Herpesviridae lung reactivation and infection in patients with severe COVID-19 or influenza virus pneumonia: a comparative study

Detection rate of herpes simplex virus DNA in the lower respiratory tract of critical care patients with or without coinfection determined by the Biofire® pneumonia plus panel

We investigated whether the results returned by the Biofire® Pneumonia Plus Panel (FA-PP) in lower respiratory tract specimens (LRT) specimens may identify patients who should be targeted for Herpes simplex virus (HSV) DNA testing. We included 35 adult ICU patients who underwent protocolized HSV DNA testing in LRT and/or plasma specimens by real-time PCR. Of these, one patient underwent allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation, one a kidney transplantation and one was under CAR-T cell therapy. Twenty-three of the 33 patients (69.6 %) had HSV-type 1 (HSV-1) DNA detected in LRT specimens (median viral load: 5.67 log10 copies/ml). Viral DNA was detected in 12/14 (85 %) plasma samples (median, 3.4 log10 copies/ml) from patients with HSV-1 DNA present in LRT specimens. Patients testing positive by the FA-PP had a non-significant (P = 0.28) higher rate of HSV-1 DNA detection (10/13; 77 %) compared with patients returning negative results (9/16; 56 %). In conclusion, requests for HSV DNA testing in ICU patients should not depend on the results of conventional culture methods nor those provided by the FA-PP.

A Case of Persistent KSHV Viremia in the Context of HIV, SARS-CoV-2, and Other Co-Infections

Despite the high prevalence of latent Kaposi's sarcoma-associated herpesvirus (KSHV) infections in patients from endemic areas with a high human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) prevalence, KSHV lytic reactivation in the context of other co-infections is not well understood. Lytic KSHV infections can contribute to severe inflammatory symptoms and KSHV-associated pathogenesis. We have previously reported on KSHV reactivation upon severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) exposure in a non-hospitalised cohort of people living with HIV (PLWH). From this cohort, we identified a 34-year-old male who presented for routine HIV care in May 2021 with an unusually high KSHV viral load (VL) of 189,946.3 copies/106 cells, before SARS-CoV-2 infection. The patient was invited into a 2-year follow-up study where his peripheral blood was analysed for selected virological, clinical, and inflammatory parameters every 6 months. He remained highly viremic for KSHV throughout the 2-year study period, during which he was infected with SARS-CoV-2 and developed disseminated tuberculosis, with steadily increasing levels of the inflammatory markers C-reactive protein (CRP), and interleukin-6 (IL-6). His HIV VL remained controlled (<1000 copies/mL) and his CD4 count bordered immunosuppression (±200 cells/µL), suggesting some responsiveness to antiretroviral treatment (ART). However, the patient's uncontrolled lytic KSHV infection may increase his risk for developing a KSHV-associated pathology manifesting with inflammation which should be closely monitored beyond the study period.

Fever following extracorporeal membrane oxygenation decannulation: Infection, thrombosis or just physiology?

PURPOSE

Fever is frequent after extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) decannulation. We aimed to evaluate the incidence of post-decannulation fever and describe its causes.

METHODS

Adult ECMO patients who were successfully weaned from ECMO were retrospectively included. Minimal and maximal core temperatures were collected daily for each patient from 48 h before decannulation up to 5 days after. Patients were grouped according to the cause of fever (infection, thrombosis, or no evident cause) and compared. Plasma cytokine profile was obtained, each day from decannulation to 5 days after for 20 patients.

RESULTS

Between January 2021 and December 2022, 123 patients successfully weaned from ECMO were included. Post-decannulation fever occurred in 54 patients (44 %). It was associated with an infection in 39 patients (72 %) and with a thrombosis in 6 patients (11 %), and no cause was identified in the remaining 9 (17 %). Prolonged ECMO duration, extended ICU length-of-stay, diabetes and vascular comorbidities were significantly associated with a higher risk of infection. Finally, the pro-inflammatory cytokine profiles did not differ between febrile and afebrile patients.

CONCLUSION

Post-decannulation fever was common, and was mainly due to infections or thrombosis. Fever should therefore not be considered as a benign inflammatory reaction until proven otherwise.

Differences in clinical characteristics between coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and influenza: a systematic review and meta-analysis

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) epidemic has brought major challenges to the global health system, and influenza is also a problem that cannot be ignored. We aimed to explore and compare the clinical characteristics of COVID-19 and influenza to deepen the understanding of these two diseases and provide some guidance for clinicians to make differential diagnoses. We searched PubMed, Embase and Web of Science for articles and performed a meta-analysis using Stata 14.0 with a random-effects model. This meta-analysis was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. One hundred articles involving 226,913 COVID-19 patients and 201,617 influenza patients were included, and all the articles included patients with these two diseases as experimental and control groups. Compared to influenza, COVID-19 was more common among men (OR = 1.46, 95% CI: 1.23-1.74) and people with a higher body mass index (MD = 1.43, 95% CI: 1.09-1.77). The proportion of current smokers among COVID-19 patients was lower than that among influenza patients (OR = 0.25, 95% CI: 0.18-0.33). Patients with COVID-19 had longer stays in the hospital (MD = 3.20, 95% CI: 2.58-3.82) and ICU (MD = 3.10, 95% CI: 1.44-4.76), required mechanical ventilation more frequently (OR = 2.30, 95% CI: 1.77-3.00), and had higher mortality (OR = 2.22, 95% CI: 1.93-2.55). We also found significant differences in some blood parameters between the two groups of patients. Upper respiratory symptoms were more obvious in influenza patients, and the proportion of comorbidities was higher than that among COVID-19 patients. There are some differences in the major characteristics, symptoms, laboratory findings and comorbidities between COVID-19 patients and influenza patients. COVID-19 patients often require more medical resources and have worse clinical outcomes.

Cytomegalovirus Blood DNAemia in Patients with Severe SARS-CoV-2 Pneumonia

INTRODUCTION

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) DNAemia has been described in critically ill patients, including patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. Our objective is to evaluate the prevalence and clinical impact of CMV DNAemia among patients undergoing invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) for severe SARS-CoV-2 infection and to explore the association between CMV DNAemia levels and clinical outcomes.

METHODS

In this retrospective monocentric study, we included patients admitted in a tertiary ICU for severe COVID-19 and who required IMV. We aimed to compare clinical and demographic variables between patients with and without CMV DNAemia. Univariate and Cox regression analyses were performed to identify factors associated with CMV DNAemia.

RESULTS

During the study period, CMV blood DNAemia occurred in 30/135 patients (22%). Patients with CMV blood DNAemia had longer ICU and hospital length of stay, as well as longer duration of IMV, and were more likely to have received dexamethasone. However, there was no significant difference in ICU mortality between patients with and without CMV DNAemia (64.8% vs. 56.7%, p = 0.42). The Cox regression analysis showed that dexamethasone was the only factor independently associated with CMV blood DNAemia (HR 4.23 [1.006-17.792], p = 0.049).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with severe SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia requiring IMV, CMV DNAemia is common and associated with prolonged ventilation and increased LOS but not with increased mortality.

Viral reactivations and fungal infections in nonresolving acute respiratory distress syndrome

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a condition affecting 10% of patients requiring admission to the intensive care unit and results from endothelial dysfunction, alveolar epithelial injury and unbalanced inflammation, leading to exudative pulmonary oedema. A significant portion of these patients experience a lung injury that fails to resolve. Persistent or worsening respiratory failure beyond 5 days after the initiation of mechanical ventilation is referred to as nonresolving ARDS. Viral and fungal pathogens can exploit the hyperinflammatory environment and altered immune landscape in ARDS, perpetuating a cycle of ongoing inflammation and lung injury, thereby contributing to the progression towards and persistence of nonresolving ARDS, even in previously immunocompetent patients. This review discusses the significance, pathophysiology, diagnostic challenges and key knowledge gaps concerning various viral and fungal pathogens in nonresolving ARDS, with a particular focus on influenza-associated and COVID-19-associated pulmonary aspergillosis and pulmonary reactivation of Herpesviridae, such as cytomegalovirus and herpes simplex virus. Diagnosing these infections is challenging due to their nonspecific clinical presentation and the inability of current tests to distinguish between fungal colonisation or asymptomatic viral shedding and clinically significant infections or reactivations. A deeper understanding of the complex interplay between these pathogens and the host immune system in the context of ARDS, combined with advances in diagnostic and therapeutic strategies, has the potential to enhance the management and prognosis of patients with nonresolving ARDS.

Bronchoscopic Diagnosis of Severe Respiratory Infections

The diagnosis of severe respiratory infections in intensive care remains an area of uncertainty and involves a complex balancing of risks and benefits. Due to the frequent colonisation of the lower respiratory tract in mechanically ventilated patients, there is an ever-present possibility of microbiological samples being contaminated by bystander organisms. This, coupled with the frequency of alveolar infiltrates arising from sterile insults, risks over-treatment and antimicrobial-associated harm. The use of bronchoscopic sampling to obtain protected lower respiratory samples has long been advocated to overcome this problem. The use of bronchoscopy further enables accurate cytological assessment of the alveolar space and direct inspection of the proximal airways for signs of fungal infection or alternative pathologies. With a growing range of molecular techniques, including those based on nucleic acid amplification and even alveolar visualisation and direct bacterial detection, the potential for bronchoscopy is increasing concomitantly. Despite this, there remain concerns regarding the safety of the technique and its benefits versus less invasive sampling techniques. These discussions are reflected in the lack of consensus among international guidelines on the topic. This review will consider the benefits and challenges of diagnostic bronchoscopy in the context of severe respiratory infection.

Comparison of Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes in Intensive Care Units Between Patients with Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) and Patients with Influenza: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Severe infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) or influenza virus can cause patients to be admitted to intensive care units (ICUs). It is necessary to understand the differences in clinical characteristics and outcomes between these two types of critically ill patients.

METHODS

We searched Embase, PubMed, and Web of Science for articles and performed a meta-analysis using Stata 14.0 with a random-effects model. This paper was written in strict accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines.

RESULTS

Thirty-five articles involving 131,692 ICU patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and 30,286 ICU patients with influenza were included in our meta-analysis. Compared with influenza patients, COVID-19 patients were more likely to be male (odds ratio (OR) = 1.75, 95% CI: 1.54-1.99) and older (standardized mean difference (SMD) = 0.16, 95% CI: 0.03-0.29). In terms of laboratory test results, COVID-19 patients had higher lymphocyte (SMD = 0.38, 95% CI: 0.17-0.59) and platelet counts (SMD = 0.52, 95% CI: 0.29-0.75) but lower creatinine (SMD = -0.29, 95% CI: -0.55-0.03) and procalcitonin levels (SMD = -0.78, 95% CI: -1.11-0.46). Diabetes (SMD = 1.27, 95% CI: 1.08-1.48) and hypertension (SMD = 1.30, 95% CI: 1.05-1.60) were more prevalent in COVID-19 patients, while influenza patients were more likely to have cancer (OR = 0.52, 95% CI: 0.44-0.62), cirrhosis (OR = 0.52, 95% CI: 0.44-0.62), immunodepression (OR = 0.38, 95% CI: 0.25-0.58), and chronic pulmonary diseases (OR = 0.35, 95% CI: 0.24-0.52). We also found that patients with COVID-19 had longer ICU stays (SMD = 0.20, 95% CI: 0.05-0.34), were more likely to develop acute respiratory distress syndrome (OR = 4.90, 95% CI: 2.77-8.64), and had higher mortality (OR = 1.35, 95% CI: 1.17-1.55).

CONCLUSIONS

There are some differences in the basic characteristics, comorbidities, laboratory test results and complications between ICU patients with COVID-19 and ICU patients with influenza. Critically ill patients with COVID-19 often require more medical resources and have worse clinical outcomes. PROSPERO Registration Number: CRD42023452238.

Pulmonary herpes simplex virus and cytomegalovirus in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome related to COVID-19

PURPOSE

Human herpesviruses, particularly cytomegalovirus (CMV) and herpes simplex virus (HSV), frequently reactivate in critically ill patients, including those with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) related to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The clinical interpretation of pulmonary herpesvirus reactivation is challenging and there is ongoing debate about its association with mortality and benefit of antiviral medication. We aimed to quantify the incidence and pathogenicity of pulmonary CMV and HSV reactivations in critically ill COVID-19 patients.

METHODS

Mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients seropositive for CMV or HSV were included in this observational cohort study. Diagnostic bronchoscopy with bronchoalveolar lavage was performed routinely and analyzed for alveolar viral loads and inflammatory biomarkers. Utilizing joint modeling, we explored the dynamic association between viral load trajectories over time and mortality. We explored alveolar inflammatory biomarker dynamics between reactivated and non-reactivated patients.

RESULTS

Pulmonary reactivation (> 104 copies/ml) of CMV occurred in 6% of CMV-seropositive patients (9/156), and pulmonary reactivation of HSV in 37% of HSV-seropositive patients (63/172). HSV viral load dynamics prior to or without antiviral treatment were associated with increased 90-day mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 1.24, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04-1.47). The alveolar concentration of several inflammatory biomarkers increased with HSV reactivation, including interleukin (IL)-6, IL-1β, granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF), and tumor necrosis factor (TNF).

CONCLUSION

In mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients, HSV reactivations are common, while CMV reactivations were rare. HSV viral load dynamics prior to or without antiviral treatment are associated with mortality. Alveolar inflammation is elevated after HSV reactivation.

Herpesviridae and Atypical Bacteria Co-Detections in Lower Respiratory Tract Samples of SARS-CoV-2-Positive Patients Admitted to an Intensive Care Unit

Shortly after the emergence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), cases of viral, bacterial, and fungal coinfections in hospitalized patients became evident. This retrospective study investigates the prevalence of multiple pathogen co-detections in 1472 lower respiratory tract (LRT) samples from 229 SARS-CoV-2-positive patients treated in the largest intensive care unit (ICU) in Slovenia. In addition to SARS-CoV-2, (rt)RT-PCR tests were used to detect cytomegalovirus (CMV), Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1), herpes simplex virus 2 (HSV-2), varicella zoster virus (VZV), and atypical bacteria: Chlamydia pneumoniae, Mycoplasma pneumoniae and Legionella pneumophila/spp. At least one co-detection was observed in 89.1% of patients. EBV, HSV-1, and CMV were the most common, with 74.7%, 58.1%, and 38.0% of positive patients, respectively. The median detection time of EBV, HSV-1, and CMV after initial SARS-CoV-2 confirmation was 11 to 20 days. Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) and tracheal aspirate (TA) samples showed equivalent performance for the detection of EBV, CMV, and HSV-1 in patients with both available samples. Our results indicate that SARS-CoV-2 infection could be a risk factor for latent herpesvirus reactivation, especially HSV-1, EBV, and CMV. However, additional studies are needed to elucidate the clinical importance of these findings.

Herpes Simplex Virus Bronchopneumonitis in Critically Ill Patients with Acute on Chronic Liver Failure: A Retrospective Analysis

(1) Background: Critically ill patients are frequently diagnosed with pulmonary Herpes simplex virus-1 (HSV) reactivation, which then can lead to HSV bronchopneumonitis and is associated with higher mortality and longer mechanical ventilation. For the particular subgroup of critically ill patients with acute on chronic liver failure (ACLF), however, the impact of HSV reactivation is unknown. We investigated the impact of HSV reactivation in these patients. (2) Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis, evaluating data from 136 mechanically ventilated patients with ACLF between January 2016 and August 2023. Clinical parameters were compared between patients with and without HSV bronchopneumonitis. (3) Results: 10.3% were diagnosed with HSV bronchopneumonitis (HSV group). Mortality did not differ between the HSV and non-HSV group (85.7% vs. 75.4%, p = 0.52). However, the clinical course in the HSV group was more complicated as patients required significantly longer mechanical ventilation (14 vs. 21 days, p = 0.04). Furthermore, fungal superinfections were significantly more frequent in the HSV group (28.6% vs. 6.6%, p = 0.006). (4) Conclusions: Mortality of critically ill patients with ACLF with HSV bronchopneumonitis was not increased in spite of the cirrhosis-associated immune dysfunction. Their clinical course, however, was more complicated with significantly longer mechanical ventilation.

Prevalence and clinical relevance of VZV lung detection in intensive care unit: A retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To assess the clinical relevance of varicella zoster virus (VZV) lung detection among patients hospitalized in intensive care unit (ICU).

METHODS

We present a monocentric retrospective cohort study from 2012 to 2020. VZV genome was detected in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid by real-time PCR.

RESULTS

Twelve of 1389 (0.8%) patients exhibited VZV lung detection, corresponding to an incidence of 13.4 (95% confidence interval [CI] 5.8-21.0) per 100 person-years. Immunosuppression and prolonged ICU stay constituted the main risks factors. VZV detection was not associated with pulmonary deterioration but associated with a risk of shingles occurrence during the following days.

CONCLUSION

VZV lung detection is a rare event among ICU patients, occurring mostly in immunocompromised patients with prolonged ICU stay. Due to its scarcity and the lack of association with pulmonary failure, a targeted approach to the VZV lung detection diagnosis may allow a significant cost saving without affecting the quality of patients care.

COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination, and Human Herpesviruses Infections

There are several human herpesviruses. A common characteristic of infection by these viruses is latency, by which the virus assumes a non-replicative state, subverting the attentions of the host's immune response. In immunocompetent hosts, herpesviruses are immunologically controlled, although periodic virus shedding can occur. In situations where immunological control is lost, herpesviruses can reactivate and produce clinically apparent disease. It is now becoming apparent that COVID-19 or exposure to COVID-19 vaccines can exert several effects on the immune system. The pandemic of COVID-19 shows no sign of abating, with new severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) variants continuing to evolve. Several COVID-19 vaccines have been developed, and much of the world's population has either experienced COVID-19 or been vaccinated against it. There are an increasing number of reports of associations between herpesvirus infections or reactivations and COVID-19 or COVID-19 vaccination. For instance, a positive cytomegalovirus serostatus may indicate a greater likelihood of severe COVID-19, and herpes simplex virus reactivation may be linked to increased mortality. Epstein-Barr virus reactivation appears to be associated with post-acute sequelae of COVID-19. Finally, herpes zoster has been reported to be associated with COVID-19 vaccination. This brief narrative review will provide several insights into associations between herpesvirus infections or reactivations and COVID-19 or SARS-CoV-2 vaccination.