Predictors of a fall event in hospitalized patients with cancer

Development and validation of a nomogram for individualizing fall risk in patients with hematologic malignancies

Inpatient falls are common adverse events especially for patients with hematologic malignancies. A fall-risk prediction model for patients with hematologic malignancies are still needed. Here we conducted a multicenter study that prospectively included 516 hospitalized patients with hematologic malignancies, and developed a nomogram for fall risk prediction. Patients were divided into the modeling group (n = 389) and the validation group (n = 127). A questionnaire containing sociodemographic factors, general health factors, disease-related factors, medication factors, and physical activity factors was administered to all patients. Logistic regression analysis revealed that peripheral neuropathy, pain intensity, Morse fall scale score, chemotherapy courses, and myelosuppression days were risk factors for falls in patients with hematologic malignancies. The nomogram model had a sensitivity of 0.790 and specificity of 0.800. The calibration curves demonstrated acceptable agreement between the predicted and observed outcomes. Therefore, the nomogram model has promising accuracy in predicting fall risk in patients with hematologic malignancies.

Using machine learning models to predict falls in hospitalised adults

BACKGROUND

Identifying patients at high risk of falling is crucial in implementing effective fall prevention programs. While the integration of information systems is becoming more widespread in the healthcare industry, it poses a significant challenge in analysing vast amounts of data to identify factors that could enhance patient safety.

OBJECTIVE

To determine fall-associated factors and develop high-performance prediction tools for at-risk patients in acute and sub-acute care services in Australia.

METHODS

A retrospective study of 672,400 patients admitted to acute and sub-acute care services within a large metropolitan tertiary health service in Victoria, Australia, between January 1, 2019, and December 31, 2021. Data were obtained from four sources: the Department of Health Victorian Admitted Episodes Dataset, RiskManTM, electronic health records, and the health workforce dataset. Machine learning techniques, including Random Forest and Deep Neural Network models, were used to analyse the data, predict patient falls, and identify the most important risk factors for falls in this population. Model performance was evaluated using accuracy, F1-score, precision, recall, specificity, Matthew's correlation coefficient, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).

RESULTS

The deep neural network and random forest models were highly accurate in predicting hospital patient falls. The deep neural network model achieved an accuracy of 0.988 and a specificity of 0.999, while the RF achieved an accuracy of 0.989 and a specificity of 1.000. The top 20 variables impacting falls were compared across both models, and 12 common factors were identified. These factors can be broadly classified into three categories: patient-related factors, staffing-related factors, and admission-related factors. Although not all factors are modifiable, they must be considered when planning fall prevention interventions.

CONCLUSION

The study demonstrated machine learning's potential to predict falls and identify key risk factors. Further validation across diverse populations and settings is essential for broader applicability.

Frequency, Characteristics, and Risk Factors for Falls at an Inpatient Cancer Rehabilitation Unit

PURPOSE

Falls in the hospital can lead to adverse events, including injuries. Studies have shown that patients with cancer and those undergoing inpatient rehabilitation (IPR) are at higher risk for falls. Therefore, we measured the frequency, degree of harm, and characteristics of patients who fell in an inpatient cancer rehabilitation unit.

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted on inpatient cancer rehabilitation patients admitted from January 2012 to February 2016. Fall frequency, degree of harm, fall circumstances, cancer type, patient's fall risk score on the basis of the MD Anderson Cancer Center Adult Inpatient Fall Risk Assessment Tool (MAIFRAT), length of stay, and risk factors were evaluated for patients.

RESULTS

There were 72 out of 1,571 unique individual falls (4.6%), with a falls incidence of 3.76 falls per 1,000 patient-days. Most fallers (86%) suffered no harm. Risk factors for falls included presence of patient-controlled analgesia pump (P = .03), pump such as insulin or wound vacuum-assisted closure (P < .01), nasogastric, gastric, or chest tube (P = .05), and higher MAIFRAT score (P < .01). The fallers were younger (62 v 66; P = .04), had a longer IPR stay (13 v 9; P = .03), and had a lower Charlson comorbidity index (6 v 8; P < .01).

CONCLUSION

The frequency and degree of harm for falls in the IPR unit were less than previous studies, which suggests that mobilization for these patients with cancer is safe. The presence of certain medical devices may contribute to fall risk, and more research is needed to better prevent falls in this higher-risk subgroup.

Falls during oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy for gastrointestinal malignancies - (lessons learned from) a prospective study

This prospective cohort study aimed to characterise the impact of oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy and its neurotoxic side effects (i.e., chemotherapy-induced neuropathy) on functional fall-risk and falls. Twenty chemotherapy-naïve participants (mean age, 59 years; 16 males) were consecutively included. A multimodal fall risk assessment was performed at four time points within 6 months. Polyneuropathy was assessed using the Neurologic Disability Scale; the fall risk was assessed by functional tests (Tinetti Test, Chair-Rising Test, and Timed up and Go Test). Patient-reported outcomes comprised the Hospitality Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), the Falls Efficacy Scale - International (FES-I) to assess the fear of falling, and the Physical Activity for the Elderly (PASE) questionnaire. Three falls occurred during the study. All fallen participants had a high fall risk-index (≥4 more risk factors) compared to only 30% of the non-fallen participants (p = 0.03) and suffered more frequently from pre-existing mild polyneuropathy (p = 0.049). Study discontinuation (n = 12) was associated with a higher rate of polypharmacy (p = 0.045), anxiety (HADS-A, p = 0.03), and specific fear of falling (FES-I, p = 0.025). In contrast, study completers (n = 8) reported an improvement in physical activity (PASE) (p = 0.018). In summary, pre-existing fall-risk factors impacted more falls than chemotherapy. A fall risk index offers a time-efficient screening option in an outpatient oncological setting.

Risk factors for falls in hospitalized patients with cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

A primary cancer diagnosis has been confirmed as an important risk factor for falls, and the incidence of falls has been shown to be higher in patients who have undergone cancer treatment than in those who have not undergone cancer treatment. Falls during hospitalization increase the medical costs of additional treatment and falls-related mortality. Many falls are preventable and a good understanding of the predictors of falls in this population is needed. However, the risk factors for falls have not yet been identified. The purpose of this review was to identify the risk factors for falls in hospitalized patients with cancer. Eleven English and Chinese electronic databases were searched from their inception to April 2022 and the methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale. Five studies involving 1237 patients with cancer were included. The meta-analysis identifies eleven risk factors for falls in hospitalized patients with cancer, including age, history of falls, opiates, benzodiazepines, steroids, antipsychotics, sedatives, radiation therapy, chemotherapy, the use of an assistive device and length of hospitalization. Based on the evidence presented in this article, healthcare workers have the capacity to help reduce fall risk through the development of preventive support strategies in this population. Multicenter, prospective studies of patients with cancer should be conducted to further identify and validate their risk factors for falls.

Fall predictors in hospitalized patients living with cancer: a case-control study

PURPOSE

To identify fall predictors and develop an assessment tool to be used for screening hospitalized cancer patients at risk for fall.

METHODS

A retrospective case-control study was conducted in 2018 at a cancer center in Northern Italy. The study participants were 448 adult cancer patients admitted to the oncology ward from 2009 to 2013. The case group consisted of 112 patients presenting at least one fall, while controls were randomly chosen by matching each case for age, sex, and admission period with three patients who did not fall. Data for the fall predictors were extracted from the electronic medical records. Conditional logistic regression was used to evaluate the association between patient's characteristics and fall risk.

RESULTS

The overall prevalence of patients having at least one candidate fall predictor was high (98%). Seven of the studied variables showed an independent association with fall risk at multivariate analysis. These were tumor site, the presence of neurologic diseases, gait imbalance disorders, fatigue, and the assumption of certain medications such as diuretics, hypnotics, and opioids (odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals in brackets were 3.78 (1.78-8.13), 2.26 (1.08-4.77), 4.22 (1.87-9.52), 2.76 (1.45-5.26), 2.66 (1.52-4.66), 2.41 (1.20-4.85), and 3.03 (1.68-5.45), respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, we identified falling risk factors in an Italian population of hospitalized cancer patients and developed a new risk assessment tool. An external validation is necessary before implementing our screening tool in clinical practice.

Direct care nurses and support staff thoughts and feelings about the reasons patients fall at a cancer center

Extensive research addresses the prevalence and high fall risk for cancer patients related to age, diagnosis, treatment side effects, pharmacological side effects, and cognitive and/or motor deficits. The purpose of the study was to explore the thoughts and feelings that inpatient and outpatient oncology direct care nurses (registered nurses) and support staffs have about reasons patients fall; as well as their thoughts on what might be done to prevent falls. This descriptive qualitative study used focus groups as the method for discovery. Six themes were identified: Effect on Me, Guilt, Noncompliance, Poor Choices, Inconsistency, and No Authority. This study is significant and relevant because there is little previous research addressing staff thoughts and feelings about why patients fall and what additional interventions they think can be implemented to prevent falls. Findings from this study may be helpful in developing and/or refining current fall policies. Existing research suggests unlicensed patient care providers often have minimal participation in postfall reviews. This study suggests they can provide insight into why patients fall. Additionally, both registered nurses and unlicensed providers describe barriers that often impede their ability to work as a team to prevent patient falls. Findings from this study identified the need for the patient care team to strengthen collaborative work to create safer patient environments.

Risk Factors for Falls in Hospital In-Patients: A Prospective Nested Case Control Study

Background: Patient falls are considered a challenge to the patient’s safety in hospitals, which, in addition to increasing the length of stay and costs, may also result in severe injuries or even the death of the patient. This study aims to investigate the associations between risk factors among fallers in comparison with the control group.

Methods: A prospective nested case control study was performed on 185 patients who fell and 1141 controls were matched with the patients at risk of fall in the same ward and during the same time. This study was conducted in a university educational hospital in Tehran with 800 beds during a 9-month period. The data included demographics, comorbidities, admission details, types of medication, clinical conditions, and activities before or during the fall. The data was collected from clinical records, hospital information system, error reporting system and observations, and the interviews with the fallers, their families and care givers (physicians, nurses, etc). Data analysis was conducted through time-based matching using a multi-level analysis.

Results: In a multilevel model including patient-related, medication, and care-related variables, the factors that were significantly associated with an increased risk of patient falls included: longer length of stay (odds ratio [OR] = 1.01; CI=0.32 to 0.73), using chemotherapy drugs, sedatives, anticonvulsants, benzodiazepines, and angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, visual acuity (OR=6.93; CI=4.22 to 11.38), balance condition (OR= 6.41; CI=4.51 to 9.11), manual transfer aid (OR=8.47; CI=5.65 to 12.69), urinary incontinence (OR= 8.47, CI= 5.65 to 12.69), and cancer (OR=2.86, CI=1.84-4.44). These factors were found to be associating with more odds for a falling accident among patients. Several characteristics such as fall history (OR=0.48; CI= 1.003 to 1.02), poly-pharmacy (OR=1.37, CI=00.85 to 2.2), stroke (OR=0.94, CI= 0.44 to 2.02), and nurse to patient ratio (incidence rate ratio=1.01, CI=0.01 to 0.03) were not significantly associated with falling in hospitals.

Conclusion: It seems that a combination of both patient-related factors and history of medication should be considered. Moreover, modifiable clinical characteristics of patients such as vision improvement, provision of manual transfer aid, diabetes control, regular toilet program, and drug modification should be considered during the formulation of interventions.

Incidence and risk of falls in patients treated for hematologic malignancies in the Intensive Hematology Unit

Objective:

to determine the incidence and rate of risk of falls in adult patients treated for hematologic malignancies in the Intensive Hematology Unit of a reference hospital.

Method:

this is a retrospective observational study. A total of 101 patients were evaluated. The occurrence of falls was obtained from records of the unit and the predictive variables of the Hendrich II model were collected, namely: sex, presence of dizziness or vertigo, mental confusion, elimination problems, depression, use of benzodiazepines, use of anticonvulsants, and the Get up and Go test.

Results:

two fall events were reported in 101 patients (incidence of 1.98% over a 1.5-year period). Based on the cut-off point 5 of the Hendrich II Model, 30 patients (29.7%) were at risk of fall at the moment of hospital admission, 41 (40.6%) in the middle of the hospitalization period, and 38 (37.6%) at the moment of hospital discharge.

Conclusions:

patients treated for hematological malignancies presented low incidence and high risk of falls during hospitalization.

Risk Factors for Falls in Adult Cancer Survivors: An Integrative Review

PURPOSE

The aim of the study was to identify risk factors for falls among cancer survivors.

DESIGN

Integrative literature review.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and PEDro for studies investigating fall risk in cancer. Reports of randomized controlled trials, descriptive studies (quantitative and qualitative), and theoretical papers meeting predetermined criteria were included. Quality ratings of included studies were done, and data were extracted and compiled by two independent reviewers.

FINDINGS

Twenty-nine articles met inclusion criteria. Literature quality was moderate (median quality score: 1.67 out of 3 possible points). Heterogeneity of statistics and reporting methods precluded calculation of summary effect sizes, but physical function, cognitive function, balance/gait, and certain medication types appear to increase fall risk.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Modifiable risk factors, such as those identified in this review, represent tangible intervention targets for rehabilitation professionals for decreasing the risk of falls among cancer survivors.

Factors associated with self-reported falls, balance or walking difficulty in older survivors of breast, colorectal, lung, or prostate cancer: Results from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare Health Outcomes Survey linkage

Background

Cancer and its treatment affect body systems that are important in preventing falls and controlling balance/walking. This study examined factors associated with self-reported falls and balance/walking difficulty in the past 12 months in older survivors of four major cancers.

Methods

This was a cross-sectional study analyzing population-based data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results–Medicare Health Outcomes Survey (SEER-MHOS). Data from cohorts 9 to 14 (January 2006 to December 2013) were extracted. Inclusion criteria were: age ≥65 years at cancer diagnosis, first MHOS completed during years 1–5 post-cancer diagnosis, first primary breast (n = 2725), colorectal (n = 1646), lung (n = 752), and prostate (n = 4245) cancer, and availability of cancer staging information. Primary outcomes were self-reported falls and balance/walking difficulty in the past 12 months. Multivariable logistic regression was constructed for each cancer type to examine independent factors associated with falls and balance/walking difficulty.

Results

In all cancer types, advancing age at cancer diagnosis and dependence in activities of daily living were significant independent factors associated with increased odds of reporting falls and balance/walking difficulty in the past 12 months. Additionally, depression was independently associated with falls and sensory impairment in feet was independently linked to balance/walking difficulty in all cancer types. Other independent factors of falls and balance/walking difficulty varied across cancer types. In breast cancer only, localized or regional cancer stage was significantly associated with increased odds of reporting falls and balance/walking difficulty, whereas treatment with radiation decreased the odds of falling. No association between falls and balance/walking difficulty with time since cancer diagnosis, cancer stage, or cancer treatment was found in colorectal, lung, and prostate cancer.

Conclusion

There exists some heterogeneity in factors associated with self-reported falls and balance/walking difficulty between different cancer types. Future research is necessary to ascertain factors predictive of falls and balance/walking difficulty in older cancer survivors, particularly factors related to cancer diagnosis and treatment.

Fall Risk Program for Oncology Inpatients: Addition of the "Traffic Light" Fall Risk Assessment Tool

BACKGROUND

The incidence of falls on inpatient oncology units indicated the need for quality improvement. This project aimed to reduce falls by implementing a fall reduction plan including the "Traffic Light" Fall Risk Assessment Tool (TL-FRAT).

LOCAL PROBLEM

We retrospectively reviewed the oncology unit fall data from January 2013 to September 2014 and found that the average fall incidence was high.

METHODS

The project used a program evaluation design, and the process was guided by Kotter's 8-step change model.

INTERVENTIONS

We implemented the TL-FRAT to classify oncology inpatients at a high risk of falling in advance.

RESULTS

The average fall incidence and falls with injury during the project were reduced.

CONCLUSIONS

Adding the TL-FRAT to the fall protocol on the units effectively reduced the incidence of falls related to impaired mobility. The TL-FRAT can improve nurses' sensitivity to falls related to impaired mobility and, subsequently, guide corresponding fall prevention strategies.

Predictors of falls in older survivors of breast and prostate cancer: A retrospective cohort study of surveillance, epidemiology and end results-Medicare health outcomes survey linkage

OBJECTIVES

To identify predictors of falls in older breast and prostate cancer survivors.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study analyzed population-based Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results-Medicare Health Outcomes Survey (SEER-MHOS) linkage. Inclusion criteria were age >65 years at cancer diagnosis, first primary female breast or prostate cancer, cancer staging information available, completion of baseline MHOS during years 2-3 and follow-up MHOS during years 4-5 post-diagnosis, and falls information available. Data from 437 breast and 660 prostate cancer survivors were analyzed. Multivariable logistic regression was constructed to evaluate variables from baseline MHOS with relation to falls from follow-up MHOS. Model accuracy was assessed using area under receiver-operating-characteristic curve (AUC).

RESULTS

At follow-up MHOS, 26% of breast and 22% of prostate cancer survivors reported falls in the past 12 months. In breast cancer, a history of falls (odds ratio (OR) = 4.95, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 2.44-10.04) and sensory impairment in feet (OR = 3.33, 95%CI = 1.51-7.32) were significant predictors of falls. In prostate cancer, a history of falls (OR = 3.04, 95%CI = 1.79-5.15), unmarried (OR = 1.82, 95%CI = 1.12-2.95), lower physical summary score of quality-of-life(OR = 0.96, 95%CI = 0.94-0.98), urinary incontinence (OR = 1.69, 95%CI = 1.08-2.65), older age at diagnosis (OR = 1.05, 95%CI = 1.01-1.09), and shorter time post-diagnosis (OR = 0.96, 95%CI = 0.93-0.99) were significant predictors of falls. AUC was 0.67 and 0.77 for breast and prostate cancer, respectively, indicating moderate accuracy of models in detecting fallers.

CONCLUSIONS

Asking older breast and prostate cancer survivors about falls in the past 12 months is imperative in fall prevention. Further examination of deficits specific to each cancer is necessary to assess fall risks.

Research of falls risk of taking central nervous system drugs in oncology inpatients

This study aimed to analyze the medication use and related falls risk of central nervous system(CNS) drugs in oncology inpatients, explore the association between CNS drugs and falls. In this study, we enrolled inpatients, hospitalized in the oncology department of the Teaching Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, from March 2013 to October 2015. All inpatients were divided into two groups: taking-CNS drugs group (treatment group) and non CNS drugs group (control group). The falls risk between two groups were being compared and analyzed. Results showed that a total of 768 inpatients were enrolled in this study; 401 of them were males and 367 were females; the average age was 47.9±5.8 year-old. Of them, 129 were taking CNS drugs, while 639 were not. In the treatment group, the number of fall patients was 39, at an incidence rate of 30.23%; of the 39 fall patients, 3 suffered fractures, and 1 suffered an intracranialhemorrhage; while in the control group, the incidence of falls totaled at 45, at an incidence rate of 7.04%; 4 of the patients suffered fractures. The difference of incidence rate between two groups had statistical significance (P＜ 0.01). The incidence rate of falls in the treatment group was 4.29 times that in the control group. By the further analysis of CNS drugs, results implied that hypnotics, sedatives, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (no patient taking tricyclic antidepressants in this study), opioids, antiepileptics and antipsychotics had relationship with falls (OR>1). Our finding indicates that oncology inpatients have a higher risk of falls resulting from taking CNS drugs. Therefore, it is necessary to build up a systemic mechanism of nursing safety management on preventing falls of oncology inpatients, to improve nursing quality, and reduce the risk of falls.

Fall risk and prevention agreement: engaging patients and families with a partnership for patient safety

Significance and background

Falls are multifactorial in medical oncology units and are potentiated by an older adult's response to anxiolytics, opiates and chemotherapy protocols. In addition, the oncology patient is at an increased risk for injury from a fall due to coagulopathy, thrombocytopenia and advanced age. At our National Cancer Institute-designated inpatient cancer treatment centre located in the southeastern USA, 40% of the total discharges are over the age of 65. As part of a comprehensive fall prevention programme, bimonthly individual fall reports have been presented with the Chief Nursing Officer (CNO), nursing directors, nurse managers, physical therapists and front-line providers in attendance. As a result of these case discussions, in some cases, safety recommendations have not been followed by patients and families and identified as an implication in individual falls. Impulsive behaviour was acknowledged only after a fall occurred. A medical oncology unit was targeted for this initiative due to a prolonged length of stay. This patient population receives chemotherapeutic interventions, management of oncological treatment consequences and cancer progression care.

Purpose

The aim of this project was to explore if initiation of a Fall Prevention Agreement between the nursing team and older adults being admitted to medical oncology units would reduce the incidence of falls and the incidence of falls with injury.

Interventional methods

In order to promote patient and family participation in the fall reduction and safety plan, the Fall Risk and Prevention Agreement was introduced upon admission. Using the Morse Fall Scoring system, patient's risk for fall was communicated on the Fall Risk and Prevention Agreement. Besides admission, patients were reassessed based on change of status, transfer or after a fall occurs.

Evaluation/findings

Fall and fall injuries rates were compared two-quarters prior to implementation of the fall agreement and eight-quarters post implementation. Falls and fall injuries on the medical oncology unit had an overall reduction of 37% and 58.6%, respectively.

Discussion/implications

A robust fall prevention standard does not ensure care team participation in all elements to reduce fall occurrence. Historically, the Fall Risk and Prevention Agreement had not been initiated on admission. Incorporating patients and families in discussions related to fall risk and prevention is consistent with collaborative communication. The Joint Commission and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services in 2002 encouraged patients and family participation in the acute care experience to promote safety. The medical oncology patient in many cases on admission is identified as 'moderate' risk for fall. It is during the course of treatment and an extended length of stay that deconditioning and treatment side effects result in a fall. This patient population often overestimates their abilities and functional status.Engagement with patients and families during the admission process will hopefully communicate the need for a collaborative effort for fall prevention during the hospitalisation. Although this project is limited in data, integrating patients and families into care planning may have a significant impact in reducing falls in the 'moderate' risk patient. Additional studies including a multivariate analysis are needed to determine whether supporting evidence links fall reduction to the presence and use of a patient and family agreement.

Associations between hyponatraemia, volume depletion and the risk of falls in US hospitalised patients: a case-control study

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to determine if abnormal laboratory values which may indicate volume depletion are associated with increased odds of experiencing a hospital-acquired fall.

DESIGN

Matched case-control study.

SETTING

Four hospitals located in the Southeast USA.

PARTICIPANTS

Data from 699 adult fallers and 1189 matched controls (non-fallers) were collected via chart review from 2005 to 2010. Controls were matched to cases by nursing unit, time of fall and length of stay.

OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary exposures included serum sodium, blood urea nitrogen (BUN), creatinine, BUN/creatinine ratio and haematocrit. Conditional logistic regression with m:n matching was used to determine adjusted and unadjusted ORs.

RESULTS

Serum sodium levels were strongly associated with falls. In models controlling for demographic and other fall risk factors, patients with serum sodium levels of 125 mEq/L or less were associated with increased odds of experiencing a fall as compared with those with serum sodium levels of greater than 134 mEq/L (adjusted OR (aOR)=5.08, 95% CI 1.43 to 18.08). Conversely, elevated BUN, creatinine and elevated BUN/creatinine ratios were not associated with increased odds of experiencing a fall (aOR=0.64, 95% CI 0.49 to 0.84; aOR=0.70, 95% CI 0.54 to 0.92 and aOR=0.77, 95% CI 0.58 to 1.04, respectively.) CONCLUSIONS: Laboratory indices that may indicate volume depletion appear to be unrelated to falls. However, hyponatraemia does appear to be a risk factor for falls, and those with serum sodium levels below 126 mEq/L are at especially high risk. It may be that other deficits associated with hyponatraemia, like altered mental status, are associated with risk of experiencing a hospital-acquired fall. These results indicate that abnormal laboratory values, like low sodium, can be useful for identifying hospitalised patients at risk of falling. Therefore, further investigation into abnormal laboratory values as predictors of hospital-acquired falls is warranted.

Risk factors and characteristics of falls among hospitalized adult patients with hematologic diseases

OBJECTIVES

Falls and fall-related injuries are major problems in hospitals. In hematologic patients, both disease and its treatment, including chemotherapy and allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT), can cause anemia, febrile neutropenia, and bleeding tendency, which may result in falls and fall-related injuries.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 397 consecutive admissions to the hematology unit at our institute which included 201 adult patients with hematologic disease.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

A total of 56 fall events were observed in 43 patients, and the incidence of falls was 2.49 per 1000 person-days. The median hemoglobin, platelet, and serum albumin levels prior to fall events were 8.65g/dl (range, 6.3-12.7), 38×10⁹/l (range, 7-454), and 2.85g/dl (range, 1.6-4.3), respectively. Despite the presence of thrombocytopenia among the majority of patients who fell, no serious injury was observed. Multiple variable logistic regression analysis demonstrated that age older than 65years (hazard ratio [HR], 2.86; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.17-6.99, P=0.02), admission for allo-HCT (HR, 9.48; 95% CI, 3.35-26.80, P<0.001), hypnotic medication (HR, 3.57; 95% CI, 1.56-8.20, P=0.002), urinary or intravenous catheter placement (HR, 2.34; 95% CI, 1.08-5.09, P=0.03), and hypoalbuminemia (HR, 2.30; 95% CI, 1.07-4.96, P=0.03) were significantly associated with increased fall risk. These findings indicated that special attention should be paid to patients with such risk factors during their treatment.

Fall Reduction Interventions for Hospice Patients

Despite efforts to decrease inpatient falls at a Midwestern Veterans Administration Medical Center, patients on the hospice unit continued to have higher rates of falls than patients on other units. The purpose of this article is to review the literature to determine if evidence-based, population-specific, fall prevention measures could be implemented to reduce the risk of falls for hospice patients. As a result of this literature review, an end-of-life care plan was developed and will be utilized to increase the frequency of assessment and rounding, and to encourage family involvement during this critical time frame.

Risk factors of falls among inpatients with cancer

AIM

To investigate the risk factors and predictors of falls according to the general characteristics, conscious state, physical condition and treatment of hospitalized patients with cancer.

BACKGROUND

Inpatients with cancer experience falls more frequently than those without cancer, and the degree of injuries is more severe among inpatients with cancer. A specific fall prevention strategy is needed for each patient. Prevention of falls in patients with cancer is very important for improving the quality of nursing care.

METHODS

This retrospective study included matched case-control patients. We evaluated patients between January 1, 2013, and December 31, 2014. A total of 356 patients (fall group, 178; non-fall group, 178) were included. For fall prediction, logistic regression was performed on the variables that were statistically significant in the univariate analysis.

RESULTS

The variables that were significant predictors of falls were the use of an assistive device, history of falls and fatigue.

DISCUSSION

The predictors of falls in patients with cancer include physical conditions and general characteristics. Fall prevention strategies in patients with cancer should be planned individually with multifaceted aspects, including physical symptom management.

LIMITATIONS

The study was conducted at a single cancer center in Korea; thus, our results cannot be generalized. Additionally, in Korea, it is common to have family members or private caregivers for patient care, and this might have influenced the results.

CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING AND HEALTH POLICY

The predictive factors for falls reflect the nature of the patient's environment, culture and disease. Falls have a negative effect on patient safety and can significantly influence quality of life. Policies for patient safety need more specialized and customized approaches.

A retrospective review of fall risk factors in the bone marrow transplant inpatient service

Purpose The purpose of this study was to compare medications and potential risk factors between patients who experienced a fall during hospitalization compared to those who did not fall while admitted to the Blood and Marrow Transplant inpatient setting at The James Cancer Hospital. Secondary objectives included evaluation of transplant-related disease states and medications in the post-transplant setting that may lead to an increased risk of falls, post-fall variables, and number of tests ordered after a fall. Methods This retrospective, case-control study matched patients in a 2:1 ratio of nonfallers to fallers. Data from The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center (OSUWMC) reported fall events and patient electronic medical records were utilized. A total of 168 adult Blood and Marrow Transplant inpatients with a hematological malignancy diagnosis were evaluated from 1 January 2010 to 30 September 2012. Results Univariable and multivariable conditional logistic regression models were used to assess the relationship between potential predictor variables of interest and falls. Variables that were found to be significant predictors of falls from the univariable models include age group, incontinence, benzodiazepines, corticosteroids, anticonvulsants and antidepressants, and number of days status-post transplant. When considered for a multivariable model age group, corticosteroids, and a cancer diagnosis of leukemia were significant in the final model. Conclusion Recent medication utilization such as benzodiazepines, anticonvulsants, corticosteroids, and antidepressants placed patients at a higher risk of experiencing a fall. Other significant factors identified from a multivariable analysis found were patients older than age 65, patients with recent corticosteroid administration and a cancer diagnosis of leukemia.

Validation of Predictors of Fall Events in Hospitalized Patients With Cancer

BACKGROUND

A seven-item cancer-specific fall risk tool (Cleveland Clinic Capone-Albert [CC-CA] Fall Risk Score) was shown to have a strong concordance index for predicting falls; however, validation of the model is needed.

OBJECTIVES

The aims of this study were to validate that the CC-CA Fall Risk Score, made up of six factors, predicts falls in patients with cancer and to determine if the CC-CA Fall Risk Score performs better than the Morse Fall Tool.

METHODS

Using a prospective, comparative methodology, data were collected from electronic health records of patients hospitalized for cancer care in four hospitals. Risk factors from each tool were recorded, when applicable. Multivariable models were created to predict the probability of a fall. A concordance index for each fall tool was calculated.

FINDINGS

The CC-CA Fall Risk Score provided higher discrimination than the Morse Fall Tool in predicting fall events in patients hospitalized for cancer management.

A clinical care pathway to improve the acute care of patients with glioma

BACKGROUND

Patients with glioma are at increased risk for tumor-related and treatment-related complications. Few guidelines exist to manage complications through supportive care. Our prior work suggests that a clinical care pathway can improve the care of patients with glioma.

METHODS

We designed a quality improvement (QI) project to address the acute care needs of patients with gliomas. We formed a multidisciplinary team and selected 20 best-practice measures from the literature. Using a plan-do-study-act framework, we brainstormed and implemented various improvement strategies starting in October 2013. Statistical process control charts were used to assess progress.

RESULTS

Retrospective data were available for 12 best practice measures. The baseline population consisted of 98 patients with glioma. Record review suggested wide variation in performance, with compliance ranging from 30% to 100%. The team hypothesized that lack of process standardization may contribute to less-than-ideal performance. After implementing improvement strategies, we reviewed the records of 63 consecutive patients with glioma. The proportion of patients meeting criteria for 12 practice measures modestly improved (65% pre-QI; 76% post-QI, P > .1). Unexpectedly, a higher proportion of patients were readmitted within 30 days of hospital discharge (pre-QI: 10%; post-QI: 17%, P > .1). Barriers to pathway development included difficulties with transforming manual measures into electronic data sets.

CONCLUSIONS

Creating evidence-based clinical care pathways for addressing the acute care needs of patients with glioma is feasible and important. There are many challenges, however, to developing sustainable systems for measuring and reporting performance outcomes overtime.

Falls in older adults with cancer: a systematic review of prevalence, injurious falls, and impact on cancer treatment

PURPOSE

The purpose of this systematic review was to update and expand the existing systematic review with the aim to answer the following questions: (1) How often do older adults (OA)s with cancer fall? (2) What are the predictors of falls in OA with cancer? (3) What is the rate of injurious falls and predictors of injurious falls in OA with cancer? (4) What are the circumstances and outcomes of falls in this population? (5) How do falls in cancer patients affect subsequent cancer treatment?

METHODS

Medline, Pubmed, Embase, and CINAHL were searched. Eligible studies included clinical trials, cross-sectional, cohort, case-control, and qualitative studies in which the entire sample or a sub-group of the sample were OA aged 60 and above, had cancer, in which falls were examined as a primary or secondary outcome and published in English.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven studies met our inclusion criteria with most involving the outpatient setting. Fall rates and injurious fall rates varied widely. Consistent predictors of falls were prior falls among outpatients and cognitive impairment among inpatients. There were no data on impact of falls on cancer treatment. Data on circumstances of falls were limited.

CONCLUSION

Falls and fall-related injuries are common in older cancer patients. However, little is known about circumstances of falls and impact of falls on cancer treatment. Many known fall predictors in community-dwelling OA have not been explored in oncology. More research is needed to address gaps in these areas.

The effectiveness of a participatory program on fall prevention in oncology patients

Falls are known to be one of the most common in patient adverse events. A high incidence of falls was reported on patients with cancer. The purpose of this study was to explore the effect of a participatory program on patient's knowledge and self-efficacy of fall prevention and fall incidence in an oncology ward. In this quasi-experimental study, 68 participants were recruited at a medical centre in Taiwan. A 20-min fall prevention program was given to patients. A questionnaire was used to evaluate the effectiveness of program after on day 3 of intervention. The data of fall incidence rates were collected from hospital record. Fall incidences with and without the program were used to compare the effectiveness of intervention. The patients' knowledge and self-efficacy of fall prevention are better than after intervention. A statistically significant difference in fall incidence rate was observed with (0.0%) and without (19.3%) the program. Our findings suggest that the fact of the bedside is that the most risk for falling in hospital must be communicated to the hospitalized patients. Educating patients about fall prevention and activities associated with falling increases their awareness of the potential of falling and promoting patient safety.

Systematic review of falls in older adults with cancer

OBJECTIVES

Older adults frequently experience falls, at great cost to themselves and society. Older adults with cancer may be at greater risk for falls and have unique risk factors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We undertook a systematic review of the available medical literature to examine the current evidence regarding factors associated with falls in older adults with cancer. PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, CENTRAL, DARE, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and clinical trials.gov were searched using standardized terms for concepts of oncology/cancer, people 60 and older, screening, falls and diagnosis. Eligible studies included cohort or case-control studies or clinical trials in which all patients, or a subgroup of patients, had a diagnosis of cancer and in which falls were either the primary or secondary outcome.

RESULTS

We identified 31 studies that met our inclusion criteria. Several studies suggest that falls are more common in older adults with a diagnosis of cancer than those without. Among the 11 studies that explored factors associated with outpatient falls, some risk factors for falls established in the general population were also associated with falls in older adults with cancer, including dependence in activities of daily living and prior falls. Other factors associated with falls in a general population, such as age, polypharmacy and opioid use, were not predictive of falls among oncology populations. Falls among older adults with cancer in the inpatient setting were associated with established risk factors for falls in people without cancer, but also with factors unique to an oncology population, such as brain metastases.

CONCLUSIONS

Falls in older adults with cancer are more common than in the general population, and are associated with risk factors unique to people with cancer. Further study is needed to establish methods of screening older adults with cancer for fall risk and ultimately implement interventions to reduce their risk of falls. Identifying which older adults with cancer are at greater risk for falls is a requisite step to ultimately intervene and prevent falls in this vulnerable population.

Fall prevention in high-risk patients

In the oncology population, disease process and treatment factors place patients at risk for falls. Fall bundles provide a framework for developing comprehensive fall programs in oncology. Small sample size of interventional studies and focus on ambulatory and geriatric populations limit the applicability of results. Additional research is needed.

Serious fall injuries in hospitalized patients with and without cancer

Characteristics of adults hospitalized with and without cancer were compared to determine factors of serious injuries after fall events. More patients with cancer who had a serious injury received corticosteroids (P = .005) and were treated on a palliative care floor. More patients without cancer had higher prevalence of stroke (P = .026) and diabetes (P = .041) history and were treated on a surgical floor. Future research is needed to identify interventions that could prevent serious injuries after fall events.