Gender disparity in cardiovascular mortality following radiation therapy for Hodgkin's lymphoma: a systematic review

Sex-related differences in the efficacy and toxicity of cancer treatments

Differences between the biological sexes have long been observed in cancer incidence and prevalence, and in treatment outcomes including efficacy and toxicity. Ideally, there should be sufficient information to improve the individualization of cancer treatment by incorporating sex into treatment decisions. Necessary information should include: the nature and source of these differences; whether inherent to the specific cancer (such as molecular profiles, metabolic behaviors, and immune responses); the pathophysiological mechanisms of the specific cancer; or the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles of different cancer drugs. The influence of gender, which is defined as the sociocultural construct that determines societal norms for males and females, should also be included in personalized decision-making. This review aimed to describe the current evidence on the impact of sex and gender on treatment effects, outcomes, and toxicity profiles in cancer patients. Data for the influence of gender were negligible, whereas clinical studies and meta-analyses in different cancer types have identified differences between males and females in the effectiveness on survival outcomes of immunotherapy, chemotherapy, targeted therapy, and radiotherapy. Similarly, toxicity profiles of different cancer treatments varied between sexes. Based on these observed differences, it seems clear that sex should be included as an important variable when individualizing treatment; however, more research into sex- and gender-related differences in cancer treatment efficacy and toxicity, and the causes for these differences, is required before this can be fully incorporated into individualized treatment programs in real-world clinical practice.

Consequences of ionizing radiation exposure to the cardiovascular system

Ionizing radiation is widely used in various industrial and medical applications, resulting in increased exposure for certain populations. Lessons from radiation accidents and occupational exposure have highlighted the cardiovascular and cerebrovascular risks associated with radiation exposure. In addition, radiation therapy for cancer has been linked to numerous cardiovascular complications, depending on the distribution of the dose by volume in the heart and other relevant target tissues in the circulatory system. The manifestation of symptoms is influenced by numerous factors, and distinct cardiac complications have previously been observed in different groups of patients with cancer undergoing radiation therapy. However, in contemporary radiation therapy, advances in treatment planning with conformal radiation delivery have markedly reduced the mean heart dose and volume of exposure, and these variables are therefore no longer sole surrogates for predicting the risk of specific types of heart disease. Nevertheless, certain cardiac substructures remain vulnerable to radiation exposure, necessitating close monitoring. In this Review, we provide a comprehensive overview of the consequences of radiation exposure on the cardiovascular system, drawing insights from various cohorts exposed to uniform, whole-body radiation or to partial-body irradiation, and identify potential risk modifiers in the development of radiation-associated cardiovascular disease.

AOP report: Development of an adverse outcome pathway for deposition of energy leading to abnormal vascular remodeling

Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are complex, encompassing many types of heart pathophysiologies and associated etiologies. Radiotherapy studies have shown that fractionated radiation exposure at high doses (3-17 Gy) to the heart increases the incidence of CVD. However, the effects of low doses of radiation on the cardiovascular system or the effects from space travel, where radiation and microgravity are important contributors to damage, are not clearly understood. Herein, the adverse outcome pathway (AOP) framework was applied to develop an AOP to abnormal vascular remodeling from the deposition of energy. Following the creation of a preliminary pathway with the guidance of field experts and authoritative reviews, a scoping review was conducted that informed final key event (KE) selection and evaluation of the Bradford Hill criteria for the KE relationships (KERs). The AOP begins with a molecular initiating event of deposition of energy; ionization events increase oxidative stress, which when persistent concurrently causes the release of pro-inflammatory mediators, suppresses anti-inflammatory mechanisms and alters stress response signaling pathways. These KEs alter nitric oxide levels leading to endothelial dysfunction, and subsequent abnormal vascular remodeling (the adverse outcome). The work identifies evidence needed to strengthen understanding of the causal associations for the KERs, emphasizing where there are knowledge gaps and uncertainties in both qualitative and quantitative understanding. The AOP is anticipated to direct future research to better understand the effects of space on the human body and potentially develop countermeasures to better protect future space travelers.

The intersection of heart failure and cancer in women: a review

Cancer and cardiovascular disease represent the two leading causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Women continue to enjoy a greater life expectancy than men. However, this comes at a cost with more women developing diabetes, hypertension and coronary artery disease as they age. These traditional cardiovascular risk factors not only increase their lifetime risk of heart failure but also their overall risk of cancer. In addition to this, many of the cancers with female preponderance are treated with potentially cardiotoxic therapies, adding to their increased risk of developing heart failure. As a result, we are faced with a higher risk population, potentially suffering from both cancer and heart failure simultaneously. This is of particular concern given the coexistence of heart failure and cancer can confer a worse prognosis than either a single diagnosis of heart failure or cancer alone. This review article explores the intersection of heart failure and cancer in women at multiple levels, including traditional cardiovascular risk factors, cardiovascular toxicity derived from antineoplastic and radiation therapy, shared pathophysiology and HF as an oncogenic process. This article further identifies opportunities and strategies for intervention and optimisation, whilst highlighting the need for contemporary guidelines to better inform clinical practice.

Tailored to a Woman's Heart: Gender Cardio-Oncology Across the Lifespan

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Females outnumber males among long-term cancer survivors, primarily as a result of the prevalence of breast cancer. Late cardiovascular effects of cancer develop over several decades, which for many women, may overlap with reproductive and lifecycle events. Thus, women require longitudinal cardio-oncology care that anticipates and responds to their evolving cardiovascular risk.

RECENT FINDINGS

Women may experience greater cardiotoxicity from cancer treatments compared to men and a range of treatment-associated hormonal changes that increase cardiometabolic risk. Biological changes at critical life stages, including menarche, pregnancy, and menopause, put female cancer patients and survivors at a unique risk of cardiovascular disease. Women also face distinct psychosocial and physical barriers to accessing cardiovascular care. We describe the need for a lifespan-based approach to cardio-oncology for women. Cardio-oncology care tailored to women should rigorously consider cancer treatment/outcomes and concurrent reproductive/hormonal changes, which collectively shape quality of life and cardiovascular outcomes.

Sex-Based Differences in Clinical Outcomes of Acute Coronary Syndrome Among Patients With Mediastinal Radiation Exposure: Insights From The National Inpatient Sample (2009-2020)

There is a paucity of data about the sex differences in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) outcomes in patients with prior mediastinal radiation. The National Inpatient Sample database from years 2009 to 2020 were queried for ACS hospitalizations of patients with prior mediastinal radiation. The primary outcome was MACCE (major cardiovascular events), and secondary outcomes included other clinical outcomes. A total of 23,385 hospitalizations for ACS with prior mediastinal radiation exposure ([15,904 (68.01%) females, and 7481 (31.99%) males]) were included in analysis. Males were slightly younger than females (median, age (70 [62-78] vs 72 [64-80]). Female patients with ACS had a higher burden of hypertension (80.82% vs 73.55%), diabetes mellitus (33% vs 28.35%), hyperlipidemia (66.09% vs 62.2%), obesity (17.02% vs 8.6%) however, males had a higher burden of peripheral vascular disease (18.29% vs 12.51%), congestive heart failure (41.8% vs 39.35%) and smoking (70.33% vs 46.92%). After propensity matching, primary outcome MACCE was higher in males (20.85% vs 13.29%, aOR: 1.80 95% CI (1.65-1.96), P < 0.0001) along with cardiogenic shock (8.74% vs 2.42%, aOR: 1.77 95% CI (1.55-2.02), P < 0.0001) and mechanical circulatory support use (aOR: 1.48 95% CI [1.29 -1.71], P < 0.0001). We observed no differences in the length of hospital stay, however total hospitalization cost was higher in males. This nationwide analysis showed significant disparities in outcomes among male and female ACS patients with prior mediastinal radiation history, with increasing trend in hospitalization for ACS among males and females but decreasing mortality among females.

Machine Learning in Cardio-Oncology: New Insights from an Emerging Discipline

A growing body of evidence on a wide spectrum of adverse cardiac events following oncologic therapies has led to the emergence of cardio-oncology as an increasingly relevant interdisciplinary specialty. This also calls for better risk-stratification for patients undergoing cancer treatment. Machine learning (ML), a popular branch discipline of artificial intelligence that tackles complex big data problems by identifying interaction patterns among variables, has seen increasing usage in cardio-oncology studies for risk stratification. The objective of this comprehensive review is to outline the application of ML approaches in cardio-oncology, including deep learning, artificial neural networks, random forest and summarize the cardiotoxicity identified by ML. The current literature shows that ML has been applied for the prediction, diagnosis and treatment of cardiotoxicity in cancer patients. In addition, role of ML in gender and racial disparities for cardiac outcomes and potential future directions of cardio-oncology are discussed. It is essential to establish dedicated multidisciplinary teams in the hospital and educate medical professionals to become familiar and proficient in ML in the future.

Quantitative assessment of radiotherapy-induced myocardial damage using MRI: a systematic review

PURPOSE

To determine the role of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based metrics to quantify myocardial toxicity following radiotherapy (RT) in human subjects through review of current literature.

METHODS

Twenty-one MRI studies published between 2011-2022 were identified from available databases. Patients received chest irradiation with/without other treatments for various malignancies including breast, lung, esophageal cancer, Hodgkin's, and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. In 11 longitudinal studies, the sample size, mean heart dose, and follow-up times ranged from 10-81 patients, 2.0-13.9 Gy, and 0-24 months after RT (in addition to a pre-RT assessment), respectively. In 10 cross-sectional studies, the sample size, mean heart dose, and follow-up times ranged from 5-80 patients, 2.1-22.9 Gy, and 2-24 years from RT completion, respectively. Global metrics of left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF) and mass/dimensions of cardiac chambers were recorded, along with global/regional values of T1/T2 signal, extracellular volume (ECV), late gadolinium enhancement (LGE), and circumferential/radial/longitudinal strain.

RESULTS

LVEF tended to decline at >20 years follow-up and in patients treated with older RT techniques. Changes in global strain were observed after shorter follow-up (13±2 months) for concurrent chemoradiotherapy. In concurrent treatments with longer follow-up (8.3 years), increases in left ventricle (LV) mass index were correlated with LV mean dose. In pediatric patients, increases in LV diastolic volume were correlated with heart/LV dose at 2 years post-RT. Regional changes were observed earlier post-RT. Dose-dependent responses were reported for several parameters, including: increased T1 signal in high-dose regions, a 0.136% increase of ECV per Gy, progressive increase of LGE with increasing dose at regions receiving >30 Gy, and correlation between increases in LV scarring volume and LV mean/V10/V25 Gy dose.

CONCLUSION

Global metrics only detected changes over longer follow-up, in older RT techniques, in concurrent treatments, and in pediatric patients. In contrast, regional measurements detected myocardial damage at shorter follow-up and in RT treatments without concurrent treatment and had greater potential for dose-dependent response. The early detection of regional changes suggests the importance of regional quantification of RT-induced myocardial toxicity at early stages, before damage becomes irreversible. Further works with homogeneous cohorts are required to examine this matter.

Radiation-Induced Aortic Stenosis: An Update on Treatment Modalities

The adverse effects of radiation therapy for cancer are well described and can include a wide array of cardiac complications. Radiation-induced aortic stenosis (AS) is an increasingly recognized entity that poses particular therapeutic challenges. Several retrospective studies comparing the outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) vs those after surgical aortic valve replacement patients with radiation-induced AS have found a trend toward decreased mortality and fewer major complications with TAVR. Surgical aortic valve replacement is associated with increased mortality in patients with radiation-induced AS compared with patients without a history of prior radiation. TAVR has been shown to be a safe and effective alternative in patients with radiation-induced AS, with safety similar to that for patients who have not received prior radiation. However, rare and unexpected complications may occur after TAVR from the deleterious effects of radiation on mediastinal structures. More studies are needed to identify the optimal way of managing patients with radiation-induced AS, and algorithms are needed for planning these complex interventions.

Coronary artery disease in women

Cardiovascular disease is the leading global cause of death in women but remains underdiagnosed and undertreated. Health professionals play an important role in improving the heart health of Australian women. Routine heart health checks should be offered to all women 45 years of age and older and to all Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander women 30 years of age and older. Cardiovascular risk assessment in women must include traditional and sex-specific risk factors, including their pregnancy history and early-onset menopause. Women with pregnancy-related hypertensive and metabolic disorders have an increased long-term cardiovascular risk and require close monitoring. Women with acute coronary syndrome may not experience classical chest pain. More often, they experience cardiovascular events in the absence of obstructive coronary disease and have poorer cardiovascular outcomes. The recognition of sex-specific differences and more sex-specific trials are key to improving clinical outcomes.

Women at heart: Introducing gender cardio-oncology

As cardio-oncology imposed itself as the reference specialty for a comprehensive cardiovascular approach to all patients with cancer, a more specific and careful cardiac evaluation of women entering their journey into cancer care is needed. Gender medicine refers to the study of how sex-based biological and gender-based socioeconomic and cultural differences influence people's health. Gender-related aspects could account for differences in the development, progression, and clinical signs of diseases as well as in the treatment of adverse events. Gender also accounts for major differences in access to healthcare. As for medicine and healthcare in general, gender-related characteristics have gained significance in cardio-oncology and should no longer be neglected in both clinical practice and research. We aimed to review the most relevant cardiovascular issues in women related to the cardio-oncology approach to offer a specific gender-related point of view for clinicians involved in the care process for both cancer and cardiovascular disease.

Gender Differences in Diagnosis, Prevention, and Treatment of Cardiotoxicity in Cardio-Oncology

Gender differences exist throughout the medical field and significant progress has been made in understanding the effects of gender in many aspects of healthcare. The field of cardio-oncology is diverse and dynamic with new oncologic and cardiovascular therapies approved each year; however, there is limited knowledge regarding the effects of gender within cardio-oncology, particularly the impact of gender on cardiotoxicities. The relationship between gender and cardio-oncology is unique in that gender likely affects not only the biological underpinnings of cancer susceptibility, but also the response to both oncologic and cardiovascular therapies. Furthermore, gender has significant socioeconomic and psychosocial implications which may impact cancer and cardiovascular risk factor profiles, cancer susceptibility, and the delivery of healthcare. In this review, we summarize the effects of gender on susceptibility of cancer, response to cardiovascular and cancer therapies, delivery of healthcare, and highlight the need for further gender specific studies regarding the cardiovascular effects of current and future oncological treatments.