Advances in the treatment of traumatic scars with laser, intense pulsed light, radiofrequency, and ultrasound

Combination therapy of pulsed dye laser and ablative fractional carbon dioxide laser for the treatment of pediatric postburn scar: a systematic review

This study aims to determine the effectiveness of combining pulsed dye laser (PDL) and ablative fractional carbon dioxide laser (AFCL) in the treatment of scars in pediatric patients, as well as to identify appropriate treatment parameters, initial treatment timing, and treatment intervals through a systematic literature review. A literature search was conducted between April 6, 2014 and April 6, 2024 in four databases to select studies on the effects of the combination of carbon dioxide fractional laser and pulsed dye laser therapy in children hypertrophic burn scars. This systematic literature review included 497 participants across 8 studies, with individual study sample sizes ranging from 17 to 125 participants. 7 studies reported the gender distribution of participants, with a higher proportion of males (60%, n = 264) than females (40%, n = 170). The average age of the patients was 7.18 years, and scald (62%, n = 235) were identified as the primary cause of scar. The combination therapy of 595 nm PDL and 10,600 nm AFCL significantly improved Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) / Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) score. Study treatment intervals were approximately 1-2 months for simultaneous treatment and 1 month for PDL and 3 months for AFCL for sequential treatment. Two studies investigated the efficacy of early laser therapy (< 3 months), the AFCL laser energy parameters ranged from 30 mJ-50 mJ, significantly lower than the rest of the studies of laser energy parameters, which ranged from 50 mJ-120 mJ. The PDL energy density parameters showed little difference from study to study and were in the range of 5-12 J/cm2. Complications after treatment (4%, n = 22), with rash being the most common (50%, n = 11). Rational use of PDL combined with AFCL (lower laser energy, increase density parameters, shorten treatment intervals (< 1 month)) can safely and effectively treat hypertrophic scars in pediatric burn patients and is superior to single-type laser therapy in efficacy. Significant disorganization was observed among studies suggesting the need to explore high-level evidence-based clinical research that may improve treatment outcomes.

Efficiency of Early Sequential Laser Treatment for Facial Linear Scars in Cross-Sectional Regions

BACKGROUND

Long linear scars in cross-sectional regions can adversely affect facial aesthetics and functionality, leading to substantial psychological distress. Early intervention with carbon dioxide ablative fractional laser (CO2-AFL) and 595-nm pulsed dye laser (PDL) has shown promise in mitigating post-surgical scarring. However, the effectiveness of this treatment for extensive facial scars across different areas remains unclear.

METHODS

We reviewed medical records of 39 patients with long scars from facial trauma between January 2022 and October 2023. Treatment commenced with two sessions of PDL and three sessions of CO2-AFL 1 week post-suture removal. Outcomes were assessed using Antera 3D imaging and the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS 3.0). Quality of life improvements were measured using the Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36).

RESULTS

All patients completed five sessions of laser treatment. Significant reductions were noted in Patient and Observer scores on the POSAS (p < 0.05). Antera 3D analysis revealed substantial improvements in average roughness, depression depth, and elevation depth across facial regions. The significance of improvements in color variation, texture elevation span, melanin hyperconcentration, and hemoglobin hyperconcentration varied by area. Patients also showed significant improvements in SF-36 scores for physical role limitations, social functioning, and emotional well-being compared to pre-treatment levels (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Early sequential treatment with PDL and CO2-AFL effectively improves long scars in various facial areas.

The Effectiveness of Early Treatment With Intense Pulsed Light Combined With Fractional Erbium Laser in Preventing Post-traumatic Hypertrophic Scar Formation

BACKGROUND

Once scars form and begin to proliferate, treatment becomes challenging. Traditional methods of scar treatment often provide suboptimal results. Therefore, early intervention has become widely accepted, with a focus on prevention during the wound-healing phase rather than later treatment. Here, the authors evaluate the effectiveness of early treatment with intense pulsed light (IPL) combined with fractional erbium laser in preventing the formation of post-traumatic hypertrophic scars.

METHODS

A total of 120 patients who underwent emergency cosmetic suture surgery for facial trauma between January 2019 and December 2021 were selected for the study. The control group received conventional antiscar therapy (pressure therapy or antiscar medication), while the observation group received IPL combined with fractional erbium laser in addition to the conventional treatment. The specific treatment doses were adjusted based on the patient's age, scar color, texture, and thickness. A treatment course consisted of 3 to 5 sessions, with 4-week intervals between treatments. Follow-up was conducted within 1 year after treatment to assess the improvement in scar appearance before and after therapy.

RESULTS

After IPL combined with fractional erbium laser treatment, patients in the observation group showed significantly lower scores in color, thickness, vascular distribution, softness, and total scores on the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) compared with the control group. During the follow-up, 3 complications were observed: 2 cases of skin blisters and 1 case of pigmentation. No immediate skin lesions, depigmentation, infections, ulcers, or other adverse reactions were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with early-stage superficial scars following trauma surgery, early treatment with IPL combined with fractional erbium laser not only leads to significant improvements in appearance and effectively prevents hypertrophic scar formation but also promotes rapid recovery with few complications. This approach has clinical value.

Emerging biomedical technologies for scarless wound healing

Complete wound healing without scar formation has attracted increasing attention, prompting the development of various strategies to address this challenge. In clinical settings, there is a growing preference for emerging biomedical technologies that effectively manage fibrosis following skin injury, as they provide high efficacy, cost-effectiveness, and minimal side effects compared to invasive and costly surgical techniques. This review gives an overview of the latest developments in advanced biomedical technologies for scarless wound management. We first introduce the wound healing process and key mechanisms involved in scar formation. Subsequently, we explore common strategies for wound treatment, including their fabrication methods, superior performance and the latest research developments in this field. We then shift our focus to emerging biomedical technologies for scarless wound healing, detailing the mechanism of action, unique properties, and advanced practical applications of various biomedical technology-based therapies, such as cell therapy, drug therapy, biomaterial therapy, and synergistic therapy. Finally, we critically assess the shortcomings and potential applications of these biomedical technologies and therapeutic methods in the realm of scar treatment.

Artificial keloid skin models: understanding the pathophysiological mechanisms and application in therapeutic studies

Keloid is a type of scar formed by the overexpression of extracellular matrix substances from fibroblasts following inflammation after trauma. The existing keloid treatment methods include drug injection, surgical intervention, light exposure, cryotherapy, etc. However, these methods have limitations such as recurrence, low treatment efficacy, and side effects. Consequently, studies are being conducted on the treatment of keloids from the perspective of inflammatory mechanisms. In this study, keloid models are created to understand inflammatory mechanisms and explore treatment methods to address them. While previous studies have used animal models with gene mutations, chemical treatments, and keloid tissue transplantation, there are limitations in fully reproducing the characteristics of keloids unique to humans, and ethical issues related to animal welfare pose additional challenges. Consequently, studies are underway to create in vitro artificial skin models to simulate keloid disease and apply them to the development of treatments for skin diseases. In particular, herein, scaffold technologies that implement three-dimensional (3D) full-thickness keloid models are introduced to enhance mechanical properties as well as biological properties of tissues, such as cell proliferation, differentiation, and cellular interactions. It is anticipated that applying these technologies to the production of artificial skin for keloid simulation could contribute to the development of inflammatory keloid treatment techniques in the future.

Prospective Evaluation of Fractional Carbon Dioxide Laser Treatment of Mature Burn Scars, Post-traumatic Scars, and Post-acne Scars

BACKGROUND

Annually, around 100 million patients worldwide acquire scars, some of which can cause significant problems. Various treatment interventions, such as topical scar creams, steroids, laser therapy, and surgery, have been developed to manage these scars. This study was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of fractional CO2 laser treatment by assessing outcomes using the Patient Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) and clinical photographs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 47 patients were included in the study, divided into three groups: a post-acne scar group with 14 patients, a post-burn scar group with 17 patients, and a post-traumatic scar group with 16 patients. Detailed histories were taken, and clinical examinations were performed and recorded on a prepared proforma. Aesthetic outcomes were evaluated based on clinical photographs, and total patient and observer scores were recorded using POSAS at baseline, and after one and three months. POSAS comprises two components: the observer scale (POSAS-O) and the patient scale (POSAS-P). Fractional CO2 laser treatments were performed in each group, with sessions repeated every four weeks for three consecutive sessions. Data were analyzed using the paired t-test for before-and-after comparisons in each study group. Welch's ANOVA test was used for comparisons among the three groups at a significance level of p=0.05, using MS Excel (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, Washington) and IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 20 (Released 2011; IBM Corp., Armonk, New York).

RESULTS

The mean age for men was 26.38 ± 8.19 years and for women 22.21 ± 6.38 years. The study comprised 34 female patients (72.34%) and 13 male patients (27.66%). The mean POSAS observer and patient scales were recorded and compared for all three types of scars from baseline to three months. The mean percentage change in POSAS-O and POSAS-P (total score) in relation to different scar sites was recorded. The most significant difference in mean percentage change, statistically significant (p-value < 0.05), was observed for facial scars, followed by scars on the neck, and was minimal for scars on the hand, in both observer and patient groups. Even a single session of fractional CO2 laser therapy had profound effects on the overall quality of scars.

CONCLUSION

Fractional carbon dioxide laser therapy improves the quality of scars and produces significant improvements in skin texture, with better effects on post-traumatic scars than on post-burn and post-acne scars. Future studies are needed to better understand the mechanism of action and to optimize the doses and timing of therapy.

Fractional CO₂ Laser Therapy for Effective Treatment of Facial Traumatic Hypertrophic Scar: A Case Report

BACKGROUND Hypertrophic scars occur when there is an excessive wound-healing response in the skin. Fractional, or fractionated, carbon dioxide (CO₂) laser therapy uses narrow shafts of light to smooth the skin surface and stimulate dermal collagen, which tightens the skin. This case report describes a 57-year-old woman with a traumatic hypertrophic scar of the face treated with fractional carbon dioxide laser therapy. The purpose of this case report was to highlight the role of fractional CO₂ laser therapy in treatment of a facial traumatic hypertrophic scar in a patient after a motor vehicle crash. CASE REPORT A 57-year-old female patient presented with a hypertrophic, rigid, post-traumatic scar on the left side of her face following a motor vehicle crash. For the hypertrophic scar removal, the patient underwent 1 treatment session with fractional CO₂ laser using the µ-Scan DOT scanning system. After 1 laser treatment session, the photographic documentation, which permits monitoring the treatment's effectiveness in esthetic improvement, showed a significant improvement in scar texture and color. In addition, a significant reduction in scar height was observed following laser therapy. Fractional laser treatment with the device was very well tolerated by the patient, who reported no pain or discomfort, complications, or adverse effects either during treatment or in the follow-up period (3 months). CONCLUSIONS This report demonstrates the cosmetic application of fractional carbon dioxide laser therapy in a case of hypertrophic scar with the use of an effective therapeutic protocol that did not require the use of suturing.

Early postoperative interventions in the prevention and management of thyroidectomy scars

Thyroidectomy scars, located on the exposed site, can cause distress in patients. Owing to the cosmetic importance of thyroidectomy scars, many studies have been conducted on its prevention and treatment. Scar formation factors mainly include inflammatory cell infiltration, angiogenesis, fibroblast proliferation, secretion of cytokines such as transforming growth factor (TGF)-β1, and mechanical tension on the wound edges. Anti-scar methods including topical anti-scar agents, skin tension-bearing devices, and local injections of botulinum toxin, as well as lasers and phototherapies, that target these scar formation factors have been developed. However, current studies remain fragmented, and there is a lack of a comprehensive evaluation of the impacts of these anti-scar methods on treating thyroidectomy scars. Early intervention is a crucial but often neglected key to control hyperplastic thyroidectomy scars. Therefore, we review the currently adopted early postoperative strategies for thyroidectomy scar reduction, aiming to illustrate the mechanism of these anti-scar methods and provide flexible and comprehensive treatment selections for clinical physicians to deal with thyroidectomy scars.

The Short- and Long-Term Outcome Priorities of a Western Australian Adult Burn Population

To optimize patient recovery, understanding which outcomes are most important to burn patients is key. However, research to determine what outcomes are patient priorities is limited. Therefore, we assessed what outcomes are most important to Western Australian burn patients, separately in the short-term (<6 months) and long-term (6-24 months) after injury. Adult patients who had a burn injury 3-36 months ago completed a survey, rating the importance of 36 short- and long-term outcomes. The survey items were ranked according to the number of patients reporting the outcome as "very important." Results were compared between subgroups based on age, gender, burn size, and number of surgeries. Ninety-three patients were included. In the short-term, "not having a wound infection" (87.1%), "good wound healing" (83.9%), and "walking or moving around" (74.7%) were the most important outcomes. "Lifting or moving something" (67.6%), "walking or moving around" (66.2%), and "being independent" (66.2%) were reported as most important in the long-term. Scar-related outcomes were more important to females and to patients with multiple surgeries; mental health outcomes were priorities for females and patients with major burns; walking and moving around to males and older patients; and social and financial outcomes were rated highly by patients with major burns and multiple surgeries. In conclusion, the most important outcomes were consistent across time periods, indicating the importance of core outcomes in longitudinal follow-up. The wide range of priority outcomes and differences between subgroups underlines the need for multidisciplinary care and a patient-centered approach to support patients.

Advances in laser therapies for the scar

Scars are classified into 5 types: Superficial scars, hypertrophic scars, atrophic scars, depressed scars, and keloid. These types are primarily characterized by abnormal production of fibroblasts and collagen, as well as the disorderly arrangement of connective tissue. Laser treatment for scars involves the coordinated activation of various signaling pathways and cytokines. However, the exact pathological mechanism for scar formation remains unclear, leading to a lack of radical treatment. Recently, laser treatment has gained popularity as a new minimally invasive approach for scar treatment. The emergence of new theories such as fractional, picosecond laser, and laser-assisted drug delivery has led to continuous advance in laser treatment. Up to now, it has been developed numerous novel treatments, including combined with drug, physical, and other treatments, which have shown superior therapeutic effects. In order to optimize laser treatment in the future, it is crucial to combine new materials with postoperative care. This will help clinicians develop more comprehensive treatment strategies. Therefore, it is important to explore treatment options that have broader applicability.

Influence of scar age, laser type and laser treatment intervals on paediatric burn scars: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Laser therapy has emerged to play a valuable role in the treatment of paediatric burn scars; however, there is heterogeneity in the literature, particularly concerning optimal timing for initiation of laser therapy. This study aims to investigate the effect of factors such as scar age, type of laser and laser treatment interval on burn scar outcomes in children by meta-analysis of previous studies.

Methods

A literature search was conducted across seven databases in May 2022 to understand the effects of laser therapy on burn scar outcomes in paediatric patients by metanalysis of standardized mean difference (SMD) between pre- and post-laser intervention. Meta-analyses were performed using the Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software version 4.0. Fixed models were selected when there was no significant heterogeneity, and the random effects model was selected for analysis when significant heterogeneity was identified. For all analyses, a p-value < 0.05 was considered significant.

Results

Seven studies were included in the meta-analysis with a total of 467 patients. Laser therapy significantly improved Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS)/Total Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (Total POSAS), vascularity, pliability, pigmentation and scar height of burn scars. Significant heterogeneity was found between the studies and thus subgroup analyses were performed. Early laser therapy (<12 months post-injury) significantly improved VSS/POSAS scores compared to latent therapy (>12 months post-injury) {SMD -1.97 [95% confidence interval (CI) = -3.08; -0.87], p < 0.001 vs -0.59 [95%CI = -1.10; -0.07], p = 0.03} as well as vascularity {SMD -3.95 [95%CI = -4.38; -3.53], p < 0.001 vs -0.48 [95%CI = -0.66; -0.30], p < 0.001}. Non-ablative laser was most effective, significantly reducing VSS/POSAS, vascularity, pliability and scar height outcomes compared to ablative, pulse dye laser and a combination of ablative and pulse dye laser. Shorter treatment intervals of <4 weeks significantly reduced VSS/POSAS and scar height outcomes compared to intervals of 4 to 6 weeks.

Conclusions

Efficacy of laser therapy in the paediatric population is influenced by scar age, type of laser and interval between laser therapy application. The result of this study particularly challenges the currently accepted initiation time for laser treatment. Significant heterogeneity was observed within the studies, which suggests the need to explore other confounding factors influencing burn scar outcomes after laser therapy.

The Comparison of Efficacy and Safety Between General and Topical Anesthesia on Micro-Plasma Radiofrequency Treatment for Hypertrophic Scar: A Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

While micro-plasma radiofrequency (MPR) treatment has a significant impact on hypertrophic scars, patients often require anesthesia to alleviate substantial discomfort. Currently, patients with similar degrees of scarring may choose surface anesthesia or general anesthesia based on their personal preferences. Nevertheless, the effectiveness and safety of different anesthesia modalities remain uncertain.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effectiveness and safety of both general and surface anesthesia in MPR treatment for hypertrophic scars.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study involving 101 patients diagnosed with hypertrophic scars who underwent MPR with different anesthesia methods. The primary measures of efficacy included the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) scores assessed before the first treatment and six months after the final treatment. Pain relief was evaluated using Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores. Safety was assessed by comparing the incidence of adverse reactions between the two groups.

RESULTS

Patients in the general anesthesia group showed a significant difference in scar pigmentation 6 months after the treatment and lower pain level than those in the surface anesthesia group in the treatment of MPR. The difference in safety was not statistically significant. After adjusting for confounding factors and propensity score matching, the outcome of VSS and VAS scores was stable.

CONCLUSION

General anesthesia, as opposed to surface anesthesia, appears to enhance both the effectiveness and safety of MPR while reducing postoperative pain in the treatment of hypertrophic scars. For patients with heightened pain sensitivity, general anesthesia may be the preferred treatment option.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE II

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors http://www.springer.com/00266 .

Current application and modification strategy of marine polysaccharides in tissue regeneration: A review

Marine polysaccharides (MPs) are exceptional bioactive materials that possess unique biochemical mechanisms and pharmacological stability, making them ideal for various tissue engineering applications. Certain MPs, including agarose, alginate, carrageenan, chitosan, and glucan have been successfully employed as biological scaffolds in animal studies. As carriers of signaling molecules, scaffolds can enhance the adhesion, growth, and differentiation of somatic cells, thereby significantly improving the tissue regeneration process. However, the biological benefits of pure MPs composite scaffold are limited. Therefore, physical, chemical, enzyme modification and other methods are employed to expand its efficacy. Chemically, the structural properties of MPs scaffolds can be altered through modifications to functional groups or molecular weight reduction, thereby enhancing their biological activities. Physically, MPs hydrogels and sponges emulate the natural extracellular matrix, creating a more conducive environment for tissue repair. The porosity and high permeability of MPs membranes and nanomaterials expedite wound healing. This review explores the distinctive properties and applications of select MPs in tissue regeneration, highlighting their structural versatility and biological applicability. Additionally, we provide a brief overview of common modification strategies employed for MP scaffolds. In conclusion, MPs have significant potential and are expected to be a novel regenerative material for tissue engineering.

Microneedle-mediated drug delivery for scar prevention and treatment

Scars are an inevitable natural outcome of most wound healing processes and affect skin functions, leading to cosmetic, psychological and social problems. Several strategies, including surgery, radiation, cryotherapy, laser therapy, pressure therapy and corticosteroids, can be used to either prevent or treat scars. However, these strategies are ineffective, have side effects and are typically expensive. Microneedle (MN) technology is a powerful, minimally invasive platform for transdermal drug delivery. This review discusses the most recent progress in MN-mediated drug delivery to prevent and treat pathological scars (hypertrophic and keloids). A comprehensive overview of existing challenges and future perspectives is also provided.

Scar Management and Dyschromia: A Summary Report from the 2021 American Burn Association State of the Science Meeting

Burn scars, and in particular, hypertrophic scars, are a challenging yet common outcome for survivors of burn injuries. In 2021, the American Burn Association brought together experts in burn care and research to discuss critical topics related to burns, including burn scars, at its State of the Science conference. Clinicians and researchers with burn scar expertise, as well as burn patients, industry representatives, and other interested stakeholders met to discuss issues related to burn scars and discuss priorities for future burn scar research. The various preventative strategies and treatment modalities currently utilized for burn scars were discussed, including relatively noninvasive therapies such as massage, compression, and silicone sheeting, as well as medical interventions such as corticosteroid injection and laser therapies. A common theme that emerged is that the efficacy of current therapies for specific patient populations is not clear, and further research is needed to improve upon these treatments and develop more effective strategies to suppress scar formation. This will necessitate quantitative analyses of outcomes and would benefit from creation of scar biobanks and shared data resources. In addition, outcomes of importance to patients, such as scar dyschromia, must be given greater attention by clinicians and researchers to improve overall quality of life in burn survivors. Herein we summarize the main topics of discussion from this meeting and offer recommendations for areas where further research and development are needed.

Vascular and Collagen Target: A Rational Approach to Hypertrophic Scar Management

Significance: Hypertrophic scarring is a challenging issue for patients and clinicians. The prevalence of hypertrophic scarring can be up to 70% after burns, and patients suffer from pain, itching, and loss of joint mobility. To date, the exact mechanisms underlying hypertrophic scar formation are unclear, and clinical options remain limited. Recent Advances: Several studies have demonstrated that pathological scars are a type of hyperactive vascular response to wounding. Scar regression has been found to be accompanied by microvessel occlusion, which causes severe hypoxia, malnutrition, and endothelial dysfunction, suggesting the essential roles of microvessels in scar regression. Therefore, interventions that target the vasculature, such as intense pulsed light, pulsed dye lasers, vascular endothelial growth factor antibodies, and Endostar, represent potential treatments. In addition, the mass of scar-associated collagen is usually not considered by current treatments. However, collagen-targeted therapies such as fractional CO₂ laser and collagenase have shown promising outcomes in scar treatment. Critical Issues: Traditional modalities used in current clinical practice only partially target scar-associated microvessels or collagen. As a result, the effectiveness of current treatments is limited and is too often accompanied by undesirable side effects. The formation of scars in the early stage is mainly affected by microvessels, whereas the scars in later stages are mostly composed of residual collagen. Traditional therapies do not utilize specific targets for scars at different stages. Therefore, more precise treatment strategies are needed. Future Directions: Scars should be classified as either "vascular-dominant" or "collagen-dominant" before selecting a treatment. In this way, strategies that are vascular-targeted, collagen-targeted, or a combination thereof could be recommended to treat scars at different stages.

Treatment of sensitive skin by short-wave radiofrequency combined with intense pulsed light

BACKGROUND

Sensitive skin is a widespread dermatologic condition, and no optimal treatments have been established so far.

OBJECTIVE

To investigated the efficacy and safety of the combined therapy of short-wave radiofrequency (SWRF) and intense pulsed light (IPL) in improving transepidermal water loss (TEWL) and facial erythema in sensitive skin patients.

METHODS

Twenty-two patients with sensitive skin received the SWRF treatment once per week for 4 weeks and IPL treatment once. Digital photographs and three-dimensional images were taken at each follow-up. The clinical efficacy was evaluated by the improvement of sensitive scale-10 including irritant symptoms and facial erythema. In addition, erythema area and TEWL values were measured.

RESULTS

All patients showed subjective and objective improvement in irritant sensations and facial erythema after treatment. The TEWL values decreased from 20.29 ± 5.97 g·h^-1 ·m^-2 at baseline to 14.70 ± 6.02 g·h^-1 ·m^-2 after SWRF treatment and 13.78 ± 4.70 g·h^-1 ·m^-2 after combined therapy (p = 0.000). The clearance of the erythema area was statistically significant, with 14.05% ± 5.71% at baseline, 9.38% ± 4.08% after SWRF treatment, and 5.73% ± 2.79% after combined therapy (p = 0.000). No adverse events were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of SWRF with IPL was effective in relieving skin irritant sensations and facial erythema of sensitive skin by repairing skin barrier function.

Diagnosis, Treatment, and Management of Painful Scar: A Narrative Review

Painful scars can develop after surgery or trauma, with symptoms ranging from a minor itch to intractable allodynia. The problem of the painful scar may involve both intraneural and extraneural structures, requiring a systematic approach to diagnosis and treatment of this neuropathic pain condition that can impact quality of life and function profoundly. In this review, we outline the algorithm for the diagnosis, management, medical and surgical treatment of painful scars.

Molecular Features of Hypertrophic Scars After Thermal Injury: Is There a Biologic Basis for Laser Therapy?

Significance: Hypertrophic scars (HTS) and keloids are common after thermal injuries and other trauma to deep regions of dermis of the skin. These abnormal scars can cause contractures and the thick masses of scar tissue that result in functional and cosmetic impairment. Management of these dermal fibrotic conditions includes a wide range of medical and surgical treatments, which can be time consuming, only partially effective, and often uncomfortable for patients. Recent Advances: The molecular pathophysiology of HTS has become more understood over the past two decades, where thermal injury to the reticular dermis results in an inflammatory response, fibrogenic growth factor release, and the formation of a dermal scar with increased collagen and proteoglycan composition in an abnormal morphology. Lasers are becoming a widely used form of treatment for these types of scars; however, the evidence for the beneficial effects of laser treatments and the understanding of their mechanism of action are still evolving. Critical Issues: Paradoxically, laser delivery of thermal energy to the skin is suggested to improve scar remodeling and wound healing, yet HTS is a well-recognized complication of excessive thermal energy delivered by laser treatments. This review aims to examine the current evidence for the use of lasers for HTS, and to investigate the molecular mechanisms where re-injury of a burn scar from laser treatment could result in overall improvements in scar quality. Future Directions: Improved design of clinical trials for the treatment of scarring in the future will evolve from new methodology and models of HTS in animals and humans.

Laser in surgical scar clearance: An update review

Scar formation is a consequence of wound healing that developed from damaged tissue either from physical injury or surgical incision. A hypertrophic scar develops due to an abnormal healing response to trauma. It might lead to serious functional and cosmetic disability. There are numerous methods mentioned in the literature to treat such scars but to date, no single method has been known to cure them. In this review, we focused on differences between various types of nonsurgical management of hypertrophic scar focusing on the indication, mechanism of action, and efficacy of the pulsed dye laser (PDL), fractional carbon dioxide laser (fCO2), Er-YAG laser, and intense pulse light (IPL). The literature research included peer-reviewed articles (clinical trials or scientific reviews) which were identified by searching electronic databases like PubMed till January 2021 and reference lists of respective articles. Only articles published in the English language were included.

Scar-Free Healing: Current Concepts and Future Perspectives

Every year, millions of people develop scars due to skin injuries after trauma, surgery, or skin burns. From the beginning of wound healing development, scar hyperplasia, and prolonged healing time in wound healing have been severe problems. Based on the difference between adult and fetal wound healing processes, many promising therapies have been developed to decrease scar formation in skin wounds. Currently, there is no good or reliable therapy to cure or prevent scar formation. This work briefly reviews the engineering methods of scarless wound healing, focusing on regenerative biomaterials and different cytokines, growth factors, and extracellular components in regenerative wound healing to minimize skin damage cell types, and scar formation.

Laser management of hypertrophic burn scars: a comprehensive review

Hypertrophic scars often develop following burn-related injuries. These scars can be cosmetically unappealing, but associated symptoms of pruritus, pain and restricted range of motion can impair a person’s quality of life. Laser and light therapies offer a minimally invasive, low-risk approach to treatment, with a short postoperative recovery period. As laser technology developed, studies have shown decreased scar thickness, neuropathic pain and need for surgical excision, as well as improved scar pigmentation, erythema, pliability, texture, height and pruritus. In this review, we present the evolution of laser therapy for hypertrophic burn scars, how different types of lasers work, indications, perioperative considerations and guidelines for practice management.