B Hemoperfusion: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Endotoxin, a component of the cell membrane of gram-negative bacteria, is a trigger for dysregulated inflammatory response in sepsis. Extracorporeal purification of endotoxin, through adsorption with polymyxin B, has been studied as a therapeutic option for sepsis. Previous studies suggest that it could be effective in patients with high endotoxin levels or patients with septic shock of moderate severity. Here, we perform a retrospective, single-centre cohort study of 93 patients suffering from abdominal septic shock treated with polymyxin-B hemoperfusion (PMX-HP) between 2015 and 2020. We compared deceased and surviving patients one month after the intervention using X² and Mann-Whitney U tests. We assessed the data before and after PMX-HP with a Wilcoxon single-rank test and a multivariate logistic regression analysis. There was a significant reduction of SOFA score in the survivors. The expected mortality using APACHE-II was 59.62%, whereas in our sample, the rate was 40.9%. We found significant differences between expected mortality and real mortality only for the group of patients with an SOFA score between 8 and 13. In conclusion, in patients with abdominal septic shock, the addition of PMX-HP to the standard therapy resulted in lower mortality than expected in the subgroup of patients with intermediate severity of illness.

Cost-effectiveness of polymyxin B hemoperfusion for septic shock: an observational study using a Japanese nationwide administrative database

BACKGROUND

Polymyxin B hemoperfusion (PMX) removes endotoxin from septic shock patients. Although the treatment has been clinically used for more than 20 years, its cost-effectiveness has not been evaluated in detail.

METHODS

This study used the Japanese diagnosis procedure combination (DPC) administrative database from April 2018 to March 2021. We selected adult patients with a primary diagnosis of sepsis and the SOFA score at the sepsis diagnosis was between 7 and 12. The patients were divided into the PMX group that received PMX treatment and the control group that did not receive PMX. After adjusting the patient background by propensity score matching, we calculated the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) by determining the difference in quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) and medical cost between the PMX and the control groups.

RESULTS

Nineteen thousand two hundred eighty-three patients were included in the study. Among them, 1492 patients received PMX treatment, and 17,791 did not. As a result of 1:3 propensity score matching, 965 patients in the PMX group and 2895 patients in the control group were selected and analyzed. Twenty-eight-day mortality and hospital mortality were significantly lower in the PMX group. The average medical cost per patient of the PMX group was 31,418 ± 21,144 Euro and that of the control group was 24,483 ± 21,762 Euro, with a difference of 6935 Euro. Life expectancy, life year-gained (LYG), and the QALY were 1.70, 0.86, and 0.60 years longer in the PMX group, respectively. The ICER was calculated to be 11,592 Euro/year, which was lower than the reported willingness-to-pay threshold of 38,462 Euro/year.

CONCLUSION

Polymyxin B hemoperfusion was shown to be an acceptable treatment in terms of the medical economy.

Rationale for sequential extracorporeal therapy (SET) in sepsis

Sepsis and septic shock remain drivers for morbidity and mortality in critical illness. The clinical picture of patients presenting with these syndromes evolves rapidly and may be characterised by: (a) microbial host invasion, (b) establishment of an infection focus, (c) opsonisation of bacterial products (e.g. lipopolysaccharide), (d) recognition of pathogens resulting in an immune response, (e) cellular and humoral effects of circulating pathogen and pathogen products, (f) immunodysregulation and endocrine effects of cytokines, (g) endothelial and organ damage, and (h) organ crosstalk and multiple organ dysfunction. Each step may be a potential target for a specific therapeutic approach. At various stages, extracorporeal therapies may target circulating molecules for removal. In sequence, we could consider: (a) pathogen removal from the circulation with affinity binders and cartridges (specific), (b) circulating endotoxin removal by haemoperfusion with polymyxin B adsorbers (specific), (c) cytokine removal by haemoperfusion with sorbent cartridges or adsorbing membranes (non-specific), (d) extracorporeal organ support with different techniques for respiratory and cardiac support (CO₂ removal or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation), and renal support (haemofiltration, haemodialysis, or ultrafiltration). The sequence of events and the use of different techniques at different points for specific targets will likely require trials with endpoints other than mortality. Instead, the primary objectives should be to achieve the desired action by using extracorporeal therapy at a specific point.

Risk Factors with 30-Day Readmission and the Impact of Length of Hospital Stay on It in Patients with Heart Failure: A Retrospective Observational Study Using a Japanese National Database

Heart failure is a major disease, and its 30-day readmission (readmission within 30-day after discharge) negatively impacts patients and society. Thus, we need to stratify the risk and prevent readmission. We aimed to investigate risk factors associated with 30-day readmission and examine the impact of length of hospital stay (LOS) on 30-day readmission. Using the Diagnosis-Procedure-Combination database from April 2018 to March 2021, we conducted multiple logistic regression to investigate risk factors with 30-day readmission. Also, we conducted subgroup analysis in the short LOS group. To examine the association between LOS and 30-day readmission, we performed propensity score matching between the short and middle LOS groups. As a result, we categorized 10,283 patients and 169,842 patients into the readmission group and the no-readmission group. We identified the following factors as the risk of readmission: short LOS, female, smoking, older age, lower body mass index, lower barthel index, artificial ventilator, beta-blockers, thiazides, tolvaptan, loop diuretics, carperitides, class Ⅲ antiarrhythmic agents, myocardial infarction, diabetes, renal disease, atrial fibrillation, dilated cardiomyopathy, and discharge to home. As a subgroup analysis in the short LOS group, we revealed that the short LOS group risk factors differed from overall. After propensity score matching in the short LOS group and middle LOS group, 37,199 pairs were matched, and we revealed that shorter LOS increases the risk of readmission. These results demonstrated that shortened LOS increases 30-day readmission, and risk factors are unique to each LOS. We suggest stratifying the readmission risk and being careful with early discharge.

Endotoxemic Shock: A Molecular Phenotype in Sepsis

BACKGROUND

Marked heterogeneity exists among patients with sepsis, both in terms of distribution of organ dysfunction and its severity. Such heterogeneity could be explained by the presence of multiple subtypes of sepsis that may have important implications for treatment.

METHODS

Narrative review of published literature involving endotoxin from 1970 to 2022.

RESULTS

In humans, endotoxemia is most consistently associated with a specific pattern of organ failure including shock, endothelial dysfunction, acute kidney injury, and hepatic dysfunction. This pattern is consistent with complement activation and uncontrolled inflammation, two features of endotoxemia. Unbiased discovery using artificial intelligence also identifies a subtype of sepsis which features these same organ failures.

CONCLUSION

Endotoxin appears to represent an important molecular phenotype of sepsis with unique clinical features and high mortality.

Epidemiology of sepsis in a Japanese administrative database

Sepsis is the leading cause of death worldwide. Considering regional variations in the characteristics of patients with sepsis, a better understanding of the epidemiology in Japan will lead to further development of strategies for the prevention and treatment of sepsis. To investigate the epidemiology of sepsis, we conducted a systematic literature review of PubMed between 2003 and January 2023. Among the 78 studies using a Japanese administrative database, we included 20 that defined patients with sepsis as those with an infection and organ dysfunction. The mortality rate in patients with sepsis has decreased since 2010, reaching 18% in 2017. However, the proportion of inpatients with sepsis is increasing. A study comparing short-course (≤7 days) and long-course (≥8 days) antibiotic administration showed lower 28-day mortality in the short-course group. Six studies on the treatment of patients with septic shock reported that low-dose corticosteroids or polymyxin B hemoperfusion reduced mortality, whereas intravenous immunoglobulins had no such effect. Four studies investigating the effects of treatment in patients with sepsis-associated disseminated intravascular coagulation demonstrated that antithrombin may reduce mortality, whereas recombinant human soluble thrombomodulin does not. A descriptive study of medical costs for patients with sepsis showed that the effective cost per survivor decreased over an 8-year period from 2010 to 2017. Sepsis has a significant impact on public health, and is attracting attention as an ongoing issue. Further research to determine more appropriate prevention methods and treatment for sepsis should be a matter of priority.

Potential survival benefit and early recovery from organ dysfunction with polymyxin B hemoperfusion: perspectives from a real-world big data analysis and the supporting mechanisms of action

Background

Endotoxin (ET) removal therapy with polymyxin B-immobilized fiber column hemoperfusion (PMX-HP) has been used for the treatment of septic shock. Some observational studies reported clinical benefits, particularly in specific subgroups of patients. However, larger randomized controlled trial results have been disappointing.

Main body

The four studies that revealed the survival benefit of PMX-HP were based on the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination (DPC) national inpatient database (J-DPC study). Nevertheless, one J-DPC study and a randomized controlled trial (RCT) conducted in France evaluated PMX-HP in patients with abdominal septic shock and did not report a significant survival benefit. In both studies, the severity of illness was too low to find substantial significant differences in mortality. The results of the J-DPC studies further suggest that some subpopulations of patients could benefit from PMX-HP. Based on these results, this review revisited prior RCTs and other large-scale studies on PMX-HP. In addition, four J-DPC studies and one large-scale study reported a survival benefit with PMX-HP. A secondary analysis of the EUPHRATES trial, the most recent double-blinded RCT of PMX-HP conducted in North America, suggested a survival benefit in patients with high levels of endotoxemia. In the J-DPC studies and the EUPHRATES trial, ventilator-free days, vasoactive drug-free days, and renal replacement-free days were significantly improved in the PMX-HP groups. These findings suggest that PMX-HP can contribute to early recovery from organ dysfunction. The reduction of supportive care likely provides important health and economic benefits for managing patients with septic shock. Finally, the blood levels of mediators or biomarkers related to respiratory, cardiovascular, and renal dysfunction have been reported to be normalized with PMX-HP.

Conclusions

These results support the biological rationale for the improvement in organ dysfunction observed in the J-DPC studies and other large-scale studies, including the EUPHRATES trial. Real-world evidence from large data sets suggests an appropriate patient population that are likely to benefit from the utility of PMX-HP for septic shock.