1
|
Wagner T, Toft BG, Lauritsen J, Bandak M, Christensen IJ, Engvad B, Kreiberg M, Agerbæk M, Dysager L, Carus A, Rosenvilde JJ, Berney D, Daugaard G. Prognostic factors for relapse in patients with clinical stage I testicular non-seminoma: A nationwide, population-based cohort study. Eur J Cancer 2024; 202:114025. [PMID: 38531266 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2024.114025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2024] [Revised: 03/03/2024] [Accepted: 03/14/2024] [Indexed: 03/28/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Approximately 30% of patients with clinical stage I non-seminoma (CSI-NS) relapse. Current risk stratification is based on lymphovascular invasion (LVI) alone. The extent to which additional tumor characteristics can improve risk prediction remains unclear. OBJECTIVE To determine the most important prognostic factors for relapse in CSI-NS patients. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Population-based cohort study including all patients with CSI-NS diagnosed in Denmark between 2013 and 2018 with follow-up until 2022. Patients were identified in the prospective Danish Testicular Cancer database. By linkage to the Danish National Pathology Registry, histological slides from the orchiectomy specimens were retrieved. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Histological slides were reviewed blinded to the clinical outcome. Clinical data were obtained from medical records. The association between prespecified potential prognostic factors and relapse was assessed using Cox regression analysis. Model performance was evaluated by discrimination (Harrell's C-index) and calibration. RESULTS Of 453 patients included, 139 patients (30.6%) relapsed during a median follow-up of 6.3 years. Tumor invasion into the hilar soft tissue of the testicular hilum, tumor size, LVI and embryonal carcinoma were independent predictors of relapse. The estimated 5-year risk of relapse ranged from < 5% to > 85%, depending on the number of risk factors. After internal model validation, the model had an overall concordance statistic of 0.75. Model calibration was excellent. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE The identified prognostic factors provide a much more accurate risk stratification than current clinical practice, potentially aiding clinical decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Wagner
- Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Pathology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.
| | - Birgitte Grønkær Toft
- Department of Pathology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Jakob Lauritsen
- Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Mikkel Bandak
- Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Ib Jarle Christensen
- Department of Pathology, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Borgmester Ib Juuls vej 1, 2730 Herlev, Denmark
| | - Birte Engvad
- Department of Pathology, Odense University Hospital, J. B. Winsløws vej 15, Winsløwsparken 15, 5000 Odense C, Denmark
| | - Michael Kreiberg
- Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Mads Agerbæk
- Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 99, 8200 Aarhus N, Denmark
| | - Lars Dysager
- Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, J. B. Winsløws vej 15, Winsløwsparken 15, 5000 Odense C, Denmark
| | - Andreas Carus
- Department of Oncology, Aalborg University Hospital, Hobrovej 18-22, 9000 Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Josephine Julie Rosenvilde
- Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Daniel Berney
- Centre of Cancer Biomarkers and Biotherapeutics, Barts Cancer Institute, Charterhouse Square, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Gedske Daugaard
- Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Travis LB, Feldman DR, Fung C, Poynter JN, Lockley M, Frazier AL. Adolescent and Young Adult Germ Cell Tumors: Epidemiology, Genomics, Treatment, and Survivorship. J Clin Oncol 2024; 42:696-706. [PMID: 37820296 DOI: 10.1200/jco.23.01099] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2023] [Revised: 07/05/2023] [Accepted: 08/11/2023] [Indexed: 10/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Innovations in the care of adolescent and young adult (AYA) germ cell tumors (GCTs) are needed for one of the most common AYA cancers for which treatment has not significantly changed for several decades. Testicular GCTs (TGCTs) are the most common cancers in 15- to 39-year-old men, and ovarian GCTs (OvGCTs) are the leading gynecologic malignancies in women younger than 25 years. Excellent outcomes, even in widely metastatic disease using cisplatin-based chemotherapy, can be achieved since Einhorn and Donohue's landmark 1977 study in TGCT. However, as the severity of accompanying late effects (ototoxicity, neurotoxicity, cardiovascular disease, second malignant neoplasms, nephrotoxicity, and others) has emerged, efforts to deintensity treatment and find alternatives to cisplatin have taken on new urgency. Current innovations include the collaborative design of clinical trials that accrue GCTs across all ages and both sexes, including adolescents (previously on pediatric trials), and OvGCT (previously on gynecologic-only trials). Joint trials accrue larger sample sizes at a faster rate and therefore evaluate new approaches more rapidly. These joint trials also allow for biospecimen collection to further probe GCT etiology and underlying mechanisms of tumor growth, thus providing new therapeutic options. This AYA approach has been fostered by The Malignant Germ Cell International Consortium, which includes over 115 GCT disease experts from pediatric, gynecologic, and genitourinary oncologies in 16 countries. Trials in development incorporate, to our knowledge, for the first time, molecular risk stratification and precision oncology approaches on the basis of specific GCT biology. This collaborative AYA approach pioneering successfully in GCT could serve as a model for impactful research for other AYA cancer types.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lois B Travis
- Department of Medical Oncology, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN
| | | | - Chunkit Fung
- J.P. Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY
| | - Jenny N Poynter
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
| | - Michelle Lockley
- Centre for Cancer Genomics and Computational Biology, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - A Lindsay Frazier
- Dana Farber-Boston Children's Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lauritsen J, Sauvé N, Tryakin A, Jiang DM, Huddart R, Heng DYC, Terbuch A, Winquist E, Chovanec M, Hentrich M, Fankhauser CD, Shamash J, Del Muro XG, Vaughn D, Heidenreich A, Sternberg CN, Sweeney C, Necchi A, Bokemeyer C, Bandak M, Jandari A, Collette L, Gillessen S, Beyer J, Daugaard G. Outcomes of relapsed clinical stage I versus de novo metastatic testicular cancer patients: an analysis of the IGCCCG Update database. Br J Cancer 2023; 129:1759-1765. [PMID: 37777577 PMCID: PMC10667594 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-023-02443-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2023] [Revised: 08/07/2023] [Accepted: 09/14/2023] [Indexed: 10/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Active surveillance after orchiectomy is the preferred management in clinical stage I (CSI) germ-cell tumours (GCT) associated with a 15 to 30% relapse rate. PATIENTS AND METHODS In the IGCCCG Update database, we compared the outcomes of gonadal disseminated GCT relapsing from initial CSI to outcomes of patients with de novo metastatic GCT. RESULTS A total of 1014 seminoma (Sem) [298 (29.4%) relapsed from CSI, 716 (70.6%) de novo] and 3103 non-seminoma (NSem) [626 (20.2%) relapsed from CSI, 2477 (79.8%) de novo] were identified. Among Sem, no statistically significant differences in PFS and OS were found between patients relapsing from CSI and de novo metastatic disease [5-year progression-free survival (5y-PFS) 87.6% versus 88.5%; 5-year overall survival (5y-OS) 93.2% versus 96.1%). Among NSem, PFS and OS were higher overall in relapsing CSI patients (5y-PFS 84.6% versus 80.0%; 5y-OS 93.3% versus 88.7%), but there were no differences within the same IGCCCG prognostic groups (HR = 0.89; 95% CI: 0.70-1.12). Relapses in the intermediate or poor prognostic groups occurred in 11/298 (4%) Sem and 112/626 (18%) NSem. CONCLUSION Relapsing CSI GCT patients expect similar survival compared to de novo metastatic patients of the same ICCCCG prognostic group. Intermediate and poor prognosis relapses from initial CSI expose patients to unnecessary toxicity from more intensive treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jakob Lauritsen
- Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Denmark
| | - Nicolas Sauvé
- European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Alexey Tryakin
- Department of Chemotherapy, N.N.Blokhin Russian Cancer Research Center, Moscow, Russia
| | - Di Maria Jiang
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Robert Huddart
- Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden Hospital, Downs Road, Sutton, Surrey, UK
| | - Daniel Y C Heng
- Division of Medical Oncology, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | | | - Eric Winquist
- Department of Oncology, University of Western Ontario and London Health Sciences Centre, London, ON, Canada
| | - Michal Chovanec
- 2nd Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Comenius University, National Cancer Institute, Bratislava, Slovakia
| | - Marcus Hentrich
- Department of Hematology/Oncology, Red Cross Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | | | | | | | - David Vaughn
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Abramson Cancer Center at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Axel Heidenreich
- Department of Urology, Uro-Oncology, Robot Assisted and Specialized Urologic Surgery, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Cora N Sternberg
- Englander Institute for Precision Medicine, Sandra and Edward Meyer Cancer Center, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York-Presbyterian, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Andrea Necchi
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Carsten Bokemeyer
- Department of Oncology, Hematology and BMT with section Pneumonology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Mikkel Bandak
- Department of Consulting and Research, International Drug Development Institute, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium
| | - Abolghassem Jandari
- European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Laurence Collette
- European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Silke Gillessen
- Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, EOC, Bellinzona, Switzerland
- University of Southern Switzerland, Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Joerg Beyer
- Department of Medical Onccology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
| | - Gedske Daugaard
- Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Speicher P, Fankhauser CD, Lorch A, Ardizzone D, Helnwein S, Hoch D, Hermanns T, Beyer J, Akhoundova D. Excellent survival in relapsed stage I testicular cancer. BMC Cancer 2023; 23:870. [PMID: 37715132 PMCID: PMC10503206 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-023-11388-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2023] [Accepted: 09/07/2023] [Indexed: 09/17/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Two thirds of patients with germ-cell cancer (GCC) present as clinical stage I (CSI). Following orchiectomy, active surveillance (AS) has become their standard management. However, 15-50% of patients eventually relapse with metastatic disease after AS. Relapses need to be detected early in order to achieve cure and avoid overtreatment. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed consecutive GCC patients treated at two Swiss academic centers between 2010 and 2020. Patients with stage IS and extragonadal primaries were excluded. We compared disease characteristics and survival outcomes of patients relapsed from initial CSI to patients with de novo metastatic disease. Primary endpoint was the IGCCCG category at the time of relapse. Main secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS We identified 360 GCC patients with initial CSI and 245 de novo metastatic patients. After a median follow-up of 47 months, 81 of 360 (22.5%) CSI patients relapsed: 41 seminoma (Sem) and 40 non-seminoma (NSem) patients. All Sems relapsed in the IGCCCG good prognosis group. NSem relapsed with good 29/40 (72.5%) and intermediate 11/40 (27.5%) prognostic features; 95.1% of relapses occurred within five years post-orchiectomy. Only 3 relapsed NSem patients died from metastatic disease. Five-year OS for relapsed CSI patients was 100% for Sem and 87% (95% CI: 61-96%) for NSem patients; five-year PFS was 92% (95% CI: 77-97) and 78% (95% CI: 56-90) for Sem and NSem, respectively. When stratified by IGCCCG prognostic groups, good risk relapsed patients had a trend towards better OS and PFS as compared to de novo metastatic patients. CONCLUSIONS GCC patients who relapse after initial CSI can be detected early by active surveillance and have an excellent survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philip Speicher
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Hospital of Thun, 3600, Bern, Switzerland
- Department of Medical Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, 3010, Bern, Switzerland
| | | | - Anja Lorch
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital Zurich, 8006, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Davide Ardizzone
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Zurich, 8006, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Simon Helnwein
- Department of Medical Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, 3010, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Dennis Hoch
- Department of Medical Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, 3010, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Thomas Hermanns
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Jörg Beyer
- Department of Medical Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, 3010, Bern, Switzerland.
| | - Dilara Akhoundova
- Department of Medical Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, 3010, Bern, Switzerland
- Department for Biomedical Research, University of Bern, 3008, Bern, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Survival of Testicular Pure Teratoma vs. Mixed Germ Cell Tumor Patients in Primary Tumor Specimens across All Stages. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15030694. [PMID: 36765653 PMCID: PMC9913474 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15030694] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2022] [Revised: 01/13/2023] [Accepted: 01/20/2023] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
Abstract
We aimed to test for survival differences between testicular pure teratoma vs. mixed germ cell tumor (GCT) patients in a stage-specific fashion. Pure teratoma and mixed GCT in primary tumor specimens were identified within the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (2004-2019). Kaplan-Meier curves depicted five-year overall survival (OS) and subsequently, cumulative incidence plots depicted cancer-specific mortality (CSM) and other-cause mortality (OCM) in a stage-specific fashion. Multivariable competing risks regression (CRR) models were used. Of 9049 patients, 299 (3%) had pure teratoma. In stage I, II and III, five-year OS rates differed between pure teratoma and mixed GCT (stage I: 91.6 vs. 97.2%, p < 0.001; stage II: 100 vs. 95.9%, p < 0.001; stage III: 66.8 vs. 77.8%, p = 0.021). In stage I, survival differences originated from higher OCM (6.4 vs. 1.2%; p < 0.001). Conversely in stage III, survival differences originated from higher CSM (29.4 vs. 19.0%; p = 0.03). In multivariable CRR models, pure teratoma was associated with higher OCM in stage I (Hazard Ratio (HR): 4.83; p < 0.01). Conversely, in stage III, in multivariable CRR models, pure teratoma was associated with higher CSM (HR: 1.92; p = 0.04). In pure teratoma, survival disadvantage in stage I patients relates to OCM. Survival disadvantage in stage III pure teratoma originates from higher CSM.
Collapse
|
6
|
Ke H, Jiang S, He Z, Song Q, Yang D, Song C, Dong C, Liu J, Su X, Zhou J, Xiong Y. Clinical features and prognostic factors in patients diagnosed with lymphovascular invasion of testicular germ-cell tumors: Analysis based on the SEER database. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1142441. [PMID: 36937437 PMCID: PMC10020199 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1142441] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2023] [Accepted: 02/20/2023] [Indexed: 03/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Lymphovascular invasion (LVI) is a high-risk factor for testicular germ-cell tumors (TGCT), but a prognostic model for TGCT-LVI patients is lacking. This study aimed to develop a nomogram for predicting the overall survival (OS) of TGCT-LVI patients. Methods A complete cohort of 3288 eligible TGCG-LVI patients (training cohort, 2300 cases; validation cohort, 988 cases) were obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Variables screened by multivariate Cox regression analysis were used to construct a nomogram, which was subsequently evaluated using the consistency index (C-index), time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC), and calibration plots. The advantages and disadvantages of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system and the nomogram were assessed by integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) and net reclassification improvement (NRI). Decision-analysis curve (DCA) was used to measure the net clinical benefit of the nomogram versus the AJCC staging system. Finally, Kaplan-Meier curves were used to evaluate the ability to identify different risk groups between the traditional AJCC staging system and the new risk-stratification system built on the nomogram. Results Nine variables were screened by multivariate Cox regression analysis to construct the nomogram. The C-index (training cohort, 0.821; validation cohort, 0.819) and time-dependent ROC of 3-, 5-, and 9-year OS between the two cohorts suggested that the nomogram had good discriminatory ability. Calibration curves showed good consistency of the nomogram. The NRI values of 3-, 5-, and 9-year OS were 0.308, 0.274, and 0.295, respectively, and the corresponding values for the validation cohort were 0.093, 0.093, and 0.099, respectively (P<0.01). Additionally, the nomogram had more net clinical benefit as shown by the DCA curves, and the new risk-stratification system provided better differentiation than the AJCC staging system. Conclusions A prognostic nomogram and new risk-stratification system were developed and validated to assist clinicians in assessing TGCT-LVI patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hu Ke
- Urology Department, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Shengming Jiang
- Urology Department, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Ziqi He
- Urology Department, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Qianlin Song
- Urology Department, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Dashuai Yang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Chao Song
- Urology Department, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Caitao Dong
- Urology Department, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Junwei Liu
- Urology Department, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Xiaozhe Su
- Urology Department, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Jiawei Zhou
- Urology Department, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Yunhe Xiong
- Urology Department, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China
- *Correspondence: Yunhe Xiong,
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Tao H, He F, Shi Q, Liu R, Wang Z, Du K, Li J, Liu H, Lu Z, Zhang J, Bai Y. Efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy/maintenance chemotherapy after induction chemotherapy and concurrent chemoradiotherapy in patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: Experiences of two centers. Cancer Med 2022; 12:6811-6824. [PMID: 36420689 PMCID: PMC10067090 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.5470] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2022] [Revised: 10/16/2022] [Accepted: 11/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE In general, there are not many studies exploring the clinical value of adjuvant chemotherapy or maintenance chemotherapy (AC/MC) after induction chemotherapy and concurrent chemoradiotherapy (IC+CCRT+AC/MC). The purpose of this study was to establish a clinical nomogram for the use of AC/MC in patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LA-NPC). MATERIAL AND METHODS Two centers (Guangzhou Medical University Cancer Center [N = 1226] and Zhongshan People's Hospital [N = 150]) recruited 1376 patients with LA-NPC. All the patients underwent IC+CCRT; 560 patients received AC with cisplatin/nedaplatin plus docetaxel/paclitaxel (TP) or cisplatin/nedaplatin plus fluorouracil (PF), and 81 patients received MC with S-1. Multivariate Cox regression was used to confirm optimal predictors of progression-free survival (PFS), and a nomogram was established to identify patients into low-risk and high-risk cohorts. Additionally, bootstrap internal validation was performed to further verify our nomogram. RESULTS After propensity score matching (PSM), the survival curves were not statistically different between IC+CCRT+AC/MC and IC+CCRT (all p > 0.05). Then, a nomogram was developed based on variables that were screened by univariate and multivariate Cox regression, including N stage, cumulative platinum dose during CCRT, body mass index (BMI), IC cycles, IC regimen and cervical lymph node (CLN) necrosis and infiltration of adjacent tissues. The results of the nomogram showed that the high-risk cohort had greatly worse 5-year DMFS, LRFS, PFS and OS compared to low-risk cohort (all p < 0.05), and subgroup analysis found that the 5-year DMFS, PFS and OS of patients treated with IC+CCRT+AC/MC were better than those treated with IC+CCRT in high-risk cohort (all p < 0.05). Notably, the incidence of adverse effects for IC+CCRT+AC cohort was higher than that for IC+CCRT+MC cohort, especially leukocytopenia and neutropenia. IC+CCRT and IC+CCRT+MC were associated with similar incidences of adverse effects. CONCLUSIONS The addition of AC or MC to IC+CCRT could improve the DMFS of patients with high-risk NPC and prolong their survival. Additionally, our findings suggest a potential role of AC/MC following IC plus CCRT in the treatment of high-risk LA-NPC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hao‐Yun Tao
- Department of Radiation Oncology Guangzhou Medical University Cancer Center Guangzhou China
| | - Fang He
- Department of Radiation Oncology People's Hospital of Zhongshan City Zhongshan China
| | - Qi‐Yun Shi
- Department of Breast and Thyroid Surgery, Southwest Hospital Army Medical University Chongqing China
| | - Ran Liu
- Department of Pediatrics LongHua District People's Hospital Shenzhen China
| | - Zhi‐Long Wang
- Department of Radiology People's Hospital of Zhongshan City Zhongshan China
| | - Kun‐Peng Du
- Department of Radiation Oncology Guangzhou Medical University Cancer Center Guangzhou China
| | - Jian‐Feng Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology Guangzhou Medical University Cancer Center Guangzhou China
| | - Hui Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology Guangzhou Medical University Cancer Center Guangzhou China
| | - Zhi‐Qiang Lu
- Department of Radiation Oncology People's Hospital of Zhongshan City Zhongshan China
| | - Jing‐Jing Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology People's Hospital of Zhongshan City Zhongshan China
| | - Yu‐Hai Bai
- Department of Radiation Oncology People's Hospital of Zhongshan City Zhongshan China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Lesko P, Chovanec M, Mego M. Biomarkers of disease recurrence in stage I testicular germ cell tumours. Nat Rev Urol 2022; 19:637-658. [PMID: 36028719 DOI: 10.1038/s41585-022-00624-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Stage I testicular cancer is a disease restricted to the testicle. After orchiectomy, patients are considered to be without disease; however, the tumour is prone to relapse in ~4-50% of patients. Current predictive markers of relapse, which are tumour size and invasion to rete testis (in seminoma) or lymphovascular invasion (in non-seminoma), have limited clinical utility and are unable to correctly predict relapse in a substantial proportion of patients. Adjuvant therapeutic strategies based on available biomarkers can lead to overtreatment of 50-85% of patients. Discovery and implementation of novel biomarkers into treatment decision making will help to reduce the burden of adjuvant treatments and improve patient selection for adjuvant therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Lesko
- 2nd Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Comenius University and National Cancer Institute, Bratislava, Slovakia
| | - Michal Chovanec
- 2nd Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Comenius University and National Cancer Institute, Bratislava, Slovakia
| | - Michal Mego
- 2nd Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Comenius University and National Cancer Institute, Bratislava, Slovakia.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Hamilton RJ, Canil C, Shrem NS, Kuhathaas K, Jiang MD, Chung P, North S, Czaykowski P, Hotte S, Winquist E, Kollmannsberger C, Aprikian A, Soulières D, Tyldesley S, So AI, Power N, Rendon RA, O'Malley M, Wood L. Canadian Urological Association consensus guideline: Management of testicular germ cell cancer. Can Urol Assoc J 2022; 16:155-173. [PMID: 35623007 PMCID: PMC9245964 DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.7945] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Robert J Hamilton
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Division of Urology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Christina Canil
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, The Ottawa Hospital and the University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Noa Shani Shrem
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, The Ottawa Hospital and the University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Kopika Kuhathaas
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Maria Di Jiang
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Peter Chung
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Scott North
- Department of Oncology, Division of Medical Oncology, Cross Cancer Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Piotr Czaykowski
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | - Sebastien Hotte
- Division of Medical Oncology, Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Eric Winquist
- Division of Medical Oncology, Western University and London Health Sciences Centre, London, ON, Canada
| | | | - Armen Aprikian
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Denis Soulières
- Division of Medical Oncology/Hematology, Le Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Scott Tyldesley
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of British Columbia, BC Cancer Vancouver, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Alan I So
- Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, BC Cancer Vancouver, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Nicholas Power
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Ricardo A Rendon
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Capital Health - Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | - Martin O'Malley
- Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Lori Wood
- Division of Medical Oncology, Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre, Halifax, NS, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Oldenburg J, Berney DM, Bokemeyer C, Climent MA, Daugaard G, Gietema JA, De Giorgi U, Haugnes HS, Huddart RA, Leão R, Sohaib A, Gillessen S, Powles T. Testicular seminoma and non-seminoma: ESMO-EURACAN Clinical Practice Guideline for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 2022; 33:362-375. [PMID: 35065204 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.01.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 65] [Impact Index Per Article: 32.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2021] [Revised: 12/17/2021] [Accepted: 01/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- J Oldenburg
- Department of Oncology, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog; Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - D M Berney
- Department of Cellular Pathology, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London; Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - C Bokemeyer
- Department of Oncology, Hematology, Bone Marrow Transplantation with section Pneumology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - M A Climent
- Fundacion Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, València, Spain
| | - G Daugaard
- Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - J A Gietema
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - U De Giorgi
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST),'Dino Amadori', Meldola, Italy
| | - H S Haugnes
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital of North Norway and UiT-The Arctic University, Tromsoe, Norway
| | - R A Huddart
- Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - R Leão
- Department of Urology, Hospital de Braga, Hospital CUF Coimbra, Faculty of Medicine University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - A Sohaib
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton, Surrey, UK
| | - S Gillessen
- Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, EOC, Bellinzona; Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, USI, Lugano, Switzerland; Division of Cancer Medicine, University of Manchester, Manchester
| | - T Powles
- Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Dieckmann KP, Pokrivcak T, Geczi L, Niehaus D, Dralle-Filiz I, Matthies C, Dienes T, Zschäbitz S, Paffenholz P, Gschliesser T, Pichler R, Mego M, Bader P, Zengerling F, Heinzelbecker J, Krausewitz P, Krege S, Aurilio G, Aksoy C, Hentrich M, Seidel C, Törzsök P, Nestler T, Majewski M, Hiester A, Buchler T, Vallet S, Studentova H, Schönburg S, Niedersüß-Beke D, Ring J, Trenti E, Heidenreich A, Wülfing C, Isbarn H, Pichlmeier U, Pichler M. Single-course bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin (1xBEP) as adjuvant treatment in testicular nonseminoma clinical stage 1: outcome, safety, and risk factors for relapse in a population-based study. Ther Adv Med Oncol 2022; 14:17588359221086813. [PMID: 35386956 PMCID: PMC8977693 DOI: 10.1177/17588359221086813] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2021] [Accepted: 02/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Clinical stage 1 (CS1) nonseminomatous (NS) germ cell tumors involve a 30% probability of relapse upon surveillance. Adjuvant chemotherapy with one course of bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin (1xBEP) can reduce this risk to <5%. However, 1xBEP results are based solely on five controlled trials from high-volume centers. We analyzed the outcome in a real-life population. Patients and Methods: In a multicentric international study, 423 NS CS1 patients receiving 1xBEP were retrospectively evaluated. Median follow-up was 37 (range, 6–89) months. Primary end points were relapse-free and overall survival evaluated after 5 years. We also looked at associations of relapse with clinico-pathological factors using stratified Kaplan–Meier methods and Cox regression models. Treatment modality and outcome of recurrences were analyzed descriptively. Results: The 5-year relapse-free survival rate was 96.2%. Thirteen patients (3.1%; 95% confidence interval, 1.65–5.04%) relapsed after a median time of 13 months, of which 10 were salvaged (77%). Relapses were mostly confined to retroperitoneal nodes. Three patients succumbed, two to disease progression and one to toxicity of chemotherapy. Pathological stage >pT2 was significantly associated with relapse rate. Conclusion: The relapse rate of 3.1% found in this population of NS CS1 patients treated with 1xBEP at the routine care level was not inferior to the median rate of 2.3% reported from a meta-analysis of controlled trials. Also, the cure rate of relapses of 77% is consistent with the previously reported rate of 80%. This study clearly shows that the 1xBEP regimen represents a safe treatment for NS CS1 patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Klaus-Peter Dieckmann
- Department of Urology, Hodentumorzentrum, Asklepios Klinik Altona, Paul Ehrlich Straße 1, 22763 Hamburg, Germany
- Department of Urology, Albertinen-Krankenhaus, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Tomas Pokrivcak
- Department of Comprehensive Cancer Care, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Lajos Geczi
- National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary
| | - David Niehaus
- Department of Urology, Asklepios Klinik Altona, Hamburg, Germany
| | | | - Cord Matthies
- Department of Urology, Bundeswehrkrankenhaus Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Tamas Dienes
- National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Stefanie Zschäbitz
- Department of Medical Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Pia Paffenholz
- Department of Urology, Uro-Oncology, Robot Assisted and Reconstructive Urologic Surgery, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | | | - Renate Pichler
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Michal Mego
- 2nd Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Comenius University, Bratislava, Slovak Republic
| | - Pia Bader
- Department of Urology, Städtisches Klinikum Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe, Germany
| | | | - Julia Heinzelbecker
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Medical Centre, Saarland University, Homburg/Saar, Germany
| | - Philipp Krausewitz
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Susanne Krege
- Department of Urology, Evangelische Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany
| | - Gaetano Aurilio
- Medical Oncology Division of Urogenital and Head and Neck Tumours, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Cem Aksoy
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Urologie, Medizinische Fakultät Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Marcus Hentrich
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Red Cross Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Christoph Seidel
- Department of Oncology, Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation with Division of Pneumology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Péter Törzsök
- Department of Urology and Andrology, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Tim Nestler
- Department of Urology, Bundeswehrzentralkrankenhaus Koblenz, Koblenz, Germany
| | | | - Andreas Hiester
- Department of Urology, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Tomas Buchler
- Department of Oncology, Charles University and Thomayer Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Sonia Vallet
- Department of Internal Medicine II, Universitätsklinikum Krems, Krems, AustriaDepartment of Oncology, Palacký University Medical School and Teaching Hospital, Olomouc, Czech Republic
| | - Hana Studentova
- Department of Oncology, Palacký University Medical School and Teaching Hospital, Olomouc, Czech Republic
| | - Sandra Schönburg
- Department of Urology, Universitätsklinikum Halle (Saale), Halle (Saale), Germany
| | | | - Julia Ring
- Department of Urology, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Emanuela Trenti
- Department of Urology, Central Hospital Bolzano, Bolzano, Italy
| | - Axel Heidenreich
- Department of Urology, Uro-Oncology, Robot Assisted and Reconstructive Urologic Surgery, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | | | - Hendrik Isbarn
- Martini-Klinik, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Uwe Pichlmeier
- Institute of Medical Biometry and Epidemiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Martin Pichler
- Division of Oncology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Testicular cancer is the most common solid malignancy amongst young men, and a large proportion present with stage I disease. The options for management following radical orchiectomy are multifold. We review here approaches to treatment in this setting, providing an update on recent publications. RECENT FINDINGS At Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, we maintain a nonrisk adapted active surveillance approach. With a dedicated surveillance program using low-dose computed tomography imaging, patients are appropriately identified early for treatment on relapse. There are ongoing investigations into minimizing toxicities of treatments for relapse, and in particular, retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) presents an attractive alternative. This, though, remains investigational in the setting of seminoma. SUMMARY Testicular cancer is a highly curable malignancy. In stage I disease, an active surveillance approach following radical orchiectomy is preferred, irrespective of risk-profile. This approach serves to limit the toxicity of adjuvant treatment in a significant proportion of patients, while maintaining excellent survival outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jerusha Padayachee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto
| | - Roderick Clark
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Padraig Warde
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto
| | - Robert J Hamilton
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
First-line salvage treatment options for germ cell tumor patients failing stage-adapted primary treatment : A comprehensive review compiled by the German Testicular Cancer Study Group. World J Urol 2022; 40:2853-2861. [PMID: 35226138 PMCID: PMC9712404 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-022-03959-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2021] [Accepted: 02/01/2022] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE In this review, we summarize and discuss contemporary treatment standards and possible selection criteria for decision making after failure of adjuvant or first-line cisplatin-based chemotherapy for primarily localized or metastatic germ cell tumors. METHODS This work is based on a systematic literature search conducted for the elaboration of the first German clinical practice guideline to identify prospective clinical trials and retrospective comparative studies published between Jan 2010 and Feb 2021. Study end points of interest were progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS), relapse rate (RR), and/or safety. RESULTS Relapses of clinical stage I (CS I) patients irrespective of prior adjuvant treatment after orchiectomy are treated stage adapted in accordance for primary metastatic patients. Surgical approaches for sole retroperitoneal relapses are investigated in ongoing clinical trials. The appropriate salvage chemotherapy for metastatic patients progressing or relapsing after first-line cisplatin-based chemotherapy is still a matter of controversy. Conventional cisplatin-based chemotherapy is the international guideline-endorsed standard of care, but based on retrospective data high-dose chemotherapy and subsequent autologous stem cell transplantation may offer a 10-15% survival benefit for all patients. Secondary complete surgical resection of all visible residual masses irrespective of size is paramount for treatment success. CONCLUSIONS Patients relapsing after definite treatment of locoregional disease are to be treated by stage-adapted first-line standard therapy for metastatic disease. Patients with primary advanced/metastatic disease failing one line of cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy should be referred to GCT expert centers. Dose intensity is a matter of ongoing debate, but sequential high-dose chemotherapy seems to improve patients' survival.
Collapse
|
14
|
Late toxicities and recurrences in patients with clinical stage I non-seminomatous germ cell tumours after 1 cycle of adjuvant bleomycin, etoposide and cisplatin versus primary retroperitoneal lymph node dissection - A 13-year follow-up analysis of a phase III trial cohort. Eur J Cancer 2021; 155:64-72. [PMID: 34371444 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.06.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2021] [Revised: 05/20/2021] [Accepted: 06/14/2021] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND One cycle of adjuvant chemotherapy with bleomycin, etoposide and cisplatin (BEP) has shown superiority in recurrence-free survival over retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) in patients with clinical stage (CS) I non-seminomatous germ cell tumours (NSGCTs) of the testis in the setting of a phase III trial. We report the recurrences and late toxicities of this study after 13 years of follow-up. METHODS Questionnaires from 382 patients with CS I NSGCT treated with 1 cycle of adjuvant BEP (arm A) or RPLND + two cycles of adjuvant BEP in cases of pathological stage II disease (arm B) were evaluated regarding recurrences and late toxicity. Overall, information on recurrence status was available in 337 patients, and 170 questionnaires were evaluable for toxicity (arm A: 95; arm B: 75). RESULTS With a median follow-up of 13.8 years (0-22), 3 patients (1.6%) in arm A and 16 patients (8.4%) in arm B experienced recurrence. The 15-year PFS in arm A/B was 99% (CI 96-100%)/92% (CI 89-99%) (p = 0.0049). The 15-year OS in arm A/B was 93% (CI 87-97%)/93% (CI 86-97%) (p = 0.83). Eight patients (4.2%) in arm A and four patients (2.1%) in arm B showed metachronous secondary testicular cancer (p = 0.26). Five patients (2.6%) in arm A and four patients (2.1%) in arm B developed other malignancies. Toxicities were not significantly different apart from retrograde ejaculation, which occurred more frequently after RPLND (10% versus 24%, p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS With long-term observation, one cycle of BEP remains superior to RPLND in preventing recurrence and was tolerated without any clinically relevant long-term toxicities.
Collapse
|
15
|
Heidenreich A. Management of Late Relapses in Metastatic Testicular Germ Cell Tumors: Still a Challenge. EUR UROL SUPPL 2021; 30:11-12. [PMID: 34337541 PMCID: PMC8317867 DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2021.05.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Axel Heidenreich
- Department of Urology, Uro-Oncology, Robot-Assisted and Specialized Urologic Surgery, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Department of Urology, medical Unveristiy of Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Aparicio J. Recent treatment advances in clinical stage i nonseminomatous germ cell tumors. Actas Urol Esp 2021; 45:326-327. [PMID: 33622525 DOI: 10.1016/j.acuro.2020.08.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2020] [Accepted: 08/22/2020] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- J Aparicio
- Servicio de Oncología Médica, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, Valencia, España.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Systemic treatment of advanced urogenital malignancies has changed significantly in recent years and it will continue to change rapidly in upcoming years. It is the scope of this review article to providing the reader with the most recently approved treatment strategies to be used in daily routine for the individualized and most optimal treatment of our patients. RECENT FINDINGS Immunooncological therapy (IOT) has emerged as the treatment of choice in metastatic renal cell carcinoma and we describe the most relevant clinical trials and we will give some differential therapeutic recommendation who might be best treated with which combination therapy considering both oncological efficacy and treatment-related toxicity. New neoadjuvant treatment options for muscle-invasive bladder cancer are reported. With regard to metastatic prostate cancer, the landscape of medical therapy is continuously evolving and the new, and most relevant therapeutic strategies for metastatic hormone-naive and castration-resistant PCA are described. Last, but not least, we highlight latest developments in the management of advanced testis cancer. SUMMARY The novel treatment options reported in this article are ready for use in daily routine and already represent or will shortly represent new guideline-recommended therapies.
Collapse
|
18
|
Albers P. Re: The 111 Study: A Single-arm, Phase 3 Trial Evaluating One Cycle of Bleomycin, Etoposide, and Cisplatin as Adjuvant Chemotherapy in High-risk, Stage 1 Nonseminomatous or Combined Germ Cell Tumours of the Testis. Eur Urol 2020; 79:160-161. [PMID: 33229103 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.08.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2020] [Accepted: 08/11/2020] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Albers
- Professor of Urology and Chair, Department of Urology, University Hospital, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Carbonnaux M, Vinceneux A, Peyrat P, Fléchon A. [Treatment of testicular germ cell tumors relapse]. Bull Cancer 2020; 107:912-924. [PMID: 32653158 DOI: 10.1016/j.bulcan.2020.03.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2020] [Revised: 03/05/2020] [Accepted: 03/25/2020] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Seminomatous (SGCT) and non-seminomatous (NSGCT) germ cell tumors (GCT) are rare but their incidence are increasing. We will discuss different therapeutic strategies in relapse disease: patients with stage I germ cell tumor have an excellent prognosis with a cure rate approaching 98-99 %, whatever the histology and the chosen treatment (surveillance strategy or adjuvant treatment). Relapses are observed among 20% of patients with stage I SGCT or low risk NSGCT and 50 % of patients with high risk NSGCT. Patients are treated according to the international prognosis group (IGCCCG) for SGCT and low risk NSGCT, naïve of chemotherapy. After an adjuvant treatment, the protocol must be adapted to the number of previous cycles (1 or 2 BEP) and to the prognosis group. Five to 50% of patients relapse after a first line of metastatic chemotherapy according to initial prognosis group. Dose-dense chemotherapy according to the GETUG13 protocol reduces the risk of relapse for the patients with poor-risk group NSGCT and unfavorable tumor marker decline. The prognosis of patients with relapsed or refractory GCT after a first line is more negative since only half of them will be cured by salvage standard chemotherapy. An international therapeutic trial (TIGER) is ongoing in first line salvage treatment evaluating high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) with hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Finally, developing biomarkers for predicting clinical relapse, the management in expert centers of these patients and participation in therapeutic innovation are important perspectives for a better understanding and treatment of these patients with a poorer prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mélodie Carbonnaux
- Département d'oncologie médicale, centre Léon-Bérard, 28, rue Laennec, 69337 Lyon cedex 08, France.
| | - Armelle Vinceneux
- Département d'oncologie médicale, centre Léon-Bérard, 28, rue Laennec, 69337 Lyon cedex 08, France
| | - Patrice Peyrat
- Département de chirurgie, centre Léon-Bérard, 28, rue Laennec, 69337 Lyon cedex 08, France
| | - Aude Fléchon
- Département d'oncologie médicale, centre Léon-Bérard, 28, rue Laennec, 69337 Lyon cedex 08, France
| |
Collapse
|