Primary hepatic malignant vascular tumors: a follow-up study of imaging characteristics and clinicopathological features

Hepatic Angiosarcoma with eosinophilia: A Case Report and Literature Review

Background

Hepatic angiosarcoma is an extremely rare, uncontrollable tumor with strong invasion, high mortality rate, and extremely poor prognosis. There is first report on hepatic angiosarcoma accompanied by eosinophilia.

Case Presentation

A woman with a chief complaint of poor appetite for about 3 months presented to a local hospital with a liver mass. Laboratory examination revealed a significant increase in eosinophils count was 9.58% in the serum. Abdominal MRI revealed multiple focal high-density lesions in the liver and spleen, and cranial MRI revealed multiple high-density shadows in the skull. Laparoscopic biopsy revealed a hepatic angiosarcoma and targeted treatment with Anlotinib was performed. Two months later, the patient died of splenic rupture and bleeding.

Conclusion

Hepatic angiosarcoma often has no specific clinical manifestations, and we found that this case can lead to an increase in eosinophils, which is worth the attention of clinical physicians.

Magnetic resonance imaging and clinicopathological findings of primary hepatic angiosarcoma

PURPOSE

To investigate the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and clinicopathological features of primary hepatic angiosarcoma (PHA) and enhance preoperative diagnosis.

METHODS

MRI and clinicopathological information of 12 cases proved PHA were reviewed. Summarize the MRI characteristics of PHA combined with literature reviews.

RESULTS

Among 12 cases (6 males and 6 females; age range, 23-70 years; mean, 53.3 years), one presented as a large mass, two as a diffuse infiltrating tumor, and nine as a mixed pattern of large masses with multiple nodules, all involving both lobes of the liver and ranging from 0.1 cm to 11 cm in diameter. A total of 63 lesions were analyzed, including 21 masses and 42 nodules. 13 masses (61.9%) demonstrated intratumoral hemorrhage. 18 masses (85.7%) demonstrated heterogeneous patchy, ring-shaped, septate, or irregular shaped enhancing foci on late arterial phase (LAP). On dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI), 14 masses (66.7%) showed a centripetal or centrifugal pattern of incomplete progressive enhancement. 6 nodules (14.3%) appeared intratumoral hemorrhage. 31 nodules (73.8%) showed no enhancing foci on LAP images and 27 nodules (64.3%) showed enhancement pattern of complete filling, either centripetal or centrifugal pattern. Moreover, 12 cases (100%) exhibited prominent vessels within or adjacent to at least one lesion.

CONCLUSION

PHA exhibits diverse appearances on MRI. Typical MRI signs include multifoci with intratumoral hemorrhage, prominent vessels within or adjacent to the foci, as well as varied degrees of progressive enhancement with incomplete filling in dominant masses of PHA.

Comparison of clinical and MRI features of hepatic angiosarcoma and epithelioid hemangioendothelioma

OBJECTIVE

Differentiating hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (EHE) and angiosarcoma (AS), the two most common vascular tumors in the liver, is important due to disparities in their prognosis and treatment. We aimed to compare clinical and MRI features of the two tumors.

METHODS

This retrospective study included patients with pathologically-confirmed AS or EHE who underwent MRI using gadoxetate disodium between 2008 and 2023. Two radiologists independently reviewed MR images. Wilcoxon rank sum and Fisher's exact tests were used to compare clinical and imaging features. Overall survival was compared using restricted mean survival time at 3 years.

RESULTS

32 patients with AS (18 women [56.3%]; median age, 68 years) and 38 with EHE (24 women [63.2%]; 51 years) were included. Patients with AS were generally older (81.3% ≥ 60 years; P < 0.001), had more frequent laboratory abnormalities (P ≤ 0.018), and poorer overall survival (11.2 vs. 31.8 months; P < 0.001) than those with EHE. On MRI, a large dominant mass accompanied by smaller nodules (14/32, 43.8%), often with ill-defined margins (15/32, 46.9%) was prevalent in AS; compared with nodules of similar sizes (24/38, 63.2%; P = 0.015) with well-defined margin (30/38, 78.9%; P = 0.002) in EHE. Cirrhotic appearance of the liver was more frequent in AS (62.5%, P < 0.001), along with decreased parenchymal enhancement on hepatobiliary phase (31.3%, P < 0.001) and ascites (37.5%, P = 0.010). AS frequently presented with avid enhancement of bizarrely-shaped foci, with a centrifugal enhancement pattern. In comparison, targetoid appearance was characteristic of EHE (78.9% on T2-weighted, 54.1% on diffusion-weighted, 65.8% on multiphase images) (P ≤ 0.002), with enhancement degree typically lower than that of the aorta. On hepatobiliary phase, all the AS exhibited hypointensity, while 39.5% of EHE showed targetoid appearance (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Patients aged ≥ 60 years presenting with laboratory abnormalities, typically with a large dominant mass accompanied by smaller nodules, exhibiting avid, bizarre, and centrifugal enhancement-particularly in the cirrhotic-appearing liver-suggests the likelihood of AS over EHE.

Proposed diagnostic and prognostic markers of primary malignant hepatic vascular neoplasms

INTRODUCTION

Primary malignant hepatic vascular tumors with various malignant potentials include epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (EHE) and angiosarcoma (AS), which may overlap pathologically. This study aimed to compare the pathological findings of hepatic EHE with those of AS, in association with patient outcomes.

METHODS

Fifty-nine histologically confirmed patients with 34 EHE and 25 AS were admitted to a tertiary hospital from 2003 to 2020. Their EHE and AS pathological features were compared. Immunohistochemistry for CD31, ERG, CAMTA-1, TFE3, P53, and Ki-67 labeling was performed on paraffin-embedded blocks. Markers, along with histological findings, were analyzed for the purposes of diagnostic and prognostic significance by multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

CAMTA-1 was 91.2% positive in EHE, but negative in AS (p = < 0.001). AS was significantly correlated to an aberrant p53 expression, high Ki-67 labeling, and high mitotic activity, compared to EHE (all, p = < 0.001). EHE can be classified as low grade (LG) and high grade (HG) using the prognostic values of mitotic activity and ki-67 labeling (sensitivity = 1, specificity = 1). Low grade-EHE showed significantly better overall survival than high grade-EHE (p = 0.020).

CONCLUSIONS

Immunohistochemistry for CAMTA-1, P53, and Ki-67 labeling may help distinguish EHE and AS in histologically ambiguous cases, especially small biopsied tissue. Moreover, the combination of mitotic activity and Ki-67 labeling can be a prognostic factor for EHE with various clinical features.

Characteristic contrast‑enhanced ultrasound findings of hepatic epithelioid haemangioendothelioma: A case report and literature review

Hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (HEHE) is a rare liver tumor, which is usually diagnosed by pathological examination, since the diagnostic imaging criteria remain to be defined. However, contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) may reveal the characteristic features of HEHE to aid diagnosis. In the present study, two-dimensional ultrasound examination of a 38-year-old male patient showed a mass in the right liver. CEUS showed an S5 segment hypoechoic nodule, and imaging features resulted in the diagnosis of HEHE. Surgery was shown to be an appropriate and successful treatment for HEHE. In conclusion, CEUS may be valuable for the diagnosis of HEHE, thereby avoiding the serious consequences of misdiagnosis.

A complementary comment on primary hepatic angiosarcoma: A case report

BACKGROUND

This article examines primary hepatic angiosarcoma (PHA) and fat-poor angiomyolipoma (AML), two uncommon vascular cancers. Clinical decisions in these situations are frequently aided by pathology reports and imaging techniques. Uncommon malignant tumors of the vascular endothelium include PHA. Another diagnosis that should not be overlooked when employing contrast-enhanced MR and contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) imaging techniques is fat-poor AML, one of the uncommon vascular tumors of the liver. In both conditions, biopsy is the primary means of diagnosis.

CASE SUMMARY

In our article, besides the diagnosis of PHA, fat-poor AML, one of the other rare vascular tumors of the liver, is mentioned. In the case, a 50-year-old female patient with VHL Syndrome was admitted to our hospital with nonspecific lesions such as right upper quadrant pain, weight loss, and nausea. Abdominal ultrasonography (US) revealed a hypoechoic heterogeneous lesion with occasional faint contours. In computed tomography, it was observed as a hyperdense nodular lesion in segment 4. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed that the lesion did not contain fat. In connection with the known history of VHL Syndrome, we first evaluated the possibility of AML. Thereupon, a histopathological sample was taken and the diagnosis was made as fat-poor AML with 5% fat content.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, PHA in our case report and fat-poor AML in our clinic are two uncommon liver vascular malignancies with comparable incidences. Important imaging techniques like contrast-enhanced US (CEUS), CECT, and CEMRI give us substantial advantages in both cases. However, a biopsy is used to provide the final diagnosis.

Primary hepatic angiosarcoma: A case report

BACKGROUND

Primary hepatic angiosarcoma (PHA) is a rare malignant tumor of the vascular endothelium. Clinical manifestations and laboratory and imaging examinations often lack specificity for PHA. We report a case of PHA, and describe the ultrasound characteristics and characteristic changes in laboratory values associated with PHA.

CASE SUMMARY

A 75-year-old woman presented with right upper quadrant abdominal pain for half a month. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at a local hospital revealed multiple liver space-occupying lesions, and she was admitted to our hospital for further diagnosis. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) revealed multiple slightly hyperechoic nodules in the liver, which were suspected to be of malignant vascular origin. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography revealed multiple low-density nodules in the liver, considered to be metastatic hematopoietic malignancies. Contrast-enhanced MRI showed that the multiple liver nodules shared features with infectious lesions. Laboratory examination revealed normal alpha-fetoprotein levels, slightly increased other liver enzymes, decreased platelets, and significantly increased D-dimer levels. Liver biopsy and histopathology confirmed the presence of PHA.

CONCLUSION

CEUS can provide valuable clues for the diagnosis of PHA and greatly improve the success rate of puncture biopsy.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Serum AFP-L3 and GP-73 in the Diagnosis of Primary Liver Cancer

Objective

To investigate the combined application value of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) combined with serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP)-L3 and Golgi protein (GP)-73 in the diagnosis of primary liver cancer.

Methods

The data of 200 patients with suspected liver cancer admitted to our hospital from February 2020 to February 2021 were retrospectively analyzed, and they were randomly divided into an experimental group and a control group, with 100 cases in each group. The experimental group received a combined detection of MRI with serum AFP-L3 and GP-73, and the control group adopted traditional diagnostic methods (spiral computed tomography and serum AFP). The diagnostic yields of the two groups were compared. Surgical resection was performed after the diagnosis of primary liver cancer, and the correlation between the efficacy and combined detection of MRI with serum AFP-L3 and GP-73 levels was analyzed.

Results

The two groups presented comparable general information (P >0.05). The surgical results showed 160 cases of primary liver cancer, including 75 cases in the experimental group and 85 cases in the control group, and 40 cases of benign liver lesions. The diagnostic accuracy of the experimental group (73/75, 95%) was significantly higher than that of the control group (76/85, 86%) (P < 0.05). The serum levels of AFP-L3, GP-73, and AFP in patients with primary liver cancer were remarkably decreased after surgery (P < 0.001). The preoperative and postoperative AFP-L3, GP-73, and AFP levels of patients with primary liver cancer were significantly higher than those of patients with benign liver lesions. The AUC (95% CI) for the combined detection of MRI and serum AFP-L3 and GP-73 levels in patients with surgically confirmed primary liver cancer was 0.747 (0.619-0.874).

Conclusion

MRI combined with serum AFP-L3 and GP-73 presents favorable diagnostic efficiency in the diagnosis of primary liver cancer, which is worthy of clinical application.

Establishment and validation of prognostic nomograms to predict the overall and cancer-specific survival in patients with hepatic malignant vascular tumors

OBJECTIVE

To characterize the clinicopathologic features and to investigate the prognostic nomograms for overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) in patients with Hepatic malignant vascular tumors (HMVT).

METHOD

Patients diagnosed with HMVT between 1973 and 2015 were screened from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. The Kaplan-Meier (KM) was used for survival analysis. The univariate and multivariate Cox analyses were performed to identify independent predictors. Furthermore, the prognostic nomograms were established and evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 510 HMVT patients were collected, and randomly divided into HMVT-training (N=308) and validation cohort (N=202) groups. The 3- and 5-year OS for overall HMVT were 21.3% and 19.8%, and the corresponding CSS was 29.8% and 27.7% respectively. Age at diagnosis, grade, tumor size, and histological type were identified as prognostic factors for OS and CSS in patients with HMVT. However, sex was just for predicting CSS, and T stage was only an indicator of OS. These factors were further utilized to construct the nomograms for OS and CSS in the HMVT-training cohort showing credible performance with the C-index of 0.763 and 0.762, respectively. Moreover, the AUC value for 1-, 3-, 5-year OS was 0.873, 0.905 and 0.898, and the corresponding value for CSS was 0.808, 0.794 and 0.788 respectively. Additionally, the calibration curves demonstrated a favorable agreement between the predicted and actual 1-, 3- and 5-year survival rates both in the training and validated cohorts.

CONCLUSION

This was the largest population-based study to describe the clinicopathologic characteristics in patients with HMVT. Moreover, we established and validated prognostic nomograms that indicated an accurate prediction for 1-, 3- and 5-year of OS and CSS.

Hepatic Epithelioid Hemangioendothelioma Presenting Synchronously with Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (EHE) is a rare malignant tumor with unknown pathogenesis. Herein, we report a case of a hepatic EHE presenting synchronously with a hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). To the best of our knowledge, this is the second case report of synchronous hepatic EHE and HCC. An 84-year-old man presented with back pain. During examination, a tumor in liver segment 3 was coincidentally detected. Tumor marker (carbohydrate antigen 19-9, alpha-fetoprotein, and protein induced by vitamin K absence or antagonist-II) levels were elevated. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography revealed perinodular enhancement in the arterial and portal phases. Another tumor was detected in liver segment 2, which was homogeneously enhanced in the arterial phase, followed by washout in the portal and late phases. Based on these imaging findings, we diagnosed the tumor in segment 3 as a solitary cholangiocellular carcinoma and the tumor in segment 2 as a solitary HCC. Lateral sectionectomy of the liver was performed. Microscopically, spindle-shaped and epithelioid cells were present in the tumor in segment 3. On immunohistochemistry, the tumor cells were positive for CD31 and CD34, focally positive for D2-40, and negative for AE1/AE3. Therefore, the tumor in segment 3 was ultimately diagnosed as an EHE and the tumor in segment 2 as a well-differentiated HCC. Preoperative diagnosis of EHE is difficult owing to the lack of specific findings. Intratumoral calcification, halo sign, and lollipop sign are occasionally found in EHE and are useful imaging findings for diagnosis. Clinical behavior is unpredictable, ranging from indolent growth to rapid progression. Clinical or pathological predictors of the course of EHE are urgently required.