1
|
Jairath V, Gibble TH, Moses R, Klooster B, Litcher-Kelly L, Walker M, Bernstein MC, Rupinski K, McLafferty M, Travis S, Dubinsky M. Patient interpretations of patient-reported outcome measures to assess bowel urgency: qualitative interviews in ulcerative colitis. J Patient Rep Outcomes 2024; 8:54. [PMID: 38819757 DOI: 10.1186/s41687-024-00733-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2024] [Accepted: 05/16/2024] [Indexed: 06/01/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Bowel urgency is an impactful core symptom of ulcerative colitis (UC). Patient-reported outcome (PRO) questionnaires have been developed and used to assess the patient experience of this important symptom. The objective of this paper is to present evidence from qualitative research conducted to support the use and interpretation of select PRO questionnaires to assess bowel urgency related to the UC patient experience. METHODS Qualitative interviews were conducted with ten adults with a clinician-confirmed diagnosis of moderately to severely active UC. Interviews aimed to document patient interpretation of modified recall periods for the Urgency Numeric Rating Scale (Urgency NRS), two global assessments (i.e., the Patient Global Impression of Severity [PGIS] and Patient Global Impression of Change [PGIC]), and four items (Items 11, 16, 23, and 26) of the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ), and explore the patient perspective of meaningful change on these questionnaires. RESULTS Both modified Urgency NRS versions (with 7-day or 3-day recall period) were interpreted as intended by most patients (≥ 88.9%), and slightly more than half of patients (60.0%) reported that the 7-day recall period was more relevant to their bowel urgency experience. Patients reported thinking of bowel urgency (≥ 80.0%) or bowel urgency-related accidents (70.0% of patients) when interpreting the global assessments and IBDQ items. Most patients reported a 1- to 3-point change as the smallest meaningful improvement that would be meaningful on the Urgency NRS (similar to findings on other questionnaires). CONCLUSION Adults with UC can understand and respond to the Urgency NRS with modified recall periods (i.e., 7-day or 3-day), interpret the conceptual content of the PGIS, PGIC, and select IBDQ items to be inclusive of bowel urgency and bowel urgency-related accidents, and select answers representing meaningful improvements on the Urgency NRS, PGIS, PGIC, and IBDQ item response scales. These results further contribute patient-centered data to existing UC and bowel urgency research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vipul Jairath
- Departments of Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, Canada
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Western University, London, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kim C, Brown FL, Burk C, Anatchkova M, Sargalo N, Kaushik A. Patient experiences in ulcerative colitis: conceptual model and review of patient-reported outcome measures. Qual Life Res 2024; 33:1373-1387. [PMID: 38438664 PMCID: PMC11045605 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-024-03612-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/19/2024] [Indexed: 03/06/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE To identify symptoms and their impacts on daily functioning and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) experienced by adult patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) and evaluate patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures for UC clinical studies. METHODS A conceptual model of symptoms and impacts of UC were developed from a literature review. PRO measures were identified from the literature, clinical trials databases, health technology assessment submissions, and regulatory label claims, and were selected for conceptual analysis based on disease specificity and use across information sources. PRO measures covering the most concepts when mapped against the conceptual model were assessed for gaps in psychometric properties using Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guidance and consensus-based standards for the selection of health measurement instruments (COSMIN) criteria. RESULTS The conceptual model grouped the 52 symptom concepts and 72 proximal and distal impacts into eight, two, and five dimensions, respectively. Of 65 PRO measures identified, eight underwent conceptual analysis. Measures covering the most concepts and assessed for psychometric properties were the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire, Symptoms and Impacts Questionnaire for UC, UC-PRO symptoms modules, UC-PRO impact modules, and Crohn's and UC Questionnaire; all had good or excellent support for content validity. The UC-PRO Signs and Symptoms fully met FDA guidance and COSMIN criteria for content validity and most psychometric properties. CONCLUSION Existing PRO measures assess concepts relevant to patients with UC, but all PRO measures reviewed require further psychometric evaluation to demonstrate they are fit for purpose.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chong Kim
- HEOR, Gilead Sciences, Foster City, CA, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Jairath V, Hunter Gibble T, Potts Bleakman A, Chatterton K, Medrano P, McLafferty M, Klooster B, Saxena S, Moses R. Patient Perspectives of Bowel Urgency and Bowel Urgency-Related Accidents in Ulcerative Colitis and Crohn's Disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2024:izae044. [PMID: 38513272 DOI: 10.1093/ibd/izae044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2023] [Indexed: 03/23/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Bowel urgency is bothersome in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) or Crohn's disease (CD) and impacts their well-being but remains underappreciated in clinical trials and during patient-healthcare provider interactions. This study explored the experiences of bowel urgency and bowel urgency-related accidents to identify the concepts most relevant and important to patients. METHODS Adults with a diagnosis of moderate-to-severe UC or CD for ≥6 months and experience of bowel urgency in the past 6 months were included. Qualitative, semi-structured interviews were conducted via telephonic/Web-enabled teleconference. Interview transcripts were coded and analyzed in ATLAS.ti 9 using a systematic thematic analysis. RESULTS In total, 30 participants with UC or CD (n = 15 each) (mean age 52 and 50 years, respectively) participated in the interviews. The majority of participants were receiving biologic and/or conventional therapy (80% and 87%, respectively). Most participants with UC (87%) and all with CD experienced bowel urgency-related accidents. The most frequently reported symptoms co-occurring with bowel urgency were abdominal pain, fatigue, and abdominal cramping. Abdominal pain and abdominal cramping were the most bothersome co-occurring symptoms of bowel urgency and bowel urgency-related accidents. In both groups, participants reported decreased frequency of bowel urgency and not wanting to experience bowel urgency-related accidents at all as a meaningful improvement. CONCLUSIONS Participants with UC or CD expressed bowel urgency and bowel urgency-related accidents to be bothersome and impactful on their daily lives despite use of biologic and/or conventional therapy. These findings underscore the need for development of patient-reported outcome measures to assess bowel urgency in clinical settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vipul Jairath
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Western University, London, Ontario, OX3 9DU, Canada
| | | | | | | | - Paolo Medrano
- Patient-Centered Outcomes, Adelphi Values, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Megan McLafferty
- Patient-Centered Outcomes, Adelphi Values, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Brittany Klooster
- Patient-Centered Outcomes, Adelphi Values, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Long MD, Schreiber S, Hibi T, Gibble TH, Fisher DA, Park G, Moses RE, Higgins PDR, Lindsay JO, Lee SD, Escobar R, Jairath V. Association of Bowel Urgency With Quality-of-Life Measures in Patients With Moderately-to-Severely Active Ulcerative Colitis: Results From Phase 3 LUCENT-1 (Induction) and LUCENT-2 (Maintenance) Studies. CROHN'S & COLITIS 360 2024; 6:otae001. [PMID: 38313767 PMCID: PMC10838132 DOI: 10.1093/crocol/otae001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2023] [Indexed: 02/06/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Improvement in bowel urgency (BU) was associated with better clinical outcomes in phase 3 LUCENT-1 (induction) and LUCENT-2 (maintenance) studies in moderately-to-severely active ulcerative colitis (UC). We assessed association of BU with quality-of-life (QoL) outcomes. Methods LUCENT-1: 1162 patients randomized 3:1 to intravenous mirikizumab 300 mg or placebo every 4 weeks (Q4W) for 12 weeks. LUCENT-2: 544 mirikizumab induction responders re-randomized 2:1 to subcutaneous mirikizumab 200 mg or placebo Q4W through Week (W) 40 (W52 of continuous treatment). Patients reported BU severity in the past 24 hours using a validated Urgency Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). In patients with baseline Urgency NRS ≥3, the association between BU Clinically Meaningful Improvement (CMI; ≥3-point decrease) and remission (score 0 or 1) with patient-reported outcomes was assessed at W12 and W52. Results A significantly greater proportion of patients with versus without BU Remission achieved IBDQ remission (W12: 87.3% vs 42.7%, P < .0001; W52: 91.4% vs 45.5%, p < .0001). Similarly, BU Remission was associated with more patients achieving CMI in SF-36 Physical Component Summary (W12: 69.0% vs 44.4%, P < .0001; W52: 77.5% vs 42.1%, P < .0001) and Mental Component Summary (W12: 53.5% vs 41.0%, P = .0019; W52: 62.0% vs 38.3%, P < .0001) scores. At W12 and W52, patients with BU CMI or Remission showed significant improvements in EQ-5D-5L and Work Productivity and Activity Impairment:UC scores. Significant improvements were also seen in fatigue, abdominal pain, and nocturnal stool. Conclusions In patients with moderately-to-severely active UC, improvement in BU was associated with improved QoL in phase 3 LUCENT-1 and LUCENT-2 studies. Clinical Studies LUCENT-1: NCT03518086; LUCENT-2: NCT03524092.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Millie D Long
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Stefan Schreiber
- Department Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel University, Kiel, Germany
| | - Toshifumi Hibi
- Kitasato Institute Hospital, Minato-ku, Center for Advanced IBD Research and Treatment, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | | | - Gina Park
- Techdata Services Company LLC, King of Prussia, PA, USA
| | | | - Peter D R Higgins
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | | | - Scott D Lee
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | | | - Vipul Jairath
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Dubinsky M, Bleakman AP, Panaccione R, Hibi T, Schreiber S, Rubin D, Dignass A, Redondo I, Gibble TH, Kayhan C, Travis S. Bowel Urgency in Ulcerative Colitis: Current Perspectives and Future Directions. Am J Gastroenterol 2023; 118:1940-1953. [PMID: 37436151 PMCID: PMC10617668 DOI: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000002404] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2022] [Revised: 06/02/2023] [Accepted: 06/13/2023] [Indexed: 07/13/2023]
Abstract
Bowel urgency (BU), the sudden or immediate need for a bowel movement, is one of the most common and disruptive symptoms experienced by patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). Distinct from the separate symptom of increased stool frequency, BU has a substantial negative impact on quality of life and psychosocial functioning. Among patients with UC, BU is one of the top reasons for treatment dissatisfaction and one of the symptoms patients most want improved. Patients may not discuss BU often due to embarrassment, and healthcare providers may not address the symptom adequately due to the lack of awareness of validated tools and/or knowledge of the importance of assessing BU. The mechanism of BU in UC is multifactorial and includes inflammatory changes in the rectum that may be linked to hypersensitivity and reduced compliance of the rectum. Responsive and reliable patient-reported outcome measures of BU are needed to provide evidence of treatment benefits in clinical trials and facilitate communication in clinical practice. This review discusses the pathophysiology and clinical importance of BU in UC and its impact on the quality of life and psychosocial functioning. Patient-reported outcome measures developed to assess the severity of BU in UC are discussed alongside overviews of treatment options and clinical guidelines. Implications for the future management of UC from the perspective of BU are also explored.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marla Dubinsky
- Susan and Leonard Feinstein Inflammatory Bowel Disease Clinical Center, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Icahn School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | | | - Remo Panaccione
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Toshifumi Hibi
- Center for Advanced IBD Research and Treatment, Kitasato Institute Hospital, Kitasato University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Stefan Schreiber
- Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | - David Rubin
- The University of Chicago Medicine Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Axel Dignass
- Department of Medicine I, Agaplesion Markus Hospital, Goethe University, Frankfurt/Main, Germany
| | | | | | - Cem Kayhan
- Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Simon Travis
- Experimental Medicine Division, John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
France E, Uny I, Turley R, Thomson K, Noyes J, Jordan A, Forbat L, Caes L, Silveira Bianchim M. A meta-ethnography of how children and young people with chronic non-cancer pain and their families experience and understand their condition, pain services, and treatments. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2023; 10:CD014873. [PMID: 37795766 PMCID: PMC10552070 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd014873.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chronic non-cancer pain in childhood is widespread, affecting 20% to 35% of children and young people worldwide. For a sizeable number of children, chronic non-cancer pain has considerable negative impacts on their lives and quality of life, and leads to increased use of healthcare services and medication. In many countries, there are few services for managing children's chronic non-cancer pain, with many services being inadequate. Fourteen Cochrane Reviews assessing the effects of pharmacological, psychological, psychosocial, dietary or physical activity interventions for managing children's chronic non-cancer pain identified a lack of high-quality evidence to inform pain management. To design and deliver services and interventions that meet the needs of patients and their families, we need to understand how children with chronic non-cancer pain and their families experience pain, their views of services and treatments for chronic pain, and which outcomes are important to them. OBJECTIVES 1. To synthesise qualitative studies that examine the experiences and perceptions of children with chronic non-cancer pain and their families regarding chronic non-cancer pain, treatments and services to inform the design and delivery of health and social care services, interventions and future research. 2. To explore whether our review findings help to explain the results of Cochrane Reviews of intervention effects of treatments for children's chronic non-cancer pain. 3. To determine if programme theories and outcomes of interventions match children and their families' views of desired treatments and outcomes. 4. To use our findings to inform the selection and design of patient-reported outcome measures for use in chronic non-cancer pain studies and interventions and care provision to children and their families. The review questions are: 1. How do children with chronic non-cancer pain and their families conceptualise chronic pain? 2. How do children with chronic non-cancer pain and their families live with chronic pain? 3. What do children with chronic non-cancer pain and their families think of how health and social care services respond to and manage their child's chronic pain? 4. What do children with chronic non-cancer pain and their families conceptualise as 'good' chronic pain management and what do they want to achieve from chronic pain management interventions and services? SEARCH METHODS Review strategy: we comprehensively searched 12 bibliographic databases including MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycInfo and grey literature sources, and conducted supplementary searches in 2020. We updated the database searches in September 2022. SELECTION CRITERIA To identify published and unpublished qualitative research with children aged 3 months to 18 years with chronic non-cancer pain and their families focusing on their perceptions, experiences and views of chronic pain, services and treatments. The final inclusion criteria were agreed with a patient and public involvement group of children and young people with chronic non-cancer pain and their families. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We conducted a qualitative evidence synthesis using meta-ethnography, a seven-phase, systematic, interpretive, inductive methodology that takes into account the contexts and meanings of the original studies. We assessed the richness of eligible studies and purposively sampled rich studies ensuring they addressed the review questions. Cochrane Qualitative Methods Implementation Group guidance guided sampling. We assessed the methodological limitations of studies using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme tool. We extracted data on study aims, focus, characteristics and conceptual findings from study reports using NVivo software. We compared these study data to determine how the studies related to one another and grouped studies by pain conditions for synthesis. We used meta-ethnography to synthesise each group of studies separately before synthesising them all together. Analysis and interpretation of studies involved children with chronic non-cancer pain and their families and has resulted in theory to inform service design and delivery. Sampling, organising studies for synthesis, and analysis and interpretation involved our patient and public involvement group who contributed throughout the conduct of the review. We used the GRADE-CERQual (Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative research) approach to assess our confidence in each review finding. We used a matrix approach to integrate our findings with existing Cochrane Reviews on treatment effectiveness for children's chronic non-cancer pain. MAIN RESULTS We synthesised 43 studies sampled from 170 eligible studies reported in 182 publications. Included studies involved 633 participants. GRADE-CERQual assessments of findings were mostly high (n = 21, 58%) or moderate (n = 12, 33%) confidence with three (8%) low or very low confidence. Poorly managed, moderate or severe chronic non-cancer pain had profound adverse impacts on family dynamics and relationships; family members' emotions, well-being, autonomy and sense of self-identity; parenting strategies; friendships and socialising; children's education and future employment prospects; and parental employment. Most children and parents understood chronic non-cancer pain as having an underlying biological cause and wanted curative treatment. However, families had difficulties seeking and obtaining support from health services to manage their child's pain and its impacts. Children and parents felt that healthcare professionals did not always listen to their experiences and expertise, or believe the child's pain. Some families repeatedly visited health services seeking a diagnosis and cure. Over time, some children and families gave up hope of effective treatment. Outcomes measured within trials and Cochrane Reviews of intervention effects did not include some outcomes of importance to children and families, including impacts of pain on the whole family and absence of pain. Cochrane Reviews have mainly neglected a holistic biopsychosocial approach, which specifies the interrelatedness of biological, psychological and social aspects of illness, when selecting outcome measures and considering how chronic pain management interventions work. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS We had high or moderate confidence in the evidence contributing to most review findings. Further research, especially into families' experiences of treatments and services, could strengthen the evidence for low or very low confidence findings. Future research should also explore families' experiences in low- to middle-income contexts; of pain treatments including opioid use in children, which remains controversial; and of social care services. We need development and testing of family-centred interventions and services acceptable to families. Future trials of children's chronic non-cancer pain interventions should include family-centred outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma France
- NMAHP Research Unit, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK
| | - Isabelle Uny
- Institute of Social Marketing, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK
| | - Ruth Turley
- Development Directorate, Cochrane Central Executive, Cochrane, London, UK
| | - Katie Thomson
- Occupational Therapy, Human Nutrition & Dietetics, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | - Jane Noyes
- Centre for Health-Related Research, Fron Heulog, Bangor University, Bangor, UK
| | - Abbie Jordan
- Department of Psychology, University of Bath, Bath, UK
- Bath Centre for Pain Research, University of Bath, Bath, UK
| | - Liz Forbat
- Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK
| | - Line Caes
- Department of Psychology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK
| | - Mayara Silveira Bianchim
- NMAHP Research Unit, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK
- Centre for Population Health and Wellbeing Research, School of Medical and Health Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ha C, Naegeli AN, Lukanova R, Shan M, Wild R, Hennessy F, Jyothi Kommoju U, Potts Bleakman A, Hunter Gibble T. Rectal Urgency Among Patients With Ulcerative Colitis or Crohn's Disease: Analyses from a Global Survey. CROHN'S & COLITIS 360 2023; 5:otad052. [PMID: 37928613 PMCID: PMC10622170 DOI: 10.1093/crocol/otad052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2023] [Indexed: 11/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Rectal urgency is a common but under-reported inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) symptom. The present study assessed the prevalence of rectal urgency and its association with disease activity and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) among patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) or Crohn's disease (CD) in a real-world setting. Methods Data were drawn from the 2017-2018 Adelphi IBD Disease Specific Programme™, a multi-center, point-in-time survey of gastroenterologists and consulting adult patients with UC or CD in France, Germany, Italy, Spain, the United Kingdom, and the United States. Gastroenterologists completed patient record forms and patients completed self-reported forms. Analyses were conducted separately for patients with UC or CD. Patient demographics, clinical characteristics, disease activity, symptoms, and PROs were compared between patients with and without rectal urgency. Results In total, 1057 patients with UC and 1228 patients with CD were included. Rectal urgency was reported in 20.2% of patients with UC and 16.4% with CD. Patients with rectal urgency were more likely to have moderate or severe disease (UC or CD: P < .0001), higher mean Mayo score (UC: P < .0001), higher mean Crohn's Disease Activity Index score (CD: P < .0001), lower Short IBD Questionnaire scores (UC or CD: P < .0001), and higher work impairment (UC: P < .0001; CD: P = .0001) than patients without rectal urgency. Conclusions Rectal urgency is a common symptom associated with high disease activity, decreased work productivity, and worse quality of life. Further studies are needed to include rectal urgency assessment in routine clinical practice to better gauge disease activity in patients with UC or CD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christina Ha
- The F. Widjaja Foundation Inflammatory Bowel Immunology Research Institute at Cedars-Sinai, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | | | | | | | - Rosie Wild
- Adelphi Real World, Bollington, Cheshire, UK
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
International Consensus on Definition of Mild-to-Moderate Ulcerative Colitis Disease Activity in Adult Patients. MEDICINA (KAUNAS, LITHUANIA) 2023; 59:medicina59010183. [PMID: 36676807 PMCID: PMC9861955 DOI: 10.3390/medicina59010183] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/24/2022] [Revised: 01/12/2023] [Accepted: 01/13/2023] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
Background and Objectives: At present, there is no consensus definition of mild-to-moderate disease activity in patients with ulcerative colitis. The objective of the present study was to establish a reliable definition of mild-to-moderate disease activity in adult patients with ulcerative colitis. Materials and Methods: Twelve physicians from around the world participated in a virtual consensus meeting on 26 September 2022. All the physicians had expertise in the diagnosis and treatment of inflammatory bowel disease. After a systematic review of the literature and expert opinion, a modified version of the RAND/University of California, Los Angeles appropriateness method was applied. A total of 49 statements were identified and then anonymously rated (on a 9-point scale) as being appropriate (scores of 7 to 9), uncertain (4 to 6) or inappropriate (1 to 3). The survey results were reviewed and amended before a second round of voting. Results: Symptom and endoscopic-based measurements are of prime importance for assessing mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis activity in clinical trials. The experts considered that clinical activity should be assessed in terms of stool frequency, rectal bleeding and fecal urgency, whereas endoscopic activity should be evaluated with regard to the vascular pattern, bleeding, erosions and ulcers. Fecal calprotectin was considered to be a suitable disease activity marker in mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis. Lastly, mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis should not have more than a small impact on the patient's daily activities. Conclusions: The present recommendations constitute a standardized framework for defining mild-to-moderate disease activity in clinical trials in the field of ulcerative colitis.
Collapse
|
9
|
Dubinsky MC, Clemow DB, Hunter Gibble T, Li X, Vermeire S, Hisamatsu T, Travis SPL. Clinical Effect of Mirikizumab Treatment on Bowel Urgency in Patients with Moderately to Severely Active Ulcerative Colitis and the Clinical Relevance of Bowel Urgency Improvement for Disease Remission. CROHN'S & COLITIS 360 2022; 5:otac044. [PMID: 36777368 PMCID: PMC9802448 DOI: 10.1093/crocol/otac044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Bowel urgency reduces ulcerative colitis patients' quality of life. Mirikizumab, a p19-directed anti-IL-23 antibody, demonstrates ulcerative colitis efficacy. Mirikizumab efficacy to reduce bowel urgency and bowel urgency association with other endpoints were analyzed in 2 Phase 3 trials. Methods LUCENT-1 (Induction): 1162 patients randomized 3:1 to intravenous 300 mg mirikizumab or placebo every 4 weeks for 12 weeks. LUCENT-2 (Maintenance): 544 mirikizumab responders during induction were re-randomized 2:1 to subcutaneous mirikizumab 200 mg or placebo every 4 weeks for 40 weeks (52 weeks of continuous treatment). Bowel urgency was measured using the Urgency Numeric Rating Scale (0-10); for patients with LUCENT-1 baseline score ≥3, bowel urgency clinically meaningful improvement (≥3-point decrease) and remission (score ≤1) rates in mirikizumab versus placebo groups were compared at Weeks 12 and 52. Associations between bowel urgency and other efficacy endpoints were assessed at Weeks 12 and 52. Results A significantly higher proportion of mirikizumab patients versus placebo achieved clinically meaningful improvement in bowel urgency and remission at Weeks 12 and 52. Significantly higher percentages of patients achieving bowel urgency clinically meaningful improvement or remission, compared with those who did not, also achieved endpoints for clinical, corticosteroid-free, endoscopic, and symptomatic remission; clinical response; normalized fecal calprotectin and C-reactive protein; and improved quality of life. Conclusions In patients with ulcerative colitis, bowel urgency improvement was associated with better clinical outcomes than in patients without improvement during induction and maintenance. A greater proportion of mirikizumab patients achieved sustainable bowel urgency improvement and remission compared to placebo patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marla C Dubinsky
- Mount Sinai Kravis Children’s Hospital, Mount Sinai, New York, USA
| | - David B Clemow
- Address correspondence to: Dr David Clemow, PhD, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana 46285, UA ()
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Dubinsky MC, Shan M, Delbecque L, Lissoos T, Hunter T, Harding G, Stassek L, Andrae D, Lewis JD. Psychometric evaluation of the Urgency NRS as a new patient-reported outcome measure for patients with ulcerative colitis. J Patient Rep Outcomes 2022; 6:114. [PMID: 36334163 PMCID: PMC9637076 DOI: 10.1186/s41687-022-00522-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2022] [Accepted: 10/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The Urgency Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) was developed as a content-valid single-item patient-reported outcome measure to assess severity of bowel urgency. Here, we evaluated the psychometric properties of the Urgency NRS. Methods Data were from a multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial in adults with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (NCT03518086). Patients completed the Urgency NRS using a daily electronic diary, from which weekly average Urgency NRS scores were calculated. Test–retest reliability, known-groups validity, construct validity, responsiveness, and score interpretation were assessed using the modified Mayo score, Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ), Patient Global Rating of Severity (PGRS), Patient Global Rating of Change (PGRC), and Geboes score. Results The study sample comprised 1,162 participants (40.2% female). Mean Urgency NRS score was higher (worse) at baseline than at week 12 (6.2 vs. 3.7). Test–retest reliability was strong, with intra-class correlation coefficients of 0.76–0.89. Baseline least-square mean Urgency NRS score was higher for participants with a PGRS score greater than the median (worse symptoms) than for those with a PGRS score less than or equal to the median (7.5 vs. 5.4; p < 0.0001), indicating good known-groups validity. Urgency NRS score was moderately correlated with IBDQ total and domain scores, PGRS, PGRC, and modified Mayo stool frequency, establishing its convergent validity. Correlations were weak for Geboes score and weak to moderate for modified Mayo endoscopic subscore and modified Mayo rectal bleeding, indicating that the Urgency NRS also had discriminant validity. Patients achieving clinical remission, clinical response, IBDQ remission, and PGRS score improvement showed significantly greater improvement on the Urgency NRS (p < 0.0001 for all), demonstrating responsiveness to change. A ≥ 3-point improvement in Urgency NRS score represented a meaningful improvement in bowel urgency and an Urgency NRS score of ≤ 1 point represented a bowel urgency remission threshold that was closely associated with clinical, endoscopic, and histologic remission. Conclusions The Urgency NRS is a valid and reliable patient-reported outcome measure that is suitable for evaluating treatment benefits in clinical trials in patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s41687-022-00522-2.
Collapse
|
11
|
Stodtmann S, Chen MJ, Siovitz L, Bereswill M, Lazar A, Croft N, Kierkus J, Faubion WA, Mostafa NM. Bridging Fixed Dose to Body Weight-based Regimen of Adalimumab in Paediatric Ulcerative Colitis Using a Pharmacometric Modelling Approach: Case Study with the Phase 3 ENVISION I Trial. J Crohns Colitis 2022; 16:1551-1561. [PMID: 35526272 DOI: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjac066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS The Phase 3 study ENVISION I demonstrated efficacy and safety of adalimumab in paediatric patients with moderate to severe ulcerative colitis. The protocol-specified high-dose adalimumab regimen was numerically more efficacious than the standard-dose regimen. The objective of this work was to bridge a fixed-dosing regimen to the protocol-specified high-induction/high-maintenance, body weight-based dosing regimen studied in ENVISION I, using a pharmacometrics modelling and simulation approach. METHODS A stepwise strategy was implemented, including developing an adalimumab paediatric population pharmacokinetic model; using this model to determine a fixed-dosing regimen in paediatric ulcerative colitis patients which achieves similar concentrations to those observed in ENVISION I patients; determining adalimumab exposure-response relationship using population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model and data from ENVISION I; simulating clinical remission rate in paediatric ulcerative colitis patients using the Markov exposure-response model and the dosing regimen determined to provide similar efficacy to that observed in ENVISION I. RESULTS Both developed population pharmacokinetic and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic models adequately described the observed data. Adalimumab exposure was identified as a significant predictor of clinical remission at Week 8 based on logistic regression [p <0.01]. Simulated efficacy suggested that the fixed-dosing regimen performs similarly to the more efficacious dosing regimen used in ENVISION I, by providing comparable clinical remission per Partial Mayo Score response rates over time. No relationship between adalimumab exposure and adverse events was identified. CONCLUSIONS The population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model supports the appropriateness of the use of the fixed-dosing regimen in the paediatric ulcerative colitis population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sven Stodtmann
- Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacometrics, AbbVie Deutschland GmbH & Co. KG, Ludwigshafen am Rhein, Germany
| | - Mong-Jen Chen
- Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacometrics, AbbVie Inc, North Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Lucia Siovitz
- Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacometrics, AbbVie Deutschland GmbH & Co. KG, Ludwigshafen am Rhein, Germany
| | - Mareike Bereswill
- Statistical Sciences and Analytics, AbbVie Deutschland GmbH & Co. KG, Ludwigshafen, Germany
| | - Andreas Lazar
- Immunology Development, AbbVie Deutschland GmbH & Co. KG, Ludwigshafen, Germany
| | - Nicholas Croft
- Centre for Immunobiology, Blizard Institute, Barts and the London School of Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Jaroslaw Kierkus
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Feeding Disorders and Pediatrics, Children's Memorial Health Institute, Warsaw, Poland
| | | | - Nael M Mostafa
- Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacometrics, AbbVie Inc, North Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Dubinsky MC, Panaccione R, Lewis JD, Sands BE, Hibi T, Lee SD, Naegeli AN, Shan M, Green LA, Morris N, Arora V, Bleakman AP, Belin R, Travis S. Impact of Bowel Urgency on Quality of Life and Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Ulcerative Colitis. CROHN'S & COLITIS 360 2022; 4:otac016. [PMID: 36777426 PMCID: PMC9802402 DOI: 10.1093/crocol/otac016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Bowel urgency is commonly experienced by patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) and is associated with reduced health-related quality of life (QoL). Mirikizumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody directed against the p19 subunit of IL-23, significantly reduced bowel urgency in a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled Phase 2 clinical trial in patients with moderate-to-severe UC (NCT02589665). Methods All patients (N = 249) reported symptoms including absence or presence of bowel urgency. Absence of urgency was defined as no urgency for the 3 consecutive days prior to each scheduled visit. Missing urgency data were imputed as present. After 12 weeks of induction treatment, patients who achieved clinical response continued maintenance mirikizumab treatment through Week 52. We assessed the relationship of urgency with QoL, clinical outcomes, and inflammatory biomarkers at Weeks 12 and 52. Results Patients with absence of urgency demonstrated significantly greater improvement in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) scores even after adjusting for rectal bleeding (RB) and stool frequency (SF), significantly higher rates of all clinical outcomes at Weeks 12 and 52, and a greater decrease in inflammatory biomarkers C-reactive protein and fecal calprotectin compared to those with presence of urgency. Absence of urgency at Week 12 was associated with improved IBDQ scores at Week 52, while Week 12 RB or SF status was not. Conclusions Absence of urgency is strongly associated with improvement in QoL as well as clinical measures of UC disease activity. These findings suggest urgency may be a useful surrogate marker of disease activity and an important treatment target for UC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marla C Dubinsky
- Address correspondence to: Marla C. Dubinsky, MD, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, One Gustav Levy Place, Box 1134, New York, NY 10029, USA ()
| | - Remo Panaccione
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - James D Lewis
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Bruce E Sands
- Dr. Henry D. Janowitz Division of Gastroenterology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Toshifumi Hibi
- Department of Gastroenterology, Kitasato Institute Hospital Center for Advanced IBD Research and Treatment, Minato-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Scott D Lee
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Vipin Arora
- Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IndianaUSA
| | | | - Ruth Belin
- Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IndianaUSA
| | - Simon Travis
- Nuffield Department of Medicine, Oxford University Hospital, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Asscher VE, Verbiest CM, Waars SN, Mooijaart SP, van der Meulen-de Jong AE, Pieterse AH, Maljaars PJ. Perspectives on Treatment of Inflammatory Bowel Disease in Older Patients: Applying Gut-Feeling in an Evidence-Based Era? EUROPEAN MEDICAL JOURNAL 2022. [DOI: 10.33590/emj/21-00262] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: The older inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) population is challenging to treat because of heterogeneity in characteristics related to frailty. The authors aimed to study factors contributing to the difference in treatment between older and younger patients with IBD and the relation between frailty and therapy goals, from the perspectives of both professionals and patients with IBD.
Methods: Semi-structured interviews in 15 IBD professionals and 15 IBD patients aged ≥65 years.
Results: Professionals had 1–20 years of experience, and three practiced in an academic hospital. Patients were aged 67–94 years and had a disease duration between 2 years and 62 years. The authors found that professionals aimed more often for clinical remission and less often for endoscopic remission in older compared with younger patients. Older patients also aimed for clinical remission, but valued objective confirmation of remission as a reassurance. Professionals sometimes opted for surgery earlier in the treatment course, while older patients aimed to prevent surgery. Professionals’ opinion on corticosteroids in older patients differed, while patients preferred to avoid corticosteroids. In professionals and patients, there was a shift towards goals related to frailty in patients with frailty. However, professionals did not assess frailty systematically, but judged frailty status by applying a clinical view.
Conclusions: Many therapy goals differed between older and younger patients, in both professionals and patients. Professionals did not assess frailty systematically, yet aspects of frailty influenced therapy goals. This underlines the need for clinically applicable evidence on frailty in IBD, which could aid tailored treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vera E.R. Asscher
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Cynthia M. Verbiest
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Sanne N. Waars
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Simon P. Mooijaart
- Department of Gerontology and Geriatrics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands; Institute for Evidence-Based Medicine in Old Age (IEMO), Leiden, the Netherlands
| | | | - Arwen H. Pieterse
- Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - P.W. Jeroen Maljaars
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Dubinsky MC, Irving PM, Panaccione R, Naegeli AN, Potts-Bleakman A, Arora V, Shan M, Travis S. Incorporating patient experience into drug development for ulcerative colitis: development of the Urgency Numeric Rating Scale, a patient-reported outcome measure to assess bowel urgency in adults. J Patient Rep Outcomes 2022; 6:31. [PMID: 35362902 PMCID: PMC8975984 DOI: 10.1186/s41687-022-00439-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2021] [Accepted: 03/18/2022] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Bowel urgency, the sudden or immediate need to have a bowel movement, is a common, bothersome and disruptive symptom of ulcerative colitis (UC). UC treatment goals include control of urgency; however, it is not consistently assessed in UC clinical trials. The Urgency Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) is a new patient-reported measure to assess severity of bowel urgency in adults with UC developed in accordance with Food and Drug Administration guidelines. Methods Qualitative interviews were used to develop Urgency NRS. The scale asks patients to report the immediacy status of their UC symptom over the past 24 h on an 11-point horizontal numeric rating scale [0 (No urgency) to 10 (Worst possible urgency)]. Higher scores indicate worse urgency severity. A 2-week diary study assessed floor and ceiling effects, test–retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) (2,1) between Week 1 and 2), and construct validity (Spearman correlation using Week 1 scores). Weekly scores were calculated as mean score over each 7-day period. Results Qualitative interviews with 16 UC patients (mean age 37.9 ± 11.6 years; 50% female; 56% White) confirmed relevance, content, and comprehensiveness. The 2-week diary study included 41 UC patients (mean age 44.2 ± 14.6 years; 51% female; 56% White). No ceiling or floor effects were identified. Test–retest reliability was high (ICC = 0.877). Average Urgency NRS and patient global rating of severity scores were highly correlated, with a moderate correlation between average Urgency NRS and stool frequency, demonstrating construct validity. Conclusions Bowel urgency is a distinct symptom of UC. The Urgency NRS is a well-defined, content-valid, and reliable measurement of bowel urgency in adults with UC. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s41687-022-00439-w.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marla C Dubinsky
- Department of Pediatrics, Susan and Leonard Feinstein IBD Center, Icahn School of Medicine, Mount Sinai, 17 East 102nd Street, 5th Floor East, New York, NY, 10029, USA.
| | - Peter M Irving
- Department of Gastroenterology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Remo Panaccione
- Inflammatory Bowel Disease Unit, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | | | | | - Vipin Arora
- Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | | | - Simon Travis
- Translational Gastroenterology Unit, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust and NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Randall JA, Guobyte A, Delbecque L, Newton L, Symonds T, Hunter T. Qualitative research to explore the symptoms and impacts experienced by children with ulcerative colitis. J Patient Rep Outcomes 2020; 4:75. [PMID: 32894366 PMCID: PMC7477023 DOI: 10.1186/s41687-020-00238-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2020] [Accepted: 08/18/2020] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ulcerative Colitis (UC) is a chronic gastrointestinal disease that often presents during one's most productive years and is characterized by colon inflammation. Key symptoms and impacts in adults are well-known, however, experiences among pediatric populations have not been well documented. The purpose of this study was to understand the health-related quality of life and symptomatic experience of children (2-11 years) living with UC. METHODS Qualitative, semi-structured face-to-face interviews were conducted. Children aged 5-11 years were interviewed, as well as their parents/caregivers in matched dyads. Parents/caregivers of children aged2-4 years were interviewed within a parent/caregiver-only cohort. All participants were recruited from the United States. Interviews were coded using thematic analysis. RESULTS Key symptoms and impacts reflecting the lived experience of UC were identified following thematic analysis, generating a conceptual model. A total of 32 participants (20 parents/caregivers and 12 children) were interviewed. Results identified a substantial burden of UC in children. All children and parents/caregivers reported that they/their child experienced stomach/abdominal pain. Other symptoms discussed by over 75% were blood in stool, diarrhea/loose stools, stool urgency, incomplete evacuation, stool frequency, and feeling gassy/passing gas. The most frequently discussed impacts by over 75% of participants were on emotional and practical aspects, seriously affecting quality of life. CONCLUSIONS Qualitative analysis of the interviews identified a substantial burden of UC on children, with a profound impact on their lives. The symptomatic experience is reflective of adults and adolescents. A high level of agreement between parents/caregivers and children was demonstrated regarding the perception of the presence or absence of symptoms. Children aged 8-11 years showed higher levels of agreement with parents/caregivers than did younger children, indicating appropriateness of self-report of symptom data in the 8-11 years age group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jason A. Randall
- Clinical Outcomes Solutions, Unit 68 Basepoint, Shearway Business Park, Shearway Road, Folkestone, Kent CT19 4RH UK
| | | | | | - Louise Newton
- Clinical Outcomes Solutions, Unit 68 Basepoint, Shearway Business Park, Shearway Road, Folkestone, Kent CT19 4RH UK
| | - Tara Symonds
- Clinical Outcomes Solutions, Unit 68 Basepoint, Shearway Business Park, Shearway Road, Folkestone, Kent CT19 4RH UK
| | | |
Collapse
|