Longitudinal piglet sampling in commercial sow farms highlights the challenge of PRRSV detection

Evaluating postmortem tongue fluids as a tool for monitoring PRRSV and IAV in the post-wean phases of swine production

BACKGROUND

Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) and influenza A virus (IAV) are swine pathogens that can significantly impact the performance of post-weaning pigs. While oral fluid (OF) samples are widely used for monitoring these viruses, postmortem tongue fluid (TF) samples present a cost-effective alternative with potential advantages in viral detection. This study aimed to compare the performance of TF and OF samples collected from nursery and finishing pig herds in detecting PRRSV and IAV using reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR). A Bayesian latent class model was used to estimate diagnostic sensitivity and specificity for TF and OF under the assumption of conditional independence. The study also examined the relationship between mortality rates and RT-qPCR outcomes, the success rate of Sanger sequencing for the PRRSV ORF-5 region, and the effect of pooling daily aggregated TF samples on the probability of PRRSV detection.

RESULTS

IAV was detected in 34.9% of OF samples and 30.2% of TF samples, while PRRSV was identified in 67.4% of OF and 53.5% of TF samples. TF samples had a significantly lower mean Ct for PRRSV (29.1) compared to OF samples (32.8) but had a similar Ct (30.9) to OF (29.7) for IAV. The hierarchical latent class Bayesian model estimated the sensitivity and specificity values for OF as 37.3% and 61.7% for IAV, and 64.3% and 35.1% for PRRSV. The estimated sensitivity and specificity values for TF were 33.5% and 66.0% for IAV, and 53.0% and 47.0% for PRRSV. Among 22 matched TF and OF pairs submitted for PRRSV sequencing, 45.5% of OF samples and 63.6% of TF samples were successfully sequenced, with the higher success rate for TF attributed to having lower Ct values. Additionally, mortality rates were notably higher when PRRSV was detected, especially in cases with concurrent IAV detection. Regarding sample pooling, our results indicated that pooling TF samples significantly increased detection probabilities, with a 1/7 dilution achieving a 79% RT-qPCR detection rate, compared to a detection rate of 14.3% when testing a single day's TF sample from a week with only one positive day.

CONCLUSION

The findings support the use of TF samples as a viable complement or alternative to OF samples for PRRSV and IAV surveillance in post-weaning pigs when mortalities are available. The cost-efficiency of TF sampling can enhance monitoring compliance, improve early pathogen detection, and facilitate timely responses to emerging threats in swine production. This study advocates for the adoption of TF as a risk-based sampling strategy in nursery and grow-finish settings, complementing live animal samples such as OF, ultimately contributing to better herd health management.

Assessment of individual and population-based sampling for detection of influenza A virus RNA in breeding swine herds

Sample types currently used for Influenza A virus (IAV) surveillance in swine farms vary in sensitivity, convenience of collection, and herd representativeness. Family oral fluids are an effective population-based sample type for detecting porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) (ribonucleic acid) RNA by real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-rtPCR) in breeding herds. However, little is known about the efficacy of family oral fluids samples for detecting IAV RNA in these herds. This study compared the probability of IAV RNA detection among individual and population-based samples. A 3,500-sow breeding herd was sampled for matched sets (n = 57) of family oral fluids, udder wipes, sow nasal wipes, individual piglet nasal wipes, and drinker wipes, tested by RT-rtPCR for IAV RNA. Overall, 57.9 % (33/57) of family oral fluids, 49.1 % (28/57) of udder wipes, 28.1 % (16/57) of sow nasal wipes, 15.8 % (9/57) of drinker wipes, and 66.6 % (38/57) of individual piglet nasal wipes were positive. Family oral fluids showed a Kappa value of 0.81, indicating near-perfect agreement with individual piglet nasal wipes, while udder wipes had a substantial agreement (Kappa = 0.65). Other sample types showed fair agreement (Kappa < 0.28). These results validate family oral fluids as an efficient alternative population-based sample for IAV surveillance in breeding herds. The proportion of positive piglets within litters by room was 91 % in room A (20/22), 70 % in room B (17/24), and 9 % in room C (1/11). This study also highlights the importance of sampling different farrowing rooms within the same breeding herd to enhance IAV surveillance.

First assessment of weeks-to-negative processing fluids in breeding herds after a Senecavirus A outbreak

Senecavirus A (SVA) causes vesicular disease in swine and has been responsible for a rampant increase in the yearly number of foreign animal disease investigations conducted in the United States. Diagnostic investigations for SVA are typically performed by sampling animals individually, which is labor-intensive and stressful. Developing an alternative aggregate sampling method would facilitate the detection of this virus at the population level. In a preliminary study, SVA was detected in processing fluids (PF) collected in a breeding herd before and after outbreak detection. The objective of this study was to estimate the average number of weeks PF remain SVA-positive after an SVA outbreak. Ten farrow-to-wean breeding herds volunteered to participate in this studyby longitudinally collecting PF samples after an SVA outbreak was detected and submitting samples for RT-rtPCR testing. The PF samples from the 10 farms were SVA-positive for an average of 11.8 weeks after the outbreak. Here, we show that testing of PF may be a cost-effective method to detect SVA and help halt its spread in SVA-endemic regions.

A cross-sectional assessment of PRRSV nucleic acid detection by RT-qPCR in serum, ear-vein blood swabs, nasal swabs, and oral swabs from weaning-age pigs under field conditions

Introduction

The porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) continues to challenge swine production in the US and most parts of the world. Effective PRRSV surveillance in swine herds can be challenging, especially because the virus can persist and sustain a very low prevalence. Although weaning-age pigs are a strategic subpopulation in the surveillance of PRRSV in breeding herds, very few sample types have been validated and characterized for surveillance of this subpopulation. The objectives of this study, therefore, were to compare PRRSV RNA detection rates in serum, oral swabs (OS), nasal swabs (NS), ear-vein blood swabs (ES), and family oral fluids (FOF) obtained from weaning-age pigs and to assess the effect of litter-level pooling on the reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) detection of PRRSV RNA.

Methods

Three eligible PRRSV-positive herds in the Midwestern USA were selected for this study. 666 pigs across 55 litters were sampled for serum, NS, ES, OS, and FOF. RT-qPCR tests were done on these samples individually and on the litter-level pools of the swabs. Litter-level pools of each swab sample type were made by combining equal volumes of each swab taken from the pigs within a litter.

Results

Ninety-six piglets distributed across 22 litters were positive by PRRSV RT-qPCR on serum, 80 piglets distributed across 15 litters were positive on ES, 80 piglets distributed across 17 litters were positive on OS, and 72 piglets distributed across 14 litters were positive on NS. Cohen's kappa analyses showed near-perfect agreement between all paired ES, OS, NS, and serum comparisons (). The serum RT-qPCR cycle threshold values (Ct) strongly predicted PRRSV detection in swab samples. There was a ≥ 95% probability of PRRSV detection in ES-, OS-, and NS pools when the proportion of positive swab samples was ≥ 23%, ≥ 27%, and ≥ 26%, respectively.

Discussion

ES, NS, and OS can be used as surveillance samples for detecting PRRSV RNA by RT-qPCR in weaning-age pigs. The minimum number of piglets to be sampled by serum, ES, OS, and NS to be 95% confident of detecting ≥ 1 infected piglet when PRRSV prevalence is ≥ 10% is 30, 36, 36, and 40, respectively.

Assessing the role of sow parity on PRRSv detection by RT-qPCR through weekly processing fluids monitoring in breeding herds

The use of processing fluids to monitor the breeding herd's porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRS) status has gained industry acceptance. However, little is known about PRRS virus RT-qPCR detection dynamics in processing fluids and factors that may contribute to maintain PRRS virus in the herd after an outbreak. This study aimed to describe weekly RT-qPCR processing fluid results in breeding herds after an outbreak and to evaluate the proportion of RT-qPCR positive results among parity groups. Processing tissues of 15 first parity (P1), 15 second parity (P2), and 15 third parity or higher (P3+) litters (parity groups) were collected weekly for between 19 and 46 weeks in nine breeding herds. Processing fluids were aggregated, and RT-qPCR tested by parity group weekly. Additionally, a subset of 743 processing fluid samples of litters that formed 50 parity groups, as previously described, were RT-qPCR tested individually at the litter level. The agreement between RT-qPCR results of processing fluid samples of parity groups (15 litters) and results based on individual litter testing was assessed using overall percent of agreement, Kappa statistic, and McNemar test. The association between RT-qPCR results and the parity group was evaluated using a generalized estimating equations model, after accounting for the effects of sampling week, breeding herd PRRS control strategy (i.e., open to replacements v/s closed) and herd. An autoregressive correlation structure was used to account for the repeated samplings within a herd in time. The overall agreement was 98 %, and Kappa statistic 0.955 (McNemar p = 1.0). Sensitivity of parity group processing fluid samples was estimated at 100 % (95 % CI 89-100 %), while specificity was estimated at 94 % (95 % CI 71-100 %). Although P1 aggregated litters had on average a higher proportion of RT-qPCR positive results from outbreak week 25 onwards, the proportion was not significantly different to the one observed for P2 and P3+ aggregated litters (p > 0.13). Additionally, herds that interrupted gilt entry had lower odds of PRRS RT-qPCR positivity than herds that continued entering gilts (OR = 0.35, 95 % CI 0.16-0.78). PRRS virus persistence in processing fluids was not affected by the sow parity effect in most of the breeding herds studied. No evidence of disagreement between RT-qPCR results of an aggregated sample of 15 litters and those of individual litters was observed. This level of litter aggregation testing strategy may be of particular use at the last stages of an elimination program under low PRRS virus prevalence.

Evaluating oral swab samples for PRRSV surveillance in weaning-age pigs under field conditions

Introduction

The use of serum and family oral fluids for porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) surveillance in weaning-age pigs has been previously characterized. Characterizing more sample types similarly offers veterinarians and producers additional validated sample options for PRRSV surveillance in this subpopulation of pigs. Oral swab sampling is relatively easy and convenient; however, there is sparse information on how it compares to the reference sample type for PRRSV surveillance under field conditions. Therefore, this study's objective was to compare the PRRSV reverse-transcription real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-rtPCR) test outcomes of oral swabs (OS) and sera samples obtained from weaning-age pig litters.

Method

At an eligible breeding herd, six hundred twenty-three weaning-age piglets from 51 litters were each sampled for serum and OS and tested for PRRSV RNA by RT-rtPCR.

Results and Discussion

PRRSV RT-rtPCR positivity rate was higher in serum samples (24 of 51 litters, 83 of 623 pigs, with a mean cycle threshold (Ct) value of RT-rtPCR-positive samples per litter ranging from 18.9 to 32.0) compared to OS samples (15 of 51 litters, 33 of 623 pigs, with a mean Ct of RT-rtPCR positive samples per litter ranging from 28.2 to 36.9); this highlights the importance of interpreting negative RT-rtPCR results from OS samples with caution. Every litter with a positive PRRSV RT-rtPCR OS had at least one viremic piglet, highlighting the authenticity of positive PRRSV RT-rtPCR tests using OS; in other words, there was no evidence of environmental PRRSV RNA being detected in OS. Cohen's kappa analysis (Ck = 0.638) indicated a substantial agreement between both sample types for identifying the true PRRSV status of weaning-age pigs.