Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis and Treatment in Patients With Cancer: ASCO Clinical Practice Guideline Update

Acute limb ischemia due to a common iliac artery thrombosis following total pelvic exenteration with pelvic sidewall resection: A case report

Acute limb ischemia following pelvic exenteration with laterally extended endopelvic resection is a rare yet severe complication. Prompt diagnosis is essential for optimal treatment and recovery. This condition should be suspected if the patient presents with rest pain, paresthesia, motor deficit or and sensory loss. We report a case of a patient, diagnosed with an acute right limb ischemia at day one following a pelvic exenteration with right pelvic sidewall resection for a recurrent cervical cancer after radiotherapy. Through the collaboration of a multidisciplinary team, the patient was successfully treated with surgical thrombectomy.

Exploring the Emerging Association Between Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors and Thrombosis

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized cancer treatment, but their association with thrombosis presents significant clinical challenges. Patients with cancer already exhibit elevated risks for venous thromboembolism and arterial thrombosis, with treatment modalities like chemotherapy further exacerbating this risk. Emerging evidence suggests that ICIs contribute to thrombotic events through multifactorial mechanisms, including immune dysregulation, T cell activation, endothelial dysfunction, elevated tissue factor expression, and impaired fibrinolysis. Additional risk factors such as obesity, smoking, prior thrombotic events, and combination ICI therapy further increase thrombosis susceptibility. The literature reports varying incidence rates of ICI-associated thrombosis, with some studies indicating comparable risks to chemotherapy, while others highlight higher rates, particularly during the initial treatment phase. Management aligns with standard protocols for cancer-associated thrombosis, using low-molecular-weight heparin or direct oral anticoagulants, though optimal treatment duration and the role of prophylactic anticoagulation require further investigation. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the mechanisms, incidence rates, and clinical management strategies of ICI-associated thrombosis, emphasizing the importance of proactive risk assessment to optimize patient outcomes.

Impact of body mass index on D-dimer diagnostic utility for deep vein thrombosis in patients with cancer: a single-center retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND

Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is a common complication in cancer patients associated with significant morbidity and mortality. D-dimer is a widely used screening tool for suspected DVT; however, its accuracy may be influenced by body mass index (BMI). We evaluated whether BMI modified the diagnostic utility of D-dimer levels in patients with cancer and DVT.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 439 patients with newly diagnosed solid cancers suspected of having DVT between January 2013 and December 2020. DVT was confirmed or excluded by using computed tomography or echography. D-dimer was measured, and patients were classified by BMI as low- (< 18.5 kg/m2), normal- (18.5-24.9 kg/m2), or high-BMI (≥ 25.0 kg/m2). D-dimer levels, positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV), and overall survival (OS) were compared.

RESULTS

Of 439 patients, 175 (39.9%) had DVT. BMI did not differ significantly between the DVT-positive and DVT-negative patients. In the normal and high BMI groups, D-dimer levels were significantly higher in patients with DVT than those without (p < 0.01), whereas patients with a low BMI did not show this difference (p = 0.12). Using a 1 µg/mL cut-off, PPV was 32% in low-, 52% in normal-, and 49% in high-BMI patients; NPV was 83%, 91%, and 97%, respectively. OS did not differ among the BMI groups, and no deaths were directly related to DVT.

CONCLUSION

Diagnostic performance of D-dimer level may diminish in underweight patients with cancer. Clinicians should carefully interpret the D-dimer levels in low-BMI populations and consider additional diagnostic strategies.

Direct Oral Anticoagulants Are Comparable to Low Molecular Weight Heparin at Sustaining the Circulating Extracellular Vesicle and Inflammatory Profiles of Cancer Associated Thrombosis Patients: An Observational Pilot Study

INTRODUCTION

Cancer patients face a 4 to 7-fold higher risk of developing thrombotic events compared to individuals without cancer. This elevated risk is driven by the underlying tumour biology and the effects of cancer treatments, significantly increasing the mortality rates of these patients. While low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) is the gold standard anticoagulation, direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are emerging as effective alternatives. Recent clinical evidence indicates reduced recurrent VTE upon DOAC treatment compared to LMWH; however, there is limited understanding of the underlying mechanistic pathways. Of interest, extracellular vesicles (EVs), released from a multitude of cells including platelets and tumour cells, are known as potent intercellular communication mediators, capable of progressing coagulation, thrombosis, as well as tumour growth and metastasis.

METHODS

We characterised the extracellular vesicles and inflammatory markers associated with hypercoagulability and thrombosis in cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT) patients, comparing those treated for 8 weeks with DOACs to those receiving LMWH. This pilot observational study recruited 28 CAT patients (21 baseline, 13 treated with DOACs, 8 treated with LMWH; 14 paired) and quantified their circulating, platelet-derived, and endothelial-derived EVs using Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis and flow cytometry. Proteomics was performed on the EV cargo and patient plasma, quantifying the inflammatory profiles of the patients under both treatment arms.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

We demonstrated that DOAC treatment maintained hypercoagulable and prothrombotic EV profiles similar to LMWH treatment, showing a remarkably stable EV cargo proteome. Inflammatory profiles were also comparable between treatment arms, with a trend toward a DOAC-mediated reduction of circulating cytokines, highlighting potential anti-inflammatory effects.

CONCLUSION

This pilot study demonstrates that DOACs sustain the circulating EV and inflammatory profiles to the same extent as LMWH, supporting this clinical shift in anticoagulant treatment in the cancer setting.

Efficacy and safety of extended duration postoperative thromboprophylaxis with low molecular weight heparin among subgroups of patients undergoing surgical resection of colorectal cancer: A post-hoc analysis of the PERIOP-01 trial

BACKGROUND

Extended duration postoperative thromboprophylaxis is suggested by clinical practice guidelines after any cancer-related major abdominal surgeries. However, recent evidence reported relatively low rates of symptomatic venous thromboembolism (VTE) after colorectal cancer surgeries, suggesting the need of a careful risk-benefit assessment in this setting.

METHODS

This is a pre-planned post-hoc analysis of the PERIOP-01 trial which compared extended to standard thromboprophylaxis in patients undergoing surgical resection of localized colorectal cancer. Subgroup analyses were performed based on different baseline characteristics. The primary efficacy and safety outcomes were major VTE and clinically relevant bleeding events, respectively.

RESULTS

A total of 614 patients were included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis (307 patients in each group). Major VTE events occurred in 2 % and 1 % of the extended and standard-duration thromboprophylaxis groups, respectively. Clinically relevant bleeding events occurred in 3 % of each group. No specific characteristics were found to be associated with a decreased incidence of major VTE among patients receiving extended thromboprophylaxis. Patients with colon cancer resection receiving extended thromboprophylaxis were at an increased risk of clinically relevant bleeding (HR 2.57, 95%CI 1.25-5.30). Other characteristics that may be associated with an increased incidence of bleeding included age (≥75) (HR 2.37, 95%CI 0.47-11.98) and sex (HR 2.13, 95%CI 0.20-23.17).

CONCLUSIONS

In the PERIOP-01 trial, extended thromboprophylaxis did not reduce the incidence of major VTE in any subgroups of patients. However, this strategy may be associated with an increased incidence of bleeding among patients with colon cancer, and perhaps among male and elderly patients.

Clinical outcomes of extended venous thromboembolism prophylaxis after oncologic colorectal surgery

BACKGROUND

Current guidelines recommend extended venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis after colorectal surgery for cancer. However, adherence to these guidelines has been low. Moreover, the effectiveness of extended VTE prophylaxis has not been evaluated using real-world data.

METHODS

This study retrospectively analyzed a random 25% sample of the 2009-2022 IQVIA PharMetrics Plus for Academics database, an administrative claims database representative of the commercially insured population of the United States. Patients with cancer who underwent oncologic colorectal surgery were included. The primary outcomes were 90-day postdischarge VTE and bleeding events. The association between preoperative and intraoperative variables and the outcomes was assessed using univariate and multivariate main-effect logistic regression models.

RESULTS

A total of 13,117 surgical procedures were analyzed (35.0% laparoscopic colectomy, 33.4% open colectomy, 17.3% laparoscopic rectal resection, and 14.2% open rectal resection). The median age was 59 years, and 52% of patients were female. Extended VTE prophylaxis prescriptions were filled for 676 patients (5.2% of eligible patients), primarily with enoxaparin (95.5%), and increased over time (1.7% in 2010 to 12.0% in 2021). After risk adjustment, extended VTE prophylaxis was not associated with 90-day postdischarge VTE (odds ratio [OR], 1.15 [95% CI, 0.68-1.83]) or bleeding (OR, 0.93 [95% CI, 0.63-1.33]). The only factors independently associated with postdischarge VTE were the Elixhauser comorbidity score and surgery type.

CONCLUSION

Most patients who underwent colorectal surgery for cancer did not receive extended VTE prophylaxis. This did not seem to affect the risk of postoperative VTE or bleeding. Further research should focus on patients most likely to benefit from extended VTE prophylaxis.

Elevated Thrombin Generation and Venous Thromboembolism Incidence in Patients Undergoing Cytoreductive Surgery with Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy Compared with Minimally Invasive Rectal Surgery

Surgical treatment of colorectal cancer carries a risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE). We investigated changes in coagulation and fibrinolysis and the VTE incidence within 30 days in patients undergoing open cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS + HIPEC) for peritoneal metastases from colorectal cancer and minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for localized rectal cancer.This cohort study included 45 CRS + HIPEC and 45 MIS patients. Blood samples were obtained preoperatively, at the end of surgery, and postoperative day (POD) 1, 3 to 4, and 5 to 7. Systematic ultrasonographic screening for VTE was performed between POD 3 and 7. Computed tomography scan was performed if complications were suspected. The primary endpoint was the difference in mean change (Δ) with [95% confidence intervals] from preoperative to end of surgery in prothrombin fragment 1 + 2 (F1 + 2) levels. Secondary endpoints were the difference in mean change in biomarkers of coagulation and fibrinolysis from preoperative to POD 5 to 7 and the VTE incidence.F1 + 2 levels increased from preoperative to the end of surgery in both groups. The mean increase from preoperative to end of surgery in F1 + 2 levels was significantly greater in CRS + HIPEC patients than MIS patients: Δ1,322 [1,040:1,604] pmol/L, p < 0.01. The VTE incidence was significantly higher after CRS + HIPEC than MIS (24 vs. 5%, p = 0.01).F1 + 2 levels were increased after both procedures, but to a far greater extent following CRS + HIPEC. The VTE incidence within 30 days was significantly higher in patients treated with CRS + HIPEC than in MIS patients.

Thromboembolic Events in Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Patients With and Without Cardiovascular Comorbidities Receiving Oral Androgen Receptor Pathway Inhibitors

BACKGROUND

This study investigates the association between thromboembolic events (TE) and castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) patients receiving oral androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPi) compared to those undergoing chemotherapy, both with and without a pre-existing history of cardiovascular disease (CVD).

METHODS

A total of 2779 men diagnosed with CRPC were identified using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Medicare Linked Database from 2012 to 2016. Patients were stratified based on their CVD history. Within each CVD stratum (pre-existing CVD vs. no pre-existing CVD), patients were further categorized into two treatment groups: those receiving oral ARPi and those undergoing chemotherapy. Unadjusted and inverse probability treatment weight (IPTW)-adjusted proportional hazards models, using Fine and Gray's method, were applied to evaluate the potential association between ARPi treatment and TE.

RESULTS

Patients with pre-existing CVD treated with ARPi exhibited a significantly lower crude hazard ratio (HR) for TE compared to chemotherapy (HR 0.39, 95% CI 0.27-0.58, p < 0.001). However, after adjustment using IPTW, this association was no longer significant (adjusted hazard ratio [AHR] 1.00, 95% CI 0.75-1.32, p = 0.99). For patients without CVD, ARPi use was also associated with a reduced risk of TE in the crude analysis (HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.32-0.87, p = 0.01), but this effect was not statistically significant after IPTW adjustment (HR 0.99, 95% CI 0.69-1.41, p = 0.94).

CONCLUSION

ARPi demonstrated no significant effect on TE risk compared to chemotherapy, regardless of pre-existing CVD status. Similarly, when excluding patients with a prior history of TE, ARPi use remained non-significantly associated with new TE in the IPTW-adjusted competing risk analysis, highlighting the need for further investigation.

The efficacy and safety of low-molecular-weight heparins for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in abdominal or pelvic cancer surgery: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) have been widely used for thromboprophylaxis in postoperative patients with abdominal or pelvic cancer. However, evidence regarding the optimal type of LMWHs remains limited.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of different types of LMWHs in patients undergoing abdominal or pelvic cancer surgery through a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

METHODS

The network meta-analysis was guided by the PRISMA guidelines. The primary outcomes included venous thromboembolism (VTE), major bleeding, and all-cause death. Results were summarized with relative ratios (RR) and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs). The surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) was calculated to assess the performance of various LMWHs.

RESULTS

A total of 19 RCTs involving 6318 patients were identified. Compared to non-LMWH, LMWHs significantly reduced the risk of VTE [RR 0.57, (95 % CI 0.41-0.81)], DVT [RR 0.56, (95 % CI 0.39-0.81)], and PE [RR 0.26, (95 % CI 0.10-0.66)], without increasing the risk of all-cause death [RR 0.67, (95 % CI 0.39-1.14)], major bleeding [RR 1.51, (95 % CI 0.82-2.77)], minor bleeding [RR 1.23, (95 % CI 0.84-1.80)], all bleeding [RR 1.35, (95 % CI 0.98-1.84)], or thrombocytopenia [RR 0.41, (95 % CI 0.13-1.31)]. Notably, no significant differences in efficacy and safety were observed among different types of LMWHs, with parnaparin (SUCRA 86.3), dalteparin (SUCRA 74.5), and certoparin (SUCRA 88.5) ranking highest in the prevention of VTE, major bleeding, and all-cause death, respectively.

CONCLUSION

LMWHs are efficacious options for thromboprophylaxis in patients undergoing abdominal or pelvic cancer surgery, without increasing the risk of major bleeding or all-cause death. However, no significant differences were observed in efficacy and safety among different types of LMWHs used in this context.

Challenges and Opportunities of Direct Oral Anticoagulant (DOAC) Therapy in Complex Clinical Scenarios: A Comprehensive Review and Practical Guide

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have emerged as a preferred alternative to vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) for the prevention and treatment of thromboembolic disorders, offering improved safety, predictable pharmacokinetics, and ease of administration. Despite these advantages, their use in complex clinical scenarios presents significant challenges that necessitate individualized therapeutic strategies. This comprehensive review explores the efficacy, safety, and limitations of DOAC therapy in special populations, including patients with renal or hepatic impairment, obesity, cancer-associated thrombosis, and antiphospholipid syndrome. Additionally, we examine their role in uncommon thrombotic conditions such as superficial venous thrombosis, embolic stroke of undetermined source, upper extremity vein thrombosis, inferior vena cava thrombosis, pelvic vein thrombosis, and cerebral vein thrombosis. The pharmacokinetic variability of DOACs in renal and hepatic dysfunction requires caution to balance the bleeding and thrombotic risks. In obesity, altered drug distribution and metabolism raise concerns regarding appropriate dosing and therapeutic efficacy. Cancer-associated thrombosis presents a complex interplay of prothrombotic mechanisms, necessitating careful selection of anticoagulant therapy. Furthermore, the use of DOACs in antiphospholipid syndrome remains controversial due to concerns about recurrent thrombotic events. Finally, in some unusual scenarios like inferior vena cava, pelvic vein, and cerebral vein thrombosis, the use of DOACs has scarce evidence. This review aims to guide clinicians in optimizing anticoagulation management in challenging patient populations by synthesizing current evidence and providing practical recommendations.

Advances and Challenges in the Application of Novel Oral Anticoagulants for Venous Thromboembolism Prevention Following Colorectal Cancer Surgery

BACKGROUND

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common but severe complication following colorectal cancer (CRC) surgery. Traditional anticoagulants such as low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) and vitamin K antagonists face limitations in clinical due to requirements for frequent monitoring, subcutaneous administration, and poor patient adherence. Novel Oral Anticoagulants (NOACs), with advantages including oral administration, stable pharmacokinetics, and no requirement for routine monitoring, have emerged as potential alternatives for postoperative VTE prophylaxis.

METHODS

This narrative review synthesized evidence from PubMed and Web of Science (up to October 2024). Initial plans for a systematic review were adjusted due to limited CRC-specific trials, focusing instead on bridging existing evidence to emerging clinical applications.

RESULTS

Postoperative VTE incidence remains heterogeneous, influenced by symptom-driven versus systematic detection and temporal improvements in perioperative care. Extended LMWH reduces VTE risk, yet adherence remains low. The PROLAPS II trial demonstrated rivaroxaban's efficacy in reducing VTE after laparoscopic CRC surgery, with comparable major bleeding rates to placebo. Meta-analyses confirm NOACs' non-inferiority to LMWH for short-term prophylaxis, but CRC-specific extended regimens lack validation. Safety concerns include heightened gastrointestinal/genitourinary bleeding risks and potential drug interactions with anticancer therapies. Clinician familiarity gaps and patient resistance to injectable agents further impede guideline adherence. Conflicting guidelines underscore unresolved debates on ideal regimens.

CONCLUSION

NOACs offer practical advantages over LMWH for extended thromboprophylaxis in CRC surgery, particularly in enhancing adherence. However, bleeding risks and limited high-quality evidence necessitate cautious clinical integration. Future research must prioritize large-scale RCTs to validate LMWH-NOAC sequential regimens, optimize risk-stratified protocols, and address interactions within enhanced recovery pathways. Harmonized guidelines and provider education are critical to bridging implementation gaps.

Predicting the risk of postoperative venous thromboembolism in rhinoplasty patients: a cohort study

BACKGROUND

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a rare complication following rhinoplasty surgery, with an occurrence rate generally estimated to be between 0.5% and 1%. In contrast, the occurrence rate of VTE in orthopedic surgeries, particularly in lower limb fracture surgeries, can reach as high as 10% or more. This significant difference highlights the varying risks associated with different surgical procedures and underscores the importance of identifying risk factors specific to rhinoplasty. Despite its relatively low incidence, the potential for VTE in rhinoplasty patients necessitates a thorough analysis of risk factors to enhance patient safety and guide clinical practice. This study aims to analyze the risk factors for postoperative VTE in rhinoplasty patients and develop a predictive model to assist clinicians in identifying at-risk individuals.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 1100 rhinoplasty patients admitted to a cosmetic hospital from January 2016 to January 2022. Patients were divided into Non-VTE group (1012 cases) and VTE group (88 cases) based on the occurrence of VTE within one month postoperatively. General patient information was collected and subjected to univariate analysis. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify risk factors for postoperative VTE in rhinoplasty patients and establish a predictive model. Internal validation was performed using bootstrapping technique to assess the accuracy and predictive performance of the model.

RESULTS

Univariate analysis showed that the proportions of IBD, Myocardial infarction, Previous VTE, PICC/central line, Rib graft, and History of nasal surgery were significantly higher in the VTE group compared to the Non-VTE group (all P < 0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified IBD, Myocardial infarction, Previous VTE, Rib graft, and History of nasal surgery as independent risk factors for VTE (P < 0.05). The constructed predictive nomogram model demonstrated good calibration and predictive accuracy, with an area under the ROC curve of 0.845, indicating excellent discrimination and clinical predictive performance.

CONCLUSION

IBD, Myocardial infarction, Previous VTE, Rib graft, and History of nasal surgery are independent risk factors for postoperative VTE in rhinoplasty patients. The predictive model effectively assesses the risk of VTE in patients, providing important guidance for clinical decision-making.

Extended Reduced-Dose Apixaban for Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism

BACKGROUND

In patients with active cancer and venous thromboembolism, whether extended treatment with a reduced dose of an oral anticoagulant is effective in preventing recurrent thromboembolic events and decreasing bleeding is unclear.

METHODS

We conducted a randomized, double-blind, noninferiority trial with blinded central outcome adjudication. Consecutive patients with active cancer and proximal deep-vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism who had completed at least 6 months of anticoagulant therapy were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive oral apixaban at a reduced (2.5 mg) or full (5.0 mg) dose twice daily for 12 months. The primary outcome was centrally adjudicated fatal or nonfatal recurrent venous thromboembolism, assessed in a noninferiority analysis (margin of 2.00 for the upper boundary of the 95% confidence interval of the subhazard ratio). The key secondary outcome was clinically relevant bleeding, assessed in a superiority analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 1766 patients underwent randomization at a median time since the index event of 8.0 months (interquartile range, 6.5 to 12.6); 866 patients were assigned to the reduced-dose group, and 900 to the full-dose group. The median treatment duration was 11.8 months (interquartile range, 8.3 to 12.1). Recurrent venous thromboembolism occurred in 18 patients (cumulative incidence, 2.1%) in the reduced-dose group and in 24 (cumulative incidence, 2.8%) in the full-dose group (adjusted subhazard ratio, 0.76; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.41 to 1.41; P = 0.001 for noninferiority). Clinically relevant bleeding occurred in 102 patients (cumulative incidence, 12.1%) in the reduced-dose group and in 136 (cumulative incidence, 15.6%) in the full-dose group (adjusted subhazard ratio, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.58 to 0.97; P = 0.03). Mortality was 17.7% in the reduced-dose group and 19.6% in the full-dose group (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.86 to 1.06).

CONCLUSIONS

Extended anticoagulation with reduced-dose apixaban was noninferior to full-dose apixaban for the prevention of recurrent venous thromboembolism in patients with active cancer. The reduced dose led to a lower incidence of clinically relevant bleeding complications than the full dose. (Funded by the Bristol-Myers Squibb-Pfizer Alliance; API-CAT ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03692065.).

Thromboelastography-based dynamic evaluation of perioperative coagulation changes and anticoagulant efficacy in lung cancer patients

BACKGROUND

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common postoperative complication in oncologic surgery, closely associated with perioperative hypercoagulability. Thromboelastography (TEG) may be an effective method for monitoring hypercoagulability and guiding preventive anticoagulation.

METHODS

We prospectively collected perioperative clinical data from lung cancer surgery patients at our hospital between June 2019 and January 2020. TEG and coagulation-related indicators were monitored preoperatively, and on postoperative days 1 and 3. Newly diagnosed postoperative VTE was monitored using lower limb color doppler ultrasound.

RESULTS

A total of 241 lung cancer surgery patients were included, with 25 developing VTE postoperatively (10.4%). TEG results showed a significant decrease in the R value (a thrombin marker) on postoperative day 1, followed by an increase on day 3. The MA value (a platelet marker) increased postoperatively. D-dimer levels also rose after surgery. On postoperative day 1, thrombin-related hypercoagulability was predominant (15/17 preoperatively, 40/46 postoperatively), whereas platelet-related hypercoagulability was dominant on postoperative day 3 (18/35). Patients who received prophylactic anticoagulation had significantly higher R values on day 3. The ROC curve for D-dimer predicting new-onset VTE showed AUCs of 0.732, 0.790, and 0.847 preoperatively, on days 1, and 3, respectively.

CONCLUSION

D-dimer helps identify high-risk patients for postoperative VTE, while TEG aids in classifying and monitoring hypercoagulability, optimizing anticoagulation therapy choices and dosages.

Venous and arterial thrombosis in patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICPi) have been associated with a prothrombotic and pro-atherogenic tendency which could lead to an increased risk of thrombosis. The aim of this study was to investigate the incidence of venous and arterial thrombosis (myocardial infarction or ischemic stroke) in patients who used ICPi as compared with the general population. Furthermore, we investigated the association between the occurrence of venous or arterial thrombosis and mortality.

METHODS

Patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors ICPi between January 1, 2013, and May 31, 2020, at the University Medical Center Utrecht, the Netherlands, were included in this study. Indirect standardization was used to compare the incidence rates of venous and arterial thrombosis in patients who used ICPi to the age- and sex weighted incidence rates in the general population. Time-dependent Cox proportional hazard regression model was used to calculate Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CIs to investigate the association between the occurrence of a venous or arterial event after start of an ICPi and mortality.

RESULTS

The age- and sex weighted incidence rates in 663 patients who used ICPi as compared to the general population was 22.7-fold (95% CI 16.6-31.0) increased for venous thrombosis, 3.0-fold (95% CI 1.2-7.1) increased for myocardial infarction, and 3.2-fold (95% CI 1.6-5.7) increased for ischemic stroke. After adjustment, the all-cause mortality risk was 2.3-fold (95% CI 1.5-3.5) increased for patients who were diagnosed with venous thrombosis during follow-up and 2.2-fold (95% CI 1.1-4.1) increased for patients who were diagnosed with arterial thrombosis during follow-up as compared with patients without venous or arterial thrombosis during follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Patients receiving ICPi have elevated risks of venous thrombosis and arterial thrombosis. Occurrence of venous thrombosis or arterial thrombosis during treatment with ICPi is associated with an increased mortality risk.

Healthcare resource utilization and costs after initiating direct-acting oral anticoagulants or low molecular weight heparins in patients with venous thromboembolism

BACKGROUND

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) can lead to significant healthcare resource utilization (HcRU) and costs. First-line treatments such as direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOAC) and low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) are utilized for VTE management. There are limited observational studies to determine which first-line drug for VTE is associated with lower HcRU and cost. Therefore, we sought to compare HcRU and costs of commercially insured patients with VTE who initiated DOAC or LMWH in the US.

METHODS

We utilized Merative MarketScan Research Database (2016-2021) to identify adults initiating DOAC or LMWH for VTE. Baseline measures were assessed 12 months prior to the index date of drug initiation. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to control confounding. For HcRU, logistic regression was used to model emergency room and inpatient visits and the negative binomial count model was used for outpatient visits. The average marginal effect for total healthcare cost comparing DOAC with LMWH users was estimated using a generalized linear model. HcRU and costs were evaluated for 12 months posttreatment initiation.

RESULTS

DOAC users had lower odds of inpatient visits (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.53, 95% CI 0.46 to 0.59), emergency room visits (aOR 0.86, 95% CI 0.73 to 0.99), and outpatient visits (adjusted incident rate ratio 0.52, 95% CI 0.50 to 0.54) in comparison to LMWH users. DOAC users had lower total healthcare costs of -$9573 (95% CI -$11,149 to -$7997) (US dollars).

CONCLUSION

This cohort study suggests that DOAC use is associated with fewer inpatient, outpatient, and emergency room visits, and lower healthcare costs compared to LMWH use for VTE management.

In Vivo pharmacokinetic interactions of ribociclib with rivaroxaban and apixaban in rats: implications for increased drug exposure and dose adjustments

Background

Apixaban (API) and rivaroxaban (RIVA) are orally available inhibitors of coagulation factor Xa and are commonly used to treat cancer-related venous thrombosis. Ribociclib (RIBO), a first-line treatment for hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative (HR+/HER2-) advanced breast cancer, is an inhibitor of CYP3A4, P-gp, and BCRP. Given the potential for these drugs to be co-administered in clinical settings, there is limited information regarding the pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions (DDIs) between ribociclib and these anticoagulants. This study aimed to evaluate the extent of DDIs between ribociclib and rivaroxaban or apixaban in rats and to explore the optimization of drug dosing strategies.

Methods

Male Sprague-Dawley rats were divided into 9 groups (n = 6), receiving ribociclib, apixaban, rivaroxaban, ribociclib with rivaroxaban, ribociclib with apixaban, and combinations with reduced doses and time intervals. Blood concentrations were measured using ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS). Pharmacokinetic parameters such as AUC, Cmax, CLz/F, and Vz/F.

Results

Ribociclib significantly increased exposure to both rivaroxaban and apixaban, with a greater impact on rivaroxaban. Specifically, ribociclib increased the AUC0-t, AUC0-∞ and Cmax of rivaroxaban (normal dose) by about 2.4-fold, 2.1-fold and 1.8-fold, while increasing apixaban exposure by about 60.82%, with a trend towards an increase in Cmax that was not statistically significant. When co-administered with ribociclib, even at a reduced dosage of 1 mg/kg, rivaroxaban exhibited a significant increase in exposure, with the AUC increasing by 2.3-fold and Cmax by 1.3-fold. Despite the reduction in dosage, the pharmacokinetic effect of ribociclib on rivaroxaban persisted. While administration of rivaroxaban 12 h after ribociclib resulted in a less pronounced increase in exposure compared to the normal-dose group. The results of qRT-PCR showed that ribociclib reduced the expression of Cyp3a1 and Abcg2 in rat intestine.

Discussion

This research highlights the need for careful consideration of dosing regimens to minimize toxicity risk and optimize the safety of clinical co-administration of ribociclib with rivaroxaban.

Evaluation of the efficacy of totally implantable venous access port in breast cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy

OBJECTIVE

The use of Totally Implantable Venous Access Port (TIVAP) has gained importance in chemotherapy for cancer patients due to its ability to reduce complications compared to conventional central venous catheters. Chemotherapy for breast cancer often requires long-term venous access, and the choice of device can impact both treatment efficacy and patient quality of life. This study randomly divided 355 breast cancer chemotherapy patients, who were treated from January 2022 to January 2023, into the TIVAP group (n = 177) and the control group (n = 178) to evaluate the application effect of TIVAP.

METHODS

The patients in the TIVAP group used totally implantable venous access ports, while those in the control group used central venous catheters. We compared the clinical efficacy, ability of daily life, complications, and patient satisfaction between the two groups. Statistical analysis was performed using t-tests for continuous data and χ2 tests for categorical data.

RESULTS

Our results showed that the total clinical efficacy was 96.61% in the TIVAP group and 90.45% in the control group, and the data of the two groups were significantly different (P < 0.05). Before the intervention, the daily living ability scores of the two groups were analyzed, and the difference between the two groups was not significant (P > 0.05). After the intervention, the daily living ability scores of the patients in the TIVAP group (77.41 ± 7.02) were significantly higher than those of the control group (66.75 ± 6.42) (P < 0.05).In terms of complication rate, the TIVAP group was 5.08%, which was significantly lower than that of the control group (12.36%), and the difference between the two groups was significant (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Therefore, the application of TIVAP in breast cancer chemotherapy patients can effectively reduce the toxic and side effects of chemotherapy, ensure that the patients use the drugs according to the chemotherapy cycle, and then improve the clinical outcome.

The efficacy of atorvastatin on inflammation and coagulation markers in high-risk thrombotic cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is a prevalent complication associated with malignancy. Clinical use of thromboprophylaxis is recommended, however its usage is limited due to bleeding complications, more cost associated, and reluctance to receive anticoagulant injections. Rivaroxaban a relatively easy to administer anticoagulant but it has a risk of bleeding and is expensive. Inflammation is the important factor in pathogenesis of cancer-associated thrombosis. Statins have the anti-inflammatory property that could decrease proinflammatory cytokines. Consequently, statins may be used as thromboprophylaxis for cancer patients receiving chemotherapy.

OBJECTIVE

To provide comparison between atorvastatin and rivaroxaban on affecting inflammatory biomarkers (interleukin 6 [IL-6], C reactive protein [CRP]) and coagulation activation biomarkers (Tissue Factor [TF], prothrombin fragment 1 + 2 [F1 + 2], D-Dimer) in cancer patients at high risk of thrombosis receiving chemotherapy.

METHODS

A randomized controlled study that was double-blinded and involved high-risk cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy. For up to ninety days, participants were randomized to receiver either atorvastatin 20 mg or rivaroxaban 10 mg daily. The level of plasma of IL-6, CRP, TF, F1 + 2, and D-dimer were assessed 24 h before chemotherapy, 30, 60, and 90 day after chemotherapy. The latest observation carried forward (LOCF) approach was used to examine the data. The laboratory results were evaluated using an independent T test or Mann-Whitney U test prior to and after chemotherapy.

RESULTS

Eighty-six randomized patients were enrolled, although both groups showed a decreasing trend in plasma level of IL-6, CRP, TF, F1 + 2, and D-dimer, there were no significant differences between the two groups (p > 0.05). In the atorvastatin group, there was a significant correlation between delta level of IL-6 and F1 + 2 (r = 0.313, p = 0.043) and delta level of CRP and F1 + 2 (r = 0.398, p = 0.009), whereas in the rivaroxaban group there was a significant correlation between delta CRP and D-dimer level (r = 0.387, p = 0.009).

CONCLUSION

Atorvastatin decreases IL-6 and CRP level, which also decreases F1 + 2 level. Atorvastatin did not substantially differ from rivaroxaban in decreasing plasma levels of inflammatory biomarkers IL-6, CRP, and coagulation activation biomarkers TF, F1 + 2, D-dimer in high-risk cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ISRCTN71891829, Registration Date: 17/12/2020.

Expanding the Role of Heparin Derivatives in Oncology: From Anticoagulation to Antitumor Activity

Current research demonstrates the expanding therapeutic potential of heparin derivatives in oncology, extending beyond traditional anticoagulation mechanisms. This systematic analysis examines the structural characteristics, molecular mechanisms, and therapeutic applications of heparin-based compounds in malignancy treatment. The essential antithrombin binding pentasaccharide sequence has enabled development of specialized molecular variants, particularly fractionated heparins and their non-anticoagulant counterparts. These agents exert antineoplastic effects via multiple pathways, particularly through modulation of heparanase enzymatic activity and specific protein-glycosaminoglycan interactions. Evidence from pivotal clinical trials (FRAGMATIC, MAGNOLIA, GASTRANOX) confirms efficacy in managing cancer-associated thrombosis while indicating potential enhancement of chemotherapeutic outcomes. The preparation methods utilize enzymatic cleavage reactions and selective chemical derivatization to generate structurally modified heparins exhibiting unique molecular characteristics and biological activities. Analysis of the glycosaminoglycan analog dociparstat sodium reveals significant activity in myeloid malignancies, mediated by specific interference with CXCL12/CXCR4 signaling cascades. Significant challenges remain in manufacturing scale-up, analytical validation, and long-term safety assessment. Future studies must address dose optimization, combination strategies, and controlled clinical trials to determine the full therapeutic potential of these compounds in clinical oncology.

The role of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio as venous thromboembolism predictors in breast cancer patients pre- and post-therapy

OBJECTIVES

Breast cancer (BC) accounts for 12.3% of all cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (VTE). Platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) are recognized inflammatory biomarkers but have not been incorporated into thrombosis risk stratification models. We evaluated NLR and PLR as predictive biomarkers for VTE in BC patients to determine their optimal predictive cutoffs and net predictive value before and after treatment.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective pilot study that involved 56 women with BC, recruited prior to treatment (chemotherapy and immunotherapy) initiation with at least 6-month monitoring for VTE. NLR and PLR were assessed pre and posttreatment.

RESULTS

Five patients (8.9%) developed VTE. NLR and PLR increased significantly posttreatment (P = 0.001). Post, not pretreatment, NLR (P = 0.029) and PLR (P = 0.033) were significantly associated with VTE occurrence. Receiver Operating curve analysis indicated enhanced predictive capacity for VTE postimmunotherapy. Optimal posttreatment cutoffs were 3.6 for NLR and 280 for PLR, aligning with existing literature, with slightly elevated NLR.

CONCLUSIONS

Posttreatment NLR and PLR have higher predictability for VTE in patients receiving immunotherapy compared to chemotherapy. NLR outperforms PLR, particularly postimmunotherapy. This data holds promise for thrombosis risk stratification in the context of immunotherapy but requires evaluation in larger studies.

Anticoagulants: From chance discovery to structure-based design

Taking a historical perspective, we review the discovery, pharmacology, and clinical evaluation of the old and new anticoagulants that have been approved for clinical use. The drugs are discussed chronologically, starting in the 1880s, and progressing through to 2024. The innovations in technology used to develop novel anticoagulants came in fits and starts and reflected the advances in science and technology over these decades, whereas the shift from anecdote to evidence-based use of anticoagulants was delayed until the principles of epidemiology and biostatistics were introduced into clinical trial design and to the approval process. Hirudin, heparin, and vitamin K antagonists were discovered by chance, and were used clinically before their mechanism of action was elucidated and before their net clinical benefits were evaluated in randomized clinical trials. Subsequent anticoagulants were designed based on a better understanding of the structure and function of coagulation proteins, including antithrombin, thrombin, and factor Xa, and underwent more rigorous preclinical and clinical evaluation before regulatory approval. By simplifying oral anticoagulation, the direct oral anticoagulants have revolutionized anticoagulation care and have enhanced the uptake of anticoagulation, but bleeding has not been eliminated and there is a need for more effective and convenient anticoagulants for thrombosis triggered by the contact pathway of coagulation. The newly developed factor XIa and XIIa inhibitors have the potential to address these unmet clinical needs and are undergoing clinical evaluation for several indications. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Anticoagulant therapy is the cornerstone of treatment and prevention of thrombosis, which remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Elucidation of the structure and function of coagulation enzymes, their cofactors, and inhibitors, coupled with advances in structure-based design led to the discovery of more convenient, safer, and more effective anticoagulants that have revolutionized the management of thrombotic disorders.

Development and validation of machine learning models for predicting venous thromboembolism in colorectal cancer patients: A cohort study in China

BACKGROUND

With advancements in healthcare, traditional VTE risk assessment tools are increasingly insufficient to meet the demands of high-quality care, underscoring the need for innovative and specialized assessment methods.

OBJECTIVE

Owing to the remarkable success of machine learning in supervised learning and disease prediction, our objective is to develop a reliable and efficient model for assessing VTE risk by leveraging the fundamental data and clinical characteristics of colorectal cancer patients within our medical facility.

METHODS

Six commonly used machine learning algorithms were utilized in our study to predict the occurrence of VTE in patients with rectal cancer. In the modeling process, LASSO regression was employed to identify and exclude variables not associated with VTE. Additionally, hyperparameter tuning was conducted via 5-fold cross-validation to mitigate overfitting, and 200 bootstrap samples were used to adjust the apparent performance on the training set. The selection of the VTE assessment model was determined by a thorough evaluation of performance criteria, such as the AUC, ACC and F1 score.

RESULTS

The RF model exhibits consistent and efficient performance. Specifically, in the internally validation dataset, where generalizability was adjusted, the RF model achieved the highest scores across multiple metrics: AD-AUC (0.895), AD-ACC (0.871), AD-F1 (0.311), AD-MCC (0.316), AD-Precision (0.241), AD-Specificity (0.888). For external validation on unseen colon cancer data, the RF model also performed best in terms of ACC (0.728), F1 (0.292), MCC (0.225), Precision (0.192), and Specificity (0.740), with a suboptimal AUC of 0.745 and a Sensitivity (Recall) of 0.615. Additionally, the RF model demonstrates strong performance not only on the original dataset but also on datasets processed via alternative imbalance handling techniques.

CONCLUSIONS

Our research successfully established and validated a risk assessment model for assessing the risk of VTE in colorectal cancer patients.

Development and Validation of a Modified Khorana Score for Predicting Venous Thromboembolism in Newly Diagnosed Stage IV Lung Cancer

We aimed to establish an effective model to identify metastatic lung cancer patients at high risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Patients diagnosed with stage IV lung cancer from January 2011 to June 2019 were included in the development cohort; those recruited from July 2019 to June 2021 were included in the validation cohort. Univariable and multivariable analyses determined the risk factors for VTE. Then we assessed the value for predicting VTE of the Khorana score and modified Khorana score in these two cohorts; 575 patients were included in the development cohort, and 202 patients in the validation cohort. Adenocarcinoma, D-dimer, and the Khorana score were independent risk factors for VTE. In the development cohort, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of the Khorana score in patients with newly diagnosed stage IV lung cancer was 0.598 (95% CI, 0.512-0.684). The AUC of the modified Khorana score was 0.747 (95% CI, 0.689-0.805). The difference was statistically significant (P <.001). The AUC of the modified Khorana score in the validation cohort was 0.763 (95% CI, 0.661-0.865). The modified Khorana score is more able to accurately predict VTE in patients with newly diagnosed stage IV lung cancer than the Khorana score.

Unveiling the complexities of catheter-related thrombosis: risk factors, preventive strategies, and management

Catheter-related deep venous thrombosis (CR-DVT) is a common complication of central venous catheters, however optimal prophylactic and treatment strategies have yet to be fully defined. While the use of anticoagulation for CR-DVT prophylaxis is not routinely recommended, current available data offer heterogeneous results due to small sample size, non-uniform study design, and varying comorbid conditions. Available guidelines for the treatment of CR-DVT generally recommend a limited duration of anticoagulation after catheter removal. If ongoing use is required and the device remains functional, guidelines support anticoagulation throughout the time the catheter remains in place. It is worth acknowledging that data guiding these recommendations is largely derived from observational studies of upper extremity CR-DVT, along with randomized trials of anticoagulation in patients with lower extremity DVT. Therefore, large, randomized controlled trials are desperately needed to define optimal management, especially in patients who are at high risk for bleeding. This review explores the epidemiology and risk factors of CR-DVT, diagnostic, prophylactic and treatment strategies, guideline recommendations, and future advances in the field, including the introduction of novel anticoagulants. With current available evidence, we also conclude with an individualized approach to preventing and managing CR-DVT to assist clinicians who are faced with this common clinical scenario.

Development and validation of a prediction model for VTE risk in gastric and esophageal cancer patients

Objective

This study focuses on the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with gastric or esophageal cancer (GC/EC), investigating the risk factors for VTE in this population. Utilizing machine learning techniques, the research aims to develop an interpretable VTE risk prediction model. The goal is to identify patients with gastric or esophageal cancer who are at high risk of VTE at an early stage in clinical practice, thereby enabling precise anticoagulant prophylaxis and thrombus management.

Methods

This study is a real-world investigation aimed at predicting VTE in patients with GC/EC. Data were collected from inpatients diagnosed with GC/EC at Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital between 1 January 2018, and 31 June 2023. Using nine supervised learning algorithms, 576 prediction models were developed based on 56 available variables. Subsequently, a simplified modeling approach was employed using the top 12 feature variables from the best-performing model. The primary metric for assessing the predictive performance of the models was the area under the ROC curve (AUC). Additionally, the training data used to construct the best model in this study were employed to externally validate several existing assessment models, including the Padua, Caprini, Khorana, and COMPASS-CAT scores.

Results

A total of 3,742 cases of GC/EC patients were collected after excluding duplicate visit information. The study included 861 (23.0%) patients, of which 124 (14.4%) developed VTE. The top five models based on AUC for full-variable modeling are as follows: GBoost (0.9646), Logic Regression (0.9443), AdaBoost (0.9382), CatBoost (0.9354), XGBoost (0.8097). For simplified modeling, the models are: Simp-CatBoost (0.8811), Simp-GBoost (0.8771), Simp-Random Forest (0.8736), Simp-AdaBoost (0.8263), Simp-Logistic Regression (0.8090). After evaluating predictive performance and practicality, the Simp-GBoost model was determined as the best model for this study. External validation of the Padua score, Caprini score, Khorana score, and COMPASS-CAT score based on the training set of the Simp-GBoost model yielded AUCs of 0.4367, 0.2900, 0.5000, and 0.3633, respectively.

Conclusion

In this study, we analyzed the risk factors of VTE in GC/EC patients, and constructed a well-performing VTE risk prediction model capable of accurately identifying the extent of VTE risk in patients. Four VTE prediction scoring systems were introduced to externally validate the dataset of this study. The results demonstrated that the VTE risk prediction model established in this study held greater clinical utility for patients with GC/EC. The Simp-GB model can provide intelligent assistance in the early clinical assessment of VTE risk in these patients.

Prospective assessment of venous thromboembolism in lung cancer patients using a standardized screening protocol

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is highly prevalent in cancer patients. While its actual incidence remains disparate among studies, specific subpopulations, such as lung cancer patients, might be at an increased risk. We aimed to assess the impact of a screening protocol in determining both the incidence and risk factors for VTE and evaluate the usefulness of predictive biomarkers and risk stratification tools in lung cancer patients. For this purpose, we designed a prospective cohort study including all consecutive, newly diagnosed lung cancer patients between October 2023 and April 2024 in a tertiary center and assessed each patient using a standardized screening protocol. VTE screening included baseline and 3-month reassessment of coagulation tests, D-dimer levels, and imaging (duplex ultrasound of the lower limbs for deep vein thrombosis screening and contrast-enhanced thoracic computed tomography for pulmonary embolism screening). A total of 102 patients were included, of which 16 (15.7%) were diagnosed with VTE. VTE was more frequent in males (p=0.031), patients with COPD (p=0.004), and patients with metastatic disease (p=0.038), particularly those under immunotherapy (p=0.026). Patients with VTE presented a D-dimer concentration more than three times higher at baseline and fivefold the levels observed in non-VTE patients at 3 months (p=0.002). Paired with Khorana scores, D-dimer concentration 4.5 mg/L at 3 months improved the predictive capacity of this VTE risk assessment tool in patients under active treatment. Active VTE screening yielded a significant increase in diagnosis, suggesting the incidence of this complication in newly diagnosed lung cancer patients is underestimated. Risk assessment tools can be enhanced by the addition of D-dimer-based parameters.

Why patients fail to seek information on OTC product interactions with a direct-acting oral anticoagulant: perspectives on information-seeking

BACKGROUND

Many patients taking direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) also consume over-the-counter (OTC) products (dietary supplements and OTC medications), yet many lack knowledge of potential interactions that may increase or decrease DOAC efficacy and may not seek information about OTC products. The objective of this study was to describe patient attitudes and beliefs that inhibited information seeking about potential apixaban-OTC product interactions.

METHODS

Participants included English-, Spanish-, Mandarin-, and Cantonese-speaking adults from two large academic medical centers who reported taking apixaban (a frequently prescribed DOAC) in the past month. Thematic analysis was performed on semi-structured interviews.

RESULTS

Sixty patients aged 24-93 years (mean = 65.3; SD = 15.6) were interviewed; 55% were women. Participants took a total of 236 OTC products. Those with potential interactions with apixaban warranting consideration for therapy modification included: ibuprofen (n = 14; 5.9%), aspirin (n = 8; 3.4%), and naproxen (n = 3; 1.3%). Interviews revealed 5 major themes related to a lack of information-seeking about OTC products: (1) patients lack awareness of the potential for interactions; (2) patients believe that OTC products are safe and/or regulated (largely because they were familiar with the products, had previously taken them, or assumed that dietary supplements were regulated by the Food and Drug Administration); (3) patients believe that providers are responsible for alerting patients about potential interactions (as patients assumed that providers were aware of their OTC product use); (4) patients had prior knowledge of and/or used OTC products infrequently; and (5) obtaining information can be inconvenient. Inquiries regarding preferred information sources revealed 59 (98.3%) patients most frequently sought or would seek information from physicians and 34 (56.7%) from the internet.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients taking apixaban raised reasons for not seeking information about potential OTC product interactions that included poor awareness, perceptions regarding the safety of OTC products, and beliefs in provider responsibility for informing them about interactions. Greater patient education is needed regarding the potential for OTC product-DOAC interactions and the regulation of OTC products, particularly dietary supplements.

Risk factors for venous thromboembolism in patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy as treatment for ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVE

During the treatment of ovarian cancer, the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) post operatively is well established, however, patients may be at even greater risk during neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). This study aimed to determine the incidence and timing of VTE amongst patients undergoing NACT, whether there was an association with survival, and examine risk factors associated with the development of VTE.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a retrospective cohort study of patients diagnosed with ovarian, fallopian tube and primary peritoneal cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy betweenApril 2011 and April 2022 at a gynaecological cancer centre in England. Clinical factors examined included: age at diagnosis, Body Mass Index (BMI), presence of inflammatory co-morbidity, tumour morphology, stage of disease, pelvic mass,ascites,retroperitoneal lymphadenopathy, Khorana score, serum albumin levels, chemotherapy regime, bevacizumab administration and Ca 125 levels.

RESULTS

Of 304 patients analysed, 73 (24%) patients developed venous thromboembolism. Of the patients who developed VTE, fifty-five patients developed pulmonary embolism (75%) and the stage of treatment at which most VTEs were diagnosed was neoadjuvant chemotherapy (32%). There was no correlation observed, between the incidence of VTE and any risk factors, including Khorana score, with the exception of low albumin (<35 g/L)(odds ratio (OR):2.1(95%CI 1.1-3.9; p = 0.06) and patients who did not receive paclitaxel chemotherapy (OR:2.04(95%CI 1.02-4.05; p = 0.08). There was no difference in survival rates between the VTE group and the non-VTE group.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates high rates of VTE, especially pulmonary embolism, in ovarian cancer patients undergoing NACT. The present study, amongst others in the literature also suggest that the risk of VTE in ovarian cancer patients undergoing NACT is underestimated by current risk stratification models. Therefore, prospective trials dedicated to ovarian cancer patients specifically, and a development of a risk model that takes into account factors established by higher levels of evidence, are strongly recommended.

Validation of clinical risk assessment scores for venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer: a population-based cohort study

BACKGROUND

Guidelines recommend using risk assessment tools to identify ambulatory patients with cancer at high risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE).

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to validate a new cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT) risk score in a population-based healthcare setting.

METHODS

We used healthcare registry data and electronic medical records from the Central Denmark Region to calculate the new CAT risk score and the guideline-recommended Khorana score in patients with a first-time cancer diagnosis who initiated systemic cancer therapy. Patients were followed for 6 months after initiation of therapy. The outcome was any VTE identified through hospital discharge diagnoses. Discrimination was assessed using C statistics.

RESULTS

We included 12 471 patients from 2012 to 2020. Of these, 416 (3.3%) developed VTE. The C statistic was 0.71 (95% CI, 0.68-0.74) for the new CAT score and 0.66 (95% CI, 0.63-0.70) for the Khorana score. The 6-month cumulative VTE incidence was 5.0% in 6175 patients classified as high risk by the new CAT score compared with 1.7% in 6296 patients classified as low risk. The 6-month cumulative VTE incidence was 5.2% in 4263 patients classified as high risk by the Khorana score compared with 2.4% in 8208 patients classified as low risk.

CONCLUSION

The new CAT score had a discriminatory ability similar to that reported in the derivation study. The C statistic was numerically higher than that of the Khorana score. Our findings support the implementation of the new CAT score to identify ambulatory patients with cancer who are at high risk of VTE.

Thromboprophylaxis in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer treated with chemoradiation and brachytherapy

OBJECTIVE

To determine the incidence of clinical and subclinical venous thromboembolic events (VTE) in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) treated with high-dose thromboprophylaxis during definitive chemoradiation and brachytherapy.

METHODS

A prospective observational study was undertaken from August 2021 to December 2023 in patients with primary LACC treated with definitive chemoradiation in two Dutch tertiary hospitals. Patients received high-dose thromboprophylaxis during chemoradiation and brachytherapy. In week 4 or 5 of the overall treatment time, plasma D-dimer levels were determined, and all patients underwent venous ultrasound imaging of the legs to screen for deep vein thrombosis (DVT). If indicated, patients received a CT-angiography to screen for pulmonary embolism (PE).

RESULTS

Among 89 included patients, cumulative incidence of clinical and subclinical (V)TE was 7.9 % (n = 7). DVT was found in two patients, PE in three patients, DVT and PE in one patient and one patient had an arterial thromboembolic event (ATE). Of these patients, three (3.4 %) had subclinical VTE, diagnosed during the screening before brachytherapy, and four (4.5 %) had clinical VTE of whom two developed VTE during chemoradiation, one during hospitalization for brachytherapy and one after completing treatment. Of the seven patients with VTE, two (28.6 %) were treated with hyperthermia. Adverse bleeding events after brachytherapy occurred in eight patients.

CONCLUSION

Routine thromboprophylaxis in patients with LACC leads to a relative low incidence of thromboembolic events during chemoradiation and brachytherapy. Further research should focus on identifying high risk factors leading to targeted screening and prevention of VTE in high risk patients.

Venous Thromboembolism Incidence and Risk Factors in Patients Undergoing Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Malignancy is a well-known risk factor for venous thromboembolism (VTE), and the Khorana risk score is effective for screening patients with solid tumors. However, there is a lack of validated screening tools and established risk factors for patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT). Current literature reports a 2.5% to 8.5% incidence of VTE in HCT recipients. Anticoagulation is difficult to manage post-transplantation, given prolonged thrombocytopenia and the likelihood of bleeding. By identifying risk factors, a predictive model may be developed to prospectively test prophylaxis strategies in patients at the highest risk of a thromboembolic event (TE). This retrospective single-center study evaluated the cumulative incidence of TE at 6 months following allogeneic or autologous HCT in adult subjects undergoing transplantation between March 2014 and December 2019. The study also aimed to identify risk factors for developing a TE, evaluate the time from HCT to TE, and compare 1-year survival following HCT between patients with a TE and those without a TE. In evaluating the incidence of TE, ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes were used to determine cancer diagnosis, TE events occurring up 180 days after HCT, and comorbidities of interest. Each subject was reviewed for data accuracy by a manual retrospective chart review. Statistical tests including the cumulative incidence method with competing risks, Gray's test, and univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were used to analyze the time to first TE, evaluate risk factors, and assess 1-year survival post-HCT in relation to TEs occurring within 180 days of HCT. Variables examined included age, sex, body mass index, transplant type, hospital length of stay (LOS), history of TE prior to transplantation, active infections, graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), veno-occlusive disorder, cytomegalovirus serostatus, and other factors. The study included 636 evaluable patients; the majority were male (57.9%) and white (68.7%) and had undergone autologous HCT (68.4%). Twenty-nine patients (4.6%) experienced a TE within 180 days post-transplantation. TEs were more common in the allogeneic HCT recipients (n = 13/201; 6.5%) compared to the autologous HCT recipients (n = 16/435; 3.7%; P = .122). The cumulative incidence of TE was higher in patients who developed an active infection compared to those who did not (7.6% versus 3.1%; P = .011). Hospital LOS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.03; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.0 to 1.06; P = .036) and active infection (HR, 2.34; 95% CI, 1.1 to 4.95; P = .027) were significantly associated with TE in univariate analysis but were not retained in the final multivariate model. There was no difference in 1-year survival between all patients who experienced a TE and those who did not; however, in the autologous HCT group, 1-year survival rate was significantly lower in patients with a TE compared to those without TE (80.4% versus 95.3%; P = .01) (Figure 3C). None of the examined variables, including a history of TE and GVHD, were associated with TE risk. Although the overall incidence of TE in our study was low, many patients received pharmacologic or mechanical prophylaxis, suggesting that such strategies may be effective in mitigating TE risk. Such factors as infection and hospital LOS may further increase TE risk. Providers should continuously monitor for risk factors and signs and symptoms of TE post-transplantation. It is also imperative to consider chemical prophylaxis if counts are recovered during hospitalization.

Impact of COVID-19 in the incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and clinical outcomes in cancer patients: a cohort study

PURPOSE

To determine the incidence of VTE and clinical outcomes in a cohort of cancer patients and COVID-19 infection, and to establish possible predictive factors of VTE.

METHODS/PATIENTS

A single-center retrospective cohort study was performed to determine the incidence of VTE and mortality in 118 cancer patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection from March to August 2020. We calculated individual Khorana Risk and CATS-MICA scores in order to evaluate their utility to identify risk of VTE or death. Continuous variables were compared using Wilcoxon or Student's T test, and categorical variables were compared using the Chi-Square or Fisher's exact text among patients with and without VTE. A Log-Rank test was performed to detect mortality differences between the groups.

RESULTS

A total of 118 patients were included. VTE global incidence was 4.2% (n = 5), and mortality 25.4% (n = 30). Obesity (p = 0.05), recent chemotherapy (p = 0.049) and use of steroids (p = 0.006) were related to higher risk of VTE in the univariate analysis, although they were not confirmed in the multivariate analysis as independent risk factors. Statistically significant differences in all-cause, COVID-19-related and cancer-related mortality according to the Khorana risk score (KRS) were observed. CATS-MICA score (CMS) also showed statistically significant differences in mortality between low- and high-risk patients. Prediction of risk of VTE development with these scores showed a tendency towards significance.

CONCLUSIONS

In this cohort, VTE incidence was similar to previously reported in the general population with SARS-CoV-2 infection. KRS was associated with overall and specific-cause mortality, and might be a useful prognostic tool in this setting.

Regional anesthesia in the patient receiving antithrombotic or thrombolytic therapy: American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine Evidence-Based Guidelines (fifth edition)

Hemorrhagic complications associated with regional anesthesia are extremely rare. The fifth edition of the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine's Evidence-Based Guidelines on regional anesthesia in the patient receiving antithrombotic or thrombolytic therapy reviews the published evidence since 2018 and provides guidance to help avoid this potentially catastrophic complication.The fifth edition of the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine's Evidence-Based Guidelines on regional anesthesia in the patient receiving antithrombotic or thrombolytic therapy uses similar methodology as previous editions but is reorganized and significantly condensed. Therefore, the clinicians are encouraged to review the earlier texts for more detailed descriptions of methods, clinical trials, case series and pharmacology. It is impossible to perform large, randomized controlled trials evaluating a complication this rare; therefore, where the evidence is limited, the authors continue to maintain an 'antihemorrhagic' approach focused on patient safety and have proposed conservative times for the interruption of therapy prior to neural blockade. In previous versions, the anticoagulant doses were described as prophylactic and therapeutic. In this version, we will be using 'low dose' and 'high dose,' which will allow us to be consistent with other published guidelines and more accurately describe the dose in the setting of specific patient characteristics and indications. For example, the same 'high' dose may be used in one patient as a treatment for deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and in another patient as prophylaxis for recurrent DVT. Due to the increasing ability to obtain drug-specific assays, we have included suggestions for when ordering these tests may be helpful and guide practice. Like previous editions, at the end of each recommendation the authors have clearly noted how the recommendation has changed from previous editions.

Risk assessment and prevention of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism in ambulatory patients with solid malignancies

Venous thromboembolism remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality among ambulatory cancer patients, necessitating effective risk assessment and prevention strategies. Despite the availability of risk assessment models and guidelines recommending primary thromboprophylaxis with low-molecular-weight heparins or direct oral anticoagulants, the application of these strategies is inconsistent. This review provides an overview of the current state-of-the-art venous thromboembolism risk assessment and thromboprophylaxis in ambulatory patients with cancer, focusing on existing risk assessment models and the latest guideline recommendations. Finally, it summarizes gaps in knowledge, discusses future directions, and highlights recent advances and state-of-the-art research presented at the 2024 International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis Congress in Bangkok, Thailand.

Occurrence and management of thrombosis recurrence and bleeding in low-molecular-weight heparin-treated patients with cancer-associated thrombosis: a French nationwide cohort study

Background

Rates of venous thromboembolism (VTE) recurrence and bleeding remain high in patients with cancer who are prescribed anticoagulants (ACs) such as low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) after an initial VTE event.

Objectives

To identify patient characteristics associated with VTE recurrence and bleeding in patients receiving LMWH for cancer-associated VTE and to explore secondary AC management and clinical outcomes in these patients.

Methods

An observational study was conducted using nationwide French data for adults with active cancer who were hospitalized with VTE in 2013-2018 and were reimbursed for LMWH ≤ 30 days after hospital discharge. The main outcomes were VTE recurrence and bleeding. For both outcomes, the proportions of patients who experienced the outcome were calculated for different patient characteristics. AC switching following VTE recurrence and bleeding was tracked using Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical codes.

Results

A total of 31,771 patients received LMWH, of whom 1925 (6.1%) experienced VTE recurrence and 1804 (5.7%) bleeding. Most recurrent VTE and bleeding events occurred within 6 months after the initial VTE event. The proportion of patients with VTE recurrence and bleeding varied between cancer types. Most patients who experienced VTE recurrence or bleeding continued to receive LMWH. Eleven percent of patients with VTE recurrence experienced a further recurrent VTE event within 3 months.

Conclusion

More than 10% of patients who received LMWH for cancer-associated VTE experienced VTE recurrence or bleeding. AC management options in this patient population should be prospectively assessed in clinical trials.

Fragility index for extended prophylaxis following abdominopelvic surgery: A methodological survey

BACKGROUND

Fragility Index (FI) is increasingly used to assess robustness of statistically significant p-values reported in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). FI represents the lowest number of non-events changed to events that would make study findings non-significant. This methodological survey was designed to assess the fragility of the evidence for extended VTEp following major abdominopelvic surgery.

METHODS

MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL were searched from inception to November 2023. RCTs with parallel, double-armed, superiority design comparing extended VTEp for patients undergoing major abdominopelvic surgery to controls with at least one statistically significant dichotomous outcome were included. Walsh et al.'s method of calculating FI was utilized.

RESULTS

After review of 611 citations, 6 RCTs were identified with 12 statistically significant outcomes between groups. The mean number of patients randomized per RCT was 419 (SD 176). The median FI was 1.5 (range: 1-4). The number of patients lost to follow-up was greater than the FI for 10/12 (83.3 ​%) outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Statistically significant differences reported in RCTs evaluating extended VTEp following major abdominopelvic surgery are not robust.

Management and outcomes in patients with tumor thrombus: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Tumor thrombus can be associated with an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and poor prognosis. The risks and benefits of anticoagulation remain unclear.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the role of anticoagulation and associated outcomes in patients with tumor thrombus.

METHODS

We conducted a single-center retrospective cohort study in patients with tumor thrombus from 2019 to 2022. All patients were followed for 12 months from the diagnosis of tumor thrombus or until death if death occurred earlier. The primary outcome was the percentage of patients prescribed any dose of anticoagulation for tumor thrombus (or concurrent bland thrombus/VTE). The secondary outcomes included new thrombosis, major bleeding, clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding, and mortality. We calculated the 6- and 12-month cumulative incidence of outcomes with 95% CI and compared those given anticoagulation vs not, considering death as a competing risk.

RESULTS

We included 211 patients, among whom 106 (50.2%; 95% CI, 47.9%-52.6%) were given anticoagulation for tumor thrombus or concurrent VTE (present in 21.8%). The most common type of cancer was hepatocellular carcinoma (28%). Splanchnic veins were the most commonly involved (49.3%). Anticoagulation was more likely used if tumor thrombus involved the inferior vena cava and/or the heart, with concurrent VTE, or if thrombosis service was consulted. The overall 12-month incidence of new VTE was 11.4% (95% CI, 7.3%-16.5%), that of major bleeding + clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding was 36.6% (95% CI, 29.6%-43.5%), and mortality of 52.5% (95% CI, 44.8%-59.6%), with no significant differences among groups given anticoagulation or not.

CONCLUSION

Patients with tumor thrombus carry high risks of VTE, bleeding, and mortality. The impact of anticoagulation remains unclear.

C-reactive Protein, Genetic Susceptibility, and the Long-Term Risk of Venous Thromboembolism in Patients with Past Cancer

BACKGROUND

 Several studies have indicated that C-reactive protein (CRP) level is associated with the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in the general population. However, CRP appears to be unrelated to VTE events in patients newly diagnosed with cancer. As the survival time of cancer patients increases, the effect of CRP on the long-term risk of VTE may change. We aimed to investigate the association between CRP and VTE in cancer survivors and further assess the modification effect of genetic susceptibility.

METHODS

 The Cox proportional hazards model was used to evaluate the association between CRP levels and VTE risk as well as to investigate the joint effect of CRP and genetic susceptibility. The Kaplan-Meier curve and restricted cubic spline were used to visualize the relationship between CRP and VTE.

RESULTS

 This study included 27,806 participants with cancer diagnosis at baseline in the UK Biobank. Over a follow-up period of 344,636 person-years, a total of 1,151 VTE events were recorded. Participants were divided into four groups based on CRP level quartiles. The adjusted hazard ratios (95% CIs) of Q1, Q2, Q3, and Q4 were 1.00, 1.20 (0.99-1.44), 1.25 (1.04-1.50), and 1.51 (1.25-1.82), respectively. For those with high genetic risk of VTE, high CRP had an additional increased risk for VTE.

CONCLUSION

 CRP can be used as a predictive biomarker for VTE risk in cancer survivors, especially in those with high genetic risk. Future research can explore whether prevention and treatment strategies for VTE can be developed based on CRP for cancer survivors.

Impact of thrombocytopenia on bleeding and thrombotic outcomes in adults with cancer-associated splanchnic vein thrombosis

ABSTRACT

Malignancy is a risk factor for splanchnic vein thrombosis (SpVT). Data on the natural history of cancer-associated SpVT are limited. This was a single-center, retrospective cohort study of 581 adult patients with cancer and SpVT. We aimed to characterize the impact of thrombocytopenia on major bleeding and progression or recurrence of SpVT within 1 year of an initial cancer-associated SpVT diagnosis. Baseline thrombocytopenia (platelet <100 × 103/μL within 15 days of SpVT diagnosis) was present in 39.5% of patients. A total of 39.2% of patients received therapeutic anticoagulation within 2 weeks of an SpVT diagnosis. The cumulative 1-year incidence of major bleeding was 10.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 8.2-13.2) and 16.2% (95% CI, 13.2-19.2) for SpVT recurrence/progression. In the multivariable regression analysis, therapeutic anticoagulation was associated with increased major bleeding (adjusted risk ratio [aRR], 1.74; 95% CI, 1.08-2.81) and decreased progression/recurrence of SpVT (aRR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.35-0.86). Baseline thrombocytopenia was not independently associated with either major bleeding (aRR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.43-1.34) or progression/recurrence of SpVT (aRR, 1.14; 95% CI, 0.73-1.78). A secondary analysis using inverse probability of treatment weighting with propensity scores for baseline thrombocytopenia corroborated that patients with thrombocytopenia did not have an increased bleeding risk (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.81; 95% CI, 0.48-1.39). The multivariable analysis in which platelets were treated as a time varying covariate also did not reveal an association with major bleeding (aHR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.55-1.45). Bleeding and thrombosis progression were frequent in patients with cancer-associated SpVT. Anticoagulation was associated with increased major bleeding and decreased thrombotic progression; thrombocytopenia did not impact the outcomes.

A Comprehensive Review of Catheter-Related Thrombosis

Catheter-related thrombosis (CRT) is a frequent and potentially serious complication associated with the widespread use of intravascular devices such as central venous catheters, including peripherally inserted central catheters and implantable port systems, pacemakers or implantable cardioverter-defibrillators. Although CRT management has been informed by guidelines extrapolated from lower extremity deep vein thrombosis (DVT), unique challenges remain due to the distinct anatomical, pathophysiological, and clinical characteristics of upper extremity DVT. Risk factors for CRT are multifactorial, encompassing patient-related characteristics such as cancer, prior venous thromboembolism, and infection, as well as catheter-specific factors like device type, lumens, and insertion site. The diagnosis of CRT relies primarily on ultrasonography; however, computed tomography angiography and magnetic resonance imaging play a complementary role, particularly in anatomically challenging cases or when complications such as pulmonary embolism or superior vena cava syndrome are suspected. Treatment strategies for CRT include anticoagulation, catheter removal when feasible, and, in select cases, local thrombolysis or catheter-directed interventions. Anticoagulation remains the cornerstone of therapy, with direct oral anticoagulants increasingly favored due to their safety profile and efficacy. This article provides a detailed review of CRT, focusing on clinical features, diagnostic methods, and treatment strategies while addressing specific challenges in managing pacemaker and hemodialysis catheter-related thrombosis.

Efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban in preventing venous thromboembolism in postoperative patients with gynecological malignancies: protocol for a randomised controlled open-label trial (G-alfalfa trial)

INTRODUCTION

Compared with the guideline-recommended use of low-molecular weight heparin (LMWH) for 28 days to prevent venous thromboembolism (VTE) after cytoreductive surgery, oral rivaroxaban avoids the pain and inconvenience of daily injections and reduces medical expenses. The proposed randomised controlled trial (RCT) aims to compare the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban and enoxaparin in preventing VTE in patients after surgery for gynaecological malignancies and to provide a reference for clinical medication prevention.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This is a single-centre, randomised, controlled, open-label and assessor-blind clinical trial. Patients undergoing surgery for gynaecological malignancies will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to an oral rivaroxaban study group and a subcutaneous injection enoxaparin control group for anticoagulant prophylaxis. The medication administration begins 12-24 hours after surgery and continues for 28 days, with a 30-day follow-up after surgery. Clinical events during the treatment and the follow-up period will be observed. The primary endpoint will be any VTE. Secondary endpoints will be any bleeding event, medication compliance rate, rivaroxaban pharmacokinetics and pharmacogenomics. The sample size required for the G-alfalfa trial is derived based on power calculations of the VTE incidence in the two intervention regimens in previous literature.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Fujian Maternal and Child Health Hospital on 2 April 2024 (Approval No.:2023KY174-03). The results of the trial will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at relevant conferences.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR) 2300078535.

Gender-affirming hormone therapy in the transgender patient: influence on thrombotic risk

Research regarding the hematologic sequelae of estrogen and testosterone therapy for transgender people is an emerging area. While estrogen therapy has been widely studied in cisgender women, studies in transgender individuals are limited, revealing variable adverse effects influenced by the dose and formulation of estrogen used. Thrombotic risk factors in transgender and gender-diverse individuals are multifactorial, involving both modifiable and nonmodifiable factors. Management of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in individuals receiving gender-affirming estrogen entails standard anticoagulation therapy alongside shared decision-making regarding hormone continuation and risk factor modification. While data and guidance from cisgender women can offer a reference for managing thrombotic risk in transgender individuals on hormone therapy, fully applying these insights can be challenging. The benefits of gender-affirming hormone therapy include significantly reducing the risk of suicide and depression, highlighting the importance of a contemplative approach to the management of hormonal therapy after a VTE event. Although limited, the available data in the literature indicate a low thrombotic risk for transgender individuals undergoing gender-affirming testosterone therapy. However, polycythemia is a common adverse effect necessitating monitoring and, occasionally, adjustments to hormonal therapy. Additionally, iron deficiency may arise due to the physiological effects of testosterone or health care providers' use of phlebotomy, an aspect that remains unstudied in this population. In conclusion, while the set of clinical data is expanding, further research remains vital to refine management strategies and improve hematologic outcomes for transgender individuals undergoing gender-affirming hormone therapy.

Preventative and curative treatment of venous thromboembolic disease in cancer patients

Cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (CAT) is common in patients with cancer and associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The incidence of CAT continues to rise, complicating patient care and burdening healthcare systems. Patients with cancer experiencing VTE face poorer prognoses, making prevention and effective management imperative. This narrative review synthesizes evidence on thromboprophylaxis in ambulatory patients with cancer receiving systemic therapy and acute treatment strategies for CAT. Risk assessment models (e.g., Khorana score) aid in identifying high-risk patients who may benefit from thromboprophylaxis. Pharmacological thromboprophylaxis with low molecular weight heparins (LMWHs) and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) has been shown to reduce the risk of CAT without significantly increasing the risk of bleeding complications. However, implementation of risk-based strategies remains limited in clinical practice. For acute CAT management, LMWHs have been the standard of care, but DOACs are increasingly favored due to their convenience and efficacy. However, challenges persist, including bleeding risks and drug interactions. Emerging therapies targeting Factor XI inhibitors present promising alternatives, potentially addressing current limitations in anticoagulation management for CAT.

From Code to Clots: Applying Machine Learning to Clinical Aspects of Venous Thromboembolism Prevention, Diagnosis, and Management

The high incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) globally and the morbidity and mortality burden associated with the disease make it a pressing issue. Machine learning (ML) can improve VTE prevention, detection, and treatment. The ability of this novel technology to process large amounts of high-dimensional data can help identify new risk factors and better risk stratify patients for thromboprophylaxis. Applications of ML for VTE include systems that interpret medical imaging, assess the severity of the VTE, tailor treatment according to individual patient needs, and identify VTE cases to facilitate surveillance. Generative artificial intelligence may be leveraged to design new molecules such as new anticoagulants, generate synthetic data to expand datasets, and reduce clinical burden by assisting in generating clinical notes. Potential challenges in the applications of these novel technologies include the availability of multidimensional large datasets, prospective studies and clinical trials to ensure safety and efficacy, continuous quality assessment to maintain algorithm accuracy, mitigation of unwanted bias, and regulatory and legal guardrails to protect patients and providers. We propose a practical approach for clinicians to integrate ML into research, from choosing appropriate problems to integrating ML into clinical workflows. ML offers much promise and opportunity for clinicians and researchers in VTE to translate this technology into the clinic and directly benefit the patients.

Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practice of Master Nursing Specialist Students Toward Catheter-Related Thrombosis: A Cross-Sectional Study

Evaluating Master of Nursing Specialist (MNS) students' knowledge, attitudes, and practice regarding catheter-related thrombosis (CRT) prevention and treatment is beneficial in developing effective CRT training for them. This study thus aimed to explore their knowledge, attitudes, and practice toward CRT. This was a cross-sectional study that included 1046 MNS students in China. The results revealed that the median scores for the participants' knowledge, attitudes, and practice were 12 (interquartile range: 9-14), 55 (interquartile range: 50-65), and 62 (interquartile range: 51-71), respectively. There was a positive correlation between knowledge and attitudes, as well as attitudes and practice. Age, school level, proactively learning CRT knowledge, gender, enrolment method, participation in clinical practice time, and attendance at CRT training were related to knowledge (p < 0.05). Attendance at CRT training and experience using thrombosis risk assessment forms were related to attitude and practice (p < 0.05). Gender and experience caring for CRT patients were associated with practice (p < 0.05). MNS students have insufficient knowledge of CRT prevention and treatment, and the practice needs to be improved. However, their attitudes are positive.

Utility of the modified Ottawa score for identification of more preferable candidates of extended anticoagulation therapy in cancer-associated isolated distal deep vein thrombosis: insight from the ONCO DVT Study

BACKGROUND

The ONCO DVT study (Edoxaban for 12 Months Versus 3 Months in Patients With Cancer With Isolated Distal Deep Vein Thrombosis) revealed superiority of 12-month relative to 3-month edoxaban treatment for the thrombotic risk in cancer-associated isolated distal deep vein thrombosis. However, it is unknown whether the superiority could be common in different modified Ottawa score subgroups.

OBJECTIVES

To identify more preferable candidates for extended anticoagulation in patients with cancer-associated isolated distal deep vein thrombosis using the modified Ottawa score.

METHODS

In this post-hoc subgroup analysis of the ONCO DVT study, we stratified 601 patients into the low (≤-1, N = 126), intermediate (0, N = 323), and high (≥1, N = 152) modified Ottawa score subgroups and compared clinical outcomes between the 12-month and 3-month edoxaban treatment groups.

RESULTS

The cumulative incidence of symptomatic recurrent venous thromboembolism or venous thromboembolism-related death was not different between the 12-month and 3-month edoxaban treatment groups in the low score subgroup (0.0% vs 2.2%), whereas it was lower in the 12-month than in the 3-month edoxaban treatment group in the intermediate (0.8% vs 7.6%) and high (3.1% vs 15.6%) score subgroups. There were no significant differences in the cumulative incidences of the major bleeding between the 12-month and 3-month edoxaban treatment groups in the low (10.1% vs 7.6%), intermediate (8.8% vs 5.0%), and high (13.9% vs 12.6%) score subgroups.

CONCLUSION

A 12-month compared with 3-month edoxaban treatment showed a lower risk of thrombotic events in patients with cancer-associated isolated distal deep vein thrombosis in the intermediate and high modified Ottawa score subgroups but not in the low score subgroup, suggesting a limited benefit of extended anticoagulation therapy beyond 3 months in patients with low modified Ottawa score.