Malnutrition Screening: An Interprofessional Approach in Outpatient Oncology

Two Distinct Nutritional Assessment Tools Have Dissimilar Outcomes in a Sample of Older Adult Patients With Cancer

Introduction

Malnutrition is strongly associated with negative outcomes in aged populations with cancer. Several studies have compared the outcomes of nutritional-screening tools, but knowledge specifically covering older adult patients with cancer remains limited. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of two tools, the Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA) versus the Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA) for this population.

Method

Cross-sectional study with 432 participants who consented to participate and were enrolled at admission to medical and surgical wards of a tertiary referral hospital. The participants’ nutritional statuses were simultaneously assessed using the PG-SGA and the MNA, and the outcomes compared using the kappa statistical test. The Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (ROC) was employed to calculate the MNA sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and was compared with PG-SGA.

Results

Prevalence of good nourishment was observed in 62.5% and 61.1% of the participants, as detected by PG-SGA and MNA, respectively. Both tools concurred moderately (kappa = 0.453). Importantly, there were significant differences in the diagnosis of malnutrition (7.6% vs. 4.6%, p = 0.000). The MNA showed sensitivity of 72.2% and specificity of 75.9% in detecting good nourishment for the population investigated.

Conclusion

The MNA may not present greater sensitivity, possibly due to a lack of coverage of gastrointestinal symptoms. It is a quick and efficient tool for nutritional assessment of older adult patients with cancer, but as it is more specific than sensitive, caution is recommended when identifying borderline or early malnourished individuals of this population.

Malnutrition risk at solid tumor diagnosis: the malnutrition screening tool in a large US cancer institute

BACKGROUND

In cancer, malnutrition is common and negatively impacts tolerance and outcomes of anti-tumor therapies. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of malnutrition risk and compare the clinicodemographic features between those with high malnutrition screening tool (MST) scores (i.e., ≥ 2 of 5 = high risk for malnutrition, H-MST) to low scores (L-MST).

METHODS

A cohort of 3585 patients (May 2017 through December 2018), who completed the MST at least once at the time of diagnosis of any stage solid tumor, were analyzed. Logistic regression tested for associations between clinicodemographic factors, symptom scores, and H-MST prevalence.

RESULTS

The median age was 64 years (25-75 IQR, 55-72), with 62% females and 81% White. Most common tumor primary sites were breast (28%), gastrointestinal (GI) (21%), and thoracic (13%). Most had non-metastatic disease (80%). H-MST was found in 28%-most commonly in upper (58%) and lower GI (42%), and thoracic (42%) tumors. L-MST was most common in breast (90%). Multivariable regression confirmed that Black race (OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.5-2.4, p =  < 0.001), cancer primary site (OR 1.6-5.7, p =  < 0.001), stage IV disease (OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.4-2.2, p =  < 0.001), low BMI (OR 4.2, 95% CI 2.5-6.9 p =  < 0.001), and higher symptom scores were all independently associated with H-MST.

CONCLUSIONS

Twenty-eight percent of solid tumor oncology patients at diagnosis were at high risk of malnutrition. Patients with breast cancer rarely had malnutrition risk at diagnosis. Significant variation was found in malnutrition risk by cancer site, stage, race, and presence of depression, distress, fatigue, and trouble eating/swallowing.

Barriers in Nursing Practice in Cancer Cachexia: A Scoping Review

This scoping review aims to identify the barriers in practice and clinical trials for oncology nurses in cancer cachexia. We used the framework proposed by Arksey and O'Malley and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for scoping reviews. Studies written in English and published between 2008 and 2021 were retrieved from five databases: MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and EMBASE. A total of 1075 studies were identified, and 34 full-text studies were assessed for eligibility by three researchers. Seventeen studies met the inclusion criteria. This review revealed several barriers to nursing practice and clinical trials in cancer cachexia. First, health-care professionals, including nurses, faced individual barriers (insufficient understanding and skills for diagnosis and management) and environmental barriers (lack of standardized screening tools or treatment options, difficulties in collaboration with other professions, and limited human resources) in practice. Second, studies on nurse-led interventions for cancer cachexia were relatively few and different in objectives, making it challenging to integrate the outcomes. Finally, there were no established educational programs for nurses that explicitly focused on cancer cachexia. This scoping review revealed individual and environmental barriers in nursing practice. In addition, there have relatively few clinical trials involving oncology nurses in cancer cachexia. Continuing education for nurses should cover cancer cachexia to improve the quality of oncology care in the future. It is also necessary to standardize practical assessment tools that are easy to assess daily and lead to interventions and develop nurse-led multidisciplinary care.

Contemporary Insights into Cancer Cachexia for Oncology Nurses

Cachexia is a complex, multiorgan phenomenon targeting skeletal muscle resulting from systemic metabolic imbalances. Multifocal in nature, It's ultimate outcome is significant muscle degradation and loss of adipose tissue exhibited as the "wasting syndrome" which is associated with significant functional decline. Currently, there are no approved biomarkers for screening nor therapeutic options to manage cancer cachexia. Furthermore, multiple psychosocial sequelae characterize the patient and family coping paradigm. Heightened education about the pathophysiology of cancer cachexia and awareness of intra-familial emotional distress can enhance oncology nurses' advocacy about, and attentiveness to, this common manifestation of advanced cancer.