Costs of care and outcomes for high-dose therapy and autologous transplantation for lymphoid malignancies: results from the University of Nebraska 1987 through 1991

Predictors of a short hospitalization in bone marrow transplantation patients presenting to the emergency department

BACKGROUND

Despite the advantages of bone marrow transplantation (BMT), patients receiving this intervention visit the emergency department (ED) frequently and for various reasons. Many of those ED visits result in hospitalization, and the length of stay varies.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of our study was to identify the patients who were only briefly hospitalized and were thus eligible for safe discharge from the ED.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study conducted on all adult patients who have completed a successful BMT and had an ED visit that resulted in hospitalization.

RESULTS

Our study included 115 unique BMT with a total number of 357 ED visits. Around half of those visits resulted in a short hospitalization. We found higher odds of a short hospitalization among those who have undergone autologous BMT (95%CI [1.14-2.65]). Analysis of the discharge diagnoses showed that patients with gastroenteritis were more likely to have a shorter hospitalization in comparison to those diagnosed with others (95%CI [1.10-3.81]). Furthermore, we showed that patients who presented after a month from their procedure were more likely to have a short hospitalization (95%CI [1.04-4.87]). Another significant predictor of a short of hospitalization was the absence of Graft versus Host Disease (GvHD) (95%CI [2.53-12.28]). Additionally, patients with normal and high systolic blood pressure (95%CI [2.22-6.73] and 95%CI [2.81-13.05]; respectively), normal respiratory rate (95%CI [2.79-10.17]) and temperature (95%CI [2.91-7.44]) were more likely to have a shorter hospitalization, compared to those presenting with abnormal vitals. Likewise, we proved higher odds of a short hospitalization in patients with a quick Sepsis Related Organ Failure Assessment score of 1-2 (95%CI [1.29-5.20]). Moreover, we demonstrated higher odds of a short hospitalization in patients with a normal platelet count (95%CI [1.39-3.36]) and creatinine level (95%CI [1.30-6.18]).

CONCLUSION

In our study, we have shown that BMT patients visit the ED frequently and many of those visits result in a short hospitalization. Our study showed that patients presenting with fever/chills are less likely to have a short hospitalization. We also showed a significant association between a short hospitalization and BMT patients without GvHD, with normal RR, normal T °C and a normal platelet count.

Economics of hematopoietic cell transplantation

Given the rapidly rising healthcare costs, it is important to understand the economic costs of hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), a procedure that is being used more frequently in the treatment of various hematologic disorders. Studies have reported a wide range of costs for HCT, from $36 000 to $88 000 (USD) for a single autologous transplantation for the initial hospitalization, to $200 000 (USD) or more for a myeloablative allogeneic procedure involving an unrelated donor. Common posttransplantation complications, such as infections and GVHD, have been shown to be significant cost drivers. Comparisons across studies are limited by differences in patient populations, cost ascertainment methods, and length of follow-up. This article summarizes the current state of knowledge about costs and cost-effectiveness of HCT, highlighting the challenges in conducting these studies and identifying important areas for future research. We discuss the need for more value-based assessments of HCT using high-quality approaches to measuring costs and outcomes so that potential future efforts to contain costs are well informed and appropriate.

Assessing the charges associated with hematopoietic stem cell mobilization and remobilization in patients with lymphoma and multiple myeloma undergoing autologous hematopoietic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to perform a detailed analysis of the charges associated with chemomobilization and remobilization of autologous hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) and to quantify medical costs and resource utilization associated with these procedures.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Patients with lymphoma underwent chemomobilization with ifosfamide and etoposide with or without rituximab (IE ± R). Patients with multiple myeloma (MM) received a modified hyperfractionated cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, dexamethasone (hyper-CVAD) regimen after failing to mobilize with growth factors only.

RESULTS

Between January 2004 and October 2006, 98 patients with lymphoma underwent HSC mobilization with IE ± R. Mobilization with IE ± R was effective, with 90.8% of patients collecting at least 2 × 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg. The total charges for treatment were $27,996 and $37,667 for patients mobilized with IE and IE + R, respectively. Hospital readmission for complications occurred in 26.5% of patients, resulting in additional charges of $10,356. The preapheresis procedure charge was estimated to be $2522, the charge for a 2-day apheresis session was $5160, and the postapheresis phase resulted in charges of $8040. Our analysis determined that reducing apheresis by 1 day has the potential to save $6600. We also performed a retrospective analysis of 16 patients with MM remobilized with a modified hyper-CVAD regimen. Remobilization was successful, with 87.5% of patients. Our analysis determined that mobilization, preapheresis, apheresis, and postapheresis phase charges were $24,968, $2522, $6158, and $12,060, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Optimization of HSC mobilization regimens to reduce failure rates would not only benefit patients but also reduce the overall medical costs.

Cost effectiveness of high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell support as initial treatment of aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

The GOELAMS 072 study showed that first-line high-dose chemotherapy (HDT) with peripheral blood stem cell transplant (PBSCT) support was superior to the standard chemotherapy regimen (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone; CHOP) in adults with aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). The aim of the study was to evaluate the pharmacoeconomic profile of HDT with PBSCT support relative to standard CHOP therapy as first-line treatment in adults with aggressive NHL. We performed a cost-effectiveness analysis from the French Public Health Insurance perspective, restricted to hospital costs (euro, year 2008 values). The clinical effectiveness criterion was censured overall survival (OS) difference after a median follow-up of 4 years for the entire cohort. A total of 197 patients were included (CHOP, n = 99; HDT, n = 98). Uncertainty was assessed using non-parametric bootstrap simulations and various scenario analyses. Five-year OS did not differ significantly between groups for the entire cohort. Nevertheless, subgroup analyses appeared to be more relevant for decision making: among patients with a high-intermediate risk according to the age-adjusted International Prognostic Index (IPI), HDT yielded a significantly higher 5-year OS than CHOP (74% vs 44%; p = 0.001). Among these patients, the mean censured OS survival, adjusted for time discounting and quality of life (QOL), increased with HDT by 1.20 years (95% CI 1.19, 1.21). The cost per life-year saved with HDT was estimated as euro34 315 (95% CI 32 683, 35 947) in this subgroup. Results suggested that HDT with PBSCT support might be considered a cost-effective strategy among patients with high-intermediate-risk NHL according to the age-adjusted IPI. Its place and its cost effectiveness potential versus, or in combination with, rituximab still need further research.

Costs of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation with high-dose regimens

To characterize the costs of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation with high-dose regimens (HDCT), we analyzed clinical information and costs of 315 HDCT recipients during a 4-year study period beginning in 2000. Multivariate analyses were performed to identify pre- and/or post-HDCT factors predicting higher costs within the first year. Overall survival (OS) at 100 days and 1 year were 80% and 58%, respectively. The median cost and days of hospitalization were $102,574 in 2004 US dollars and 36 days in the hospital for 100 days, and $128,800 and 39 days in the hospital for 1 year. Early costs, defined as costs within the first 100 days, accounted for 84% of total costs within the first year. Inpatient costs comprise 94% of the early costs, but only 61% of the later costs defined as costs incurred between 101 days and 1 year. Of the pre-HDCT factors, unrelated donors and advanced disease risk were significantly associated with increased cost. When post-HDCT events were also considered, these pre-HDCT factors were no longer independently predictive of high cost. Instead, severe complications post-HDCT were associated with higher costs, increasing total costs $20,228 on average. If no complications occurred, the mean cost within the first year was $79,222. These results provide cost estimates for complicated and uncomplicated HDCT procedures, as well as costs for management of specific transplant complications.

Costs of cancer care in the USA: a descriptive review

Although many studies assessing the cost of cancer care have been conducted in the US, to date, these studies and the underlying methods used to estimate costs have not been reviewed systematically. We conducted a descriptive review of the published literature on the cost of cancer care in the US, and identified 60 papers published between 1995 and 2006 pertinent to our study. We found heterogeneity across the studies in terms of the settings, populations studied, measurement of costs, and study methods. We also identified limitations in the generalizability of findings, the misclassification of patient groups and costs, and concerns with study methods. Among studies that reported costs of cancer care in multiple phases of care and for multiple tumor sites, costs were generally highest in the initial year following diagnosis and the last year of life, and lower in the continuing phase (i.e. the period between the initial and last year of life phases), following a 'u-shaped' curve. Within phase of care, costs for lung and colorectal cancer care were generally higher than those for breast and prostate cancer care, however, the long-term or lifetime costs for each type of cancer were more similar, reflecting the differences in survival and costs in each phase between the different disease types.

Cost-effectiveness of postremission intensive therapy in patients with acute leukemia

BACKGROUND

We assessed the cost-effectiveness of high-dose arabinoside (HiDAC)-based and allogeneic stem-cell transplantation (alloSCT)-based therapy in patients with acute leukemia.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We analyzed the outcome, cost and cost-effectiveness of 106 patients treated from January 1994 to January 2002 [94 acute myelogenous leukemia (AML)/12 acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL)]. Forty-two young patients at either intermediate or unknown cytogenetic risk received postremission intensive therapy (24 HiDAC-based/18 alloSCT-based therapy).

RESULTS

After a median follow-up of 50 months, the estimated 7-year overall survival for the HiDAC-based group showed a tendency to be higher than the alloSCT-based group (48% versus 28%, P = 0.1452). The HiDAC-based group spent a significantly lower total cost ($US51,857 versus 75,474, P = 0.004) than the alloSCT-based group. Cost-effectiveness analysis showed that the mean cost per year of life saved for the HiDAC-based group is considerably less expensive than the alloSCT-based group ($US11,224 versus 21,564). The reduced total cost for the HiDAC-based group originated from lower cost in room fees, medication, laboratory and procedure, but not in blood transfusion and professional manpower fees.

CONCLUSION

For the postremission therapy in young AML patients at either intermediate or unknown cytogenetic risk, cost-effectiveness of HiDAC-based therapy compares favorably with that of alloSCT-based therapy, which deserves further clinical trials.

Documented and clinically suspected bacterial infection precipitating intensive care unit admission in patients with hematological malignancies: impact on outcome

OBJECTIVE

To assess the impact of documented and clinically suspected bacterial infection precipitating ICU admission on in-hospital mortality in patients with hematological malignancies.

DESIGN AND SETTING

Prospective observational study in a 14-bed medical ICU at a tertiary university hospital.

PATIENTS

A total of 172 consecutive patients with hematological malignancies admitted to the ICU for a life-threatening complication over a 4-year period were categorized into three main groups according to their admission diagnosis (documented bacterial infection, clinically suspected bacterial infection, nonbacterial complications) by an independent panel of three physicians blinded to the patient's outcome and C-reactive protein levels.

RESULTS

In-hospital and 6-months mortality rates in documented bacterial infection (n=42), clinically suspected bacterial infection (n=40) vs. nonbacterial complications (n=90) were 50.0% and 42.5% vs. 65.6% (p=0.09 and 0.02) and 56.1% and 48.7% vs. 72.1% (p=0.11 and 0.02), respectively. Median baseline C-reactive protein levels in the first two groups were 23 mg/dl and 21.5 mg/dl vs. 10.7 mg/dl (p<0.001 and p=0.001) respectively. After adjustment for the severity of critical and underlying hematological illness and the duration of hospitalization before admission documented (OR 0.20; 95% CI 0.06-0.62, p=0.006) and clinically suspected bacterial infection (OR 0.18; 95% CI 0.06-0.53, p=0.002) were associated with a more favorable outcome than nonbacterial complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Severely ill patients with hematological malignancies admitted to the ICU because of documented or clinically suspected bacterial infection have a better outcome than those admitted with nonbacterial complications. These patients should receive advanced life-supporting therapy for an appropriate period of time.

Aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: economics of high-dose therapy

High-intermediate grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) is an aggressive form of the disease, which can respond well to combination chemotherapy, with long-term survival seen in 40-50% of patients. When NHL relapses following standard treatment, high-dose chemotherapy with peripheral blood stem cell or bone marrow support may still cure a significant proportion of patients. Despite a significant rise in the incidence of NHL over recent years, there remains only limited published economic study concerning the overall lifetime cost of treatment, the cost effectiveness of specific treatments or the overall societal cost burden of the disease. The majority of studies identified for the purposes of this review considered the cost of alternative forms of chemotherapy and bone marrow support strategies for patients with advanced disease. Data from these studies suggest that there is a definite trend towards reduced costs for high-dose therapy, possibly reflecting increasing technical experience and improved bone marrow recovery through the use of stem cell transplantation and growth factors. The limited number of cost-effectiveness evaluations suggest that high-dose therapy, following a chemosensitive relapse, is likely to be considered favourable against commonly quoted cost-effectiveness thresholds. Cost effectiveness is becoming an increasingly important factor to consider in the formal assessment of new interventions conducted by groups such as the UK National Institute for Clinical Excellence. In light of the increasing incidence of NHL and the extended use of high-dose treatments in other subgroups of patients, there is a need for increased research into the economics of new interventions for NHL.

Symptom management and successful outpatient transplantation for patients with multiple myeloma

This retrospective descriptive study compared symptoms and symptom management in patients who completed autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation without hospital admission with those of patients who required unplanned hospital admission during the transplantation period. The sample consisted of 87 patients with multiple myeloma treated as outpatients during a 16-month period. Medical records and electronic database records review for each patient provided data on patient characteristics, medical factors, and symptoms/symptom management. Neither age, gender, religion, payer source, treatment on or off protocol, nor positive blood culture made a difference in hospital admission. The percentage of outpatient visits that included documented teaching on self-care made a significant difference (P = .008). Longitudinal analyses of patients' documented symptoms before admission compared with nonadmitted patients captured changes over time in symptoms/symptoms management. Overall, the patients' symptoms were managed well. Significant differences were fatigue, measured as the percentage of usual energy (P = .017), and the amount of oral hydration in a 24-hour period (P < .001). Results call attention to the role that fatigue and the amount of oral hydration may have in unplanned hospital admissions and to the importance of teaching on self-care.

Psychiatric morbidity and impact on hospital length of stay among hematologic cancer patients receiving stem-cell transplantation

PURPOSE

To determine the prevalence of psychiatric disorders during hospitalization for hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (SCT) and to estimate their impact on hospital length of stay (LOS).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In a prospective inpatient study conducted from July 1994 to August 1997, 220 patients aged 16 to 65 years received SCT for hematologic cancer at a single institution. Patients received a psychiatric assessment at hospital admission and weekly during hospitalization until discharge or death, yielding a total of 1,062 psychiatric interviews performed. Psychiatric disorders were determined on the basis of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition. Univariate and multivariate linear regression analyses were used to identify variables associated with LOS.

RESULTS

Overall psychiatric disorder prevalence was 44.1%; an adjustment disorder was diagnosed in 22.7% of patients, a mood disorder in 14.1%, an anxiety disorder in 8.2%, and delirium in 7.3%. After adjusting for admission and in-hospital risk factors, diagnosis of any mood, anxiety, or adjustment disorder (P =.022), chronic myelogenous leukemia (P =.003), Karnofsky performance score less than 90 at hospital admission (P =.025), and higher regimen-related toxicity (P <.001) were associated with a longer LOS. Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (P =.009), non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (P =.04), use of peripheral-blood stem cells (P <.001), second year of study (P <.001), and third year of study (P <.001) were associated with a shorter LOS.

CONCLUSION

Our data indicate high psychiatric morbidity and an association with longer LOS, underscoring the need for early recognition and effective treatment.

Economic aspects of high-dose chemotherapy: a clinician's perspective review

Over the last 15 years, the increased use of high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) has led to a considerable increase in the cost of cancer treatments. After making a general economic analysis of the benefits and costs of healthcare initiatives, this paper considers all of the different phases and elements of HDC, as well as the strategies for reducing basic, indirect and out-of-pocket costs. The cost of HDC has decreased by 40-60% over the last decade and its cost-effectiveness ratios are now similar or only slightly higher than those of other widely accepted medical interventions. However, except in the case of some hematological and paediatric neoplasms, the efficacy of the treatment has not yet been clearly defined and so it should only be used in well-designed clinical trials that should also include prospective cost evaluation measures.

Costs and effectiveness of staging and treatment options in early-stage Hodgkin's disease

PURPOSE

Using a cost-effectiveness analysis, to weigh the costs and benefits of the different staging and treatment options in early-stage Hodgkin's disease.

METHODS

We constructed a decision-analytic model for a hypothetical cohort of 25-year-old patients with early-stage Hodgkin's disease. Markov models were used to simulate the lifetime costs and prognosis of each staging and treatment strategy. Baseline probabilities and cost estimates were derived from published studies and bills of relevant patient cohorts.

RESULTS

Among the six management strategies considered, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of laparotomy and tailored treatment compared with mantle and para-aortic-splenic radiation therapy in all clinical stage I-II patients was $24,100/quality-adjusted life year, while that of the strategy of combined modality therapy in all clinical stage I-II patients compared with laparotomy was $61,700/quality-adjusted life year. All the remaining strategies were dominated by one of these three strategies. Sensitivity analysis showed that the cost-effectiveness ratios were driven predominantly by the effectiveness rather than the cost of each strategy. In particular, the analysis was heavily influenced by the utility of the post-laparotomy health state.

CONCLUSIONS

In considering the various alternative management strategies in early-stage Hodgkin's disease, even very small gains in effectiveness were enough to justify the additional costs of more expensive treatment options.

Cost-effectiveness of high-dose chemotherapy in first-line treatment of advanced multiple myeloma

The cost-effectiveness of high-dose chemotherapy in multiple myeloma was considered as part of a UK National Health Service Executive regional evidence-based appraisal process. The use of high-dose chemotherapy supported by autologous stem cell transplantation in patients under 65 years of age was shown to provide a marginal benefit of 0.7 life-years over conventional chemotherapy. This corresponded to an incremental cost 'per life-year gained' figure of approximately pound15 000, based upon initial treatment costs and trial-period data only. The use of high-dose chemotherapy in the first-line treatment of advanced multiple myeloma improves event-free and overall survival and appears to be a cost-effective treatment option.

Comparing cost-effectiveness analyses for the clinical oncology setting: the example of the Gynecologic Oncology Group 111 trial

For the practicing oncologist, balancing quality of care with cost containment has become an unavoidable challenge. The development of new technologies, increased patient awareness, growth of managed care, and aging of our population represent conflicting interests in this endeavor. Medical literature has recently been inundated with economic analyses in an effort to approach some of these difficult questions, but often times it is difficult to see how this research applies to any particular oncologist's practice. This article identifies many of the key issues raised in the critical evaluation of cost-effectiveness analyses as they relate to the practicing oncologist. We offer suggestions on the interpretation of these studies to the clinical setting, using the recently published Journal of Clinical Oncology articles on cost-effectiveness analyses of paclitaxel-cisplatin as first-line therapy for ovarian cancer as examples.

Mobilization, collection, and processing of autologous peripheral blood stem cells: development of a clinical process with associated costs

We surveyed five academic medical centers to develop a clinical process for patients undergoing cytokine mobilization and leukapheresis prior to autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation. Costs were obtained from three centers and applied to each component of the pathway. Costs were divided into three categories: (1) pre-apheresis evaluation; (2) process of apheresis; (3) post-apheresis and peripheral blood stem cells processing. All centers participated in the development of the leukapheresis pathway. Because charges vary greatly among institutions, costs were determined from three of the institutions and a mean was calculated for each of the components of the process. Pre-apheresis costs consisted of central line placement, blood work, and the price of cytokine (rhG-CSF). Costs associated with apheresis included professional fees (for physicians and nurses), leukapheresis with stem cell cryopreservation, storage, sterility testing, analysis of circulating CD34+ cell counts, and 1 day of cytokine therapy. The post-apheresis process included thawing with sterility testing along with CD34+ cell number analysis and the performance of clonogenic assays. Total costs were as follows: (1) pre-apheresis, $2711; (2) apheresis, $2990; and, (3) post-apheresis/stem cell processing, $754. This survey from five academic medical centers provides the average costs associated with three main components of the apheresis procedure. Because many patients require multiple aphereses, interventions to achieve target CD34+ cell collections in as few collections as possible would result in significant cost reduction.

Overview of autologous stem cell transplantation

There has been a dramatic increase in the number of autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplants over the last decade. Faster recovery of cell counts, lesser transplant morbidity, shorter hospital stay and reduced cost compared with marrow autografts have been the main advantages of autologous peripheral blood cell over marrow transplants. In this paper we attempt to review the advances in the biology and mobilization of stem cells, and focus on clinical results of autologous peripheral stem cell and marrow transplants for disease specific sites such as breast cancer, myeloma, autoimmune diseases, germ cell tumors, the acute and chronic leukemias, the non-Hodgkin's lymphomas and Hodgkin's disease. We also discuss transplant related complications, gene therapy and the different methods of purging. This review was intended for autologous peripheral stem cell transplants, however, unavoidably, it also discusses autologous marrow transplantation and aspects common to both procedures.

Economic analysis of a phase III study of G-CSF vs placebo following allogeneic blood stem cell transplantation

Hematopoietic colony-stimulating factors (CSF) decrease the duration of neutropenia following stem cell transplantation (SCT). With CSF-mobilized allogeneic blood SCT (alloBSCT), the yields of CD34+ cells are several-fold higher than in other SCT settings, raising concern that post-transplant CSF use may be unnecessary. In this study, we estimate the resource and cost implications associated with CSF use following alloBSCT. A cost identification analysis was conducted for 44 patients on a randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled trial of G-CSF following alloBSCT. Study drug was given daily until an absolute neutrophil count (ANC) > or = 1000 cells/microl. Billing information from the time of transplant to day +100 was analyzed. The median number of days to an ANC > or = 500 cells/microl was shorter in the G-CSF arm, 10.5 days vs 15 days (P < 0.001), while platelet recovery and rates of acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and survival were similar. Resource use was similar, including days hospitalized, days on antibiotics, blood products transfused and outpatient visits. Total median post-transplant costs were $76577 for G-CSF patients and $78799 for placebo patients (P = 0.93). G-CSF following allogeneic blood SCT decreased the median duration of absolute neutropenia and did not incur additional costs, but did not result in shorter hospitalizations, or less frequent antibiotic use.

Impact of chemotherapy on the mobilisation, harvest and economic costs of autologous peripheral stem cell transplantation in patients with multiple myeloma

To evaluate factors affecting mobilisation and harvest and to calculate the economic costs of autologous stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma (MM) we analysed 29 consecutive patients who had been transplanted at the Nijmegen University Hospital between January 1992 and February 1999. Thirteen patients had been treated with three or more melphalan cycles before transplantation (melphalan group), while four of the remaining 16 patients (no-melphalan group) had only received one melphalan cycle with an interval of one year or longer before harvest. The two groups were analysed for differences in mobilisation, harvest and the costs. Collection of a sufficient number of peripheral stem cells failed in 4 patients in the melphalan group, and these patients were transplanted with both bone marrow and peripheral stem cells. The greater need for growth factors (median 6,400 microg vs 4,500 microg) and the longer duration of admission (median 8 days vs 3 days) for mobilisation in the melphalan group increased significantly (p=0.01) the total mobilisation costs (median fl 13,876 vs fl 6,101). The greater number of apheresis sessions (median three) and the additional bone marrow harvests for patients who could not achieve a sufficient number of stem cells, increased significantly (p<0.001) the total harvest costs (median fl 9,690 vs fl 1,615) in the melphalan group. This resulted in significantly (p=0.008) higher overall costs of the procedure (median: fl 49,576 vs fl 35,889). The haematopoietic recovery of all groups was similar. The no-melphalan group was subdivided in two groups based on the median number of chemotherapy cycles before harvest. The heavily treated group had received more than 5 chemotherapy cycles and the moderately treated group four cycles or less. The median overall costs of these two groups were comparable (median fl 36,837 vs fl 34,351). This study suggests that the administration of stem cell toxic melphalan before harvest contributes to administration of more dosages of growth factor, longer admission duration for mobilisation and higher number of leukaphereses in order to collect sufficient number of stem cells. This resulted in significantly higher overall costs. More cycles of chemotherapy without melphalan did not increase significantly any studied parameter nor the total costs of procedure. Melphalan therapy or heavy pre-treatment did not prolong the repopulation interval, probably due to the infusion of similar number of progenitor cells.

Predicting costs of stem-cell transplantation

PURPOSE

Few studies have formally evaluated the relationship between costs, baseline patient characteristics, and major complications of stem-cell transplantation. We sought (1) to determine whether obtaining baseline information enabled identification of patients whose treatments would be the most costly and (2) to estimate inpatient costs for managing specific transplantation complications.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We collected inpatient costs and clinical information for 236 consecutive patients undergoing transplantation at a single institution between July 1, 1994, and February 20, 1997. Multivariable linear regression was used to evaluate the associations between baseline patient characteristics and costs of hospitalization for initial transplantation and between clinical events and such costs.

RESULTS

The median initial inpatient cost in 1997 dollars was $55,500 for autologous transplantation (range, $28,200 to $148,200) and $105,300 for allogeneic transplantation (range, $32,500 to $338,000). When only baseline variables were considered, use of a mismatched allogeneic donor and year of transplantation were significant predictors of costs. No characteristics predicted which patients would incur the highest 10% of costs. When clinical events were considered, infection and in-hospital death were associated with higher costs in autologous transplant recipients ($18,400 and $20,500, respectively), whereas infection, veno-occlusive disease, acute graft-versus-host disease, and death were predicted to add between $15,300 and $28,100 each to allogeneic transplantation costs.

CONCLUSION

We were not able to identify before transplantation the patients whose treatments would be the most costly. However, the association between clinical complications and higher costs suggests that prevention may have significant economic benefits. Interventions that decrease these complications may have favorable cost-benefit ratios even if they do not affect overall survival.

Cost analysis of autologous peripheral stem cell transplantation versus autologous bone marrow transplantation for patients with non Hodgkin's lymphoma and acute lymphoblastic leukaemia

We evaluated the costs of unpurged autologous stem cell transplantation in a non-randomised study of 54 consecutive patients with lymphoproliferative malignancies who have been transplanted at the Nijmegen University Hospital between July 1992 and March 1998. Thirty-five patients were transplanted with autologous peripheral stem cells (APSCT): 30 had non Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) and 5 acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL). Nineteen patients were transplanted with autologous bone marrow stem cells (ABMT): 17 had NHL and 2 ALL. The number of progenitor cells (CFU-GM, BFU-E) and nucleated cells was significantly higher in peripheral blood transplants. The duration of cytopenia was shorter after APSCT. The leucocyte recovery to 0.5 x 10(9)/L was 13 days for recipients of peripheral stem cells compared to 20 days for bone marrow recipients (P <0.001). The platelet recoveries to 20 x 10(9)/L were 13 and 29 days, respectively (P = 0.001). This resulted in significantly shorter admission duration 24 days after APSCT versus 30 days (P = 0.003) after ABMT. Furthermore, a statistically significant difference between both groups was observed for antimicrobial costs (mean: fl 2,939 vs fl 4,888; P = 0.008), platelet transfusions (median: 3 vs 7 units; P = 0.01) and erythrocyte transfusions (median: 6 vs 10 units; P = 0.03). The mean overall costs were lower in patients transplanted with stem cells from peripheral blood: fl 34,178 versus fl 43,469 (P = 0.007). This study suggests that the APSCT results in significant cost savings due to shorter hospital stay and less costs of supportive care, despite higher mobilisation costs. The costs of blood transfusions and antimicrobials for patients with ALL were significantly higher when compared to patients with NHL.

Outpatient-based bone marrow transplantation for hematologic malignancies: cost saving or cost shifting?

PURPOSE

To determine whether a shift in care from an inpatient-based to an outpatient-based bone marrow transplantation (BMT) program decreased charges to payers without increasing clinical complications or out-of-pocket costs to patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This nonrandomized prospective cohort study compared clinical and economic outcomes for 132 consecutive BMT patients with hematologic malignancies who received either inpatient- or outpatient-based BMT care.

RESULTS

Seventeen of 132 BMT patients underwent outpatient-based BMT. Compared with the inpatient-based group, the outpatient-based group had a markedly lower mean number of inpatient hospital days (22 v 47; P <.001) and decreased mean inpatient facility charges ($61,059 less per patient; P <.0001) but had higher mean outpatient facility charges ($49,732 higher; P <. 0001). Total professional fees were similar for the groups. The mean total charge to payers was only 7% less ($12,652; P =.21) for outpatient-based BMT than for inpatient-based BMT, but total charge was 34% less for outpatient compared with inpatient BMT ($54,240; P = 0.056) in a subset of patients who had a standard rather than high risk of treatment failure. There was no significant difference between groups in out-of-pocket costs for transportation, lodging, meals, home nursing, household assistance, child care, medication expenses, or unreimbursed medical bills. There also was no significant difference between groups in reported income lost, involuntary unemployment, or months of disability. The two groups had similar rates of major complications, including death, significant acute graft-versus-host disease, and veno-occlusive disease of the liver.

CONCLUSION

Increased use of outpatient-based BMT should produce substantial cost savings for payers without adverse effects on patients for those patients who do not have a high risk of treatment failure.

Cost-minimization analysis of CHOP, fludarabine and rituximab for the treatment of relapsed indolent B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in the U.K

The optimal therapy for patients with relapsed indolent B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma is unclear. Combination chemotherapy such as CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisolone) or purine analogues including fludarabine are frequently used and the anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody rituximab has recently been licensed for use. However, no comparative studies of these therapies have been reported. Since relapsed indolent B-cell NHL is generally regarded as incurable with current therapies, the place of each of these therapies is likely to be determined by their relative efficacy, toxicity and cost. We undertook a literature review and a retrospective analysis of patients receiving combination chemotherapy for relapsed indolent B-cell NHL at our institution to determine the response rates and the duration of response when treated with CHOP or fludarabine. Reported response rates and median response duration for these regimens are similar, and similar to those reported in phase II studies of rituximab. A cost minimization analysis was therefore conducted. The per patient costs for the treatment of drug-related adverse events were pound 5049 for CHOP, pound 2953 for fludarabine and pound 109 for rituximab. When costs of a full course of each treatment were compared, the costs per patient for CHOP, fludarabine and rituximab were pound 7210 (pound 5975-8445), pound 10022 (pound 8917-11126) and pound 6080 (pound 5892-6267) respectively. In this preliminary analysis, rituximab appeared to have a similar efficacy rate to CHOP and fludarabine, but had significantly fewer adverse events and a lower total cost per patient. These data require confirmation in a prospective randomized study with formal assessment of cost-effectiveness.

Effect of CD34(+) cell dose on resource utilization in patients after high-dose chemotherapy with peripheral-blood stem-cell support

PURPOSE

The mean time to neutrophil and platelet recovery for patients receiving high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) supported with peripheral-blood stem cells (PBSCs) is related to the dose of CD34(+) cells infused. The effect of cell dose on resource utilization after transplantation has not been previously reported.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We assessed CD34(+) cell dose and resource utilization for 1,317 patients undergoing transplantation with PBSCs from April 1991 to June 1997. PBSCs were collected after mobilization with chemotherapy and recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rhG-CSF). Daily measurement of the CD34(+) content of the PBSC collection was performed by a central laboratory using a single CD34(+) analysis technique. Resource utilization included engraftment parameters, length of stay, and transfusion requirements for 100 days posttransplantation. Analysis included descriptive statistics and multiple regression.

RESULTS

Mean patient age was 47 years, and 86% of patients were female. Median cell dose was 3.6 x 10(6)/kg and 13.2 x 10(6)/kg for patients receiving less than 5.0 x 10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg and 5.0 x 10(6) or more CD34(+) cells/kg, respectively. Patients receiving less than 5. 0 x 10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg were more likely to have metastatic breast cancer or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and required more platelet and RBC transfusions, 3.3 more hospital days, and increased antibiotic and antifungal use. In univariate analysis, the cost of care was $41,516 (+/-$20,876 SD) and $32,382 (+/-$16,353 SD) for patients with less than 5.0 x 10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg and 5.0 x 10(6) or more CD34(+) cells/kg, respectively. In multivariate analysis, patients with less than 5.0 x 10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg had an increase in costs of $5,062 (+/- $1,262 SE).

CONCLUSION

Infusion of more than 5.0 x 10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg was associated with a reduction in resource utilization. Achieving a target of 5.0 x 10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg should have important clinical and economic benefits for patients.

Thoracic radiation therapy before autologous bone marrow transplantation in relapsed or refractory Hodgkin's disease. PMH Lymphoma Group, and the Toronto Autologous BMT Group

The aim of this study was to assess the relationship between radiation therapy (RT) and treatment-related mortality in patients receiving high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) and autologous bone marrow transplantation (ABMT) for recurrent/refractory Hodgkin's disease (HD). Between December 1986 and December 1992, 59 patients previously treated at the Princess Margaret Hospital underwent HDCT (etoposide 60 mg/kg, melphalan 160 mg/m2) and ABMT, performed for refractory (13 patients) or relapsed (46 patients) HD. RT was incorporated in the salvage treatment with the intent to achieve complete control of disease prior to ABMT. RT was given before ABMT in 33 patients, and after ABMT in 4 patients. Treatment-related (TR) mortality was defined as any death occurring within 100 days of ABMT. Autopsies were performed for all patients with TR deaths. With a median follow-up of 4.6 years (range 1.2-7.4 years), the actuarial overall survival was 41% +/- 14% at 5 years. We observed 37 deaths, and 10 of these were TR deaths. Among the 24 patients who received thoracic RT before ABMT, there were 8 TR deaths, 3 of these solely attributable to radiation pneumonitis. The remaining 5 TR deaths all had respiratory failure with complicating sepsis as a major medical problem. The interval from RT to ABMT was shorter for 8 patients dying of TR death (mean 37 days; range 0-103 days), than for the 16 survivors (mean 105 days; range 0-263 days) (P = 0.026). Among 9 patients with ABMT within 50 days of thoracic RT, 6 had TR death. In contrast, among the 35 patients without thoracic RT (26 no RT, 9 non-thoracic RT), there were only 2 TR deaths. The 4 patients treated with mantle RT post-ABMT had no serious pulmonary complications. The use of thoracic RT before HDCT and ABMT was associated with a high post-transplant mortality rate. It was most evident in patients who received thoracic RT within 50 days prior to ABMT, or when the target volume included large volume of lung. We recommend that the use of post-transplant RT be investigated to decrease TR mortality.

Early infections after autologous transplantation for haematological malignancies

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the early infectious complications following autologous transplantation in haematological patients. Sixty-one patients who underwent either autologous bone marrow (BM; 28 patients) or peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC; 33 patients) transplantation for haematological malignancies were reviewed retrospectively. Engraftment happened significantly faster and the length of hospital stay was shorter in the PBSC group compared with the BM group. All patients in the study developed fever and all but two experienced temperatures > or = 38.5 degrees C. Overall, 57 patients had signs of oral mucositis, 23 with ulceration. Twenty patients had bacteraemia, 12 developed pneumonia, 6 systemic fungal infection. No major differences were found between the two groups in distribution or incidence of infections. This study indicates that the use of peripheral blood stem cells results in faster engraftment and shorter hospital stay, whereas the effect on the incidence of early infections seems to be unaffected.

The true cost of bone marrow transplantation

Bone marrow transplantation is an example of a highly technical therapy that offers hope to patients with bone marrow failure or various malignancies. Bone marrow transplantation is much more costly "up-front" but perhaps not more costly long-term than alternative therapies. Although economic analyses appear relatively simple, interpretation and use can be problematic. Several economic analyses have identified complications that occur frequently and affect the reported cost-effectiveness of high-dose chemotherapy. Efforts to reduce the cost of bone marrow transplantation have focused on new strategies to more effectively control these complications. The introduction of new technologies to speed engraftment, to improve patient selection methods, and the shifting of care to outpatient settings all have resulted in significant reductions in duration of hospital stay, treatment-related mortality, and costs. More studies of long-term outcomes are needed for transplant and nontransplant treatment options to guide present and future applications of this treatment option.

Bone Marrow Transplantation for Cancer—An Update

The number of allogeneic and autologous bone marrow transplants continues to grow worldwide. Bone marrow transplantation (BMT) has become standard therapy for many patients with leukemia, lymphoma, multiple myeloma and testicular cancer. Encouraging results of autologous BMT in treating patients with poor-risk breast cancer have led to this approach being tested in nationwide randomized trials. In order to increase availability and efficacy of BMT, other sources of hematopoietic cells are explored for transplantation, such as from HLA-matched unrelated volunteer donors, partially matched related donors, placental/umbilical cord blood and allogeneic peripheral blood. Relapse of original malignancy remains the main obstacle for the success of BMT. Recent clinical investigations have demonstrated that donor-derived peripheral blood leukocytes are effective in inducing remissions in patients with hematological malignancies who relapse after allogeneic BMT. BMT procedures are associated with significant complexity and should be carried out only in transplant units that meet adequate standards. In order to better define the role of BMT in treating cancer, more phase III clinical trials are needed. The future of BMT will depend on further improvements in its efficacy and economic constraints.

Cost-effective models for flutamide for prostate carcinoma patients: are they helpful to policy makers?

BACKGROUND

More than 50,000 male patients received hormonal therapy for metastatic prostate carcinoma in 1995. Nonsteroidal antiandrogens, such as flutamide, when used in conjunction with castration, are effective in prolonging the time to progression of disease and survival. Only one-third of newly diagnosed patients with metastatic prostate carcinoma receive flutamide. Physicians may be reluctant to prescribe flutamide because of quality of life, toxicity, and cost considerations.

METHODS

Physician focus groups evaluated quality of life factors for metastatic prostate cancer.

RESULTS

Using quality of life estimates with the National Cancer Institute's (NCI) 0036 clinical trial results, our revised model of flutamide use predicted that, for minimal disease, survival increased by 4.33 quality adjusted months (QAMs) at an incremental cost of $25,000 per quality adjusted life year (QALY) saved and for severe disease, survival increased by 4.11 QAM at a cost of $18,000 per QALY saved. However, if quality of life estimates are used in conjunction with the Prostate Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group (PCTCG) meta-analysis estimates, survival increased by 2.1 QAM at an incremental cost of $41,000 per QALY saved for persons with severe disease and increased by 2.6 QAM at an incremental cost of $53,700 per QALY saved for persons with minimal disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Using NCI 0036 trial data, flutamide has an incremental cost-effectiveness more favorable than most therapies, while estimates based on the PCTCG found a less favorable outcome for the drug. Concerns about out-of-pocket expenditures and efficacy limit flutamide utilization; quality of life considerations are less cogent.

A review of the costs, cost-effectiveness and third-party charges of bone marrow transplantation

In an era of health care reform, costs, cost-effectiveness and charges for health care are taking on a larger role in the decision to adopt a new therapy. Hospitals, health maintenance organizations, third-party payers, doctors and patients all have an interest in the economic factors of health care; however, not all new therapies or medications have been analyzed. Bone marrow transplantation is one of the most expensive cancer treatments, costing an average of +193,000 per patient; therefore, many economic studies have focused on the costs of the therapy. However, it is important to note that these findings are not necessarily applicable to other diseases. Cost data are not static and even small changes in protocol can make a large difference in costs. Also, cost data from outside the United States is not always applicable to the United States system due to differences such as socialized medicine, workers' wages and pharmaceutical costs. Many economic analyses focus on the hospitals' charges and extrapolate cost-effectiveness from these figures, yet the amount hospitals charge for services and products is not always relative to the costs. Therefore, third-party payer costs are also important in analyzing the cost-effectiveness of a procedure. This article will review five signature papers which illustrate important issues to consider when trying to determine the costs and cost-effectiveness of bone marrow transplants.

Whole blood harvested after granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (Neupogen) mobilization, and reinfused unprocessed after high-dose melphalan treatment, accelerates hematopoietic recovery in patients with multiple myeloma

BACKGROUND

High-dose melphalan (HDM) is now a standard treatment for multiple myeloma (MM). Stem cell transplants are fast evolving as an alternative to bone marrow transplants because they are less traumatic and easier to perform. A study was undertaken to test if whole blood harvested after mobilizing peripheral blood stem cells with granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) reinfused as such (without stem cells being processed or concentrated through a cell separator) for rescue after HDM (dose 140-180 mg/m2) in MM accelerates hematopoietic recovery.

METHODS

Eight consecutive patients with MM were given HDM after receiving 4-5 courses of infusional vincristine, doxorubicin, and dexamethasone (VAD) chemotherapy. Approximately 6 weeks after the last course of chemotherapy, at the start of the procedure, G-CSF (Neupogen) was given at a dose of 10 microgram/kg subcutaneously daily for 4 days to mobilize stem cells. All of the patients had brisk leukocytosis (18.4-64.6 x 10(9)/L). On day 0 (fifth day after G-CSF), 1 L of blood was removed by phlebotomy and kept at room temperature for 24 hours. This was followed by a rapid intravenous (i.v.) bolus of melphalan at a dose of 140 mg/m2 in the first three patients, 155 mg/m2 in the 4th, 170 mg/m2 in the 5th, and 180 mg/m2 in the 6th, 7th, and 8th patients, applies to all patients along with hydration and diuresis. Twenty-four hours later, I L of blood previously removed was transfused back to the patient without any processing through the cell separator. The numbers of mononuclear cells reinfused was between 0.76 and 3.2 x 10(8)/kg (mean: 1.82 x 10(8)/kg). The number of CD 34+ cells infused in 4 patients ranged from 1.9 to 2.8 x 10(6)/kg (mean: 2.35 x 10(6)/kg). G-CSF was restarted on day 2 at a dose of 5 microgram/kg and given daily until the granulocyte count was 0.5 x 10(9)/L or more for 3 consecutive days. Antibiotics were given whenever a patient developed pyrexia. Platelets were transfused if below 20 x 10(9)/L or for incidences of overt bleeding.

RESULTS

Granulocyte counts touched 0 between Days 6 and 10, lasting for an average of 3.4 days. Duration of granulocyte count below 0.5 x 10(9)/L was 6.5 days (range: 5-9), and these rose to 1.0 or more x 10(9)/L by Day 13.7 (range: 13-16). The number of platelet transfusions given per patient was 2.5 (range: 0-4). Intravenous antibiotics were used for 9 days (range: 4-12), and patients were discharged on Day 19 (range: 16-22). Follow-up ranged from 45 to 380 days.

CONCLUSIONS

Hematopoietic recovery was rapid in all patients, including those who received doses of melphalan higher than 140 mg/m2. This resulted in less need for platelet transfusions or antibiotics, and hospitalization was short. Our results are historically similar to conventional peripheral blood stem cell transplants but much better than autologous bone marrow transplants, indicating that whole blood after G-CSF provided sufficient progenitor cels for early engraftment. The procedure is less labor intensive insofar as it does not require separation and concentration of stem cells. It has the potential of becoming an alternative to autologous marrow and peripheral blood stem cell transplantation in patients with MM.

Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor as adjunct therapy in relapsed lymphoid malignancy: implications for economic analyses of phase III clinical trials

With the increasing concern over the high cost of health care, policy makers have incorporated economic analyses into phase III clinical trials as the randomized clinical trials can provide important information on the efficacy and potential cost-effectiveness of new pharmaceutical agents. Economic analyses of single-hospital experience during phase III trials of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) as adjunct therapy for high dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell support found significant shortening of neutropenia with GM-CSF at each hospital, but shortened hospitalization (and lower costs) at only two of three hospitals. In this study, we added data from three additional hospitals and found that the 103 patients who received GM-CSF had, on average, 5.7 days shorter durations of severe neutropenia than the 95 patients who received placebo (p < 0.0001) and 3.4 days shorter in hospitalization (p = 0.06). However, the duration of hospitalization, the primary determinant of health care costs, was shorter for GM-CSF patients in only four of the six centers and the duration of hospitalization of placebo patients was shorter at the other two centers. Careful analyses must be carried out when phase III clinical trial results are used to derive estimates of cost-effectiveness of new pharmaceutical agents. The interpretation of economic analyses of phase III clinical trials raises issues related to the perspective of the investigators, study design, collection of data on resource utilization, learning curve effects and generalizability of the results to other settings.